WEBVTT - The Odd Lots Variety Show

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Odd Lots listeners, it's Joe Wisenthal. So on Thursday,

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>September nine, Tracy Elloway and I hosted the first ever

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots Variety Show at the w n y C

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Green Space in Manhattan. The show featured Sam Antar, Lee

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>book Eyed, Brad Setzer, Uh, Stephanie Kelton. We even had

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a surprise guest, one of the Spy Kids. If you

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know that story, you should be excited about that, and

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>if you don't, well, then this will be a treat

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for you. And we even had musical guests, so we

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>had the country singing economist Merle Hazard and I sing

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a few of my own songs. So on this week's

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots, we're going to feature the full length audio

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that we recorded at the live show, so that even

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't able to make it out that night,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you can still hear the great conversations and music from

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that night. And if you'd like to see video from

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the event, you can find it on the Bloomberg Markets

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and Finance channel on YouTube or just by searching Odd

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Lots Variety Show will also be featuring video clips and

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>teasers from the event on social media. You can check

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it out on Twitter from the handle at Podcasts, and

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that Tracy Alloway and I will be tweeting

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>links to it plenty. If you missed it, don't worry

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>because we are very hopeful and confident that this won't

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>have been the last Odd Lot Variety show. So thanks

0:01:34.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone for listening and enjoy the show. Hi, thanks everyone

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for coming. I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway, and

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the Odd Lots Variety Show. It's our first

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>ever live event and we're so happy to have you

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>all here. Um. I have to say I'm a little

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>disappointed because I wanted our first odd LODs live event

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be an odd LODs Live poker tournament. But this

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is also cool. I'm not disappointed. Uh. Just a couple

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of notes before we start. We have some really really

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>great people backstage, some guests that we've been wanting to

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 1>get on the podcast for a very long time. One

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>housekeeping note, this is being recorded in audio format. Of course,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's also being recorded in video format, so please just

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be mindful of that, and other than that, enjoy the show.

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>One other thing, we don't have time for Q and

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>A unfortunately, but we'll have cocktails and reception afterwards. Who

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>can hang out and mingle and ask questions that you

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a chance to ask. So let's get started,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>all right. Our first guest is a criminal, is actual

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>convicted felon. He is the former CFO of Crazy Eddie,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which for any long time New Yorker may remember their

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>ads in the seventies and eighties, who was an electronics retailer. Uh.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Also a fraud through and through from the beginning. Uh.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>And so we have the CFO. He now does work

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on forensic accounting. And I want to bring in Samanta.

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, who are you? What do you do? I'm

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a retired criminal? Are you reformed criminal? Do you think

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>i'd be here right now if I didn't get caught? Well,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe I would as a legitimate CEO that hasn't gotten

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>caught yet. Do criminals ever truly retire? Yeah, because you know,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>after a while, you know it's um, you know what

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what's what's What's the benefit of doing any more crime?

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Even though at times I feel like I'd love to

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>do crime again. After meeting some of the people in

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this room here, I said, oh man, this would be

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>easy just to go back into the game. Again, So

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>tell us about how you got into the business and

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.679
<v Speaker 1>what was crazy Eddie, and how did you become at CFO.

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Crazy as was a small garden variety electronics operation. Uh.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>We engage mostly in income tax evasions. Stealing the sales

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>tax gave us the competitive advantage because that's six or

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>seven percent we can steal. Gave us the opportunity to

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>discount more to customers and still make money. So we

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>were pretty much being competitive by you know, by by

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>evading taxes in the old days. Uh. It was a

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>family oriented business. We wanted to grow and they wanted

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the inside family member to to be the

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>CFO of the company if the company grew to assert

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and level. So they picked me because I was the

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>nerd that read the Wall Street Journal and barons when

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>he was twelve years old. So they put me through

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>college so I can become an accountant to help them

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>commit more sophisticated crimes in the future. So eventually I

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.559
<v Speaker 1>go to brew College right over here in twenty third Street,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I get my c p A. And of course I

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>become a criminal mastermind, you know, doing white collar crime.

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I went to college to become an effective white collar criminal,

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 1>white collar criminal should never cheat themselves out of getting

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a good education. So I was one of those kids

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that cheated in school anything. I earned my grades because

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be the best at what I was

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>doing in crime. Did you know that was the ultimate

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>destination was crime at the time, and you were okay,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And it was fun a lot of money when I

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was fourteen years old. They got a fifteen hundred dollar

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>bonus in nineteen seventy one in cash. Does anybody have

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>any fourteen year old kids? Imagine if your kid came

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>home with a fifteen hundred dollar cash bonus today even

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and the money, of course is not worth as much

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>as it was back then. Go ahead. So what was

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>the most useful thing you learned from accounting for a

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>life of criminality? Is that people are very, very gullible.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>People are too trusting. Uh. As a criminal, I learned

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to consider your humanity as a weakness to be exploited

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the execution of my crimes. In other words, your

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>good nature. You're wanting to trust people, You wanted to

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>give people a benefit of the doubt. That gave me

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to execute my crimes. Second part is is

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that people are you steal more with a smile than

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you can without have gone? Anybody knows how I was

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>working the crowd. He has shaking hands, smiling, and everybody

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was happy with me. Right. You see, if if people

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like you, it's easy at to steal from them because

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they're comfortable with you. So let's talk Uh,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>that's nice and theoretical, but let's talk practical. So obviously,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a lot of people that would like

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to steal the income tax or the sales tax that

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they owe. But you have auditors who are forced to

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>come in. So how do you like dupe the people

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>whose job it is to make sure that you're not dealing.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to fraud, the distraction is always more

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>important than the law. Now, line is not a problem.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You can ask me any question here and I'll lie

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to you right to your face, as you will know

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference. But the point is is that if you

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>can distract somebody from doing their job, chances are they're

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to ask you the question that you have

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the law about. So in the crazy Eddie case, let's

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>take auditors. The audits would be done over a period

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of say eight weeks, so they'd have to be twelve

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent each week, right, So by week

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>six out of eight, they should have seventy five percent

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the work done in seventy five percent at a

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>time and twenty percent of the work left to do

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in twenty five percent at time. My job was to

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>store them by having only twenty five percent of the

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>work done in seventy five percent at a time, so

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that they had have to do seventy five percent of

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the work and only twenty five percent at a time,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>which is causedn't the cram rush to get things done

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and miss key order procedures? And that worked every single year.

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you know why? Because in the nineteen eighties there

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>were no females in accounting doing none. It was a

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>male dominated profession and most of the leg work was

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>done by twenty one twenty five year old kids fresh

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>out of college that was single. And what's the easiest

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>way to distract the mail order to from doing their

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>jobs female accountants is beautiful as you and they would

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they spent most of that time flirting with the females

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of doing their jobs. And every single year, like

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Pavlov with the dog, you put the wood in front

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of the dog gets salivates. Well, you put the female

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in front of the account and they salivate. They don't

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>even do anything else. That's pretty much how we're able

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to succeed for us. We didn't get caught because of

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>our aortors. We got caught because somebody I thought that

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Crazy A's was a goldmine, and they took advantage of

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a dropping the stock price and they took over the

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>company right from out under us. In other words, we

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>were benefited. We were we were a victim of our

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>own fraud. No oh, I was gonna say, talk to

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>us about that moment. What happened when when you heard

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that someone was actually interested in the company and you

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>knew that it was a fraud. Well, we tried to

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>take it over at seven dollars this ship we thought,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we knew that people were hunting the company to take

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it over. So we've made a bid at seven dollars

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a year and excited, Why are you gonna pay seven

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars a share for a company you know it is worthless?

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Because we weren't going to use our money anyway. We're

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna defraud the idiots on Wall Street take all the

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>money have them finance to take on. We're gonna get

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the company for nothing. So we've got seven dollars a year,

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and guess what submediate out to actually bet eight dollars

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a year, thinking that we were trying to steal the company.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the initial investigation into the Crazy Eddy fraud,

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the SEC thought that we deliberately understated on numbers to

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>take over the company on the cheap. Well, I want

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to like back up a second, what is the difference?

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And we we uh. Sam was a guest on a

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>recorded podcast, and I thought this was one of the

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>most key ideas that he said. There is a difference

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the nature of fraud when you're a private company

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>versus public company. The economics of crime change when you

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>go public. So what's the difference. You get a better

0:09:54.080 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>bang for the buck overstating your income as a public company,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>even if it means overpaying your taxes then understating your

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>income as a private company and evading your taxes. For instance,

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if I steal a million dollars from my own companies

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a private company, in other words, I skim a million

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars and I don't show it as income and we

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have at tax rate, I'm evading four hundred thousand dollars

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in taxes. Simple math. Right, one million dollars, four hundred

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. Right. If I now I'm a public company

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and I put that million dollars back into the company, right,

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I have an inflated pre tax income of one million dollars.

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna overpay my taxes by four hundred thousand. I'm

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have an inflated net income of six hundred thousand dollars.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And if my company is trading at a multiple of

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>earnings let's say thirty times earnings pe ratio, I'm creating

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>eighteen million dollars and fictitious wealth by overpaying my taxes

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>by four hundred thousand dollars agains. Who's most stock? Crazy?

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Any people? The hand of family does? We created a

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>security screud by going legit. We said it was more

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>profitable to screw investors than to than to screw the

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>internal revenue service. That was the whole idea behind the

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>crazy Eddy for it. Okay, I'm gonna jump forward again.

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>What was it like in prison? And did you do

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a Shawshank redemption kind of thing where you started doing

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone's tax accounting for the kids, and my kids are here, um,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>believe it or that I didn't. I didn't go to prison.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I got house arrested when they were young because they

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>were too young to be traumatized by what was going on.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They'd see daddy wearing an ankle bracelet, so they bring

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>their friends over if they daddy's ankle bracelet. So did

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you tell on your own family members? Yes, but not

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>my immediate family, my cousins. Yes, of course. Absolutely. Do

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you think I'm gonna go to jail for them? Have

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to have some standards? YEA. One thing I'm very curious

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about it. We just have a couple of minutes left.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Is these days with computers and all kinds of more

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>are easy, you know, ease of tracking inventory? Is it

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>harder to do? For all these days? Crime evolves? I'll

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>give you one one example. Computers and everything. One of

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the things one of the questions raised by Wall Street

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>prior to us going public was what we had an

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>adequate computer system? Which we didn't. So what do we do?

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>We get them? Um? Computer World magazine to bring one

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of their beautiful female reporters over right, and she writes

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>this story about crazy at these computer system that tracks inventory,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and we put a nice lady in with with a

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>smini skirt in front of the computers and all of

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the red, orange and yellow lights are going on, and

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>people think we have a great computer system. If a

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>traction is always more important than the life. If you

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>were going to do it fraud today, in modern times,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what would it be multi level marketing or time shares?

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Because it's legitimate fraud. I see people. I've done work

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on the forensic side on that. I see people getting

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>fleeced all the time by these industries pretending to be

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>legitimate businesses. I mean they might be good investments for

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. I'm not he had to talk about investments,

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And actually I haven't been in the market for over

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a decade, but I will tell you these these these

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>companies are the scum of American capitalism, the ruination of

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>American capitals. They should not be allowed to exist. All right,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Sam answer the former CFO of Crazy Eddie, Thank you

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>very much for your lessons for us. Thank you all right.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Moving swiftly along, We're gonna bring up our next panel.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>And those of you that listen to a plots know

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that obviously we talk a lot about financial markets on

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the show, and I think sometimes there's a tendency to

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>think that markets are sort of divorced from people's day

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to day lives, when in fact they matter a lot

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to how everyone lives. So for our next panel, we're

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>going to focus on some big moments in the debt market,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>specifically UM and big moments in the debt market that

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>have actually changed the world in various ways. Our next

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>two panelists are Brad Setser, an American economist and former

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>staff economist at the Treasury Department. Many of you probably

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>follow him on Twitter, and if you don't, you definitely

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>should because he has great insights. And we also have

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Lee book Eye, who's been described previously as the philosopher

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:30.239
<v Speaker 1>King of sovereign debt lawyers. He's represented nearly every country

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's gone bankrupt since the nineteen eighties and really reshaped

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that we think about sovereign debt. His mere

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>presence at airports have been known to move a country's

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>debt market. Uh, and he's recently retired from the law firm.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Cleary Gotlieb and we managed to get him out of

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>his semi retirement to come talk to us. So very exciting.

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring them on right. Uh, So we purposefully gave

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>ourselves a really sort of a vague intro, which means

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I now have to struggle to think what the first

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>question is. But I think we want to focus on

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>debt crisis to begin with. Do they all look the same?

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there a common thread? How do you actually spot

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a debt crisis coming? Lee? Let's start with you. They

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>don't all look the same, but they have one thing

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in common. They're all a crisis um and they never

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>come in isolation. A sovereign debt crisis will almost always

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be accompanied by a banking crisis, or trade crisis, a

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>currency crisis, sometimes a social crisis. Uh. The pressure on

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the politicians who are there when the crisis begins is

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>intense because they all know that history suggests that the

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>politicians there when a crisis begins are rarely the ones

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there when it ends. Bread By the way, I just

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>want to tell quick anecdote about Brad because we're here. So.

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was probably fourteen years ago and I

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>was like unemployed. I hadn't been in New York that long.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I applied for a job to like blog about economics

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>or something, and Brad was my interviewer and I bombed

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the interview and I think at the job, but we

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that's because he asked me about Argentina had just defaulted

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, and he asked me some

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>question about Argentina. Was like, you know, he asked my

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>way through. I had no idea, so I bombed. I

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it. But we're now here and I'm you know,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>he's at the hot seat. So and once again Argentina

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't the news. Uh so, Brad, why does Argentina first

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of all? Uh? Second of all, why does Argentina? Why

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>did they default so much? What's the deal with that? Well?

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I made probably one of the biggest hiring mistakes in

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>my life. Um. We we'd actually hired Felix Salmon, who

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>would turned to be a pretty good blog so we

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>could have put together Felix and Joe and like, uh,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>probably been a successful blogging firm. Um. So, what does

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Argentina default so much? I guess it's because people lend

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>them so much money? Okay, why do people keep lending

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>them money? Because this seems to happen literally at this point,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>almost every five years. I think people consistently overestimate Argentina's

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>capacity to repay. Yeah, they just kind of gets like

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>squonky sovereign debty. Uh, Argentina doesn't have a big export base.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It exports soybeans and UH soybean oil. It hasn't developed

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>other export industries, so exports are very small share of

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Argentina's economy. If you have a small share of exports,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you have less capacity to support foreign currency debt. Yet

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Argentina keeps borrowing in foreign currency. So I mean essentially

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>every time what would normally be a currency move and appreciation,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it turns into a debt crisis. So I described Lee's

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>career saying that he's represented in numerous governments. So give

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>us your opinion on why those governments keep tapping the

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>market for money that apparently they can't actually afford. Look,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty first century, no sovereign borrows money in

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the international markets with the expectation that they'll ever have

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to repay it. If by repay you mean devote current

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>resources to settle that liability. They borrow it in the

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>sure and certain hope that when it matures they will

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>be able to go back into the market and borrow

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>from someone else to pay that back, and when that matures,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll do the same so on in perpetuity. I sometimes

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think of sovereign debt that it used to be a

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>joke that if you had a pal who was on

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a diet and you saw them about to tuck into

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a chocolate declaire, you were supposed to say to them, Now,

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>remember a moment on the lips. A lifetime on the hips.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Sovereign debt is that when a sovereign borrows money today, uh,

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that debt in a net sense, will probably stay on

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>its balance sheet forever. That which is why sovereign debt

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>stocks almost always go up. They will occasionally go down,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>but almost always go up relentlessly, remorselessly. Well, Brad, you

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that argent Tina is particularly ill suited to take

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on foreign currency debt due to its immature export base.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Why not adopt a different model? Why do they have

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to borrow from borrow from international markets? Well, I mean

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they have at times tried a different model. I mean,

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for better or for worse. The Kushners were frozen out

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of the market for a long period of time. They

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>still kind of wanted to run budget deficits, so they

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of borrowed from the Central Bank to UH finance

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>government spending. Mockery came along and said, I wanted to

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>go back to be a more legitimate form of finance.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>UH and Argentina, in addition to having a small export sector,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>has a really small banking sector. Lots of historical reasons,

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the history of inflation, so we couldn't finance the budget

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>deficit with the banking sector. The market was there and

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the temptation was strong, Uh Lee should they do? Should

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>they do a different approach? And I'm also curious, like

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>after Mockery one, everyone's like, yeah, he's going to do

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>all the liberal reforms that people want. And the i

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>m F is excited because they're gonna do some playbook

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>and obviously, as we've seen over the last several months,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>it's completely failed. How much burden is there on the

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or as a responsibility on the international community, whether it's

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>organizations like the i m F. Two, try that playbook

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>again and sort of think, like, you know, how much

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is it their fault for adopting this pattern that just

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't working. Well, here's a curious asymmetry in the international

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. Organizations like the I m F. Every year

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>by their articles of agreement will send a team of

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>economists down to every one of their members analyze the

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policies and usually criticize them, sometimes brutally, but they

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>have no power at that stage to get the country

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to change policy. It is only when the country cannot

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>pay its debts and comes to the I m F

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and asks for a program that the IMF can begin

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, you must adopt these fiscal adjustment measures. It's

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a curious asymmetry. It's as though the medical profession was

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>unable to tell patients to avoid smoking cigarettes, that they

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>could only help them when they come in with the

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>consequences of it. So is the solution to debt crises

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always have to be fiscal adjustment or austerity or

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>are there alternatives that are just never pursued? Well, debt

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>crisis you you started this question, Tracy. Debt crisis come

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in different forms. Sometimes often I guess they are caused

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>by chronic fiscal mismanagement of the economy, but not always

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>um There have been debt is caused by natural disasters,

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the hurricane, the the earthquake, the tidal wave. UH Debt

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>crisis can be caused by a Lehman moment in the

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>international markets. Debt crisis can be caused by some other sovereign,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>some other place in the world misbehaving or the victim

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of gross misfortune, which causes the investor community to recoil.

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's almost like you're seeing them wake up and

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>remember the risks of sovereign nothing and then they pull back.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And when they pull back, Uh, going back to my

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier analogy, Uh, when all the debt is assumed to

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be refinanciable and it no longer is refinanciable, then there's

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a debt crisis. Bread. Do you think some other model

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>should be pursued? I mean, let's say you could go

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>back in time too, after right after Mockery went to

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the election or some other point. Was there another path

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that plausibly could have been taken by Argentina to avoid this?

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean like, you know, more austerity per se,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>because whatever, you know, it's tough, But was there like

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a totally different approach they could have taken. I in

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Argentina's particular case, there were choices, but I'm not sure

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the choices would have avoided some form of austerity. One

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>choice would have been to borrow more in pass uh,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>not to borrow in dollars. I mean, you get into

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>debt trouble most typically when you borrow in a currency

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that is not your own. There may be some differences

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>across cases, but that's the commonality. Otherwise you can sort

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 1>of print your way out of the crisis. Uh So,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>once Mockery decided not to borrow into in Paso's I

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>think there were on a difficult trajectory. So you could

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>have borrowed more in Pasos. You could have retained some

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of the capital controls, tried to lock in the domestic

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>investors and forced them to keep buying Argentina's debt. Uh.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And in that world, if you had not been relying

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>as heavily on the central bank for financing, you probably

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>would have had to have run smaller fiscal deficits at

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the time. The other question, which sort of Lee avoided

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is that once you get into trouble and wants you default,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes a question of how much you want

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay back ah. And so one way of avoiding

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>too much austerity after you have stopped paying is to

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>strike a generous deal with your creditors and gives yourself

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a fresh start right on this Notely, do you hate creditors? No,

0:25:54.440 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly not um. Look, the countries, all countries, but particularly

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>developing economies, can benefit enormously from access to capital markets

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if it is done with moderation and maturity. Ah. The problem,

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and this goes to Joe's Yo's you were dancing around this,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 1>But the answer to your question is that the political

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>flesh is notoriously weak. Look, politicians like to spend money

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it helps them get re elected. Politicians don't like to

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>tax because it doesn't help them get reelected. They don't

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>like to cut services because that doesn't help them. Uh. Borrowing,

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly borrowing from outside your own country. So in the

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>international markets is the way to cover that deficit. Ah.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It allows you to spend money without raising taxes um

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and for as long as it lasts, it's the one

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a full thing. But the problem is it is for

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>most politicians to tempting and they will borrow often to

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the saturation point of what the market will lend them.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And that is where global economics comes in. If you

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>live in a time as we have for ten years

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>in which the central banks, major central banks of the

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>world have driven interest rates to near zero and have

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pumped massive amounts of liquidity into the market through quantitative

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>easing and similar programs. There's enormous amount of money slashing

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>around that will need a home and they will welcome

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>a borrower willing to take it. So there you have

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a confluence of two dangerous things. A tendency of politicians

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to borrow as much as they can and attend and

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>see of a market, not a tendency a financial imperative

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to lend money to someone at the best interest rate

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they can. Let's talk about a country that's even worse

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>shaped by a long shot, I think than Argentina, and

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that is Venezuela. And Tracy mentioned Lee that you were

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in retirement, but give it all the rusteny retirement semi retirement.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>So you are involved in some way in Venezuela, but

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not working for Maduro right, No, okay, So what's

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going what what's your what are you doing with Venezuela? Yeah,

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I am acting as what we're calling a strategic advisor

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Guideau administration in Venezuela. And what's on the

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>agenda for helping them? And how much can you actually

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do as long as Maduro is cleaning onto power. Well,

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. Until that man takes the hint that

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he should exit the political stage. There isn't much that

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>can be done with respect to the country's external debt.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The country owes north of a hundred and fifty billion

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>US dollars. Its economy has been utterly decimated by twenty

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>years of corruption and grotesque economic mismanagement. There is a

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>deep humanitarian crisis in the country. There is a serious

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>refugee crisis at at you know, levels proportional to Syria um.

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But there is no possibility of dealing with that debt

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>stock until Mr Maduro says audios, thoughts and suggestions approach

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>forward for Venezuela. I mean, Venezuela is going to be

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>like the super Bowl for sovereign debt lawyers. Once the

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:03.719
<v Speaker 1>restructure and get started. You have every single possible issue.

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You have two sovereign borrowers, one sovereign, one quasi sovereign,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the PETAVSA, the state oil company, both of whom owe

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount in international bonds. The legal equivalence or

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 1>non equivalents between their debts is to be determined. Ample

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>scope for creativity. The contractual provisions in Venezuela's bonds are

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>very old school, which means that they have more litigation

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>possibilities and avenues and fewer tools to facilitate a restructuring

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>than a modern restructuring clause would allow. You have an

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>issue of equity between bond holders and sovereign creditors like China,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like Russia, but then Russia has played a kind of

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>clever game because Russia hasn't lent necessarily as Russia. Russia

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>has lent as Rosneft, the state oil company. Uh sort

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of seems like the sovereign, but it isn't technically the sovereign.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You have a whole host of court claims for past

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>expropriation whose relative rank uh I think is not clear

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>compared to other obligations. We may have a different view,

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it uh it it has every

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>avenue of complexity that one could ever imagine, combined with

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the greatest need for debt reduction. I think one can imagine,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Brad how important our debt relationships to international politics, Because

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, you are building up a relationship

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>between two companies. This country owes that country some money

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or vice versa. But on the other hand, you can

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>see it as a point of antagonism when things start

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to go wrong or whenever there's tensions. And the one

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about right now is China and the US

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and one trillion dollars plus worth of U S treasuries

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>held by China. Yeah. Look, I probably made my my

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>name by tracking China's treasury holdings before anyone else thought

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting. Uh. And the boring reality is that

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the treasuries have been the most boring aspect of the

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>trade war. China hasn't used them as leverage. China probably

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>can't use them effectively as leverage. I think China has

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>been disappointed by the fact that it's law, you know,

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's treasury holdings, which at one point in time,

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like China's GDP, they've kind of come down. Treasury and agencies,

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to be correct, um, have never really provided them with

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>much leverage over the US political system. Uh. Soybean farmers,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, are a much more potent political force.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's partially because the US borrows in its

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>own currency, partially because the FED can buy far more

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>bonds than China could ever sell, and partially because the

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>relationship with China was always arm's length. The US never

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>really wanted China to accumulate so many reserves, and as

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a result, the US never promised China much of a return.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chinese learned this. I think one of

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the one of my seces is that frustration with a

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>lack of leverage provided by treasury bonds contributed to China's

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>decision to lend more through its policy banks, more through

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the Belt and Road initiative, more through direct close relationships,

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>loans to specific politicians, specific companies, and less through a

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>deep liquid bond market like the treasury market. So I

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know if people know this or not, but Tracy

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>has contributed to um the tensions between the U S

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and China with an article that she wrote a couple

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago. So apparently there's some people that like

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>bought some old Chinese bonds from like the early nineteen hundreds,

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like in an antique shop or something like that, that

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they just say their bonds, and now they're trying to

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>lobby the Trump administration to get to enforce uh, I

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you describe it. They want Trump to make China

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>pay them. Sure, they want Trump to basically exert pressure

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on China to pay this hundred year old that the

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>People's Republic of China actually repudiated back in nineteen So Lee,

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about this earlier. Do they have do

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 1>you think they have any sort of shot at these people?

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Like picked up some pieces of paper and anyway, wait,

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 1>is China going to be represented by Lee? In which

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>case legally I think not. Um. Whether Mr Trump wishes

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>to use this or rattle this saber that I don't know.

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But these bonds were actually the subject of litigation back

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties UH and the courts decided that

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the statute of limitations had run on these obligations. It

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't just China, by the way, there are Czarist Russian

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bonds for that went into default in nineteen seventeen. They

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>slash around, UH. And there was actually a very interesting

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>situation in the mid nineties when Russia wanted to issue

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>euro bonds in Europe. The French government said to the

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Russian government, not until you pay us some money to

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>settle the old Czarist bonds that are held by French citizens.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And they paid them I think five million dollars to

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. So these things slosh around. It's it's there

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are other countries, by the way, that may be a

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit of option value if something could happen where

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 1>they're worth. My image is most of these things are

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>framed and on bathroom walls. Uh and break the glass

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>when Mr Trump tells you too, they are beautiful debt certificates.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to say that they're very gorgeous and

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we should all buy them for the art value at least,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>um Lee, we'd be remiss if we didn't ask you,

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>in your forty plus your career, what your most interesting

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>moment was, jetting in and out of countries, often in

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy or on the verge. Interesting is hard adjective, but

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>most tense I think was Greece. Greece in twenty ten

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>encountered a terrible debt crisis. Grease a member of the Eurozone,

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:02.919
<v Speaker 1>member of the European Union. Uh so it had as

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>its domestic currency the euro, but it wasn't a domestic

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>currency like the Argentine pesos. The Greeks unilaterally couldn't print it,

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so in that sense it was a foreign currency. Um.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>They owed north of three hundred billion euros, virtually all

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of it in the form of bonds, and the question

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was would a debt restructuring for that debt stock force

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Greece to leave the Eurozone, possibly force it to leave

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the European Union to bring back the drachma. And that

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 1>had enormous political consequences across Europe because many in Europe

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that the UH, the Eurozone, the monetary union was indissoluble,

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and had it proved even not to be, might there

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>have been others who would leave? Might the market have

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>looked at Greece and said, if Greece can restructure, maybe

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Spain could, maybe Italy could, maybe La Belle France could,

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and would that not bring a cataclysm upon European finance?

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So it was a tense period. We're almost wrapped up

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>before we go, Um, I just want to turn the

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>subject a little bit because Brad, you know, we're talking

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about US China and the trade war, and sometimes you

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>come on TV and I said, what's your prediction for

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the trade war? So, with you know less than a

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>minute to go at this point, what is your prediction

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for where things are going with you as China trade

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I I, my guess this is one of the cases

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where you can get on TV simply by reading the

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>president's Twitter account and saying that the best predictor of

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>what US trade policy will be will be with the

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>tone of his past ten tweets. If the past ten

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>tweets are J. Powell is the biggest threat to human civilization,

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>then he's probably not thinking about escalating with China. If

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>his last ten tweets or I'm a tariff man, he

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>probably is going to escalate with China. So the recent

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>pattern of tweets seem to be back on J. Poweh

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is not the world's best central banker, rather than China

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is our greatest enemy. So right now I'm putting slightly

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>higher odds on a kind of what's called the mini deal.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>China buy some soybeans, the US doesn't escalate any further.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Trump administration really wants to do

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the last round of tariffs anyway, and then that provides

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of an unspoken truce to go through the election.

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, We're going to leave it there. That's Lee

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>book Eyed and Brad Setser, thank you so treating with us.

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. I have to be very careful with this

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>next intro because it's slightly last minute, and it's also

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>not on your lineup. It's a surprise guest who we're

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>not going to name. Instead, we're going to bring him

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 1>out and we're gonna play a game, and you all

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to guess who he is, and

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to do so by asking questions that

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>can be answered in yes or no format. And there

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of people and hear who I know

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>know who this person is, so please don't ruin it

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for everyone else. Yes, all right, let's bring him on

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the special guest. You can clap even though you don't

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>know who he is. All right, who is it? Who

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is it? Who wants to get shouted out? Is being recorded?

0:40:54.520 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>So you know right to ask loud? Ye? Yes, keep

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:14.479
<v Speaker 1>become financial frauds if you committed no good question? What's

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter handle? Don't don't have one? Mystery? Do you

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>specialize the reco part? I do not. I barely know

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:29.479
<v Speaker 1>what that is. She's a big point, you guy, No

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>good guess though, that's a good guy. You work on

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the podcast? The question was does he work? Do you

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>work on the podcast? But you're welcome to like, I'll

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>come on. Are you related to we work in any way?

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it a good question. Are you really do work? Yeah,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in exactly Yeah the news, so yeah, fair enough,

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but we work. Questions do you work now? Are you

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 1>involved in country music? Involved? That's a good question. No, unfortunately,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you're have an opinion on platinum coins. No, you know what?

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Iven you know what? I love that like no one

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just even like anywhere in the wallparks like I swear,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>none of you have asked remotely like you're not You're

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>not getting warm at all. It's not even close. No,

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if I did, I had one. Do you work for

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the government. I'm kind of young, but no I did not. No, yeah,

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I got it's getting worse. Actually, want questions are getting

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>further away the towel. Let's not tell. Okay, so there's

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>a hint. Why don't you show the hint because it's

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>been like two minutes and it's not getting better. You

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>guys are getting anywhere close. Ye, this in particular is

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the import in peace. Yes, there, you're one of the

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen kids. It's eleven. Actually we'll give that just to

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>be clear, Just to be clear. So the shirt, in

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>case you didn't see it, says uh sp dr. And

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that was enough for someone to say that you were

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the kids. So who are the kids? What's

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>going on? I'm going to do the unveiled before people

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.760
<v Speaker 1>start talking about platinum coins again UM or bitcoin. So

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the Spy eleven, also known as the Spy Kids, are

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven pretty random. UM, now millennials who have about two

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars tied to them in the form of

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest e t F, the SPDR SMP five

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 1>d E t F, known by the ticker sp Y.

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I still can't believe this is real. So what's the deal? Well, basically,

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Spy was created as a unitary investment try UM partially

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 1>because it would be easy to get through the SEC

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>regulations UM at the time. To create this type of vehicle,

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they had to basically get two separate divisions of the

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 1>SEC to come together and approve it, which, if anybody

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>has worked with regulators, that's incredibly difficult. Oh gosh, it's

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's probably around nine when this document was created. UM.

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I've probably more leading up into that. I think probably

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>late eighties early nineties as well. But UM. This so

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>basically what a unitary investment trust is. Just to give

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a little legal background, is UM it's a vehicle that

0:44:35.840 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 1>they put these investments into for this initial et f

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>UM that is connected to not only does it have

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a date limit to to go against the rule of perpetuities,

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but they also have measuring lives, which is us eleven

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 1>kids who are all kind of family members who are

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>born around the time that this was created. So um

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, myself and two of my cousins who couldn't

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>make it tonight A are also on our part of

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the eleven. But you didn't know that you were actually

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>listed on this legal document until one of our reporters

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:11.839
<v Speaker 1>actually called you up. What was that conversation, like, did

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you think immediately that it was a scam? Yes? Actually

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I was like it was this was just a few

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Yes, this was probably mid August. Yeah, You've

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>going your whole life without knowing that the world's largest

0:45:25.040 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>et f how much is in it now a quarter

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of a trillion dollars, is continue It's continued existence is

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:36.479
<v Speaker 1>contingent on you and ten other people being alive. Yes, okay,

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get that clear. And you found

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>this out a few weeks ago, Yes, I mean that

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the lead and email it's like you're connected to this

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.919
<v Speaker 1>massive billion dollar fund. I mean that reads like any

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Nigerian prince scam. Like what it guys, You're getting real elaborate,

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, businesses are giving this info away in

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>these hacks. Like why do you got to do all this?

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm still a little confused. What was the legal requirement?

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know. Well, so I have a question

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on this because you actually touched on it already, the

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>rule against perpetuities. Have you just become an expert in

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this in the past three or four weeks a little bit?

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>My um, so, my mom who put us on this

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>list was actual AMEX council at the time for the

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>American Stock Exchange who kind of helped push and create

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this product. Um, and yeah, she she kind of explained

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it to me. It's it's very it's basically to avoid

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:33.520
<v Speaker 1>having something that can go on in essentially perpetuity. Um,

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't have any for example of trust, it could

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 1>if you had to go on in perpetuity, can be

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.879
<v Speaker 1>doling out assets forever in theory. But that's why they

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have these rules in place to kind of limit these things.

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And one of them is to use measuring lives. And

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what we are essentially present that like they've made

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.239
<v Speaker 1>so much money on this, and I assume you don't

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.919
<v Speaker 1>get anything. I was that was my first question, And yes,

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I was quite like, and I do I get, like

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know royalty or anything. Yeah, a couple of yeah,

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:08.399
<v Speaker 1>like does someone I mean clearly not because you didn't

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>know about this until recently. But how did they know

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're alive? I you know, that's funny that that

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>was a question we had, like who's tracking Is there

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>anybody tracking us? You know? My cousin joked, it's like

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the Born Supremacy where they have all like the faces

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>and and la heartbeats going like on the screen and all.

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody did. I don't think anybody So

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing to understand here when this was

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>all done, this was part of a sixty page legal

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>document that was meant to be filed at the SEC

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and like lost forever, you know, it just would end

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>up in some random government. They weren't expecting these things

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>all be digitalized and put up on Edgar filings um

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and easily searched by people on Twitter. Apparently, um, not

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.240
<v Speaker 1>easily searched. I did that search by the way, well somebody,

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:58.839
<v Speaker 1>I thought somebody, Well somebody had found here, yeah and

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 1>sent it to us yet. Okay, but it took a

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>long time too. It took years for them to find it. Yeah.

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Have you met the other spy kids? Are you all friends? Now?

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I like to think that you're all going to go

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on vacation together and some room together, right like? That

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>seems like it would be like a major financial stability

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>risk to have you all the same plane or the

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>same building, right like. It's yeah, it does not seem

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like a good idea. Um no, actually, so two of them,

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>uh other names on the list, I don't know. I mean,

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>their their names are out there already. I guess Pete

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and Paul Pavelka are my cousins and they were also

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of born around the same time. So my mom thought, well, yeah,

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>let's put them on there as well. What do you actually,

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, what do you do besides I have

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 1>two So I actually work in public relations for a

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>financial PR firm and routh I'm group got to get

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the plug. Sorry, uh yeah right, um, so there's no

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not that weird that financial reporters reached out

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to me. It was kind of like, but the weird

0:48:56.719 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>question was like, is your name Kevin Patrick McGrath. Now,

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't use my middle name on anything like. I

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably on two documents connected to me and

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>it's so that was like when I was like, what,

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like what is this all? Like? That was really the

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that ticked me. I was like, where does this

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>come from? Are you putting it on your business card?

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Spy kid? I haven't yet, but I'm thinking about it.

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Also thinking about getting some identity protection service. That's right

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if if anyone wants to help crowdfund some identity theft

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>protection for Kevin whose full name and birth date is

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>widely available, um, and we should probably do that. Can

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I just say, I'm I'm extremely impressed that, Like how

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 1>particularly you talk about like securities law and the law

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.920
<v Speaker 1>relating to perpetuities and stuff like that. You know, I mean,

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess like you're probably crammed after like discovering all

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this and what to learn everything, but I am very impressed. Oh,

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you? And um, now it's part of that be sure,

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I definitely read into it. But um, also just being

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>around my mom my whole life and she was just

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>very talked about work very well, Oh yeah, what did

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>she say so someone, I assume you asked her like mom, Yeah,

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>so before I think maybe shortly before Rachel was able

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to contact me at work. Rachel is the Bloomberg reporter. Correct. Um,

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>she she had called my home and gotten my dad

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.319
<v Speaker 1>on the line. So he's like, calm, like, obviously this

0:50:19.360 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>has to be connected your mother. And I realized that

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 1>once I saw someone sent me the filing and I

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>saw that it was Spy And I had known Spider

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>from a kid, from being a kid, because obviously they

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>had the really cool merch and spy. You know, as

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>as your eight year old kid, you go to like

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>your parents like the swag room at their office and

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you see like spiders, and I was like, awesome, like

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm grabbing all that. Um, you're perfectly made for all thoughts.

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 1>By the way, if you think that's cool exactly, Um,

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I was just kind of I called her

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>up and I was like Mom, like did you do this?

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And she's like did I do that? She was she

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>did not remember. Again, this was just a very It

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to be more like I knew one day

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>conversation and I know that's the more exciting. Uh, but no,

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was just for them. It was very routine.

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It was just kind of like a call going around

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the office, like, Hey, does anybody had recently had kids?

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Who know somebody had recently kids? Would want to put

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>their name on this fund? And now now I'm on. Yeah, alright,

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Kevin McGrath, thank you so much for coming on and

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>being our surprise guest, and thanks everyone for playing the

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>game right. And now it's time for the first musical

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>break of the evening. Our guest today is America's foremost

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>country singing economist, possibly maybe the only one. You might

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>know him from his smash hit that came out during

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, Inflation or Deflation, which asked the crucial question

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 1>would we face that, would we be more like Zimbabwe

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>or Japan? And so far I think Japan is winning. Uh.

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>He has some new numbers live from Nashville, Tennessee. Uh.

0:52:02.520 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Merl Hazard, thank you Joe and Tracy for that very

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>kind introduction. Mic on there, all right, you're all ready

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear some down home music about high finance. All right, Well,

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 1>my name is Merl Hazard, and that's Hazard with the

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Z as in zero interest rate policy, the songs that

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I've done over the last twelve years or so since

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the crisis have been about UH economics, finance, banking, derivatives,

0:52:44.880 --> 0:52:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and asset back securities. There are songs about life, and

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>people do sometimes ask me how a country singer from

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Nashville could kind of get into that kind of thing,

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it really just comes natural. My daddy

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was a coal miner and my mama was a supervisor

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and compliance at Morgan Stanley being winter. Now, this first

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>song I want to do is on a monetary topic,

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's seen seigniorage. And if I said seigniorage, I'm

0:53:13.120 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna quiz anybody. But does that mean a lot,

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a little, or nothing? Okay, So for some of you

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a new topic. Basically, when a government produces its

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>money supply, it makes a profit. Could be an emperor

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in ancient times, a king, queen, modern government. They could

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be stamping coins with images, they could be printing paper,

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they could be doing electronically. They make a profit. They

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>use it in part to pay their army, and now

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>central banks actually by securities and make interesting dividends on

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this creative money. And that's seigniorage. So I figured that's

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good topic for a song. And uh, it's

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to the two and I'm going to use an old melody.

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You may recognize this by a guy named Harry Warren,

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>has been going for decades. But Junior, you're ready, Oh,

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this is my son Merle Junior, good company on guitar

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and you're ready to do that signorage? All right? All

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the money you print and the coins that you meant,

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that's seigniorage on as much as you make. There's no

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>interest to pay that seignior ridge from the hills to

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the plains, like a dream of John Keynes. It's state income.

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Every central bank knows that as M zero grows they

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:41.000
<v Speaker 1>can make some even gangsters with cash in an illegal stash.

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That's seigniorage for a central bank earns as the black

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>market churns. This is true. Money's value is strange. It's

0:54:54.600 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a means of exchange and of storridge. That is how

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:06.959
<v Speaker 1>central banks printing dollars and Frank's stern siniorage. Yes, senior ridge,

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's send George, thank you, thank you. What do you think?

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:23.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a much better response than we got at the

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>cracker barrel in Chattanooga. It is. So. I hope y'all

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>are watching the PBS series on country music that just

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>started up. It's really good. And uh, you know, I

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:39.839
<v Speaker 1>love Nashville, where I live and where Merle grew up.

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>He lives here now, but uh, you know, Nashville. We

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 1>got hot Chicken, We've got um the Grand Old Opry,

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and we've got the headquarters of Lions Bernstein. It's pretty

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>much everything a man neat um this, let's see. And

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, one thing I love about country music is

0:55:57.520 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>you can take an idea, the kind of idea you

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:01.359
<v Speaker 1>wake up in the middle night. You might forget when

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you wake up or dimly recall. But if you're write

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 1>down a few words to make them rhyme, put a

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:09.319
<v Speaker 1>few chords on it, you've got something. Well that's what

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I try to do with this next song. And it's

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>called The Fed is watching the Market? Are you ready?

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready? All right? The Fed? The one, two, three, four,

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The Fed is watching the market. The market is watching

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. It's a game of follow the leader, but

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell which one is being led. The Fed

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is watching the market, the markets watching back In return,

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:48.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals are in tatters. I'm not sure it even matters

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what companies possess or or what they hear. The FED

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is watching the market. They're trying to protect us from shocks.

0:56:59.000 --> 0:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Where they speak of financial conditions, I'm thinking they really

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:10.800
<v Speaker 1>mean stocks. The FED is watching the market. The market

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is returning it's gaze. It makes some people wealthy, yet

0:57:15.600 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>still it feels unhealthy when chrice valued part ways. FED

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>believes in free markets, except not the market for cash.

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>It helps to make bubbles more likely. Your cut rates

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the first sign of a crash. The FED is watching

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the market, But is there any bit of meat left

0:57:40.440 --> 0:57:45.959
<v Speaker 1>in the soup? Incentives are perverse, Evaluation is recursive. We're

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>caught in a financial feedback loop. Yes, we're caught in

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a financial feedback loop. Yes, we're caught in a financial

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:59.680
<v Speaker 1>feedback loop. Yes, we're called in a financial feedback I

0:57:59.720 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 1>think got the idea. Thank you, thank you all, thank

0:58:07.840 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you well. If you're getting we're gonna do one more

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>song for you. And if you're getting into these songs, uh,

0:58:12.480 --> 0:58:14.720
<v Speaker 1>check out the website merl hazard dot com. There are

0:58:14.760 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 1>songs on YouTube. There's some streaming things, uh, you know,

0:58:18.760 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and Apple Music and even on iTunes. So if

0:58:22.600 --> 0:58:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got, uh holidays are coming up. And if you've

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>got colleagues at the financial firms where some of you work,

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and they are intellectual and mildly depressed, I'm told this

0:58:32.120 --> 0:58:35.960
<v Speaker 1>will cheer them up. You may Samantha friendship or get

0:58:36.000 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a promotion or something out of it. So this next

0:58:38.520 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>song is about them. The statutory framework under which the

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve operates the US Central Bank. Yeah, it's a

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:50.680
<v Speaker 1>good topic. Uh So I respect central bankers that they

0:58:50.680 --> 0:58:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have a really hard job in any country. I think

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they have an even perhaps even harder job in the

0:58:55.680 --> 0:59:00.120
<v Speaker 1>US because the the statue gives them to conflicting goals US.

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And imagining myself in that position, I wrote this Lament

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the American Central Banker, which will finish up with

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and the title is dual Mandate Junior. It's awfully hard

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a central banker. For rich folks like to

0:59:24.760 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 1>see the currency strong, but the average Joe's not overjoyed

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if he's destitute, unemployed. Seems like every time I choose,

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm choosing wrong. The right says I should tighten up

0:59:46.000 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on credit, not Donald Trump, most of the right to

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the risk of inflation nice and low, while the

0:59:56.320 --> 1:00:01.520
<v Speaker 1>left and many economics scholars are jin me to print

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>more dollars. I'm torn between the two ways I could go.

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got a due mandate, due mandate. I gotta keep

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>prices stable while giving jobs to those for able due mandate,

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>due mandate. My job is harder than you'll ever know.

1:00:35.360 --> 1:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Unlike here in the US, the Bank of England has

1:00:37.960 --> 1:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it relatively easy ban con England, and so I hear

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>does Europe's DCB, Europe the Uncentral Their goal is for

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>stable price. That's simpler. It must be nice a single mandate,

1:00:55.520 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>unlike poor on mucky meat. Because I've got up due mandate,

1:01:04.840 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>due mandate, I gottau solve labors troubles without creating financial

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>bubbles due mandate, do mandate. It's tough for me to

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>make our economy equal. My job is harder thanuel ever know.

1:01:34.440 --> 1:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, thank you all very much. It's great to

1:01:36.560 --> 1:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be here. And I'm like, all right, well, we've come

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to the final interview of the night, and um, I

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think unless you've been living under a rock over the

1:02:27.040 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>last year or so, you've probably heard in the news

1:02:30.040 --> 1:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of debate and discussion about modern monetary theory.

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Probably a lot of it um has been caricature. It's

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>like other people who just say print the money, they

1:02:39.640 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of do um. But also so it's also kind

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of caricatured um. Anyway, tonight we have with us the

1:02:47.520 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>person who I think has done more than anyone else

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>these uh these days to be a proponent and an

1:02:54.240 --> 1:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>advocate and a voice for MMT, and that is Stephanie Kelton.

1:02:58.480 --> 1:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>She is a professor. It's Tony Brooks. She's also an

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor to the Bernie Sanders campaign. In addition to

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>talking a little bit about what m m T is,

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get her perspective on the state of

1:03:09.440 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy and economics right now, because we live in

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting times, large deficits by historical standards, very interest rates

1:03:17.960 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>by historical standards, and yet things aren't working and we're

1:03:20.800 --> 1:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not having inflation like people would have expected. Wage growth

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>has been poor GDP growth across the developed world very

1:03:27.720 --> 1:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>mediocre since the crisis. So I wanna you know, economists

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are scratching their head. They're looking forward to hearing how

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I MMT economist examined some of these puzzles of modern

1:03:39.360 --> 1:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>economic life. So it's definitely called what do you say

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when do people say that about mm T, Like, oh, yeah,

1:03:51.400 --> 1:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just print the money. Well, you just said it, I said, stage, Um,

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>what do I say? I don't know what else to

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>say except you know what we've been saying for now

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>two decades? Uh and print then I thought it just

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>started in the last couple of years. You guys have

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>been at it for We've been at it for a

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>little while, and as far as I can tell, none

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of us has ever said MMT is about, you know,

1:04:13.760 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>printing the money. But it gets shorthanded that way, and

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like nails on a chalkboard every time I do

1:04:19.480 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>an interview. Now I sit down and I say, okay,

1:04:21.200 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do this on the understanding that you're not

1:04:23.720 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>going to run a story that says MMT is about

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>printing money. And so we do the interview. In the

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>headline reads economists says print more money. You know. Okay,

1:04:31.240 --> 1:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so nothing I can do. I'm going to take the

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bait in that case. What is MMT about? And why

1:04:36.040 --> 1:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>has it suddenly sort of exploded into maybe not entirely

1:04:39.960 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the public consciousness, but certainly um this demographic. Well, it's

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like the impossible question to say, you know, what is

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>MMT about, because it's, uh, it's a group project that

1:04:51.440 --> 1:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>started more than two decades ago with UM maybe a

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen economists in the early years, producing scholarship

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>on questions from you know, the Eurozone, to trade, to

1:05:03.800 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>social security, to government finance that deficits to the you know,

1:05:07.760 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's this enormous project. So there's no way

1:05:10.280 --> 1:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to just say this is what MMT is in like,

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a sound bite. But I think most people

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>when they think of MMT, they think of it as

1:05:18.560 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>UM an analytic framework. So it's a mac we're macro economists.

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's an analytic framework that tries to update the

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>lens through which we UM understand the monetary system and

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the policy options that are available I guess in the

1:05:35.040 --> 1:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>post Bretton Woods, post gold standard era. And so we're

1:05:38.600 --> 1:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, look, there's policy space that has opened up

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>around us since we have gone off of the gold

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>standard or fixed exchange rates, and we're not taking full

1:05:47.240 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>advantage of that space. We could be doing better, and

1:05:50.440 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>so we're trying to you know, shine a light on

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>some of those things. So what was the impetus when

1:05:55.880 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>when this first started. Was it that something has changed

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>about either the finance system or the economy and we

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>want to understand the existing world better. Or was it

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the policy prescription that you were after, because I think

1:06:08.720 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>nowadays lots of people here m MT they think full employment,

1:06:11.400 --> 1:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>they think universal healthcare, that sort of thing, which which

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was the inspiration behind I don't think it was either. Actually,

1:06:18.480 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think back to you know, when I

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>started training as an economist from undergrad let's say, to

1:06:25.320 --> 1:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>graduate school. It was the mid nineties, and you know,

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>there were already different schools of thought out there. The

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>post Kaynsians were saying very different things from more mainstream

1:06:34.960 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>types of economists, and especially when it came to the

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>financial system, to banking and finance and those sort of questions. So, um,

1:06:42.400 --> 1:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>we were always kind of agitated by the way that

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>mainstream economists describe how finance works in particular, so we

1:06:51.760 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>had a different narrative set up from the very beginning.

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But then, you know, with m MT, I think it

1:06:57.040 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>started evolving as we started to think differently about the

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>role of taxes and the relationship between money and taxes

1:07:04.280 --> 1:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and state finance, and it kind of opened up around

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the question of launching the Euro, I think really because

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at countries that were making a decision

1:07:13.880 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to abandon their currencies and adopt a common currency, and

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of I think sparked the broader interest. So

1:07:22.920 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that essentially it's an analytical framework, and as

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in the intro, I think we're people would agree.

1:07:29.760 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We're at a moment where a lot of people feel

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>unsatisfied with the existing answers that economists have given, or

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that mainstream economists have given on things like the recovery.

1:07:40.720 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Why hasn't growth been faster? Why hasn't inflation picked up

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>despite cutting rates and these trillion dollar deficits. What's your

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>answer to that? What is the let's start with that.

1:07:52.720 --> 1:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Why hasn't inflation picked up despite all these things that

1:07:56.440 --> 1:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>economists would have said, oh, yeah, that'll definitely cause inflation. Well,

1:07:59.880 --> 1:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the models are too mechanistic and they lead

1:08:04.480 --> 1:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>us to too simple and understanding of really complex phenomenon

1:08:08.400 --> 1:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like inflation. And so if you're trained like I was

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the early years, to think that, um, you know,

1:08:14.760 --> 1:08:17.519
<v Speaker 1>money is inflation is something that happens when you print

1:08:17.520 --> 1:08:21.599
<v Speaker 1>too much money, or you know, the Milton Friedman. Inflation

1:08:21.640 --> 1:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is always an everywhere monetary phenomenon. So if you seek

1:08:24.479 --> 1:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>central banks doing things like que and people say quantitative

1:08:28.120 --> 1:08:30.639
<v Speaker 1>easing is printing money, and printing money leads to inflation,

1:08:30.640 --> 1:08:32.719
<v Speaker 1>then we all come to expect that if you believe

1:08:32.760 --> 1:08:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that inflation automatically picks up because the labor market gets tight,

1:08:37.200 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and your market, your your model tells you that tight

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>labor markets working through a Phillips curve sort of relationship,

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>lead to pressure on wages that then lead to increased pressure.

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the models are too simple and we have

1:08:50.439 --> 1:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>too much faith in them. Well, actually on that point,

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because I get the logic of this idea that okay,

1:08:56.280 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>unemployment falls and then workers have more borrowing bargaining power,

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and then that leads to higher wages, and then they

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have more um you know, more purchasing power and so on,

1:09:07.160 --> 1:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>what is the conceptual flow Because we haven't even really

1:09:09.479 --> 1:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>seen robust wage growth by any stretch, even though the

1:09:12.720 --> 1:09:15.759
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate is below four percent. So just like breaking

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it down, like, why does even the most simple, seemingly

1:09:18.960 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>logical idea that low unemployment would have all these positive

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>effects on prices? Why does that not even seem to

1:09:25.200 --> 1:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be worked well. I think most of it has to

1:09:27.200 --> 1:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>do with one key phrase that you just use, which

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:35.519
<v Speaker 1>is bargaining power, and how is bargaining power exercise through unions?

1:09:36.000 --> 1:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And what's happened to unions over the course of the

1:09:38.320 --> 1:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>last thirty years. I mean, they've mostly been decimated. So

1:09:41.240 --> 1:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard to tell a rational story about how,

1:09:45.160 --> 1:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>even as the labor market titans, workers are supposed to

1:09:48.720 --> 1:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>exercise the power in the negotiating process. If they don't

1:09:53.200 --> 1:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have union representation, what are they supposed to do walk

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in and just sit down with the boss, kick their

1:09:57.320 --> 1:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>feet up on the table and say, I'm here for

1:09:59.160 --> 1:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the raise. You know, labor markets tight, let's go. It's

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>just not there. The mechanisms aren't in place for that

1:10:06.120 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen for for huge swaths of the American workforce.

1:10:09.960 --> 1:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So here's one thing I sometimes wonder, but if if

1:10:12.200 --> 1:10:14.719
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the U S at least woke up tomorrow

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and accepted m m T as the analytical framework for

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the economy, what would change like? What would that world

1:10:21.400 --> 1:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>look like, and what would that change from the current

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>scenario actually tell us about what's wrong with the way

1:10:27.960 --> 1:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we think about economics. I mean, honestly, I think the

1:10:30.240 --> 1:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing that changes is the conversation that we have.

1:10:33.479 --> 1:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if we had a better set of

1:10:37.200 --> 1:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>lenses and we were able to see more clearly, you know,

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the space around us, the monetary system,

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the way it works. I just think that a lot

1:10:45.120 --> 1:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of the questions we asked today, and a lot of

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that we presume stand in the way of

1:10:50.320 --> 1:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Congress passing legislation that would do something more ambitious,

1:10:53.920 --> 1:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like what we can't because trillion dollar deficits, or we

1:10:56.240 --> 1:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can't because China has all this debt, or we can't

1:10:57.960 --> 1:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because look what happened to Greece, or we can't be right. Um,

1:11:01.160 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>at least that would go away, and then we would

1:11:04.000 --> 1:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have a very different conversation even the tax cuts. Right

1:11:07.080 --> 1:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if we were looking through an MMT lens and we said,

1:11:10.920 --> 1:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are looking to do between a trillion and

1:11:13.200 --> 1:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a half or two trillion, depending on how you want

1:11:15.160 --> 1:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to cost it out in tax cuts. Instead of saying, um,

1:11:18.960 --> 1:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>we can't afford it, will blow a hole in the

1:11:20.560 --> 1:11:22.519
<v Speaker 1>budget and all this kind of stuff, we would have

1:11:22.720 --> 1:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a different conversation. It would be about you know, the

1:11:25.640 --> 1:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>presumed effectiveness in terms of job creation and the potential

1:11:29.560 --> 1:11:32.439
<v Speaker 1>inflation risk in an economy that may or may not

1:11:32.479 --> 1:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be closer to full employment. So I just think, you know,

1:11:34.760 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>social security, Are we really going to have a conversation

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>about the government's ability to keep its promise to future retirees,

1:11:40.800 --> 1:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>their dependence and the disabled. If we're not afraid of

1:11:43.320 --> 1:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>running out of money, then the conversation changes. Then it

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes about demographics and inflation risk. And I just think

1:11:48.760 --> 1:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>we have a richer, more substantive national debate than this,

1:11:53.920 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, arbitrary, frivolous conversation about you know, entitlements driving

1:11:59.000 --> 1:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>us into a debt crisis, which is as I mentioned,

1:12:02.120 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>insure you are on one of the teams in the

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:07.639
<v Speaker 1>primary and you met uh speaking of like the sound

1:12:07.720 --> 1:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of like screeching chalkboards. How much does it hurt you

1:12:10.680 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>when you hear Democratic candidates blast the tax cuts on

1:12:14.840 --> 1:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the grounds that it blew out the deficits. It does,

1:12:18.560 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But I haven't heard that much of it, and I'm encouraged.

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:24.639
<v Speaker 1>You know what, It's funny, Joe, because what I hear

1:12:24.680 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Democrats saying is that they would like to repeal all

1:12:29.360 --> 1:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>or much of the Republican tax cuts, not because they

1:12:32.680 --> 1:12:34.599
<v Speaker 1>blew a hole in the deficit. We got to repair

1:12:34.640 --> 1:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that damage, but because they want to use those tax

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>cuts to quote pay for something else. In other words,

1:12:40.400 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the same as saying I want to use the

1:12:43.200 --> 1:12:46.519
<v Speaker 1>deficit to build infrastructure. It's no different. It's tantamount to

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>saying I want to keep the deficit, but I want

1:12:48.680 --> 1:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to direct it towards some other aim, right. I mean so,

1:12:52.920 --> 1:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>even though we have some Democrats complaining about Republicans expanding

1:12:56.760 --> 1:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>deficit for very specific purposes, there are quite a few

1:12:59.640 --> 1:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>higher file Democrats who seem to be embracing mm T,

1:13:02.960 --> 1:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>whereas Republicans who actually have a de facto history a

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>blow of embracing MMT haven't done that. Why do you

1:13:10.720 --> 1:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think that is? Do you mean openly invoking so they'll

1:13:15.040 --> 1:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>expand the deficit for their pet projects, um in a

1:13:18.400 --> 1:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of m MT way, But they don't seem to

1:13:21.040 --> 1:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>embrace the theory in the way that some Democrats. Well,

1:13:23.680 --> 1:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's better to embrace it actively than to embrace it rhetorically.

1:13:27.479 --> 1:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So I get in some sense, you know, it's more

1:13:30.920 --> 1:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>encouraging to see someone pushing through an agenda UM that

1:13:37.000 --> 1:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't hue to the hysteria around dead indeficits. Is this

1:13:41.160 --> 1:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>my preferred um set of policies. No um. But you know,

1:13:46.760 --> 1:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not as if it's encouraging just because a few

1:13:49.760 --> 1:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have invoked MMT, because at the same time, you know,

1:13:54.040 --> 1:13:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the Speaker of the House has reinstated PAGO, and that's

1:13:57.680 --> 1:14:01.519
<v Speaker 1>not terribly encouraging. If you're looking the potential to take

1:14:01.560 --> 1:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate and then move ambitious progressive legislation,

1:14:05.520 --> 1:14:07.479
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to do it in an environment in

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>which PAGO is in place, which is a rule that

1:14:11.000 --> 1:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>exists in the House of Representatives today that says you

1:14:14.439 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>can't add to the deficit, so everything has to be

1:14:16.920 --> 1:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>deficit neutral. So I mean, it's it's good and bad,

1:14:20.120 --> 1:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's there's progress for sure being made now. One of

1:14:23.800 --> 1:14:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the policy agendas that's likely to be on the plate

1:14:27.520 --> 1:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of a theoretical democratic administration, particularly if it's of the

1:14:30.760 --> 1:14:33.519
<v Speaker 1>more progressive way, or if it's if it is Bernie

1:14:33.880 --> 1:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>would be a green New Deal. And something that you

1:14:36.960 --> 1:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>hear people say is like some people like, well, how

1:14:39.120 --> 1:14:41.719
<v Speaker 1>can we afford it? And the response is often well,

1:14:42.280 --> 1:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we didn't ask that question. We didn't We

1:14:45.000 --> 1:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't choose to fight the World Wars based on whether

1:14:48.160 --> 1:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we could afford to. We figured out a way to

1:14:50.240 --> 1:14:53.639
<v Speaker 1>do it. So what are the lessons from the wars?

1:14:53.800 --> 1:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And I mean I think Kines wrote a pamphlet how

1:14:56.240 --> 1:14:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to Pay for the War that applied today towards something

1:14:59.520 --> 1:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>as in is a green New Deal. Yeah, I mean

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that Kines's little book, which it was called

1:15:07.240 --> 1:15:09.559
<v Speaker 1>how to Pay for the War. That's literally the title

1:15:09.600 --> 1:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of the little pamphlet. And you would think, just based

1:15:12.040 --> 1:15:13.439
<v Speaker 1>on the name of it, that this must be a

1:15:13.479 --> 1:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>book about where to get all the money to finance

1:15:16.360 --> 1:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>World War two? And this is Kines was British economist

1:15:18.800 --> 1:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of corso this was, you know, advice for the British government.

1:15:22.439 --> 1:15:24.439
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out you read this thing and has

1:15:24.479 --> 1:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with where the British government is going

1:15:27.000 --> 1:15:29.559
<v Speaker 1>to get all the money to finance the war effort.

1:15:29.880 --> 1:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's about understanding that this is going to be a

1:15:32.800 --> 1:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>massive endeavor, that it's going to involve transforming the economy

1:15:37.640 --> 1:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>away from one that's oriented around producing for the consumer

1:15:41.080 --> 1:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to one that's oriented around winning the war right, transforming

1:15:45.280 --> 1:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the entire economy, and Caines was mindful of the inflation

1:15:50.360 --> 1:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>risks because the government was going to have to ramp

1:15:52.200 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>spending way up, and in order to do that, it

1:15:55.439 --> 1:15:58.759
<v Speaker 1>was going to have to take resources away from other uses,

1:15:58.840 --> 1:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and so you're elbowing out the private sector in order

1:16:02.040 --> 1:16:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to bring people and industries into public service and to orient,

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the war effort. So the whole book

1:16:10.400 --> 1:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is about how to do that in a way that avoids,

1:16:12.680 --> 1:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to the extent possible, creating an inflation problem. And it

1:16:15.800 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>turns out it was really effective. It was a very

1:16:18.320 --> 1:16:22.559
<v Speaker 1>careful analysis of how to allow the government to spend

1:16:22.680 --> 1:16:27.599
<v Speaker 1>into the economy while removing enough purchasing power strategically right.

1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>It was really important to Kean's that remove the purchasing

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>power from the right hands, because if you remove purchasing

1:16:33.200 --> 1:16:35.679
<v Speaker 1>power from the wrong hands, you might not do much

1:16:35.720 --> 1:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate the inflation risk. In other words, if all

1:16:38.240 --> 1:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you do is tax the very richest people who weren't

1:16:41.160 --> 1:16:43.799
<v Speaker 1>going to spend much of that money in the first place,

1:16:43.880 --> 1:16:46.599
<v Speaker 1>then you run the risk of a real inflation problem.

1:16:46.680 --> 1:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So he understood that this had to be done really strategically.

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So with a green new deal same thing. Right, The

1:16:51.840 --> 1:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>same principle applies if you're going to do something that

1:16:55.080 --> 1:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is truly transformative. That you're not just talking about transforming

1:16:59.800 --> 1:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the way we deliver energy, but the way we build

1:17:03.240 --> 1:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>housing and transportation, and the way we deal with food production, agriculture.

1:17:07.920 --> 1:17:11.519
<v Speaker 1>You're going to touch nearly every piece of the US economy.

1:17:11.560 --> 1:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And so the lesson is to look back at what

1:17:14.479 --> 1:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Kines told us and to figure out if you're going

1:17:16.479 --> 1:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to go that big and you're going to make that

1:17:18.800 --> 1:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of investment in the US economy over a short

1:17:21.040 --> 1:17:24.599
<v Speaker 1>period of time ten years or so, right, Um, that

1:17:24.760 --> 1:17:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there are important lessons to learn from what Kines was

1:17:28.160 --> 1:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>doing in that little pamphlet, And inflation is the major risk,

1:17:31.760 --> 1:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>not bankruptcy or financing. So this sort of connects with

1:17:35.200 --> 1:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the criticisms that you often hear about MMT,

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>which is it's actually not that different to Kynesianism in

1:17:41.240 --> 1:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>various ways. How would you respond to that? How how

1:17:43.720 --> 1:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>would you lay out the differences explicitly? Well, I think

1:17:47.720 --> 1:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of them, and you're right, I

1:17:50.120 --> 1:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there are examples like the one I just gave

1:17:52.479 --> 1:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where I'm saying basically, um, when it comes to the

1:17:55.120 --> 1:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Green New Deal. Listened to Kin's. Okay, that was about

1:17:57.760 --> 1:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation risk. But um, there are very substantive differences between

1:18:03.560 --> 1:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the way that we analyze some big questions in the

1:18:06.720 --> 1:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>way that some headline canesians. I mean, I don't know

1:18:09.360 --> 1:18:12.519
<v Speaker 1>how much I want to pick on certain people and

1:18:12.560 --> 1:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>give specific examples. I was a contributor at Bloomberg for

1:18:16.960 --> 1:18:18.599
<v Speaker 1>a period of time. I got into a little back

1:18:18.640 --> 1:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and forth with Paul Krugman. We traded some columns him

1:18:21.080 --> 1:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times, me writing for Bloomberg, and um,

1:18:24.479 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there we taste out. I think some of the important differences.

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, the conventional Keynesian models tell you

1:18:31.840 --> 1:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that deficits are supposed to drive interest rates up. That's

1:18:34.439 --> 1:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the way it works in normal times. And that when

1:18:36.960 --> 1:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the government increases its deficit as to increase borrowing, and

1:18:40.320 --> 1:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>as it borrows more, that gobbles up private savings that

1:18:43.760 --> 1:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>are no longer available to finance private investment, leaving UM

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>companies with fewer resources to invest, And so investment goes down,

1:18:52.280 --> 1:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and his investment goes down, you get a slower, growing,

1:18:55.080 --> 1:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>more lethargic economy. M emty. This is just one example

1:18:58.080 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but MMT says, no, no, no, hang on. Deficits don't

1:19:00.960 --> 1:19:04.519
<v Speaker 1>gobble up savings. They augment savings. If the government spends

1:19:04.600 --> 1:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars into the economy and only taxes ninety

1:19:08.320 --> 1:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars back out, we label that a government deficit. But

1:19:11.680 --> 1:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>what we forget is that just deposited ten dollars into

1:19:15.400 --> 1:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some part of the economy. My deficit. If i'm government,

1:19:18.000 --> 1:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Uncle Sam. My deficit becomes a surplus in some

1:19:21.680 --> 1:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>other part of the economy. So from the very beginning

1:19:24.720 --> 1:19:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of this crowding out story where deficits become the villains

1:19:27.720 --> 1:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of progress in the economy, MMT says, no, no, hang on,

1:19:31.320 --> 1:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you're getting it wrong. From that very first step, right,

1:19:33.760 --> 1:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>deficits add to savings. And then we could go on

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>about the relationship between interest rates and investment. They think

1:19:39.240 --> 1:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that they are obviously inversely related. We say, interest rates

1:19:43.400 --> 1:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>are policy variable, not something determined by market forces, or

1:19:47.000 --> 1:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>at least they always can be. So there's just we

1:19:49.360 --> 1:19:52.519
<v Speaker 1>go on and on. Another thing to people say about

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:55.599
<v Speaker 1>m m T is that like, well, yeah, sure, because

1:19:55.640 --> 1:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the US is the world's reserve currency, so the US

1:19:58.320 --> 1:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of policy flexibility. Other countries don't have it.

1:20:02.600 --> 1:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know how much you're paying attention. We

1:20:04.840 --> 1:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Argentina. What is the sort of m

1:20:08.200 --> 1:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>m T if you were you know, if Mockery had

1:20:10.520 --> 1:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>brought in you instead of the I m F and

1:20:12.200 --> 1:20:14.559
<v Speaker 1>said what should I do to make my economy more stable?

1:20:14.880 --> 1:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>What have what would have been the uh the mm

1:20:17.240 --> 1:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>tiers advice. Well, I mean, I think the last discussion

1:20:20.400 --> 1:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was was really good and very much on point in

1:20:23.160 --> 1:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>many ways, in the sense that to the extent that

1:20:25.520 --> 1:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you're able to avoid doing so, you should avoid borrowing

1:20:28.439 --> 1:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in a foreign currency, and not every country has the

1:20:32.240 --> 1:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>capacity to UNI laterally just s I am not going

1:20:35.200 --> 1:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to the international markets at all. I'm only borrowing in

1:20:37.880 --> 1:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>my own currency. Some countries can't do that, but Argentina

1:20:41.680 --> 1:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>could do less of that, and that would be advisable

1:20:44.960 --> 1:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>UM for for a start. Yeah, I mean, obviously the

1:20:49.920 --> 1:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency status gives us an additional degree of freedom.

1:20:54.400 --> 1:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>There is, you know, an extra benefit to being the

1:20:57.120 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>world's reserve currency. But you know, I was just in

1:20:59.560 --> 1:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Japan too long ago, and yeah, but but there's a

1:21:04.479 --> 1:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>country that is not the world's reserve currency that UM

1:21:08.400 --> 1:21:10.799
<v Speaker 1>has a debt to GDP ratio if you go gross

1:21:10.880 --> 1:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of like two, right, and I go over there.

1:21:15.400 --> 1:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And the biggest question I got from all all of

1:21:18.240 --> 1:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Japanese press everyone I talked to, how do we get inflation?

1:21:21.520 --> 1:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>What can we do to cause inflation? Like they're desperate

1:21:23.960 --> 1:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to create inflation. Their debt ratios the you know, highest

1:21:26.960 --> 1:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world interest rates or right where the Bank

1:21:28.880 --> 1:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Japan puts them very low. Inflation is low. It's just

1:21:31.840 --> 1:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh well, actually I was going to ask about, um,

1:21:35.280 --> 1:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the chaos that we've seen in money markets

1:21:38.040 --> 1:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this week, UM. And part of that was said to

1:21:40.720 --> 1:21:43.719
<v Speaker 1>have been caused by this ramp up in T bill

1:21:43.800 --> 1:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>issuance by the government, UM, which sort of bled through

1:21:47.000 --> 1:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>into money markets. I guess I'm curious how much does

1:21:50.840 --> 1:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>MMT sort of reflect on the existing banking system and

1:21:54.920 --> 1:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>regulations when it comes to gauging its own impact. Oh,

1:21:58.960 --> 1:22:01.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean I think that if you ask

1:22:01.600 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>me what's the greatest strength of MMT, you know, I'll

1:22:05.120 --> 1:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit brazen here. I think we've gotten

1:22:09.000 --> 1:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all the big stuff right. There's nothing that has been

1:22:12.080 --> 1:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>major that we've gotten wrong. Nothing, I don't I think

1:22:14.479 --> 1:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty impeccable record, and I think the strength

1:22:17.400 --> 1:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is that we have a superior understanding of monetary operations,

1:22:22.880 --> 1:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and that is we dig deep into the weeds on

1:22:25.320 --> 1:22:28.599
<v Speaker 1>some of this stuff monetary operations that other people kind

1:22:28.600 --> 1:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of superficially understand. But m M tears are really in

1:22:32.280 --> 1:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the weeds. So you're both very on Twitter, very online,

1:22:36.400 --> 1:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and you probably saw some of the conversation from folks

1:22:39.200 --> 1:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the MMT community. Nathan is sitting over there, Scott Fullwiler,

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Rowan Gray, these guys were tweeting out. You know, I

1:22:46.080 --> 1:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>was trying to write a book and so trying as

1:22:48.520 --> 1:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>much as possible not to get two involved in what

1:22:51.880 --> 1:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was happening with you know, financial markets in the last

1:22:54.320 --> 1:22:57.519
<v Speaker 1>couple of days and FED interventions and so forth. That

1:22:57.560 --> 1:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys were all over it in a deep way.

1:22:59.360 --> 1:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, we have a d M group that we

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>were all going back and forth and trying in real

1:23:04.040 --> 1:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>time to you know, make full sense of it, because um,

1:23:07.680 --> 1:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very much in the weed, well more generally, so

1:23:10.680 --> 1:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't you know, get too in the weeds on

1:23:14.320 --> 1:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the operations of money markets and the repo markets, which

1:23:16.920 --> 1:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't even understand myself. Uh, just generally speaking, what

1:23:21.600 --> 1:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is it? What do you make of like sort of

1:23:23.120 --> 1:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>mainstream Fed policy? Do rate cuts stimulate the economy? It depends.

1:23:29.040 --> 1:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It depends where you are in and in which cycle

1:23:32.640 --> 1:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think. I mean, right now we've embarked on yet

1:23:35.720 --> 1:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>another cutting cycle. We don't know how long it's going

1:23:37.920 --> 1:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to be. But since the summer, the Fed, for the

1:23:39.960 --> 1:23:43.559
<v Speaker 1>first time since before the crisis has cut again twice.

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Now is that the kind of action that you think

1:23:47.040 --> 1:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>could have a positive impact on the economy. No, I

1:23:50.880 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>mean not much. It's unlikely to do a lot of harm.

1:23:55.360 --> 1:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>If more and Mosler were sitting here, he'd say they've

1:23:57.720 --> 1:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>got the break and the gas pedals mixed up. In

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>other words, Um Warren has for a long time. This

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of founding father of M M T.

1:24:06.000 --> 1:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So for those that aren't familiar with the name, Warren

1:24:08.880 --> 1:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>actually makes the argument, and I think Randy Ray does

1:24:11.840 --> 1:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's a pretty compelling argument if you actually do.

1:24:15.040 --> 1:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a paper on this one I was a

1:24:17.040 --> 1:24:20.479
<v Speaker 1>lot younger and published it, and there's some empirical support

1:24:20.520 --> 1:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>for the idea that central banks when they raise interest rates,

1:24:24.040 --> 1:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they think they're tightening. When they cut interest rates. They

1:24:26.400 --> 1:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>think they're easy, they think it stimulates the economy to

1:24:29.439 --> 1:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>lower rates. But in some countries where the debt is

1:24:33.439 --> 1:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>very large, interest is somebody's income, right, bond holders receive

1:24:38.120 --> 1:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>interest as income, and raising rates as bonds are rolled

1:24:41.920 --> 1:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>over and interest rates are going up, this is tantamount

1:24:45.120 --> 1:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to fiscal expansion. In other words, it's an increase in income, right,

1:24:48.360 --> 1:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>interest income. So there is the possibility that raising interest

1:24:53.320 --> 1:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>rates has a stimulative of fact. Now against that, obviously,

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>credit becomes more expensive, So interest sensitive sectors like home

1:25:02.720 --> 1:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>buying and durable goods like automobiles and stuff. Maybe people

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>borrow less to buy a home or a car in

1:25:09.040 --> 1:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>an environment in which interest rates arising. But to think

1:25:12.040 --> 1:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that this one price in the entire U S economy,

1:25:15.680 --> 1:25:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the overnight interest rate, the Fed's policy tool, one price

1:25:19.160 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that if they just move at twenty five basis points

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>here and twenty five basis points there, that they can

1:25:24.120 --> 1:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>steer this enormous economic ship called the United States economy

1:25:28.200 --> 1:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much as stretch for me. Yeah, but that's it.

1:25:34.400 --> 1:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what we believe. That's what economists believe, right. The

1:25:37.040 --> 1:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>FED the dual mandate song, it will go through your

1:25:39.320 --> 1:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>head tonight. Right, the dual mandate. The Feds got a

1:25:42.479 --> 1:25:45.559
<v Speaker 1>dual mandate, and they're supposed to use this one price

1:25:46.280 --> 1:25:50.599
<v Speaker 1>and make these modest adjustments to bring about, you know,

1:25:51.240 --> 1:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a broad equilibrium in the economy where we get low

1:25:53.880 --> 1:25:58.479
<v Speaker 1>inflation and high levels of employment and growth. So one

1:25:58.520 --> 1:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thing we're hearing a lot about now, to the point

1:26:01.200 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>where it's become a cliche, is that fiscal policy is

1:26:04.000 --> 1:26:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the new monetary And Joe and I heard this several

1:26:06.560 --> 1:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>times today alone. Is that the right direction or do

1:26:12.200 --> 1:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>you worry that we're just going to assume that any

1:26:14.760 --> 1:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>form of fiscal stimulus is going to be the panacea

1:26:18.000 --> 1:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that we've been seeking. Well, look, I think that you

1:26:21.520 --> 1:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know this is textbook stuff. Right. There are two levers.

1:26:24.040 --> 1:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing macroeconomic policy, Uh, you you either pull

1:26:28.439 --> 1:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the monetary policy lever, which is conventional policy tweaking the

1:26:32.760 --> 1:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rate, or you pulled the fiscal policy lever, and

1:26:35.439 --> 1:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that's taxes and government spending. And for the last thirty years,

1:26:39.600 --> 1:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we have leaned extremely heavily on central banks, not just

1:26:43.240 --> 1:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the US but around the world. Right, the

1:26:45.080 --> 1:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>central banks were the only game in town. Fiscal policy

1:26:47.720 --> 1:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is that thing that sits behind the glass with the

1:26:49.960 --> 1:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>breaking case of emergency cover on it. And central banks

1:26:53.920 --> 1:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to to steer economies, right, um, and that

1:26:58.840 --> 1:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>hasn't worked all that for thirty years, you know. Larry

1:27:02.000 --> 1:27:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Summer says, the last three expansions in the US were

1:27:04.880 --> 1:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bubble driven. I mean all three, right, the last, from

1:27:07.840 --> 1:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the savings alone to the um subprime to the dot

1:27:12.439 --> 1:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>com in the So that's kind of how we do it.

1:27:16.040 --> 1:27:18.839
<v Speaker 1>And now everybody's sort of waking up to this idea

1:27:18.880 --> 1:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's another lever that we we have to become

1:27:22.439 --> 1:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>more reliant pump. But does that mean that any fiscal

1:27:25.240 --> 1:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>policy is good fiscal policy and all has good effects. No,

1:27:28.640 --> 1:27:31.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's got to be targeted and have a

1:27:31.600 --> 1:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>few moments left. But I think this is one of

1:27:33.640 --> 1:27:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the main things they say, Yeah, it makes sense that

1:27:36.840 --> 1:27:39.759
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policymakers should run the show more often in terms

1:27:39.760 --> 1:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of demand management. But then they look at what that

1:27:43.080 --> 1:27:45.559
<v Speaker 1>means and no one actually looks at d C right

1:27:45.560 --> 1:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>now and thinks, oh, this is a Congress that is

1:27:48.640 --> 1:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>capable of working with the president that could deliver anything

1:27:51.240 --> 1:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>meaningful in any period of time or timely manner. That

1:27:54.960 --> 1:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seems like a real problem just from a practical standpoint.

1:27:57.840 --> 1:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>That it's all nice to say that fiscal policy is

1:28:00.240 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the lever that should be pulled, but that applies politics

1:28:04.160 --> 1:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for better or worse, is there how do you address

1:28:07.520 --> 1:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that concern that it's like, Okay, maybe monetary policy is

1:28:11.080 --> 1:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>not that effective, but at least they could do something well,

1:28:14.400 --> 1:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>So I know how I I would address it by

1:28:16.880 --> 1:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>putting it on automatic pilot to a large extent, in

1:28:19.920 --> 1:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>other words, take the responsibility away from Congress to act

1:28:23.720 --> 1:28:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in real time to make smart decisions with tax policy

1:28:27.840 --> 1:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and spending, and to do that through a federal job guarantee,

1:28:31.680 --> 1:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>which is to say that in the last downturn, you know,

1:28:35.840 --> 1:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we were losing eight hundred thousand jobs a month at

1:28:38.720 --> 1:28:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the height of the Great Recession, and if we had

1:28:41.680 --> 1:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>had um uh something in place, a program in place

1:28:45.360 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to absorb workers into employment instead of allowing them to

1:28:50.080 --> 1:28:53.479
<v Speaker 1>fall into unemployment, it would have provided a cushion for

1:28:53.560 --> 1:28:56.599
<v Speaker 1>the economy to recover more quickly. So you know, Janey

1:28:56.680 --> 1:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>yellen Uh several years ago at Jackson Hole, the big

1:28:59.840 --> 1:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>me being that takes place between FED officials and invited

1:29:03.120 --> 1:29:06.519
<v Speaker 1>academics and others. Um. She said, we need to strengthen

1:29:06.560 --> 1:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the automatic stabilizers. We need better automatic stabilizers, and a

1:29:09.720 --> 1:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>federal job guarantee is like turbo charging the automatic stabilizers

1:29:14.160 --> 1:29:18.719
<v Speaker 1>we have today. And that's what I would do. Stephanie Carlton,

1:29:18.800 --> 1:29:26.599
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. We've tried so long. We've tried

1:29:26.680 --> 1:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of times to actually get you to come

1:29:28.320 --> 1:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast itself. So I'm glad we finally want

1:29:30.439 --> 1:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>me to happen. I'm glad to thanks for having me.

1:29:42.360 --> 1:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, uh, our our next act is the last

1:29:46.040 --> 1:29:49.519
<v Speaker 1>of the evening. Um. It's it's someone you've probably never

1:29:49.560 --> 1:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>heard of before. Um. In addition to being a genius

1:29:54.000 --> 1:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>at poker, a poly math, an expert in Chinese food,

1:29:59.600 --> 1:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and the provider of original insights into everything from economics

1:30:03.080 --> 1:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to finance, markets, philosophy, and trade, he also has musical

1:30:07.439 --> 1:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>abilities on the level of a Bob Dylan or Van Morrison.

1:30:11.840 --> 1:30:14.599
<v Speaker 1>He's also the best colleague anyone could ever ask for,

1:30:15.479 --> 1:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>despite writing his own introduction and making me repeat it here. Yes,

1:30:21.400 --> 1:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it is time for the musical stylings of Mr Joe Wisenthal.

1:30:29.760 --> 1:30:32.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm just gonna play a few songs, UM,

1:30:32.840 --> 1:30:35.599
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really intimidated now after having watched uh More

1:30:35.600 --> 1:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>All play. But I wrote a few songs about markets

1:30:38.960 --> 1:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and economics. This first one, UM is about one of

1:30:44.600 --> 1:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>my favorite lessons from markets, which is that, Um, no

1:30:48.280 --> 1:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>matter how bad things get in life, one of the

1:30:51.640 --> 1:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>lessons that markets tells us is that they can get

1:30:53.800 --> 1:30:58.479
<v Speaker 1>infinitely worse. You can always go to zero. La the

1:30:58.640 --> 1:31:04.679
<v Speaker 1>old trader in the pits of Chicago home, and where

1:31:04.760 --> 1:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>i'd be without him, heaven only nose because he taught

1:31:11.240 --> 1:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>me the lesson. I still think about today, and any

1:31:17.240 --> 1:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>time i'm filling down, I think of what he'd say. Well,

1:31:26.280 --> 1:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I told him I was gonna buy a stock because

1:31:28.960 --> 1:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it went down so much, and I said it's gonna

1:31:32.320 --> 1:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>rebound and I'm gonna make a bunch. He said, I

1:31:35.960 --> 1:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>hope you get your money. Yes, I hope you get

1:31:39.000 --> 1:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>your cash. But there's a simple lesson that's of use

1:31:43.040 --> 1:31:46.519
<v Speaker 1>in life and math. No matter how hard you fall,

1:31:46.680 --> 1:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>no matter how he loo you get, you can't always

1:31:50.560 --> 1:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>go down another hundred percent. No matter how hard you fall,

1:31:57.080 --> 1:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>no matter how hello you get, you can't always go

1:32:01.520 --> 1:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>down another hundred percent. Well, I heard you're doing badly

1:32:08.280 --> 1:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to get well. Well, I heard you're

1:32:11.880 --> 1:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in the valley and you're trying to climb the hill.

1:32:15.640 --> 1:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Well I hope, Well I think that you'll do better. Yes,

1:32:18.920 --> 1:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I really think you will. But there's a simple lesson

1:32:23.080 --> 1:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to and still, no matter how hard

1:32:26.960 --> 1:32:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you fall, no matter how hello you get, you can't

1:32:30.760 --> 1:32:37.439
<v Speaker 1>always go down another hundred percent. Well, I think about

1:32:37.520 --> 1:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>life's journeys and all it's ups and down and all

1:32:42.040 --> 1:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the hidden corners that I couldn't see around, And sometimes

1:32:48.160 --> 1:32:51.759
<v Speaker 1>it's like I'm swimming and I'm trying not to drown,

1:32:52.360 --> 1:32:56.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think about the lesson I learned in Chicago town.

1:32:56.920 --> 1:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>No matter how hard you fall, no matter how low

1:33:01.160 --> 1:33:08.519
<v Speaker 1>you get, you can always go down another hundred Well.

1:33:08.560 --> 1:33:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw that trader years ago and he was looking frail.

1:33:13.240 --> 1:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>He made a fortune trade in cotton, then he lost

1:33:15.920 --> 1:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the linen on the rail. He said, it really don't

1:33:19.880 --> 1:33:22.599
<v Speaker 1>matter much. You just got a few years or left,

1:33:23.200 --> 1:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and it don't matter how high's your pile when you're

1:33:26.240 --> 1:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>facing death, no matter how how hard you fall, no

1:33:30.080 --> 1:33:34.479
<v Speaker 1>matter how low you get, you can always go down

1:33:34.600 --> 1:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>another hundred percent. Thank you, so uh, So, one of

1:33:47.680 --> 1:33:50.559
<v Speaker 1>my favorite characters in the world of financial markets are

1:33:50.600 --> 1:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>um Charlatan's, who sell newsletters where they claim that they

1:33:54.000 --> 1:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like predict the future and they get people to subscribe

1:33:57.040 --> 1:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, I predicted all this, and I predicted

1:33:59.280 --> 1:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>all that, and fight with them a lot, and you

1:34:01.320 --> 1:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>know you should never subscribe to their newsletters. UM So

1:34:04.439 --> 1:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a song about them, and uh, I said,

1:34:06.960 --> 1:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I dedicate this song to all the Charlotte Teans in

1:34:08.880 --> 1:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the audience to I knew bad things we're gonna happen

1:34:20.520 --> 1:34:23.679
<v Speaker 1>under the bombs we're gonna fall. I knew the stocks

1:34:23.680 --> 1:34:26.599
<v Speaker 1>were gonna crash, and I tried to warn you all.

1:34:28.080 --> 1:34:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Now listen, my friends, I get no joy from being right,

1:34:32.880 --> 1:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to know what happens next, you

1:34:34.920 --> 1:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta pay me for my next insight. Fifty dollars a

1:34:40.080 --> 1:34:45.280
<v Speaker 1>year is really not that bad to know the things

1:34:45.479 --> 1:34:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that I'm knowing. Fifty dollars a year is really not

1:34:51.720 --> 1:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that bad to know the way that we're going. I

1:34:58.479 --> 1:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>knew bad things we're gonna happen, the bombs were gonna fall,

1:35:03.240 --> 1:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I knew the socks were gonna crash, and I'm meant

1:35:05.840 --> 1:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to warn you all. Now listen, my friends. I get

1:35:10.120 --> 1:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>no joy from being right, But if you want to

1:35:13.880 --> 1:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>know what happens next, you gotta pay me for my

1:35:16.160 --> 1:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>next insight. I predicted Brexit and President and Trump. I

1:35:24.439 --> 1:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>know which way the wind is blowing. I predicted the

1:35:29.400 --> 1:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>mortgage melt down and Amazon's melt up. I can see

1:35:35.120 --> 1:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the seeds were sewing. I knew bad things were gonna happen.

1:35:41.520 --> 1:35:44.519
<v Speaker 1>The bombs were gonna fall. I knew the socks were

1:35:44.520 --> 1:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna crash, and I tried to warn you all. Now

1:35:49.080 --> 1:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>listen to my friends. I get no joy from being right,

1:35:53.640 --> 1:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but if you want to know what happens next, you

1:35:55.640 --> 1:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta pay me for my next insight. Some I'm a

1:36:00.720 --> 1:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>gene yes, but that's really not at at all. I

1:36:05.520 --> 1:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just know where to look. And if you want to

1:36:10.680 --> 1:36:15.240
<v Speaker 1>know all the things that I know, you've got a

1:36:15.240 --> 1:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of You've got to read a lot of ancient

1:36:17.200 --> 1:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Greek books. Some say I'm clairvoyant, but that's really not

1:36:23.120 --> 1:36:29.519
<v Speaker 1>at at all. I just know where to look, and

1:36:29.640 --> 1:36:33.519
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know all the things that I know,

1:36:35.200 --> 1:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>just download my free you book. All right, it is

1:36:47.680 --> 1:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my last song, and I'm so I was talking to

1:36:49.680 --> 1:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine the other day and he was

1:36:50.960 --> 1:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>like recommending that I listened to like some singer that

1:36:53.640 --> 1:36:56.240
<v Speaker 1>um he liked, and he's like, oh, his songs are

1:36:56.240 --> 1:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>really class conscious. And I said, well, what does that mean?

1:36:59.200 --> 1:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Like which class? And he's like, well, the working class, obviously.

1:37:03.160 --> 1:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And then it occurred to me as soon as he

1:37:04.640 --> 1:37:06.599
<v Speaker 1>said that, like, no one ever writes a folk song

1:37:06.720 --> 1:37:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for the shareholder class. Um seems unfair. Um, So I

1:37:13.280 --> 1:37:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote a folks song for the shareholder class. It's called

1:37:16.280 --> 1:37:25.519
<v Speaker 1>the Shareholder Blues. Well. For many years, I've been buying stock,

1:37:25.920 --> 1:37:30.519
<v Speaker 1>and all the money that I made I deserved, but

1:37:31.240 --> 1:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been doing so hot, and I blame it

1:37:34.000 --> 1:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Federal Reserve. I am the working man. He

1:37:39.280 --> 1:37:42.679
<v Speaker 1>wants more pay and a bonus of a thousand large ones.

1:37:44.720 --> 1:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'd like to say that it's okay, just as

1:37:47.920 --> 1:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>long as it don't eat into margins. Hey, my friends, Hey,

1:37:53.880 --> 1:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>my friend, haven't you heard the news. I've been coming

1:37:58.800 --> 1:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>down with a bad case other share holder blue. Well.

1:38:06.080 --> 1:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I bought a stock and it doubled in just a

1:38:09.920 --> 1:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred days, but that wasn't long enough to be eligible

1:38:15.600 --> 1:38:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for the long term capital game. So I held onto it,

1:38:20.920 --> 1:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just hoping that I could pay less tax. But you

1:38:26.840 --> 1:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can guess what happened next. The stock gave the games

1:38:30.040 --> 1:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>right back. Hey my friend, Hey, my friends, haven't you

1:38:35.560 --> 1:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>heard the news. I've been coming town with a bad

1:38:39.120 --> 1:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>case other share holder blue. Now, these are tough times

1:38:46.840 --> 1:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. Student loan dead burden on the young, and

1:38:51.880 --> 1:38:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the low interest rates don't help as you get older,

1:38:56.840 --> 1:39:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and there ain't no raises for the working man as

1:39:00.600 --> 1:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>soon as they pay Uncle Sam, and nobody gives a

1:39:05.240 --> 1:39:13.240
<v Speaker 1>damn about the struggling share holder. Hey my friend, Hey,

1:39:13.360 --> 1:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>my friend, haven't you heard the news. I've been coming

1:39:18.240 --> 1:39:24.720
<v Speaker 1>down with a bad case of the shareholder blues. Now

1:39:24.760 --> 1:39:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers say the economy's movement, but we all know

1:39:28.840 --> 1:39:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it's sick. But if you've got if you listen to me,

1:39:33.320 --> 1:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got a few ideas and we can make this

1:39:35.720 --> 1:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>economy tick. But if you enact the policies, than me

1:39:42.160 --> 1:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and my friends down't like we're gonna bring the economy

1:39:47.760 --> 1:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>to its knees when we go on a capital strike.

1:39:51.920 --> 1:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey my friends, Hey my friend, haven't you heard the news.

1:39:58.520 --> 1:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been coming down with a bad case share hold

1:40:06.840 --> 1:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, that's it. All right, Mr Joe Wise and

1:40:17.960 --> 1:40:27.280
<v Speaker 1>thal that's it. That's it. This has been the first

1:40:27.360 --> 1:40:30.720
<v Speaker 1>ever episode of The Odd Lotts Variety Show. I want

1:40:30.720 --> 1:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to thank everyone for coming out, of course all of

1:40:33.080 --> 1:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>our wonderful guests, as well as our producer Laura Colson,

1:40:37.840 --> 1:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>who I don't know if she's backstage, but if you

1:40:39.920 --> 1:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>want to come out, Laura, so everyone could thank you

1:40:41.920 --> 1:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for really organizing this and does all our shows every

1:40:44.920 --> 1:40:48.439
<v Speaker 1>week and she put this on. It's really awesome. Ye,

1:40:50.200 --> 1:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Laura. I also wanna thank Jed Sandberg because um,

1:40:57.160 --> 1:40:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing came out of his budget at Bloomberg,

1:40:59.720 --> 1:41:03.559
<v Speaker 1>so he's told us repeatedly. He's reminded us so the

1:41:03.600 --> 1:41:05.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have this space and drinks and everything.

1:41:05.920 --> 1:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And and if you enjoyed the event, do tell Jed

1:41:10.160 --> 1:41:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and other people at Bloomberg that you liked it, because

1:41:12.400 --> 1:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll put on more of them, including potentially in some

1:41:15.320 --> 1:41:18.760
<v Speaker 1>different countries which would be interesting. And thanks again to

1:41:18.840 --> 1:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all our guests, and thanks for coming up to Ta

1:44:02.960 --> 1:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Ta Ta ta eat