WEBVTT - Special Episode: Angela Saini & Superior

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and this is This Podcast Will

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Kill You. Welcome back, everyone to the latest installment of

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the tp w k Y Book Club. I hope you

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>all are having fun so far and are learning so

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so much, because I certainly am serious. This is like

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a dream come true, and I'd love to hear from

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you all about these episodes or the books we're talking about.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>What did you think? Did you enjoy these books as

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>much as I did? What questions do you wish I

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>had asked? Are there other books you'd love to add

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to the book club list? Send your thoughts to our

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>contact us form on our website This Podcast will Kill

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You dot Com, or our email This Podcast will Kill

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You at gmail dot com. I hope you have more

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>room on your shelves or space on your eReader, because

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this week's book is yet another must read. Superior The

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Return of Race Science, by award winning science journalist and

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>author Angela Siiny, published in twenty nineteen, traces the origins

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of race science and examines its disturbing persistence in medical

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and scientific research today. Sayiny, whose other fantastic books examined

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>sexism and scientific research in her book Inferior and the

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>complex roots of patriarchy in the Patriarchs, which is just

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>now out, joins me on this bonus episode to chat

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about the topics she explores in Superior. Listeners of the

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast are likely familiar with some of the story of

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>how eugenics rose to prominence, especially in the United States,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>as the field of genetics provided a means through which

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>eugenesis could classify individuals or groups as quote unquote fit

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>or quote unquote unfit to reproduce. We've discussed eugenic laws

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and policies in the context of Huntington's disease, diabetes, hemophilia,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and most recently, epilepsy, just to name a few. In

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>some cases, you are forbidden to get married if you

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>had been diagnosed with any one of a number of

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>conditions or diseases scored within a certain range of an

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>IQ test, were alleged to have committed a crime, or

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>had skin color that was deemed inferior. Eugenic policies didn't

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>stop at outlawing marriage to certain individuals. However, there was, also,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, the incredibly frequent practice of forced sterilization. The

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>appalling popularity and widespread acceptance of eugenics in the US

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>often gets downplayed or omitted entirely in some histories which

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>portray Nazi Germany as the originator of eugenics, when in

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>fact Adolf Hitler took inspiration from the eugenic policies of

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the US. But while the origin of eugenics dates back

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>decades before the Third Reich, the racist ideas and prejudices

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that gave rise to eugenics had existed for hundreds of

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>years in the form of race science, and race science

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly did not die out with the fall of Nazi

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Germany after World War II. You can find ample evidence

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of race science in medical, genetic and biological research done today,

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>helped along by the burgeoning field of genomics, with some

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>scientists continuing to search for a genetic basis to race

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>despite never finding one because it doesn't exist, or looking

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for population level genetic differences in intelligence, or promoting race

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>based medicine. While some of these researchers make no attempt

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to hide their racist motivations for conducting this research, others

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>may be well meaning but still participate in the type

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of research that supports the notion that racial groups can

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>be defined biologically and classified hierarchically. In her widely acclaimed

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>book Superior, Angela Siini explores the deep history of race science,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>tracing how racial categories were constructed and examining what purposes

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they served and continue to serve, particularly in the justification

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of slavery and colonization. She charts the repackaging that race

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>science underwent as scientific knowledge about fields such as genetics

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and genomics expanded. As Sione reveals, this insidious repackaging has

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed for the continued presence of race science today in

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>many forms, some of which are overtly racist and others

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that are unintentionally so, but harmful all the same. Superior

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is a compelling, eye opening, an essential read that feels

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>increasingly relevant, chillingly so in the political and scientific landscape today.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited to get to the interview itself, so

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a quick break here and when we get back,

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll dive right in. Angela, thank you so so very

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>much for being here today. I loved your book, Superior,

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>for how brilliantly you trace the problematic history of eugenic

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and race science and its disturbing persistence in medicine and

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>scientific research today. So tell me what is race science

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and what made you decide to write a book about it.

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Race science is number one, the belief that there are

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>biological races that exist, that we are not necessarily one

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 2>human species, that we can be divided to some degree

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>into separate breeds or types of person. But more fundamentally,

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 2>I think throughout the history of race science, it was

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 2>a belief that there was also a hierarchy between these races,

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 2>that there were some populations that were genetically or through evolution,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 2>more superior to others.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>At what point did you say, hey, I want to

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.679
<v Speaker 1>write a book about this, Like, how did you first

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>learn about it? And then how did that turn into

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>writing a whole book?

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>What does some degree this book has been in the

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>back of my mind since I was a child. So

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in a part of London, Southeast London,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>in which the far right was very active in the

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighties and nineteen nineties. There were a number of

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 2>racist murders in the area broader area where I lived

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and the town where me and my sisters lived. We

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>were one of few at that time, one of few,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>very very few ethnic minorities. It's very different now. My

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>parents still live there and it's completely different. Demographically, but

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>when we were growing up, racism really was the backdrop

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>to my teenage years in ways that sometimes I think

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 2>it's difficult for people to understand about Britain now. For

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>younger people living there now, it was just, you know,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 2>all the time, this was a fact of life that

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 2>you were confronted with, and that was part of the

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>reason I went into journalism in the first place. One

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>of the first things I remember writing for other people

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>was about this violent racist incident that me and my

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>sister was subjected to when we had some visitors from

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>visiting our home and we were out with them, and

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I read that out in class when I think I

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 2>was around eight or nine, and very quickly realized the

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>power that the cathartic power for myself in being able

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to write things down and process them, but also the

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 2>power that could have in helping other people understand. When

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I got to university many years later, I got involved

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>in anti racism activism. I became one of the coachairs

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>of the Anti Racism committee at Oxford, and I started

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>writing for the student press about race and racism. And

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 2>when I left university, rather than becoming an engineer, which

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I would have done otherwise if my life

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 2>had been different. I went into journalism. I worked at

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>ITN and the BBC as a news reporter TV news

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>reporter for years, and then when I went freelance to

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>write science books, my writing and my reporting was driven

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 2>by this idea that science is a system of power,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 2>just like any other. Is an establishment that consists of

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>people who are worried about things like their own personal

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 2>status funding. It's informed by the politics of the world

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 2>around it. So my books really look at that and

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>try to understand what part does science play in helping

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>us understand ourselves, but also how is science affected by

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 2>the wider world around it. And when it came to

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 2>writing Superior, you have to remember it was commissioned at

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a time when people still thought that we were getting

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>past race. This is an issue for you know, previous generations,

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>not for future generations, which is very naive of course,

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and it was actually quite a hard sell in that sense.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't an easy one to convince people of that

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 2>a book like this needed to be written. But of course,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight things have only got worse. I mean, the

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>rise of ethnic nationalism populism all around the world and

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 2>the horrific ways in which scientific racism or pseudo scientific

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>racism has been co opted by the far right, and

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it has entered the main stream to some degree. If

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you think look at things like the Great Replacement theory,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>which is hugely informed by these pseudoscientific ideas. It has

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>turned out to be prescient, but it didn't feel that

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 2>way when I started writing it.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into the insidious ways that race science

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is still done today, I want to start at the beginning.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>How and when did the concept of race originate and

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>how did the growth of science, especially disciplines like systematics

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>or anthropology deepen racial categories.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have to understand that the development of modern

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Western science happened at a particular point in time. And

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not to say that science didn't exist before that.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>It did. I mean, it may have been called different things,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and it may have looked different. It may have not

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>involved the empirical method or you know, the kind of

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>rigor or establishment that evolved later. But science was practiced

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 2>all over the world in lots of different ways. But

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 2>during the development of modern Western science in the sixteen

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>seventeen eighteenth centuries in Europe and later in North America,

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>The political reality was one of a growing imperialism, imperial force,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and then later the development of slavery, the Transatlantic slave trade.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Now slavery, of course, also has been practiced all over

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the world for as long as we can we have records.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 2>But the nature of that political reality necessarily informed the

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 2>way that science developed, because as European Enlightenment naturalists were

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 2>looking at the natural world and saying, can we codify it?

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Can we start placing boundaries and develop a taxonomy around nature?

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, different plants and animals, different types of creature,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>and how they're related to each other. Can we do

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the same for humans? Which sounds like a perfectly logical

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>thing to do. But of course, as they were doing this,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have a very thorough understanding of how human

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>variation worked all over the world, and they certainly weren't

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>fully convinced at that point that we were just one

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>species as we know we are now, or that we

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>are very homogeneous species as we know we are now,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 2>And so a lot of this understanding came from sometimes

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 2>just myth and legend or travelers' reports, folk ideas that

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>they had about how human difference played out. Very superficial things,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 2>but particularly the political hierarchies of that time. So for example,

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Europeans would have looked at the Transatlantic slave trade. They

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 2>would have encountered people in states of subservience and other

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>people who had power over them, and then started to

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 2>equate that in their imaginations with some idea of a

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 2>racial hierarchy or some idea of you know, that there

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 2>are groups that are better than others, which, as I

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 2>said before, societies have always done. The powerful have always

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>done that to the less powerful in different ways. You know,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>men have done it to women, the free have done

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 2>it to slaves, citizens have done it to non citizens.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Natives have done it to foreigners. This is, you know,

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>part of how humans operate when it comes to think

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>about their own status and the status of others. But science,

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>which we imagine to be this subjective project, was affected

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 2>by this too. So for example, last year, I remember

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I was in the New Orleans on holiday and there's

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful little historical museum there, and in that museum

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 2>you can see a book from around the middle of

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the eighteenth century called the Black Code. This is a

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 2>very thick book produced by the French authorities there, which

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>was a guide for how the black residents of the

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>city should behave with respect to the white systens of

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the city, and vice versa. Now, why was it called

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the Black Code? Earlier that book would have been termed

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the Slave Code. But because of the Transatlantic slave trade

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>and the demographics around that, blackness began in the eighteenth

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>century to be associated with subservience and slavery. And so

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>when you read these early taxonomies of race where they

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 2>divide people up by color, and that's not just one

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's just one arbitrary way of dividing people.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 2>There is no natural way of doing it. But that's

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>just one way you can see. You know, blackness is

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>associated with slavery, that brownness is associated with something else,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>yellowness is associated with something else. And love and behold,

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, whiteness is always elevated. Is this perfect special

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>category of human that is just superior to everyone. So

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 2>it's very self serving, it is very political. And this

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>is something I like to remind people of is that,

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, during the Black Lives Matter resurgence after the

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>murder of George Floyd, there were some scientists that came

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>out and said, you know, stop politicizing science, Why are

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>you bringing anti racism into science? Well, if we did

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>not have anti racism in science, trust me, we would

