WEBVTT - Is Flavor Really All In Your Brain?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Guess what will what's that mango? So I was watching

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this old BBC clip online of an electronic lollipop. What

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is that? So it's not actually a candy. The lollipop

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is still being developed in labs. But it's this gentle

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>clamp that slides metal plates over the top and bottomy tongue.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it helps to call this clamp gentle.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>That still doesn't sound that appealing. Well, here's what's cool

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>about it. So it sends currents through your tongue and

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>adjust the temperature on those plates, and the electronic lollipop

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>can actually trick your tongue into thinking it's tasting a

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>wide variety of flavors, like a lemony sour taste is

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the easiest to pull off, and scientists can do reasonable

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>approximations of other flavors. But the application of all this

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is really cool. Like imagine you're watching Iron Chef and

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Flay is on there and he's just made the

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>most amazing eggplant spaghetti taco in the world, and you

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out for the life of you what an

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>eggplant plus spaghetti and a taco shell should taste like,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And so you just take a lick of your lollipop

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you get a sense of that flavor.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's kind of weird, but it is pretty cool.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Reminds me a little bit of smell vision, except for

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>your taste bud exactly. And you can see how this

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>might be used in online grocery shopping in the future

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>or checking out new recipes. It's totally fascinating. But what

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>I found most interesting in all of this are the limitations.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Because these currents are only playing with your tongue, they

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>can only create a set of basic flavors. But when

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the scientists added technology that incorporates your nose, suddenly the

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 3>range of flavors expanded dramatically, and that got me thinking

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>what other tricks can we play on our tongue and

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>how much a flavor is really just something constructed in

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>our brain.

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's what this episode is all about.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey, their podcast listeners, Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Will Pearson and as always I'm joined by my good

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>friend mangesh Hot Ticketer, and today I'm here to address

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a big problem in the English language.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure we were talking about starting sentences with

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>because because my second grade English teacher had the same

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>argument with me.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Wait, this was second grade. You got in trouble in

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 3>second grade for starting sentences.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Was because yeah, actually it was more of a thing

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that she said we shouldn't do. And then I started

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>every sentence in a story with a word because it

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>was not a good strategy for going to recess that.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, at some point we'll do a whole

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>episode on grammar, so you can save your SOB stories

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>for then. But today I'm talking about how English speakers

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 3>use the words taste and flavor interchangeably, as though they

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:32.119
<v Speaker 3>mean the same thing.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait, they don't mean the same thing.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I know, it's pretty crazy. So I've been reading this

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>new book called Flavor. It's by Bob Holmes, and it's

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 3>really good. As Holmes explains, taste is just one component

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>of flavor, and he writes, the best way to think

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 3>about flavor is that it's the sum of all the

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 3>sensations we get when we have food in the mouth.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So think about the weight of the bowl, the color

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 3>of the plate, the crunch of the potato chip. Even

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the choice of background music can have a direct effect

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 3>on how we perceive flavor.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because when I think of flavor, it seems

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like such a specific thing, like popcorn flavor, jelly beans,

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>that's a flavor.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 3>I think there might be some people who disagree with

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>you on this, but.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying is true. Like taste and

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>smell and touch and sound, they all play a role

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in how much we appreciate food. I guess I've just

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>been using the wrong vocabulary.

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 3>All right. Well, I'm not here to flavor Shandy, but

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 3>we do have Bob Holmes on the show today, which

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 3>is super exciting, and we'll be talking to him about

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 3>flavor and some of the fascinating studies and facts he

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 3>covered in his book. Speaking of which, do you have

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>a terrible quiz lined up for us today? Oh?

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course I do. Sticking with the flavors theme, we're

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>playing real vintage recipe or gourmet cat food flavor. It's

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a little harder than you think.

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Awesome, all right, all right, Well, let's kick this off

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>by talking about taste. Even if it's not the same

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 3>thing as flavor, it's obviously an important thing, definitely so.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>In the English speaking world, psychologists have traditionally acknowledged four

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>different tastes. They're sweet, sour, salty, and bitter, and humans

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>have different receptors for each of these. And then more recently,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we've added a fifth taste, umami, which kind of just

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds made up, so we need to talk about that.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it did feel like a few years ago people

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>started talking about umami and it was like breaking news,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>like did you hear about this umami flavor? And actually,

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to be honest, I got confused. I was mixing it

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>up with the word unagi, which is the Japanese word

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 3>for fresh water eel, so I was trying to understand

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 3>why eel got to be a flavor of its own.

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, don't get me wrong, I love eel, but

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>it was still a little confusing.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was confusing to me because I thought we

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>were getting a brand new flavor, like you know that

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>apartment you have, did you know it's been hiding a

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>secret room all this time? Or like you're familiar with

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the rainbow, guess what we're adding a new color exactly,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And instead it was like, you know, parmesan cheese or

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>soy sauce, those are umami. You just didn't have a

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>word for it, right, But umami is definitely distinct. Yeah,

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a Japanese word meaning delicious flavor and linguists usually

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>translated as savory or maybe meaty, and his Homes explains

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there are a few reasons why it takes a while

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to rap your head around what umami is. First, is that,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>unlike other tastes, you don't really experience umami as this

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>isolated thing. Think about it. You can bite into a

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>strawberry and immediately experience that as sweet, or lick a

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>French fry and no, that's kind of a salty taste.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 3>I think we've talked about this. You've got to stop

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 3>licking your French fries. That's a little weird.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>They're just so good though. But anyway, you can experience

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>those tastes in a pretty pure and direct form. With umami,

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's more in combination with other things. Taste researcher Paul

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Breslin also points out that the receptors for umami have

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty low maximum intensity compared to other tastes, which

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>prevents us from being able to note something as being

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>very umami, unlike how we might say something's very sweet

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or very salty.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and there's a much stronger cultural element than I realized.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I know the stereotypes of different cultures being

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 3>able to handle different levels of spice or things like that,

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>but I really didn't think about how that could be

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 3>applied to something like umami. But it turns out many

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>people in Asian countries have no problem identifying things as umami,

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 3>but they have the same ease that American children have

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 3>identifying things as sweet. It's really interesting how taste has

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 3>developed differently in different places around the world.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's back up for a minute and talk about

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>how these tastes would have developed from an evolutionary perspective.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's one thing for us to identify or talk

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 3>about these tastes when we cook at home or eat

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 3>at restaurants now, but for our ancestors, these tastes were

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>key to survival. So think about how a sweet taste

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 3>would have let someone know that they were getting sugars,

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 3>which are an important way to get calories for energy,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 3>or tasting salt would be an indication of electrolytes, and

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 3>a mommy would have indicated the presence of proteins. Now,

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 3>on the negative side, our ancestors learned from bitter taste

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 3>that something might be toxic, or from sourness that a

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 3>fruit might have gone bad or just not be good

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 3>to eat.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not hard to see how we'd be hardwired

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to like sweet, salty, and a mommy. And it's equally

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to see how other animals have evolved differently because

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of their different nutritional needs. Like there was a cat study.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It's oh great, it's back. Well, a study was done

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that showed cats, because their carnivores are unable to really

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>identify sweetness and it has no appeal for them. And pandas,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>who are some serious bamboo eaters, don't really need to

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>identify umami, so they've lost the ability to taste it well.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>And even more extreme than that, vampire bat's love of

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>blood has caused them to lose the ability to taste

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 3>umami sweet and bitter. I'm actually curious why we don't

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 3>do a bad study like we do cat studies. Have

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned I don't like cats. I think you've mentioned

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>that a few times, all right, I just wanted to

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>make sure. So back to how we've evolved, there's another

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 3>thing about taste that I think is just crazy interesting.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 3>So just as we're discussing how flavor is much more

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 3>than just taste. Taste also happens to be more complex

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 3>than we thought. Did you know that there are taste

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>receptors in multiple places around our body, not just our mouth?

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Sure, it's crazy, isn't it.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so that means you do know about this. I'm

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna quiz you. So, do we have taste receptors in

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>our lungs?

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:07:57.920 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>What about our guts?

0:07:58.800 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 3>What about it our brain? Yes? What about our forte?

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Definitely no, we don't.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 3>We do not have taste receptors in our forehead. You

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 3>slum dog millionaireed me you should know about it. There's

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 3>no cheating on our quizzes. So this isn't exactly well

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>understood yet, but it's really fascinating. The ones in the gut,

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 3>for example, detective Mommy and sweet and let our brains

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>know that some yummy and nutritious food has arrived, and

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 3>if they taste something bitter, they let us know there

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 3>may be a problem and trigger a response of some kind.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>So you can get the sense for why they're helpful.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 3>But why do you think we need taste receptors in

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 3>our respiratory system?

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's one way of letting our bodies know if

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>bacteria has arrived because bacteria have a communication chemical with

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a bitter taste, and when the receptor is in our

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>respiratory system, notice this, they help our bodies mount response.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.239
<v Speaker 1>There's even some thinking among scientists that these bitter receptors

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>may have existed in other areas of our body, first

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as a way of detecting infection and then moving to

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>our mouths.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Holmes explains. If this is the case, we have

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>disease to thank for the flavor of coffee, beer, and broccoli.

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>It's weird, right, all right. So I know in a

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>few minutes we're going to play a quiz, but before

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we do that, I think we should find out whether

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we're super tasters.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Super tasters Well.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not as exciting as it sounds, because while it

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>does mean someone has a more intense sense of taste,

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>supertasters tend to be much more bland eaters because most

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>tastes tend to be that much more extreme for them.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, given the fact that the last time we ate

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 3>at the Chinese place downstairs, it looked to me like

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 3>you just ordered a plate of hot peppers, So I'm

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>guessing you're not a super taster.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we had a joke in our family that our

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>dad served as so much spicy food that we burned

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>off our taste buds.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 3>I believe that.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me show you how we test for this using

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this filter paper. Each strip has a small amount of

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>a bitter compound on them. It's called prople thigh ORUSIL

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>or PROP. So we're going to put these on our

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>tongues and find out which of these three categories of

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>tasters we fall in. Non tasters will taste nothing, tasters

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>will notice the bitter taste but it's not a huge deal,

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and super taste will have this super strong response to it.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, I like this. We should also get some

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>other members of the PTG team in here.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you say?

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Definitely?

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 3>All right, so let's give this a shot. So we've

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 3>got two of our team members joining us. We've got

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 3>Noel Brown, you may know from stuff they don't want

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 3>you to know, also a supervising producer on the show,

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 3>and Jerry Roland, our executive producer. Here, guys, you guys

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 3>ready to give this a shot? Am I ever?

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, So we've all got these strips and on

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 3>the count of three, we're going to put them on

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 3>our tongues. We're going to see what happens now. As

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 3>a reminder, if you taste nothing, which may be the case,

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 3>you're a non taster. If you taste a little bit

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of bitter, just some bitter, then you're a taster. And

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 3>if it tastes extremely better, then you are a super taster.

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 3>So ready, all right on the count of three, one, two, three.

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know it sides. You may have to flip

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 3>it out. Oh wait, you get something I got? I

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 3>got a hint of bitter. Uh huh. Mine is totally bitter.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 3>It's like great fruit bitter. Oh nice, I have a

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>real paper taste, but I mean something completely different. We

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 3>can't talk about it. Might be fooling myself about this.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh Jerry, she's running away.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>She's always had great.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Is blown? I hate grapefruit, super taster. Okay, spicy food, Jerry,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I love spicy food. But you just like the torture.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm not sure what's happening. Wow, oh man,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>that's so disappointing. You've given us a lot to think

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like I'm so cheated. Like not only

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>can I not see those like three D magic pictures,

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but also I can't taste these people.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is the worse. Okay, that's a bummer. I

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>was getting. I think I was getting a slight taste

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>of bitter. Okay, here we go. Well, while we're having

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 3>so much fun, when you say we play a little quiz,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 3>sounds good.

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 3>So who do we have on the line today, Mango.

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We've got Sarah Fiddler, who's got one of the list

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs in the world. She's a flavor guru at one

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite ice cream companies, Ben and Jerry's.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>We are so excited to have you on. Welcome to

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 3>part time Genia.

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Sarah, thank you for having me.

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm really curious how you got this job. I mean,

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>what sort of training and schooling do you have to

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 3>have to become a Ben and Jerry's flavor guru.

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, personally, I have a degree in food science from

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 5>the University of Vermont and a degree in baking and

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 5>pastry from the Culinary Institute of America. There are a

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 5>group of us flavor gurus here, and everybody's got kind

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 5>of a mixed background, from chefs to food scientists, all

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 5>comes from different backgrounds.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>It's very cool, that's awesome. And how are flavors decided upon? Like,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 3>how do you guys decide you have so many fun

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 3>and creative and awesome flavors, how do you guys come

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 3>up with these?

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, we start out by being very creative and kind

0:12:55.960 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 5>of playing around in our test kitchens, and then we

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 5>meet with our marketing team, our brand management team, sometimes

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 5>our social mission team and figure out which of our

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 5>crazy flavors makes the most sense to launch for the

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 5>next season.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And so, how many flavors are you typically playing with?

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 5>It could be arranged anywhere from maybe three to ten

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 5>at a time.

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty crazy. I heard that the Ben and Jerry's

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>staff takes a field trip every year to research new flavors.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that true?

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. We go on what we call trend tracks. Pick

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 5>a city or area that seems to be filled with

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 5>really up and coming food places, sometimes cocktail places, farms,

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 5>and go as a group and eat as much as

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 5>we possibly can, and then come back and make ice

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 5>cream inspired by what we ate.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Cool, But where are some of the fun places you've

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>trekked to?

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm relatively new to the company, so I have

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 5>yet to go on a track, but I've heard that

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 5>they've gone to San Francisco, Portland's I believe there was

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 5>a trip to Japan before I started.

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Very cool.

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I'm so jealous of this job. That sounds pretty great.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Now we also know about the flavor graveyard at Ben

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>and Jerry. So are there are there ceremonies when flavors

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 3>are buried there? And how does this work? How do

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>you pay your respects?

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 5>I think for some of the flavors that were a

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 5>little bit more loved, they do ceremonies, and sometimes it's

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 5>more of a quiet affair.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>We won't get into that then. So that's pretty great.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, So manga, what game are we playing today

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 3>with Sarah?

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>It's called do Me a Flavor? Mostly because I just

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear you say do me a flavor all things.

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciate that. That's a pretty terrible title of

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>how do we play?

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Basically, we're giving Sarah three popular flavors from an iconic

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>food or drink brand, and she just has to tell

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>us what we're talking about.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that sounds fun. All right, Sarah, are you ready

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>to play?

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm ready?

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Question number one? This chip comes in cool Ranch,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Nacho cheese, and heat Wave flavors, So do me a

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 3>flavor and tell me what product we're talking about. Real yepah,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 3>you got it for one, question number two. The most

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>popular flavors of this candy include very cherry and buttered popcorn,

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>though the blueberry flavor was particularly popular in the nineteen

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>eighties when it was created for Ronald Reagan. Do me

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a flavor, Manger, are you gonna make me say?

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Do me a flavor?

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Do me a flavor and tell me what brand we're.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Talking about jelly Belly.

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>You got it two for two for two question number three.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 3>This sports drink originally came in lemon, lime, and orange flavors.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 3>It has since expanded to include rainberry, glacier freeze, and

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 3>cool blue. Do me a flavor and tell me what

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 3>beverage I'm talking about? Betray Yes, all right, she's three

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>for three. Let's see if she can get the last

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>two Question number four. While this O shaped breakfast cereal

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 3>does come in flavors like fruity and frosted, the most

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 3>popular varieties are still original and honeynut. Do me a

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>flavor and tell me what breakfast cereal I'm talking about? Curios. Okay,

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>we've saved the hardest for last. Good luck on this one. Okay,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 3>question number five. This iconic ice cream brand has the

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 3>best punny flavors, including Fish Food, American Dream, and the

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Tonight Dough. Do me a flavor and tell me what

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 3>really wonderful ice cream company we're talking about, Ben and Jerry.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>All Right, that would have been kind of embarrassing if

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>she'd missed out.

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, Sarah when an astounding five for five, which wins

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>her the grand prize, A hundred note from us to

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>her mom or boss, singing her praises.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So congratulations Sarah, and thank you so much for flaving.

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>That's awesome. Congratulations Sarah, Thank you both. Please tell all

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the people at Ben and Jerry's we say thank you

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 3>for making wonderful ice or even keep up the great work.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 3>I will.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Guess what will?

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 3>What's that mango?

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm coming to terms with the fact that I'm not

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a super taste all right.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, lucky for you, we've been talking about the fact

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 3>that flavor is so much more than just.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Taste, and then we just talked about taste. But I

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's time we backed that statement off and talk

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>about another key component of flavor, and that's smell, all.

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, talk to me about smell.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you think taste is a complicated thing, it's

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing compared to the complexity of smell. Think about the

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>millions upon millions of smells in the world and how

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>our noses have to make sense of them and help

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>us identify what things are. In fact, as Holmes points out,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the old faction researcher Joel Mainland estimates that they're about

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven billion smelly molecules in the world.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And while that doesn't mean they're about twenty seven billion

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>smells because some might be identical, that still this incredible number.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, the other thing Holmes explains that I find so interesting,

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 3>and this goes back to your electric lollipop example, but

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that's how different taste than smell are. So our sense

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 3>of taste is pretty easy to break down. We can

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 3>enjoy a dish of sweet and sour pork and understand

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 3>that it's sweet and sour, or have some ketch up

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 3>and know that it's sweet, sour, salty and umami. And

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe we're not thinking about those things actively, but those

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 3>are all there and we can identify them. But smell

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 3>is different because you really can't break it down. Instead,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 3>our brains take all the information from the smelly molecules

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and create a single perception of smell. As Holmes writes,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>if you combine ethyl isobutorate, which is a fruity odor,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 3>ethyl maltol, it's just caramel like an allyl alpha ionine,

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 3>which is violet like in the proper proportions. For example,

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>what you smell is not caramel coated fruit on a

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 3>bed of violets, but pineapple.

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And how much more complicated by the fact that in

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>English we really don't have the language to describe smells

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>in any significant way other than seeing what they smell like.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So we might say something smells fishy or like grass

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But this isn't the case everywhere, and especially

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in places that depend much more on those smells for survival,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>such as the remaining hunter gatherer tribes. Take the Jihai

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>tribe of Thailand. A research team set up a smell

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>test between a group of Jehai men and a group

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of men from Texas, and when the Jahai men were

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>presented with certain smells, they had just an easy time

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>communicating what they smelled with very descriptive words, as they

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>did in describing colors, and the Texans, on the other hand,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>were of course able to describe colors, but they struggled

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>when asked to describe smells.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 3>When there's one more reason why smell is just so

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 3>difficult for us to understand and talk about.

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>What's not?

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 3>All right? So humans have around four hundred odor receptors,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 3>but the part that makes things complicated is that only

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 3>about half of those receptors work in pretty much everyone.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 3>But then of the other half, there's this wide range

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 3>of which ones work in some piece and not in others.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 3>So that leads to an incredibly wide range of smells

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 3>that humans are capable of processing. In fact, for the

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>most part, no two people have the same sense of smell,

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 3>which is pretty crazy.

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but needless to say, our sense of smell makes

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge contribution to the flavors we process.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>And there's another biggie to add to taste and smell,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and that's the sense of touch. Think about the burn

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 3>of a chili pepper, or the chili feeling in your

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 3>mouth when you're chewing on a minty piece of gum,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>or fizz in a carbonated drink. Oh man, that first

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 3>sip of a coke, how good is this first sip

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 3>of a coke?

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So good? I think I'll have one right now.

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 3>All right to Atlanta. So it's interesting how little is

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 3>really understood about this component of flavor, at least how

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 3>few studies have been done on it. But we do

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 3>know that spicy hot, for example, is not a taste.

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 3>It's something you feel. And then we have specific receptors

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 3>that cause the heat sensation when we eat spicy things.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of spicy hot, do you know how the Scoville units,

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>which measure the heat of chili peppers got its start?

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 3>How's that?

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Apparently it goes back to this pharmacist and researcher, Wilbur Scoville.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Scoville came up with the scale back in nineteen twelve,

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was a pretty smart way of doing it.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You figured out that you could create a scale based

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the amount of dilution required before the burn of

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a chili could no longer be felt, so super hot

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:20.959
<v Speaker 1>pepper would take much more dilution.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that is pretty smart.

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And now it's easier for scientists to just measure

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the amount of capsaicin, which is the main ingredient that

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a chili hot, and then just convert those into

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Scoville units.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty wild how hot some peppers can be. Take jalapenos,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 3>for example, which we think of is pretty hot. They

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 3>come in about five thousand Scovill units. Cayennes are at

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 3>about forty thousand. The habban nio comes in at over

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand, maybe even up to three hundred thousand.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 3>But even the hobbin niro doesn't hold a candle to

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 3>the Carolina Reaper.

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And how many Scoville units does that one have?

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Two point two million. It's unbelievable, it's crazy. That's basically

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>like police eat pepper spray. And there's a new contender

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 3>out there. It's called Dragon's Breath, which is a tiny

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 3>pepper that can possibly kill.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You, but it sounds so cute. So we have Noel

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown here to test this out. Why would you even

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>make a pepper that hot.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's so unbelievably hot that can actually numb your

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>skin to touch, and that makes it useful as an

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>anesthetic in areas without medical supplies. But let's leave the

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 3>hottest of the hot peppers aside for a minute. It's

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 3>interesting that we humans enjoy inflicting this burning pain on ourselves,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and we don't know exactly why this is. I mean,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 3>I know, we know about the endorphin release that happens

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 3>when we eat spicy foods, but that still doesn't answer

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>the question of why that happened.

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, first we feast, does that chili head enthusiast show.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I was reading an interview that said it's much

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>easier to get people to drop their inhibitions when they

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>eat a chili pepper because they're like sweating and it's

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like they've just exercised. So instead of those awkward questions

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you go through in the beginning of an interview, people

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just skip past that by eating chilis Wow. Anyway. We

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>know humans like heat, but researchers have yet identify another

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>mammal that seeks the heat of chili peppers. I mean,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>birds eat plenty of them, but they don't actually have

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the receptors that would feel the heat of cupsason, so

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no sensation at all for them even in eating

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a super hot pepper. I wonder if birds enjoy the

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>first sip of a coke, oh man.

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>To it while we savor our beverages. Why don't we

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:31.719
<v Speaker 3>take a break for a quiz. Our guest today has

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 3>been a science writer and correspondent for New Scientist magazine

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 3>for over twenty years, and as the author of Flavor,

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 3>the brilliant book we've been talking about in this episode,

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and for those who listen to our episode on How

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Clean We Should Be, you know, I'm not surprised that

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 3>a New Scientist writer would produce such a great book.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Bob Holmes, Welcome to Part Time Genius.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Hi, thanks for having me.

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Bob. In Flavor, you mentioned that we can pretty much

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 3>do away with the idea that we have previously had

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 3>about taste maps, where different parts of our tongues helped

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 3>us experience different taste. So our taste maps really not

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>a thing we should think about anymore.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 4>They really aren't, and it's pretty easy to demonstrate that.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 4>All you have to do is take a cute tip

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 4>and dip it in salt water and rush it around

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 4>your tongue. You know, the taste map says that you

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 4>say it's salty. I think it's right at the tip

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 4>of your tongue, and you'll find that you can taste

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 4>the salt anywhere.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Huh. So how did this come about?

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure. It turns out there are slight differences

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 4>in different parts of the tongue, and you've got a

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 4>few more bitter taste bud's right at the back and

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 4>a few more sweet at the front, and things like that,

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 4>but it's not enough to make much of a difference

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 4>at all.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>You also write the possibility of a sixth taste or

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>even more than that, and could you talk a little

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about that?

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 4>Sure, Yeah, I mean it's almost certainly at least it

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 4>tastes and maybe quite a few more. You know, we

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 4>all know about sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and most of

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 4>us know about umami, which is that fifth taste that's

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 4>sort of safe retaste, but almost certain. I think the

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 4>evidence is really good now that there is in fact

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 4>the taste for fat, or more specifically, for the fatty

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 4>acid breakdown products of fat. These are actually the nasties.

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 4>The researcher who demonstrated this is the easiest way to

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 4>think about what they taste like is to imagine old

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 4>rancid French fry oil. It's gone off, and that's what

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 4>fatty acids taste like. Yeah, I definitely know that it's

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 4>almost certainly one of those warning tastes to keep us

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 4>away from rancid.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Fats, and is there anything good that can be done

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>with it?

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 4>A little bit of these nasty, fatty acids are part

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 4>of what makes aged cheese interesting, huh So yeah, and

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 4>probably also a little bit in aged meat and things

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 4>like that. Yeah, So in very small quantities, you know,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 4>just like putting a little bit of cat in persum

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>actually is a good thing. You know, these nasties in

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 4>our food probably do add interest if there's little enough

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 4>of them.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 3>One of the other things that you explained that I

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>thought was super interesting is that humans get a bad

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 3>wrap for having an inferior sense of smell. So is

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>this really a myth?

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 4>We have fewer odor receptors in our nose than it's

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 4>something like a dog does, so they probably are better

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 4>than us, but not nearly as much better than us

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 4>as we think. When people have looked, they found that

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 4>humans are actually pretty good at smelling stuff. A blindfolded

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>person can follow on a chocolate trail across a lawn

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 4>on their hands and he's sniffing to find where the

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 4>chocolate was d So, you know, most of the reason

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 4>that we think we're so bad at smell is that

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 4>our noses are way up in the air and all

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 4>the smells are down there on the ground. So if

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 4>we were to, if we were to explore our worlds

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 4>just like our dogs do, we'd find there were stuff

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 4>there we could smell. People can go into a into

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 4>a onto a bookshelf and pick out which book someone

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 4>has just handled by the smell alone.

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 4>And at the other place, we're really good at smell. Actually,

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 4>it's in flavor. The shape of our heads mean that

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 4>means the flavors foods that are inside our mouths have

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 4>very quick access to the olfactory part of the nose,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 4>and so we're probably way better than our dogs are

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 4>at appreciating flavor.

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm. That's really interesting.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>That's so crazy. I mean, I feel like that totally

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>changes the truffle game, like the truffle hunting game, Like

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't need a pig if you're on all four four.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 4>That's probably right, right, that some people don't smell the

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 4>key compound and truffles.

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'd probably do it for the right bar of chocolate. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 3>all right. Well, being an expert on flavor, we couldn't

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 3>let you go without putting you to the test on

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 3>an ultimate flavor quiz. So, mango, what what game do

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we have? What game do we have Bob playing today?

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>We're playing a game called vintage recipe or a gourmet

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cat food flavor.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>That's right, So we'll be tossing you a delicious sounding item.

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Delicious is in air quotes, which doesn't work quite as

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 3>well on podcasts. But you have to tell us if

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>it's a vintage recipe we found online or a gourmet

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 3>cat food flavor. So you ready to get started?

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Ready?

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 3>So the first one is ham and bananas, hollandais ham

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 3>and bananas Holland days? Is this a vintage recipe we

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>found online or a gourmet cat food flavor.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go vintage.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you would be right.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a great way to make use of your leftover

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bananas and ham apparently.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Okay. Number two Sea Bess in Seabas consumme.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go cat slicks for that one.

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right, it's from Tiki Cats Hawaiian queen Emma

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Luau line.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Of course, all right. Question number three liver sausage, pineapple.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I can't imagine the cat eating pineapples. I'm gonna go

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 4>with vintage recipe.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, three for three. I really probably would have guessed

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>cat food on that though, just because the word liver

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>would have thrown me off. I think, all right, number

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 3>four lime cheese salad is he correct?

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right, it's a It was a recipe from

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Jello and and it's a Yello bed with a seafood

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>salad plopped on top.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I think I've had that Midwestern church suppers.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 3>All right, we've got two left. He's four for four

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 3>so far. Here we go. Ocean fish, tuna and cheese sauce.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 4>That sounds like it would appeal to a cat.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, it is a gourmet coffee. I can't believe

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's cheese sauce in Yeah, it's from the Tasty Treasures line.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, some fancy cat food. All right, let's see if

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 3>you can get six for six spam and limas spam

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and Lima's.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 4>No recipes.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Yeah, it was a promotional recipe from Hormel, and

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it had a Spanish gravy and frozen lime of beans.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 3>That is incredible, So Bob, how has Bob done?

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>He ran the table. He did won an incredible six

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for six, which wins him Today's grand prize, which is

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>our endless admiration.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Wow, congratulations, Bob.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 4>That is huge, Thank you kindly.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, Bob, thanks so much for writing a terrific

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 3>book and for joining us today on Part Time Genius.

0:30:49.240 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, guess what I've got my pocket here? Mango?

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, that sounds so creepy.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, I should have I probably should have phrased that

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>a little differently. But guess what I have in my

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 3>pocket here? That rhymes with schmop blocks.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>That sounds even creepier. But you've got pop rocks, right.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I know we've talked about taste, smell, and touch and

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that those are considered the flavor trinity, but we can't

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.959
<v Speaker 3>leave out sound or other multisensory effects on how we

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 3>experience flavor.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're gonna crack open those bad boys or not?

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's do it. They are so good. Pop

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Rocks reminded me of that, you know, that part in

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the Eddie Hazard routine where he's talking about chiropractors and

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 3>how they live for the noise, and that chiropracting or

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 3>what do you call.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It, chiropractice cracking bones.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Would be nothing if they didn't hear the sound. They're

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 3>just like I live for the noise, I crack your bones.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, all right, you remember how our friend and

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 3>former Mental Flaws editor, Ah, they pop rocks are still

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 3>just popular, like crazyhood. I don't think I've had one

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 3>of these since I was ten. I need more. Okay,

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 3>So you remember our friend and former Mental Flaws editor

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 3>jess and Collins used to talk about chip o'clock in

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the office.

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for you listeners, there was a period in the

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>mid afternoon when the editorial staff and Mental Flaws used

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to all go out for their afternoon snack and grab

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a bag of chips. It made her crazy.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, while that sound may be difficult for the person

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>not eating the chips to listen to, for the people

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 3>eating chips, that sound likely increase their enjoyment. So papers

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 3>have shown that people rate chips is tastier if they

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 3>provide a louder crunch. It was even a study by

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Charles Spence and Maxampinie that had people eat one hundred

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 3>and eighty pringles.

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm so envious that people got to eat pringles for

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sign I.

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Mean, we did get to have pop rocks and I

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of coke, and we got to watch Jerry have

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 3>that bitter taste. But as they did this, they wore

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 3>headphones that played back the sound of their crunch, so

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 3>as they work their way through the chips, the researchers

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 3>adjusted the volume level of the crunch feedback, and they

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 3>found that the louder crunching made them rate the chips

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent tastier than the softer crunching.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I still can't believe they got to eat sprinkles for sign.

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I I know the sound of an expensive coffee maker

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>has been showed to increase how people rated a cup

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of Joe, But I also loved the study where Spence

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>had a group of subjects eat oysters while listening to

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>different sounds. Some of them heard the sounds of waves

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and seagulls, and some of them heard sounds from barnyards

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like chickens clucking and cows mooing. And not only did

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>those who heard the sea sounds rate the oyster's tastier,

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they also experienced them as saltier.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I love this stuff because it kind of feels like

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 3>food trickery. But I guess as we understand that all

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>our senses are involved in how we experience flavor, it's

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 3>really no more trickery than anything else we do to

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>enhance flavor. So let's talk about some of the other

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>multi sensory effects on flavor.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I love that music can affect how we experience flavor.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Like Holmes notes that really powerful music like Carl Orff's

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Carmina Burana causes people to note the heavier flavors in

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a red wine and what he describes as zingie music

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>actually brings out the brighter flavors and a white wine.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And with that in mind, I'd like to recommend after

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the show we all listened to Holland Oates and neat

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a bag of rollos. I bet that can only make

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the experience of both better.

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.479
<v Speaker 3>And then we'll eat one of those Reese's Fast Break

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 3>bars and listen to Aya the Tiger.

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's science and action, folks. We'll report back.

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 3>But there's some other fun and funny results of experiments,

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Like there was this Goldilock style experiments using three bowls

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of yogurt. Yogurt was the same in all three bowls,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 3>but the bulls weighed different amount.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And how many bears were involved this is zero.

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't published in our bear reviewed medical journals, but

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 3>people did note that they enjoyed the yogurt in the

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>heaviest bowl, most like, why should weight of a bowl

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 3>affect your enjoyment? And strawberry moose served on a white

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 3>plate was rated sweeter than the same dessert served on

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 3>a black plate.

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite studies was the one on hockey

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>fans at Cornell, and researchers found that when the home

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>team won, fans actually found the ice cream to be sweeter,

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and when they lost, they noted it as more sour.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>How weird is that?

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 3>That's almost as sciencey as our science.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so if all these senses contribute to flavor, why

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do we only associate flavor with the stuff happening in

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>our mouths?

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's the work of our brains. It takes all

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 3>that information smell, taste, texture, sound and combines it into

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 3>one experience, and then it tells us that experience is

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 3>happening in our mouths. So as a side note, many

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 3>food scientists now say that while foods obviously contain flavor molecules,

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 3>they believe the actual flavors themselves aren't created by the food,

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 3>but instead by our brains.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Which I guess would be a big part of the

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>reason why we all experience flavor differently.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 3>That's just weird, yes it is. But we are not

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 3>done with our weird facts for the day. You know

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 3>what time it is. It's time for the part time

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 3>genius factos, the part of the show where we share

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 3>some of the interesting facts we learned recently but didn't

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 3>get a chance to mention just yet.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 1>So Bill, why don't you start this round all right?

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Sure? So? If you read airline mages, you often see

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 3>that famous chefs pair up with airlines to improve the

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 3>n flight meals, but the odds are stacked against them.

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 3>According to a study commission by the German airline carrier Lufthansa,

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 3>between the elevation and the dryness that occurs in the cabin,

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 3>your sensitivity to sweet and salty foods decreases by about

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent, which means the meal probably tastes a whole

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 3>lot better if you save it for after you land.

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you know? Peanut butter and mayo sandwiches used to

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be a popular thing like According to Garden and Gun magazine,

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>The sandwiches were a staple during the Depression and could

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be fancied up by adding a few leaves of lettuce

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and some pickles, and so the editors at food fifty

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>two this other site, also tried the sandwich on reader recommendation,

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and their verdict was, if you wear a blindfold when

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you take a bite, it almost tastes like a tuna sandwich.

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, why don't we just name a few odd

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>recipes we've found since we both looked them up. The

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 3>Betty Crocker recommended a tuna and jello pie, also known

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 3>as a summer.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Pie devoid the winter sales slump. Doctor Pepper Wren ads

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that you should heat the soda in a saucepan and

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 1>then poured over a lemon. Gross which is why nothing

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of Christmas more than a steaming mug of

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper.

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Did you know that Johnny Walker makes a mustache wax

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 3>that enhances their drinks. The wax comes in three flavors, pepper, citrus,

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and ginger, and it helps to apply a generous amount

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>to your stash.

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So, I know, we talked about eating in texture today,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but I learned this isn't a completely new concept. In

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties, the Italian futurists played with food and

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>texture in a completely different way. Diners were clothed in

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>textured pajamas which they stroked with one hand in a

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>dark room while burying their face and vegful. What and

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>when they looked up for their plates, a waiter which

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.919
<v Speaker 1>sprits them with perfume. For some reason, the movement didn't

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>take I.

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Can't imagine why.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, futurists hated pasta, and they like to sculpt their meats.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And there was also one course where you ate salad

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>out of a tiny box with one hand and turned

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a crank with the other. As long as you were

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>turning the crank, your waiter would dance for you.

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 3>That is so good. I have to give you this one,

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 3>so you earned this week's fact Off. Speaking of which

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 3>we need to nominate as smarty pants to our Hall

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 3>of Genius. I'm thinking we should give it to William

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Mitchell's family. Mitchell was a food inventor who grew up

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.879
<v Speaker 3>on a farm, worked his way through college, and then

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 3>went on to invent cool whip, powdered egg whites for

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 3>cake mix, quickset, jello tang and.

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>That's so many amazing things and what.

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>And pop rocks. Apparently the candy was supposed to be

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 3>a carbonated drink mix, but it worked better as a

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 3>crazy kids treat.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>He's in William Mitchell's family. You'll be getting a certificate

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the mail and special thanks to our brilliant nonfiction

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>librarians over at the Hoover Public Library in Hoover, Alabama

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>for recommending the book Flavored by Bob Holmes. If you

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like what you heard, be sure to pick up a

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>copy today. That's it for today's episode. Thanks for listening.

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again for listening to Part Time Genius. Be sure

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe wherever you listen to your podcast.

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 3>And because we're a brand new show, if you're feeling

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 3>extra generous, we'd love it if you give us a

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 3>rating on Apple Podcasts. Part Time Genius is produced by

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 3>some of our favorite geniuses. It's edited by Tristan McNeil,

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 3>theme song and audio mixing by Noel Brown. Our executive

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 3>producer is Jerry Rowland. Our research team is Gabe Lucier,

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Lucas Adams, Autumn white Field, Madrano, Austin Thompson, and Meg Robbins.

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 3>Jason Hope is our chief cheerleader.