WEBVTT - Queen Elizabeth, Bond Market, Compound King ETFs

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Throughout this morning, we've

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>been getting perspective on the life, legacy, and the death

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of Queen Elizabeth the Second. We want to bring on

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>John Authors this morning. He covers Markets, Forest, Bloomberg News. John,

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time here give us

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how the country will mourn the queen

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>over the coming days and I think weeks. Just explain

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.319
<v Speaker 1>how the whole process works. Well, yes, this has been

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a long long planned uh event um like literally from

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>bacts decades place. As I understand, if we have ten

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>days of morning before the funeral takes place, any coronation

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>for childs will be in when Elizabeth's face. He wasn't

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>crowned until from that sixteen months after she succeeded to

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>suffering said, the coronation is still a ways off. In

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the interim the country basically shut down. So um, that's

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>most dramatically Football is pantils or soccer, which really as

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>American business. Yeah, it's a very big deal, but um,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't feel right to be going out

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and playing playing soccer this weekend, so that disappears. Um. Similarly,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the last night of the Proms, which is this this

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>big music festival in the Albert Hall, um, and the

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>last night is um uh you know, a big display

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of patriotism. People waved their Union jack's they see land

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of Hope and glory Jerusalem or that kind of thing

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that's been canceled or I believe the first time since

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the shopping World War. I haven't checked that, but I

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think they have. That's another almost imponderable how could

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you possibly not have the last night of the Proms? Um?

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>So yes, the country it's very strange in this this

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>day and age, because the country still really does close down.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Um knots of closed today. So if you wanted to

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>go take advantage of the strong dollar and you're shopping

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in Region Street, Knox Street, this is not the day

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it. They're not going to stay close to

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the full ten days. Um. But a lot of stores

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>have just such completely Today, I think the only really

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>significant aspects of life that does continue as normal is

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is schools. I think primarily because one of the lessons

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we learned from the pandemic was that of all the

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.119
<v Speaker 1>different things wanted to to shut down during the pandemic,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it was small closes that put the most. So are

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>john are our financial markets expected to be open on

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as regular I can't actually choked on the day of

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Unity. I'm not. I haven't checked us to as

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>do exactly um what the plans are, but you would

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>normally expect um. Britain doesn't have as many national holidays

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as most other panties, and it's sort of a convention that, um,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>when there is an event in the royal family, we

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>get a you know, we get a day off for it.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>When when Harry and um Will got married, that was

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a day off for that, Queen Black and

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>jubilably to see those a day off for that. This

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>will be a day I mean the day and she

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is actually when when the funeral actually happens, will be

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a local shutdown and day. Of course you can't I

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine, you know, a good subject the queen, well

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>now the king trading through um the Queen's funeral. I'm

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>really interested to know what you expect from King Charles

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Third. He's going to give an address I believe

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in about two and a half hours and um, you know,

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been a very outspoken Prince of Wales. But a

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are saying that that could very much

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>change once he's wearing the crown. I suspect it probably

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>has to. He does indeed have a very difficult um

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>financing position because we don't need to rate over it

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>yet again. But certain things we all know about his

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>private life, which have even been dramatized in fantastic Netflix

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>series and so unmediu that that sensible authority, that mystique

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that his mother had is something that you cannot be

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>retrieved of. Him was a big as a person, uh,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and that is a problem. The fact that he has

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>already been around so long um also makes it very

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult still seems extremely straight to even be used of

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the word is uh. The idea that he is the

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>king now is very difficult for a lot of us

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the stomach. I think he needs to make clear that um,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take his his mother as a as

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a as a guiding light that he's he's going to

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>try to do things the same way. And I imagine

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we do have William will now get to be the

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Prince of Wales, which will also require zone foreignation ceremony. Uh.

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>If I were Charles, I would um trying to maintain

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>authority by being quite a quiet figure and really put

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>um it's some and he's you know, and his beautiful

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>white forwards as the as the people for the nations

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>who identify with that, that would work very well. One.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>We only have about thirty seconds left. But I wonder

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>if you think this strengthens the union because the Queen

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>did pass at Balmoral in Scotland and you know there

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>will be a new Prince of Wales. It makes me

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think of the United Kingdom. Um kind of yes, I

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>felt like it was falling apart. Does that turn around now? No,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the greatest consents for me is that. Uh. Yeah,

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as an English person and I respect to Scotland, I

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>really hated the idea that they would leave that they're

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>entitled if they want to. I think the sense of

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>total loyalty to the Queen may not be there, but

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I think this makes it easier to leave. Okay,

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, John, great perspective appreciated. John authors. He covers

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>markets for Bloomberg News Bloomberg Opinion, UH, as you can

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>tell by Zac and he is a British so we

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>love getting his perspective here on the news of the

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>passing of Queen Elizabeth. A second, I end go that

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is a function Matt turning me onto recently. That is

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Index browser gives you all the you know,

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the bond fixed income in disease, uh, gives you kind

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of a sense of where they're going. And the US aggregate,

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg US aggregate corporate you know in the index

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is down eleven point five percent on a global basis.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, I mean, just brutal, brutal returns in

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income market. I'm kind of thinking it can't

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>get any worse. I'm gonna go in there and buy

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some bonds. Adam Coon's portfolio manager went through Capital Management. Adam,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of my call there? I think

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I might be going in on the bondom mark. I

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>can't get any worse in it. I mean, it can't

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get worse but from our viewpoint, bonds are the tray

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>for the next year. And when you when you look

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at um just kind of where markets are right now,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>we kind see three and a half percent of the

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>ten years the peak for this cycle and rates and

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the long term secular bullet trend to continue. This

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of a blip and we've gotten pretty

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>used to easy returns and fixed income of the last

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ten years, so this should be expected to have a

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>sell off. This has definitely been more aggressive than than

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what we expected. But when we look across the universe

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of of corporate bonds, specifically higher grade corporate bonds, we

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we we really like what we see. Um. We've been

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>using the phrase kids kids in the candy store, but

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you're looking at a names like Alphabet

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and Apple trading well but four percent, and then you've

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got Facebook and Meta bonds trading above five. Um. There's

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of opportunities in the corporate world right now. UM,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the indexes or in terms of the

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>rapper what what do you like? Do you've owned by

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the bonds themselves? Do you buy a tracking fund? You

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>buy e t F? How do you get into that? Trade.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So so for us, we're we do buy individual bonds

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and specifically we are not shying away from duration right now.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh Over the last several years we have been a

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>shorter duration till to cross our strategies. But right now

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we are adding to our A and double A rated

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>corporate uh corporate paper by buying individual bonds UM adding

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to the basis now you can add through e t

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>F carticular like l q d UM just to get

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>corporate exposure is a great way to do it if

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to buy individual bonds. But like

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I said, we are looking at adding to duration um

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten years and now. So when you kind

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of look at at the landscape from a monetary policy standpoint,

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we kind of see there two scenarios and both of

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>which we think farewell for interest rates and bonds in general.

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's say they act to aggressively and they break

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Ultimately that's going to lead to a decline

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates. Or they pivot and say, you know what,

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we've We've done our job and inflation is waning, so

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to pull back and and and may even

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>begin to uh cut interrut rates, which the euro are

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>your euro dollar curve is thing. They're going to cut

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>interest rates in the first quarter, So in either of

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>those scenarios, you're going to see interest rates decline. And

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>when you look at balance sheets and just credit in general,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it looks fairly firm and stable. So we don't see

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>any credit issues hitting the market, which is why we're

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>adding to credit exposure to not only get the duration

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but also the credit spread exposure. Adam, some economists are

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>telling me I need to be ready for a recession

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in the not too distant future. So what does that mean.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I have to actually look at leverage ratios and interest coverage.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Do I have to be really focused on credit quality?

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're if you're a fixing income investors,

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you need you need to understand out of quality. Um.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think where we're at in the cycle, and

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>when you look at where spreads of actually widened too,

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you're compensated for that risk right now. So we we

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>view right now an asymmetric return profile where the risk

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>reward is in favor of going along credit versus a

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago when we were if we had this conversation,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we were struggling to get three percent and spreads were

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>an all time type, so it was asymmetric in the

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other direction, where there were in a lot more you

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>could squeeze out of the markets, UM, but a lot

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>more downside. So we we have run through that cycle.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're looking at the markets, we're seeing that

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>this reward you're you're getting for the risk you're taking,

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you are being compensated. I have a listener who wants

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to know what your take is on the volatility we've

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>seen in currency, specifically the yen and the Taiwan dollar

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>UM and foreign investors reducing exposure to US assets. Yeah,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean I look with the dollar, STRING think that's

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what we should expect. I think that the US

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar has kind of reached its maximum of evaluation relative

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to other currencies. So if we see the US economy

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>begin to roll over, which there's plenty of evidence for that,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll start to see the U S Dollar

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>decline on a relative basis, which will move more assets

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>back to the U S. So, so that's that's another

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>case for Bobs. Alright, Adam, good stuff. Appreciate getting your perspective,

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts there, Adam Coon's he's a portfolio manager. At

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Winthrop Capital Management, located in beautiful Carmel, Indiana, just outside

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of Indianapolis. Carmel's are very nice burb of Indianapolis. Getting

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on fixed income here. Uh, they're pretty bullish here.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Interesting to see, all right, that's Adam Coon's portfolio manager

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>with our capitol manager. Nice kind of little rip here

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to the market. Sharre I wasn't really expecting it. It's

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting as well because we had um uh Bullard come

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>out and say he's leaning towards seventy five basis points

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to the next meeting that is coming up September twenty one.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>You can always see when the FED meetings are if

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you just type f E d GO on your Bloomberg

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>term auld. The same goes for b O E B

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>O j E C b b OC Bank of Canada nice,

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>which we follow closely here of course, Well they're so

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>close exactly. But that is a good one. That's f

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.199
<v Speaker 1>E D go is a good one in the next

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>right decision. September twenty one, at two pm Wall Street Time,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>let's check out Ted Oakley, founder and managing partner at

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Oxbow Advisors and a prod alum of the Texas Tech.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I think their long Long Horns, is that, right, Ted Longhorns?

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>The University of Texas Longhorns, University of Texas Long There's

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a very big difference between the University of Texas Texas Tech.

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Is Texas tex a great school? And I know what

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>what under God did my undergrad there? It's a it's

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a right engineering school, right, Actually, it's a it's a

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>real good college. Excellent. Hey, Ted, what do you I mean?

0:13:58.120 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You've been around the block a few times here, You've

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>seen markets come and go. Um, what do you make

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of these equity markets, these fixed income markets at sixty

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>portfolio that a lot of us were kind of brought

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>up on. What do you make of that whole concept?

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Given what we've seen so far this year? Well, you

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>know what happened on the sixty forty is really it

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>came into play where people really got hooked on it.

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the last twelve years or so prior to that,

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you would come and go, but nothing like

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this last time because they could just plug and play

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on sixty and it worked. Now you're in a situation

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>where we, like I've seen it many times, where you're

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in a true bearer market and you can't lean on anything,

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and necessarily you've got to be able to be reasonably nimble.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And you keep going to lower lows and you get

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>good bounces like but in July. Maybe you're getting one

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, But then they go to lower lows, and

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what frustrates people the most. And then

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on the bond side, you know, you can have bonds

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>raids peak and start down like you did, no aid

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>like you did, and no one and the market still

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>goes on down. And I think that's what a lot

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the what I should say the novice, the younger

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>players don't understand is that you know, there's a lot

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of things that happened here, nuances that you've gotta do.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You have to know a little bit about what you're

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>doing in this kind of market. What are you expecting

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>um in terms of the US stock market over the

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>next year, you know, into two into three. I guess

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>your FED call is pretty important in that aspect, in

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that in that respect, isn't it? Well? It is. I

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think I think what people forget is that if the

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>FIT is serious about keeping you know, the funds rate

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>half a point over the inflation, right, we leave interest

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>drift back to you know, three and a half or

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>four uninflation, you're still you're still well behind on the

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>funds rate at two and a half, and on the

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>market itself, we're thinking, uh, we think we don't get

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a low in the market until the first or second

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter of twenty three more than likely, because it's just look,

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're nine months end of the year and nobody's ahead

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of the market right now. So there. I don't think

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they can catch up in ninety days. Maybe we're wrong,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but I've seen it before. It gets hard to do,

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they start protecting, and then you go into

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the new year, we think the earnings will be lower.

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Companies are just now coming into what's going to be trouble,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and then real estate is just now coming into the

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>tough part. And we think both of those will come together.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do you do? Well, you gotta hold a

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of cash. I mean we hold in our three strategies,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we hold on average, we hold more than fifty percent

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>cash all of them right now. And and when I

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>take cash, you know, we're getting on a variable rate treasury,

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a ninety day reset. We get three now,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty good, you know, fully guaranteed we're getting

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>three fifty three sixty on a two year treasury, you know,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>three and a half on eighteen months. We can hold

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it in places and make some money. Um, And we

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>don't buy into this idea that well, I don't want

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to hold cash because I can't make any money three

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>per cents better than a minus twenty the way we

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>look at it, Yeah, exactly, that's where we are. What

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do you typically hold? Ten? Like, what's what would be

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>your average cash holding relative to what you're doing now? Well,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on the stock side, it would be, you know, five

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to seven uh in m BE ten it was a

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>little higher last year. We started raising cash in twenty one. UM.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>On the income accounts, we move up and down the

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>yield curve, particularly on the bond accounts, and you know,

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we have brought a lot of things in short the

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>last two years and now we've actually started just gradually

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>moving back out the yield curve some. So it just

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>depends on what which strategy it is. Really. How are

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>things down in Corpus Christie where you are? Ten, Well,

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Austin, Corpus Christie, but I'm in Austin. Austin

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is different than any other city in Texas. It's sort

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of like a California city in a way, but for

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>better for worse. You got influx of people like crazy,

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it's good or good and bad. Now on the coast,

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, they're doing okay because they have a

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, they have ports and they have

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the energy is really keeping those sports busy. Houston, Brownsville, Corporus, screw,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>they all keep the sports busy. So they're they're they're

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty busy right now. And is it still I mean,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, just being in Texas in general, oil up.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, oil is eight six dollars a barrel. That's

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good price historically. How are people feeling

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>about energy down there? They feel okay. I think the

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>energy people, and I've said this before, they're not very

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>good at a sentiment on where they should be. But

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>but I will say this, they're a little surprised. I

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think that it's at five. But it doesn't you know,

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's okay. I mean they they can still drill,

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they can still do projects, um that sort of thing.

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh Um. I know we're getting ready to purst this

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a personal thing, but I'm getting ready to go into

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a project that we think we'll do pretty well. But

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it depends on depends on whether it's

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>gas or oil where they are, but generally it's staying

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>fairly steady. Yeah, it looks like that way, all right, Ted,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. Always appreciate getting your

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on these markets, your perspective, Ted Oakley. He's a

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.239
<v Speaker 1>founder and manager part of ox Bow Advise. Great new

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>movie by the way, called Vengeance, which I rented on

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple yesterday, and it's about um kind of you know,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like an arrogant New York City hipster who goes down

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to Texas for a funeral and he thinks he knows

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>everything and they're all country bumpkins. Ye, Robert can't well,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Founder and portfolio manager of Upholdings, Robert was, was I right,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are you guys the ones behind the first hedge fund

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to go through a conversion to an e t F structure?

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>And if so, why we were? Uh? You know, the

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen et F rule adjustments really open the

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>floodgates for for active managers to bring their strategies inside

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of e t F s. And the short answer is, um,

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the e t F is the most efficient vehicle in

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the world to manage money. You know, the tax efficiency

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of it, the liquidity and the low fee structure, and

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the access that you get. It was just a no

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>brainer for us because if your goal is to maximize

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, long term compounded returns to investors, you've got

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to minimize fees and taxes. And you know, we saw

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>no other vehicle than that that could beat the e

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>t F and doing that, that's not why you run

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund. You run a hedge fund again super

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>super rich. I mean you're giving away two and twenty Uh.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>You know it makes sense for a buyer of the

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>e t F, But what's what's your motivation? It depends

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>on your time horizon. You know, I I turned thirty

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 1>nine last week. You know, I've got a thirty year

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>investment career ahead of me. And uh, if you the

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>more you you backload your your earnings and your winnings,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that the larger of a firm that you can build.

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, our focus is not on extracting

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all the value in the first ten years of running

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this business. It's it's focusing on, you know, the decades

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead of us. It's a relatively low expense ratio as well.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at point six here, Um, that's got to

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be very competitive. How are you doing? So what was

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting is, yeah, we looked at the at the when

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we did the conversion, we looked at the history of

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>active management, going back to mutual funds in the forties, fifties, sixties, seventies,

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and over any period of time, the long term average

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, investors are willing to pay for active

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>management was about sixty basis points. So people were there's

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>discussion out there about you know, race to bottom with

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>indexes that charge zero, indexes strip charge zero. You know,

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no research, there's no management, there's there's

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing that's happening underneath the surface. So we thought that

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the fair thing to do was was charged What what

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>has been the industry norm now for for almost eighty years.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Amazon? It's a question. Amazon

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has clearly built an incredible company. It's a it's a

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a mid size holding in our portfolio right now.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But but I gotta be honest that um there, Uh,

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>capital intensity is a real problem and one of the

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>things that we focus really intensely on is what is

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the return on invested capital that companies are generating. So

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>when a company has new capital expenditures or new operating expenses,

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>what what is the new operating cash flow that has

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>generated off of that incremental spend in the in the

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>coming years. And the problem with Amazon is that if

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you were to take a Google, every new dollar that

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Google puts in capex, they're generating sixty more cents of

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>operating cash flow in the subsequent year. For Amazon that

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers about ten cents. And so they are in a

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>structurally lower return on invested capital business. And even the

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that's always that's always been the case with Bezos. He's buying,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he's building these fulfillment centers in all over the country.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>But the stock kind of works. So I kind of

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like, I kind of I don't disagree with your math.

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>But for some reason Amazon has gotten the benefit of

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the doubt from shareholders because the strategy they can turn

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they can turn on when they want.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't forget. It's not Bezos anymore, right, Jesse. So

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's basis to make come on, It's like Alphabet and Google. Please.

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, what do you so. I mean, look,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of investors have have exposure to Amazon,

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>whether they realize it or not. Uh, you know, there's

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>such a huge component of a lot of indices and

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>stock stocks work until they don't. And I think that's

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>been one of the big reckonings this year is it's

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>especially amongst growth investors. They've been shocked at how much

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of percentage points moved in the tenure treasury

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>resulted in multiple reratings across growth assets. So Amazon is

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>held onto its valuation for now, but eventually the math

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of return on investor capital catch up to your business

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and you need to you need to generate the cashual

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to justify your valuation. And to again, just to pick

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon for a second, if you're to look ten

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>years ago, um, I believe the business was was trading

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for a couple hundred billion dollars and over the last

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>ten years the business generated seventy billion dollars of free

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. So that's a cumultive investment of a long

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>period of time. Now they have a one and a

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>half trillion dollar valuation, is Amazon gonna deliver at least

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars of three cash flow over the next

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years right now, their capital intensity tells you that

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that's probably not gonna happen. So those are the things

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that we focus on. What you love, what's something that

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>gets you really excited in the morning, well or all

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>day depending well, So there's yeah, there's a couple of

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>different ways to make money in the market. There's there's

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>investing in the outstanding companies like like an adie end

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that does ended end payments and has that's plugged in

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>these little APIs and just gets all this growth. You

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>get to be a venture capital investor without having to

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>pick amongst all these individual venture companies. So I'd say

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a company like that is one that I'm more excited

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about than just about any company in the world. But

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's more expensive and you've got to know that or

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>expect that they're going to grow even faster than than

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>than what the market things. So I'd say that's on

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>just quality of business and growth of the industry and

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the differentiations. Technology ad is definitely a tough and at

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum, where you know we

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>have a very different view than the market is i'd

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>say meta. I mean, you talking about companies that are

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>considerate more more cash flow than their market cap. It's

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be really easy for Meta to generate more

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>than four hundred billion dollars of pre cash flow. All right,

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Robert Greig Stuff really appreciated some fascinating discussion near Robert

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>can't well found our portfolio manager of Upholding. Thanks for

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Miller V three, pt on Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always catch

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio