WEBVTT -  Week 6 Preview, Start/Sit, DFS Plays |

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Don Yeah, welcome, Hey happen your host by eight Rob

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Man n fin did Rob say, Francis Frank stand fall

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>ladies and tell in yours? Yeah with no we want

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>you inside studio at thirty four this he's in b NFS.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>He is Frank Stanford. I am grang Susman. No e

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>y today. That's okay because we had a lot to

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>break down from week six. What's happening, Frankie, Greggy, what's up? Man?

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>Week six is here? We got one game in the

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>books Patriots and Giants last night, and of course who

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>would have seen a frustrating game from Bill Belichick coming? Yeah,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it happens, Greg. It happens, but ultimately happy to

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be here on a Friday, happy to break everything down.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing? How did you sleep last night?

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I slept, I slept. I slept okay. I think they

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>might have shot the air off of my buildings, and

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>now it's like blowing warm air. So I mean, you

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>can open the window. I didn't realize. I didn't realize

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that degrees. It's not a couple of beers a bunch

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of wings last night, so I didn't like necessarily realize

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't necessarily cold there because I went up this morning,

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>went in the shower, and they went back into my bedroom.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it is grossly hot in here. It's much

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>nicer than the living room when there's no air on.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So I went over to the air conditioner, which I

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have said at sixty seven. Naturally, it was like seventy four.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Like this, this is bad. I don't like this. It

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is October eleven. It's probably the right time of the

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>year for the air conditioner to be shut off. It's

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>only fair. I don't think the air conditioners should be

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>shut off. Personally, I don't like believe in heat. I

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actually had a friend who would just leaves a c

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>running like a year. I have to pay for it

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in the winter. I'm like, what do you do I

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>would do if I had to pay for it. I'd

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>have the air on every now when I slept, we

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>could just open the window. I'm going to I think

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's equally as cold. When I go to a hotel.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>The first thing I do is for the air like

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, so it sets when I go to sleep,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's freezing. That's fair. Yeah, I like it to

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>be cold, like like bundling underneath the covers, freezing ice cold.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I watched the game last night as well in a bar.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg And I've got to tell you, I understand that

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>fans the word fanatic is like someone who's crazy passionate

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about their sport and what they're rooting for. Obviously, but

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're down by two or three scores to the

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots and you're a Giants fan, it's about

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>time to stop clapping rambunctiously and being annoying in the bar.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's like my legitimate takeaway from last night

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>watching the game. Like, and I would say that to anyone,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>even like a Jets fan. If I'm watching the game

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm down, like two scores, there's five minutes left in

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the game, Like, all right, well, I've accepted defeat. It

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. This guy just let's go Giants. Dude,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the game's over. Yeah, I mean he was over man.

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You were able to do that the entire first half.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>That was cool game. They played well. You know, they

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>tied the game of fourteen fourteen yesterday. I said this

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>game was not going to be competitive for the most part.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the score is indicative of how

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>well the Giants actually played. They actually showed up and

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>put up a fight. Defense played well. They had the

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>striped sack fumble of Tom Brady returned it for a touchdown.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Josh Gordon gets hurt on the play, So

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>why we can never be excited about Josh Gordon. We

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>can't have nice things. Hopefully he's all right, but put

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>up a dud last night. So if you had him

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup, you've already kind of set yourself back

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But ultimately, yeah, I thought I thought

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the Giants played well overall. You know, It's like Daniel Jones,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we knew he was gonna struggle against this this defense, rookies.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Young quarterbacks typically struggle against the New England Patriots, and

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>he did very nice touchdown throw to Golden Tape. Put

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that right on the money. One might say he dropped

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a diamond there, Greg, but ultimately three interceptions. Kind of

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>saw that coming when it when it when referring to

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones. But dude, the process again for Sony Michelle.

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was there and he had a good game.

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, twenty two carries for eighties six yards. A

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>guy touched the ball twenty four times, had ten totally

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>yards three point nine yards per carry. You don't love

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to see that. But they scored three touchdowns Greg from

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>like the one inch line, and Sony Michelle gets none

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of them. So all right, here's what I get, right,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Bolden's in the game. They're not taking him out.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>They hand the ball to him three different times. Fine,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>he had three carries. One of them was for a touchdown,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so I said, fine, all right, hold on the second

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>one the classic Brady on the goal line. Fine, and

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that should have been James White so another but it

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't clearly didn't get in, but it was close, I

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 1>mean it was. It was a great play by James White.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a close enough for them to call it

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown on the field certainly, like when they show

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>on the replay like it was obvious. So fine, the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>classic Brady on the one, I'm gonna fall in. Fine.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But the third one they were on the six. It

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was were the five, and it was clearly you hand

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this the Sony, you let him go in three times.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's clearly what you should do. Instead they

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>did the Brady sneak from the five and predictably he

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>gets some the one and then you have the real

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>classic Brady sneak. That was not fair, Frank, that was

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>mine touchdown. It was look, Sony Michelle, the process was

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 1>there again. We liked Sony Michelle yesterday and he was

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in a good spot and they scored, you know, three

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns from that close. You imagine Sony Michelle would get

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one of them. James White, solid game as well, it

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was saved his night. Nine catches in a PPR for

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>forty six yards. So we liked him yesterday as well.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Didn't do anything on the ground, doesn't normally do anything

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. But Edelman great game, fifteen targets, massive

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>nine for one fifteen. It was a solid game all around.

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we pretty much were no spot on for

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>everything that we said outside of look, I said start

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>no Giants. I was wrong about Golden Tate. I will

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>admit that. Um, you know a lot of it came

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on that one place sixty four yard touchdown. But yeah,

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating. You know, when you think the Patriots are

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna do one thing, obviously they go ahead and do

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>something different. Tom Brady getting his two rushing touchdowns saved

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>his night because he didn't throw for a touchdown. Did

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>throw for three and thirty four yards. So it's gonna

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>end being a good week for Tom Brady. He'll probably

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>check in as a top you know eight quarterback when

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it, don't do it very very much. Do

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it gave him Brady? We gotta remember. I mean it's

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>even forty years now, but like wet, remember Brady, this

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>is every year these one yard touchdown runs and they happened.

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>We should remember that he does that. He's drafting he's

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have at least three or four rushing touchdowns every

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>single season. Even though he is most he is the

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>least mobile quarterback in the NFL. I always wanted to

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>see him versus Eli Manning in a ring. What was

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>even tom Brady when he was coming out man like

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the slowest forties of all time? Didn't he

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he was extremely unathletic. Pull it up for you real quick,

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I did always want to see I think

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers would be good in that race as well.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>How about this Craig tom Brady coming out of college

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>right a five point to eight the zero if percentile.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think I would be using the word zero

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with today on the show zero zeroes. All right, we're

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>going with the Giants and Patriots when we come back,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>let's on everything else that comes your way on a

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Friday edition of the BFFs Daily Rhodo dot Com learned

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stop. Industry leading DBS tools

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot Com

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>optimized in minutes, building optimized line up for cash games

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and turneys. Learned from the game's best DFS players joined

0:08:44.080 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com rich go through about whoa whoa,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>whoa back with you here on a Friday edition on

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the VFFS. Frank Stanfold, Gregg Sauceman, gentlemen were ladies and

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gentlemen are watching here on Sports Green. Get on the grid.

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We got some p s as we gotta get to Frank.

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go first. P s A coming up this Wednesday,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we will not you're doing a waiver wire recambinetition of

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the program. What will be stay? We will have our

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fantasy basketball preview shot. Let's go back by popular

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>demand wasn't really ever here, I guess, but upon it.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Every year a lot of people have been asking us

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter do a fantasy basketball preview show for season

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>long league, So we will be doing that. Actually, have

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>my home league draft this weekend. We already got the

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>draft boards set up. It's pretty legit excited for it.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Got a couple of the drafts coming up as well.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So next Wednesday, Fantasy basketball season preview, next public service announcement.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you got? This Sunday we have the BFS

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel contest going on. That is correct. Can get in

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the game and you want to play, you can face

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>off against the BFS. I did not do well last week.

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I also did not do well last year. We thought

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we were gonna score up billion points right, and we

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>were pretty you know, because we pretty much had the

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>same lineup. So yes, we are hosting the FanDuel BFS

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Contest once again. Twenty members. If you're already part, part

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>of the contest is make sure to set your line

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>up once again. You go to the friends tab on

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>top of FanDuel. You're already part of the contest. All

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is set your lineup. It's five

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar entry. Top three positions pay out. We're looking forward

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>to having you. I was really damn close and doing

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>really well too. I just would have had will Fuller

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to the DeAndre Hopkins. You know what's annoying about it?

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I loved will Fuller to the right process. Yeah, you

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>finished ninth I finished tense, So there you go. Shout

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>out to the guru for twenty who who took it

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>home last week? Steve finished See you finished sixth, so

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher than us. Damn it. Alright, let's

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>job Steve, our editor graphics extraordinaire downstairs. Indeed, all right,

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So goot to be in about contest and once again

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this Wednesday, two pm Easter you're listening live or whenever

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the podcast, it's the VFFS Fantasy Basketball

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>pre You. We have a draft next Saturday, which I

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>can't participate in unfortunately, and then I have another draft

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>coming out. I'm trying to figure out when that When

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is our pit draft might be the night before the

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>season starts on that Monday Wednesday was supposed to. Now

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that's something you actually have to talk to the commissioner about,

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Steve downstairs. I don't know when we're gonna do it,

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's not next Wednesday anymore. I thought it was

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be Wednesday, but as of now, it says Monday,

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the night before the season starts. So do we get

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>confirmation on that? Downstairs? Greg? We gotta come on, we

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta we gotta go football. We have a lot of

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>games talk about we'll figure it out off the year.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a lot of talk about, let's go come on,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, fortunes on by this week Buffalo Bill, Chicago Bears,

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Colts, and the Oakland Raiders. None of them are playing.

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You know who are playing in London? It's tam Bay

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers and the Carolina Panthers. Last time these two teams played,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody was like, hey, Cam Newton looks hurt and terrible.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Since then, Kyle Allen has not lost for the Carolina Panthers,

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Panthers and Tampa Bay I like d J. Moore, I

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>like hert to Samuel this week, we're freeing road Joe

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. Gets a road Joe in a little bit.

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll start off with the Carolina Panthers side of things.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I like d J. Moore and

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel will in this spot. The Tampa Bay Bucks

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>secondary has reverted back to where they've been the past

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. They are allowing the six most fantasy

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing quarterbacks. So I think Kyle Allen is

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky stream this week or especially in super flex leagues.

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I like using him. The Bucks have abot three hundred

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen plus passing yards four games in a row. They've

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed eight passing touchdowns over their last three games. Christian

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey very good putting on historic performances. He is good

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to go full practice. He will play this Sunday play

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps this season. Guess what use Christian McCaffrey.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You didn't need me to tell you that d J.

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Moore the targets went back up to eight last week.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>It's really been a kind of seesaw situation so far

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this season. One week at d J Moore, one wee

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>gets Curtis Samuel. I think both guys can have success

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in the spot going up against the Bucks defense. If

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you remember the first time they played on Thursday Night football,

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys could have had monster games, but

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton could not hit on those throws down the field,

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so ultimately, uh, they had more modest performances. But I

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do think that they are both in play as wide

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>receiver threes in this spot. Michael Thomas last week just

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>went for eleven, one, eight, two, and two against this

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Bucks defense. So I think d J. Moore

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and Curtis Samuel are bold in play. I think Greg

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Olsen is in play as well. Just six targets total

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>over his last two weeks. Greg, but the last time

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>he faced Tampa Bay on that Thursday night game, six

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for one ten. Tampa Bay is allowing these second most

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to opposing tight end, So I like all

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the past catchers again that means I have to like

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen. Let's move over to the Tampa Bay Bucks

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Hopefully Mike Evans shows up for this spot.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The Calina Panthers are going to or at least it

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're gonna get Dante Jackson back the cornerback

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's really really good. I mean, early on in

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the season their secondary was playing as well as it was.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Part of that was due to Dante Jackson. Regardless, I

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>still have Chris Godwin ranked as a top six wide

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver this week. I still have Mike Evans inside my

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>top twelve. I think this is a little bit of

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a squeaky wheel game. He's not necessarily complaining himself, but

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about getting him more involved. So I think

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that we gotta bounce back performance here from Mike Evans

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing of the targets this season and has the same

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of red zone targets as Chris Godwin this season

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Greg I do like Ronald Jones as a

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>flex option as a high end RB three in this spot.

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I like a few of those other names in the

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>poll a little bit more Kenyan Drake's to Adrian Peterson's,

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't have those guys. I do like

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones as a flex. Carolina allowing four point seven

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry the running backs this season and they

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are vulnerable on the ground. So Ronald Jones has outstapped

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Barber two weeks in a row. I think he makes

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it three weeks in a row this week. Question for

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>me is the status of O. J. Howard left which

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>has talked O J. Howard up? Say where I get

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>him involved. He's been dropped in the leagues, He's been

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>traded in the league. O J. Howard by Blake Billy

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is not even projected as the top twenty five dynamic

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>this week. Um, this is Pat Mayo mark ingram like

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>would Howard's were for you this week? Frankie. O J.

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Howard is fourteen for me, so not quite outside my

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>top twenty five if you can, if you could stream

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys over him. I think Jared Cook

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is sneaky this week. Uh a, noah fan. I think

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it's in a good matchup against the Tennessee Titans Vance McDonald.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>If he plays, it's the Sunday night game, so it's

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be hard to know. I like him going

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>up against the Chargers as well, but I'd like to

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>take a wait and see approach to it. Jay Howard,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if he was dropped, I think you should be added.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>You should be stashing him. It's been really frustrating. I

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>love j Howard coming into the season. I will take

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>an l up to this point, still think that he's

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>super talented but not being utilized correctly. If you can

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get away from him this week, Greg, I would, He's

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>my tight end. Fourteen on the week, Okay, you're tight

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen on the week not quite streaming down fells

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>over him yet I feel like you wanted that they

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are close. They are close in the ranking. Okay, uh,

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>let's continue on. Frank will go into a week six

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>over here in the NFL. Let's go back to the

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>main land and let me get to Cleveland and Seattle.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I talked about this one's game earlier. So for some reason,

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the sharps as we are not sharps.

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are on Cleveland, say, and it's

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>really in games, like I know you want to say,

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what you see isn't real. It's not

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as it appears, but sometimes it is. One team looks

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>like they suck the other team. One team has six

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>days off, the other team doesn't. The other team as

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>ten days off. Would you rather have the team that

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>has more rest and is better or the team that

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is worse with less rest. These sharks in the public,

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they're saying worse. And it's one of those things where

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it just kind of like defies all logic. It seems

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>like we get one of these situations every week in

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL where it looks so obvious that what you

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>expect to happen, which normally would be Seahawks have all

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this time off, they're the better team, they should dominate.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't happen. They don't play as well on

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the road. I think a lot of the reason why

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at Cleveland this week, Greg is because

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks cannot generate pressure. The problem for the Cleveland

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Browns has been they're getting pressured a lot. Baker mayfields

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>running around like a chicken without a head. Their offensive

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>line is not good. We just saw Nick Bosa have

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>a monster game on Monday Night Football. That's because the

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is not good. Well, the Seattle Seahawks cannot

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>really generate pressure, So I think that's what people are

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at here. They could get Greedy Williams and Denzel

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Award back in this spot as well. Pay attention to that.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>They would be huge additions to this defense as well

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>if they can get them back. I don't I don't

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want to trust Baker Mayfield in this spot. I

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Seahawks defense is a great one. I

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they've faced a ton of a ton

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of great quarterbacks so far. They did face Jared Golf

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Week five in the Thursday Night Football game,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>but Baker Mayfield has not had multiple touchdowns and a

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>single game so far this season. Jarvis Landry is the

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>one who's actually seeing more targets uh than Odell Beckham

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's actually performing. Odell Beckham ranked outside my

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen this week at the wide receiver position, so

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>there might be a situation where you could get away

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>from him. There's a few other names to talk about

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Obviously, you're using Nick Chubb. We'll we'll

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>hit on some of the Seahawks when we get back,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we will hit the Seahawks. Will continue on going through

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>all these teams. Week six in the NFL, the BFS

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>breaking down as only we can. It's the ground. More

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on the way next. Daily Rhodo dot Com learn from

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the game's best players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Roado dot Com optimize that in minutes, building, optimize,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>line up for cash games and turneys. Learned from the

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players joined Daily Roado dot com. Get

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the game with Draft Kickings sports Book, where the

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>listeners of the show can get any deposit bonus but

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred bucks. Here's how it works. Create a Draftking

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sports book account, make a deposit pleased your first bet

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff Kings will match it with bonus of up

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred dollars and that offers eligible to all

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>users plus new users. We're gonna be risk prevet two

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks. Go to sports Good dot com slash DK

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to play. That's Sports Grade dot com slash DK And

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>if you have a gambling problem, call winning on you.

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Gambler went one and over in New Jersey only eligibility

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>restrictions apply, so you have site for details. Right, and

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you had a couple more points you wanted to make

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a game In the Seattle Seahawks, I think Russell Wilson

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>has about as much upside as any quarterback in the

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL when he gets into shootouts. But they still do

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>want to run the football. Uh we saw you know,

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>two sixty eight yards and four touchdowns last week. He

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is to QB one on the season. But again it's

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it's whether or not this turned into a shootout, you know,

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if they can just run the ball on the you know,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>keep this ball on the ground for the entire game,

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what they would want to do. Even

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>with for Shawd Penny back last week, Chris Carson played

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>focent of the Snaps, had a season high twenty seven carries.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The Browns just got shredded by the forty Niners run games.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So I like Chris Carson a lot this week, especially

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>in DFS. The same thing applies to the wide receivers

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>as they do to Russell Wilson. If this game, you know,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>turned into a little bit of a back and forth affair,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think Tyra Lockett can have a good game.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen when Russell Wilson has good games. Tya Lockett

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the main beneficiary of that. I

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>think he's a high end wide receiver to Will Dislee.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>If you own them, I think you gotta play him.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>The Snaps are up a huge amount over the past

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>two weeks since they traded away Nick Vannette, and he

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>has at least eight yards or a touchdown in four

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>straight games. So a lot of consistency from Will Disley

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. Greg. I think based on what I said

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about Baker, I think most people will feel the same way.

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna want to use him, which is gonna

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>make him a good GPP play. I don't think a

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are gonna be on him. Yeah, that's fine,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>find play in DFS. I'm not on Baker this week.

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I am all my man. He were just talking about

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Will Disley. Chris Carson is probably gonna continue to just

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do Chris Carson things at this point with the Seahawks.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me move on to Kansas City and Houston, Frank,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>because the end of the year potentially, I'm not gonna

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>go with that far. But sure he plays New England soon.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true. But we saw the Chiefs and Rams last

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>year and we we said going into that one, a

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of offensive firepower might be the game of the year.

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Tonight it did live up to the height of I

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>think this could be one of those games not gonna

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>go that far. Like of course, your fantasy purpose is

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>indeed good news potentially on the Kansas city front. And

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>he read just comes out and says Tyreek Hill is

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a game time decision. Sounds like he'll go through warm

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ups and we'll see if he's ready to rock. That's

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the closest we've been to getting Tyreek Hill back. I

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>don't expect Sammy Watkins to play in this one. I

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>asked you this question downstairs off air. Let me ask

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you to you on the air. If Tyreek Hill and

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins don't play, the starting three wide receivers for

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are DeMarcus Robinson, Nicole Hardman, and Byron Pringle.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You need to start or how would you order those

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>three guys if you need to start one of them

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>for the Chiefs. First and foremost, I do not expect

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins to play, and I would be really surprised

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>if Tyree Hill plays in this spot as well. I

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they should rush him back. I understand

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's a big game going up against the Houston Texans. Personally,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Tyreek Hill is going to play in

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the spot, but if he does, make sure you get

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>him in your lineup. I would rank them if both

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of those guys are out, DeMarcus Robinson one, Byron Pringle too,

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and Nicole Hardman third. We saw last week that when

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Byron Pringle stepped up, he played over ninety percent of

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. He actually played more than Kole Hardman. I'm

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not saying Nicole Hardman's a gadget player, but I think

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that they want to pick and choose their spots where

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to use him. I don't know that he's

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>technically up to speed because he is a rookie, but

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I would rank it to Marcus Robinson, Byron Pringle, and

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Hardman. And I actually would like Robinson and Pringle

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>as wide receiver threes, assuming that's how you kill and

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins are out. Obviously you're using Patrick Mahomes. You

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't need me to tell you that. I like Damian

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Williams in this spot play fifty percent of the snaps

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>last week, Houston allowing over four yards per carry four

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>point two four not great, but they're allowing nine receptions

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing running backs, which is the most

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. So I think Damian Williams could be

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>used in that regard. I think he is a low

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>end RB two in this matchup. On the Houston Texans

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>side of things, it's really good spot for Carlos Hide.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw last week Marlon Mack and other running backs

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all season able to impose their will against

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>his Kansas City Chiefs defense. They cannot stop the run.

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Hide played is playing of the snaps on the season,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>just had twenty one carries last week. I like Carlos

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>had Hide as a high inflex This would set up

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for a Duke Johnson game, but of course we can't

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>trust Bill O'Brien could be a key q T game

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. I understand DeAndre Hopkins has not done what

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>has been expected of him so far this season. I

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good spot to jump back in on DFS.

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are gonna jump back

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in as well. Still like Will Fuller as a low

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver too in the spot. Pay attention to

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills though game time decision. If he's out, that

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>elevates will Fuller even more. We saw last week with

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills out. But honestly, if Kenny Stills plays, he's

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be on the field just enough to annoy

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>will Fuller owners. So just keep those things in mind. Uh,

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Darren Fells, if you're really really desperate streaming tight end.

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about him a little bit yesterday. Greg. Yeah,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in the Darren Fells thing. As I told

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you yesterday, I'm starting in a league because I am desperate.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I have no I have no Darren Waller in that

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>J Howard No. I as I said before, I have

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>O J. Howard ranks. I know you had it ranked,

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>but I also saw your lineup and you had Darren

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Fells in it and OJ Howard on the bench. Yeah.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's gonna be one of those things where

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna play it up to like right until game

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>time Sunday morning, if I wake up in time for

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the London game. But you, I hope you do because

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you'll be here all right. Yes, it's a good point.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I will, I will be away. I should. I hope,

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we hope Jacksonville and New Orleans, Gardner Minshew taking on

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Teddy throws about Jacksonville is a one point favorite in

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this one at home New Orleans obviously a different team

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>on the road than they are at home. Frankie, how

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>do you see this one shaking out? Start off with

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars side of things. I like Gardner Minshew, the stream,

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the stash, That's what I'm calling it this week. Multiple

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown throws in four of five games. We've talked about

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the stats all week long. There's only three quarterbacks that

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>have at least sixteen fantasy points in every game the season,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Pat Mahomes, Kyler Murray and Gardner Minshew. This mow Orlans

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Saints defense actually could be taken advantage of through the air.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>They're allowing the second most fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this season. I have Minshew ranked as a top twelve quarterback.

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I would use them over Aaron Rodgers this week, as

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy as that sounds. Leonard Fournet, you're getting him in

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>their number two, an opportunity to share number three and

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>snaps among the running back position. I understand it's a

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>tougher matchup for going up against the New Orleans Saints

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed the six to his fantasy points, but still

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with the workload Leonard four Net is getting, you have

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>to throw him in there. DJ Chark getting a lot

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of questions about DJ Chark going up against Marshawn Lattimore.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>This is where you're actually gonna find out how good

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>DJ Chark is because over the past two weeks, Lattimore

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>has been lights out, just limited Mike Evans to a

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>zero A donut. I still have d J Chark rank

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>as a low end wide receiver two top twenty four

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver because he has a legitimate rapport with Gardner Minshew,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and I like D. D. Westbrook as a sneaky wide

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver three play sneaky play in DFS as well. The

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>way to attack the Saints defense is through the slot,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>and d D. Westbrook actually has the same amount of

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>targets as DJ Chark on this season, just not scoring

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as many touchdowns on the New Orleans Saints side of things.

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like Teddy Bridgewater as much in this spot.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he had a great game last week. I

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think it was a good spot going up against the

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Bucks defense. Jalen Ramsey looks like he's going

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to play, we think, which means it's gonna be tougher

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>on Michael Thomas. You're still using him, you have to

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>roll him out there. One of the best wide receivers

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Alvin Kamara sneaky DFS play. Greg. I

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>think everyone's gonna be looking at the Christian McCaffrey's and

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingrams in a really good spot. But don't forget

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>about Alvin Kamar. I know he's like a little bit

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>banged up, but I think he is a sneaky DFS play.

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a lot of people are going to

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>be looking at him. Greg, Yeah, I think that's fair. Frankie,

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>your boy d J shark leasy a f C receiving yards.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>He's been amazing. He's the top five wide receiver in

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. I feel like this is set up five art.

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I know think people realize that he's really good and

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he was. He has the draft pedigree, was taken in

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the second round of the NFL Draft last year, and

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this guy is really really coming into his own very impressive. Again.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the week where you find out how talented

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>he really is. Going up against Marshall Latimore. Uh that

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>he's very, very talented. Washington and Miami not so talented. Oh,

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Greggy. I think we have a sneaky

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>stack opportunity here. Jane Martinez and said all week long

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>he wishes this game was flex to Sunday Night football.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. I'm with him, let's go. I wasn't here

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>when Frank talked about Miami. Now that I am, I'll

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>let him do it again. Well, Greg's away. All Miami

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins wide receivers are in play. I'm really I don't

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>know what this is gonna end up like a ten

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>six game. It's gonna be why you're excited to watch

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this game. I'm not going to watch it. I mean,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna watch however much they show of it

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on red zone. To be honest with you, but the

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>spot just doesn't get much better than the Miami Dolphins offense. Here.

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Washington defense not a good one. We saw that last week.

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>The New England Patriots running backs ran all over this defense.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Kenyan Drake is in a good spot. I

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like him as a flex spot this week, as a

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>flex play this week. Uh, And I'm hoping that they

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>just don't use Calen Balaj anymore because he's averaging one

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>point five yards for carry. He's not very good. The

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers are in a really good spot here as well.

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman a shell of his former self. They're allowing

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the second most fantasy points to opposing wide receivers this season.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Preston Williams has nineteen targets over his last two games.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We saw before the bye week that Vanta Parker had

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a big game four receptions for seven yards and a

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdown as well. So if I liked the wide receivers,

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta like Josh Rosen. Look if you pair these

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>guys up in DFS, Rosen and Preston Williams, I understand

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those like hold your nose type of things,

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but it opens up so much salary everywhere else. I

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like Josh Rosen as a streaming quarterback in super flex

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>leagues as well. Gray I haven't ranked as my QB twenty.

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>On the week, Adrian Peterson talking about how he's, you know, revitalized.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The rebirth is coming. This is the best week of

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>practice they've had since he's joined the Washington football team.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Bill Callahan wants to run the football You're getting a

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>much of crazy quotes there, Greg saying, you know, if

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you have more rushing attempts in the opposing team, you're

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna win. I don't think that's how football works.

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this guy is coaching like it's the nineties.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the decade that I had in my mind

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. So you know we're we're in lockstep here.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The last time Adrian Peterson was dominant was the nineties

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sixties as well. But he isn't a good spot here.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>We probably see fifteen plus carries. I like him as

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a flex option as well. You asked me downstairs. I

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>will answer the question now. I will go with Kenyan

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Drake because I think that there is more receiving upside here. Yeah,

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that was the that was the question I was about

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask you. I like Terry McLaurin as well as

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a high end wide receiver three with case keenum the

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>assumed starter. Where's McLaurin compared to like DeVante Parker this week?

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I have Parker and Preston Williams right outside the top

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty six. They have them back to back. Um, they are,

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, low end wide receiver threes. They're right in

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that range. I have McLaren as a high end wide

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver three. He's a top thirty wide receiver for me

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this week. Remember every game that he played with case

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Keenum as a starter, he scored a touchdown in He

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was the wide receiver ten through the first three weeks

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season. So they'll be a matchup against the Dolphins.

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>There'll be some opportunities for Washington make big plays. The

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>big play guy is Terry McLaurin, which puts him in

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a very good spot you have if you are really

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>desperate too. I think Paul Richardson just you know if

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a deeper league yourself. I don't know, no,

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but I play in an NFC league where I have

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple guys on by on missing Davonte Adams. It's going

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>up against the Miami Dolphins. I will just throw the

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>name out there, Greggy. That's all I can do. The

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>last time you did that, so I couldn't predict case

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Keenen was gonna get bitch in the first quarter. Greg,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter. You would have a monster game Arizona Atlanta next,

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>as was everything else. Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DBS players. We don't just give you

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>premier advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DBS tools and

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now Daily Rhodo dot Com optimize that

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, building optimized one for cash games and turneys

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>learned from the game's best DFS players, going Daily Rhado

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Alright, Frank, we've got a lot of games left,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a little time to do them. Shall we jump in?

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. Arizona Cardinals are taking on the Atlanta Falcons.

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This He's gonna may be the fantasy game of the air. Franky, Yeah,

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this has fantasy points written all over at Matt Ryan

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>three yards passing in every game this season. Arizona allowing

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the fourth most fantasy points to opposing quarterbacks twelve touchdowns

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to zero interceptions. Devanta Freeman low nd RB two for me.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I look, his red zone usage has been really frustrating

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. Edo Smith has nine red zone opportunities, Davanta

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Freeman has just seven, and Vonta Freeman has been saved

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:00.479
<v Speaker 1>by his targets and his receiving, which is good for fantasy.

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>We like that, but overall, Edo Smith is a thorn

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in the side of DeVonta Freeman. Freeman is a lowand

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>RB two for me. I think this is a good

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>spot for Julio Jones in DFS. Obviously, in season long

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you're using him. I think that Calvin Ridley is a

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>boomer bust wide receiver three. It's really hard to trust

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>him on a weekly basis because Mohamed san New is

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>still They're still playing a lot of snaps, playing the

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>most mass of all these wide receivers actually, and getting

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>targets as well. I don't hate Mohamed Sanu as a

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>bye week replacement if needed. Austin Hooper, I mean, what

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna say about the guy? He's the top

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>three tight end right now and Fantasy has at least

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>six targets in every game he is the He's going

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>up against the Cardinals, who allow the most Fantasy points

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of tight ends. They get shredded every single week except

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for when Tyler Effort plays them and the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So that was a great call last week by yours truly. UM.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I like Austin Hooper using him in season long DFS.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>The price is really high. I mean, if you can

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of fit them in there, but you do have

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay up in order to get Austin Hooper, Greg

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray my fourth quarterback going up against the Atlanta Falcons.

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>We just saw de Shawn Watson throw for five touchdowns

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>have a historic game against him. Will Fuller went off.

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>If Christian Kirk plays, I think he's a high and

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three either way. I like Larry Fitzgerald. The

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>targets have been consistent. I think that this is a

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>big game for fits. You have to pay attention to

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. They said that there's a chance that he plays. Honestly,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if there's a risk of him being ruled out throughout

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 1>the course of this game or re injuring his back,

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I wish that they would just call it beforehand, don't

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>let him play, and give Chase Edmunds the full workload,

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you own David Johnson, you should be handcuffing

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>him with Chase Edmonds. So pay attention to this. If

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>DJ plays, obviously you have to use him. If he's out.

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds is gonna be one of the talkiest plays

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in DFS. Craig understandably, so he'll be cheap enough going

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>against Atlanta. I completely completely get it's gonna be high

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>schooling affair. Kyla Murray number four overall in your rankings.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I love him for DFS. I love Kyla Murray. This week.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I've actually just puning to my lineup. Oh, I guess

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I should take him out. Usually whenever we have the

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>same lineup, Greg, everything goes wrong. So one more early

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>game yet. I know I skipped ahead, but it's the

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagles and the Vikings going at a good game of Minnesota.

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to say what this Minnesota offense is. They

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>took it to the Giants through the air last week. Obviously,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Philly secondary is susceptible. More Adam Feeling here. I think

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a really good spot for Adam Feeling. He's

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an illness, but should be good to go.

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>The Stefon Digs thing is really really tough to figure out.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I think for most teams that drafted him a you

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>probably have a bad record. You might not have a

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>better option. I do have him as a you know,

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>low end wide receiver three just because of the matchup.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The matchup doesn't get much better than this. Philly allowing

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most Fantasy points to opposing wide receivers. And

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that's with facing the New York Jets last week, so

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine how bad they were even before that game.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.479
<v Speaker 1>So it's a good spot. This is exactly what Adam

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Feeling was talking about after that Chicago Bears game. When

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you go up against the defense that is really good

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 1>against the run, can you switch up your game plan

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and throw the football? They should do that this week.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles are allowing two point eight yards per carry

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. That is the best in the NFL.

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 1>You're still using Dalvin Cook and in fact, I think

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook is a sneaky GPP play in DFS this

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>week because a lot of people are gonna see that

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>little red number next to the name that says that

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a tough matchup. But he's Dalvin Cook. He's

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred yards rushing in every game but one.

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That game was against the Bears, but he scored a

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game as well. I think Kirk Cousins

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>sneaky in DFS a good streaming quarterback as well. On

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the Eagle side of things, Greg this is a little

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 1>bit tougher because this Vikings defense plays better at home

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's in Minnesota. I think you're still gonna use Carson Wentz.

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>He is a you know, he's he's a fringe e

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>QB one from the top twelve quarterback. Because again, Uh,

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this defense isn't as good as it has been, but

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they do play better at home. Uh, if you can

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>get away from the Eagles running backs as well. I

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think Jordan Howard is in the mix as like a

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>flex running back. I like Adrian Peterson more. I like

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake Moore, I like Carlos Hyde more so. I

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>like Ronald Jones more as well than I do Jordan Howard. Uh,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this Vikings defense is good against the run. I do

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like Alshon Jeffrey as a solid wide receiver three at

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>least eight targets in each of the past two games. Greg. Yeah, absolutely,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>we're more like Bumpy Roads this year too. He hasn't

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been nearly as good nos not not been nearly as

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>consistent as we would have probably, um, let me get

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to let me get to Baltimore here. Um Baltimore is

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>where's Baltimore? The route is on, or at least that's

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what the spread says. It's it will be Greg another

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>one to call game this that one Baltimore and Cincinnati.

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Markue's Brown is not practiced at any point this week.

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he's gonna plays. People pick ups

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>need here. I actually own Hollywood Brown in my home league,

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and he is, you know, in my lineup as of now,

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and I put in acclaim just before the show to

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>pick up police need. Honestly, if you don't see a

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>player practice all week long, usually they don't play, or

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>if they do play, they're not nearly as effective, or

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they play limited snaps. So I'm really really worried about

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown in this spot overall, even though it's a

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>solid matchup going up against the Bengals defense. Personally, I

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna play. I think we see a

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 1>monster game out of Mark Andrews. I think Willie Sneed

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>would be the biggest beneficiary of Hollywood Brown being out.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>The targets. You know, they haven't been huge for Willie Sneed,

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but he has been a little bit more consistent the

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks. Obviously, mark Ingram is in a

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>smash spot here. He's really chalky for DFS this week.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Love him for season long. Obviously, he's the RB six

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>on the season, had a season high nineteen carries last week,

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati allowing over five yards per carry on the season.

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Two opposing running backs Tyler Boyd double digit targets in

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>four out of five games. And I've said this all

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>week long as well, referring to Autentate Audentate no more

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>of a he's a top forty wide receiver. I prefer

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins wide receivers over him, but I do like

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd. This Ravens secondary has been banged up. They

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just lost Tony Jefferson last week, who was a starting

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>safety for them as well. Joe Mixon solid to low

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>end RB two. He's like a top twenty running back.

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>He's touchdown dependent. Could fall behind here there. Twelve point

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>underdogs don't really want to get uh involved with Andy

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Dalton in the spot obviously, but um look, I wish

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that Joe makes it would be more involved in the

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 1>past game, but for whatever reason, Zach Taylor is not

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>using him in that regard. Really good pass catcher coming

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>out of Oklahoma, but it just hasn't necessarily been there. Uh,

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a solid matchup, but they could fall behind.

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Greg where Ingram and you're rking this week, Greggy, mark

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Ingram is top ten. Pull it up for you specifically.

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I do like him a lot. I have him as

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>RB eight on the on the week fan of mark

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Ingram this week? Yeah yeah, really really obvious play Rams

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and thanks man, Rams and ers, thanks for your heart

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>hitting analysis. Greig. I'm just kidding. Niners are undefeated. They

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>go to l a facing team that have lost two

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.479
<v Speaker 1>in a row against the Seahawks and the Bucks Rams

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>return home. Can they stop the forty Niners undefeated? Ways,

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a really tough game to call here. Obviously, the

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners lose Mike McGlinchey, which is not great for

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line. Uh, they're playing lights out and we said,

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know after that Monday Night football, showing that they

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have all the pieces to be a legitimate team in

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the NFL because they have a good defense. They have

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a good defensive line, they get pressured, they can stop

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the run. They have a solid secondary as well. They

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have a really good offensive line now now without Mike McGlinchey,

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>but they can run the football. They have a quarterback

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in Jimmy Garoppolo who can make plays as well. I

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>think we see a little bit of a back and

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>forth affair here between the forty Niners and the Los

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Rams. The Rams have allowed have at least eight

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns. They They have allowed eight passing touchdowns over

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>their last two games, so could be susceptible to the

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>past here. When it comes to Jimmy Garoppolo, forty Niners

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have the highest rushing percentage in the NFL. I like

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>both Tevin Coleman and Matt Brita as low end r

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>B two's. Yes, they are splitting time, but again, this

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is a really good one, especially at run blocking,

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they're going to try and keep

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this Rams offense off the fields. I like both of

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>those guys. Don't want to get involved with any forty

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Niners Wide receivers extremely hard to predict obviously, Still like

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle, we saw the breakout game last week, eight

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>plus targets in three out of four games. Season play

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for DFS For me, Jared Goff getting a lot of

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.760
<v Speaker 1>questions about him Greg He is a top ten quarterback

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for me this week. I understand it's against this forty

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Niners defense, but plays much better at home. I cannot

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, stress that enough. If there's one spot where

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you can target the forty Niners defense, greg it is

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>through the slot. I think we get another monster game

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 1>from Cooper Cup. Jared Goff, it's better if you own

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>even fantasy football. Don't watch. Just look at the game. Yeah,

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're probably fifty pass attempts. You're gonna get three out

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards, three touchdowns, three interception, and you're gonna get

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>between pretty good game. And maybe he didn't watch it

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because he was actually terrible. Yeah. I don't think Girly

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is gonna play man. It doesn't sound good for him.

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the practice report yet. Obviously they're on

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast, so we'll see what happens if he

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play. Malcolm Brown obviously a super chalk play for

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>DFS defense. They are, but they're still gonna have scoring

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities because it is the Ram's offense. They're gonna get

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>down the field. It is a tougher matchup forty Niners

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing just three point eight yards per carry. Two opposing

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>running backs. That mentioned. Really like Cooper Cup for DFS.

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 1>He's a top five wide receiver from me this week.

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Interested to see you know how the target share breaks

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>down if Brandon Cooks plays. I think he's gonna play

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Um, how the target share breaks down

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>between him, Robert Woods, and Gerald Everett who has seen

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a ton of targets over the past two weeks Jets

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and Dallas. Sam Donald will return to these Sunday. He'll

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>have extra panning around his spleen because, according to Adam Gaze,

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he's to protect him so he doesn't die. Great. What

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>can go wrong will go wrong, hopefully not death death. Yeah,

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm really rooting for Sam Donald to come out of

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 1>this game alive. Craig, that's all you want. You would

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>hate to see it, you told me before off the

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>air earlier this week. You expect a big Levy on

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Bell game. Yeah, well, we just saw the Dallas game.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys allowed you know, four rushing touchdowns to Aaron Jones.

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 1>There having the fourth most receptions two running backs this season.

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell playing the snaps, which is the second most

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL at the running back position. He has

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a monster opportunity share, seen seven percent of the Jets targets.

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that comes with Luke Falk, but I

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a really good spot going up against the

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys. Try and buy Levian Bell now if you can.

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott multiple TV passes in four out of five games.

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg Williams honestly has the Jets playing good defense. You

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't expect that, but they've just been on the field

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so much, Greg, that you know they're kind of being

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>exposed at times, but their defense actually is playing well.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I still do like Dak Prescott just going up against

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that secondary. I I don't trust the cornerbacks of the Jets,

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think Dak say top ten quarterback here. I

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like ka Mari Cooper as a top ten wide receiver.

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I like Michael Gallup as a low end wide receiver too.

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We saw both of these guys with fourteen targets just

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>one week ago. Uh now is also the time to

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>buy on Ezekiel Elliott if you can do so. He

0:43:57.640 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ranks as the RB twelve, but I do think that

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>he will have some success in this spot going up

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets. I want to like Jamison Crowder. Greg.

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw a Week one with the seventeen targets, but

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>then last week Marius Thomas has nine targets and this

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>week they're talking up Robbie Anderson that he's been open,

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but we just haven't been able to get him the ball.

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of a wait and see approach. I

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>want to see how the Jets wide receivers are used

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>this game. I don't think that I want to start

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>any of them against this Cowboys secondary. Pittsburgh and Los

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Angeles the Chargers on Sunday Night Football. Frankie, we don't

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>know what the quarterback is for Pittsburgh quite yet. For

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, we kind of understand what we're getting ourselves

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>into at the running back position and a wide receiver. Yeah,

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I have Melvin Gordon ranked as my RB sixteen on

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the week. I have Austin ekel Or a few spots

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>below at RB twenty. He had a massive target game

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>last week, you know, fifteen receptions, but only had three carries.

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon had twelve carries. They were close to a

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty split in terms of snaps as well. I

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think this is a game where we start to see

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon take over a little bit more. On the

0:44:58.000 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 1>other side, I think we see a lot of James

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Connor as well. Even if Mason Rudolph goes I don't

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be on. We've seen that they try

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to limit his passes as well. I think we get

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of James Conner in this spot here as well.

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen, you're using him. Mike Williams. He isn't that

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley's spot for me. He's a inconsistent wide receiver

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>three at thirteen targets last week. But you know what's

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the target share gonna look like this week? So there's

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a few other wide receivers I mentioned early on that

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I would trust more so in the spot one last

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>game to get to Frank it's a little bit earlier

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>on the day. It's a never Bronco was taking on

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee great game. Save the best for last. Use

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the running backs. That's pretty much all I can tell them.

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry getting around twenty carries per game. I like

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay and Royce Freeman. Phillip Lindsay a top twenty

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>running back for me. Philip Lindsay, Royce Freeman more of

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a high end flex option. Courtland Sutton I do like

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as a high end wide receiver. Three. Emmanuel Sanders sneaky

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, low end wide receiver three. He's been a

0:45:56.480 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit more inconsistent here. Gregor to w Adams, I

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think he plays personally. I agree to the six

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 1>weeks are saying now Adams a fantastic weekend. Enjoy Week six.

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>He's Frank Stanville m Greg Susman will do it all

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>again on Monday. Daily Rhodo dot com learned from the

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>game's best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Rodo dot com optimized in minutes,

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>building optimized line up for cast games and turneys learned

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot com.

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So what did I happen? What did I? Here's what

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you missed on the BFF. I understand that fans, the

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>word fanatic is like someone who's crazy passionate about their

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sport and what they're rooting for. Obviously, but when you're

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 1>down by two or three scores to the New England

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and you're a Giants fan, it's about time to

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>stop clapping rambunctiously and being annoying in the bar. I mean,

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that's like my legitimate takeaway from last night watching the game. Like,

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that to anyone, even like a

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Jets fan. If I'm watching the game, I'm down like

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>two scores. There's five minutes left in the game, Like,

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, I've accepted. Defeated is what it is.

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>This guy, just let's go Giants. Dude, the game's over. Yeah,

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, game was over. Man. You were able to

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do that the entire first half. That was cool game.

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They played well. You know, they tied the game up

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>fourteen fourteen. You know, yesterday I said this game was

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to be competitive for the most part. I

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:53.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the score is indicative of how well

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the Giants actually played. They actually showed up and put

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>up a fight, defense played well. They had the striped

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sack fumble of Tom Brady returned to for a touchdown.

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Josh Gordon gets hurt on the play. That's

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>why we can never be excited about Josh Gordon. We

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>can't have nice things. Hopefully he's all right, but put

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up a dud last night. So if you had him

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup, you've already kind of set yourself back

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but ultimately, like, oh yeah, I thought,

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Giants played well overall. You know it's look,

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones. We knew he was gonna struggle against this

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this defense. Rookies, young quarterbacks typically struggle against the New

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:25.360
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots. And he did very nice touchdown throw the

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>golden tape put that right on the money. One might

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>say he dropped a diamond there, Greg, but ultimately three interceptions.

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Kind of saw that coming when it when it when

0:48:33.160 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>referring to Daniel Jones. But dude, the process again. For

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle, I mean he was there, and he had

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a good game. I mean twenty two carries for eighties

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>six yards. A guy touched the ball twenty four times,

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred and ten total yards, three point nine

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:48.800
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. You don't love to see that. But

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they score three touchdowns, Greg from like the one inch line,

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and Sony Michelle gets none of them. So all right,

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:57.279
<v Speaker 1>here's what I get, right, Random Bolton's in the game.

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>They're not taking him out. They hand the ball to

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 1>him three different times. Fine, he had three carries, one

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of them was for a touchdown. So I said, fine,

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all right. Hold. On the second one, the classic Brady

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 1>on the goal line, fine, and that should have been

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>James White. So another but it wasn't clearly didn't get in.

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 1>But it was close. I mean it was. It was

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a great play by James White, and it was close

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>enough for them to call it a touchdown on the

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>field certainly, like when they saw the replay, like it

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was obvious. So fine, the classic Brady on the one,

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna fall in. Fine. But the third one they

0:49:30.960 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>were on the six were the five, and it was clearly,

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you hand this the sony, you let him go in

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>three times. I think that's clearly what you should do. Instead,

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>they did the Brady sneak from the five and predictably

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets to the one and then you have the

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>real classic Brady sneak. That was not fair, Frank, that

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was my touchdown.