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>be perpetuating the pseudoscientific myths. It started off political, and

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>that's why it's so important to continually think about these

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>things and how we might interrogate them and challenge them

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and correct them in order to have a better science

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of human difference going forward. But that original sin, if

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 2>you like, or those original mistakes around race, the development

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of this idea of race came to form the bedrock

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>of the science of human difference for hundreds of years.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>So by the time you get to the nineteenth century,

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 2>by which time these pseudoscientific beliefs are deeply rooted in

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the Western scientific establishment, you have serious physicians and biologists

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 2>claiming that black people have thicker skin than white people,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that their bones are denser, that they don't feel pain.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>In the same way legitimizing slavery and colonialism on the

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>basis that races are just different and that some races

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 2>have a right to control others or to civilize others.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Ideas about the primitive or the modern what it meant

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 2>to be civilized became kind of fed into all of this,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and we still live with the legacy of it to

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>this day.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>We often still talk about other kinds of early humans

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or harmonyms in a way that places us humans at

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the very top, using words like faster, or smarter or stronger.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And one of my favorite parts of your book is

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>when you discuss how this hierarchical language recently disappeared, specifically

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 1>for Neanderthals. Can you take us through this public image

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>makeover that Neanderthals underwent.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 2>It was fascinating for me. I spent a portion of

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 2>my research time when I was writing Superior in Australia,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 2>which is one of the most fascinating countries in the

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 2>world culturally because of the depth and length of different

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Aboriginal communities and their kind of cultural ideas about the

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>world and time and space. And it's just incredibly mind blowing.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's difficult for me to put into wards

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 2>how revolutionary it is for someone raised in the West

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>to be witnessed to a system of thought that is

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 2>so diametrically different from what you're used to. And we

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>have to remember the racial history of Australia was one

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 2>in which these entire cultures were you know there was

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 2>an attempt to wipe them out. One of the very

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>first pieces of legislation to pass in Australia in the

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth century was the White Australia Act, which essentially tried

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to breed out the color from Australia. It forcibly took

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 2>children away from their parents raised them in boarding schools,

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 2>something that in North America. Of course, the story we're

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>also familiar with because of the story of Indigenous Americans,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to whom this was also done. And it's only relatively

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 2>recently we're starting to understand the scale of the horrors

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of what went on in these institutions. But it does

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 2>mean that while not destroyed, cultures were undermined, all in

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 2>the name of this idea of white supremacy, that the

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 2>white settlers in Australia had a right to that territory,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 2>that the communities that had lived there for tens of

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 2>thousands of years did not, this idea that they were

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 2>primitive and doomed to die out. Now, in the nineteenth centuries,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 2>also when the first bones of Neanderthals were discovered and

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>identified in the Neandervalley in Germany. Let's remember one of

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the first things archaeologists and scientists did when they discovered

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.959
<v Speaker 2>those bones was to go and compare them to the

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 2>bones of living Aboriginal Australians. Why did they do that

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>to people living on the other side of the world.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 2>And the reason, of course, is that here was this

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>form of human or species of humans it was conceived

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 2>of then, that had gone extinct. And in the racial

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 2>hierarchy or taxonomy of that time, there was a belief

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 2>that other races were also doomed to go extinct, among

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>them the indigenous Australian communities of Australia and New Zealand.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>And so if anyone was going to share some resemblance

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to Neanderthals, scientists, you know, in this ridiculous pseudoscientific myth

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 2>that they had created, thought it must be them. This

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 2>comparison was made, and even to this day, if you

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>look up the dictionary definition of Neanderthals, of course it's

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 2>not just this extinct form of human, but also kind

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>of a brutish, oafish, stupid man. He's a Neandertal. So

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 2>for years this association had been made. What's fascinating for me,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>as a journalist who writes on this topic is that

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in the last few decades, as it became clear that

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>perhaps there was some mixing between the Antertals and humans,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to the extent that we share some Neandertal ancestry. Many

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of us on the planet share some Neandertalle ancestry, but

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>particularly in Europe, of course, because Neanderthals lived in Europe,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that those of European heritage share, particularly this Neanderthal ancestry.

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 2>The language around Neanderthals began to shift, and it's palpable

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 2>in the scientific literature, but also in the popular press.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, people started saying that Neanderthals were smarter than

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>they then perhaps we thought they were, that they were

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 2>more human, just like us, and that I find particularly

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 2>galling this idea that here is this extinct form of

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>human of whom we know very little about, you know

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 2>very little, and the rehabilitation that Neanderthals have gone through

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 2>drawing them into the circle of humanity, when one hundred

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 2>years ago or more, living people, living modern humans were

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>driven out of the circle of humanity by virtue of

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>this idea that they were closer to in Neanderthals. No

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>scientist or geneticist or archaeologist will now paleontologists will ever

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 2>admit that there is anything you know, racialized about this,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>that there is anything racist going on in the way

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that they frame these things. But I think it's impossible

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 2>to look at that the kind of speculation that went

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 2>has gone on over the last hundred years and not

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>see that of course there is how can there not be?

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And since this rehabilitation of the Neanderthal image, there

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have been many scientific studies trying to link bits of

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthal DNA to functional rules like immune function or sleeping

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>patterns or brain shape. What are some of the problems

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>with these types of studies.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't have a problem with people doing whatever research

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 2>they want. What I don't understand is why anyone would

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>imagine that these tiny portions of that genetic legacy will

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>somehow reinforce the idea of race, which is what some

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 2>on the far right are hoping that it will. That

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>it will somehow show that Europeans are fundamentally different at

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 2>a genetic level because of this association with the Andanderthals.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 2>That is impossible. As I said before, we are genetically

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>more homogeneous than chimpanzees.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We are very very.

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 2>Genetically homogeneous species. There are no black genes, there are

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 2>no white genes. There is no gene that exists in

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 2>all the members of one population and not another. But

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>there is an undercurrent here in this research that perhaps

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 2>we can isolate something that makes some people different from others.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And of course that's what a lot of population genetics

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 2>is about, is about finding differences, genetic differences between populations.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 2>And while I don't have kind of a theoretical problem

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>with that, a lot of my work is about asking

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 2>scientists what are they trying to achieve here, what is

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the end goal of all of this, And is it

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 2>really about improving health or improving our understanding of humanity?

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Or is there something else going on that it may

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 2>be subconscious, I don't know, but something else going on here.

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>In the second half of the nineteenth century, the introduction

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the theory of evolution and then the rise of

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>genetics paved the way for eugenics to be widely accepted. First,

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>what is eugenics? And second why do you think it

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>gained so much traction, especially in the US.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, in some sense, the groundwork had been laid for

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the ideology of eugenics for a very long time, because,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 2>as I said, if you start with the premise that

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>the human species can be divided into breeds, that some

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 2>people are better than others by nature. Eugenics is the

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>belief that some people should be allowed to have children

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and some people shouldn't, or some people should be allowed

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 2>to have more children than others based on their genetic fitness,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>that the child of beautiful, clever parents is more likely

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 2>to be beautiful and clever, which, of course, as we know,

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 2>is not true. But leaving aside the fact that eugenics

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>as itself is flawed in that heredity doesn't work that way,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 2>it was popular because it spoke to that kind of

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 2>scientistic belief that society could be improved if we just

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>managed reproduction, which is an idea to some degree that

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>we still live with. It's an idea that is woven

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>through popular culture. Even now that you know, why are

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 2>some people having loads of kids and the clever people

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 2>are not having loads of kids? And what will that

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>mean for the future. Well, necessarily it won't mean anything.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>But we have at the back of our minds this

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 2>eugenically informed idea that we want everyone in the world

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to be the best that they can possibly be. We

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 2>want them to be the smartest, the fittest, the strongest,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the tallest, and that we can somehow engineer a society

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 2>like that through selective breeding or by encouraging reproduction in

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>some than others. And it was very popular on the

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 2>left and the right. I have to add. It wasn't

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 2>just we associate it now with the Nazis in Germany

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>in their program of racial hygiene, which of course led

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 2>to the Holocaust. But it was very popular among progressives

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 2>social progressives who believed very much that this was a scientific,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a technological solution to society's problems. If people who were

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>criminally indigent over generations or intellectually deficient over generations, if

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>they could just be wiped out somehow, then society's problems

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 2>will be fixed. But of course, as I said, it

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work that way.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And in your book you discuss several modern misconceptions about eugenics,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>one being that eugenics was born with the fascists and

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Nazis of World War two, and another being that it

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>died after the war. But what is the truth behind

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.719
<v Speaker 1>these misconceptions and why do you think the sanitized version

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of events has persisted?

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is the big events in history that we remember,

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 2>and the Holocaust is, you know, the culmination of eugenics

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 2>style thinking. So of course we do associate it with

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Nazi Germany, and perhaps it's normal that we should that

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>we would, But it actually started in London at University

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 2>College London with the cousin of Charles Darwin Francis Galton.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>It was developed with this wholehearted support of politicians at

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Winston Churchill and thinkers like Virginia Wolfe. Virginia wolf very

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 2>much believed in this idea of class superiority and inferiority.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>So this was a popular view at the time across

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 2>parts of Europe, but particularly taken up in the US.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So the UK itself didn't in the end carry through

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 2>with any eugenic style policies government policies, but the US did.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 2>There were sterilization policies here, there were anti immigration policies

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 2>which were certainly informed, I think by the eugenics movement.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 2>And there was an overlap, a very solid overlap, between

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the American eugenic society and mainstream science and genetics that

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 2>continued for a very long time. There were attempts even

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>after the Second World War to rehabilitate genics to create

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a kind of signs of positive eugenics. There were attempts

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>by some scientific racists like William Shockley, Nobel Prize winning engineer,

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 2>who try to create a sperm bank for Nobel Prize

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 2>winners and very smart people in which he placed his

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 2>own sperm, and of course that continues. Jeffrey Epstein did

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.479
<v Speaker 2>something similar. He was very much adhered to this idea

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that smart, brilliant people should be having more children, leaving

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>aside the fact what qualities do we really want in

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the next generation. Do we really want more William Shockley's

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 2>than Jeffrey Epstein's. I'm not sure about that. But the

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>point is that we live with these ideas and sometimes

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>in very subtle ways. Even now. Sometimes I look at

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the exhortations on social media to be the best version

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of yourself, and I think to myself, how different is

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 2>that really from this eugenic idea that we are not

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 2>enough as we are, that we can't accept people just

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>as they are. Be happy with that desperate kind of

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 2>quest that modern day middle class parents have to turn

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>their children into superhuman kids through training and classes, and

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I very much imagine one day, probably genetic selection, they're

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 2>not happy with what they have, and that is tragic

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>because if there is one ideal I think that has

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>evolved throughout the twentieth and twenty first century that I

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>think it would be tragic for us to let go of,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 2>is that every life matters, and every person is valuable

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 2>in their own way. Regardless of how productive they are

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>or how useful they are to society, They're still precious

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>and useful to us, to themselves, and it is it's

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>awful that you know, we still live this up with

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 2>this idea that we are not enough. I think, I

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>very much think that is a eugenic style of thinking

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>that we hang on to.

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely. In recent decades, the growing availability of genomic

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>technology and data has led to the continued search for

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a biological basis for race, despite never having found one.

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And one example of this type of research that you

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>give in your book is the Human Genome Diversity Project,

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>whose creators, as you point out, don't appear to be

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>intentionally trying to support racist claims. But how much does

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>intention matter?

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, so, the Human Genome Diversity Project was a kind

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of an offshoot of population genetics, and we have to

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 2>remember here that population genetics itself was a response to

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the eugenics establishment. So before the Second World War there

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>were eugenics labs everywhere. Cold Spring Harbor had one, there

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>was one at University College London, whether eugenics projects started.

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 2>But after the war, of course, that became very unfashionable,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and so a lot of eugenesists or race scientists as

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 2>they would have been called, completely innocuously before the Second

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>World War, began to reversion themselves, rehabilitate themselves as geneticist

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>population geneticis And this was a very left wing group

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of people at the beginning, so they were very much

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 2>opposed to racism. Many of them had experienced the horrors

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of what had happened during the Second World War and

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>wanted to leave that behind. But the science of human

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>difference was so deeply rooted in this idea of human

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>difference at the population level, it was very difficult to

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>do that in a whole scale way. So what you

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 2>get with the Human Genome Diversity Project is an attempt

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 2>to map human variation in a way that, for all

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 2>intents and purposes, looks very much like old fashioned race science.

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Was looking for genetic differences between populations. They won't call

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 2>them races, but they essentially are races that they're looking at,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 2>or large population groups, which is essentially the same thing.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 2>And so it was fraught from the beginning. It had

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of opposition from indigenous groups, particularly because the

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 2>project was all about going to these small, isolated communities

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>around the world in the belief that they might be

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>genetically exceptional in some way. None of them were, but

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, there was this in their imagination. They hoped

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 2>that they could pinpoint something genetically special about these isolated groups.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>And of course these isolated groups were not fans of this.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>They had learned over the centuries not to fully trust

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Western scientists coming in and trying to take their genetic

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>material or their biological material. So there was a lot

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:44.479
<v Speaker 2>of pushback on that front, but also conceptually, as social

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 2>scientists have been at pains to point out those flaws.

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 2>From the beginning, they didn't really resolve these group of

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 2>anti racists within science hadn't fully resolved why what they

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 2>were doing was not really race science. In the end,

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it didn't really go in anywhere. But what did come

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>out of that project more broadly was ancestry testing. So

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 2>modern day ancestry testing really is a product of that

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 2>movement within population genetics, and of course ancestry testing has

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 2>only re affirmed in the public imagination this idea that

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>race must be real, because then how else can you

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>take a DNA test and it tell you where you're from.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, we are going to take a quick break here,

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and when we get back, there's still plenty to talk about.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back everyone, Let's get back into it. In your book,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about how race science is still conducted by two

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>primary groups, These well meaning anti racist scientists whose research

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>nevertheless perpetuates the notion that race has a biological foundation,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the racial realists, the quote unquote racial realists

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who exploit scientific language to disguise themselves as legitimate scholars

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>when they are really just using pseudoscientific journals to promote

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>racist views. What role do each of these groups play

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to race science today?

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Rather than two groups, I think it's it's more useful

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>to think about it as a spectrum, because yes, there

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 2>are those on the very far fringes, the pseudoscientific fringes

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 2>of academia, with one maybe one foot in academia, and

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 2>most of their time not you know, just blogging on

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 2>these far right blogs or with their YouTube channels and

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 2>producing kind of these pseudoscientific papers for pseudo scientific journals,

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 2>and they are very much allied to the far right.

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 2>There are ideologies and beliefs are straight out of the

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth century. There is no real difference between what they

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 2>say and what they believed in the nineteenth century. But

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 2>mainstream science, to some degree, I think, still has this

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 2>commitment to race, which plays out in far more subtle

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 2>ways usually. I mean, there are some firmly within mainstream

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 2>academia who give a lot of space to those on

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the fringes. So I wouldn't say that they're necessarily anti racist.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 2>They will say probably that they're apolitical, that they are

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 2>just driven by curiosity, or you know, that they have

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>no political skin in the game, they're just interested. But

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 2>for some reason they give a lot of space to

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>those on the far right. And in fact, I just

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>published a piece recently in and Dark about mainstream scientific

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 2>journals and how much overlap there is between the people

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 2>who write for them and the people on these racist fringes,

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and there's far more than you would imagine. But then

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 2>there are also mainstream scientists who are permitted to anti racism,

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>who very much believe in the need to move on

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, really make a break from those mistakes

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of the past and the pseudoscience of the past. But

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, deal keep coming back to race as

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a guiding principle in the way that they think about

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 2>human difference. And you see this particularly in medicine. So,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 2>for example, in recent years, we've had a lot of

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 2>calls from very well intentioned people in medical research and

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 2>clinical research asking for more people of color to take

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 2>part in clinical trials. And sometimes this bleeds into this

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 2>claim that drugs tested on white people might not work

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 2>in black and brown people, which is absolute nonsense. Of

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>course that's not true. If it were, we would have

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 2>real problems right now when we went to the doctor.

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 2>But there is this problematic kind of space in which

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 2>we want diversity in clinical trials. Of course, because there

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 2>is such a huge degree of individual difference between us,

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 2>it's good to be able to map that in as

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 2>broad a way as possible, and to some degree, you know,

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 2>calling for people from different ethnicities can feel like a

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 2>way of achieving some of that diversity. But the truth is,

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 2>if you have a large enough group of people. It

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really matter what race they are as long as

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 2>there is enough of them, and that sometimes gets lost

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 2>in that messaging. So we need to be very careful.

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.919
<v Speaker 2>I think about the way that we talk about race

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 2>in science, and this is something I often say to

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 2>researchers when I do talks at universities or when I've

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.320
<v Speaker 2>spoken at the nih IS. Every time you use race,

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>ask yourself why you are using it and what you

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 2>think race means in that context? How are you defining it?

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 2>It's astonishing to me how many papers I read that

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 2>don't go through that essential first step.

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>As you point out the implication of many behaviors genetic

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>studies looking at racial differences in traits such as intelligence,

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is that if there is a biological difference, then social

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>programs would fail. What are some of the inherent issues

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>with studies like this and who benefits from them? Like

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>who wants to draw that conclusion?

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 2>There's always been this claim, and this goes back to

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 2>at least before the eugenics era, that no amount of

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>affirmative action or trying to fix society's problems when it

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>comes to racial inequality will work because deep down we

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 2>are just fundamentally different. And this is why this grift

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>continues into the present is because there are so many

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 2>people still invested in this idea that racial difference at

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the psychological or intellectual level is so real that we

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 2>will never really overcome it, that when we look and

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.720
<v Speaker 2>see these racial disparities, for example, in American society, that

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 2>that is something that will never be overcome because that

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 2>just reflects nature. Very again, a very self serving argument.

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 2>It's an argument for doing nothing, for not changing anything,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 2>and it's very ahistorical because, of course, if you look

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 2>at any group of people that has been designated and

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 2>then deliberately oppressed for centuries and deliberately disadvantage, and then

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 2>overlay on that the legacy of prejudice created by those myths,

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 2>pseudoscientific myths and centuries of disadvantage, of course you are

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 2>going to society is going to look the way it does.

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, how can it look any different. But that

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of lazy, pseudoscientific approach to explaining inequality is still there.

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 2>You see it in, for example, in Charles Murray and

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Richard Hernstein's The Bell Curve, which is still popular, which

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 2>people still cite and still read. You see it in

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 2>more subtle ways sometimes in the literature and education, for instance.

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:59.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, how do we solve educational disadvantage? We haven't

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 2>completely got rid of that yet. But what I would

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 2>say to people, and this is what you know, people

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 2>like W. E. B. Dubois said, when everyone is treated fairly,

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 2>when you have really extended that hand of opportunity to

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 2>absolutely everyone in as fair away as you can and

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 2>you still see difference, then perhaps you can come back

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and start complaining about it. But you can't do that

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how is a journal like Mankind Quarterly benefiting from

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>this harmful notion that scientists and the science is objective

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and that whatever scientists conclude from research is truth with

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a capital T.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Well. The Mankind Quarterly was a journal that appeared in

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen sixties after the Second World War, and it

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 2>was a reaction to the fact that race science was

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 2>moving out of science because it wasn't seen it was

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 2>seen as illogical and pseudoscientific. By this point, it was

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>completely unfashionable to be a race scientist in the after

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the Second World War, but there were a number of

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 2>academics around the world who were still committed to it,

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 2>who very much still thought that maybe we weren't one species,

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 2>that we were different species or subspecies or breeds, and

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that racial mixing was somehow dangerous to society that would

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 2>create these strange hybrid people, which I know sounds absolutely

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 2>bizarre now, but was an actual fear that, you know,

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 2>some people had less than a century ago. So they

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>created a journal of their own. It was called The

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Mankind Quarterly. It was funded by a very wealthy segregationist,

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Wickliffe Draper, American man who had inherited his wealth and

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 2>invested it in the segregationist cause. And one of the

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 2>planks of this was to fund racists within science and

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 2>academia who shared his views, who could then be used

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 2>as a kind of intellectual force with which to convince

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>conservatives that desegregation was a stake. And that's exactly what

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 2>The Mankind Quarterly was for. Wickliffe Draper distributed it to

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.880
<v Speaker 2>prominent conservatives in the US, and some of the people

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 2>who wrote for it were prominent in the early days,

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 2>quite prominent scientists. There was Henry Garrett, who was a

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>very well known and distinguished psychologist who argued that racial

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 2>mixing was deadly, that it was dangerous to society. There

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of overlap between this community who wrote

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:32.359
<v Speaker 2>for it and right wing, far right wing politicians and

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 2>figures in the segregationist movement and white supremacist movement, and

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 2>there were calls for it to be shut down. Even

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 2>at the time the journal was reviewed in mainstream scientific

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 2>journals and found to be complete nonsense. People asked for

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 2>it to be shut down. It wasn't shut down because,

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 2>like I said, it was independently funded, and in fact,

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 2>it's still in publication today. And that's the thing that

0:42:55.719 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 2>people find absolutely impossible to understand is how something like

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 2>this can still be circulated today. That's not to say

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it's widely read, but it is there, and it certainly

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 2>has influence on the far right. Many of the people

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 2>who write for it, or who have written for it,

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, also provide intellectual ballast, if you want to

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 2>call it that, for some of the most horrific right

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 2>wing ideologies that we have, and they are cited. They

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>were cited by the man who killed ten black people

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 2>at a supermarket and Buffalo just last year. If you

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>read his manifesto, there are scientific article after scientific articles

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 2>cited there, and many of those people have written for

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the Mankind quarterly.

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It is yeah, shocking and disturbing that it still exists

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and is still popular and like you said, published in

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>by people who have a foot in both academia and

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>publish in legitimate scientific journals, but also things like me

0:43:56.080 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and kind Cordly. So you mentioned how a lot of

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>biomedical studies still use race as a category that they

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 1>want to measure something by, even though that something maybe unclear.

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And in your book you wrote about the hypertension drug

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>by Dill, where does this drug fit into the growing

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>problem of racialized medicine?

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 2>By Dill was one of the first, and as far

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 2>as I'm aware, the only still is the only drug

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 2>approved by the FDA from marketing to black patients only.

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's a racially specific drug at least in marketing terms,

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 2>which is unprecedented. And the reason that it has a

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 2>very long backstory, and in fact, there are some very

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 2>good books by Jonathan Cahn and Dorothy Roberts that kind

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 2>of go into this story in much more detail. But

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I interviewed the inventor of Bydel for my book and

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>he admitted quite happily that bidel works on everyone. It's

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>not that it works better on black people. It was

0:44:55.600 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 2>just a complete act of expediency that it was much

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 2>cheaper and cost effective to test only on black people.

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 2>And because in America rates of hypertension are much higher

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 2>among black Americans, they did it that way. So there's

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 2>no logic. But there's no scientific logic behind it. And

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 2>in fact, he himself prescribes it to white and black patients.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't discriminate in the way that he prescribes it.

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>There has long been this correlation between being black in

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 2>America and having higher high pertension. There's no genetic basis

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 2>to it, at least that's not what studies are found,

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of money has gone into looking for

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 2>genetic explanations for this. It is most likely associated with

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.879
<v Speaker 2>social factors. You know, high blood pressure or persistently high

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 2>blood pressure, which is what high pertension is. You see

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 2>all over the world. Millions of people around the world

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 2>have it. My mother has it. You know. This is

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:52.399
<v Speaker 2>a common condition and it's caused most often by high

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:54.919
<v Speaker 2>salt in the diet, which is why the highest rates

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:57.839
<v Speaker 2>in the world are seen in Finland and Germany. Once

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 2>adjusted for other factors, of course, Infinite and Germany diets

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 2>tend to be very high in salty meat and fish.

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.359
<v Speaker 2>It's also caused by stress. People have shown that higher

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 2>blood pressure is associated with fewer years of education, with

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 2>being an immigrant. So there are lots of factors that

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 2>contribute to high blood pressure, and of course stress and

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 2>racial discrimination and one of them. But this kind of

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 2>desperation to prove a racial genetic underpinning to hypertension is

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 2>just the most fascinating story and it just shows I

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.239
<v Speaker 2>think it's emblematic of the ways in which race can

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:40.919
<v Speaker 2>be invoked in medicine inappropriate ways, but just continue over

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 2>time until it becomes myth, until it becomes dogma. And

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 2>even now that dogma is so deeply rooted that in

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 2>which is the body that advises doctors on how to

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 2>treat patients deal advises different drugs if you're under fifty,

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 2>if you're black, then if you white, and there is

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 2>no scientific basis for that. I should add, you know,

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 2>there was a study done in twenty twenty one, this

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:08.319
<v Speaker 2>is after my book came out that showed that there

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:13.400
<v Speaker 2>is no logic, there's no evidence basis for prescribing different

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 2>drugs based on ethnicity.

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Since your book came out, have you seen any examples

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of racialized medicine or racialized discussions or language, you know,

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:29.800
<v Speaker 1>involving racialized differences in terms of COVID in popular media.

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean at the beginning of the pandemic, there

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of speculation. You might remember this in

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the panic in the kind of absence of scientific evidence

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 2>which we had, you know, we really didn't know anything

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 2>at the end of twenty nineteen and early twenty twenty,

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 2>we really knew so little about this virus, and there

0:47:50.680 --> 0:47:54.480
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of speculation about the possibility that certain

0:47:54.600 --> 0:47:58.959
<v Speaker 2>racists couldn't catch COVID. And then later in April or May,

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I remember I was in the UK. Then I was

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 2>still living in the UK, and rates were very high

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 2>among Asian people living in Britain. So this is usually

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 2>in Britain that refers to South Asian, so from the

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 2>South Asian subcontinent, and people started speculating about whether South

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Asian people were uniquely susceptible to this virus. But of

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 2>course you only had to look at the demographics to

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 2>understand why that was. It was because the virus hit

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:29.840
<v Speaker 2>in London, first, London is a minority white British city,

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 2>so demographically it does not look like the same as

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the UK, and the majority of or

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 2>a disproportionate number of frontlines workers in London come from

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 2>ethnic minority or immigrant backgrounds, not to mention the fact

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 2>that the NHS, which is where a number of those

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 2>deaths happened among doctors and nurses, is disproportionately staffed by

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 2>ethnic minorities, so of course the figures are not going

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:56.959
<v Speaker 2>to look the same. And that's leaving aside the fact

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 2>that race impacts health on so many different levels, which

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 2>we can see for ourselves, for example, in the fact

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that when we should have known this already that in

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:09.359
<v Speaker 2>the US, black Americans have a lower life expectancy than

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 2>white Americans, not in any way because they are somehow

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 2>uniquely biologically disadvantaged, but just because of the way we live,

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the way people are treated, for the same reason that

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 2>poor people around the world have a lower life expectancy,

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of course, because of the lives that they live in

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the way that they are treated. And why those social

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 2>explanations for the differences weren't brought in sooner, why I

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 2>had to endure you know, while we all had to

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 2>endure serious scientists and physicians making these ridiculous claims in

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 2>those early months of the pandemic, which did enormous damage

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to people, because later on, when the vaccine came out,

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:54.720
<v Speaker 2>ethnic minority groups were nervous about taking the vaccine because

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 2>they felt that a vaccine tested on white people wouldn't

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 2>necessarily work on them. Had emails with people asking me that,

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:07.480
<v Speaker 2>which is absolutely nonsensical. But of course that ridiculous speculation

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.600
<v Speaker 2>on the part of scientists and doctors for the two

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>years prior had fed into that.

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Of course since publishing Superior, have you received any

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>pushback either from population geneticists studying humans or from race realists.

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, the race realist still won't leave me alone. One

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons I'm not on Twitter or Facebook anymore.

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 2>I left Twitter a few years ago. The degree of

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 2>trolling I was getting was just unbearable. And it wasn't

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 2>just me. Maybe I'm very thin skinned. I probably am,

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 2>but I just couldn't handle it anymore. It was just incessant.

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't write anything, I couldn't do anything. They published

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 2>all the personal details of my family, including my son

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 2>who's just a kid. He's nine years old now that

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 2>he was seven or eight then, and it was just

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't I couldn't bear it. I had to just

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>distance myself. I took down any pictures of him. I

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:08.759
<v Speaker 2>try and keep a minimal presence on social media now,

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and it's a very difficult thing to deal with because,

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.479
<v Speaker 2>of course, as a freelance journalist, you work, your only

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:19.359
<v Speaker 2>currency is your reputation. And I still worry sometimes that,

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, for people who don't know any better, they

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 2>will see these things that they write online and they

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 2>will believe them about me, that I'm compromised in some way,

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 2>that I'm some kind of left wing stooge who is

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 2>just peddling these They call me a pseudo scientist, you know,

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>these scientific racists online, these pseudoscientists online. And that is

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 2>a hard thing to deal with as a freelancer. And

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 2>it's not just me. There are many of us who

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:49.760
<v Speaker 2>deal with that every single day. So that really doesn't stop.

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 2>And I hope people can see through that now. I

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 2>hope people are more aware of their tactics and the

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:57.480
<v Speaker 2>way they operate, and in fact, at the end of

0:51:57.560 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen, because of all of them, I started a

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 2>group which now sits under the Royal Institution in London

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 2>called Challenging Pseudoscience. So I bought together scientists, academics, policymakers,

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 2>social media experts, people who work in the misinformation space,

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 2>counter terrorism experts, and we as an informal group. None

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of us get paid. We have quite a bit of funding,

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:23.239
<v Speaker 2>but none of us get paid, and we commission projects

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 2>around scientific misinformation and disinformation. We commissioned some research last

0:52:29.320 --> 0:52:33.280
<v Speaker 2>year on anti vaxers. There's some really detailed ethnographic research

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on anti vaxxers and how they work. And we run

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 2>public events and I hope that we're making some traction there.

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's my way of kind of making a

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 2>difference in this space, is just to help clean up

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the wild West that the Internet has become when it

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 2>comes to these kind of ridiculous pseudoscientific conspiracy theories. And

0:52:56.760 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I hope that ultimately we can create a system, if

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 2>not a regulation, which I would certainly hope for, but

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 2>at least a return to some kind of civil discourse

0:53:07.760 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 2>online which is informed by a factual, you know, good

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:17.240
<v Speaker 2>faith information, not what we have at the moment.

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Angela, thanks again, so much for taking the time to

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>chat with me. I really enjoyed our conversation. If you

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>also liked this interview and want to learn more, check

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.320
<v Speaker 1>out our website this podcast will Kill You dot com,

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:50.720
<v Speaker 1>where I'll post a link to where you can find

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Superior The Return of Race Science, along with a link

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 1>to Angela's new book The Patriarchs How Men Came to Rule,

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which sounds super fascinating on to read list as of today,

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget you can check out our website for

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:09.239
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of other cool things, including but not limited to, transcripts,

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Quarantini and place, beta recipes, show notes and references for

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>all of our episodes, links to merch our bookshop dot org,

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 1>affiliate account, our Goodreads list, a first hand account form,

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and music by Bloodmobile. Speaking of which, thank you to

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Bloodmobile for providing the music for this episode and all

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes. Thank you to Leana Squiatchi for our

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 1>audio mixing, and thanks to you listeners for listening. I

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>hope you liked this bonus episode and our loving being

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the TPWKY book Club. A special thank you,

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 1>as always to our fantastic patrons. We appreciate your support

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so so very much Okay, until next time, Keep washing

0:54:52.640 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 1>those hands, oh.

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh