1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,680 Speaker 1: But the rule of law exists in this country. It 2 00:00:02,880 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: came to this verdict, and you know at this point, 3 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:09,760 Speaker 1: thank you to the jurors, thank you to this judge. 4 00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:12,280 Speaker 1: Thank you to all the court security officers and the 5 00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 1: witnesses and everybody who's they and their family members had 6 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:18,159 Speaker 1: to walk into the belly of the beast to do this. 7 00:00:18,239 --> 00:00:20,599 Speaker 1: But this is the system working in a fair way. 8 00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:23,640 Speaker 2: The system working in a fair way. They were giddy 9 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 2: all afternoon and evening on MSNBC yesterday and just the 10 00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 2: rule of law has been restored. No one is above 11 00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:32,880 Speaker 2: the law. Blah blah blah. 12 00:00:32,920 --> 00:00:37,760 Speaker 3: To discuss the proceedings and reaction to them, please welcome 13 00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 3: back to the Armstrong and Getty Show. Retired Superior Court 14 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:43,440 Speaker 3: judge Larry Goodman, who retired a few years back after 15 00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:45,760 Speaker 3: thirty one years in the Superior Court handling mostly murder 16 00:00:45,800 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 3: trials in Alameda County in the Bay Area of California. 17 00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:51,279 Speaker 4: Mister judge, sir Larry, how are you. 18 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:53,160 Speaker 5: I'm doing good? How are you guys this morning? 19 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:53,960 Speaker 4: Good? 20 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 3: Initial question, you're a superior court judge. Now do you 21 00:00:56,880 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 3: start in the inferior court? Get promoted to the mediocre 22 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:01,840 Speaker 3: court and end up in the superior court. 23 00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:02,560 Speaker 4: How does that work? 24 00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 5: Well, actually, I got appointed initially to the municipal court 25 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:07,119 Speaker 5: and I was there for two and a half years 26 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:08,920 Speaker 5: and then elevated the Superior Court. 27 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:10,240 Speaker 2: I have a superior tone. 28 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 4: Does that help? 29 00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 2: Sometimes? 30 00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:15,679 Speaker 5: That's why you can't fall back on yeah. 31 00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:15,720 Speaker 4: You know what? 32 00:01:15,840 --> 00:01:18,759 Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly, baffle them with bullets, as they say. All right, 33 00:01:19,040 --> 00:01:23,560 Speaker 3: More seriously, Larry, what was your initial reaction to the 34 00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 3: news of the verdict yesterday? 35 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:28,840 Speaker 5: It was like a gut punch. I mean, it's it 36 00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:31,319 Speaker 5: was hard to take because I know what went on, 37 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:33,160 Speaker 5: and I know how most of the people that I 38 00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:35,600 Speaker 5: worked with took their oath of office as a judge 39 00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:37,880 Speaker 5: to do the right thing, regardless of how you felt. 40 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:42,480 Speaker 5: And this judge, obviously that oath didn't mean anything to him. 41 00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 5: His rulings, his mannerisms, his uh, the instructions, the whole 42 00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 5: thing was just such a farce that it actually made 43 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 5: me sad and made me angry. 44 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 3: So, without getting into the real legal weeds, what was 45 00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:59,760 Speaker 3: it about the instructions that bothered you? 46 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:01,600 Speaker 5: Well, first of all, I don't know why you don't 47 00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:03,760 Speaker 5: give the instructions to the jurors so they can go 48 00:02:03,840 --> 00:02:05,960 Speaker 5: in and read them when you've got fifty five pages. 49 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:08,919 Speaker 5: But also the idea that they didn't have to have 50 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:11,520 Speaker 5: unanimous as to what the underlying one of the three 51 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:15,079 Speaker 5: crimes were that was supposed to make this a felony, 52 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:19,560 Speaker 5: the fact that they referred to Cone as an accomplice, 53 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,959 Speaker 5: which implies that there must be a crime, All those 54 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:24,919 Speaker 5: different kind of things that I guess he took the 55 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:28,560 Speaker 5: standard instructions and did some creative writing to kind of 56 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:31,320 Speaker 5: dri direct it towards the guilty verdict. 57 00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, I've been a little cautious because I'm not an 58 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:38,639 Speaker 3: attorney nor judge. But the idea that our system has 59 00:02:38,680 --> 00:02:41,200 Speaker 3: this sacred principle that you've got to be convicted by 60 00:02:41,320 --> 00:02:43,520 Speaker 3: jury or your peers beyond a reasonable doubt of a 61 00:02:43,560 --> 00:02:48,840 Speaker 3: specific offense that is laid out quite specifically by the government. 62 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 3: But you can take a felon I'm a misdemeanor and 63 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,080 Speaker 3: mutate it into a felony based on I don't know 64 00:02:56,440 --> 00:03:00,240 Speaker 3: a crime, some crime, whatever crime doesn't matter, So you 65 00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:04,440 Speaker 3: can supercharge a specific charge with a vague reference to 66 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 3: some crime that may or may not exist. 67 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:07,320 Speaker 4: That bothers me a lot. 68 00:03:07,919 --> 00:03:10,079 Speaker 5: Well, it should, particularly if you're the defendant. I mean, 69 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:12,800 Speaker 5: we talked about this last week or the week before that. 70 00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:16,400 Speaker 5: A real judge would have made the prosecution state, specifically 71 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 5: before the trial ever started, what are the underlying crimes 72 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,600 Speaker 5: that you're going to prove to make this become a felony. 73 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:25,040 Speaker 2: Well, he stated the opposite in the closing argument or 74 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:29,000 Speaker 2: in his dury instructions. Right, you can have different three 75 00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:30,959 Speaker 2: of you could think this is the crime, three of 76 00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:32,480 Speaker 2: you could think this is the crime whatever. 77 00:03:32,680 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 5: It was a smortus board of possible crimes to get 78 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:37,640 Speaker 5: to a felony. And then the idea that the defense 79 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:41,120 Speaker 5: has to go first in closing arguments. They have no 80 00:03:41,280 --> 00:03:44,960 Speaker 5: chance to rebut what the prosecution says when they finally 81 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:48,360 Speaker 5: did start laying out with the potential underlying crimes might which. 82 00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:50,400 Speaker 2: Is which is why some of my favorite legal pundits 83 00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 2: say it's obviously a due process problem because you can't 84 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:57,520 Speaker 2: you can't rebut what you're being charged with because you 85 00:03:57,520 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 2: don't even. 86 00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:01,640 Speaker 5: Know exactly exactly. I mean, that's the key to the 87 00:04:02,040 --> 00:04:04,440 Speaker 5: Bill of Rights and the right to do processes. You 88 00:04:04,520 --> 00:04:06,400 Speaker 5: have to be able to know what you're charged with 89 00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:07,720 Speaker 5: so you can mount a defense. 90 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 3: All right, So just let's bottom line this. So I 91 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,080 Speaker 3: were to say to you, hey, Larry, I think this 92 00:04:13,320 --> 00:04:16,360 Speaker 3: is a fine judge, and this verdict it will stand 93 00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 3: up on appeal. I'll bet you a fifty thousand bucks. 94 00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:20,200 Speaker 3: I'm right, What do you say? 95 00:04:20,560 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 5: I'll take the bet. Really, No, it's going to get 96 00:04:25,240 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 5: reversed unless unless this corruption goes all the way through 97 00:04:28,279 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 5: the appellate level of the New York courts, which I 98 00:04:30,520 --> 00:04:33,800 Speaker 5: don't think it does. There's just so many things he 99 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:37,080 Speaker 5: did wrong. From the question should have been a change 100 00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:42,160 Speaker 5: of venue. He definitely should have recused himself, the instructions 101 00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 5: the way they were given, the rulings that he made, 102 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:47,279 Speaker 5: not letting the guy testify that was the FEC expert. 103 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:50,840 Speaker 5: And even though he couldn't testify, one of the underlying 104 00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:53,640 Speaker 5: crimes was a violation of the federal election laws, and 105 00:04:53,680 --> 00:04:55,479 Speaker 5: they I bet the jury didn't know what the federal 106 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,000 Speaker 5: election law was that he supposedly violated. So, I mean, 107 00:04:58,200 --> 00:04:59,840 Speaker 5: there's just tons of things that are going to be 108 00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:01,120 Speaker 5: to be reversed. 109 00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 2: Okay, then you've made a perfect argument to set this up. 110 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 2: And this is where I've been confused since yesterday afternoon, 111 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:11,120 Speaker 2: when I would hear legal experts say, very unlikely Donald 112 00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:13,839 Speaker 2: Trump will do any jail time, Very unlikely. Blah blah blah. 113 00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 2: Guy with this guy with that. Okay, this is the 114 00:05:16,400 --> 00:05:20,560 Speaker 2: same judge you just described that's gonna make the decision. 115 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:23,480 Speaker 2: Doesn't that mean there's a chance that he's going to 116 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:25,520 Speaker 2: decide that this guy that has bad mouthed me and 117 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:29,279 Speaker 2: my family and I've had to hit him with a 118 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 2: whole bunch of warnings and fines and has shown no 119 00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:35,280 Speaker 2: contrition whatsoever. Screw this rich guy who thinks he can 120 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:36,680 Speaker 2: do whatever. I'm gonna throw him in jail. 121 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,479 Speaker 5: Well, you know, I never underestimate what this judge will do. 122 00:05:40,720 --> 00:05:43,039 Speaker 5: I mean, I don't think he will do that. I 123 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:45,400 Speaker 5: think there would be such a total outcry. I think 124 00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 5: there would in the public. I think there would be 125 00:05:48,360 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 5: avenues where they could the defense could probably stop him 126 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:53,640 Speaker 5: from the actually putting him in jail. But this is 127 00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:56,760 Speaker 5: the same judge that presided over the Trump Organization case. 128 00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 5: He presided over Trump's financial guy for one of his corporations. 129 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:04,160 Speaker 5: He's got the Steve Banyer case. He's making a career 130 00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 5: out of Donald Trump. 131 00:06:05,279 --> 00:06:09,360 Speaker 3: So so we're talking to Larry Goodman, retired Superior Court 132 00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:13,839 Speaker 3: judge about the Trump trial and verdict. Obviously, so, Larry, 133 00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:16,400 Speaker 3: I'm sure you've seen as a judge for several decades 134 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,680 Speaker 3: bad attorneys, good attorneys, great attorneys. Our theory around here 135 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:24,400 Speaker 3: was that the Trump defense was more a political defense 136 00:06:24,760 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 3: than a we're going to win this trial no matter 137 00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:29,480 Speaker 3: what it takes defense. What did you take away from 138 00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:31,159 Speaker 3: the Trump defense team's performance. 139 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:34,800 Speaker 5: I've never been real impressed with the defense lawyers that 140 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 5: he's had, and I'm not sure why. It's just they 141 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:39,480 Speaker 5: seem to kind of plod through things. They don't come 142 00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:44,320 Speaker 5: up with any like really creative defenses or any cohesive defenses. 143 00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:48,800 Speaker 5: They kind of respond rather than attack, and so I 144 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 5: think it was political. I think they set it up. 145 00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:52,640 Speaker 5: I think they kind of saw the writing on the 146 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 5: wall and they kind of mounted the defense so he 147 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,599 Speaker 5: could end up being the martyr before Berdy came back. 148 00:06:57,760 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 2: Which might be smart. I mean, based on a lot 149 00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:01,920 Speaker 2: of the reaction we've seen today, it might have been 150 00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 2: the smartest move. I heard somebody point out what they 151 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:07,120 Speaker 2: would have liked best was an acquittal, but they decided 152 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,200 Speaker 2: that was very, very unlikely. So what they would like 153 00:07:09,279 --> 00:07:12,760 Speaker 2: second best is a guilty verdict. Yeah, for the martyr 154 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:14,120 Speaker 2: reasons you just said, Well. 155 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:17,880 Speaker 5: He makes the martyr won't be reversed on appeal before 156 00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:20,200 Speaker 5: the election. So you got to get what you can 157 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:22,680 Speaker 5: get and build use it to your advantage, which is 158 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:24,680 Speaker 5: look what they did to me. I'm a political like 159 00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 5: you said yesterday, I'm a political prisoner. 160 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:27,000 Speaker 4: Oof. 161 00:07:27,640 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 2: That's a little strong. 162 00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, mine, Well he raised about the GDP of France 163 00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:37,360 Speaker 3: in three hours. Larry, I'm gonna put you on the spot. 164 00:07:37,400 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 3: Creativity wise, I think anybody with a conscience and reasonable 165 00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:45,640 Speaker 3: intelligence understands why this sort of law fair where you 166 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 3: have a local prosecutor attempting to bring down a national candidate, 167 00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 3: is so dangerous. How easy would it be if the Republicans, 168 00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 3: for instance, said, Okay, this is the way you want 169 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 3: to fight, We're gonna we're gonna get to work on 170 00:07:58,400 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 3: cooking up some more of this sort of thing. 171 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 4: How easy would it be for, say, I don't know. 172 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 3: What's a good conservative city an Omaha prosecutor to cook 173 00:08:07,600 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 3: up something. If I don't know, maybe Joe Biden gave 174 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:12,880 Speaker 3: speeches in Omaha through the years and got paid for 175 00:08:12,960 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 3: him or whatever. How hard would that be to get 176 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:15,880 Speaker 3: this really cranking. 177 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:18,400 Speaker 5: Well, the genies out of the bottle, and you can't 178 00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 5: put the genie back in the bottle, So it'd be 179 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:24,400 Speaker 5: pretty easy. What about the Attorney General of Arizona suing 180 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:28,800 Speaker 5: majorcas or charging him with a violation of the borders 181 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 5: of their state, or adding to crime or some conspiracy 182 00:08:31,560 --> 00:08:35,280 Speaker 5: to allow drug dealing to go on in Arizona. I mean, 183 00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:37,040 Speaker 5: you can come up with all kinds of things. And 184 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:40,480 Speaker 5: the thing that's kind of interesting, Republicans don't seem to 185 00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:44,000 Speaker 5: play dirty like that a lot, and they play they 186 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 5: play hardball. Republicans play softball sometimes. But it's certainly easy 187 00:08:49,360 --> 00:08:49,880 Speaker 5: to do. 188 00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:53,640 Speaker 3: Well, and especially if you remember, as I'm just remembering, 189 00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:56,320 Speaker 3: you don't need to get a conviction necessarily, right, You 190 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 3: just want to drag him through the mud, make them 191 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:00,800 Speaker 3: spend money and time exactly. 192 00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:03,480 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, it's that's all they did. I mean, 193 00:09:03,520 --> 00:09:05,760 Speaker 5: they got the conviction, but even if they'd been a 194 00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:08,720 Speaker 5: not guilty verdict, they succeeded in making him the story 195 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,200 Speaker 5: and making him look bad for what six weeks was it? 196 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:14,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the question really of this whole thing, is 197 00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:18,959 Speaker 2: is this an outlier blip or is the Genie out 198 00:09:18,960 --> 00:09:20,719 Speaker 2: of the bottle, and this is where we're going to 199 00:09:20,800 --> 00:09:22,599 Speaker 2: go from here on out. That's that's the question of 200 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:23,360 Speaker 2: this whole thing to me. 201 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:26,200 Speaker 5: Well, I don't know how do you end go? No, 202 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:28,120 Speaker 5: I'm just I don't know how you would undo. Once 203 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:31,200 Speaker 5: it happens, it's the path has been started, So I 204 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 5: don't know how you bring it back. 205 00:09:32,880 --> 00:09:37,760 Speaker 3: Well, only if there's a recognition among conservatives and moderates 206 00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:40,839 Speaker 3: that this is a terrible path. This is an incredibly 207 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:44,079 Speaker 3: dangerous Pandora's box. We've opened here and we need to 208 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:46,719 Speaker 3: shut it but fast. Although I don't know if you 209 00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:49,120 Speaker 3: heard the freedom loving quote of the day this morning 210 00:09:49,160 --> 00:09:51,200 Speaker 3: at the very beginning of the show. It was from 211 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:55,679 Speaker 3: a Greek historian who's talking about precedence and how no 212 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:58,360 Speaker 3: matter how narrow the path upon which they enter, they 213 00:09:58,360 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 3: create for themselves a highway where they wander with the 214 00:10:01,240 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 3: utmost latitude, and no one thinks the course is evil 215 00:10:04,520 --> 00:10:09,680 Speaker 3: for himself, which has proven profitable to others. Wow, okay, yeah, 216 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:10,880 Speaker 3: how appropriate is that? Man? 217 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 4: Human nature does not change. 218 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 5: Nope, And like I said, once they do it, and 219 00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:18,160 Speaker 5: if they're successful, they'll do it again. 220 00:10:19,120 --> 00:10:22,320 Speaker 3: Retired Superior Court judge Larry Goodman, Larry, we always appreciate 221 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:23,280 Speaker 3: the time and the insights. 222 00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:23,839 Speaker 4: Thanks a million. 223 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:26,199 Speaker 5: Hey, thank you guys. Take care we well. 224 00:10:26,240 --> 00:10:30,280 Speaker 2: And since this was a you know, this was a 225 00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:32,600 Speaker 2: local New York guy in New York, it wouldn't have 226 00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 2: to be for instance, if you just if Gavin Newsom 227 00:10:38,120 --> 00:10:39,719 Speaker 2: is the nominee, it doesn't have to be a red 228 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:41,640 Speaker 2: state that goes after gavinet. It could be a red 229 00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:44,360 Speaker 2: county in calib blue blue California, because there are our 230 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:46,920 Speaker 2: red counties and red towns. And you get that person 231 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 2: to sue Gavin Newsom because the homeless problem you've allowed 232 00:10:51,040 --> 00:10:54,320 Speaker 2: has cost us this much money, you know, that sort 233 00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:55,640 Speaker 2: of thing, and you tie them up in court. 234 00:10:55,720 --> 00:10:59,320 Speaker 3: And yeah, there were some ren counties during the utterly 235 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:02,840 Speaker 3: unconstantutional and I mean, by the specific wording of the 236 00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:06,600 Speaker 3: California Constitution, the unconstitutional shutting down of the economy during COVID. 237 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:10,040 Speaker 3: They're closing the schools. But the red counties really just 238 00:11:10,120 --> 00:11:12,719 Speaker 3: kind of said, hey, we're coming at you unless you 239 00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:14,880 Speaker 3: you soften up and do the right thing, as opposed 240 00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:17,400 Speaker 3: to actually dragging them into court and making it happen. 241 00:11:17,640 --> 00:11:24,640 Speaker 3: But yeah, the Pandora's box is open now we. 242 00:11:23,080 --> 00:11:31,200 Speaker 2: We and it's it's interesting to me that, at least 243 00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:34,080 Speaker 2: on the left leaning channels, I didn't see one person 244 00:11:34,160 --> 00:11:37,640 Speaker 2: bring up, you know, a possible downside to this, not one. 245 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:44,960 Speaker 3: That is striking and at the risk of sounding hyper partisan, 246 00:11:46,160 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 3: I am more than willing to take on their arguments 247 00:11:49,480 --> 00:11:53,800 Speaker 3: and beat them in this discussion one hundred percent. That's 248 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:56,240 Speaker 3: our job. I mean, that's your job as a voter 249 00:11:56,360 --> 00:12:00,320 Speaker 3: and as an American. They don't even they pretend as 250 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:03,280 Speaker 3: though the counter arguments don't even exist, as you've just indicated, 251 00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:05,800 Speaker 3: which is well, let's a measure of something. 252 00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:06,960 Speaker 4: You can call it what you want. 253 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 2: Joe Biden made a big decision on Ukraine yesterday that 254 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:14,120 Speaker 2: may have happened the day of the verdict so that 255 00:12:14,520 --> 00:12:17,040 Speaker 2: it didn't make the news. Really I'm not sure. Seems 256 00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:19,360 Speaker 2: like a heck of a coincidence. Anyway. Other stuff to 257 00:12:19,400 --> 00:12:22,480 Speaker 2: talk about too, and more on the Trump trial, all 258 00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:25,800 Speaker 2: on the way Armstrong and Getty