WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Defense Good Enough?

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Let's go. Are you

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>It is Wednesday, September sixteenth, twenty twenty, Season sixteen, episode

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>number twenty four. Welcome to another edition of The Break.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>We are live from the s WBC Board studios at

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the Star. We've got Dave Amber at the Star as

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>well in different locations. Also have our special guests Bucky Brooks,

0:00:57.680 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>who is joining us again this week. He'll be on

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with us every week on Wednesdays and Thursdays. He'll give

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>us some analysis on the upcoming opponent. This week, obviously,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Atlanta Falcons. A little later in

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the show, though, we'll have a few things we got

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to get into. We got some transactions that the Cowboys

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>made yesterday, a little report that just came out that

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk a little bit about in the second

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>segment as well. And then we'll have a little bit

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>more conversation later in the show around the Cowboys defense

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and what we saw from them last week and how

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>they prepare for next week. So no further Ado. Let's

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>welcome in Bucky Brooks from NFL Network. Bucky, Welcome to

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the show, hey man, thanks for having me on. All right,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>let's let's jump right in. I had a couple of

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>questions for you. I'm gonna start with kind of a big,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>big picture question for you. Just as you look at

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta offense, talk to me about what you think

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is their greatest strength, and then what you think is

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>their greatest weakness. Their best strength, the biggest strength, and

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>their skill players. They are loaded at the perimeter positions,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>three ward receivers that can play Calvin Riley, Julio Jones,

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Russell Gage has emerged, Tid Gurley in the bad Feel

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>when healthy is one of the best running backs that

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing. And then you have a former MVP and

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, so their offense is loaded with a fireprower.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say the biggest weakness is upfront. They have

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>struggled in the past being able to dominate people at

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the point of attack in the trenches. They can be

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmed at times, and even though they fancy themselves as

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be a physical offense, they're a little more

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>finesse in the way they're constructed at the line of scrimmage. Now,

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>after week one of watching this first game of the Cowboys,

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously we notice many many struggles in the defense. What

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is something an area that the Cowboys can actually improve

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>within just one week when they get ready to face

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. I think the big thing Nanda mcnolan has

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>trotted out the guys and he understands what he has

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>from a defensive standpoint. They have to dominate each and

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>every week up front at the line of scrimmage. The

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Lawrence has to be a five star player. He

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is expected to be the best passion should they need

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>him to play at that level, because he is the

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>guy that sets the table all this. Smith gave tremendous

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>effort a week ago. He is heavy handed, he's solid

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>against the run. Everything Griffin is still settling in. But

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest area where the Cowboys have to improve, they

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have to dominate at the line of scrimmage because you

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>don't expect the secondary to hold up each and every week.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>With the young guys did they have, So they have

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>to be able to disrupt the timing and rhythm of

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the passing game by really controlling everything at the point

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of attack. Who's the best receiver from Alabama in the NFL?

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think this is easy. I think Julio

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Jones is the prototypical number one receiver that everyone wants.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>He's big, he's fast, he's physical, he's an outstanding route runner.

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a playmaker with the ball in his hands. I

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think the only thing that you can knock who your

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones on is For whatever reason, in Atlanta, they haven't

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>found a way to get him enough touchdowns. He hasn't

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>been the dominant player in the red zone. Based on

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the skill level, you would think that he would be

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown waiting to happen. It just hasn't worked out

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for him in Atlanta. But look, man, there's the guy

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>averages one hundred and seventeen yards per game. He is

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to deal with. When he gets it going, he's phenomenal.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a phenomenal player. Who second, Bucky I was just

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna follow up, who's the second best from Alabama? Mary Cooper? Yeah,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like It's funny because the Mary Cooper would

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be there because he is more established and

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>more consistent than I would say Calvin Really Calvin really

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of plays in the sidecar. But Mary Cooper. Mary

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Cooper is a fantastic player. I think the expectations are

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>always very lofty for him because of where he is now.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>He's with the Dallas Cowboys, He's on the big stage.

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>People expect Cowboy number one receivers to be exceptional players.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think when you look at him and look

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>at his body at work, it's hard to dispute that

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not a phenomenal player, that he's not a top

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ten wide receiver. Bucky, I want to go back to

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what you brought up about the Cowboys pass rush, which yeah,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is gonna be how the defense succeeds.

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, but the Rams didn't really give

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>him a chance. If you watch that game on Sunday,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jared Goff was getting rid of the ball

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. For the most part. When I think of Atlanta,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think of Matt Ryan taking deep shots down field,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>which you know, maybe that helps the Cowboys, but is

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that accurate or are we going to see this again

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>where Atlanta doesn't even give the Cowboys pass for us

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance to get going. It's funny that you said that.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>When you studied the numbers from Matt Ryan's performance against

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks, he really struggled on passes air yards

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>fewer than ten yards, meaning a quick rhythm pass game.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason, the first half against the Seahawks, he

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was right about a fifty percent completion mark, didn't really

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of success. Now, when the Seahawks backed

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>off at the end of the game in the fourth

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter and kind of played that two minute defense, he

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was eleven for eleven. But the numbers are deceiving. But yes,

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>the way the Rams attacked the Cowboys, the quick rhythm throws,

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the bubble screens, the quick els, the movement passes, where

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they neutralized the pass for us by really getting the

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>ball out in under two and a half seconds. That

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is the way teams will approach to Dallas Cowboys. And

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so that puts the onus on the corners. As much

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>as we talk about them, as much as we want

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to see them get more interceptions, they're going to have

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to walk up and put their hands on wide receivers

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt the timing, and so Mike Nolan may have

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to get out of his comfort zone. He may have

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to play a little more man to man, a little

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>more pressure to try and disrupt the rhythm of the

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons passing him Bucky Against the Seahawks, the Falcons

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 1>put up five hundred and twenty two yards of total offense,

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>second in the NFL last week in Week one, Why

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>did they end up losing? Like that's a lot of yards.

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously they only scored twenty five points, But why did

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>they end up losing after having such a what looks

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like such a productive offensive day Because they were basically

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>eating potato chips, a lot of empty calories, a lot

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of empty calories. In the fourth quarter, they were chasing,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they were chasing points in the fourth quarter. That's really

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>when at Ryan got going. But early in the game,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this was a very competitive game. And what happened They

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>went for it on down, they were stopped. The swac

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>yards came back and kind of stretched it out. But

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this game, in the third quart fourth quarter, it was

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty one twelve, it was pretty tight. The Seeyaks had

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things go They were and stretched out.

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Then in the fourth quarter it was previous defense Matt

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan kind of throwing it down the yard. They were

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>still throwing the ball with less than a minute left,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and so that's where the yards come. I think the

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>big thing when it comes to the Falcons, how are

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they going to play dirt cutter? Can't put the ball

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in Matt Ryan's hands and say fifty four times and

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>think the DEA's a winning recipe. Todd Gurley has to

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>be a bigger factor, and will they be committed to

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>running the ball to kind of balance out this offense.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>The way the La Rams were able to win, they

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>ran the ball, they were very patient and it was

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a ball control approach. They played with their offense to

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>keep Dallas's offense on the sideline. And more teams are

0:07:58.200 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do that because when you really look at

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the Boys offense, it is really an unstoppable unit. They

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>only can stop themselves, so you have to play a

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>little keep away to keep them on the sidelines. The

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons will probably take some of that approach to

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>try and take some of that out of the game. Now,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>something that a lot of fans keep bringing up is

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys run defense and how unefficient they've been last

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>year and even a little this year. In this first game,

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>when you speak about the Falcons, do you see this

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>being a problem with the running game that they got

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>going on over there? Well, I mean, here's the thing

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>about the National Football League. Once you put stuff on

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>tape that you can't defend, you're going to have to

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>defend it each and every week until you show that

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you can stop it. So the Rams are gonna take

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Falcons are gonna take what the Rams

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>did and they're gonna put some of those things into play.

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna run the outside zone. They're gonna continue to

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>see if they can pound in it. If the Dallas

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are disciplined enough to stop it early, If they

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>stop it early in the game, you won't see it again.

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But if the Cowboys don't stop the run early in

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the game, the first quarter of Russian yards really matter.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>If they don't stop it, they're gonna get a heavy

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>dose of the run game. You can't allow a team

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to have forty rushing attempts too many Russian attempts. You

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>really got to cut it off, and you have to

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>get the game where you're dictating part of the reason

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. I don't think they played a bad defensive game,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but they never could control the game because they couldn't

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>get the Rams and lawn yards third down situations, third

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and two, third and three, third and four. It's even Stephen,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's easy for the play caller to do it. So

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams, they have to win first and second

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>down to force the ramp force the Falcons to throw

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in obvious passing downs. Buck yet did not see the

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Falcons game. I'm curious though they didn't go for it

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>on fourth downs. Should they have kicked the field goal instead?

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And are they still talking about that in Atlanta all week? Well,

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>so here's the thing where the Falcons. The Falcons were

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>oh for four on fourth down attempts, and so they

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>had a fake punt where they got the first down,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but the guy fumbled it, gave it back to the

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks and read his own territory. They went for it

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>on a fourth and six, didn't get it in the

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>red zone, and then they had a couple of other failures,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, they're disappointed because they were trying to

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive. But the thing about being aggressive when it

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go your way, you have to answer for it.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And so fourth down would be a huge game considering

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>both teams tried to be aggressive and it didn't go

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>their way. To be interesting to see how those situations

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>play out on Sunday. But yeah, you kind of touched

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>on this when you were answering Amber's question. But and this,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it goes back to last season with

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys defense too, in the sense that, like, if

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you watch the game, it felt like they got dominated.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, they gave up one hundred and fifty three

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards and they obviously lost the game. They also

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>only allowed twenty points and they actually only allowed three

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>point eight yards per carry. And I feel like the

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>narrative here, and I'm not saying it's wrong, but people

