WEBVTT - Tech News: Zuckerberg Gets Sued

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>He there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'mond executive producer with I Heart Radio. And

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. It's time for the tech

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>news for Tuesday, May twenty four, two thousand twenty two.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a whole bunch of stories, although most of

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>them are pretty short. Let's jump to it. And in

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a news item that prompted me to actually double check

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the date on the article, the Attorney General for Washington,

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>D C. Carl Racine, has sued Mark Zuckerberg because of

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cambridge Analytica scandal. All right, let's do a quick

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>overview of what Cambridge Analytica was really all about. First,

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you start off with a guy, a researcher and professor

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>named Alexander Cogan, who created an app for the Facebook

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 1>platform that was called This is Your Digital Life and

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a personality quiz. So Cogan was conducting research

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>into social relationships in general, and he offered a small

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>payment for folks to take the test, and more than

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>two fifty thousand people installed the app and took that test,

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and that generated a whole lot of information. But Beyond that,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the app was also able to access the data of

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the friends of the people who took the quiz. Now,

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're not familiar, Facebook lets you create profile settings

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that can limit who can see what is on your profile.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You could have a public profile, which means anyone can

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>see everything that you've posted on there, or you can

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have a profile that's restricted just to the people who

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>are on your friends list. Well, Facebook's app interface would

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>allow app developers to view profiles as if they were

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>friends with all those people. So, in other words, let's

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>say you activate an app like this on your Facebook profile.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Now that app can view your friends profiles as if

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the app were you. That was a huge problem because

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your friends never had an opportunity to consent or deny

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>consent to the app gathering their personal information. They they

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>never even saw anything about it. You as a user,

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>saw an agreement and you could agree to it, but

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>your friends never did so. As a result, the app

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sucked up data from millions of users. Uh. Initially the

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>belief was around eighty million, and then later the investigation

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>said it was closer to thirty million people. Still huge

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>number considering that around I think two seventy thousand people

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>took the test, as so the vast majority of people

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>who had their information pulled into this database never even

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>took the quiz anyway. Cogan's research company partnered with the

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>parent company of an analysis slash campaign strategy company, and

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that was Cambridge Analytica. That that being the strategy company.

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge Analytica ended up getting access to all this data

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that was pulled from this quiz, and Cambridge Analytica claimed

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that the data provided valuable information for political campaigns, that

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>using the data from this quiz would mean that political

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>candidates could target prospective voters with incredible accuracy, that campaigns

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>could be really effective because they could tailor the campaign

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to trigger specific responses from those people. It turned out

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of those claims were more hype than

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>substance anyway. All this happened around two thousand fourteen into

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand sixteen, but the world at large remained ignorant

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>about it until two thousand eighteen, when various expose a

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>pieces brought the matter to global attention. It was clear

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook, Cogan, and Cambridge Analytica had all been involved

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in some questionable activity, uh to the extent that those

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>activities were criminal. Remains sort of an open question now, Racine.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.119
<v Speaker 1>The Attorney General of Washington, d C. Previously sued Facebook,

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the company which is of course now known as Meta,

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and later in that process he wanted to add Zuckerberg

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>as a defendant in the case, but the judge ruled

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that it was too late in the proceedings for the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General to do that, and that Meta case is

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>still ongoing. So meanwhile, the Attorney General has now named

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg in a new lawsuit about this, and the Attorney

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>General argues that Zuckerberg bears responsibility for sharing user data

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>without those users consent, and further that he withheld information

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>about the subject rather than divulging the info in a

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>timely manner. Essentially, this accounted to a data breach and

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he had a responsibility to report that, but he did

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>not do it. The Attorney General says Zuckerberg has violated

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Now, some of y'all might

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>remember that Zuckerberg previously had to testify before Congress about

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the matter of Cambridge Analytica, so I'm sure this lawsuit

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>will bring up all sorts of bad memories for Old Mark.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Last week, I talked about how the Fifth Circuit Court

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals lifted an injunction that was against Texas's controversial

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>bill that allows social network users to suthe the social

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>networks themselves if they get banned. If the users argue

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that they were banned because of their political views and

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that this was infringing on their free speech, that means

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that that law is now in effect in Texas. Meanwhile,

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>over in Florida, a somewhat similar bill has received the

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>opposite treatment. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in order to block a Florida law that would have

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>otherwise allowed politicians to sue platforms for banning them or

0:05:55.680 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for moderating their content. So if a political candidate we're

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>posting something that was demonstrably false and the platform then

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>labeled it as misinformation, they would be able to sue

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the platform under this law. That law got blocked. So

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>here we've got to somewhat similar laws and two dissimilar outcomes,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>which is fun times right. Anyway, the Court of Appeals

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Florida case found that the Florida law was

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional because social network companies have protection under the First

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Amendment that means the social networks can create and enforced

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>content moderation rules, and moreover, the government cannot restrict the

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>company's content moderation practices because if the government did that,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be the same as the government censoring a company,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and that is not constitutional. It seems as though the

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has not come to the

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>same bizarre conclusion as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in which one judge stated that platforms like Twitter and

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Facebook are quote unquote Internet provide leaders and thus should

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be treated as common carriers. That is patently absurd, especially

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>since I s p s, the actual companies that provide

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Internet access, have had their common carrier status stripped away

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>during the Trump administration, and so it goes quality assurance.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Employees at Raven Software, which is a subsidiary of Activision Blizzard,

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have now officially formed their union. The employees began their

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>attempts to organize last year and recently held their union vote,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>which passed, and that makes their union, the Game Workers Alliance,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the second official union in the video games industry here

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. It's a significant achievement, in no

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>small part because Activision Blizzard reportedly took several steps to

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>discourage the unionization attempt. Those steps included splitting up the

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>QUA team and placing them in different departments in order

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of keep them from organizing, allegedly, or arguing

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that any union vote should really fall on the entire

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>staff of Raven Software, not just the q A department.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>The q A department is twenty something people, whereas the

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>entire staff is like three hundred and fifty, so people

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>have argued that that attempt was really to try and

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>dilute the q A department's ability to unionize. Despite all

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>those efforts, the employees did form their union, and they

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sent a statement to the verge and said it's their

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>hope that they inspire further employee organization efforts within the

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>video game industry. Meanwhile, it's Sony's u S division of PlayStation.

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Former employee m m Ayo has filed a lawsuit against

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>her former employer, and this is the second time that

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>she has done this. Judge dismissed her earlier complaints, saying

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that the scope of her complaint was far too wide

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that she needed to restate her complaint in a way

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that was more narrow and focused. So this new lawsuit

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>has done that, and it alleges that women working for

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Sony PlayStation within the state of California have been the

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>subject of sexual discrimination and systemic sexism. So we will

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have to see how that lawsuit unrolls as time goes on.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>I've done several stories about various tech companies running into

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>friction as they tried to create policies that require employees

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to come back into the office. Recently, Apple postponed its

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>plans to require corporate employees to come into the office

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>three days a week. They currently have are required to

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>come in two days a week, and the company cited

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns about rising COVID nine team cases as the reason

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for postponing that plan. Meanwhile, over at Google, employees who

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>are in the Google Maps division are circulating a petition

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>asking the company to extend work from home benefits. Google

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>currently plans to require those employees to come back into

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the office five days a week starting in early June.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>The employees objections include concerns about how much it costs

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to live near Google offices and how much inflation and

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>supply issues have caused gas prices to skyrocket. So, in

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>other words, these employees are saying it's too expensive to

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>work for Google if they are required to come into

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the office five days week, And yeah, that's not how

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>employment is supposed to work. When it's too expensive for

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>you to work somewhere, things are broken anyway. According to

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, some sixt of Google Maps employees

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>have already signed the petition. Whether that makes a difference

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. Okay, we've got a bunch more

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>stories to get through. Let's take a quick break. We're

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>back and it's time to talk about TikTok. Now, for

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a while, there was no real easy way for creators

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok to monetize their work and their popularity. So

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you have folks who are getting really well known on

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>TikTok super fast, but they didn't have an easy way

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to leverage that into making money. Like, yeah, they were

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot of notoriety, but notoriety don't pay the rent. Anyway.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They started to figure out ways to kind of indirectly

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>make money. Creators could try and lure followers to other

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms where they could get support, whether it's Patreon or

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>something else, or they could try and land sponsor deals,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and they could get paid by sponsors for creating special

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>content on TikTok, which TikTok would later help support, and

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>then later still TikTok added a tip feature that lets

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>users leave a tip for their favorite creators, And now

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is introducing a subscription service to some of the

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>more popular creators on the platform. Users will be able

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay a subscription to access live stream sessions from

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>those creators, so it's kind of a way of getting

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>some exclusive content. And the whole system right now is

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>invitation only, so we're gonna likely see a gradual rollout

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>before it becomes you know, platform wide, and at the

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>time of this recording, I don't have any info on

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what kind of subscription tiers we might be looking at,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, how expensive they are and whether there are

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple levels. But in addition to that initiative, TikTok had

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>also earlier announced that it is going to have an

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>ad revenue sharing program with creators. So while early on

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the most you could hope for from being popular on

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok was to be famous, now we can add the

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sibling getting rich to that. Nicks at least for some

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>creators more power to y'all, I can never do what

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>y'all do. I If I were to really adopt TikTok um,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I have no doubt it would be a infrequently viewed,

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pathetic display of me trying to be relevant. And um,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's plenty of that on TikTok already, so

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no need for me to jump in on that.

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon continues to sunset features on older Kendall models. The

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>company sent out an email to folks who own older

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Kindle devices like the second generation Kindle, the fourth and

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fifth generation Kindles, and a couple of other models. The

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>message indicates that these Kindle devices will soon no longer

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to purchase or borrow titles directly from the device,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>so you won't be able to buy a new book

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>from the Kindle itself. Instead, those owners will have to

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the Amazon web page. You know, use like

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a computer or smartphone to go there. You can purchase

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>things on the web page and then use the web

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>page to share that content to your devices, so it

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>adds some extra steps and becomes less convenient now. The

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>likely reason behind this is that older Kindle models are

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>running on systems like essentially operating systems that Amazon can't

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>update anymore because the the hardware of those older Kindle

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>models aren't really able to support later versions of that system,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so features are getting left behind. Previous the Amazon Kindle

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>owners who had purchased units with three G connectivity found

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>their devices severely restricted because tell, the communications companies have

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>been shutting down their old three G networks, so there's

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing to connect to. You know, if there's no infrastructure

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to support connectivity, there's no connectivity. Really, these stories illustrate

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>how the stuff we buy has a limited lifespan that

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily related to how well the hardware works

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>over time. Like everything on the device might still be

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in perfect working order, but the back end no longer

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>supports that device. Uh, it's because the rest of the

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>system is evolving, whereas that device is stuck in that

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>form factor. We've seen this in tons of technology. In fact,

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like this is old news, right, because there's a long

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>running joke in the computer world that you go, you

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>buy a PC, you bring it home, and by the

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>time you get out of the box, it's already obsolete.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That joke has been around forever. But this is the

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing we can expect happen as we rely

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>on more products that lean on cloud services, and in fact,

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the reasons that folks can get a

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>little antsy about buying into a new product because the

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>product might work fine, but if that back end system

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that provides the features shuts down or changes in some way,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you could be left with a useless pile of electronics

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that technically still works but can't connect to anything. So

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a risk, and it's a tradeoff. So the risk,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of course is that your device may no longer work,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but the other benefit to it is that, you know,

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we end up getting devices that end up having far

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>more capabilities then they're on board electronics would allow all

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on their own, So it's a given take. As the

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>world pivots to lean more heavily on renewable energy sources

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and battery technology, we've seen some pretty big obstacles pop

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>up recently. I've mentioned before how the electric vehicle industry

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is under intense pressure because more and more countries are

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>setting a deadline for migrating away from internal combustion engine vehicles.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, we are producing far too

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>few batteries in order to support a total switch to

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>e vs, like, if we wanted to produce as many

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles as would be necessary to replace all internal

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine vehicles, we couldn't do it because we don't

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have enough battery production to cover that well. The International

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Energy Agency reports that the price for raw materials that

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are being used in stuff like batteries and renewable energy

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>technology has really gone up recently, and it's due to

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different factors. You've got you know, COVID issues,

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got supply chain problems, and you've got Russia's war

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. Russia currently is the source for a massive

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of material that's used in various renewable energy technologies,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and the war has cut off access too much of

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that supply. As a result, the price of those materials

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has increased dramatically. Lithium alone jumped up seven eight percent

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in cost from Anuary to March. Many people have pointed

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>out that this is really a huge wake up call.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The underlines a fairly obvious conclusion, and that conclusion is

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>don't put all your eggs in one basket. I mean,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>we have an old folks saying that really nails this

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>home right. So in other words, it is critical to

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>diversify where you get your materials from, as depending too

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>heavily on a single source spells doom when something interrupts

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that supply. Over the last several years, we've seen the

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>cost of renewable energy come down because manufacturing facilities have

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>created more efficient processes and started to produce at larger scales.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So the cost of renewable energy has declined over time.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But there is concerned that these rising costs in raw

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>materials is going to slow or perhaps even reverse that

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>trend in the not too distant future. Perhaps next Sunday

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>a d Airbnb has become the latest US company to

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pull out of China. Uh And I know it's weird

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to include Airbnb in a tech podcast, but it is

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>one of those companies that often gets treated like a

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>tech company, seeing as how the interface for Airbnb is

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Internet dependent. Anyway, Airbnb's reason for pulling up stakes is

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different from companies like LinkedIn and Yahoo.

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Those companies primarily left over concerns about how the Chinese

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>government was demanding access to user information. In Airbnb's case,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>it appears that the main motivator for leaving China was

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because of a rise in so called super apps, which

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>provide multiple services to users. They can range from stuff

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like online shopping services, to ride hailing services to yeah

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>booking a place to stay, so more Chinese citizens have

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>been relying on these kind of catch all apps rather

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>than on those that focus on a single service. Airbnb

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>will continue to provide Chinese citizens who travel abroad access

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to booking places when they are staying outside of China,

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but you'll no longer be able to pop on Airbnb

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to find a place to crash the next time you

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>had to Shanghai. Speaking of China, the country has an

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>app called wi Bo, which is sort of like Twitter.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's spelled w e i b O, and I apologize

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if I am completely mispronouncing it. I very likely am.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.479
<v Speaker 1>But that app recently banned an account belonging to James Liang.

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>He is a co founder of a company called trip

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com, which is a travel services company in China,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and according to Wibo, Liang had violated quote relevant laws

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and regulations end quote. Wibo did not go into more

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>detail about exactly what Liang's violations were. The current hypothesis

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>is that Wibo band Liang because Leang had posted criticism

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of China's zero tolerance policy when it comes to COVID outbreaks. Now,

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>as you probably know, the practice in China is to

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>lock down a region anytime a COVID outbreak is detected

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>within that region, which shuts down everything for a couple

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>of weeks at a time usually, and it grinds all

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>activity to a halt. And we've seen stories of companies

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>like Tesla trying to work around this by encouraging employees

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to essentially move into the manufacturing facilities so that they

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>literally live where they work. Anyway, Lang argued that the

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>practice of shutting down regions is causing enormous economic disruption

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and that it's becoming increasingly difficult to recover from that disruption,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to have been enough to get him

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>banned from Wi Bo. Now, on the one hand, I

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>do feel China's response has been way too strict. It's

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>it's gone over the top. On the other hand, I

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>worry that the workarounds are putting people in danger simply

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>to avoid disruptions in business. So companies like Tesla and

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>others that are trying to get around these issues, I

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>worry that it's disregarding people's health just for the sake

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of keeping things going. Goodness knows, you know, I really

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>hate seeing people in my own country behave like there

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is no pandemic. There never was a pandemic. Shut up,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you mask wearing freak. You're the problem. I'm not the problem.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I do not like that attitude. I suspect there's probably

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a pathway that's somewhere in between these various extremes that

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be the most responsible, keeping the most people

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>healthy while creating the smallest amount of economic disruption. But

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.479
<v Speaker 1>what the heck do I know? I'm a podcaster. All Right,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>we have a few more stories to wrap up before

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>we get to that. Let's take another quick break. Okay.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I do have a positive story about China that I

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>definitely wanted to share, and that is the country plans

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to launch a space telescope named shun Chian, which means

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to study the heavens in three and shun Chian will

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>be a lot like the Hubble space telescope, but with

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a significantly larger field of view. According to one source

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I was reading, it will be three fifty times the

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>field of view of the Hubble telescope, and this space

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>telescope will be used to expand our understanding on big

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>questions like why is the universe expanding at an accelerated rate?

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Like we understand that it's expanding, but why is that

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>expansion accelerating. It's also going to be used to try

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and help get more information on really tricky things like

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>dark energy and dark matter. China plans to insert the

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>telescope into a similar orbit with the Tiangong Space Station,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>which would allow the station and telescope to doc with

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>one another in the event that the telescope requires service,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a good plan. You might remember that the

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Hubble initially had a flaw in it that affected image

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>resolution and required NASA to send up some service crews

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in Space Shuttle missions to address that problem. Starlink, the

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>satellite internet service provider from space Sex, has introduced a

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>new subscription model for those who want to travel around

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and bring their Starlink antenna with them. Currently, subscribers pay

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred ten bucks per month to subscribe to starlink,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and a few Starlink users discovered that when they initially

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>signed up for service, they had to uh specify an

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>address they could actually bring their Starlink antenna with them,

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>set it up wherever they stop, and still access service

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>while they are traveling. And so folks began to do that,

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they were traveling around and bringing connectivity with them. Well,

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX took a look at that and thought, hey, I'd

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like to make money off of that. So now the

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>company is going to offer a more expensive plan that

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>outright supports this type of use. For one five bucks

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a month. Starlink customers can take their set up with them,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>making it a portable connectivity solution as long as they're

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>traveling within areas that Starlink provides service. The company is

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>not going to support and activity on the move, so

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>you are not meant to, you know, set up your

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>star Link at the back of a van or something

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and try and get uh Internet connectivity while you're driving

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>down the streets, so you're really meant to set it

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up wherever you stop and then pack it up when

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you're ready to move on. I'm wondering how many folks

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>out there have adopted a nomadic lifestyle and how that's

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>worked out for them, and also how much money they

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>had before they jumped on that, because while the idea

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds really interesting to me, whenever I actually start to

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>think about it, I come to the conclusion that I

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>just don't make enough money to make that kind of

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>thing work out, at least not without becoming a drifter.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not cool enough to be a drifter. And

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Video announced that is shifting toward liquid cooled graphics cards

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for data centers. So, in a data center, you've got

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hundreds or maybe even thousands of computers and they're all

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>packed close together. These machines generate a lot of heat,

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly when they're working hard on processor intensive operations like

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>really intense AI processes and electronics in general do not

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>perform well in heat, so that means data centers have

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to rely heavily on cooling systems, typically air cooling systems,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to bring operational temperatures down so that machines don't start

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>failing left and right now. That in turn costs money

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and takes up a lot of space. So in Video's

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>plan is to use water cooling technology, which is more

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>energy efficient and takes up less space than air cooling tech,

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for their graphics cards for these data centers. The ideas

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that the data centers won't have to use quite as

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>much energy to air cool the computers, though of course

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in videos, approach really just covers the graphics cards and

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not CPUs or other types of processors. Still, the move

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>could end up saving energy and money, which are pretty

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>good goals to shoot for. Finally, Superman will have to

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>find another place to change when in New York City

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>as he goes from mild mannered reporter to a man

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>who can leap tall buildings in a single bound. And

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that's because New York has removed the lasked of its

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>public pay phones this week. We are at the end

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of an era. Now, some of y'all might be asking,

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is a public pay phone? Well, young Padawan.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>In the old days before cell phones, cities would install

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>public payphones as a type of convenience. You can walk

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>right on up to one of these payphones, some of

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which were housed in booths, complete with a door that

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you could close to black out the sounds of the

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>city and prevent nosey types from listening in. On your

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>telephone call, you'd plunk in some coins and a coin

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>slot and you would make your call. Long distance calls

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>cost more, and you would have to plunk in more

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>coins if your call ran along an operator would tell

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you that you need to add more coins if you

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to continue the conversation, or you could call collect

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:46.919
<v Speaker 1>as we used to say, and the person on the

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>other end of the line could choose to accept the

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>charges and talk to you, or deny the charges, and

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you would be left there forlorn in a payphone with

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a dead receiver in your hand. Also, Superman could change

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in phone booths. Uh, I should mention, however, the pay

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>phones that New York removed weren't actual phone booth payphones,

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so my Superman joke doesn't really work anyway, but I

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of wanted to include it. Back on track. Now

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that we are in an era where pretty much everyone

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>has at least a cell phone, if not a smartphone,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>public payphones have become largely obsolete. New York has been

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>replacing them with kiosks that include stuff like ports where

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you can charge your own phone, WiFi signals so you

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>can connect via the kiosk, and an interface that lets

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you make calls over the kiosk itself free of charge.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a very different world these days. Also slight tangent.

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 1>This end of an era makes me a little sad

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because I remember an a r G in an alternate

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>reality game in which players who solved clues would discover

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>coordinates that would lead to a public payphone, and a

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>phone call would come in on that public payphone at

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a particular time, So you would be prompted to go

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to this pay phone at a certain time so that

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you could receive a call. So you would go to

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that location, you'd stand by the phone, and sure enough

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it would ring and you would answer it and you

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>would end up speaking with a character within the A

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>r G. That kind of thing was super cool to me.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually helped solve some of the clues that led

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>to some of the phones, though I was never able

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to one of the phones at the specific time,

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>which I really regret. I did listen to some of

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the recordings of the calls, and some of them were

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>truly delightful and weird and um some of them cringe e,

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but lots of fun. Anyway, that approach has become less

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.959
<v Speaker 1>viable as more locations have eliminated public pay phones, so

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not likely to run into that kind of thing

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>these days. Obviously, you could still have a r G

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>S where you get calls on your own personal device,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but that just you know, it doesn't get you out

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world. It doesn't make you feel more immersed

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the way this particular approach did. I just thought it

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was really cool idea. Anyway, that's it. That's the news

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>for Tuesday, May twenty four, two thousand, twenty two. Hope

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you all are well. If you have any suggestions you

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>would like for future episodes of tech Stuff, or any

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>questions or anything like that, you have two ways to

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>get in contact with the show. The first is you

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>can use the I Heart radio app and UH and

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>navigate to the Text Stuff profile on I Heart Radio's app,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>which is free to download, and there you will see

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a little microphone icon. If you touch that, you can

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>record a voice message up to thirty seconds long, and

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.719
<v Speaker 1>only Tary and I can listen to it, and we

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>can take your request. That way, you can even indicate

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>if you would like us to include the audio in

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the future episode. If you don't say that, I'm not

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 1>going to do it because I believe an opt in

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>not opt out. The other way, of course, to get

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us is to use Twitter. The handle

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for the show is text Stuff h s W and

0:29:51.120 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again releasing text Stuff is an

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I heart Radio,

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.