WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Union Pacific Deal, Novo Nordisk Earnings 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies. One person's

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>cast is another person's animal spirits, breaking market.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Our viewer is if the economy is slowing down, there

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 3>is the possibility of the debt spirals. Both futum competing

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 3>and AI are going to power the future.

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>People are just buying everything with tex Bloomberg Intelligence with

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio, YouTube and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney, I'm Normalanda filling it on Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 4>Each in every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why the planemaker Boeing reported am

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 2>moreer than expected loss last quarter, plus.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Well discuss why the Dutch brewing company Heineken reported a

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 4>decline in beer volume sales.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>But first we begin with news in the railroad industry.

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 4>This week, Union Pacific agreed to buy Norfolk Southern and

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 4>a seventy two billion dollar cash in stock transaction. The

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 4>merger would create the first and only US transcontinental Railroad.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 3>For more on this in.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>The Future of the Railroad Industry, guest host Isabell Lee

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 2>and I were joined by Lee Clascow, Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Transport Logistics and chipping analysts. We first asked Lee to

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 2>give us his outlook on how this mega deal can

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 2>get done.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 6>I think the whole speculation before the deal was formally

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 6>announced about a possible consolidation, and I think people are

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 6>just trying to take maybe a breather right now because

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 6>there are some execution risks. Right this deal is not

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 6>going to close. If it does close until early twenty

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 6>twenty seven, it needs regulatory approval, which is not an

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 6>easy thing to do. There were certain rules that were

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 6>created at the Surface Transportation Board to make it very

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 6>difficult for large Class one rail mergers to happen. That

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 6>was because at one time in the eighties and nineties,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 6>those sorts of deals resulted in terrible service. I think

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 6>that the rails today were much more cognizant of service

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 6>as it relates to integration. And I don't really think

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, either company once once, assuming a merger does happen,

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 6>are going scorched earth in terms of, you know, what

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 6>they're going to do to their networks. You know, they

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 6>mentioned on the call that they had earlier today that

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 6>they're really not going to lay off any uh, you know,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 6>frontline workers. Most of the probably layoffs are going to

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 6>happen you know, in in in in the offices. So

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 6>you know, that would just mean that services would prevail.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 6>And one of the reasons why they are doing this,

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, from an outsider looking in, you know, it

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 6>does make complete sense. Between the two of them. They

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 6>interchange around a million and car loads a day and

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 6>if they're just able to if that's that car load

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 6>is able to be on the same network, it's not

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 6>only going to improve network fluidity, it will actually lower

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 6>the railroads their costs. Let's hope they pass on some

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 6>of that cost savings to their shippers. I think that's

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 6>what shippers might be concerned about.

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 7>And it'll it'll provide probably a better service product that

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 7>they can go out and compete against other modes such

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 7>as trucks, and you know that's you know, also a

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 7>good thing because you know, from an environmental standpoint, railroads

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 7>are less fuel efficient, you know, trucking kind of deals

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 7>with you know, turnover issues and trucker availability issues.

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 6>Right now that's not an issue, but at times it

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 6>can be. And so you know, it is definitely a

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 6>very interesting deal. It will create the first trans continental railroad.

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 6>But you know, they do have their work cut out

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 6>for them to get that regulatory approval.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 8>So the deal is worth eighty five billion dollars, How

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 8>do they plan to make money back? What are the

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 8>financial wins so to speak, to justify that happy price?

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Tad.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they laid out two point seven five billion in synergies,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 6>about one point seven five and that two point seventy

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 6>five is going to be from revenue. So what they're

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 6>saying is that, you know, we can probably get more

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.799
<v Speaker 6>volume onto the network because it all of a sudden

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 6>becomes a much more compelling service offering, and then about

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 6>a billion dollars in cost savings and some of that. Again,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 6>you don't need to CEOs, you don't need two CFOs.

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 6>You don't need two corporate headquarters, you know, the dimension.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 6>They are going to have their headquarter in Omaha where

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 6>Union Pacific is located, and keep a I think they

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 6>worded a major presence in Atlanta where Norfolk is currently

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 6>So but you know, obviously they're not going to need

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 6>as much space as they once have. And then there's

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 6>technology benefits, you know, so you're only you know, money

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 6>in technology once, not twice to get those productivity improvements.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 6>So I think those are the major aspects of it.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 6>And you know, they mentioned that you know, they could

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 6>be you know, EPs a creative after year or two.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, he mentioned a lot of regulatory agencies are going

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to weigh in here on this deal. I also think

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 2>President Trump is likely to weigh in. Do we know

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>anything about how he might view this deal or just

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 2>consolidation in general?

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 3>What's the views as to the Trump administration?

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we don't. The language that management noted on

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 6>the call is like they wouldn't have moved forward with

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 6>this transaction if they felt that it was impossible to

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 6>get regulatory approval. So whether that means they were talking

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 6>to the administration, whether that means they were talking to

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 6>the STB or the DOJ, or everybody in between. That's

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.559
<v Speaker 6>kind of you know, if you read between the lines,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 6>is what they were saying. The fact that they're not

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 6>going to lay off any union folks is probably a

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 6>net positive for a Donald president Donald Trump to say,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, this is okay with me.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 6>So there's a lot of unknown still and again this

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 6>is this is going to take a long time. So

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 6>we have a deal. It has to get Surface Transportation

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 6>Board approval, which you know won't happen at least for

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 6>a year and a half.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 8>Could this park more railroad mergers in the US? And

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 8>if it goes through, what will shipping look like in

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 8>five to ten years? You said, absolutely, please elaborate.

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. So, so the other railroads in the US are

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 6>Burlington Northern, which is you know, owned by Berkshire Hathway.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 6>They may make their own bid for Norfolk Southern or decide,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're just going to go after CSX because

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 6>if they do not merge, then they're going to be

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 6>at a competitive disadvantage. Why would you want to send

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 6>your freight across two railroads when you can send it

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 6>across one. So it just would make sense. And if

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 6>there is regulatory appetite for this kind of a transaction.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, you could see a Berkshire hacked the way

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 6>and CSX coming and you know, if their competitors were

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 6>able to get a deal, there's no reason why you

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 6>wouldn't get a deal done between the two. A lot

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 6>of ifs and butts and candies and nuts, but we'll

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 6>see what happens.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 5>Our.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Salie Clascow, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics and shipping analysts.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Move next to news in the drug and pharmaceutical space.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 4>This week, the Danish drug maker Novo Nordisk announced that

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>insider Masier Mike Dustar would need to take over as

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the company CEO. This came after Novo cut its full

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 4>year outlook, stating that it's seen a decline of its

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 4>blockbuster weight loss drug wig Goovi for more.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Guest host Isabel Lee and I were joined by Michael Shaw,

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior pharmaceutical and biotech analyst. Your First asked

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Michael to break down Novo's a recent guy.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 9>It's reported guidance now is calling for some percent sales

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 9>growth six percent operating profit growth after adjusting for currency,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 9>and that compares to fourteen and fifteen percent respectively previously.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 9>Now a lot of that is related to the US market. There,

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 9>they're still seeing headwinds from compound and GLP one, which

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 9>seems to be the main driver that's affecting wegov growth.

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 9>And there's a lack of visibility here. So all of

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 9>that creates uncertain z for investors and also kind of

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 9>questions around not only only twenty twenty five numbers, but

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 9>the exit rate into twenty six. So there's concerns about

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 9>you know, mid to long term growth given how concentrated

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 9>or how reliance orry Novo is on WE'REGOVI for growth.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 9>The other headwind is competition to a zepic, So that's

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 9>the GLP one for diabetes and that's another you know,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 9>key growth driver for the for the company. Second piece

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 9>of news new CEO appointment. So they went with an

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 9>internal candidate. I think the market was perhaps expecting them

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 9>to go for an external candidate, so you know, perhaps

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 9>a bit of disappointment there. But that said, you know

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 9>he's been at the company. So this is Mike Dudster.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 9>He's been at the company since ninety two. He's been

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 9>heading up international operations since twenty sixteen and over that time.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 9>You know, we've seen international operations sales double to around

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 9>eighteen billion dollars, So you know, he's an internal higher,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 9>he's familiar with the company culture. I think it's a

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 9>bit too early to to, you know, to write him

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 9>off before he's even started. Now, his focus is going

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 9>to be on re get gaining ground to Lily in

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 9>the obesitie space, maintaining leadership in a diabetes space, and

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 9>then improving execution. And that's something that's going to be

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 9>key ahead of the Cagary Semma launch as well as

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 9>the launch for its oral JP one in a in obesity,

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 9>particularly given you know Cagary Summer perhaps isn't as differentiated

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 9>as we had hoped for, and then the oral JLP

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 9>one profile perhaps trails of Lily's.

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 8>The new CEO said he's planning to review the company's

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 8>cost base with outstting specific targets and metrics. So could

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 8>this indicate indicate that Novos preparing for a period of

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 8>solar growth after the initial surge and demand, especially the

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 8>blockbuster we Go V drug.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think it will be hard to slash

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 9>R and D to be honest, So I mean, and

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 9>they would need to you know, continue marketing, continue to

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 9>do DTC in order to you know, in order to

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 9>compete with Lily. They're obviously healy heavy investing into Capex

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 9>at the moment, but there is probably some operating leverage

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 9>in there, you know, to provide some sort of relief.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the company's got a margin about forty five,

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 9>which is at the top end for large farmer.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mikey, is there any reasons to believe that maybe

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the marketplace has been over estimating the size of this

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>OBC drug market?

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 9>I think, I mean, yeah, I think there's always a

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 9>risk with it with an indication this size when you

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 9>look at the market potential. You know, in the US alone,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 9>it's one hundred and thirty one hundred and forty million patients,

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 9>which which is a target population.

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 3>There is a population head.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean there is a risk that you know,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 9>perhaps consensus did get ahead of itself. But the difficulty

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 9>here is, you know, you have you know, huge runway

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 9>of patients. There's obviously limited supply, so that it's difficult

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 9>to know kind of you know, how quickly that supply

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 9>can come on board. Now, you know, Nova gives guidance

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 9>around you know, the growth prospects. You know, where they

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 9>think sales et cetera are going to go, but they

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 9>keep they don't necessarily quantify, you know, the cadence supply

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 9>and how that how quickly that's going to come online.

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 9>So that kind of makes forecasting quite difficult. And obviously

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 9>they don't want to give that information because it's competitive

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 9>information and they want, you know, lily to know about it.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Our thanks to Michael Shaw, Bloomberg Intelligence senior BARMA biotech analysts.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we'll discuss the importance of Samsung producing AI

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 4>chips for the ev giant Tesla.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies in one hundred

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and thirty industries.

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 4>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I go on

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>the terminal. I'm normal Inda and I'm Paul Sweeney, and

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 4>this is Bloomberg.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm normal, Linda filling it on

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence. We move on to earnings and the aerospace

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>and airline industries.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>This week, planemaker Boeing recorded a smaller than expected loss

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 2>for the second quarter, along with revenue that beat analyst expectations.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 2>Going also said it almost halted its cash burn last quarter.

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Separately, Jet Blue Airways posted a smaller than expected lost

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 4>in the second quarter as the man rebounded.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 2>For more guess Isabel Lee and I were joined by

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>George ferguson Bloomberg Intelligence. Senior Aerospace, Defense and Airlines analyst.

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 2>First asked George for his key takeaways on Boeing's earnings.

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 10>The free cash flow is still a little bit negative,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 10>not much cash from operations positive a little bit two

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 10>hundred million. I think it was roughly on two hundred

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 10>negative free cash flow to a positive and cash flow,

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 10>I think roughly. So we're seeing an inflection point here

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 10>in cash flow.

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 6>So cashflow had.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 10>Been negative for the last I think it was six

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 10>quarters before this, and I think that's just the sign

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 10>of they're getting more aircraft delivered. They're gonna you know,

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 10>they've got a lot of inventory still, they'll pull off

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 10>the shelf to build aircraft going forward to pull a

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 10>bigger report proportion of stuff off the shelf than they

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 10>would during normal times, which should juice that cash flow up. Uh,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 10>you know pretty well. So I think it's you know,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 10>the turnaround is still in uh is underway. It looks

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 10>like it's you know, well in you know, in swing

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 10>in the results we saw and the way you know,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 10>company management commented on the end of the year and

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 10>so you know, I think it was a pretty good

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 10>results quarter for Boeing again, turn around intact.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 8>How are they addressing quality in safety issues, especially when

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 8>it comes to the seven three seven MAX program.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean there it's you know, as Kelly Oprok said,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 10>it's a process. I think just the sign of seeing

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 10>increased deliveries is showing us that the quality improvement at

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 10>Spirit you know, has has seen success. And they're talking

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 10>about you know, they're at thirty eight seven thirty sevens

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 10>a month now. Kelly Opork says he's going to approach

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 10>the FA in a short period of time and work

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 10>on the forty two. It's seven thirty sevens a month.

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 10>So again he must have some level of confidence that

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 10>his quality and his engineering is good in order in

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 10>order to go further. It's not perfect. They've been slowed

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 10>down a little bit in the certification of seven three

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 10>seven DASH ten and DASH seven. They've pushed them into

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty six. I think it's okay. It's not a

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 10>big move. You know, we'd like to see them come

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 10>faster because seven thirty seven DASH ten is a large

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 10>competitor to the Airbus A three twenty, which is very

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 10>successful and one of the reasons they saw United place

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 10>a big order with Airbus. But again, I think that

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 10>you can't expect this stuff to go in a straight line.

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 10>And the fact that they think twenty twenty six is

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 10>when they could get certification, it doesn't tell me anything's broke.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 10>It just tells me the process is nonlinear, and I

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 10>think to be expected in aerospace, all right.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Also, jet Blue posted a smaller than expected loss. Here,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with Jet Blue and the airline business?

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>He's aces because I know the last quarter, Boy, these

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>airline companies are really reticent to give any kind of guidance.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean a lot of them have come back

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 10>with guidance in a lot of cases is lower a

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 10>lot you know, the airline business right now is really

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 10>counting on less capacity in the second half of twenty

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 10>twenty five, and we'll see how that goes. Last time

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 10>I looked at domestic capacity plans for three Q it's

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 10>kind of about zero growth. I mean, I think they

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 10>need to cut capacity in the marketplace. If you look

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 10>at jet Blues results, load factor fell by I think

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 10>it was around three hundred basis points down to the

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 10>low eighties from mid eighties they and they held fares

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 10>pretty much flat, yields were kind of just up a

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 10>little bit. So that just tells me that there's too

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 10>much capacity in this market. They just can't fill airplanes

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 10>at the right price. Jet Blue has other problems like

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, the gear turbo fan keeps them from expanding.

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 10>That means costser ballooning on them. But I don't see

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 10>how they'd want to expand right now. What I see

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 10>as a market that has can't fill airplanes at the

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 10>price that's going to keep them very profitable, and so

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 10>someone's got to cut. And the question is who the

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 10>full service carriers are saying, Hey, we got premium to

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 10>subsidize us. We don't care. The low costs are going

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 10>to have to jet Blue will cut in three Q

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 10>but every time they cut, their costs go high or

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 10>per seed, so they're a bit of a challenging position.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 8>It does seem like the issues just compound for the

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 8>companies in this space from aircraft shortages.

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Delivery delays, pilot shortages.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 8>Wage inflation, labor and negotiation and so on. Are there

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 8>differences in how Boeing and Jet Blue addressing the issues

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 8>or is really an industry wide consensus and problem.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean if you talk to Boeing, everybody wants

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 10>an airplane, right and they're sold out in the seven

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 10>thirty seven and seventy eight seven to the end of

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 10>the decade. Everybody wants the newest, and I think what

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 10>needs to happen is, again the airlines are just putting

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 10>too much capacity in the marketplace, especially in the US,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 10>and someone has to cry uncle and say, hey, you know,

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 10>we can't take the profitability at these levels. Park some

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 10>airplanes get them out of the business so they can

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 10>write size compacity, and I think nobody wants to do it.

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 10>You have some competitors that are in a situation where

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 10>they they've you know, some of them are declared Chapter

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 10>eleven it's like spirit and then and then refashion themselves

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 10>and got back out in the marketplace. But it's either

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 10>someone's gonna have to go away or the market's going

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 10>to have to get negative enough and profitability that people

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 10>start to park airplanes. As we get into laid end

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 10>of this year, four Q and one Q, those are

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 10>weak quarters for the US airline industry. If something doesn't improve,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 10>If you've got a Jet Blue that's barely positive and

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 10>profitability in two Q without a change in this market,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 10>that's that's a strong negative. Near the end of the year,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 10>people will start to cut capacity and try to boost fares.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 2>So, George, who does that? Is it one of the

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 2>big three? I mean, Jet Blue can't drive capacity in

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>this industry.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 10>It's got to be one of the big three, right, Yeah, Look,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 10>I don't think it's. The big three are in a

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 10>game of chicken with the low cost right they think

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 10>that they've got pole position here and that they just

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 10>keep capacity and someone's going to fail on the low

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 10>cost side because the low cost doesn't have this premium seating.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 10>They might be right right right now, it looks like

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 10>their profitabilities hanging in there. The low cost carriers are

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 10>the ones taking it on the chin our.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to George Ferguson, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Aerospace, Defense and

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Airlines analysts.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 3>We moved to news from the ev giant Tesla.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 4>This week, we heard Samsung will make AI chips for

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Tesla in a sixteen point five billion dollar multi year deal.

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 4>That's according to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, must be the

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 4>statement on x where he stated that the strategic importance

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 4>of this deal is hard to overstate.

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>For more guestos, John Tucker and I were joined by

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Craig Trudell, Bloomberg Global Autos Editor. We first asked Craig

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>what this deal between Tesla and Samsung will do for

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the carmaker.

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 11>Samsung is an existing supplier of these high powered semiconductors

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 11>that are used for its driving systems that it markets

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 11>as a full self driving and autopilot. Contrary to those

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 11>names that you know, you cannot buy a Tesla today

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 11>and have to drive itself for you. You still need

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 11>to pay attention and keep your hands on the wheel

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 11>and eyes on the road. But uh, it is the

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 11>case that those systems are are becoming more more capable

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 11>and that Tesla's trying to kind of press the issue

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 11>with them to the point where uh, you know, they're

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 11>they're taking people out of out of the driver's seat

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 11>and and having uh you know, supervisors in the in

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 11>the passenger seat of cars in Austin, Texas, and and

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 11>trying to to take that elsewhere as well. Uh this

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 11>this will be interestingly. Musk announced that they will be

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 11>going to a T S M C chip for for

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 11>the next generation of Semis that they use and then

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 11>go to Samsung, relying on on supply from from this

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 11>plant in Texas that that Samsung is boys to to open,

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 11>uh in the near future.

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 12>And what near future? How how long does it take

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 12>to build a fab plant? The cool kids say fab right.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's right. Yeah, I mean I think, uh, you know,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 11>the the this is a project on Samsung's part that's

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 11>been in the worse for some time, right, and and

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 11>so uh they they you know, were sort of moved

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 11>actually by the Chips Act under the Biden administration, and

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 11>Trump uh was was critical of of the Chips Act,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, on the on the campaign trail. And yet

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 11>we've seen uh sort of a continuation and somewhat of

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 11>an embrace of it. Uh you know, as we've we've

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 11>seen a change in the White House, uh in terms

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 11>of the exact timing of when exactly this new AI

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 11>chip uh you know, will will be coming out of

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 11>that Texas factory. It's it's not yet clear, and the

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 11>companies have have not said much because uh, you know,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 11>they of course agreed to uh you know, some some

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 11>privacy here that must proceeded to to sort of loosen

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 11>up on you know, at least over social media.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Craig, do we know at this stage to what extent

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk is engaged in the day to day the

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 2>strategic of Tesla and any stepped back from his doze responsibilities.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think you can you can glean so

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 11>much from his his you know activity on x as

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 11>to what he's paying attention to. And it absolutely is

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 11>the case that we're seeing him him posting more about

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 11>things like this deal with Samsung, and I do think

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 11>that that's helpful sort of for for sentiment around Tesla.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 11>And yet I would say too that you know, if

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 11>if there was a sort of you know, scorecard, sort

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 11>of an informal scorecard that you'd be keeping track of

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 11>where he's sort of devoting most of his time and

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 11>attention to I would say it's as much or more

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 11>on XAI and just ai in general than it is

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 11>on Tesla specifically. You know, you heard from him a

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:56.959
<v Speaker 11>few months ago that he would really be turning his

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 11>attention back to Tesla, you know, as he was making

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 11>his way out of the White House. But I think

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 11>you know, the amount of attention and emphasis he's put

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 11>on trying to catch up to the likes of open

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 11>AI and Google in our artificial intelligence and LMS is

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 11>you know, definitely exceeds you know, the amount of you know,

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 11>noise we're hearing from him about the day to day

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 11>interworkings of Tesla.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 4>Our thanks to Craig Drudell, Bloomberg Global Autos Editor. Coming up,

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>we'll discuss the impact of President Donald Trump's a big,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 4>beautiful bill on green hydrogen.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 2>IF research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 4>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I go on

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 4>the terminal, I'm normal, Linda.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>And all Paul Sweeney and this is Bloomberg.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.479
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Cocklay and

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. That's the non

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm normal into filling in on

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to the consumer goods industry this week.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 4>The Dutch brewing company Heineken reported a decline in beer

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 4>volume sales during the second quarter. This came as Heineken

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 4>feest disputes over price increases with regional buying groups in

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Western Europe.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 2>The More guest host John Tucker and I were joined

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 2>by Duncan Fox, Bloomberg Intelligence senior consumer products analysts. First,

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>they asked Duncan for his take on honingg it's most

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 2>recent guidance.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 13>Essentially, European retailers decided not delayed pushing the prices up

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 13>after I suppose last year wasn't particularly big on pricing

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 13>the last three percent of the local Heinegen brown, but

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 13>the previous two years when inflation was raging, you know,

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 13>they did get fourteen and ten percent respectively. In twenty

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 13>two and twenty three. Costs of goods are not really

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 13>going up, so I think the retailers just pushed back

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 13>and he took them longer to push to get a

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 13>small price through in Europe and that's just hit the

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 13>So it's about fifty of the overall business.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 12>What is what is a Heineken class in the pub?

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 13>Well, if you're in London, a heck of a lot.

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 13>It's it's probably eight pounds plus I can be about ten,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 13>which they are either the Dorset, you'd be lucky to

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 13>get it. You know, it's sort of around five to

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 13>six pound. But nonetheless, you know, when you're pushing the

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 13>price up the premium Heinegen brand, which is probably twenty

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 13>percent more expensive than any other sort of mainstream beer

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 13>that they've got on the pulfo, you can see why

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 13>the volumes struggled in the short term given cost of

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 13>living crisis. So it's something they will resolve and hope

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 13>they have evolved in fact on the pricing, so one

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 13>hope it will get better as we go to the

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 13>second half. With that's a weather that we've found in Europe.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 2>So we we had I guess the announcement of a

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 2>trade deal between the US and the EU, I don't

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>think what's it mean for the spirit's business, the beer business,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 2>line business asking for a friend.

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 13>I hope you've already stocked up that fifteen percent is

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 13>probably is probably a good outcome given some of the

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 13>rumors that were going around from April on was that

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 13>he could have gone up to two hundred percent. But

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 13>obviously the cost of beer coming in for someone like

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 13>harnek and they basically ship in from either Holland or Mexico.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 13>Some of the Mexican beer may well be tariff free

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 13>on the us NCA agreement, but then you've got the

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 13>out sort of the cans, So lord knows how much

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 13>that will push the price up. But yeah, they'll just

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 13>have to push prices up on beer and spirits. Spirits

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 13>at fifteen percent probably say it's not huge, but it'll

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 13>mean pushing prices up three four percent something of that

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 13>order on top of what they would normally try and get.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 13>So it's it's not going to be easy to do,

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 13>but it's not as disastrous as thirty percent or something

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 13>like that, which Renby said would take thirty five million euros,

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 13>So a little bit better than expected or feared, but

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 13>it's still not going to be great and use wine.

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 6>There really isn't.

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 13>Anybody that exports wine that's quoted, so it's a bit

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 13>difficult to say all the impact is, but it will

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 13>certainly make it more expensive compared to your good, US

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 13>great varieties that come on the market. So I would

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 13>have thought you'd see people switch to US lines.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 12>I find that's kind of disturbing. This part of the

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 12>story where you quote the CEO of Heineken beer markets

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 12>have declined that a pace Heineken has rarely seen any

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 12>time before. Is this the end of humanity as we

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 12>know it?

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 13>Well, if it carries on you, I think there was.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 13>There's been stories that, you know, the gen Z's have

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 13>given up and drink. I think that's wildly wrong. But

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 13>there's certainly people are abstaining during the week a little bit.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 13>But the real problem is that people are drinking more

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 13>at home going to the pub, and that's sort of change.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 13>That's the big change from COVID. So you've got to

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 13>make sure you get your pricing at retailer's right. Goes

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 13>back to your original question, because people that know it's

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 13>sort of more like eighty percent drinking at home in

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 13>the US, it's anywhere between sort of fifty and twenty percent,

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 13>depends on where you're on in the world. There are

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 13>a lot more people drinking at home and going to

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 13>pugs and clubs, so the mix is poor really or

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 13>has been, and it needs the good summer would help

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 13>and in these people to have a bit more money

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 13>in their pocket as well, so maybe feeling a little

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 13>bit more confident that they can go out and spend

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 13>with their friends rather than buying it cheap from retailers

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 13>and entertaining at home.

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't get are one of this is a national phenomenon

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's a phenomenon on the Jersey Shore, which is

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 2>people are drinking like these iced tea vodka things, the

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>White Claws, all this stuff that's not beer.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Are you seeing that? Is that a trend around the world?

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 13>Unfortunately, it seems to be that is a trend. You

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 13>get a lot of ready to drinks being being pushed

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 13>and they big for sort of twelve eighteen months, and

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 13>it does tend to go against the beer volume more

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 13>than anything else. Spirit companies are doing it with no

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 13>alcohol spirits now and they're also pushing you in bigen

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 13>and tonic or already drink gin and tire and stuff

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 13>like that. So there's just a lot more choice to

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 13>the consumer than there was, you know, when I was

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 13>a kid, So it just takes a little bit of

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 13>a shine off. You can try new things, and I'd

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 13>say people are spending more or spending a similar amount

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 13>of arcoli just buying less of it in terms of volume.

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 13>So it's all about getting the value right. Premium brands

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 13>are doing well in Premium brand did very well in

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 13>these results, but it's only twenty four percent of their

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 13>overall volume, So you know, four point five percent on

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 13>twenty four percent doesn't sort of help.

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Part thinks Sid Duncan Fox Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Consumer Products analysts.

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg n EF,

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>previously known as a New Energy Finance.

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 4>They're the team at Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes as

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 4>the energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings,

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 4>and agriculture sectors. This week, we looked at the impact

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 4>of President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill on US clean

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 4>energy spending and on hydrogen For more.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Guest host John Tucker and I were joined by Martin Tangler,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg n EF's head of hydrogen Research. First to ask

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Martin how the Trump administration is impacting the hydrogen sector.

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Hydrogen was being portrayed, as you've kind of implied, as

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 5>this huge economic opportunity until recently, and if you've been

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 5>following the news, then you may have noticed that there

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 5>was There has been a lot less news on hydrogen

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 5>these days, with a couple exceptions, and I think this

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 5>was to be expected. The industry right now is what

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 5>we have called it bn EF and what Gardner of

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 5>course has called in their high cycle theorem a truffle disillusionment.

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.479
<v Speaker 5>So previously people were too excited. We had this this

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 5>inflated expectation about how much hygiene we were going to use,

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 5>and we were going to use it in cars, We're

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 5>going to use it in heating, We're going to use

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 5>it everywhere, and b and EF Bloomberg NEF you're saying, no,

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 5>that's not going to happen. Let's take a step back.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 5>And now we're kind of there. So we're seeing projects

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 5>canceled and fid's final investment decisions turning out not to

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 5>be final and being taken back. So what's the was

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 5>the problem? I would say problem number one is low demand.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of producers, a lot of companies want

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 5>to make this stuff, but not so many want to

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 5>buy it. Why do they not want to buy it?

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Because it's turned out to be more expensive, especially the

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 5>green kind hydien made from water with renewed electricity, And

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 5>why is that? Why is it expensive Because there's less

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 5>insufficient policy than people expected, which kind of brings us

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 5>now to Trump. So you're asking, what's going on with Trump?

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 5>What's going on in the US. So, of course the

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 5>obb B A but got the right number of bees

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 5>and one big beautiful bill Act got passed just recently,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 5>and that had a lot of impact on of course

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 5>clean energy and hydrogen as well. In one sentence, I

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 5>would say it cemented the dominance of blue hydrogen over green.

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 5>Of course, gray hydrogen one that we make from fossil

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 5>fuels without any carbon capture and storage. We don't care

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 5>how much we release. That's the one we make most

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 5>of today.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 12>Hydrogen.

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so blue hydrogen is hydrogen that's made the same

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 5>way as gray from fossil fuels, which is made from

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 5>natural gas, but where we try to capture some of

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 5>the CO two that's released in the process and as

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 5>you may be aware and of the Trump administration, they

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 5>like the CO two or CO two capture, so they've

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 5>improved some of the conditions for the forty five Q

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 5>tax credit. Many of the tax credits got canceled or revised,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 5>but the forty five Q for capture, carbon capture and

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 5>storage actually got better for blue hydrogen producers who now

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 5>can make more money if they do the enhanced oil

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:09.959
<v Speaker 5>recoveries that they pumped the CO two back into an

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 5>old field and extracted, they may now get the same

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 5>amount of money as if they were just to bury

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 5>that underground. So that's an improvement for blue hydrogen that's

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 5>come out of the obbb A.

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 12>The credits favor hydrogen that's kind of polluting and not

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 12>the stuff that's the good stuff.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 5>I think I know that I wouldn't I would not

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 5>go that far. So there's another kind of hydrogen's green,

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 5>which I also want to talk about, which is made

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 5>from renewables and the tax credits. There were very generous

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 5>tax credits for that called forty five V, and those

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 5>got scaled down very significantly. So you now must start

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 5>construction by the end of twenty twenty seven, as opposed

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 5>to end of twenty thirty two in order to be

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 5>eligible for this very generous tax credit that was passed

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 5>by the Biden administration in twenty twenty two. So that's

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 5>been a reduction in support for the green kind, which

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 5>is lower emissions, and improvement for the support very very

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 5>limited improvement, but some improvement in the support for blue

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 5>and then blue. There's a lot of questions around how

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 5>much of the carbon you actually capture, but you could

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 5>argue that you could capture ninety five percent, as much

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 5>as ninety five percent in some situations has not been

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 5>done yet but could be done. Then actually it's not

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 5>so unclean. So there's lots of people. Some say it's

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 5>it's it's very dirty, but others say it's it's it

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 5>can be quite clean.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Martin.

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 2>To the extent that this administration is not as supportive

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of the energy transition that led let us say, is

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe some other administrations, What does that mean for the

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 2>global trends here?

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 3>How important is.

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 2>The US in terms of this global transition to alternative

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 2>energy sources?

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 5>Well, I don't think I have the expertise to talk

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 5>about more broadly alternative energy sources more broadly, but certainly

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 5>in terms of hydrogen again, which is my field. I

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 5>would argue the US is very important to the people.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 5>When the tax credits were announced back in twenty twenty two,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 5>everybody was really really afraid that the US would jump

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 5>in and take over everything in hydrogen. And then people

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 5>were waiting and waiting for the final guidance on these credits,

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 5>which came very very late, and the US actually did

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 5>not become a leader, but it can still be a

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 5>leader on exports of especially that blue hydrogen that I

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 5>talked about. The Japanese, the Koreans they're keen to import

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 5>some of it to burn in power plants, which we

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 5>have a whole series of report reports that says bad idea.

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 5>But if the Japanese, Japanese and the Koreans want to

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 5>do it, then I think the US is there and

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 5>ready to sell that, and that actually happened. So we

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 5>had a deal between for example, CF Industries and a

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 5>couple of Japanese companies to sell that blue ammonia, which

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 5>is a chemical made out of hydrogen to be burned

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 5>in Japanese power plants are used in steel plants in Japan.

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 5>And then you've got Europe, which is very very focused

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 5>on green hydrogen. They really want to adopt green as

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 5>opposed to blue to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. But

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 5>we still see an opportunity for blue hydrogen from the

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 5>US being exported to Europe if the carbon price is

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 5>here in Europe rise to the levels that we expect

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 5>them to rise to in twenty thirty at bnf.

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 4>R thanks to Martin Tangler, beenap's head of hydrogen research.

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal