WEBVTT - Would TechTV Make it in Streaming Media?

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>job in Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio and love all Things tech. And I had a

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.159
<v Speaker 1>listener send me a message via Twitter to handle for

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. Is tech Stuff h s W in case

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you ever want to do this? And they asked if

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought perhaps tech TV, a once keybole channel that

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is no more, if it could have survived in the

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>realm of streaming, And I thought this was a great

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for me to bring on Tom Merritt onto the show.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Tom is um He's a podcaster extraordinaire. He's been a

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>voice in tech for a couple of decades. I first

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>became aware of his work when I started listening to

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Buzz out Loud podcast from c Net. This was

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>before I was ever a podcasters, before I even worked

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at how Stuff Works dot com. So uh, that's when

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I first became a fan of of his work. And

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a pleasure having him on to talk about

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>tech TV and his insight. So let's listen to that

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation right now. I am pleased to welcome longtime friend

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the show that's putting it lightly. Tom Merritt, whose

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>work was actually a lot of the work that that

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>inspired me before I got into podcasting. Uh so, Uh,

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tom's been doing this for a while. He's

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>been working in not just what we used to call

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>new media, which is just media now, but also old media.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Tom's Tom's done at all. Tom, welcome

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>back to tech stuff. Ah, thank you for having me.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's good to be back. For those who don't know. Uh,

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I often joke that I heart media publishes about half

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of all the podcasts that are out there. Tom hosts

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>or co hosts. The other hand, I do probably too many.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's quite that many, but yeah,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I do a lot, that's true. I don't know. I

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>would never describe it as too many. Tom. I just

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>say that, first of all, your time management skills have

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>got to be worlds better than my own. But the

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why I asked you here obviously is that we

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>had this listener who wrote in and asked, in the

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>world of streaming, would something like tech TV be able

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to have continued? Now. I've done an episode about tech

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>TV in the past, but it's great to talk to

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who is actually there, at least for a while. So, Tom,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>can you kind of for people who might not have

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>known about tech TV because maybe they're just never got

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that channel, or perhaps they're on the younger side of

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>my listeners, can you kind of fillis in on what

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that was all about. Tech TV, or z d t

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>V as it originally was called because it was owned

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>by Ziff Davis, the publisher of computer magazines, tech magazines

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and websites UH as a cable television network that began

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties on cable to be devoted to

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>technology topics. Ziff's idea was, let's take the topics that

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we cover in our publications and our websites UH and

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>put them on television. Let's make television versions of that UH.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it has its roots in a show called

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Site that was on MSNBC, which people may not

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>realize was originally Microsoft NBC. It was. It was a

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>combination of Microsoft and NBC that NBC eventually just took

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>over and never changed the name. Tech TV had shows

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>about helping how to, It had shows about technology news.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It had shows about technology finance, video games, uh MP

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>three's and audio came along and a show about audio

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was started. So all the tech topics you can think

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of were there in two thousand. Uh, this is in

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the earliest days. So the joke is that tech TV

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>covered the dot com boom and the dot com bust

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and then got busted because it went away when it

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was bought by Comcast, which merged it into the G

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>four network. And then of course we all know that,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>uh the G four network had its own roller coaster story.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That the kind of roller coaster where you have one

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>big hill and then a real long flow down until

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you just end up with cops three runs, yeah, towards

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the end, although they're back trying to do a streaming version.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>So but G four devoted to gaming, not technology. Tech

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.799
<v Speaker 1>TV was devoted to broad technology. They had a gaming

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>show called x Play that was the only one of

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the only things that survived over into the G four merger.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But but everything else was about various topics were right

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, I watched tech TV back in

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, and one of the things that really struck

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>me is that that was a channel that I mean

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they were talking to like a lot of the shows,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to people who knew their stuff right. It

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't It wasn't necessarily like the kinds of things you

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>would see on say local news, where they might cover

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a tech story where it's very superficial you don't really

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>dive into it. We were talking about shows where people

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>were calling in live or asking live questions about very

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>particular issues that they might be running into and like

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>solving them in real time. And I remember watching and

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking like I can't, I can't imagine how much you

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>would need to know about these subjects in order to

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to to do this effectively and still be

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>also personable on camera. Like that's that was the other

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>side of it is that obviously, you know, you don't

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>just want to have the ben Stein kind of approach

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to delivery, or no one's gonna bother watching unless they

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>just happen to have a blue screen of death they

0:05:55.720 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>can't get rid of. Yeah. The most watched shows on

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the network through most of its run were the live

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>call in shows hosted by Leolaporte, Call for Help and

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the screensavers. Uh. Internally we referred to them as the

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Tools and the Toys show. Call for Help was the

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Tool show is very much focused on practicality. I need

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>help doing x, uh, you know, because I need to

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>get something done. Screensavers was more of the Toys show.

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's where you had more of the hacking and they're like,

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>what can I make things do? I I want to

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>try this, you know, help me out with that. And

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they were live, which was unusual in many respects, including

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it was, if not the first, certainly

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the first television shows to have chat rooms

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>running on screen, so as you chatted uh during during

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the show, your chats could show up on screen. There

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>was a slight delay for moderation just in case, but

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but chat with screens was streamed onto the television and

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you could call in on the net Cam network uh

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in in seven when it launched, you could call in

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with a netcam uh using see you see me uh,

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and they would set you up and you could appear

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Uh. And that was definitely something new

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>where the audience not only not just could call in

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on the phone, which they could, but could actually have

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a camera uh and and appear on the show with

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a camera, something that even now is not done a lot.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But now you're like, oh yeah, you could totally do

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's all a matter of screening and and that

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. Back then, you you had to walk

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>people through it. So to your point about needing a

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated audience, you needed an audience who was sophisticated enough

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to run software and set up a

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>web camera and all of that sort of thing. Yeah,

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and I remember, you know, the heavily pixelated net cams

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the past dial up. That's right. It's pretty incredible

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>actually when you really think about it, that it was

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>even you guys even managed to do it that uh,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and that the audience was was a thriving part of it.

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I would argue that a lot of that work.

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean clearly we see that play out in other

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>platforms today. Right. Twitch would not be Twitch if it

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were not for some of the things that were prototyped

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and tested and proven to work with tech TV, where

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you see things like audience engagement and that builds a community,

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and that that's the sort of thing that ends up

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>giving a show life beyond you know, whatever the content

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is that's on the screen. It's a thing that it

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes a collaborative effort with the people on the show

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and the audience. I mean, if you're doing a help show,

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>then you really don't have content unless you have an

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>audience to write in and ask for things or to

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>call in and ask for things. So I saw a

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of things on tech TV that we're kind of

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say, with presage, the the various elements that

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we kind of take for granted in a lot of

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>online streaming UH services now, whether it's you know, YouTube

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>streaming or twitch streaming, things of that nature, a lot

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of those have I think, kind of taken lessons that

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>were first learned back in the late nineties and early

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand's. Yeah, I often wonder what would have happened

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>if they had not sold tech TV to Comcast. UH.

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Tech TV was sold by Ziff Davis to Paul Allen,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Microsoft. His Vulcan Ventures ran it.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Then the dot com bust came along. Also, in my opinion,

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>both Vulcan's UH financial folks and Paul Allen got board

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>with tech TV because as of the day it was

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sold to Comcast by Paul Allen, they were making money

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>internationally because they had international versions of the network UH

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and syndication agreements. They were break even on the web,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which which I was was a part of, and they

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>were getting close to profitability on broadcast. It was the

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>wrong time to sell, in my opinion and a few

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>other people's opinion, because the show, the network was becoming viable.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>What was valuable of it about it at the time

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>of the sale was that it was in fifty million homes.

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Back then, you needed to be in at least sixty

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy million homes to really make a go of it.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh So part of the theory behind selling was, well,

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if you sell the Comcast, you get better distribution. But

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons Comcast wanted it was for those

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty million homes that G four wasn't in. G four

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was in thirteen million homes. Uh And so you merge

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>those two networks, which is what they did, and overnight

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you're getting close to that viability number. Uh That number

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is smaller now because there's a smaller number of homes,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but back then you you needed you needed to really

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>get in as many homes as possible. The other problem

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>with tech TV it was solo, so every other almost

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>every other cable network out there was on there because

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>it was part of a package. Right There was ESPN,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>News because well, if you want ESPN, you gotta take

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>ESPN News. There was Bravo because well if you want MSNBC,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take Bravo. Uh. And and all of the

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>big companies had those kinds of arrangements. Even the h

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>G t V s were like, well, you want HDTV,

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take d I Y Tech TV was it.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>They were on their own, so they kind of needed

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>something to get past that fifty million mark. If they

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>had stuck around, though, I wonder if they would have

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gone the way of most cable networks, which is you

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you keep broadening out your base until you're really no

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>longer about what you were originally about. We see that

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with the History Channel, we see that with sci Fi, etcetera.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Or would they have split into multiple networks? Would would

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>they have been able to launch secondary networks maybe broaden

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>out the main network, but but have more specific networks

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the way an h G t V, A, d I

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Y food uh. And all of that happened as it was,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it got merged into G four, the tech went away.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And to to your original viewer question, I don't think

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you could do it now because so much has changed.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>You would you are doing it. Uh, and you kind

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of alluded to that, like there's a YouTube or a

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitch show for everything tech TV was doing, and the

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>entire internet is essentially tech TV in a way. There

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are people doing help shows, there are people doing podcasts,

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>there are people doing uh streaming of games. All these

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>things that the tech TV was pioneering are just deragur right.

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitch talks to its chat as as you stream all

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the time. Uh. We had tech TV Radio where we

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>would uh, in addition to news, do sort of behind

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the scenes shows about the shows on tech TV. Every

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>show has a behind the scenes podcast. Now. Uh, It's

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>it's just everything now. So I don't know if it

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>would make sense to try to bottle it all back

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>up into a niche network anymore because it's just so pervasive.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Tom and I have more to say about the tech

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>TV story and and streaming, but first let's take this

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>quick break. You've touched on a ton of things, like,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I used to work you know this, I

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>used to work for Discovery Communications. Uh, I've worked for

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the same company for you know, fourteen years. It's just

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>been owned by different people. So but when I was

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>working for Discovery, you know, we got to see the

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>full side of the whole carriage agreements, those agreements where

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a cable company has like multiple channels in its network

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and the there'll be one or two jewels that they

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>have that everyone wants, but because you know they have

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that the customers want, they say, well, you

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>also have to take these other channels as well. I

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think that that would have been probably the evolution we

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>would have seen with tech TV had it stuck around,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I was also going to bring up the point

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>about how you would start off with these cable channels

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that would have very uh focused uh subject matter or topics,

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>or they would cater to a very specific audience, and

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>over time, because there's this need and old media to

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow, Like that's how success is shown by

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>growth year over year. It's not it's not it's not

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>really revenue so much as how much did you grow

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>compared to last year. Uh. You can't continue to grow

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if you are incredibly focused, something that tech stuff has

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>seen over the past, because like I have a great audience,

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful audience, but it's not like you know, maybe

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>someone will tune into a specific episode if they think

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it sounds interesting, but it's not the sort of thing

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>where I'm going to see explosive growth. Um at this stage,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it would be great if that happened. But that's the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing that I think a lot of cable

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>companies we're looking at and they said, let's broaden this out.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the one the flagship that I always think

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of as MTV, because there's the cliche joke of do

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you remember when they used to show music videos? Um,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>which you know, and I make that joke, and meanwhile,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Bob Pittman's my boss. I should be real careful about

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>jokes about MTV. But yeah, it's it's but that's that's

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the sort of that's the sort of train. And now

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that we have these these streaming services that allow for

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>much more narrowly focused content where you can find your

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>audience and you can have that level of engagement, I

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>think that ends up making up a lot for the

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that it doesn't necessarily work as well in the

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>cable world because it is really hard to build that

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of structure that supports the community. I know a

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of cable companies have tried that, where they try

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to marry whatever cable content is up on screen with

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a website that's built out, but that doesn't it's not

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily uh, something that that works organically, and it's really

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to drive people to a different screen when you

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have them on one. Um. So I think I think that,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the listeners question, Yeah, we're we're seeing

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>plenty of programming out there that is touching on all

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the elements that tech tv touched on, but it's just

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>not it's just not tech tv. UM. I'm guessing that

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>was probably the resurgence of G four that really brought

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that question up, and that in case that case is

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different too. It's again it's um, it's

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>again catering to the gaming community, but with the exception

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of stuff like x play, you're not seeing a lot

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of the classic G four properties come back in full swing. Yeah,

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it does. It does delight me that x play is

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>still around in some form. It was originally called game

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Spot TV because If Davis owned a magazine called game Spot,

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>but it was hosted by Adam Sessler uh, and then

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it became extended Play once as IF sold the company

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't want to use the ZIF name anymore. Uh.

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And then at one point they decided to try to

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>make it edgier. So they dropped the tended and just

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>made it explay. Uh and and it's been that ever said,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So that is a launch show from z D t

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>V that under three different names has survived, which I

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of love. But yeah, when you think about starting

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a cable network now, well who would start a cable

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>network now? Like, who wants a cable network? What you

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>see now are uh packages of content? Right. I think

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the future of ESPN will be a slow uh moving

0:17:55.600 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>from ESPN the cable network first to e s p

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>N the app. ESPN plus is their their their back

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>door to escape and survive into. You'll see more and

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>more things go there. You see all the networks doing this,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Paramount plus, Peacock, Disney plus. Uh. Instead of launching channels,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they're launching services that package all their content together. So

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of going back to that idea that Ziff Davis

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>originally launched the network as a companion to their magazines

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and websites. I wonder if there is a company that

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>could create some kind of streaming service, might have to

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>be free ad supported rather than subscription based, but could

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a c net could as if Davis could, uh, you know,

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a vox UH create an app that has the equivalent

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of a tech TV in it, where it's got shows

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that you can tap into, and then the resources of

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the publications involved in there. If there were a

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>return of a tech TV kind of thing, that that's

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the only way I can imagine it taking place, I think.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And one of the other reasons why I'm so glad

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you're on the show, Tom is that I knew that

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you would be the perfect person to talk to about this,

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>not just because of your tech TV history, but of

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>course you also co hosted a show called Chord Killers

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>where you talk about stuff like the cable industry and

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>streaming services, and I mean, you'll go into all sorts

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>of different uh stories on those topics. But you know

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you've I remember listening to Chord Killers ages ago where

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we were just starting to have those conversations of um,

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, cord cutting becoming like a trend and UH

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and now that you have this era of all these

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>different streaming platforms that are available, UH, now the conversation

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>tends to revolve around which ones do I subscribe to

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and which ones can I afford to? Not to what

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>content am I willing to miss? Out on that's what

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the conversation becomes. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Uh. We used to

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>joke Brian Brushwood, my my co host on Court Killers,

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and I used to joke that we started to show

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about tablets before the iPad came out, basically uh, and

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but we we stuck around long enough that it paid off,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because Yeah, we have shifted over the years from how

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>could you possibly do this? To uh, what do you

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>watch and how do you decide? Yeah, no, it's that's

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the conversation I end up having. I have another

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>show called Large nerd Dron Collider with a friend of

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>mine and that ends up being our conversation all the

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>time where she'll say, oh, did you see this new

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>show on Hulu? And I said, oh, that's it's one

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the ones I canceled. So it's because it's just

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to keep up with them all. But but yeah,

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think this was exactly what my listener

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was really looking for, was to kind of get that

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>insight and um, yeah, it's a totally different world now

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>with the different ways of approaching I think the fact

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know that there are these platforms out there

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>finding an audience still continues to be one of the

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>most challenging aspects for any content creator out there. But

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are someone who wants to do something where

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, you launch a Twitch channel where you're

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>helping people with tech problems, I think there are opportunities

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>out there. The question you need to be able to

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>define what success is to you and maybe set some expectations,

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's not like you're necessarily going to see uh,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>monumental success right out of the gate, or even you know,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you may not see monumental success at all. But if

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>it's something that you derive pleasure from and and it's

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>not pulling too much of your attention away from other

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>things that you need to do, I think it's a

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>great thing to pursue. Um and and to your point,

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>well with court killers, if you stick around long enough,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you might become relevant. Yeah, right, just just stang in there.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>The good news is you don't need to be in

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>eight million homes to to be successful. Right that It's

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get an audience, but at least you

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get as big of an audience as

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you used to have to do to to have some success. Yeah,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to. You don't have to find the

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>money people, right, the people who will put forward whatever

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the capital is in order for you to have all

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff and and the the equipment you need to

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to get into something like that is not

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's still an expense. But there are

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of computers that are coming out now that

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have the basic stuff that you would need right away

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that can produce good enough results where if you're if

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the content you put out is really good, people will

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>watch it. Obviously, you know, it's it's hard to judge

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that because you always think about the standouts that have

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the super high quality webcam or or they're using a

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, a very expensive camera and lighting set up

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and green screen, and they have the mixers and all

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. But you know, those are those

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>are things that you can worry about later on down

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the road. Um, Tom, thank you so much for joining

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>the show and and having a little walk down memory

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>lane with me. Is been a real pleasure. Well, thank you.

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the one of the things I try not

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to bore my friends with is is endless stories about

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tech TV. So I appreciate your giving me a chance

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>to have a purpose to bore people about tech TV.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't boring at all. And I mean, if you

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ever find yourself with like thirty seconds of extra time

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the day, I mean you could always just launch

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>another old Stories from Tech TV podcast, right have would

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be like a Patreon only thing. Sure, sure, yeah, there's

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>an idea there. I would like to apologize everyone in

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Tom's life who was just saying we're just trying to

0:23:53.160 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>have but again, I really appreciate it. And if you

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>out there listening to this, if you haven't gone to

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>explore all the different podcasts that Tom does, I highly

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>recommend you check them out. Tom, which ones would you

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>suggest people listen to besides all of them? Yeah, folks

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>who listen to tech stuff probably would appreciate Daily Tech

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>News show, which is all about technology news. Uh. There's

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>also Sort and Laser, which is about science fiction and

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>fantasy books. There's Cord Killers. As you mentioned. All my

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>shows are at tom Erett dot com. Uh. And and

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to put in a plug for for some

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>shows that I just sort of help get going. Uh.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>There's one called Barbecue and Tech Chris Ashley and Rod

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Simmons just to to tech executives talking about how much

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they love barbecue in the intersection of the two worlds

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and the tech John, Rob Dunwood and and friends. Uh,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about tech from a black perspective. Look for those

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>as well. That's fantastic. Yeah, And if you listen to

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom shows, you're gonna hear other voices that you'll be

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. People I've had on on tech stuff in

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the past. Shannon Morse has been on your shows many times. UM,

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>wonderful friend of the podcast as well. So thanks again, Tom.

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's not let's not make it like, you know, two

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or three more years before we talk again. Agreed. We

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have a bit more to say, or at least I

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have a bit more to say after we take this

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Okay, let's talk a bit about G four

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>TV and by lett sounds just me because Tom's already

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>he's gone. Thanks Tom, that's great for him to be

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Yeah, let's talk about G four TV

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for a second. So in the episode I did where

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned G four TV was coming back, that was

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>back when the group of people trying to resuscitate G

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>four TV were mainly focusing on streaming events, specials, a

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of retrospectives, that kind of thing. But after more

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>than the year of that kind of stuff going on,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>G four was actually able to establish itself as a

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>linear television channel. That happened on November six of this year.

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And uh, linear TV, in case you're not familiar with

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 1>that term, it essentially just is old school television. It

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>means that programming is running on its schedule and you

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>see whatever is playing when you tune in. It's what

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom was talking about when you mentioned the paramount plus stuff.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Linear TV is uh that just that unbroken stream of programming.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's not on demand. It's not the way like

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of streaming services are typically set up today. Um,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's uh, we're getting some stuff back again,

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>attack of the Show and ex play, uh and other

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff as well. So it shows that G four, despite

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it had that kind of painful uh decline,

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>which ultimately uh meant that it turned into the Esquire Channel,

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>has managed to Claude's way back. And Uh, I don't

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mean to to say that in a way that's you know,

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>uh talking down what they've done. I think it's pretty

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal and I think it's fantastic that gamers can have

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this kind of content available to them, still not tech TV.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>That part has not returned along with the G four

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>TV stuff. However, as Tom was saying, a lot of

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the content that you would find on tech TV, a

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of that stuff has been distributed across thousands of channels.

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have everything from people doing deep dives

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>into technology where they're getting really technical. They just assume

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>from the get go that you have a strong based

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding of technology before they even get started to stuff

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>more like what my podcast is, where I would say

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I I take a more general knowledge approach where I'm

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not assuming anyone has that deep level of understanding, largely

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's where I come from. I'm I've tell people

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I studied English literature in college. I

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>had no intention of becoming a tech podcaster out of college,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but kind of fortunately gravitated toward it after after more

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>than a decade of flailing around in the uh in

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the real world. And so I go at this from

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of, let me do this as if I

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>were listening the idea of, all right, let's establish the

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>foundation before we start diving into the nitty gritty. So yeah,

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the tech TV model as it stood would probably be

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>very different in streaming, I would say, but because we

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do have lots of stuff out there that is similar

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to tech TV. In fact, you know, you've got Leo

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Report's Twitter network, you've got the Daily Tech News show

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Merritt, You've got stuff like tech stuff, You've

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>got numerous podcasts and video streams. I think that it's

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>actually a much more rich world when it comes to

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that sort of content, Um, and a lot of these

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>endeavors can survive on a much smaller audience base than

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what you would see with a cable channel, right, like

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to hit certain big, big numbers with cable

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>channels in order for that cable channel to be profitable

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's expensive to run those. The operations that we

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>see on the Internet tend to be slightly smaller in scale,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes dramatically smaller in scale, so they don't have the

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>same overhead costs that a cable channel would have. So

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, Um, you know, it may be that

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the output isn't as flashy as it could be if

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it were a cable channel, but I think it's just

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as relevant. So thanks again for sending in that question

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>about tech TV and whether it would survive on streaming.

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It was fantastic to be able to catch up with

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>tom uh. It sounds like I might be popping onto

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>daily tech news show sometime in the new year, so

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to that show you might hear my

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>voice on it. I apologize ahead of time for that.

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if any of you out there have

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for topics I should cover on episodes of tech Stuff,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe you've got a company I would you would like

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>me to talk about, or a specific technology, or maybe

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a trend in tech um maybe sort of a perspective

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on historical aspects of technology, any of those things. Let

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>me know. Send me a message via Twitter again. The

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is tech Stuff H s W

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. H