1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,920
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Benchmark is brought to you by Stage Summit, the

2
00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:06,760
Speaker 1: world's largest gathering of small and medium businesses, featuring Sir

3
00:00:06,880 --> 00:00:12,040
Speaker 1: Richard Branson. July in Chicago. Register with promo code business

4
00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:22,880
Speaker 1: at stage summit dot com for just ninety dollars. Hello,

5
00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,320
Speaker 1: and welcome back to the Bloomberg Benchmark podcast show about

6
00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:31,840
Speaker 1: the global economy. It's July. I'm Scott Landman and economics

7
00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:35,120
Speaker 1: editor for Bloomberg News in Washington. Today we're bringing you

8
00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:39,000
Speaker 1: a special bonus edition devoted to the Federal Reserves meeting

9
00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:41,960
Speaker 1: this week. Joining me in our DC studio are my

10
00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:46,120
Speaker 1: colleagues Chris Condon and Ginas Smilek, who cover the Federal Reserve.

11
00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:52,880
Speaker 1: Al Right, the Federal release its interest rate decision on Wednesday. Now,

12
00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:55,600
Speaker 1: no rate hike is expected, and we're just going to

13
00:00:55,640 --> 00:00:58,920
Speaker 1: get a statement with no press conference from Chair Janet Yellen.

14
00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:02,240
Speaker 1: So what should we care about? We're going to tell

15
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:05,600
Speaker 1: you the five things you need to know. Chris, you

16
00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:10,160
Speaker 1: lead off with number one, jobs and the economy. So

17
00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:12,120
Speaker 1: right off the top of the statement, we're going to

18
00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:15,360
Speaker 1: get this usual assessment of the economic conditions, and I

19
00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:18,760
Speaker 1: think right there we're gonna start with a pretty positive

20
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,600
Speaker 1: note overall economic conditions. Now, remember, I think it's important

21
00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:26,240
Speaker 1: to remember the first quarter of this year was pretty disappointing.

22
00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:31,320
Speaker 1: The second quarter was a fairly good rebound, and already

23
00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:34,880
Speaker 1: by June we saw the Committee saying that economic activity

24
00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:37,640
Speaker 1: appeared to have picked up. They have more reason for

25
00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:40,559
Speaker 1: a little more confidence, I think now this meeting Scott,

26
00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:45,080
Speaker 1: from the numbers, we're seeing growth on an annualized basis

27
00:01:45,120 --> 00:01:48,240
Speaker 1: in the second quarter could be over two percent, and

28
00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,160
Speaker 1: some of the initial indications are that the third quarter

29
00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:54,840
Speaker 1: is also going pretty well. So there again we're going

30
00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:57,960
Speaker 1: to see something positive on the job side, to again

31
00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:02,600
Speaker 1: a positive signal. Again, let's step back. May was an

32
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:07,080
Speaker 1: absolutely stinker of an employment report, what eleven thousand new

33
00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:10,520
Speaker 1: jobs in that month, but rebounded very strongly in June

34
00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:15,280
Speaker 1: two eighty seven thousand. Now, the Committee is not likely

35
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:18,800
Speaker 1: to sort of swing wildly from one reaction to another.

36
00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:24,840
Speaker 1: There more likely to somehow acknowledge that the trend, looking

37
00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:28,200
Speaker 1: at all of these, while slowing down a bit, is

38
00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:32,959
Speaker 1: still pretty positive, still strong enough to add jobs in

39
00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:36,440
Speaker 1: lower unemployment. So the takeaway from that is that that's

40
00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:39,400
Speaker 1: a sign that they that they might actually raise interest

41
00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:41,960
Speaker 1: rates this year, right, that would push them in that direction.

42
00:02:42,040 --> 00:02:46,320
Speaker 1: That's right, all right, Gina. Number two, what do they

43
00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:50,200
Speaker 1: say about global developments now that Brexit has shaken things up?

44
00:02:50,639 --> 00:02:52,720
Speaker 1: So the global outlook is going to be a major

45
00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:55,600
Speaker 1: focal point at this meeting, And like you said, because

46
00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:57,880
Speaker 1: of Brexit, what we saw in the June meeting is

47
00:02:57,880 --> 00:02:59,840
Speaker 1: the FED was giving us an indication that is going

48
00:02:59,880 --> 00:03:04,120
Speaker 1: to continue to closely monitor global developments. Now we've since

49
00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:06,600
Speaker 1: that meeting, we've had the Brexit, so British vote to

50
00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,200
Speaker 1: exit the European Union, and we know that that could

51
00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:13,080
Speaker 1: introduce a lot of uncertainty going forward because obviously they

52
00:03:13,120 --> 00:03:15,400
Speaker 1: still have to negotiate the terms of that now. At

53
00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,560
Speaker 1: the same time, we've heard from quite a few FED

54
00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:20,640
Speaker 1: officials that they're not overly concerned about Brexit, you know,

55
00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:23,359
Speaker 1: they think it could be sort of something marginal to

56
00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:25,520
Speaker 1: the U. S economy, but it does introduce a lot

57
00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:28,360
Speaker 1: of uncertainty into the outlook. So I think what kind

58
00:03:28,400 --> 00:03:31,720
Speaker 1: of indication we see around Brexit, whether there's any sort

59
00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:33,880
Speaker 1: of explicit reference to it, is going to be a

60
00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:37,800
Speaker 1: really strong either devish or hawkish signal. Okay, let's go

61
00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:41,800
Speaker 1: back to Christopher number three, what do they say about

62
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:45,480
Speaker 1: the pace of rate hikes and their timing? Right? So here,

63
00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,680
Speaker 1: I think we're gonna run up into the problem of

64
00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:55,920
Speaker 1: very short and rather vague, sometimes purposefully vague statement. What

65
00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:58,040
Speaker 1: do we see in June? We saw this that the

66
00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:02,080
Speaker 1: committee expects that anomic conditions will evolve in a manner

67
00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:06,560
Speaker 1: that will warrant only gradual increases in federal funds rate.

68
00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:09,560
Speaker 1: Probably reasonable to expect that they're going to keep that

69
00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:15,480
Speaker 1: exact language in there, so we don't learn anything explicitly new.

70
00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:19,000
Speaker 1: But at the same time, we know that there will

71
00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:23,160
Speaker 1: be a debate going on about how many times they

72
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:26,720
Speaker 1: should be prepared to raise interest rates this year, with

73
00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:31,039
Speaker 1: some of the Hawks arguing, like Esther George from Kansas

74
00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:34,480
Speaker 1: City Loretta Master from Cleveland, who are both voters this year,

75
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:38,440
Speaker 1: they'll likely be urging the committee to keep the door

76
00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:43,279
Speaker 1: open for a September rate increase. Others will be arguing

77
00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:46,320
Speaker 1: more dubbish ly that perhaps the Fed may not be

78
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:49,560
Speaker 1: able to raise at all this year. Where does the

79
00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:52,640
Speaker 1: center of the committee fall, Where does chair yell and fall?

80
00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:58,000
Speaker 1: We don't really know, and we're unlikely to learn anything

81
00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:02,040
Speaker 1: very specific from the state. One thing we do know

82
00:05:02,200 --> 00:05:05,320
Speaker 1: about this committee under Janet Yellen, they do like to

83
00:05:05,400 --> 00:05:09,000
Speaker 1: keep their options open. So I think it's fair to

84
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:12,520
Speaker 1: expect that we're not going to get language that rules

85
00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:16,440
Speaker 1: out September. But neither are we going to get language

86
00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:21,440
Speaker 1: that explicitly signals us that they're likely to move in September.

87
00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:23,600
Speaker 1: But if they don't change the language at all, then

88
00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:26,320
Speaker 1: people are going to take If they don't actively signal

89
00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:28,560
Speaker 1: that they're probably going to move in September, people are

90
00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:31,040
Speaker 1: probably going to think that they're going to skip that, right,

91
00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:35,320
Speaker 1: They could well do that. One thing to bear in mind, though,

92
00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:40,479
Speaker 1: if additional really strong data does come in after this

93
00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:43,719
Speaker 1: meeting and the Fed thinks that they're going to have

94
00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:47,080
Speaker 1: to prepare the markets for a move in September. Janet

95
00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:50,720
Speaker 1: Yellen is scheduled to speak in late August in Jackson Hole,

96
00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:54,680
Speaker 1: Wyoming at the Kansas City FEDS Annual Symposium. That will

97
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:58,279
Speaker 1: be very closely watched. She'll have all the opportunity in

98
00:05:58,279 --> 00:06:01,480
Speaker 1: the world to give a different and signal. At that point, Gina,

99
00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:05,359
Speaker 1: you're up for number four. Inflation is still low and

100
00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:08,640
Speaker 1: bond yields have fallen even further since the last meeting,

101
00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:12,320
Speaker 1: What could they say about this? You know, the fact,

102
00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:14,600
Speaker 1: as you mentioned, inflation is still low, bond yields have

103
00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:16,880
Speaker 1: fallen lower. I think that gives them a lot of room,

104
00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:20,640
Speaker 1: um to remain cautious about inflation. UM. So we have

105
00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:23,440
Speaker 1: seen a core inflation in particular start to move up

106
00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:27,039
Speaker 1: a little bit. But in their past statement they mentioned that,

107
00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:29,360
Speaker 1: you know, inflation has continued to run below the committees

108
00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,760
Speaker 1: to percent longer run objective, and you know that allowed

109
00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:34,520
Speaker 1: them to sort of still take their time with hiking.

110
00:06:35,000 --> 00:06:37,479
Speaker 1: And I think that that status quo sort of still

111
00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:40,760
Speaker 1: stands because even as core inflation moves up, there are

112
00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:42,960
Speaker 1: all these factors that are keeping it down on the

113
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:45,520
Speaker 1: edges um, and I think that they're going to take

114
00:06:45,520 --> 00:06:47,560
Speaker 1: all the room and back and give them. So that

115
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,880
Speaker 1: would probably be a factor in not raising rates any

116
00:06:50,920 --> 00:06:53,920
Speaker 1: time immediately, right right, absolutely. I think in a world

117
00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:56,000
Speaker 1: where you're worried about job growth, you're worried about the

118
00:06:56,200 --> 00:06:59,960
Speaker 1: global economic outlook, the fact that inflation still remains subdued

119
00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:01,839
Speaker 1: means that you don't have to be in any hurry

120
00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:05,120
Speaker 1: to move those rates up really quickly. All right. Finally,

121
00:07:05,240 --> 00:07:10,320
Speaker 1: number five, the actual vote it was unanimous last time

122
00:07:10,320 --> 00:07:13,240
Speaker 1: in favor of leaving rates unchanged. What do you think

123
00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:15,920
Speaker 1: is going to happen this time? I think many people

124
00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:20,080
Speaker 1: will expect the previous dissenter, Esther George to return to

125
00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:23,440
Speaker 1: that column. I in fact, was out to Lake Ozark,

126
00:07:23,520 --> 00:07:26,760
Speaker 1: Missouri a couple of weeks ago and heard her speak. Um.

127
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:31,000
Speaker 1: That was after the June meeting, and Esther acknowledged that

128
00:07:31,040 --> 00:07:34,000
Speaker 1: at that June meeting she she voted with the rest

129
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,240
Speaker 1: of the committee out of her concerns about the main

130
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:42,120
Speaker 1: jobs report and the then pending Brexit vote. Um. But

131
00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:45,520
Speaker 1: since those things, because of the June jobs report, because

132
00:07:45,520 --> 00:07:47,920
Speaker 1: of how markets had calmed down after the vote in

133
00:07:47,920 --> 00:07:52,160
Speaker 1: the UK, that she was back basically to her usual

134
00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:57,040
Speaker 1: stump speech about the risks of moving too late. So

135
00:07:57,120 --> 00:08:01,440
Speaker 1: I think it's fairly reasonable to expect a descent from her.

136
00:08:01,480 --> 00:08:03,160
Speaker 1: I think do you think that as well? Yeah, I

137
00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:05,560
Speaker 1: think that's accurate. And you know, another person of interest

138
00:08:05,640 --> 00:08:09,000
Speaker 1: at this meeting I think is James Bullard. So he

139
00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:11,760
Speaker 1: at the after the last meeting released a special statement

140
00:08:11,760 --> 00:08:13,600
Speaker 1: where he said, you know, I think we have one

141
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:16,360
Speaker 1: more rate increase and then we're pretty much on hold.

142
00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:18,840
Speaker 1: And he didn't say when that one rate increase should be.

143
00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,120
Speaker 1: And so I was at a press groom with him

144
00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:22,760
Speaker 1: the other day, and you know, he got the question,

145
00:08:22,880 --> 00:08:24,760
Speaker 1: why wait, you know, if you expect one more to

146
00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:26,840
Speaker 1: be necessary, why not just go ahead and do it?

147
00:08:27,280 --> 00:08:29,680
Speaker 1: Um And so I think some some focus is going

148
00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:32,360
Speaker 1: to be focused on him, just you know, is he

149
00:08:32,440 --> 00:08:33,960
Speaker 1: going to be is he going to descend? Is he

150
00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:35,280
Speaker 1: going to say we ought to just go ahead and

151
00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:38,080
Speaker 1: do this one rate increase. But it's interesting because his

152
00:08:38,160 --> 00:08:40,760
Speaker 1: reply to this question was, you know, I move on

153
00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:43,520
Speaker 1: good news. I only move on good news. And it

154
00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:45,400
Speaker 1: seems to me like we haven't had the kind of

155
00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:48,080
Speaker 1: good news he'd be looking for. But it should be

156
00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:50,160
Speaker 1: interesting to watch that vote and how that plays out.

157
00:08:50,520 --> 00:08:52,800
Speaker 1: So in that case, I would say we we kind

158
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,800
Speaker 1: of take in favor of raising rates, uh sooner given

159
00:08:56,800 --> 00:08:59,640
Speaker 1: that if Esther George switches back to it. Is that

160
00:08:59,720 --> 00:09:04,800
Speaker 1: fair marginally? So? Yes? Alright? Well overall, I think from

161
00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:09,320
Speaker 1: that I counted slightly more factors in favor of keeping

162
00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:13,200
Speaker 1: rates on hold for the next meeting or so rather

163
00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:16,560
Speaker 1: than moving closer to a rate increase. Is that fair?

164
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:18,760
Speaker 1: I think that's what we're hearing and I you know,

165
00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:21,920
Speaker 1: one thing to caution is, no one's really expecting a

166
00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:25,160
Speaker 1: rate increase this month. Obviously, everyone is looking at what

167
00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:26,960
Speaker 1: this is going to mean for September and how it's

168
00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:28,880
Speaker 1: going to set September up. And I think what we're

169
00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:32,280
Speaker 1: hearing is the feed is probably not going to really

170
00:09:32,320 --> 00:09:34,880
Speaker 1: really bring September onto the table. That that's what economists

171
00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:37,080
Speaker 1: are telling me, not yet, and and and don't forget

172
00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,440
Speaker 1: they'll repeat their refrain, maybe not in the statement, but

173
00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:44,120
Speaker 1: they'll be very soon repeating their refrain that their data dependent.

174
00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:46,720
Speaker 1: They will want to see more data, and there will

175
00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:53,760
Speaker 1: be some significant economic data coming in between this meeting

176
00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:56,800
Speaker 1: and the meeting in September. And one thing that Chris

177
00:09:56,840 --> 00:10:00,000
Speaker 1: continually cautions me to remember, which is a really good point,

178
00:10:00,559 --> 00:10:03,480
Speaker 1: is while the FED lights to signal rate rate increases

179
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:05,600
Speaker 1: before they happen, they are going to have Jackson Hole

180
00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:07,880
Speaker 1: to do it this time. So there's no real pressure

181
00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:09,880
Speaker 1: for them to get that in this statement because they'll

182
00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:12,400
Speaker 1: have more messaging time in between now and the next meeting,

183
00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:15,920
Speaker 1: and that takes place in late August, right right exactly, Well,

184
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:19,240
Speaker 1: that was really fascinating. Uh, we're all going to be

185
00:10:19,280 --> 00:10:22,880
Speaker 1: on the edge of our seats as always this Wednesday

186
00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:26,120
Speaker 1: at exactly two pm when the headlines hit our wire.

187
00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:29,720
Speaker 1: So thanks Chris, thanks Gina for taking the time to

188
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:33,559
Speaker 1: talk about this today. Awesome, Thanks Guy. Thanks. Benchmark will

189
00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:36,120
Speaker 1: be back with our regular episode later this week, and

190
00:10:36,280 --> 00:10:38,680
Speaker 1: until then, you can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal

191
00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:42,480
Speaker 1: and Bloomberg dot com, as well as on iTunes, pocket casts,

192
00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:45,440
Speaker 1: and Stitcher. You can talk to and follow us on Twitter.

193
00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:49,320
Speaker 1: Chris is at Chris ja Condon, Gina is at at

194
00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:52,480
Speaker 1: Gina Smile s M I A L E K, and

195
00:10:52,559 --> 00:10:55,280
Speaker 1: I'm at Scott Lanman s c O T T L

196
00:10:55,360 --> 00:11:03,160
Speaker 1: A N M A N. See you next time. Bloomberg

197
00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:05,720
Speaker 1: Benchmark is brought to you by Sage Summit, the world's

198
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:09,600
Speaker 1: largest gathering of small and medium businesses, featuring Sir Richard

199
00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:13,319
Speaker 1: Branson July twenty fifth to twenty eighth in Chicago. Registered

200
00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:15,960
Speaker 1: with promo code business at Sage Summit dot com for

201
00:11:16,040 --> 00:11:17,160
Speaker 1: just ninety nine dollars