WEBVTT - CFB Live on Spotify (9/22): Week 4 Weirdness Potential

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbo hell that for me, I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>for a day at the steak? Is that woo woom?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>And then and Tye, welcome back to the Soliburble boys

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and girls. My name is ty hilden Brandt. You'll hear

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>from Dan Rubinstein here momentarily because this is another excerpt

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 2>from College Football Thursdays. It's the live show we do

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>on Spotify every Thursday night, five pm East, two pm West.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 2>We would encourage you to join next week. If you

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>weren't able to make it this week, that's fine. Check

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>out soliverble dot com slash Spotify. That is soliverble dot

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 2>com slash Spotify again. We do it every Thursday evening.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>We play games, we make picks. The excerpt you are

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>about to hear is Dan and I talking about weird

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff college football weirdness, as you may have heard us

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>say when we did our previews this week. Week four

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 2>does not have any obvious headliners, and oftentimes at college

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>football it's the weird weeks. It's the quiet weeks that

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.919
<v Speaker 2>jump up and get you and produce just the weird outcomes,

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>the weird situations that make college football great. So we

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 2>went through and we wanted to talk about the weird

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>circumstances we could be talking about when we do our

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>recap show for week four. Again, thank you so much

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>for downloading, listening, and supporting the solid verbal. We will

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 2>be back next week to talk all things week four.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, here's a little blurb from college Football Thursdays.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about some weird college football stuff stuff.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan, you're really going for it today. Your voice is

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>back and you are You're digging deep.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I am digging deep. We are looking for results. We

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 2>are looking for game situations that would make for the

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>most entertaining retelling when we do our recap show on Sunday.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Have you given a look to this slate? What is

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>the weirdest possible thing that could happen this week?

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Iowa and Rutgers hitting the over, although it keeps coming down,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's I guess less and less relatively impressive.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 2>But it's still over under the over. I tweeted this

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 2>out shortly before we went live. This single most confusing

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>thing that could happen, not just this week, maybe all

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>year is Iowa and Rutgers getting into a shootout. The

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 2>over under currently is thirty three and a half points.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>That is the lowest point total in college football in

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>over twenty years, I believe since the year two thousand.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I made that joke earlier in the week

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and even better.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this means there's any possibility of

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the over hitting or a shootout happened, But some hints

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>this week. Did you see what Greg Ciano had to say?

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Some hints this week that maybe one of our favorite

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>coaching tropes, maybe they would open up the offense.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Got to open it up, really open it up.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll open up the offense for this special game

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>against Iowa as if they were holding back against their

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>previous opponents. Maybe we'll open it up, open it up

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 2>for this game against Iowa.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan, it would be great if in the preseason, in

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>fall camp, Kirk Farns in a press conference said, you know,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>really thinking about closing up the playbook even more, really

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about narrowing. It's gonna be.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Tech mobile out there. Four plays, keep it simple, Maybe

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 2>run a few variations off that and expand to eight.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Iowa Rutgers thirty four. I'm seeing maybe thirty three and

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a half at the moment. Wow, I mean, so the

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>big surprise there would be great quarterback play or even

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess comp quarterback playing like well. Final score twenty

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>eight twenty four. Fifty is not a huge number to

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>hit as far as win total or point totals go. No,

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>if they were to surpass fifty, that would be like

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs popping out of your head, tongue wagging, slapping the

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>ground like a cartoon wolf. I can't believe what I'm

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at here. The thing is, I hate betting unders.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I hate it because it's such a buzzkill, Like I

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>just want to say some points, but this is rooting

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>against action.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>But this is so comically low. It's so comically low

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>that I'm conflicted because normally I would bet over because

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>I want to see action, and clearly I don't want

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 2>to see a game that has twenty total points. That

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 2>just seems boring as hell. So I'm inclined to go

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 2>over just because it's so low. I'm also inclined to

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 2>go under, just so twenty years from now, I can

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 2>say I was there, when I was there, when this

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>game was decided on two field goals and a six

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 2>nothing score.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd have Wisconsin scoring twenty eight points against Ohio State

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as a very weird occurrence unless there are plural, multiple

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>pick sixes. Really yeah, I'm just not a believer in

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this offense at all, with what they did against Wazoo.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I know they got loose a little bit last week

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>against no body, but.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Six to seven against New Mexico State, Dan, come on.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, shout out Skyler Bell. But I just I

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>don't see that happening against Ohio State. There's just there

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>are a few places where you're like, why are they

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ever bat at off Why are they ever like underwhelming

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>at offense when they have that vision? And I can

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>understand things growing stale. Excuse me, but the depths of

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>where Wisconsin, who did end up winning a bunch of

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>games last year after a pretty nightmarish September highlighted by

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was it the Notre Dame and Penn State games, Still

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like much has changed. That there's a

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>certain sloppiness to Wisconsin's offense that we saw against Washington State.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>That would be surprising to me that they get to

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight Kansas State getting to twenty eight. Maybe that's

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>our like weird, like the hateful twenty eight. That's our

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>number right now. It would be so it would be

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>weird for me, even with the news story. I don't

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>know if you have any Wisconsin offense thoughts. It would

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be weird to me if Quinn Yours were already back

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and he's well, the story is that he's going to dress.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>The story is that he's going to dress. So this

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Quin Yours because I was actually going to bring this

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 2>up when he got done Quinn Yours. When he initially

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>went down, the reports were all over the place the

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>span of his injury, how long it would take to heal,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and the initial report was two to six weeks. Now

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that's a bit of a spectrum, right, That's that's you

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Usually hear a little bit more specificity around and any

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of injury along along the lines of how much

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 2>how much healing time is required, But two to six

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>is a window. And then there have been reports along

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the way where Quinn Ewers is progressing better than better

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>than expected. The prognosis maybe isn't as bad as initially thought.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's still I mean, that's a huge deal

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 2>for Texas. First off, if he comes back, because I

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 2>think he's far and away the better quarterback there. What

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say as for a weird result

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>would be Quinn, you weres playing playing well in Texas

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>still losing, that would be odd, still losing on the

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>road to Texas Tech, which you know, it may not

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 2>come down to whoever is playing quarterback for the Longhorns.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>It may come down to whether or not the Texas

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 2>defense can show the flashes that they showed against Alabama,

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>or if we're going to see more of what the

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>advanced numbers would tell us the efficiency numbers tell us

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>about Texas football, which is they're going to have a

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 2>hard time stopping the pass, particularly against a pass happy

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 2>offense in the form of Texas Tech led by Zach Kittley,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the new offensive coordinator.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it would be. It would be weird if at

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>three h eight pm on Saturday, the prevailing whether it's Twitter,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's whatever, the prevailing bit of advice is you

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 1>gotta get it on ESPN, Misszoo. Auburn is just going off.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The game is going off. This is much like I

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's happening here. These guys are trading haymakers.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>This game is wild. That would be an unexpected weird

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thing to come across mid to late afternoon on Saturday afternoon,

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know. I'm not a believer. I'm sorry

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in either one of these teams, but I'm gonna flip

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it to the positive, TI, please. It would be a

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shock to me if, as I'm looking across the SEC,

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be a shock in an incredible way that

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and M got attacked together this week, and

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>now I know they're getting healthier at receiver. Evan Stewart

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>namely is coming back. They got a couple of young

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>dbs back against Arkansas, which seems important against kJ Jefferson.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It would be weird to me if this game weren't incredible,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>just because it always kind of is. Last year, I

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>know was pretty disappointing. Yeah, and that was just one

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>big play basically responsible for A and M's points. But

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this game is always it always seems to be because

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's at Jerry World, always seems to be odd and

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>comes down to a weird overtime moment or comes down

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to a last second thing. It would be weird to

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>me if this game weren't incredible, because I just always

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>look forward to it in the SEC.

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I think Florida going to Tennessee and winning by two

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns or multiple touchdowns would confuse every projection system I've

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>seen so far this year. None of the metrics would

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>know what to do with that, because nothing says that

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that's even a possibility. I think that'd be interesting.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there is there's a certain amount of turbulence

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to Florida Tennessee. There just is.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>There is, there is rivalry game table for sure. Penn

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>State being taken to the wire with Central Michigan seems

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>plausible to me.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>That seems pausible to me. Taken to the wire four

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown favorites, Yeah, that seems plausible to me. Penn State

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously let down spot Central Michigan could score points. We've

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>already seen that this year. I don't think it's a

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.359
<v Speaker 1>bad off out. They can't stop any buddy, but offensively

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not bad. This seems like the kind of game

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Penn State takes off. They're not going to lose, But

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight points that seems like a stretch to me.

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I would I'm not going to include that in my

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>tie versus the world. Bet Okay, I know if you

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were feeling really strongly about no.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, you were saying weirdness, weirdness potential, weirdness

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 2>potential is there with the Penn State Central Michigan game.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>We got a lot of folks in the chat bringing

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>up Oregon State and USC.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's let's deep.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Dive running the full gamut from USC losing on a

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 2>pick six, which would be that would actually be kind

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 2>of funny.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Poetic all the way to.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Like what do we got here? Oh my gosh, there's

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of USC Oregon State thoughts here.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, in general, I think Oregon State beating USC.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't care how they do it, but Oregon State

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 2>beating USC feels entirely possible to me. It would also

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 2>be very crushing for the PAC twelve, which I believe

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>would cannibalize itself earlier than usual if that were the case,

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Like I guess, I guess Washington still has a chance

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>in Utah. You know, Utah would have to get its

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>act together and impress in a way that they didn't

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 2>back in week one. But right now, there's so much

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>steam on USC that losing on the road to Oregon

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>State would would be a pretty big dagger to the

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Pac twelve.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>If that game were a seventeen thirteen final, that would

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be a surprise to me. With some of the down

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>moments from these defenses. You know, it wouldn't be weird.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't be a surprise if Oregon State pulled it off.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Smith, I saw it in a couple different places,

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>has had success against Alex Grinch, going back to their

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>time competing against each other in the Apple Cup. Different

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of roster, especially on defense for those Washington teams

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>with you know, Buddha Baker and Videvea, guys like that.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But no, given i mean US comfortably won this game

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>last year in LA and given the different ways in

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>which Oregon State on offense can gash teams, I'm just

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about the Oregon State defense. I'm I'm worried

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that the safety valve on that offense, Luke Musgrave is

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>out for this game. Some shaky kicking at times for

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Oregon State. That US is not an excellent team. So

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that you need to be buttoned up to

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>beat USC isn't totally true. But it'd be nicer to

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>be healthier if you're Oregon State and to have a

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>defense that you could count on a little bit more

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>than what you've been able to these past couple of years.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But teams get better, teams improve on either side of

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I'm just I'd be surprised if it were

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>low scoring to me with these defenses.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 2>A bunch of awesome suggestions here in the chat, let

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 2>me see if I can get to as many of

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>these as I can. We've got Shaye, We've got Alex

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about the Maryland Michigan game. Maryland blowing out Michigan.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean that would be a huge surprise, Shay, or

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Maryland just upsetting Michigan would definitely be a big deal.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>We know Maryland can score. I don't know if I

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 2>trust him to win. But alas, we've got Nathan saying,

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>weirdest thing would be Arkansas and A and M playing

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a totally normal, boring game in Arlington. To your point, Dan, right,

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>this is a game that just oozes weirdness. It's sort

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 2>of what the matchup is made out of.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Collins fired at halftime by getting run over by

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the Rambling wreck at the fifties.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh, pick gruesome. I don't mean to laugh at violence.

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 2>That would be weird, that would that would definitely be weird.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>We've got other ones here. Let's see, We've got someone

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 2>calls it cor Vegas cor Vaalus. I've never heard that one.

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I like. I like that one. Navy playing ECU can't

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>bet on the pirates against the United States Naval Academy

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 2>just out of principle, I agree with that.

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>What's happened in the Sunbeast?

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Tie?

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>What's coastal in the Sunbast? We have Coastal tonight, Coastal

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Carolina on the road against Georgia State. Yeah, I quietly

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>liked the Panthers and Coastal Carolina despite George staping all

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>on three only two and a half point favorites. So

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that's sneaky, weird jmu App State tie. It would be

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>weird if this weren't No, I'm not saying I'm not

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>picking right now. I'm just saying, you'd be weird if

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't crazy, right.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be a blowout. Honestly, I think

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 2>App State's going to blow him out, all right?

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That does it Forballers.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you again for your undying support as we go

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 2>through this here college football season. We will be back

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>on Monday talking all things week four. If you're a

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>verballer at verballers dot com, get a little bit early

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 2>access to that recap show, which we'll record live on

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Sunday morning. Enjoy your weekend, Enjoy your weekend of college football.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Stay solid,