WEBVTT - Mini Crush #36

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome to movie Crush special a dish. Uh.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>It is Monday morning and I am drinking a triple

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>latte with a with a healthy splash of booze. No, no, no,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a morning drinker. Nol. No man, I don't.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine those madmen? No man, I would be

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.599
<v Speaker 1>asleep by lunchtime. I'm not a big day drinker anymore.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it. Well, here's the thing. Nothing better

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>than a day buds, a day drink um or two

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is great, like son is out. You're on a patio,

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's nice, get a get a couple of drinks in you.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>That is the best. But you're on a boat. You know, great,

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I get so tired now and it's

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's kind of thing where unless you just keep

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that train going this evening. You have a few drinks

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>at two, and then by thirty you're like, come out,

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>what do I do? Uh? And then keeping that train going,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a dangerous game too. It's a very dangerous, the

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>most dangerous game. It's a gambit gamp. It is that

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is that. The word is absolutely a word. And a

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Marvel character who threw uh fire cards and he's from

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. Yeah, a trench coat. I used to like

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>him a lot. Let what's the definition here? A device,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>action or opening remark, typically one entailing a degree of risk. Okay,

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that is calculated to gain advantage. I don't know about that.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it may not be a game, but it's a

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>living language. My friend Malleable, someone posted a picture of

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Justin Bieber looking like Hi from Raising Arizona. Did you

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>see that? Isn't that funny? That is pretty funny. He's

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just like the Hawaiian shirt. Everybody looked that up. That's

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>very funny. And his hair is long and he's got

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a mustache. Yeah. Thank I gotta thank Jasmine Spearing for

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this on the Movie Crushers page. Um, she posted, I

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>guess Justin Bieber tweeted stop sending me this ship and

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a picture of that side by side of of

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Cage as Hi mcdonnov Fromraising Arizona and himself looking

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>just like him. So that's pretty funny. I guess Justin

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Bieb the Beabs is getting barraged and is upset, unless

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>he's just getting around, but either way, that's great. All right, everyone,

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>This is a very special edition, like I said, UM,

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna tell you what's going on here. I

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>have in my hand a piece of paper, a series

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of pieces of paper, very awkward way to say, a

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>stack of paper. And this is UM, I came, here's

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what this is. This is from nineteen the mid nineteen nineties.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I've gotta be very vague with this, I think, uh.

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And this was a letter to a Hollywood director and

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it is from a Hollywood producer with the subject line

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could name these names. It's a memo

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to director, memo from producer. Subject line um character casting.

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And it is a inside look at, at least in

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineties, how men talked about women in Hollywood

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and about casting women in Hollywood. I came into um

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ownership of this memo. Let's call it the casting memo

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that sounds salacious. UH. I came to acquire this many

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>many years ago, probably about probably only a few years

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>after this memo UH was was sent. And I've always

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>read it and thought it was sort of funny. But now,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in the age of the Me Too movement and Hollywood

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>creeps and jerks being exposed, it's I see it in

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a different light. So here's what I'm

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna do everyone this episode. I'm just gonna read this

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>whole thing to give everyone an inside peak of what

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood is like on the inside, or at least how

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it was in the mid nineties. And I bet still

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>lives in the circles. How about that. I'm readying word forward. Uh,

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna read the actresses names because uh, you know,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important. This is a one two three.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a page memo. Everyone here we go, dear name

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>or dacted in the wake of Elizabeth Shoe's decision. So

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>here's what happened. I guess is Elizabeth Shoe backed out

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of a MOVI me and they need to recast this

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>part in this film. In the wake of Elizabeth Shoo's decision.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Thought i'd take a moment to recap some of the

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>character potentials we discussed last night and a bit more detail,

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you'll indulge me, discuss an approach to casting

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this role that I feel would favor us with a

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>positive response the next time we pop the question. I'm

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>assuming he doesn't mean getting married to one another. This

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>list largely the product of brainstorming with name redacted and

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>name redacted. Does not take into consideration any availability issues,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>nor does it deal with a matter of price quotes. Uh,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like they're shopping for a car. It is designed merely

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to generate discussion on two fronts, the suitability of the

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>actress for the role and the impact each actress might

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>have on the overall profile for the film. Here goes

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in alphabetical order. Patricia Arquette colon. When you indicated that

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>she might not be any more interesting than Ashley Judd,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>come inclined to agree. However, my belief is that her

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>profile is somewhat higher than Judd's, and that might help

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>give the bigger names were considering for supporting casts the

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>comfort level they require to jump on board. All right,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not too bad. Maybe not very nice too, called

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Patricia Arquette or Ashley Judd. Uh, not super interesting, But

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Drew Barrymore, What do you got? Oh no, no,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just feel like this reads like

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like horse trading document or something like that. Yeah,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit. I mean, we'll just let people

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>make it their minds. I'm just gonna read it. Drew Barrymore.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>We didn't discuss her yesterday, but thought we'd mentioned her now.

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>She too young, too, TARTI. We certainly could believe her

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>as the sort who would bunk with the other character

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>or anyone else in the film for that matter, after

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a first meeting, And by bunk with this producer means

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sleep with. But is she capable of holding anything in reserve?

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Or she simply two on the nose and two out there,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Sandra Bullock, she could do a good job with this,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but I agree with you when you say it's probably

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not in the cards. However, if you thought she was

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the one, don't see how it hurts to pop the question.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this producer knows will pop the question

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>means specifically means fucking ask someone to marry. Yeah, but

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, but maybe like in the Hollywood parlance, that

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>means as them to be in your movie. Yeah, what

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>a dummy? Uh see how it hurts the pop the question.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Her people at her agency can and do give quick answers,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and to the best of my knowledge, she's uh yet

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to work with a world class director. You never know,

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Ellipsus Cameron Diaz believe she's on the brink of becoming

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a very big movie star. And has resisted doing fluff

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>parts in stupid movies for big money since her breakout

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>roll in The Mask, the Jim Carrey picture. She really

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>tries hard and it's very serious about her work. Well,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that's very nice. This is no actress model bimbo. She's

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>good people too. And for the age thing. Remember the

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>part uh is part girl, part woman. Switches easily between

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the two. All right, that's actually very kind. Cammie Diaz

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is no actress model. Bimbo's good people know. It's good

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to know. Uh, And Hesh, it's clearly mid nineties. Obviously,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this is only if we go the no name route.

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Do we know at this point is if such an

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>option is even available to us. I've not seen her work,

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but I know a number of people with good taste

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>who thinks she's terrific. Definitely a woman on the way up. Okay,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and Hesh, And by the way, I didn't. This is

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>not all just an indictment. This is just an insider peak. Wait, wait,

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how did you acquire this document? Chuck? I can't say.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't say no. I'm just gonna I don't want

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone to ever get in trouble, So I'm just uh it.

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I found it in a bottle on a seashore. It

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>because that that that is how Hollywood memos are delivered, right,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Judd. I think she's okay, but does her participation

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>put bigger name supporting potentials out of reach? Does she

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>really have the chops? Is she the real stuff? I'm

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not yet convinced. I'm not sure she can bring the layers,

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the mystery, and the uh. He says magic, but I

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>assume he means magic to the character that would make

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>her truly memorable. I think you should definitely look at

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a good bit of tape on her before committing It.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Troubles me a bit that her best reviews by a

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>wide margin, came in her breakout film, her breakthrough film,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Ruby in Paradise, and that she hasn't garnered nearly as

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>much critical praise since Gwyneth Paltrow after Julia Roberts my

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>personal number two choice, audiences adore her, and more importantly,

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this girl is the real deal. I heard you when

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>she said that she was in communicado for the next

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, and I wouldn't dream of suggesting we wait

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>for her to surface. Could we consider going outside regular channels?

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I e. Her family rather than her agency to get

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to her quicker Julia Roberts. Everyone we know this person

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>wants Julia Roberts as the number one choice. Here's what

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>he has to say. Um the name redact, character redacted

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>for the ages to the manner born, who writes that

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>what does that even mean to the manner born? Have

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>no idea, manner m A n O R to the

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>manner is that it's saying a manner like a like

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an estate that no, I don't know, I have no idea,

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense. Yeah, I don't get that. Someone explained

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that to me on Facebook. If if you know what

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that means to the manner born, Julia flat out knows.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This girl underlined, I promise you. Granted we're talking money,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking agency posturing, et cetera, but name redacted. I

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>truly believe that if you laid out all the parameters

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>were dealing with to the agents with a phone call,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a prompt and positive response is within the realm of possibility.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Do not forget for a moment that the girl adores

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you and has the utmost respect for you. She also

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>guarantees a big opening weekend or two and when we

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>make a great film. On top of that, you'll be

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in back end heaven. That sounds like fun, yeah to

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the manner born. Uh yeah it is. It's like I

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's a sounds like a British phrase meeting destined

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to be suited to something by virtue of birth or

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>custom and practice. So you can actually spell it both

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>ways m A n n e r or m A

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>n o R m o o r meaning more of

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the birthright and the class kind of of echelon of actress.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>That well, yes, that's a little clue. Everyone, very downtain

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>abbey kind. It might be a brit who wrote this memo.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I know that everyone's gonna take this is just a

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>big like puzzle to be solved. Well, you know, and

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that. Everyone movie crushers, get get out

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on this. Yeah, dudes, get a get a murder wall

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>going on this. It would be wonderful. Where were we here?

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, we were in back in heaven. I could

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have forgetten all, although I know that you could give

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>a damn about that score. So another clue. I guess

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a director who doesn't care about money and back end

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this is actually this could be a fun game. Please

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think about this one eclipses when owner writer in my

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>book the ultimate woman child child woman in movies today,

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>she's a real woman child. What is that from? Is that?

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't read? Is that? I think? So? Wow? I'm not

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>really sure why you think she's not right for this character.

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I think she has real talent and works very hard.

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you got for me? Sorry? Am so it's

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>crush with eyeliner. She's a real woman, right. I love

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that song. I sensed the collaboration between you two would

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be extraordinary and would result in her giving a memorable performance. Moreover,

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think she's one of the handful of people on

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this list would absolutely no problem holding her own with

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>lead actor name redacted. People are like, now, just give

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>us that glue. Sorry, everyone, mirror Sorvino an intelligent, committed performer.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh think she's about the work and not about price

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and perk jive, perk jive. Yeah, you know all that

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>price and perk jive, give me perks, give me money,

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that job, all that job. Now, I don't I have

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>no idea where this guy's from now. UH don't know

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that she's among the more natural choices for this particular role.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But with your help. I'm confident she would be more

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>than credible. H if we use her? How do we

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>keep her boyfriend off the set? Wow? I don't even

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>know because that guy's trouble. I'm gonna look up. Actually, Uh,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna break and I'm gonna come back in one

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>second because I gotta look up who this who this

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>person dated in the mid nineties. We'll be right back.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm back everyone. If this memo was written

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>when it says, Wow, I'm gonna tell Noel, you all

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are so mad at me right now. I'm so sorry

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that I can't just the bulge clues left and right.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna tell Nol uh. And we're gonna play

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a some elevator music for one moment while while Nolan

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I have a ten second discussion. All right, Nol, He's well,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this. He was he It wasn't is a

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>very famous director's tour. They didn't want on set. No,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean they didn't want him to like micromanage their shoot. Right.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>He might like you, he was gonna walk in and say, like,

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>why is that camera there? Maybe? Man, this is getting good.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Everything guy's reputation precedes him. Uh, Uma Thurman other producer

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Nam red acted as a big fan. I'm not so sure.

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>She's a bit of a cipher to me, and I

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can never tell if she's all on the surface or

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if there's something really going on there. Maybe that's a

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>plus for this part. Still don't know if she's a

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>real actor, but think she might work. Uma. Yeah, she's

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a real actor at this chance. She's great. A cipher

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>who was this person? Who was this wizard? Using all

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>these weird terms, yeah, cipher's cool. Cipher is means sort

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of like a like a like a husk, right, like

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a well, the idea of a thing

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and not the actual thing itself. The true cipher is

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a is a like disguising like a code, So she

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just like an enigma. You know what else? I love

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that the use of the word cipher for like a

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>rap lyric like a freestyle is called a cipher. Oh,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really nice, which makes sense because like you know, there's

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of double entendres and wrap and like a

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of like hidden kind of like messages that you

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of know, you know, the context in

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>order to like pull out. So that makes sense they

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>would use it for them like a good double entente.

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, Charlie Scarren, the girl here refers to as girls.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of annoying. The girl from Two Days in

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the Valley I didn't see it, but here she's really good.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Definitely a babe, definitely capable of the film fatale thing.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>From everything I've heard. Tom Hanks caster in the movie.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh he currently has out and she's the female lead

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>opposite either Christian Slater or Jason Patrick. I forget which

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in a high profile movie. Definitely a star ascendant. Maybe

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Two Days in the Valley is worth your having a look.

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I kind of feel like the girl

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like a Hollywood trope in a way.

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember in Mulholland Drive where they're like, this is

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the girl, Yeah, this is the girl. Yeah. I have

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a feeling like that said it is, but also just

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of an example of Hollywood's just sort of history

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of ownership and misogyny and and more than misogyny, misanthropy,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, in general, like actors are cattle, they're not

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>even people. Well they call it a casting call, right,

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is like a cattle call. Yeah, I mean, and

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean some directors are not like that. But I

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know there are many directors very famously that just like

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the thing that always weirds me. I've never I've never

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>been to one, but you see him in in movies

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that are depicting this stuff. Like the casting call is

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so strange because you'll have like, you know, dozens of

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>women or or or men all look the same and

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they're all auditioning for the same thing, and they're all

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>wearing the same kind of like outfit or whatever. Well

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a trope, yeah, absolutely, but it's true. It's true.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>But that's what makes it feel like a cow call

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's like all of these like very homogeneous looking creatures.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Just they're kind of moving and doing their lines. You know, man,

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's like to It's very depressing. And that's

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the trope in movies is it's always very depressing because

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the actor is all excited about the au dish walks

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in and sees thirty of them in the room and

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>just is deflated. But they're also the ones that they

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's so clever that they wore the vast or

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>whatever because it's like a cowboy roll or something, or

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that they like went the extra mon But everyone. I

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's actually that's a specific one and I can't

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>probably that's from but that's you know, that's been a

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of I think so. Um. I occasionally in my

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>old days as a as a p A, would get

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>wrangled into shooting auditions and casting sessions and stuff like that,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I always always just felt bad. There's nothing

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine anything in the at least film industry wise,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>quite so intimidating as the audition process just awful. I'll

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>never do it, alright. So that's uh. Charlie's Robin Wright.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>One of producer name redacted's faiths favor Raves. I wish

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to do some more research on this person

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and their wizardry with the English language. One of the

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>producers favor Rapes. But I agree with you when you

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>say she's too old. No, would you do me a

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>favorite look up how old Robin Wright was in the

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties and for and by the way, I'm not

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say like thirty two or thirty five of them,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh dude, I'm gonna say twenty eight. Really yeah, it's

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna go find out. I mean, she was born in

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty six, so do the birthday math. She was she

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>was twenty nine or thirty, And hey, I'm not saying like,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>oh she said she swold. She may have been too

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>old for this part for sure. Um, so I'm not.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not being overly crepy. Yeah. But at the same time,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like with dudes, it's it's like that math doesn't seem

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to apply. Like DiCaprio gets to play an old man

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or a young buck still too, they're like, all who

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>cares he's Leo? Yeah, yeah, you're right, Um, she's too old.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I also here that she can be somewhat difficult to

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>work with, that she can be a bit of a

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>strange one, not necessarily a team player. M hm. Renee Zellwigger,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the semi unknown who's about to break out and the

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise picture opening in a few weeks. He's talking

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about Jerry McGuire here. I've heard a lot of good

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>things about her, but have yet to see her myself.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure if you wanted to see the whose picture

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it could be easily arranged. So that's the list. Now,

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>let me take a moment to ask you to consider

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat different approach to getting our character name redacted.

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that we might have a few problems getting

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer we want if we go through go through

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the through channels agent route. By simply submitting the offer

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and the script and leaving it at that. I realized,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that's quote how it's done end quote. But it's not

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>how you've always done it. How many times have you

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>cast major talent over the years without the benefit of

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a completed, finally polished script A lot and you didn't

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>always know the actor have previous working experience with him either.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>How did you do it by telling them your vision

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of the film and your take on their character. I'm

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>telling you, when you communicate in this fashion with an actor,

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it is truly compelling stuff, and they get really excited.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>I did you know It's funny is that at this

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>point in this director's career, he's sort of legendary already,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and this producer is talking to this director about something

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that he's sort of already mastered. Very funny. Uh. They're

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>seduced not just by your vision name redacted, but also

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>by your considerable charm. I've seen you in this mode,

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and when you've got it going, you could sell Rice

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Japanese. Oh lord, I can't help but think

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that if you had the opportunity to meet with Elizabeth

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Sho and then handed her a script, that we would

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have received a different answer. And such an approach will

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>give a performer the backbone to stand up to their

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>agents and managers when the sons of bitches tell their

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>clients to stay away because they're not getting their rate

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or because they don't think the script is quite there yet,

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the sons of bitches nol. I like that. I think

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that this can work, and I think this is a

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.959
<v Speaker 1>valid way to proceed. But I think that way because

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that you are all capitals the man. Just

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>don't you forget it, ellipsus, never forget oh man, that's

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it everyone, that's the casting papers. And how about this.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>If we have any Hollywood insiders listening out there, and

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you have internal memorandums or letters that are in this spirit,

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>send them to me. I will not out you. I

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>will redact to all the names. I think this gives

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 1>people a really interesting inside look at kind of what

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>goes on behind the scenes, uh in Hollywood. And I

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>would love to do more of this stuff. Uh. And

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to look up right now. I don't even

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>know who ended up playing this role, and I don't

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think I could tell you because that

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>would be probably too much in uh of a clue.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna look right now. Very interesting. Well, they

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>went with an actress that uh is not very famous

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at all, um still to this day, and I dare

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I say, is a bit of a niche actor and

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>um did not become some big superstar a fine actress,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to be sure. Very interesting. All right, I'm sure that

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>frustrates you even more. And that's part of what this

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is all about, everyone, to kind of tease you a bit.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>This episode is a subtitled movie Crustration, Movie Crustration. I

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like it. That's that should it should be titled movie Crustration.

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Colon the casting memo redacted redacted. I love it, all right, everyone,

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening. I hope you enjoyed that. I'd love

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to hear some feedback if you were like, no, that

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a big stup, a waste of time, Chuck,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I prefer the regular crushes. Don't worry, We're not gonna

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like change up the format. I just thought that was

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fun thing to do today. So that

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is it for this week. Everyone, oh can I can

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I plug a plug real quick? Oh? No, plug away,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna plug because today in the actual day, in

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>real time and space where we occupy. Currently, a show

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that I've been working on for the network called Happy

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Face as Lars this first episode and it's um, it's

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's sort of a true crime show. It is

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a true crime show, but it takes a much different

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>approach than what you might expect. It's about a killer

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the Pacific Northwest and as the Happy Face Killer,

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>but the story centers around his daughter and her experience

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>growing up not knowing her father was a killer and

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>then turn her life took when she found this out.

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's just it's got a beautiful score from an

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>amazing band from Athens called Hope for a Golden Summer.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It's got this real melancholy kind of it's a very beautiful,

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>sad and horrific story, but it has a lot of

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>heart and it really the way we captured it. I'm

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just so proud of of the work everyone that worked

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on it is done and I really think you guys

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>would dig it. It's just it's a very cinematic story. Um,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't lean heavily on like the gory details

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff in there, but it's really just kind

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the story about the human cost of these kinds

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>of crimes. Yeah, buddy, I've been, uh, the way I've

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>been describing it is like, um, a true crime story

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>told through the eyes of a different kind of victim,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>which is the daughter of this monster. Yeah, and the

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>story has twists and turns. It's not what you might

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>expect as the story progresses. Yeah. So by now there

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>should be a handful of episodes out um, but we're

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>doing one a week, I think for twelve episodes. So

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>check it out if you get a chance. I think

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys will dig it. Yeah, big shout out to

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Noel and Chandler. Who else you want to shout out?

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Nol oh Man, I mean Melissa Moore, who's the killer's daughter,

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>who was an amazing subject, an amazing person to work with.

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Pacheco, who is a producer we're working with on

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this out of New York, fantastic, Matt Riddle, my pal

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>who we were able to freelance out to help write

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing, and it's just been destroying it and doing

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing work with story editing, Will and man Gesh from

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Part Time Genius, who have eped the thing um and

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of been overseeing the whole thing with them,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's just been a really joyful thing to work on.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Despite how dark material is. It really it's got a

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope to the story. And it's crazy because

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the band that worked on it is a hope for

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>a golden summer, something that goes hand in hand. What

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like that Melissa has um She may

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>have already gotten some substantial closure in her life previous

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to this, but do you think this helped her cathartically? Oh, hugely?

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And she she just texted me a few minutes ago

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>saying how thrilled she was with with what we had

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>made together and how yeah, you really experience her growth

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>on the show. I mean, I don't want to diminish

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>anything about calling these subjects characters, but it's almost like

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the way a character and a film has to change

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and growth in the arc of the film. That's actually

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>feel that and it's why they make movies like that.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That's great. I'm just beyond proud of those things. So

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Awesome, Everybody go support Happy Face another

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one of our great shows as we expand our network.

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Very proud of Noel and the work he's doing here. Uh,

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and we appreciate your support on all fronts. So with

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that we bid you ado. Noel and I are going

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the manner in which we had

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>been born. Yes to a men are born and are born.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought of myself as that I was born

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on the manner with a silver spoon in my mouth.

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, everyone, we'll see you next week.