WEBVTT - Lamborghini CEO Seeing Overwhelming Demand for Vehicles

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Here back with what's going

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>on and just talk about some of the big macro

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>stories that are going on in the world. But also

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in the luxury auto industry is Stefan Vinkelman. He is

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>chairman and CEO of Lamborghini, and he's with us in

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>our interactive broker studio right here in New York City.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>How are you. I'm very good, Thank you, I say

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lightly um. There is so much going on in the

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>world that I am always curious Tim and I are

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to whether it's luxury automobiles or the

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>luxury space in general, how it impacts your buyers, whether

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>it's the war in Ukraine, whether it's supply chain constraints,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>volatility in the financial markets. Been a crazy first quarter.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>What what jumps out? I can tell you that since

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years we are in crisis more

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>more or less the pandemic than the chip shortage. Now

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>the war in Ukraine. What I can tell you, and

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>which is for us very surprising, that already in the

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>second part of the market, our type of market was

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>coming back stronger than expected. And as we speak, we

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are selling every day more cars that we are able

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to produce. So we have an order bank which is

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>longer than one year of waiting time. Is that typical?

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>This is before let's say, beforeies or before the pandemic,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it was between six seven, eight, maximum nine months, depending

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on the model and on the launches. And now this

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is very good and healthy for a company like ours.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>But that the market came back so strong and so sudden,

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this was unexpected. The short that the chip shortage for us,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>being part of the Volkswan group, was less an issue.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>We were lucky because we have small manufacturers or low volumes,

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>high margins, so we got a priority line from from

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Volkswan group and now the war in Ukraine. For sure,

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we we put our um operations on hold in Russia,

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so we stopped it. And we have an important supplier

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in the in the West Ukraine, so we had stopping

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>goals and production for the Huracan, which is one of

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>our models. But now we are let's say, on in

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>our face where we have five six days of view

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of what is happening and we are not losing any

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>production at I mean, so this is for us pretty

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty okay. Then it's clear stock market did anything slow

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>down that first quarter because of the molty No, as

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we speak, I have to tell you, and I'm unable

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to make let's say, a forecast for the year two.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But as we speak, there is no slowing down on

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the request for our cars and this is very positive.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>We have also to say that they are more people

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>with the money at their disposal in comparison to a

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, so the the words is increasing and they're

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more benefiting forments. We have a very young customer base

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're very proud of owning a LAMBORGINI. We have

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to keep the promise of always delivering dream cards. This

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is par amount for this suc because of inflationary pressures

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. You mentioned the chip shortage, labor casts, all

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the inflationary pressures that we see happening around the world

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. How much have you had to race prices

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so far? We have not, let's say, transfer the cost

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of of the material cost roll materials to customers. We

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have a price increase between one and two per cent,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>which is not something which is unusual. Why haven't you

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>why haven't you passed that along? If the consumers will

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>need to wait for a year for a Lamborghini, they're

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>probably willing to pay more more from the Let's say,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>if if this is going to continue, there is a

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>further increase on the materials, certainly we are we will

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>be forced to do so. At time being, we have

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it under control and I'm happy to say so. But

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for the future, as they said that, it's very difficult

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to to make a forecast uh the future. So the

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>new models, they will have higher material cost due to

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>hybridizations or batteries and combustion engines together, so there will

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>be a slight price increase, but only due to that.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>How is the supply chain it? Although impacting your roll

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>out this year, right, You've got a bunch of new

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>models coming. Um, is any of that being impacted now

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a time being not. It's clear that it's early to

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>speak about the new geopolitical situation because today we are

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>not in the new normal, so we have to wait

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>until the conflict is over and what is going to happen.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>For sure, we are acting global. So we are a

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>company which is only good when we are able to

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>sell worldwide. So we have high investments, little volumes, so

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we cannot flood one market and think that this is

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the the idea of the future, so we have to

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>act global. On the other hand, acting global means also

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that our supply chain. We cannot just say that we

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>stay in one country. So we will see how this

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen. Also, the pandemic with all the

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>logistic chain was messed up and it took a lot

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of time to go back to normal, so we have

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>to see how this is going to be once Uh, yeah,

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a new normal in place. You did suspend

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sales to Russia, correct, Um, how much of an impact

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is that for you guys? But luckily we can divert

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the production of the order bank or that the cars

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>which we are going to produce or we wanted to

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>produce for Russia into other markets. So we have no

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>losses and the due to the fact that we have

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this long order bank, we don't have a negative impact.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Will you stay out of Russia? We will see after

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>after the war. As I said, it's very difficult now

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a forecast about what the geo political situation

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. The longer the wall last, and

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>more difficult it would be to go back now, I'm

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>sure about that. We know the incredibly some incredibly wealthy

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>oligarchs in Russia have had sanctions and posted down them

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not by the interest the United States, but the UK

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and the European Union as well. If they were to

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>approach you in another country to buy a vehicle, would

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you sell them a vehicle? But we have a list,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a blacklist of people, and this is part of the

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>business we had also before and there are all some

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of these guys on the list and we will not

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>sell them cards. Have you been approached but not to

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>my knowledge, but we have We have our dada's all

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>partners worldwide, So at time being I don't see that

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>there's anybody all right, the hard parts over. I got

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one more question. Uh, it's similar to what Carol was asking.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, right now you suspended you've suspended vehicle sales

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in Russia. What would have to happen for you to

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>start vehicle sales in Russia? Up again, Frank you speaking,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because once the war is going to

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>be over, that there will be a new situation and

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to see how the European Union, because we

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>are part of the union. European Union is going to

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>react in terms of sanctions, and we will we are

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we will be aligned on what the government is going

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell us. But does it make you nervous? Because

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like it's a new Russia right now.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But this was something which nobody was expecting and U,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least very few people were expecting. And I

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>think that this is something which in in the twenty

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>first century or something which should not happen. Therefore, we

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>will see. But okay, it's a pity. It's a pity

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>also for the Russian customers in my opinion, Yeah, yeah, absolutely,

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in Russian citizens and certainly the Ukrainian citizens. Hey, okay,

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>hard part over, So tell us why you're in New York.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We do have the New York Orders show you guys

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>have a global debut. Tell us what's coming up? Yes,

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>on Friday there will be UM the view of the

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>new version of a Hurakan. It's called Hurakan Technica. Um.

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a perfect bridge between let's say the weeks the

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two week stremes. We have not the Evil, which is

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a really drive cary and d ST which is the

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>closest to a race car we have done on the

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Ura Can. So this is a perfect mix of driving pleasure, lifestyle.

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a world car, right, It's a broadcast which is

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>very easy and very good also to drive on the racetract.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's like which is a new front and new rear,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>real real seering, more down force, less drag, more holespower.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, which is very easy and fun to drive.

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's this for? You mentioned were wheel steering. I've never

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.599
<v Speaker 1>driven a car with rear wheel steering. A lot of

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the super sports cars yes about acceleration longitudinal performance, but

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.719
<v Speaker 1>this is something which in my opinions, are given. It's

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>much more about the lateral acceleration, how you get into

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the corner, out of the corner. The way to power ratio,

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the breaking, so the handling in one word, which is

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>part of how we define performance. And therefore the real

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>reseeing is enabling you and and different types of speed

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>to be more performing. The reaction time is less. Well, Lamborghini,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you know it goes hand in hand in terms of design, innovation, speed, performance. Um,

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>how is it your customer in particular, what is it

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.719
<v Speaker 1>they increasingly want, especially as the auto industry, whether it's

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>through e v S and so on and so forth,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 1>it is changing. So they want to buy into a

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>brand which is including So there's something which they want

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to be part of their loyal right they're loyal to.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>One is the brands or events. In a very easy words,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about sustainability more and more, it's about digitalization. These

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are the main things which people look into. And due

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that our customer base is becoming younger

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and younger, we are forecasting that by five we will

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we have seventy of our customers younger than forty in Russia. Sorry,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in China for example, we already have an average h

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>so we have very young customers. I just want to know,

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>did Matt Miller give you a hard time about a campaign.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Ev you got to hear the roar of the engine.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Did he do it? No? Yeah, somehow, somehow he would ask,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But I convinced him that this could be still a

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>good time for us. You are such a good sport

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and we wish you well and good luck with the launch.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Stefan Fie Colman he of course as chairman CEO of Lamborghini,

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and we are delighted have had him here in our

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>studio on this Tuesday. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.319
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Let's not go to Leona Baker. We've talked

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the past well week, Carol about what

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly Twitter is going to look like under Elon Musk.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, but now it's not necessarily under Elon Musk.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>He is the largest individual shareholder with more than nine

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>percent stake in the company. But what could he do

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter exactly? And so that's what our deals team

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>looked at. Specifically, let's get that story from Blueberg News

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>deal team reporter and leader, I should say leader, Leanna Baker.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>She joins us via zoom in New York City, Leanna,

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with us. Uh day doesn't

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>go by without some kind of reporting on what Ellen

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>is up to, especially when it comes to Twitter. Uh

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>So tell us what you guys set out to do

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and what you thought about it in terms of what

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter takeover how it might work. So usually my

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>team is trying to find out about takeovers that we

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>know are going to happen. This is sort of a

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>theoretical exercise to understand if Elon Musk wanted to buy Twitter,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>how would you do it? So there's a few ways. Um.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>One way is that you can keep a quiet shares

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>of the company, because you mentioned that he's already the

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>largest individual shareholder, so why could be not, you know,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>by even bigger chunks of the company. One thing we

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>looked at is that that's a possibility, but Twitter calways

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>put in a poison pill to prevent Mosk or any

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>shareholder from getting an even bigger steak. That's so old school, right,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>That is so old school, it feels it's true, but

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>poison bills are still used a lot when there is

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a big shareholder trying to kind of get control of

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a company by acquiring shares in the open market. Twitter

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we've heard hasn't done one yet, but it's something they're

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, monitoring to see if they might need to

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to pull that maneuver. Another way that Musk could try

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy the company is doing a tender offer. This

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>seems sort of unlikely, but what this would mean is

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that he would um put out a statement saying if

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>any share olds the Twitter want to sell to me

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with this price, UM, you know, please go ahead. This

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>uh would also be pretty hard from us because you

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have to get a certain amount of shareholders on board,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>usually more than Another thing he could do is what

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he tried to do a few years ago with the

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>funding secured story tablot take privates that ever happened. He

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>could go to the regular route of working with investment

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>bankers and trying to get square to the Negli. That's

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>something I want to talk to you about, Leona, because

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we had Mandy singing here a week ago Monday, and

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>that was this was before we even found out that

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he would be offered a board seed and then were

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not rejecting that board seed. And he mentioned silver Lake

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is a potential partner UH that could team up potentially

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>with Elon Musk to actually make a play for the company.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>How would that work? Like UM already put in a

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in Twitter, and they have a board seat.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Their post CEO, E Jun Survant puts on the board,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so really also had a history with Musk. They were

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the names that Mosk had spoken to about

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the potential test like take private that never happened. That said,

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it would be pretty tough for them to maybe partner

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>with Moss because the silver Lake is now associated with

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the board and Musk rejected the board seat. So we

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's any tension there. I don't want

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be speculating, but certainly that is a private actuality partner

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that believes in in Twitter. So it's something to think

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about a side pool for. Like there's so many private

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>equity firms out there that are always looking at opportunities.

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're trying to keep it up in mind, Hey

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>just got thirty seconds, So there's like when all of

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a said and done, there's just a chance he just

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sells it all and walks away right just quickly. That

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like a really good option for him. UM personally,

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think bus might be too busy to be

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>pulling off a huge emin a deal a farm twitter

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>would still take a lot of time and focus. And

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he has so many other projects and public companies he's

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>evolved in so uh. But if he were to sell

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>his steak, he probably used to work with an investment bank.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It's such a big steak you have to sell them

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the block trade. So we're looking at all these options,

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's still gonna work out that human robots so like,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, that might just take up too much of

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>his time. Hey what about self driving robot? Or there's

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the boring hole that we need in all our major

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cities and the neink Long can we go just naming

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>other things that Elon Musk is working. Oh my god,

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Leanna Baker, thank you so much. Steals Team leader U

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News via zoom in New York City. You're listening

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. All right, SPACs heard of them? Yeah,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I have? You know, you don't hear hibout as much

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in two as you did in late uh. These special

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>purpose acquisition companies continue to the very much be part

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of our market conversations, are also part of the conversation

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to concerns that are on the radar

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of regulators. This story Bloomberg Big Take, and it's also

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the upcoming new issue of Bloomberg business Week. The

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>story by Noah boo Hire and Matt Robinson. Noah's a

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter for Bloomberg News. He joins us on the

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>phone from Seattle. Joel Webber is editor at Bloomberg Business Week.

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>He's with this in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Joel,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>what did your team, the team at Bloomberg Business Week

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>find when they crunched the data when it came to

0:16:53.960 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps interesting activity in SPACs before a SPAC goes and

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>acquires a company, well in ongoing propaganda for a return

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to office stories. Um. No, it was in New York

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>last weekend. We rubbed shoulders and he was like, Hey,

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been working on this back thing. You should you

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>guys should take a look at it. And we looked

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>at it and we're like, oh, this is really interesting.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So the way that UM spack works is there's something

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>called a stock warrant that gets basically issued in advance

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of a SPACK happening, and it gives holders the right

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to buy shares at a specific price. And when Noah

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>started digging into that data, he found some interesting stuff.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Yeah, UM, you know, as you mentioned there,

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>there are these warrants out there that are that are

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.719
<v Speaker 1>traded UM ahead of time, and and they're they're interesting

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>to look at because they're pretty volatile. They tend to

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>spike on deal news. UM. And the reason we even

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>started poking around this is that several months ago there

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>were some some well timed trades in the warrant of

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the SPAC that that uh that is UM merging with

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's media platform. And we know that regulators were

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>poking around that one. So we asked the question, like

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>how common was this there there there you know, literally

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>been hundreds of SPACs that have I POD in recent

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>years and and and um you know, hundreds that have

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>announced or completed mergers and and so we started looking

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>back through the data and UM, we're looking particularly for

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>instances when UM the volume of warrant trading spiked uh

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in in in the days and weeks ahead of a

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>merger announcement. Now, UM, I should say that there are

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really benign reasons for that. UM. A

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of these merger talks leak early in the press,

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a which is a good reason for for

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>why trading would pick up UM. But a lot of

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the spikes in trading that we uncovered, UH weren't so

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>easily explained, And so the story was really about that.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>And as we started poking around, we realized that you know,

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we weren't the only ones who who who found this

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of activity interesting. UM. We understand that the sec

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>UM and other regulators are are examining trades ahead of

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>these the all announcements to figure out if if the

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>trades were based at all on inside information. Well, and

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the it looks like inquiries by regulators includes dwack,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>which I just love to say, and that is a

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>dwack one more time. It's like walking into a door

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>or it happens to be a spack connected to former

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump. Tell us about that. Yeah, so what

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>happened there is UM, the warrants for for that spack

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>started started UM trading freely. I believe it was late

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>September of last year, very shortly after they started trading.

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>There was just a pronounced pop in in the volume

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of those warrants UM. And then about two three weeks later,

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the merger gets announced and the value of those warrants

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>just stores I think they were, you know, before the deal,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we're under fifty cents apiece. They eventually climbed to more

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>than thirty seven dollars each. They've moderated some, but but

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the potential was there for someone to uh make a

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>very quick and hafty UM profit. Now we don't no

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one has alleged wrongdoing in that case. We don't know

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>UM what the outcome of the SEC and FINRA's information

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>requests is going to be, but we know they are interested.

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>What about when it comes to Vecto i Q Acquisition

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>corporations purchase of the EV maker Nicola, because that shows

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>how quickly, as you write, investors can profit. Yeah. Look,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's an example we call out in the story UM.

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know what we we found there is that

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>there was there was a pickup and warrant trading about

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks prior to that UM merger getting announced. And uh,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the warrants quickly went um from under a

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar to more than more than four dollars. They later

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as as the deal got closer to completion,

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.159
<v Speaker 1>rose significantly higher. And so really the question here, what

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what what all of this raises is you know, how

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>leaky were these deals? And we're people who were involved

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in them, um doing enough to safeguard the material non

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>public information? UM. Insider trading cases are extremely hard for

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>regulators to prove. Uh, but um, you know, the data

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is is suggestive of you know, a potential for people

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to be trading on inside information. And one of the

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>bits of reporting that I thought was interesting is, uh,

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you too. You spoke to a professor at New York

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>University School of Law who has written a ton about spacks,

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael oldreg Uh what did he have to say? Because

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there's the law firm component who's working on spots but

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>SPACs but uh, and you know, obviously lawyers are going

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a key part of this, but not every

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>law firm is top tier, right, yeah, I mean SPACs

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>historically we're we're a bit of a backwater in the

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>financial world. So UM, the companies that were big in

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this at the outset were not not your um, you know,

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>most well known firms. Um. That professor you know said,

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these these law firms we're taking um

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>uh this business on sort of a you know, uh,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they were turning through a lot of these deals and um.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The question is whether you know folks didn't dot the

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>i's and crossed the teas and um. You know there's

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot bigger firms that are the deal with

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>M and A more frequently, probably have more controls and

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>um rules around how information gets shared. And and his

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>point was really just this is a world that that

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that didn't attract the you know, most top flight law firms.

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So maybe there was a potential that things weren't done right.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, just in the last thirty seconds that we

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>have with you, iswy one. Was that the peak when

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes to SPACs at least in this cycle or

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are they kind of a thing for the rear view

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mirror right now? Yeah, I'm glad you raised that. So

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>UM look uh, yes there was a burst of this

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in one as as time went on, you saw, um

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you see in the data less of a pop um

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>when these deals get announced. UM. So to the extent

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this was happening, you know, I think it was. It

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was something that that that may have happened a while ago,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and um, but it takes a while for regulators to

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>dig into this stuff. Remember that cover that we did

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the But there you go, there you go, dack. That's

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>all I'm gonna say. Jill Weber, editor of Business Week

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and Nobu hire financial porter at Bloomberg News. Check out

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the story. This is Bloomberg. I'm yeah, but you let

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>me drive. Oh no, no, no, who's right? Please? I

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>want to drive. It's a good question. This is the

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the Clothes on Bloomberg Radio. All right, just

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about ten minutes left in today's trading session. It's been

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>an interesting day. We of course got that CPI print,

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that core number coming in a little bit light, and

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>initially we saw some enthusiasm uh and risk on trade

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the equity markets, but that is

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>not the story. Now we are seeing equities just as

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we heard from Charlie, just off our loads of the session.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the markets. Let's get into it.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Veronica willis investment strategy analyst at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>She joined us on the phone from St. Louis, Veronica.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>How are you. I'm doing well, how are you guys?

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>We're doing okay. It's been it's been a kind of

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a wild figure. Yeah. UM, I do want to talk

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what's what's going on with the markets,

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because well, if we look at the SMP five, we're

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at levels that we were last at back

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in mid March, depending on where you look March sevent

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>or so. I'm wondering how you explained the volatility that

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing. I think there's a lot of volatility

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>around what's going on with inflation, a lot of volatility

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>related to geopolitics, and you know, we're off of those

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>loads from you know, the worst of the correction in

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred, and you know, we're really seeing

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>some confusion around this inflation data that's come out. You know,

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the headline numbers were a little bit worse than what

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we were expecting, but then looking at the core CPI,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>UM some encouraging data there, just in terms of you know,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>could this be the peak with energy prices a little

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>bit lower than what we've seen last month, and so

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>could we expect maybe next month some releasing that inflation number,

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think the market is taking all of this

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>information into consideration and that's why we're seeing a lot

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of volatility here. I feel like there's just so many unknowns.

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>There was a great column that I read on the

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg today and basically it just said, when it comes

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to the FED, you know understand that they there's no

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>clear voyance from the Federal Reserve. Don't expect it. They

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to take each meeting, look at the situation

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in front of them, and make a decision based on that.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And if that means being more aggressive as a FED,

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll do it. If it means backing off because they're

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned about either doing too much or the economic data

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>starts to come undone that's we're going to get is

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that how we need to kind of think about it.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>That understand the FED is going to be doing this

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>in real time. Absolutely, the FED takes into consideration everything

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going on with the economy, everything that's going on

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>with inflation, and they're being very transparent with us and

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>letting us know exactly what they're thinking and what they're

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>path forward that they see at that moment. Is each

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>time that the notes come out each time that they

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have a meeting, and so I think that that transparency

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from the feed is a very good thing. The FET

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>knows what's going on with the economy, and they know

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>what they have to do, and they've told us, you know,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what their plans are each step of the way. But

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>plans don't mean anything. It doesn't matter until they set

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it down right at the FED Reserve the day of

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a meeting and say okay, where are we absolutely and

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, as of now, we're thinking that there's going

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a fifty basis point rate hike in May,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe another fifty in June, but of course all of

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that can change. A lot can happen between now and May. Well,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about where you should be deploying money right now,

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>at least in your opinion. Thanks for the notes that

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you sent before, and to our producer Paul Brent Brennan

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who who got these to US um US large cap

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in US mid cap over US small cap. Why is that? So?

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We think that right now we're in that portion of

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the economic cycle where we're shifting from kind of mid

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to late cycle, and that's where we think that large

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and mid cap can really shine over something like small

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>cap that's more cyclical, that tends to do better in

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that earlier part of the economic cycle when we're seeing

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that stronger economic growth. The large and MidCap stocks are

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.479
<v Speaker 1>higher quality, so we're expecting to see a little bit

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>more return on equity there in those spaces as opposed

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to something like small cap, which, as I said, is

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more cyclical, and certainly with um better

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>expectation for US box over international stocks, just you stemmed

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in our expectation for US economic growth to be the

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>outperformer on the global stage. Ravonica. It's a big week

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for the big bank earnings, right, and we're all going

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to be all over them starting tomorrow. UM. I've been

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at the KBW Bank index. It's down about another

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>one point four percent today, down eleven percent year today,

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but down from the January high. I find that a

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>little perplexing considering the move up in rates, which we've

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>all been saying as soon as we start to see

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>moving up in rates, this is going to be good

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for the net interest margin at all of these big banks.

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the pressure that we're seeing

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in those big bank names, UM, I think that expectations

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>are that earnings might be a little bit underwhelming for

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. We have seen a move up in rates,

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't widespread throughout the entire first quarters, so

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we might not start to see that benefit for financials

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>until the second quarter comes out. And so I think

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're seeing right now in this data that um,

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there could be some disappointments in those first quarter earnings

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for these banks. UM. So I think that's what the

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>markets watching out for. Is it already priced in now?

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>Then at this point, considering how much pressure has been

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.479
<v Speaker 1>on these names, I would think that it's been priced

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>ben But the market is pretty unpredictable. Um, they're looking

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>very closely at what the what they're expecting the banks

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to come out with. We'll see some earnings tomorrow to

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>see what that picture really looks like. What about picture

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. One of the reasons we love talking

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>or hearing from the banks is because we get a

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>good take on their read on the economy. Sometimes, uh,

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering what we should be looking for from

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the banks when it comes to their commentary around that. Well,

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, looking at the US we're expecting

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>two point six p m GDP growth, which is a

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher than average but pretty close to an

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>average economic growth, but much lower than the high growth

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen. We're looking very closely at signs that

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are signaling a slowdown in that economic growth in the US,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but not expecting a recession this year for the US.

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the US a little bit next Sorry, what

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>about next year in the US? UM next year in

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the US that the risks that there might be a

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>recession are rising. UM, we haven't made an official call

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not they're will be your recession, but

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's something in consideration with move higher in rates. But

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thet you pretty much has no choice to do with

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with inflation, and it'll be really key

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to see whether or not they can orchestrate this soft

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>landing UM to give us a better sense of what

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>might happen in three with economic growth. All Right, we're

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it on that note. Covered a lot of ground.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Veronica Willis. She is investment strategy analyst at

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo Investment Institute, joining us on the phone from St. Louis.

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube. Sarah to

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News