Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Join the conversation
Speaker 1: and message Buck on Facebook, Instagram, or email Team Bucket
Speaker 1: iHeartMedia dot com if he may read it on the show.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why you're not seeing a lot of
Speaker 1: coverage of what's happening at our southern border at all,
Speaker 1: and it's because it looks awful for the Bond administration.
Speaker 1: I just came back and I can tell you that
Speaker 1: everyone you speak who knows they're hiding this as much
Speaker 1: as they possibly can. That the journos and I'm talking
Speaker 1: about people working on the security there, National Guard, border patrol, immigration,
Speaker 1: customs enforcement, everybody, local sheriff's, local police, that are all
Speaker 1: very clear on what's happening here. Biden, folks don't want
Speaker 1: the American people to figure out that the estimate I heard,
Speaker 1: the estimate I heard from a senior member of border patrols,
Speaker 1: they think they'll have a million illegals cross in the
Speaker 1: United States this year alone. A million You've got in
Speaker 1: that sense from what's going on the news. No, let's
Speaker 1: have another news cycle where we pretend we have no
Speaker 1: common sense and police are the problem in America what
Speaker 1: it comes to violence, and let's just throw cops under
Speaker 1: the bus. Let the Democrats do all the time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's really gonna help. That's gonna be great, isn't it disgraceful?
Speaker 1: I was so angry at the stuff I was seeing
Speaker 1: happening in the news while I was out doing field reporting.
Speaker 1: But it was important to tell you what's really happening
Speaker 1: at the border, and I've got to tell these stories.
Speaker 1: I've also got to tell you to prepare. You know
Speaker 1: that I'm a student of history and that whenever you
Speaker 1: look throughout history at what happens with fiat currency, it
Speaker 1: gets very bad every time. Every fiat currency actually historically
Speaker 1: has eventually had a major crisis, in many cases a
Speaker 1: complete collapse. But gold has been a measure of wealth
Speaker 1: throughout history, and there's a good reason for that. You know,
Speaker 1: gold has never been worth zero. And you can have
Speaker 1: real gold and silver now as part of your wealth,
Speaker 1: either in your retirement accounts or delivered securely to your
Speaker 1: home with the Oxford Gold Group. This is the industry
Speaker 1: leader in precious medals and the only gold and silver
Speaker 1: company I trust. Oxford Gold Group will beat any competitor's
Speaker 1: price on gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. If you want
Speaker 1: to get financial stability, you need to look into acquiring
Speaker 1: real gold and silver with the Oxford Gold Group. Call
Speaker 1: Oxford today eight three three six hundred gold. Don't gamble
Speaker 1: with your hard earned money. Put your money into something solid,
Speaker 1: safe and secure. Just look at history. Call the Oxford
Speaker 1: Gold Group at A three three six hundred gold and
Speaker 1: get your free investment guide right now a three three
Speaker 1: six hundred GLD. Not only is the border in a crisis,
Speaker 1: but those who are tasked with stopping it have no
Speaker 1: interest in doing so at the political level, and they
Speaker 1: leave the people on the front lines completely unable to
Speaker 1: deal with it in any meaning full way. They don't
Speaker 1: want them handling this problem other than to process the
Speaker 1: people coming. So I went down there last week because
Speaker 1: you know, I was in the McAllen. I went into McCallen,
Speaker 1: the Rio Grand sector of the US Mexico border. I
Speaker 1: was out with members of Border Patrol. I went out
Speaker 1: with an NGO that does anti human trafficking work and
Speaker 1: tries to tries to assist local law enforcement, state law enforcement,
Speaker 1: because you know that's a part of this too. The
Speaker 1: Biden administration could do a whole lot more at the
Speaker 1: federal level if they wanted to, but they would much
Speaker 1: rather allow Texas National Guard and Texas Sheriffs and the
Speaker 1: rangers to have to pick up all the slack. Here's
Speaker 1: what you don't see. Here's what you don't hear about
Speaker 1: the border. Why is it? You know? One night when
Speaker 1: I was down there, we went ninety minutes in the
Speaker 1: car west of McAllen. Now. McAllen is a city of
Speaker 1: about one hundred thousand, not a particularly built up plays,
Speaker 1: not a major city by any stretch, and it sits
Speaker 1: right on the US Mexico border in southeastern Texas, right
Speaker 1: on the Rio Grande. And you can see people handing
Speaker 1: themselves in in broad Dayla, surrendering again broad Dayla. The
Speaker 1: first night I'm there with my team, we go out
Speaker 1: and within fifteen minutes we're standing right at a border crossing.
Speaker 1: And within fifteen minutes you have kids coming, dozens at
Speaker 1: a time, children and I mean eight year olds, ten
Speaker 1: year olds, just in a group, walking right across the border,
Speaker 1: just being sent right across the border by themselves. Sometimes
Speaker 1: adults present a lot of times not You can imagine
Speaker 1: how traumatizing this is for them. But and it's awful.
Speaker 1: Here's the part of it, though, that you have to
Speaker 1: think about. Here's the part of that doesn't make sense
Speaker 1: until you dig into a little bit more. They can
Speaker 1: show up and the cartels do this, and they will
Speaker 1: push people right into the hands of border patrol. Then
Speaker 1: border patrol has to take care of them, to get
Speaker 1: them food and medicine and take the hospital if need be.
Speaker 1: Why not always do that? Why is it that there
Speaker 1: are remote places along the border where you will go
Speaker 1: where I went and you'll see efforts to cross there.
Speaker 1: It's because the cartels are incredibly sophisticated international not just
Speaker 1: smuggling and criminal enterprises, but really terrorist organizations, and they
Speaker 1: have a communication and essentially a strategic command and control
Speaker 1: that lets them spread the border patrol and the resources
Speaker 1: we have down there as thinly as possible. Remember, because
Speaker 1: of the children that are being processed at any given
Speaker 1: time in the Rio Grande sector, forty percent forty percent
Speaker 1: of border patrol agents are doing paperwork, changing diapers, making
Speaker 1: sure that people have medicine that they need, whatever, maybe
Speaker 1: straight up humanitarian and babysitting mission. Essentially, what do you
Speaker 1: think the vicious Mexican drug cart tells do while that's
Speaker 1: going on? They run drugs across the border, and in
Speaker 1: some places we have the technology deployed to at least
Speaker 1: have a sense of what level of drugs are coming across,
Speaker 1: and others we have no idea. And you know, we've
Speaker 1: just gone through a year in this country with the
Speaker 1: most overdoses in history. Over eighty thousand is the figure
Speaker 1: that I've seen. We've gone through a year with the
Speaker 1: biggest spike in crime in over twenty years in America.
Speaker 1: I think the single most powerful, most vicious criminal enterprise
Speaker 1: in North America should get a little more attention on
Speaker 1: all this. They are making money hand over fist from
Speaker 1: the human smuggling that the journalists run around pretending is
Speaker 1: the foundation of America. Oh, we're a nation of immigrants. No,
Speaker 1: we're not a nation of people coming in in violation
Speaker 1: of federal law, paying off drug cartels in the process.
Speaker 1: That's actually not the you know, the the origins of
Speaker 1: the American experiment and the source of our greatness, as
Speaker 1: much as the journals may pretend otherwise. Why do they
Speaker 1: deploy Why is it? I went out with went out
Speaker 1: ninety minutes, I said, west of mccallunt a place called
Speaker 1: Fronton with this All Things Possible Anti Trafficking group atp
Speaker 1: is the group. Victor Marks is the founder of it.
Speaker 1: We went out there and some of the guys that
Speaker 1: he's with are are very elite former Special operators, uh
Speaker 1: and and they they come along because their whole mission
Speaker 1: now that they're out, I mean, they're some of these
Speaker 1: guys are retired now after having been in Special Operations
Speaker 1: and and SF guys and others for decades. They just
Speaker 1: want to save kids from the worst people in the world.
Speaker 1: That's their whole mission. They go to Iraq, they go
Speaker 1: all over the world and they save children from human trafficking.
Speaker 1: And in this case, they know that these children are
Speaker 1: being trafficked, and they're there to try to assist in
Speaker 1: the border patrol mission of at least making sure everyone's safe,
Speaker 1: get them some food, get them some water to the
Speaker 1: children who are coming across, and also to make sure
Speaker 1: that there aren't cartel predators mixed in among these groups,
Speaker 1: which as we know, that does happen. And so there's
Speaker 1: there's a tremendous amount of lawlessness and illegality going on
Speaker 1: here and also suffering, but just suffering in general, I
Speaker 1: mean people what they're putting these kids through is appalling.
Speaker 1: And the fact that I know people keep saying, oh, well,
Speaker 1: the parents must be really desperate. I'm sorry, find what's
Speaker 1: what's being what's being done here? I mean sending in
Speaker 1: an eight year old, they're a ten year old. I
Speaker 1: had kids telling me through a translator that they've been
Speaker 1: traveling for over a month to get to get to
Speaker 1: the border from Central America. Buses, trains, a lot of
Speaker 1: it on foot, traveling for a month. People are coming
Speaker 1: from all over the world as well. That's another part
Speaker 1: of this. You have to understand. They have Romanians who
Speaker 1: have been showing up, you know, sixty seventy Romanians in
Speaker 1: the last month or two. They have people coming from
Speaker 1: Sri Lanka, from China, from Brazil, from Venezuela. Now, why
Speaker 1: do you think that's happening? Why is it that people
Speaker 1: who have the money for a plane ticket, they're not
Speaker 1: walking from China. Why is it that people who have
Speaker 1: money for a plane ticket would rather fly to Mexico
Speaker 1: and pay off the cartels to get into America then
Speaker 1: try to do it the legal way. Ah, because if
Speaker 1: you just put a tiny bit of effort and resources
Speaker 1: into it, the border is open. I mean, that's really
Speaker 1: that's really the only thing that they can point to.
Speaker 1: They say, well, some people get turned back only a
Speaker 1: they mess up, only if they either try to go
Speaker 1: and they know that they're single adult males and they
Speaker 1: try to make a run for it and they get caught,
Speaker 1: or if there's some there's some other problem with a family.
Speaker 1: All the children get to stay and will stay. Almost
Speaker 1: all the family units now are getting to stay. I mean,
Speaker 1: they have this title of forty two authority under COVID
Speaker 1: that they were using to send back family units, but
Speaker 1: now at least one Mexican state along the border is
Speaker 1: not taking family units back at all. So that means
Speaker 1: that those family units are staying. All those if you
Speaker 1: come at once, there's one part of the border where
Speaker 1: if you come you get to stay if your family
Speaker 1: units dependent also on the age of the children you're with.
Speaker 1: And I try to find out and they said, we
Speaker 1: don't talk about it because they don't want people to know.
Speaker 1: But there's essentially special treatment depending on the age of
Speaker 1: the children. So that's an incentive to bring younger and
Speaker 1: younger children, which means that that's why you're seeing people
Speaker 1: with newborns and all this coming to the border all
Speaker 1: the time now because it helps them, helps the adults
Speaker 1: get into the country. The whole thing's a mess. They're
Speaker 1: spreading us thin across, spreading a resources thin across the
Speaker 1: border for all our security services, because then that makes
Speaker 1: it easier to smuggle in other individuals who aren't family units,
Speaker 1: and drugs and whatever contraband they want. And can Kamally
Speaker 1: even be bothered to go down there, No, no, she can't.
Speaker 1: I went down there. I gotta tell you there's one point.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm looking across the Rio Grande. It's midnight. I'm
Speaker 1: with a team. They've got some night vision goggles. We're
Speaker 1: watching in real time as rafts are crossing the river
Speaker 1: full of migrants. The cartels have it all orchestrated. Okay,
Speaker 1: now you go twenty people on a raft maybe meant
Speaker 1: for two or four. Twenty people pile onto this raft,
Speaker 1: go here. They know where our surveillance assets are, They
Speaker 1: understand where the choke points are and where the areas
Speaker 1: that are open, wide open, and they're just playing us.
Speaker 1: And as this is going on, I hear small arms
Speaker 1: fire break out just across the border. I mean a
Speaker 1: couple of hundred yards away. One of the National Guard
Speaker 1: guys says, oh, that's definitely belt fed, because the small
Speaker 1: arms pop pop pop was met with a brew of
Speaker 1: somebody going full full auto on a heavy weapon, probably
Speaker 1: a two forty or something like that, just a few
Speaker 1: hundred yards away from us. This is going on the
Speaker 1: on the Mexican cartel controlled side of it, and which
Speaker 1: you realize is they're they're fighting each other because meaning
Speaker 1: on the cartels are fighting each other because it's so lucrative.
Speaker 1: There's so much money to be made here that they'll
Speaker 1: kill anyone on their side of the border who gets
Speaker 1: in the way. Our side is where they're sending all
Speaker 1: they're sending, all the drugs, they're sending, all the all
Speaker 1: the human trafficking. Their side is where it's just a
Speaker 1: bloody contest for control, and they're exporting lawlessness and misery
Speaker 1: and dysfunction, all kinds of problems to this country and
Speaker 1: becoming ultra wealthy in the process. And what are we
Speaker 1: doing about it? There's no plan to handle this. I
Speaker 1: went to see the massive facility at Donna, the Donna
Speaker 1: Facility Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and Border patrol located there
Speaker 1: with with people and it looks like a city. You're
Speaker 1: not allowed anywhere inside. They're very strict about the kind
Speaker 1: of access you have. They don't want journalists to see it.
Speaker 1: They don't want people to know what's going on. And
Speaker 1: they told me when I was down there, they're planning
Speaker 1: to basically double the size of it the next sixty days,
Speaker 1: another one, another massive tense city for the processing of
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants. Does that make it sound like they have
Speaker 1: a plan to slow this down, to stop this, because
Speaker 1: they don't. I can assure you of that. They don't
Speaker 1: have a plan. They know that this benefits them in
Speaker 1: the long run. Everything that I saw at the border
Speaker 1: with my own eyes solidified what I've been telling you
Speaker 1: here on the show. Our border is as close to
Speaker 1: fully open as it could be without the Biden administration
Speaker 1: just saying no more laws down there. Just come. Anyone
Speaker 1: gets to come with five minutes of thought, with just
Speaker 1: a little bit of money and a little bit of resolve,
Speaker 1: anybody who wants to get into the United States across
Speaker 1: the US Mexico border right now has a much better
Speaker 1: than even chance. Probably you've got a ninety percent chance
Speaker 1: now if you know, if you know what you're doing
Speaker 1: of getting the United States permanently. How many people want
Speaker 1: to come to the US from Latin America alone, according
Speaker 1: to polls, thirty to forty million. Biden administration sees that
Speaker 1: as a big pool of future Democrat voters. Republicans are
Speaker 1: attacking you, saying you wouldn't be in New Hampshire talking
Speaker 1: about infrastructure, you should be in the southern border talking
Speaker 1: about immigration. How do you respond to them? Play political game?
Speaker 1: Kama is not going to play political games, no, of course,
Speaker 1: not no interest in political games. She's so disingenuous and
Speaker 1: honestly so incompetent in this, in this role as borders are.
Speaker 1: Although no, I say that, and then I have to
Speaker 1: edit myself because I assume she's I mean, she's incompetent
Speaker 1: from the perspective of she wants this to stop. But
Speaker 1: as I've already told her, she doesn't want this to stop.
Speaker 1: So in some way, in some sense, there's an extreme
Speaker 1: competency here because she's given cover to this whole continued, wide,
Speaker 1: wide ranging infiltration of the United States with drugs and
Speaker 1: flood of illegal immigrants. I mean, the drugs are poisoning
Speaker 1: our communities all over the place, and and Remember this
Speaker 1: is this is I talked you overdoses. It's not just
Speaker 1: the overdoses that are coming as a result of the
Speaker 1: cartels putting this stuff out there freely. It's accessible to people,
Speaker 1: it's inexpensive. They're making this stuff in vats and and
Speaker 1: they mark sometimes the pills to look like pharmaceutical grade pills.
Speaker 1: They can sell them for more, and so people think
Speaker 1: they're safe when they're absolutely not. Sometimes there are hot
Speaker 1: batches where somebody will die from just taking one. And
Speaker 1: they've been taking you know, opioids for a long time.
Speaker 1: They think they know what they're doing, but it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: There's no quality controls. The cartels they don't care who dies.
Speaker 1: And yet, what are they doing about this? What is
Speaker 1: the what is the Biden team doing to try to
Speaker 1: fix this? Nothing? Nothing? They because what are they gonna do?
Speaker 1: Turn around and tell their their activist base that they
Speaker 1: actually don't want this illegal immigration to continue. And remember
Speaker 1: the opioids that are flooding into our communities. Not only
Speaker 1: are they you know, killing teenagers and young adults in
Speaker 1: precedented numbers, they create a lot of criminality here. What
Speaker 1: do you think people are shooting each other over for
Speaker 1: the most part. In Chicago and Saint Louis, and name
Speaker 1: a city with a high crimer, what do you think
Speaker 1: the number one reason for shootings in those places are
Speaker 1: drug gang activity. Just like on the cartel side of
Speaker 1: the border, there are people who are doing everything that
Speaker 1: they can. They're on the cartel side of the border.
Speaker 1: There are people who Mexican side of the border will
Speaker 1: use extreme violence for control of their territory. Here the
Speaker 1: raw material for the drug wars that are killing Americans
Speaker 1: that are shooting, you know, little girls in there as
Speaker 1: they try to sleep at night, or because of drive
Speaker 1: buys or the things that's coming from the cartels. They're
Speaker 1: not making the drugs that they're selling on the South
Speaker 1: side of Chicago. They're not making the drugs they're selling
Speaker 1: in cities all on Baltimore and cities all across America.
Speaker 1: It's coming from across the border. So that's what I
Speaker 1: mean by importing dysfunction and misery and death. And yet
Speaker 1: we're told, oh, don't worry about it. Oh, it's it's
Speaker 1: just about being humanitarian. We're a nation of immigrants. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: the cartels are using the infiltration, or rather they're using
Speaker 1: the illegal crossing into this country of over one hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand people a month right now as a
Speaker 1: huge smoke screen to run in large amounts of drugs,
Speaker 1: whether through the ports of entry or in between in
Speaker 1: the seams of our border coverage. And people die from
Speaker 1: drug overdoses, people die in the drug war is caused
Speaker 1: by this. This is the biggest domestic national security challenge
Speaker 1: we face by far. And yet you turn on the
Speaker 1: elite journals and the news sources everything, you know what
Speaker 1: they'll tell you. That's the white nationalist militias. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: as if that's a real threat that we all have
Speaker 1: to be so concerned about all the time. Do you
Speaker 1: know about q and on? Q Andon is coming for you.
Speaker 1: I assure you you don't have to wear a Q
Speaker 1: and on. It's not about to burn down your your
Speaker 1: house or your business. Q and On is not selling
Speaker 1: your children lethal drugs. But if you were to pay
Speaker 1: attention to the media, that's the real threat. Any minute now,
Speaker 1: they'll be an insurrection. We have the worst murder rate
Speaker 1: last year, worst murder rate increase last year in over
Speaker 1: twenty years. And what's the Democrat response. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: it's it's sick. Really, it's almost sadistic what they're doing
Speaker 1: to America. It's it's like they enjoy inflicting greater misery.
Speaker 1: We have spiking murder rates and with that, rapes, assaults,
Speaker 1: home invasions, all kind of viciousness and grotesque behavior, criminal,
Speaker 1: grotesque behavior. And the Democrat Party wants what attack the cops.
Speaker 1: They're the problem. Those of us who say we're back police,
Speaker 1: those of us who say we want to secure border,
Speaker 1: we're the bad guys. Maybe we're part of that insurrectionist group. Outrageous, outrageous.
Speaker 1: You really do get the sense sometimes that there must
Speaker 1: be some people on the left who just who know
Speaker 1: they're ruining America. Maybe they believe they'll build it back better,
Speaker 1: borrow from Biden as something else, but they are ruining
Speaker 1: this country right now. There's really nobody out there as
Speaker 1: stalinist when it comes to masking and all the most
Speaker 1: the most absurd of the COVID regulations as airline attendance
Speaker 1: and airline employees. I don't know what it is. I
Speaker 1: think it's because airlines are used to just enforcing and
Speaker 1: enforcing stupidity against everybody as much as they possibly can.
Speaker 1: You know, oh my gosh, don't don't turn on your
Speaker 1: don't turn on your your iPad or the plane will crash, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, there's no this is all just absurd. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's like a one and a billion chance that that
Speaker 1: they could interfere with the communications and bring the plane down.
Speaker 1: No person seriously believes that, but the for a long
Speaker 1: time airlines are oh you you can't even have your
Speaker 1: kindle in your hands. You know you gotta. It's all
Speaker 1: so stupid. But I I was told that my mask
Speaker 1: wasn't good enough on the flight down by one airline attendant.
Speaker 1: We don't say stewardess anymore, right, you know, that handed
Speaker 1: me a new mask, and I said, well, what if
Speaker 1: I just sit here with a cookie in my hand
Speaker 1: and eat? Really slowly? Said oh, well, now that there
Speaker 1: are reasonable limitations they say on how long you can
Speaker 1: actually have your mask down to eat or drink? Who
Speaker 1: enforces that? What's the time limit? Do I have sixty seconds?
Speaker 1: Do I have five minutes to eat my stand which
Speaker 1: or to have my coffee? I mean, for God's sakes,
Speaker 1: they even told me to mask up. They announced over
Speaker 1: the PA system, a mask up between bites. Well, we'll
Speaker 1: get into this and just a second here. You know,
Speaker 1: we've got small businesses, a lot of them are really
Speaker 1: getting ramped up, getting going right now, which is great.
Speaker 1: And I want to make your small business as efficient
Speaker 1: and profitable as possible so you can do well, your
Speaker 1: employees can do well. You don't want HR to become
Speaker 1: a major expense when running a business. HR issues can
Speaker 1: kill you. You've got wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements,
Speaker 1: labor regulations, and HR manager salaries are pricey as you know,
Speaker 1: you're talking about an average of seventy thousand dollars a year.
Speaker 1: That's why you need Bambi. Danby matches you with your
Speaker 1: very own dedicated HR manager that you can easily reach
Speaker 1: by phone, chat or email. Danby has thousands of active
Speaker 1: clients and over a thousand trust pilot reviews with a
Speaker 1: four point nine rating. Okay, it's a game changer as
Speaker 1: a service, and it's so inexpensive. Ninety nine dollars a month.
Speaker 1: You'll get a dedicated HR manager who will craft your
Speaker 1: HR policy and maintain compliance ninety nine dollars a month.
Speaker 1: They can handle onboarding terminations, and they customize your policies
Speaker 1: to fit your business and help you manage your employees
Speaker 1: day to day. It's month a month. There are no
Speaker 1: hidden fees. You can cancel anytime. You didn't start your
Speaker 1: business because you wanted to spend all your time on
Speaker 1: HR compliance. Let Bambi help Go to bambee dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. That's Bambi dot com slash buck right now
Speaker 1: to schedule your free HR audit bambee dot com slash buck. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, Jim, I don't want to come out ahead
Speaker 1: of a CDC announcement, but as you've hinted yourself just
Speaker 1: now a moment ago, that very soon, eminently, in the
Speaker 1: next few days, very likely the CDC will be coming
Speaker 1: out with updating their guidelines of what people who are
Speaker 1: vaccinated can do and even some who are not vaccinated,
Speaker 1: and certainly what one can do outdoors. Visa v mask
Speaker 1: is going to be one of those recommendations. So stay tuned.
Speaker 1: It's coming soon, all right, And if you don't mind,
Speaker 1: I'll press a little bit. I know you don't want
Speaker 1: to get ahead of these guidelines, but I assume airports
Speaker 1: travel that sort of thing that'll be coming up as
Speaker 1: well well, sooner or later. I don't know if it's
Speaker 1: all going to be coming out at once. I mean,
Speaker 1: the one thing for sure is the thing that's on
Speaker 1: a lot of people's minds is what about outdoors because
Speaker 1: obviously a lot of people are going to be sending
Speaker 1: a lot of time more outdoors now because the weather
Speaker 1: is getting really nice, beautiful spring. Whether you're going to
Speaker 1: be seeing people wanted to do things outdoors without masks,
Speaker 1: and it's common sense to know that the risk when
Speaker 1: you are outdoors, which we have been saying all along,
Speaker 1: is extremely low, and if you have vaccinated, it's even lower.
Speaker 1: So you're going to be hearing about those kinds of
Speaker 1: recommendations soon. Risk in the weather is loa with a mitigation. However,
Speaker 1: when you I mean, this guy, what a little jerk.
Speaker 1: His name should be alongside the designer of the Hindenburg
Speaker 1: in the Annals of Science. This guy is the absolute worst.
Speaker 1: You know, as we've been saying all along, you know
Speaker 1: the risk he actually said in another it's minuscule. That's
Speaker 1: the word that he used recently over the weekend. Minuscule
Speaker 1: risk of transmission outside. Really tell that to all the
Speaker 1: paranoid lunatics walking around New York City now by themselves
Speaker 1: outside as I'm speaking to you and have been doing
Speaker 1: so for a year. Cut off my mask on off,
Speaker 1: Gotta put a mask on my face outside by my chauvre,
Speaker 1: or someone's gonna breathe on beer. Crazy, emotionally disturbed, psychologically
Speaker 1: damaged because they believe you've fauci before. Because they listened
Speaker 1: to the science, they actually think this was an intelligent
Speaker 1: thing to do. I see people in New York by
Speaker 1: themselves out in the street, double masking, as if one
Speaker 1: wasn't enough. I take the virus. So seriously are you seeing, folks?
Speaker 1: What I've told you all along is true. What I've
Speaker 1: been saying to you is reasonable and rooted in the
Speaker 1: data and rooted in the science. And all these libs,
Speaker 1: all these furious libs running around, why don't you believe
Speaker 1: the science? They that what happened here was they were
Speaker 1: able to take the media, the journos, the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: were able to combine anti trump Ism and fauciism all
Speaker 1: at once. That's what really happened here. If you were
Speaker 1: anti Trump, you became a fauci and these two things
Speaker 1: became inextric inextricably linked. It didn't matter if one and
Speaker 1: the other had anything to do with each other. In reality,
Speaker 1: it didn't matter even when Trump was no longer president.
Speaker 1: You still you wear your mask the way trump people
Speaker 1: wear a Maga hat to show political solidarity. And you've
Speaker 1: even started to see more and more now people saying, Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: so wearing a mask outside isn't really reasonable, but it's
Speaker 1: a good example to set. Oh I'm sorry, so so
Speaker 1: now we are actually doing things for show. I've been
Speaker 1: saying they do this crap for show for months and
Speaker 1: they said, oh, you don't if you're an idiot, you
Speaker 1: don't believe the science all this stuff. And now they're
Speaker 1: straight up admitting that I was right and they were wrong.
Speaker 1: I just want to be very clear about this. What
Speaker 1: I've been telling you is true, and what the Fauciites
Speaker 1: and the journals have been saying is crap. Now they
Speaker 1: can try to rewrite history, and now they founch you go, oh,
Speaker 1: we've been saying all along, you know, it's very I've
Speaker 1: been how many months. If I've been saying the fauci
Speaker 1: wasn't a snied little coward, he would say, no outdoor
Speaker 1: masks if there's no reason for it, it's stupid. Why
Speaker 1: do they want every masking outdoors because they wanted to
Speaker 1: be masked up all the time, and everyone had to
Speaker 1: be masked because if anybody broke from the fauci I
Speaker 1: had consensus, if anybody refused to be emotionally and physically
Speaker 1: dominated by these collectivist nut jobs, then they would lose
Speaker 1: their grip on power. Then there would be the chance
Speaker 1: of freedom beginning to return to the American people. Then
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, we'd be in a different place,
Speaker 1: and they simply could not abide that, could they. They
Speaker 1: simply couldn't let us be in a place where individuals
Speaker 1: were making their own determinations. They've been controlling your ability
Speaker 1: even an outside to breathe fresh air for over a year.
Speaker 1: People tell me that we don't have to worry about
Speaker 1: tyranny in this country. I'm just gonna say this to
Speaker 1: you right now. The Second Amendment has never been more
Speaker 1: important for those of us paying attention. The check on
Speaker 1: government tyranny that exists because of firearms in the hands
Speaker 1: of civilians has never been in my lifetime more important
Speaker 1: than it is right now. Because you see the mentality
Speaker 1: of the Fauciites. You see what happens in Canada where
Speaker 1: they're pulling with a police are being sent to pull
Speaker 1: old ladies by their hair. You know you're not social
Speaker 1: distancing enough, then throw them on the floor and handcuff them.
Speaker 1: And why are you wearing a mask? It's really terrifying.
Speaker 1: It's sad because people are so stupid and have been
Speaker 1: all along. Oh, if you don't mask up three times,
Speaker 1: you're a denier. You don't believe the virus is real.
Speaker 1: Arguments that only morons make, but they were making them
Speaker 1: all the time. I mean, all these all these news
Speaker 1: organizations in The York Times, CNN so shameful. Social media
Speaker 1: should should never be forgiven for their role in the
Speaker 1: oppressive censorship around lockdowns. I mean they should. They showed
Speaker 1: they are authoritarian crap. The people that are making decisions
Speaker 1: of policy decisions on Twitter and Facebook and Google are
Speaker 1: shameful leftist loons shutting down essential political debate. Do you
Speaker 1: realize that we're we're gonna find out is not only
Speaker 1: is outdoor masking and we've known this all along, but
Speaker 1: there will be more and more studies. They can't now
Speaker 1: that people are starting to wake up and open their eyes.
Speaker 1: There's just gonna be more and more information there's gonna
Speaker 1: be more data to prove fauci is a disaster has
Speaker 1: been all along. I could just smell, oh I could.
Speaker 1: I could see the dishonesty dripping off that smug lib
Speaker 1: bureaucrat from the beginning, From the beginning. You don't go
Speaker 1: from haha, masks are stupid, They don't protect anybody to
Speaker 1: masks are even better than vaccines, with no actual data
Speaker 1: to support this, by the way, other than theoretical studies
Speaker 1: that they're doing. Where they're they're blasting some some water
Speaker 1: particles into a mask, as if that's representative of the
Speaker 1: way things happen in real life. It's all so outrageous
Speaker 1: and this is what they've done. They blame Trump for
Speaker 1: all the deaths in this country. Is Trump? Is trumpet
Speaker 1: fall for Brazil? Take a look at the numbers in Brazil?
Speaker 1: Is Trumpet fall for what's going on in India right
Speaker 1: now with COVID? Do you know that last summer they
Speaker 1: were writing stories. Last summer they were writing stories about
Speaker 1: how masks save in India from COVID. You know that
Speaker 1: it was because of their masking. What do you think happen? Now?
Speaker 1: They're actually beyond hospital capacity in places. They're having terrible
Speaker 1: problems in India. Blaming Trump for this what an absurdity.
Speaker 1: Blaming Trump for COVID is like blaming somebody for an
Speaker 1: asteroid hitting the planet. It's just it's beyond the comprehension
Speaker 1: of any intelligent, fair minded person. But you see so
Speaker 1: much of our study. I mean, the leftists are box
Speaker 1: checkers and their institutionalists, and they do what they're told,
Speaker 1: and they just want to pat on the head. They
Speaker 1: want to be told, oh, you're one of the smart,
Speaker 1: good ones because you do what we tell you to do,
Speaker 1: what the power apparatus tells them to do. They don't
Speaker 1: think for themselves. They don't have individualism, they don't have
Speaker 1: intellectual courage. You know, plenty of people can do multivariable
Speaker 1: calculus and think that they're really smart. How many of
Speaker 1: how many of the people that will go around bragging
Speaker 1: about their school or their degree, we're willing to stand
Speaker 1: up and say Fauci is full of it? Very very few,
Speaker 1: because common sense and courage are more valuable in life,
Speaker 1: more important than a GPA and an Ivy League school
Speaker 1: or an advanced degree in public health public health policy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: now they're finally saying outdoor masking, and I know, I
Speaker 1: know what the excuses will be. Oh, but it's because
Speaker 1: we have a vaccine. You still have tens of millions
Speaker 1: of people who are vaccinated, still COVID flowing around the country.
Speaker 1: And their argument isn't we've beat COVID, because then why
Speaker 1: should we mask anywhere? Their argument is, yeah, it turns
Speaker 1: out outdoor masking is not really necessary. It was never necessary.
Speaker 1: And that's the point. It was never reasonable, no matter
Speaker 1: what they tell you. So how do I know that
Speaker 1: I've been right along? How did I come to these conclusions?
Speaker 1: I know so many of you agree with me, by
Speaker 1: the way, and you know team you've been with it,
Speaker 1: You've been supporting me. One of my favorite things, whether
Speaker 1: it was that seapacker, people coming up to him in
Speaker 1: the street, is when they say, I really appreciate that
Speaker 1: you held the line, that you've kept it real about
Speaker 1: lockdowns and COVID policy this whole time. I've never gotten
Speaker 1: so much hatred in my life. I've never gotten so
Speaker 1: much scorn and disdain online and from from people you know,
Speaker 1: all over the the liberal journal universe, that I'm reckless,
Speaker 1: that I'm causing death, all I'm doing is speaking the
Speaker 1: obvious truth. But that but then it's you know, it's
Speaker 1: like I'm spreading COVID. I'm the the reason for COVID
Speaker 1: exactly what they did the Trump You say, well, Buck,
Speaker 1: how how would you know this stuff? How did you know?
Speaker 1: And there's so many reasons. But here's a here's a
Speaker 1: really good example of why. Why is it that I
Speaker 1: know that something's up? And I told you Fouci at
Speaker 1: the beginning? Oh yeah, mask sir, joke. They don't really do.
Speaker 1: They might make you feel better, but they don't do anything.
Speaker 1: That was in March of twenty twenty, and now here
Speaker 1: we are with with oh the big smart doctors who
Speaker 1: work at the CDC or whatever. They're all telling us
Speaker 1: that masks quote may be more effective even than vaccines
Speaker 1: end quote. Remember that, Yeah, based on what shut up,
Speaker 1: do what you're told. That's what they tell you. How
Speaker 1: do I know they're full of crap? Here's a good example.
Speaker 1: December thirtieth, twenty twenty. In September, this is the Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal. India is reporting almost one hundred thousand COVID
Speaker 1: cases a day, with many predicting it would soon pass
Speaker 1: the US and overall cases Instead, infections drop and are
Speaker 1: now at one fourth that level. One of the main
Speaker 1: reasons Indian health officials say is the country has managed
Speaker 1: to encourage and enforce almost universal acceptance of masks without
Speaker 1: much debate. December of twenty twenty, Friends, India staved off
Speaker 1: a horrible wave of the pandemic because of masks. That's
Speaker 1: what we're told. That's what the Indian The Indian fouchyites,
Speaker 1: the Indian equivalent of fauci here, claim that it was
Speaker 1: their mask policies. Okay, here's an update as of today
Speaker 1: from CNN as India breaks another global COVID nineteen record
Speaker 1: and hospitals run out of oxygen, countries pledge assistance and
Speaker 1: aid hospitals. They've actually gone beyond hospital capacity in Indian out.
Speaker 1: It's a horrible situation now, not everywhere, but there are
Speaker 1: places where that's happening, and they're having record numbers of
Speaker 1: COVID cases and hospitalizations and all this. But wait, I thought,
Speaker 1: I thought they beat it with masks. That's what we
Speaker 1: were told. They beat it with masks. Masking saved India.
Speaker 1: That was the narrative from the Indian government. So what happened?
Speaker 1: Did all of a sudden, people just stop masking. No
Speaker 1: are a nice try. The policies didn't change, folks. All
Speaker 1: you have to do is think about this. They work
Speaker 1: so well that they don't work, and then I can
Speaker 1: go hire and beyond this. You know the M I
Speaker 1: T studies. So this is what I mean though by
Speaker 1: giving you a sense of how do I know? They're
Speaker 1: full of crap things like this? It can't be Masks
Speaker 1: saved India in December, and now India is going through
Speaker 1: a horrible COVID wave while they're all still masking, and
Speaker 1: we don't say, hmm, maybe it had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with the masks then or now. This is called logic.
Speaker 1: This is called thinking for yourself, which libs do not do.
Speaker 1: They are collectivists. They want to be thought of as
Speaker 1: virtuous and smart and good, and they don't want to
Speaker 1: actually have to earn that or work for that. They
Speaker 1: just want to sign their name to it by being
Speaker 1: a leftist. That's all you gotta do. Be a fauciite.
Speaker 1: You have Kamala A in an interview with I don't
Speaker 1: remember name from from CNN. One of those CNN journals
Speaker 1: are pretty interchangeable. Kamala's vaccinated. She's sitting thirty feet away
Speaker 1: from the CNN host for the interview over the weekend.
Speaker 1: This is performative, that's what that is. That's not about
Speaker 1: happen tomeology. But add to that, add to that the
Speaker 1: fact that a study came out. Now, now it's a
Speaker 1: theoretical study from MIT. I actually looked at the study itself.
Speaker 1: But the they're making the case at what is considered
Speaker 1: one of the most elite math science STEM institutions in
Speaker 1: the world m T. Caltech. These are the places. But
Speaker 1: they're making the case that whether it's six feet of
Speaker 1: distance or sixty feet of distance really makes no difference.
Speaker 1: That it's about duration indoors. Now, I want, I want
Speaker 1: you to think this through for a little bit. And
Speaker 1: they cite all this different evidence they have and they're
Speaker 1: they're doing modeling. People say, oh, it's just models. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what do you think All the masks stuff is based
Speaker 1: off of models, not real world data. But now the
Speaker 1: now models are irrelevant. Now models don't really count. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you what we're gonna find out is what
Speaker 1: I've been saying. Oh long, the notion that you wear
Speaker 1: this mask if you're indoors, for you know, for an
Speaker 1: extended period of time, and virus is being expelled by
Speaker 1: an individual into the air. It's sub microscopic, and it's
Speaker 1: just being expelled in the air. And you wear this loose,
Speaker 1: loosely draped clothing over your face that you're pulling down,
Speaker 1: you're touching, you're pulling down, you're you know, masking up
Speaker 1: between bites and all this stuff, and that this is
Speaker 1: supposed to protect you in any meaningful way is insane.
Speaker 1: They're what this MIT study is saying is you know
Speaker 1: you could if you're indoors long enough, even if you're
Speaker 1: way across the other side of the room, you know,
Speaker 1: you could still get infected. Oh but that mask on
Speaker 1: your face is really going to protect you from that.
Speaker 1: Think about this. We're not talking about spittle, We're not
Speaker 1: talking about someone you know, just they're they're saliva hitting
Speaker 1: you in the face from talking to you. Were talking
Speaker 1: about sixty feet away still getting infected. Whether you're six
Speaker 1: feet or sixty feet they say, doesn't really make a difference.
Speaker 1: And as we know, six feet is completely arbitrary. It
Speaker 1: was all arbitrary, don't you see. It was just we're
Speaker 1: panicking and the medical establishments like wait, we don't really
Speaker 1: know how to stop this from spreading, and so let's
Speaker 1: just enforce a whole bunch of arbitrary, stupid rules as
Speaker 1: long as we say so. And then they got drunk
Speaker 1: with the power, and then it was you know, Fauci
Speaker 1: wanted to show everybody his abs on the cover of
Speaker 1: Vanity Fair. Take a look. I gotta tell you, it's
Speaker 1: good to be right. It's it's nice to be right
Speaker 1: about things. And when it comes to all the lockdowns
Speaker 1: and all that, I feel it's just not just a
Speaker 1: it's not an ego thing. It's it's a why do
Speaker 1: you get up every day and do work in the media, buck,
Speaker 1: why do you even do this kind of stuff. Let's
Speaker 1: try to tell you the truth because it is in
Speaker 1: short supply these days. And when I've been telling you
Speaker 1: for a long time now about the mentality of the
Speaker 1: lockdowners and the left and what they're doing, it's all
Speaker 1: it's all now not just coming. It's always been true,
Speaker 1: but it's becoming more apparent. People are seeing now what
Speaker 1: the truth is about all of this, and I think
Speaker 1: it's really it's the beginning of accountability for what has
Speaker 1: been done to us, for the mass delusions weaponized against
Speaker 1: the American people by the Democrats, in this in this
Speaker 1: anti Trump frenzy, in the fauciite consensus, and I just
Speaker 1: all of it. It's so absurd. But being right matters,
Speaker 1: It always has mattered to me, and on issues like this,
Speaker 1: of course it's critical. But it's also important to be
Speaker 1: right about what you're doing with your money. I mean,
Speaker 1: there are people that are saying the stock market could
Speaker 1: be on the verge of historic gains. According to my
Speaker 1: friends at Carnivore Trading, they've spotted several key indicators, but
Speaker 1: you know, the biggest profits they believe are going to
Speaker 1: come in sectors that Wall Street experts are missing. Carnivore
Speaker 1: Trading is an elite squad of strategists who influence major
Speaker 1: Wall Street investors. When you subscribe to Carnivore, you'll receive
Speaker 1: real time text alerts of explosive trades they're making for
Speaker 1: their elite clients. You can mirror their trades with your
Speaker 1: discount broker or pass, but why would you pass? Their
Speaker 1: trades routinely crush the S and P five hundred. The
Speaker 1: market looks to be on the verge of another historic upswing.
Speaker 1: According to my friends at carnivore. Get off the sidelines
Speaker 1: and mirror carnivores trades now right now. You'll get two
Speaker 1: weeks free. That's right, two weeks free of this service.
Speaker 1: Try it out. See if you're somebody who's in the
Speaker 1: market at all. If you're trading, check out carnivore. Go
Speaker 1: to get our Trades dot com and use promo code buck.
Speaker 1: That's get our Trades dot Com promo code buck. See
Speaker 1: website for guarantee terms and conditions. Past performance not a
Speaker 1: guarantee of future earnings. You know, I guess this means
Speaker 1: that doctor Fauci is now determined that you can get COVID.
Speaker 1: You can catch it through your webcam. That's the only
Speaker 1: thing I can conclude. But really it's silly, and this
Speaker 1: type of theater really is distracting to people who need
Speaker 1: to go out and get the vaccine. We have a
Speaker 1: lot of people, particularly those overage forty and those who
Speaker 1: are overweight, who all need to get the vaccine, and
Speaker 1: that all of the vaccines, the risks of the vaccines
Speaker 1: are less than the risk of the disease, particularly if
Speaker 1: you're over forty and overweight. But when Biden goes on
Speaker 1: the computer screen to a zoom call and wears a mask.
Speaker 1: He's making a mockery of the science. And this is
Speaker 1: dissuading people who are skeptical anyway, a mockery of the science,
Speaker 1: says MD and Senator Rand Paul, one of the few
Speaker 1: people who's been out there speaking the truth on this.
Speaker 1: And I am so thankful for those voices out there
Speaker 1: who who held the line for the truth when it
Speaker 1: would have been so much easier to say, just listen
Speaker 1: to Fauci, just listen to Fauci. He will save us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. I'm here to save you. I don't really
Speaker 1: you know, I kind of talk in circles and I
Speaker 1: basically go on TV to say there might be a
Speaker 1: surge after a plateau. There'll be a surge and then
Speaker 1: another surge. But but then but then declination. I'm not
Speaker 1: even sure if that's a word, but I like it.
Speaker 1: And then there'll be an ascent of the of the variable,
Speaker 1: the multipolarity of the diminution of the Yeah, you get
Speaker 1: it right, this is And the people, I just it's
Speaker 1: amazing me. They sit there, they watch CNN and they
Speaker 1: just go, oh, gosh, doctor Fauci, He's so smart. He
Speaker 1: he really knows what's going on, He really knows how
Speaker 1: to save us. That little that little jerk. Let them
Speaker 1: lock down schools, let them shut kids out of school,
Speaker 1: no reason for it. Totally totally owned by the Democrat left,
Speaker 1: this guy and won't cross the teachers' unions because of
Speaker 1: course they're important to the left. No wonder he was
Speaker 1: elevated out of the Trump administration. You're not gonna start
Speaker 1: fresh with somebody else. They say Trump was so bad,
Speaker 1: they keep Fauci. Why, guy's a little turncoat. He's the worst,
Speaker 1: the absolute worst. I gotta say it was. It was
Speaker 1: funny though, watching We got Ah We got a call
Speaker 1: of world leaders on Friday, Vladimir Putin, Angela merkel Er,
Speaker 1: Juan of Turkey, EU leaders, Ursula, Vander Leon, Ursula, Vander Leon,
Speaker 1: guten tag my name, my name is Ursula, and all
Speaker 1: of them are appearing on zoob The only we have
Speaker 1: this un buck Sexton dot com. By the way, we
Speaker 1: got the story up there. Go check out there, go
Speaker 1: check it out. The only one wearing a mask is Biden.
Speaker 1: In case you are wondering whether the mask has turned
Speaker 1: into a symbol of left wing Democrats, solidarity. He's wearing
Speaker 1: a mask. Friends on a zoom call. You know, Kamala
Speaker 1: sits down for an interview. She's masked in her interviews.
Speaker 1: She's vaccinated. She's vaccinated, and she's sitting down from another
Speaker 1: person who I bet is also vaccinated and seeing another
Speaker 1: I don't know that for one hundred percent, but it's
Speaker 1: also vaccine seated. She's masked, not that that really does anything,
Speaker 1: and they're thirty feet apart. This is the definition of
Speaker 1: virtue signally, let's see. It's just absurd. It's absurd, absolutely
Speaker 1: reckless idiocy on display. This is the way they do
Speaker 1: it is this is the approach that they take. And
Speaker 1: if you're opposed to it, if you have a problem
Speaker 1: with you're the bad person. I don't know what it
Speaker 1: is with airlines, but I'm not gonna let this go.
Speaker 1: They are mask fascists all these airlines. I think it's like,
Speaker 1: like I've been saying, it's because the closest thing that
Speaker 1: most Americans ever experienced to a totalitarian state, at least
Speaker 1: pre Democrat governors during the COVID error, because you know,
Speaker 1: that feels pretty damned totalitarian. But the closest thing most
Speaker 1: American's experienced to a totalitarian state comes in the form
Speaker 1: of being on an airplane. Sit this way, have your
Speaker 1: have your you know, seat belt buckled at all times.
Speaker 1: You can't stand, you can't sit, You can't have this
Speaker 1: in your hands. Mask up, shut your face, do what
Speaker 1: you're told, Look at me, give me a verbal. Will
Speaker 1: you help with the exit door? All this stuff they
Speaker 1: do as if as if we're just all morons. I oh,
Speaker 1: but what if there's a person who doesn't know how
Speaker 1: to use the seatpel and what if you know, what
Speaker 1: if your trade tables down? You know, what if a
Speaker 1: lot of things. But we we just the airline culture
Speaker 1: is to treat customers badly because it's a very expensive
Speaker 1: business to get into and people can't just you know,
Speaker 1: set up a competitor, and it's highly highly regulated, and
Speaker 1: so what do you get. You get airlines that treat
Speaker 1: you like garbage, like garbage just don't care. They just
Speaker 1: they just don't care. And you see this with the
Speaker 1: masking more than anything else. I mean, they are just
Speaker 1: they're getting they said, mask up. I was on a
Speaker 1: Jet Blue flight. I'm gonna call out the airline that
Speaker 1: wasn't a Jet Blue flight. Last night coming back from
Speaker 1: Texas and they said mask up between bites. I was like,
Speaker 1: they can't be that stupid, They're not really How is
Speaker 1: that enforceable? Well, it's really just is the airline steward
Speaker 1: or steward it's in a bad mood that day because
Speaker 1: then you're you're aa, you too slow at that cookie?
Speaker 1: Mask up a little faster. Do they really think they're
Speaker 1: protecting people from COVID? Are they? Are? They total morons?
Speaker 1: And you'd say, oh, bucket's not there for all. That's
Speaker 1: the airlines. It's the policy. Okay, who are Please? Somebody
Speaker 1: show me the morons that think that that we're going
Speaker 1: to save lives because we're masking up between bites on planes.
Speaker 1: I want to talk to those people. I want them
Speaker 1: to try to explain and to speak very clearly, very
Speaker 1: precisely about how this is going to help anyone. You know,
Speaker 1: I was in Austin for a couple of days after
Speaker 1: being at the border over the weekend. And yes, Austin
Speaker 1: great food, fun town, but the lives are ruining it now.
Speaker 1: I know you'd say it's always in a lib city, yeah,
Speaker 1: but now we're reaching end stage lib in Austin Okay,
Speaker 1: we're at the point now where you look around you're saying, really,
Speaker 1: they defunded police in Austin, we're gonna get any more
Speaker 1: defund the police stuff. But they defunded police in Austin
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty million dollars. They haven't done anyn
Speaker 1: with the money yet. They just said let's let's have
Speaker 1: less money for cops. Their murder rate doubled. Oh okay, that's,
Speaker 1: you know what, well done, Austin mayor. I mean, you
Speaker 1: think about this, how much dumb are they gonna get?
Speaker 1: You know, what their focus is buying up properties now
Speaker 1: to how is the homeless population in. That's not gonna
Speaker 1: make the homeless population go away or even necessarily help them.
Speaker 1: It's just going to encourage more people, more transients to
Speaker 1: show up in downtown Austin, and you know, urinate and
Speaker 1: defecate outside and harass and assault people and steel and
Speaker 1: use drugs and you know all the stuff that goes on.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I was so glad, and I you know,
Speaker 1: I put out the shout out to some of some
Speaker 1: of the KLBJ fam down there, and you know, I
Speaker 1: was happy to finally get some time on the ground
Speaker 1: in Austin. And yes, the food, the restaurants. Credit where
Speaker 1: it's due. The restaurants are amazing. I mean, that's some
Speaker 1: of the best meals I've had in I don't know,
Speaker 1: a couple of years. Really it was. The food's incredible.
Speaker 1: And because it's Texas, people are a little bit nicer,
Speaker 1: and so there's some upside to it. But in terms
Speaker 1: of the policies, these lives are out of their minds
Speaker 1: and and their policies on things including masking in Austin,
Speaker 1: you know, everywhere you go, you know, get up from
Speaker 1: the table, mask up, you know, sit down, you take
Speaker 1: the mask off. I mean, it's so dumb. We should
Speaker 1: all just be so sick of it. It didn't save us,
Speaker 1: it didn't protect us. They were wrong. They were wrong.
Speaker 1: It's obvious. And anybody argues me, it's say, okay, well,
Speaker 1: I'm explain the epidemiology of I'm sitting here for two
Speaker 1: hours breathing into a room, you know, without a mask.
Speaker 1: I get up, I go to the bathroom, got a
Speaker 1: mask up for that. I walk in, got a mask up.
Speaker 1: While I while I wait for a second to go
Speaker 1: to my table. Then I say at the table of
Speaker 1: the mask up I have this policy. And also I
Speaker 1: know they got rid of the statewide mask mandate. But
Speaker 1: you know, wherever there are Libs, wherever they're a Democrat,
Speaker 1: Biden Harris voters in full control. You just have this insanity,
Speaker 1: no reasonableness, you know, and they're just all everywhere. The
Speaker 1: mask propaganda is everywhere, and the social distancing propaganda, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, say outdoors in the parks, stay six feet
Speaker 1: away from each other, don't get too close to each other.
Speaker 1: You know. It's like they're setting up little pens for
Speaker 1: people like we're all animals, you know. You can only
Speaker 1: only be with the animals from your own family, can't
Speaker 1: mix with the other, you know, farm animals. It's absurd.
Speaker 1: This was in Texas. I know, you say, Buck Austin,
Speaker 1: isn't it is? It's Texas, so I had I had
Speaker 1: a good time there. But it's like the Libs are
Speaker 1: running an experiment to see how much how many cities
Speaker 1: they can ruin and how many lives they can destroy,
Speaker 1: while the only upside is posting hashtag BLM on their
Speaker 1: Facebook page. That's really what we're up against now. I
Speaker 1: was at the US Mexico border when the debates and
Speaker 1: the news coverage of the mckea Bryant case was at
Speaker 1: its peak, so I haven't had a chance to really
Speaker 1: talk to you about my thoughts on this case until now.
Speaker 1: And this is very troubling what happened here, because this
Speaker 1: should be an instance where anybody who understands law and order,
Speaker 1: who understands the need to protect life, understands consequences of actions,
Speaker 1: would say a police officer is justified in using lethal
Speaker 1: force to stop a person from stabbing to death another
Speaker 1: person in broad daylight right in front of him. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you are coming up with a textbook training manual
Speaker 1: level a lethal use of force situation person trying to
Speaker 1: stab to death another person with butcher knife or kitchen
Speaker 1: knife in front of a police officer, that's going to
Speaker 1: be a very good example to use. If a cop
Speaker 1: can't draw his weapon or her weapon and use it
Speaker 1: against a person who is in the process of murdering
Speaker 1: another human being, then law enforcement and a fundamental foundational
Speaker 1: bargain we have with the state, so to speak, that
Speaker 1: they will have a monopoly on the use of force
Speaker 1: to protect us, although as we know, we have our
Speaker 1: own firearms and so it's not an entirely a monopoly.
Speaker 1: It all falls apart. You know, after the Chauvin case
Speaker 1: and that verdict, which which we've talked about a bit
Speaker 1: here on the show. I knew that immediately the Left
Speaker 1: wasn't good to say, Okay, maybe the system does work.
Speaker 1: They said, well, this is just the first of many
Speaker 1: victories that they plan to rack up against the police.
Speaker 1: Not a police officer who used excessive force against the
Speaker 1: police as a general thing, and throwing all the law
Speaker 1: enforcement officers under the bus in the process. But the
Speaker 1: mckea o' brien case, I must say this, the the
Speaker 1: dishonesty around this the media they leave out in headline
Speaker 1: after a headline, story after story, she was trying to
Speaker 1: stab to death another young black woman. She was trying
Speaker 1: to stab to death another human being. It's on video
Speaker 1: plane for all to see. The cop here is a hero,
Speaker 1: not a bad guy. I'm sorry for miss Bryant's family.
Speaker 1: I know she is sixteen. I understand the loss of
Speaker 1: a child is a terrible tragedy under any circumstances that
Speaker 1: all set. A cop here saved a life by taking
Speaker 1: the life of an aggressor in a clear lethal force situation.
Speaker 1: That is what happened. If we abandon this, if we
Speaker 1: start to say, oh, but but but you know, you know,
Speaker 1: knives don't really count, or or well, she was sixteen,
Speaker 1: so that doesn't count. Whatever we're we're essentially keeping, we're
Speaker 1: essentially keeping the door wide open for complete anarchy and
Speaker 1: mob rule on the streets. What cop would ever take
Speaker 1: the job? What cop would ever want the job knowing
Speaker 1: that in this circumstance you actually use your gun and
Speaker 1: people are going to call you a racist and a
Speaker 1: murderer for it. He saved a black girl's life by
Speaker 1: using his weapon. It's very clear in the video this woman,
Speaker 1: her arm reaches back with this knife. She's about to
Speaker 1: stab someone to death. You don't have to wait until
Speaker 1: the blade goes in. You don't have to wait until
Speaker 1: there's gushing from the carrond artery. You're supposed to act
Speaker 1: before that happens. As a law enforcement officer. Is there
Speaker 1: really any debate or doubt about this? The left thinks,
Speaker 1: so white cop kill the young black girl, racist and bad.
Speaker 1: That's that is the narrative, a vicious, destructive narrative. It's
Speaker 1: a lie, and it destroys so much of what holds
Speaker 1: us together as a society when they do this stuff,
Speaker 1: but they don't care. Just a bunch of just a
Speaker 1: bunch of civilizational arsonists. That's what the corporate media has become.
Speaker 1: And of course Democrat elected leadership. But here's here's Karen
Speaker 1: Bass on her version of what happened here play four. Well,
Speaker 1: let me just say that oftentimes when this happens, absolutely
Speaker 1: there's an emotional reaction. But what Jensaki said I agree with.
Speaker 1: Whether it applies to this case or not, I think
Speaker 1: is not the issue. You also had Adam Toledo, thirteen
Speaker 1: year old child. You know, he had a gun, he
Speaker 1: dropped it, he raised. We need to be able to
Speaker 1: distinguish between, yes, between Derek Chauvin that was murder and
Speaker 1: this which looks to me like a righteous We absolutely
Speaker 1: need to distinguish. But we also need to look at
Speaker 1: policing overall. And one of the things that I hope
Speaker 1: we really address is maybe the focus needs to be
Speaker 1: on de escalation. I know police officers are taught to
Speaker 1: shoot to kill. A lot of people raise, well, why
Speaker 1: couldn't he be shot her in the leg? Why couldn't
Speaker 1: he have done all these different things? The point is
Speaker 1: we have got to come up with the way to
Speaker 1: stop there's so many people being killed in the country.
Speaker 1: The people being killed in this country are not being
Speaker 1: killed by cops, if you guys talking about so many
Speaker 1: of them. This is the misuse of statistics, the misrepresentation
Speaker 1: of numbers to support a narrative. Cops are not the
Speaker 1: reason for the surge and murder, and actually the reason
Speaker 1: for the surge and murder is the undermining of cops
Speaker 1: in the last year. Cops are a very very very
Speaker 1: small percentage of the lethal force instance of any kind
Speaker 1: in this country. And yet listen to just this Democrat
Speaker 1: representative just spewing nonsense, just garbage. Okay, this was this
Speaker 1: was a case. They leapt on this again. The left
Speaker 1: jumped on it. They said, oh mckea Brian sixteen year
Speaker 1: old girls, she's black killed by a white guy. Racism. No,
Speaker 1: it's not racism. Actually, sorry, you don't get to do that.
Speaker 1: You don't get to just pretend that every time a
Speaker 1: cop uses his weapon he or she is the bad guy.
Speaker 1: There are bad cops, there are mistakes, but we're not
Speaker 1: letting them get away with treating this like every incident
Speaker 1: that BLM comes up with, where the narrative goes way
Speaker 1: beyond the facts or even completely misrepresents the facts to
Speaker 1: support a political cause. In this case, the political cause
Speaker 1: is identity politics, the Democrat Party, undermining of police, the
Speaker 1: whole thing. It's so disgraceful and people are suffering because
Speaker 1: of this. Okay mckea. Briant got shot because she was
Speaker 1: trying to stab another human being to death. She made
Speaker 1: a very bad decision. It doesn't matter that she was sixteen.
Speaker 1: It was a question of life and death for the
Speaker 1: person she was trying to stab. And the Democrats the
Speaker 1: dishonesty around this's they're appalling. Jensaki, that knitwit idiot, appalling
Speaker 1: what they've said about this Lebron James, that's spoiled brat
Speaker 1: disgusting with this tweet about the police officer. Don't I'm
Speaker 1: done never watching the NBA again, I'll tell you that much.
Speaker 1: Not that I've been watching it anyway. It's garbage. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's that time of year where I'm trying to get
Speaker 1: all my stuff done. You know, tax Day got pushed
Speaker 1: back and I got all this admin and but you know,
Speaker 1: one of the things about doing it and just setting
Speaker 1: yourself up is you give yourself peace of mind, and
Speaker 1: you know you gotta do it, so now's the time, right.
Speaker 1: Procrastination just makes things harder. And you know, if you're
Speaker 1: at that stage of life where you're just buying a home,
Speaker 1: having babies, trying to build your financial future, you need
Speaker 1: to secure your family's future. By establishing a will or trust.
Speaker 1: At Trust and Will dot com for as little as
Speaker 1: thirty nine dollars, you can nominate guardians for your children,
Speaker 1: determine who would get your stuff in the event, and
Speaker 1: plan for future medical care, all from the comfort of
Speaker 1: your home. You know, hiring a traditional state attorney can
Speaker 1: cost thousands, and using a one size fits all template
Speaker 1: is not specialized enough for your needs. Trust and Will
Speaker 1: documents are designed by a state planning experts and customize
Speaker 1: for the state you live in. With live customer support
Speaker 1: seven days a week, Trust and Will dot COM's team
Speaker 1: is available to answer any questions you have while setting
Speaker 1: up your plan. I've been on the site. It's so easy,
Speaker 1: straightforward and just get it done. Do it now. Gain
Speaker 1: peace of mind at Trust and Will dot com. Slash
Speaker 1: buck and get ten percent off plus free shipping of
Speaker 1: your customized legal documents. The hard copies, they'll send them
Speaker 1: to you. Don't wait, go right now. This is really important.
Speaker 1: Get ten percent off plus free shipping at trust and
Speaker 1: Will dot com slash Buck. The Supreme Court has granted
Speaker 1: cert meaning that they will actually hear a case about
Speaker 1: concealed carry in New York. Could this be lining up
Speaker 1: a real win for the Second Amendment? And also what's
Speaker 1: the state of the Biden administration's gun grab efforts. We'll
Speaker 1: get into that with our friend Cam Edwards. He is
Speaker 1: the editor of Bearing Arms dot com. Cam. Great to
Speaker 1: have you, hey, Buck, thanks so much for the invite.
Speaker 1: So tell me what's going on here with this this
Speaker 1: Supreme Court case New York Concealed Carry. Where are we? Yeah?
Speaker 1: This is a big deal. Um. You know, this is
Speaker 1: a case that challenges the the carry licensing laws in
Speaker 1: New York State, not New York City particular, because you've
Speaker 1: got sort of this two tiered system in New York State.
Speaker 1: Although New York City's gun laws could certainly be impacted
Speaker 1: by this court case. And basically what's being challenged is
Speaker 1: the discretionary issuing of these licenses. You know, if you
Speaker 1: live in forty two states, you live in a place
Speaker 1: that recognizes your right to carry and as a what
Speaker 1: we call a shall issue system, meaning if you meet
Speaker 1: the statutory requirements, you know, you've you've passed your background check,
Speaker 1: you've undergone your training, then you get your concealed carry
Speaker 1: license when you apply. New York is one of a
Speaker 1: handful of states like California and Maryland, Massachusetts that give
Speaker 1: broad discretion to law enforcement to deny a concealed carry
Speaker 1: license to anybody because they don't recognize a general right
Speaker 1: of self defense. So in order for you to get
Speaker 1: a concealed carry license, you have to be special, you
Speaker 1: have to be different. You have to be somehow above
Speaker 1: the average citizen, because the average citizen doesn't have the
Speaker 1: right to bear arms in self defense in these states.
Speaker 1: It's remarkable because I know a New York City, if
Speaker 1: you're a celebrity and you have connections, you can get
Speaker 1: a concealed carry permit. Other than that, unless you can
Speaker 1: prove that you're moving large amounts of you know, diamonds
Speaker 1: or precious metals cash in your business day to day,
Speaker 1: you have almost no chance of getting concealed carry license.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know why Howard stir Earn gets a
Speaker 1: concealed carry permit, but I don't why exactly. Look, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump had a concealed carry license in New York City,
Speaker 1: but you know, none of the folks working in Trump
Speaker 1: Tower had a concealed carry license because they can't get one.
Speaker 1: And I have no problem with Donald Trump and to
Speaker 1: concealed carry license. But you know the guy who owns
Speaker 1: the Bedega a couple of blocks over, who wants to
Speaker 1: be able to protect himself and his family, well he's
Speaker 1: at work. Well he has the same right as Donald
Speaker 1: Trump does to keep him bear arms. It says of
Speaker 1: the City of New York and the State of New York,
Speaker 1: they don't see it that way. How do you think
Speaker 1: this will shake out? I know that that rioting a
Speaker 1: tea leaves and trying to get ahead of where the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court of It is they're going to hear this
Speaker 1: this case. But I can't even think I can't even
Speaker 1: think of a an argument that could be made that's
Speaker 1: reasonable that even let's say John Roberts, who is always
Speaker 1: a concern here, would go along with on the prohibition
Speaker 1: side of this equation. Yeah, I'm I'm you know, I'm
Speaker 1: cautiously opt to mystic on paper, we should have at
Speaker 1: least five votes, even without Justice John Roberts. We've got
Speaker 1: you know, Red Cavanaugh, We've got Justice Scalia, excuse me,
Speaker 1: Justice Alito, Justice Thomas, Justice Gorsitch, and now we've got
Speaker 1: Justice Barrett, you know, all of whom have expressed support
Speaker 1: for the right to keep in bear arms. Several of
Speaker 1: those justices have actually urged the Court to take a
Speaker 1: secondment in case over the past few years, saying that
Speaker 1: lower courts were abusing the Heller decision in the McDonald
Speaker 1: decision which struck down DC in Chicago, scandgun bands, respectively.
Speaker 1: So you know, I think there is reason for cautious
Speaker 1: optimism for at least a five four decision. I'd love
Speaker 1: to see Justice Roberts join along. Frankly, I'd love to
Speaker 1: see a unanimous nine nothing decision in favor of our
Speaker 1: right to keep in bear arms. But I don't think
Speaker 1: that's going to happen. Unfortunately. I think the liberal wing
Speaker 1: of the Court is still going to try to explain
Speaker 1: that our rights are not actually into vidual rights at all.
Speaker 1: They're they're a right to join the militia, but they're
Speaker 1: not a right to carry a handgun in self defense.
Speaker 1: Speak of cam Edwards. He's the editor of bearing arms
Speaker 1: dot Com and also the host of the forty eight
Speaker 1: fool podcast Cam. I'm hearing that there are some states
Speaker 1: that are that are moving toward more more permissive carry
Speaker 1: requirements as well. What can you tell me about that? Yeah, absolutely,
Speaker 1: this is the other side of the coin, buck. I mean,
Speaker 1: you've got, you know, as I said, eight states left
Speaker 1: in the country that still have these sort of discretionary
Speaker 1: laws in place. You have forty two states that are
Speaker 1: shall issue, but you have twenty states that are constitutional
Speaker 1: carrier permit less carry. In other words, they still have
Speaker 1: their concealed carry licensing system, but as long as you're
Speaker 1: a legal gun owner, no permit is required for you
Speaker 1: to carry. And we've actually seen four states just this
Speaker 1: year adopt permit less carry legislation. Utah, Montana, Tennessee and
Speaker 1: i have all embraced permit less carries since January first
Speaker 1: of this year. So, you know, even if folks want to,
Speaker 1: you know, try to claim the well, back in seventeen
Speaker 1: seventy six, nobody walked around carrying a gun, which is false.
Speaker 1: Even if you adopt this sort of you know, living
Speaker 1: constitution theory, Well, the fact remains that Americans in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one are just as wedded to our right to
Speaker 1: keep in bear arms as they were back in seventeen
Speaker 1: ninety one when the Bill of Rights was ratified. Cam,
Speaker 1: are we seeing anything you know, bubbling up from the
Speaker 1: the gun grabbers at the federal level and Biden administration
Speaker 1: still But we had a couple of there were a
Speaker 1: number of mass shootings that occurred, and we went right
Speaker 1: back into, oh, we need to have all these changes made,
Speaker 1: we need We started hearing about the gun show loophole,
Speaker 1: We started what happened with all of that? Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you know, Joe Manson's what happened to it, because he
Speaker 1: said that he's not in favor of the language that
Speaker 1: has passed out of the House in terms of these
Speaker 1: back ground check bills. So Congress appears to be stymied
Speaker 1: right now, although Chris Murphy of Connecticut did say last
Speaker 1: week that he sees a path to sixty votes, and
Speaker 1: he's apparently been reaching out to Republicans talking about maybe
Speaker 1: a scaled down version, maybe something like a Mansion to
Speaker 1: be bill that would require background checks a gun shows
Speaker 1: and online sales, but would not cover you know, private
Speaker 1: transfers between family and friends. I still think that's the
Speaker 1: wrong way to go. I mean, look, but these are
Speaker 1: largely unenforceable and surely unconstitutional gun control laws. They won't
Speaker 1: make a difference in terms of fighting violent crime, which
Speaker 1: is on the increase around the country. But we need
Speaker 1: to focus on those violent offenders as opposed to trying
Speaker 1: to ban or arrest our way to safety. And the
Speaker 1: Biden administration is still stuck on this mentality of well, no,
Speaker 1: let's just been more gun laws on the books. Even
Speaker 1: at the same time you've got other Democrats say well,
Speaker 1: we need to abolish the police. You've got, you know,
Speaker 1: a very schizophrenic Democratic party. They can't decide if they
Speaker 1: want to try to pass you know, a new non
Speaker 1: violent and felony offenses or possessory offense, not even violent offenses,
Speaker 1: new non violent possessory offenses, or if they want to
Speaker 1: try to get rid of our nation's law enforcement. Do
Speaker 1: we have some sense cam of whether are we at
Speaker 1: an all time high for American legal gun ownership and
Speaker 1: legal guns in circulation. It would seem like that could
Speaker 1: be the case. We're certainly at an all time high
Speaker 1: in terms of gun sales. There are more than twenty
Speaker 1: million firearms sold last year according to the the National Shooting
Speaker 1: Sports Foundation. In terms of a percentage of the population,
Speaker 1: you know, it might not be as high as it
Speaker 1: was several decades ago, but we are seeing more Americans
Speaker 1: every day embrace the right to keep in my arms,
Speaker 1: and I think that's a really, really good thing, particularly
Speaker 1: when you see, you know, we just had a new
Speaker 1: Asian American Second Amendment groups start up just a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks ago in response to the threats and the
Speaker 1: violence that were seen against that community. If you got
Speaker 1: the National African American Gun Association, which is owned by
Speaker 1: thousands of members a month, and then you've got you know,
Speaker 1: the traditional Second Amendment groups like the Second Amendment Foundation,
Speaker 1: gun Owners of America in ra that they say they
Speaker 1: are all as well seeing growth in terms of their members.
Speaker 1: So I think we are in a renaissance for our
Speaker 1: right to keep in bear arms, where more Americans, including
Speaker 1: many who never ever considered exercising their rights before, are
Speaker 1: now choosing to do so. And I think it's a
Speaker 1: very good thing. And do you believe we're going to
Speaker 1: see some data, you know, it's perhaps a little bit
Speaker 1: earlier this, but data for I always remember the John
Speaker 1: Lott book More Guns, Less Crime talking about concealed carry
Speaker 1: permit increases in areas where there's high violent crime, and
Speaker 1: you can draw you can actually see based on the
Speaker 1: numbers and the statistics a decline in violent crime in
Speaker 1: areas that allow concealed carry versus those that don't, especially
Speaker 1: when they when they institute that new legislation. Have we
Speaker 1: seen any data cam about how you know, gun sales,
Speaker 1: gun permits are affecting. You know, our state's getting hit
Speaker 1: worse than others with the increase in violent crime that
Speaker 1: could be attributed to or rather that could do you
Speaker 1: see what I'm saying. I mean, do we have any
Speaker 1: data on this yet? Well, you know, we know not
Speaker 1: any firm data. The FBA Uniform Crime Report will be
Speaker 1: out in probably a couple of months at least for
Speaker 1: the first six months of twenty twenty, and that'll be
Speaker 1: really interesting to see. But you know, we do know
Speaker 1: that the homicide rate in places like New York City, Philadelphia,
Speaker 1: Los Angeles, Portland, Oregon, Chicago, places with a lot of
Speaker 1: gun control laws on the books, they did see their
Speaker 1: firearms homicide rate increase exponentially last year despite all those
Speaker 1: gun control laws that were on the books. Anecdotally, Oklahoma
Speaker 1: City was actually one of the few major cities that
Speaker 1: did not see an increase in homicide. And Oklahoma is
Speaker 1: a constitutional carey state, so you would anticipate right that
Speaker 1: if if more gun control laws equaled safer streets the
Speaker 1: New York City, you know, Oklahoma's, you would have led
Speaker 1: the way in terms of an increase in violent crime. Instead,
Speaker 1: it was the opposite. You saw places that restrict the
Speaker 1: right to keep in bear arms, see you know, fifty
Speaker 1: sixty seventy percent increases in their homicide rate. And there's
Speaker 1: you know, Oklahoma City, where if you're a legal gun owner,
Speaker 1: you can lawfully carry without a license, and they bucked
Speaker 1: the trend. I think that's worth exploring. Everyone's always got
Speaker 1: to be on the lookout for bucking the trend. Camp
Speaker 1: great to have him an editor of Bearing arms dot Com.
Speaker 1: Camp Thanks so much, Buddy, appreciate your expertise. As always,
Speaker 1: you bet anytime. Buck. You mentioned police reform a couple
Speaker 1: of times. The House, of course has passed the bill
Speaker 1: that you were a co sponsor when you were in
Speaker 1: the Senate, but it doesn't have there's not a high
Speaker 1: hope for it to pass as is in the United
Speaker 1: States Senate. So you know, you talked about the fact
Speaker 1: that you have a special responsibility. The President talked about
Speaker 1: the fact that he would always have the backs of
Speaker 1: African Americans in this country. So will you and he
Speaker 1: get more involvedolved in the informal negotiations going on? And
Speaker 1: if so, how well. We've made our position clear each
Speaker 1: of us and as an administration, we've made our position clear.
Speaker 1: But it is for the folks in the Senate um
Speaker 1: to work together to resolve whatever may be differences of
Speaker 1: opinion about the details of the legislation. But I think
Speaker 1: there's no question that the American people in a bipartisan
Speaker 1: way realize and and and want that there will be
Speaker 1: some reform of this system. Nope, not true, there's not
Speaker 1: there's not bipartisan demand for police reform. There's a Democrat thing.
Speaker 1: Want everyone to be very clear on this is Democrats
Speaker 1: who say they want police reform. The Democrat base is
Speaker 1: running around screaming about defunding police. The Democrat leadership is
Speaker 1: calling it police reform, and those of us who actually
Speaker 1: know something about law enforcement and statistics when it comes
Speaker 1: to crime and the truth, it's just a broad concept
Speaker 1: the truth and thinking that it still matters. We hear
Speaker 1: this stuff from Kamala, We hear what she's saying, and
Speaker 1: you just recognize it's all propaganda. There's no serious police reform.
Speaker 1: Every well, what I think, oh, getting rid of qualified immunity?
Speaker 1: You think that you think that you're gonna have good
Speaker 1: people signing up to be law enforcement officers. If every
Speaker 1: time a cop has to wrestle some crazy crackhead to
Speaker 1: the ground or some guy high on meth or you
Speaker 1: know whoever, and you know, they they scrape their chin
Speaker 1: or they you know, they they you know, bust up
Speaker 1: their shoulder a little bit because the cop is wrestling
Speaker 1: with them, because they're resisting arrest. You can sue the
Speaker 1: cop personally directly. What person is gonna want to sign
Speaker 1: up for that job? Who's gonna want to be a
Speaker 1: part of law enforcement? If that becomes the reality. Indeed,
Speaker 1: there's not really a lot of clarity on this is
Speaker 1: there from the Democrats. They don't seem to understand what's
Speaker 1: going to happen here. They don't seem to really know
Speaker 1: that what's gone on already, and you see this from
Speaker 1: the last to the date of from the last twelve months.
Speaker 1: Attacking cops, undermining law enforcement, hurts law and order, which
Speaker 1: hurts people. It means that there's real suffering from this.
Speaker 1: You know, victims of violent crime. Not only are they
Speaker 1: harmed and of course in pain and all of it
Speaker 1: from the actual act, they suffer with trauma long after
Speaker 1: the incident. Real trauma, not oh my gosh, somebody look
Speaker 1: made a joke on a TV show. I don't like. Trauma.
Speaker 1: Real trauma. That's what victims of violent crime deal with,
Speaker 1: not the Libs snowflake make believe trauma of you know,
Speaker 1: a conservative speaker coming to a college campus. So there's
Speaker 1: real pain here that comes from these bad ideas. And
Speaker 1: that's what I think there's not enough of a focus
Speaker 1: on in these debates and discussions that when Democrats get
Speaker 1: their way with stuff like defund the police or just
Speaker 1: hurting law enforcement efforts, people suffer. They hurt people with
Speaker 1: that and then and then, but the Democrats pretend that
Speaker 1: it's it's bipartisan d like where we all agree with
Speaker 1: them on this. Instead, why even pretend they have to
Speaker 1: try to get us to agree and they'll just say
Speaker 1: we agree and then do whatever they want. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: The Republicans said they want to do this too. Let's
Speaker 1: just you know, executive order from Biden. They say this
Speaker 1: about gun gun reformed. It's always reform. You know, it's
Speaker 1: not control, it's not it's you know, not bands, it's
Speaker 1: not buy backs or whatever. Right, it's always reform. Now
Speaker 1: play fifteen. Congress has to act exactly because we have
Speaker 1: to codify. That's a fancy word for make permanent, make
Speaker 1: the law that we agree. We should have background checks,
Speaker 1: that's just reasonable gun safety laws. We should have an
Speaker 1: assault weapons band. Assault weapons have been designed to kill
Speaker 1: a lot of people quickly. They are weapons of war.
Speaker 1: And Congress has to act. Danna. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: I was recently in Connecticut Senators Murphy and Blumenthal and
Speaker 1: the governor. There's so many people, the families of Sandy Hook.
Speaker 1: You know, I honestly thought, I honestly thought that when
Speaker 1: did those babies, twenty six and seven year old children
Speaker 1: were slaughtered? I really thought Congress would act. I thought
Speaker 1: that would be a thing, and it didn't happen. And um,
Speaker 1: but do you think it can happen? My question, wouldn't happen.
Speaker 1: But my question your priority as an administration, but it's
Speaker 1: part of our priority. We have to multitask, Yeah, multitask
Speaker 1: when's you going to get to the border? Buck's been
Speaker 1: to the border? Has Kamala been in the border this year?
Speaker 1: Just wondering, well, the vice president's playing can't fly down there.
Speaker 1: What's the problem on the gun control issue or the
Speaker 1: the just agitating lawful gun owner's issue, because that's really
Speaker 1: what they do with this stuff. She says they need
Speaker 1: back We have background checks. We need more background checks. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's really gonna stop criminals from from murdering people. That's
Speaker 1: that's a great idea. We keep going back to the
Speaker 1: same arguments with Democrats because ultimately this is all about power,
Speaker 1: not about reality in terms of dealing with problems, and
Speaker 1: we need to make sure that we don't just get
Speaker 1: worn down by the endless propagandizing and lies they tell,
Speaker 1: because it does get exhausting. I will say that I'm
Speaker 1: exhausted with the Biden Harris bullcrap already. I did have
Speaker 1: some really good food in Austin over the weekend, but
Speaker 1: I gotta say I think when it comes to my proteins,
Speaker 1: when it comes to my steaks, my chicken, my burgers.
Speaker 1: I can do it as good as anybody. And you
Speaker 1: know why, I've got the best product moink all right.
Speaker 1: Monk is grass fed and grass finished beef and lamb,
Speaker 1: pastured pork and chicken, wildcut Alaskan salmon. It gets sent
Speaker 1: right to your door in a box. Okay, it's packed, frozen,
Speaker 1: ready to go right at your freezer. You thought out,
Speaker 1: and like I've done, you'll make the most amazing whole
Speaker 1: roast chickens. The bacon is succulent and delicious. All they
Speaker 1: have to do is sign up at monkbox dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. That's right, monkbox dot com slash buck, and
Speaker 1: you'll get a monk box sent right at your door
Speaker 1: with all these incredible grass fed pasture raised meats. You've
Speaker 1: got the wild salmon, top quality stuff, and you'll be
Speaker 1: helping family farmers become financially independent outside the grip of
Speaker 1: big agriculture. They guarantee you'll say, oink, oink, I'm just
Speaker 1: so happy I got MoInd Join the monk movement today.
Speaker 1: Go to monkbox, m o I n k box, moinkbox
Speaker 1: dot com, slash buck and listeners to this show get
Speaker 1: a free year of ground beef. That's moinkbox dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck m o I n k box dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. It is harsany time. My friend David Harsani
Speaker 1: from National Review with us now go to National Review
Speaker 1: dot com for his latest Mister David, great to have you.
Speaker 1: Oh it was great to be here. Thank you. I
Speaker 1: was at the border last week, so I missed some
Speaker 1: of the back and forth because I was busy trying
Speaker 1: to actually do in the field reporting on illegal immigration issues.
Speaker 1: Some of the discussion around this most recent police shooting
Speaker 1: involving this young woman mckea Bryant, I was no. I
Speaker 1: can't say I'm surprised anymore. I don't really always have
Speaker 1: the words at hand here, but um, it is amazing.
Speaker 1: I think I could say that that there are people
Speaker 1: that seem to claim now and in the media, that
Speaker 1: wanting to stay that trying to stab another person with
Speaker 1: a six or seven inch long, very sharp knife is
Speaker 1: not actually a lethal force situation. Well, I think happened
Speaker 1: was that the timing of that shooting worked perfectly for
Speaker 1: them for their political needs, and then when they know
Speaker 1: more information came out, it was obvious that it was
Speaker 1: justified shooting. And but then they were sort of boxing
Speaker 1: into a corner and they have to defend it. At
Speaker 1: least some people that other people I think are just insane.
Speaker 1: But you know, you have someone who that cop, from
Speaker 1: all the evidence we have or see, saved another young
Speaker 1: girl's life. And I'm not sure you know the things
Speaker 1: that people say. Now, you need to talk him down,
Speaker 1: you need to shoot him in the leg. You know,
Speaker 1: I was surprised they didn't say, like shoot the knife
Speaker 1: out of her hand. And people live in a fantasy world.
Speaker 1: Once you draw in its situation like that, and you
Speaker 1: you know, cops have to shoot to kill. There's no
Speaker 1: other you know, cops don't shoot for your foot as
Speaker 1: far as I know. And so I don't know, you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's just a couple of things on that. I mean,
Speaker 1: because this is this came up and Congresswoman Bass, for example,
Speaker 1: when on the Sundays when one of the Sunday shows
Speaker 1: and said, yeah, people that are talking about shooting the leg,
Speaker 1: and uh, it's hard to shoot somebody in the leg
Speaker 1: in a situation like this where they're moving and and
Speaker 1: and and beyond that, cops don't train to do that.
Speaker 1: And also that's very unlikely to stop someone who from
Speaker 1: stabbing somebody else to death. Actually, people don't really necessarily
Speaker 1: understand this. It's very easy to get shot of the
Speaker 1: leg and still be able to swing your arm and
Speaker 1: whether it's pull the trigger or swing your arm and
Speaker 1: kill somebody or stab someone. So it's just people say
Speaker 1: these things out loud, David, and I think it's important
Speaker 1: we understand that it comes largely from ignorance. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are these are actually stupid things to say. It's
Speaker 1: not like this is an an opinion that's intelligent that
Speaker 1: should be taken seriously. But some of those will hold
Speaker 1: these opinions are either in positions of public trust and
Speaker 1: power or supposed to be informing the public. And that's
Speaker 1: what's so troubling to me. Yeah, I mean people just
Speaker 1: take this, you know, perfunctory anti cop position because it's
Speaker 1: the cops shooting shooting someone of color, you know, automatically
Speaker 1: we know who's guilty and who's innocent. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just it's not how it works in the real world.
Speaker 1: These things go down with you know, in seconds, and
Speaker 1: cops have to make choices. Sometimes cops are bad people,
Speaker 1: but most often I just don't buy that they're going
Speaker 1: around looking to shoot young you know, black tea, you know, teenagers.
Speaker 1: It's just it's just an outrageous remark. And you saw
Speaker 1: what Lebron did. He put a picture up of the
Speaker 1: cop and said you're next or whatever. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just all emotion, and it's getting to a point where
Speaker 1: it's actually quite dangerous. Who's going to want to be
Speaker 1: a cop if if they can't, you know, if they
Speaker 1: go out there and they have to worry about politics
Speaker 1: all the time. It seems it seems like a really
Speaker 1: bad situation you're setting up because the communities that often
Speaker 1: need cops the most won't have the right kind of
Speaker 1: people being policemen. You know. For a long time, we're
Speaker 1: speaking to David Harsani, senior writer at National Review dot com. David,
Speaker 1: for a long time, I feel like conservatives have been saying,
Speaker 1: you know, the woke sports stuff has ever since Kaepernick,
Speaker 1: it's just been more in your face and getting worse
Speaker 1: all the time. But we say, Okay, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna watch this or I'm not gonna watch that.
Speaker 1: Now I have to say it just to be as
Speaker 1: always honest with my audience. I don't really watch professional
Speaker 1: sports anymore, and I haven't for years now. I used
Speaker 1: to watch football before that, I used to watch basketball,
Speaker 1: but I basically just I opt out. I don't care.
Speaker 1: I think it's a ways I'm seeing though with this,
Speaker 1: with this Lebron tweet, and and it's a lot, it's cumulative,
Speaker 1: but I feel like people now have just they've really
Speaker 1: had enough. Actually that's especially you know, Lebron James, a billionaire,
Speaker 1: runs around talking about how cops just want to murder
Speaker 1: unarmed black men for no reason, and and uses a
Speaker 1: platform to really say stupid and harmful things and just
Speaker 1: show such a lack of gratitude not just for law
Speaker 1: enforce him for the country that's allowed him to become
Speaker 1: this global, you know, unbelievably wealthy superstar. I think people
Speaker 1: have actually had enough. And I'm wondering if you see
Speaker 1: that too, or if I'm too optimistic. No, I see that,
Speaker 1: and I definitely see it with myself. Even and I'm
Speaker 1: a big fan of professional sports. I worked as a
Speaker 1: you know, I was in sports sports writer for years
Speaker 1: before I gotten into political writing, and I am I'm
Speaker 1: having a hard time with it. I'm not even really
Speaker 1: a boycotting type. I don't really do that, but it's
Speaker 1: quite difficult, not with the NBAM and Knicks fan so
Speaker 1: it's like like I've been paying that much attention until
Speaker 1: recently anyway, so it's been easy. So I've never really
Speaker 1: had to make those kind of choices. But with baseball,
Speaker 1: for instance, what went on with the All Star Game,
Speaker 1: you know, being moved from Atlanta to Denver, things like that.
Speaker 1: It's getting more and more difficult for me to watch
Speaker 1: watch the you know this, and yeah, I mean Lebron
Speaker 1: he has great physical attributes. I'm sure he worked his
Speaker 1: ass off. I'm sorry to get to where he is.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I could say that, but he
Speaker 1: definitely is not a smart man, and there's no reason
Speaker 1: for us to listen to him when it comes to
Speaker 1: these kind of situations. In fact, he is sort of
Speaker 1: creating you know, he has how many fifteen million followers
Speaker 1: on Twitter or something. I mean, he's creating and fueling
Speaker 1: more anger where where in the situation in Columbus or
Speaker 1: instance where there shouldn't have been any and it's a
Speaker 1: he's you know, he's peddling dangerous myths and that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it wouldn't be I just if somebody decided to to be,
Speaker 1: you know, to take violent action against that cop in
Speaker 1: response that Lebron James tweet, Let's say, nobody would be like,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, how could that happen? Right? I mean,
Speaker 1: you're saying you're next. You're one of the most prominent
Speaker 1: um black celebrities and influencers in the world, and you're
Speaker 1: basically telling your followers like, we're coming for you. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's not that far from incitement. And
Speaker 1: I mean I think, you know, I think Lebron James
Speaker 1: is I think he's a shameful moron. And I think
Speaker 1: people should understand that he's a He's good at basketball,
Speaker 1: he is not good at thinking about important policy issues.
Speaker 1: And you know, enough is enough. Like we've I think
Speaker 1: we've actually reached the point where I don't need to
Speaker 1: hear from any semi literate, spoiled brat athlete who has
Speaker 1: a social position that they want to flaunt on social media.
Speaker 1: They can do it. They have a right to do it.
Speaker 1: I have a right to call the morons and not
Speaker 1: actually pay attention to anything they do right or coaches
Speaker 1: like Steve kerr or owners, I mean commissioners like baseball commissioner.
Speaker 1: I mean, who cares what you have to say about
Speaker 1: some local Popovich is horrible, for example, he's pathetic on
Speaker 1: this stuff. Oh yeah, he just sounds like a commy.
Speaker 1: It's ridiculous. I mean, makes tons of money coaching basketball.
Speaker 1: But anyway, you know, I mean, so all these guys,
Speaker 1: I don't really need to hear from them. Typically I
Speaker 1: would just ignore them. But now you know, they're moving
Speaker 1: off Star Game for for you know, they're they're they're
Speaker 1: costing people jobs over mythology, right it left wing mythology.
Speaker 1: And they're writing letters that sound like something you know,
Speaker 1: some freshman would write in college. It's just it's just aggravating,
Speaker 1: and it makes it very difficult to watch, you know,
Speaker 1: why want to participate and pay their salaries. So David
Speaker 1: Arsani a senior writer at National Review, And you know, David,
Speaker 1: I also think that people are seeing more and more.
Speaker 1: Now we're we're almost at this hundred days and on
Speaker 1: Biden's got his speech on on Wednesday. This is just
Speaker 1: the this is the the ideology and the approach of
Speaker 1: the Obama administration through the the effeckless uh, sub mediocrity,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, that's really all we're getting. Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: it's actually sort of uh, you know, the same the
Speaker 1: same issues are are important to him, it seems, but
Speaker 1: also that they're just repped up further to the left
Speaker 1: than they were. It's the same kind of strong and
Speaker 1: the same kind of um, you know, the same kind
Speaker 1: of string of opponents, the same kind pretend bipartisanship efforts
Speaker 1: that never really happen, and uh, you know, I think
Speaker 1: that the Conservatives are more in tune with this. I
Speaker 1: think when a Bobby became present, there was some good
Speaker 1: will there. I don't think that good will exist really anymore,
Speaker 1: and it shouldn't. So yeah, I mean I think this
Speaker 1: is going to be. Yeah, you never know what happens
Speaker 1: in the world. Their events pop up and things change.
Speaker 1: But so far, I think he's been he's really been
Speaker 1: really mediocre. And he had a chance actually to bring
Speaker 1: people together. I know that that never really happens, but
Speaker 1: he didn't really try to take it at all. David
Speaker 1: was speaking of David Harsani of National Review dot com
Speaker 1: David Europe on this on this John Carey story, which
Speaker 1: you know, I just I think John Carey's actually the
Speaker 1: perfect climate change ambassador. Just a a snob who you know,
Speaker 1: achieved his money through marrying two very rich ladies, by
Speaker 1: the way, whose money came from their ex husbands. You know,
Speaker 1: a snob who flies around on private jets to go
Speaker 1: to conferences to talk about how to unnecessarily tax and
Speaker 1: make less poor and more miserable the rest of the world,
Speaker 1: so that they think they're saving the planet from this
Speaker 1: imaginary catastrophe. But there's something else that John Kerry did recently.
Speaker 1: It has to do with Israel and Iran. Bring everybody
Speaker 1: up to speed. Well, there were leaked tapes from the
Speaker 1: Iranium Foreign Minister talking to one of his allies. You know,
Speaker 1: they were making some kind of show, but this was
Speaker 1: off the record conversation, and among many other things that
Speaker 1: he said, he said that John Kerry had told him
Speaker 1: about at least that's a quote two hundred covert Israeli
Speaker 1: operations in Syria that had happened. Now, if you think
Speaker 1: about this for a second, we have Iran is a
Speaker 1: terrorist state. It is It's Revolutionary Guard is considered a
Speaker 1: terrorist organization, and we're trying to make a d with
Speaker 1: them to not have nuclear weapons supposedly, but John Israel's
Speaker 1: our ally. Now you could be critical of Israel, whatever,
Speaker 1: it's a longtime ally. And John Kerry is telling the
Speaker 1: terror state the covert operations of our ally in Syria.
Speaker 1: Syrians just fired rocket in Israel the other day, tried
Speaker 1: to hit their nuclear facility. So that is I think unprecedented.
Speaker 1: I can't think of something like that ever happening. And
Speaker 1: the New York Times mentioned it on paragraph like twenty
Speaker 1: six in their story. In the Washington Post didn't even
Speaker 1: mention it in the story about this, so um, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're right about John Kerry is perfect to be a
Speaker 1: climate ambassador and the climate change stuff. Did you see
Speaker 1: that the Biden the only guy wearing a mask on
Speaker 1: all these other world leaders, Biden's wearing masks. I don't want,
Speaker 1: I refuse to take seriously any person anymore who says
Speaker 1: wearing a mask is not political. It has been explicitly
Speaker 1: political for Democrats really for a year now. Oh my god. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean they talk about they have more patriotic to
Speaker 1: things to say about masks than they do about a flag.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just it's been incredible and even so
Speaker 1: today I don't know if you saw this that Fauci
Speaker 1: was saying that the CDC was going to come out
Speaker 1: with new guidelines that we don't really need masks outside. Well,
Speaker 1: if we didn't need masks outside now, we never needed them, right,
Speaker 1: It just makes no sense. So just just to jump,
Speaker 1: just to jump to the conclusion, David, we did never
Speaker 1: need them outside, right, Like this has been clear all along.
Speaker 1: I've been telling people this for over a year, and
Speaker 1: you know, I just want to know when, when when
Speaker 1: do I get you know, my the strikes on me
Speaker 1: on social media and the suspensions and all this stuff
Speaker 1: that I've had for saying things explicitly specifically like masking
Speaker 1: outdoors makes no sense. You know, it was all just
Speaker 1: suppression in support of the narrative. And I just believe
Speaker 1: that they were able to mix together anti Trumpism with
Speaker 1: Fauciism in this way that we're just now be people
Speaker 1: are just beginning to wake up to the full extent
Speaker 1: of it. You saw that MIT study where it said,
Speaker 1: you know, it doesn't matter if you're six feet away
Speaker 1: from someone or sixty, if you're inside or if you
Speaker 1: wear a mask, it doesn't make a difference. So, um,
Speaker 1: you know they used this science to basically suppress religious freedom,
Speaker 1: the ability to gather to make political political marches or whatever.
Speaker 1: While some political marches, others were allowed, and really there
Speaker 1: was no real good science to back it up. Now,
Speaker 1: you can maybe forgive it in the beginning when they
Speaker 1: don't know what's going on, but after a while it
Speaker 1: was pretty clear to a lot of people what was
Speaker 1: going on is including yourself. And then they kept depressing people,
Speaker 1: and we're suppressing their right. So that is a lesson
Speaker 1: hopefully people will learn from, though I'm pretty skeptical that
Speaker 1: this case. David Harsani, everybody go to National Review dot
Speaker 1: com for his latest and if you're on Twitter, follow
Speaker 1: at David Harsani. David, thanks so much, my friend, anytime.
Speaker 1: Thank you well. And during the campaign he made us
Speaker 1: all believe that Joe Biden would be the moderate cho
Speaker 1: it's to do. Really that court packing was a bonehead idea.
Speaker 1: All of a sudden, we've got a commission to change
Speaker 1: the structure of the Supreme Court, making dcs state. I
Speaker 1: think that's a very radical idea that will change the
Speaker 1: makeup of the United States Senate. AOC said his first
Speaker 1: hundred days exceeded her expectations. That's all you need to know.
Speaker 1: I like Joe Biden, but I'm in the forty three percent.
Speaker 1: He's been a disaster on foreign policy. The border is
Speaker 1: in chaos, the Iranians are off the map. He's opening
Speaker 1: up negotiations with the Iranian regime and they haven't done
Speaker 1: a damn thing to change. Afghanistan's going to fall apart.
Speaker 1: Russian China or pushing already pushing him around. So I'm
Speaker 1: very worried. I think he's been a very destabilizing president
Speaker 1: and economically throwing a wet blanket over the recovery, wanting
Speaker 1: to raise taxes in a large amount and regulate America
Speaker 1: basically out of business. So I'm not very impressed with
Speaker 1: the first hundred days. This is not what I thought
Speaker 1: I would get from Joe. What has Joe Biden made
Speaker 1: better through his decision making and through policy. I know
Speaker 1: there are more vaccines, you know, more vaccination shots are out,
Speaker 1: but that was always that was already on track, that
Speaker 1: was already happening when he came into office. What is
Speaker 1: something Joe Biden has done that you'd say, you know what,
Speaker 1: even though I don't agree with this guy, I'm really
Speaker 1: thinking about this one. Is there an Okay, he's going
Speaker 1: to continue with the Trump withdrawal from Afghanistan plan. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's we'll see if he does it. He'll see if
Speaker 1: he sticks to it. But that makes things better. But
Speaker 1: that's a continuation of previous policy. That's not some big
Speaker 1: decision going against the grain. Where have you seen an
Speaker 1: improvement in your life because this guy is the president.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen it anywhere. There's nothing I can think of.
Speaker 1: And I just came from the border, as it told me.
Speaker 1: The border, the borders the worst it's ever been, which
Speaker 1: affects so much all over the country. It's so much
Speaker 1: in our society. So what is it that you can show,
Speaker 1: What is it that you can point to you say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, Joe Biden. He's done a good job at well,
Speaker 1: if you're a leftist, there's a lot of things you
Speaker 1: could fill in the blank with. We're hearing more and
Speaker 1: more from the progressive left about how Joe Biden's actually
Speaker 1: a really good president, a really good leader. Here he
Speaker 1: is play clip one. One thing that I will say
Speaker 1: is that I do think that by administration and President
Speaker 1: Biden has definitely exceeded expectations that progressives had. You know,
Speaker 1: I'll be frank, I think a lot of us expected
Speaker 1: a much more conservative administration, a more conservative administration. Yeah,
Speaker 1: no one thought that Joe Biden was going to have
Speaker 1: a conservative administration or that anyone would use that word
Speaker 1: to describe any aspect of it. But here's what the
Speaker 1: Democrats did, And this is something that they have honed.
Speaker 1: This is a skill that they have gotten very good
Speaker 1: at over the years. They have Okay, they have made
Speaker 1: the affirmative decision in election after election to lie to
Speaker 1: the American people about what their party really stands for
Speaker 1: and what their candid really is. In the primary, they're
Speaker 1: pushing one thing, you know, they're pushing the left wing
Speaker 1: socialist nonsense that we know they all really believe in.
Speaker 1: But then the general election, it's, oh, good old Scranton Joe.
Speaker 1: You can trust him. He is every bit the trojan
Speaker 1: horse that I warned you and anyone who would listen
Speaker 1: about all of last year. And he's also the sub
Speaker 1: mediocrity just intellectually, and it comes to his integrity and courage.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's truly astonishing this guy's present the
Speaker 1: United States. I mean, I know I know he won
Speaker 1: the election, and I know he's a lead the free world.
Speaker 1: But Joe Biden's a loser. He's just a loser, and
Speaker 1: unfortunately now the country's gonna be losing because of him.
Speaker 1: Rock and roll, fellow Patriots, it's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: Wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow wow. Producer,
Speaker 1: Mark Buddy, how much did you miss your favorite radio host?
Speaker 1: I know I was away from you for days. For days.
Speaker 1: That are Buddy, That are Buddy, Rob Smith, that take
Speaker 1: care of everything everything. Okay, when did you become my
Speaker 1: favorite radio host? Wow? Wow? Harsh way harsh, I haven't
Speaker 1: insulted you on the here a few day. Yeah. You know,
Speaker 1: probably there's some guy, you know, the you know, blah
Speaker 1: blah blah blah, the Madman on w kt RS vtvu
Speaker 1: W Sports Network. You know, there's probably some who is
Speaker 1: actually the best sports broadcaster. Would you say best sports
Speaker 1: broadcast my favorite? I don't know if he's the best.
Speaker 1: I'm the best radio host period. Who's the best sports
Speaker 1: radio broadcaster? My favorite is what I will throw out there,
Speaker 1: and that is Craig Carton, And a lot of people
Speaker 1: may have a problem with that because he is technically
Speaker 1: a convicted felon. I don't know if you've ever heard
Speaker 1: of this. No, Um, he was number Is he the
Speaker 1: one who was biting the ladies on the behind? No, no, nothing,
Speaker 1: no violent crime, no anything like that. That was marv Albert, right,
Speaker 1: I don't think that was marf Albert. I think he, Um,
Speaker 1: marf Albert's the one who was cross dressing. I thought
Speaker 1: he bit the lady behind. Maybe he did. Okay, sorry,
Speaker 1: go ahead. But Craig Carton was a very popular morning
Speaker 1: show host on WFA N in New York and then
Speaker 1: got involved. Basically, he had a gambling addiction and he
Speaker 1: used other people's money to gamble with for when he
Speaker 1: was supposed to be using it for another business. And
Speaker 1: he went to jail for a year. WFA and rehired
Speaker 1: him recently. And uh, I mean he uh is a
Speaker 1: host that bothered. He's like, you know, how Howard Stern,
Speaker 1: he's either love him or hate him. Carton is very
Speaker 1: similar to that. And I've always you know, when I
Speaker 1: was a kid, I really liked him and I still
Speaker 1: like him to this day. All right, fair enough, there
Speaker 1: we go. Well, apparently you're you're you're still okay, you
Speaker 1: know you didn't get no one, No one kidnapped my
Speaker 1: producer Mark nothing. I don't have to go all Liam
Speaker 1: Neeson from taking to go track him down and save
Speaker 1: his save his But you know, so you're okay. I'm
Speaker 1: glad I could leave you a couple of days. You
Speaker 1: didn't burn the house down. Well, missus. Mark was obviously
Speaker 1: watching over you. So that's good. Well you marked, that's
Speaker 1: the most important part. Yeah. I was down there the
Speaker 1: border and we did have you know, we did have
Speaker 1: some uh some cartel gunfire in the background, which was
Speaker 1: pretty pretty a good reminder of how you go to
Speaker 1: that in Mexico side of the border, and uh, it
Speaker 1: is rough stuff happening there. Not a lot of people
Speaker 1: don't even realize. They tried last year in the probably
Speaker 1: the wealthiest and most secure neighborhood of Mexico City, which
Speaker 1: is the capitol, the cartel tried a an ambush to
Speaker 1: kill the chief of police of Mexico City like that.
Speaker 1: I mean, if something that happened in an American city,
Speaker 1: we would we would be all so outraged, rightly, so
Speaker 1: we'd be completely freaked out. Happen a Mexican people don't
Speaker 1: even know about it. So I don't know, but you know,
Speaker 1: there are all these resorts that people say are all
Speaker 1: inclusive there that are really great, so you know, I
Speaker 1: might go check it out at some point. I love
Speaker 1: an all inclusive resort in the Caribbean. There, you've never
Speaker 1: been to one, I've been. I've been to an all
Speaker 1: inclusive in a very long time, and I always feel
Speaker 1: like all inclusive it's not going to be the same
Speaker 1: quality as if you're paying But I'm told that's not true. Now,
Speaker 1: told they are all inclusives where it's really high end
Speaker 1: stuff you're getting, Like the food is usually the concern
Speaker 1: for me, you know, I'm I'm snobby about I like
Speaker 1: good foods. I just like good food. It depends on
Speaker 1: where you go. Like where we me and my wife
Speaker 1: went for our honeymoon was fantastic, But obviously you have
Speaker 1: to pay a little more for stuff like that, and
Speaker 1: then you can get a bargain resort that maybe the
Speaker 1: quality won't be as good, but you'll still have a
Speaker 1: good time. Yeah that's true. Well, I need some warm
Speaker 1: weather and uh and you know, a beach and I'll
Speaker 1: be in pretty good shape. But anyway, what's up. It'll
Speaker 1: be warm here soon. That's true, and uh, I can
Speaker 1: go out to Long Beach or Jones Beach right or
Speaker 1: whatever the Long Island south shore beaches are. They have
Speaker 1: lovely beaches out there on Long Island. I'm saying I
Speaker 1: could go out to those beaches or the Jersey Shore, yeah,
Speaker 1: which from what I understand, actually has so many lovely parts.
Speaker 1: But people now just associate it with the show and
Speaker 1: snooky and smooshing sold on say that last bird again, smooshing, smushing,
Speaker 1: Oh it's smushing. Yeah, I thought I thought when one
Speaker 1: I thought, when one is you know, has been out
Speaker 1: to enough dinners and has met the parents to make
Speaker 1: to make babies, one would smoosh. But you're saying it's
Speaker 1: smush special fun fun time. Yeah. Yeah, it was the
Speaker 1: smush Room. Ah, So smoosh might be a different thing
Speaker 1: if you watch that show as a sitcom like you,
Speaker 1: if you go into it saying I'm watching a sitcom,
Speaker 1: not a reality show. It is one of the funniest
Speaker 1: shows out there. It was wildly pop I remember that.
Speaker 1: And the guy who I feel like was one of
Speaker 1: the smartest of the whole bunch was the one with
Speaker 1: the with the very unique hairstyle who then became a DJ,
Speaker 1: and I remember hearing that he at one year made
Speaker 1: twenty million dollars as a DJ. DJ Paul d Is
Speaker 1: that right? Yeah, that guy. Yeah, he's a very successful DJ.
Speaker 1: I want to make twenty million dollars at DJ. You
Speaker 1: just sit there and just go yeah, pump it up, yeah,
Speaker 1: like yell, and you know, press the play button. I
Speaker 1: think they do a little more than that. I don't know.
Speaker 1: It's a playlist. At least in the old days, the
Speaker 1: DJs had to scratch, you know. They still do that,
Speaker 1: It's just in a digital way. There's not actual records
Speaker 1: there A yeah, fair enough, all right, I missed all
Speaker 1: of you, so let me get to your roll call
Speaker 1: thoughts here. And I did miss you, guys. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I was out for a couple of days, not plenty
Speaker 1: of be out again for a long time, so I'm
Speaker 1: very glad to be back here with you. And I
Speaker 1: hope my guest host did a I hear he did
Speaker 1: a very solid job of keeping all informed and entertained.
Speaker 1: That's the plan. Let's get to it. Michelle dear Buck.
Speaker 1: I'm a relatively new listener, only for the past five months,
Speaker 1: but I remember seeing you on Fox News when I
Speaker 1: used to watch that channel. I want to say I
Speaker 1: thoroughly enjoy your show and often listening with my twelve
Speaker 1: and seventeen year old sons in the car on the
Speaker 1: way home from school. They get a kick out of
Speaker 1: the voices, as do I. But the best thing is
Speaker 1: I know they're actually listening to you. They asked me
Speaker 1: questions about the things you talk about and seemed genuinely
Speaker 1: interested in the content. I'm looking forward to listening to
Speaker 1: the Battle of Multi podcast with them in the car.
Speaker 1: Keep up the good work and shields high well. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much, Michelle, and I'm recording Malta. I'm Alta
Speaker 1: Part two this weekend. I've already got the research done
Speaker 1: and everything, so that's the plants. It'll be out next week.
Speaker 1: Listen to Malta Part one though, please all of you
Speaker 1: if you haven't already, and you know that's it's a
Speaker 1: great precursor. The second one's gonna be the actual battle
Speaker 1: and some of you might enjoy that as a as
Speaker 1: a standalone podcast a little bit more, but the preamble
Speaker 1: to know the backstory and everything else is really worth
Speaker 1: your time. A lot of rich history, a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff going on. There's some other battles we talk about.
Speaker 1: So An Michelle, I'm so glad that your sons, you're
Speaker 1: twelve year old or seven year old, listen. I hope
Speaker 1: I can teach them, keep them entertained, and if they
Speaker 1: don't like the politics, they can always get doctor Fauci. Oh,
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo, Why why what your sons are listening to me?
Speaker 1: Do they understand that I have that best interested hall
Speaker 1: at the time. Let me explain why? Why what a
Speaker 1: governor want to help your sons because he doesn't mind
Speaker 1: even talking about all the naughty things the governor did
Speaker 1: because the governor I was very bad in New York.
Speaker 1: You get the idea, Richard Buck, I just finished listening
Speaker 1: to a podcast. I completely agree with your listener who
Speaker 1: suggested you do a series on fascism. Amen, I agree
Speaker 1: with your assessment that DeSantis and Pompey would be a
Speaker 1: formidable ticket for the Republicans in twenty twenty four. I
Speaker 1: was pulling that combination a couple of weeks ago, two
Speaker 1: ivy leaguers who don't act like it. I hope that
Speaker 1: Trump does not run in twenty twenty four. I will
Speaker 1: not vote for him in a primary. Most of my
Speaker 1: family and conservative friends have similar thoughts. I support the
Speaker 1: vast majority of his policies and positions, but find him
Speaker 1: objectionable in many ways, not the least of which was
Speaker 1: that he surrounded himself with advisors who steered him in
Speaker 1: the wrong direction too many times. Also, I resent his
Speaker 1: knee jerk criticisms of Mike Pence and Bill Barr. Keep
Speaker 1: up the great work, Yeah, Richard, You'll notice I never
Speaker 1: jumped on the bash Bill Barr train. I thought that
Speaker 1: was really I thought it was on fair. I thought
Speaker 1: it was wrong. I think Bill Barr did a lot
Speaker 1: to stand against the left wing menace, and I think
Speaker 1: that he was very solid for the administration. I think
Speaker 1: that he kept Trump out of trouble and a lot
Speaker 1: of things. And people that turned on Bar with the election,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I think they were misled. I don't think
Speaker 1: that Bar was. Barr was not the problem in this election.
Speaker 1: You know. It wasn't that he was unwilling to look
Speaker 1: at things. I heard from people who were in the
Speaker 1: room with the Attorney general, people that I know and trust.
Speaker 1: When the room with the Attorney general, former Attorney General
Speaker 1: now Bill Barr, when he was hearing about election for
Speaker 1: all things, and he said, let's go, let's look at it.
Speaker 1: Get me the information. He was personally looking into it. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think Trump was very unfair to bar at the end.
Speaker 1: And I think he was very unfair to Pence at
Speaker 1: the end too. There was no Pence delivered the election
Speaker 1: to Trump in the last minute thing. That was not
Speaker 1: a real thing, folks. And the president, you know, the
Speaker 1: former president Trump, but he said to Pence, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: all right, he you know, in the in after the election,
Speaker 1: those last few months, the Trumpster made some big mistakes.
Speaker 1: And we we need we need, we owe it. Whether
Speaker 1: you're you know, still supermago or a little on the
Speaker 1: fence about Mago, owe it to be honest with each
Speaker 1: other about that. We owe it to ourselves to be
Speaker 1: honest about it. And I think that that's that's where
Speaker 1: we are now. Whether you want Trump to run or not,
Speaker 1: that's still an open question, and I respect that people
Speaker 1: are gonna have different opinions on that. But from November
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty until you know, January Biden swearing in Trump,
Speaker 1: Trump is getting a lot of bad advice and made
Speaker 1: some bad decisions. And I'm always going to speak the
Speaker 1: truth to you about this stuff. And that is what happened.
Speaker 1: And some of his advisers, I mean, the thing with
Speaker 1: the kids that were basically controlling access to the president
Speaker 1: of the White House absurd, absurd. And I still remember
Speaker 1: a lot of people, including that I respecting they were all.
Speaker 1: Don't be critical of the nepotism. He needs people he trust. No, Now,
Speaker 1: they were libs. They were libs. Does that matter to anybody?
Speaker 1: They were unfiable libs in the Trump White House? Does
Speaker 1: that strike anybody as a good idea? Doesn't strike me
Speaker 1: as a good idea, you know? So, you know, and
Speaker 1: I I spoke the truth to you about about this
Speaker 1: even when it wasn't popular. You know, when I would
Speaker 1: talk about the nepotism in the Trump White House, people, Oh, grown,
Speaker 1: go listen to somebody else, you know who. That's what
Speaker 1: people are doing. Oh, I'll listen to somebody who's gonna
Speaker 1: say everything Trump does is amazing. This is the truth zone,
Speaker 1: my friends, This is this is the truth. Hut. I
Speaker 1: tell it to you the way I see it. Every
Speaker 1: doesn't mean I'm always right, but I give it to
Speaker 1: you as my as my peers and my friends and
Speaker 1: my colleagues and fellow patriots. That's how I do this.
Speaker 1: That's how we do this show every day. I respect
Speaker 1: this audience. They don't pan their here. Let's see, we've
Speaker 1: got Dennis Buck and best ever producer, Mark Wow outstanding
Speaker 1: job at the Siege of malt did just as expected.
Speaker 1: That was fun and entertaining to listen to and well
Speaker 1: worth the long way. Looking forward to part two concerning
Speaker 1: the Columbus, Ohio incident. Wasn't the police officer in a
Speaker 1: no win situation? What if he had not intervened and
Speaker 1: the potential stabbing victim was stabbed and died, the narrative
Speaker 1: simply would have changed. You see, the white cop just
Speaker 1: stood by and watched a black individual get killed. Hands down,
Speaker 1: you've got the best podcast out there. Buck, thanks for
Speaker 1: the great work of you and Mark duth shieldside. Dennis,
Speaker 1: thank you so very much, man, and I appreciate that
Speaker 1: you liked this podcast and that you listen, and I agree.
Speaker 1: I think it is the best podcast, and I just
Speaker 1: wish the word would get out even more to more folks.
Speaker 1: I wish people that think that they already listened to
Speaker 1: some conservative podcasts give this one a shot, Who's easier
Speaker 1: to listen to, Who's more informative? Who is a better
Speaker 1: usage of your time? I don't think there is one.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna tell you, and I've heard the other folks.
Speaker 1: I don't have really time to listen to anybody else
Speaker 1: because I got to do my own show every day.
Speaker 1: But I've heard what they do. I'm not saying there
Speaker 1: aren't people who are good and talented their own way.
Speaker 1: There certainly are. But I think this is the best.
Speaker 1: So even if you've got a friend who listens to
Speaker 1: a conservative podcast already, say have you tried buck Sexton?
Speaker 1: You know, switch to the real thing, step into the
Speaker 1: buck Revolution. All right, we're rolling with row Call. Remember
Speaker 1: to check out at buck Sexton dot com. We got
Speaker 1: stories posted there. I put up an editorial about my
Speaker 1: border trip over the weekend, so you can listen there.
Speaker 1: Please please do that, and you can always listen to
Speaker 1: the podcast there too. We got a player at the top.
Speaker 1: And let's get Oh and if you want to send
Speaker 1: us roll call more, the more the merrier, and roll
Speaker 1: call Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton Team, Bucketehartmedia dot com.
Speaker 1: I will tell you for those that are KLBJ family
Speaker 1: in the Austin area. I went to some great places.
Speaker 1: I went to Lauro, which is a Asian barbecue fusion play,
Speaker 1: loved it. Went to a brunch place called Picnic, loved it,
Speaker 1: totally gluten free, which was just heaven for me. And
Speaker 1: the first night, which to a place called Uchiko in Austin.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, the food in Austin is mind blowing,
Speaker 1: really really good. The politics are awful of the city.
Speaker 1: It's a shame. All the homelessness and the vagrancy and
Speaker 1: just the lib mask manias everywhere. That was disappointing. It
Speaker 1: didn't really feel like being in Texas. It felt it
Speaker 1: felt like being in a suburb of Washington, DC honestly
Speaker 1: a lot of the time, which is not a compliment
Speaker 1: in that regard on the politics. All right, Adam, team
Speaker 1: buck listen every day to your show, your unique perspectives
Speaker 1: about the fresh air. Thank you. From a selfish perspective
Speaker 1: or maybe not, I've resigned myself the fact they'll be
Speaker 1: no longer comedians to make us laugh out loud. I
Speaker 1: often catch myself thinking, how so and so comedian would
Speaker 1: see this world? What lends, what filter? What optics. I mean,
Speaker 1: would Don Rickles be woke or would he fight for
Speaker 1: his right to call out people like he did? Would
Speaker 1: George Carlin create an eight eighth word you aren't allowed
Speaker 1: to say on TV? How about prior or Ralphie May?
Speaker 1: What would they be said? And this messed up world
Speaker 1: we're stuck in? What are we without laughter? It's sad
Speaker 1: to think this art form will never exist as we
Speaker 1: knew it. For me, I was lucky. I saw Seinfeld
Speaker 1: do stand up in eighty seven, saw Leno live in Norman, Oklahoma,
Speaker 1: saw Eddie Murphy do raw in Orlando. My wife, who's
Speaker 1: a lovely Chinese woman, sees way too many parallels to
Speaker 1: will she immigrant to where she immigrated from, and is
Speaker 1: worried we're headed for saying what that said. All I
Speaker 1: can do is watch YouTube of comics I love. But
Speaker 1: for how long? Adam? I? I totally agree with you.
Speaker 1: I wish I could tell you that I thought that
Speaker 1: things were going to get better and things were going
Speaker 1: to be improving on this front. But the Left has
Speaker 1: largely destroyed comedy. You're not allowed to make jokes and
Speaker 1: you're allowed to be a real comedian anymore. You're only
Speaker 1: you're allowed to be a left wing political commentator who
Speaker 1: attack conservatives and attacks Christians, and you make jokes in
Speaker 1: between political comments, not just you can't just make jokes.
Speaker 1: Although that guy Nate Bargatsy, who is a Nashville guy,
Speaker 1: he was good on Netflix. You could watch his not
Speaker 1: a loot of no cursing, no gross stuff, no woke stuff.
Speaker 1: I thought Nate Bargatsy was very good. You know, he's
Speaker 1: not right wing, he's not conserving, He's just making jokes.
Speaker 1: And it was so refreshing. I said, Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: this guy's actually just trying to be a comedian. Look
Speaker 1: at this, Joan. We just found out here in Maryland
Speaker 1: the University of Maryland system is mandating all staff students
Speaker 1: a person I'll be vaccinated. When will this end? Force
Speaker 1: masking and now forced vaccinations? How do we stop this?
Speaker 1: There are thousands of us here in Maryland ready to
Speaker 1: take a stand. A demando rights back. Oh Joan, I
Speaker 1: feel for you. I'm so sorry, but I wish I
Speaker 1: had a quick answer. But all I could say is,
Speaker 1: no matter what, stay in the fire, no matter what
Speaker 1: you face. Shields tie