WEBVTT - Johnson Says He Would Short Steel Based on Trump Protectionism

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud and Bloomberg dot com. Well

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at the US International Trade Commission in Washington, that's E

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Street just over near the Capitol within walking distance. Representatives

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>of US Steel are speaking before the Trade Commission looking

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>for a revival of an argument against an antitrust complaint

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>having to do with dumping of steel by rival Chinese manufacturers.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And here to tell us more is Gordon Johnson. He

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is managing director and the head of Alternative Energy as

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>well as Metals and mining equipment research, and he joins

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone. A great great to have you

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>with us, A Gordon at Action Capital Management. I beg

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>your pardon, um, you know, I was looking at the

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at the price movement today of U S steal. We

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>got the stock up nearly four percent. Do they just

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have to like wave a flag every now and again

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and say, um dumping tariff and then you know, depending

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>upon whose in power it moves the stock. Yeah, I

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>mean that does indeed seem to be the case, and

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the Trump administration is definitely focused on China.

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think people need to look at, uh the

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>reality here. Uh the Obama administration h rained heavily down

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on China. In fact, they hit China with a number

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of very aggressive tariffs. And if you look at total

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese imports as a percent of US STILL imports UM

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in six point one percent, seven point two percent, it

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>dropped all the way to two points. So the point is,

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>even if you basically completely closed China out from directly

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>importing still into the United States, is going to have

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a very modest, if any impact on the overall steel backdrop.

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the rhetoric are you know, comments

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the Trump administration UH an impact on

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Um. You know, people have this very aggressive

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>initial reaction, but it's just not the numbers just don't

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pan out well, and let's get to what US deal

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually doing. They filed a lawsuit against rival Chinese

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing UH companies, saying that they colluded to keep prices

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>low to undercut American competitors. UH. They were filed this

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>though under a statute covering unfair trade practices, which usually

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>oversees domestic issues. I mean, does U S steal even

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have standing? Is their international law that would bring Chinese

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing companies into this? I mean, is this lawsuit a

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>no go basically? I mean it looks like it is.

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a lot of the things they've done recently, UM.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't say a lot of the things, but some

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the things they've done recently seemed to be UM,

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty aggressive UM and trying to benefit from uh

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be a pro UH protectionists. UH, you

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>know US administration. Look, at the end of the day,

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems like U S stills and this has been

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the case for a while. It seems like their strategy

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is effectively to benefit from protectionism, and that just doesn't work.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>We saw this UM in late nineting in the late

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>nineties and the early two thousand's UH, when President George W.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Bush implemented a Section two A one tariff, which essentially

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>put taxes on every single still important for the United States.

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Shortly thereafter, the European Union ruled this UM. UH that

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that action unfair. Uh and and then shortly thereafter, you know,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>there were some reactions by the European Union and the

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>US pulled that back. Look, protectionism does not work because

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>effectively the bulk of US still demand is in China,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>not US. The global still demand is in China. The

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>US has just roughly seven percent of global still demand.

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly, these still manufacturers sell the people like

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>automakers and you know, appliance makers, etcetera. And those guys

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have to compete globally. So if you drive up the

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>cost of domestic still, it's going to kill their customers

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and eventually kill them. So it just doesn't work. Well, Gordon,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>I just want to put the put the production in

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>China in perspective, because China's steel capacity, global steel making capacity,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe, is bigger than the United States, European Union, Japan,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and Russia. Yeah yeah, I mean, I mean that they

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>account for sevent of all steel making growth as well.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and you know it looks crazy. Issue um.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eight nine, China embarked upon a massive stimulus,

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and that stimulus was targeted primarily at building essentially offices

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and homes and that benefited the global steel community massively.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>All these stocks went to the moon and it was

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>driven by China, and as a result, you had a

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of capacity created in China, still capacity to meet

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this boom in demand. Clearly there's a lot of empty

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and ghost cities in China. It was inefficient capital, but

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless that created a lot of capacity, and the problem

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is that capacity is still existent, but the demand is

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>falling so um It's like, you know, when everything was

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>working in the favor of the U S still mills,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they weren't complaining about what China was doing, which was

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>creating a lot of this capacity. But now that things are,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, turning around, now they're starting to complain. The

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>reality is this, there's about eighty eight countries that ships

