WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 12/29: Grading the Defense, Route Running Issues and Dolphins Preview

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex Barth. I'm Lazar, Well everybody nailed it,

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>joined us always buying our pick DAFA match. Here is

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Evan Lazar and Alex Bark. I sent you that the

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>clip of Brady throwing that slam. Okay, that was the

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't he doesn't like it when I bring up Brady.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, and welcome into a video edition. We're back

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on video. Yeah, back on. I might need to move

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>or something. I don't know. All right, anyways, we got

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the solo. This is great. This is back to our roots.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And not only do we have video, but we got

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they change the camera angles. They can put

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>us in a two box. There we go, there's this box.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>This is look at that next level video. I'm excited. Uh,

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>like I said Evan Lazar alongside me, as always Alex

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Barth and uh, we got a little bit of to

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>unpack your today. But as I normally do, I always

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>start with like a twenty minute soliloquy that I've been

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about for the last week since we were on

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the air last Thursday or was a Wednesday, I don't

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>even remember. Anyways, and this one, this one has to

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>do I think more so with what I'm seeing on

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>social media, the callers that we're having call in as well.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>But mostly I'm going to be personal about it and

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>say that it's it's really my social media that I'm

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing this on, all right, and it's starting to drive

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>me up in an absolute wall. Okay, and I send

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you Last night, I was trying to look for the

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>words to perfectly explain how I feel, and I think

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm scrambling to pull up the tweet that I think

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Robert May's from the Athletic who I love. He had

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the perfect synopsis of what we're going through right now

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.279
<v Speaker 1>in New England at the quarterback position with Mac Jones,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is that we now live in a black

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and white quarterback situation where it's either you stink or

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you're elite, and there's no there's no middle ground. And

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what's more important about the no middle ground

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>is that there's no nuance to the conversation. It's all

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just yes or no, did you complete the pass or not?

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you produce or did you not produce? And there's

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>no conversation about the details about the nuance of how

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we got here, and I think the biggest thing with

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones and I don't know if Mac Jones is

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>good or not. I don't know. I don't know if

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy or the franchise quarterback or whatever you

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>know term you want to use. What I do know

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is that if you've decided based off of this season

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that Mac Jones is not the guy, you don't know football.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't know football. You're moron. Sorry, you're dumb because

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you can't decide that based off of this You just can't.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't properly evaluate that position with the absolute dumpster

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>fire that they have put him in. And let me sorry,

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>let me let me build on that real quick. I

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to cut off your momentum. But honestly, if

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it was just this season, and I've heard people say this,

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>if it was just this season, maybe there's a little

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of an argument, but what we're just throwing last

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>year out right, when he took them to the playoffs

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>as a rookie, and could he have played better shore?

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think people realize how hard that is

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to do. So I don't want to cut your your

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>your rants off, but one I wanted to say, there's

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of familiar names in the chat on YouTube,

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. And two, yeah, I just love that

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>tweet so much about either your elite or you suck.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the error that we grew up in

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that has kind of ended at this point, right. And

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when I say we grew up, I mean when we

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>were in like middle school. Right, you have Brady Manning,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Breeze Flacco written not Flacco but like Rivers. You're like

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you at all, Big Ben. Yeah, Like, that's not normal.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think people just assume that you're gonna be able

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to get an elite quarterback when in reality there's three

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>or four of those guys at most at one time

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>crowd the league, Right, is a league that era from

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like two thousand and five to two thousand and fifteen

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>will never be replicated again in terms of the quarterback

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>talent around the league. It's not coming back. That's not

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the norm. And Evan, this goes to a take I

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 1>have that we've talked about a lot on this show. Ye,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the time it will take you to find that elite

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is simply not worth it. It's not unless you

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are picking at the very top of the draft, and

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>there is a no dug ey there, Lawrence right as

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>opposed to him, there's there's fifty two other players on

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the roster, finding fifty two other really good players, and

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then a quarterback that just won't screw it up. But

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that that quarterback, a quarterback who just won't screw it up,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>which there are teams in the league that have pined

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for that guy for decades, is now considered a bump yeah,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>which is mind blowingly dumb, Like you said off the tip,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So I want to keep hammering home the point that

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>this is not a mac Jones is actually secretly elite

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>rant right, Like, this is not that this is I

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know how everybody's ready, not everybody. I don't know

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>how so many people are ready to just pronounce his

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>career dead off of playing quarterback with Matt Patricia calling

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>your play. This isn't This isn't just oh, well, sophomore

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>slump he st No, this is an unprecedented situation. The

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>regression here is not this isn't just oh it's the

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>second year and defense has figured him out and they're

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>giving him new looks that that's not what this looks.

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>That might have been down the stretch last year, right, right, right, exactly, Yeah, yeah,

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:56.239
<v Speaker 1>So the most important thing I would say with football,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and really with a lot of team sports, but in

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 1>football in particular, you have to have good structure, right.

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a good foundation of what you're

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>doing offense or defense, it doesn't matter. So on offense,

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that means a stable offensive line, a plan, right, a

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>good system with a plan going in of what you're

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going to execute, what you're gonna do, a certain rhythm

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or timing to your passing game from quarterback and receivers,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>which has been something that we're going to talk about

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's been a huge issue for the Patriots. And defensively,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing. You could have eleven of the

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>best athletes out on defense, if they're all running around

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with their chickens with their heads killed off, you're gonna

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>be a bad defense. You could have eleven above average

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.679
<v Speaker 1>or just average NFL athletes, if they're all on a string,

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be a good defense. Right. It's structure. Okay,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I go ask the Cleveland brown It's the ultimate team

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>game because the Cleveland Browns have great talent on the

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>defense side of the ball. Miles Garrett, Davian Clowney, Denzel Award,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeremiah Assa, Jock Ja. Yeah. Yeah, they have talent on

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that side of the ball. They're poorly coordinated. They run

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>around like crazy people, right, they don't know where they're going.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't have structure. Okay, so that's the most important thing. Well,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>hang on, let's let's uh. I'm trying to find the

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>exact quote. I can't remember what it is from the

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick Nick Saban documentary on HBOG. Remember that where

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill says something along the lines of good players can't

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>overcome bad coaching. Yeah, and he also said that sometimes

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we overcomplicate things when you lost again because he can't tackle, right.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>That was that was the the punchline of that whole

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>rant from the two of them, right, was, sometimes we

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>get into scheme and matchups and this and that and

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the other thing, and we you know what, guys, I

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>think we just didn't have a good day tackling. I

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's what it comes down to. So this is,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that was the exact quote, good players

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can't overcome bad coaching. I want to get into specific

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>examples because I don't want to just throw this out

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>there of it's not Max, not the problem and all

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. I want to give you specific examples,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not even going to give you example. So

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we do on that. We don't just spew, you know,

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>take we back it up is I don't even want

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to give examples. I'm going to get to the to

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the low lights examples. I actually want to give you

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>examples of highlights first and why these plays were made

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to be so difficult on the quarterback even though it

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>was actually a good play. So the first one I

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up is the seem splitter to Kendrick

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Bourne where he throws the ball into the Tampa two

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.719
<v Speaker 1>defense and it looks like he throws the ball in

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a triple coverage and he asked to thread the needle

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>between three guys because he had to. The reason why

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is that on that play they're running dagger right. Dagger

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is just that middle read route by Kendrick Bourne and

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>then a dig route filling in underneath it. If you

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>go and watch it on film, they get exactly what

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they want. They get Kendrick Bourne to clear out the

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa two the middle of the defense, and there is

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a parting of the red seas between the numbers right,

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>like literally the numbers are wide open in the middle

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>of the field. The problem is is that Tai Kwon

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Thornton takes his sweet time running the dig route on

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the dagger route just lattidati dottid running up the field right,

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't actually become an option on the play.

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So mac Jones is reading the play and there's only

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one other route backside, which is kind of not even

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a part of it, right, and he's waiting to read

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>out the play and he's like, the only way that

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to complete this pass right now is if

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I drop a dime to Kendrick Bourne on the head

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Tampa two defender and in between the like

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to throw this ball on a seed into

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>triple coverage, Like that's the only completion on the field

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. And that's what he did. But that was

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>made more difficult because Taikwon Thornton didn't run the route hard.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But let me let me just first of all, let

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>me just add some context to that too, and what

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>happened there, I hear. There's two big complaints I hear

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>about mac Jones a lot. Yes, he constantly throws in

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a triple coverage double a trip coverage, and he doesn't

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>throw guys open. Yeah, well you can't not do both

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of those things. If a guy's already open, you can't

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>throw him open. That doesn't make sense. And if you

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>want the quarterback to throw guys open, well then he

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>has to throw it covered receivers. That was a great

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>example that the player talking about Kendrick porn of Heat

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>threw Kendrick Borne, and Kendrick makes a great play to

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>go up and get that ball too. Like that is.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>They made that play last year right against the Browns

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown, and I wouldn't shut up for the

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year. You remember this about how that

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was such a high level play and that play was

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason I have long term faith and all of

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it right, high level play from both of them. But

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>also it wasn't a fluke because they did it last

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>year and they did it again. So I just I

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that play itself. I know you're going in a

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>different direction, but I just want to throw that in

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>as a great example of why mac Jones isn't worth

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>quitting one because and then you said, well, why doesn't

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>he make that play more often he isn't had a

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ton of opportunities for reasons outside of his own control.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, Kendrick Boorne hasn't been on the field.

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It just is night. So it's a very low percentage throw.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But the reason why he has to even attempt it

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the first place is because the high percentage throw

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>never comes to fruition, right, Right, So then on the

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>sideline catch to Kendrick Bourne where Born taps his toes

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in and they the one that was reviewed and reversed

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>as a as a catch right on the side of

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>It's four verts. Okay, it's literally four verticals. It's the

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>simplest concept in the in the league. Four verticals. And

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to pick on Scottie Washington too much

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because Scottie Washington probably shouldn't even been in the game, right.

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a practice squad elevation. He's only but he is

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>indecisive on his route coming up the seam, so he

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually threaten the half field safety on that side

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the field. It doesn't put the safety in conflict.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to two on one the safety in the

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>deep part of the field, but it doesn't because Scotty

0:11:54.920 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington is not actually threatening up the seam, so the

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>safety on that half side of the field gets to

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>cheat to the sideline. So that's another throw that mac

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones has to back shoulder to Kendrick Bourne to keep

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it away from the safety, and he has to throw

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it from the far hash and Kendrick Bourne has to

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>make a circus catch along the sideline just to get

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>it complete. These are the little details, like the Taekwon route,

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Scotty Washington route like these are the little details

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of why this offense always looks like it's it's so

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>hard for them to just complete a pass, right, okay,

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't even getting into first third down to

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>say the receivers collide or they call you know, they

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>show blitz, they see it coming. Mac Jones adjust the

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>protection at the line of scrimmage and Kevin Harris goes

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the wrong way and it's an unblocked runner and he's

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>almost sacked for safety on their own goal line. Or

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the play action pass that's going around Twitter, and everybody's

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>telling me that I don't I don't know what I'm

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about, right, because they're right, you know, Quarterbacks Expert

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>six seven nine. When three followers. He knows football right,

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>football coach. He coached his son's Pop Orner team last year,

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and he's telling me that Mac is late, that he's

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>late on the throw. Don't mind you that Jacoby Myers

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>running an option route down the field where he can

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of break it down and break inside or out.

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It takes ten minutes to run the damn route, right,

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And so mac Jones is sitting there waiting. Everybody's like,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he should anticipate. It's an option route. He could break

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in or out. If he breaks in, or excuse me,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>if he breaks out and mac Jones throws in, it's

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a pick six the other way. And then we're all like, well,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>why did he throw the ball? That's the play against

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>the Jets that got called back for the roughing. It's

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a similar idea, Yeah, that's what I'm saying, Like it

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>would be the same. That's the alternative outcome, right, And

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody's like, oh, Mac, Mac holds the ball too long.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>The route needs to declare, right, like you need to

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>give the quarterback a clear indication of are you breaking

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in or are you breaking Oh? Taekwon Thornton was opened deep.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>He was open deep after Mac Jones already threw the

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>ball right because right, So this is what I'm talking

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>about when I look at the little details of what's

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going on, and i'm that specific play action pass. Jacoby's

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>running an option route. He has a downfield option to

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>break in or break out based off of the cornerbacks position.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of those plays where ideally your quarterbacks

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>drop is set up and syncd up to the fact

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that that route's going to take a little bit longer

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to run, right, So they run it on a five

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>step drop, which is more like a bang play action right,

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hit the backfoot, balls out onto a dig route and

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>we're off and running. I posted the exact play that

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they ran last year that's supposed to look like against

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Texans last year, where it's back of the foot

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>hits the ground from mac Jones. Jacoby breaks in, balls

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there and we're off to the races. And this instance,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he's standing there and he's patting the baby. He's holding

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the football like come on, come on, come on, right,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and then he has to throw it behind him because

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the safety is about to clean him out and it's late. Well,

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, you hear the concept about like

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at backs right when the quarterback gets to that

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>final step in his drop, he wants to be able

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball. But you can't throw the ball

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. You can't throw the ball to

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's not looking. You might have some sort of

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>back shoulder concept or something, but you talk about the

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>timing and the chemistry of the offense, they're just not

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>there right now. The guys need to be looking at

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Mac Jones right for him to be able to throw

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball. And if and this is where a lot

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, oh well Mac holds the ball

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>talk and Dan Rolovski has done great breakdowns on this

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Yeah, when the quarterback gets to that backstep

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the drop, if he's looking around at his reads

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and all he sees are the backs of helmets, what's

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he supposed to do right, right, You're just gonna blind throw.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how it turns into interceptions. So that and really

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what this all comes down to, This is why this

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>year has been so frustrating, is it is really tough

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell exactly what's wrong with this offense unless you

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>watch it on this level. You watch it on the film.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You can, I can, and I can promise you, and

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm taking a lot of shots at the

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter coaches and all that, I can promise you that

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I can tell that you don't watch the film. I

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>can tell it's like okay, because you're watching it on TV.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>He's throwing balls in can please, throwing balls behind quote

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>unquote behind receivers and you're saying, you know this is

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's Max Fall, Like what does he doing? But you're

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not watching the detail of the play and seeing why

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it happens. The protection breaks down, Jacoby takes his time

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>on the route like all these different factors of timing.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And I asked Mac Jones about this yesterday and I

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think he was necessarily throwing shade, but I'm gonna

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>let I'm gonna say he was for me, right, for me,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Not for throwing shade at you. No, no, no, no,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing shade at them at the offense right when game

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>time comes, it's not It's got to be in rhythm.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>The spacing needs to be good. That's how really good

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>offenses work. It's not wrong. Timing, spacing, rhythm, that's what

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>good offenses do. He's not wrong. We don't have a

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>good offense. Is what he's saying. We don't have spacing,

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't have timing and rhythm in the passing game.

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>This isn't Madden. You can't just sit there and say, oh,

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>you know why flash is open? Why isn't he throwing to?

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Why it doesn't work that way in real life? And again,

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this is not me saying that I think that mac

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Jones is secretly Tom Brady and they're holding the kid back.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It's me saying that I don't know what mac Jones

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is because all of this stuff is holding him back

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so much that we can't make an evaluation on the Colt.

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me phrase that another way, because I

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think this argument has maybe gotten through to some people more. Yes,

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>name a quarterback who does succeed in the situation. Honestly,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought about this last night because I knew that

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that was going to sort of be the because then

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what people say, Well, well, there's other quarterbacks that

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>are in bad situations, not like this. I don't watch

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:16.239
<v Speaker 1>enough Uh Colts or Houston Texans film. I've seen the

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Colts have unfortunately been on primetime like a whole lot lately. Yeah,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got a whole lot of cults. Yeah, but I don't.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched the Texans closely, but those statistically, it's

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots, it's the Colts, the Texans. Those are the

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>three worst offenses in the NFL right now statistically, So

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't watch a ton of their team. But I

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>thought about it as well, of if this was if

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow was in this offense and you switched the

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks on Sunday, Like we're talking about what's wrong with

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow? Right right? That's like that's plastered all over

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>ESPN right now, is what's wrong with Joe Burrow? Why

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>does he look like this nineteen Brady you know, Rogers

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the year this year because they're

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year because there was no trust in the right.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no timing, there's no rhythm, there's no trust, there's

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>no nothing that they can hang their hat on like

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that's good offense. And I just I find it really

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>infuriating that. Obviously, I find it infuriating when everybody is

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a genius and knows football, so that's what that's besides

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the point. I find it more infuriating that people are

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>writing Mac Jones off without the caveat of what he's

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>playing in Like last year with Trevor Lawrence, well urban Meyer,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how could you anybody that's probably the most

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>comparable situation. And we all said, right, you need to

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>see what happens when urban Meyer isn't there, right, and

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>he can look at what happen Peterson, who's not I

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think Doug Peterson is like some savant like this

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is not Bill Walsh walking through the door. But he's

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a professional offensive coach, right, He's a professional offensive coach,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>has done it at a high level, that's been around

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the block a billion times, and he knows what he's

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>doing on that side of the ball. And look at

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the season that I think I saw that Trevor Lawrence

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>has the biggest increase in passer rating from year one

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to year two in NFL history, all because he has

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>some competent coaching. Right. They really didn't even change the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>personel that much. I mean, they added Calvin Riel is coming,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>but he's not added Christian Kirk. That's pretty much it

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who everybody thought they overpaid it. And and Evan Ingram,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>who I would say that's a coaching like the way

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>they're using him is so different than the way he

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was being used in New York or the way they

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>use their tight ends last year. So yeah, it's it's

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough year because you want to try to

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.239
<v Speaker 1>explain it to people and that's our job, right, yes,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>but there's really there's no real way to do it

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>without kind of sounding a little pretentious and saying you

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have to watch the game. And I understand that just

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>sounded like a complete It will shout out to the

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>people who watched this show and listen to the show,

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because they they I think they get that. I think

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the people are turning into this show understand that. I

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes he's see an office. Oh they're not fast enough,

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh they're not big, Like oh they make a lot

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of pants, like you just see it on TV and

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's easy. This is it's really down to a deep

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>level where you have to go where you have to

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>go to see where this offense isn't functioning properly. And

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again, people just was like, oh, well

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just not good. What if they're just not good

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>with almost they made very few personnel changes on offense

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in the off season, very few. They changed both of

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>their guards, right, they lost both guards, but the line

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>was one guard spot. You replaced Michael ow WHENO like

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael and when who stepped in? Who's been maybe their

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>best offensive player this year, one of the best guards

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in football. He's not an issue. The other spot, you

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>used a first round pick to replace your other guard,

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>which first round pick you think is a plug and

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>play guy. The only other real change is Davante Parker

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>replaced me kill Harry upgrade. They went from sixth and

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>scoring two. I think they're seventeenth eighteenth now it's over

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown less per game. Yeah, so all the schedule

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>schedules comparable. Yes, they hung fifty on Jacksonville last year,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>they didn't play Jacksonville this year, but in terms of

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the defenses, it's pretty comparable. So what happened. It's not

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a talent issue, it's not it's a it's a schematic issue.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna wrap it up on this and I

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about one other thing on offense before

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we kind of open this up a little bit. Mac

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Jones played good in this game, especially in the second half. Well,

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they put his favorite receiver on the field and suddenly

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he looked much better. And it's not to take it

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>all away from Mac Jones, but can we also talk

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about how Kendrick Bourne played as well. Sure, the downfield

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>throws were great through all three of them to Kendrick

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Bourne were great throws, touchdown, throwdown, talk about chemistry, timing, rhythm.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Everything that play was was chemistry and time. He read

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that the defender's back was to the line of scream,

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>which wasn't going to make a play on the ball.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Put it in a spot for Kendrick Bourne Born you know,

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>went and got it. Great great throw, great catch. Yeah,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Mac played fine in this game. He did benching him

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>moving on from him, it's ridiculous, it's ridiculous talk. But

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if if Mac Jones plays it, say next year they

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>get the offense, they fix the things we see we

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>say they need to fix. Yeah, right, and Mac Jones

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>plays at that level, and we're doing a bunch of hypotheticals.

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I know the team hates hypotheticals, but just humor. Let's

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>say they fix the things they need to fix, schimmatically

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and Mac plays at that level next year for eighteen games,

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>does he get his fifth year option picked up? He should, Yeah,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I would think he'd be is that is that a

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>guy you'd extend. I think he'd be a top fifteen,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>top twelve quarterback if all those things, if he plays

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at that level with the right pieces around him. Yeah,

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what I don't Just the greast year, he was

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.239
<v Speaker 1>twelve to seventeen and wherever you want to put him

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>right staysically he was top half. He was closer to

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the top fifteen, top twelve, honestly. But the other thing

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to say about the offense that this is

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>something that's been on my radar all year, but I

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>think it's gotten particularly horrible, quite frankly, is the route running.

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen the Patriots run routes this this poorly.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Before and since covering the team and starting in twenty

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen and breaking down their tape and all this kind

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, I have never seen them look so sloppy

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on film running routes as they do now. Obviously, I've

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about spacing a lot, you know, tight ends,

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>colliding with each other, Kendrick Boorn running into Johnny Smith

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and getting him can cuss like. These things are things

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that happen from time to time, but you don't see

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>them happen multiple times every single week, like you just

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>don't see that. The other thing that has been driving

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>me nuts. I've mentioned it with the Meyers thing and

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the Thornton route. They just some guys just think that

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they have like all day to run a route, like

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they just they feel like they can just lollygag up

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the field. Like I just don't understand I'm timing. I

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's effort, Like I don't want to

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>question effort. I hate doing that, but it just looks

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to me like they feel like, oh, I'm gonna, you know,

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw six fakes right, like I'm gonna get

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to the top of the route and I'm gonna do

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of jab steps, a bunch of head fakes,

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and like try to really get loose on this guy.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And what I think it comes back too, And that's

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>let's also get into the little things too, like breaking

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a route off at a certain uh you know, yardage

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>marker or step right, you know, one step, three step, five, step,

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>seven step routes. Not being able to to do that

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>properly too has been a big thing. But I think

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>what it comes down to with the timing of the

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>routes and how long it's taking them sometimes is I

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>really think that they're trying to do too much. Like

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to and this relates back in a way

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to some of the miscues at the end of games

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen, you know, Ramandre trying to fight for

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>extra yards. Obviously what happened at the end in Vegas.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that these receivers are thinking to themselves,

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not good enough for me to just gain eight

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>yards on first and ten. I have to gain twenty

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, right, Like they're trying to create so much

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>separation with all these head fakes and jabs and you know,

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sweet releases at the line of scrimmage that take twenty

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>minutes to get off the line because they feel like

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to make a big play every single time

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they're pressing and when when when you're committing a lot

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of penalties and stuff like that. Like this team has

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>really struggled to incrementally work the ball down the field

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>right right, and when you do that, I think you

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of get in the back of your head, Man,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>we need a big play. We can't we can't do

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>this for twelve thirteen plays. We gotta get in the

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>end zone in six or seven, and I think guys

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are playing. I think maybe there's also a level of

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>overthinking just in terms of and this goes back really

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to the coaching when you can't get lined up, when

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>when guys don't know the play right, you know, when

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that keeps happening, you know, you screw the play up

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>four five times? All right, I gotta run this rat right, Yeah? Yeah,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>this might right, Yeah, Okay, this is the play. Like

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's just the whole, the whole irony in this,

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the real irony. And this is do you remember all

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the way back in the summer, really in the spring,

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>when they change the offense, and it was, oh, we

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>want to simplify it. We wanted to be less thinking, right,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to be less thinking for the receivers in

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the tight ends and the running backs in the end.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if it's because they change the offense,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the two might be unrelated. But one of the big

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>problems now, ironically in all of this is everybody on offense,

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>mac the linemen, that the skill players looks like they're

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>overthinking quite a bit. Yeah, And now what it comes

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>down to is that it's no longer stuff like play

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>design and sequencing and all the fancy stuff about offense.

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We are so far beyond that, like can behind that,

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not beyond it, behind it. We're just that's not the

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest issue with the team because they can't execute the

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>fundamental well. So that's I compared it to when I

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was on the Hub earlier this week. I compared it,

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you gotta everybody needs to know what the

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>plays are, what the calls are, we're to line up

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>right right. Once you do that, you start building on that,

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>right you start you know, then you start building off

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>a place and let's like two three, four and on

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the checklist. They can't get past one right now, right

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't start doing two, three, four and five until

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>one is checking. I don't know if they're capable of

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>doing two, three, four and five, to be honest with you.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest issue that from a coaching standpoint, I

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think with this team right now is the fundamental details

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the game right like they are not They're not

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a sound football team on offense right now, where they're

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>running precise routes and they know where they're supposed to

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be at and the combinations are spaced out properly. And

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>working properly and timed up properly, Like you can't start

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>doing creative stuff. We can't start getting into downfield RPOs

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>or fun things that we talk about sometimes that I

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about that I love, Right, we can't start getting

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>into that type of stuff if we can't run slant

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>flats in a row. That's what I'm saying. You can't

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>do two, three, four, and five until that first box

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is checked. And I mean to your point that they can't.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>There's two maybe you know, two games left in the

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>regular season. Who knows if they get me in the playoffs.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>That's stuff that you're trying to get checked off back

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the summer. So who knows what's going to happen

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with that, at least in terms of this year's team.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think we're basically saying this. So the

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals and the details of this football team on offense

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are as bad as I've ever seen it, And that,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to me is a coaching failure across the board. It's

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>not just Matt Patricia. I'm looking at Troy Brown, I'm

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at Nick Kaylee, Like these guys are judge, of course,

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, at the bare minimum keeping it

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>buttoned up right, like keeping it sharp is the bare

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>minimum on either side of the football. I could really

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>care less at this point if you're an offensive creative genius,

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're Mike McDaniel or Kyle shanhander one are these

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that's motioning people and play action this way and

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>play action that way? Like, I could care less at

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this point because they can't. They're not doing the simple

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>things great. And what I don't understand is is like

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>when Jacobe Myers takes ten hours to come out of

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>his route on that play action pass. It's like I

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have to think Troy is in the film room and

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>being like, hey, we gotta you got to get out,

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like we gotta get going here. And we know Jacoby

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>can do it because we've seen him do it in

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the past, correct, right, So it's not like, oh, he

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>just can't again. It goes back to my thing about

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the talent level, right, it's not like he can't do it.

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I do take a small victory lap here though, because

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do you remember after the Minnesota game, we were sitting

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>here and you were talking about Mackley didn't come back

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and I said, if they just clean it

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>all up in the margins. You say, I forget the margins,

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like then he'd be able to do this and that.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>This is this is what I meant. Basically, this is

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what I was saying. Until you're you have the detail,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>because this team has always won by playing bit. They

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are better in the margins than their opponent, the little things,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the details, the not making avoidable mistakes. The Patriots won

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for twenty plus years by simply being better at that

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>than there were than any opponent they faced. They were

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>always going to be better than the other team at that.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And to your point back then, I get it. You

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>want to be more explosive and you need to be

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>able to make plays, not just prevent the other team, YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>But until you can start doing that stuff on them,

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like doing that stuff on the margin correctly, is what's

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going to allow you to take that next step into

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>what you wanted to see. I still think it all

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from they have to clean up the little things first,

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the dail so many bad habits that this team has

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>developed in the passing game is just can I give

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you an interesting stat? I've given you the stat off

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the air. I don't know that I've ever given it

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>given it on the air. Yeah, So we talk a

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>lot and I don't know exactly what it means, but

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it's indicative of what we're talking about. Right, we talk

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, you know, okay, third down struggles. Well,

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the average distance to go? This is a big

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>bill thing. When they have a good game on third down,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you ask him about it, he'll almost always say, well,

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we move the ball on first and second down was manageable. Right,

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So you look at all right, they're struggling on third down?

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>What's their average yards to go? And then maybe take

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it a step deeper, all right, well are they picking

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>up yards on second down? Right? Even if they don't

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get it on first they're picking up yards on So

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going through and I'm tracking these numbers on Pro

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Football Reference. Shout out to them, great, great website, and

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm curious. I go, all right, I wonder

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>what their average distance to go on first down is? Like,

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is this something that's even tracked? Because well it's first

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and ten right, right, first ten? The Patriots average distance

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to go on first down this year is ten point

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>two yards. That was the longest in the league, tied

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with a couple of teams, the Raiders have actually passed them.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are now ten point three to go on

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>first down. What does that mean? Right, You're in a

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of first in fifteens, first and twenties and but

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the difference is so it's the Patriots, the Raiders, in

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, we're all at ten point two. Now the

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Raiders are at ten point three. The Patriots have run

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>about forty less first down snaps and those other two teams,

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a much smaller sample size. Yeah, Now,

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not every team is first and ten. There's only eight

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league that are averaging exactly first and ten.

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You also have some other teams that are under. The

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are actually the best in the league of this.

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings average first down distance to go is nine

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>point six. They're alone, which is I don't even how

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that gets there. Red zone, right, they have some of

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it is you know, you get guys to jump off sides,

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but first and goal from the five, first and goal

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>from the three right brings that average down. Yeah, so

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it basically just tells you they're putting. But that's all

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on your own. The opponent doesn't have a lot to

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>do with that number. A lot of that is just

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? Right? And basically I'm as I'm

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>talking through this here, what that number I think it

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>means is the Patriots and the Seahawks and the Raiders

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 1>and those other teams that are up there, they are

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>putting themselves in difficult situations on their own accord. Yeah,

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I just I just wonder where they go from here

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side of the ball, because I think

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>any realist would look at this situation and notice that

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every is not just the whole is not performing.

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much every position group has regressed as well, right,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like every individual except Michael and winning except Michael, and

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I had Hermandre Stevens in until two weeks ago, which

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll look at. Nobody else could step up. He had

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to take ninth in the league and touches him. Yeah,

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's and he admitted after the game, this

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 1>is the first time he said anything along the lines.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>He said he's a little banged up right now. Yeah,

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's doing a ton. Yeah. So any other people

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>would look at this objectively and and clean house on

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the offensive side of the ball, right, like you bring

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in coaching, Yeah, you bring in somebody like Bill. There's

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>people want them to clean house in terms of players

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on on Dowse. You bring in somebody like Bill O'Brien

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and he brings all of his own coaches right or

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>something along those lines. So we'll see what ends. That's

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>an offseason thing. I don't like playing the what if

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for the crystal ball game with the coaching staff, but

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's the that's our forty minute rant on the offense.

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's take some phone calls. Patty, thanks for hanging on.

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I know we had you on hold for a while.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>How you doing good? Now? You guys doing today? Good?

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Doing well? So before the Buffalo game, I had made

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a I said the same phrase that Max said in

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this press conference yesterday, which is I just wanted to

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>see him let it rip because that was a game

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that they weren't supposed to win anyway, So what would

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>what would be the harm in just you know, seeing

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what you can do down the field, you know? And

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and I like that, he said back, because I would

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like to see them over the next couple of games.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And Evan, you kind of spoiled your pick on PU,

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to see what you guys thought about

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully. You know, I just want him to beat

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins because the Dolphins are my NFL Yankees. I

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>can't stand them, never have been able to stand them.

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And do you guys think that there's been a player,

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not over the course of the season, not a single game,

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not a Malcolm Butler, but over the course of the

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>season that spend more stand back than Mac Jones this year. Yeah,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a really good question, Patty. And to your

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>first question, thanks for calling the just grip it and

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>rip it right. Like you know, in the second half,

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they finally opened up the passing game and he made

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>some plays down the field. The interesting part about it

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is against the Dolphins, and the Dolphins and they're they're

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>coordinated by Josh Boyer who used to be here and

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>was underflow in Miami and he was the one holdover.

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It was that they kept the continuity on defense. They

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>brought McDaniel and to run the offense, and they kept

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the continuity and on defense. So they still play a

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of man coverage. They still blitz a lot, right,

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not. They don't come out you with all the

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Amibia all out blitzes and stuff like that, Like they

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.959
<v Speaker 1>used to do so much with Flores, but they still

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>play a lot of man free which is you know,

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>five man rush everybody else you know, one post safety

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the field man coverage. Right, there's

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>no robber, there's no underneath help, nothing like that because

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they're rushing five. So they still play a lot of

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that style of coverage. So teams like the Packers last

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>week when they found success in the day attack down

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 1>field against this team, right, you know, that's they're okay

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>at covering deep passes, but to shorten the intermediate stuff

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and really the middle of the field because they don't

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have any help at the intermediate middle of the field,

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that's really where this team is very vulnerable. So in

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of respects, I do think they're gonna come

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>after mac mac Jones. They've done that every single time

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>they've played the Patriots in the three games with mac

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Jones at quarterback over the last two years, they always

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>come after them. I think they're going to continue to

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>do that and instead of which I think is what

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll end up doing. We'll see, if you know, Marcus

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Jones doesn't clear protocol, then maybe not. But instead of

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 1>running a play a game plan like that against Arizona

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or there's you know, fifteen screens and draws and you know,

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to just survive those downs where they blitz. It

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.479
<v Speaker 1>would be nice to see them just try to block

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it and let mac Jones stand in there and make

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some throws down the field against it. I don't think

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they will because I think that they'll be conservative again,

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>but that maybe there is that potential there this week

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>after what seeing what it did last week in the

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>second half, that they will just try to block it

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>up and hit some throws down the field. The one

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I'd say is if they're gonna do that, Kendrick

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Born needs to be out there. Oh yeah. I mean

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he should be out there, right, He should be out

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there one way or the other. But yeah, I just

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like every time we've done this this year,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>where he gets out a little bit of run and

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>we get all excited and this is it. Here it comes,

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna put him back in the offense. Yeah, and

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>then he goes back on the shelf for three weeks.

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I'm expecting now. I think they kind

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of have to play him because DeVante Parker's in concussion protocol.

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Smith is in concussion protocol. I don't think either

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys are going to play on Sunday.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's basically the same situation that they had last week,

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>where you just have you have three receivers healthy. I

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>really have no choice, right right. I mean they technically

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have four, but you're not if you're playing Kendrick Born

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 1>over Agloa and Taekwon Thornton at this point, then we're

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>watching different tapes. But they did. But they've done that

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>all year. I know. I would say, all right, David

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York, what's going on? David? You're on the air. Hey, guys,

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>how's it going good? So I had a point in

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>a question. So my point was, I'm sure you've done

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this before. I went back and I looked at some

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of the film from the Colts game last year, you know,

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the one where they were down like twenty and nothing. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And that was one that was like the game where

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I considered, like, you know, that's our word, how could

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>this often could any worse? That's their worst offensive game.

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>But actually looking back at it compared to this year,

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that looks like, at the very least the new England

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Patriots offense and a well oiled machine. Granted they were

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in hurry up for mostly that guy after the game,

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>but that just kind of was eye opening to me.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And then my question was what do you want to

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>make Teddy Bridgewater do on Sunday? Like what do you

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>force them to do? How do you beat them? Yeah?

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Good question, David. So to the first point I have

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for the call. I have reviewed that Colds

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>tape a lot. I reviewed a lot of you know,

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>went back and I have, you know, a lot of

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>positive plays sorted on my computer and I like to

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just sometimes run through um last year and be like,

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>what was what was working? Right? Like what was that

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they ran well? And in that Colds game, I remember

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it vividly. Mac Jones hit the same concept three different ways, right.

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>It was just that their their levels, you know, dig

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>levels concept and they have the backside vertical, hit the

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>deep dig, then he hit the short dig, and then

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>he hit the vertical three different ways. I can't even

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you that he's hit the same play three different

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>ways all year, let alone in one game, right, And

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the the time, Like all of the

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>things that we're saying is that they just don't run

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>anything consistently well enough in a row to be able

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to do something like that. So yeah, that Colts game

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up being if that was the film he was

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>putting out right now. I mean, I think it's kind

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of similar in some ways to this last game against

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, because they were bad in the first half

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of that game, and they were bad the first drive

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the second half. I believe he was an interception

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. He only threw one pass the first quarter. Right,

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a bad game for them in the first half,

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of similar. But it just sticks out

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to me that they were able to make the make

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the same play work three different ways, right, Like, that's

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the old you know, that's the old addage in

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways that with football is that it

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be super complex, right, can be the

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>same play, you know, the coverage adjust you and you

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>hit it different ways. So to the second question, what

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>do we want Teddy Bridgewater to do? Well? Here is

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the interesting chess match about this game is

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that the blueprinter or the book on the Miami Dolphins

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>offense really since that Charger game, but it maybe started

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with San Francisco, but they're more of

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>his own team is to play man coverage. Yeah, yeah,

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they get into Tyreek Kill and Jalen Waddle's faces, and

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the motion, play action and misdirection that

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that Mike McDaniel uses and uses well is just just

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>torment zone coverage, right, because your your guys are that

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 1>are spot drappers, are just in conflict the entire game,

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in the middle of the field. Is it a run,

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is it a reverse? Is it a sweep? Is it

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know? This guy's motion in this way and coming

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 1>out that way? Now we have play action like there's

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>just no the middle linebacker has got like six different

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>things going on. And Bill Bill's talked about this, right

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that against those kind of teams play action motion stuff

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like that, Yeah, is a lot less of active against

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>man coverage because in man coverage, there's no there's no

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not reading cues, right, You're just this is my assignment.

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm going off this assignment, whereas in zone, yes,

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>then you need to be more aware of everything that's

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>happening in front of you. The thing I'd add to

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that too is take and this is maybe more of

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a Dolphins thing than a Teddy Bridgewater specific thing. But yeah,

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>take away short stuff, make him throw the ball deep.

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is the concern, right, because I wholeheartedly agree

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>with you, especially with Bridgewater in there, because he I

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>said this, he can dig and dunk all day long.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Like that's Teddy b right, Like you get the ball

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>out quickly, he'd throw he averages like six yards air

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:42.399
<v Speaker 1>yards per attempt, like that's that's his sweet spot, that's

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>where he wants to be. But the problem is is

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that if you can't man up on the outside and

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you're playing zone, that's what's going to be there, right.

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>The checkdowns is what's going to be there. The soft

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>stuff underneath is what's going to be there. And I

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 1>think this gets to a point that I wanted to

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>bring up a bigger picture point. And we're talking about

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this earlier about defense nowadays in the NFL, and I

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people watch that first half, specifically

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>against Burrow, and they're like, Oh, they're just so much

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>soft zone, right, They're just sitting in soft zone. They're

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>giving up things underneath, and Burrows just you know, getting

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the football out quickly, distributing the ball out quickly, and

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just shredding them. And I think in a lot

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of ways unfortunately, especially with the Patriots defense, the way

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're built, where they're really stronger upfront and the

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>back end is sort of the weaker part of their team,

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>especially with all the injuries. It's just really difficult nowadays

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to really dictate the terms of the game on defense. Yeah,

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the way the rules are set up, the quarterbacks are

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>so good, the receivers are so good, Like, you just

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>can't control or dominate the game defensively the way that

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you used to be able to. And I think that

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of teams, pretty much every team I watch

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on film defensively is doing the same thing, and that

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 1>is they're playing too high shell. Sometimes they rotate it

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.879
<v Speaker 1>into three, sometimes they stay into and I say three,

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean like cover three or post safety. But everybody's

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>backing off because all they want to do. That Ben

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>don't break. Is how thirty two teams are playing defense

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, But I'll say thirty one because I think

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco might be the San Francisco. Yeah, they're on

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a different level. But no, it's a good point, you know,

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you you kinda and we talked about it before with

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the Great even some of the elite quarterbacks in the

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>league right now are turnover happy. Yeah, look at it,

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>guy like Josh Allen, because that's all it is, is

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that you're just trying to bait them. You're hunting big place, right,

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 1>So it's all right, let's just see if you'll throw

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>us one, right and if not, we'll hold a field

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>goal in the red zone. Like that's defense at this point,

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>right right. And the other thing specifically is it relates

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to that game. You had receivers of six, five, sixty

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>three and six one against corners of five, ten, five,

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>eight and five eight. Yeah, you're not exactly going to

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>come up to the line and press. That's not exactly

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>recipe to win. And I mean we'll get into it

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>more when they when we get to the offseason. Jalen

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Mills is still here, obviously, Jack Jones is still here.

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But you're seeing the depth kind of be tested on

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the boundary corner. Specifically, they need more size in the

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>secondary because the whole, like receivers are getting bigger. Guys

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>who would have been tight ends ten years ago are

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 1>now wide receivers like Higgins exactly so and it's if

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna play man. And I remember talking to guys

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.399
<v Speaker 1>on like the eighteen nineteen Patriots about this, that had

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the guys the horses to play man for four quarters

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary. If you're gonna feel more, JC Jackson,

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Jason mccordy, John john what a unit if you are

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna play man. It's a lot like basketball where you

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to have guys that can cover

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>one through five, Right, Like, you can't put a five

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>foot eight Marcus Jones on a center like t Higgins

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna live in man coverage. So you have

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to have bigger guys. And that's not a knock on

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Jones. There's within positions, there's different types of players

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at each position, right. So it's just like a game

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of basketball, where you know, you match big on big

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and you match the guards on the guards, and like

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of how you have to go about it.

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.359
<v Speaker 1>So with that team in eighteen, you know that John

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Jones in the slot, and they had Gilmore and Jason

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>mccordy and Jac you had some more size on the outside,

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and they were able to match up against every different

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 1>body type that they were going to see and unfortunately

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this defense doesn't have that. So I actually think that

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing defensively, although it might be looked at

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as treading water on a lot of downs and a

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:26.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of situations, especially between the twenties, I think they're

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>doing what they can, right, Yeah, And this is sort

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of defense nowadays. Like spin the dial, you know, get

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you into your two shell, high shell, make it to three,

0:46:37.880 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>make it one, make it two, make it four, and

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just continue to spend that dial as much as you

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly can, and hope and pray that you win on

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>third down a couple of times, maybe you get a

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>turnover two or three. And that's how you hold a

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:57.760
<v Speaker 1>team to twenty points, right, That's that's the end game? Right? Yeah? No, absolutely,

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think you hear some times people say, oh,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.879
<v Speaker 1>they allowed twenty one points. Twenty four points, doesn't really

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that good to be a game on defense. But what

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>are the stipulations if those were long sustained drives, right right?

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And or not? Like sorry, not if those are not

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>long sustained drives, if you were able to keep your

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:16.800
<v Speaker 1>offense on the field, like you said, if you know,

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you hold them to a field on the key spot

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>defense is so situational at this point. Yeah, it's not

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily as weird as it sounds. It's not necessarily just

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>keep points off the ball board at all costs. Yeah,

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's keep the game manageable. It set the tone, you know,

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>how's your tani. But it's literally making sure that they

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>don't score forty on every quarters. If you're if your

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>team is built for shootout offensively, then yeah, maybe you

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>play a little more aggressive. But if you have an offense,

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's more dank and dunk. You know, how can we

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>shorten the game? How can we limit the total number

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of drives? Can we get red zone stops? Right, it's

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very very situational. All right, let's fly through some

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of these costs. In the last twenty minutes or so,

0:47:56.120 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>we had all right, Christen Fresno, what's going on? Going

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>quick question for you guys. So in this scenario, so

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously all the news that Derek Carter just toppen. So

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>actually I want the feathers state. I go there. I've

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:15.279
<v Speaker 1>grown up watching Derek play, Davante Adams to play. I

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>know in the past, I've been reports that we've previously

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>tried trading for Derek and I know all the relationship

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>with Josh McDonalds and Mac Jones. Any chance to Bill

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Belichick and Josh and DWAs get together in trade Derek Carr,

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Devant Adams, true Mac Jones and possibly like a first

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>round pick. Okay, so thanks for the call, Chris. I

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to drop you quick. We just have to

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>go here. Yeah, this one, I look, I would love

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to have Davante Adams here. Yeah. And if you're telling

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:48.440
<v Speaker 1>me that the only way I can get Davanta Adams

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but I have Davante Adams is to take on Derek Carr,

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>then I'll swallow the pill. But I don't like swallow. Yeah.

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the first time I've heard that one phrased that way,

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>which I'm a little more interesting. So the Derek Carr

0:49:01.360 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>thing to me is baffling because Mac Jones is just

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper version of Derek Carr. Right, So why are

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you trading the same player Mac Jones for Derek Carr

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>just to play pay excuse me, pay with money, pay

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the more expensive quarters in the older quarterback. Yeah, and

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you get him off the rock. It's crazy to me.

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>How three weeks ago I'm sitting here hyping up the

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 1>defense for how they played against the Raiders, and all

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I hear is Derek Cars terrible. Derek Carr doesn't belong

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Derek Carr. Is Derek Carr that now all

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, Well, could you imagine if they had

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr instead of Mac Jones quarterback? Look, I think

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man meme, It's like it is the same people.

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's as bad. That game against the

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Patriots one of the worst I've seen him play. I

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's quite that bad. But everybody talking about

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>oh well, Max panicky in the pocket and Mac has

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:53.960
<v Speaker 1>trouble getting through his reads, which, like I don't think

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is as true as people make it. But if those

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are your complaints, those are also two of the biggest

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>knocks on Derek Carr. If you want to say you

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want a different quarterback, fine, come to the table with

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:06.280
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent army. This is gonna be my new thing. Okay,

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying this right now. If you're gonna tell me

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Max shouldn't be the Patriots quarterback. If you're gonna tell

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>me Max shouldn't be the Patriots quarterback, well then who

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>should Yeah, That's gonna be my question. You don't move

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>on from a guy who a year ago took the

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 1>team in the playoffs as a rookie. You don't move

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.839
<v Speaker 1>on from a guy like that just because oh greener pastors, right.

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You move on from a guy like that with a plan.

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And if Derek Carr is your plan, you're spinning your tires.

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 1>At best, you're spinning your tires. So I blame Josh

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Allen for this. I do too. I blame Josh Allen

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for a lot. I blame Josh Allen, I blame mahomes

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I blame Herbert because it has set an expectation that

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>every quarterback not only has to be this like cyborg

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with a rocket arm, but he also has to play

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that style to win right where this this backyard, you know,

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a gunslinger style that they all play. And Herbert maybe

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not as much as Alan and uh and mahomes um,

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but just because of the offense that he's in. But

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in general, like that, the it's death to the to

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the traditional pocket passer, right like. And then this is

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>like a f which I think is so dumb, which

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>because you can still at the end of the day,

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:22.879
<v Speaker 1>football is still football. Yeah, and I really aesthetically when

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you see, you know, Josh Allen make a throw with like,

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a guy hanging off of him and he's

0:51:28.640 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>got well you know he see throwing it with one arm.

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, no, no feat nothing right, Like he's just

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>throwing off platform. It's it looks so cool. It doesn't.

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But what people don't realize is how slim the margin

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of error is to operate that way. And yeah, I

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>just don't know Josh Allen's success. What do people who

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>don't get enough credit? Is everybody else on that roster

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>who allows him to operate that way. But here's my point.

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>But listen, listen, here's my point. Here's my point because

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it goes to what you're saying. Yeah, to have a

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that play Mahomes is the one difference in this.

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Mahomes on another planet. Yeah, But whether it's

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Allen, whether it's Mahomes, whether it's Aaron Rodgers

0:52:09.080 --> 0:52:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the latter stage of his career, you have to

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 1>have such a good roster around that guy to allow

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>him to play that way, to allow him to play

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>up to a skill set. So if you have to

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>build an elite roster Anyway, why give up all those

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>assets to go chase the QB when it's been proven

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can win with that elite roster, even if

0:52:27.200 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback isn't that good. Well, we have we have

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>spied on hold. So he's getting oh boys, So let

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>me just say we're getting to this argument here in

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>rock Purty exists. Yeah, brock Purty exists. You have Kyle

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan running the offense. But I think the general, the

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr thing, the fact that this is a conversation

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to trade the younger Derek Carr, the cheaper rookie contract,

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr for Derek Carr for thirty million dollars a year.

0:52:53.200 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr is just mind blood. And if you think,

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>if you don't think Derek Carr has been good in Vegas,

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>which I know a lot of Patriots fans don't. On

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the way they talked after that game, what does bring

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 1>him into a worst situation do for you? I don't

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>know it Like it's if you're if you want to

0:53:07.480 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 1>replace Mac Jones, fine, come to the table with a

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>better option. All right. Oh in North Carolina? Oh, how's

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it going? Oh you're on the air? Hello? Hey, Oh, Hello, gentlemen,

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>any time, long time, Thank you. I just wanted to

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:27.839
<v Speaker 1>make a remark about the season, as it's been fascinating

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 1>actually from like an academic standpoint, because if you think

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:35.560
<v Speaker 1>back to preseason, we uh, we all wondered how we

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 1>would be able to tell if it was the offensive

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>coaching or the players and uh and I think that's

0:53:41.600 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten really murky. And I believe it started with just well,

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the play calling was the problem. We weren't utilizing certain

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:54.279
<v Speaker 1>certain tools in the bag, like RPO's play action. And

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>then to look at where it's at now and sort

0:53:56.680 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of evolved to this, well, the positional code terrible as well,

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least blackluster. Yeah, that's I just think it's

0:54:05.080 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating him worthy of like a retrospect at some point.

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>That's totally on the one eighty that I did, because

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I started with this offense and was like, well, they're

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>just not creative, they're not calling the right plays, they

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't call enough play action, they don't call enough RPO.

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 1>But now we're so far removed from even that part

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of the discussion because now we just need to execute.

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Just day one. Can get lined up? Can you get

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:32.680
<v Speaker 1>lined up right? And I don't. Maybe I misunderstood the call. Yeah,

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the call. Maybe I misunderstood a little bit.

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's murky in terms like it sounds

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:38.319
<v Speaker 1>like he was saying, well, do they not have enough

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>talent or they're not coached? Right, I don't think that

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 1>part's murky at all. Yeah, and we already got into

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that about the offensive ranking from last year. I won't

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.399
<v Speaker 1>redo that, but I don't think it's murky there all

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 1>right here, it comes all right, spe how are we doing?

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I didn't even want to get into

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, Alex. But I mean, good, stop using the

0:54:56.760 --> 0:54:59.839
<v Speaker 1>word proved. You know it hasn't been proven yet. I mean,

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>call me when they when that kind of situation, high ranking,

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of high flying talent with your your net neutral quarterback,

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because what a super Bowl. It hasn't happened. But I mean,

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't I didn't want to get into that, all right,

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go. But Nick Foles did happen. Speak

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles happened? I would say, enough, guys have gotten

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>one game, all right, So Carson when he was he

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was so Nick Foles and Carson Wentz happened. It's two

0:55:24.040 --> 0:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of us speak. Nick Foles was the quarterback for the

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>entire playoff run. It wasn't just one game. We're just

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.399
<v Speaker 1>messing with you. What do you? What? Are you? Okay? Fine?

0:55:31.520 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But Carson went that season was a very pre injury.

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz was very, very great situation on a great Rossie.

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I say this to Alex all the time, and I

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's hilarious. If Jimmy Garoppolo hits that throw at

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the end of that Super Bowl and wins that then,

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then then his whole argument is so much stronger. His

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 1>whole argument is so much strong Only Shanahan didn't put

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it in his hands. Okay, you want to let me

0:55:57.200 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>bring up jim Mcaroppolo. Just what if those two team

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:04.359
<v Speaker 1>play ten times, Jimmy Garoppolo loses eight out of ten

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of those games. Well he did because that team was

0:56:06.760 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so heavily dependent on the running game. Until they get

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the postseason, They're like, all right, Jimmy playing it. Look

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Well, now I'm the NFC Championship game me

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>through at eighteen. But that's my point. If you just

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:18.319
<v Speaker 1>had a bet like it could have worked, if they

0:56:18.400 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 1>just coached it better. Oh please, all right, what was

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:23.239
<v Speaker 1>your point? What did you actually at the time, what

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:25.879
<v Speaker 1>did you actually call in? I really okay, I really

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to talk about that. What I what I wanted.

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say that Evan, some you and I,

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>through different roads to Grandma's house, have come to kind

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.439
<v Speaker 1>of feel the same way about Mac Jones at this point.

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel uncertain. I feel like the needle for me

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is not moved adequately because of the situation, because there

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are things you guys like, are up. I think that

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Alex is still too much of a Jim. I mean,

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>there's too much of a of a of a mac

0:56:47.560 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 1>apologist at this point, like and I don't season clearly

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for his world wards. But but what I wanted to

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get you guys to address, I'm genuinely curious and I'm

0:56:57.520 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not coming at this where that this is right, this

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:03.399
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, And please avoid using the words rookie wall.

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Just tell me what Mac is in total. Look, get

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole body of work from the post by Indie

0:57:10.680 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>game last year, board like what like, because I don't

0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think he was that great toward the end of the

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 1>season last year. So please, I genuinely want to hear

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:22.280
<v Speaker 1>what you guys think about is playing since the indie

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 1>game on. Yeah, that that's a really fair point. I

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people bring up spin thanks for

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the call, and we always appreciate the back and forth.

0:57:29.480 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason why I don't want to, the

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:34.600
<v Speaker 1>reason why I give him a little bit of a

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:36.640
<v Speaker 1>pass for what happened at the end of last year

0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily a rookie wall. It's just more that

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that offense had hit its ceiling and they still weren't

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 1>under personnel wise in a spot where they were going

0:57:49.240 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to go toe to toe with Buffalo,

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 1>for example. Right. So what I was really hanging my

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hat on with that was that, Okay, this is the baseline,

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.120
<v Speaker 1>right like, this is the this is the floor for

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones, and that floor is a good enough capable

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL starter. And now let's see if they go out

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and add somebody more than Davante Parker and they build

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>off of what they did offensively, and Josh McDaniels doesn't

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:17.959
<v Speaker 1>leave for Vegas and they are and they really grow

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, then you know, hopefully they finished stronger in

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the future. And of course what we have is what

0:58:25.440 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Spee was, you know, saying what we've been saying this

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>whole time is a whole lot of nothing because we

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what we have and that part is

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:34.280
<v Speaker 1>scary and frustrating all at the same time. But I

0:58:34.360 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think the last, you know, let's call it five or

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 1>six games of last season, I don't think he played

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly well, But I think that on the whole, he

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 1>still played well enough to me for me to be

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that if we keep building with this, it's going

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to turn out to be okay. But we just never

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>got to build with it. And that's the that's the

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>disappointing part. There's a lot of rookie quarterbacks that come

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>into the league that just can't win, period. Right. There's

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>there's one little bit south of here wearing green. I

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 1>think that somebody that Mac Jones was winning you the

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>games he should have won you, Yeah, which I know

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sound like a lot. It's for a rookie quarterback,

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a good baseline, right, And outside of maybe that

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Colts game, I don't know that any of those losses

0:59:18.680 --> 0:59:21.280
<v Speaker 1>were games that Patriots necessarily should have won for reasons

0:59:21.320 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond Mac Jones. Ideally, the quarterback becomes a guy who

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe wins you some games you shouldn't and eventually starts

0:59:27.800 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 1>turning those games into games you should win. And what

0:59:30.960 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw in that first year as a whole, like

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, even though he didn't play as well down

0:59:35.000 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the stretch, I didn't think he played overly poorly. It

0:59:37.520 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>was nowhere close to what it looks like this year.

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought there's enough to build on here that in

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a year, I think he does start to win some

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of those games, and then in two or three years

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>some of those games start to flip. That's how rookie

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>quarterback development generally works, Like you said, Unfortunately, the building

0:59:55.600 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on it never came because Josh McDaniels laughed in YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The rest is history. That's what I saw from Mac Jones.

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw a guy who could at least win you

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the games he needed to win. And all right, if

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>he's doing that in year one, where does it go

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in year two? Where does it go in year three?

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what was exciting. Year two now has kind of

1:00:13.240 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just been thrown away, and it's well, now he has

1:00:15.840 --> 1:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to get back to year one and you're restarting, and

1:00:18.080 --> 1:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just the timeline is totally thrown to the wind,

1:00:21.480 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty much uncharted territory at this point. Again,

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the regression from year one to year two for mac Jones,

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there really is no comp that you can look at

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, all right, this guy was God has

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed a playoffs year one completely fell off in year

1:00:34.720 --> 1:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>two like that hasn't happened. Quarterback growth or regression is

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>generally pretty linear, and this is just a roller coaster, right,

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's that's the part that frustrates me the most,

1:00:46.640 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is that this is such a lost season, right that

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from of value down standpoint and to that end, not

1:00:53.240 --> 1:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>only have the Patriots potentially ruined quite frankly mac Jones. Yeah, look,

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance that he never gets back to where

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>he was your one, because the fundamentals, the confidence, all

1:01:05.680 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of it is just so shot from this. Not only

1:01:07.680 --> 1:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>did it right now and not only did they ruin him,

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>but they stunted him most important, I would say it's

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>one and the same, Yeah, and but I but the

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is is that I was I at the end

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of last year, I thought that they had a guy

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that was worth building with. I wasn't one hundred percent

1:01:23.960 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that he was going to be an elite quarterback

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>or a perennial All Pro or anything like that. But

1:01:29.960 --> 1:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I was I thought that they had a guy that

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it was worth giving a shot too, right to get

1:01:35.240 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to that point for two three four years now, it

1:01:39.320 --> 1:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>feels like we've skipped over this year an hour, back

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to square not square one in terms of like week

1:01:46.360 --> 1:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>one twenty twenty one, but just chance. I think you're

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the conversation for Mac Jones heading into twenty

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty three is going to be similar to the conversation

1:01:56.320 --> 1:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you you'd have about a rookie. Yeah, I actually think

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it is guy. What exactly is he? Because again, the

1:02:01.680 --> 1:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>two seasons we have are so vastly different that no,

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I like that take that you're kind of

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>back Mac Jones heading into twenty twenty three, I think

1:02:12.680 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>will be viewed much like a rookie quarterback would be

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>does he belong in this league? What exactly does he

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>give you? And those are all fair questions. Some of

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that's on him, some of that is reasons beyond his control,

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but he's basically back to his rookie year at this point. Right.

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>All I've ever asked for out of this situation is

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that we just put mac Jones in a solid foundation

1:02:32.880 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like he was in last year and now in the

1:02:35.200 --> 1:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>year three, even though maybe mentally and some of the

1:02:38.120 --> 1:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals have regretted because of what's gone on this year.

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It should, in theory be another offseason with Tom House,

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>another offseason in this in an NFL strength and conditioning program,

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like we should still be making progress physically from that stand,

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't even say were we could see another

1:02:54.560 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>step from him, and that we obviously didn't get to

1:02:56.920 --> 1:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>see this year. At the very least, next year we

1:02:59.240 --> 1:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>get our answer, right if you put him in a

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>better situation than the very least, it's like, all right,

1:03:03.120 --> 1:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if they have a real ose in place and the

1:03:05.560 --> 1:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>offensive lines fixed and he's still struggling, well, then he's

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>not the guy. And that could happen. But if you know,

1:03:11.160 --> 1:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they bring in Bill O'Brien and they get the tackle

1:03:13.280 --> 1:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>situation figured out, maybe they bring in a receiver, right,

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and they go back to averaging thirty points a game

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like they did last year, well, okay, now we're in business,

1:03:21.400 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and and then it becomes well, you still burned a year,

1:03:23.560 --> 1:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but all right, no, he is the guy. Twenty two

1:03:26.960 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is the anomaly contract to a right. Yeah, but okay,

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so really quickly before we sign off here, uh your

1:03:33.760 --> 1:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, two minute take on on Sunday. We've talked

1:03:36.120 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the Dolphins, but I want to

1:03:37.640 --> 1:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of hammer this one. I mean, you said this

1:03:39.920 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to me a practice. It was something I was thinking

1:03:41.600 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple days ago. It reminds me a lot of

1:03:43.320 --> 1:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that Bill's playoff game lach Year in the sense that

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they had you know, DeVante Bossby out there, Juan Williams

1:03:48.760 --> 1:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>just got They didn't have any depth Jalen will Uh,

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Mills at COVID, John Jones was sick. Yeah, jac

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Jackson played, but he was one foot out the door

1:03:57.200 --> 1:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>by that. He was also hurt. I think they just

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't have anybody in the secondary. Everybody was sick or

1:04:02.280 --> 1:04:05.959
<v Speaker 1>hurt or whatever. You know. Jonathan Jones was inactive because

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt. That's what I'm saying. Yeah, so you know,

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Jones hasn't practiced this week. Jack Jones hasn't practiced

1:04:12.080 --> 1:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of weeks. Jalen Mills isn't practice in

1:04:13.760 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. Jonathan Jones, I believe is still

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report, although he's practicing. So who are

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you putting out there against If they're you know, one

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the top three skilled position groups in the league,

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's just you know, whether it's Miles

1:04:29.440 --> 1:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Bryant or you know, you're deep on the depth chart now.

1:04:32.040 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It banged up John Jones getting into the practice squad,

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Quandre Mosley. You're asking a lot of guys that you

1:04:38.400 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>really weren't planning on putting on the field this year,

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>putting on the field in very different roles. It's gonna

1:04:44.280 --> 1:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>be a tall task even without two, to keep up

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with these receivers if they can do it. Look, Miami

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played great football lately. Their defense has been inconsistent.

1:04:52.840 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Their offense, even beyond two, has been turnover prone. So

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a chance to hang with it if they

1:04:57.000 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>were healthy at corner. I think the Patriots have a

1:04:59.120 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>good shot in this game. Yeah, I just that's a

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of injuries to overcome in the secondary. Yeah it.

1:05:05.040 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I never really gave him a shot in that playoff

1:05:07.080 --> 1:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>game last year anyways, just because of how it looked

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at a couple of weeks earlier, and I that team

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really felt like it was sort of letting go of

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the rope down the stretch. But I think that this team,

1:05:18.800 --> 1:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I really thought maybe they had a chance in this game.

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I just can't. I can't figure out how they how

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they defend this offense, even with Teddy Bridgewater. And what

1:05:28.520 --> 1:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>my guess is, and this goes back, you know, over

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the football, Well, my guess

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is that they're gonna defensively do what we were just

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about, which they did a lot against the Bengals,

1:05:39.080 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>which they did a lot against the Bills, and they're

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just gonna sit in soft zone and survive, right, and

1:05:43.400 --> 1:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully they can keep the game, they can shorten it right.

1:05:46.320 --> 1:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Gay gave up twenty two points Cincinnati.

1:05:48.880 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>They gave up what twenty four ultimately right to Buffalo,

1:05:51.360 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>even though it was not kind of like a fake

1:05:52.920 --> 1:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, they gave up twenty four. Like that's the

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>type of game that you need to play, but in

1:05:58.000 --> 1:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>order to win that game, your offense actually do something right.

1:06:01.280 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is no longer I thought going into this

1:06:03.600 --> 1:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>game that this could be a game that the Patriots

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>defense actually control the game and really put them in

1:06:10.400 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a position to win. Now I'm not really sure if

1:06:13.880 --> 1:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of get to that point anyway at

1:06:16.920 --> 1:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this point. So this is a just don't get you know,

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>don't don't give up thirty five to Teddy Bridgewater, right,

1:06:25.200 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>keep him in the twenties, and then offensively, you gotta

1:06:27.840 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do something Kendrick Borne. That that's what you gotta do.

1:06:31.200 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Get the ball to Kendrick Borne. Keep him on the

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>field because you can move the ball and you can

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>score points when he's on the field. Okay, we have

1:06:37.160 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one more caller just called in, all right, and then

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wrap John. What's up? John? Hey, guys, I

1:06:45.720 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>was wondering what your dream off season plan for the

1:06:48.720 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Patriots that tackle Winde receiver, And I'm that's a coordinating okay,

1:06:53.640 --> 1:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so this is uh, thanks for the college John, John

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>knows I put together my ten point plan for the Patriots. Yeah,

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing We're not doing ten points. Okay, Okay,

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't have time for that. But give me your

1:07:03.560 --> 1:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>dream offensive coordinator, dream tackle, dream receiver quickly go. So

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm ten points, all right, if we're being realistic, Yes,

1:07:12.120 --> 1:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it probably is, Bill o'bri I'm assuming Josh McDaniels was

1:07:15.360 --> 1:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>staying in Vegas. I'd love to get Josh back. If

1:07:17.240 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not him, give me Bill O'Brien wide receiver. I've been

1:07:20.280 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>on the record with this, DeAndre Hopkins. I think there's

1:07:22.600 --> 1:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance he's available. I think there's a chance he's

1:07:24.480 --> 1:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>get a bull at a relatively good price. Is he

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna let bygones be bygones with Billy? Oh? I forgot

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>about that, all right? You know what we said dream offseason? Yes,

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they bury the hatchet. If I had to pick one,

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Bill puts him in the room at the ground round,

1:07:37.920 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just like it did with Rodney Harris. If I had

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to pick one, I would say Hopkins. So I'll fine

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Chad o'shay as euroc so you can get DeAndre Hopkins

1:07:47.280 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to come here and play wide receiver and then a tackle.

1:07:49.880 --> 1:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually think i'd love to see him at two

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>tackles because wins out Trents on a contract here. I

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's a classics. Signed one draft one. I don't

1:07:56.880 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have the list of the top tackles in front of me,

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but signed one of the top ten tackles free agency

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in free agency and then use that first round pick

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on another tackle. So I'm not too far off from you,

1:08:06.080 --> 1:08:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll say. I'll say, for for the sake of our argument,

1:08:08.040 --> 1:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Roderick Jones is the tackle in the draft. I'd like that. Yeah,

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So Bill O'Brien number one. Yeah, I know you're not

1:08:12.760 --> 1:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna like this, but Cliff Kingsbury number two. Okay. If

1:08:15.960 --> 1:08:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Cliffkins fired by Arizona and you can't make Bob happen,

1:08:18.720 --> 1:08:21.719
<v Speaker 1>then i'd bring him back, Okay, But then you probably

1:08:21.760 --> 1:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can't get Hopkins. Yeah. There's a lot of issues there

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:28.479
<v Speaker 1>with Hopkins, right, so I can't really get too caught

1:08:28.560 --> 1:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>up on the hot wid you don't want Hawkins as

1:08:30.760 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>much as I do. The wide receiver one is difficult

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for me right now because I think Hopkins is really

1:08:36.360 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the obvious one that would be available, but getting him

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>is politically So would you rather have O'Brien or Hawkins?

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I said yesterday when you asked me this question off

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the year, that I'd take Bill O'Brien because I think

1:08:48.800 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're just so sloppy structurally, right, like as

1:08:53.320 --> 1:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>an offense that like I think that that fixes it.

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>More like, if if you give Matt Patricia DeAndre, Hopkins

1:08:58.160 --> 1:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to be any better, I'll say that it's not.

1:09:01.560 --> 1:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's not. But it's not O'Brien or Hopkins, it's

1:09:03.760 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>another like any oc you want besides O'Brien and Hopkins.

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe Hopkins and Cliff actually really like you. Maybe

1:09:10.760 --> 1:09:12.599
<v Speaker 1>they do. So if it's Hopkins and Cliff, who would

1:09:12.600 --> 1:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you rather have then Hopkins and Cliff? Okay, So I

1:09:14.800 --> 1:09:16.519
<v Speaker 1>don't think that Cliff is a drop off from So

1:09:16.600 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that's it's not Hopkins and you keep Patricia. It's Hopkins

1:09:19.600 --> 1:09:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and just not Bill O'Brien. It can be you whever

1:09:21.720 --> 1:09:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you want, just not Bills might say when you talk

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>about the sloppiness, Yeah, go back and watch some of Alabama.

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Alabama had a lot of the same issues this year

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of pro like he's a pro Alabama had

1:09:34.320 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same issues this year in terms

1:09:36.000 --> 1:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the nuts and bolts that the Patriots did. But

1:09:37.960 --> 1:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was that because it's college kids versus NFL. But they

1:09:41.040 --> 1:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't had those problems in the past. It's always been

1:09:42.840 --> 1:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>college kids in the past. They didn't have that problem

1:09:44.840 --> 1:09:47.479
<v Speaker 1>last year with Billy. Oh either fair, that's fair? Okay?

1:09:47.760 --> 1:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh ot So I've really been hang on if not Hopkins,

1:09:52.479 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>who I don't know Judy. I guess I really like Higgins.

1:09:57.479 --> 1:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he's gonna demanded trade that really,

1:10:01.520 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I uk is one of those guys that

1:10:03.320 --> 1:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have to know how to use, and

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not confident in that. Yeah, it sounds like Judy

1:10:09.160 --> 1:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>if not Hawkins. Yeah, I'd go Higgins if they can

1:10:11.640 --> 1:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>get opens on them. So Higgins over Jude. There's a

1:10:14.160 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of there's a lot of there's a big bill

1:10:18.520 --> 1:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>coming for Cincinnati, right Oh. Yeah, Joe Burrow is going

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a forty fifty million dollars and that's not

1:10:23.960 --> 1:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>an organ Now we're getting down the rabbit hole here,

1:10:26.240 --> 1:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's not an organization that is flushed with cash,

1:10:31.120 --> 1:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>right right, Like that's not a big pocket owner and

1:10:34.560 --> 1:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>not a big pocket market. So at some point in

1:10:37.000 --> 1:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>time you have to think about that in Cincinnati. So

1:10:39.640 --> 1:10:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to tee Higgins as well. Offensive line, all

1:10:44.640 --> 1:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>four drafting a tackle in the first round, especially if

1:10:46.680 --> 1:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't make the playoffs and they have a top

1:10:48.320 --> 1:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten, they're probably gonna be in that ten

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen range. You can really get a franchise guy

1:10:52.600 --> 1:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>at that spot. And this is a really good I

1:10:54.880 --> 1:10:56.599
<v Speaker 1>think you can get a franchise tackle in the twenties

1:10:56.600 --> 1:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in this class. This is a really good tackle class. Yeah,

1:10:59.240 --> 1:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it is not a great wide receiver class. No, it's not.

1:11:02.479 --> 1:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So the other guy that I throw out there, because

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, sign one and one percent. You have

1:11:09.200 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the cap space to maybe go out and get one

1:11:11.160 --> 1:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger name tackles in the market. I really

1:11:13.720 --> 1:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and they don't let me. Sorry to cut off. They

1:11:15.880 --> 1:11:17.719
<v Speaker 1>don't have a ton of big name pending free agents.

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So Jones is pretty much John Jones and Devin if

1:11:19.920 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>he wants to come back. But Devin's coming back at

1:11:21.920 --> 1:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it one way, He's the only coming here, right, So

1:11:24.000 --> 1:11:26.519
<v Speaker 1>there's But I'm just saying they have all that caps.

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not one of those things where, yeah, they have

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cap space, but everybody's up and you

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have to resign people. They have a lot of cap

1:11:31.320 --> 1:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>space and they really don't need to spend a lot

1:11:33.160 --> 1:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of it in house, and they can also free up

1:11:35.000 --> 1:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>some space with the right moves. Anyways, Uh, I'm getting

1:11:39.720 --> 1:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>more and more married to the idea of Mike McGlinchey

1:11:42.640 --> 1:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>because just I'll lay it out really quickly, right tackle

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>first of all, So that so checks that box right,

1:11:49.360 --> 1:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you draft obviously the higher premium position at

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>left tack Most of the guys in the draft are

1:11:53.400 --> 1:11:56.599
<v Speaker 1>primary left tackles. Right tackle U six foot eight, three

1:11:56.720 --> 1:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty right tackle, love it love power, blocking down downhill

1:12:00.400 --> 1:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>type of guy, which hopefully they'll get back to that system.

1:12:04.439 --> 1:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The third thing, number nine overall pick in the draft

1:12:07.320 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, they love that, right, that's

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Stefan Gilmour, right. It's the guy that they couldn't get

1:12:13.640 --> 1:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>their hands on because he was too high up in

1:12:15.600 --> 1:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the draft for them. That he has all the raw

1:12:18.200 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>tools and ability like ball of clay type of guy.

1:12:22.040 --> 1:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been lights out necessarily for San Francisco, but

1:12:24.920 --> 1:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the system that he's in because in

1:12:26.800 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco you gotta be able to move your feet.

1:12:29.479 --> 1:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's an outside zone scheme. It's a bootleg scheme.

1:12:32.400 --> 1:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like there's a lot of moving pockets. There's a lot

1:12:34.200 --> 1:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of linear movement for the offensive line. Like when you're

1:12:37.320 --> 1:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>six foot eight, three thirty, you just want to come

1:12:39.000 --> 1:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>off the ball right, like you don't want to be

1:12:41.120 --> 1:12:45.639
<v Speaker 1>stepping out by Shanahan. I don't that might have been

1:12:45.720 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the regime right before Shanahan. I don't know, but notre

1:12:48.240 --> 1:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Dame guy. I really like McGlinchey, especially because, you know,

1:12:53.400 --> 1:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Elton Jenkins just signed an extension, Conklin and Cleveland just

1:12:57.280 --> 1:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>signed an extension. So some of the other guys are

1:13:00.200 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to you know that are at the top of

1:13:02.000 --> 1:13:05.519
<v Speaker 1>the tackle marketer signing extensions and mcglinchey's gonna hit unrestricted

1:13:05.520 --> 1:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>free agencies. So that's that would be my plan. We'll

1:13:07.920 --> 1:13:10.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely outline the plan. Believe it or not, we might

1:13:10.680 --> 1:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>only have one more in season show. Yeah, so we'll

1:13:14.320 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely outline the plan more on the first offseason show,

1:13:18.760 --> 1:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever that is, and so we'll definitely have a more

1:13:22.040 --> 1:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fleshed out detailed show on that. But we'll be back

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>next Thursday, hopefully next Thursday again on the video show

1:13:29.439 --> 1:13:33.439
<v Speaker 1>for your YouTube fans, and we'll be back for next

1:13:33.479 --> 1:13:36.639
<v Speaker 1>week in Buffalo and hopefully a meaningful game in Buffalo.

1:13:36.720 --> 1:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So thanks so much for watching. You can say that

1:13:38.840 --> 1:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this time and listening, and we'll see you guys next week. Bye.

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for downloading this podcast, Subscribe on Apple, google Play,

1:13:48.320 --> 1:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and everywhere else you listen. Like the show, Please rate

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>and review US Listener comments and ratings help keep US

1:13:54.640 --> 1:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>high in the podcast rankings, so new listeners can find us.

1:13:57.960 --> 1:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to checkpatriots dot com for more news and

1:14:01.360 --> 1:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts.