1 00:00:15,564 --> 00:00:29,284 Speaker 1: Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making 2 00:00:29,364 --> 00:00:32,004 Speaker 1: better decisions. I'm Maria Kannakova. 3 00:00:31,764 --> 00:00:32,764 Speaker 2: And I'm Nate Silker. 4 00:00:32,964 --> 00:00:35,004 Speaker 1: So today on the show, we've got a fun one 5 00:00:35,044 --> 00:00:38,004 Speaker 1: for you. We'll be playing a game that we've played 6 00:00:38,004 --> 00:00:41,484 Speaker 1: on the show before, Good Call, Bad Call, and we're 7 00:00:41,524 --> 00:00:44,924 Speaker 1: going to be starting up by talking about wealthiest man 8 00:00:44,964 --> 00:00:48,004 Speaker 1: in the world, Elon Musk, who's about to become even 9 00:00:48,244 --> 00:00:52,644 Speaker 1: wealthier because Tesla has given him quite the compensation package. 10 00:00:52,684 --> 00:00:54,684 Speaker 1: So we'll discuss whether that's a good call or a 11 00:00:54,684 --> 00:00:55,124 Speaker 1: bad call. 12 00:00:55,324 --> 00:00:59,644 Speaker 2: And we'll be talking about the purported crisis of masculinity. 13 00:01:00,044 --> 00:01:04,644 Speaker 2: I am trying not to add skeptical inflection to my voice. 14 00:01:04,684 --> 00:01:07,004 Speaker 2: In fact, as we'll hear, you know, I don't think 15 00:01:07,044 --> 00:01:09,404 Speaker 2: there's any particularly good reason to be skeptical, but maybe 16 00:01:09,244 --> 00:01:14,764 Speaker 2: maybe Aria disagree. We'll have a fun segment, I predict. 17 00:01:21,324 --> 00:01:24,924 Speaker 1: All right, Nate, le let's get into it. But before 18 00:01:24,924 --> 00:01:26,884 Speaker 1: we do, I want to welcome you back to the 19 00:01:27,004 --> 00:01:28,084 Speaker 1: United States. 20 00:01:28,684 --> 00:01:30,924 Speaker 2: Thank you. No, I mean I if I had learned 21 00:01:31,404 --> 00:01:34,324 Speaker 2: a word of Norwegian or Finnish, I would greet you 22 00:01:34,364 --> 00:01:36,684 Speaker 2: in that language, but they're very fluent in English, and 23 00:01:36,724 --> 00:01:38,524 Speaker 2: so it was not necessary to be honest. 24 00:01:40,884 --> 00:01:43,044 Speaker 1: You and I were both abroad, but I came back 25 00:01:43,084 --> 00:01:45,884 Speaker 1: a week before you from Barcelona, and you were in 26 00:01:46,164 --> 00:01:49,284 Speaker 1: northern Europe. Was summer over in northern Europe. 27 00:01:49,884 --> 00:01:56,084 Speaker 2: It was quite pleasantly temperate. I was in Norway. Saw 28 00:01:56,164 --> 00:01:58,604 Speaker 2: some fjords, pretty good fucking fjords. 29 00:01:58,684 --> 00:01:58,804 Speaker 1: Right. 30 00:01:58,884 --> 00:02:00,844 Speaker 2: The first day we kind of drove around. We're like, oh, 31 00:02:00,884 --> 00:02:03,804 Speaker 2: this is nice. Looks like Maine or something, right, And 32 00:02:03,844 --> 00:02:06,284 Speaker 2: then the next day we took a fucking cruise on 33 00:02:06,364 --> 00:02:10,244 Speaker 2: the real fjords. One of the most spectacular natural things 34 00:02:10,284 --> 00:02:12,844 Speaker 2: I've ever seen. Hawaii is up there, but you know, 35 00:02:12,924 --> 00:02:17,244 Speaker 2: top top three in terms of things that will hopefully 36 00:02:17,404 --> 00:02:20,604 Speaker 2: outlast the human race. That sounds pessimistic, but you know 37 00:02:20,604 --> 00:02:22,404 Speaker 2: what I mean, right, Eternal, I do know what. 38 00:02:22,444 --> 00:02:26,204 Speaker 1: You mean, and I do I hope they outlast as well, 39 00:02:26,284 --> 00:02:28,684 Speaker 1: and I hope that they last long enough at least 40 00:02:28,684 --> 00:02:30,604 Speaker 1: for me to see them, because those are one that's 41 00:02:30,604 --> 00:02:32,404 Speaker 1: one of the things that I've never seen that I 42 00:02:32,404 --> 00:02:34,084 Speaker 1: would love to see one of these days. 43 00:02:34,364 --> 00:02:38,164 Speaker 2: Then, since sent some time in Helsinki, Finland, you can 44 00:02:38,204 --> 00:02:41,404 Speaker 2: tell I have some pronouncing it Helsinki, not Helsinki, which 45 00:02:41,404 --> 00:02:45,724 Speaker 2: is how uneducated Americans say, very nice town, great food, 46 00:02:45,724 --> 00:02:48,244 Speaker 2: which I wasn't expecting. And then Amsterdam. 47 00:02:47,804 --> 00:02:52,484 Speaker 1: Briefly, where there's also delicious food. Hmm, you didn't agree. 48 00:02:52,764 --> 00:02:55,404 Speaker 2: No, I think I like Amsterdam and Robbie and I 49 00:02:55,444 --> 00:02:57,964 Speaker 2: have some friends there. I have visited a number of times, 50 00:02:58,084 --> 00:03:01,884 Speaker 2: had a great visit. I think Amsterdam is pound for 51 00:03:02,204 --> 00:03:03,524 Speaker 2: one of the worst food cities. 52 00:03:04,444 --> 00:03:05,164 Speaker 1: Huh. 53 00:03:05,244 --> 00:03:07,524 Speaker 2: And it's good like Nipalese and stuff, there's good. It's 54 00:03:08,164 --> 00:03:12,764 Speaker 2: mixed at Nikolie right uh. And so like you know, 55 00:03:12,884 --> 00:03:15,924 Speaker 2: the international food's good, but the Dutch food, the continental food, 56 00:03:15,964 --> 00:03:17,044 Speaker 2: I know. 57 00:03:17,284 --> 00:03:18,644 Speaker 1: So. So I think this is where you and I 58 00:03:18,724 --> 00:03:21,764 Speaker 1: kind of differ because someone as someone who grew up 59 00:03:21,804 --> 00:03:26,524 Speaker 1: eating hariring, I absolutely love it. And you can get 60 00:03:26,564 --> 00:03:28,004 Speaker 1: really incredible hairing. 61 00:03:27,844 --> 00:03:31,724 Speaker 2: And you get hair. We took the boat, the ferry 62 00:03:31,804 --> 00:03:36,044 Speaker 2: from Helsinki to Tallinn, Estonia for a day too. Pretty 63 00:03:36,044 --> 00:03:37,324 Speaker 2: good fucking haring on that boat. 64 00:03:37,404 --> 00:03:41,684 Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, I'm sure. I'm sure it was delicious. Well, 65 00:03:41,884 --> 00:03:46,364 Speaker 1: welcome back to the United States. You were missed. I 66 00:03:46,444 --> 00:03:48,764 Speaker 1: think New York missed both of us. But but now 67 00:03:48,764 --> 00:03:49,964 Speaker 1: we're now we're all back. 68 00:03:50,284 --> 00:03:54,164 Speaker 2: How did how did Barcelona but the Barcelona? How did 69 00:03:54,244 --> 00:03:55,604 Speaker 2: Barcelona go how the epint go. 70 00:03:56,724 --> 00:04:00,164 Speaker 1: It was fine. You know, it's very funny because I actually, 71 00:04:00,764 --> 00:04:03,924 Speaker 1: you know, I'm normally pretty good at not cashing and 72 00:04:03,924 --> 00:04:06,684 Speaker 1: then like having one big score when it comes to these. 73 00:04:07,044 --> 00:04:09,564 Speaker 1: I actually cashed in I think half of my event 74 00:04:09,804 --> 00:04:12,364 Speaker 1: and had no big scores, so ended down for the trip. 75 00:04:13,364 --> 00:04:17,484 Speaker 1: The deepest I went was well, actually I got fourth 76 00:04:17,524 --> 00:04:20,804 Speaker 1: in one event, but I missed out Nate on a 77 00:04:20,964 --> 00:04:25,484 Speaker 1: thirty seven thousand euro page jump and it was really 78 00:04:25,564 --> 00:04:29,044 Speaker 1: it was really heartbreaking. Had I just made it and 79 00:04:29,524 --> 00:04:31,244 Speaker 1: had I lasted, and had I been in third, I 80 00:04:31,244 --> 00:04:33,444 Speaker 1: would have been way up for the trip. So we 81 00:04:33,444 --> 00:04:36,724 Speaker 1: were very close. And you know, we've talked on the 82 00:04:36,764 --> 00:04:40,004 Speaker 1: show before about butterfly effects and how you know one 83 00:04:40,004 --> 00:04:44,044 Speaker 1: thing affects another. There was a player who was the 84 00:04:44,044 --> 00:04:46,924 Speaker 1: short stack, so people who don't play poker. He had 85 00:04:47,044 --> 00:04:51,164 Speaker 1: the fewest chips, and it seemed pretty likely that I 86 00:04:51,204 --> 00:04:54,964 Speaker 1: would end up outlasting him, and he ended up getting 87 00:04:55,004 --> 00:04:59,124 Speaker 1: it all in with ACE five off suit and getting 88 00:04:59,124 --> 00:05:01,644 Speaker 1: called by Ace King or actually Ace three, not ACE five, 89 00:05:01,724 --> 00:05:05,844 Speaker 1: Ace three getting called by Ace King, and he hit 90 00:05:05,884 --> 00:05:09,084 Speaker 1: his three and ended up doubling, and then he knocked 91 00:05:09,084 --> 00:05:12,244 Speaker 1: me up out a little while later, so you know 92 00:05:12,324 --> 00:05:13,284 Speaker 1: butterfly effects. 93 00:05:13,324 --> 00:05:15,404 Speaker 2: It was it was a good player or bad player. 94 00:05:16,964 --> 00:05:21,284 Speaker 1: Incredibly wealthy player who doesn't really care. He is capable 95 00:05:21,444 --> 00:05:24,524 Speaker 1: of playing well, but at that point he was not 96 00:05:24,564 --> 00:05:27,364 Speaker 1: playing well because he was kind of in and I 97 00:05:27,404 --> 00:05:30,484 Speaker 1: don't give a fuck, but you guys all care about 98 00:05:30,484 --> 00:05:33,284 Speaker 1: the money type of mood. He is a businessman, he's 99 00:05:33,284 --> 00:05:34,524 Speaker 1: not a professional poker player. 100 00:05:34,684 --> 00:05:39,124 Speaker 2: You know, sometimes people with a fucket attitude toward ICM. ICM. 101 00:05:39,204 --> 00:05:42,844 Speaker 2: If you don't play poker, is the strategy the changes 102 00:05:42,924 --> 00:05:45,964 Speaker 2: you make when you're trying to cash a tournament I've had, 103 00:05:45,964 --> 00:05:47,684 Speaker 2: By the way, this is probably cashed a lot and 104 00:05:47,764 --> 00:05:50,524 Speaker 2: nothing too exciting beyond that, right, But like, if you're 105 00:05:50,564 --> 00:05:52,844 Speaker 2: really rich, though, and you just care about winning, then 106 00:05:52,884 --> 00:05:55,124 Speaker 2: you don't have to play with ICM. And it's like 107 00:05:55,164 --> 00:05:58,004 Speaker 2: annoying to all the other knits at the table who are. 108 00:05:58,844 --> 00:06:01,364 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a t shirt that some poker players like 109 00:06:01,444 --> 00:06:06,124 Speaker 1: to wear that says ICM is for poor people. That 110 00:06:06,244 --> 00:06:08,924 Speaker 1: means that people who care about the independent hip model. 111 00:06:08,924 --> 00:06:11,844 Speaker 1: You know, the value of your of your chips actually 112 00:06:12,244 --> 00:06:17,084 Speaker 1: changes as these huge payge ump sloom. That means you're poor. 113 00:06:17,804 --> 00:06:21,164 Speaker 1: And if you can say fuck it. Sometimes that's that's 114 00:06:21,204 --> 00:06:23,324 Speaker 1: the way to do it, and you know, there is 115 00:06:24,004 --> 00:06:27,004 Speaker 1: It's a it's an interesting analogy kind of to to 116 00:06:27,244 --> 00:06:31,164 Speaker 1: life because there are definitely moments in life where you 117 00:06:31,204 --> 00:06:33,644 Speaker 1: know it pays to hang around a little bit, but 118 00:06:33,724 --> 00:06:35,364 Speaker 1: sometimes you're like, ah, fuck it, I want to play 119 00:06:35,404 --> 00:06:36,964 Speaker 1: to win, right like I want to I want to 120 00:06:37,004 --> 00:06:39,444 Speaker 1: get I want to take a big swing. I really 121 00:06:39,524 --> 00:06:42,724 Speaker 1: want to go for it. And sometimes that feels really good, 122 00:06:42,804 --> 00:06:46,204 Speaker 1: even if it's not necessarily correct, and you have to 123 00:06:46,284 --> 00:06:48,724 Speaker 1: just try to think, you know what, what risks? Am 124 00:06:48,764 --> 00:06:51,844 Speaker 1: I willing to take? What's the reward here? Is it 125 00:06:51,884 --> 00:06:54,164 Speaker 1: worth it? And am I I think this is actually 126 00:06:54,164 --> 00:06:57,964 Speaker 1: really important? Am I willing to walk away? Right? Like? 127 00:06:58,604 --> 00:07:00,644 Speaker 1: It's kind of like the fuck you money type of 128 00:07:00,924 --> 00:07:03,884 Speaker 1: type of concept, where will I walk away? Like if 129 00:07:03,924 --> 00:07:07,084 Speaker 1: this doesn't go right? And ICM as for poor people, 130 00:07:07,404 --> 00:07:09,844 Speaker 1: that person says, I am willing to walk away, right, 131 00:07:09,924 --> 00:07:12,964 Speaker 1: I am willing to forego you know, forty thousand dollars, 132 00:07:13,004 --> 00:07:16,044 Speaker 1: four hundred thousand dollars. It doesn't matter because I'm not 133 00:07:16,164 --> 00:07:19,204 Speaker 1: poor and I don't care, and you do and. 134 00:07:19,124 --> 00:07:21,284 Speaker 2: Your time is valuable too, you know what I mean? 135 00:07:21,884 --> 00:07:25,044 Speaker 2: I mean obviously, sometimes you're just giving up thousands of 136 00:07:25,124 --> 00:07:28,684 Speaker 2: dollars by not adapting your raine is right, but like, yeah, 137 00:07:28,724 --> 00:07:31,724 Speaker 2: I think it's anything wrong with we're saying opportunity cost 138 00:07:31,884 --> 00:07:33,724 Speaker 2: is high. I mean, it's a very very very very 139 00:07:33,804 --> 00:07:35,484 Speaker 2: very slippery slope, but. 140 00:07:35,724 --> 00:07:39,804 Speaker 1: Yeah, it certainly is. And on that note, Nate, maybe 141 00:07:39,844 --> 00:07:42,924 Speaker 1: we should talk about someone who has the most fuck 142 00:07:42,964 --> 00:07:49,724 Speaker 1: you money in the entire world, Elon Musk. So we 143 00:07:49,924 --> 00:07:51,844 Speaker 1: play a game good call, bad call? You know, is 144 00:07:51,884 --> 00:07:53,484 Speaker 1: this a good call? Is this a bad call? And 145 00:07:53,604 --> 00:07:56,244 Speaker 1: right now we're going to be putting that lens not 146 00:07:56,404 --> 00:08:00,204 Speaker 1: on Musk, but on Tesla's board because earlier this week, 147 00:08:00,284 --> 00:08:03,604 Speaker 1: so we are recording on Monday, September eighth, So I 148 00:08:03,604 --> 00:08:07,564 Speaker 1: guess it was last week that Tesla offered it's CEO, 149 00:08:07,764 --> 00:08:11,604 Speaker 1: Elon Musk, a new compensation package that's going to be 150 00:08:11,804 --> 00:08:17,044 Speaker 1: worth one trillion dollars over the next ten years and 151 00:08:17,204 --> 00:08:19,924 Speaker 1: by the end of it if he actually earns out 152 00:08:19,964 --> 00:08:22,644 Speaker 1: this compensation package, which is an if, right, there are 153 00:08:23,004 --> 00:08:25,644 Speaker 1: a lot of things that have to go right, but 154 00:08:26,244 --> 00:08:30,004 Speaker 1: he would own almost twenty nine twenty eight point eight 155 00:08:30,204 --> 00:08:34,764 Speaker 1: percent of Tesla's stock because that's how his compensation would 156 00:08:34,804 --> 00:08:37,404 Speaker 1: be paid out, which is huge, right, and that's a 157 00:08:37,444 --> 00:08:43,004 Speaker 1: lot more than most CEOs ever get to earn of 158 00:08:43,044 --> 00:08:45,364 Speaker 1: their of their company's stock, which would put him in 159 00:08:45,404 --> 00:08:48,844 Speaker 1: a really interesting position. So basically, you know, the board 160 00:08:48,884 --> 00:08:51,844 Speaker 1: has thrown money at him to try to get him 161 00:08:51,884 --> 00:08:54,844 Speaker 1: to stick around. Nate, do you want to talk about 162 00:08:54,884 --> 00:08:56,844 Speaker 1: some of the things that he has to do or 163 00:08:56,844 --> 00:08:58,244 Speaker 1: should I just go through that quickly? 164 00:08:58,324 --> 00:09:00,644 Speaker 2: Why don't you go You know, I'm still on finish 165 00:09:01,164 --> 00:09:04,124 Speaker 2: time here, so why don't you go through it? Maria? 166 00:09:04,364 --> 00:09:09,204 Speaker 1: All right? So, basically he needs to meet some milestones, 167 00:09:09,524 --> 00:09:14,604 Speaker 1: which include everything from profits that have to increase over 168 00:09:14,844 --> 00:09:20,364 Speaker 1: twenty four times to one million autonomous taxis that are 169 00:09:20,404 --> 00:09:26,124 Speaker 1: going to be deployed, one million humanoid robots, and car 170 00:09:26,164 --> 00:09:29,964 Speaker 1: sales obviously, so there are a lot of things that 171 00:09:30,164 --> 00:09:34,164 Speaker 1: have to happen. So Tesla has to reach four hundred 172 00:09:34,204 --> 00:09:40,164 Speaker 1: billion in adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization annually, 173 00:09:40,604 --> 00:09:44,204 Speaker 1: and right now it is earning less than seventeen billion 174 00:09:44,244 --> 00:09:47,404 Speaker 1: dollars a year, so that's quite a high number. He 175 00:09:47,524 --> 00:09:50,604 Speaker 1: needs to have an eight point five trillion dollar market cap. 176 00:09:51,004 --> 00:09:55,124 Speaker 1: Current market cap is about one trillion. The robotaxis is 177 00:09:55,164 --> 00:09:57,724 Speaker 1: a huge ask, right because right now they're way behind 178 00:09:57,724 --> 00:10:03,364 Speaker 1: schedule on that. So they have to deliver twenty million teslas, 179 00:10:03,404 --> 00:10:07,124 Speaker 1: which is actually probably the most attainable, but I don't 180 00:10:07,164 --> 00:10:08,204 Speaker 1: know we can talk about that. 181 00:10:09,724 --> 00:10:15,564 Speaker 2: I could deliver fourteen million teslas, and. 182 00:10:15,164 --> 00:10:20,404 Speaker 1: And they're humanoid robots. Optimus is another one where they've 183 00:10:20,444 --> 00:10:24,044 Speaker 1: had a lot of issues, including in their demos. The 184 00:10:24,124 --> 00:10:28,124 Speaker 1: Optimus robots have not hit their benchmarks over time. I 185 00:10:28,164 --> 00:10:31,564 Speaker 1: think Elon has been over optimistic with all of these, 186 00:10:31,564 --> 00:10:34,204 Speaker 1: including the robots. But these are the things that have 187 00:10:34,284 --> 00:10:37,644 Speaker 1: to happen for him to get his compensation. Except and 188 00:10:37,724 --> 00:10:40,364 Speaker 1: this is one big except. So I was reading all 189 00:10:40,404 --> 00:10:42,284 Speaker 1: of this and I was like, huh, interesting thing that 190 00:10:42,324 --> 00:10:47,524 Speaker 1: they put in there. If there are factors quote outside 191 00:10:47,764 --> 00:10:52,764 Speaker 1: Tesla's control end quote that hurts Tesla's ability to reach 192 00:10:53,004 --> 00:10:57,004 Speaker 1: these milestones and reach these delivery targets, then Musk will 193 00:10:57,044 --> 00:11:00,124 Speaker 1: still get compensated. And it seems to me that that's 194 00:11:00,164 --> 00:11:03,004 Speaker 1: a pretty big out right that must can say, oh, well, 195 00:11:03,044 --> 00:11:04,044 Speaker 1: you know this was up might. 196 00:11:04,004 --> 00:11:07,124 Speaker 2: Have the best lawyer billing cycles in history. If there's 197 00:11:07,124 --> 00:11:09,164 Speaker 2: a dispute over this, I would think. 198 00:11:09,484 --> 00:11:12,604 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think so. So that's kind of the that's 199 00:11:12,644 --> 00:11:16,404 Speaker 1: the one caveat This will come to a vote on 200 00:11:16,604 --> 00:11:21,724 Speaker 1: November six. Listeners might remember as well that Musk already 201 00:11:21,764 --> 00:11:25,284 Speaker 1: has a prior compensation package that is in courts right 202 00:11:25,324 --> 00:11:29,444 Speaker 1: now because it was challenged. So yeah, so that's where 203 00:11:29,444 --> 00:11:33,364 Speaker 1: we are. And the question is right, like good call 204 00:11:33,564 --> 00:11:36,364 Speaker 1: or bad call on the part of the board of Tesla. 205 00:11:37,044 --> 00:11:40,444 Speaker 1: Everything is going down. Profits are going down, Tesla's market 206 00:11:40,484 --> 00:11:42,844 Speaker 1: share is going down. Is it a good call to 207 00:11:42,924 --> 00:11:46,004 Speaker 1: just throw money at Elon and try to kind of 208 00:11:46,044 --> 00:11:47,964 Speaker 1: get him to hit all of these targets to get 209 00:11:47,964 --> 00:11:50,124 Speaker 1: his attention back? Do we think this is a good 210 00:11:50,204 --> 00:11:53,404 Speaker 1: use of capital? Do we think Elon will be motivated 211 00:11:53,444 --> 00:11:55,684 Speaker 1: by it? He's already the world's richest man. Do we 212 00:11:55,724 --> 00:11:57,484 Speaker 1: think he's going to perform? Like? What do we think 213 00:11:57,524 --> 00:11:59,844 Speaker 1: about all of this? I think it's actually a really 214 00:11:59,964 --> 00:12:05,284 Speaker 1: kind of interesting psychological question about someone who's already insanely wealthy. 215 00:12:05,324 --> 00:12:07,564 Speaker 1: You know, how do we motivate someone like that? And 216 00:12:07,844 --> 00:12:10,444 Speaker 1: is this, you know, is this the way to do it? 217 00:12:11,084 --> 00:12:14,564 Speaker 2: Yeah? I think it's a smart package. Actually, so you 218 00:12:14,604 --> 00:12:17,084 Speaker 2: can burn me at the stake for being such a capitalist. 219 00:12:17,084 --> 00:12:19,204 Speaker 2: But no, the reason why it's smart is because it 220 00:12:19,244 --> 00:12:22,884 Speaker 2: would seemed to me like these targets are a not 221 00:12:23,804 --> 00:12:27,124 Speaker 2: terribly easy to hit, notwithstanding the ambiguity of some of 222 00:12:27,164 --> 00:12:29,964 Speaker 2: these you know, acts of God clauses, right and b. 223 00:12:31,004 --> 00:12:33,444 Speaker 2: If the company is doing that well, then there's a 224 00:12:33,484 --> 00:12:36,284 Speaker 2: lot of wealth to go around, right. We're talking about 225 00:12:36,724 --> 00:12:41,764 Speaker 2: much higher than market growth. The fact that Tesla you know, 226 00:12:41,924 --> 00:12:46,244 Speaker 2: is facing more competition from Chinese automakers. It's products you're 227 00:12:46,244 --> 00:12:48,604 Speaker 2: not seen as innovative. They are all these things they 228 00:12:48,924 --> 00:12:50,964 Speaker 2: are trying to do, robo taxis and stuff like that, 229 00:12:50,964 --> 00:12:53,604 Speaker 2: but they're kind of like not as market leading right now. 230 00:12:53,684 --> 00:12:56,564 Speaker 2: But like, but if he turns it around, then I 231 00:12:56,564 --> 00:12:59,764 Speaker 2: think it strikes me as like fairly rational if it's 232 00:12:59,804 --> 00:13:02,324 Speaker 2: unlikely to be hit these benchmarks. Although Elon has bet 233 00:13:02,364 --> 00:13:05,044 Speaker 2: on himself before and been right, it's part of why 234 00:13:05,044 --> 00:13:07,764 Speaker 2: he is already the world's richest man, I'm all for it. 235 00:13:08,444 --> 00:13:13,564 Speaker 1: Well, so theoretically, I don't mind, you know, great compensation 236 00:13:13,724 --> 00:13:18,844 Speaker 1: packages if there's a good end result. I'm wondering, though, 237 00:13:20,044 --> 00:13:22,564 Speaker 1: if you want to get you know, the world's richest 238 00:13:22,564 --> 00:13:26,004 Speaker 1: man right to focus on Tesla, even though his attention 239 00:13:26,124 --> 00:13:28,884 Speaker 1: has been elsewhere, his ambitions have been elsewhere. You know, 240 00:13:28,964 --> 00:13:32,324 Speaker 1: he's interested in X and SpaceX and all these other things. 241 00:13:33,404 --> 00:13:37,524 Speaker 1: Is just like throwing dollar signs at it. Is that 242 00:13:37,804 --> 00:13:40,924 Speaker 1: really going to be the best motivator? And the reason 243 00:13:40,964 --> 00:13:43,604 Speaker 1: I asked that, and maybe the answer is yes, but 244 00:13:43,644 --> 00:13:46,804 Speaker 1: the answer could also be no, because there is a 245 00:13:46,884 --> 00:13:51,844 Speaker 1: lot of really great psychological research about intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation, 246 00:13:52,364 --> 00:13:54,724 Speaker 1: and a lot of times the reason that games players 247 00:13:54,804 --> 00:13:57,964 Speaker 1: want to play, you know, are four flow states and 248 00:13:58,044 --> 00:14:01,244 Speaker 1: kind of things that are intrinsic to the game, right, 249 00:14:01,284 --> 00:14:03,084 Speaker 1: Like they want to do better, they want to level up, 250 00:14:03,124 --> 00:14:04,564 Speaker 1: they want to do this, they want to get that, 251 00:14:05,244 --> 00:14:07,924 Speaker 1: like things that make them a good player within the game, right, 252 00:14:07,964 --> 00:14:10,564 Speaker 1: that convey some sort of prestige on them. 253 00:14:10,684 --> 00:14:11,964 Speaker 2: And it fits. 254 00:14:12,244 --> 00:14:14,084 Speaker 1: And I'm not talking about people for whom like this 255 00:14:14,124 --> 00:14:16,404 Speaker 1: is their profession and like they just need to get paid. 256 00:14:17,324 --> 00:14:22,884 Speaker 1: But when you start replacing intrinsic motivation with extrinsic motivation, 257 00:14:23,004 --> 00:14:26,804 Speaker 1: right when you start putting dollar values on everything, sometimes 258 00:14:26,844 --> 00:14:31,004 Speaker 1: motivation actually lacks. So there can be this you know, 259 00:14:31,044 --> 00:14:34,964 Speaker 1: ironic effect where where when you actually get money, like 260 00:14:35,004 --> 00:14:37,284 Speaker 1: all of a sudden, it's not fun anymore. And that's 261 00:14:37,324 --> 00:14:39,124 Speaker 1: why a lot of people. You know, you sometimes hear 262 00:14:39,164 --> 00:14:42,644 Speaker 1: the advice like keep your hobbies, your hobbies right, don't 263 00:14:42,684 --> 00:14:45,124 Speaker 1: try to make everything into a side hustle, because you 264 00:14:45,164 --> 00:14:47,124 Speaker 1: might find that you no longer enjoy the types of 265 00:14:47,164 --> 00:14:49,884 Speaker 1: things that you used to really enjoy when you feel. 266 00:14:49,644 --> 00:14:54,044 Speaker 2: Like you have to experience. Yeah, I'm curious, Nate. 267 00:14:54,084 --> 00:14:56,324 Speaker 1: Why don't you actually say a little bit more about that, 268 00:14:56,364 --> 00:14:58,084 Speaker 1: because I think that that is part of the question 269 00:14:58,204 --> 00:15:01,284 Speaker 1: here right about whether this is the best motivator. 270 00:15:01,924 --> 00:15:03,804 Speaker 2: Well, look, I'll talk about the two big things that 271 00:15:03,844 --> 00:15:07,324 Speaker 2: I find very motivating, and maybe they're not so different 272 00:15:07,364 --> 00:15:09,124 Speaker 2: than the way Elon thinks about the world. 273 00:15:09,204 --> 00:15:10,244 Speaker 1: Right. You know. 274 00:15:10,404 --> 00:15:14,924 Speaker 2: One is just to build a product that you think 275 00:15:15,044 --> 00:15:17,124 Speaker 2: is really great. Right, to do something that nobody else 276 00:15:17,164 --> 00:15:21,804 Speaker 2: has done, to differentiate, to add intellectual value, artistic value, 277 00:15:21,844 --> 00:15:24,924 Speaker 2: aesthetic value, whatever it might be. Right, But it's like, Okay, 278 00:15:25,604 --> 00:15:28,924 Speaker 2: here's the world. Nobody is building a good election model 279 00:15:28,964 --> 00:15:30,844 Speaker 2: or writing a book like the book I wrote, or 280 00:15:30,844 --> 00:15:32,604 Speaker 2: whatever else, right, and so I am going to do 281 00:15:32,724 --> 00:15:36,004 Speaker 2: that really well. Right, And I think Elon is or 282 00:15:36,044 --> 00:15:40,004 Speaker 2: maybe was motivated by that type of thing, right, he 283 00:15:40,124 --> 00:15:45,364 Speaker 2: definitely has vision. I think you have to be pretty biased, 284 00:15:45,404 --> 00:15:46,684 Speaker 2: not to give him credit for that, right, And the 285 00:15:46,804 --> 00:15:49,804 Speaker 2: other big motivator is like the desire to prove people 286 00:15:50,124 --> 00:15:54,404 Speaker 2: wrong and the fact that you'll have people like us say, oh, 287 00:15:54,604 --> 00:15:58,764 Speaker 2: these targets seem very hard to achieve. They're kind of crazy. 288 00:15:58,844 --> 00:16:01,484 Speaker 2: It can't be done. How can he do all these 289 00:16:01,484 --> 00:16:03,604 Speaker 2: things where they're not even like leading the robotaxi market 290 00:16:03,644 --> 00:16:05,964 Speaker 2: for example, Like, like that could be very motivating too, 291 00:16:05,964 --> 00:16:09,124 Speaker 2: I think I think more so than the money, really, right, 292 00:16:09,124 --> 00:16:11,644 Speaker 2: It's like they're not like that. You have very many 293 00:16:11,884 --> 00:16:14,204 Speaker 2: anyone in Silicon Valley, be the founders or vcs or 294 00:16:14,204 --> 00:16:16,684 Speaker 2: whatever else. They don't like just go and say, Okay, 295 00:16:16,844 --> 00:16:18,004 Speaker 2: well I made a lot of money. I'm going to 296 00:16:18,044 --> 00:16:20,644 Speaker 2: go right in the sunset and hang out at my 297 00:16:20,764 --> 00:16:24,404 Speaker 2: private villa in Tuscany and show up and go to 298 00:16:24,444 --> 00:16:27,404 Speaker 2: really nice three star Michelin restaurants. Right, They usually are 299 00:16:27,444 --> 00:16:31,124 Speaker 2: still motivated to prove their doubters wrong, which makes them 300 00:16:31,164 --> 00:16:34,804 Speaker 2: assholes sometimes. And I don't think anybody would would shy 301 00:16:34,844 --> 00:16:40,204 Speaker 2: away from accusing Elon of that either, right, But yeah. 302 00:16:39,204 --> 00:16:41,404 Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I think that that is a very powerful 303 00:16:41,444 --> 00:16:44,284 Speaker 1: motivator for people like Elon, Right, like, prove the hater's wrong. 304 00:16:44,364 --> 00:16:46,804 Speaker 1: Prove that I can do it, prove that I'm better 305 00:16:46,844 --> 00:16:49,524 Speaker 1: than they think I am because I know better now. 306 00:16:49,684 --> 00:16:53,884 Speaker 1: He has shown a pension for overconfidence. Right. He has 307 00:16:54,324 --> 00:16:57,924 Speaker 1: failed to hit very ambitious targets in the past, but 308 00:16:58,564 --> 00:17:01,644 Speaker 1: they're actually you know, you know, I mean this is 309 00:17:01,884 --> 00:17:05,044 Speaker 1: and listeners of the show no, no fan of Elon, 310 00:17:05,364 --> 00:17:11,284 Speaker 1: but this is something that is actually pretty not smart, 311 00:17:11,324 --> 00:17:14,964 Speaker 1: but like it is something that can work when you 312 00:17:15,004 --> 00:17:19,524 Speaker 1: do set these ambitious targets, right, even if you don't 313 00:17:19,684 --> 00:17:24,124 Speaker 1: actually hit them, you might hit a much higher target 314 00:17:24,164 --> 00:17:26,764 Speaker 1: than you otherwise would have done in trying to hit 315 00:17:26,804 --> 00:17:29,924 Speaker 1: this crazy target. Right. So it's kind of the opposite 316 00:17:30,004 --> 00:17:35,564 Speaker 1: of customer service business or consulting when you say under promise, 317 00:17:35,644 --> 00:17:37,964 Speaker 1: over deliver, right, Like, that's how you get people to 318 00:17:38,004 --> 00:17:40,924 Speaker 1: be really happy. Like you tell them a little bit 319 00:17:41,004 --> 00:17:43,084 Speaker 1: less than you think you're capable of doing, and then 320 00:17:43,164 --> 00:17:45,284 Speaker 1: once you hit what you're actually capable of doing, they'll 321 00:17:45,324 --> 00:17:47,364 Speaker 1: be like, holy shit, this is even better than I thought. 322 00:17:47,724 --> 00:17:50,644 Speaker 1: And he is kind of doing the opposite, right. Historically, 323 00:17:50,644 --> 00:17:54,204 Speaker 1: what he's done is over promise and underdeliver. That's not 324 00:17:54,244 --> 00:17:57,124 Speaker 1: necessarily great for Tesla's stock in the short term, but 325 00:17:57,404 --> 00:18:01,724 Speaker 1: it might not be necessarily a horrible strategy for motivating 326 00:18:01,804 --> 00:18:06,124 Speaker 1: people within the company to actually strive to hit kind 327 00:18:06,164 --> 00:18:09,364 Speaker 1: of these other milestones. And one of the reasons why 328 00:18:09,404 --> 00:18:11,924 Speaker 1: I think that probably the board wants him there and 329 00:18:12,044 --> 00:18:14,124 Speaker 1: is willing to kind of do any throw anything at 330 00:18:14,124 --> 00:18:18,804 Speaker 1: the problem to get him there is that anecdotally, Musk 331 00:18:18,924 --> 00:18:23,164 Speaker 1: does have a very strong motivating influence on workers when 332 00:18:23,204 --> 00:18:26,964 Speaker 1: he's present, right, and when he's not, motivation tends to sag. Like. 333 00:18:27,044 --> 00:18:29,564 Speaker 1: It is a very kind of cultive personality type of 334 00:18:29,604 --> 00:18:32,204 Speaker 1: business from what we've heard and from what we've seen, 335 00:18:32,684 --> 00:18:34,884 Speaker 1: and so maybe they're just trying to do everything they 336 00:18:34,964 --> 00:18:37,924 Speaker 1: can to try to get him physically there and really 337 00:18:38,004 --> 00:18:41,844 Speaker 1: trying to motivate people directly. I'm torn, right, Like, I 338 00:18:41,884 --> 00:18:44,444 Speaker 1: don't know. Obviously, I don't think they should be throwing 339 00:18:44,564 --> 00:18:47,004 Speaker 1: this amount of money at anyone, but like, let's just 340 00:18:47,044 --> 00:18:50,284 Speaker 1: put that aside and just think about. 341 00:18:50,084 --> 00:18:54,684 Speaker 2: Type of socialists are you running your rand moom Donnie's campaign? 342 00:18:55,524 --> 00:18:58,964 Speaker 1: I know, I know, right, but so let's let's just 343 00:18:59,004 --> 00:19:00,484 Speaker 1: put those considerations aside. 344 00:19:00,604 --> 00:19:06,244 Speaker 2: And you believe billionaires shouldn't exist? Are billionaires Okay. 345 00:19:06,284 --> 00:19:11,684 Speaker 1: I'm fine with billionaires existing, but but yeah, so so 346 00:19:11,764 --> 00:19:14,764 Speaker 1: the I think the question here is is an interesting 347 00:19:14,844 --> 00:19:17,204 Speaker 1: one in terms of how do we, you know, how 348 00:19:17,244 --> 00:19:20,684 Speaker 1: do we get people like that to perform at peak? They, 349 00:19:20,804 --> 00:19:24,484 Speaker 1: I think, are trying to throw everything into the equation, 350 00:19:25,004 --> 00:19:27,564 Speaker 1: you know, all these targets, money, all all of these 351 00:19:27,564 --> 00:19:30,084 Speaker 1: different things. The one thing that does worry me is 352 00:19:30,124 --> 00:19:33,764 Speaker 1: that out clause that I read to you, right, because like, 353 00:19:34,604 --> 00:19:37,124 Speaker 1: if he can just get the money without doing anything, 354 00:19:38,364 --> 00:19:40,404 Speaker 1: I think that there's a good chance that he is 355 00:19:40,484 --> 00:19:45,044 Speaker 1: going to potentially go there. So I might be worried 356 00:19:45,044 --> 00:19:48,364 Speaker 1: about language, but that's my biggest that's one of my 357 00:19:48,404 --> 00:19:48,964 Speaker 1: biggest Oh. 358 00:19:48,964 --> 00:19:52,644 Speaker 2: Look, I assume that, I mean, Tesla's stock was up 359 00:19:52,684 --> 00:19:56,924 Speaker 2: on this, right. I assume that, like the lawyers have 360 00:19:56,964 --> 00:19:59,724 Speaker 2: thought about how that clause might be interpreted in their 361 00:19:59,764 --> 00:20:02,444 Speaker 2: outclauses and in clauses. And I'm making that term up right. 362 00:20:03,524 --> 00:20:06,564 Speaker 2: I assume that, like it's not just you know, writing 363 00:20:06,564 --> 00:20:08,364 Speaker 2: things up on a white board, that they thought this 364 00:20:08,404 --> 00:20:09,724 Speaker 2: through a little bit. But yeah, look, to me, the 365 00:20:09,804 --> 00:20:15,844 Speaker 2: question is also, you know, does elon add that much 366 00:20:16,004 --> 00:20:20,524 Speaker 2: marginal value over another CEO? That kind of thing is 367 00:20:20,604 --> 00:20:22,364 Speaker 2: very hard to test, right if you go and I 368 00:20:22,404 --> 00:20:27,724 Speaker 2: asked my handy assistant Claude the AI. But I asked Claude, 369 00:20:28,324 --> 00:20:31,564 Speaker 2: what's the empirical literature say on whether CEO pay packages 370 00:20:31,604 --> 00:20:32,164 Speaker 2: are worth it? 371 00:20:32,284 --> 00:20:32,564 Speaker 1: Right? 372 00:20:32,684 --> 00:20:35,404 Speaker 2: And Claude wasn't sure. There does not seem to be 373 00:20:35,444 --> 00:20:39,244 Speaker 2: a clear consensus on this question in general and specifically. 374 00:20:39,404 --> 00:20:43,564 Speaker 2: I mean, you know, Elon got very distracted by politics 375 00:20:43,564 --> 00:20:46,004 Speaker 2: for some period of time. Well, that's stracts the right word. 376 00:20:46,004 --> 00:20:47,964 Speaker 2: I mean, I think most people would say that XAI 377 00:20:48,244 --> 00:20:50,964 Speaker 2: is doing interesting things behind kind of the big three 378 00:20:51,004 --> 00:20:56,564 Speaker 2: AI labs, but is a serious player, right, there's SpaceX 379 00:20:56,604 --> 00:21:00,084 Speaker 2: There's a lot of things, so yeah, you know. Meanwhile, 380 00:21:00,244 --> 00:21:03,884 Speaker 2: Elon has also been accused of recreational drug use in 381 00:21:03,964 --> 00:21:06,924 Speaker 2: well sourced stores in the Wall Street Journal. He is 382 00:21:07,004 --> 00:21:10,684 Speaker 2: a polarizing figure. I don't believe that his approval writing. 383 00:21:10,684 --> 00:21:12,964 Speaker 2: We've been tracking favorability of branks for Elon. They haven't 384 00:21:13,004 --> 00:21:14,724 Speaker 2: really improved very much. And see let the White House. 385 00:21:14,724 --> 00:21:17,404 Speaker 2: In fact, if anything, Republicans are more mad at him 386 00:21:17,404 --> 00:21:20,084 Speaker 2: now than they once were. Democrats haven't really you know, 387 00:21:20,564 --> 00:21:24,084 Speaker 2: returned to admiration for him yet. So there are a 388 00:21:24,124 --> 00:21:27,204 Speaker 2: lot of disadvantages too. But you know, I mean, look, 389 00:21:28,444 --> 00:21:30,684 Speaker 2: one of the other options he owns somewhere in the 390 00:21:30,764 --> 00:21:34,364 Speaker 2: range of fifteen percent of Tesla stock, right, so who's 391 00:21:34,364 --> 00:21:37,404 Speaker 2: the largest shareholder. If you wanted to oust him, you 392 00:21:37,444 --> 00:21:40,084 Speaker 2: would have to have the majority of other shareholders wanting 393 00:21:40,124 --> 00:21:42,324 Speaker 2: him out, which is very difficult for lots and lots 394 00:21:42,324 --> 00:21:44,724 Speaker 2: of reasons. So, you know, maybe it's not a choice 395 00:21:44,724 --> 00:21:50,444 Speaker 2: between Elon and generic CEO so much as motivated Elon 396 00:21:50,564 --> 00:21:51,844 Speaker 2: versus unmotivated Elon. 397 00:21:52,804 --> 00:21:54,844 Speaker 1: Yeah, so at the end of the day, night, good 398 00:21:54,884 --> 00:21:56,964 Speaker 1: call or bad call. I think you know where you 399 00:21:57,004 --> 00:22:01,484 Speaker 1: come down, all right, and I am it's hard going. 400 00:22:01,644 --> 00:22:03,604 Speaker 1: I'm gonna waffle on this one. I'm going to say, 401 00:22:03,724 --> 00:22:05,884 Speaker 1: I really I'm not sure I can see it going 402 00:22:05,924 --> 00:22:09,884 Speaker 1: either way. And this is a very waffly answer, But 403 00:22:10,284 --> 00:22:12,324 Speaker 1: that's at the end of the day where I'm coming 404 00:22:12,324 --> 00:22:17,124 Speaker 1: out and yeah, I'm hedging, Nate, I'm hedging. So yeah, 405 00:22:17,164 --> 00:22:21,404 Speaker 1: so that's where we are. Let's take a quick break now, 406 00:22:21,724 --> 00:22:23,524 Speaker 1: and then when we come back, we're going to talk 407 00:22:23,564 --> 00:22:27,644 Speaker 1: about the Battle of the sexes or you know, is 408 00:22:27,684 --> 00:22:31,244 Speaker 1: there actually a crisis of masculinity. We'll find out after 409 00:22:31,284 --> 00:22:47,604 Speaker 1: the break. Nate. Normally, when I think of the Battle 410 00:22:47,644 --> 00:22:50,444 Speaker 1: of the Sexes, I'm thinking game theory. Right, there's actually 411 00:22:50,484 --> 00:22:53,124 Speaker 1: a game that's called Battle of the Sexes. But in 412 00:22:53,364 --> 00:22:57,644 Speaker 1: today's segment, that is not what we're talking about, well 413 00:22:57,884 --> 00:23:00,804 Speaker 1: sort of, but not really. We're talking about kind of 414 00:23:01,004 --> 00:23:04,004 Speaker 1: the headlines that have been in the news over the 415 00:23:04,084 --> 00:23:08,044 Speaker 1: last few years about kind of a crisis of modern 416 00:23:08,444 --> 00:23:12,404 Speaker 1: masculinity that men are not doing as well as they 417 00:23:12,444 --> 00:23:17,284 Speaker 1: once were. Basically, you know, suicide as up, education levels 418 00:23:17,324 --> 00:23:20,684 Speaker 1: are down, loneliness is up. You know, we're seeing a 419 00:23:20,724 --> 00:23:24,404 Speaker 1: loneliness epidemic. And that's actually true of both sexes, but 420 00:23:24,444 --> 00:23:28,164 Speaker 1: more for men than for women's suicide actually is also 421 00:23:28,244 --> 00:23:30,084 Speaker 1: true that it's going up for both men and women, 422 00:23:30,164 --> 00:23:34,004 Speaker 1: but more for men, and on and on. So the 423 00:23:34,124 --> 00:23:37,684 Speaker 1: question here is is this actually a crisis of masculinity 424 00:23:38,044 --> 00:23:42,484 Speaker 1: or are these overblown headlines that basically are just like 425 00:23:43,444 --> 00:23:46,524 Speaker 1: little data blifts that really do not tell the whole 426 00:23:46,564 --> 00:23:51,964 Speaker 1: story where there's actually, you know, just as much male 427 00:23:52,044 --> 00:23:55,004 Speaker 1: dominance as there ever was, and maybe on the margins 428 00:23:55,124 --> 00:23:59,084 Speaker 1: certain things are changing a little bit, but it's still 429 00:23:59,844 --> 00:24:03,884 Speaker 1: basically same old story. So that is that is the 430 00:24:03,924 --> 00:24:08,044 Speaker 1: topic for this Battle of the Sexes. And obviously I'm female, 431 00:24:08,244 --> 00:24:10,764 Speaker 1: you're male, but I'm gonna let you kick this one 432 00:24:10,844 --> 00:24:14,524 Speaker 1: OFFN eight. So what is your kind of initial reaction 433 00:24:14,644 --> 00:24:16,244 Speaker 1: and then we can get into some data. 434 00:24:16,804 --> 00:24:21,524 Speaker 2: Yeah, look, maybe I'm playing into the stereotype a little 435 00:24:21,564 --> 00:24:23,764 Speaker 2: bit here. I think there's something real. I mean, one 436 00:24:23,804 --> 00:24:25,364 Speaker 2: reason why I say that is because you can see 437 00:24:25,404 --> 00:24:28,804 Speaker 2: it reflected in voting patterns too, which is something that 438 00:24:28,844 --> 00:24:32,684 Speaker 2: I study quite a bit, where among young voters in 439 00:24:32,724 --> 00:24:36,764 Speaker 2: the US and elsewhere, there are bigger gender splits than 440 00:24:36,764 --> 00:24:41,364 Speaker 2: there ever have been before. Historically, gender is only mildly 441 00:24:41,364 --> 00:24:44,404 Speaker 2: predictive of voting share. Usually women are a bit more 442 00:24:44,684 --> 00:24:47,724 Speaker 2: liberal than men, but that's been more profound, for example, 443 00:24:47,804 --> 00:24:50,364 Speaker 2: for Kamala Harris, for Donald Trump. And I think it 444 00:24:50,404 --> 00:24:55,564 Speaker 2: reflects the fact that, like some men feel a little 445 00:24:55,604 --> 00:24:59,324 Speaker 2: bit left out of the direction that society is headed, right, 446 00:24:59,324 --> 00:25:03,044 Speaker 2: They feel society as too risk averse, They feel emasculated, 447 00:25:03,164 --> 00:25:07,444 Speaker 2: They feel that, you know, institutions may be led. Well, 448 00:25:07,484 --> 00:25:11,564 Speaker 2: I don't know certainly what I call the village in 449 00:25:11,604 --> 00:25:14,244 Speaker 2: my book, right, the village is kind of academia and 450 00:25:14,284 --> 00:25:17,044 Speaker 2: media and so forth. Certainly in that field you see 451 00:25:17,044 --> 00:25:21,484 Speaker 2: more and more women leaders. Right in like democratic politics, 452 00:25:21,484 --> 00:25:23,004 Speaker 2: a lot of people who work on campaigns you know, 453 00:25:23,044 --> 00:25:25,044 Speaker 2: the women who ran Joe Biden's campaign was a woman. 454 00:25:26,324 --> 00:25:29,004 Speaker 2: So yeah, I think there's I think there's something there. Maria. 455 00:25:29,164 --> 00:25:32,604 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, having there be something there and having it 456 00:25:32,644 --> 00:25:36,404 Speaker 1: be like a full blown crisis are two different things. 457 00:25:36,644 --> 00:25:40,444 Speaker 1: So I do think that there's definitely I agree that 458 00:25:40,524 --> 00:25:42,844 Speaker 1: there is dissatisfaction. I mean, I think a lot of 459 00:25:42,844 --> 00:25:45,764 Speaker 1: what you're talking about is probably what got us you know, 460 00:25:45,844 --> 00:25:48,604 Speaker 1: Trump two point zero, right, what got us to that, 461 00:25:49,284 --> 00:25:51,844 Speaker 1: to that moment in time where a lot of people 462 00:25:51,884 --> 00:25:54,724 Speaker 1: felt really disaffected. And by the way, you're seeing this 463 00:25:54,844 --> 00:25:58,284 Speaker 1: in women too, where it's kind of a dovetailing that 464 00:25:58,324 --> 00:26:02,404 Speaker 1: where you're seeing the tradwife movement right where women are saying, yeah, 465 00:26:02,484 --> 00:26:06,684 Speaker 1: you know, we want to be at home and be 466 00:26:06,844 --> 00:26:10,884 Speaker 1: wives and full time homemakers and cook elaborate meals and 467 00:26:10,924 --> 00:26:13,084 Speaker 1: take care of our children and have lots of children. 468 00:26:13,124 --> 00:26:14,764 Speaker 1: We've talked on the show a little bit about this 469 00:26:14,844 --> 00:26:16,844 Speaker 1: movement in the past, but I think that these two 470 00:26:16,924 --> 00:26:19,324 Speaker 1: things are kind of going hand in hand, right. So 471 00:26:19,364 --> 00:26:22,484 Speaker 1: it's not just men who feel disaffected. There is a 472 00:26:22,524 --> 00:26:25,364 Speaker 1: subset of women who think, oh, you know, it's good 473 00:26:25,404 --> 00:26:27,884 Speaker 1: that women are staying at home. They shouldn't be in 474 00:26:27,924 --> 00:26:30,644 Speaker 1: the workforce in the same numbers as men. Men should 475 00:26:30,644 --> 00:26:33,884 Speaker 1: be the breadwinners. You know, we like traditional gender roles, 476 00:26:34,124 --> 00:26:38,884 Speaker 1: So you definitely have this current, this subcurrent in society. 477 00:26:39,484 --> 00:26:42,364 Speaker 1: That said, I think that some of the data that 478 00:26:42,564 --> 00:26:47,364 Speaker 1: has been cited that shows that basically men are not 479 00:26:47,484 --> 00:26:50,804 Speaker 1: doing as well as women. I think that a lot 480 00:26:50,844 --> 00:26:54,044 Speaker 1: of those data points, if you dig a little bit deeper, 481 00:26:54,804 --> 00:26:59,084 Speaker 1: don't hold a lot of water. So, for instance, when 482 00:26:59,084 --> 00:27:02,164 Speaker 1: it comes to the workforce, we still do have quite 483 00:27:02,204 --> 00:27:07,004 Speaker 1: a significant gender pay gap. So women on average make 484 00:27:07,084 --> 00:27:10,604 Speaker 1: eighty three cents to eighty five on the dollar. 485 00:27:11,084 --> 00:27:12,724 Speaker 2: Of what I'm going to I'm going to note for 486 00:27:12,764 --> 00:27:15,484 Speaker 2: the record that I think people would be the. 487 00:27:15,324 --> 00:27:19,724 Speaker 1: Causes of that, the causes of that. Yeah, that's that's 488 00:27:19,764 --> 00:27:21,924 Speaker 1: totally fine. I'm just saying that this that this still 489 00:27:21,964 --> 00:27:25,044 Speaker 1: exists right when, because if we're posing the question of 490 00:27:25,084 --> 00:27:27,244 Speaker 1: men are not doing as well as women, I'm just 491 00:27:27,404 --> 00:27:29,324 Speaker 1: kind of saying that there is a still a gender 492 00:27:29,324 --> 00:27:33,564 Speaker 1: pay gap that is in favor of men, and it 493 00:27:33,724 --> 00:27:39,404 Speaker 1: holds true over all education levels. So basically, men who 494 00:27:39,684 --> 00:27:41,844 Speaker 1: have no education are able to get better jobs and 495 00:27:41,884 --> 00:27:44,964 Speaker 1: women who have no education. Women with PhDs are paid 496 00:27:45,004 --> 00:27:48,884 Speaker 1: more than women with PhDs, and we still don't see 497 00:27:48,924 --> 00:27:53,444 Speaker 1: women progressing into positions of power at nearly the same 498 00:27:53,524 --> 00:27:56,124 Speaker 1: rates as we see men. So we do. We do 499 00:27:56,244 --> 00:27:59,444 Speaker 1: have that sort of thing and the fact that, oh 500 00:27:59,524 --> 00:28:02,924 Speaker 1: that there's a crisis in higher education, or that women 501 00:28:03,924 --> 00:28:07,044 Speaker 1: graduate from college more often than men. This has been 502 00:28:07,084 --> 00:28:10,604 Speaker 1: the case for kind of a long time, Like women 503 00:28:10,684 --> 00:28:14,084 Speaker 1: tend to do better academically and have for a very 504 00:28:14,124 --> 00:28:17,044 Speaker 1: long time. So this is not something new. It's not 505 00:28:17,124 --> 00:28:19,164 Speaker 1: like all of a sudden we have different education. 506 00:28:19,284 --> 00:28:21,284 Speaker 2: I've got to push back. I mean, it has gotten 507 00:28:21,284 --> 00:28:23,644 Speaker 2: I believe significantly big. I mean in terms of like 508 00:28:23,684 --> 00:28:26,204 Speaker 2: college graduation rates is going to like three to two 509 00:28:26,284 --> 00:28:29,404 Speaker 2: women or might go to two to one, and eventually, 510 00:28:29,484 --> 00:28:31,284 Speaker 2: I mean this kind of leads to interesting things like 511 00:28:31,324 --> 00:28:35,124 Speaker 2: should there be affirmative action for men on campus? It 512 00:28:35,124 --> 00:28:38,284 Speaker 2: also affects things like the campus dating scene potentially. 513 00:28:38,444 --> 00:28:42,164 Speaker 1: That's actually so nate, that's actually the kind of a 514 00:28:42,444 --> 00:28:45,804 Speaker 1: data point in the opposite direction. If this is If 515 00:28:45,804 --> 00:28:48,804 Speaker 1: it's true that it has gotten worse and there is 516 00:28:48,884 --> 00:28:51,044 Speaker 1: still a huge gender pay gap and that men are 517 00:28:51,124 --> 00:28:53,764 Speaker 1: still getting paid more than women, even though women are 518 00:28:53,764 --> 00:28:56,564 Speaker 1: pushing to get educated and are more educated than men. 519 00:28:56,644 --> 00:28:58,844 Speaker 1: That that actually shows that men are getting even more 520 00:28:58,844 --> 00:29:01,044 Speaker 1: privileged when it comes to how much they're being paid 521 00:29:01,044 --> 00:29:03,524 Speaker 1: than women. Right, Because if. 522 00:29:03,324 --> 00:29:07,124 Speaker 2: You're no, I don't think necessary, I mean, are there 523 00:29:07,124 --> 00:29:08,084 Speaker 2: are a few things here right. 524 00:29:09,484 --> 00:29:11,084 Speaker 1: This is, by the way, By the way, the reason 525 00:29:11,124 --> 00:29:13,444 Speaker 1: we're going back and forth on this is even economists 526 00:29:13,524 --> 00:29:15,364 Speaker 1: go back and forth on this, like the data is, 527 00:29:15,804 --> 00:29:18,684 Speaker 1: the data is really complicated, and this is a very 528 00:29:18,764 --> 00:29:22,604 Speaker 1: muddy subject with tons of confounds, and it's really really 529 00:29:22,644 --> 00:29:25,884 Speaker 1: hard to control for all of the variables. So I'm 530 00:29:26,124 --> 00:29:28,604 Speaker 1: I'm just doing a little bit of a caveat on that. 531 00:29:29,844 --> 00:29:31,884 Speaker 2: Let me go through a couple of arguments that I 532 00:29:31,924 --> 00:29:35,004 Speaker 2: think the kind of economists on the other side of 533 00:29:35,004 --> 00:29:38,204 Speaker 2: this issue we'd go through, and some of them are 534 00:29:38,484 --> 00:29:41,444 Speaker 2: are explanations liberals would like more, some conservatives would like more. Right, 535 00:29:42,404 --> 00:29:48,564 Speaker 2: you know, one belief is that women often take more 536 00:29:48,604 --> 00:29:53,164 Speaker 2: time out of their careers to care for children, to 537 00:29:53,324 --> 00:29:56,164 Speaker 2: care sometimes for other like ailing family members, for things 538 00:29:56,204 --> 00:29:59,044 Speaker 2: like that, and that you know, if you count for that, 539 00:29:59,124 --> 00:30:02,004 Speaker 2: then there's questions about how much of the gender wage 540 00:30:02,124 --> 00:30:05,684 Speaker 2: gap remains. You know. The more plocularly incorrect thing too, 541 00:30:05,724 --> 00:30:07,724 Speaker 2: This is kind of what got Larry Summer's in a 542 00:30:07,764 --> 00:30:11,524 Speaker 2: lot of trouble at Harvard University. Right, you know, there 543 00:30:11,524 --> 00:30:15,524 Speaker 2: are some evidence that men have higher variance, that they 544 00:30:16,564 --> 00:30:19,964 Speaker 2: end up in really bad circumstances, commit substantially more violence 545 00:30:20,324 --> 00:30:24,404 Speaker 2: and more crime. Right, can crash out in different ways. 546 00:30:25,084 --> 00:30:29,404 Speaker 2: But if there's more genetic variation in a population, then 547 00:30:29,444 --> 00:30:31,764 Speaker 2: maybe the very top earners Elon Musk of the world 548 00:30:31,804 --> 00:30:34,604 Speaker 2: to bring him up again might tend to be men more, right, 549 00:30:34,644 --> 00:30:37,364 Speaker 2: I mean, those are those are theories that compete with this, 550 00:30:37,644 --> 00:30:42,524 Speaker 2: I guess, right, you know, I think one could ask 551 00:30:43,164 --> 00:30:49,484 Speaker 2: how predictive is college completion of success in career anyway? 552 00:30:49,724 --> 00:30:54,284 Speaker 1: Right, yep, that's a very valid question, especially now when 553 00:30:54,324 --> 00:30:56,124 Speaker 1: you have you know, also the Pewter teals of the 554 00:30:56,124 --> 00:30:58,804 Speaker 1: world paying people not to go to college. You know. There, 555 00:30:58,844 --> 00:31:02,244 Speaker 1: I think we are seeing a very very different society 556 00:31:02,284 --> 00:31:04,284 Speaker 1: than even ten years ago, and I think that that 557 00:31:04,364 --> 00:31:07,444 Speaker 1: shift is going to all the all the evidence shows 558 00:31:07,444 --> 00:31:11,404 Speaker 1: that that shift is not a prairiy blip that people 559 00:31:11,524 --> 00:31:15,364 Speaker 1: are putting less value on. Okay, where did you go 560 00:31:15,404 --> 00:31:16,764 Speaker 1: to school? Et cetera, et cetera. 561 00:31:17,324 --> 00:31:19,764 Speaker 2: Yeah, and tech, as you said, is like the field 562 00:31:19,764 --> 00:31:23,644 Speaker 2: where this is most pronounced. Right, there's now a you know, 563 00:31:23,764 --> 00:31:29,004 Speaker 2: anti higher education quadrant in tech I would see, right, 564 00:31:29,044 --> 00:31:31,684 Speaker 2: But it hasn't spread to like finances much, which is 565 00:31:31,724 --> 00:31:34,204 Speaker 2: still a bit more hierarchical. But like all this is 566 00:31:34,244 --> 00:31:41,164 Speaker 2: tied together, right, the backlash against elite higher education and 567 00:31:41,564 --> 00:31:44,804 Speaker 2: the backlash against women's roles in society. These things are 568 00:31:45,004 --> 00:31:49,004 Speaker 2: tied together, I think to like a greater and greater extent, right, 569 00:31:49,724 --> 00:31:51,884 Speaker 2: you know, and again you know, Look, my premise is 570 00:31:51,884 --> 00:31:55,044 Speaker 2: always at like, it doesn't do anybody any good to 571 00:31:55,044 --> 00:31:59,284 Speaker 2: pretend that, on average, that gender differences don't exist. 572 00:31:59,444 --> 00:31:59,644 Speaker 1: Right. 573 00:32:00,044 --> 00:32:03,644 Speaker 2: If you look at measures of self reported well being, 574 00:32:03,724 --> 00:32:07,724 Speaker 2: if you ask people are you happy or not? Basically? Right, 575 00:32:08,404 --> 00:32:12,484 Speaker 2: First of all, there are enormous generational divides where a 576 00:32:12,484 --> 00:32:16,004 Speaker 2: lot of gen Z reports very poor mental health, But 577 00:32:16,084 --> 00:32:20,084 Speaker 2: there is a gender gap too. Men tend to report 578 00:32:21,004 --> 00:32:26,124 Speaker 2: higher happiness, lower levels of anxiety and depression. If you 579 00:32:26,164 --> 00:32:30,324 Speaker 2: look at like what circumstances, what life circumstances affect people's 580 00:32:30,364 --> 00:32:33,164 Speaker 2: sense of well being? Right? For some types of things, 581 00:32:33,244 --> 00:32:37,444 Speaker 2: men are more resilient, but not for work related stuff. 582 00:32:37,484 --> 00:32:37,564 Speaker 1: Right. 583 00:32:37,604 --> 00:32:39,524 Speaker 2: If you ask kind of questions about like what would 584 00:32:39,564 --> 00:32:41,964 Speaker 2: happen if you got demoted at work or you weren't 585 00:32:41,964 --> 00:32:46,844 Speaker 2: performing expectations that you know, men have a bigger psychological 586 00:32:46,844 --> 00:32:49,284 Speaker 2: effect from that than women do on average, all these 587 00:32:49,524 --> 00:32:50,164 Speaker 2: our averages. 588 00:32:50,484 --> 00:32:54,884 Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, I will just add to that to kind 589 00:32:54,884 --> 00:32:59,924 Speaker 1: of give a broader picture that usually the gender differences 590 00:33:00,444 --> 00:33:04,244 Speaker 1: within genders are much much larger than the gender differences 591 00:33:04,284 --> 00:33:07,764 Speaker 1: between genders on almost any data point you can find. Right. 592 00:33:07,764 --> 00:33:10,004 Speaker 1: That means men differ more from men, and women differ 593 00:33:10,044 --> 00:33:12,764 Speaker 1: more from women than men on average, and women on 594 00:33:12,804 --> 00:33:15,884 Speaker 1: average differ from each other. That is something that is 595 00:33:15,964 --> 00:33:18,924 Speaker 1: just basically true of almost anything you can find in 596 00:33:18,964 --> 00:33:21,964 Speaker 1: the psychology literature. So I just want people to keep 597 00:33:21,964 --> 00:33:23,284 Speaker 1: that in the back of their minds. 598 00:33:23,724 --> 00:33:26,204 Speaker 2: Yeah. Look, you know, I just came from the self 599 00:33:27,044 --> 00:33:30,324 Speaker 2: professed happiest country in the world, Finland. I was trying 600 00:33:30,364 --> 00:33:31,204 Speaker 2: to do it. Oh my god. 601 00:33:31,244 --> 00:33:33,684 Speaker 1: That that always just I get such a kick out 602 00:33:33,684 --> 00:33:34,084 Speaker 1: of that. 603 00:33:35,284 --> 00:33:38,404 Speaker 2: They seem pretty happy. They drink a lot, you get offered, 604 00:33:38,724 --> 00:33:40,204 Speaker 2: Oh that's probably why. 605 00:33:40,324 --> 00:33:45,404 Speaker 1: Yeah, they haven't bought into the alcohol is bad for 606 00:33:45,444 --> 00:33:48,604 Speaker 1: you yet, so yes, their life satisfaction is probably higher. 607 00:33:48,684 --> 00:33:51,084 Speaker 2: This could be, this could be a whole different episode. 608 00:33:51,084 --> 00:33:52,684 Speaker 2: Not that we could do the boost thing, right, but 609 00:33:52,764 --> 00:33:55,404 Speaker 2: like national happiness rankings, what do they really tell you, right, 610 00:33:56,604 --> 00:34:03,004 Speaker 2: I think they're probably somewhat real. One thing you actually notice, 611 00:34:03,044 --> 00:34:05,164 Speaker 2: I haven't published this work. Maybe I'll get around to 612 00:34:05,164 --> 00:34:09,004 Speaker 2: it eventually. If you look at fertility rates by country, 613 00:34:09,844 --> 00:34:14,644 Speaker 2: then happiness is somewhat predictive of that when you control 614 00:34:14,764 --> 00:34:17,124 Speaker 2: for GDP. I mean, basically, you know, the big thing 615 00:34:17,124 --> 00:34:18,484 Speaker 2: that no one wants to talk about is that, like 616 00:34:19,204 --> 00:34:22,764 Speaker 2: both men and women have seen to discover around the 617 00:34:22,764 --> 00:34:25,764 Speaker 2: world that like, when you get wealthier than maybe there 618 00:34:25,764 --> 00:34:27,924 Speaker 2: are better things to do with your life and to 619 00:34:27,964 --> 00:34:31,524 Speaker 2: have children, right, and this is causing potential decline in 620 00:34:31,564 --> 00:34:33,964 Speaker 2: the global population. Right. That's a big difference between not 621 00:34:33,964 --> 00:34:36,844 Speaker 2: really between men and women, but it's also a generational difference. 622 00:34:36,924 --> 00:34:37,124 Speaker 1: Right. 623 00:34:37,924 --> 00:34:43,084 Speaker 2: But people actually have, controlling for other factors, more kids 624 00:34:43,124 --> 00:34:45,404 Speaker 2: in happier countries, which suggests to me that there is 625 00:34:45,484 --> 00:34:49,684 Speaker 2: like some tangible difference here potentially. I mean, you could 626 00:34:49,724 --> 00:34:52,964 Speaker 2: look at things like suicide rates. I haven't looked at that. Actually, 627 00:34:53,604 --> 00:34:56,164 Speaker 2: you know, men commit suicide much more offer than women, 628 00:34:56,244 --> 00:35:01,804 Speaker 2: even though even though they report higher self reported mental health, 629 00:35:01,804 --> 00:35:03,884 Speaker 2: which is interesting. Maybe it's another case of like having 630 00:35:03,964 --> 00:35:07,844 Speaker 2: more variation potentially, but I think these things are at 631 00:35:07,924 --> 00:35:10,644 Speaker 2: least partly real, and some of us that it's more 632 00:35:10,684 --> 00:35:14,324 Speaker 2: you know, the notion about like men not feeling like 633 00:35:14,364 --> 00:35:16,644 Speaker 2: they have a lot of close friends, right. 634 00:35:16,884 --> 00:35:19,444 Speaker 1: That's actually a huge thing. I think that there's a 635 00:35:19,484 --> 00:35:22,844 Speaker 1: lot to that, and I think that there you know, 636 00:35:22,924 --> 00:35:30,084 Speaker 1: women historically socially have had to kind of be more socialized, right. 637 00:35:30,124 --> 00:35:32,644 Speaker 1: It's it's one of those things where women, I think, 638 00:35:33,644 --> 00:35:37,444 Speaker 1: just in general in society have kind of had to 639 00:35:37,644 --> 00:35:40,244 Speaker 1: get support groups, right, and be nice and be the 640 00:35:40,284 --> 00:35:43,404 Speaker 1: people in the family who take care of calendars and 641 00:35:43,444 --> 00:35:47,044 Speaker 1: appointments and keep up with other parents and like and 642 00:35:47,084 --> 00:35:50,004 Speaker 1: do all of the social stuff. And for men, that 643 00:35:50,564 --> 00:35:54,724 Speaker 1: once again historically hasn't always been their dominant social role. 644 00:35:54,804 --> 00:35:57,124 Speaker 1: So we actually do see that that men tend to 645 00:35:57,124 --> 00:36:00,724 Speaker 1: have smaller circles, and that those circles often shrink with 646 00:36:00,884 --> 00:36:05,164 Speaker 1: age unless they do something specifically to counteract it. Something 647 00:36:05,164 --> 00:36:07,964 Speaker 1: else that we mentioned briefly but have not gone into 648 00:36:08,004 --> 00:36:10,804 Speaker 1: in detail, But I think it's important here, including in 649 00:36:10,884 --> 00:36:14,524 Speaker 1: social circles who you interact with, and I think that 650 00:36:14,644 --> 00:36:19,484 Speaker 1: this is affecting both genders, is that you know, teens 651 00:36:19,644 --> 00:36:24,244 Speaker 1: right now. Tweens are coming up in an era where 652 00:36:24,604 --> 00:36:28,084 Speaker 1: so much activity is online, right, and there's this atomization 653 00:36:28,244 --> 00:36:30,724 Speaker 1: of society that we didn't experience you and I and 654 00:36:30,724 --> 00:36:33,164 Speaker 1: A when we were when we were growing up. And 655 00:36:33,204 --> 00:36:36,684 Speaker 1: I think that there are generational differences that we have 656 00:36:36,764 --> 00:36:38,964 Speaker 1: no idea yet how that's going to play out, but 657 00:36:39,444 --> 00:36:41,444 Speaker 1: as of now, I think that those do not have 658 00:36:41,484 --> 00:36:44,484 Speaker 1: a great effect on mental health. Right if you socialize 659 00:36:44,484 --> 00:36:47,164 Speaker 1: online versus in person, there is a difference. We do 660 00:36:47,244 --> 00:36:49,404 Speaker 1: have data on that, and so I do think that 661 00:36:49,444 --> 00:36:52,724 Speaker 1: we're going to be seeing kind of some spillover effects 662 00:36:52,764 --> 00:36:55,564 Speaker 1: from that in the future. And it's too early to 663 00:36:55,604 --> 00:36:58,244 Speaker 1: say whether you know what the gender differences will be, 664 00:36:59,044 --> 00:37:01,644 Speaker 1: what kind of what the fall from that will be, 665 00:37:01,724 --> 00:37:04,604 Speaker 1: But there is an important kind of generational shift going 666 00:37:04,644 --> 00:37:07,004 Speaker 1: on right now that we should be paying attention to. 667 00:37:10,684 --> 00:37:12,564 Speaker 2: And we'll be right back after this break. 668 00:37:25,964 --> 00:37:26,164 Speaker 1: Yeah. 669 00:37:26,324 --> 00:37:28,924 Speaker 2: Look, I think some stereotypes are true on an average, 670 00:37:28,964 --> 00:37:32,484 Speaker 2: right If you let's say I get dinner with a 671 00:37:32,604 --> 00:37:36,084 Speaker 2: male friend playtonic right the next day, do I get 672 00:37:36,124 --> 00:37:39,884 Speaker 2: like a follow up thank you We'll stening out again 673 00:37:39,924 --> 00:37:43,684 Speaker 2: soon text? Probably not? Right with a female friend over 674 00:37:43,724 --> 00:37:46,244 Speaker 2: fifty to fifty I would say, right, just an observation 675 00:37:46,324 --> 00:37:47,684 Speaker 2: I think will hold true for a lot of people. 676 00:37:48,604 --> 00:37:52,644 Speaker 2: You know, men stereotypically like to hang up by doing 677 00:37:52,684 --> 00:37:55,644 Speaker 2: things together. Right, you're watching a football game, you're watching 678 00:37:55,684 --> 00:37:59,324 Speaker 2: a movie, you're playing a video game. Right, maybe playing poker, 679 00:37:59,804 --> 00:38:03,444 Speaker 2: women tend to you know, involve more talking on average, 680 00:38:03,604 --> 00:38:07,124 Speaker 2: don't shoot the messenger, right, There is data on this, right, 681 00:38:07,164 --> 00:38:09,244 Speaker 2: and like and that might be more threatened by a 682 00:38:09,524 --> 00:38:12,204 Speaker 2: like a model where now you're hanging out in person 683 00:38:12,444 --> 00:38:14,884 Speaker 2: or you're or you're not hanging out in person as much. Right, 684 00:38:14,924 --> 00:38:17,484 Speaker 2: you know, I think poker is interesting and there is 685 00:38:17,564 --> 00:38:22,124 Speaker 2: certainly outright sexism in poker, for sure, and yes, but 686 00:38:22,764 --> 00:38:25,564 Speaker 2: you know, I also think it's a male bonding experience 687 00:38:25,804 --> 00:38:28,644 Speaker 2: and an outlet for some men who feel like they 688 00:38:28,644 --> 00:38:32,164 Speaker 2: don't have another way to like to make friends. Right, 689 00:38:32,324 --> 00:38:34,644 Speaker 2: you go to the poker room, and believe me, there 690 00:38:34,644 --> 00:38:36,844 Speaker 2: are some poker players who are very sociable and eloquent 691 00:38:36,884 --> 00:38:39,684 Speaker 2: and everything else, but like you want, Yeah, some guys 692 00:38:39,764 --> 00:38:42,724 Speaker 2: just want to play poker and talk about crypto and 693 00:38:42,804 --> 00:38:44,644 Speaker 2: sports and women. 694 00:38:45,004 --> 00:38:45,204 Speaker 1: Right. 695 00:38:45,924 --> 00:38:48,804 Speaker 2: You know, that's one of the reasons why poker is 696 00:38:48,804 --> 00:38:51,844 Speaker 2: a popular hobby with with with men right, and might 697 00:38:51,924 --> 00:38:54,324 Speaker 2: encourage men who are like, Okay, this is my this 698 00:38:54,404 --> 00:38:56,524 Speaker 2: is my safe space a little bit when you do 699 00:38:56,524 --> 00:38:59,444 Speaker 2: see some of the more sexist behaviors, Oh for sure. 700 00:38:59,484 --> 00:39:03,004 Speaker 1: I mean I've said that often that you know, especially 701 00:39:03,044 --> 00:39:05,204 Speaker 1: at lower stakes, when you go to your local casino, 702 00:39:05,244 --> 00:39:08,804 Speaker 1: that's where I've experienced some of the greatest misogyny because 703 00:39:09,124 --> 00:39:11,484 Speaker 1: I think that people there are playing for different reasons 704 00:39:11,484 --> 00:39:13,164 Speaker 1: than when you get to like high stakes pros for 705 00:39:13,204 --> 00:39:15,084 Speaker 1: whom like this is a career, they're taking it like 706 00:39:15,124 --> 00:39:18,124 Speaker 1: it's their profession. And at those lower stakes you often 707 00:39:18,164 --> 00:39:21,044 Speaker 1: get people for whom like this is their socializing, right, 708 00:39:21,124 --> 00:39:23,364 Speaker 1: like this is there, like I just want to be 709 00:39:23,444 --> 00:39:25,284 Speaker 1: with the guys and like I don't want to watch 710 00:39:25,284 --> 00:39:27,724 Speaker 1: my fucking mouth. Like you're the one who chose to 711 00:39:27,764 --> 00:39:30,244 Speaker 1: sit at this table. If I want to, you know, 712 00:39:30,484 --> 00:39:34,044 Speaker 1: hit on the dealer and like talk about her boobs 713 00:39:34,084 --> 00:39:36,444 Speaker 1: and like mention your ass, that's fine, And if you're 714 00:39:36,444 --> 00:39:38,764 Speaker 1: not comfortable, you leave, right, I'm not going to change 715 00:39:38,764 --> 00:39:41,124 Speaker 1: my behavior. I'm here with the boys. I want to drink, 716 00:39:41,164 --> 00:39:43,524 Speaker 1: I want to have fun. So I think that there's 717 00:39:43,564 --> 00:39:47,844 Speaker 1: definitely something to that. And yeah, so I do think 718 00:39:47,844 --> 00:39:51,204 Speaker 1: that all of these factors matter when we're thinking about, like, 719 00:39:51,724 --> 00:39:54,484 Speaker 1: is there actually a crisis here? Right, So at the 720 00:39:54,564 --> 00:39:56,604 Speaker 1: end of the day and night, how would you weigh 721 00:39:56,724 --> 00:39:59,364 Speaker 1: all of this to say, you know, is there a 722 00:39:59,444 --> 00:40:02,204 Speaker 1: crisis or are these just kind of some issues where 723 00:40:02,204 --> 00:40:05,084 Speaker 1: men are winning some where they're losing. And it's true 724 00:40:05,084 --> 00:40:07,884 Speaker 1: of women as well, and we're just in a moment 725 00:40:07,884 --> 00:40:11,124 Speaker 1: of social change that's not necess necessarily gender related, which 726 00:40:11,164 --> 00:40:14,044 Speaker 1: is how I would kind of think about it, as 727 00:40:14,084 --> 00:40:16,724 Speaker 1: opposed to saying, yes, it's a crisis of masculinity, that 728 00:40:16,724 --> 00:40:18,404 Speaker 1: would be my answer. How would you answer it? 729 00:40:19,884 --> 00:40:22,804 Speaker 2: Well, look, I think most people are will tend to 730 00:40:22,804 --> 00:40:25,004 Speaker 2: treat everything as a crisis, whether or not it's actually 731 00:40:25,484 --> 00:40:30,924 Speaker 2: incret nor. The mental health numbers for young people are 732 00:40:31,044 --> 00:40:34,164 Speaker 2: very bad, and I think it has to constitute a crisis. Now, 733 00:40:34,164 --> 00:40:39,524 Speaker 2: they're worse for women than men. But look, okay, let 734 00:40:39,564 --> 00:40:41,204 Speaker 2: me be a little spicier here, right, I think there 735 00:40:41,284 --> 00:40:48,204 Speaker 2: is often implicit bias against men in how the village, right, 736 00:40:48,404 --> 00:40:50,564 Speaker 2: the kind of progressive communities talk about some of these 737 00:40:51,124 --> 00:40:53,844 Speaker 2: things potentially, Right, if you kind of get at the 738 00:40:53,924 --> 00:40:58,604 Speaker 2: question of, like to go back to self diagnosed mental health, right, 739 00:40:58,724 --> 00:41:02,044 Speaker 2: some people will say, Okay, women are higher and liberals 740 00:41:02,084 --> 00:41:03,884 Speaker 2: are higher. This isn't even bigger different talking way, Liberals 741 00:41:03,884 --> 00:41:06,484 Speaker 2: are higher than conservatives by a wide margin. 742 00:41:06,764 --> 00:41:06,924 Speaker 1: Right. 743 00:41:08,324 --> 00:41:11,604 Speaker 2: You know, they will say, well, that's because there is 744 00:41:11,644 --> 00:41:17,964 Speaker 2: a stigma against declaring mental health conditions, and that women 745 00:41:18,684 --> 00:41:21,724 Speaker 2: and concern or women and liberals don't suffer from the stigma, 746 00:41:22,084 --> 00:41:29,484 Speaker 2: whereas conservatives and men do, right, to which I would say, okay, 747 00:41:30,284 --> 00:41:36,084 Speaker 2: maybe there is something to stoicism basically, right, and you 748 00:41:36,084 --> 00:41:39,324 Speaker 2: know they're popular still assists books and podcasts and websites 749 00:41:39,324 --> 00:41:41,564 Speaker 2: and things like that where it's like, okay, you know, 750 00:41:41,644 --> 00:41:44,924 Speaker 2: maybe there's something to be said for like toughing it 751 00:41:44,964 --> 00:41:50,044 Speaker 2: out under pressure. Maybe this is actually an evolutionarily smart strategy, right, 752 00:41:50,084 --> 00:41:54,084 Speaker 2: Maybe it's okay to like compartmentalize things a little bit, right, 753 00:41:54,164 --> 00:41:55,564 Speaker 2: or you know, to kind of the example of what 754 00:41:55,644 --> 00:41:57,684 Speaker 2: was kind of half joking about before. We're like men 755 00:41:57,804 --> 00:41:59,764 Speaker 2: like to do stuff, women like to talk with one another, 756 00:42:00,124 --> 00:42:03,564 Speaker 2: you know. Now and then I'll see like some op 757 00:42:03,724 --> 00:42:06,324 Speaker 2: ed in the Atlantic or whatever. Right you Usually when 758 00:42:06,364 --> 00:42:08,444 Speaker 2: by women they're like, well, men don't know how to 759 00:42:09,484 --> 00:42:11,164 Speaker 2: good friendships. It's like fuck you if I want to 760 00:42:11,204 --> 00:42:14,244 Speaker 2: go out and watch a baseball game with my friend, Like, 761 00:42:14,284 --> 00:42:16,284 Speaker 2: don't tell me it's like any less valid than like 762 00:42:16,644 --> 00:42:18,644 Speaker 2: chatting chatting chatting pressure. Yeah. 763 00:42:18,724 --> 00:42:21,564 Speaker 1: Yeah, no. And by the way, I actually think there's 764 00:42:21,564 --> 00:42:24,044 Speaker 1: good data for both men and women that you bond 765 00:42:24,044 --> 00:42:26,684 Speaker 1: more through experiences that like that kind of stuff and 766 00:42:26,724 --> 00:42:28,844 Speaker 1: doing things together is just good for friendship period. 767 00:42:29,244 --> 00:42:31,844 Speaker 2: Yeah, people talk so much, you know, what's what's they 768 00:42:31,924 --> 00:42:34,124 Speaker 2: to talk about? Go do something? 769 00:42:35,084 --> 00:42:38,044 Speaker 1: But yeah, I mean, but it sounds like it sounds 770 00:42:38,084 --> 00:42:40,924 Speaker 1: like you're you're kind of on the same page as 771 00:42:40,964 --> 00:42:44,084 Speaker 1: I am when it comes to like, yeah, there are 772 00:42:44,084 --> 00:42:48,244 Speaker 1: obviously some issues happening, but it's less clear how much 773 00:42:48,284 --> 00:42:51,684 Speaker 1: of it is. Gender is kind of a crisis of 774 00:42:51,804 --> 00:42:55,564 Speaker 1: masculinity as such, right, because the mental health stuff that's 775 00:42:55,764 --> 00:42:59,204 Speaker 1: that's a very different crisis like that is not The data, 776 00:42:59,284 --> 00:43:02,404 Speaker 1: as you said, are not great for women either. So 777 00:43:02,444 --> 00:43:04,604 Speaker 1: I think there are lots of things going on. I 778 00:43:04,684 --> 00:43:06,444 Speaker 1: do think we need to there are lots of trends 779 00:43:06,484 --> 00:43:08,524 Speaker 1: that we should be paying attention to. But I think 780 00:43:08,564 --> 00:43:11,244 Speaker 1: the data inconclusive. When it comes to, oh, you know, 781 00:43:11,364 --> 00:43:14,404 Speaker 1: is there is there a crisis for one gender or another? 782 00:43:14,444 --> 00:43:17,324 Speaker 1: I think the answer there is no, there's not enough 783 00:43:17,684 --> 00:43:21,004 Speaker 1: evidence for that, but there are some undercurrents that we 784 00:43:21,004 --> 00:43:24,964 Speaker 1: should be paying attention to and monitoring, especially with the 785 00:43:25,004 --> 00:43:26,324 Speaker 1: next generation coming up. 786 00:43:27,364 --> 00:43:28,924 Speaker 2: Yeah, look, I mean I don't know. If you look 787 00:43:28,964 --> 00:43:33,964 Speaker 2: at like the male versus female employment population ratio, right, 788 00:43:34,004 --> 00:43:38,124 Speaker 2: it's dropped actually for everybody, in part because you have 789 00:43:38,204 --> 00:43:40,964 Speaker 2: like the population aging outside of prime working years, but 790 00:43:41,604 --> 00:43:44,444 Speaker 2: it's dropped quite a bit more for men. Right in 791 00:43:44,524 --> 00:43:47,524 Speaker 2: two thousand and five according to the Bureau of Labor 792 00:43:47,564 --> 00:43:52,524 Speaker 2: Cystix before before the site gets compromised by Trump. So 793 00:43:52,804 --> 00:43:57,524 Speaker 2: in two thousand and five, seventy three percent of men 794 00:43:57,604 --> 00:44:02,564 Speaker 2: aged twenty and older were employed. Now it's sixty seven percent. Right, 795 00:44:02,604 --> 00:44:04,764 Speaker 2: there's a drop off for women, but it's been less 796 00:44:04,804 --> 00:44:08,124 Speaker 2: from fifty eight to fifty six. It looks like here, right, So, 797 00:44:08,204 --> 00:44:11,644 Speaker 2: like I think, I think there's plenty of evidence for this, right, 798 00:44:12,004 --> 00:44:14,844 Speaker 2: quantitative and qualitative and everything and everything else. 799 00:44:15,524 --> 00:44:18,084 Speaker 1: But there's also evidence against it that we've talked about. 800 00:44:18,124 --> 00:44:20,204 Speaker 1: I don't think we need to rehash it once again. 801 00:44:20,204 --> 00:44:22,124 Speaker 1: But it sounds like you're coming out more on the 802 00:44:22,204 --> 00:44:24,684 Speaker 1: side of crisis. I'm coming out less on the side 803 00:44:24,684 --> 00:44:27,764 Speaker 1: of crisis. And I don't just don't like the crisis language. 804 00:44:27,804 --> 00:44:30,964 Speaker 1: I think that is I think that's way too alarmist, 805 00:44:31,164 --> 00:44:34,004 Speaker 1: and that is not how we should be approaching this. 806 00:44:34,164 --> 00:44:37,164 Speaker 1: I'm much more in the camp of stoicism, you know, 807 00:44:37,204 --> 00:44:41,244 Speaker 1: that's one of the underlying philosophies of my writing. So 808 00:44:41,804 --> 00:44:44,244 Speaker 1: I'm all for that. This has been fun, though, and 809 00:44:44,284 --> 00:44:47,124 Speaker 1: I think that it is interesting to look through these data. 810 00:44:47,404 --> 00:44:50,484 Speaker 1: It's a really tough topic one that I'm sure some 811 00:44:50,564 --> 00:44:52,884 Speaker 1: of these things will will be revisiting. But it also 812 00:44:53,004 --> 00:44:55,404 Speaker 1: it goes to show that, you know, assessing these sources 813 00:44:55,404 --> 00:44:59,884 Speaker 1: of risks, it's tough, right, and it's a really difficult 814 00:44:59,964 --> 00:45:03,444 Speaker 1: job for economists try to parse the numbers, and there's 815 00:45:03,444 --> 00:45:06,284 Speaker 1: so much going on that it's just not going to 816 00:45:06,324 --> 00:45:08,604 Speaker 1: be a clear story ever, which is why people can 817 00:45:09,484 --> 00:45:12,764 Speaker 1: right authoritative op eds on opposite sides of this insight 818 00:45:12,884 --> 00:45:17,084 Speaker 1: data that seems to support their point of view. So yeah, 819 00:45:17,084 --> 00:45:20,004 Speaker 1: this has been a fun show, Nate. I you know, 820 00:45:20,244 --> 00:45:22,964 Speaker 1: one of the other things about northern Europe where you 821 00:45:23,044 --> 00:45:25,724 Speaker 1: came from, is that there also is a lot more 822 00:45:25,724 --> 00:45:28,684 Speaker 1: gender equality there than there is in other parts of 823 00:45:28,724 --> 00:45:31,364 Speaker 1: the world. So curious if that has something to do 824 00:45:31,404 --> 00:45:33,444 Speaker 1: with the happiness levels as well. But maybe we can. 825 00:45:34,084 --> 00:45:36,284 Speaker 1: Maybe we can leave that for another show. 826 00:45:37,204 --> 00:45:38,724 Speaker 2: Look, I think if you look at the happiest countries 827 00:45:38,724 --> 00:45:41,164 Speaker 2: in the world, they're also smaller countries, right, I think 828 00:45:41,204 --> 00:45:42,004 Speaker 2: that absolutely. 829 00:45:42,044 --> 00:45:45,364 Speaker 1: Yeah, so many confounding factors. Yeah, lots and lots of 830 00:45:45,404 --> 00:45:48,924 Speaker 1: confounding factors there. And on that note, Nate, I hope 831 00:45:48,924 --> 00:45:51,444 Speaker 1: you have a lovely week, and let me invite you 832 00:45:52,124 --> 00:45:55,444 Speaker 1: to dinner so that we can talk, because I'm female 833 00:45:55,564 --> 00:45:57,364 Speaker 1: and you know I like to I like to bond 834 00:45:57,404 --> 00:46:00,204 Speaker 1: over talking and good food. So let's get a dinner 835 00:46:00,204 --> 00:46:01,084 Speaker 1: from the calendar. 836 00:46:01,284 --> 00:46:03,404 Speaker 2: You know, maybe go to a Yankees game, Maria, you 837 00:46:03,404 --> 00:46:04,204 Speaker 2: can get dinner there. 838 00:46:04,324 --> 00:46:07,204 Speaker 1: Okay, all right, I will. I will go to a 839 00:46:07,284 --> 00:46:16,924 Speaker 1: Yankees game, Nate, because I am a good friend. Let 840 00:46:17,044 --> 00:46:18,964 Speaker 1: us know what you think of the show. Reach out 841 00:46:19,004 --> 00:46:23,124 Speaker 1: to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot fm. And 842 00:46:23,244 --> 00:46:25,364 Speaker 1: by the way, if you're a Pushkin Plus subscriber, we 843 00:46:25,404 --> 00:46:28,124 Speaker 1: have some bonus content for you that's coming up right 844 00:46:28,164 --> 00:46:29,124 Speaker 1: after the credits. 845 00:46:29,324 --> 00:46:32,564 Speaker 2: And if you're not subscribing yet, consider signing up for 846 00:46:32,764 --> 00:46:34,924 Speaker 2: just six ninety nine a month. What a nice price. 847 00:46:35,284 --> 00:46:37,924 Speaker 2: You get access to all that premium content and ad 848 00:46:38,084 --> 00:46:40,884 Speaker 2: for listening across Pushkin's entire network of shows. 849 00:46:41,564 --> 00:46:44,644 Speaker 1: Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanikova. 850 00:46:44,324 --> 00:46:46,684 Speaker 2: And by me Nate Silver. The show is a co 851 00:46:46,764 --> 00:46:50,644 Speaker 2: production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced 852 00:46:50,644 --> 00:46:54,404 Speaker 2: by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer is Sonia Gerwit. Sally 853 00:46:54,444 --> 00:46:57,484 Speaker 2: Helm is our editor, and our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. 854 00:46:57,964 --> 00:46:59,164 Speaker 2: Mixing by Sarah Bruger. 855 00:46:59,564 --> 00:47:00,764 Speaker 1: Thanks so much for tuning in.