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>still into the United States without a section to a

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>one tariff going after one individual country. We've already killed China.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, there are imports have trapped from like

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>two million tons a year to roughly seven hundred and

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine thousand tons of year two thousand, fifteen to sixteen,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>six point one percent of US imports at two point

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>six We've already killed them. But they're just gonna ship

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>there still into another country. Uh, and eventually it will

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>probably find its way into the United States, and I

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think that there's no way around that. And you know,

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>these U. S still mills continue to focus on China,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think China's already it's a dead horse. Well, Gordon,

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it isn't interesting though, and it is telling

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that U. S. Steal is reviving some of these complaints

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>at this point and asking the major steel trade organization,

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the US International Trade Commission in Washington, to support its

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>claims about collusion by Chinese manufacturers. Do you think that

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they are going to get a warm reception by politicians

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in Washington currently, or do you think that the geopolitical backdrop,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>including North Korea, has changed the calculus for President Trump

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and his advisors and that they will not take this

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>attempt by U. S. Steal seriously. Look, there's two things

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>all highlight. I think there's no doubt that the issues

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in North Korea have changed Trump's view um and stance

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on China. Clearly, in his um while campaigning, he said

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he was going to label them a currency manipulator. He's

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>pulled that back. But let's look at the second dynamic

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we just had an O c TG oil Country tubular

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>good ruling UM, and that ruling came out with respect.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't Chinese, but it was on South Korean UM

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially oil country tubular goods UH STILL producers UM that

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>service that sector rather and the overall result when the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>result came out, the U. S Still stocks were battered

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>because the market was expecting a thirty to thirty five

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>percent tariff because Navarro essentially sent a letter to the

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Department of Commerce and the tariff came out at roughly

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.559
<v Speaker 1>for most guys, but the biggest guy was they dropped

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the tariff from four percent to two percent. So the

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>reality is, if you look at the rhetoric, he's pulled

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it back and if you look at the most recent decision,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>it was not in favor of the U. S Still mills.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we would be shorting the stocks actually

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on UH strength around UH you know, Trump protectionism, etcetera.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I think that his desire for China to help

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>solve the North Korean problem is much bigger than the

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric given in the campaign season, and I think that

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that play out in reality. And just to

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>note right, I mean, you've got US steal down for

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the year. Right, it's down about a little bit more

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>than ten percent, right, right, I mean it's up big

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>today on this rhetoric. But um, you know you just

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>had you just you are, I just reported earnings. You

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>are as a big equipment rental company here in the

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>US of their business in the US eight percent in Canada,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and they just dropped their expectation, uh for growth in

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the U S. What was it. I think it was

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two four before now they're getting to I think two

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>point four percent. And in in Canaday they were looking

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for four percent. This is industrial growth and they took

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it down the negative point three percent. So I think,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the optimism on Trump, I think reality is

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to set in and I think that you know,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as earnings come out, I think that two one earnings

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>for still guys are gonna be good. But I think

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>as some of the earnings come out for industrial guys,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just some disappointment ahead. Gordon Johnson, thank

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Gorton Johnson as Managing

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Director and head of Alternative Energy, Medals and Mining and

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Equipment Research at Axiomic Capital Management in New York. This

0:08:50.520 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>is Bloombergh. We talk a lot about President Trump's infrastructure

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>spending plan. He talked about a one trillion dollar program

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to implement to fix our roads

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and bridges and tunnel. Somebody with pretty good insight into

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>what that plan might look like is David Compton. He's

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Old Dominion freight Line, which is

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>based in Thomasville, North Carolina, and it just celebrated its

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth year on the NASDACT. David, thank you so

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Thank you for having me on

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>with you today. So I wanted to start with the

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending plan because I know that you were co chair.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You are the co chair of the American Trucking Association's

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Infrastructure Task Force, and you have met with President Trump.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us some insight into how feasible the

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending plan that he was talking about is and

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of where it is right now, well as we

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>understand it now, the the Trump administration is working on

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>their infrastructure plan and hope to have um something out

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>into Congress by the end of May. That's the latest

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we hear. You know, as far as the total infrastructure

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you know of one trillion. Uh. It's it's it's a

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit hard for me to address all of it

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because I honestly don't believe that that trucking and transportation

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>roads and bridges will will get uh um but perhaps

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe a third of that um that excuse me, kind

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of frog in my throat, But that's that's basically where

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we where we are on that uh. But the uh,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cost of under investment in our highways

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and bridges is absolutely huge. Congestion on the interstate systems

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>alone are costing the trucking industry nearly uh fifty billion dollars,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's estimated over one hundred billion for all motorists.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Automobile repairs due to potholes are costing the average motorists

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>over five hundred dollars per year per motorists, for a

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>grand total of a hundred and twelve billion. Roadside crashes

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>UM are causing due to you know, antiquated designs and

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>poor insurance and exit ramps or anyone who's been in

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>traffic understands how how it's sort of challenged US roads are.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But David, do you think that we really are going

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to see uh material change or material construction in the

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>next three years that could potentially even support your business.

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope so. Our Infrastructure Task Force, which is

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>made up of eleven CEO s from from small truck

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>lines all the way with less than a hundred trucks

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>up to the nation's largest truck lines UH, is working

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>with the Trump administrate and UH leaders in Congress, both

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and the House side UH to try to

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>shape an infrastructure bill that addresses the most critical problems

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of the trucking industry and provides for the most immediate

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and sustainable financing solutions. And we think we've got a

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty good a pretty good plan or roadmap to be

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>able to come up with the money that's needed UH

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish this. All right, Mr Congan, I'm wondering if

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I could just attack this this topic in just a

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>slightly different way, because I every now and again I'm

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on the road and I see one of your thirty

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand tractor trailers all across the country, and they have

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the Major League Baseball UH, you know logo on on

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side. You move the teams of Major League Baseball.

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>It's like, uh, you know, moving chessboard or something. I mean,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because you know, you move them from spring training back

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to the right. I mean, I'm this is something that

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you're this is detail and I mean, my goodness moving

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is it just such a stressful thing for anybody? Imagine

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>doing this to the level that you guys at old

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Dominion Freight do that. What are do you feel that

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you're being heard by the right people to fix some

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of these I mean, no one is four potholes right.

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>No one says okay, no, no, no, we love pottle.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>No one ever says that. So is there are there

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>some things that you feel that you're being heard by

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the right people in the right place at the right time.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Considering that we that you have Donald Trump as president

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that will help fix some of these very basic things

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that you've just described, and that obviously you're in a

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>better position to tell to explain what's going on than

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>than you know, someone just reading a paper. I believe

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we are in an excellent position to be heard. The

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting that we had with President Trump Vice President Pence,

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Just what's that like? Can you shed some can you

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just us what's it like to even be there? What

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>does it feel like? Well? It was it was an

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>exciting day it was. It was actually monumental. It was

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the first time in the history of the American Trucking

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Association for a t A to have two trucks on

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the lawn at the White House, represented by eleven UH

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>top CEOs from our industry and twelve of our top

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>truck drivers representing the America's road team, and the ability

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to meet the President and Vice President opened the door

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for further discussions. Obviously, the day that we were there

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was the day that the Health health Care Repeal and

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Replaced bill was supposed to be voted on, and and

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that was the top of mind for the for President

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump that particular day. But we have had subsequent we

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>being the truck the A t A, UH President Chris Spear, UH,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Vice President, Bill Sullivan, and others in leadership

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at A t A have had some meaningful discussions with UH,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>some of Trump's advisors and we are what specifically would

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you like to have happened or do you believe would

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be helpful to their mission to improve the infrastructure? What

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what can people do? Who here you speak and UH,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>well here's here and all the people that are into

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>baseball because you're you're you're moving those baseball teams. Well,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the baseball teams are are important for us, uh, but

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>but not as important as the uh ninety thousand shippers

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that uh that we have UM giving us revenue. But right,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>your customers, Yeah, our customers. Baseball is very small part

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of it. But here's the deal. The annual cost of

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>under investment in in in our infrastructure is costing motors

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>over fourteen hundred dollars per year. And what we are

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>proposed using, UH, what we're proposing UH is a build

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>America infrastructure fee to be added at the to the

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>rack cost per gallon of just twenty cents and and

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have this thing index to fuel economy and inflation. Twenty

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>cents a gallon is really not very much. You recall

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>when we were all paying uh four and five dollars

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a gallon for gas. UH. Twenty cents a gallon only

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>represents an annual cost of roughly eighty dollars per motorists

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to address a four hundred dollar per motorists problem. To me,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a good return on investment. And this infrastructure

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>fee at the rack. I don't know if you know

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what I rack is, but there are thirteen hundred active

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>UH terminals fuel racks across the country owned by only

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>two fifty five owners, and they collect and pay the

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for we gotta leave it there, David Congdon, I'm sorry,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of Old Dominion freight Line. We want

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to take a moment to let you know about something

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>new from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you can use our

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>io s app or our new Google Chrome extension to

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>scan any news story on any website, instantly revealing relevant

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.719
<v Speaker 1>news and market data from Bloomberg and other sources related

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to the companies and people you're reading about. So no

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>matter where you're reading the news, you can bring the

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>power of Bloomberg's news and data with you. It's pretty amazing.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Download our Io s app or search for the Bloomberg

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>extension on the Chrome Store to try it out. Learn

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 1>more at Bloomberg dot com. Slash lens Well corrosion. Corrosion

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>is a two point two trillion dollar problem worldwide, and

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>our next guest is trying to solve it. Christina Lamancy

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is the president and the chief executive and the co

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>founder and a physicist and just happens to be in

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>charge of Modu Metal, based in Seattle, but she joins

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>us here in our studio, Christina, thank you very much

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for being here. Um. Corrosion, I guess we could say

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>rust is a problem that is never really going to

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>go away because of the just the nature of certain

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>types of chemical and metal reactions, unless, of course, I

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>guess we call modu metal. Tell us what you're doing

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to fight this battle? Absolutely, so, we are UM, first

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, trying to address this huge problem that today

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>represents about four point one percent of the gross domestic

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>product of the United States. So we spend a lot

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>of money and a lot of energy addressing this challenge

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of corrosion, and we think we can reduce that impact

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>on our economy. We're doing it by introducing an entirely

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>new class of materials into the marketplace. That class of materials,

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>UH is what we call nano laminated alloys. They're basically

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like metallic plywood, so they're layered materials, but in our case,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the layers are on the nanometer scale. UM, and maybe

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>even more profoundly impactful is that we're we're having in

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>order to bring these materials to market, to revolutionize the

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing process for metals as well. So we have a

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>process that doesn't use heat anymore. We're actually using electricity

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as the input form of energy to manufacture metals directly.

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So before we get into the specifics I'm wondering so far.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the company has been around for a couple

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of years and this technology has been around for a

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. How has the demand grown by industrial companies? Well,

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we when we first started out with mode metal, it

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was just a concept, so we were really just trying

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to bring this this technology from

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a science into really a manufacturing process. Now we're working

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>with with major oil and gas companies to bring it

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>into very large scale market applications. So the market has

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>really embraced the technology. And we talk about the cost

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of corrosion. It's something that impacts a number of major industries.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So oil and gas is just one example. Infrastructure construction,

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, transportation, you name it. The pain is there

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of major industries. So it's been it

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>has been embraced across the board. Uh, in terms of

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>its applications. Well, I also just want to congratulate you,

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Christina lamos Ny. Uh. You are a finalist for the

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Edison Awards, So good luck with that, I know you're

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>here in New York. You've been named the finalist for

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for that. Can you use let's say the Coastguard as

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>an example. Obviously they must deal as most ship owners

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>must deal with corrosion and rust. Tell us about using

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>modu metal technology for the Coastguard. That's such a great example.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we've done some work with the Coastguard. We've

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>deployed technology with them. As as you mentioned, the Coast

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Guard operates in a very corrosive environment. So they they're

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>typically operating in marine environments where they're salt water, oftentimes

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>high temperature. So on the coast of of let's say

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, Florida, things like that, um or you have

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>accelerated corrosion because of heat and um and so corrosion

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is degrading the fleet. Even even as they're operating and

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.959
<v Speaker 1>building new structures, they're having to deal with the degradation

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of the old. We've actually done some work with the

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Coast Guard on something as simple as connectors fasteners like

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, bolts. It turns out that's a that's a

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>critical point of a failure for for some of these

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>these structures. And so basically what we've done in in

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>some cases we actually just coat conventional steals with our

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>nano layered alloys and we can extend the life as

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>much as tend to. We've demonstrated thirty times increase in

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>performance at an equivalent cost to like a conventional zinc.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's a dramatic difference in terms of the longevity

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of that product in a field, the safety factor associated

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with that connector, and we basically are keeping cost at parity.

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So talking about that cost, I mean, how much would

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it cost to nano laminate say, all the bolts in

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a ship, and uh, how how do you how exactly

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>do you nano laminate something? Yeah, the way to think

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>about it, I think is it we're introducing a new structure,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>so it's the nano lamination. It's um to kind of

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>geek out on the science a little bit. We're kind

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of we're galvanically coupling to similar metals when we make

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>these layered alloys, and we're controlling that galvanic couple and

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>that's what's extending the life of the product in a

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>corrosive environment. We're doing it though with the same basic

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>raw materials, So from a cost driver standpoint, we really

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have the same basic costs as a conventional let's say,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>hot dip galvanized process. We're just fundamentally changing the structure

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's resulting in a huge impact in terms of performance.

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Are planning on taking the public company public right now

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we're private and UH and we're really growing the business

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>to try to bring the product into the market in

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a very very big way. But where are you getting

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>financing from? So we do UM. We do a lot

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of work with within the oil and gas sector, as

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, And the fun part for us is that

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our customers have actually joined us as

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>partners UM. So today we're jointly owned by Chevron, Conico,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Phillips BP, all of whom were customers and then they

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>became partners in the venture. We're also jointly owned by

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the founders FUN out of Silicon Valley, and so we

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just have a great team of partners that have joined

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>us in this venture. Christina Lamosney, thank you so much

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Really a fascinating developments president and chief

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>executive officer and co founder of Madu Metal, which is

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>based in Seattle, but she is here with us in

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg eleven three oh studio, and she gave us

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>business cards that are made out of nano laminated metal.

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Pretty cool him, I think I think I need some metal.

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>There you go. That was the sound of it. Well,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have come up with a replacement to the Dad

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Frank Act of two thousand and ten. It is going

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be aired in a hearing later this month. I

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>want to bringing Nathan Dean, who's a government an analyst

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence, is going to tell us what's in

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this replacement to the Dodd Frank Act before we get there, Nathan,

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is this thing dead on arrival or does this thing

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have legs? So it's dead arrival? When when you think

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, when it's becoming law, it will pass the House,

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>It should pass the House. It should pass the House

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>by August. You will see a lot of headlines of

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about this will pass. But it's dead on arrival

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. This this is the Republican kitchen sink bill.

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>There are just too many provisions in here to get

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>bipartisans support in the Senate. And because the filibuster still exists,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's the this bill really doesn't have

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>any chance over there in this Senate. Okay, So given

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's probably did on arrival in the Senate,

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>should we care about it? There are provisions in this

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that we should care about. It's a starting point,

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a negotiations so uh, leaving. A lot of this

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>bill is designed about this teen percent leverage ratio banks

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>need to go from you know, around six and a

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>half to ten percent for the big banks. That could

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>cost him around four hundred twenty billion for the eight largest.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But there are other provisions in this bill that i'd

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>look at, you know, look at how they're going to

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>change the stress testing process. Uh, look how they're going

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to make relief for smaller and community sized banks. But

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the controversial provisions in here, repealing the

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>vocal rule, changing the CFBB, uh, repealing the Durban Amendment,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>which would cost the banks. You know, it did cost

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the banks billions of dollars and interchange fees. You know,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>those things are just too controversial. They're not going to

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>pass Elizabeth More and they're not going to pass the

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>other Democrats, and so I think it's more importantly to

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>see what's going to come out of the Senate in

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>their review, and we're expecting that sometime the next couple

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of months. The Senate has a of course, the Banking Committee,

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and Senator Mike Creepo, he's the Republican from Idaho, is

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the chairman. Can you give us some insight into his

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking and then maybe kind of reference a previous bill

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that was introduced by the former Banking chairman, UH, Senator

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Richard Shelby, a Republican from Alabama. Yeah, so you know,

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the Senate right now is conducting a review of dot Frank.

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>They actually went out to the industry and he said,

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>send us comments. And this was bipartisan effort, both Mike

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Creepo and Senator Sherried Brown, the ranking member from Ohio,

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and the bank comments and the industry comments have been

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>piling in. Goldman Sachs, for example, just submitted their comments.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News did an article on it, and it talked

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about changing the stress test, changing the calculation of a

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>leverage ratio. So a lot of this stuff I think

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>could generate bipartisans support, But really what happens in the

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Senate we expect them to put together their own bill.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned Senator Richard Shelby, his big push

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>last year was changing the city threshold. He wanted the

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>city threshold to go from fifty billion to five billion.

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Senator Mike Crepo he wants that changed as well. Is

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>probably too high. You know that five billion would would

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>allow P and C and US Bank, for example, to

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>should their shed their Ciffy designation. To be clear, Siffy

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>is significantly important financial institution, correct, and if you're labeled

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to Ciffy means you get a lot more capital in

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>liquidity requirements and then you have to go through the

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>stress test. So you know, whether that that threshold ends

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up a tune in fifty billion or it moves to

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>a case by case designation. You know, we do expect

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the Senate because this is one of Senator Creepo's key

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>things that he wants to work on. We do think

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>that Ciffy threshold is going to be in there. So, Nathan,

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>as you were saying, this is sort of a kitchen

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>sink effort by Republican Congressman h. But the interesting thing

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is banks are not too excited about this bill. It's

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>called the Financial Choice Act. It would replace the Dodd

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank Act, which set out to prevent another bank driven

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis like the one that we saw in two

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. Why aren't big banks excitedly for two reasons. One,

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we mentioned going to the ten percent

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>leverage ratio, that's gonna increase capital requirements for large spanks.

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bi's credited Animal Sternal Cocuna did analysis where

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>it's four and twenty billion for JP Morgan. That's billion alone.

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>It's probably not something they want to do. Secondly, they

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>probably understand that this bill is dead on arrival, and

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so why waste the political capital fighting for full repeal

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of the vocal rule when you know it's not gonna happen.

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you hear a lot of comments coming from

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond and other bankers saying, you know, we just

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>need to tweak the vocal rule and we need to

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>play around with the market making exemption. You know, but

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in spirit, you know, they say they're okay with it.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think the banks are waiting to see what

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>comes from the Senate. You know. One thing to keep

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in mind, you know, Chairman Henseling he's term limited at

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of this term, so he's got two years

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to essentially put something out there, and if not he's

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to move off of the chairmanship. So, you know,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we still don't think dot frank is gonna be a

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>year one issue. I think you'll see something come out

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>from the Senate later this year, but I still think

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>dot frank will be a two year issue. So if

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>this is not a year one she I mean, are

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there specific deadlines that they have to meet in order

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the ball rolling on this? So no, there's

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>no specific deadlines. I think that, you know, one thing

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that we are telling our clients is watch out for

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling debates and the government shutdown debates later

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this year, not the April one, but maybe in September,

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because that's the time that's ripe for amendments. You know,

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand fourteen, Republicans inserted this amendment that

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>repealed the swaps pushout provision. They did it three days

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>before government shut down. They sent it up to the

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>White House, and they told President Barack Obama sign it

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>or the government's going to be shut down. And President

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Obama did sign it. So this is this tactic of

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>putting an amendment out there. You know, if I wanted

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to repeal the vocal rule for example, maybe I submit

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it right before the debt ceiling is about to hit

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens. So we're just telling clients to

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be very careful about those deadlines, probably in September August

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>time frame. But in terms of just repealing dot frank,

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this can go on to two thou eighteen. There's no

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>really no no deadline there, all right. So if there

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if there's no deadline, just quickly, Nathan Um, why are

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans even bothering to do this to keep it

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the new cycle. I think that, you know, they

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>need to show that they're doing something. You know, this

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is there's been a lot of work done on repealing

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>dot frank. They've this has been going back to two

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten. There's been over two fifty bills that have

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>passed the House that have said something. So I think

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this is to keep the ball rolling. And you know,

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>if they can move on with infrastructure and tax reform

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare, then you know, I think you'll have the

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>pieces in place. All right. I want to thank you

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>very much for giving us all the information. Nathan Dean

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is government analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. You're joining us from

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Studios in Washington, and you can follow Nathan

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Dean on Twitter at Nathan Dean d C. Thanks for

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Pam Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramowits

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:30:57.560 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio