WEBVTT - Hoops Tonight - Thunder STATEMENT win vs. Celtics, Steph & Warriors big win vs. Magic + Mailbag

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All I want for the holidays this year

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is some NBA action. This week, new customers can score

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty instantly in bonus bets just for

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>betting five bucks an instant dub just for you guys.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>The MVP odds are heating ups. Just you guys know.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>On DraftKings to Day December eighteenth, Nikola jokicch plus two ten,

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Luka Doncic plus four hundred, Joel Embiid plus four twenty

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>five shake kills Us, Alexander plus nine hundred, Yannis plus

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred, Jason Tatum plus eighteen hundred. Download the Draftking

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Sports Book AP now and use code hoops. New customers

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>can get one hundred and fifty instantly in bonus bets

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for betting just five dollars on basketball only on DraftKings

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Sportsbook with code hoops. The Crown is yours. Gambling problem

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred gambler or visit www dot one

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler dot net. In New York, call eight

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>seven seven to eight hope and why, or text hope

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and why to four six seven three sixt nine. In Connecticut,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>help is available for problem gambling. Call eight eight eight

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>seven eight nine seven seven seven seven, or visit CCPG

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and Resort in Kansas. Twenty one plus age varies by jurisdiction,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>eight hours after issuance. See dkang dot com slash basketball

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for eligibility and deposit restrictions, terms and responsible gaming resources.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome to tonight. You're at the volume. Happy Wednesday, everybody.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Hope all of you guys are having a great first

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>week of the year. We have an awesome show today,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that epic showdown between the Celtics and the Thunder. We're

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be breaking that game down from the perspective of

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>both teams. The Golden State Warrior it's got a huge

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>win against the Orlando Magic last night, one that they

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>very badly needed as the Magic continue their slide. And

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>then we have three mail bad questions for the end

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of the show as well. You guys are the Joe

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Fourget started subscribe to a brand new YouTube channel. I

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot to me if you guys would take

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a second to scroll down and hit that subscribe button.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget about our podcast feeds. Wherever you get your

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>podcasts under Hoops Tonight, follow me on Twitter at Underscore

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Jason lt That's where I put film threads on most

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>mornings as well as show announcements. I did a film

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>thread on both of today's games, including an extensive film

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>thread on Celtics thunders. You guys can find that on

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed. And the last but not least, keep

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>dropping mail bad questions in the YouTube comments so we

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>can keep hitting them throughout the week. All right, Well,

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a showdown between the top two teams in

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>my power rankings yesterday and it did not disappoint. And

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, early on there was a very specific matchup

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that was going horribly for the Celtics. We talked a

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lot about Boston's defensive personnel and there's a lot of

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on Jason Tatum, who I think is capable of

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>being one of the best permit defenders in the league

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>when he's locked in. You saw some of that against

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Shake Guild just Alexander down the stretch of this game.

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown is another wing athlete. Christaps Porzingis has a

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>rim protector. Al Horford is the excellent team defender, the

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>guy that can cause Joel Embiid problems. And there's a

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of focus in those departments. But the Celtics actually

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have one of the best defensive guard course that you'll

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>find in the league. Derek White and Drew Holliday are

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>both excellent guard defenders, and Shay was just cooking those dudes.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Outside of a late possession where Derek White got to

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>stop on shake Guildes Alexander, it was a lot of

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>him just going right around those guys and either finishing

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at the rim or wrecking havoc with the pass. And

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically Drew Holliday just looked like he was stuck in

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the mud in this game. He was bad on both

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>ends too, freight from the field with three turnovers on

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the other end, but really really struggled defensively. Got benched

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for Peyton Pritchard late in the game. Derek White did

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a better job on both ends of the floor, but

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>he struggled to stay in front of shit. That was

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the key matchup early on. And then the other thing

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that I thought the Thunder did really well is they

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>attacked Porzingis when he was roaming off the ball. This

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that we see a lot around the

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>league these days is taking your primary rim protector and

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just putting them on the worst offensive player from the

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>other team, at least the worst off ball other player

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>right or offensive player, And then that puts you in

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a position where you know you might concede some catch

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>and shoot threes to that guy, but if he's roaming

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>around wrecking havoc on all of the other action elsewhere

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on the floor, it can be a beneficial trade off

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for you. Right. But what the Thunder did, which I

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>thought was really smart, is again porzingis in that case,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>his focus is on the other four guys. He's not

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>hyper concerned with what the bad offensive player is doing.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>He spent most of the game on Josh Giddy and

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a good amount of it on Aaron Wiggins as well.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I liked is they just

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>look to get Josh Giddy the ball one way or another.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>There was a you know, a play where they had

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Giddy with the ball the right elbow and it's all

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this other action going on, and it looks like it's

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>designed to get someone else the ball, But then Josh

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Gitty just rips to the left and gets by Porzingis

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and gets an and one off the glass. He hit

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>another three in Porzingis's face in the right corner on

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a play where Porzingis was just being a little passive

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because he's not worried necessarily about Josh Gitty as a scorer.

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gitty hit a second half three off of a

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>dig down, hit a couple of threes. There was a

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>play where he was on Aaron Wiggins and he's watching

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the floor and they just backscreen for

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>him and Aaron Wiggins cuts along the baseline that hit

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>him and he gets a wide open layup. It's a

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>very important, you know, counter when they have a guy

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're using as a roamer to make sure that

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he also has to account for the guy that he's

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>actually guarding. And you know, one of the other things too.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've talked about this on the show before. This

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is another common theme around the league where it's like,

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't think this guy can shoot, so let's just

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>give him wide open looks. And they did that with

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gitty again, and it's like, I understand that as

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 1>an initial strategy, but I think you need an audible

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>from it quickly, because one these guys are pros and

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>two most bad shooters in the NBA are actually streaky shooters,

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and if they start to feel good with their shot,

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they can really knock him down. And so it's one

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of those things where like it's one thing if you

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>leave him wide open and he misses the first one,

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he might spiral mentally, and that might be a good

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>strategy for you the rest of the game. I'll give

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you an example like the like when the Lakers decided

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to ignore Miles Turner in the n Season Tournament championship game.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>He ended up going one for five. It worked out.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The one he made was late in the game. He

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>had already missed a bunch of them, right, It's like

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that worked out in that case. But there have been

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>plenty of examples this year where the Lakers ignored a

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>guy I think like Dante Xum from the Mavericks, and

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>he keeps making shots and they keep ignoring him, and

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>it's like, this is a professional basketball player. He's gonna

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>make shots, right, And so they conceded the open threes

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to Josh Gidty, and instead of adjusting when Josh Getty

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>started making them, he kept making them. He ended up

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hitting two massive ones late in the game. And then

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>for Boston, their best success was coming from their two

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>man game with Jason Tatum and Derek White, or Jayson

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Tatum with Peyton Pritchard. And the main reason why they

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>were having success there is, again, you've got a bigger

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>defender loudort On Jason Tatum, who they do not want

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to switch under any circumstances. And then you've got these

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>smaller guards, you're thinner guards guarding Peyton Pritchard or Derek White,

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and so they don't want to switch and they don't

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want to hedge because those guys, you know, Derek White

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and Peyton Pritchard can both shoot, you know, catch and

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>shoot threes off the move relatively easy. Derek White's been

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>killing teams with that this year, and so they were

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>able to get a lot of paint touches out of it.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the primary driving force of Boston's offensive success,

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>although they did have a lot of the typical offensive

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>issues you come to expect from Boston, like Tatum hunting

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>pull up threes. He took seven more pull up jump

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>shots in this game, leading to only six points. That's

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>been a consistent theme throughout this season and then as

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a team just taking a lot of like early clock,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more difficult threes rather than you know, running some offense

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to get higher quality shots, and so okay,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>so he started to pull away. In that third quarter,

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they started to get hot with their three point shooting

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>right like. They hit two quick threes to start the

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>third quarter which quickly get them the lead, and then

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they just start to slowly pull away, and then the

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Thunder bench really grew the lead. In the early fourth quarter.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Williams Jay will the backup center, ended up hitting

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge above the break three on the left wing,

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>basically in a bailout situation at the end of the clock.

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>That felt like free money. That was an awesome shot.

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Vasili J Mitchitch had a really nice like pump fake

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>drive a closed out kickout pass to Keason Wallace in

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the right corner which he made Jadub Jaylen Williams was

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>starting forward. He ended up hitting a nasty little driving

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>fade away over Luke Cornett and then suddenly the thunder

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>were up eighteen and it seemed like the game was over.

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But then the Celtics made a run and they were

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>awesome on offense. In this run a lot of the

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>same things I was just talking about. Derek White hit

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of wing threes, actually scored on ten consecutive

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>possessions up until Jaln Brown's garbage time three late in

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the game when it was already over, and they made

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it into a game. But when you're down eighteen, you

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>have to play perfect defensively, and they just gave up

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>too many baskets on the other end against the Shake

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Gilders Alexander Chet Homegrin pick and roll action and so

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>what I want to do here, which is what I

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thought was the most interesting part of this game. Down

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the stretch, when Boston really locked in and tried to

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>make it a game, they put Jason Tatum on Shake

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Gildos Alexander, and then from there Shay started spamming the

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Chet pick and roll to try to get easy shots

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that Jason Tatum was causing some disruptions

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ball. And from there a really interesting chess

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>match took place, one that kind of reminded me of

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the type of adjustments that you see in a playoff series,

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to dive into that. On a possession

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>by possession basis. So first time they were on the

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>pick and pop. Now again, just imagine shake gild A

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Sallex Enter on the ball. Chet comes to set the screen.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Porzingis is basically showing to help Tatum as she's coming

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>over the top of that screen, and Chet is popping

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to the three point line. So the first time they

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>run it, Peyton Pritchard rotates off of j Dub and

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they actually end up forcing a turnover. So the second

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>time they do it, for whatever reason, Pritchard just doesn't rotate.

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>He's guarding Josh Giddy this time in the left corner.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Shay comes off the screen, Chet pops to the left

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>wing extended, and Pritchard just doesn't rotate for whatever reason,

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>even though he just did on the previous possession, and

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Chet hits the wide open three. Important note because Chet

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on unguarded catch and shoot jump shots this year is

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>shooting forty seven percent. That's one point four to two

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>points per shot, so that's something that you can never

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>afford to do. And from there we start to see

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the beginnings of a personnel shortcoming for Boston. That's showing

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to the surface, which is basically that Porzingis is not

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>fast enough to show on ball screen while recovering to

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Chet at the three point line. No shame in that.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>There's like two centers in the league that can do that,

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe three, like go Bear Anthony Davis and and you know,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Bam out of Bio maybe Draymond. Like there's only a

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>small handful of guys that are that are fast enough

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So there's no shame in that. But

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that was the personnel shortcoming that they started to have.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Right so, third time down the floor they go to

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>run that that same pick and pop action. Right this time,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown is the weak side guy in position to rotate.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>He actually stunts into the passing lane and then recovers

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 1>it gets Shay to hesitate. Chet's not open anymore, Porzingis

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>can recover. Now Shay's stuck on an island with Jason Tatum.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what the that's what that little dig down rotation

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>or fake, little you know, stunt into the passing lane

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that Jaylen Brown accomplished. It gave Jason Tatum the opportunity

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to guard Shae on an island and try to get

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a stop. Shae goes left, gets to a pump fake

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and Tatum jumps out of his shoes and lands on

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>top of Shae, sends him to the foul line. Right,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So we've run it three times now and the Thunder

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have gotten a bucket on two of the possessions. Five

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>points and three possessions. So spamming that action again. There's

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so much focus on, you know, the individual defense. It's like, oh,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Jason Tatum on Shae Gilde Alexander and I understand people

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>want basketball to be one on one so bad, but

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just not that. It's it's all about a five

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>man unit and what they can accomplish together. This is

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a great example of how like, even if you have

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a great person to throw at an individual, if they

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have an action they can run that brings multiple defenders

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>into the action, they can have success. And again, like

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>even if Tatum does a better job and gets a

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>stop on Shae there because of the pick and popp

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>or they give up the basket, that would still be

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>three points and three possessions. So we get our first

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>major adjustment. On the fourth possession down the floor, the

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Thunder go back to that Shade Chet pick and pop.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>This time, though Boston switches Derek White onto Chet home

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>and in the possession when shit in the idea there

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is just you're putting an athlete. You're putting a much

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>faster player, bringing more foot speed into the action. And

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so Derek White can kind of soft hedge and be

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there to help as the screen is going by, but

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>then he has the speed to recover to Chet. So

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on this possession, Shay ends up throwing a kickback pass

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to Chet, who tries to drive on Derek White. Derek

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>White guesses the close out angle right beats Chet to

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that right hand drive and ends up taking the ball away,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so they end up getting a stop. And one of

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the interesting things there, there's two little adjustments I think

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that you'd see from the Thunder in a playoff series

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if they kept doing that. One, give the ball to

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Chet at the foul line and just let him go

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to work against Derek White. I think I think he's

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated that he can have success there. And then two,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chet was setting a lot of ghost screens

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch, and there's a very important distinction between

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>when to ghost screen and when to actually screen. So

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, what is a ghost screen. A ghost

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>screen is when I run up like I'm gonna set

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a screen, but without actually setting one. I basically just

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>get right to where I'm about to set a screen,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and then I shoot off to the three point line.

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And basically the idea there is I'm trying to get

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>my guy to hedge, because if he hedges and I

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>slip out, I have an opportunity for a quick catch

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and shoot three or a lot of times you'll see

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that and pick and roll from big guys slipping to

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the short role and they're looking for an opportunity to

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>catch that over the top pass. But it only is

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>open if the guy hedges, right. If the guy doesn't

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hedge and he's staying home, then it's actually more important

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>for you to set a screen because if you set

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the screen and the guy's not actually hedging, your defender

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is not actually hedging, then I might be able to

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>actually set a solid screen on Jason Tatum, which would

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get Shaite downhill right. And so that was one other

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>adjustment I think they would have picked up on film

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in a playoff series. It's like, hey, when they put

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Derek White on you, we need to read whether or

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not he's hedging. He's not hedging. We need to set

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>solid screens and try to get Shaye separation from Jason

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Tatum so he can get downhill. So fifth time down

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the floor, this Derek White adjustment has caused some problems,

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so they go to a double drag action. They bring

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>two screeners up into the action. I think it was

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren if I remember correctly, and

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on that possession, it ends up leading to a switch

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>from Boston, Shay gets Derek White on him. This is

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>when Derek White gets that key stop that I was

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>telling you guys about, although Jalen Brown ends up getting

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>beat back door basically by Lou Dort for offensive rebound

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>put back. So the sixth time down the floor they

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>go back to Porzingis on. Chet still goes screening, not

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>setting good screens, and what ends up happening is the

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>pop's not open because Chet's not setting a good screen

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and Porzingis is in a really soft coverage. He's not

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>back in a He's back instead of up in the hedge,

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so it ends up in his Shae Tatum iso. Anyway,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Shay's icing isolating Tatum on the left wing. Christops Porzingis

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is guarding Chet Holmgren, but he's way down at the

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>foul line. Okay, and again this is an example of

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.119
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. Tatum, good one on one defender, hasn't.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>The only score Shay has on him at this point

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is a pump fake foul, which Tatum's probably not gonna

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fall for the next time. Right, So instead of letting

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Tatum guard Shay, Porzingis is way too far in help,

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Shay just throws an easy kickout pass to Chet at

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the above the break and he knocks down yet another three.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Like we mentioned earlier, that's an extremely high percentage shot.

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You could argue Chet's one of the best standstill shooters

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in the league. So bad help. Another big defensive mistake

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>from Boston as they get another basket. So, for those

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of you guys keeping track, we had five points through

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>three possessions. They didn't score on the fourth, so five

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>through four. They get an offensive rebound put back on

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the fifth, so we're up to seven on five, and

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>then on the sixth possession they give up a three.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we've given up ten points in six possessions. So again,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Boston literally scored on ten consecutive possessions down the stretch

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of the game, but they gave up baskets give up

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>ten points on six possessions, which ends up being basically

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>what prevents Boston from ever getting the opportunity to gain

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the lead seventh time. Down the floor, they go back

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to Derek White on Chet Holmgren. It's a really interesting

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>possession where they just had a lot of struggle with

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this a couple possessions ago, so they don't bring Chet

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>into the action. On the other side, you could see

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Josh Giddy and Jalen Williams kind of debating which one

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of them should go set the screen. They hesitate too long,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Shay has no choice but to attack Jason Tatum and Iso.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>That's when he takes the really really difficult fade away,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>drifting into the baseline along the right block and he

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>ends up missing there. So in total ten points over

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>seven possessions, basically looking at Shay heliocentric ballscreen game right

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so down the stretch after as we see there, because

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>they started to figure it out with the Derek White

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on chrisops Porzingis thing, there were defensive mistakes in there

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that still led to ten points for the Thunder on

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>seven possessions, but from a schematic standpoint, they figured out Now,

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>if we have Eric White on krisops Porzingis and we

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have Jason Tatum on Shay, they don't get the same

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>high quality shots. As long as we follow our defensive

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>principles elsewhere on the floor, go to a good step

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>for the Celtics, Right, But I always talk about diversity

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of shot creation. Shay is a shifty skill guard, right,

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Williams is a downhill athlete. This is why I

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>always talk about like the spamming actions or heliocentric basketball

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>should be used in short bursts. Identify your advantage, get

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 1>whatever you can out of it. When the adjustments are

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>made and they've started to figure it out audible quickly,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that happens in basketball is you

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>see the same thing over and over and over and

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>over again. The defense just kind of figures out how

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to guard it just by virtue of they practiced guarding

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it over the course of the previous dozen possessions. Right,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's important to know when you've kind of squeezed

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the sponge for all it's worth, make an adjustment down

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. All Jalen Williams. The last couple of possessions,

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Williams Peyton Pritchard on him. Key mistake here. I

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>thought from Boston as well, Drew Holliday didn't play particularly well.

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't even say didn't play. Drew Holliday was garbage

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game. It's not a good Drew Holida game.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>He'd be the first person to tell you that it happens.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Sometime guys play. Sometimes guys play bad games. Right, But

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mizoula ends up going with Peyton Pritchard down the

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>stretch of the game. This is where it's a personnel

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>shortcoming because Jalen Williams is like, wow, I have Peyton

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Pritchard on me. I'm going right through this dude, And

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he just drives right into him, bullies in with the

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>shoulder behind the back. Drouble goes into the lane and

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>draws a foul and gets to the foul line right,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So easy bucket. And again, do you remember how I

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>said Derek White got a key stop on Shaye Late

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You actually, if I remember correctly, you got a second

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>one too, on a step back three that Shaye took

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in between these two possessions. But like again, it's because

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Derek White got lots of possessions and at the end

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of the game he was focused enough to play really

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>good defense. Right. I would have given Drew that same leeway.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd have been like, you've played like shit tonight, no worries,

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Go get a stop for me. Now, go get a

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>stop for me. Go do what you've done your entire career.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Go get a stop. And instead, like Drew Holliday, even

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on a bad night, just has a much better chance

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of staying in front of Jalen Williams in that situation

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>than Peyton Pritchard does. I thought that was a mistake.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Next two trips down the floor, the previous the one

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>after that, shake Kyils Alexander ended up I think taking

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a step back three over Shakekil's with Alexander if I

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly, or excuse me, over Derek White if I

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly. But then the last one, Shay's got Jason

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Tatum on him and Jalen Williams has Derek White on him,

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and they end up going with a kind of like

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a quick little dribble handoff to get a switch. And

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>now Jalen Williams is coming down against Jason Tatum. Jason

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Tatum is in a trail position, he's in a passive switch,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>So like there's a difference between switching aggressively, meaning like

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I set the screen and my guy just shows hard

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and like applies ball pressure versus like a really passive switch,

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where like when he's coming off the screen, the guy's

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of waiting for him below the level of the screen.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>And you might ask yourself, why in the world is

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Williams looking to attack Jason Tatum down the stretch

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of one of the smaller Boston guards, And the

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>answer is simple, Jason Tatum was so far back on

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>his heels. Jay Dubb just hit the jets, and like,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Jason Tatum is a better athlete than Jay Dubb, but

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>not when he's got a running start like that, JDub

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>ends up getting downhill and taking that little short fade

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>away over the top that ends up being the dagger.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Really really impressive move, a great example of diversity of

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>shot creation, right, Like your skill guard spammed an action

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for ten possessions or seven possessions and got you ten points.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That was great, But towards the end it became clear

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that Boston was starting to figure out the action right

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and they were weaponizing their two best defensive players on

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>SCHET in on SGA right, So you had another matchup

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that you could go to with a different perimeter shot

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>creator in Jalen Williams that provides a different style of

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>shot creation, real downhill force. He ends up getting downhill

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>twice at the end of the game and getting you

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>four points out of it. That was a perfect example

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of that specific dynamic you know. On the Boston front,

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>their offense was fine. Again, there were some bad shots

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in that fourth quarter. Tatum took a couple of bad

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>step back threes that I really didn't like. But before

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brown's three at the end of the game, when

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the game was basically over, Boston scored on ten straight possessions.

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So offense wasn't the story of this particular game. Now

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it is worth mentioning part of the reason they went

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>down eighteen was bad offense. A lot of the things

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I talked about earlier, bad pull up jump shots, bad

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>early clock threes when they could have gotten better shots.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 1>But that's where the game was lost. And then you

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially find yourself in a position where you have to

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>play perfect down the stretch, and it's like you scored

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ten straight times great, but the Thunder ended up getting

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>something like I want to say it was it was

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>four points in their final three possessions, So that'd be

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen points over their final ten possessions. And that's one

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>offensive rating that's not gonna be enough to get it

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>done when you're down eighteen early in the fourth quarter.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So the next question is are the Thunder a legitimate

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>championship contender. This is a team that I have waited

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>up until this point to add to my championship contender

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>list for a lot of different reasons that we don't

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>have to get into. But let's take a deep let's

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>take a deeper look at it. So the key factors

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that I look at with championship contenders right half court offense,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>half court defense. They're top five in both categories. They're

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the number one half court offense in the league right now.

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They have diversity of shot creation right like, they've got

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a shifty guard that's more of a skill guard. They

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>have like an athletic guard in Jalen Williams. They've got

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a skill big to kind of tie it all together.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't really have as much power in the lineup

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>as i'd like like Jalen Williams is really the only

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>guy that brings power, and that's one concern to me

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think power offenses thrive in the playoffs more

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>than skill offenses do in a lot of cases. But

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to put it simply, I don't think this team is

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle to score in the playoffs. I think

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they have enough on that end of the floor. Now. Defensively,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they have versatility in terms of their coverages right like,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they're good in drop coverage. They have an excellent point

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of attack defender to throw out the best players in

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the league, and Loud Dort. I actually loud Dort's become

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, one of the most valuable players in

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the league with his ability to guard the best perimeter

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>weapons in the league while well being difficult to screen

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>while being a plus offensive player. On the other end

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of the floor, they have a really good rim protector

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and chet Holmgren. So that's kind of the two brackets

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of drop coverage concept. Right. They also

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>have switchability to like they don't have a lot of

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>easy targets, and they're good in help side. I have

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>two major concerns with the Thunder. Their overall physicality. Boston

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>made nine field goals in the paint in that fourth quarter,

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>they had four offensive rebounds. Just in the fourth quarter,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they scored on ten consecutive possessions down the stretches. I've

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>said several times already Boston had a one to thirty

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>seven offensive rating in that quarter. I think I think

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they showed a good example of how okay, so he's

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a little on the thin side, they're not. You know,

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they have some stout players, guys like Lou Dorton Jalen Williams,

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but almost every other guy on the roster is thin

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and somebody that can be physically bullied in some cases,

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that just makes it a little

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>bit tougher when games turn into rock fights, right. And

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>then lastly, the inability to rebound. They gave up an

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 1>off They give up an offensive rebound on thirty three

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of their opponent's misses this year. That is the

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>second worst mark in the league, which I think would

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be a problem in a seven gamer. That said, I

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>do want to add them to my contender's list, So

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the question is where you can. And one last note

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on the contender piece too, I think part of it

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is Shay, Like, Shay is just reaching that point now

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.959
<v Speaker 1>where he's a top tier superstar and we have to

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>include him in the list of guys that can definitely

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be the best player on a championship team. Like, here's

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Is Tatum a better playoff player overall? Probably?

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I said out a poll earlier, like who would

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you take in a playoffs with two early even teams

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter? And it's like sixty forty favoring SGA. At

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>this point, I actually sided more with Tatum just because

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>he's way more experienced, which I've always thought matters when

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you get to that level. And two, Tatum really can

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>inflict the game physically, Like he can really put his

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>physical imprint on a playoff series in a way that

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>he didn't used to be able to. I think something

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>silly like him switching on to Shay and really doing

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a nice job down the stretch of this game is

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a great example of impact that extends beyond half court

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>shot creation. But Shay is clearly much better in the

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>chess match, Like he's one of the best chess match

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>players in the league. There's only a small handful of

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that'd take over him. So and I think it

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would translate well to the postseason. So I do think

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder are a contender. The question is where. So

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to update my contender tier. I still have

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Denver at one, Boston at two, then a drop off.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I have Milwaukee at three, the Lakers at four. I'm

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna put the Thunder in at five, and then I

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>have the Wolves at six, the Suns at seven, the

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Warriors at eight, and all of these teams I think

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>need a trade to take a step up, as I've

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about all season, to get into that Denver Boston tier.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Milwaukee needs an excellent point of attack defender,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>something they do not have on the roster. I think

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers need a point of attack defender that can

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>also play off the ball. Their primary offensive players are

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>not good enough offensively. Like the Bucks, I think can

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>get away with a more limited offensive point of attack

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>defender by virtue of the fact that their half court

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>offense has been so good because of Damon Giannis. Right

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like that to me is they have a little bit

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>more margin for error there. The Lakers need like a

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>legit two way guy. They need a guy that can

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>defend at the point of attack. Slot Torrian prints onto

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lesser defense defensive assignments, and that is a plus offensive player.

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>The Thunder I think absolutely need a low man, something

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about all season. They need a big

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>forward that can slot between Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren,

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that moves John to the bench, that can help them

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in help defense situations, that can help them in rock fights,

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that can help them on the defensive glass. That to

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>me is the need that they need to fulfill to

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>get back up into that top tier with Denver and Boston.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>They're way more talented than even the Lakers, than even Milwaukee,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the Thunder arguably have some of the most talent

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the league. They're a lot closer to Boston than

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody else's in terms of like total talent down the roster.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But they're super young, and they're super inexperienced, and everything

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about NBA history tells us those teams type tend to underachieve.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Super young, super inexperienced, super thin and small. That to

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>me is what kind of keeps them down right now.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>A veteran forward that can help them with their size

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and physicality, that would go a long way to addressing

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those problems and getting them up into

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that list. The Wolves, I don't really even know if

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a trade that would get them into that top tier.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little concerned just in general about their half

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>court offense, and I don't think that there's necessarily a

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>move they can make. It really just comes down to

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>they're six for me, but their pathway to winning is

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>aunt just goes up a crazy level in the playoffs

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and out executes all the best shot creators in the league.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>But I just find that to be somewhat unlikely. The Suns,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they desperately need some sort of perimeter forward that can

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>play on both ends of the ball, a type of

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>player that we've been talking about for a while, but

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically a physical forward basically think of like a bigger,

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>stronger version of Eric Gordon. That's what they need, is

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like a big forward that can defend that can also shoot.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that they have the resources to

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.959
<v Speaker 1>actually make that a sort of move, So I kind

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of view them as a long shot contender. And then

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors, to me, if they get a star, like

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>if they a secondary star, like if they flip Kaminga

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Paul for Pascal siakam Or Kamenha and Chris

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Paul for Jeremy Grant Or Kamena and Chris Paul and

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>picks for Lori Markinen, like, I just think they instantly

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>become one of the best teams in the league because

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's Steph Curry, it's Straymond Green, it's Klay Thompson, it's

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wiggins, and it's a a really really good secondary

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>star forward. I think that team is in that top tier.

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's where they shake out as for now as

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it pertains to the Thunder. In the big picture, would

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine get them a couple seasons a playoff

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>experience and give them a little bit a year's in

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the weight room and years of just experience and growth

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and just growing into a grown man basketball team. And

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be a perennial top tier championship contender.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Like every year, They're gonna be in that Denver Boston tier.

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It feels like almost a certainty for me at this point.

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>The Boston Oklahoma City matchup, I thought Boston showed down

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the stretch that they can have some success slowing down

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder offense, and they show that they have lots

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of physical advantages all over the floor in terms of strength.

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a pretty clear takeaway from that

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter run that Boston had. If they started a

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>seven game series tomorrow, I think I'd pick Boston to

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>win in six or seven, depending on who had home court. Again,

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think those physical advantages would wear them down

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the series. But a very very

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>very entertaining example of that matchup that we got to

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>see last night. All Right, moving on to Magic Warriors.

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not gonna go too long on this game,

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but the Magic ended up going up ninety three ninety

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>two on a Franz Wagner layup with eight minutes and

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty three seconds left. Then they go on a defensive run. Now,

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>if you really look at the Warriors post Draymond Green suspension,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>they've not been a very good defensive team. If I

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly, I think they're nineteenth in defense since the

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Draymond Green suspension. But you can win games with defensive

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>runs as long as you have the offense to actually

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>turn that run into a lead. Right, So it's ninety three,

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, it's ninety three ninety two with eight thirty

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>three left in the fourth quarter and the Warriors give

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>up just ten points over the next seven and a

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>half minutes as they take an eleven point lead and

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of key contributions. I thought Klay Thompson did

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a really nice job in Pala Mancarro. He got him

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a few times with the bully ball, but down the

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>stretch he got several stops in a row. Really nice

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>job absorbing contact and then attacking the shooting pocket. Again.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to size mismatches in the post, defensively,

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you do not want to try to challenge up top.

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You want to disrupt the base and disrupt the shooting

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pocket those so you want to absorb blows to where

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not getting easy easy lift close to the basket,

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and then when he exposes the basketball low, you have

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to attack it there. If you attack it high, those

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>dudes are trained to finish over contests all day long,

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>especially when they have size. But when you attack the

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>shooting pocket you can disrupt that motion. You get a

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>key strip on Paalow late in the game. I thought

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Clay was awesome. It's a great example of I wrote

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in my notes, losing the battle but winning the war

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there were times when Paalow scored on on Clay in

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>just bullyball possessions. But again it's like, if you can,

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, over a seven possession sample over the course

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the game, hold him to two or three buckets,

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>then you've done your job. And I thought Clay did

0:32:57.960 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>his job. I thought Brandon Pizemski had a really nice

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>defense game, digging down into passing lanes and driving lanes

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and getting steals and deflections. He was also doing a

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really nice job peeling off and boxing out the center.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the most important jobs in defensive rebounding.

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Is like somebody shoots the ball and your rim protector

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>has to leave his man to go contest a shot.

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Trace Jackson Davis leaves his man a lot to try

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to block shots, which a team like Orlando can have

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>success on the offensive glass in that vacancy that opens

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>up there. But I thought Pazemski was doing a really

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>nice job of boxing that man underneath the backboard whenever

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he had an opportunity when Trace Jackson Davis was going away,

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>which helped them on the defensive glass. Trace in general,

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought, had a really good game. Another example of

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that high motor athlete. I've always been talking about just

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>active hands, smart help. Had some key contests at the

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>rim late in the game. A block on a Lobb

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>pass on a Jalen Suggs close out attack, a block

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on a Mo Wagner post up when Movanger was bowling

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>his way to the rim, a lot trace was awesome.

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Johnathan Kaminga had a big block on a Jalen Suggs

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>baseline drive late in the game, and he was in

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>good position on his weak side rotations. Just a really,

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>really good defensive effort from a lot of key guys

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>as the Warriors went on a defensive run. As matter

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of fact, they ended up scoring five points just off

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of turnovers in that fourth quarter. I think Klay had

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a really good offensive quarter in the fourth. He hit

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the big three after the Magic went up ninety three

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to ninety two. He hit a classic Klay Thompson movement

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>three coming off a screen towards his right to put

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>them back up ninety five to ninety three. Very next possession,

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he hit Tray Jackson Davis slipping the same action again

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>makes the three pulls the hedge pulls the screen defender

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>further out. The second time able to hit the slip,

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>he ended up getting free throws at it. He had

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a transition runout dunk, and then he had a big

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>backcut for a layup late in the game when Steph

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was running the point. But most importantly, Steph got his

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>groove back, something that we've been waiting on for a while.

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Steph's previous ten games twenty three points, three rebounds, five

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>assists per game, forty one percent from the field in

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty six percent from three. It's really hard to win

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>when your superstars playing bad basketball, and Steph was playing

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>bad basketball by his standards, But last night looked like

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the real Steph had a lot of success late in

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the game attacking Goga Patadz and pick and roll, particularly

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 1>splitting that action so when Goga hedges, he had an

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to kind of shoot that gap, beat him for

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a layup once. Then he snaked to the pick and

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>roll and dragged him out to the right wing in

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a switch and hit a three in his face. Had

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>some success against Jalen Suggs, beating him off the dribble,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and got to a nice step back three in the

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter as well. Just looked like the real Steph

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty six points and six assists on twenty shots. A

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of other shout outs. I thought Andrew Wiggins had

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of key scores in the second half on

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Gary Harris in post ups. Big part of the Warriors

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>offense right now is attacking mismatches with their wings. Jonathan

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Kaminga had four assists last night. That's only the second

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>time this season he's had four assists in a game.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Tends to play on an island a lot, right, Like

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>when he's running out in transition or when he's attacking

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the post, he can be really good. He

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>scored in the post again on Anthony Black, drawing a foul.

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>He's up to fifty six post ups this year, including

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>passes leading to one point one to one points per possession,

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>which is excellent. When he shoots out of the post,

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>he draws a foul twenty two percent of the time,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So like when he's on an island, he actually is

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>a very useful player. But the Warriors are not an

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on an island team very often, right, and so it's

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>important to be able to play in their normal motion.

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I thought Jonathan Minga did

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a really nice job of last night was doing the

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Draymond thing, which is when you catch the ball on

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter, your first thing is where's Steph? Where is Clay?

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Are they open? If they are, I'm gonna throw him

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball. And he was hovering around that top of

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the key area a lot and throwing those rifle swing

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>passes to those guys and got assists out of it.

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>He had four cysts, and I thought it was a key,

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>little like moment of growth from Jonathan Kaminga in terms

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of his role on this team. All right, moving on

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to the mail bag. So I've got four questions for

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys today before we get out of here. I

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>do have four. I said three earlier, but it's four.

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there are a lot of teams in

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>need of a starting caliber small forward this year. Who

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>are some names that you think could be on the

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>move and where they might be going? And on a

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>larger scale, what does this need say about the state

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the league in basketball? So it's not just small forwards.

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>I look at it more as like there's a lot

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of guys that need more of like a perimeter, two

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>way guy, and there are a lot of teams that

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>need for like a low man two way guys. So

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like the teams that need more of a perimeter two

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>way guy are like the Lakers and the Bucks. I

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>think the MAVs are another team that could be looking

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a smaller version of that type of deal,

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just as a guy that they could throw at the

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>best perimeter players in the league. It's been a lot

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.959
<v Speaker 1>of Derek Jones Junior to start this year, and and

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Derek Jones Junior is fine, but I think they could

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>use another option there. The teams that are looking for

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>more of a low man or like the Pacers or

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the Kings, or the Thunder or the Warriors, right like,

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>these are teams that have good perimeter defenders, but they

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>need help and interior physicality that those are examples of

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>those teams. The kind of raymind guys that I look

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>at this year that it could be available. Anybody from

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn is Brooklyn's falling apart, so look at Dorian Finney Smith.

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 1>McHale Bridges is another guy I think that could be

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>had potentially if the slide for Brooklyn continues. Alex Caruso

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Chicago Bulls is another guy. Javon Carter from

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bulls is another guy be looking at. He's

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>another guy that could be more affordable. There are a

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of those types of guys out there that I

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>think teams will be going after. Alex Cruso is up

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>over forty five percent from three this year, by the way,

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy the low man that I look at. There's

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>three big ones, Louri Markin and Jeremy Grant, Pascal Siakam,

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and they're all very different, right, Like Luri Markinen is

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>this like outstanding offensive play finisher, right just a dead

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>eye shooter, a guy that can screen and roll the rim,

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a guy that can beat mismatches in the post. Like

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 1>he's a just really like a imagine like a big

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>giant forward version of Klay Thompson. He's like a tip

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of the spear kind of guy. I think. I think

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>he's really valuable. Jeremy Grant is more of like a score.

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that like attacks mismatches in the post.

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>That all takes a lot of like ISO pull up

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>jump shots and stuff. But he's shooting the ball really

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>well off the catch this year and has been really

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>good and effective scoring out of the post. So I

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's more a lesser version of Lori markin In

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>for lack of a better term, but Jimmy Graan has

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>had some impressive moments of perimeter defense this year. I

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>still think he's got that in him if he's willing

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy into a role, and he's a guy that

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd be open to looking at, especially if you're a

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>team that can't get into the bidding war for Lori

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>markin In and then Pascal Siakam. This is a guy

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that I think both the Warriors and Lakers should be

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>calling on, mainly just because I view him as a

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.319
<v Speaker 1>guy that I think is one of the best available

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>players per value. He's you know, kind of gone under

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the radar in a lot of ways because he's not

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a very good shooter. But this is a guy who's

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a transcendent athlete. This is a guy that was so

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>damn athletic that Draymond Green was struggling to handle him

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty nineteen playoffs. Right, this is a guy that, like,

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>if you like, when he is asked to do a

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ton with the basketball, like he has the last couple

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>of years. He can be somewhat underwhelming as a postseason player, right,

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>but when he's in a position where he's playing alongside

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 1>guys who do a lot of that stuff for him,

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and he can really focus his effort and energy to

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>just inflicting his physicality on the game. He can be

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a game changing athlete. And so even though teams like

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors and Lakers might not be interested in him

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>from a shooting standpoint, I look at it as like,

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>just for the price for the caliber of player that

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>you're getting back, you put him like a wig in

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Siam Draymond frontline, a Siakam Lebron Anthony Davis frontline. Those

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are front lines that could like absolutely maul some of

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the bigger front lines in the league, even teams like

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Denver and so I think that that could be a

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>real swing piece this year that teams should be looking

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>out for. All right, next mail back question. All right,

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I actually missed a small part there. What does this

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>need say about the state of the league in basketball?

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Pretty quickly? I just think it's a clear indicator of

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the obvious fact that weak side responsibilities matter a lot,

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>or I should say role player responsibilities matter a lot.

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of teams this year that have

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>stars that are playing well that are not necessarily succeeding

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that they should, right, Like we've seen

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>this with Damon Giannis. I know they're doing good in

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the regular season in terms of standings, but they've lost

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of big games and struggled specifically because of

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>something silly like who's guarding the other team's point guard,

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Like who's picking up the in applying ball pressure during

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>this game? Like they just that singular role not being

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 1>filled has made it so that the Bucks look bad

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>in big games. That's a real problem to keep an

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>eye on, right. Like the Lakers, it's like Lebron James

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and Anthony Davis both playing way better than last year,

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>both like legitimately playing at a top ten level this season,

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and they're a five hundred basketball team in large part

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>because they don't have a guy that can pick up

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>at the point of attack and knock down a three

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at a high rate. Like it's a legitimate issue for them.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's these teams like Oklahoma City that have

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so much skill and they have a rim protector, or

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers as well, so much skill, have a rim protector,

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but not having a lowman, and you're seeing just how

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally important a lowman is in big time matchups, and

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's a As the game has become

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>more spread out and there's more talent on the floor,

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's become more important than ever to have guys that

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are willing to do the dirty work on both ends

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of the floor. Next question, do you honestly think the

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Suns will be healthy around playoff time? Knowing the injury

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>history of the three stars on their roster. So here's

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the thing, it's let's just say for this, I would

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:37.799
<v Speaker 1>say there's a good chance that they're healthy and there's

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a good chance they're not right, So let's just call

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it fifty to fifty. If it's fifty to fifty, there's

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>we all know that if they get hurt, they're not

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a threat. But that can be said about every team

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in the league. I believe that if the Nuggets lost

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Gordon or KCP or Michael Porter Junior, they would

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>go from being a top tier championship contender to the

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>lower tier. Like, lose a player and kicking you down

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a tier is a reality for every single team in

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, except for maybe Boston. Like maybe Boston could

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>afford an injury to one of their guys, right, But

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, like, no team really has that type

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of flexibility, And so when it really comes down to it,

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like, do you want should we just right off

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the Suns all year and be like, screw it, they're

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hurt. No, Like, we have to prepare for

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the potential, you know, eventuality that that they're healthy and

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>what could happen if they are. And I think that's

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of the way that we should cover them,

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense. A lot of Nuggets fans upset

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that I had them lower in my power rankings. I'll

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>just pull one comment here. Nuggets ranked too low. The

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>ten wins out of their last twelve games, played one

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 1>loss they let slip away and should have won. The

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>most recent was definitely an embarrassing performance. But they're nowhere

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>near as low as eight. So a couple things. My

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>power rankings are designed to be a vehicle with which

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I can honor or pay respect to teams play good

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>regular season basketball. That was one of the decisions we

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>made early in the year, Like, I don't want my

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>power rankings to be the same as my contender rankings.

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 1>The Nuggets are number one in my Contender rankings. There

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:13.479
<v Speaker 1>has not been a single moment this year, not even

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for a split second, not even during stretches when Jamal

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Murray was out and they looked bad, Like I have

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:23.479
<v Speaker 1>not even for a second doubted or had any sort

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of change of heart as it pertains to Denver being

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>number one on my Contender's list, Like I am, I

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 1>trust them more than everyone else, and it's not particularly close,

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and like I'm a big believer in Denver, right, But

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>they're nine and eleven against teams that are five hundred

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are better this year, and in my Power Rankings list,

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the teams that are above just have more impressive wins.

0:44:48.120 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm using that list, that specific list for regular

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 1>season kudos, and so that that's the purpose of that list.

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And so Denver fans like them being eight and in

0:45:01.200 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the Power rankings. More has to do with the fact

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that they've just been They've been a really good standings team.

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>They're fifteen to zero against below five hundred teams, which

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is what's carried them in the standings, but in the

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>bigger games, by the way, mostly because of things like

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Murray being out and Aaron Gordon missing a big

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>game against the thunder like there's no question. That's why,

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>which is why I'm not worried about them for the postseason.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>But but for my power rankings list, there are teams

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>out there that have been more impressive in terms of

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>winning big regular season games and just the totality of

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>regular season accomplishments. That's why I have Denver at eight

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point. It has nothing to do with what

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I see as their championship potential. Go look at the

0:45:43.360 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>teams I have above them, and look at them in

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>big games. Look at their key like signature wins this year.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Most of the teams above them have a lot more

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in that specific department. Last question, I started tweaking my

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>shooting form since I have bad habit of shooting with

0:45:57.360 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>way too high of an arc. How should I go

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about fixing it? How feasible is it to just lean

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>into it? Love the show, keep it up. So I

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have a philosophy of a shooting form, and it's a

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>philosophy of gain from coaching kids, because, as you can imagine,

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:12.479
<v Speaker 1>when you coach kids, you coach a lot of kids

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that bad shooting form. And it's really a simple to me,

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:19.759
<v Speaker 1>like there are a million different ways to shoot a basketball,

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's way less important to focus on

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the particulars of your release and more on little details

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like how is your balance, are you good at making

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sure you have a good wide base and going straight

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>up and down all the time, and getting good lift

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like that's step one, particularly because most shots in basketball

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 1>are on the move in some way, shape or form.

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Even when you're spotting up, you might be relocating, you

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 1>might have just played a lot of defense, and so

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you're tired. Legs and lift are a huge part of it.

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>From there, the second bit of it is like any

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>energy transfer is what I refer to it as, but

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>energy transfer is how do you get from your feet

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>through to the top of the shot in a way

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that has no wasted energy, that has no unnecessary movement,

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>which then creates a muscle memory that is simple that

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you can replicate. If you can do that, if you're

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>balanced and you have good energy transfer, meaning you have

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a good you know, routine that doesn't have wasted energy

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that you can that you can reproduce every single time.

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You can be a good shooter even if you shoot

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of arc, even if you shoot with

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:30.400
<v Speaker 1>very little arc, even if you shoot with opposite thumb,

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>even if you shoot with one hand, even if you

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>shoot without jumping super high, even if you jump while

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:39.160
<v Speaker 1>shooting or shooting, even if you shoot while jumping super high,

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that to me is way less important. Then do you

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have good lift? Are you doing the exact same thing

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>every time? It's got to be replicable, replicable. When I go,

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I shoot on the shooting machine at least twice a week,

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so I do a lot of different kinds of shooting drills.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I do a lot of like one person, one ball,

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>like movement shooting drills. That's that's where I do all

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:01.399
<v Speaker 1>my off the dribble and movements in the primary goal.

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>There is like trying to do game speed and like

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>add a lot of complication to it. Right when I'm

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on the shooting machine, I just do stand still shooting.

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And when I'm on the shooting machine, I have this

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:16.760
<v Speaker 1>constant mentality there are two shooting machines here, the machine

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that's throwing me the ball, and then me. I need

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to be a machine. How does the shooting machine get

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball to me in the same spot every single time?

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Because it's literally like a little catapult that's going like

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this and with the same spring on the same hinge,

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball to the same spot every single time. Right,

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I need to be as a shooter. I

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>need to have a form that like looks the exact

0:48:40.160 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>same every single time with very little wasted movement. And

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I need to look like a shooting machine. And if

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I do that, I'm going to be more consistent as

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a shooter. And so again I wouldn't focus so much

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>on this particulars of your form. Just make sure that

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you have good fluidity and energy transfer and make sure

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you have good lift, make sure you're doing the same

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 1>thing every single time. All right, guys, that is all

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I have for tonight. We'll be back tomorrow breaking down

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the packed Wednesday night slate as always. I appreciate you guys,

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see you then. The volume