WEBVTT - Why Private Assets Are Essential: Masters in Business with Stephanie Drescher

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry Ritholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 2>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie Dresher is Chief Client and Product development Officer at

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>private investment giant Apollo. She's been there for over twenty years.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 2>She spent a decade before that doing alternatives at JP Morgan.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>What a fascinating person. Apollo runs eight hundred and forty

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in client assets, and she has really not

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 2>over overseen the wealth division, but also worked on a

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>variety of geographies, new products. She's on everybody's Best off list,

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>She's been on the Baron's Women and Financial List, sits

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 2>inception every year. I thought this conversation was fascinating. If

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you're remotely interested in private equity, private debt, private credit,

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>private infrastructure, you'll find this conversation absolutely fascinating. With no

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>further ado Apollos, Stephanie Drescher, Stephanie Dresher, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Mary, happy to be here, Happy to have you.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to get into Apollo when your investment

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>philosophy in a bit, but before we do. I just

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 2>have to start with your background. Bachelors in Barnard at

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Columbia MBA from Columbia Business School. What was the original

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>career plan?

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I did always have finance in my sites, so undergrad

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>it was econ and psych. I joke that I use

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the psych in my day to day field way more

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>than the econ RaSE days. But there was always a

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>draw towards doing something in the financial kind of arena,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>interest in markets and the like. So very early internships

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>led me down that path.

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And I read somewhere in your background that you were

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly inspired to go into finance by your grandmother. Tell

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>us about that.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 3>That is true. So my father's mother live with us

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 3>for a time, and I believe or not, she was

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>born in the very very late eighteen hundreds, and while

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>her brother went on to become a doctor, she kept

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>out it an eighth grade education, and so the power

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 3>of education was always a core value and a focus

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.519
<v Speaker 3>of hers and my family. And she used to read

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street Journal cover to cover every day, super smart,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 3>loved tracking stocks, and so we started to track stocks together.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 3>And how old were you at this time? Oh, I

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know, maybe twelve, Okay, and in a very high

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 3>time way. We would put it up on the refrigerator

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and kind of see the changes and the holdings that

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>she had in her portfolio and sometimes overlapped with that

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>of my parents. That was the early.

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Start, so you get an MBA from Columbia. JP Morgan

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>was the first job right out of school.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>It was although there was a mentor right prior to

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>the JP Morgan opportunity that, believe it or not, I

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>started babysitting for this family and I didn't know what

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the mother did day to day until after a period

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 3>of time of babysitting. She looked at me and she said,

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.119
<v Speaker 3>I think your babysitting days are over. And I said,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you're trying about. And she said,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>I run a women led healthcare consulting firm. Would you

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>like an internship? And I practically fell off my chair

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 3>and I said, I would love an internship.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>How old are you at this time?

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>It was like late high school, maybe early college, early

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>early and it was the most amazing kind of opportunity

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>that someone could give me, right just seeing a professional

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 3>organization do its thing and all the analysis and client

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 3>relationship management that went into that so while I decided

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that healthcare wasn't my thing and consulting wasn't my thing,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>it was very an easy bridge to JP Morgan and

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the finance field.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 2>So when you started JP Morgan, what was the role,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>how did you what areas were you toiling in?

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 3>So I started with a rotational opportunity, which was terrific.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I had everything from fixed income research to private banking

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 3>in Geneva.

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Did you go to Switzerland?

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I did? Yeah. For about six months, I realized that

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I needed to buy all of my groceries during the

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 3>day because it was closed by the time I got

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 3>out of work, and then I liked to travel on weekends. Importantly, though,

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 3>and seriously, it was a terrific time in my life

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 3>to be more aware of time zones and cultural nuances

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 3>and really see kind of a client perspective outside of

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:17.119
<v Speaker 3>New York and the US.

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a big world.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Totally, yet it also can feel so small once you

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 3>start to travel and live elsewhere. So that was a

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 3>terrific opportunity. And then ultimately out of that rotational program,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>ended up in alternatives within the private bank, and then

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 3>we were off to the races.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 2>So alternatum's way back then, but before we leave Switzerland,

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I recall a vacation not too long ago to Lake

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Geneva and what's amazing, And we were in this hotel

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that used to be a castle, and like, you think

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 2>you have some understanding of the Gilded Age and old

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 2>money and then you see no, no, we mean five

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 2>hundred years. Yeah, it's just such a different io, so

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>different than here. Yeah, really really amazing. So you're in

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 2>the Alts group at JP Morgan. You stay at JP

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Morgan for a decade, tell us a little bit about

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the work you did there.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So it was very early days of speaking to families

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 3>around the world, the ultra high network. Clients of JP

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Morgan thought the role of alternatives in their portfolio, and

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I remember distinctly speaking about the core and satellite within

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>alternatives now kind of private markets as our nomenclature. But

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 3>it gave me such a great perspective in terms of

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the educational kind of foundation that we needed to set

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 3>first with those clients. And I see it now continuing

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 3>to play out. But my time at JP Morgan, and

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 3>it was a very fast ten ten years and an

0:06:53.080 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>amazing kind of training ground, was kind of assessment of

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>all the different private market strategies from private equity to

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 3>hedge funds to credit, and the seat was a combination

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>of the buyside, so kind of due diligence on the

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>managers we were going to put on platform and then

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>the cell side in terms of the educational component to

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>the end banker and client. Super Fun traveled around the

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 3>world speaking about how alts could factor in to return

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 3>profiles and diversifications, smoother volatility, all at a time when

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 3>private equity was not on the front page. Yeah, every day.

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>It was very early.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's contextualize a little bit. This is the mid to

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>late nineties and early two thousands. The stock market was

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 2>just screaming high or double digits, especially the last four

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>years of the nineties. What was it like then? How

0:07:55.480 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 2>receptive was the audience to you should consider the private markets?

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 2>How how much smaller was the whole space back then?

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was very early days and a very small fraction.

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I remember, you know, if we if we launched kind

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.239
<v Speaker 3>of one manager a quarter, it was a big deal.

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Now I feel like there are probably dozens kind of

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 3>on the shelf available for for clients every every day,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>every quarter. The but the transformation was starting to take

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 3>hold where there were especially the large families, recognizing the

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 3>return potential that a manager in alternatives could provide in

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 3>their portfolio, and they didn't want to rely. It was

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>very early, but they saw that they didn't want to

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 3>rely exclusively on public market exposure. So you know, when

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 3>we look at actually the percentage is in kind of

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>large family office clients today it matches or frankly exceeds

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 3>that of an institution, but it's still they started at

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>the ultra high net worth end so much earlier, kind

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of back in those days than most in wealth. So

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I think there were the likes of a JPMorgan client

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>base and a select number of other private banks did

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 3>start early in showcasing these opportunities, and the adoption as

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I traveled around the world was strong, but it was

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 3>still kind of storytelling and a lot of niche opportunities.

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Where I feel like we fast forward to today, people

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 3>recognize that private market solutions can play both the core

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 3>and satellite in their portfolios. It relates to a compliment

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 3>to the public market exposure.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 2>So you join Apollo in two thousand and four, I'm

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of curious a few years earlier we have the

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 2>dot com implosion. A few years later, we have the

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Great Financial Crisis. I hate when people call these, you know,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>once a century events because it seemed to happen a

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>lot more frequently than that. But how significant were those

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>giant public events to telling the story of, hey, here's

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 2>some private market investments that you don't have the same

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 2>sort of volatility and regular you know explosions.

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, you're you're right. They were such an incredibly

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>important backdrop to why alternatives, why private markets? And in fact,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>when I was still in my seat at JP Morgan,

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 3>but Apollo was offering then our private equity flagship fund five,

0:10:53.559 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the dot com boom was just at its tail and

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 3>was starting to fracture. You saw the signs, and Apollo

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 3>came onto the platform and was talking a value story,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>and for the first several weeks there wasn't as much

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 3>take up, and then as the market started to change dramatically,

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>there was this wake up call of whoa, you know what,

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>let's look at value again, And that kind of was

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the tell end of the of the story for that fundraise.

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Back around the two thousand period, fast forward to the

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Great Financial Crisis, it was such an incredible time at

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>that point, I was already in my apollo seat to

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>see the investment committee dynamic, and you know, there were

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>moments that, thankfully because we were so steeped on the

0:11:55.520 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 3>credit side in addition to obviously our view of private equity,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 3>where we could back up the truck on certain credits

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 3>with conviction. And I look back now with honestly such

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>pride for the decisions that were made in that period

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>of time, and frankly many subsequently during moments of dislocation

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 3>where they make it look so easy on the investment side,

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 3>but it actually takes so much work and rigor to

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 3>be in position to make those big investment calls in

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>those moments in time. But it served us incredibly well

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>and continues to even Liberation Day. Right post when the

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 3>market started to move materially, there wasn't that much time

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 3>within forty eight hours were there was kind of a

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 3>correction from the volatility that we saw on household issuers

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>and names. But thankfully, based on our scale and knowledge

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 3>of those capital structures, we were able to put about

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty five billion of dollars to work in just a

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>few days, and we're one of the biggest market participants

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 3>during that moment of dislocation.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mentioned high conviction investments. I recall in

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the mid to late two thousands, people tossed around the

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 2>phrase toxic assets, and my attitude was always, there's no

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 2>such thing as toxic assets. There are only toxic prices.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Everything discounted enough eventually becomes attractive.

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Look, we are one of our kind of taglines that

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 3>you'll hear internally and externally is purchase price matters.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred percent. What you pay for something is

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>going to have a giant impact on what the subsequent returns.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be totally and you know that that does.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>It does require discipline, especially when multiples are going to

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of stratospheric levels. But you know it has that

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 3>strategy has borne out in a very kind of productive

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>and successful way for us maintaining that discipline. But as

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you're saying, like spotting those moments where investments are mispriced

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>or not well understood, and being willing to deal with

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>that complexity at the right place, at the right price

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 3>in order to generate the outcome we want.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Really really interesting coming up, we continue our conversation with

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie Dresher, Apollo's chief client and Product development officer, discussing

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>her career at Apollo. I'm very ritults. You're listening to

0:14:46.040 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry Ridolts. You're

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>special guest this week is Stephanie Dresher. She is Apollo's

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Chief Client and Product Development Officer. Apollo runs about eight

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty billion dollars in client assets, So I

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 2>love this title, but I got to think people are wondering,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>what's a day in the life of Apollo's chief Client

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and Product development officer? Like it sounds like that's a

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>really wide bit of land.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 3>It's it's a fun job. So I've been at Apollo

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>now twenty one years, and when I first started, I

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 3>built out the institutional side of the business globally, so

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>sovereign well funds think the dB public pension plans, and

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>that was very much our core client base with an

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>episodic offering through a private bank or a wire from

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>time to time. As that market evolved and matured into

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 3>a very robust global business there, it was clear to

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Mark Rowan now CEO and I that at some point

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 3>complementing that institutional business with a wealth strategy was in

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 3>our future. We wanted to make sure, though, that we

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 3>chose the right moment to really lean in to wealth

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 3>because it does take a massive commitment, and I'm sure

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk more about it. So in my role, I

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>am fortunate enough to build out our business as it

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 3>relates to our client set of offerings, our product development,

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>as well as our partnerships with our distributors, with our investors,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and just making sure that as we continue to innovate,

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 3>wet our clients where they are and often kind of

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 3>co author the types of offerings that are most meaningful

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 3>to them. So in any given day, I get to

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 3>think about our set of products and what we're innovating.

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I get to speak with our clients and partners existing

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and prospects. I manage a large group of people and

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 3>our talent, and I lean in with a very keen

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 3>focus on culture, which means a lot to me.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's really interesting. How would you describe Apollo's culture

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and what do you do to help shape that?

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>So, look, since the day I join, there have been

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 3>certain common themes to our culture which I think have

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 3>always kind of propelled us forward as a firm now public,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 3>but very much feels like a partnership. And the first

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>one is making sure that we continue to innovate, to

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 3>feel very entrepreneurial, and to empower our people to kind

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 3>of find those opportunities and pursue them in an appropriate way.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 3>We manage the firm as a meritocracy, so we want

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>to give people responsibility and let them kind of really

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 3>kind of have the greatest impact that they can for

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 3>their own professional careers as well as for the firm.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>And we want to have a winning high performance culture,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 3>meaning you know, even with all the success that we've had,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>we want to maintain that, propel it forward and continue

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 3>that high level of performance. And importantly, we do it together,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 3>so it's not about any one person. I often say

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to my team, you know, it's we, not me, And

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that's really powerful. So when we bring everything that Apollo

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>has to offer, we call it kind of the one

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Apollo to any client situation or any goal. We can

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 3>use that power of the firm to be successful and

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 3>to allow us all to win.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 2>Really really interesting, you know. So the biggest complaint I

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 2>heard from various corporate executives during the pandemic was how

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>do we maintain the corporate culture We've spent so much

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>time and energy trying to build over the years. Suddenly

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>everybody's at home on a zoom call in their pajamas.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 2>How do you maintain corporate culture like that?

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 3>It is it's so important, frankly, whether we're all in

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 3>the office to maintain that culture or certainly the challenges

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 3>during during the pandemic making sure certainly during that during

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of that COVID period of creating forums, even if

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 3>it was remote, to maintain the connectivity was really important

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 3>to have different I remember many different kind of lunchtime

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 3>meetings that we would have on Zoom, or our family

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 3>community group would have different webinars where it was the

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 3>employee as parent and then their children frankly were involved

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 3>as well. So I think it's kind of forced fostering

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 3>that sense of community, even if it is in fact remote.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 3>And then thankfully once in office. I know, as I

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 3>was passing through the sixth floor here at Bloomberg, I

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>saw the very deliberate kind of floor plan that you

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 3>have and food and beverage kind of accessible to employees.

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Everybody has to go through six It causes all these

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>random meetings that you have. Oh, I haven't seen all

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 2>the time. How's everything going? Because everybody shows up for

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 2>coffee or.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Treats totally and we have the same So ours is

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 3>on the eighth floor. But we call it the casual collision,

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 3>and that's really important to our culture to kind of

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>show up certainly as soon as we could do do

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 3>so from a practical perspective and allow for that collaboration,

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 3>it's super important for people to share and get to

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 3>the best answer possible together.

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 2>So I want to talk about the wealth channel, but

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 2>before I get there, I have to ask about something

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 2>that Apollo does that not every large private markets firm does.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You have talked about realigning the interest of the firm

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 2>with clients, making sure that you're on the same side

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 2>of trades and towards that end. Apollo is a regular

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>co investor along with clients in certain projects.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Tell us about that. Yeah, So from a kind of

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet perspective, we are often one of, if not

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>the largest investor side by side with our third party

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 3>clients and the investments and rategies that we manage. So

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 3>through our retirement services business a theme as well as

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 3>our third party business we invest side by side, and

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 3>so the decisions we make on behalf of the balance

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 3>sheet are aligned with the outcomes of the strategies in

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>which we invest their party capital. So we often say, well,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 3>we can't guarantee the outcome, we guarantee a shared outcome,

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and that means a lot to us in terms of

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 3>our commitment and focus, but also to our clients because

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 3>they know how important it is to us in multiple ways.

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine if anybody has hesitation on a investment,

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 2>if you see the private equity firm co investing along

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 2>with you, that has to be a big confidence driver.

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>It is, and in certain instances, like when you look

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 3>across the industry, a commitment from an asset manager might

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 3>be at the two point five percent or three point

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>five percent. It's it's an outlier if it's a five

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 3>percent commitment.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 2>But not double digits exactly.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Where in one strategy of ours, which has a diversified

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>portfolio of private markets, we are two thirds of that portfolio.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 3>So when we say that it's it's meaningful to our

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet, we mean it.

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 2>How does that work in terms of direct stakes and

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>performance fees? Like if you're most of the invested assets.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>That has to have an impact on what the balance

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 2>sheet looks like. How do you guys align that?

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 3>So, look, we are performance first at the end of

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 3>the day. Our our relationships and the trust that we

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>build are over time through performance and through service. I mean,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 3>we want to make sure that our partners feel our

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 3>support in just about every way. So for us, it's

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 3>never about a particular fee of one type or another. Ultimately,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 3>we're not focused on an AUM goal. That is the

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 3>reward for good performance and as long as we are

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>making the best investment decisions and showing up frankly as

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 3>a best in class partner for our clients, that is

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 3>what drives our business forward.

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about the wealth channel,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 2>which is where you focus some of your time early

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 2>in your career at Apollo. Tell us how this has

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 2>changed over the past twenty years, and tell us a

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit about what type of clients show up there.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, you know, the wealth business I saw certainly

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 3>in my very early days of JP Morgan, but then

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 3>for my first kind of sixteen plus years at Apollo,

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 3>the private bank or wire was really more the exception

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 3>than the role. It was more of a episodic type

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>of relationship that all completely transformed into a strategic commitment

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 3>from all of us at Apollo starting about four or

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 3>five years ago. So when Mark Rowan took the Reins

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>as CEO, all the stars aligned to build a wealth

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 3>business to complement the institutional and that decision truly needed

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 3>to come from the top CEO on down because it

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 3>is strategic, it's not transactional. If you're going to do

0:25:59.920 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 3>it well, it needs to be a long term commitment

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 3>to the channel. And in my view, there are actually

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 3>only a small number of firms that can really show

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>up and do this well in partnership with all the

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 3>financial intermediaries involved with wealth. And the reason I say

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>that is when you look at what's required, it's a

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 3>pretty massive lift. You need to make sure that you

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 3>build out the right relationships and you need the team

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>globally in place to do that across channels and geographies.

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 3>You need to make sure that the product mix is

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 3>extensive enough so that you're relevant as it pertains to

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>our investment capability, but you want to make sure that

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 3>you're showing up with the right structures for the right clients.

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Then there's the educational component there's a service, there's technology.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 3>For example, we have spent actually a billion dollars one

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars from our balance sheet in wealth tech investments

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 3>alone to make sure that we're partnering and investing in

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.719
<v Speaker 3>firms that will help the industry. So I think there

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>are very few that can do that well and truly

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 3>meet the wall clients where with in order to meet

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 3>their portfolio needs.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 2>So within that channel, family offices, high net wealth, sovereign

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>funds are you're also selling through other intermediaries like broker's

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 2>firms or rias.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Tell us a little bit about that, yes, So the

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 3>channels represented in wealth include the private banks and wires

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 3>as one channel, the independence which includes rias and independent

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 3>broker dealers. Family office is also kind of under our

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 3>wealth umbrella. That's the ultra high net worth space selectively.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>And then we have geographic focus, you know, outside of

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 3>of the US, across EMA, uh and and Asia. The

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 3>rest of North America is covered appropriately out of Canada

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 3>and lat Ham. So so each of those channels are

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 3>are represented. And while each has differences and we definitely

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 3>approach them with different resourcing and and commitments, the common

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 3>denominator of all of them is helping the intermediary, the

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 3>advisor or the banker or the CIO of the family

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:52.479
<v Speaker 3>office either build for retirement in the case of their

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 3>underlying client, or build to a certain level of wealth.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 3>And so whether it's you know, a wire like a

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>UBS or a Morgan Stanley and their set of advisors

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 3>or you name kind of an RIA, we want to

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>show up to that intermediary with offerings that are going

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 3>to work for their platform and their their base and

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>make sure that we can speak to semi liquid as

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 3>well as drawdown and really kind of listen closely to

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 3>what they're looking to provide their clients.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>So the challenge we always see on the RAA side

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>is on the privates, it seems everything is sort of

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>a one off and whereas on the public side, the

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>custodianship is standardized, the reporting is standardized, all the compliance

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and due diligence is pretty you know, turnkey tell us

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 2>about a the challenges of all the private investments that

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 2>may not all be identical, and is there a solution

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>out there, a platform in development that might make this

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 2>more like a turnkey, more public security like than private.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a journey, but I think it's already getting better,

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 3>and I do see a world where it becomes so

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 3>much easier, more efficient to access. And so if we

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 3>look at what we're already seeing, you know, when we

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>think about an interval fund structure where you can buy

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>many different underlying strategies, it's point and click through an advisor.

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 3>But it's point and click. There isn't kind of the

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 3>fullsome subscription process that we've seen. There's innovation which you

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 3>know we have worked on in partnership with Statesheet, for example,

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 3>where there are ETF structures of which private markets are

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a part. And I think the technology is moving from

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of more of an analog to digital in just

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of the plumbing in the infrastructure that supports the

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 3>private markets overall ecosystem. So there's definitely a lot of

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 3>time and effort to try to simplify the processes, and

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to go hand in hand with

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 3>an evolution that's already starting where allocators are looking to

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>managers like ourselves to not only offer specific parts or

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 3>specific strategies, but to increasingly offer more holistic solutions. So

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 3>a bundle of private market solutions which could be multi

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 3>strategy going to eventually kind of multi strategy, multi manager

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 3>as well, which can then be housed not only in

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the accounts, brokerage accounts or self directed that we see

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 3>so often today, but in a range of pools of

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 3>capital and models and a number of discretionary pools of

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 3>capital that are highly applicable for private markets.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Really really interesting. Coming up, we continue our conversation with

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie Dresher, Apollos chief Client and Product development Officer, discussing

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the state of private markets today. I'm very results you're

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 2>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Marry Redults.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 2>extra special guest to Stephanie Dresher. She is the chief

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Client and Product development Officer at private investment giant Apollo,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 2>helping to oversee eight hundred and forty billion dollars in

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 2>client assets. So we're living in a moment where private

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>credit and private equity they used to be a small niche.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 2>That's no longer the case. Not only are they mainstream,

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 2>they're one of the fastest growing parts of the investment world.

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit about what's happening in that

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 2>space and what's driving that shift?

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think there's been a transformation in terms of

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 3>public and private holdings in a portfolio and what does

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 3>it mean to be safe or risky? Think Historically people

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 3>have thought that because something was liquid in the public markets,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 3>it was inherently safe or frankly safer, and something less

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 3>liquid in the private markets. And as we look at

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two and frankly many moments of dislocation in

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the public markets, I think there's now a much clearer

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 3>recognition that the public markets can be both safe and risky,

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 3>as can the private markets. Because when we look at

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the public markets, let's say the S and P five hundred,

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>for example, the performance and frankly moments of underperformance had

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 3>been so concentrated in terms of the attribution to roughly

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 3>seven stocks. Sometimes people will say ten stocks. But when

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 3>there's so much concentration or frankly, lack of diversification in

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the public markets, it creates a moment where people start

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 3>to zoom out and say, frankly, what if the toolkit

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 3>for my equity piece of the portfolio should have a

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 3>combination of both public and private And frankly, what if

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 3>my fixed income segment of the portfolio should have both

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 3>public and private. Then the toolkit for advisors and for

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 3>families is much broader to create that excess return. And

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 3>what we've seen is the desire to incorporate the private markets,

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 3>not just as an add on to an otherwise traditional

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 3>sixty forty portfolio, but rather thinking of it as part

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 3>of their core holdings in equity and debt, and now

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 3>thinking simply of alternatives as an alternative to public stocks

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and bonds.

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So sixty forty becomes fifty thirty twenty or sixty twenty

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty or something along those lines.

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, or it could even keep whatever percentages are split

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 3>between public, between equity and debt, but have both the

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 3>public and private options available within each of those percentages

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 3>to maximize the return, to maximize oversification, and to reduce

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the volatility. It's a game changer. It's no longer nice

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 3>to have private markets in a portfolio. It's a need

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to have in order to meet the long term financial

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 3>goals of the client.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things I can't help but notice

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 2>over the course of my career, which began more or

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 2>less around the same time as yours in the mid nineties,

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 2>is that the total number of public equities has shrunk dramatically.

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 2>The Wilshire five thousand is about thirty four hundred stocks,

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 2>The S and P five hundred still five hundred and

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 2>two stocks. Because of a shares it's a little over

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 2>five hundred. But even the Russell two thousand and some

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of the other broader indexes far fewer public names in there.

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 2>How much the shrinking of the public float driving activity

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 2>onto the private side.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very real. You're right, it's about half

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 3>the number of public companies it was, you know, just

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, even a couple of decades ago. At the

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 3>same time, when when you look at the number of

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 3>companies total number of companies globally, ninety percent are in

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:32.560
<v Speaker 3>fact private. So if someone truly wants representative exposure in

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 3>their portfolio, it's really hard to rationalize eliminating ninety percent

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 3>of the total number of companies out there right and

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 3>focusing exclusively on public because it's liquid. Realistically, one needs

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 3>to look at what is the return profile goal for

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the portfolio, what type of illiquidity can can someone accept,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and then a portfolio that allows for that excess return.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Institutions have realized that now over decades, and they've been

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the beneficiaries of that excess return by accepting some amount

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 3>of illiquidity. With the advent of new structures in the

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 3>private market, certainly for wealth and increasingly even for institutions.

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 2>You.

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Can select offerings out there that provide more interim liquidity.

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 3>It's not your ATM, no one should think that it is,

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 3>but it provides a much broader suite of solutions across

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 3>a range of liquidity profiles, offering far more liquidity than

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 3>one would have received in a traditional private equity draw

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 3>down structure. In our view, as we develop portfolios with

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 3>our clients, depending on what they're looking for in terms

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of underlying return and liquidity, we believe there's a role

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 3>for a mix of both more liquid private markets structures

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 3>as well as draw down depending on the strategy.

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about liquidly and semi liquidly as well

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 2>as illoquidly. The academic perspective has always been, hey, when

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 2>you're moving into an ill liquid market, you get the

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 2>benefit of the illiquidity premium. It's a smaller market, it's

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 2>less efficient, there's opportunities to create alpha here, but the

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.919
<v Speaker 2>trade off is your money is locked up for three years,

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 2>for five years, for seven years, whatever it is. When

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.879
<v Speaker 2>first with the semi liquid products, are you giving up

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 2>some of that upside in exchange for semi liquidity.

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Our view is that the structure and the design should

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 3>marry the underlying assets in the portfolio.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>So two year credit notes are going to be more

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 2>liquid than perpetual open ended exactly.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 3>So we have you know, in our view, the strategies

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 3>within private markets are so wide ranging, which to your point,

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 3>in terms of portfolio construction, you know, our view is

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 3>that since a private market holding can span everything from

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 3>short term investment grade credit all the way through to

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 3>your traditional kind of private equity drawdown, that's a very

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 3>wide range. And when you think broadly about that type

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of exposure, why shouldn't an allocation in in a portfolio

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 3>be maybe even fifty percent to private markets, just given

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 3>the breath and applicability of the underlying assets from the

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 3>short dated investment grade credit all the way through to

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 3>more traditional private private equity. To your point, there are

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.879
<v Speaker 3>options where private markets can be a part of an

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 3>overall portfolio, like an ETF format where it is in

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 3>fact daily as part of a broader portfolio, or if

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 3>you go to kind of an investment create strategy. It

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 3>may be you know, monthly in nature, but you're you're right.

0:41:21.640 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 3>The trade off for stepping out a bit on the

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 3>liquidity curve, albeit you know, not too much. Further, is

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 3>a pickup in the access return really interesting?

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm not going to quote you exactly, but

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I did read something you had said about private credit

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>is that you see a full on fundamental rethink taking

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 2>place in the space. Explain what you mean by fundamental rethink.

0:41:55.719 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, the the idea of of private markets or

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 4>alternative of our alternatives being that very high risk portion

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 4>of a portfolio and therefore a small percentage of one's

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 4>allocation locked up for a long period of time.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 3>That's just no longer the modern thinking of the use

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 3>of private markets in a portfolio. There's no reason right

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>now why an advisor and a banker can't think in

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 3>a far more flexible way that how they are meeting

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 3>the need to save for retirement or the ability to

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 3>build wealth with private market structures in mind. So it

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of goes back to that idea of public markets

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 3>being safe and private markets being risky. That's no longer

0:42:55.840 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of the thinking in the market. I think intermediaries

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 3>have really challenged that historical way of building portfolios and

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 3>they want the same benefits that the institutions have now

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 3>had for decades. The reality is that the size of

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the wealth market in terms of assets held by families

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:27.399
<v Speaker 3>by individuals is about the same size as that held

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 3>by institutions, each about one hundred and fifty trillion or so. Globally.

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 3>The institutions right now have an average allocation of over

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent to private markets. The individual on average three percent.

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was going to say single digits, clearly, absolutely,

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 2>and all of the when we look at the projections

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and a variety of wargame scenarios, this looks like this

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>is going to continue to grow over the next decade.

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 2>The I know this is a speculative question and no

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 2>one really knows, but how large can the private markets

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 2>get relative to the public markets? Can they be the

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 2>same size eventually?

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Look, our view is that origination is the great differentiator.

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:27.839
<v Speaker 3>So we focus not as kind of a um as

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:32.280
<v Speaker 3>a limiter, but rather origination and.

0:44:32.200 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe to find that because when I hear origination, I'm

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 2>thinking not all private investments are created the same.

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, It's the ability to create proprietary investment opportunities is

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:55.839
<v Speaker 3>in our view, a huge differentiator for a platform, and

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 3>we partner with financial intermedia years and that is additive

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the flow of investment opportunities, but not exclusively.

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 3>In fact, over the last almost fifteen years now, we've

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 3>built out sixteen proprietary origination engines so that we can

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 3>create that investment alpha and house for the benefit of

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 3>our clients, and that proprietary origination fuels are underlying portfolios,

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 3>which ultimately, in our view, is critical to delivering on

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the return.

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 2>So those sixteen different engines, I'm going to assume they're

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 2>each in a different type of space exactly, So real assets, infrastructure,

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 2>private credit, private debt, which isn't always the exact same thing.

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Private equity has got to be many more. What other

0:45:56.440 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 2>spaces are you what other geographies are you looking at,

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>What other spaces you're looking at? What's the product makes

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 2>look like?

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So on the origination side, it is quite broad.

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 3>I think everything from fleet finance to.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Fleet jets, ships above.

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:22.760
<v Speaker 3>And even trucking. You know, there's a whole range in

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 3>terms of everything from aviation to kind of ground transport.

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 3>There's consumer finance, there's specialty finance, that's there's mortgages. So

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 3>it's it's quite broad in terms of the reach, but

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 3>it's it's ultimately originating the investment in what we call

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of the industrial renaissance, and the need for that

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 3>private capital is real and additive to to what could

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 3>otherwise be found in the public markets.

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Really really fascinating. But before I get to I only

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 2>have you for limited amount of time. Before I get

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 2>to my favorite questions, let me just ask you one

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 2>more question. What do you think investors who are looking

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 2>at the private markets aren't thinking about or talking about.

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 3>But should be.

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 2>What sort of topics, geographies, policy issues, what's out there

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that is getting overlooked but perhaps shouldn't.

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 3>So what I'm seeing more and more is a global

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 3>trend of the democratization for private markets. And as I

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 3>look at what's happening, certainly in our own backyard in

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 3>terms of the executive orders around four oh one K,

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and then I look to Europe and I see their

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 3>regulation around the l TIF two point zero, or I

0:47:56.760 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 3>look even to the UK and I see REGs in

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 3>the UK and France in terms of certain requirements and

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 3>percentages to private markets in their retirement plans. To me,

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a global theme of the desire to allow more

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 3>access of private markets to the individual and through their advisors,

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 3>through the intermediaries, to truly be able to adequately plan

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 3>for retirement. And we see obviously the state of kind

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of retirees here in the US, and there's a dire

0:48:41.800 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 3>need to give them through managed accounts, through target date

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:55.280
<v Speaker 3>access to investments that will provide that additional access return.

0:48:55.960 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 3>And you know, as as we think about it, most

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 3>of those four oh one k's have time horizons of decades, right,

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 3>yet the solutions they have available to them are daily

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 3>liquid that mismatch does not need to exist. And you know,

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 3>with with the changes that we're we're seeing come out

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 3>of DC, you know, we're hopeful that the framework for

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 3>the benefit of those retirement plans will continue to be

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:35.879
<v Speaker 3>one that shifts from the historical view of maximizing those

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:40.399
<v Speaker 3>pools of capital to the lowest possible fee, to one

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 3>where they look to maximize outcome and truly maximize the

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 3>result for those participants.

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Really really very fascinating. Let's jump to our final five

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 2>questions that I ask all of my guests, Starting with

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 2>tell us about your mentors who helped your career.

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mentioned in a prior part of our series

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 3>someone that I used to babysit for who gave me

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 3>my first shot in a healthcare consulting firm, so she

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 3>will remain part of my kind of uh my personal

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 3>advisory board. While at JP Morgan Mary Erdos is kind

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 3>of rock star status in my book and an amazing

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 3>uh mentor throughout my career.

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 3>And then you know many at Apollo that I won't

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 3>name because I want to embarrass them, but that have

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 3>been incredible sponsors of my career with a lot of

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 3>opportunities just to continue to grow and develop as a professional.

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about books. What are you reading? What are

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 2>some of your favorites so well?

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:58.840
<v Speaker 3>In terms of what I'm reading right now, there's a

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 3>book called Such Good People, which I will give a disclaimer.

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 3>It's written by Amy Bloomfeldt, and she is a great

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 3>close friend from college, and it's a great read. And

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 3>so I'm at the end and I don't want it

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 3>to end. So that's that's a great one. I was

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 3>actually just away this weekend and I have to say

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 3>I was struck where I was in the Berkshires, and

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:30.080
<v Speaker 3>I was struck by the fall foliage and beautiful coming in.

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I live and work in New York City, so seeing

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 3>those surroundings and being back in nature, it did make

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 3>me think of Emerson and Thoreau, who I did love,

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's been a while since I've I read their works,

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 3>but it inspired me to go back and dust that off.

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about what's keeping you entertained these days? What

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:54.240
<v Speaker 2>are you streaming or listening to other than you? Well,

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 2>this doesn't count us. Give us a different.

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 3>One, okay, Well, when that is top of mine and

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:07.280
<v Speaker 3>who we actually just had participate live at a client

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 3>forum of ours is doctor David Sinclair of life Span,

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 3>and he is affiliated with Harvard, and his work fascinates

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 3>me in terms.

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Of I.

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Love that. That's a different one and I love that

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:31.760
<v Speaker 3>professor as well in terms of the value of happiness

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 3>at different stages of our lives.

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 3>But this actually relates to longevity more in terms of

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 3>genetics and all the research and science and even drug

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 3>development that is going into the kind of health and

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 3>wellness from a longevity.

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 2>The health Span study is that what they yes.

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Exactly and research that they're already doing in terms of

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 3>eyes that could have applicability to many other parts of

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 3>our bodies. So I just find it kind of a

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:04.399
<v Speaker 3>fascinating field that I think will develop so much over time.

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 3>And of course, from our work perspective, as I think

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 3>frankly of the work of both of those Harvard professors

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:15.080
<v Speaker 3>and doctors. Now, how does it tie into the high

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 3>performance culture and mindset that we have as a farm Like,

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:22.439
<v Speaker 3>how do we take that thinking and try to think

0:53:22.440 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 3>about our own employees over time?

0:53:25.520 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And our final two questions, what sort of advice would

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you give to a recent college grad interest in the

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 2>career in investing privates alternative investings? What's your advice?

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, first off, go for it, because I think it's

0:53:42.239 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 3>there's still so much growth ahead. And I would just

0:53:47.320 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 3>say stay curious because you know, as as we think

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:59.359
<v Speaker 3>about kind of the innovation that's happening just about from

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:05.720
<v Speaker 3>every of product innovation and channels, and frankly even applicability

0:54:05.760 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 3>of AI to what we do today, if you're tuned

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 3>in from a curiosity perspective coupled with kind of strong

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:21.400
<v Speaker 3>work ethic, I think that's a winning recipe.

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 2>And our final question, what do you know about the

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 2>world of alternative and private market investing today? Would have

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 2>been useful thirty years ago or so when you were

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 2>first getting started.

0:54:33.640 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, no fun if you have the answer key right.

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:43.240
<v Speaker 3>But look, I would say the one thing that stays

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 3>the same is change, and to embrace that and to

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:54.480
<v Speaker 3>be flexible, to recognize that there will be so much

0:54:54.520 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 3>evolution and change that continues in front of us from

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 3>an industry and certain as someone starting if someone's starting

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 3>out now, to kind of enjoy that ride and recognize

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 3>that there will be many chapters that unfold and the

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 3>best we can kind of try to see where that

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 3>puck is going, but certainly and embrace that there's so

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:26.240
<v Speaker 3>much more innovation and opportunity to come.

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Really really interesting. Thank you, Stephanie for being so generous

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 2>with your time.

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 3>We have been.

0:55:32.920 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Speaking with Stephanie Dresher, Apollo's chief client and product development Officer.

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 2>If you enjoy this conversation, check out any of the

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 2>five hundred and eighty nine we've done over the previous

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 2>eleven and a half years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg,

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 2>wherever you find your favorite podcast, and be sure and

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:58.840
<v Speaker 2>check out my new book, How Not to Invest The ideas, numbers,

0:55:58.880 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and behavior that destroys wealth and how to avoid them

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your books at. I would be remiss

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:07.920
<v Speaker 2>if I didn't thank the Cracked team that helps put

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 2>these conversations together each week. Alexis Noriega is my video producer.

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Sean Russo is my researcher. Anna Luke is my producer.

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts at Bloomberg. I'm

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Barry Rudoltz. You've been listening to Masters in Business on

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio