Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity Show told free on numbers eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine foot one Sean, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. There's a lot happening
Speaker 1: in the news, not the least of which is I mean,
Speaker 1: it's always tragic. I never want to hear about anybody
Speaker 1: that lost their life. Scott Besson actually said something that
Speaker 1: I think we should pay attention to about the shooting
Speaker 1: is on what Maria bart touromo and this is the
Speaker 1: shooting that took place at Mara Lago and an armed
Speaker 1: man breached the security perimeter. And the report is very straightforward,
Speaker 1: very accurate, consistent. Apparently there was one one still picture
Speaker 1: that was released. And it's just sad in so many
Speaker 1: different ways that anybody is going to be delusional and
Speaker 1: sick enough. And this is why we talk a lot
Speaker 1: about personal safety and security on this program and why
Speaker 1: you need a personal safety security strategy for you and
Speaker 1: your family, your employees, et cetera. But the sheriff, who's
Speaker 1: a good guy, happened to know I'm Sheriff Rick Bradshaw,
Speaker 1: described the encounter at one point thirty this morning. The
Speaker 1: security detail detected that an individual had made his way
Speaker 1: into the inner perimeter of mar A Lago. He said,
Speaker 1: a deputy and two Secret Service agents on the detail
Speaker 1: went to that area to investigate. They confronted a white
Speaker 1: male that was carrying a gas can and a shotgun.
Speaker 1: He was ordered to drop those two pieces of equipment
Speaker 1: that he had with him, at which time he put
Speaker 1: down the gas can raised the shotgun to a shooting position.
Speaker 1: At that point in time, the deputy two Secret Service
Speaker 1: agents fired their weapons, neutralized the threat, and he was
Speaker 1: deceased at the site FBI special agent. But Skiles has said,
Speaker 1: the bureau which is leading the investigation, you know, they
Speaker 1: also want to get any other nearby footage of this
Speaker 1: guy entering the facility, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: But it's a tragedy.
Speaker 1: And then, you know, then we're reading things like well
Speaker 1: Tech show that the gunman who was shot at our
Speaker 1: lago was obsessed by the Epstein issue. And the only
Speaker 1: thing I could say about all of this is, and
Speaker 1: I have been saying it now for some time, this
Speaker 1: rhetoric has got to stop. The Treasury Secretary Scott Besson
Speaker 1: talking to Maria Bartromo, they are normalizing this violence. It's
Speaker 1: got to stop, and he called for a new ad.
Speaker 1: In this new ad from this Illinois lieutenant governor, in
Speaker 1: particular the ad featuring several people saying f Trump, F Trump,
Speaker 1: F Trump and declaring, you know, she's not scared of
Speaker 1: a wanna be dictator. I'm running for Senate to stand
Speaker 1: up to Donald Trump. And she also said she plans
Speaker 1: on holding Trump accountable for the crimes he's committed.
Speaker 2: Blah blah.
Speaker 1: This is why this midterm matters so much. So much,
Speaker 1: is so much at stake. This is a This is
Speaker 1: a group of people that is now committed to shutting
Speaker 1: down the Department of Homeland Security, I mean, which is insane.
Speaker 1: And by doing so, they're shutting down the Coast Guard.
Speaker 1: By doing so, they would be defunding the Secret Service.
Speaker 1: By doing so, they're defunding FEMA. By doing so, they
Speaker 1: basically would want and go back to and return to
Speaker 1: wide open borders. And we know the disaster when you
Speaker 1: have open borders like we did under Biden. In spite
Speaker 1: of them lying saying the border was closed and the
Speaker 1: border was secure, it was a big lie. And the
Speaker 1: entire Democratic Party, for the most part, maybe with a
Speaker 1: few exceptions here or there, not many were complicit in
Speaker 1: this big lie.
Speaker 2: It was a big lie.
Speaker 1: And we know known terrorists and murderers and rapists and
Speaker 1: child molesters, other violent criminals and cartel members and gang
Speaker 1: members entered this country over twelve plus million unvetted Harris
Speaker 1: Biden mayorc as illegals, and we're dealing with the aftermath.
Speaker 1: And just last year alone, in twenty twenty five, the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security ICE agents were able to apprehend
Speaker 1: twenty one people convicted or charged with murder of American citizens,
Speaker 1: illegals murdered, convicted of murder, or or charged with murder
Speaker 1: of American citizens. You know, the same thing. Fifty four
Speaker 1: hundred people last year alone were arrested. They're either convicted
Speaker 1: or charged with raping or other sexual crimes against American citizens,
Speaker 1: all the illegal immigrants. And at what point do you
Speaker 1: say enough is enough? At what point do you say
Speaker 1: that the dehumanization and the incitement and the language and
Speaker 1: the fascist and the Nazi and the Hitler comparisons, gestopo
Speaker 1: comparisons have to stop. And at what point you know,
Speaker 1: when the media covers things, you know, whatever you think
Speaker 1: of the Jeffrey Epstein case, there are a couple of
Speaker 1: exculpatory things for Donald Trump, and the Left has wanted
Speaker 1: this to be about Donald Trump, and it keeps bouncing
Speaker 1: back on them in ways that they never anticipated, including
Speaker 1: the pictures of Bill Clinton and hot tubs and swimming
Speaker 1: pools and on airplanes of Jeffrey Epstein including Hakim Jeffreys
Speaker 1: and Chuck Schumer after his conviction in Florida. You know,
Speaker 1: for this with trafficking or whatever it was with young ladies,
Speaker 1: that they're still soliciting campaign donations. Nobody's asking them any
Speaker 1: questions about it. Donald Trump threw this guy out on
Speaker 1: his ass and Palm Beach at Marlo Lago, at his club,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump praised the FBI, thank you for what you're doing.
Speaker 1: This guy has he needed to be caught, cooperated with
Speaker 1: and even spoke to law enforcement about Epstein to tell
Speaker 1: the truth about this guy. That part never gets brought
Speaker 1: up by the radical left. Now, if somebody has incriminating
Speaker 1: information on you, and you own a club and you're
Speaker 1: going to kick them out and humiliate them and embarrass
Speaker 1: them the way Trump did some what twenty five years ago,
Speaker 1: and it's a big deal. In Palm Beach, get kicked
Speaker 1: out of a club for bad behavior, then you would
Speaker 1: think that this information would have been released by a
Speaker 1: very vindictive, very angry Jeffrey Epstein. But there's never been
Speaker 1: anything to release or anything to say. So it makes
Speaker 1: you wonder anyway here to talk about this and talk
Speaker 1: about other national security issues like what happened in Mexico.
Speaker 1: This weekend, Mark Morgan is with his former FBI former
Speaker 1: acting Commissioner of CBP. Let's talk about what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Do you tie the rhetoric, For example, there's an eight
Speaker 1: thousand percent increase in threats in the last year against
Speaker 1: ICE agents. Do you tie that to the rhetoric? Do
Speaker 1: you tie incidents like what happened at mar Lago to
Speaker 1: the rhetoric of the radical left? Do you tie the
Speaker 1: fact that there there's been a eight hundred percent increase
Speaker 1: in ramming attempts against law enforcement. Do you tie that
Speaker 1: to what's happened, you know, with the rhetoric that's been
Speaker 1: ratcheted up. Do you tie other acts of violence which
Speaker 1: has gone of significantly against law enforcement and ICE agents
Speaker 1: in particular, Do you tie it to the rhetoric of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, which is consistently attacking these agents.
Speaker 3: Look, Shawn, I think just from a common sense perspective,
Speaker 3: it's a rhetorical question. I know you mean it that way.
Speaker 3: I mean that the answer is clear and the answer
Speaker 3: is yes, especially when you take an individual like this
Speaker 3: is this latest fascination attempted President Trump. I mean clearly,
Speaker 3: and most time when we see shooters like this, active shooters,
Speaker 3: there's going to be some sort of mental health issues.
Speaker 3: It's to varying degrees, right, And so when you've got
Speaker 3: a population like that and then you throw on this rhetoric,
Speaker 3: you take this this what I call unhealthy ideation, and
Speaker 3: it just exasperates everything. And then for those who who
Speaker 3: don't have a mental illness, what you do is you're
Speaker 3: fostering this belief that they have this moral high ground
Speaker 3: and that somehow then they move from that whole moral
Speaker 3: high ground that justifies action because why Sean, Because they're
Speaker 3: being told that this is about our our very essence
Speaker 3: of our of our our life, our democracies, and danger
Speaker 3: and they all this this stuff that is absolutely beyond
Speaker 3: the pale. And of course it's leading to a lot
Speaker 3: of what we're seeing right now. But I got to
Speaker 3: tell you, you know, you mentioned the sheriff. I think
Speaker 3: he did. I think he did a very good job
Speaker 3: in his first kind of press conference on this. It
Speaker 3: was it was fairly timely after the event. I think
Speaker 3: he was coming across it very generally transparent, and he
Speaker 3: was very very specific and the and the way that
Speaker 3: he was talking to make sure that what he was
Speaker 3: talking about was accurate. I mean, it really was kind
Speaker 3: of a I think, a masterclass in crisis one O one.
Speaker 3: But I think in the days to follow, you're we're
Speaker 3: going to hear a little bit about more about this
Speaker 3: young man. And I think we're going to hear something
Speaker 3: about some degree of mental illness that that that unhealthy ideation,
Speaker 3: that that because in part the radicalization, heard that that
Speaker 3: he was really drawn to the Epstein issue.
Speaker 1: We are mentally ill people of a apt to susceptibility
Speaker 1: when people an authority keep telling them that maybe objects
Speaker 1: that they don't tend to like are Nazis and fascist
Speaker 1: and Gestapo.
Speaker 3: So that's exactly right, that's exactly my point. But even
Speaker 3: you know, some people are going to miss interprets all.
Speaker 3: So he's talked about all these people that are going
Speaker 3: out there and attacking you know, ice agents are are
Speaker 3: mental ill No, I'm not saying that, but to your
Speaker 3: point is spot on, is that there's there is a
Speaker 3: class of people here that are very susceptible, like you said,
Speaker 3: especially coming from people of power. But guess what, you
Speaker 3: don't even have to have a mental illness to be
Speaker 3: susceptible to that, right, I mean, how long have we
Speaker 3: been hearing that that if you if you are for
Speaker 3: the conservative movement, if you do support President Trump and
Speaker 3: some of the thing he's trying to do, that we're
Speaker 3: a basket of deplorable that we're you know again, that
Speaker 3: that the democracy is going to come to an end.
Speaker 3: We hear all this evil stuff, so people start to
Speaker 3: become radicalized and from radicalization to action because they're being
Speaker 3: told we have to act. The world's coming to an end,
Speaker 3: democracies coming to an end. The rhetoric just has to
Speaker 3: to stop. We have to take a deep breath, take
Speaker 3: a step back. But I don't see that happening, Sean.
Speaker 3: Every single time we see something like this, it seems
Speaker 3: to get worse. We maybe have a day where we
Speaker 3: take a break, but less than twenty four hour cycle,
Speaker 3: we're back to the same stuff.
Speaker 2: Let me ask you.
Speaker 1: Caroline Levett, White House Press Secretary, put out a post
Speaker 1: that the US provided intelligence support to the Mexican government
Speaker 1: to assist in this operation against this next generation drug
Speaker 1: lord narco terrorist called Elmentcho was a top target for
Speaker 1: the Mexican government and the United States government, one of
Speaker 1: the top traffickers of fentanyl into the US. President Trump
Speaker 1: rightfully designated this next generation cartel is a foreign terrorist organization.
Speaker 1: I'm glad America played a role in this. However, it's
Speaker 1: not playing out very well or particularly well in Mexico,
Speaker 1: and I know people there. We know twenty five Mexican
Speaker 1: National Guard troops have been killed in cartel violence in
Speaker 1: the wake of this operation that took down this drug
Speaker 1: cartel kingpin.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Look, John, We've seen this happen, you know, play
Speaker 3: out several times. You can look the past decade. The
Speaker 3: latest one was twenty nineteen. So went at Daryl Chapel's son, right,
Speaker 3: we saw the same thing. We saw the cartels bow
Speaker 3: up and show their might and they're willing to use
Speaker 3: violence and the Mexican Mexican government back down within a
Speaker 3: few hours and turn the sun back over. So what
Speaker 3: I'm hoping we're seeing like you said, there is no
Speaker 3: doubt in my mind that the United States is heavily
Speaker 3: involved in this because the Mexico long time ago not
Speaker 3: only a lost of political will, but they lost their
Speaker 3: capability capacity to actually buy themselves defeat their cartels. There's
Speaker 3: no way I think they would have done this without
Speaker 3: US assistance. And I'll go a step further, and I'll
Speaker 3: bet you that I'm going to be proven right on
Speaker 3: this is that it was also a promise by the
Speaker 3: United States to Mexico that We've got your back. Because
Speaker 3: you're seeing now what happened to that nineteen pales comparison
Speaker 3: to the really that the country wide violence that the
Speaker 3: cartel now is inflicting because of what the Mexican government
Speaker 3: did on them. But if I can real quick, here's
Speaker 3: a mistake we make. Though the cartels are one of
Speaker 3: the most I mean, their business acumen rivals most fortunate
Speaker 3: five hundred companies, and their ability to mobilize massive violet
Speaker 3: show of force rivals some nations militaries, but what we
Speaker 3: do in this country, we often only think about drugs
Speaker 3: and cartels.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: We often refer to as the Mexican drug cartels. That's
Speaker 3: not true. I mean a huge portion of their business
Speaker 3: is human smuggling. During the Biden administration, the ten million
Speaker 3: people that enter a country illegally, plus another couple of
Speaker 3: million guideways known and unknown, that the cartels reaped. That
Speaker 3: I'm being conservatively, that's about forty billion dollars just on
Speaker 3: human smuggling. Forty billion dollars. That's more than some country gds.
Speaker 3: That's almost the entire budget of the United States a
Speaker 3: marine corps. Think about that, and they're taking that money
Speaker 3: to forty billion on human smuggler loans, put it back
Speaker 3: into their organization to expand other operations life drugs and
Speaker 3: synthetic drugs coming into this country. That's why we have
Speaker 3: to talk about when we talk about the cartel's not
Speaker 3: just drugs, it's also human smuggling. And that's why what
Speaker 3: President's doing on that front is absolutely essential to our
Speaker 3: safety and national security.
Speaker 1: Where do you think those ends in Mexico? Because I
Speaker 1: don't think. I think that the Mexican government watched what
Speaker 1: happened with Maduro, and I think that got scared. It's
Speaker 1: the only reason they acted.
Speaker 3: Look I I one agree, and on top of that, again,
Speaker 3: I think they've got that commitment. We've never seen this shot. Look,
Speaker 3: the military's dabbled in it, but not until this administration
Speaker 3: have we seen the robust military support. Look ag Barr,
Speaker 3: he said it best. You know, this is a couple
Speaker 3: of years ago and he said, look, the only way
Speaker 3: that we're going to defeat the cartel is if the
Speaker 3: United States military gets involved. And that's the support. Not
Speaker 3: tanks in the ground, not boosts on the ground. But
Speaker 3: this is really kinetic, precision surgical operations assisting the Mexican government,
Speaker 3: just like we did Plan Colombia. I hope that's what
Speaker 3: we're seeing the beginning of, because I don't think without it,
Speaker 3: I don't think the Mexican cover government would have done that,
Speaker 3: especially what happened in twenty nineteen. And I think we're
Speaker 3: going to see shortly here, We're going to see shortly.
Speaker 3: We're going to see if the Mexican government backs down
Speaker 3: or not. If they don't back down, we know the
Speaker 3: United States America and the military is absolutely supporting, and
Speaker 3: that's exactly what needs to be done. We have to
Speaker 3: defeat the cartels if we're going to be safe, if
Speaker 3: our NASA security is going to be where it should be,
Speaker 3: in this country. The cartels have to be wiped off
Speaker 3: the face of the planet, full.
Speaker 1: Stop, and said any better. Mark Morgan, thank you for
Speaker 1: your time. I always appreciate you. Eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one. Shawn is on number. You want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, all right, Obviously, all eyes
Speaker 1: on the Middle East, Iran, Israel. What's going to happen
Speaker 1: the Iranians saber rattling have been for a couple of
Speaker 1: weeks now, and it looks like if the President wants
Speaker 1: to take military action, he's in every position to do so.
Speaker 1: And Israel is back in the news and they will
Speaker 1: probably bear the brunt of the attacks from the Iranians
Speaker 1: because they're the more local target. Death to Israel, death
Speaker 1: to America. But anyway, with so many opinions of motions
Speaker 1: surrounding it, you know, it's hard to know where to start.
Speaker 1: But you know, anti Semitism sadly is worse than it's
Speaker 1: ever been. You see it on college campuses, the halls
Speaker 1: of Congress, you know, you see it in you know,
Speaker 1: hear it on air.
Speaker 2: It's it's everywhere.
Speaker 1: It's growing worldwide, and at a time when Jewish communities
Speaker 1: are experiencing more hostility, more threats, more violence than ever
Speaker 1: we as Christians, if you're a Christian, you have a
Speaker 1: powerful opportunity to respond with God's love and stand by Israel.
Speaker 1: And we do so proudly. On this program we honor
Speaker 1: the room of our faith. We believe we were. This
Speaker 1: country was founded on Judeo Christian principles and it's more
Speaker 1: than a belief. And by partnering with the IFCJ, the
Speaker 1: International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, you know now we
Speaker 1: are pushing back against the darkness, the ignorance, the hatred.
Speaker 1: And you can join us and bless is Rail and
Speaker 1: stand with them in their time and need. Please go
Speaker 1: to the IFCJ website IFCJ dot org one word today,
Speaker 1: IFCJ dot org, and they could use your help. They're
Speaker 1: on the ground, they're providing tons of support for so
Speaker 1: many people that have been suffering, you know, ever since
Speaker 1: October seventh, twenty twenty three. I want to go back
Speaker 1: to Linda. You enjoying this Gavin Newsom fight we've been
Speaker 1: having all day?
Speaker 2: Oh he is special? Does that mean you're actually.
Speaker 1: Found somebody that you hate more than me? So you're
Speaker 1: going to take my side?
Speaker 5: I like that him and his hair, Joe can just
Speaker 5: I mean, shove it where the sun don't shine. What
Speaker 5: a terrible human.
Speaker 1: So anyway, he was, he's at this town hall. I
Speaker 1: guess he's being interviewed. I mean, and this is part
Speaker 1: of a post that I put up here. This guy
Speaker 1: is unbelievable. I mean, does he does he ever work?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm serious, does this guy ever work? It
Speaker 1: is amazing. This man is now a full time world traveler.
Speaker 1: He's in Davos, he's in Munich. He's a full time
Speaker 1: ex poster. I mean, spending his morning, you know, in
Speaker 1: late night, I guess, and morning, you know, fighting me
Speaker 1: on X, which I'm perfectly happy doing, you know, full
Speaker 1: time Trump stalker. Trump's on his mind twenty four to seven,
Speaker 1: full time podcaster. Now he's got some stupid book that
Speaker 1: he's trying to sell.
Speaker 2: No show. Governor.
Speaker 1: And if he really gave an Adam Schiff about the
Speaker 1: people of California, I think he'd be making sure that
Speaker 1: fire hydrants out in cal California, and reservoirs had water
Speaker 1: for predictable wildfires and predictable Santa Anna winds, and they
Speaker 1: practiced the science of forestry, considering liberals loved to quote
Speaker 1: the science, especially him during COVID. Well, that's right, he
Speaker 1: was in the French laundry and his kids were having
Speaker 1: in person learning because they didn't go to public schools
Speaker 1: like the rest of the kids in California. And maybe
Speaker 1: be thinking about, you know, fixing those problems, lowering taxes,
Speaker 1: resolving the homeless mess that he swore back in two
Speaker 1: thousand and eight.
Speaker 2: He had a plan to fix it.
Speaker 1: And they have the worst when it comes to education
Speaker 1: K through twelve, like close to forty in the country.
Speaker 1: It's like one of the worst in the country. You know,
Speaker 1: in spite of taking him more revenues than any other
Speaker 1: state in the country, they'd fix the broken education system.
Speaker 1: They're billions in debt because of all the money and
Speaker 1: programs and that they give in reward illegal immigrants. And
Speaker 1: of course there are those people that commit crimes. They
Speaker 1: don't keep statistics out in California, crimes committed by illegals
Speaker 1: against American citizens. Why do you think that is because
Speaker 1: they don't want you to know. In my view, they'd
Speaker 1: stop rewarding and protecting illegal immigrants with sanctuary state and
Speaker 1: city protections. It's bankrupting the state. Some of these people
Speaker 1: are committing violent crimes against citizens of this country in
Speaker 1: the state of California. And as I told him, spare
Speaker 1: me your phony lectures about his impoverished life, you know,
Speaker 1: because he also had another life, all right. Granted, his
Speaker 1: parents got divorced, and maybe his mother did struggle. I
Speaker 1: have no reason to doubt that. But he also had
Speaker 1: a father and apparently was close to the Getty family,
Speaker 1: one of the wealthiest families at the time in the country,
Speaker 1: and they included him in a lot of extravagant trips.
Speaker 1: And I doubt most Americans went on a safari abroad
Speaker 1: the way he did, and other perks that he had
Speaker 1: in his life. Anyway, here's what he said now in
Speaker 1: this context, because people have been going after I'm hard.
Speaker 1: They're all over x today. He's telling the Atlanta Mayor
Speaker 1: Andre Dickens during a Sunday night event promoting his forthcoming book,
Speaker 1: Young Man in a Hurry, And this is what he said.
Speaker 6: I'm not you know, I'm not trying to impress you.
Speaker 6: I'm just trying to impress upon you. I'm like you.
Speaker 6: I'm no better than you. You know, I'm a nine
Speaker 6: sixty sat guy and you know, and I'm not trying
Speaker 6: to offend anyone, you know, trying to act all there.
Speaker 6: If you got nine forty, but literally a nine sixty SAT, guy,
Speaker 6: I cannot You you've never seen me read a speech,
Speaker 6: because I cannot read a speech. Maybe the wrong business
Speaker 6: to be.
Speaker 1: So he thinks that what a nine to sixty SAT
Speaker 1: score makes him more like African Americans? Is that what
Speaker 1: he's implying is he's being interviewed by an African American
Speaker 1: And I just wrote Let that sink in.
Speaker 2: Let people decide. Remember when Biden said this about poor kids.
Speaker 3: We have this notion that somehow, if you're poor, you
Speaker 3: cannot do it.
Speaker 5: Poor kids are just as bright and just as talent
Speaker 5: as white kids, wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids.
Speaker 6: I really need it. But think how we think about it.
Speaker 2: Oh, we think about it, right right, Linda. It's pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 5: The thing is, and I don't know how you feel
Speaker 5: about this, I can surmise, but you know, he's coming
Speaker 5: back and saying, Oh, the crowd wasn't black, it was
Speaker 5: mostly white. I'm like, why do the people in the
Speaker 5: crowd have anything to do with the ridiculous things You're saying,
Speaker 5: I don't care if the room was empty and you
Speaker 5: were just doing an interview. What you said was god awful.
Speaker 5: Has nothing to do with the people in the crowd,
Speaker 5: whether it.
Speaker 2: Was mostly they got awful. Who cares?
Speaker 5: That has nothing to do with it.
Speaker 1: So then he doesn't like that I highlight this, and
Speaker 1: then he attacks me about the video that the president
Speaker 1: put out that also had, you know, the one second
Speaker 1: video of former President Obama and his wife. And then
Speaker 1: I wrote him back, I said, you didn't give an
Speaker 1: Adam schiff about Joe Biden. You were Joe Biden's public spokesperson,
Speaker 1: knowing Biden partnered with the former klansman Robert KKK Bird
Speaker 1: that tried to prevent the integration of public schools. Spare
Speaker 1: me your effing fake phone paid outrage. He's cursing at
Speaker 1: me a lot in this thing. Now it got interesting.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you noticed this twitch he actually
Speaker 1: did in an analysis of this because so many people
Speaker 1: were following this and it was trending so long today
Speaker 1: and the headline is he knows he's toasts. Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: flips out on Sean Hannity and curse filled post about
Speaker 1: his racist gaff not my problem. That's the way other
Speaker 1: people are chronicling it. But Gavin Kevin doesn't doesn't like
Speaker 1: the truth being told to him, you know, just doesn't care.
Speaker 1: And so you know, spare me, his his his outrage.
Speaker 1: But when he started cursing at me, then all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, a bunch of people started engaging, you know,
Speaker 1: Tim Scott, Ted Cruz. Tim Scott says Sean Hannity's absolutely right,
Speaker 1: Gavin Nussen suffers from the bigotry of low expectations. And
Speaker 1: I'm tired of Democrats, including the likes of Kathy Hochele
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden's stereotyping black black people. That's Tim Scott
Speaker 1: and apparently making Nicki Minaj went hard at Gavin after
Speaker 1: he said this. His way of bonding with black people
Speaker 1: is to tell them how stupid he is and that
Speaker 1: he can't read. And that means my first read on
Speaker 1: him was correct. He's been handed so many things and
Speaker 1: put in high positions he's never earned or deserved. And
Speaker 1: you know, I want to know the craziest part of
Speaker 1: this footage, It will haunt him forever. He literally slowing
Speaker 1: his speech down, and it just is it just exposes Democrats. Now,
Speaker 1: this is the party that often loves to you see it.
Speaker 1: I say, every two years and every four years, every
Speaker 1: election cycle, you're gonna you're gonna get the race card played.
Speaker 1: Republicans are racist, they're sexist, they're misogynists, they're homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: They they want dirty air and water, and they want
Speaker 1: to kill grandma and grandpa. All right, let's get to
Speaker 1: our busy phones. Eight hundred ninety four one, Shawn is number.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Walter is in Massachusetts. Walter, Hi, how are you glad
Speaker 1: you call?
Speaker 7: Thank you for taking the carms for handity. I just
Speaker 7: want to start by saying, my wife and I are
Speaker 7: big fans and we watch you almost every night. But uh,
Speaker 7: that we had is if the Democrats are that inconsiderate
Speaker 7: that they're not they're going to boycott President Trump's State
Speaker 7: of the Union, why don't they fill the empty seeds
Speaker 7: or even just their seats with uh, angel families or
Speaker 7: pictures of the people that have been killed by these
Speaker 7: illegals in the last eight years.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's a bad idea at all, But
Speaker 1: you know what, you're going to get the same exact
Speaker 1: non response from Democrats you got last year when Lincoln
Speaker 1: Riley and Jocelyn Nungary's family were invited. You're going to
Speaker 1: get the same exact reaction.
Speaker 4: I promise you I would put those pictures somewhere so
Speaker 4: that when they when they span the crowd or even
Speaker 4: the president, these people that have lost.
Speaker 7: Loved ones will be remembered. And the only other thing
Speaker 7: I want to say to you, it seems to me
Speaker 7: that this country was dead for full years and since
Speaker 7: President Trump took over, everybody woke up, and now they
Speaker 7: hate authority across the country. It's like anybody that has
Speaker 7: any kind of authority, they protest and they hate it.
Speaker 7: So we just don't understand why there's so much hatred.
Speaker 7: And I really appreciate you taking our call, and I
Speaker 7: hope something can change in the next three years.
Speaker 2: It can.
Speaker 1: The progress will only continue if you and everybody else
Speaker 1: in this audience, not just you, but you and everyone
Speaker 1: else makes a commitment that you're going to vote this
Speaker 1: midterm election year and you're not going to allow the
Speaker 1: great progress we're making to stop. Because if Democrats get elected,
Speaker 1: they're going to be the party that will stop all progress,
Speaker 1: the party of never ending investigation and impeachment. And there
Speaker 1: will be it will be like a full It'll be
Speaker 1: not only a government shutdown'll be the country will shut down.
Speaker 2: Progress will end.
Speaker 1: It'd be a disaster anyway, Walter, appreciate you, man, Right
Speaker 1: quick break, right back, we'll continue. More of your phone
Speaker 1: calls coming up. Eight hundred and nine four one, sewn
Speaker 1: as we continue this Monday straight ahead.
Speaker 7: The final hour roundup is next.
Speaker 1: You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
Speaker 1: for the final hour free for all on the Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show. Right back to our busy phones. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one, Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Chris in Connecticut, Hey, Chris,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called?
Speaker 8: Hey, Sean, thanks for taking my call. Been listening for
Speaker 8: twenty five years and the first time I've ever called.
Speaker 8: I wanted to go back to the tariffs for a minute,
Speaker 8: and that conservatives just don't exploit language in the legal
Speaker 8: sense that I think we really ought to. You look
Speaker 8: at this tariff decision and what John Roberts said, I
Speaker 8: think you seriously blurred the line between indirect and direct taxes,
Speaker 8: potentially setting the stage for litigation that could even potentially
Speaker 8: update or excuse me, up end not only the progressive
Speaker 8: tax system, but all the fees that are charged, which
Speaker 8: are now, in my opinion, completely in question because those
Speaker 8: are no different than a tariff. It's a cost to consumers,
Speaker 8: it's indirect, and now all of a sudden, it's defined.
Speaker 7: As a tax.
Speaker 8: If a tax is defined as a tariff and they're
Speaker 8: the same thing, then Article one, section eight says it has.
Speaker 3: To be uniform.
Speaker 8: So you've got that type of thing. And then on
Speaker 8: top of that, you know again, legal language is everything.
Speaker 8: Democrats are great at exploiting this stuff. You look at
Speaker 8: Article four, Section four. You can't have you can't have
Speaker 8: anything but a republican form of government. Well, how is mom,
Speaker 8: Donnie not being challenged on this particular thing exactly? That
Speaker 8: language and the constitution. These are things that the conservatives
Speaker 8: are just so bad at doing, and Democrats always wind
Speaker 8: up exploiting. You've got to get these things in the
Speaker 8: legislation and you have to attack all these potential points. Now,
Speaker 8: even if it fails, you get the idea out there
Speaker 8: and you get these people to litigate to try to
Speaker 8: change back to the originalist, textualist way of the Constitution.
Speaker 8: Indirect taxes versus direct taxes have been ruled on. It's
Speaker 8: nowhere in the Constitution.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: I don't really thought of that aspect of it, but
Speaker 1: I will tell you this, and it's what I said
Speaker 1: on Friday. I'll just reiterate it, and others now picked
Speaker 1: up on it. The Washington Journal at a good piece.
Speaker 1: The headline was havin our descent gives Trump a tariff
Speaker 1: workaround to all but undo the Supreme Court ruling. And
Speaker 1: I go back to what he said in his descent
Speaker 1: that the statutes, and he specifically named them, the Trade
Speaker 1: Expansion Act, the sixty two section two thirty two, the
Speaker 1: Trade Act of seventy four, sections one twenty two to
Speaker 1: twoh one and three ZHO one, the Terriff Act of
Speaker 1: nineteen thirty, section three thirty eight. In essence, the Court
Speaker 1: today concludes the President checked the wrong statutory box rather
Speaker 1: than another statute, who imposed these tariffs? And what actually
Speaker 1: is interesting about this, and Scott Bessont made this point
Speaker 1: as well, is that the Supreme Court is actually giving
Speaker 1: the president a stronger hand because otherwise the President's actions
Speaker 1: when when he ruled under the International Emergency Economic Powers
Speaker 1: Act that would have expired when his term expired. Under
Speaker 1: the use of what Kavanaugh is suggesting, it doesn't expire,
Speaker 1: so in essence, it is stronger. It's going to be
Speaker 1: what I said, It's not going to be the issue
Speaker 1: that democrats, liberals the left want it to be. And
Speaker 1: that's my prediction, and I think you bring up some
Speaker 1: good points too, though we definitely worth thinking about. Appreciate
Speaker 1: to call my friend Chris in Connecticut. Don't wait twenty
Speaker 1: five years to call back.