WEBVTT - Private Credit, IPOs, and Washington

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market movin news.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Bloomberg Markets Podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, private credit. You know, we love this topic.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a big growing mark.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>One and a half around one and a half trillion.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, and you know it's just been growing.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I've been calling out that having seen a bunch of

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>credit blobs back in my day. There's going to be something.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 2>There's no regulation of this market. Something's going to go wrong.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 2>And I keep saying it, but it keeps growing. And

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what. Pretty much everything we know about

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the credit private credit business, we learned from Randy Schumer.

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>He's a coet of Senior Lending, a Churchill Asset Management

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>here in New York.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Randy, you said ninety yep, I have work to do,

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 4>yes exactly.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just I don't want to put all the blame

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>on you, but talk to us about the growth of

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>this business. Is private credit business has been such a

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>big growth story on Wall Street really since the end

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Great Financial Crisis? How concerned are you about

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the development of this market? Should investors and should regulators

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>be concerned?

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 4>And Jess is now part of the private credit policse Yes,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 4>she is. Well, the timing of this is great. Thanks

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 4>for having me on because what's happening is that And

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I talked to someone on a podcast that we're doing

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 4>recently that's coming out I think this week about that

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 4>exact question. Why are people so concerned and why is

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 4>this viewed as a bubble as opposed to natural growth

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 4>of moving loans from the public banking sector into the

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 4>non regulated, which is what the regulators wanted. And he said,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 4>because it's new, it feels new. It's not public. These

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 4>loans are not traded. These are middle market companies. And

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>part of that is just getting educated in the asset claus.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>You guys have been doing a great job in doing

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 4>that and helping me get the word out. I think

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Mark Rowan Apaula pointed out the fact that it's really

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>investor education, and the more education there is, the better

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>that we look. But the fact of the matter is

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 4>that this is actually a natural evolution away from traded

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 4>assets where the banks were considered to be not healthy

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 4>holders of these loans, and so the private credit market

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 4>has responded to the immense amount of appetite because of

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 4>so much of market volatility, these loans are untraded and

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 4>I liquid loans, as opposed to being a negative, are

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 4>viewed as being positive to a lot of investors, institutional

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 4>investors who are looking to allocate to non traded, non volatile,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 4>less correlated assets. So the reason that the asset class

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 4>has grown so much is because the investors are looking

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 4>for alternatives to the sixty forty correlation, you know, the

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 4>allocation model.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 5>That we talked about.

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 4>And at the end of the day, these are middle

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 4>market loans. These are low risk, relatively low levered, fully

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 4>secured with financial covenants, and so think of private credit

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 4>as middle market lending for grownups. Okay, it's very stable

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 4>lending that is being now packaged in multiple funds, very

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 4>diverse investor base across many, many, now thousands of investors

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 4>who are investing in this asset class, who have experience

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 4>in other complicated asset classes such as real estate and

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 4>private credit and public equities and fixed income, and so

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>it's actually meeting a demand and the demand is growing

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>as more investors realize what an opportunity and benefit it is.

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>What is your investment approach for private credit, specifically for

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>your clients, what do you advise them to do and

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 3>how to have that exposure.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 4>So we're also very fortunate to be owned by a

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 4>very large entity called TIAA, which is their holding company,

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 4>right or Neuvene, which is a trillion dollar asset manager,

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 4>and they have hundreds of billions of dollars in fixed

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 4>income and public equities and real estate and municipal bonds,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 4>and what their investors are looking at the same thing

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 4>as our investors at Churchill looking for is the stability

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 4>of returns. And so in a normal environment, a senior

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 4>credit we've talked about this will will get you kind

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 4>of a seven percent on leveraged yield in the current environment,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>which is why it's very attractive right now because rates

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 4>are up, they're earning a twelve percent on levered yield,

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 4>and so when they look at the returns of twelve

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 4>percent versus what they're getting in other markets, we're representing

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 4>a lower risk profile and so that's adding to the

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 4>appetite that these investors are looking for now. In our case,

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 4>we can offer them senior debt opportunities, we can offer

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 4>them junior capital, we can offer them private equity. So

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 4>we have a number of asset classes that we're also

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 4>offering our private equity sponsors in terms of their financing options.

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 4>So we're taking the same financing choices that we're giving

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>our clients on the financing side to the investors on

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 4>the investing side. And that's what makes the sort of

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 4>nice balance which I think as it investors and frankly,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 4>the media and regulators get to understand the asset class.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is not fast money. This is money

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 4>that investors are focusing long term assets with us long

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 4>term liabilities because these loans don't disappear tomorrow, they're not traded,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 4>and that kind of stability is really at a premium

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Who is a typical investor in one of your funds,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, we.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Don't really have typical investors. We have them from a

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 4>broad array of types of investors. So we have pension plans,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 4>we have wealth wealth funds, we have sovereign wealth funds,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 4>we have insurance companies, and essentially, as more and more investors,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 4>particularly sophisticated investors, are looking at their options in this

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.559
<v Speaker 4>higher for longer world, they're thinking, you know, I need

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 4>a premium yield because I can get five percent on

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 4>treasuries right now, but I also want stability and those

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 4>are the things that are attracting now even further down

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 4>the food chain in terms of family offices and retail.

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 4>And I think as the asset class grows, and we're

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 4>calling it kind of the new paradigms, the as investors

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 4>look at the benefits that private credit is offering and

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 4>they're seeing some very sophisticated players in this market. They're

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>they're saying, how can we party paid in this asset class.

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you see any red flags that are bubbling up

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>in private credit any corners?

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, the thing that is most I think concerning

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to anybody who has experience in the asset class is

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 4>high interest rates. Because the thing that when you look

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 4>at your portfolio with rates now at five and a

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>half percent from a benchmark perspective versus zero a year

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>and a half ago, the interest coverage is shrinking across portfolios,

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 4>and so everyone looks at that as a risk, and

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 4>it's a real risk, and so you have to build

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 4>a portfolio that is ready to accept those higher rates.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 4>And the way we do it is we look at

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 4>very defensive sectors that have high free cash flows that

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 4>are owned by private equity firms who can grow these

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 4>businesses to keep pace not only with where GDP is,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 4>but also where some of the higher growth sectors in

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 4>areas like healthcare and business services are going. So give

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 4>an example, the average growth in both revenues and IBATA

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 4>in our portfolio right now is about twelve and a

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 4>half percent. So when you look at the GDP which

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>is bouncing around two three four percent something like that.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 4>You're looking at businesses that we think will grow through

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 4>whatever cycle is coming. It looks like probably a soft

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 4>or no landing is going to be expected, but our

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 4>businesses are really faster growing than that. But they also

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 4>tend to be businesses that are market leaders that will

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 4>be able to sustain any kind of downturn even if

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 4>we do have it.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the deal flow you're seeing from your private equity sponsors.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>What's it been like today in this higher interest rate environment.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 4>We just got the October numbers. We are the most

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 4>as of the end of October, the most active direct

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 4>lender in the market right now in the United States.

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 4>The reason that that's happening is that our private equity

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 4>sponsors continue to have dry powder that they are raising

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 4>in their own funds. They wanted to put it to work.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 4>They've identified areas of interest, as I mentioned, in these

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 4>defensive sectors that in this current economy are doing well,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 4>and they realize that next year is probably going to

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 4>be a better year than people think, probably not going

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 4>to have a recession, and so they're trying to vote

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 4>with their feet and they're looking for scaled players like

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Churchill that can write large checks where we have relationships

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 4>and I think I mentioned this last time. We're an

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 4>investor in their funds and so we were sort of

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 4>first in line to be asked to join these deals.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 4>We still tend to be pretty picky. We probably do

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 4>about five percent of the deals that come in the door.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 4>So we're looking for it only the best of the best,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 4>knowing that we don't know what's coming next year. I mean,

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 4>think about where we were two or three years ago

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 4>with COVID and in traits and the good thing. And

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 4>this goes back to this issue a bubble. These middle

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 4>market companies have been tested. They've been tested through low rates,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 4>they've been tested through high rates, they've been tested through

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 4>low inflation, they've been tested through high inflation. And so

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 4>I think the benefit that needs to be explained more.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 4>And this is part of this education is why these

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 4>companies actually do well, in some cases even better than

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 4>some of the larger companies, because they tend to be

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 4>in structures that are more conservative, and also with lending

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 4>partners sisters ourselves that are basically built for the long run.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 4>We're going to work through whatever problem these companies have

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 4>to get to a final resolution. That's a positive one.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Since your clients have money to use that's sitting on

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 3>the sidelines. What do you think this tells us about

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the direction of the economy. They're willing to take more risk.

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well I think that amazingly. It looks like the

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 4>FED is engineered some kind of soft lending. Will see

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 4>what happens. It feels like their language continues to be hawkish.

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 4>They want to keep people on their toes. But if

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the case, and I do believe that it is,

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 4>that next year will be a solid, solid year, that

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 4>could be a good thing. Now in general, I do

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 4>believe that inflation will be higher and rates will still

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 4>be higher. But this is kind of the normal that

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 4>we forgot about that hasn't been with us for fifteen years, right,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 4>You've had zero interest rates for a large part of

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 4>that time. This zero gravity environment we got used to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden. You know, we're like the Apollo

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 4>astronauts that they get you back or anybody from in

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 4>these long space missions, and they can't walk because they're

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>not used to the way to gravity. That's kind of

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 4>how we're feeling right now. I think the world is

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 4>not used to having a five percent FED funds rate,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 4>but in fact that's the average over the last sixty years.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 4>So I think we're returning to that, which is good

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 4>because when you have zero interest rates, it sort of

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 4>inspires some problematic behavior. But I think this new normal

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 4>is actually very positive for private credit and for investors

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 4>in general.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Randy, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate you

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>coming in the studio again. Randy Schummer. He's co head

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of senior Lending and his senior managing director at Churchill

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Asset Management, one of the leading private credit providers in

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the marketplace. And again, it's a business. I'm just looking

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>at the some Bloomberg reporting here private credit market has

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>roughly tripled in size since two thousand and fifteen.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Team Ken's live program Bloomberg Markets

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am eastering on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 5>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 5>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty three was not a great year, kids for

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the IPO market. It was just kind of muted at best.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess there was a little bit more hope for

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four. We had some news today Shine the

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 2>China found an online fashion company that won over one

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of millions of shoppers around the world. Has confidentially

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 2>How confidentially can it be if it's followed to go

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.599
<v Speaker 2>product in the US and welcome be one of the

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 2>biggest IPOs in years. Brian Lynch joins is she's head

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 2>of market insight at Equities in So, Brian, just give

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>us a little summation. How was twenty twenty three in

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of IPO activity?

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me. Twenty twenty three was certainly an

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 7>extremely quiet year for IPOs. So far, we've seen about

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 7>twenty three billion in IPO proceeds, higher than last year,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 7>but drastically and lower the the three hundred billion we

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 7>had seen up to this point in twenty twenty one.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 7>So it's been a quiet year. And the fall cohort

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 7>of IPOs that we did see so Clavio, Instacart, Arm Birkenstock,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 7>really did not pave the way for others to follow.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 7>It looks like Birkenstock as of today is the only

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 7>one training above their open price. So it's been a

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 7>tough year for IPOs. Yet there is a lot of

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 7>demand f I pos and there are thousands of unicorn

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 7>companies sitting on the sidelines, you know, figuring out their

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 7>next move.

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 3>What does this mean for twenty twenty four.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 7>Then yeah, I do think we'll see the market pick

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 7>up in twenty twenty four, you know, both from a

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 7>macro perspective, as you know you talked about a bit earlier,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 7>we are seeing better macro indicators. We have job growth,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 7>we have strong GDP, Inflation is cooling. You know, there's

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 7>an end in sight when it comes to rate hikes

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 7>or you know, even rate cuts, So that puts us

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 7>in a better position. And ultimately a lot of these

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 7>companies are feeling a lot of pressure from both early

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 7>investors and shareholders to achieve liquidity. You know, look at

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 7>Read at a company that was rumored today to be

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 7>considering an IPO in twenty twenty four. This is a

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 7>company that was found in two thousand and five, so

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 7>they've been private for eighteen years. There's a lot of

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 7>pend up demand for liquidity, and wild platforms like equity

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 7>Zen can enable some of that liquidity while they're private.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 7>It really takes a public market exit for vast number

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 7>of investors to have access and you know that wide

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 7>scal liquidity for early shareholders.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Is Kim kardashing going to save the IPO market? I

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>hear she's got a company called Skims, which I'm sure

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 2>John Tucker.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 6>Is aware of, but oh he do that's wearing at

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 6>this skirf.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, talk to us about like, I don't know, what

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 2>do you know about Skims?

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 7>Sure? So Skims kind of bucks the trend of some

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 7>of these other companies. They were just founded in twenty nineteen,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 7>so a relatively young company valued out of four billion

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 7>dollar valuation over the summer, but they're rapidly growing. They

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 7>obviously have a strong brand name, you know, the connection

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 7>with Kim Kardashian certainly helps. And you know, from what

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 7>I've heard, they have a strong product as well. So

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 7>if they did IPO next year, they would certainly be

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 7>different than a lot of these ten fifteen, almost twenty

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 7>year old companies that we expect to hit the markets.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>What industry groups are doing better at going public at

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 3>this point versus others that are struggling. Is it more

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 3>company specific or is it more industry specific?

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 7>I think it is company specific to some extent. You know,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 7>there are certain things that any company is going to

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 7>need to exhibit to have a successful IPO. They need

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 7>to be showing profitability, they need to be in growth,

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 7>and they need to have a strong brand that investors

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 7>know and recognize. That being said, a lot of these

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 7>companies this fall showed some of those elements and still

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 7>weren't successful. The industries that we're seeing the most investor

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 7>interest in in the private markets are AI and machine learning,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 7>so not surprising, information technology so pure tech companies, and fintech.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 7>So those are the areas we're seeing interest in the

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 7>private markets. When you look at AI and machine learning,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot of these companies are younger companies who are

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 7>less likely to be close to an IPO. So I

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 7>think some of these pure tech companies that have really

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 7>attractive multiples could be the ones, you know that have

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 7>a more successful debut.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, Brian, I wonder what the what are the

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>bankers saying as to why they didn't get more done

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three. Like back in my day, as

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 2>long as this market wasn't crashing, I could push out

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of stuff out the door, particularly from companies

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that are really looking for some liquidity. What are they

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 2>saying here, what kind of market do they need? I mean,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the S Andp's up sixteen seventeen eighteen percent, even equal

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 2>weighted it's up four or five percent, So it's not

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>like the market's down.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 7>I think you're right. The macro indicators show that we

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 7>are in a pretty good place for companies to exit.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that there's just a lot of trepidation in

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 7>the market given that we haven't seen a blockbuster IPO

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 7>be successful, you know, this year or last year really,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 7>so it's I think it's more of an investors are nervous.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 7>They're looking for someone to lead the packing kind of

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 7>tell everyone, Okay, this is going to work out fine,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 7>and we've yet to really see that. I do think

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 7>once we see one or two really successful IPOs, the

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 7>doors will open more because you know, the macro factors

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 7>are there and it should be a decent market to exit.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 7>That being said, I think another factor that impacts a

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 7>lot of these companies is that if they raise capital

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty one, it's very unlikely that that valuation

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 7>is still where the market is unless they into it.

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 7>So they're just going to have to accept that the

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 7>IPO at a lower evaluation, you know, if they're trying to.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Exit, well, Shine could be maybe one of these companies

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>because it's I think according to the Wall Street Journal

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>reporting Shine, which is it's a Chinese company, so that

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 2>could be an issue for some people. But it's now

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 2>based in Singapore, was valued around sixty six billion dollars

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>in a fundraising round in May, and is likely to

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 2>aim for an even higher valuation in an initial public offering,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>So I guess. And it's got Gold and Sachs and

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley. So I mean, it seems

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 2>like all the elements are there for Shine. Do we

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 2>have any sense of timing Shine would be early twenty

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>four later twenty four.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 7>Indications look like this would be an early twenty four IPO.

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 7>But this is also a company that has had its

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 7>valuation decrease. They raised capital in twenty twenty two at

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 7>one hundred billion dollar valuation, earlier this year raised again

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 7>at a sixty six billion dollar valuation, and as you said,

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 7>looking at an eighty or ninety billion dollar valuation. So

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 7>they haven't bucked that trend of companies that have had to,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, accept that their twenty twenty one twenty twenty

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 7>two valuation may not be where the market is anymore.

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 7>But to your point, it's a company that has achieved

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 7>twenty three billion dollars in revenue, had its most profitable

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 7>half in the first half of this year. You know,

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 7>it was growing rapidly with new distribution centers in the US, Canada,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 7>and Europe. They're opening new manufacturing centers in Brazil and India.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 7>So a lot of growth going on there, but also

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 7>some concerns about their relationship with China, you know, IP infringement,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 7>labor practices and some other things. So certainly not a

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 7>straight forward story on this one.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 3>We only have about a minute left. But what other

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 3>companies should we keep on our radar that could potentially

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>go public next year?

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Reddit's one that we mentioned. They are in comations

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 7>to potentially file next year. They're private for a very

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 7>long time, and really they have solidified themselves as one

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 7>of the leading social media platforms in the US. They

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 7>made you know, a lot of splashy news in the

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 7>error of the meme stocks their subreddits. Wall Street Back

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 7>was really you know, the catalyst for a lot of

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 7>the retail momentum in the stock market. So I think

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 7>they are an important one to watch and see. Geek

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 7>is another one that has confidentially not sorry, not confidentially,

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 7>had filed to go public, hasn't yet, but has grown significantly,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 7>and we know they're considering an IPO, so we have

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 7>eyes on that one as well.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, hopefully twenty four will be be a

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 2>better IPO market than we have more opportunities to talk

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>to Brian. Brian Lynch is head of market insight at Equities.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 5>In you're listening to the tape cans are live program

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 5>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 5>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 5>from our flagship New York station Just say hello, what's playing?

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Just met Paul Sweeny live here on Bloomberg Interactive Broker.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 2>This is a treat, folks. Neil Hennessy joins us chief

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 2>market strategist The Hennessy Advisors. He started this back in

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty nine. I'm not gonna call him old, I'm

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>gonna say he's a seasoned investor. It but we share something.

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>We share something. We both started our careers at Pain whatever,

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 2>which is a great brokerage, firm, investment bank, great retail presence.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Back in the day, it was acquired by I don't

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>know where this now is, but now it's basically the

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 2>guts of ubs here in the US, but the House

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>of Pain Neil, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 2>You see a market like this SPX up seventeen to

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 2>eighteen percent, but it's you take out the Magnificent seven

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 2>and what do we got here? So how do you

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 2>look at markets like this that doesn't feel like a

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 2>healthy market.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, the market really hasn't gone any place. I mean,

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 8>as of yesterday, you look at the Nasdaq was up

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 8>thirty seven percent, but you take out they always say

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 8>eight stocks, we'll get to the magnificence seven here in second.

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 8>But essentially you take those out, the market's up seven percent,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 8>so it's really gotten no place. That downs up to

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 8>and a half or three percent.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 6>So those eight.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 8>Companies have controlled the market. But interesting enough, then you

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 8>get to three weeks ago, I guess we came up

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 8>with the new slogan magnificent seven.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 6>Then Netflix went.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 8>Out, but that made me think to go back to

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 8>nineteen sixty when the movie was made, The Magnificence Short.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 8>So I'll give you something to think about here is

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 8>in that movie, the ending, they hired seven gunslingers to

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 8>help protect the town and there are only three left.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 8>So you tell me which three of the seven are

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 8>going to be left?

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>So what do you do with a market that has

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 2>that lack of breath? I know you guys at Hennessey

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 2>are value investors, So how do you approach this market?

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>How has it changed maybe over the last several years?

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 8>As you know, you know value, what is a place

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 8>that you want to be if you want to play again?

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 8>So look at the SMPT five hundred you're talking about.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 8>Apple is seven over seven percent of that thirteen percent

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 8>of the Nasdaq. And if you think logically, would you

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 8>put thirteen percent of your money in one stock?

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 6>Probably not?

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 8>Okay, So but that's what people have been doing at

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 8>some point in time, just like the late nineties when

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 8>all the value managers were getting fired because if you

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 8>weren't twenty three years old and you didn't have a

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 8>dot com on your forehead, you were fired. But essentially,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, I love the mid cap arena, like the

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 8>Hennessy MidCap thirty. And the reason I like that is

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 8>mid cap stocks have really outperformed everything over time, and

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 8>they're large enough to withstand an economic tsunami. They're big

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 8>enough to make an acquisition that would be a creative

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 8>to them from a smaller company. But they're also big

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 8>enough to be acquired by a larger company and be

0:23:58.440 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 8>a creative.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 6>There.

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 8>You see a lot of value in that mid cap

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 8>arena right now.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>What stocks or industries in midcaps do you like?

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, you know energies energies there, But I

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 8>mean if you look at names that people don't associate

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 8>too much when you get the radio, TV or something

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 8>like that, is Comfort Systems, big deal, but most likely

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 8>they did part of this building because they're industrial and

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 8>building and putting in the ventilation, hating air things of

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 8>that sort.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 8>They earn eight dollars a share and pay a dollar dividend,

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 8>so logic would tell you there's plenty of room to

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 8>raise the dividend.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 2>You can set up seventy to date, so yeah, you

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 2>call for seven billion dollar market cap company fix is

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a ticker, Yeah.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 6>And then you can look at Sprouts farmers market.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, this is a public company.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 6>Hold on, huh.

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go ahead and.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.959
<v Speaker 6>I'm just going Sprouts up on the terminal. Okay.

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 8>You know it's farmers market, and truly when you walk

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 8>into the store, you feel like you're in a farmer's market.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 6>There's produce all over.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 8>And then if you think about inflation, food prices that

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 8>have gone up, and you go, well, geez, do I

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 8>really want to get into a specialty market like that

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 8>or Whole Foods? Well, there's a big difference between Sprouts

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 8>and say Whole Foods or and that's simple that you know,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 8>you look at the produce and you look at the

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 8>vegetables and stuff, and you just add a little bit

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 8>of positive and you can make a very cheap meal

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 8>for a family. And that's that's their their niche. They

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 8>have about three hundred stores, mainly on the West coast.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 8>But you know, here's this company that makes three dollars

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 8>a share and doesn't pay a dividend. So you know,

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 8>there's so much value out there you just keep keep

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 8>looking for it and then buy and hold it.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 2>S FM is the ticker there. It's got about a

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 2>four point three billion market cap, up thirty percent year

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to dat. How do you guys at Hennessy define value?

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is there a pe threshold? How do you

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 2>scream to find sprouts for farmer's market is I know

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 2>analyst didn't come to you and say, hey, I just

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>went into this great farmers market. I think we should

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 2>buy it. So I'm guessing you guys screen here.

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, you're right.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 8>Everybody has to a certain Every money manager has a formula. Yep, okay,

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 8>And we have a formula and what we do is

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 8>once a year we rework the formula. So essentially it's

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 8>looking for companies between one and ten billion dollars in

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 8>market cap. We're looking for increase in earnings. The main

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 8>point being a price is sales ratio of one point

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 8>five or less. So we're not going to pay more

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 8>than a dollar fifty for a dollar in sales. And

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 8>that's where the value is. Because earnings, just like anybody,

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 8>you can manipulate earnings by taking a ride off or

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 8>adding this, or taking a game, and earnings don't pay

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 8>your bills. Cash flow pays your bills. And so when

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 8>you start to look at a truer number, unless you're

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 8>going to do an Enron, it's sales, right, and so

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.199
<v Speaker 8>we won't like I say, pay it more than a

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 8>dollar fifty for dollar and sales. Now you take those

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 8>magnificent magnificent easy for me to say, the seven or

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 8>eight stocks, and you're looking at a price of sales

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 8>of you know, somewhere in the nine ten. So you

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 8>know we're they're buying. You know, there are eight times

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:19.479
<v Speaker 8>what our threshold.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Is at least, what are you selling?

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, we're not selling anything because when we do this formula,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 8>at the end of the formula, we buy to thirty

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 8>companies okay that hit the list and essentially buy them

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 8>an equal dollar mounts, hold them for one year, and

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 8>then readjust the portfolio to then the thirty stocks that

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 8>hit our list and buy them an equal dollar mounts.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 8>But the last stage of that is we're looking for

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 8>companies that have or stocks that have price appreciation over

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 8>three or six month period, and then we buy the

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 8>top thirty that have the best price appreciation after one year.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 8>And you sort of ask, why would you do price

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 8>pre and aren't you just chasing the market.

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 6>The reality is really.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 8>Smart managers more than me, they've been buying these companies

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 8>for a while. They've just been holding their hand little

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 8>by little by little by little, so over a three

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 8>six twelve month period it goes up. So we're not

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 8>catching it in the first inning, right, We're catching the

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 8>stocks in their third inning, fourth inning, which is where

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 8>you want to be.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sounds reasonable to me. It's a plan. You've been

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>doing it a long time and must be working. Neil Hennessy,

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>chief market strategist, Hennessy Advisors based out there.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 9>What's the name of the town again, the Vado Marine County, Nevado,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 9>Marin County, which is really a beautiful place to be

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 9>and I don't know why, you know, everybody doesn't set

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 9>up shop in Marin County.

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape. Can's our live program Bloomberg

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to Washington, DC because there is a lot

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>going on in Washington DC that will impact markets, impact

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>individual companies. So we like to get a sense of

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of what are the investors, the professional investors, how

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 2>are they kind of discounting what's happening in Washington, DC

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and some of the policy and regulatory risks. So we

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 2>always appreciate checking with Jen Flinton. She is head of

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 2>US Government Affairs at Investo, a huge money management firm. Jen,

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure there's a whole bunch of issues that you

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>guys are following down there in DC. I'd like to

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 2>start with my government is it going to shut down

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 2>anytime soon? I need to be worried about that.

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 10>Well, not until January for certain appropriations bill. So a

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 10>couple of weeks ago they were able to pass a

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 10>continuing resolution that's that stop gap funding for the government

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 10>into January, so we're not going to have a holiday

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 10>shutdown threat. We'll have two basic tiers. It'll be January nineteen,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 10>which you'll have have the Agriculture bill, the Energy bill,

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 10>the milk con and VA bill. Those will be dealt

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 10>with by January nineteenth theoretically, and then you'll have a

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 10>February second where you get the really hard appropriations bills

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 10>done right. So that's Defense, Labor, HHS, Homeland, think, Immigration,

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 10>Interior think, environment, and so they'll have to come together

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 10>over the holidays and then going into next year on

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:29.719
<v Speaker 10>these bills, the House and Senate.

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 3>So how likely are we going to see another eleven

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 3>hour type of situation leading up to these deadlines?

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 10>It's pretty likely, I'm afraid. I mean, look, you have

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 10>the Senate that is marking to f y twenty three

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 10>numbers and you have the House that's marking.

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 7>To f y twenty two numbers.

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 10>That's a big difference in money, right, So they're going

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 10>to have to.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Find why are they doing it differently?

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So the agreement on the debt ceiling negotiations over

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 10>June was to mark to f y twenty three, which

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 10>is what the Senate's doing. But conservatives in the House

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 10>were very unhappy with that budget ceialing negotiation, so they

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 10>got appropriations to agree to mark to f y twenty two.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, all right, So they can't even agree on that,

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>all right. So a lot is going to fall to

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>this new House Speaker, Mike Johnson, Republican from Louisiana. Is

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>there any reason to believe that he's going to be

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 2>more successful integrating his far right part of his party

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 2>so they can actually get something done in the House.

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 10>That's an excellent question, and we're going to know a

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 10>little bit about that over the next thirty six forty

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 10>eight hours as he meets with the conference and tries

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 10>to get an agreement to move the NDAA, which is

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 10>the National Defense Authorization Act, which must be done by

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 10>the end of the year. They never let that lapse.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 10>It's been like sixty years since that slap. So that

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 10>House to get done before they break for the holidays.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 10>And then there's got to be some agreement around the

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 10>supplemental bill, the one hundred and six billion dollars supplemental

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 10>bill for Ukraine, in Israel and no Pacific the border.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 10>And he is sort of juxt opposing the negotiations in

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 10>the Senate and has to figure out what his own

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 10>conference can swallow.

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 7>And those meetings are happening this week.

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So what's the I mean, do we are we? If

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm an investor and I thinking about Washington, DC and

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>think about policy, am I beholding to literally a handful

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 2>of representatives for just movement of my government?

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 10>Quite, frankly, it is a very tight margin. Not just

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.479
<v Speaker 10>in the House you have about a four vote margin

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 10>and in the Senate one vote margin. So yes, there

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 10>has to be compromised, there has to be negotiated agreement,

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 10>and that means making a lot of people unhappy in

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 10>order to move these bills, these must pass bills, and that,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 10>quite frankly, is the same situation that McCarthy was in

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 10>that now Speaker Johnson is in. But the same is

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 10>true for Majority Leader Schumer the Democrat, and McConnell who

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 10>are trying to walk this tightline on INDAA and on

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 10>the supplemental funding and on appropriations. So they're all still

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 10>in the same seats. It's just you know, one different

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 10>player here.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 3>So as far as looking at how some of these

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 3>deadlines kind of overlap with the next Federal Reserve well

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 3>not the next Phedoserve meeting, that decision's on December thirteenth,

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 3>but the meeting the first meeting at the beginning of

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 3>next year. It's actually January thirtieth and thirty first, So

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 3>you have some of these shutdown deadlines coming up close

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to that. How do you think this could potentially impact

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>anything coming up when it comes to some of that

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 3>policy decision when you have issues going on the other

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 3>side with the government.

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, quite frankly, Congress doesn't look much to

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 10>the monetary policy issues of the and it's questionable, I

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 10>think how much the FED considers the you know, annual

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 10>budget appropriation process the fiscal issues as it makes its

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 10>monetary decisions. And so while it is a congruence of

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 10>issues that are all going to arise at the same time,

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 10>and I expect that will make the markets a little

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, you know, volatile around around these important deadlines.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 10>I do think that as we enter into twenty twenty

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 10>four with this election year, you're going to see after

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 10>these appropriations bills are settled, the shift is going to

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 10>be a hard shift into election year politics and that

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 10>really is going to be the driver going into twenty

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 10>twenty four.

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 2>So is that kind of the message Like if I'm

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 2>a you know, Invesco port portfolio manager, equity portfolio manager

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 2>or fixed income and I called you up and I say, Hey,

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>what's the biggest I don't know risk for me and

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>my portfolio coming out of Washington, DC?

0:34:57.719 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 6>What is it?

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you say? It's just I guess the upcoming election.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>What are some of the big what's the big issue

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 2>for you?

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 10>So the next what six eight, nine weeks are really

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 10>going to be the vast majority of legislation that's going

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 10>to get done. That's going to be, as I said,

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 10>the NDAA, the approbes, but also some tax extenders which

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 10>are possible by the end of the year. And then

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 10>it's going to be a lot of messaging bills you're

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 10>going to see in the House. They're going to try

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 10>to do a lot of messaging. If they can't get

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 10>something done on immigration within the context of this supplemental bill,

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 10>they're going to push. They're going to continue to push

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 10>on that border issue. It's going to be a major

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 10>message for House Republicans. And then you're going to see

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 10>a lot of executive action. You're going to see the

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 10>agencies taking it upon themselves, within their own discretion or

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 10>discretion as they define it, uh to move the agenda

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 10>of the administration things that they weren't able to get

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.919
<v Speaker 10>done over the next last three years, or that they've

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 10>been working to resolve and finalize over the past three years.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 10>And so that's really what I'm telling folks to look

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 10>at right now is watch those executive actions.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So what are the most immediate things that you're watching

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 3>in the next few weeks as far as what people

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 3>need to be focused on in Washington.

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 10>Well, first we've got to watch these negotiations on appropriations,

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 10>and we will be behind the scenes watching that very closely.

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 10>But over the next thirty six forty eight hours, it'll

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 10>be really interesting to see how these members sort of

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 10>resolve on the NDAA, that Defense Authorization Act, which is

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 10>very important. Conference technically meets on Thursday, but they could

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 10>have a decision by Friday because they've been negotiating this

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 10>behind the scenes, and there's some amendments that could be

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 10>added to that that we'll be looking for, some related

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 10>to AI, some related to crypto money laundering issues, some

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 10>relating to outbound investment in China. So we're looking for

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 10>whether those will be included in the final NDAA. But

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 10>then it will be a race to the appropriation's deadlines

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 10>and making sure that they fund the government that is

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 10>important to the rating of the US but also sort

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 10>of the faith in this Congress's ability to get things done.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, a lot of work to do. We'll certainly follow

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 2>up with you Jen on that. Jen Flinton, she's the

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 2>head of US Government affairs for Invesco. Trying to keep

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 2>track of all the legislation, all the policy work that's

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 2>being done in Washington, DC and how it impacts investco

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>porfolio managers and their investment holdings. You know the analogous

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 2>person for Bloomberg Intelligence that does that work as Nathan

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Dean for Bloomberg Intelligence. It's so important for investors that

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 2>have a good feel for what's going on down in Washington,

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 2>d C.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or what

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 2>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio