WEBVTT - Mike Pence Talks Tariffs, Russia/Ukraine War

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now for reaction to that and much more

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>employes to say, is the former Vice President of the

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.239
<v Speaker 1>United States, Mike Pence. Vice President Pence, thank you so

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>much for being here.

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you both for having me on.

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with one of these top stories

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're following today, which has to do with the

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>pressure campaign from the White House when it comes to

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve. And now you told Bloomberg Television last

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>month that the President ought to be able to express

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>himself when it comes.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 2>To the FED.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But I want to get your thoughts on these latest

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>allegations against FED Governor Lisa Cook. What's your level of

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>concern now with that all when it comes to central

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>bank independence as we see the scrutiny Widen Well, certainly.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it'd be appropriate for Lisa Cook to respond

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to the allegations that have been made. I know the

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 3>President's called on her to resign, but she has a

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>right to defend herself.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I did read today that.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Federal Home Loan has found more than twenty two thousand

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Americans that have filed mortgages, aims, and two residences at

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 3>the same time, and so I think she should answer

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 3>for that. Have a chance to answer for it. But

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>what I hope is that the effort to push out

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>another member of the Federal Reserve isn't just simply part

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>and parcel of an effort to get Jerome Powell, who

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>our administration appointed as a Federal Reserve chair to to

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 3>lower interest rates or otherwise take action that that would

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 3>not otherwise be justified. I understand the President's frustration with

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Chairman Powell, and he's.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Entitled to speak out about that.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>But my hope is that these latest allegations are not

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>simply part of that overall pressure campaign and can be

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>given and afforded the due process that they deserve.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Mister Vice President, we'd like to turn to another topic

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 4>we've been covering very closely this week, of course, that

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 4>is the question of the President's effort to end the

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 4>war in Ukraine through a settlement between Voladimir Zelenski, the

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 4>president of Ukraine, and his Russian counterpart.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 2>You have met Vladimir.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Putin before, do you believe that President Trump is perhaps

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 4>putting too much trust in the Russian leader and his

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 4>willingness to end the war.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I haven't met Vladimir Putin, and it's clear to

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>me that Putin doesn't want peace. Putin wants Ukraine. And

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I commend President Trump for continuing to pursue peace in

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine today he is quite frankly surrounded by a lot

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>of isolationist voices in and outside the administration that frankly

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>would have cut Ukraine off a long time ago. And

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 3>so I'm grateful to President has stayed after it. I'm

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 3>grateful that he renewed military support, and I commend him

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>for meeting with President Putin and meeting with President Zelenski

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>and our European allies. But Michael, I think one thing

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>is missing, and that is I believe the time has

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>come for the United States Senate to enact those strong

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 3>secondary sanctions against Russia and send them to the President's desk.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 3>I believe that would strengthen the president's hand. With a

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>waiver authority are that are built into those sanctions, the

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 3>President could implement them or.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 2>Not implement as he saw fit.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>But my deep conviction, having studied Vladimir Putin and having

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 3>spoken to him and told him things he didn't want

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 3>to hear, Putin's not going to stop until he stopped.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>So while the President continues, on one hand, on a

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 3>vigorous track of diplomacy. I think the time has come

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>for the US Senate to put on the President's desk

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>those strong secondary sanctions that will make it clear to

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Vladimir Putin and to the Russians that unless they choose

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 3>the pathway of peace through diplomacy, we will continue to

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>provide military support and we will pass the kind of

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 3>secondary sanctions that will literally break their economy.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>What about so.

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Called secondary tariffs against China? Would you be in favor

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the administration moving towards that against Beijing, like we've

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>seen them take against India, even if some of the

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>argument has been that they haven't done that yet because

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to risk the trade talks that are

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>happening right now with China.

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I have to tell you that the secondary sanctions

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>against China and other countries that are essentially fueling the

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Russian war machine, sanctions that five hundred percent would have

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>a devastating effect on the Russian economy.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, I have.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Plenty of reasons to support strong tariffs against China. During

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 3>our administration, we changed the national consensus on China. We

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 3>imposed two hundred and fifty billion dollars in tariffs, and

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 3>we brought China to the negotiating table for that Phase

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>one trade deal in twenty twenty. So I think we

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>have to be really strong on China after years of

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 3>trade abuses. But otherwise, I believe we ought to be

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>pursuing free trade with free nations. We ought not to

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 3>be We ought not to be cheering on one hundred

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and fifty billion dollars in tariff for revenue that's ultimately

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 3>paid by American consumers and American businesses. But rather we

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 3>ought to be looking to lower tariffs with free nations

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 3>around the world. Even while we stand firm with places

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>like China.

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>We do want to get to trade. But I have

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>one other for you when it comes to Russia, because

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a large part of the discussion this week has been

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>around security guarantees. But we've had reporting here at Bloomberg

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>News that there are doubts growing about what those guarantees

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can look like because Russia wants to have a say

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in what those guarantees are going to be. What is

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>feasible in your view? What can the US push for

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>here when it comes to guaranteeing Ukraine's future, particularly when

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we know that this will likely be led first by Europe,

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but then with the United States backing.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, the President's taken NATO membership off the table, which

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>he's entitled to do. But I don't know why the

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>United States has given the Russians veto authority over who

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>joins NATO. That's our security alliance. But be that as

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>it may, I think the security commitments that we should

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 3>make should reflect NATO. They should be in a sense

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 3>like Article five, where the United States provides whatever's appropriate,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>not boots on the ground, but the kind of strategic

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 3>support that's necessary to ensure that once Vladimir Putin has

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>stopped that he doesn't go forward at all.

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>If I can come back.

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 3>The reason I'm so confident and so adamant about the

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Senate needing to move these secondary sanctions is because it

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 3>was back in twenty nineteen that President Airdawan sent the

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>tanks across the border into Syria. They were raging down

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 3>on top of our Kurdish allies, and President Trump put

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>me on a plane on Air Force two and sent

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 3>me to Turkey to negotiate a ceasefire. And what I

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>would tell you and your viewers is in that negotiation

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 3>with President Airdiwan, what was persuasive to him was the

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>fact that President Trump had given me a series of

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 3>sanctions that would be imposed on members of Air Dewan's

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>government unless he agreed to a ceasefire to allow us

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 3>to evacuate our allies from the border region. As you remember,

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 3>we secured that ceasefire, our Kurdish allies were able to

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>evacuate safely. And that's why I really do believe that

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>it would strengthen President Trump's hand if when the Senate

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>comes back, one of their first acts would be to

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>send those those secondary sanctions, that tough bill to the

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 3>President's desk, let him sign it, implement it at his

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 3>choosing with the waiver authority. But I really do believe

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 3>that at the end of the day, we've got to

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>we've got to have that hand reach out in diplomacy

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 3>and negotiations, but the other hand, reminding, reminding Vladimir Putin

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>and the Russians that there will be severe consequences, as

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the President said, there would be if the path of

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 3>diplomacy fails.

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 4>It's the Vice president we wanted to move on to

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 4>domestic politics and those questions, and that includes redistricting. It's

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 4>been a big topic this week, of course, with what's

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>happening in Texas and California. As a former Indiana governor,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 4>we do support that happening in the Hoosier State and

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 4>what will be the long term implications of this wave

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 4>to redrun congressional maps.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, Michael, as a former Indiana governor, I'll support with

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the current Indiana governor decides as appropriate with our General Assembly.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Constitution gives the states the authority to

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 3>set the time, place, and manner of elections, and I

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 3>respect that. I also understand the frustration that the President

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 3>and many Republicans have fell. I mean there were state

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 3>it's the President and I have the two times we

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 3>ran together one thirty five forty percent of the vote,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 3>and yet the congressional delegation from that state is more

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 3>like twenty percent or less. Some states where we enjoyed

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 3>thirty five percent support, there are no Republicans in Congress.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's an old saying that that way you sow,

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 3>you reap, and the heavy handedness of many Democrat legislatures

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>and governors over the years is set into motion this pathway.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to let people Indiana and other legislatures

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 3>make those decisions, but at the end of the day,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 3>it'll be the American people that.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Decide no matter what happens. When it comes to twenty

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, twenty twenty eight, we know the economy is

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going to remain a top issue for American voters. And

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this week US swybean farmers said that they were near

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a quote trade in financial precipice and cannot survive a

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>prolonged trade war, particularly when it comes to China. I've

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>learned that Indiana is the top five soybean producing state.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned about farmers and do you think that

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this administration is planning enough ahead to protect US farmers.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I believe also to believe that trade meets jobs. In

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 3>our administration, whether it was in negotiations with Canada and

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Mexico or in that the strong stand we took with

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 3>China imposing teriffs, it was always a battle about about

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 3>lowering trade barriers and ending subsidies and ending trade abuses.

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 2>My concern about I think it's a concern.

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Of many farmers in Indiana and all across the heartland,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>is that what's emerging from this administration are broad based,

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>unilateral tariffs that are being imposed on friend and foe alike.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's that's that's not leverage, that's industrial policy. Uh

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>and and I believe you know that history shows and

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.359
<v Speaker 3>and even somebody that knows a little bit about economics

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 3>knows that American companies and American consumers pay American tariffs.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean, some of the countries around the world.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 3>That export to US will take a small reduction of

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>their price, but in the main, Americans pay that cost.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 3>And it's particularly meaningful for farmers who understand that when

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 3>there's terriffs that are imposed on imported agricultural goods here,

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 3>they always result in retaliation by those markets around the world.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 3>So again, my belief has always been that free trade

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 3>with free nations. Let's stand strong on trade abusers like

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>China around the world, but let's look to lower terraffs,

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.599
<v Speaker 3>lower non terraf barriers.

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And that way we'll win in the city and on

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the farm.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 4>It's a Vice President. You brought up industrial policy, and

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 4>we wanted to ask you about some headlines that we

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 4>have seen and broken here at Bloomberg News at Bounce

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 4>some industrial policy moves. This includes the possibility that the

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 4>US government may take a stake of up to ten

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 4>percent in Intel Corp. The iconic American chip maker, as

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 4>well as take a fifteen percent cut of sales of

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia AI chips to China. Were those kinds of ideas

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 4>on the table during your time in the first administration?

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 4>And do you think these things are a good idea

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 4>or a good strategy.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 3>This was not a strategy that we employed during the

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump Pens years. And I have great concerns about having

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the US government take a position with a Golden Chairs

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and Nippon Steel, or just the latest discussions about taking

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 3>a percent of Intel. Now the Navidia agreement is even

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 3>more problematic. I mean, we have export controls in place

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 3>to protect our national security. The limitations on the ability

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 3>of Navidia to sell to chips to China was on

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the basis of our national security. Simply taking fifteen percent

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 3>of those sales doesn't serve our national interests or our

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 3>national security, I would argue, And so I think we

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 3>need to take a step back on all of this.

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd encourage the administration, and if I was speaking to

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 3>the President, I'd encourage him to It's time for us

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to think twice state.

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Owned enterprise is not the American way.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Free enterprise is the American way, and a refereed private

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 3>sector with less taxes and less regulation has created the

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 3>most prosperous economy in the history of the world. And

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>if we stay on that path, that'll always be true.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>My ser Vice President, the last minute that we have

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>with you, we do want to ask you about news

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of day. I would love your thoughts about President Trump's

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>decision to call in the National Guard to Washington, d C.

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that this was the right move.

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I strongly support the President's decision to use his authority

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>under the constitutionnsting with the Home Rule Act to really

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 3>bring safety back to the streets of Washington, d C.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I know there's a lot of debate about statistics, but

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, honestly, if Washington, d C. Was a state

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 3>to have the highest homicide rate in the country, I mean,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 3>sixteen hundred violent crimes this year alone in a city

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>this size is just astounding. And I think I think

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the residents of this city and people around the country

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 3>appreciate the President taking the steps that he's taken to

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 3>create safety on the streets of our nation's capital. And

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I fully support efforts by the President to provide resources

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 3>for states and local communities to make every city in

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 3>every town in America safe.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Former Vice President Mike Pence, thank you.