WEBVTT - The Great Transhumanist Rapture War: Part 2

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuffworks

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your mind.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick and

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Robert and I. Last time, we're talking about the rapture

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about Christian eschatology, religious eschatology in general, and secular eschatology

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of a technological nature such as the singularity trans humanism.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>And our discussion went so long that we decided to

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>divide it up into two parts. So here is the

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>second part of our conversation on the end times. Okay, well,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I've got another uh futurist, sort of techno futurist mindset

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>that I think we can ask. Is this a religion?

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it like a religion or does it just sort

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of like uh tickle some of the same weak spots

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got as many religions too. So I want to

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the singularity. Robert, do you feel good about

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the Singularity? You feel bad about it? You think it's

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of whoy? I feel good about it? U.

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean part of that I think comes from just

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>being I'm a fan of like the E and M

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Banks culture series model of of a post singularity post

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>scarcity world in which the super intelligent computers have our

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>best interests at heart. They kind of look after us

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 1>as kind of benevolent, semi noble gods. Yeah, okay, okay, Well,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think we need to explore this idea because this,

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to me is is the core of this kind of

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>topic we're talking about today, like technological eschatology. So you

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>could say that the singularity, I think has come to

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have almost as many interpretations as the Christian escuoton, right, Like,

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>just like the Christian eschatology is, they're all sort of

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>loosely related and grounded in similar beliefs, but they vary

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the explicit details or in the way you'd explain them,

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not necessarily contradictory. So, in the most basics,

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and the singularity is a hypothesis that technological innovation, at

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>some point in the future is going to reach a

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>tipping point of unimaginable innovation that fundamentally changes the fate

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of humanity on a rapid time scale. Very often it

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>involves artificial intelligence. So I'm gonna talk about three basic

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>models just to give you an idea. One one is

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the super intelligence model, and this is the idea that

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>humans are going to create superhuman artificial intelligence. So when

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, intelligence, I would probably agree has

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>been the most rapid driver of change in the universe

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>up until this point. Like in cosmological or geological history.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>What difference does ten thousand years usually make to anything?

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, not a lot, hardly any, But you think

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>about how much Earth has changed in the past ten

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand years due to intelligence. Once, once we reach the

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>creation of machines with functional intelligence exceeding that of any human,

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>assuming that actually does happen, proponents argue that this superhuman

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence is just going to rapidly transform our environment.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>The conditions of our lives, and the capabilities of human

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>civilization will be fundamentally transformed on a very huge scale.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And they say, so the age of super intelligence is dawning,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is the singularity. Another way of looking at

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it is also based on artificial intelligence, but it's known

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>as the intelligence explosion, and this is based on the

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of self improving intelligence paradigms that surpass our ability

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to understand or control them. So let's say, Robert, you

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>build a superhuman artificial intelligence. What's the first thing you

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have it do um, co author my paper about the

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>creation superhero human AI intelligence. Oh yeah, well that's that's

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a smart move. But do some talk shows to promote

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it and my book about the creation? Yeah? I guess yeah,

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to think past that. Come up with the

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>tastiest breakfast cereal ever created. No. I mean what a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say is, well, you know, the best

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>bang for your buck as soon as you create a

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>superhuman artificial intelligence is that it would be best put

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to use designing ways to rapidly make itself more intelligent,

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>which theoretically it should be able to do. So. If

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it can do this, it will experience exponential self improvement

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and not only will our technological intelligence grow, and not

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>only will it accelerate, but it's acceleration will accelerate. I

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>feel like the people saying that that's the best use

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of super intelligence UM have not seen any science fiction film,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>because it seems like the thing to do is all right.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's reached the point to where it's smart enough

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that I can take it to Vegas and and just

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>totally kill But it's not so smart that it will

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>literally kill me or or Sky at the entire country. Well,

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, I think the argument would

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>go that, well, even if you don't do that, somebody's

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna somebody's gonna say, well, I want to have a

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>smarter AI than your AI, so I'm gonna have my

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>AI improve itself that I don't know. You take your

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>AI to a poker game, and somebody else has been

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>having their AI self improve its own intelligence, and it's

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>telling that person out this metaphors out of hand. But

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but you want to be the person with the smartest day.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I right, Well, but it's kind of like you're you're

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>reaching a point where you can create your own demons,

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>create your own deities, and in doing so, it seems

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like you you need to know where to stop, like like,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe not make a full blown god, that make a

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>demi god, and let me make an artificial demigod, because

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>then then at least it has limits. Right, Yeah, you

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>want a Hercules not a Zeus. Yeah, I far rather

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with a her renegade or Hercules this in a

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>situation as opposed to a renegades Zeus, which of course

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, that's pretty much how both of those

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>guys rolled what they wanted Okay. One more idea of

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the singularity, and this is a I think a simpler version,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but it just is that at some point technological process

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>again usually the emphasis is on artificial intelligence, but you

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>could put the emphasis elsewhere. At some point it begins

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate so quickly that our power to predict the

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>outcome becomes basically zero. Events will become so strange and

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>unpredictable that we we just can't even imagine them from

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>our present vantage point. So an outside context indent, yeah, sure,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>outside context problem caused by technological innovation. Yeah. So a

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of modern singularity thinking can be traced, and there

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are plenty people who have written about this over the years,

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'd say the biggest figure in the singularity today

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>is Ray Kerswile. He's the technologist and author. Rakers while

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>very smart guy, worked on technology for years. He's made

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very accurate and interesting predictions that have

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that have proved correct over the years. But he's also

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of predictions about the future that a

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of people now think are I don't know, maybe

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>he's being overly optimistic, but anyway, Kerswill has argued in

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>several books that the Singularity, This artificial intelligence revolution that's

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>going to fundamentally change humanity is coming, and it's coming soon.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>In his two thousand five books, the Singularity is near,

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Cursewell predicted it would happen in so, Robert, you've got

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>any plans for um? I think my son will be

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>out of high school at that point. I think he's

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>he's uh graduating high school theoretically in so Okay, So

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I'm so. I don't know. Well, we have

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a job by the time the Singularity happened. I don't know. Yeah,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's crazy to think about that, Like what do

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you what do you? What do you do post high

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>school if the Singularity is coming in just a few years,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Like do you go to college? Hey? With with the

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>singularity in mind bingo, that is a very good question.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So so let's back up. Let's just assume for a

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>moment a Singularity type scaton is coming. That might be

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a big assumption, but let's assume something like that will happen.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it good or bad? Will we get the AI

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>my Trea or the AI Ragnarok? Who well, obviously I

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>want my Traya as opposed to Ragnarock. Yeah, I mean,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so the my Trea version, what would it be? You know,

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>war cease, all diseases, including aging itself or eradicated. There's

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>general abundance of resources and wealth. Everybody gets what they want.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Humans live indefinitely in a state of harmony, exploration, and bliss.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>If I feel like the model we get in most

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sci fi scenarios is that you think you're gonna get

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.479
<v Speaker 1>my Treia, but then you're actually on the road to Ragnarok,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you end up just kind of burning everything

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>down and going back to whatever nest up system you

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>had before. Right, So why do people think that we're

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road to Ragnarok? Well, you mentioned earlier, you know,

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the machine, a machine smart enough to to do all

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this great stuff for you, is also smart enough to

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to kill you if it wants to.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So why might it want to? Well, super intelligent machines,

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, either intentionally choose to eliminate humanity for

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>some reason, though I admit I've never heard this explain

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in a way that made a lot of sense to me,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Like why they would intentionally choose to hunt us down

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and eradicate us. So maybe somebody could explain that to me, Um,

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but the judge of the living and the dead, it

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>could be. But but the other version is that perhaps

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>merely by a flow of design, they tend to damage

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>or destroy humanity as a byproduct of executing their primary function,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and that that vision seems more plausible to me. But so,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>here's one common example of how something like this would go.

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got a super intelligent computer program that's smarter than

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>any human. It can improve its own intelligence, is just

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>crazy smart, and it's designed to maximize efficiency along the

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>production line of a factory that makes toilet paper. So

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody forgets to add some conditionals, and the computer program

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ends up turning all the atoms on the surface of

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the earth, including the ones in your body, into toilet paper.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It has done its job. Well, that sounds kind of crazy,

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but some tam or version of that nightmare seems more

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>plausible to me than the intentional terminator style eradication of humans.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do you think about that, Robert Um? Yeah,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I tend to interpret the sort of sky

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Net models the sort of like all humans are flawed.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>That's thus all humans must be eradicated. Thing to be

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a uh more more rejecting insecurities. Well that

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and also just a bedtime story to say, like make

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>sure you program and that failsafe, you know. And I

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like, obviously we would have that failsafe, and if

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>it were a super intelligent machine, it would have. Yeah.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I just have a hard time buying into that model

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of a super advanced system that it would be so

0:10:55.080 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>catastrophically myopic. Yeah. I mean, both visions have their advocates

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>right there. There are smart people on both sides. But

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing is all this is assuming that something

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>like the Singularity will actually happen one way or another,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and not everyone agrees that it will. But there are

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>also people who have been critical of the idea of

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the singularity, and some people who have characterized it as

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a religious idea inherently. One of them is the technologist

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and virtual reality pioneer Jerone Lanier, and he's got a

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of opinions about the Singularity. He's made this case

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in in in books, said that it's not only religious

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in nature, but potentially a dangerous or harmful religion. So

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I read an article that he wrote and published in

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times in two thousand ten called the

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>first Church of robotics, and I thought this was interesting.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So Laniard points out that every news report of an

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>advance in artificial intelligence gives us the impression that the

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>field is making steady progress to overtake human intelligence in

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>cape of alities, and I sort of agree with him.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I get that feeling when you see these little news

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>stories like there's there's a new artificial intelligence program that

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>can smell flatulence, There's a new artificial intelligence program that

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>can tell a joke. You know, all these like weird

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 1>little quirks of humanity, and they seem to add up

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to something over time. Okay, so it can smell farts,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that can make jokes about farts, because it's it's about

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the corner with the standard it has become Adam Sandler, Yeah,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it has surpassed its humanity. But yeah, so there's nothing

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong with individual AI projects, Landier says, In fact, he

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>has worked on them himself. But he makes a couple

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of points. He says individual advances in artificial intelligence research

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can be interpreted more usefully without the overall framework of AI,

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>meaning without the idea that computers are becoming synthetic versions

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of human intelligence. And the example he gives his you know,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the IBM computer winning on Jeopardy, Watson going on, are

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>beating people on Jeopardy. So he he says, that's a

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>theatrical stunt that over sells a fake aspect of what

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 1>this computer program can do, you know, conversational human knowledge,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which it doesn't really have, and undersells a real aspect

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of its capabilities that it's a very powerful phrase based

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>search engine. And then he also says that AI, uh,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that the AI that in some way passes for human

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>requires humans to do all the work. Like when you've

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>got a social robot, you know, going around saying like Hi,

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm your friendly social robot. Look at how advanced my

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence is. His point is that humans, being social,

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>will work with what they get. And if you're having

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.599
<v Speaker 1>a transaction with a robot that you are told is

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>social and nature, you can very easily adapt your social

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>behaviors to the extreme limitations of this machine, and they

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>do tend to be pretty extreme. You're not gonna mistake

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>at a machine for a human. Yeah, I mean, as

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed on a show before, or I mean humans

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>can have we can have conversations with with a with

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a doll with a with a smiley face. It's scrawled

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on the wall and in putting. So, uh, it's not

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that much of a step to say that, yes, we

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>can have a conversation with a chat bot. We can,

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we can have a conversation with the search engine, and

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of course we can certainly have a conversation with an

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>echo borg. How often, though, do you meet a person

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>who really loves fruit trees? That's true, I love fruit trees.

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I hate fruit trees. But how can you hate fruit

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>trees because I'm not a robotlet what would you do

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if you found a turtle? The turtles on his back?

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Why aren't you turning him over? Joe? But what what?

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>What I'll tell you about my mother? Okay? Sorry? So

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but anyway, A layer goes on to say, quote, what

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bothers me about this trend? And he's talking about this

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>AI media trend. However, is that by allowing artificial intelligence

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to reshape our concept of personhood, we're leaving ourselves opened

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to the flip side. We think of people more and

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more as computers, just as we think of computers as people.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think there might be something to that, actually,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of AI not only sort of lifts

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>computers up, but in a certain way, at least emotionally

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of lowers humans down. Yeah. And we we've discussed this,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel recently on the show too, about how just

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>even though we we have this increasingly pervasive model of

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>our own cognitive performance as being essentially a program, we

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>think about processing things, we think about visual input of data,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we think about crunching the numbers, uh, and various other

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>models we use technology to inform our understanding of how

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>our brains are working. And those are just those are

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>just metaphors really, and but the underlying processes are not

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>really comparable to the computers that we have today. It

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>would be we could maybe compare them to an advanced

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>computer will have in the in the future, some sort

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of maybe um, you know, um advanced machine maybe. Yeah. Yeah,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. Uh, They're they're very much metaphors.

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that they're not useful metaphors, but

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think I want to take what Lanni you

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are saying seriously here, because I think he has a point. Anyway,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>he goes on when he's going to get to the singularity,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so he says, you know, engineers are humans with human desires,

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>even though they may be advocating this sort of like

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>dehumanized technological ideology or view of intelligence in personhood in

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. And they've got the same desires that lead

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>us to create and follow religions. So this sort of

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>leads them to wrap their technological ideologies up into parallels

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of religious thinking. And he and according to Lannier, he

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks the concept of the singularity is a religion expressed

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>through engineering culture. And he points out if this religion entails,

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially scatological beliefs that imply that most people, basically,

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say, anybody not working in information theory, artificial intelligence,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or robotics, if pretty much anybody outside those fields can

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>basically just sit and wait for imminent salvation or destruction

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>via the machines. And if inadvertent devaluation of persons by

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>overstating analogies between persons and computers takes place, it can

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>certainly exacerbate tensions between traditional religions and modernity, and it

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>can be a destructive and demoralizing force in itself. So anyway,

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.479
<v Speaker 1>he ends by saying technology best serves humanity when we

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>resist the urge to turn it into a religious ideology. Yeah,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise you end up in a situation where you're like,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I could, I could exercise and eat right, but singularities

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>come in. Singularities gonna work that out, or you might think,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even gonna bother to write the Great American novel,

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because Great American Novel bought thirty seven oh five. It's

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>going to write the Great American novel. It's gonna write

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>one a day, one every hour. I could work hard

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to achieve peace in world civilization, but maybe the Ai'll

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>sort it all out for this or just kill us all.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, either one. It's sort of a demoralizing, de

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>motivating belief, which of course has obvious parallels with you know,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>more apocalyptic near future religious movements that said the end

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 1>time is coming, So what does it matter? Give me

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your money now? Certainly? Yeah, what whether it's a secular

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>or you know, supernatural or not supernatural in nature, If

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got beliefs about a powerful force that comes in

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and intervenes and makes all of our actions obsolete, either

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>either way it comes from that seems like it can

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have a de motivating force on the way you live.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Your life. But I want to say one more thing

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Linear says about the Singularity that I think is interesting.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, I listened to a podcast that was an

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>interview with Linear and and he says, quote, the difference

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>between a religious fanatic and a religious non fanatic is

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in certainty of the imminent timing of whatever their escaton is,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever their end of days is. It's when

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you believe that you know when it's happening and it's

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>soon that you really turn into a nutcase and you

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>do harm to yourself and others. In my mind, the

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Singularity movement is sort of doing that. And I think

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I see what he's saying there, because he sort of

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>qualifies saying that if you mean, in the very long

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 1>term view, humanity will make some phase transition, and it

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>has something to do with information technology that's not necessarily

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy or harmful. You know, you might say, who knows,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>over the next few thousands of years, some somehow humanity

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>might change itself, uh, due to computers and the Internet

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. But the notion that it's going

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>to happen in twenty years or something is destructive and

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a sign of fanaticism. According to him, and I think

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that that idea makes sense to me too. Well, in

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>large part, you could say, you're you're setting yourself up

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for disappointment, You're setting yourself up to fail right, that

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>you're going to reach that point when the second Coming

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen, when the Singularity is going to happen,

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and then it doesn't happen, and then how do you

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>feel about the world. Then how do you approach the

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>near and long term future? Well, I think that is

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely something we should talk about in just a moment,

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>But I want to finish up on the Singularity with

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one or two more things. First of all, I want

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to go back and defend against that by saying, there

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are also people who say, you know, look, if we're

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>worried about the Ai Ragnarok uh saying the Ai is

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna come in and destroy us, all we do need

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking about it now, even if it's not

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen soon. Just the possibility that it might happen

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>soon means that we need to be preparing immediately. I

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>can see the wisdom in that too. I mean, I

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's uh. At the risk of sounding fascil,

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I I see both sides, Yeah, well, I mean, certainly,

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>h if the iceberg is out there, we want to

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>know how not to run the ship into it. But

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>then again, but what if iceberg is a superhuman robot

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that you don't even know whether it could possibly exist

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>or not. Well, that's the kind of thinking that enables

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>humanity time and time again to not actually, you know,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with the problems they're facing them, to just say, ah,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it might not even be real. So I don't know,

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the jury is still out on the science there. So

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to offer one more thing, the impossible defense

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of singularity thinking. I found a short video on YouTube

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>where somebody in a crowd asks Ray Kurzweil himself, the

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>guy who said it's going to happen if the Singularity

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is a religion and curs while responds that. He says, essentially,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it does provide some of the same things that religion

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>traditionally provided, like a means to forestall death. That's worth

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>pointing out. But it's also not a religion inherently because

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it's based on scientific and technological prediction. And he said,

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>quote it doesn't start from rapture. He also says, quote

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>religion and or just in pre scientific times. To call

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it a religion is to say that it's pre scientific

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>or unscientific. And I think, you know, maybe or maybe not,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I definitely do sense that some people who call

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the singularity of religion, because Landing is not the only

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>one who said this, this is a thing people say

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in criticism of it. I think some people are merely

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>being pejorative. You've noticed that if you ever heard anybody

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>call something that's not a religion a religion, it's an insult.

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And that interesting, like, uh, that political candidate you agree

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>with Greg Stillson Man, you all you Greg Stilson supporters

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are like a religion that's never a positive thing. Yeah. Yeah,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I find myself doing that less and less

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like I can have it's just me personally.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think there are plenty of things that I

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>can say, Oh, I have kind of a religious interest

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>in this. Yeah, not to say that I am, you

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>know that it's some sort of like fanatical, like unrealistic

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>level of enthusiasm for it, but like I I kind

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of measure it like to the amount of my person

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of my identity, uh that I pour into

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the topics. So I would say that I have religious

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>or semi religious enthusiasm for things like science, for certain uh,

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>for certain fictional worlds and ideas, um Robert. If I

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>may compliment you, I think that's a sign of broad

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>minded thinking. I mean, no, I think both religious and

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>non religious people. I don't think this is really limited

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to people who think religion is in some way a

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. But I think generally both religious and non

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>religious people insult a thing that's not explicitly a religion

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>by calling it a religion. Yeah, I would agree with that, yes,

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, in your sense, it doesn't have to be.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in some ways we could just observe, like, okay,

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>not assuming that calling something a religion is a bad thing. Uh.

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>In what ways is the Singularity like a religio gen Well,

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it does have a lot of similarities. It

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>does seem to offer a means to forestall death. It

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>does seem to offer uh, potentially both apocalyptic and utopian

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>schatological visions. It does seem to rely I don't know

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if I would say it relies on faith in the

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>same way that many supernatural beliefs to do. But it

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>does seem to sort of ask you to to imagine

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that things that we've never seen before are

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. You know, we've never seen superhuman artificial

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence before. There's no evidence that that can in principle exist.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We but we also just don't know that it couldn't.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's just like maybe maybe not all right, So

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a good place to bring it back

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>around to trans humanism and rapture the idea that there

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are all these similarities between the two things, there are

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>certain conflicts between these two ideas, and then at the

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>very end here we may have just a little fun

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how the two crash into each other. Okay,

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me, because here's one thing I've noticed, I think,

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't seen any data to back this episode.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>This is just purely anecdotal experience. In my experience, people

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>who identify with trans humanism or belief in the singularity

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are overwhelmingly atheist or agnostic, non traditionally religious people. Yes,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you do see a great deal of that. However, it

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is worth pointing out that again they have at least

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two organizations. You have the Mormon trans Humanist Association. That's

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest advocacy network. Really, yeah, for the ethical

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>use of technology and religion to expand human abilities. That's

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they're they're from there, they're talking points. Then you also

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>have the Christian trans Humanist Association, and um, you know,

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>each one has their own sort of set of guidelines

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and all. Um. Uh and I could I could certainly

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>roll through a lot of this. But for instance, um

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Mormon trans Humanis Association has this idea that

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they push of a transfigurism. They said transfigure they say,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>transfigurism is religious trans humanism exemplified by syncretization of Mormonism

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and trans humanism. That's awesome. Um. And in meanwhile, the

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Christian trans Humanist Association, one of their tenants is that

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>God's mission involves the transformation and renewal of creation, including humanity,

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and that we are called by Christ to participate in

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that mission, working against illness, hunger, oppression, in justice, and death. Uh. Well, yeah,

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could look at it that way. For

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some reason, the idea of transforming the human animal, it's

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that I I don't see in

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>any way that it violates any tenants I recognize of Christianity,

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but it seems just sort of like esthetically in affront

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to traditional religious thinking. It's a lot of what we

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about in our you know, UH Techno Religion episodes

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that we did earlier. And you could say that this

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>episode is in many ways a sequel to those, or

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's in that spirit. But in the Techno Religion episodes,

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked about how religious thinking seems most encouraged by

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a traditional technological atmosphere, and when you bring computers and

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>iPhones and stuff, it just does seem profane in some way.

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's nothing in the Bible or in any religious

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>text I know of that says thou shalt not bring

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a computer into a worship service. But you know, it

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't feel very sacred. Yeah, it doesn't feel right. Now.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Going back to the the idea of sort of Christian

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>transhumanist ideas that James J. Hughes paper that I mentioned earlier, Um,

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he calls uh up a quote from a fourteen eighties

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>six UH work by Pico Della Mirandola. It was a

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Christian humanist and in his orritation on the dignity of

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>man wrote quote to you has granted the power of

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>degrading yourself into the lower forms of life. The beasts

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>or to you as granted the power contained in your

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>intellect and judgment to be reborn into the higher forms

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the divine um, and and and he wrote other other

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>statements as well that kind of backed up this kind of,

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, way pre humanist notion of how one might

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>improve the expression of human life. Well. Yeah, I mean, if,

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, Jesus said take all you have and give

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to the poor, then wouldn't the Christian who thinks that

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we can achieve abundance through technology be best served by

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>working on technology that will eliminate all scarcity and bring

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>great resources to everyone. Yeah, it seems like you would

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be in favor of any trans humanist idea that does

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not attempt to interfere with God's plan for humanity. Um, so,

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on what you think that plan is.

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this is where we get into an interesting idea.

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of where uh okay, So, first

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of all, you see a lot of especially the conspiracy theory,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the Christian conspiracy theoryst area of the internet.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of mashing up of trans humanist

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ideas with with the bad guys in in a book

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of revelations. Oh yeah, remember how I mentioned the ones

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who get to rule with Christ in the millennium are

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>those who have not taken the mark of the Beast

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and many and what is the mark of the beast?

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen various interpretations where they say, oh, the mark

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of the beast is trans humanism, Like to become transhuman

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is to take the mark of the beast, and therefore

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>only sort of uh, you know, non augmented humans are

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be part of this model. There have been

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>many visions of the mark of the Beast in Christian

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>literature that thought that it was going to be some

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of biometric verification. So imagine that you replace your

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>credit card with a barcode or a chip in your

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>arm or your head or your hand or something like

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that that you can use to pay for groceries or

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>something like that just by scanning your body. A lot

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of people have said, well, something like this is coming

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's got to be it. That's the mark of

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the beast. And in the Antichrist is perhaps the AI. Right,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this this post singularity artificial intelligence that that we're investing

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.239
<v Speaker 1>all of our our faith and energy into. And I

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>put it, this is an interesting idea too. I have

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seen arguments to say that the Illuminati or the anti

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Christ or the Illuminati and the inn of Christ. However,

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you want to factor those two bad guy factions together,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they are going to create a fake rapture in order

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to trick the faithful into thinking that the rapture has

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>already occurred and they were left out, thus like dismantling

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>their faith a bit. That is an awesome conspiracy theory.

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It is um and that's like the mother of them all. Yeah.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I found some some stuff online about it, dating back

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.719
<v Speaker 1>from around two thousand UM, and they were weirdly propping

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>up some of this by pointing to a Technology Review

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you article about the about editing live video, editing people

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>out of live video. Uh. The idea being here that

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>through mass media consumption, you could fake the rapture of

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>individuals and and if I may, I'm thinking if the

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Illuminati is involved in this, you could then disappear like

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>famous a moral individuals and say, hey, check out this,

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this particular awful celebrity just got raptured. You didn't clearly

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you should abandon all of your faith. That is uh,

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that is mighty sinister Robert or is it though, because Okay,

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>so if and I'm playing with the ideas here and

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>having some fun with the ideas, but if the Antichrist

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is an artificial intelligence, could it be a benevolent artificial

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that has realized, Hey, if the off if the

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>end times come, that's bad for all these humans that

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm protecting. What can I, as an all powerful AI

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>do in humans? Is soxiety to prevent the end times

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>from coming? Does that mean faking the rapture and perhaps

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>forestalling the rapture? Well, I know many Christians believe that

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Antichrist will come in the name of peace, and

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that is weird. You would end up in a scenario

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>where you would say, no, peace is bad because we

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 1>actually need all that tribulation to come so that the

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>good guys can ultimately win, even though it's going to

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of a lot of suffering. Okay, we've

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten very, very deep into the both secular and religious

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>theology of the end here, so maybe we should pull back.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready to pull back back? Let's pull back

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to the real world and and look at a few

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>examples of what happens when our our scatons, when our

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>spiritual end times utopias or apocalypse is don't come about

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as predicted. So there have been so many religious predictions

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the end times that have failed. There is no

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>way we can even begin to list them. I would

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>recommend you go to Wikipedia. Here's a great Wikipedia page,

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>uh called list of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. There

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>are just hundreds, uh and it's it's really interesting. One

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites is the leader of the or one

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of the leaders of the Monster rebellion, the Anabaptist rebellion

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in Prussia, Jon Matthias. He had a good in times

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>prediction that didn't turn out good for him, and I

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think he ended up mutilated. And yeah, anyway, things things

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>don't tend to well, actually not tend to Why am

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I hedging? No one who has ever predicted the end

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world has turned out to be correct that

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that is a true statement. Inevitably these predictions fail. And

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>then what happens when they fail, Because if you're the

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of individual who's thrown out these these predictions, you

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>tend to have there tend to be people listening to you,

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>reading your word, gathering around you, maybe giving you all

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of their money. On living in a barn with you

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or in a bunker, or planning for spaceships to come

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and steal you away so you can avoid massive floods. Um.

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And then how do you readjust well, there's a there

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>was a famous book came out from psychologist Leon Festinger

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>titled Win Prophecy Fails, and this is this was an

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>important work. He and his colleagues studied the Seekers, a

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>religious group that believed a massive flood would wipe out

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the West coast uh and and the founders said that

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 1>beings from the planet Clarion were communicating to her through

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>automatic writing. Uh And then the followers were banning their jobs, possessions,

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>their spouses to wait on the flying saucers that would

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>rescue them. And then nothing happened. So so they all

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>they all figured they were wrong and went home right, No, no, no,

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.359
<v Speaker 1>And and this is something we can sort of see.

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess we can look for models of this in

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>our own lives on lesser with with lesser um lesser steaks.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>One example that in only comes to mind, and we

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of this in sort of geek culture,

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and that is what happens from that movie that you're

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>super excited about. It doesn't get that great of reviews,

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>how do you respond. Do you say, uh, well, maybe

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be that good, or you see

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it and you think, okay, well I agree with the

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 1>critics and it wasn't that good. Or do you do

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.959
<v Speaker 1>do you double down? Oh? Many will double down, yes,

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on I think a lot of times it's based

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on how much you've invested in the movie going into it.

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a movie you hoped would be good,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>but you thought about it a couple of times before

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it came out, and then you see the reviews aren't good,

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that's oh, that's disappointing. If it's a movie you've been

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about with your friends every single day up until

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>it comes out, and then the reviews aren't good, you're like,

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>well they gotta be wrong. Now it's it's sunk cost. Now, obviously,

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with films, you can simply argue, well, hey, I enjoyed it,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>so I don't care. Uh, certainly, I'm I'm the type

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of person who enjoys many bad movies, and I you know,

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna apologize. Is about say liking Chronicles a

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 1>ritic it's a it's a bad movie. I'm not gonna

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>argue it's good, but but it certainly was enjoyable. Robert,

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I have a question for you. You seem like maybe

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the right guy for this. Were you one of the

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>few people who liked on Lee's Hulk. Yeah, well, I

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it at the time. I didn't like love it,

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>but I was like that that's the Hulk. He's holking

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it up there. Yeah. I like the follow up more,

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think. I don't think people were in

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>love with that one. Like that one, even though it

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was an early Marvel Cinematic Universe movie with the one

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>with Edward Norton. Yeah, yeah, I feel like I enjoyed

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that seemed kind of forgettable. Yeah, that one the the

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the those who are a member of the religion of

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the Marvel Cinematic Universe, they do not bring that particular

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>book of the Marvel Cinematic Bible up that much. It

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is the it is the problematic chapter in the scripture.

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like second Chronicles. People just don't quote from it

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. But it I've getting a little off

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>off subject here. Essentially, Festing festing Or entered into this

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>with the mindset that people would need to resolve cognitive dissonance.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>They can't just argue, hey, I know that this, I

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>know that my beliefs are crappy, but I enjoy them. No,

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>your beliefs were based along the lines that a flood

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>would come and you'd be on a UFO right now,

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and you are not. So how do you deal with that?

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He said that they doubled down on their beliefs and

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>recruitment efforts, but in reality some leave, but the vast

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 1>majority um experience little cognitive dissonance, and so they make

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>only minor adjustments to their beliefs. So it ends up

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>having like it doesn't have that great an effect. Like

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the failures come and you can always this is the

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>key part. You can always attribute that failed prophecy to

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>human slip ups. Right. Well, I mean, so let's say

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you predicted that the Singularity is going to come in

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a certain year and you get there and nothing happens. Well,

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean you could always say, well, hold on, now,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't challenge in any way the principle that the

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Singularity is coming and it's coming soon. It's just I

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>can explain this. We had a we had a big

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 1>recession in the economy several years back, and that cut

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>way down on funding for universities and corporations that are

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>studying machine learning and artificial intelligence, and so progress just

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>got slowed by some external events that aren't you know,

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>my predictions basically sound. We just had a few slip

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>ups that happened. We didn't realize Pokemon Go would be

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>such a success and distract everybody and and decrease productivity. Right, so,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, you can. You can make those arguments about

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>about singularity. You can make those those arguments about any

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of social utopian idea. You can make excuses for anything. Yeah,

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean the the typical problem with utopian cults is

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's almost always the same the the utopian leader says

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the way we're gonna make life better for

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>for you and all the followers, and then there's some

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of sex scandal, there's some sort of power disruption,

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>something goes wrong, and you can always say, well, no,

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they just were the wrong vessel for the message. Well,

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this also works for non technological but secular utopias. Imagine

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the way people think about the implementation of h communist utopia.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, so you create a Marxist government, uh, and

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about you know, socialist democracy or whatever.

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's so, you know, the real utopian vision, like

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna create a perfect workers paradise um and and

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it kind of fails or I mean, I guess it's

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>always arguable, but I think it's pretty hard to say,

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the Soviet Union or something and say that

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>worked great. But you can always argue, well, they did,

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't do it right. This's not it's not

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the principle. They're just they weren't real

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>communists or something. Yeah, they were the they were the

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the fake Christ as opposed to the actual cast. They

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>were antichristis yeah, there's nothing wrong with my the principle

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>behind my my end times prediction. I just I made

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I made errors. The math is wrong. I I translated

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the Golden tablets and correct really, etcetera. So that seems

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the basic time timeline, the basic outcome for

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>any kind of failed prophecy, be it you know, the

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>value of a particular superhero movie or the outcome of

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a of an apocalyptic prophecy. Robert, I want to ask

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you about one weird specific example. So we've mentioned the

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of singularity that of course hasn't been disproven yet,

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we we can imagine how it could

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>be adjusted if it were disproven. We've talked about Marxist

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed utopias, but I wonder if you could look at

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Internet as a failed secular utopia, because if you

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>go back to the early day, you know, dot com

0:40:41.840 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>bubble type days where people are talking about what's possible

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>with the Internet, there is a lot of hyperbolic positive

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>language where people are talking in incredibly grandiose terms about

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the Internet almost as a type of utopia is going

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to open all these doors and connect people all over

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the world for limitless sharing of ideas and potential, the

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>information super highway. We're you know, we're all gonna be

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>talking and sharing ideas and it's it's just gonna be great.

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, look at the your Facebook feed today.

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Could you argue that the Internet is a failed secular

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:22.799
<v Speaker 1>utopia if you if you look at its goals as

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>purely utopia and I think I think very much though,

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think the Internet. Certainly, the Internet has

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>has connected us more. It's allowed for a great deal

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>of sharing and uh and informational availability. But on the

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>other hand, it also allows you to simply, you know,

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>flock to people who share your own set of beliefs,

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>making it easier to find UH like minded individuals. Both

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>for both in the positive and in the negative sense

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you've been able it allows us to uh to put

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>on a mask UH and lose their identity and and

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lash out with the most horrible you know, in the

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>most horrible way and complete strangers. I mean, I don't

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>have to tell anybody this. You're all on the internet.

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>You know that. You know how it all plays out.

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.959
<v Speaker 1>It's more of just an expression and in various ways

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>apple amplification of who we are as opposed to a

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>refinement of who we are. And that always the way

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you can look at that as all utopias. Somehow, all

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>utopias end up being very human, Like We're still going

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to express as human no matter what sort of social

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 1>structure you try and strain us through, no matter what

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of technological change you strain us through, We're going

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>to come out as the same animal. And I think

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that's inherently why there is the appeal of these superhuman forces,

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>like either a supernatural religious force god or or you know,

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the gods of any religion coming into set things right

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.720
<v Speaker 1>via some kind of power that transcends what we're capable

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of naturally, or a superhuman artificial intelligence, powerful machines that

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>are smarter than we are and no better than us

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and can improve us in ways that we don't seem

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to be capable of our natural experimentation with social behavior. Yeah,

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So enter the AI, Enter Christ, enter the Bodhisatva of

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the future. Whatever it takes for something from the outside

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to step in and shake us into the right form.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, So there you have it, the rapture, the singularity, uh,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>trans humanism. We threw out a lot of ideas here

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>and moved them around on the board, had some fun

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>with them, hopefully, had some some thoughtful conversation about it.

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure a lot of you have some feedback

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, your own thoughts on these topics. And I

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>do want to ask everyone out there if there was

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a Christian rapture, what if there was

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a way to create a rapture proof suit. Oh wow,

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 1>superhuman technology versus superhuman uh, supernatural power. Yeah, I mean

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the the AI Antichrist that I was going on about earlier.

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps they might come up with some sort of shielding

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to try and prevent you know, souls from being uh

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 1>sucked up into the into the into the outer void.

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other hand, perhaps someone might want to,

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, even a faithful individual might say, actually I

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.720
<v Speaker 1>need to stay behind, I want to document, or maybe

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I I love the some people in my life too

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>much you are not believers, or I just want to,

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, make sure I get to work on time

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the next day. I better wear a rapture proof suit

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that will contain my myself and keep mine you know,

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:28.919
<v Speaker 1>almost like wearing a like weighted boots to keep from

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just rising above the ground. Robert, you never cease to

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>amaze me. Well, thank you, Joe, I can try, uh

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>so anyway, rapture proof suits. What do you think about that?

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You can find us at the stuff to Blow your

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. You can reach out to us on

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter a few other social media accounts as well.

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>You'll find links to those at stuff to Blow your

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com, and if you want to email us,

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>as always, you can write to us at blow the

0:44:50.800 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Mind at how stuff works dot com for more on

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 1>works dot com the f