WEBVTT - Amazon, Apple Earnings and Musk's DOGE Days 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business, finance

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek. On Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's Sheriff Deny to report that ZAID board members started

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a search forach CEO to succeed you on Musk, saying

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>directors are quote highly confident in his abilities.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 4>All right. At the same time as Elena's promised to

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 4>spend more time at his company, Musk will maintain a

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 4>presence in the White House and the President's inner circle,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 4>and we'll continue to work on the initiative from his

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 4>microoffice in the West Wing. Both of those stories are

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 4>among the most read on the Bloomberg Let's get to

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 4>It lots to cover. Bloomberg News Senior reporter Jennifer Lowe

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 4>is with us. She is at the White House. Also

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 4>here in studio, Bloomberg Business Week columnist Max Chafkin, co

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 4>host of the Elon podcast, Elon Inc. Podcast and the

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 4>author of the Contrarian Peter Thiel and Silicon Valley's Pursuit

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>of Power.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Max is in our macro office, our macro studio.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Max is going to come in just a moment.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 5>Jed, we got to start with you.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 4>You talked with Elon along with some other reporters, set

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 4>the scene the chat yesterday, what you all asked about

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 4>and what he said.

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean, this was really a remarkable opportunity. Remarkable

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 6>because we haven't had many of them to hear directly

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 6>from Elon Musk as he discusses his government role. Of course,

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 6>he's been at you know, cabinet meetings, he's been in

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 6>the Oval Office and spoken to reporters occasionally, but in

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 6>this moment in the Roosevelt Room with other reporters, he

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 6>was really opening up much more about what he's done

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 6>over the last one hundred or so days leading the

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 6>DOGE effort, the Department of Governmentment efficiency program that he's

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 6>been running for President Trump. And you know, he spoke

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 6>quite colorfully about, you know, the experience, not just the

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and sixty billion dollars in government savings that

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 6>he says he's been able to root out with this

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 6>program and cut. You know, he told us about flying

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 6>on Air Force One, about staying in the Lincoln bedroom

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 6>at at the President's request, and even tucking into, you know,

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 6>ice cream from the White House fridge. So it was

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 6>really remarkable and it told us a lot about I

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 6>think his access to the president, about his status really

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 6>in Trump's orbit even as he is making this retreat

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 6>from the White House.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Well Jennifer on that retreat. Investors cheered the news last

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>week in Tesla that he would be spending more time

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 3>away from Washington, d C. Now we're hearing he'll have

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 3>this micro office. What can you tell us about how

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>much time he will be in DC or how much

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>time he'll be spending on DOGE Moving forward, right, he's.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 6>He told us that he anticipates spending about two one

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 6>to two days a week on average and coming into Washington,

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 6>d C. Basically once every other week. So you could

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 6>see a situation where he's in town for three days

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 6>working and then comes back a couple weeks later. This is,

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 6>of course a marked contrast from the beginning of the term,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 6>when you know it was an all hands on deck situation,

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 6>really intense, as he described it, and he would spend

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, seven days a week here sometimes working just

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 6>to get into these agencies and start figuring out a

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 6>plan for accessing data and examining their spending.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 5>Max, I want to bring you in.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to Jen talk about this conversation kind of

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 4>him talking about his time in the White House, and

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I think we were all glued to the cabinet meeting

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>where he had the two hats on. Took him off

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and it kind of got he got kind of serious.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 7>It felt like, yeah, tonally kind of a valedictory tone.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, the messaging is a little bit.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 7>Confusing because on one hand, he's saying, yeah, taking steps back.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 5>On the other hand, one to two days a week

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 5>is a lot of that's a lot of days.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 7>This is a guy who is running simultaneously five companies.

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, he's got a lot of responsibilities. Even if

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 7>he is, you know, as Jen says, scaling down from

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 7>spending like all his time in Washington, spending a significant

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 7>chunk of time in Washington.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So on that, Jennifer, the timing that he's doing here. Also,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 3>the figures of one hundred and sixty billion dollars, I

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 3>think getting a lot of attention, especially earlier this year,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 3>when or maybe even a few months ago, and we

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 3>heard that two trillion dollars was his goal of cutting

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 3>from the government. Have we learned if that goal was

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>over a ten year period, over a five year period,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>or how the one hundred and sixty billion dollars sort

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of fits into that goal, or if that goal has changed.

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 6>What we do know is that the ambition is clearly

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 6>being ratcheted downward. And while he is not willing to

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 6>forego reaching, you know, a one trillion dollar target, he

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 6>wouldn't rule that out completely. He did say that doing

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 6>so on any base would require a lot of you know,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 6>willpower from elected officials, and he's just not sure that

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 6>the willpower is there. He wouldn't roll it out, but

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 6>it did seem very much like a concession that this

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 6>is he's gotten a lot of the easier, lower hanging fruit,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 6>and that this is hard to do on an enduring basis.

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 6>And by the way, I'll just say, on his time here,

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 6>he is limited as a special government employee to one

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 6>hundred and thirty days of service per calendar year.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, and it was two trillion in fact,

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 7>was his original claim and that that was an annual number,

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 7>that's a budget deficit. When he was at Madison Square

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 7>Garden before the election, you know, Howard Lutnik asked him

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 7>how much he was going to cut the deficit. He

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 7>said easily two trillion or something along those lines. So

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 7>it's a huge difference and really an unusual you know,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 7>just for Elon Musk. This is somebody who is kind

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 7>of used to projecting dominance, who just tends to go

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 7>from victory to victory to victory.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 5>This is a come down, I mean, and and he is.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 7>He's doing his best, and I think that's part of

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 7>why you're seeing these media availabil as effort to, you know,

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 7>to actually have a voice in the story, because it

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 7>is it is. It is a it's a failure at

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 7>least in the terms that he set for what he

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 7>was trying to do.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Ten before we let you go, I mean to re

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 4>assume that Elon will still have a voice or have

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 4>the president's ear ongoing, even though he maybe isn't physically

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 4>at the White House. There are limitations, right, how many

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 4>days he can serve the government in this capacity that

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>he will still pick up the phone, The President will

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 4>still pick up the phone. There will be that constant

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 4>communication or has something changed in that relationship.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's all the indications are that he will

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 6>continue to have this status around the president. I mean,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 6>he's clearly had altercations and disagreements with members of the administration,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 6>and it is perhaps one of the only folks who

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 6>can do that right now. He's, as we noted at

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 6>the top of this conversation, you know, he's got a

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 6>micro office in the West wing of the White House,

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 6>and he's not giving that up. You know, office space

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 6>in this building is pretty difficult to come by, and

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 6>that alone is an indication of the fact that he

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 6>has he is stature with a president and that seems

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 6>to be enjoyed.

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Did we figure out what a micro office is?

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like an office but smaller.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 4>What is that? I don't know.

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 5>That's just what I'm going Do you have to share desks?

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's kind of a thing nowadays. I know,

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 4>all right, Jen, incredible reporting, So appreciate Jen Deloewey, a

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 4>senior reporter at Bloomberg News there at the White House.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>We're going to stay with Max though.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Max I wanted to follow up on one thing that

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 3>you said about the status as a special government employee,

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>because you talk about this a lot on the Elon Inc. Podcast.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 3>How is that defined? If he's planning on spending one

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>or two days a week still, I mean, yeah, does

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 3>that violate that status? How does that work?

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 7>It's my guess is the accounting here can be is

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 7>probably a little bit fuzzy. It's one hundred and thirty

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 7>work days. Like I don't know if Elon Musk was.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 7>He has been staying here, as Jen was saying, weeks

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 7>at a time, essentially in Donald Trump's orbit. Now he's

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 7>also been, of course, attending space X meetings, and he's.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Played video games from his Westling office. If you're playing

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 3>video games in the office, does it count as work?

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if does account as a work day.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 4>My suspicion work when you play video games at the air.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I never play video games at the office.

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 5>My suspicion.

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 7>I mean taking it down from semi full time or

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 7>whatever he was to one to two days of days

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 7>a week.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 5>What I think that does is two things. One is it.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 7>Allows him to tell Tesla's shareholders, hey, I'm not distracted

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 7>The second thing is it probably gives them a little

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 7>bit of flexibility as far as like not being not going.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Over that one hundred and thirty days.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.599
<v Speaker 7>You know, I have to think that he's going to

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 7>have as much time in the White House with Donald

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Trump as he wants, and the administration will will figure

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 7>out a way to account for his time.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.239
<v Speaker 5>So that's so it's not bringing.

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Along because the President likes this relationship pretty cool and

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 4>also because of Elon steep Pockets.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean he is a really important I mean

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 7>there there's a lot of ink has been spilled about

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 7>the sort of popularity of DOGE and the lack there

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 7>are of the fact that making these has not, in

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 7>addition to falling well short of the claims of deficit reduction,

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 7>this has been very unpopular.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 5>On the other hand, Trump really needs Elon Musk.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 7>He is the most important donor on the Republican side

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 7>right now. He's going to be key if the Republicans

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 7>want to do well on the midterms. And you know,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 7>as Trump looks forward to his legacy, you know twenty

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 7>twenty eight, who the candidate is going to be. That

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 7>person is going to need Elon Musk in their corner.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Can we ask about you're going there?

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, go there?

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Does Elon have to be worried about the Tesla board

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 4>replacing him? I mean, the board chair has come out

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 4>and said nope, but we had another bad data point

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 4>for Tesla out of France. So I'm just curious, does

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 4>he really have to be worried?

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 5>So this report you're referring to the Wall Street Journal

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 5>report that the board had contacted executive search forms. Look,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about a normal company.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 7>This will be nothing, right, the fact that the stock's

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 7>been all over the place, He's clearly distracted. Of course

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 7>they'd be talking to other companies. And what makes this

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 7>crazy and what makes the boards denial not that surprising

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 7>is the board has been so behind Elon Musk for years.

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 7>And you know, this is the same board who has

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 7>been fighting in court to pay him like the largest

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 7>bonus you know, in history, despite the fact that Tesla's

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 7>stock price has.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Been very iffy. So so the board, you know, is.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 5>Very much still in Elon Musk's corner.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 7>If you look at the makeup of the board, you're

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 7>looking at his brother of people he has close relationships to.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 7>So I think you know, a couple of things are

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 7>possible here, assuming that the journal sources are legit, which

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 7>I do, is that you know, there may be some

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 7>opponent on the board who's been talking to search firms,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 7>or perhaps this is somebody on the board trying to

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 7>send a message to Elon Musk, trying to get through

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 7>to him saying you know, hey, this is real, we

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 7>need you to be involved. But in any case, I

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 7>wouldn't expect him to be leaving.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 5>A CEO anytime soon.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 7>If he were to leave, the stock price would would

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 7>be in trouble, be my prediction.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Some other members of the board. You mentioned Elon's brother

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Kimball Musk on the board. He's been on the board

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>for twenty one years. You've got James Murdoch who's been

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 3>on the board for close to eight years, Jeff Straubel

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 3>who's been on the board for two years, and then

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 3>Joe Gebbia, among others including Kathleen Wilson Thompson, as well

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Robin Dnelm, the chair of the board. We should note

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Max before we let you go, why do you think

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 3>is it still is? Are we still at a point

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 3>where Elon is so closely tied to Tesla and Tesla's

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 3>future because couldn't some investors or perhaps even institutional investors

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 3>see this as like, wait a second, this could actually

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 3>be a positive sign for Tesla because it would help

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>get it beyond the you know, being inextrictly bound to politics.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, if you talk to investors, you do hear that view,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 7>but it's very much a minority view. And the reason

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 7>it's a minority view I'm saying among Tesla investors, not

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 7>necessarily among outside observers, is because the valuation of Tesla

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 7>right now is very much not about its automotive ambition.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 7>So if you replaced Elon Musk with a normal CEO,

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 7>what you have as a car company. But many of

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Tesla's investors don't want to have a car company. They

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 7>want to have an AI company. And it's not clear

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 7>who runs that company, who can sell the muscles.

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Musk has got an AI company, a second one, he does.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 7>He has got Xai absolutely, But but you know, Musk

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 7>has told this story about driverless taxis and the optimist

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.959
<v Speaker 7>robot that's a humanoid robot. And when you look at

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.719
<v Speaker 7>the bullish valuations, if you listen to the bulls, they

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 7>are not counting on the model three or the model.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Why these the Tesla's kind of normal cars, which are

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 7>very successful in their own terms. They're expecting this entirely

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 7>new AI driven revenue stream, which really mostly just exists

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 7>in Elon Musk's head.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 5>And if you take Elon Musk out of the equation, how.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you do that model?

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 7>It becomes harder and and people, you know, you're laughing,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 7>but you know, Elon Musk has achieved impressive things. And

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 7>from the point of the investors, if anyone can do it,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 7>he can.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 4>And laughing, but I feel like they're investing in Elon

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 4>right and all all the craziness and all the innovation

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 4>that comes with him.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, pretty good, That's how it goes.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Max Chaffkin, Thank you so much, Bloomberg Business.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 4>We recommnist Max Chafkin, co host of the Elining podcast and,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 4>as we remind you, author of the contrarian Peter Tiel

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 4>and Silicon Valley's Pursuit of Power.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Business app, or watch US live on YouTube.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 3>On the sales side, I want to bring on Punham Boyle,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>senior analyst for e commerce at Leisure Off Price Retail

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins U from New York City

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 3>this afternoon. Let's talk about this miss when it comes

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 3>to second quarter operating income. The outlook there is that

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a result of tariffs? In your view, it.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 8>Has to be, because when I think about the operating

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 8>margin that they just posted with AWS, you know, incredible

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 8>near forty percent the downside that we're seeing going into

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 8>two Q, I can't think of anything else that could

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 8>be driving that and higher costs that they'll have to

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 8>orb due to the tariffs.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Are you surprised that, like we kind of you know,

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 4>went through that press release, there's really nothing on tariffs.

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 4>There's like that disclosure that kind of dumps everything at

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the very bottom of the page. Not surprising to see

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>that they didn't really address it in the release, And

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 4>I guess it's all going to come out on the call.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think there's going to be a lot of

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 8>questions about tariffs. Keep in mind that, you know, Amazon

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 8>is directly exposed on the one P side, so roughly

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 8>forty percent of its business is where they do have

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 8>to deal with tariffs. The other sixty percent, that's three

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 8>P the sellers have to deal with them, but Amazon

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 8>helps you set the price on its platform to make

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 8>it competitive. So there's just a lot of back and

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 8>forth that's going on, and with some suppliers they are

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 8>working one on one to see where they can help

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 8>offset the price increases. But the biggest delta between one

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 8>Q and two Q is tariffs. So the guidance that

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 8>we see here has to be a result of that

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 8>wide net that they've casted.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the ps, but translate for.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 8>US sure, third party and first party first party when

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 8>Amazon owns the goods, so basically they take on the

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 8>cost and they directly source it from the supplier. Third

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 8>party is if you and I go on to Amazon

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 8>and we start selling stuff.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 3>What's the breakdown in terms of actual goods that are

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 3>sold third party versus first party?

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 8>Sure, third party, we estimate is about sixty five percent

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 8>and third and first party is about thirty five to

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 8>forty percent?

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, sixty four And is there more like third party

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 3>is more from China or do we not know than

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 3>first party?

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 8>Well we Amazon doesn't tell you how much they get

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 8>from China. But just by looking at what's on their

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 8>platforms and third party data, irrespective third party or first party,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 8>it's estimated that over seventy percent of what's sold on

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 8>the Amazon dot Com platform is from China. So it's

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 8>a large, large, large piece of their market place.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Just to remind everybody, I mean, you you you study

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 3>e commerce at leisha off price retail, this is you know,

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 3>this is your world. This stuff is made overseas, like

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>very little of it is made here in the US,

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 3>very little.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean food is the only thing we may procure

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 8>locally that Amazon sells. Really everything else, the bulk of

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 8>what you buy in retail in the US is made

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 8>outside of the US. It doesn't matter who you are.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 4>What I don't know, Okay, I'll let him have a moment.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 5>You know what's.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Interesting put in We kind of just laugh that Normally

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 4>when we're talking Amazon, we're all over Amazon Web Services

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 4>and it's like, oh yeah, that retail business. So what

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 4>an interesting kind of report to go through and what

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 4>we're focusing on. I do want to point out though,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>that AWS reported first quarter sales gain seventeen percent to

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine point three billion, in line with analyst testaments.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 4>It was the unit's slowest growth in a year. So

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 4>it does feel like I don't know, like, what do

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 4>we get out of that.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 8>I think it's okay, I mean, okay, I'm going to

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 8>see businesses pull forward spend, pulled back on spend. There's

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 8>still a lot of momentum here on the AWS side.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 8>And really, you know, while the sales were just in line,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 8>the margin was incredible thirty nine percent operating margins thirty

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 8>nine point five percent roughly, that's huge. Consensus is looking

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 8>for about thirty five percent. So we do think, you know,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 8>this business will abb and flow and you'll have high margins,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 8>you'll have low margins depending on where they invest. But

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 8>the long term potential of AWS is still pretty sizable

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 8>and there's a long runway here.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay. So if we think about this in the context

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 3>of what we heard from what we've heard from other

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 3>companies thus far, what we heard from Microsoft yesterday, and

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 3>as a reminder, I mean, you cover the e commerce

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>at leisure, the off price retail. How do you think

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 3>about this in terms of the retail world, like the

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Walmart's of the world, the targets of the world. How

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 3>does this report sort of inform the way we should

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 3>be thinking about and investor should be thinking about those

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 3>other companies.

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 8>I think if Amazon's facing these tariff headwinds, so is

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 8>everyone else, including Walmart, including smaller companies, medium sized companies,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 8>And really there is no escape from this unless we

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 8>see things come from here. The one hundred and forty

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 8>five percent here iff that you see on China is sizable.

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 8>If that stays that way, the consumer is going to

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 8>be paying higher prices. We will see some out of

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 8>stocks on shelves in the coming months, as most companies

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 8>have halted shipments from China, and it's not going to

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 8>be an overnight switch to take everything that you make

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 8>in China to somewhere.

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Else, or even impossible for something. Some analysts have said, well,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>you said empty shelves, where are we going to see them?

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>What do you think we'll see them?

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Saw empty shelves in like a drugstore, But I don't

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 4>know that's because everybody.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Stole everything there.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Terrible.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't you know how this works.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 5>I know it's always a little war perspective.

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, BuNos, Sorry, well, you.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 8>Won't see empty shelves on Amazon but you will see

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 8>out of stocks. In fact, you know, I was just

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 8>browsing the web randomly and I started to see some

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 8>things that just said out of stock, like we'll let

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 8>you know when it comes back. So I think you'll

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 8>start to see inventory. Actually that that comes out of

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 8>China be put on hold and we don't know when

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 8>it'll come back. Because unless you raise the prices or

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 8>double them, you're not making the same margin.

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 3>On what's the consumer's willingness to pay for this stuff. Because,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 3>as I was mentioning to Caroline, if we see these

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 3>price increases across the board, if we see them a Target,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 3>if we see them at Walmart, It's not like this

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>is an Amazon specific story. We're going to see this everywhere.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 3>At what point does the consumer throw in the towel

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 3>and say, I'm not going to do this. I'm not

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 3>going to pay.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 8>I think the consumer will say I'm not going to

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 8>pay when prices go up thirty forty percent, right, it's

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 8>going to get more expensive. And if they say they

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 8>don't pay, it means before they bought ten things, now

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 8>they'll buy three things. Where are they buying those three things?

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 8>Are they going to trade down from a national brand

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 8>to a private brand. Are they going to buy more

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 8>staples that they can you know, like staple colors that

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 8>they can reuse, recycle reware, and wear less fashion that

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 8>goes out of style quickly. There's going to be trade

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 8>offs if prices rise materially. That said, we you think that,

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, people will just switch brands, They'll switch options

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 8>where they can get things cheaper. We're going into the

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 8>back half in just a few months, and that's the

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 8>peak selling season of retail. When you think about toys,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 8>specifically right for the holidays, when you think of back

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 8>to school. Yeah, I mean, what do you get your

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 8>kids if you're not going to get them the barbie

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 8>and you're not going to pay you know.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 4>You can only get them two barbies?

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Barbies only two dollars.

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, uh no, I'm just repeating you know what we've heard. Hey,

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 4>one last question I will say though, with the Amazon cart,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 4>like when you put them in and like you automatically

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 4>see the value, like if things start to get more expensive,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 4>like you might pull back thirty seconds. Top question you

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 4>think must be asked on the Amazon call?

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 8>How are we weathering this tariff storm that we're going into,

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 8>especially you know, with three piece sellers, how are they

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 8>going to control that. Amazon is still an attractive place

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 8>where value is seen because they don't have a control

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 8>on prices for everything.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, gonna leave it there, Hey put it. Thank

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 4>you so much, super super good conversation. Puna mcgoyle, Senior

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 4>analyst for e Commerce, ath Leisure, off Price Retail for

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.959
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 2>York station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 4>You know ed Ledo still with us too, of course,

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 4>co host of Bloomberg Technology, and we want to bring

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 4>into the fold. Mark German back with us, Managing editor

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 4>for Global Consumer Tech out there in our San Francisco bureau.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 4>All right, so Apple down about two point seven percent.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 5>Mark.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 4>We know you really are interested mostly in the call,

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 4>but the numbers are out. What if anything is of

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 4>interest here or you think is notable.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 9>I mean, overall revenue is up five percent every year,

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 9>so obviously that's a good thing. You saw iPhone sales

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 9>be slightly expectations from Wall Street, so that's a good thing.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 9>Show some solid momentum for the iPhone sixteen E. Notice

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.959
<v Speaker 9>that Tim Cook mentioned the sixteen e in particular versus

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 9>the pro models, which generate the most amount of revenue

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 9>for Apple. Obviously, Mac did a little bit better than expected,

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 9>iPad better than expected, but we saw some softness on

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 9>China services as well as wearables, Home and Accessories, Wearable's

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 9>Home and Accessories. The softness there continues. It's been this

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 9>way for several quarters. That's sort of surprising given the

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 9>momentum that we've seen in the past on the Apple

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 9>Watch and the AirPods and some of those peripheral products.

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 9>Services still pretty considerable double digit growth, but not at

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 9>the same level that Wall Street was anticipating. Services in

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 9>particular is quite interesting because that's going to probably be

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 9>a real headwind for Apple in the coming years now

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 9>that they're needing to adjust some of their app store

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 9>policies in relation to commissions. And then, of course we

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 9>have the Google Search deal overhanging all of this stuff.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 9>That's a double digit billion dollar annual revenue stree for Apple.

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 9>That may also go away depending on where the US

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 9>government goes with this trial against Google.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 3>A lack of a lack of commentary though, and maybe

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 3>we'll get it on the call. I know you're looking

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>for it about supply chains and about tariffs. Do you

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 3>think that's why investors are sending shares down ahead of

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 3>this call?

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 9>I think it's because of the continued softness in China

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 9>in particular. Obviously, China's Apple's third biggest market. China really

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 9>swings the pendulum here and when it comes to Apple

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 9>shares going up or down on earnings calls, And in

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 9>this case, we're at an annual decline, certainly an able

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 9>decline compared to where Apple was two years ago in

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 9>China this time around, and then missing Wall Street expectations

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 9>by about half a billion dollars. So definitely not a

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 9>good sign for Apple and China. And I think investors,

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 9>or at least those analysts on the call are gonna

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 9>have a lot of questions about that. But I hope

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 9>they do dig into tariffs as much as possible.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 10>Hey, Mark, I just want to go to the iPhone beat,

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 10>because it all comes back to the iPhone sometimes. Right,

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 10>forty six point eighty four billion. Estimate was forty fur

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 10>five point ninety four. The third party data showed a

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 10>lot of consumer electronics flying around the planet in the

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 10>first three months of this year. Do you see any

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 10>sort of evidence just from the pure number that this

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 10>was people buying handsets front running tariffs in anticipation that

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 10>maybe prices might go up in the future.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 9>I don't think the front running of purchases to avoid

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 9>price hikes in the future really happened until you know,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 9>mid late April, when that's already within Apple's third quarter.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 9>So I don't think that any of the iPhone sales

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 9>numbers that we're seeing here really were influenced by people

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 9>trying to get ahead of tariff price hikes. I mean,

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 9>Trump made his announcement in early April, and this was

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 9>not really in the public consciousness until then, which again

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 9>is the start of the third quarter for Apple. So

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 9>I think the impact there will be in the current quarter,

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 9>and I'm looking forward to hearing any guidance that Apple

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 9>gives on the call which may give us a taste

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 9>of how the iPhone's going to do in this current period.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, go ahead, Carol, what do you think they're going

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 4>to say, in terms of price increases, it's something you

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 4>gave us a heads up on earlier, you know, in

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.959
<v Speaker 4>terms of margins impact, and then price increases, you know,

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 4>in this tariff filled environment. So do you think we'll

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 4>get any kind of clarity or specifics on that.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 9>So, if I was a betting man, at least one

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 9>analyst is going to ask about the potential of price increases.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 9>And if I remained a betting man, I would say,

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 9>Tim Cook would say, we'll see nothing to announce today,

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 9>and then maybe if we're lucky. Talk about how they

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 9>think about these types of things.

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, how does Apple do price increases?

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, they really don't. I mean, the iPhone price has

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 9>been stagnant for the most part. There are some exemptions

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 9>over the past you know, seven, eight, nine years, so

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 9>they really don't do price increases. And so when they

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 9>do make the price increase, they're going to do it

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 9>from a position of strength. They're going to focus on

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 9>installment plans, They're going to focus on carrier deals, and

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 9>they're going to focus about on the technologies that they've

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 9>implemented over last decade to make the iPhone more valuable.

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 9>They're going to talk about how useful the phone is

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 9>how it's equivalent to X number of cups of coffee

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.360
<v Speaker 9>is a year, et cetera. And they're definitely not going

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 9>to mention tariffs as a reason because they saw what

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 9>that did to Amazon the other day.

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Well said, Well said, looking forward to your reporting after

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 4>the call as well. Mark Mark German, Managing editor for

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 4>Global Consumer Tech Bloomberg News out there in our San

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Francisco bureau. So ed just got about thirty seconds here.

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what are you thinking about? Is it just

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 4>again Terriff's for Apple or Amazon? Like I don't know.

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, point Like, if it wasn't that front running on

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 10>the iPhone, then what was the beat people still in

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 10>love with the iPhone? Just I think that's a really

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 10>basic question. But again, all we've got to go off

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 10>on the right now is that we noticed that Apple

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 10>added the word trade right, one single word to the

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 10>boiler plate in the forward guidance or financial disclosures disclaimer and.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Both of them.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, surprised Apple didn't have that in there already, given

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 3>what we knew about this administration, and they that those risks.

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Are listened supply chain the idea, you know what.

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Happened in twenty seventeen. Two. Yeah, but hey.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Ed Lolo, thank you so much for a moment.

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Also out with an update, ELI Lilly shares falling as

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 3>much as twelve percent earlier in the session, the biggest

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 3>intry day drop going back to October. Shares now down

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 3>ten and a half percent. This after CBS announced a

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 3>plan to drop its blockbuster weight loss of drug zet

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Bound from its preferred list making rival wey govi more

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 3>widely available. Madison Mueller is Bloomberg News Health reporter. She

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 3>joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. So

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Lily maintained sales guidance. Zet Bound performed in line with

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street's expectations, but investors who've been hoping for more

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 3>explosive growth were underwhelmed. Are we seeing prices here?

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is what is definitely starting to happen here.

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, coming on the heels of the news that

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we discussed earlier this week, which was that Nova Nordisk

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was partnering or working with some telehealth companies to distribute

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>via or to distribute pens of its blockbuster drug would

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>go V at a lower cost. And now we're seeing

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Novo partner with CVS retail pharmacies and CVS is Drug

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Benefits Manager Unit to provide more cost savings for patients

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and for health plans that cover weight loss drugs. So

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely hitting up.

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Is it just negotiating or is it I mean, we've

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 4>talked with you too that there's similar drugs, but they're

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 4>not all exactly the same. So I'm just a little

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 4>curious about fat you.

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Said, yeah, I mean that is part of the interesting thing.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Lily has said and they were saying today

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that the price of the medication, they purposefully priced it lower,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean for competitive reasons. It came onto the market

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>after Novo Nordisks drug. Lily's drugs Utbound, is a little

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more effective, but both drugs work really well for

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>weight loss. Lily's drug costs around one thousand dollars a month,

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>while Novo's is about thirteen hundred dollars a month, but

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>those the higher list prices mean that drug makers, when

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>they're negotiating with these PBMs, can provide greater discounts, bigger rebates,

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So in some ways it actually turns out to be

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a benefit when they're at the negotiating table. But those

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the things, and we were talking about

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>this earlier.

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>There's not a lot of.

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Clarity about how these negotiations work, what happens behind the scenes,

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's not something that we're probably going to get

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon.

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So was today's stock move all about this CBS news?

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, in part, I think it sort of

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>compounded the underwhelming results that you mentioned earlier. I mean,

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a good quarter for Lily, but their expectations

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for this company are so high now that they just

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can't really afford to have a a you know, inline quarter.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Investors were looking for more growth and looking for zep

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bound sales that sort of smash past X estimates like

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>they did last year, and that's just not what happened.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>So it was just a little bit disappointing, I think.

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And then and then seeing the CVS news, it was

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting because CVS and Lily both reported earnings today, so

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of got to see this happen in real time.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 4>All right, So I mean I don't know, can can

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 4>this change? I mean, how much of it is about

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 4>the GLP one still for Lily, like we always talk

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 4>about the pipeline and.

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Other things, it's like more than a seven hundred million

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 3>dollar company at this point.

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so she helps us like put this in perspective,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and that is really that valuation is really about weight

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>loss struggs. But the thing is Lily's, like you just mentioned,

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>their pipeline. People are so excited about Lily's pipeline because

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>not only do they have zep bound, which is, like

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we said earlier, a little bit more effective, but they

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>also have a weight loss pill that's coming pretty soon,

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as early as twenty twenty six, the CEO has said,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and that is thought to be the next big thing

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in this market. They are far ahead of the competition

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to that, and they're going to continue

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to sort of dominate this space.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 4>So can the one follow in terms of the PBMs?

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 4>And you know, negotiating, so you know, if they come

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>with a pill, is that a whole separate negotiation because

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 4>it's a different form of delivery versus an injection.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, that is the question. I mean, the

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>thought is that the pills will be priced lower to

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>begin with, because they're easier to manufacture. Pills are typically

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit cheaper. But Novo has a pill on

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the market right now called Rybelsis that doesn't work as

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>well for weight loss, but it's around the same price

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>as at Zempics. So it sort of is to be

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>determined what will happen with the pricing war, but the

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>expectation is that it will be a little bit cheaper

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on pricing.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 3>You and the team out with a story about a

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 3>price war here, reminding us that Novo reached a deal

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 3>with HIMS and Hers this week along with two other

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 3>telehealth medicine providers, for a month's supply starting at four

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred ninety nine dollars. This is a wee gov before

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 3>subscription fees. Leli Lily announcing expanded partnership with weight Watchers

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 3>on April twenty ninth. How low is this price going

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to go?

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the question, I mean, and I think that that's

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what investors were worried about.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Price price worth great for consumers exactly, not good for investors.

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen these companies get and we say in

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the story publicly lambasted for the prices of their drugs.

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bernie Sanders called the CEO of Novo Nordisk

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>into a hearing last year and then really railed him

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>on the price of these of these medications. And they

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>are bringing the prices down, and they are expanding accessibility options,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>affordability options for patients. But I think investors were concerned

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what this means for Lily. Are they going to lose

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>out on share because of this?

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Where is it manufactured? Is it he all here?

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So far they do. Their supply chains are sort of

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. No holl makes some of the

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>drug here. They do, they make some in Denmark. Same

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>with Lily. The first step happens in Ireland, a lot

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>more happens here. So they are also potentially exposed to Tariff's.

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Madison Muller the best health reporter here at Bloomberg News.

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Check her out on the Bloomberg.

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>MC.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll bet you let me drive.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, no, no no.

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 7>This is not a toy drug.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Honey, please gravels wait, I want to try.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question, good time.

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Plums for music.

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, Briar Jona don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 4>All right, TikTok, everybody, about eighteen minutes to go until

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 4>we wrap up the trade on this first trading day

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 4>of May May one, twenty twenty five. Charlie just breaking

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 4>down the numbers along with Jordan, and you can see that, Yeah,

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 4>up about one percent on the S and P five hundred,

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 4>all our best levels of the session. And you've got

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 4>really those big tech names continuing to push the nowstak

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 4>one hundred higher, up about one point six percent. In particular,

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Meta and Microsoft. We talked about it earlier after the day,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 4>after the clothes we get the a's of the mag.

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Seven Airbnb, no Am Jen no.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, no funny, how that works?

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Apple and Amazon?

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 4>That's what you're talking about, Okay, exactly.

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey, let's see what Max Wasserman has to say about this.

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 3>He's founder and senior portfolio manager at Mirra Mark Capital. Max.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to talk about these individual names with you.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have plenty on that in just a

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 3>few minutes. I want to hear your thoughts on the

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 3>macro environment right now, given that we've seen such a

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 3>rally over the last few days. Hard to believe that

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>April ended the way it did given the selling that

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 3>we saw in the first part of the month. Yeah,

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 3>it's great to be here.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 11>It's fascinating to see all the turmoil that's taking place

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 11>in the marketplace based on commentary out of the White House.

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 11>But if you look behind that and you look at

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 11>what's happening in the economy, we are seeing signs of

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 11>economy slowing down and you're still seeing embedded inflation. So

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 11>the question becomes, will the Fed take that embedded inflation

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 11>and hold off We'll look at the tariffs as a

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 11>transitory inflation that can be that needs to be dealt with,

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 11>or can just leave it alone. But we see the

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 11>economy slowing down, we see the consumer eventually being hurt

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 11>by that, and if the tariffs again, it's hard to

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 11>handicap that because he keeps making exceptions all the time, right,

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you just heard the latest thing about Iran

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 11>with oil, So it becomes very challenge. But we think

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 11>this market is slowing down, and we think the consumer

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 11>is going to be hurt by that, and we think

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 11>the market needs to reflect that, and we think it

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 11>is for the most part. But there's areas of pockets

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 11>where technology they're still gravitating to that right now, Hey,

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 11>do you feel.

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Like with confiction max that you can say, Okay, this

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.439
<v Speaker 4>is our market for the rest of twenty twenty five

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 4>or it could change dramatically for the better for the worse.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 11>I don't think you can do conviction for an afternoon

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 11>with this White House. I mean, every single time you

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 11>hear about a tariff, you hear an exception, and you're

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 11>going to hear that tonight. It's going to be interesting

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 11>to hear from the two companies this evening. But now

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 11>I mean mentioning names. One of the companies get seventy

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 11>percent of their products they sell to Americas from China,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 11>so that has to be inflationary unless they get an exemption.

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 11>But the question becomes planning or investing. You have to

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 11>really take a long term look and not trade this

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 11>short term because the information's changing by the hour. But

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 11>we do see good companies out there that have been

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 11>hit hard that you know, over six, twelve, eighteen months

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 11>should be in good investments paying a good dividend.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:02.439
<v Speaker 5>So we like that.

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 11>But the short term, you know, fasten your seatbelt and

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 11>they say and put the trays in the upright position,

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 11>because it all depends on what the White House says,

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 11>and then next week, what does the Fed say about this?

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 3>Max, you can name names if you want. You feel

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 3>free too.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 11>Sure, I mean, I mean, it's interesting to see what

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 11>is amagon Amazon going to say seventy percent of their

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 11>goods are coming from China, basically over two and a

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 11>half times what they sell from here. So what kind

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 11>of inflation is that going to be we all say,

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 11>and how they going to handle it?

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it'll be under an extra microscope given what

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>we heard earlier this week after that punch Bowl News

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 3>report sort of the back and forth from the White

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 3>House about what ended up happening or or what you know,

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a call between Bezos and the President regarding being transparent

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 3>about those prices and where that's coming from. There was

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of back and forth there, So I think

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 3>there will be a lot of questions about the impact

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 3>on consumers. That's and you know, typically typically Amazon is

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 3>a story that has to do less with retail and

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 3>more with AWS, and we kind of got the preview

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 3>of AWS yesterday with Microsoft. Okay, so that's some views

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 3>on tariffs. What about the inflationary side of things, and

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 3>that's certainly related to tariffs. How are you looking at

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 3>about the inflation path forward?

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 11>I still think it's stubborn, you know, we still think

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 11>it's embedded in there, and we would not be for

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 11>the FED cutting because we think inflation is still built

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 11>into the marketplace.

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Which where specifically because we're seeing a moveway and oil prices,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing lower oil prices. Where are you seeing inflation embedded?

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 11>And well, basically you're seeing the consumer spending. You know,

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 11>they're telling you that the prices went up a little bit.

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 11>You're also seeing in the fact that housing right, well

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 11>people aren't buying housing, but the cost of basically maintaining

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 11>your home, you know, if you want to do repairs

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 11>in your home, the cost of the wood, the cost

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 11>of the products. We're seeing that as an issue. You're

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 11>also seeing the fact that goods that are being bought

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:57.240
<v Speaker 11>are higher than they were. So the question really becomes

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 11>is if the consumers anticipating higher rates or slow down

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 11>they pull back on the spending. So well, yeah, you

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 11>looked earlier about the cloud, but you look at the

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 11>impact to consumer if they're facing day to day you

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 11>look at companies like Procter and Gamble, it's telling you

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 11>they're facing that issue with the products they're being selling.

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 11>You know, that's the basics of what's them to the home.

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:20.919
<v Speaker 11>So the inflation still there. Yes, energy has come down

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 11>a little bit, and yes, you know if they say

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 11>food prices. But still when you look at it, the

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 11>consumer is slowing down the spending. But is that is

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 11>that going to be permanent? I don't know, because I

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 11>can't tell you what we look like inflation. I think

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 11>the Fed is too early to act. I think they

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 11>need to be more patient because what you don't want

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 11>them to do is jump the gun cut rates. And

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 11>then you have the White House change of you know,

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 11>the issue on tariffs, and next thing you know, you

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 11>have inflation ticking up again. And I do think stagflation

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 11>is a very big concern here, all right.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 4>So hmm, net net As you say, things can change,

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 4>you know rapidly, we live it every day, every minute hour.

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Having said that, do you believe that things will settle

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 4>at some point where higher tariffs though they're not the

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 4>tariffs that they were, that there's going to be some

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 4>higher level of tariffs and disruptions as supply chains, some

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe are brought indeed back to the United States, and

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 4>things are changing that could ultimately lead to a very

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 4>different investment environment going forward, a different level of profitability

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 4>for companies here in the United States. I mean, what's

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:36.479
<v Speaker 4>the long term game that you think might be very

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 4>different for the investment environment.

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's hard to predict the long term game because

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 11>if you see.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Are you saying it could just go back to the

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 4>way it was before.

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 5>I think it's going to go back the way it was.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 11>But I think the market's reflecting disruption, right if you

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 11>look at takeout technology, the market's reflecting it. Consumers are reflecting,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 11>and energy stocks are reflecting it. Healthcare showing disruptions. And

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.439
<v Speaker 11>you have to ask yourself what's actually being and moved

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 11>back here? I mean, what's happening really, not what's being

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 11>talked about, but what's actually being moved here. Semiconductors are

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 11>getting exceptions, but you have to look at what's happening

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 11>with Taiwan. So long term, I am bullish, but I

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 11>think you're going to be choppy from the next two quarters.

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 11>I think the second half of the year as we

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 11>get through this and really settle into what tariffs are

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 11>really going to look like, and the companies have the

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 11>ability to plan for it, and the consumers get used

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 11>to what they have to deal with, and then you'll

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 11>know where the FED is do. I think the Fed's

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 11>going to cut interest rates to the fourth quarter probably.

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 11>I don't want them to cut earlier because that means

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:35.919
<v Speaker 11>the economy is really slowing down.

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 5>But it's hard to tell.

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if you look at right now, they said

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 11>GDP was negative, but that was a pull forward from

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 11>all the imports. People were front loading that. So the

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 11>question becomes employment. Employment. A lot of the problems that

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 11>you just had was New York related. Was a big uptick.

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 11>But you have to wait. The economy is still strong,

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 11>but we're seeing really good signs of a slowdown. I

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 11>think the second half of the year, everybody be more

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 11>adjusted to what we're actually dealing with, and I think

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 11>that's going to create an incredible investment opportunity. Yep, you

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 11>can look longer than three to six months, and.

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 4>We do know that you are finding opportunities. Visa waste management,

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 4>there's a couple of companies that you definitely have been buying.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 4>So any market environment, there are opportunities. Next time, we'll

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 4>talk more about the specifics of that. Max Fasserman, founder,

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 4>senior portfolio manager at mir or More Capital, around five

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:27.760
<v Speaker 4>hundred million in assets under management, joining us from Northbrook, Illinois.

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Folks.

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 3>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 3>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 3>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 3>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 3>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and always on the Bloomberg terminal