WEBVTT - US Retail Sales, TSMC Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Affo, Cardplay and Android

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Get back to the markets here.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 4>The big economic news of the day was the retail sales,

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 4>and they generally came out I think across the board

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 4>stronger than expected. The headline zero point four percent, consensus

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 4>was zero point three for growth and zero point one

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 4>percent last period, so big pick up there. When you

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 4>look at the control group, perhaps even more impressive zero

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 4>point seven percent gain versus zero point three percent forecast

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 4>and last month was zero point three percent, So again

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 4>pretty strong across the board. Let's see what it means

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 4>to some of the folks who really follow the retail

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 4>business closely, as does our next guest, Mary Shore, Senior

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Equity anams A Columbia thread Needle, joining us from Boston

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 4>via Zoom. So, Mary, just to my untrained eye, these

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 4>retail sales numbers look pretty good. What do you think

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 4>and what are you seeing in the retail space these days?

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Thanks, for having me back. I think you're right.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 7>The strong September retail sales print confirms that the consumer

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 7>is in good shape amidst a relatively strong jobs and

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 7>income backdrop. To your point, there may have been some

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 7>benefit this month from pre hurricane stock up behavior, but

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 7>overall the growth remains very healthy, as we've been talking

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 7>about for some time now.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 6>However, when you.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 7>Dig deeper, you continue to see pockets of strength and weakness.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 6>So areas of strength.

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 7>That I would highlight would be food, health and wellness,

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 7>clothing and value, which I think is really incorporated in

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 7>that general merchandise category. And then some areas of weakness

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 7>to call out would be autos and some of the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 7>bigger ticket categories that we're strong during the pandemic, like

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 7>furniture and electronics. So when I look at the data,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 7>I think it shows the consumers in good shape, and

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 7>it really is a continuation of a lot of the

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 7>trends that we've discussed in prior episodes.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 8>It's interesting. I mean, obviously this data does show that

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 8>the consumer is in a good spot, but of course

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 8>people are still complaining of this intensely high inflation. How

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 8>do you think that this really fits into the broader

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 8>economy and as we think about things moving forward, well,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 8>I think.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 7>It's exactly what we're seeing in the data. We're very

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 7>high level, we see low single digit growth, But then again,

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 7>when you dig a little deeper, you see services growing

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 7>faster than goods, and within goods, you see needs growing

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 7>faster than once. And so to your point, the inflation

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 7>that we've seen in food and housing in particular really

0:02:56.040 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 7>continues to weigh on consumer discretionary spend on goods, and

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 7>I think that is a real key reason for some

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 7>of the continued weakness in some of those bigger ticket

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 7>categories that I just highlighted.

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Mary, what are the retailers that you cover?

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 4>What are they saying about the holiday Christmas season coming

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 4>up such a big part of their annual sales?

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I think you know, as always they're cautiously optimistic.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, they're optimistic by nature, but given the macro backdrop,

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 7>I think everyone is planning their business very conservatively. They

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 7>were being disciplined on inventory. I expect promotions to be

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 7>very well controlled for that reason. But overall, I do

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 7>think it will be a strong holiday. What we've seen

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 7>this year is that during key events, the consumer does

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 7>come out and shop, so I think, you know, we

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 7>will see real strength over Black Friday and the week

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 7>before Christmas, and probably a lull in between those two

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 7>shopping periods as we've seen in the past. So overall,

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 7>I would expect a strong season, but still a little

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 7>lumpy when you're looking week by week.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 8>So Mary, talk to me about the sentiment as we're

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 8>thinking about things heading into this election. Of course, we're

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 8>less than a month away. How are consumers thinking about

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 8>this and businesses as well?

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 7>Right well, I think whether it's the election or the

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 7>direction of gas prices, what most of the companies that

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 7>I talk to say is it's really the uncertainty which

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 7>is more paralyzing for the consumer. So I would definitely

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 7>expect some noise, you know, right heading into the election.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 7>But either way, I think that the results of the

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 7>election will provide that certainty to the consumer and probably

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 7>boost consumer sentiment going forward. I think what it means

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 7>for the companies could be more mixed, Like if Trump

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 7>does continue talking about his tariff policy, then you know,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 7>that could be an overhang on some of the retailers

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 7>that import from overseas.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.799
<v Speaker 6>But I think overall, just the results of the election.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 7>In gaining that uncertainty will be a positive thing for

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 7>consumer sentiment going forward.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>All right, this Christmas shopping season, how promotional will the

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>retailers be? I know that goes right to their profit margin,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>but how do you think that's going to shake out?

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, we talk a lot about promotions versus markdowns.

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 7>You know, the retailers know they have to be promotional

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 7>to drive traffic, and so I think you should expect

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 7>to see controlled promotions. So what I mean by that is,

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 7>you know, promotions more in say the thirty percent range,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 7>and given that inventory is well controlled, I think the

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 7>retailers will try to stick to that plan for as

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 7>long as possible. I would not expect to see promotions

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 7>in like the seventy percent range and markdowns, and that's

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 7>typically what you see when the sales are a lot

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 7>weaker than planned or the inventory is a lot heavier

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 7>than planned. And I don't really expect either of those

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 7>things this holiday. So you'll still see those headline promotions,

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 7>but you have to remember that the retailers have planned

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 7>for those they bought into them, and so there's really

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 7>no negative margin implication from some of those headlines.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, we think historically and then moving into this year,

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 8>how do consumers really think about the holidays when we're

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 8>thinking in this season, is it everyone's just going to

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 8>throw everything on their credit card because we have the

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 8>holiday cheer? Or do you think they're really going to

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 8>be targeting those companies that are those stores that are

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 8>offering promotions specifically.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 6>It's a great question.

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think we do see the consumer come

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 7>out and spend around key events, and you know, especially

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 7>in a year that could be tough, you're feeling the

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 7>pinch of inflation, every consumer wants to bring a little

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 7>cheer around the holidays. So I do expect that they

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 7>will be out in the market. Having said that, I

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 7>think they're still going to be very discerning, very focused

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 7>on value, and I would expect a lot of the

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 7>value players, as I mentioned in that general merchandise category

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 7>to be the key beneficiary.

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Mari, thank you so much for joining us.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Mary Sure Senior ecuadanams a Columbia Thread Needle Investments up

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>in Boston, always helping us out talking about retail sales.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecar Play and Android

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Otto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen live

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's switch gears.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to the markets here technology in the

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 4>play here yesterday, I think it was me who said

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I think I've seen the top of AI.

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I think some of these chip.

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Companies are going to roll over and blah blah blah blah.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Well then Taiwan Semiconductor comes out with a better than

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 4>forecasted outlook. So once again I was proven wrong, particularly

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 4>it relates to technology.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what's going on.

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 4>How do you feel about that? How do I feel

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 4>about that? It lasted all of like twenty four hours?

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 4>My great call there, Man Deep Sing he's the extra,

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 4>He's the one we go to. Man Deep Sying, he's

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 4>the tech ANAMST for Bloomberg Intelligence. So Mandy talks about

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan Semi Contector. A lot of our listeners, a lot

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 4>of reviewers not really familiar with it. Tell us about

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 4>what this company does and kind of what they announced recently.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 9>I mean, basically, they are the manufacturing factory for all

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 9>your AI chips, all the chips that go into smartphones,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 9>and basically they are at the leading edge of manufacturing.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 9>When people talk about you know chips, the most powerful

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 9>AI chips with the most transistors, they are the ones

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 9>who are manufacturing it. And look, I think it was

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 9>quite a contrast between the ASML print and the TSMC print,

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 9>and what it shows you is the AI side continues

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 9>to be strong. In fact, they called out smartphones being

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 9>as strong in market as well uh in the print.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 9>So clearly the top two segments for them are working

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 9>quite well and they have more demand than they can manufacture.

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 9>These chips for Nvidia and Apple, those are their you know,

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 9>top customers, and they're raising their capex guide. So one

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 9>of the concerns was will TSMC raise their capex guide

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 9>given what we heard from a SML, Well, guess what,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 9>they are raising their capex guide. So a SML's woes

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 9>were really driven by Intel pairing back and Samsung pairing back.

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 9>But when it comes to TSMC, they continue to be strong,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 9>all right.

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 4>So Taimewan Semiconductor does a trade in US or eighty

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 4>rs in US.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 3>The ADRs are the ADRs trade in.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 4>US t SM as your tickle put InChI. Bloomberg Terminal

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 4>stock is up eleven percent today, up one hundred percent

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 4>year to date. This isn't a penny stock. This has

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 4>a market cap of over one trillion dollars. My ignorance

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 4>level on this is out of control. I mean, I

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 4>just didn't know they were that big.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 8>I know, when we're compute, the number's two big.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 3>No, it's too big.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 4>That's why we need man deep sink. So anyway, big

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 4>company folks. Giving a positive outlook on the chip business

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 4>really important for overall tech discussion about AI.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 8>So talk to us about the outlook right now? What

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 8>are expectations when we think about the tech sector more broadly?

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 8>I know earnings people have a pretty low bar, so

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 8>if companies are doing well, it'll be a really great,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 8>you know, great news coming out of that. How is

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 8>the tech sector when we're looking at AI specifically, what

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 8>are expectations right now? I know the bar tends to

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 8>be relatively high.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I don't know if the bar is low

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.479
<v Speaker 9>at this point, given what we saw with THEML ASML

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 9>was the case of expectations being too high and they

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 9>guide it to that. And now they come out, you know,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 9>this quarter and say we are taking down bookings by

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 9>fifty percent. So clearly expectations were high. It was the

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 9>management who said it, and now they took back their guide.

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 9>In the case of if I think in Video or

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 9>some of the other bellveather for AI, look, we've been

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 9>hearing that the demand for their latest chip continues to

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 9>be strong. The TSMC print is another validation that you know,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 9>they are ramping up the AI side. It's almost mid

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 9>teens of their revenue. This was almost a zero billion,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 9>a zero a dollar revenue for TSMC a few quarters back.

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 9>So in just the span of three four quarters, it's

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 9>mid teens of their revenue. That just goes to show

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 9>along with the margin expansion, the gross margin growing to

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 9>fifty eight percent. I mean, all this is positive for

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 9>AI and you know for bell Weathers like Nvidia at

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 9>the same time, this will drive up the expectations even further.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 9>So you know, the bar keeps getting higher, and at

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 9>some point I think you will have missus like what

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 9>we saw with the SML, but probably not that soon

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 9>for the likes of Invidia.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 4>So thirty secondsleft, who are the top two or three

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 4>or four buyers of these chips. Is it the Microsoft's

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 4>and the Googles of the world.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, in the case of TSMC, the top buyer

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 9>is still Apple. Okay, so that validates that smartphone to

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 9>refresh that everyone is waiting for that segment. Did well.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 9>The inventory is building up, and then Nvidia and and

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 9>Nvidia continues to become a bigger buyer of tsmcs. And

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 9>then you have got AMD and some others. But pretty

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 9>much every fabulous design company, whether it's AMD, Qualcomm and VideA,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 9>goes to TSMC for you know, manufacturing their chips because

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 9>they have a leading node monopoly. I mean, everyone else

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 9>is way behind when it comes to.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Son Go to Taiwan and see Taiwan and see them

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 4>make chips.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you should visit one of their factories, the one

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 9>in Arizona though.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're gonna do one in Arizona. Yeah, okay, that's

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 3>cool too. All right, Mandy, thank you very much again.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 4>As always, he is our absolute goat to persons for

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 4>all things technology. Senior Technology aannels. He runs all of

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 4>our tech practice at Bloomberg Intelligence, and we appreciate getting

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 4>his time because he's only a floor away.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not like a big ass. We love that, and

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 3>you walk.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Up the stairs and talk to us on Bloomberg Radio,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 4>man Deep singing.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>There, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 2>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, did retail sales today nor better than expected?

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe maybe the FED doesn't have to cut in November.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 4>And if they don't, is that okay? I don't know

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 4>the markets are creating car here. It looks like it's

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.559
<v Speaker 4>kind of okay. Let's talk to somebody who's actually has

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 4>a professional here on this whole thing.

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 3>David Kodluck. He's a founder, he's a chief executive officer.

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>And he's a chief investment strategist. I think that means

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 4>he's the boss.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 8>It sounds like it.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 4>That's right, mainstay a capital management from one of my

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 4>favorite little towns out there in the Midwest, Troy, Michigan.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I've been to Troy, Michigan. Cool little town, David.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 4>So you get a retail sales number today that's better

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 4>and expected, you get some still a pretty strong labor market.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Is this a FED that has to cut and if

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 4>they don't have to cut in November.

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that okay?

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 10>Good morning, Paul and Nora. I think it's a FED

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 10>that will continue to cut. They'll continue to ease because

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 10>monetary policy is more restrictive than it needs to be.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 11>Inflation has come down there.

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 10>I know there's fears that we could see a resurgence

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 10>of inflation here yet this year into next year, but

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 10>inflation has come down and is drifting towards target. Certainly

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 10>it is in Europe the ECB cut last night. The

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 10>key here is that when we look at the economy

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 10>and say, I think it's you know, what's interesting is

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 10>do they need to cut for a recession? No, those

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 10>that have been calling for a recession for the last

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 10>two years have been dead.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 11>We're wrong.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 10>We've kind of mocked this by my phrase the recession

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 10>is always six months away. That have actually been saying

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 10>for two and a half years now. And yeah, retail

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 10>sales came in above expectations, four tenths a month over

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 10>month versus three tenths.

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 11>We've got strong.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 10>GDP Atlanta gb GDP now forecast above three percent, uh,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 10>labors hanging in there, and so we've I always I

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 10>always am careful to use the word goldilocks economy, but

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 10>we sure, you know, if there's if there's such a

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 10>thing as a Goldilocks economy, we're sure close to it

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 10>right now. And the Fed does have the ability to

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 10>continue to ease as other central banks are around the world,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 10>just because you know, we we don't uh, we're in

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 10>that sweet spot where they can make monetary policy a

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 10>little less restrictive.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 8>So tell me, David, which economic data is most paramount

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 8>right now. I know we've always had our eyes on inflation,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 8>but it seems as though attention is really shifting toward

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 8>employment data as being more important right now. What's your

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 8>look your out look on that?

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that, Nora and I agree.

0:15:55.040 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 10>It's really it's this, when we look at employment or

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 10>labor versus inflation. You know, where are we and we

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 10>see inflation drifting down? We think that's becoming a more

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 10>non existent problem. We keep getting mixed data on labor.

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 10>You know, there was some screwy numbers in the back

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 10>months that had to be revised. But you know, if

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 10>we if we we want to keep an eye on labor.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 10>We want to keep an eye on the consumer being

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 10>two thirds of our economy, so we need labor to

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 10>stay strong enough but not too strong and not get

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 10>weak enough that they're cutting, you know, for the reasons

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 10>we don't want, which is the fear of a recession.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 10>And we think the you know that the fears of

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 10>a recession, you know, they're just there's anecdotal data there.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 10>You know, what's happening with car loan delinquencies, personal debt,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 10>credit card debt.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 11>There's that anecdotal data.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 10>But when we look at GDP, we look at labor,

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 10>we look at inflation, we look at retail salesman. You know,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 10>we've we've got when we look at the macro numbers,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 10>we've got an economy that keeps chugging along, and correspondingly,

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 10>a stock market that keeps chugging along.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 11>Again.

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 10>The people that have called for a bear market anytime

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 10>over the last two years, they weren't early. They were

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 10>just wrong, dead wrong. And you know, we're still constructive

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 10>on stocks. It always looks prudent, right, It always looks

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 10>prudent or smart to say a recession is right around

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 10>the corner, or bear markets right around the corner. But

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 10>it's key to these people that have been saying this

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 10>for so long they're dead just been wrong.

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.959
<v Speaker 8>So David, how are you advising your clients now versus

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 8>maybe this time last year?

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 10>We're you know, all that said, we're always concerned about

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 10>when when the next shoe will drop or you know,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 10>when when the first shoe will drop or the next

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 10>shoe will drop.

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 11>We are concerned about that.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 10>So that's why we're keeping an eye on the data

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 10>that were talking about here on does it is inflation

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 10>on a glide path down to the.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 11>Fence target we believe it is.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 10>Is you know, uh, do we still have though a

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 10>robust economy or we headed towards recession?

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 11>We don't think so. So Uh.

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 10>We continue to be very constructive on the markets. We're

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 10>over overweight equities. We've changed our term structure on our

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 10>bond holding somewhat. We were last year in the first

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 10>part of this year on the shortest end of the curve,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 10>just capturing yield, uh, rather than any kind of interest

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 10>rate player anything else. Because duration has worked against you, uh,

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 10>we think there's an opportunity over the next year that

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 10>duration will help you. You can get that capital appreciation

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 10>combined with the yield on your stocks, clip the coupon

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 10>and enjoy some capital appreciation. But I think my strongest

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 10>recommendation is, uh, you know, these all the naysayers, all

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 10>the doomsayers, the pundits that are you know, collapses eminet. Look,

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 10>they've been wrong, and so we're very constructive on the markets.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 10>We're bullish on the market's near term. We have an

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 10>election coming that we'll get out of the way, so

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 10>that removes some uncertainty. And we're heading into the seasonal

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 10>period that's strong for stocks from November through April. So

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, there's a lot of economic seasonality and other

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 10>factors that are good tailwinds for equities right now.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 4>David, you mentioned the election nineteen days I think coming

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 4>up or very close here.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>What do you tell your clients about it?

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 4>I mean, is there any way to election proof of

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 4>portfolio or don't worry about it?

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, unfortunately, and not our clients, because we educate our

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 10>clients about this a lot every election cycle. Don't election

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 10>proof it by going to cash. That's the worst mistake

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 10>that investors make because look at this, look at this

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 10>election like others, how polarizing, you know, between the two candidates.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, if so and so gets elected, we're going

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 10>to heck in a handbasket in the same thing for

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 10>the other candidate.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 11>And there's all this.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 10>The reality of it is is the biggest factor for

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 10>the market is uncertainty. Markets had uncertainty that will be

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 10>determined here in three weeks. So the key is don't

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 10>go to cash, stay invested in the market and as

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 10>we see who it looks like will be what administration

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 10>will be in office here in a few months, that's

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 10>where that's where we want to be tactically moving our

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 10>portfolios to worst mistake is to go to cash. And look,

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 10>this year is a perfect example. We have the best

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 10>election year through today for the markets that we've had

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 10>since the nineteen thirties. That's how good this year is.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 10>It is not the time to be to go to cash,

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 10>to wait on the sidelines until you see how it

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 10>comes out. Right, So it's looking at where what do

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 10>you expect with the candidate that will win, tactically allocating

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 10>your portfolio.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 11>For that and stay invested.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Yep, excellent stuff as always David Coodley, he's a founder,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 4>chief executive officer in Chief Investment strategist at Mainstay Capital Management,

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 4>and David and his team are ranked in the top

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 4>ten on Baron's Top one hundred Independent Financial Advisors in

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four. So we appreciate getting a few minutes

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 4>at this time.

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to a really good story I today. I

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 3>mean Blackstone.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 4>You know they got like aa jillion dollars under management

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 4>to Stock. They put up some good numbers recently, just today,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 4>stock up five percent today, up twenty eight percent.

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Year to date, fifty two week high.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Some phenomenal performance coming out of the good folks at Blackstone.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 4>I want to break it down, and we do that

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 4>with Paul Goldberg. He's Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity analyst. Paul,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 4>what is Blackstone and why and how are they executing

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>so well? Just tell us what Blackstone is in your mind,

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 4>and then what are they doing so well? Hi?

0:21:57.960 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Paul?

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 12>Thank you for having me. Blackstone called themselves a juggernaut

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 12>this morning, and they called in a press release themselves

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 12>as sort of being a benchmark for the alternatives industry.

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 12>They are in private equity, private credit, really one of

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 12>the big private real estate investors. So all these businesses are,

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 12>some of them doing really well, some of them are

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 12>recovering from the kind of a lull in the last

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 12>two years, and it's growing. They reached to one point

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 12>one trillion dollars. So that's the largest alternative manager out there.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 8>Let's talk a bit of real estate. Of course, I

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 8>view them as a bell whether I'm actually a US

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 8>real estate stocks reporter, I'm curious how are people viewing

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Blackstone and a lot of its deals recently. Are we

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 8>seeing more activity happening in that sector specifically?

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 12>There it is, and they very specifically alluded to it.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 12>They made a few very large ten billion plus deals

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 12>this year. They see in the bottom and the real

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 12>estate cycle. They also, I've seen private is being a

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 12>bit more aeriosyncratic than the public markets. So it doesn't

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 12>move necessarily in tend them. But as long as they

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 12>see the bottom, as long as they are seeing a

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 12>lower interest rate, trajectory that should be supportive in the

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 12>real estate space. The other thing is their real estate

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 12>is quite unique, right, So when we talk about real

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 12>estate and especially commercial, a lot of people think about

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 12>offices and these kinds of things. For them, it's mostly

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 12>data centers, infrastructure kind of real estate, multifamily, so different business.

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 12>And in the data centers they have over seventy billion

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 12>dollars of their one point one trillion just sitting in

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 12>those data centers.

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 4>And I like to just take a look when I

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 4>look at Blackstone. Stephen Schwartzman, the just the total Wall

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Street mobilis seventy seven years of age, co founder of Blackstone.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 4>He's got a net worth today fifty one point eight

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars.

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 11>That's puts them on.

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Number twenty four in the Bloomberg's Rich List. Credit to

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 4>talk to us about the credit business. Private credit business

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 4>got about thirty seconds in upon.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 12>Us all about the credit. This quarter was led by

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 12>credit forty billion of inflows, twenty of them going into

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 12>the credit. All the upside in fees and performance it

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 12>was going through the credit and the growth of expectations

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 12>a lot of it just in the credit as well,

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 12>So very consistent with what we're hearing throughout the year

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 12>and other managers as well.

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 3>Paul, great stuff, Thank you so much for joining us.

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Paul Goldberg, Senior equityannas Bloomberg Intelligence giving us the latest

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 4>on Blackstone.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 3>B X is the ticker symbol, folks, so check it out.

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 3>Check out that chart. Just amazing.

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg News is out the reporting here. Blackstone's credit arm

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 4>is now its top business fueling profits.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 3>They're in private equity, private credit, real estate.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 4>So as Paul Goldberg was just saying, they are the

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 4>biggest alternative asset manager out there. Just extraordinary. That's Blackstone

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 4>and then there's black Rock. I mean, if these two

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 4>were together like they were back in the day, I

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 4>mean extraordinary. So just amazing. The private equity business continues,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 4>an alternative asset management business continues to be just one of,

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 4>if not the best business on global Wall Street, and

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 4>the Black Zone folks are at the top of that.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Just say, Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 4>Bloma Limits sitting and for Alex steel on Paul Swiney

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 4>live here in our Bloomberg Interrectied Brooker Studio, and we're

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 4>streaming the video thing live on YouTube YouTube dot Com

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 4>search Bloomberg Podcast. One of the topics that Alex and

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 4>I and the folks here a Bloomberg intelligence like to

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 4>really keep a close eye on is commercial real estate

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 4>and its recovery from the pandemic. And our good friend

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Abigail Duottle, she's been very good at helping us hook

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 4>up with some really smart people industry. Abigail doo Little

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 4>joints us here today, chief market correspondent for Bloomberg News,

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 4>and today she brings us Josh Ziegan, managing Princil, co

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 4>founder at Madison Realty Capital. They're on BLO and Briginner

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Act the Broker Studio. Josh, we appreciate you coming in here. Abigail,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Thanks once again, Josh.

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Commercial real estate.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 4>I think what I've learned is I don't ask the

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 4>dumb question which I usually do, which hey, how's commercial

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 4>real estate doing? Because there are so many different pieces

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 4>of it. Where do you guys at Madison Real team

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 4>focus and then how's your business?

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 5>So we're focused on the real estate credit space. We

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 5>started the company about twenty years ago. We've about twenty

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 5>one billion of AUM and all ends of real estate credit.

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 5>A lot of our business is focused on where the

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 5>banks have not focused and we're dislocated post global financial

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 5>crisis and even more so today post banking crisis that

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 5>happened in twenty twenty three. So we've been providing capital,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 5>whether it's construction lending, transitional lending. We buy performing non

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 5>performing loans, and today the market is a lot better

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 5>than when I was on in the spring. There's definitely

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 5>a sense of the want to do deals. The investment

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 5>sales market has picked up given the rate drop that

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 5>happened in September. A lot we're waiting on the sidelines

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 5>just to see that happen. So mentally, there's this sense

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 5>that things are starting to improve and capital markets are

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 5>in a better place, albeit the banking sector has not

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 5>come back in a big way.

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 13>So you joined us in May, and at that time,

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 13>I would say were one of the more bearish commercial

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 13>real estate. I guess that we've been fortunate enough to

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 13>interview and I view you relative to some of the

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 13>other folks as really close to the banks or really

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 13>close to the money. You were talking a lot about

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 13>the banks and you said that we were in the

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 13>early innings of this thing working out. How much has

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 13>it changed since then with the FED cutting by fifty

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 13>basis points.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think what we've seen is in the spring,

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 5>there was very very little activity investment sale market, and

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 5>one of the problems was money was not going back

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 5>to investors through that because no transactions were happening. So

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 5>with rates dropping, I think what happened was that created

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 5>some solutions for barwers who needed to delever, and that

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 5>is in the form of preferred equities, some structured equity

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 5>coming into deals. Today there's not only that solution available,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 5>but there's also commonect equity and you're starting to see

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 5>more sales. Albeit the office sector is really struggling still.

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 5>There's no liquidity in the office sector, and when you

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 5>are seeing transaction that happen, capital is just tied up

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 5>in the system because a lot of the sellers are

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 5>holding financing banks are rolling over their debt. It's not

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 5>just money back to investors, so that's tying up a

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 5>lot of capital in the system.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 8>I cover US real estate from the equity side, A

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 8>cover homebuilders and then also commercial real estate. I'm curious

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned office. I was recently working on a story

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 8>that spoke about how we're seeing a bit of an

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 8>uptake on Park Avenue. It's not as bad as it

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 8>once was. As we think about vacancies, what areas are

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 8>you seeing flourishing or doing better than they were before

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 8>In the office space.

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think you're seeing sort of the haves and

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 5>have nots in office. It's the best in a class

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 5>office and then there's everyone else. And unfortunately, that best

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 5>of a class office is very limited in New York City. Yeah,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 5>there's more buildings than a place like Austin, Texas or

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 5>some other places, but it's limited. What I have seen

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 5>in the office sector is much more leasing demand. So

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 5>while the leasing demand and absorption is happening a much

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 5>greater way, it still is challenging from a cap rate perspective.

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 5>So you may have a one hundred percent office, one

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 5>hundred percent lease office building, or ninety percent lease office building,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 5>but that cap rate as compared to twenty twenty one

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 5>is very, very different, and so that's a change in

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 5>valuation that investors are not able to stomach and in

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 5>many cases can't get out of these deals today.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Josh, just kind of before the pandemic. In mike

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 4>Town in Jersey, they constructed a multi very nice, high end,

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 4>multi multi unit residential thing and a big sign out front,

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 4>financed by the local bank. If I go to build

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 4>that same property today, is that look a bank going

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 4>to be there for me?

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 5>So it's a good question. So that bank generally is

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 5>not there, and why because banks have a liquidity mismatch.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 5>They were committing long for a construction loan like that

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.719
<v Speaker 5>and borrowing short with deposits. So banks have been scrutinized

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 5>even more so today from a regulatory standpoint. And so

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 5>it was really bad post global financial crisis and became

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 5>even greater from a regulatory standpoint post March twenty twenty three.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 5>So we're filling that void. We are doing a lot

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 5>of construction lending, which is today a lot lower from

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 5>a loan to cost standpoint than we had to provide

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty one before this banking crisis. So we're

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 5>providing whole loans to that same Jersey developer to build

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 5>a multifamily, and the good news for multifamily as specific

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 5>in New Jersey and across the country is we have

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 5>seen cap rates titan since the spring when I was

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 5>on the show, by fifty to one hundred basis points,

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of that's a function of debt. I mean,

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 5>when you look at debt with rates down today, long

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 5>term rates are down and short term rates are down

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 5>to some extent. One of the problems with construction lending

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 5>and higher value add lending is you're borrowing short and

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 5>so that's an issue. There still is not necessarily the

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 5>appetite to build because of the cost of short term debt.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 13>So picking up on Paul's question and picking up on

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 13>what you just talked about with regulation, some of my

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 13>sources have said that because it's an election, you're the

0:30:55.720 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 13>regulators have actually been relatively lax and trust what you

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 13>just said. But the idea, I guess my question is

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 13>do you think that the regulation could even become tighter

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 13>next year? And then at that point are we going

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 13>to see more svbs? In other words, are we going

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 13>to see some of these regional banks? Is they are

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 13>more pain there in terms of blowing up our consolidation.

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a more politically oriented question in terms

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 5>of the election, really who wins here, But no matter what,

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 5>I so there's.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 13>A difference who wins.

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 5>I think directionally you will see more consolidation, and a

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 5>lot of that has to do with banks are upside

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 5>down in terms of having long term loans that are

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 5>at very low rates, and those aren't rolling off so

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 5>quick and they're matched with liquidity that the bank has

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 5>to pay the positor a lot more than they did

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty one when the loans were made. So

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 5>I think you will see more consolidation in the banking sector.

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 5>And oh so, I think you will see more consolidation.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 5>You start to see more of that already in this year,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 5>but you'll see more in years to come.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 13>Well, I just really want to pick up on that

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 13>election thing though, because I haven't heard anybody say that

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 13>it matters who wins. So were you making the point

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 13>that if the former president Donald Trump wins, or if

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 13>for or the current VP Harris if she wins, there's

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 13>going to be a difference in regulation. And if there is,

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 13>what does it look like.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I can't speak to specifics, but there's a

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 5>view that will be well, there'll be more regulatory pressure

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 5>from regulators in a democratic significantly more can't comment really,

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, I don't know, but more you'll be more,

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 5>all right, Josh, thanks so much for journey.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Us really appreciate it.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 4>Jos Ziegen, Managing Principle, A co founder and Madison Realty

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Capital in Abco Dolittle, Chief Markets correspondent for Bloomberg News

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 4>in our Bloomberg and aarct approp Pro studio, just kind

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 4>of get the laid down on the real estate business.

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Androyd

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business at You can also listen

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 2>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Normal, Linda sitting in front Alex deal on Paul Sweeney.

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 4>You're live here in our Bloomberg and an Actor Broker

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 4>studio or streaming live on YouTube as well, So go

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 4>check us out there. Just got back from a little

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 4>one day corporate travel gig. Alex and I went down

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 4>to the Hilton Head Island or down to Kiwa for

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 4>a client event.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Travel one. Fine, that's great.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 8>You were in United, right, what's you were on United?

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Down on Delta back on United? So both good?

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 11>Good?

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Packed?

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know the place was packed. I think people

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 4>are back out there traveling again. Here and my thing

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 4>on travel, I only travel. Somebody pays me to travel

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 4>as you should.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm just like I like that philosophy.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Exist anyway, I've been pretty much everywhere you need to go.

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 4>I think James Thornton joins us. He's a CEO of

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Intrepid Travel, joining us from London via Zoom. James talk

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 4>to us about I love to get your perspective, just

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.239
<v Speaker 4>kind of as you look at maybe business travel. What

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 4>are most companies doing in terms of business travel these

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 4>days versus pre pandemic?

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Are we back to those levels? Will we get back

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 3>to those levels? Where are we?

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're definitely back to the levels, Paul. I think

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a misconception during the pandemic that the business

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>travel environment wouldn't recover and we'd all be stuck on

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>zoom and be meeting remotely. But we're seeing that airplanes

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>are full. Business travel, corporate travel clients are up.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 2>Year on year.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Nothing beats being together face to face. So yeah, business

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>travel is back and people are flying around a meeting again.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 8>So of course everyone likes to keep in mind the

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 8>idea of limiting our carbon footprint. I'm curious, how are

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 8>business companies, How are they thinking about this when we

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 8>think about business travel, our companies being mindful or is

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 8>ESG a buzzword that's been left in the past. How

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 8>are we thinking about that now in twenty twenty four.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, I think companies are becoming increasingly mindful about

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>their carbon outputs, particularly when it comes to their staff travel,

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>but also in the sense of the way in which

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>customers are thinking about their right in theies too. At

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Intrepid Travel, we've reached launched carbon and labeled carbon labeling

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>program on five hundred of our itineries around the world,

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and we display a number about the CO two emissions

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>that come from our trips. Is a bit like a

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>food label if you like, so customers can calculate how

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>much carbon emissions per traveler come from their trip applications.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So customer things be more interested in the carbon outputs

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>of their traveling experiences.

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 4>You know you mentioned I just completed I did a

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 4>one on a tour of Ireland. Fantastic by the way,

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 4>and the Irish love me of course being from there.

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 4>But on the questionnaire afterwards, like how is the trip?

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 4>And it was awesome, off the charts, and then they

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 4>asked about the carbon footprint and I said, I could

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 4>not care less. Can you please just let me have

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 4>a vacation and just enjoy myself. But James, I think

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm into my minority. I think travelers more and more

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 4>are thinking about the carbon footprint of the plane they take,

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 4>the cruise ship they take. How does the industry adapt

0:35:58.960 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 4>to that?

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Paul. Look, I think there's two really important points here. One,

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's critically important that people have great holiday experiences. You know,

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's vitally important. We all go on holiday to relax,

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy ourselves, to have fun, to try the local

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>food and enjoy a well aired break. But at the

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>same point, we also want, as much as possible make

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sure that we're having a lighter impact upon the environment,

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to benefit local communities as much as

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can. And that's why business is like in

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Prepid are putting carbon labeling onto our itineries so that

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>customers can make more informed decision making choices. Absolutely, they

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>want to have a great trip, but they also want

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be aware about limiting the impact on the environment.

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 8>And how are we thinking about this on an international scale.

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm thinking about Paul talking about this trip to Ireland,

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 8>and I wonder if the US are we behind in

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 8>some of these efforts to really limit that carbon footprint.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 8>How are you seeing this internationally?

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, I think Europe is certainly leading the way,

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>both from a legislate but also consumer points of view,

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But I would say that the US is all stay

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>catching up, and we're certainly seeing demand from customers that

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>want to travel in a more sustainable, immersive way. Of course,

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they want to get out and they want to see

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the iconic sites, but they also want to try and

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure that their tourism dollars are staying within the

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>local communities. And that's why we're seeing a real desire

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>for people to travel on intrepid style of sustainable experience

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rich travel using different types of local transport, you staying

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in different types of local accommodation and really getting under

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the skin of a destination and hopefully having some amazing

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>holiday experiences.

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 3>So what are we seeing.

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Here, James about some of those experiential trips as you mentioned,

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 4>and we saw that coming out of the pandemic. People,

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I guess during the pandemic they buy stuff and goods,

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 4>but coming out of it, they wanted experiences. So they're

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 4>not just going to the typical like what I would

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 4>do is.

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Just go to a golf resort or beach resort.

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 4>They're doing different things. What are some of the more

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 4>popular tours that you guys do.

0:37:59.000 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I think we're living in the experiences of economy. Well,

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 1>people are desperate to get out, having been caught up

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at home during the course of the pandemic and travel

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>being taken away as a right for people. They want

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to give back out and they want to see the

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>iconic destinations. So we're seeing really big demand for destinations

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like a Japan for example. You know, great immersive destination

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>where you can get out and you can have great

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>food experiences, but it's a bit more challenging to travel

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>around independently by yourself, and that's why using reliable tour

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>operators like Intrepid is a great way to get out

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and see a destination. We're seeing Europe boom, particularly in

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder seasons, getting out of that kind of peak

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>travel period of July and August when it's hot and

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it's stuffy and it's crowded. Seeing a lot of demand

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>into Europe, particularly around those shoulder seasons of April May

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and also September October. It's a little bit cooler and

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the crowds are a little.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 8>Bit less, So James. From a legislative perspective, how are

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 8>companies being held accountable? Of course there's a lot of

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 8>business travel. We may fly out for one day and

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 8>come back. There's a lot of things that are going

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.080
<v Speaker 8>on in that making that decision. All are businesses being

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 8>held accountable for this?

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, at the moment they're not, Nora, I think businesses

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>are they going to start to be held accountable for

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what they say. What we're not seeing quite yet is

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses being accountable for what they do. And so we're

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly seeing, particularly driven out of Europe legislation to ensure

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that companies are not greenwashing and they're advertising, and we

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>think companies being picked up when they are making big,

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>bold claims around being good for the environment, but people

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>are jumping on planes. So not only is it about

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what people say in their advertising. Soon, we're going to

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>see legislation come in terms of the actual actions of

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>which companies are taking. And that's why I think it's

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>important that all companies are trying to take proactive steps

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of measuring their emissions, ideally offsetting their emissions,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately moving towards trying to decarbonize their activities, no

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 1>matter what industry they might be in.

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 3>James, thanks so much for joining us.

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 4>I really appreciate getting some of your thoughts there. James

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Thornton needs the CEO of Intrepid Travel, joining us via

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 4>that zoom thing from London. Yeah, it took this my

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 4>first when I went to Ireland. There's so many things

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 4>you want to see. I've never taken like a tour before.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'm getting to an age or that's kind of

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 4>what you do. I don't know, but there's so many

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 4>things you want to see in like a place like

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Ireland that you have to do it that way, and

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 4>we did. We saw everything, so I feel good about

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:19.839
<v Speaker 4>it and I'd recommend it.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 8>I was in Dublin back in April. Okay, first I'm

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 8>going to Ireland. Didn't get to do the massive tour

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 8>that I would have loved to do, but it's such

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 8>a beautiful place it is.

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 3>It was good.

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 4>So we did, like Dublin up the Belfast over to

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 4>darry so got the Northern Ireland experience too, and it

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 4>is different from the Republic of Ireland still today. Then

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 4>you come back down back into the Republic of Ireland

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 4>into Westport and then Limericks so very cool. So hold

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 4>the north half of the island. We'll do the southern

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 4>half and again saw a couple of Sweeney as a

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 4>matter of fact, went the mass at our family church

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 4>in Belfast back from back in the day.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 3>So that was pretty cool. Ireland, good, good times.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast bull on Apples, Spotify

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 2>weekday ten am tonoon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 2>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 2>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:16.840
<v Speaker 2>always on the Bloomberg terminal.