WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance: Lynn Martin on Global Market Trends

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Investors watching out for a range of headwinds. In twenty

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, Linn Martin, the president of the New York

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange, outlining three principal trends that may shape global

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>markets this year, volatility remaining, a reinvigorated IPO market, and

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 1>US capital markets continuing to lead the world. Lind Martin,

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>a police are saying, joins us at the table, Morty, Lyn.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me. It's great to be with you.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It's good to see you again. Let's start with the geopolitics.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Clearly the risk in the Middle East is front and

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>center after the events at the weekend. How does that

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>contribute to this theme of high volatility sticking around for

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>longer in your view?

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, the geopolitical environments are quite complicated environment.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I think we can all agree with that. It clearly

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>impacts the US equity markets and the global equity markets

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 3>by contributing to volatility. The surprise factor, that's what's going

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to contribute to volatility, and this weekend's events were, you know,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>one of those surprises.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, We've talked about this before, how capital markets might

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be increasingly polarized regionally, geographically, it might see a situation

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>where it's US capital markets for US com companies Chinese

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>companies capital markets for Chinese companies. Do you see it

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>quite the same way?

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the US capital markets are the envy of

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the world. They have withstood multiple pandemics, multiple wars, and

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 3>they've really shown to be the best source of liquidity

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 3>for a founder, for an entrepreneur to raise the capital

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>that they need to change the world. If that's true,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>more than more than ever. In fact, you know, you

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>see the ability.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>To tap the US capital markets as.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Aspirational, but also when you look at the cost of capital,

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the most efficient way to raise capital to change the world.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's put these two ideas together. So you think that

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 4>because of the potential volatility, because of the unknown unknowns

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 4>later this year, are people moving forward their plans for IPOs?

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? You know, we have a tremendous amount of companies

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on the road.

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 3>We're actually about to welcome one a large one this week.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 3>M or Sports, which is the holding company for Willis

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>for Louisville Slugger, for a lot of the brands you know, our.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Children and we use every day.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>And just later today we're about to welcome a UK

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 3>based company, Flutter, who is transferring they're listing out of

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 3>their regional market over to the New York Stock Exchange

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 3>a little bit later this morning.

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 4>One of the reasons why IPOs haven't been as active

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.399
<v Speaker 4>as people had expected was because of just a lot

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 4>of private equity companies not wanting to take the valuation cuts.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>And we've seen that even with Reddit right they have

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 4>five billion dollar market capitalization different lower than what some

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 4>of the previous private market valuations had been. How much

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 4>are people accepting a haircut, accepting not getting the price

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 4>that they wanted in order to really cash out of

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 4>those investments.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think the main you had two reasons

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 3>really impacting the IPO markets over the last two years.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>You had the volatility, the increased volatility when the VIX

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 3>is trading a you know, a thirty handle as opposed

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>to you know, below twenty. It's not that founders couldn't

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>get deals done, it was what is my stock going

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>to do the day after IPO, the month after IIPO?

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 3>What macroeconomic factors are going to influence.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>The way my stock is trading? Now?

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>You also see that there is a recalibration of valuations

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 3>in the market. I would make the argument though, that

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one had inflated valuations in the market, so

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 3>you know twenty twenty one was one side of tail risk.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>This is the last two years or the other side

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of tail risks on the Bell curve.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>There is this structure story as well, and we've talked

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot about it around this table and in Dallas

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>as well at the World Economic Forum, that we're seeing

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>regulation shift that will push more financing activity into private markets.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>When you start to think about those themes, do you

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think the lifespan, the arc of a company's lifespan, the

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>timeline of it is going to change just in terms

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of how long they stay private for versus how long

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they started private previously.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I think companies are going to be more disciple about

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>when they tap the public markets. Obviously, they're going to

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 3>want to be able to articulate a path to profitability

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>or profitability. So I think what you're going to see

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>is when companies come to market the public markets, they're

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 3>going to be public market ready. They're going to be

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 3>able to articulate a very clear message to investors, to

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 3>their shareholders that will enable them to thrive I don't

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 3>think there's any substitute though, for the public markets, and

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 3>that's been proven time and time again.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen that change already? That change you just

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>described absolutely.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 3>With the amount companies we have on the road, we

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 3>have a tremendous mount companies on the road. We have

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 3>a tremendous amount of companies that we're working with at

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the moment to tap the public market. So we're really

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>excited about the prospects for twenty twenty four.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about one threat for twenty twenty

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>four and beyond AI. I've asked you about this before,

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's go through it again. Confronting an era of misinformation

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for someone in your position, how are we going to

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>go back to doing this?

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm really glad you made the point about misinformation,

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 3>because AI is just a continuation of data driven trends

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 3>that have really existed for more than a decade. If

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>you've got good data that is going to enable models

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 3>to add efficiencies to markets. It's something that we've seen

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 3>in production for more than a decade now with the

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 3>AI or large language models that we employ to add

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>transparency to the energy markets. And as a result of

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the large language models that we have had in production

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>for a decade. We've seen the more opaque parts of

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the energy market have tremendous amount of transparency, a tremendous

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 3>amount of liquidity added to them, particularly over the last

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 3>couple of years.

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Did you guys see what happened with Taylor Swift and

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 4>X the AI sort of renditions of her and that

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.119
<v Speaker 4>basically it was preventing you from googling Taylor Swift search

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 4>and search on X because there are pornographic, artificially intelligence

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 4>generated images. But it sort of shows you some of

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the challenges in misinformation or just a false videos. I

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 4>am curious how many companies that are planning to IPO

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 4>our tech companies are building themselves as such. I mean,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 4>is it like one hundred percent their tech company, even

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 4>if they sell furniture.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, in this digital age, everyone uses technology. Everyone's

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>a technology company. You sort of missed the boat. If

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 3>you're not employing technology in some way, shape or form

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>to drive your business forward, who do you.

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 4>Think right now is your biggest competitor? Though, I mean,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 4>to John's point, the private markets. We've been talking about

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 4>that for a long time, and there was a discussion.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>About some sort of transfer.

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Is it just, you know, another stock exchange, or is

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 4>it another avenue of financing?

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't really think we have a competitor

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 3>because the role of the New York Stock Exchange is

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>just very different than a traditional stock exchange or a

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 3>listing's venue.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>Our job is to be the stewards.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Of the US capital markets, and since the US is

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 3>such an important part of the global capital markets, we

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 3>really are the stewards of the global capital markets, allowing

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 3>entrepreneurs and innovators to tap the markets to raise the

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 3>capital they need in a cost efficient fashion and to

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>democratize investing.

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 4>You expect there to be a much more active year

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>in the IPO world. We have seen this with a

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of banks predicting much more active capital markets activity

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 4>this year. How much is that predicated on significant rate

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 4>cuts by the Federal Reserve It.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the market's already pricing in the rate cuts

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 3>to a certain extent.

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 2>The one thing that I'm watching.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Is the discrepancy between the US equity markets and how

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>it's pricing in call it two or three rate cuts,

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>and then you look at the Fed fund futures markets.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>If you go further out in the curve. Towards the

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>end of the year, it's pricing in probably five or

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>six rate cuts, so there's a bit.

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Of discrepancy there.

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 3>The reason why I'm watching this is because that's what's

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>going to impact volatility. Really, volatility is what's going to

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I would say impact the IPO markets. But for the

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>short to medium term, I think we're going to see

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 3>some good IPOs.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 4>You wrote last year that seventy percent of IPOs executed

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 4>actually couldn't meet the provisions on the New York section.

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 4>What is the biggest provision that's holding some of these

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 4>companies back from going to the NICY.

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we've got a variety of quantitative standards. A

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of those are focused on the minimum amount of shareholders,

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the size of a company's float that they actually put

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 3>into the public markets, as well as the minimum.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Market cap of a company. And you're right, more.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Than seventy percent didn't qualify for US last year, and

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>that number was even higher in twenty twenty two.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange President Limartin alongside maybe we talked

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about politics, remember and Davos, and the whole room just

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>went quiet. No one wanted to discuss does this changed

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>your world, this race this year.

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, the only way it changes our world is

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>it's impacting volatility and the IPO window.

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>So our job is to.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Make sure that, particularly in years like twenty twenty four,

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 3>our systems are are reliable, resilient and open so that

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 3>people can efficiently manage risk.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>That's how you diplomatically sort of dodge that question without

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>addressing it.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Basically, they're going to look at the markets and not

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 4>address the politics of it. I will just say Saturday

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Night Live will get funnier because they seem to really

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 4>enjoy this Lynn. When you talk about volatility, how much

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 4>is really driven by an unexpected weakening in the economy.

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Is that what you're really referring to that is potentially

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 4>the greatest supplier of volatility or is it a lot

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 4>of different things?

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a lot of different things.

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 3>And the important thing to look at when you think

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>about volatility. So there's the VIX, which is clearly the

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 3>measure of equity vall. But then there's also the MOVE,

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 3>which is our index, which is the Treasury market ball,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>and those levels are still elevated. It's still above one hundred.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 3>If I look at the move Index, which I do

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 3>every day.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Said thank you to be brilliant. Lynn Martin, the NYSC President,

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us around the table.