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>are dogging on the run defense, dogging on Jalen Smith

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>for the way that he played between the linebackers and

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the defensive tackles. What did you see from them? How

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>poorly or maybe not as poorly as we think. Did

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you think they played? I think outside of the first drive,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I felt like the defense was pretty solid. The first drive.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things happened the tempo that the Rams

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>were operating, with the misdirection game that they were using,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>meaning the fly sweep action, with the zone and the

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>counters and those things coming behind it, it can put

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>your defenders in quicksand because you just don't know where

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to go. And I would give Sean McVay credit. He

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>had them operating at a fast clip. He threw a

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff at him. But really as well as

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the Rams looked like they were playing. At halftime, it

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was a fourteen thirteen lead for the Cowboys, And when

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you go back and you really look at the game,

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys kicked the field goal early in the

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, it's a twenty twenty ball game. And what

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you do is you now put the pressure back on

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff to have to make plays. And so I

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>may understand the gamble, but I would say the way

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the game was, it was an unnecessary gamble because it

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>was an even game and the Rams hadn't generated any

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>big place and so at some point you have to

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think Jared Goff is going to give you another opportunity

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a turnover, and so they kind of let

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams off the hook by going for it and

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>not getting it. That's it's things to hear you say that.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I can see the smirk on Derek's face. You knew

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>although here smiling about it, you know I was over smiling.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I had a few more questions for you, though, Buckiet.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of shocking to me that we've gone through

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>all these questions and nobody still asked about Todd Gurley.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that obviously coming in the league was

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>very very highly towed. It had some years of really

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>great production, and then over the last couple of years

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>experienced a lot of injuries. Does he look like he's

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>back to one hundred percent at this point or is

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>he still battling some things that just are going to

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>be a part of his game for the rest of

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the time he plays in the NFL. Well, I mean,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the one thing that we don't know, we

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>never would have a true sense of how he feels.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>On tape, he looked like the same guy that first drive,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the first two drives that he had for the Falcons.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>He ripped off a couple of big runs at a

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>team yard run where he looked at sprite as ever.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>The thing that Tyd Gurley has run up against he

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>has play callers who prefer to pass the ball as

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>opposed to run it. For whatever reason, he is a

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>very talented back. But they get enamored with throwing the

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>ball all over the yard and sometimes they forget about

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the running game. I do believe against the Cowboys the

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>running game will be a big part of their recipe

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>because they don't want to give the ball to Dak

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Prescott Ezekiel Elliott in that offense. So I would think

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that you would see Tyd Gurley touch it more. But

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, When Todd Gurley gets it twenty times,

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>his record, his team record is twenty twenty one. When

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>he gets it twenty five times, he is undefeated. So

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's pretty simple. If this was a video game,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make sure that he gets it twenty or

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>more times to see what happens. We'll see if Atlanta

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Falcons followed the script real quick. Before you let you go,

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>one more question. Not many teams have had success defending

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones over his career, But in the instances where

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>he has been somewhat neutralized or at least kept in chet,

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what have those teams done? Man? You gotta commit to

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>taking him away. You have to double team he's too

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>good to play one on one, So you have to

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>have a safety overtop. You have to play a little

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>two man where the corner is trailing and playing underneath

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>him and undercutting all the routes that he has. With

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a safety overtop, you have to make a concerted effort

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to take him away. The problem with the falcons, they're

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so good in other areas that they can work you with.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, Russell Gage showed up and those things. But

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if you are a gamblerman, if you're Mike Nolan,

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you live with those other guys getting their yards. What

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't do is you can't let Julio Jones dominate

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this game. You have to figure out who do I

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>want to take away. We've seen Julio Jones go for

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards. He cannot be a factor. Make Calvin Ridley,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>make Russell Gage, make make hayten Hunter whatever you got,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>make those other Hayden Hurst, make those other guys do stuff.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You can't let Julio Jones be the guy to beat you.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, man, we appreciate you taking some time with

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>us today. Another week of really great stuff. We'll have

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you back tomorrow talk a little bit about this Atlanta

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Falcons defense. We're gonna check our first break and we

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>come back. We're gonna jump into some transactions. We're gonna

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about report out there on Sean

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Lee and maybe what his status is over the next

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. We'll talk about that when we come right back.

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot com Radio. We're back in

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>new Doctor Pepper and cream Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Doctor bad Cream Soda. Is he a newcombone that's music

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to my ears? Okay, doctor times, music to my ears

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and mouths New Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda. Delas, just

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>do bay, I want to use what the pros use.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now, you can get the Jack Black Starter,

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The star includes four Jack

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites, plus a full size and tents therapy

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>lip bomb. Go to get Jack Black dot com, slash

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and use the code word Team JB. That's get

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com, slash Cowboys, the Jack Blackstarter ten

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Bucks free shipping since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>American maid with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and Team pride too, You

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all self

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>at Shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com. It's funny as we travel places, often we

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>find the places we want to travel aren't really places

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at all. They're people, their grandparents, moms, old friends, and

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>new nephews. At American Airlines, we've been using enhanced cleaning

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>measures so you can feel confident every step until you

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>get to them. So as always, our people can't wait

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to take you to yours. American Airlines, you are why

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>we fly back to the break. Elevate your work environment

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>at Formation at the Star, offering a unique workspace amenities,

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>with a variety of membership options including private offices, dedicated

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>desks in open workspace, bookachure, and formation at the Star

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Welcome back. It is the second segment of

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Break. We are live from s WBC Morig Studios

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Star. Nick and Amber joining us as well

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Star in other offices we've got. We just

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>finished up with Bucky Brooks, really good segment. If you

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a chance to check it out, make sure

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you go back and check it out. He had a

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of good nuggets about that Atlanta Falcon's offense. Tomorrow

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>again we will have him on the show. He will

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>probably be in the third segment tomorrow though, but he

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>will be on the show talking about the Atlanta defense

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>versus the Cowboys offense. Nick run me down some I

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know there were some transactions at the Cowboys did yesterday.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They signed a couple of players and just once you

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of run down the players and maybe what you

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>think this means relative to the players that they signed.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me find the list here because I've lost it,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just because there was a bunch. There's a bunch going on.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they signed off the practice squad of the Cardinals,

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They signed a tackle, Alex Light. They signed a linebacker

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Smith, off the Bears practice squad. I think those

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are the two biggest things. They did activate a Brandon

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Carr again from the practice squad, still learning what those

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>rules mean. I thought he was already on the team.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess he gets to get moved back to the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>practice squad. For those two that they are allowed to

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>bring up on Saturday, I get the biggest part. And

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then they signed some other guys to the practice squad,

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>placed Cam Irving on i Art's return, same with Jarwin

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and Vanderesh. I think the biggest part is that they

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they signed a tackle and a linebacker that they are

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>better than the guys they have so um France Bernard,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess is not really in the equation for them

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to play. They just want them to develop. Rachard Smith,

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess is a better option. Alex Light tackle this also,

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know guy that they feel like we're ready to play,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but you've got they've got seventy two hours they've got

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to pass, you know, I think three tests or so

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just to just to get in the door. So they're

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not ready to play right now, but just ready to play.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>At some point. You guys know how those rules work.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>As far as obviously, when you sign again, you sign

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a gap for the practice squad of another team, you

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have to sign them to your active roster. You can't

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>take them and move them to your practice squad. Once

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they are though established on your roster, can you then

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>move them back to the practice squad. The rule used

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to be three weeks. They have to be on your Yeah,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>sorry they yeah, Nick? Is what Nick said. They have

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to be on the active roster for three weeks before

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do anything with them. I don't know. I mean, again,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of rules that have changed, so I'm

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent sure about that. I would imagine

0:19:57.880 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that is still the case. You can't just be moving.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine they would change that because then you

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>can just willy nilly poach people however you want without

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>any repercussions. They changed it, I have to imagine that's

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the same. If they changed that rule, it would be

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>more weeks that you have to stay. I mean, because

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now you're moving over here and I've got

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a test over here. Nah, I bet you that's still

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the same, if not more, But um, you know, the

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>cam irving to IR to return. You know, that's a

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>new rule. You can put as many guys as you want,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and they can and you can bring them back as

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>many guys as you want to. And you know, we

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that was the case for Lyle. He still might

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>be We thought that was the case for Sean Lee. Well,

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking of which still was a report. Thank you Nick

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for the setup. There was a report from Jane Slater

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that came out about twenty minutes ago where she said

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that a linebacker Sean Lee is expected to be out

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>six weeks after undergoing hernia surgery last week in Philadelphia.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>That means he wouldn't be back until mid October. M

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>guys concerned not with what weeks from now, from today

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>or six weeks from when he was initially placed on IR.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It would probably be from the time he had the surgery,

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>which is which is according to this report, it happened

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>last week. Not sure on the timing of this, and

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>again these are this is her report, not sure. The

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>team has not made an official statement, so not sure

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>if that's officially what happened or actually what happened, But

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>just according to this report, six weeks, which would get

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>him back about mid October. It doesn't matter where, like when,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>what the timeline is. If he's not ready to go

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from now, that's concerning, which that was always

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be a possibility. And if you think about

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the timelines, Mike McCarthy said today, probably four to six

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks for cam Irving and so now we're here in

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe six weeks for Sean Lee. So it

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that they would go get Smith and Light.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're not going to be able to help

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, but they can help you account for that,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the next month or so. But hell, yeah,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's concerning. Yeah, I mean, all of a sudden, these

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>three positions you throw in the tight end with it

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>history positions, I think are are really really problems with

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>this team because I don't think they have number one,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a person that could step into those roles that have

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 1>now been been lost, and even their depth, I don't

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>think they have much depth at those positions. And so

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think all three of them I'm concerned about. Yeah,

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I just I mean I'm more concerned. I mean, yeah,

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned about that. With with Chun Lee, I'm just

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of frustrated by that, I mean, did that help

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the Rams? I mean, did that help you? I mean, like,

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>just just say it. I mean, this is this is

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>a prominent player who's been in the Pro Bowl twice,

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the team leaders. He's having surgery in Philadelphia.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean Terrence Newman had the same surgery surgery in

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, and it was reported right then.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who cares? I mean, I just don't understand

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. Maybe during the week if you

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say that a player is playing so

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>much and it's a different running back or a different quarterback,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I get it. But you've got you know, you've got

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a a really good player and a good person that

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is working. You know, he's worked so hard to get

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>through injuries. He's got another injury. Why don't I just

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>say it? I'm not I'm missing that part. I don't

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get it. He's going to Philadelphia for surgery. That's not

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the world to report that. I just

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know why they wouldn't do that. Yeah, am I

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>missing something here? I mean what I mean, obviously there

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>are there are things that helps Sean McVay, Like, oh man,

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought Sean Lee was going to be out there

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but Philly. But I do think that they would probably

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>make the argument, right or wrong. I think they would

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>probably make the argument that, you know, we don't necessarily

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>need every team knowing that, because the longer we hold

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that information, there may be another team that's thinking of

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to look for I mean, sorry, linebackers on

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>another practice squad that may if they know that we're

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>looking for him, it kind of maybe accelerates that. Right,

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's those kind of things we're Again what we all

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>know from covering this team and covering the NFL is

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>coaches live in a whole different world, like their mindset is,

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just the whole different world, and the things they

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>worry about are things that a lot of points that

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>would be you worry about something like you got much

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger things to worry about. It If you're thinking that

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>far ahead, I mean, there's a problem there because your

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>focus should be somewhere else. Well, I think it's it's

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>all a part of it. And again, it may not

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>be the same person. Maybe this is people who are

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>more responsible for personnel who would prefer that not to

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>be out there than maybe the head coach all I'm

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>saying is we know from covering this team and covering

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, they aren't the only people that think like that.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of teams around the NFL that

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>try very hard to keep everything behind closed doors because

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the point is they don't want to give anything away

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and possibly risk that they lose something that they want

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to be able to or some advantage that they would

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have in whatever decision that they want to make. I mean,

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just part of It's part of how football coaches

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>do it, you know. Yeah, the same coaches that still

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>cover their mouth when they when they try to call

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>play with a mask on and they're covering right Like,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just that's how football coaches are. Football personnel people

0:24:55.359 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are part of ball coach though, Yeah, maybe it's not.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not reflecting so right, Dave. I was just

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it's not reflecting in the standings through one week,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so I'll see how it goes. That's going for you.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Those those numberless numberless practice, numberless practice there that didn't

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>really help out too much. But anyway, Nah, all right,

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>here's what I want to do. Um, let's go ahead

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and take our final break. We're gonna take it a

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>little early. When we come back, I want to dive

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>into the Cowboys defense had some interesting numbers coming out

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of that first week of games, and I want to

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>throw them at you guys and get some opinions on

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>what you think that maybe these things mean in the

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things for the Cowboys defense. We'll come

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio Sam's

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American maid with pride

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud to be

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on the field with America's team. Want to show your

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Texas and team pride too? You can by purchasing your

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>own Stetson. You can look just like how the flag

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>guys do on field at every home game. Stetson Hats

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys and your

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>favorite football team. Get yours today at shop dot Dallas

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot Com. I'm Jay Novachek,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day.

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I was the guy who always got the tough yards

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Deer three zero twenty five E

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yardwork I need to do,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Deer

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Want to use what

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the pros use? How about the official men's skincare brand

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now you can

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>get the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of cowboys

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>locker room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>The Starter includes four Jack Clack skincare favorites, plus a

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>full sized and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>word team Jay. That's get Jack Black dot com slash

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys The Jack Black Starter ten bucks, free shipping. We're

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>back in a tasty treat that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's new doctor pepper and cream Soda. Let's take a listen,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Doctor cream Soda. Is he a new Combone's music to

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>my ears? Okay, doctor times, music to my ears and mouths,

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>New Doctor Pepper and cream Soda Delas just do Bad.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, Welcome Back. It is the final

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>segment of The Break live from the s WBC Mortgage

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>studios at the Star. We got David Amber also here

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Star. We're talking Cowboys versus Falcons this segment.

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>What I want to do is I have some some

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting little tidbits about this defense that I noticed from

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the game last week, and I want to throw those

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>out at you, and then we're gonna talk about some

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that they Oh what those things mean

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in your minds? Last week, Cowboys were twelve in scoring defense,

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>only allowing twenty points. Buck You mentioned that in the

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>segment we did with him about the fact that even

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>though they gave up a lot of yards, didn't give

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of points. They were twenty eight though

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>in the number of yards allowed at four hundred and

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Did we mis evaluate how they played because

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it looked so bad at the start, knowing the fact

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that they did bend quite a bit as far as

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the number of yards it gave up, but did still

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hold this team to twenty points. Let's start first with you,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Nick Well, I just they didn't make enough plays. I

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>mean that's the same goes with the offense. I mean that, yeah,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they had their moments that they got into turnover, but

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>when they needed to make a stop with them pushed

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>back like that, that's what that McCarthy was counting on.

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>He was counting on that. He was like, you know,

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>if we don't make it here, we at least we

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>got him pushed back. But until they weren't pushed back anymore.

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's not just Dak and the offense

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that didn't have them up with clutch moments. It was

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the It was the defense as well. So in a

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>game like that, I mean, they needed to be better.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily their fault. They thought maybe they thought

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the offense would scored more points, but they didn't. When

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>they were really counted on to go make a play,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. They didn't make it, at least not with

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>enough time. The Rams got too far and flipped the

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>field before they got the ball back. Hamber, dave you

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>go ahead first, before I opened my mouth and started

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>highly criticized. Yes, no, Derek, I'm freaking buying it. Derek Um.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, give some credit where it's due

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the Rams scored seven points in the second half. Like

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the defense did become a little bit more reliable as

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the game went along. But this isn't one of those

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>circumstances where you can say, oh, if you cut out

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the one long run. They did this, like they allowed

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams to run twenty five plays I think in

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the first like eight minutes of the game. Like the

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Rams just absolutely marched the field twice in a row completely,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and that alters the flow of the entire game because

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna wear your defense out, it's gonna swing time

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and possession. It's obviously going to give the Rams two

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and scoring right off the bat. Like, you can't

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do that. You can't. You cannot just be that inept

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for that long to start a game. So yeah, they

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely got their act together. Um, but that doesn't that

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do enough to excuse how unprepared they were for

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the start of the game. Am I the only one

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>who thinks that the Rams didn't play that well either? Like,

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that's how I see it right now, I see it that. Yes,

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Rams got the win and they made it happen.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, looking at the

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>game as a whole. I didn't think the offense did

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that great of a job. So in my mind, I

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the Cowboys deep offense where trying to

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>stop this amazing offense that's just eating up yards and

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>scoring points. I think that it's just they could have

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>done a lot better. They didn't. Obviously, the score doesn't

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily fully reflect all their faults there that they made.

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I just don't think that

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>we're playing against this great, amazing team. You know. I'll

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>say this though, Amber, I kind of disagree with you

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit on that. I do think the Rams play

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>well for the game plan that they had. I think

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.479
<v Speaker 1>their game plan coming in was, we want to control

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the clock, which means that we're gonna play this short,

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>quick game, and that means that they're gonna be some

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>drives that they're gonna stall out. They're gonna be some drives.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll drive the field. We'll get a touchdown, there'll be

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>someone we'll drive the field, we'll get a field goal.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.239
<v Speaker 1>The point is, if we keep their offense off the

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>field and we keep their defense on the field as

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the game wears on, we think we can come away

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with more points than they can because they are a

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>volume offense. So I think they actually played perfectly within

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the context of what they have to do. Now, will

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.959
<v Speaker 1>that work against every team the team's got a good defense,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>probably not, But a team like this where the Cowboys

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are a little limited on defense, I think it was

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a perfect and especially having such a great offense, I

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think it was a really great game plan. I think

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they played it well. What do you guys think it

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>worked for them? I just I just I feel like

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw mistakes that they made that had had their

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>game being a lot more clean, they would have been

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot better. And I guess that can apply to

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the NFL, but I just feel that the

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Rams didn't give the best that they could. But regardless,

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it worked on their benefit and they made it work

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and won the game. But the way I saw it,

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they had the ability to play a

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>lot better than they did. I gotcha, I think. I mean,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if the Rams had played up to their potential, they

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>should have had that game in hand with five minutes

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to play. You think about obviously, they missed an easy

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>field goal and then Sean McVay made two or three

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>really questionable decisions that I thought killed a couple of drives.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, credit to the Cowboys for stopping it, but

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why in the hell you run a

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>toss dive on third and short, and I don't know

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>why you don't go for it with the way that

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you were playing when you have fourth and short. I

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>think the ball was pretty close to midfield. So I

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>agree with you the Rams. They could have played better,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but they played well enough to win. Yeah. I think

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in Week one you probably saw that around the league

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that there are a lot of teams that probably could

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>have played a little bit better without having preseason games.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But again, I think they played played within the context

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of what their game plan was, and I think they

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>executed it pretty well. Here's a question from standpoint of

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>long term. Do you think that in most weeks, if

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys defense can hold to twenty, the Cowboys will

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be a successful team overall? Nicholas start with you, Yeah,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think so. I mean, I'd like to

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>think the offense is going to get in gearing and

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>get and get better. You'd like to say that, you know,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the injuries will help getting you know, if you can

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>get some of those guys back on the offensive line,

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>get Layout Collins back. Obviously, you got to figure out

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna do it tight end. But yeah, I

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>think I think twenty is a pretty good number there.

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>If you know, for this team, they can they can

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 1>get I think the offense is shown that they would

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to get more than that. But you know

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams to what they were saying about the Rams,

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>you know they they live off their defense. I mean

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they have the best defensive player in the NFL, and

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I think, you know, going for it

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>on fourth down or not going for it, it's like, well,

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we rely on our defense. And I think McCarthy's still

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out his team. I think he was

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>relying on that defense to stop him down there and

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't happen. So he's gonna we hear it all

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the time. Brian brought Us says it once a week.

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You gotta coaches have to know their team, they have

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to trust their team. He's still trying to figure out

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>what he's got on his team. Amber twenty points enough,

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think so absolutely. I think that that just it's

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna depend on the offense and then doing their part

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 1>scoring points. I think that seventeen points for this offense.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's not enough, but looking at the talent that

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>they have, I still believe that they should be able

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to score a lot more than they did in this game.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So at the end of the day, right now, I

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think that they'll be able to create the right balance

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there to get wins. But yeah, twenty points, if the

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>defense can hold them to that, I think it'll be fine. Dave.

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>If twenty points isn't enough, then what are we even

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>doing here? Like? Why? Like, just if twenty points isn't

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 1>enough on a regular basis, just let me know now

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'll take an early vacation. I'm so serious. Because

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback wants forty mill, the running backs make a

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety mill, the offensive line has been to a billion

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowls. One of the receivers is up for is

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on one hundred mill and then a first round pick. Like,

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>how is twenty points not enough? This team should be

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>scoring at least three touchdowns on a reliable basis. They

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>should be flirting with thirty more often than not. And

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you know this guy's not falling because that didn't happen

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Week one, And honestly, I'm encouraged that I mean they

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't they didn't translate it into points because they couldn't

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>convert third downs, But all of the hallmarks of a

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>good offense were still there. I mean, Zeke looked great,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Dak looked great, the receiver, the big three combined for

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred receiving yards and that was with shoddy protection.

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still optimistic that they'll get there. But if

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this team can't reliably score twenty one or more points,

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>then just let me know now so I can do

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>something else. And I agree with that. I think at

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the question will be was

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the twenty points that the defense gave up? Was that

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>because at one point there wasn't really a lot for

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams. He'd fact, they had to start airing

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it out like we saw with Atlanta here in their

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. And if they were in that kind of situation,

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>would they give up a ton more points to a

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>better offense? Right, That's the part that that does concern

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>me a bit. But I think twenty points should be

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>enough on most weeks. If this offense is what we

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's what it is, it should be. The thing is,

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>who on the Rams offense is gonna make the Pro Bowl.

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody makes the Pro Bowl on that team.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>They have some guys that have the probably Woods. Yeah,

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's just a matter of they could. They could,

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but they probably won't. I mean, you gotta be one

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the top four receivers. I don't think they will.

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it, We've seen it happen. Last one is

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>it'll get a lot tougher for that defense, And it

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>gets tougher in about four days now. They don't. It

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>won't be as hard on on defense, I mean for

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>their offense because they don't have Aaron Donald on every week.

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying it gets tougher than Jared Goff

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to Robert Woods. With Cam Acres running the ball these

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks, it's going to be tougher. Yeah, I

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree slightly. I mean I do agree, like defending Atlanta

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle is probably going to be tougher than what

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they went up against. But that offense was a machine

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen and dealt with a lot of injuries

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>last year. And I'll say it for the tenth time,

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the world of Jared Goff, but that

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>combination of the continuity that they have, plus Sean McVeigh,

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that offense is a well oiled machine, like there ain't

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>any shame and giving up, you know, four hundred yards

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to those guys. I mean that was the offense They

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>went down to Mexico City against Kansas City and combined

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 1>for like one hundred and fifty points. Like, those guys

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't slouches at all, So it will it will get tougher,

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's still a really good offense. All right. Let's

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>move on to the next topic. Cowboys were twenty fourth

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>in passing yards allowed with two hundred and sixty nine.

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>There were twenty seven the rushing yards allows on one

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty three. Which do you think is a

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem for the Cowboys defense as you see it

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, the run defense or their pass defense. Let's

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>start first with you, Dave pass because I mean, Jalen

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Smith deserves plenty of criticism, but one strength of his

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>game is defending the run. DeMarcus Lawrence is good against

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the run. Everson Griffin and you know, like I brought

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>up with Bucky, they gave up a lot of rushing yards,

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but the average was fine. I think a lot of

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that is a product of trailing for a lot of

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that game. So that doesn't concern me as much as

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a the pass rush didn't look great on Sunday night,

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and be you know, we knew going into this season

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that the secondary was going to be a problem or

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>at least a week spot, and you know, I didn't

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 1>see anything on Sunday that changed my mind about that.

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Amber That's a tough one for me. I mean, they're

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>equally as important, but and I know we have it's

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 1>a new season, and every new season you just never

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>know how the team is going to fully change compared

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to last year. But I just can't forget those games

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 1>from last year where they were killed by running backs

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who basically had no, like very little experience in the NFL,

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet they were able to just get them and

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>kill them and score points and lose games because of that.

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So to me, I think that's an area that I'm

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>still kind of focusing on and keeping my eye on,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 1>and I'm leaning more towards the rush defense. But uh,

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're both, they're both the problem. Sorry, I mean, yeah,

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>she's right about that. Yeah, they're both they're both problems.

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say I trust Mike Nolan to do a

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>better job of getting them in position to stop the run.

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>If your secondary is just not good and the guys

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just can't cover, then there's not much you could really do.

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can try to get a past, you

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 1>can blitz and all that stuff, But I mean, if

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>they still can't cover that well, that you know they're

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>only gonna get you know, the eighty ninety yard touchdowns

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>thrown on them. So I think that I trust the

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 1>run defense a little better than I trust the past

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>defense at this point. All right, Atlanta was second in

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>offense last week with five or twenty two yards. As

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier in the show, they were first in

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>passing offense with four hundred and thirty four yards. They

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>had three wide receivers catch this three wide receivers had

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.479
<v Speaker 1>nine catches and one hundred plus yards in their Week

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>one game against the Seattle Seahawks. So we have a

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 1>pretty good defense. That all being said, do you think

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have enough good defenders to match up against Julio, Ridley,

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Gauge and even Hurst who had a nice downfield catch

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>last last week at the tight end position. They have

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>enough defenders to defend those guys. Let's start with you day.

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sorry, Nick, I mean I'm no offense

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to the game. But I think that I think the

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>stats and where the rankings are just way way early,

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just because you know, it's just one game and it

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was they don't want that, like they don't want three

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>catch three guys, but nine. They don't want to be

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>second in passing yards because that means they got their

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>ass kicked. And so we saw the last year with

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>all the das numbers, it's because they were a lot

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of it was hollow. So um to answer the question, yeah,

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think they do, but it's on the

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive side of the ball. It's the offense gonna score

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>points to put them in position to be like that.

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think it all comes back to the offense.

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all about playing for your strength, and so I

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think if the offense does their job, yes, the defense

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think can be good enough to stop that atlanted offense. Canberra.

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Can you repeat your question again? It was a little

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>confusing to me. Do the Cowboys have enough defenders to

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>stop the offensive weapons for the Falcons? And look, you

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>know the stats what you name I'm like, I was thinking,

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, wait, shouldn't that have been the Cowboys. Shouldn't

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we have had those numbers here in the first week,

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but oh well, three thousand yard receivers were on a

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 1>great path right now. But anyways, I think that it's

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>just going back to your defensive line, Derek, that you

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about where it needs to start, where they

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>need to create pressure, hoping because that's where I feel

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Cowboys currently have the most talent on defense,

0:42:56.160 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think that it absolutely needs to start there.

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully the Marcus Lawrence elevates his game this week with

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the help of Alden Smith, who thankfully at least had

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a nice game last week. But I'm just hoping to

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>rely more this week on the pass rush and get

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>those guys putting some pressure there in order to help

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>those secondary players in the back and just trying to

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>stop a guy like Julia Jones is gonna be tough.

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be tough, so they're gonna definitely need to

0:43:31.360 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>get help from every single guy on defense, Dave. I mean,

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna criticize dak to no end for putting

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.919
<v Speaker 1>up garbage time stats, we gotta I mean, you gotta

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:44.479
<v Speaker 1>look at the context of this because Atlanta didn't start

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>going off until they were down thirty one to twelve

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>in that game. I think that's worth noting. But they

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>still have all that talent, and yet no, I don't think.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Dallas defense is equipped to hold

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>them down. And that goes back to the point of,

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, ideally, if you tell me I can hold

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>them to twenty four twenty eight against that offense. I

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>would like to think the Cowboys offense can be better.

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, Atlanta's defense will you know, we'll get to

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 1>them tomorrow, but they look terrible against Russell Wilson. So

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm counting on the Dallas offense to be able

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to score thirty one thirty five points in this game.

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's ambitious after watching them score seventeen, but I

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're winning this game unless you score in

0:44:29.280 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the high twenties. Yeah, I will say this. I don't

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>work the thirties preferably. Yeah, I don't. I don't think

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys cornerbacks really were challenged very much last week,

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and I certainly don't think they were the biggest part

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of the problem for the Dallas defense. I think I

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>had a much bigger problem with their defensive tackles, much

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem with the linebackers in some degree, a much

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem with their safeties, particularly in run support, than

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd get with the cornerbacks last week. But again I

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:55.399
<v Speaker 1>don't think they were challenged nearly as much. And again

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I understand the numbers can can skew that way, and

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's because it's just when we sample size. But I

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>think any of us are disputing the fact that those

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly those two top wide receivers, are great talents and

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be a handful for the secondary to be

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>able to manage. All Right, we appreciate you guys joined us.

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 1>We were back tomorrow normal time at eleven thirty am

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Central Time till then. For Nick Keatman, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia,

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I am Derek Equleton. This has been The Break live

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Club.