WEBVTT - NFL Conference Championship Betting and Fantasy Preview! 0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:36.240 Feeny. Yeah. Now's welcome your happy your host by day 0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:47.000 from mine, right, your host by God from St. Francis 0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:56.440 Practice stand ball, ladies, and tell me your happy Friday, everybody, 0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.280 and welcome into the Fantasy Best Friends for Ever, live 0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.360 on the Sports A TV Network. I am Frank Standfeld, 0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.520 and I'm thinking about changing the name of this show 0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.720 to the Fantasy Estranged Friends Forever because Frank Sussman is 0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.640 never here. What do you know? It's Friday, January seventeen. 0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.800 Greg Susman wasn't here on Monday. He's not here today. 0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.200 I am here and I am joined with my good 0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.680 buddy Fantasy tas Jim Day. What's going on? Jim? Hey? 0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.360 How you doing? Frank? Thanks for having me out and 0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.680 always good to talk football with you. Absolutely excited to 0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.320 wait wait wait, wait, hold on, you said we're talking football. 0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.880 The reason I brought you on is because I thought 0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.920 we were doing a New York Yankees Fantasy Baseball preview. Well, 0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.640 let's go for it. They suck. Oh whoa whoa, whoa 0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.600 whoa whoa. I mean, you can't be the favorite to 0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.840 win the World Series if you sucked. Come on, it's 0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:50.440 been plenty of favorite talking baseball. Jim, Ready, you want 0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:55.040 to sing this champions again? When winning became the only game? 0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.480 All right, let's knock get off. No baseball. We're not 0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.320 talking baseball today. I said yesterday on the show, we 0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.000 were all over the place cheating scandals, Odell Beckham, spankings. 0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.240 We re enacted it here on the show. Apparently I 0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.680 ended up being the security guard. Greg Sussman was Odell Beckham. 0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.720 I ended up getting spanked here on the show. We're 0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.200 not doing any of that today. We are talking football. 0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.160 We are talking the NFL Conference championships this weekend to 0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:24.320 juggernaut matchups between the Tennessee Titans and the Kansas City Chiefs. 0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.680 And on the NFC side we have the Green Bay 0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:30.720 Packers and the San Francisco Forty Niners. Jim, Before we 0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.919 get into all of that, I've gotta fill you in 0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.760 on a little story something that I felt earlier today. 0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:38.880 We usually like to do story time in this first 0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.080 first segment here, Jim. And why why would that change? 0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.799 Why would that change without Gregg Sussman here? You know, 0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.760 I'm I'm walking into work today, I'm walking from the train. 0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.000 It's about twenty five degrees this morning. Do you see 0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.519 this haircut right here, the side of my head is 0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:57.720 basically skin and I feel like you can relate to 0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.400 me because you've got the short hair. Uh. I didn't 0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.400 really think through this decision. Obviously. I can't wear a 0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.240 hat in the morning because I don't want to mess 0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:06.959 up this beautiful little thing that I got going on 0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.720 top of my head. It's very cold here in the Northeast. 0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.520 Names for what that's called, but it's very cold here 0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.720 in the Northeast. What am I thinking? What are you thinking? 0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.320 I think together, we have to we've got to grow 0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.560 out some hair here. Man, it's so cold. I'm built 0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.959 for cold. Look at this body. Cold doesn't father be. 0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.280 I did with cold just fine. It's hot weather I 0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.880 don't like, but cold I'm good with cold me and 0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.720 it got along famously all my life. Oh man, Yeah, 0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.240 I wish I could say the same, because you know what, 0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.760 give me ninety degrees over twenty degrees any day of 0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.200 the week. Here, Jim, I feel like it's easier to 0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.920 dress down were less, you know, put on some shorts, 0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:50.760 were a tank top than it is to bundle up. 0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:52.760 That's just how I've always felt. I feel like I 0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.120 also feel like it's easier to cool down than it 0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.360 is to warm up. Does that make sense? It makes sense, 0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.400 But it's just it is what it is. I mean, 0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.640 you know, if I start taking those clothes off in 0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.320 a hot day, you know, all of a sudden people 0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.840 start throwing stuff. Put it back on, put it back on. 0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.960 Well what about um? What about Mrs Day She's she's 0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:18.800 not throwing anything. She's the one. Alright. As I mentioned, 0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.760 we've got football this weekend. I'll give you some of 0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.279 the lines and what the totals are looking at looking 0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.239 like right now before we hit the break. The Tennessee 0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.360 Titans going up against the Kansas City Chiefs. The chief 0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.400 slanks seven and a half points, a total up to 0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.680 fifty two and a half as of now according to 0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.359 the FanDuel Sports book. On the other side, in the NFC, 0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.080 we got the Packers going up against the San Francisco 0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.320 forty Niners, also seven and a half point spread. Forty 0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.040 six and a half is the total there, Jim, just 0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.280 an early glance at these totals, at these spreads, Are 0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.040 you surprised by the spread, because I actually saw the 0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.000 the Titans go down to plus seven in a few 0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.839 places yesterday in the middle of the week, and now 0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.400 it's back up to seven and half. I already hit 0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.720 the Tennessee Titans at seven and a half because I 0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.880 have a feeling before this game closes it's going to 0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.640 be at seven. Are you surprised by the spreads or 0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.920 totals in either of these games? Not really. I mean, 0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.400 let's face it, both games look good, you know, on paper, 0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.800 as they should. Kansas City should be able to dominate Tennessee. 0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.719 San Francisco's defense should be able to handle Green Bay's 0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.920 offense such as it is this year. Um, and you know, 0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.080 both of them look like they're pretty solid place. But 0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.480 you know, then I started thinking about last week and 0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:37.560 the solid play that was Baltimore trouncing Tennessee and not happening, 0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.680 and then I start thinking, and then I start thinking 0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.760 too much, and everything goes breaking haywire. That's why I 0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.560 like you, Jim. We both like to think a little 0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.159 bit too much, and it ends up kind of throwing 0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.080 us into a loop here. I know something the King 0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:56.680 used to say, Uh, paralysis by over analysis. That's why 0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.920 I don't bet. I don't like to bet games or 0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.080 betlines or over I found we were just talking about 0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.880 this son the frenzy. I found it. Prop bets are 0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.720 what I do. I like prop bets, and I seem 0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:09.880 to be pretty good at him. I'm just sticking with 0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:11.760 props from now on, and I think that makes a 0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.520 lot of sense, right, especially when we have a fantasy background, 0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.000 so we know the matchups to exploit a little bit better, 0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.120 and it's easier for us to find that information. You know. 0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.680 Oh well, the Tennessee Titans allowed the fifth most fantasy 0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.440 points against tight ends this year. Travis Kelsey should be 0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.600 able to have a good game, so I'm with you 0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.960 in that. You know, obviously we have the fantasy background, 0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:32.240 so it's easier for us to look at the profits here. 0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.920 And I have you know, last week I had my 0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.400 handy dandy trends sheet with all trends that I heard 0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.720 Gabe and Joe talked about throughout the course of the 0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.000 week on the morning show. Now, I have a bunch 0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.640 of profits. Let's see how many I have here. I 0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.520 have two, four, six, eight, ten. I have ten profits 0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.560 that I'm looking at with reasoning as to why I 0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.000 like these profits. I'll bring these up throughout the course 0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.240 of the show. Uh and Jim. We'll talk about whether 0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.600 or not he likes him. Maybe we're in lockstep on 0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.480 a few of these profits. I actually tweeted out before 0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.560 promoting the show today, Derrick Henry's rushing prop is one 0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.520 oh nine and a half. I heard you talk about 0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.240 this on the Fantasy Football Frenzy and I made that 0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.120 the poll for the for the Fantasy BFS Twitter to day. 0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.240 Do you like the over under in this prop? It's 0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.160 very easy poll. Six percent of the poll right now 0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.920 say that they like the over and how can you 0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.120 not even with it being a hundred and nine and 0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.880 a half. Derrick Henry's problem last week was ninety four 0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.120 and a half. He ran for a hundred and ninety 0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.880 five yards. He cleared this by over a hundred yards 0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.880 last week. We'll talk more about Derrick Henry's problem we 0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.600 come back. We'll dive into the Kansas City Chiefs and 0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.080 the Tennessee Titans from a betting perspective, a DFS perspective. 0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.800 We'll do all that here. Fantasy PFS on the fourth 0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.800 grade TV network. NFL season is an alto so you 0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.119 can be on the eighth person a wain one million 0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:56.320 dollars in a fanuel Draft Kings Tournament dot Com dfst 0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.360 of Optimizer. If you're playing daily Fantasy sports and not 0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.000 using the Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Sign 0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.880 it now for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, 0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.760 smarter DFS projections, and better results. Into promo code action. 0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.040 First head percent discount because that's promo code action. Frist 0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.960 head percent discount. Taylor Order dot com where millionaires are 0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:31.400 made about right, yo, Welcome back to the Fantasy bfs 0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.760 live on the Sport Screen TV Network. I can't sing 0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.800 and dance without Greg Susman here, and I'm not going 0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.760 to subject Jim Day to singing and dancing either, because 0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:41.360 you know we could throw him up on the split 0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.079 screen here. I'm pretty sure no matter what we do, 0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.840 as long as it is not classic rock metal, whatever 0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.719 it might be. Oh look good, we got here. We 0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.679 got Tim Day dance. And I didn't think that we 0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.280 can make it happen without some classic rock or some 0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.160 heavy metal here on the Fantasy b f F's. But 0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.280 there you go, Jim Day being a good sport here. 0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.280 Let's jump in the Kansas City Chiefs laying seven and 0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.280 a half the total in his game fifty two and 0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.360 a half. When we went to break, Jim, we were 0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.480 talking about Derrick Henry. I think everything in this game 0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.240 starts and ends with Derrick Henry the way that he 0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.599 is playing right now. First player in NFL history to 0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.240 rush for a hundred and eighty plus yards in three 0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.240 straight games. He broke the record for the most rushing 0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.920 yards in the first four playoff games of his career 0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.840 five hundred and sixty one rushing yards in his first 0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.360 four playoff games. That is passing Terrell Davis. The Honey 0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.160 Badger said earlier this week that he tried to tackle 0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.120 Derrick Henry back in Week ten. What happened, He almost 0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.440 broke his jaw. I'm with you, Jim. If I see 0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.480 this prop here at a hundred and nine and a half, 0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.880 it's a big number, I get it. I'm either fading 0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.640 it or I'm taking the over. And there's no way 0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.599 I'm betting the under on Derrick Henry right now, the 0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.160 way that he's playing. And if you look at the 0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.880 way that you can exploit the Kansas City Chiefs, it's 0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.200 by running the football. There. Money Night did run defense 0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.160 div away this year. Back in Week ten, he ran 0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.560 twenty three times for a hundred and eighty eight yards 0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.840 and two touchdowns. I think the Titans actually keep this game. 0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:11.600 I've already been on the Tennessee Titans. I think they 0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.160 keep it close in this one. And I think a 0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:14.719 lot of that has to do with Derrick Henry. What 0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.240 say you, Jim Day? Well, I think if they're gonna 0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.719 keep it closer being this game, it's gonna have to 0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.360 be Derrick Henry. I mean, Townehill has played great this year, 0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.240 but it's kind of hard to count on me really. 0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.800 You know, he has one supremely talented rookie wide receiver. 0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.640 After that, it's a bunch of guys that really haven't 0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.360 stepped up and become that hardcore for him, so that 0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.560 that's tough. Um, He's played well, don't get me wrong, 0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.480 but he hasn't had to do much in the playoffs 0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.439 so far. And I think for them to be in 0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.280 this game, it's gonna have to be the same type 0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.320 of game where they come out and have a really 0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.440 good plan on how to slow down Momes on defense 0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.959 and then on offense. You just let Derrick Henry go. 0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.000 He's playing for his contract at this point. He's a 0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.600 free agent. If he he doesn't resign. Uh. He's playing 0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.280 for his big contract right now, probably his last big 0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.040 contract as an NFL player, So I imagine he's really 0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.199 trying to prove his point and make his numbers speak 0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:14.160 for themselves. And I'm with you. The number I'm looking 0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.520 at on FanDuel anyway is one ten and a half 0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:18.520 one or nine and a half. I would like a 0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.040 little better, but I'm still betting the one ten and 0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.199 a half on the over. I think he's gonna do it. 0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.360 I think he goes right through that. Like you said, 0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.560 Kansas City, you know, they get looks like they get 0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:31.920 Chris Jones back, but he's more of a past rusher 0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.800 than a run stopper, so you know, it doesn't really 0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.679 help that much against Henry. I think Henry goes for 0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.079 the big numbers again in this game. I do think, though, unfortunately, 0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.920 I do think that Kansas City will cover. You think 0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.319 Kansas City is going to cover? Interesting. I think that 0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.600 the Titans defense has played extremely well in the playoffs. 0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.559 Mind you, they went up against the New England Patriots, 0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.120 not a great offense, uh, and then last week they 0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.840 did a great job against Lamar Jackson. Yes, he put 0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.040 up garbage time production and from a fantasy perspective, that's great. 0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.200 They let him run around all they want, but they 0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.440 got after him. They call us turnovers. He had two 0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.679 interceptions in that game. He had a fumble loss as well. 0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.679 I don't think that this Titans defense is a great 0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.080 one by any means, but I think that they are 0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.240 playing well right now. Speaking of playing well, you know, 0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.439 I heard the closer Chris Venture bring this up that 0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.040 you know, in football, a lot of it is who's 0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.800 hot at the right time. You don't want to peak 0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.640 two early throughout the course of a football season, and 0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.160 I think both of these teams are really kind of 0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.719 peeking at the right time. The Kansas City Chiefs have 0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.080 won seven straight games during that span. You know, they 0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.920 have wins over the New England Patriots. They have wins 0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.000 over the Houston Texans obviously from last week. The Tennessee 0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.800 Titans have won seven of their last eight games as well. 0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.599 They have beat the Houston Texans. They just beat the 0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.760 m v P and the number one seed in the 0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.760 a f C in the Baltimore Ravens. So for all 0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.120 those reasons, I think that this defense is playing well enough. 0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:57.560 I think that they'll be able to keep this game close. 0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.360 I think it's a lot of Derrick Henry. He's probably 0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.680 over third the rushing attempts again in this game, Jim, 0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.880 how about from a DFS perspective, if you want to 0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.400 use Derrick Henry this week on FanDuel, he is over 0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:20.000 nine thousand dollars. He is hundred dollars on FanDuel this week. 0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:21.839 If you want to get Derrick Henry and your Pat 0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.240 and Patrick Mahomes in your lineup, they're both over nine thousand. 0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.800 It's pretty damn tough to do, Jim. Yeah, it would 0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.640 be tough to get both in and still be able 0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.600 to build a full team. And you know, if I'm 0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.719 gonna take that that shot, I think I'm gonna go 0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.920 with Derrick Henry just because after him, the running backs 0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.200 get sketchy, they do, you know, I I do think 0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.280 that we can get a decent game out of Rogers, 0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.319 even against this tough San Francisco team. You know, when 0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.320 a push comes to shove, Rogers seems to step forward. 0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:53.880 So I think if I have to pivot to Rogers, 0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.839 I think I'm okay with that. Um. But I think 0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.360 Derrick Henry as the top running back I think is 0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.920 almost a lock for this week. Yeah, there's no doubt 0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.240 about it. I understand why his price is as high 0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.040 as as it is on Fandal hundred dollars if you're 0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.000 playing the two games slate with obviously all four teams 0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.760 combined into that slate. On Patrick Mahomes over at, I 0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.319 currently have one Fandel lineup put in. I'm gonna put 0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.600 in a few more where I have Patrick Mahomes and 0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.280 Derrick Henry my lineup. But yeah, you really got to 0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.160 scrape the bottom of the barrel if you want to 0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.840 make that happen. Jim, let's go over Anthony Ferkson right now. 0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.960 I actually have George Kittle as my tight end. It's uh, 0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:35.000 you're basically punting wide receiver at that point, don't know. 0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.920 Don't even dream of getting Vante Adams in your lineup 0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.200 if you want to get Derrick Henry and Patrick Mahomes 0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.040 in there. On the other side, Jim, we saw Patrick 0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.640 Mahomes did last week, just reminding us the player that 0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.720 he can be. The upside that he has three hundred 0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.320 and twenty one passing yards, five passing touchdowns, He had 0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.160 seven rushes for fifty three yards. I actually think his 0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.360 prop of over eighteen and a half rushing yards is 0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.120 an interesting one in this game. I could see the 0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.840 Tennessee Titans doing something similar to what they did last week, 0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.440 at least stylistically from a defensive perspective, where you know 0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.720 they might give Patrick Mahomes some rushing lanes. You know 0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.200 they're going to try and take away the deep passes. 0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.280 That's that might you know, be means that they're they're 0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.480 going to man coverage, which means they're turning their back 0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:18.480 to Patrick Mahomes and he takes off and runs a 0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.160 little bit. So I do like Patrick Mahomes over eighteen 0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.240 and a half rushing yards. I also like Patrick Mahomes 0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.400 over two and a half passing touchdowns in this game, 0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.000 which you are currently getting at plus money. Jim, what 0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.760 do you think of those two props and what do 0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.280 you think overall of this matchup here for Patrick Mahomes, 0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.840 Although honestly he's matchup proof, we know that. Yeah, I 0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.960 agree with you. I like that, you know, both those 0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.560 props seem very profitabled to me. I mean, I think 0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.320 his rushing yards are definitely uh be up there. His 0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.800 passing yards right now at three ten point five, I 0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:52.880 think he goes over, but I think that's just a 0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.440 little too high for me to want to bet on. 0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.320 But I like his rushing prop of eighteen and a half. 0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.560 I definitely think he gets that um just moving around 0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.000 and doing what he has to do, making plays, extending plays. 0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:05.960 I think he does that. I actually like most of 0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.720 the quarterback rushing yards in these games just because you know, 0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.440 when everything breaks down, you know they're gonna end up 0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.920 running uh and you know both him and Tannehill can 0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.360 both run. Like both of those props in this game. 0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.240 The passing touchdowns, that kind of hard to see him 0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.120 not being over that number. So I think that's an 0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.560 even bet. Is very nice number there. Jim from the 0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.400 Titans perspective, who do you think that they try to 0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.720 eliminate from this game? Because I think they're going to 0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.760 focus in on, you know, one of Tyreek Hill and 0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.840 Travis Kelsey, And I think the more obvious answer might 0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:41.760 be Travis Kelsey just based on what we saw him 0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.479 do last week over a hundred yards, ten receptions, three touchdowns. 0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.640 But the last time these two teams played back in 0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.760 Week ten, it was Tyreek Hill who had the big game. 0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.600 He had eleven catches for a hundred and fifty seven 0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.040 yards and a touchdown as well. So who do you 0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.680 think the Tennessee Titans try and take away in this game? 0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.040 And is that affecting the way that you're playing props? Like, 0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:02.880 are you looking at Kelsey props? Are you looking at 0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.399 Tyreek Hill props? Who do you think of the Tennessee 0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.680 Titans trying to take away in this game? Jim, I 0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.440 look at all the props now, I've come to find 0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.480 I really like props and going through them all. So 0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.200 I like reading them all and see where they stand, 0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.760 see what they've done, how many times they've gone over 0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.560 under over the course of the season. So I like 0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.840 going through all of that stuff. But you know, those 0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.240 guys I tend to stay away from just because their 0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.520 numbers are usually too high and just taking too much 0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.200 of a risk I think to play them, I usually 0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.639 tend to stay away from them. Um. I usually go 0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.480 for some of the ones that are just a little 0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.720 bit less obvious. I look, if I'm Tennessee, I want 0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.600 to double both of these guys. Just try and take 0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.600 both of these guys out of the game. Let's let 0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.560 Kansas City beat them another way. And of course they 0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.119 got plenty of other weapons so they can. But if 0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.720 I'm Tennessee, I'm thinking I want to have an over 0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.160 under or two on one pretty much every snap against 0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.359 these two guys. All right, So Jim's thinking that the 0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.000 Tennessee Titans trying double bull Travis Kelsey Entireekill. That means 0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.000 things are going to be left open for players like 0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.120 Sammy Watkins, like Damian Williams. When we come back, we'll 0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.320 get Jim's thoughts on those players as well. It's the 0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.679 Fantasy BFS live on the Sportscreen TV Network. Don't go anywhere, 0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:19.359 We'll be right back. NFL season is now upon us, 0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.879 so you can become the eighth person away one million 0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.920 dollars in a Fandueler Draft Kings tournament. My settinger lineup 0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.720 using the Daily Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. 0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.840 If you're playing daily Fantasy sports and not using Daily 0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.000 Order dot Com, you're doing at all. Sign them now 0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.119 for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, 0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.200 and better results. It's a promo code action first header 0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.680 cent discount. That's promo code action, first head for cent discount. 0:18:43.760 --> 0:19:00.920 Daily order dot Com where millionaires are made, but what 0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.359 would be the next Daily Fantasy legend. Go for the 0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.880 Green with Daily Rohdo dot Com this fantasy golf season. 0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.080 For a limited time, get free access to Daily Rhodos 0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.479 p G a DFS product including Fantasy Projections, Howard By 0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.000 Data Golf p g A betting tools, and of course, 0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.919 the Daily Rhodo dot Com Fantasy Golf Optimizer. Don't lay up, 0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.560 Go for the Green with Daily Rhodo. Head to Daily 0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.080 Rhodo dot com and enter the promo code green to 0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.600 access your free seven day golf membership. That is Daily 0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.440 Rohodo dot com promo code green for your free trial 0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.280 Daily Rhodo dot Com where millionaires are made. Welcome back 0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.760 to the Fantasy best Friends Forever No Greg Susman. I 0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.560 am Frank Standfeld live on the sport Screen TV Network 0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.680 with my good buddy Jim Day Fantasy Taz breaking down 0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.159 the Titans versus Chiefs. The chief lank seven and a 0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.399 half points to total in this game fifty two and 0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.280 a half. Jim, before we hit the break, you mentioned 0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.360 that if you're the Tennessee Titans and they might try 0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.480 to do this, I don't know how six sessful they 0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.680 will be at actually doing it. You said that you 0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.600 would try and double team both Travis Kelsey and Tyreek Hill, 0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.800 so that means someone else is gonna be open in 0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.639 this game. Are you looking at Damian Williams? Are you 0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.360 looking at Simon Watkins? Uh? Do those matchups stand out 0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.280 to you? What are the player props are you looking 0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.399 at in this game? Jim Well? I do. I like 0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.880 Damian Williams a ton uh in this game. I think 0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.640 he's definitely a guy who's gonna have a a real 0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.240 good game. I look for him to have a big 0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.240 game and it just seems really strong that way to me. 0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.440 And I like his prop I rushing and receiving yards 0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.520 of over and under eighty five and a half. I 0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.720 know it's a pretty high number, but I think it's 0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.520 gonna be a type of game where we see him 0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.440 get a lot of passes out of the backfield and 0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.040 him do what he does with them, and you know, 0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.400 get going on the ground as well. McCoy is still 0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.160 not quite up to speed, not doing well right there, 0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.119 and I think it's all gonna be gonna be all 0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.120 Damian Williams all day. So I like him a lot 0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.159 um one of one of the props. You know, we 0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.040 talked about all these different props. One of the props 0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.200 I kind of do, Like, now, this is a what 0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.360 the heck prop? You don't put a lot of money 0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.879 on it, but I like any time, anytime touchdown score. 0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.600 I like McCole Hardman at plus three thirty. Now, like 0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.840 I said, it's not gonna be a big dollar amount, 0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.520 but I like the chances he gets, you know, not 0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.280 only in the offensive game plan, but also in returns. 0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.840 You got a touchdown, So I think those those chances 0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.879 are high enough at plus three thirty to take a 0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.960 shot at. Yeah, I think that's a I think that's 0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.280 a really good one. You know, mcole Hardman makes plays 0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.440 in the kick return game, and he might get a 0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.840 few deep targets per game. He's actually kind of similar 0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:38.719 to a player the Tennessee Titans have on the other 0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:40.840 side in calif Raymond, where they take like one or 0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.520 two deep shots per game. And you think, you'd have 0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.240 to think that Dorry Jackson is going to be on 0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.840 Tyreek Kill. They're gonna send some more safety attention towards 0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.080 Tyreek Kill. They're gonna bring a safety up to try 0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.280 and watch Travis Kelsey as well, so perhaps mcole Hardman 0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.240 can get behind the defense. I don't think that's a 0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.399 crazy call at all. Here, Jim, uh, I'm with you. 0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.359 There are a few long shot beat that I am 0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.440 looking at. Derrick Henry to score two plus touchdowns plus 0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.919 two twenties. Same thing with Damian Williams. Amy, and Williams 0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.040 just scored three touchdowns. Believe he has six touchdowns over 0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.320 his last three games. For him to score two touchdowns 0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.359 in this game, you're getting that a plus two eighty five. 0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:16.359 So I'm not putting a ton on that. But if 0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.479 you want to sprinkle something on a long shot type bet, 0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.680 I think Derrick Henry or Damian Williams to scored two 0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.080 plus touchdowns in this game. And then while we're talking 0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.399 about Damian Williams here, Jim, Damian Williams over three and 0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.359 a half receptions. I realized three and a half of 0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.960 running back is a pretty sizeable number. He had six 0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.959 targets last week. The Tennessee Titans allowed eight point one 0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.760 targets per game two running backs this year. That was 0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.440 the third most in the NFL. So I think Damian 0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.160 Williams is gonna see some targets in this game. The Titans, 0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.120 you know, they struggle in that department. And I'm looking 0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.399 at his twenty six and a half receiving yards as well. 0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.800 I really like both receiving props for Damian Williams and Jim, 0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.600 assuming that you like his rushing and receiving together, I 0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.679 would have to imagine that you like his receiving props 0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.359 just in general. Right, Yeah, I do laps totally do. 0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.040 I do think he's gonna be a big part of 0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.800 this game plan. Alright. So look, we we spoke a 0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.040 little bit about, you know, paying down for some players 0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.520 in this game. I mean, who's a cheaper player in DFS? Jim? 0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.919 Is it a Sammy Watkins? Are you also looking at 0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:19.360 Nicole Hardman who on Fan Duel this week? I'm scrolling down, 0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.800 He's cheap. Sammy Watkins is fifty two hundred. We also 0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.160 have Corey Davis at five thousand. You want to get 0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.080 Derrick Henry in there, Jim, you want to get Pat Mahomes. 0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.399 Can I interest you in any of those three as 0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.360 salary savers this week? Yeah, there's definitely some guys here 0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.280 that that fall under this this realm that that work. 0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.680 You know, you look like you said, if you're gonna 0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.840 have that much jock, you're gonna have to punt somewhere, 0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.159 so you might as well take some shots. And and 0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:48.440 those are some good shots to uh to take. So 0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.400 let's see, I'm trying to take us some good names 0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:58.120 here that I think go over in this one. Uh, yeah, 0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.600 you know what it's uh, you know, Sammy Watkins is 0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.560 one that I like last week on just two catches, 0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.520 you're like seventy six yards. Yeah, and that's what I'm 0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.480 kind of thinking of. You know. He all he needs 0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.800 is really one decent play to get close to his 0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.240 number of forty three and a half to go over. 0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.400 So I like the over and that one. Um, let's 0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:24.080 see so many guys here that could really look Kaj 0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.840 Sharp could be somebody that steps up and makes a 0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.760 couple of big plays. We've seen him do that in 0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.159 the past. Again, not somebody you can count on, but 0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:32.760 you know, if you've got to take a shot at 0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.639 some of these lesser guys, and you know, it's not 0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.040 a bad thing. I laughed, you know when I mentioned 0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.679 Ferk Serve before. But he's another one. You got him 0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.640 real cheap. Maybe gives you something even if you get 0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.520 twice what you're paying for him, then you're good. So 0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.520 you know, all he needs to do to hit that 0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.320 numbers score touchdown. H you know you're not gonna get 0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.920 you know, five six, seven receptions out of him, so 0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.280 they for him to score, it's got to be that touchdown. 0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.560 But it's definitely possible in this offense. Definitely possible. I 0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.280 do think that, you know, if you're gonna spend down 0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.320 for players, I would look to have more exposure of 0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.879 the Kansas City Chiefs. Just you know again, Sammy Watkins, 0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.240 his prop uh is in the forties somewhere in terms 0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.480 of receiving, and he went over that again last week 0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.040 on just two receptions. I think, John hu Smith, if 0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.560 you want to spend down at tight end, the Chiefs 0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.359 allowed the fifth most fantasy points to tight ends this year. 0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.760 So just put a bow on this game here, Jim. 0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:25.640 I'm looking at Pat Mahomes over two and a half 0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:30.240 passing touchdowns, Damian Williams over his receptions and receiving yards. 0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.480 That's three and a half receptions twenty six and a 0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.520 half receiving yards up. Ryan Tannehill under two thirty five 0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.280 and a half passing yards. I understand if they fall behind, 0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.040 he's gonna have to get back into the game. The 0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.760 Titans haven't really fall fallen behind in games so far 0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.320 in the playoffs. I think we get a lot of 0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.600 Derrick Henry, like the over on Derrick Henry. And then 0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:50.639 how about this one, Jim, I found this really interesting. 0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.160 They have this on the on the Draft King sports book, 0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.280 Patrick Mahomes over twenty three and a half fantasy points. 0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.480 You can bet over or under on their fantasy he points. 0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.960 Pat Mahomes is at twenty three and a half last 0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.200 time you face the Titans thirty two point eight fantasy 0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.000 points against the Titans. He had like over fifty or 0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.440 over forty fantasy points last week against the Texans. That's 0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.240 something that interests me. Um And I'm on the Titans 0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.200 in this game. So I guess do you disagree agree 0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.119 strongly with any of those? And what's your final prediction 0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.120 in this game? I know you don't like to take sides, 0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:25.960 but if you had to, it sounds like you're taking 0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.720 the Kansas City Chiefs, right, Jim, I am taking the Chiefs. 0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.080 I think I said it on the Friends. I think 0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.960 it was gonna be thirty thirty five. Uh in this game. 0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.080 I just think it's going to be a higher scoring game. 0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.280 It's gonna get up there. I think the over is 0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.200 a nice play, but I wouldn't bet it just because, hey, 0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.399 it's craziness when you get into the playoffs. But I 0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.159 do think they both put up some points. Uh, as 0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:52.920 far as you know, I like I'd like the Ryan Tannehill. 0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.480 I like the under on the passing yards because I'm 0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.440 seeing it is two thirty and a half. I like 0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.840 your two thirty five and a half better. I might 0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:01.920 have to go look at that. And that's one of 0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.719 the things people don't realize. A lot of people get 0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:07.920 set up on one platform and don't realize that, you know, 0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.560 find something you like, but then go around and look 0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:12.600 at some of the other platforms. You might find better 0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.520 numbers there with better odds, and every everyone is gonna 0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.679 be a little different when it comes to these players props, 0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.800 So make sure you shop around and look at the 0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.600 different platforms because you might get better prices. Yeah, that's 0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.480 a great point, Jim, and that's something that I'm always 0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.440 looking to do as well, especially on player props, because 0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.280 these these yardage totals, I mean, they're super sharp, so um, 0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:35.560 you know, a lot of the time, if you can 0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.600 get a few yard difference, a five yard difference, that 0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.119 makes that's pretty big from a from a perspective, So 0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:43.960 you want to look all around. I agree, you're gonna 0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.159 get different odds too. For example, you know you might 0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.920 see Damian Williams over his receiving yards propt minus one 0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.040 thirty somewhere. You might get it at minus one tent 0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.000 somewhere else. So I agree, you got to shop around 0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.240 when it comes to these props, right down a bunch 0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.080 of them that you like, kind of like I it 0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.240 right here, and then just kind of look around at 0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.520 different sports books and see where you can get the 0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.880 best odds. So I think that makes a lot of sense. 0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.480 I'm already on the Tennessee Titans. As I mentioned, I'm 0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.840 not gonna touch the total in this game like an idiot, 0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.359 Jim an idiot. I bet the under in the Kansas 0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.560 City Chiefs in Texans game last week it was fifty 0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.840 and a half. The Kansas City Chiefs went over by 0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:25.040 themselves at fifty one points. What am I thinking? I'm 0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.359 staying away from the total in this game. But I'm 0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.119 already on the Tennessee Titans. Let's move over to the 0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.800 Green Bay Packers at the San Francisco forty Niners, a rematch. 0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.399 They played this game back in week twelve. Jim, I 0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.920 know you remember it very clearly. San Francisco spanked the 0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.680 Green Bay Packers, bent them over the knee, pulled down 0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.680 their pants, and gave them a good old fashioned spanking 0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:51.000 Odell Beckham style. They won that game thirty seven to 0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.240 eight against the Green Bay Packers. I'm not gonna dive 0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.320 into the matchups much here because we've got a break 0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.640 coming up. But I heard Gabe talk about this on 0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.960 the morning show. Aaron Rodgers is somebody who holds onto 0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.000 things like this. He holds these grudges, he has Vendetta's. 0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.360 Do you think he doesn't remember that the San Francisco 0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.320 forty Niners with a team that passed up on him. 0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.760 He wanted to play for the forty Niners. They drafted 0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.080 Alex Smith instead. Do you think he doesn't remember that 0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.680 they lost the game thirties seven to eight back in 0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.160 the week twelve. This is where what Jim said earlier 0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.000 kind of comes into play with me too, because the 0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.920 matchups in this game, Jim to me favor the San 0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.400 Francisco forty Niners. But then I start thinking about the 0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:36.000 motivation factor for the Packers and Aaron Rodgers, and that's 0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.760 why I don't really feel great laying the points with 0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.720 the San Francisco forty Niners. How do you feel, just 0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.680 in general, will give me an overall perspective take on 0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.120 this game between the Packers and the forty Niners. Well, 0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.440 you know, forty Niners defense, like you said, last time, 0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.960 they just squashed him. But you know you can't even 0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.280 though it was only what eight weeks ago, it's so 0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.000 different now. You know, when you get into that playoff game, 0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:02.239 especially at conference championship game, you're one game away from 0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.600 going to the super Bowl, which everybody is striving for. 0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.480 You gotta throw away all the stuff that happened in 0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.200 that game in week twelve. That doesn't mean half as 0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.200 much as what this game means, not even close. So 0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.400 you know, you gotta throw a lot of that stuff out. 0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.720 And when you get to Aaron Rodgers, you could tell 0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.640 as he is one of those guys that holds onto grudges. 0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:22.600 You know he's going to be that kind of guy 0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:24.520 where he wants to go out and prove his point 0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:26.800 and that's why I say I think he's a nice 0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.360 pivot away from Mahomes this weekend as my second favorite 0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:34.320 quarterback option in DFS uh and in playoff leagues. Yeah, 0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:35.640 and not a lot of people are going to be 0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:39.239 on Aaron Rodgers in fantasy this weekend. All right, when 0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.320 we come back, we will dive into this game. It's 0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.920 the packers of forty Niners. Don't go anywhere. The bfs 0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.560 are live on the Sports Create TV network. NFL season 0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.880 is an alfada, So you can be the eighth person 0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.160 a wain one million dollars in a Fanuel DraftKings tournament 0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.040 my senior lineup using the Daily Roner dot Com DFS 0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.000 lot of optimizer. If you're playing Daily Fantasy Sports and 0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.520 not using day Order dot Com, you're doing there. All 0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.800 Sign him now for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, 0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.680 smarter DFS projections, and better results into Promo coode Action 0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.920 first head percent discount, and that's Promo code Action frist 0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.240 head percent discount, tailor Order dot Com where millionaires are made. 0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.800 Welcome back to the Fantasy best Friends Forever, the Fantasy 0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.959 estranged Friends Forever. No Greg Sussman surprise surprise. I am 0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.600 Frank Stanford, joined by the fantasy Taz Jim Day breaking 0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.400 down the Packers at the San Francisco forty Niners. The 0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.960 forty Niners laying seven and a half in this game 0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.520 forty six and a half point total. This open at 0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.680 forty five, so the total is getting bet up a 0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.880 little bit here. Jim I mentioned that the matchups all 0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:51.480 favor the San Francisco forty Niners, and specifically I'm looking 0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.800 at the ground game right. We know that at their core, 0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.440 Kyle Shanahan wants to run the football. He's got a 0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.400 three headed beast that is Raheem Mostard, Kevin Coleman, and 0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.719 Matt Brita. They just faced the Vikings last week, who 0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.680 came into that game allowing just over a hundred yards 0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.560 per game. Coleman, Moister and Brita combined for a hundred 0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:14.280 and eighty rushing yards two rushing touchdowns. UM, and I 0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.120 think the most surprising part of that gym was that 0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.440 it was Tevin Coleman. It wasn't h he Most like 0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.640 it had been, you know, basically over the final two 0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.680 months of the season. Here Green Bay comes into this game. 0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.120 They allowed the eighth most rushing yards per game to 0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.200 running backs this season, they allowed four points seven yards 0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.280 per carry of running backs, that was the fifth most. 0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.240 I think that the San Francisco forty Niners are gonna 0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.240 be able to have their way again in this game 0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:40.080 on the ground gym. The question is which one. Is 0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.000 there a possibility that the San Francisco forty Niners we're 0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.560 kind of saving Tevin Coleman in that second half of 0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.560 the season so that he would be fresh for this 0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.800 playoff run, because I would not put that past Kyle 0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.640 Shanahan one bit. No, absolutely, I agree with you. Kyle 0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:56.080 Shanahan had his best with that last week. You know, 0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.920 everybody expect Moster to come out and lace it up, 0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.520 and here we get all kept Devin Coleman. And it 0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.560 also wouldn't be surprising to me if he wanted to 0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.520 make sure Tevin Coleman was fully healthy for the playoff runt. 0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.640 Let's face it, Moster came in and was playing very well, 0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.480 so it wasn't like it was a major downgrade once 0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.360 Coleman got hurt, So why not give him a little 0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.280 extra time to get healthy, give him enough playing time 0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.680 just so he gets in, gets his legs back but 0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.040 then have him for the playoffs. It wouldn't surprise me. 0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.480 But would I bet on Tevin Coleman being number one 0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.600 this week? I wouldn't because that's Kyle shanahany You know. 0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.440 He loves to throw different things at you. He wants 0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:37.080 you to look one way while he's doing something on 0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.880 the other side. He's definitely a magician when it comes 0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:41.400 to his play calling, and one of the things I 0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.680 like about him. So, you know, I think it's gonna 0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:49.680 be Tevin Coleman, but I wouldn't bet on so. So 0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.160 you said you wouldn't bet on it. Do you mean 0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.960 that literally, Jim? Because we have the props right here? 0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.560 Are he mostly literally fifty and a half rushing yards 0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.800 is his problem and Hethervin Coleman is just forty and 0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:01.720 a half. You're gonna stay away from both of those 0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:07.479 rushing props this week, all right, bro? Excuse me? You're right. 0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.880 I actually actually have on Fandel, I have Coleman and 0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.960 over thirty eight and a half. And that's the only 0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.160 reason it's kind of making me want to look at 0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.960 that because thirty eight and a half is very doable. 0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.800 You know what, even with a limited number of touches. Uh, So, 0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.120 like you said, green Bay can definitely be run on, 0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.520 So I might very well take the shot on that. 0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.000 I don't really love Mostard being so much higher than Coleman. 0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.480 It could very well work out that way, but I 0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.960 think I take the chance on the lower number and 0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.920 you know, just probably not as big a bet. I 0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.600 think that makes a lot of sense from a DFS perspective. However, 0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.880 Jim on Fandel, Tevin Coleman is this week obviously reactionary 0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.080 to him scoring two touchdowns against the Vikings. Ver he 0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.960 Mostard is just fifty eight hundreds, So you want to 0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.799 talk about a contrarian play recency bias. Some people might 0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.960 be looking at Tevin Coleman if you need a chief 0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.000 of running back or FLEXI week, I think Whee most 0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:03.640 at fifty eight hundred dollars, it wouldn't surprise me one 0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.200 bit if he runs for seventy yards and a touchdown 0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.600 in this game against the Green Bay Packers. So from 0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.200 a DFS perspective, while other people might be looking at 0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.279 Tevin Coleman because he was the guy last week, I 0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.440 do like Raheem Mostert on Fandel just because he has 0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:20.600 seven hundred dollars cheaper than Tevin Coleman. Uh. You look 0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.960 at the defense in this game here, Jim, Obviously the 0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.359 forty Niners are the better all around defense. I think 0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.719 both teams have a very good pass rush. I think 0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.160 both teams have talented corners. I would still give the 0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.719 edge to the San Francisco forty Niners and obviously the 0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.239 better run defenses with the San Francisco forty Niners as well. 0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.080 That's why I say all the matchups in this game 0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:40.360 favor the forty Niners. But with that being said, I 0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.920 still want to take the points with the Green Bay 0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.080 Packers here and and just kind of blindly put my 0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.880 trust on Aaron Rodgers in this game. I had an 0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.080 interesting stat How about this, Jim, tell me what you 0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.160 make of this. If anything, this season, Jimmy Garoppolo was 0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.280 fourteen in NFL passer rating while under pressure, and Aaron 0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:02.040 Rodgers was sixteen the NFL while being pressured. In their 0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:05.120 first meeting, he was sacked five times. He had just 0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.560 a hundred and four passing yards in one passing touchdown. 0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.120 We've seen Jimmy Garoppolo gets shaky whenever there's pressure around, 0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.120 and I think that they'll get pressure on him this week. 0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.920 But based on these numbers, you can kind of say 0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.880 the same thing about Aaron Rodgers. No, Jim, Oh, you can, 0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.280 absolutely you can. There's no doubt about it with Aaron Rodgers. 0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:25.920 I mean, if you can find a way to take 0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.279 Davante Adams out of the game plan, and you're really 0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.400 severely hurting Aaron Rodgers because it doesn't seem like he 0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.640 trusts anyone else, um, not enough to really get them 0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.040 involved in the game plan. It it always seems like 0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.319 it's Davante Adams or busts for him. So if I'm 0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.400 San Francisco, I'm looking at that and saying, Okay, you know, 0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.480 if they're gonna beat us, let somebody else beat us. 0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.640 It's not gonna be Davante Adams. You know, you you 0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:51.400 have to bracket him. You have to do what you 0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.879 can to try and take him out of that game plan. 0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:59.359 So for me, you know, uh, just playoff games can 0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.600 be so crazy you this way, because you know, as 0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.920 we saw last week with the Baltimore Tennessee game, nobody 0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.600 saw that coming. Everybody was all over Baltimore. Looked like 0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:13.319 it should be fairly easy. Tennessee's defense wasn't that good. 0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.640 Baltimore has just been going nuts over everybody all year long, 0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.560 both in the air and on the ground, and it 0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:22.200 just didn't happen that way. So you know, you just 0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.480 never know. But in this game, like you said, everything 0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.719 points to San France, Everything on the table points to 0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.120 San fran being able to win this one, and I 0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.320 do think they do. I think they come out of 0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.080 his win. I just think it's gonna be a lot 0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.879 closer than what people think. Most of the San Francisco's 0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.360 games lately have been very close games, and if I 0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.480 lean anything in this game, I lean with the Packers. 0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.480 But I even like the total. More is being bet 0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.520 up a little bit from forty to forty six and 0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:51.440 a half, but I still do like the total at 0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.239 forty six and a half. I think we could get 0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.000 some points, a little bit of back and forth here 0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.799 with the San Francisco forty isners running the ball, throwing 0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.120 the ball to George kittle Uh. And then if we 0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.719 think the game's gonna be close, that means that we 0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:03.399 think that there's going to be scoring, or at least 0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:05.560 I do. I like the over in this game. I've 0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.719 got a little bit of a two team teaser here, Jim. 0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.080 The Tennessee Titans teasing. They're spread up to fourteen and 0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.279 a half plus fourteen and a half, and then you 0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.160 tease the over on the Packers, so you teas it 0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.279 down to thirty nine and a half and you put 0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.520 those two together, you're getting that at minus one over 0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.200 on the Draft King Sports Book. I'm gonna have to 0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.399 shop around and see if i could get better odds there, 0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.759 but that's a little too two legs teasers that I'm 0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.600 looking at between the total in the San fran Packer 0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.600 game UH and the UH the spread on the side 0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.520 of the Tennessee Titans. Jim, we didn't really talk about 0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.920 George Kittle yet. He was kind of banged up this week, 0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.120 limited in practice. He did return to a full practice yesterday. 0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.560 He's off the injury report. He's good to go. From 0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.160 a DFS perspective, kind of what I was looking at 0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.800 with Raheemost versus Tevin Coleman, I'm looking at George Kittle 0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.319 over Travis Kelsey this week. George Kittle had a big 0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.320 game against the Green Bay Packers earlier this year, and 0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.000 I think everyone is gonna look at what happened last week. 0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.320 Travis Kelsey three touchdowns, George Kittle did nothing. You're getting 0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.279 eight hundred dollars of savings on George Kittle and his 0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.080 target share is likely going to be similar to Travis Kelsey, 0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.040 maybe even better. And I think it's a good match 0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.360 against the Green Bay Packers as well. So do you 0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.800 agree with that taking the eight hundred dollars of savings 0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.239 on George Kittle over Travis Kelsey? And you know what 0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:24.719 other props are you looking at in this game? Are 0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.960 you looking at anything George Kittle related? Well, first, on 0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:32.279 George Kittle on DFS. I played draft Kings when I 0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.279 played DFS because I like the DPR aspect over fand 0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:41.439 just my personal preference. So on draft Kings, George Kittle 0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:45.080 is actually hundred dollars less. You got Kelsey at seventy 0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.719 one hundred and you got Kittle a hundred, And I'm 0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.080 with you. You know, did all the news this week 0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:52.640 of him, you know, being sat and not really practicing. 0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.520 That doesn't scare me at all. George Kittle is gonna 0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.600 be on that field. He's gonna be playing his heart 0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.319 out no matter what's going on with him. But he said, 0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:02.560 he's off the injury report. At this point. It was 0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:04.840 just a matter of him get some extra arrest and 0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.759 he'll be good to go. So I'm with you. I 0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.719 like having George George Kittle in this matchup. I would 0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.880 definitely fade uh Kelsey a little bit more, just because 0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.160 you know, like you said, recency bias is going to 0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.560 have everybody all over him. Now, it's not like you know, 0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.439 the books have. I think that Kittle is not gonna 0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.040 have a great game. Is over and under on Van 0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.000 Duel for receiving yards is seventy five and a half, 0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.520 And to me, that that's a, you know, a little sketchy. 0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:32.640 I could see him getting close that number. I could 0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.520 see him going over that number. But man, that's a 0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:38.719 tough number for me to want to bet on. I 0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.520 think it's a it's you know, it gets really tight there. 0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.360 I mean when you look at his and then you 0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.919 look at Kelsey. I'm trying to find Kelsey's real quick. 0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.400 His is seventy nine and a half. Both of them 0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.279 are really high, and man, it's so easy to get 0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:56.920 under that number. But let's see. You know, I think 0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.279 I'd rather go with receptions for Kittle and I'm not. 0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:01.120 I don't have that right in front of me. Let 0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:02.759 me see if I can find that real quick. I've 0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:07.799 got receptions on George at six and a half. You're 0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.600 getting plus money on the over there if you think 0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.839 he's gonna have a big game, you know, Yeah, right, yeah, 0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.680 I think I might take a little something on the 0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:16.880 over there and just play with it. It won't be 0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:18.560 a big bet, but it would definitely be a little 0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.239 something just because it's plus money. I'll take a little 0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:25.080 shot there, all right, Jim, I'm gonna take the Packers 0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.160 plus the points here. I'm gonna take the over in 0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.680 this game. I really do think that both of these 0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:33.960 games are close this weekend. I think that the Packers 0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:36.320 and the Titans can hang around. It wouldn't surprise me 0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:40.399 one bit if one of these teams wins. Outright, I'm 0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.920 gonna say that the super Bowl ends up being the 0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:49.080 Chiefs against the Surprise. Surprise. I'm going with the chalk 0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:52.759 picks here. Uh, what do you think regarding this game 0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.920 overall with the Green Bay Packers? Which side are you taking? 0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:57.800 And were there any player pross that you like that 0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.480 we haven't mentioned to this point in this game? Well, 0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.120 I like Green Bay, uh to cover, but I like 0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.000 San Francisco to win. So I think San fran first 0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:07.840 case and the Super Bowl is what I'm going with 0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:12.080 as well. Um, if you're looking at props in which 0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:15.759 game we were talking about the Packers game? Yeah right, sorry, 0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.480 I like I like Deebo Samuel. I like a couple 0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.840 of his props. Uh, he's over under on total receptions 0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:24.839 is three and a half. I like that. I think 0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.000 he catches more than that. Um and uh, where did 0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.000 I have his yards? I had his yards right here? Sorry, 0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:37.560 he's okay, Yeah, I like his his like Samuel. You know, 0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.120 Green Bay can give up deep passes and that more 0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.520 Deebo Samuel than anybody else on the team. Um. And 0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:48.080 you know he's got the highest yards per reception on 0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.000 the team. Things like that plays into his game. So 0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:52.560 I like him a lot in this game. To have 0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.000 a really decent game here and have big numbers. I 0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:59.239 like him more than I like Sanders in this one. 0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:03.880 So there's definitely some props here I like, Um, but 0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.360 there's some props I don't like. You know, they got 0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.000 Jimmy Garoppolo pass attempts at thirty one and a half 0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.640 if they're doing what they want to do. He doesn't 0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:13.840 hit that number, So I think I might take a 0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.560 shot at the under on that one. But it's it's tight, 0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:18.480 but I think I might. Yeah, I like that one 0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:20.920 as well, Jim. How about this, I'll throw a random 0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.080 name out there for you. Scored a touchdown last week, 0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:27.799 Hendrick Borne. His receiving prop is twenty one and a half. 0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.319 He has gone over that in six of his last 0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:32.640 eight games. He doesn't have a huge role in the offense. 0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.319 He's probably between three and five targets every single week, 0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:38.640 but twenty one and a half, that's a low number. 0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:41.640 I'm I'm interested in Kendrick Borne at over twenty one 0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.959 and a half? Can I interest you? Jim Day? Actually again, 0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.200 I'm vandeled it's nineteen and a half. Definitely another one 0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:50.920 I was looking at. I agree with you on that. Uh. 0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.120 He usually gets a chance that one or two decent 0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:55.120 plays a game, and all he's got to do is 0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:56.640 hit one of them and he can die pass that 0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.279 number easily. So yeah, I'm with you on that one. 0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.040 I actually like Geronimo Allison's over under fourteen and a 0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.359 half as well. I think that's another one. That could 0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:07.920 should definitely go over. You know, it's not like he's 0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:09.640 been playing lights out, but I think he can get 0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.560 over fifteen yards. Yeah, especially with Alan Zard getting banged 0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.160 up last week as well, I think that makes a 0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:18.920 lot of sense here of regarding Geronimo Allison, that's just 0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.399 a really low number. So I'm with you there, Jim. Uh, 0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.239 I want to thank you for joining the show today. 0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.040 We gotta let you go here throughout this break. We'll 0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.359 come back for the final segment um. But thanks Jim 0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:31.919 for joining us today. And uh, were you watching the games? 0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.760 What are you doing this week? And anything interesting? Uh? Nope, 0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.359 that's just home the wife with a couple of friends 0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.320 coming over. We're gonna put some some some ribs on 0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:43.440 the barbie queue and to sit back and relax some 0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:47.080 ribs on the bobby with Jim Day. The fantasy chash. Jim, 0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.400 I always hear you're talking about playing poker and drinking 0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.400 beers with all your buddies. I say that we have 0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.640 a big sports scrid event at Jim Day's house. One day. 0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:59.399 I'll come. I'll bring the closer, Chris Ventra. Maybe I'll 0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.040 tell Greg's us man. I haven't decided yet. What do 0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:03.960 you think, Jim, We'll make a happy Hey, I'm always 0:45:04.040 --> 0:45:07.200 up for that. Always you're always invited. All right, thank you, Jim. 0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.359 When we come back, we'll wrap up the show here. 0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:15.400 Happy Friday, Fantasy BFFs on the Sportscride TV network. NFL 0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:17.480 season is now upon us and you can become the 0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.480 eighth person a wain one million dollars in a fandueler 0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:23.040 Draft Kings tournament. My setting their lineup using the Daily 0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.920 Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing 0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.839 daily Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, 0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.280 you're doing the wrong. Sign them now for the NFL 0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:35.040 Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better 0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.439 results into promo code action first hend percent discount, because 0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:41.600 that's promo code Action, first head percent discount, Daily Order 0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:51.320 dot Com where millionaires are made. Welcome back to the 0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.280 Fantasy Best Friends Forever Live on the sports Gride TV network. 0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:56.840 We've only got three minutes left. I'll try and recap 0:45:57.200 --> 0:45:59.640 as many of the props and bets that I'm on 0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:01.719 this week in as well as my FanDuel lineup. Let's 0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:06.760 start with that. Patrick Mahomes Derrick Henry, Damian Williams, Sammy Watkins, 0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:11.120 Emmanuel Sanders, Corey Davis, George Kittle, Raheem Mostart and the 0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:15.160 San Francisco forty Niners defense over on FanDuel this weekend. 0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.040 If you are playing a two game slate, that's currently 0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:21.239 what I have in for the conference Championships. I do 0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.000 already have a bet in on the Tennessee Titans plus 0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:26.719 the points at plus seven and a half. I like 0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.319 the over on the other side with the Green Bay 0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.160 Packers and the San Francisco forty Niners that's been bet 0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:34.160 up a little bit to forty six and a half. 0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.279 I like the total in that game more than I 0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.879 like the side as well. A few props that we've 0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:42.400 been talking about throughout the course of the show today. 0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.640 Big game coming for Damian Williams. Played ninety seven percent 0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:49.680 of the snatch last week. He had six targets with 0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:53.319 the Kansas City Chiefs. The Tennessee Titans allowed eight point 0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.600 one targets per game to running backs this season. That 0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.200 was the third most in the NFL. I'm taking Damian 0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.000 Williams over at the and a half receptions over twenty 0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:04.680 six and a half receiving yards. And if you look 0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:08.280 over at the Draft Kings sports book, you get Patrick Mahomes. 0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:11.160 You can bet his over under for fantasy points four 0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:13.720 points per passing touchdown to give you a three point bonus. 0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:18.400 If he goes over three hundred passing yards. His number 0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:21.040 is that twenty three and a half d K points 0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:24.160 this weekend, I'm taking the over that total. I think 0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:25.840 he's gonna make some plays with his legs. I like 0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.920 the over eighteen and a half rushing yards last week 0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.239 against the Titans, we had Patrick Mahomes have thirty two 0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.400 point eight excuse me, the last time he faced its Titans, 0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.359 he had thirty two point eight fantasy points. Last week 0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:41.600 he had well over forty fantasy points against the Houston Texans. 0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.480 So I like like that this weekend as well. And 0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:47.439 which um with Jim Day. I like Garoppo under thirty 0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:50.400 one and a half pass attempts in this game. I 0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:52.400 think that they run the football. I think that's a 0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:55.160 matchup that they can exploit. Whether it's Tevin Coleman or 0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.080 whether it's Raheem Mostert. I'll leave that one up to you. 0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.080 I do like Raheem Mostert and from a DFS perspective, 0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.960 just because his price is cheaper, but his prop is 0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:07.120 like ten or twelve yards higher from a rushing perspective 0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:10.160 this weekend. So there you go. I hope you have 0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.560 fun this weekend with the NFL Conference Championships. It's for 0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:17.000 for for Friday. You know what that means. Waiter Talk 0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.759 is up next with Teddy Covers and Ralph Michael's no 0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:23.440 great excusan today. Hopefully he's back on Monday. I have 0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.680 no clue. Thank you for watching for Jim Day Fantasy Tests. 0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.120 I am Frank Standfeld the Fantasy BFS. We'll be back 0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:30.960 on Monday, we hope