WEBVTT - Ilana Weinstein Discusses Hedge Fund Recruitment

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Boomberg Radio.

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>This weekend on the podcast, I have an extra special guest,

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and this was a master class in what is going

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>on in the alternative space. Alana Weinstein is uniquely situated

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to understand hedge funds, venture capital, private equity, the demands

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of scaling a billion dollar firm into a forty billion

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar firm, Who is moving around from firm to firm,

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Who are the most talented people in the space, What

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is going on without flows from hedge funds and why.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to describe this except to say

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this is absolutely an incredible discussion from a person uniquely

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>situated in a one off vantage point to understand exactly

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what's taking place in this space. So, with no further ado,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Alana Weinstein. This is Masters in Business

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. My special guest this

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>week is Alana Weinstein. She is the founder and CEO

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the I d W Group, a leading boutique for

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, private equity, and family offices in search of

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>top investment talent. Previously, she worked at such August firms

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>as Goldman Stacks and the Boston Consulting Group. She got

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>her undergraduate degree from the University of Pennsylvania and her

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>MBA from Harvard Elana Weinstein, Welcome to Bloomberg Radio. And

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I add that because I've seen you on Bloomberg TV

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>many times, but I don't recall ever hearing you on

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. This is my first time, Barry, So, you've

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>been in the asset management industry for more than two decades.

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>How did you end up on the recruiting side. The

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>short answer is I was really young and I was

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>still trying to figure or out what I wanted to

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>be when I grew up. Literally, Um, I had gone

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to HBS after a year at Goldman, So I literally

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>went from penn from my dorm room to my parents home,

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>worked a Goldman for a year, uh and then UH

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and then went to HBS. And just to go back

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and answer your question, I ended up going to the

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Boston Consulting Group really because I felt I needed to

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>get a post m b A to my m b A.

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to figure out, um, what path I wanted

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to take, what sorts of problems I wanted to solve,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what industries were interesting to me, and um and this

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is in the I was in my late twenties, this

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is in the mid nineties, so the dot com because

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that's of course what we called it back then, and

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble was just bubbling. And within a

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>year and a half, my entire class of MBAs at BCG,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the class I entered with, was gonzo. I was literally

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they'd all gone to California to seek their you know,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>start the next whatever. Give me a big fat slug

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of stock options and a stock that just goes up

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>ten percent a day, and and everybody jumped at it

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and done right. And you can imagine how that ended

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>for most of them. It depends on if they knew

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>when to hit the bit or not. If they were

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>smart and and took off some risk, not too bad

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>the people who didn't, so they had gone to try

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to start dot com companies. And um, I that wasn't

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>my gig. I wasn't I realized I didn't. Really, I

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>had learned a lot of BCG. I didn't want to

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be a management consultant um as a as a career path,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and I still was figuring out what do I want

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to do? And before I committed to UM any particular pathway.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I figured I would jump into another milieu where I

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>could learn again more about companies and functions and just

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out where I wanted to commit to. And so

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I joined a large recruiting firm, thinking that would give

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>me a purview. And as it turned out, I was

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>really good at it, and I fell into quickly joined

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>their financial services practice, and uh, that's how That's how

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 1>I ended up in recruiting, and so you end up

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>focusing a little further along in your career on head funds,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>private equity, family offices. So what happened was UM after

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>about a year or two, there the dot com bubble burst,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and there this is this big search firm I was at.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Their financial services practice was really focused more on investment, banking, equities,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>traditional asset management, sort of what i'll call older school businesses,

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>compared to what I really fell into and started to

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>focus on, which was back in the late nineties early

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousands. As you'll remember, these were the this is

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>what was fueling the cell side. This is where the

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>action was. It was the prop groups, and it was

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it was these new, first of their kind type financial products.

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>It was called so it was credit correlation. Asset swaps

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even called credit derivatives back then, highly structured first

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of their kind derivativesy types of transactions. That's what we

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>were focused on for the cell side clients that I

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was working with, and that's where the juice was. And

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, I developed my own business which

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was on fire within this big firm, and it just

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>became obvious after a few years to me um to

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.039
<v Speaker 1>really try to do this on my own, given um

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I was acting effectively independently within a larger construct which

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>was having issues at the time. So let's talk also

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about the timing. As you were explained that, I began

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about the timing. If we go back years,

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what were there two hundred four hundred hedge funds Today

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>there's eleven thousand. Your timing into that ramp up could

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>not perfect Barry, right, I planned it perfectly, right. I mean,

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so so all these and Goldman sachs Is is infamous

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>for saying to a group of traders who they smell

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>might be itching to head out, Hey, why don't you

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>guys go set up a hedge fun We'll get you capital,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>will will prime broker for you, and we'll steer some

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>potential clients to you. And that's how they built an

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>immense prime brokerage business. How much was the Goldman Sacks

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>connection helpful or as you was an analyst, it had nothing.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I was literally just understand I started a Goldman in

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of my senior year of PEN. I mean

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>because I just was. I don't know, I was stupid.

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like working. I just I got through all

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>my classes. I didn't have I didn't have enough fun

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in college. At the bottom line, I'm making up for it,

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to make up for lost time now. But I

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was finished with my classes. I started middle of my

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>senior year and I was out within literally a year

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to HBS. So think about it. I was I hadn't

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>even graduated from college. So this was it was. That

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>was not what UM really what really jump started my business.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It what it was. However, UM, you are correct in

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>signaling the cell side um as as a driver of

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund talent, because back then it was the prop

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>groups that were the precursors to hedge funds. It was

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it was these you know again, high octane um and

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>these were the guys who got paid the most on

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the cell side at the time, and I even still

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>felt like they weren't capturing as much of their p

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>m L as they wanted. Well, you know it, within

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a cell side context, they were doing as well as

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they possibly could. Back then, you could be a superstar

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>prop trader and earning forty million bucks a year, which

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't happen anymore. You could be earning more certainly

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>than the CEO. But their buddies were leaving UM, many

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of whom were Goldman partners or just were um just

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like again, high octane prop traders from Credit Sweez, from

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank, from Morgan Stanley, from JP Morgan, and they

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.239
<v Speaker 1>were setting up shop. And remember back then you could

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>start with fifty and scale to a billion very quickly.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And so and all of a sudden, there's no headwinds

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>from any other part in the bank. There's no cap

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at all in terms of how you get paid. You

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can do whatever you want. And if you're an entrepreneurial

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>person who is a great investment professional and that's your

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>passion and that's what you want to do, why be

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>part of a bank. There was no headwind to getting

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>into this business and scaling if you could produce the goods,

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and back then you could do that a lot more easily,

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>quite quite fascinating. Let's let's talk a little bit a

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>lot about how your business works. Do hedge funds and

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>family offices come to you looking for slots to fill?

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Are the traders and fund managers reaching out to you? What?

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>What does the structure like? So, UM, let me back

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>up and tell you, which I'm actually quite proud of.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>We've been in business for almost seventeen years, seventeen this February.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Most of our clients we've been working with practically, if

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>not since the beginning beginning, certainly within the first few

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>years of inception of I DW. So what that means

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is we're UM, we really know their business, We've helped

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>them build their business. And yes they are coming to

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us UM for specific assignments, whether it's and the common

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>thread being they are all uh senior people who can

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>move the needle, whether it's a someone to do VI,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a t M t PM for equities UM, someone to

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>run an emerging markets business, someone to build and run distress.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, and this goes back perhaps

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to my BCG background, UM, I really are our role

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>my firm's role is to also be an advisor to

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>them as well as to the market. So it's I'll

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>give you two assignments we're working on today. A in

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the genesis of it UM each each one UM is

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>arguably for one of the biggest and most sophisticated hedge

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>funds in the world. One UM, I started talking with

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the founder at the end of the summer about a

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>new business he wants to build. He runs a forty

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar hedge funds, super successful, and he wants to

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>create something wholly other than what he does today. So

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we're helping him find somebody who could oversee that and

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>build that. That's that's a very sophisticated person who's not

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>This isn't someone looking for a job. This is somebody

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>who has actually had great success with what they've done

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and this is kind of an interesting

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe chapter two UM and and as successful as they've been,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an opportunity for even greater wealth creation. The second

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>example I'll give you is another UM client that is

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>almost as big UM and again, these are two of

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the most successful hedge funds in the world. Very forward

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking guys. Uh, this is al we've worked with for

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I came to him and I said

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to him, Um, there I see an ARB in the

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>market right now. UM, there's a universe of people who

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are really talented and our staying where they are not

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>because they're happy, but because a better option doesn't exist.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you created this, I think you could capture

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that alpha right this this group of individuals that have

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenal P and L generators, even in the last

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>few years where it's been very difficult, he's now building

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that business. So it's both UM working on UM discreet

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>assignments for our clients as well as coming to them

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with advice about where to take take their how to

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>take their funds forward. That's that's fascinating. So if someone

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>comes to you and they're looking to fill a specific role,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>what is your thought process like when you're trying to say,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>who do I know that might be a good fit

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for this? Or if I don't know anybody in particul

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>killer who comes to mind, how do you go about

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>creating UM a pool of applicants that could fill that role. Well,

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>after again almost two decades doing this, we typically, UM,

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you know most of the player We kind of No,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go so far as to say

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we have the answer before we begin, although that is

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>often correct, like actually formally begin this like someone says

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>something and you're like, I know, in the back of

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>your head, I have just the p We We've done

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>so much work in every conceivable asset class so many times,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>um that when we start something, it's rarely truly brand

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>new what it can be because certain strategies are more

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>cyclical than others. So for example, UM, when we did

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>the here's a good example, when we did the head

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of Emerging markets for one of our clients, he asked

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>me how much work we've done in e M and

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I told him we had done a fair bit of work.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>This is going back a few years. But because it's

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a cyclical strategy, not for a while. UM, So they're

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what we did is we threw a lasto over the

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>universe sort of as we knew it from when we

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>last left off and when that strategy was last in vogue,

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and and it was a pretty sizeable universe. But um,

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and this was a global search as well, right, because

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a head of emerging markets, it's the person could

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sit here or could sit in London and we just

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>dive in and we build a tapestry of who the

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>best people are, which is both by meeting people that

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>we already know to be good. But even if we

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>have no idea UM, the reality is we're doing so

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>much work in other areas, whether it's credit rates, macro,

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and if we're doing work at a multi strat and

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we have the credit candidates or the equities candidates some play,

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they will also have perspective on who is good in

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a m right, whether it's at their firm or they

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>may or they may know someone that they respected another firm.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And and the common theme is these are people we're

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>reaching out to, people who have who we who we

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>view as best in class and um, talented people tend

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to recommend other talented people, so we we very quickly

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>um form a picture of who the best people are.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing Barry is just good old fashioned

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>hard work. When we do a search, any search, we're

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>typically going through maybe to three people, even though I

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>know the answer is within ten to fifteen of those.

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We just want to make sure we're leaving no stone

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>unturned and also building our own depth and breadth of knowledge.

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So when you make a final recommendation to a firm.

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I imagine this varies from firm to firms. Do some

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>firms say find me the guy and I'll hire them.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Or do firms say give me your best on a

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>three choices and will interview them. What what's the range like?

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really it's usually iterative because again there there is

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>there's the best three choices in its basis form, which

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is people who are um who can generate Who are

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who can generate consistent P and l over time?

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>UM that meet with with our UM with that meet

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with our investing you know our investment parameters. But your

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>your version of who the those best three people are

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>may be different than someone else's. Part of it is

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>cultural fit. Part of it is just how flexible you,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as a founder are going to be with respect to

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>giving them. You may say you're going to give them

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a fair degree of you know, a lot of autonomy,

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>but they may need more than what you're willing to

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>give them. Um, they and then there were just nuances.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>They may You may say you're open to somebody who

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>runs in a in a manner that's quite that's concentrated,

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in volatile, but their version of concentration and volatility maybe

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>too much for you. So there's a lot of nuances

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>where we you and I um need to iterate on

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>truly who the best quote three are. And the way

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we work is I'm not gonna we're not gonna throw fifty.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to do the work of meeting all the

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>bull but we're going to have you meet let's call

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>it fifteen twenty that many, and they want you as

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>well because we're talking about really good people and they're

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going to learn something. They're going to learn how other

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>funds are set up, they're going to learn how other

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>um how they're going to get ideas from these people

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>right there. There may be um uh, let's say it's

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>along short equity search. There may be things that that

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that the candidates are in that are actually helpful for

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the founder to know about. So if if I told

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you that a search is a portal to meeting the

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>top fifty people in your universe, you would take every

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one of those meetings. That's a good use of your time.

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't just I need a guy to do this,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>get me some now, this is a whole big, holistic

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>process that's a really a two way street with a

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of exchange of information. That is the only way

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we work. And it's and and I will tell you, um,

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a search right now where the founder was

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>candid with me. He may not even end up hiring someone.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He just sees um an opportunity that he may may

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>being the operative word, want to capitalize upon and wants

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to meet the smartest people who do this out there.

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And then let's iterate on what makes sense. So that's

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not that different than BCG, where I had to sort

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of help a CEO draw a conclusion on whether to

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>enter a market, and the way we went about that

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was through competitive benchmarking and speaking to other really smart

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>people who sat in competitive companies and would help us

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to help him figure it out. So here's the obvious

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>business question. Typically m headhunting and recruitment firms get paid

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>when the hier is placed. If someone says to you, hey,

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I may may not hire this person, but do all

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this work, do you have to set up a different

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of consultingly. We we are retained firm. We don't

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do any work without without so it's a very different

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>structure than the old school. Now we we are at

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the risk of being totally a modest I will tell you,

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for a variety of reasons, I don't think we look

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like anybody else that the most prominent one of which

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>is um are the level we work at and the

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>access to the people that we have. So um It's. Yes,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>there are discrete roles that founders need to fill. Yes

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we are hired to complete those searches, but they tend

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to be really important searches that will move the needle

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for the for the fund. And if it's a fund

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's let's call it somewhere between ten and forty billion,

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a really important person. Um. And and and it's

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>not about who's looking for a job. It's not about

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>um uh, you know who's available. It's that's not how

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we come in things. If you think of a ven diagram,

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one bubble being best in class, and there are very

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>few people in any asset class I'd put into that

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>bubble that are really that good. Again, there's all the

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>work we do to make sure we're leaving no stone unturned,

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but I really have a firm view on who is

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>best in class. My firm does before we start at

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>any sorts. That's why I say, we sort of know

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the answer, but we just wanted we do all the

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>work to make sure we're not missing anybody. The second

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>bubble is people who are disenfranchised, miserable, looking for jobs.

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>If there's an overlap, and these days, for a variety

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of reasons we can get into, there's probably more of

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>an overlap than ever before. That's a happy coincidence. It

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>makes our job a little bit easier. All we care about.

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>All we care about is that first bubble and really

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>talented people who are who have accomplished something special. This

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>would not be an unusual profile of a candidate. Somebody

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>who oversees five billion dollars where they sit today has

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>had triple digit p n L every year for the

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>last specifically triple digit. Yeah, it's not even double digit.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Triple digit is an actual candidate and this isn't an outlier.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>This is like, this is every day what we do.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So five billion, triple digit p n L and the

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>las four years have been really, really difficult. So that's

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>quite an accomplishment, right, much much tougher environment, which we

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>can talk about um and uh uh. And compensation for

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>him has typically been between twenty and thirty a year.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>He's not looking for a job, and he's at a

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>great firm, by the way, which is not at all

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>facing the issues other firms are facing. He's coming in

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk to me and my team because he wants

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to understand given what we do, given all the smart

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>people we meet, and the clients we have, and everything

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>we see across the entire hedge fund landscape. Am I,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about the structure of where I'm sitting? UM?

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>What is what else exists out there? Here's what I've built?

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Do I take my bag of tricks and do something different?

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And then what does different look like? What should compensation

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>look like? For me? It's it's it's it's an advisory

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>UM meeting, and in that it is our job to

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>understand everything about his firm before he walks in, which

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we know. Why do we know because we've met plenty

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of other people at that firm UM constantly and UM

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and also understand what all his other options look like.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>So we have to have deep intelligence on all the

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>other funds that he could theoretically think about, and then

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have a point of view on which of our clients

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>could make sense. And there are times there isn't although

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's rare there you know there isn't something else because

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>our clients tend to be very innovative and creative. To

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>attract someone like that, there are times he should stay

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>exactly where he's at, but more often than not, we

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>can set something up that is structurally superior to where

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>he is. Even at that level, that's a very different

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>dynamic than somebody who like needs a job. Quite fascinating.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's jump into something you alluded to earlier. The

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>past decade has not been especially kind to most hedge funds.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them have been struggling. First question, from

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>your unique vantage point, why is that? And second what

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>can they do to turn of things around? Okay, so

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that it's been the past decade. I

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's more from twenty fifteen on. Okay, Okay, so

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we could that's a whole longer. That's a whole longer discussion.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>We can talk. But it's it's been it's been a

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>very very tough environment. But but let's talk about what's

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>gone on. And MO went to timing, so um, and

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>let's juxtapose it to when I started, which we talked

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 1>about earlier, which was two thousand and three, that's when

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I started my firm, uh five hundred billion of assets

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>under management, three thousand hedge funds. As you said, Barry,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Now there's eleven thousand hedge funds and three and a

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>half trillion of a UM. A lot of that growth

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>actually came post crisis. At the time of the in

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight was one point four trillion, now

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is three and a half. So that's a lot of growth.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Actually in the last is that organic growth of assets

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or is that just capital flowing? Capital flowing in literally

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>especially post crisis. Right, that's when you saw the shift, right,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's also you know you mentioned earlier we do

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>UM which we do uh work to find investment talent

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>for the hedge fund industry, but we also do work

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to find and this is when this started, was was

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. We have a very meaty

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>practice looking at UM non investment talent across functions like president, CEO,

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>head of marketing UM meaning the non investments administrative Well yeah,

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but but senior UM. But what what what really drove

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that was post crisis you saw all the the shift

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>from fund of funds and high net worth LPs to

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>institutional LPs because they realized that had they invested in

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.239
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund, they would have done much better than

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>buying the market. Right, most hedge funds were down half

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they were down, but they were down half as much

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>as the SMP on average. So so so institutions said,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll wait a second. You know this is this is like,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>this is an asset class that we should be investing in.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>And so all of a sudden, hedge funds had to

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>look they had to grow up right. It was no

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>wanting legal compliance, accounting operations. We were suddenly they couldn't

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>just be a fly by night sort of a couple

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of guys working, which is what it was, right, So

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>we were brought in all these founders that we did

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>work for on the investing side, said well, wait a second.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, my head of marketing isn't going to cut

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it anymore, my CEO isn't going to cut So we

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>had to revamp these funds and make them institutional, right,

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>so they would be attractive to institutional LPs. So what

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>happened is you saw all this institutional money pouring into

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the and and pouring into the hedge fund world, and

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>institutional LPs were also far less sophisticated back then about

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds because it was a new asset class to them.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So what so where so what happened? So we went.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So you have this huge growth of funds, tremendous amount

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of capital pouring into the industry. UM technology became much

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated, right, think about technology in two thousand and

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>three to today. So today everyone has access to the

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>same information. That's why it's so, that's why scale is

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>so important in this business. To have the ability to

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 1>have UM data science and quant and a machine internally

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that can turn that data into alphae signals. Very few

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>funds do that successfully, but it gives their people a

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>tremendous leg up if if they do create that in house.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>UM so so so everyone has access to the same data.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Information is much more transparent. Also since two thousand and three,

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, to date, you have the platforms. When I

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>say the platforms, I talk about the multi managers like

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Citadel and Point seventy two and Millennium and ballet Asney.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>These guys exploded, they got so much bigger. You have

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all these pms now sitting at these shops UM and

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>so many more eyes and ears at conferences UM and

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>behind a shorting model that can suss out under performance.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So so if management says something squishy at a conference,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>it used to have three to six months to for

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that under performance to get price fully. Now that happens

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in two days. So the window of efficiency right for

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>performance has gotten much smaller. And LPs, as I said,

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>have gotten much more sophisticated. And so with all of this,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>returns have come down because the industry is so much

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more crowded. Oh and liquidity right mutual UM funds and

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>retail have shrunk, So there's far less liquidity now than

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>there was back then. I fewer companies are going public

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>right with increased UM regulation and scrutiny. CEO s or like,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go public. If I'm a tech company,

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I can just go to the go to a big

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>tech private equity firm and and get funded. That way,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to subject myself to this. So for

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all of those reasons, UM, it's become far more difficult

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to generate alpha and what you see literally the last

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>good year for most of these funds. And when I

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>say most, one other sort of clarification point we talk

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>about eleven thousand hedge funds. Most of them are single

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>manager funds. They're not multi managers, and they're not multi strats. Although,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>um so, the actual number of hedge funds, the individual

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds tend to be single manager funds, meaning six

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand, what what sort of numbers? Probably yeah, I

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't know the exact number, but that's the

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>majority of funds, just because in order to be think

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, there aren't who else, you know, there's not

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that many other funds you can name that are multi managers, right,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>um uh. And in terms of multi strats, uh, those

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>would be funds like Davidson, Kempner, Golden Triangela, Gordon. These

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>are behe myths that are in multiple strategies and managing

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion or whatever it is dollars. There aren't that

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>many funds that look like that. Most funds are are

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>actually quite small. Most hedge funds are. I think the

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of hedge funds are two fifty million or less.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is like a cottage industry of two bit

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>players for the most part. Um But I have to

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 1>jump in and ask you this question because you you

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>said something previously that um, you just reminded me of,

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>which is it's a myth that being a hedge fund

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>manager is the route to personal riches. I'm paraphrasing somewhat,

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but you you've said that previously, your explanation of this,

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that the vast majority of hedge funds are single manager

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>funds with a couple of hundred million dollars. Is that

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what underlies that statement? Um quote you told the Wall

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal the biggest myth about working out a hedge

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>fund is it's a quick way to um earn great riches.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that what's underlying That's absolutely part of what's underlying that.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And the other piece which I was getting to that's

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>underlying that is now the difficult the difficulty of generating alpha.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So returns have come. So yes, most funds are small,

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they're inconsequential. You're not going to make a lot of

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>money managing like a couple hundred million, and many of

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>them are even smaller than that um and they're not

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going to exist. Most of these guys in in or

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>or they'll just be okay, managing a little bit of money.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's a different business model. That's not what

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you and I are talking about. Right, that's not our

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>client base, and that's typically and those small guys they're

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>lucky if they're in our office because what we're doing

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>with them is we're popping them into bigger funds. We

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of acquisition of hedge funds as well,

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so they'll get gobbled up by the bigger players if

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>there are any good and they should be thankful for

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that because they'll have now a lot more capital, resources

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and um artillery for lack of a better word, to

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be successful. Are they being gobbled up because of their

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>alpha generation or is it because of their assets? Is

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>more of an a A fund like UM Citadel doesn't

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>need the assets of a two d and fifty million

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar funds far from that two hundred and fifty million

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar fund needs Citadel because they can't grow, they don't

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have scale, they can compete for resources, talent, capital. They

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>are they are inconsequential. However, if they've had good returns,

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a great place for them to be because now

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they can scale that business. So that becomes an aqua

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>hier Is that a fair tech term to aqua higher? Yeah,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an acquisition. We're effectively you're hiring, Yes, that's exactly

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what it is. Um So there's a lot of that

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that we do as well. But but let me, because

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>this is an important point come back to why um

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to where we are today? Okay, because we are in

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a very different place today than we were when this

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>industry first started, when we when I DW first started

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>um so, so, UH, when you look at returns for

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>most funds, again, single manager funds, it's like you look

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>at UH fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, and eighteen, the last four

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>full years, it's a it's really bad. If you add

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>up the cumulative return, it's a sea of red and

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pointing to not even positive negative returns for a great

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 1>number of them. Yes, it's like if you add them up,

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's basically flat to down. So I look, I think

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just again it's a more difficult environment. It's harder

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to generate alpha UM And also if when returns come down,

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about fees, if returns come down, it's

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to justify that two and twenty fee structure.

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a discrete example. If I'm a fund

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that historically generated in the good old days returns and

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, these guys love to quote inception to

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>date returns, which is like nonsense. I mean you you

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have to they have to say that's great. Now let's

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about words, okay, and then they like go quiet,

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not good. So if you look at the return

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>turns of these funds again very bad for the last

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>four years, and you look at UM asset flows in

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the industry, they are reflective of what is going on.

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>The total amount of net outflows in eighteen was UM

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven billion. Do you know where we're at to

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>date in terms of net outflows? Go ahead over six

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and was a year we saw a lot of big

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fun shutdown, right. We saw high Fields chose to shut down,

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>URBIOND shutdown, Criterion Ivory, fold your Hill, Glen Hill, three Bays.

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm it can go on and on and on. And

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>yet we are fifty percent higher this year than last

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of net outflows to the industry. So

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>LPs are pretty um disappointed in terms of where things

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are at. And so back to my example. If I'm

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>a fund which UM returned, let's say the let's just

0:32:57.920 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>say I know it's up higher, but let's say the

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>s m P is up fifteen percent and I'm a fund,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a long short equity fund that runs UM fifty percent

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>net long. That means fifty percent of my return one

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>could get an LP could get from just buying the SMP.

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>And let's say I'm up in line with the SMP

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, So fifty percent is beta. Right when you're

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a long short, your your risk parameters are very different.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And no, but if if if, if fifth, If I'm

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>running net fifty percent long, that means that UM fifty

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>percent is correlates to the SMP. That's what that means.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So fifty percent is beta and fifty percent is alpha.

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm up fifteen and the SMP is up

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent, only seven and a half percent is alpha.

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Yet I'm charging two and twenty and that tent is

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on both alpha and beta, So um fifteen So of

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent is three percent three plus two is five.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm charging five p on a U m uh five

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>percent divided by seven and a half percent. Just follow

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>me with the math, and you know, um, your your

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>your listeners can uh yeah, I'm sure they can kind

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of work this out for themselves. It's a Mathew group.

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>That means two thirds of the alpha. By that equation

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to me, the hedge fund manager, and one

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>third to the LPs. That's not a winning construct. But

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>then you have hedge funds like the multi managers, where

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>it's all alpha. Everything they generated alpha. It's uncorrelated, it's

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>low volatility. That's why. And and so that's a totally

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>defensible business model. And jumping onto another subject, the startup environment.

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>While so few funds can scale, and we have so

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we have more closures than startups these days. The exception

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to that rule are funds that splinter off from the

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>successful multi managers. That's why we saw Exodus Point have

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the biggest launch and hedge fund history last year at

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>eight billion. That's why this year you see Woodline and

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Candlestick Um to Citadel spinouts launched with anywhere somewhere between

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>one and three billion UM. Candlestick I think was between

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one and two and will be and uh Woodline is

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>between two and three. These are exceptions that prove the

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>rule and also shine a light on the efficiency of

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this of the hedge fund universe. You have hedge funds

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that are struggling to come up with a fee structure

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that can address the lack of value creation and then

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you have funds like Element that are charging two and forty. Again,

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's efficiency. Our last time, when you discussed

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of really fascinating things, I wanted to circle

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>back to UM in particular about the shifts and where

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>institutions are putting their money and the fee structure. So

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so let's start with with the fees. One of the

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>things I've seen that's been kind of interesting, and you

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>explained earlier why institutions hate to pay alpha prices for

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>beta is the rise of a so called Falkrum fee

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 1>where there's a very modest fee on assets and the

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>actual profit sharing fee the typical two and twenty. Part

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of the fee is not on what the SMP provides,

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but only on the excess performance, so it might be

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>instead of two and twenty five basis points and thirty.

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>What what do you think of those sorts of fee

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>structures that they have any longevity? I think that we

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>need to UM. We need to move to a model

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>which is closer for if you're if funds are going

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to charge what they charge whatever, which is sizeable, UM,

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we need to move to a structure where LPs are

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>paying for alpha. That's the bottom line. So whether it

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is they lower their fees UM or the just charge

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>on alpha that has to be where the industry is going.

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Or and or here's another thought. There are hedge funds

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>which UM really and this is true of a of

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the single manager long short equity cubs

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>long short equity funds, whether Tiger cubs or related. Some

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of these guys are really best at generating long alpha.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>They're really not that good on the short side, and

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look closely at the composition of their return,

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the shorts are actually volatility enhancers and alpha detractors. But

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>they have to short because they're hedge funds, right. They

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>can't charge two and twenty without with just having a

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>long only model. And it's very hard to short when

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the market has, at least for the first half of

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this bullmarket just rampage straight up from O nine to twenty.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's called it's just it's not there. It's they're not

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not what they do best. There are UM and

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they're also not set up UM to do it as

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>well as the multi managers that have much broader and

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>deeper resource. Is UH to help these guys be successful.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>UM with respect to with respect to managing factor volatility

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and coming up with single name alpha shorts. So the

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>best thing these more concentrated directional managers could do would

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be to say, Okay, I'm best degenerating long alpha. Therefore

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>let me set myself up in a way where I

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe they create an alternative long only fund where and

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the way of this is how

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these funds are going to go UM.

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean you recently saw in the last year so

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a band even it really converted most of their assets

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to long only. And so the idea being, UM, if

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm best degenerating long alpha and I'm not that good

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at managing short term volatility and coming up with UH

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>with alpha with alpha shorts, alpha alpha generating single name shorts,

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>but I need two to three or four years to

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>let my thesis play out. Then you know what, you know,

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe you just charge on alpha at the end of

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that time period, and so you have to and it's

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>a totally different structure, but that's the point. You need

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what you're best at. It's so hard

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>now UM to generate consistent alpha, and you need to

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out what UM structure is going to enable you

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to be competitive, and that may mean locking up capital

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>for a longer period of time and charging less or

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 1>just charging on alpha. But the idea that one size

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>fits all when it comes to fees, no matter what

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you're investing style is or how much beta you employ

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>um is ridiculous. You know, the guy charging to the

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>same it's the same fee structure for the guy running

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>NET thirty and running NET sixty. So I think there

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 1>should be a hurdle um with respect to how much

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 1>is alpha and how much is beta. You mentioned how

0:39:56.320 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>many hedge fund closings that were in eighteen. Typically when

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a fund shuts down, does that money leave the space

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>or does it just rotate to a different hedge fund?

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Um at least from an institutional perspective, Well, given the

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>trend line I shared with you earlier, which is we

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have now sixty billion of net outflows to the industry,

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that's net outflows, UM, I think money is actually

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>leaving the industry. That's where I think things are going.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>And so it could go to another fund, But the

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>problem is there are so few good options where it

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to go to another fund that has had

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the same me or crappy performance. A lot of the

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:41.320
<v Speaker 1>better funds candidly are closed. That's the truth, um so.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you see when when guys splinter off

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>from the funds that are closed and LPs are salivating

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for access to they they're the ones that scale overnight.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And there're only so many of those. So that's why

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing the the aggregate amount of net

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>outflows and also the trend line. The thing on the

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>trend line is the only other year in hedge fund

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>history where we had four consecutive quarters of net outflows

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand and eight to two thousand million. We

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>are probably Q one was the only other time in

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund history we saw four consecutive quarters and that

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was and and Q one. This year we had fifteen

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>billion of net outflows, where now at sixties something, so

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you we're now in our sixth quarter of

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:31.799
<v Speaker 1>net outflows. That is first time ever in hedge fund history. Wow,

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing. So the I don't want to call it

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the flavor of the month, which it's a little too

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>uh glib, but it's clear that private equity is the

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:44.720
<v Speaker 1>shiny new thing. Lots of money seems to be flowing

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. Is that who is the beneficiary of

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the outflows from hedge funds As if you're an institution

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and you know you expected returns for equity is going

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.399
<v Speaker 1>to be five or six percent and bonds yielding less

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>than two percent and alter enoughers are promising. Do these

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>outflows end up going to private equity? UM? They do.

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, interestingly, and and it's true that in

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the last four or five years, while hedge funds have

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>suffered because their returns have come down UM, and for

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>most of them, fees have had to readjust or in

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the process of readjusting, private equity was was had the

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>hot hand because rates were low and UH, and it

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>was you know, it was easier to to buy companies. UM.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that. But it's but you know, I think

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now is the merge merging of UM

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>public in private. You see private equity firms trying to

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>get into the public markets. You see UM hedge funds

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>UH developing their private investing expertise, and so I think

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>each one is trying to capitalize upon the other's revenue stream.

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 1>That that's quite interesting. UM. One of the things I

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>read about you that I thought was pretty amusing. There

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was a event, a gala that you helped put together

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, and one of the co producers of

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the gala was Stevie Cohen of Now Point seventy two,

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and he discussed what a challenge it's been for so

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>many hedge funds and basically said, no one's winning the

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund game. There's this recruitment process where people go

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>from one fund to another to another, and the only

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>one who wins is you. He kind of dragged you

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a little. No, it was just to be clear. The

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>gallo was in honor of me. I was so we

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So it was a little bit of roasting, takeing bit

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of roasting, I think, I hope. I think it was.

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He was introducing me. I was the honoree. So I

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>think it was mentioned it was good nature and okay,

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>because when you read it, it's like, Wow, Stevie Cohen's

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>really dragging a lot, but it's nothing. I think it

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was seen that way. I think his point was, um,

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a war for talent because they're so little

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 1>of it right there. Only I said it myself, there

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are only so many people I put in that first

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>bubble of best in class in the JASSA class. That

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is true. Um, and you see it with the returns

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of funds. Are only so many funds that are performing

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and only so many people within those funds. P and

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 1>L doesn't lie. That's what I love about this industry.

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's real time. It's mark to market. You know where

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you stand at all times. Um. Uh. But um, you

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.399
<v Speaker 1>know the so and we so that is true. It's

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>there's an intense competition to attract the best. It is

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 1>also true we tend to be in the mix of it. Um.

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:36.879
<v Speaker 1>But the the other thing that's true is as much

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>as there are only so many good people, they're also

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 1>so there are only so many places those people are

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be attracted to. And Steve runs a great shop.

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Point seventy two is one of them. Um. Other places

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like Citadel, Millennium, Davidson, Kempner, Golden Tree, you know there

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are there are there are places that have built something

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>unique and are going to be able to do something

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>special to attract talent and make them more successful because

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of the very fact that they are on those at

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>those funds or on those platforms. And that's what creates

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a symbiotic relationship between talent and the best places that

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>exist and myself. At the end of the day, we

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I d W has been very deliberate about who we

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:25.960
<v Speaker 1>choose to work with. I mean, I'm not going to

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>name names, but there are places plant no no no

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the ones we choose not to work

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but because we need it is as good as I'd

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like to think we are at the end of the day.

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>The people we are dealing with on the talent side,

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they are very sophisticated, they are very smart and and

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, They're not going to go someplace that isn't

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a market step up from where they are today with

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>a pathway that is unique, and nor would I feel

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>good about trying to convince them to do that. So UM,

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I have tremendous conviction around the I have to have

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:09.240
<v Speaker 1>tremendous conviction around the um um what around our clients

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and what they've built and what they can provide for

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>talent and um and and so again. I think it

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was a joke, but at the end of the day,

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>there are only so many places that also talent really

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to go. Can you stick around a bit? I

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 1>have so many more questions. We have been speaking with

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Alana Weinstein. She is the founder and CEO of the

0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I d W Group, a leading boutique for hedge funds,

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>family offices, and private equity, starching out top talent. If

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this conversation, we'll be sure and come back

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for the podcast AFTRAS, where we keep the tape rolling

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and continue discussing all things hedge fund and alternatives. You

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can find that at iTunes, Google Podcasts. That's your Spotify,

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 1>wherever your finer podcasts are sold. We love your comments,

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 1>feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>us at Bloomberg dot net. Give us a review on

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Apple iTunes. Check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com.

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at ripolts. I'm Barry Hults. You're

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters and Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, Alanta. Thank you so much, um for doing this.

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been looking forward to this. You really are somebody

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:29.240
<v Speaker 1>who is maybe in one of the most unique spots

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:33.879
<v Speaker 1>in the entire alternative space. You see everything, you know everybody,

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 1>your perspective as to what's going on in hedge funds,

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>private equity, and maybe not quite as much venture capital,

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 1>but I know that's certainly an area that is not

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>outside your UM observations. Is unique too strong a word.

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody else has the vantage point that

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you do about what's going on in the industry. I

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I I mean, yes, it's it's completely accurate. Means it's

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:08.959
<v Speaker 1>accurate precisely because what we do every day is meet

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with the most talented people in the industry, not because

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for jobs, but because they want our perspective.

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's a virtuous loop. All If all you do

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is meet with really smart people that are best in class,

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you build a picture, a composite of what is driving

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the industry and what the opportunity said is and where

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going and UM and so we have so we

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have insight into what is going on at every single fund,

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>who is making money, how lumpy the pool of talent is,

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>how how precarious each fund is, like what situation they're in,

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:49.919
<v Speaker 1>UM like I mean, I often say, if LPs knew

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>what we know, UM, you know, they'd be pulling capital left,

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>right and center and reallocating to the places that we

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>tell them too. I have a very clear sense, as

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 1>does team on what's what? And And you know, I

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone else does because the level we're recruiting at,

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of breath um and uh and and

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>just the sheer talent that we have coming in the

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:19.399
<v Speaker 1>door across every assa class and every geography I think,

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think is second to none. And it does give

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>us insight into what to look for and what differentiates

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the bs from the non bs, the good from the great.

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>There's there really specific things we're looking for. So let

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>me ask you a little bit about something related to that.

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, when when I look at different funds, and

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken to a lot of people from a lot

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of different funds, very different personalities, who founded them, who

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>are running them, the corporate cultures seem to very dramatically

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>oak Tree Capital very different than Bridgewater, very different than

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 1>point seventy two. How important when you are looking to

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>match somebody for a very in your position is that

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>corporate culture? Um, it's definitely important, But I don't know

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's um is much variability as you as you

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:21.359
<v Speaker 1>might think. UM, I might over emphasizing Bridgewater because it's

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>such a unique I mean, yeah, that's sort of an

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>outlier into itself, right, So let's just full full disclosure.

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I've had ray On three times. I love him, I'm

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:34.439
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by him. He's a brilliant um guy. Some people

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>find him quirky. I just find him really fascinating. But

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>there there can be no doubt that Bridgewater is not

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the typical So let's let's put that sort of to

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the side. Um. I think the biggest differentiators are um

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.239
<v Speaker 1>how much it's look, no one wants to work in

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a jerky culture, so it neither do I want to

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>work with jerky founders. That's not I'm using intentionally, and

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I sir word, I'm thinking really right, So that's consistent,

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not you know, and and people. And at the

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, what's really interesting to me is

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>there are certain founders who are dear clients and friends

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of mine who you know, there's this perception that they're

0:51:18.280 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 1>like big bad wolf and really just tough and and

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>make crazy decisions and like, you know, I can be

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there one day and blown out the next, And the

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>reality is these are some of the most measured down

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to earth and I will say it good people I know,

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>but they also have great commercial instincts. And are not

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>afraid to make tough decisions. And if you're really talented,

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to be an environment where you can shine

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and aren't going to be dragged down by a bunch

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of deadwood around you, where your your your compensation gets

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>netted every year because the founders just like too wimpy

0:51:57.560 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to make tough decisions. You know, So let me push

0:51:59.840 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>back on you a little bit there. I won't even

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 1>say the funds because we'll see if you have a

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>sense of what I'm talking about. There are funds where

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>people get hired at and they know from the day

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 1>they're hired, I will eventually be fired for either good

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cause or not, because that's the way this manager operates.

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fair assessment about some funds? No, I don't.

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't. I there may be funds that

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fall in that category. That's not my client base. It's

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>really not. Um uh, there are I come back to

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>there are there are. I think the best founders are

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:40.439
<v Speaker 1>also great business builders, and when they look at their

0:52:40.480 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 1>investment talent, they don't view it differently than a portfolio.

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:47.760
<v Speaker 1>They double down on their winners and they cut their losers.

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And and that's what I want if I am a

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:55.400
<v Speaker 1>talented investment professional, because the biggest issue in this industry

0:52:55.560 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 1>from talents perspective is UM is not confidence compensation deflation.

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's if a fund does poorly and I did poorly.

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a pay for performance industry. I get that I'm

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to get paid, and I'm okay with that.

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>The biggest issue is when I said at a fund

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is not exceptional what I'm telling you, this

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is par for the course. I said, at a fund

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that is eight billion of a UM or ten billion. Okay,

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>these are big, these are big funds UM. And I

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 1>am one of two or three people that consistently drive

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>P and L every single year. And remember, the last

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 1>three or four years have been really tough. Present year excluded,

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>but again a lot of beata in the returns for

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>this year, and also snap back from being down last year,

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>right right, just riding the market back up. So you

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 1>look for the last four years excluding this year, and

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>even this year, I am the I am one of

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>two or three primary P and L drivers at a

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>fund which has sizeable assets. And what are the other

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>people doing year after year? They're noting their weight, They're

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>not really contributing, and I'm getting netted because the founder

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>having to take from my pocket to pay them, right,

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so those guys have to head out the door stroke.

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So so this idea of like, I have job security,

0:54:12.640 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, um well, I said,

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course you do. You're the star within

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the fund. And the bigger question is why do the

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 1>other people have job security? They should be like the

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>founder has a fiduciary duty to Hale's LPs to be

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.720
<v Speaker 1>retiring and retaining the best people. And part of retaining

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>them is getting rid of the ones that aren't performing

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and making room for you know, better people. Am i

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>am I hearing you say that people think hedge funds

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are cut throat, and you're suggesting some of them aren't

0:54:40.960 --> 0:54:44.759
<v Speaker 1>cut throat enough, then order or say it less emotionally

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:50.840
<v Speaker 1>less um inflammatory Lee, there are a lot of funds

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that simply aren't acting as a meritocracy. I think that

0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>founders are often very loath to make tough decisions, and

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we can all that not acting as a meritocracy, or

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>not being cut throat, or just candidly being whimps. I

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>think that there's an element of the optics of what

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are LP's going to think if I fire these three people.

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>LPs would be very smart when they do their all

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:16.959
<v Speaker 1>their operational due diligence. If I was an LP, here's

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 1>what I would be asking. I'd want to know that's

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the way. Okay, what so let me ask you the

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:26.239
<v Speaker 1>question what should LPs be doing and what aren't they

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 1>doing today? So UM, and everybody knows LPs limited partners,

0:55:30.239 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not the fund managers or the actual general partnership. I

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:38.399
<v Speaker 1>think that they should UM, they should find out from

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the founder. And you know, it's hard because if it's

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>a single manager fund, the founder at the end of

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the day is the ultimate decision maker, right if what

0:55:47.760 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>goes into the portfolio and how the portfolio is constructed.

0:55:50.719 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But ask him, and I'm going to use along short equities,

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>one because it's the hedge fund universe, and two just

0:55:56.440 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to be illustrative, it's an easy example to understand. Ask him, Okay,

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 1>where did your winners come from this year? In what industry?

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Was it industrials? Was it t MT? Was it healthcare? Uh?

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It was healthcare? What about last year? What drove pan

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>l oh Again? It was healthcare and industrials? What about

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the year before, what about the year before? And we

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>get that at the end of the day, the founder

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 1>again is the ultimate decision maker, but again just behind

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the scenes that's more gray than you. Those people have

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tremendous influence if they're senior and they're good on the portfolio,

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so UM the so LP should also be asking where

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:33.560
<v Speaker 1>did where were your biggest losers? And you're gonna see

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>patterns across the biggest winners and across the biggest losers.

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And then they should be asking the founder, what are

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you doing about getting rid of the guys who are

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:44.359
<v Speaker 1>covering the three sectors that actually have been a net

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>drain on pan L. What are you doing about um

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>developing the three sector heads that have generated the most

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>pan L. How do you manage paying those guys when

0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to when you have these other guys that

0:56:56.760 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay like these are the tough questions

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that founders really need to be held accountable for. And

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and also LP should be looking at who left Were

0:57:07.520 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>those people that were p m L generators to the

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:13.240
<v Speaker 1>fund or were those people that were that were pushed

0:57:13.280 --> 0:57:15.279
<v Speaker 1>out right because they didn't do well? And if what

0:57:15.320 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing as a trend line of the best people

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 1>leaving and they have to figure out a way to

0:57:19.160 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 1>get it that. We know that because we're interviewing these

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>people and we see the compositive the entire p l

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of the fund and who did what. If the best

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>people are leaving, you should be pulling capital. And if

0:57:29.320 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and if the people who um did not make money

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are the ones who were leaving and being managed out,

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>then you should deploy because that's a founder who understands

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:42.480
<v Speaker 1>how to manage his team and is managing them again

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like a portfolio, unemotionally and making decisions in their best

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in you're really answering a question I was about to

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you, which is what should founders do to retain

0:57:52.080 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>their best people? And what you're effectively saying is pay

0:57:55.840 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and bonus the high high performers and cut the people

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the night. And I'll go one further. I think

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that founders need to be willing to go to zero

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for themselves in times where they don't have much of

0:58:12.840 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a performance fee. And that has been true for the

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>last four years. Even this year, a lot of funds

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 1>may be doing better, but they have a high water

0:58:19.640 --> 0:58:21.560
<v Speaker 1>mark from the previous year or a group of year,

0:58:21.600 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning that what you've took as a profit um as

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a profit distribution. Once we fall off of those market highs,

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't take another profit distribution until you get back

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>over that you lost money last year. You first have

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to make that back up before you start to get paid. Right. So,

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a guy who for the last three or

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>four years is generated tremendous pan L for the firm,

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and there are guys who come in to meet with

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>us who literally are of the pm L of the

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 1>fund for a hundred of the p L, other people

0:58:53.040 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>are a dragon exactly, if the founder would be wise

0:58:56.880 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to go into his pocket, go into his management fee

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and and pay that person right so that they don't

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what they need to do, and and and also

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:08.360
<v Speaker 1>be clear about how they're coming up with the number.

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>For many of these guys, if they're not sitting at

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a multi manager which is formulaic, or they don't have

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 1>even if they have points in the fund a lot

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of the times, how UM there's a jump bowl which

0:59:19.400 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is discretionary if they don't. If the if the absolute

0:59:23.160 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>number is disappointing because times are not good and there

0:59:25.840 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't much of a performance fee, and also assets have dwindled,

0:59:28.520 --> 0:59:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so the management fee is smaller. Founders need to give

0:59:32.080 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>people insight into how they're coming up with the numbers,

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's not this black box. Um they they again

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to running a business, not just managing

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a p n L. And that's a mind shift for

0:59:43.880 --> 0:59:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of founders because they grew up. What they

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:50.720
<v Speaker 1>know best is investing, right, not managing people. They need

0:59:50.760 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to manage their fun like a business, not because not

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like a cliptocracy, which is how a lot of these

0:59:57.040 --> 0:59:59.840
<v Speaker 1>guys view it, that that work the cliptocracy. So let

0:59:59.840 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>me lip the question from what founders need to do

1:00:01.880 --> 1:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to retain their best people to some of those best

1:00:05.480 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>people that talent. What are they looking for? What makes

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>them decide not only that I'm ready to move, but

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go there or here? What What are

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>they looking for? So the most important So the things

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for having change, they're just more difficult today

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to come by. They're looking for stability right when you

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>see funds like big funds back and we started with

1:00:27.800 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Eaton Park and Perry going out of business and then

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>all the others I mentioned last year, and they'll be

1:00:32.360 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>more to come. Um that means that there's no more

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>terra firma under their feet. And by the way, you

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>even look at funds that are still that are big,

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that that are well known names, they're still existing today.

1:00:45.680 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It may be interesting for your listeners to look at

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the a U M drops of these funds. Green Light, Okay,

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is by the way, I'm going back to

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:56.439
<v Speaker 1>not circle two thousand and three or two thousand and set.

1:00:56.480 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Let let's say right before the crisis two and seven

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or two. I'm talking about in the last few years.

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is how precipitous the a U M drops were.

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Green Light was twelve billion now it's sub three billion.

1:01:06.960 --> 1:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Corvis was seven billion, now it's two billion. Discovery was

1:01:10.200 --> 1:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen billion, now it's three billion. For Tree was thirteen billion,

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>now it's five billion. Scopia a year ago, one year

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>ago was almost seven billion. You know what it is

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>today under two billion. So these are again like only

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>so many funds even get into the billion dollar territory, right,

1:01:28.240 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So these are the these are the sort of the

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger names, the bigger guys, and they are a shell

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of their former selves. So stability is like very hard

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to come by these days. And you may think, oh,

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a well known fund that's stable. NA. Not not

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the case. Um. The second thing that's really important is netting,

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>which we talked about not being in a construct where

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to continuously get netted, right, I mean

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>went by netted. You mean your payment is a little

1:01:56.360 --> 1:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of a kibbutz where you're not necessarily well winning

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>all of your uh, your pan l. It gets spread around.

1:02:04.400 --> 1:02:06.439
<v Speaker 1>As a guy just said to me the other day,

1:02:06.440 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and I love this phrase, and I told him I'm

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to steal it. He said, I feel like labor arbitrage.

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what's got your high performer. They're a low performer.

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And everybody I'm generating all this pan L, no one

1:02:17.920 --> 1:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>else around here is pulling their weight. And every year

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm paid a fraction of what I should be paid.

1:02:24.080 --> 1:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's a guy right to be pent. And does

1:02:28.800 --> 1:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>management not understand the frustration of a high performer, like

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we are not talking about um a low octane sort

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of people work on an hourly basis. This is these

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>are people who are willing to live and die on

1:02:46.120 --> 1:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>eating what they kill. And it's it's a really um

1:02:52.760 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>aggressive industry. It sounds like some firms are sort of

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to soften it and make it more of a group.

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a look, there's a lot of inertia

1:03:03.440 --> 1:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. We saw this with LPs, to this

1:03:06.120 --> 1:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>pace of net al flows is only just picking up now.

1:03:09.120 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>For a long time LPs were sort of just hoping

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>things would get better. Well, the consultants always say to them, hey,

1:03:14.840 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an off year. Just given another two or

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>three years and we'll be fine. And if to ten

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>years of hearing that people finally figured out and it

1:03:21.880 --> 1:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna be fright right, so um So I think

1:03:24.840 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there's an element of hoping that things change, hoping that

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the performance gets better. Um And and and you know,

1:03:32.720 --> 1:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand, these senior people that we're speaking

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to have been where they've been for in many cases

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>over a decade. They have a real relationship with the founder,

1:03:40.760 --> 1:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>they helped build the fund um they are partners where

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting, so it's not as transactional, you know, as

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>one might think. And I and they feel loyal, they

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>feel embedded. But at a certain point, the chickens do

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>come home to roost. And I think we're kind of

1:03:56.680 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at that tipping point. We really are at a tipping

1:03:59.080 --> 1:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>point in the industry, both with respect to frustration on

1:04:02.720 --> 1:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the part of talent, frustration on the part of LPs, UM,

1:04:08.000 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and UM. You know, I think that it's it's

1:04:11.640 --> 1:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the shakeout. Is it's happening. We see we see money

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>leaving the industry and the guys who figured it out

1:04:18.360 --> 1:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are the absolute clear winners, and they're going to gobble

1:04:21.240 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up the best talent and UM that's they've represent stability,

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't net their talent. And the other few things,

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>just to answer your question, are that these guys do

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>best the winners UM talent. Also what you asked me,

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:36.959
<v Speaker 1>what talents looking for? They want to be made better,

1:04:37.240 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>They want to improve. So, you know, in an environment

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>where returns are so hard to come by, how can

1:04:43.040 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I be better at shorting? How can I be better

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>at managing UM volatility? UM? How do I how do

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I improve? And the and the best places, which are

1:04:52.600 --> 1:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>typically UM that have really sophisticated UH technology and data

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>UM and risk management are the best multi managers. They

1:05:03.960 --> 1:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>give these guys an unbelievable feedback loop. So they say

1:05:07.640 --> 1:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to them, listen, let's look at your P and L um,

1:05:10.960 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you are a lot of it came from um you know,

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it's actually not like a lot of it came from

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>beta or came from factor exposure. That's not repeatable. So

1:05:22.960 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>giving them transparency into how they make money sets them

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>up for better success in the future. And and there

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are very few places that have the same tools and

1:05:32.040 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>resources um as some of the guys that I mentioned,

1:05:35.440 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>all the big scalable giant shops that that are not

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>afraid to spend them, but ones. But that's the last

1:05:41.560 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>part of your sentence is key. There are funds. It's

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing how few funds use scale to their competitive advantage.

1:05:47.280 --> 1:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a fun time thinking of which is north of

1:05:49.240 --> 1:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion. They have nothing internally. They basically they have

1:05:54.360 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>two people that manage half the a U M. Those

1:05:57.280 --> 1:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>two people literally have like two people in beneath them,

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's no infrastructure. There's no there's like five data

1:06:04.760 --> 1:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>scientists at the entire firm. There's no real They haven't

1:06:08.520 --> 1:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>built the fund in a way which bestows competitive advantage

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on its people. And the problem with that construct is

1:06:15.480 --> 1:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if the two golden geese leave the fund, there's no interest,

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing there after that, So you you hinted at

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>something earlier. I want to get explicit about regarding partnerships.

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>How should these firms be thinking about succession planning? Not

1:06:32.640 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>just if the founder is hit by a bus, but

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens when they retire, what happens when they want

1:06:37.480 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to spend more time away from the office. What should

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>firms be doing about that? Well, you know, the industry

1:06:44.040 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is still relatively young, so we haven't had that much

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>succession that's gone on. Right, So the same way I'm

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>still running I DW and I'd like to think I'm

1:06:54.040 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>still young, right, thank you. Many of these funds that

1:06:58.000 --> 1:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>started about the same time, there's no succession going on.

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>These guys are in their forties, right but for but

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for the But there are some um that have done

1:07:07.360 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it successfully, and I think we can look to them

1:07:09.920 --> 1:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>for how to do this one. It can't just be

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a found one founder in his brain that LPs are

1:07:17.000 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>investing in right and and and a like a bunch

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of UH investment analysts around him. They have to feel

1:07:25.520 --> 1:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like there is um UH an infrastructure there which will

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to do as well with or without him. And

1:07:33.960 --> 1:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there are two models that lend themselves to it.

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>One is the multi manager construct, where there are multiple

1:07:39.800 --> 1:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pms right that have autonomy and are managing capital, and

1:07:44.120 --> 1:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>there's also sophisticated risk management in house to help them

1:07:49.360 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>be as successful as possible. That's not the founder every

1:07:52.200 --> 1:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>day walking the floor making sure these guys are thinking

1:07:55.640 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>about the world in the right way and and sifting

1:07:58.680 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>through their ideas and say this is interesting, this isn't

1:08:01.720 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>let's size this, let's short that this is. This is

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the car that sort of you know, runs on its

1:08:06.960 --> 1:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>own UM. And then the other model would be the

1:08:10.560 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>multi strategy model UM. And we saw this very recently

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>with UM Tom Kempner stepping down name on the door,

1:08:18.360 --> 1:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Davidson Kempner one of the original founders and turned over

1:08:21.720 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the reins to Tony use Off and they did not

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>miss a beat. And the reason they were able to

1:08:26.200 --> 1:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>do this is it's a real partnership with fourteen engage

1:08:30.240 --> 1:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>partners UM. Decision making is done in unison. This is

1:08:34.720 --> 1:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>it's not like partnership a lot of hedge funds. Partnership

1:08:37.640 --> 1:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is a nice thing to put on the business card,

1:08:39.320 --> 1:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, it's still this

1:08:41.280 --> 1:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of partner there. It's exactly so this is. This

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>operates kind of like I think it was modeled in

1:08:47.960 --> 1:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>some ways after the old Goldman Sachs partnership. It really

1:08:51.600 --> 1:08:55.519
<v Speaker 1>UM is a group of engage people who make the

1:08:55.560 --> 1:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>important investing and operating decisions for the firm. And when

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they when Tony moved up, they very wisely took two

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of their people of that group of fourteen and made

1:09:05.120 --> 1:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>them um CO deputy managing partners, signaling to l P

1:09:09.040 --> 1:09:11.519
<v Speaker 1>S there's already a plan in place when and if

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Tony retires, and the place operates again in a way

1:09:15.400 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>where the strength of the firm and its secret sauce

1:09:19.640 --> 1:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>is not just one guy at the top. So I

1:09:21.600 --> 1:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you a question, because you and I

1:09:23.120 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are both talking about this guy and that guy. Guys, guys, guys,

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what is to be said? I'm going to man splain

1:09:32.280 --> 1:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the lack of women and hedge funds to you would

1:09:34.280 --> 1:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be pretty hilarious. Why are there such a lack of

1:09:37.680 --> 1:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>women in the industry? UM? Generally speaking, it's true in finance,

1:09:42.040 --> 1:09:46.519
<v Speaker 1>but it is really acute in hedge funds. Why is

1:09:46.600 --> 1:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that and is that ever gonna change in our lifetimes?

1:09:51.200 --> 1:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I have thought about this question a lot. UM So

1:09:56.600 --> 1:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of things. One is, there is

1:09:59.640 --> 1:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a twenty two at work where look, people are attracted

1:10:04.640 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to industries and into roles where they see people like

1:10:08.400 --> 1:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>themselves having success. Has to be a role model somewhere.

1:10:11.200 --> 1:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>There isn't right now. So are there any high profile

1:10:14.920 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>women hedge fund managers? Um, there is really hardly Annie.

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>There's Leader Braga who spun out of Blue Crest, and

1:10:25.960 --> 1:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>there is um uh Dawn Fitzpatrick, who's the c I

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>O of Soros. But those are really the only two

1:10:36.000 --> 1:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that come to mind that runs scale businesses, and Dawn

1:10:39.040 --> 1:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't found Soros, right, that's so that's a different I think.

1:10:43.439 --> 1:10:48.519
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, like General Custer's white horse? Right? Um? What

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>what color was that? Uh so? Um? Uh so, so

1:10:53.640 --> 1:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you know there are women quote unquote air quotes running funds,

1:10:56.840 --> 1:10:59.479
<v Speaker 1>but there are two bit players like they don't you

1:10:59.520 --> 1:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>know they It just it's not influential funds and so

1:11:03.400 --> 1:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and and again think about the fact that back in sixteen,

1:11:06.360 --> 1:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ten of the a u M, which was around two

1:11:08.920 --> 1:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>point nine trillion back then, was controlled, So ten percent

1:11:13.240 --> 1:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of hedge funds controlled the u M. So that's even

1:11:16.680 --> 1:11:19.479
<v Speaker 1>smaller now it is very much a fat headlong tail.

1:11:19.560 --> 1:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It is not the normal distribution, right, So back to women,

1:11:23.120 --> 1:11:26.479
<v Speaker 1>so the one they don't really have role models to. Again,

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the industry is still fairly young. When you compare it

1:11:29.240 --> 1:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to finance, like investment banking or UM. You compare it

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to consulting, or you compare it to medicine. Those are

1:11:35.800 --> 1:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>all industries that have been around much longer, so they've

1:11:38.600 --> 1:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>had more of a chance to catch up to for

1:11:40.960 --> 1:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, to make it for for women to UM

1:11:44.240 --> 1:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>have a bigger percentage. But when when we look at

1:11:47.320 --> 1:11:51.879
<v Speaker 1>things like law and medicine and consulting, women are forty

1:11:52.080 --> 1:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>plus percent. When we look at finance, there's been a

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of gains in the past decade, but it's still

1:11:59.040 --> 1:12:03.599
<v Speaker 1>really tilted towards the male side. UM. I can name

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>two dozen chief economists, uh market strategists. I mean, there's

1:12:09.040 --> 1:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>tons of women in very visible places today that didn't

1:12:13.280 --> 1:12:17.639
<v Speaker 1>exist twenty years ago. But find it's still very It's

1:12:17.680 --> 1:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>still so much better than the hedge fund industry. It

1:12:20.120 --> 1:12:23.519
<v Speaker 1>really is. So that the hedge fund industry is worse

1:12:23.560 --> 1:12:27.599
<v Speaker 1>than finance. So finance is bad, right, So fine, So

1:12:28.000 --> 1:12:30.479
<v Speaker 1>that's my man explaining about the lack of women. If

1:12:30.560 --> 1:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I always find my always laugh at myself when I'm like,

1:12:33.640 --> 1:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>are you man explaining this too harsh? And know it's

1:12:35.760 --> 1:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more about this stuff than you ever will, but it's

1:12:38.360 --> 1:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>true there are so few women. So we need to

1:12:40.720 --> 1:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>do a better job of pulling women in earlier and

1:12:43.520 --> 1:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>explaining to them that this is an industry that is

1:12:47.920 --> 1:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>not just hospitable to women, we are dying for women.

1:12:51.200 --> 1:12:54.479
<v Speaker 1>It is rare that I do a search, um where

1:12:54.520 --> 1:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the client at some point does not say to me,

1:12:58.560 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we love for the a successful candidate to

1:13:01.280 --> 1:13:03.599
<v Speaker 1>be a woman and and the problem but the problem

1:13:03.720 --> 1:13:07.759
<v Speaker 1>is we have a fiduciary duty to hire the best person,

1:13:08.360 --> 1:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not the best woman. And so by the time we

1:13:11.240 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>get involved, which is really at the most senior end

1:13:14.000 --> 1:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of the industry. If you think about a mountain, if

1:13:16.479 --> 1:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>at the base there are so few, you know, it's

1:13:19.800 --> 1:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the pool you start out with, and then by the

1:13:23.360 --> 1:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>time we get there very much against right. And so

1:13:27.560 --> 1:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that that, um, that's the issue as well

1:13:30.840 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as UM the fact that there's something about the P

1:13:34.280 --> 1:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and L and the volatility of the P and L

1:13:36.320 --> 1:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that is that is um. You know, it's it's you

1:13:40.040 --> 1:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>can't control it. Even in private equity, you have more

1:13:42.439 --> 1:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>control than you do in the public markets. You have

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ten uere money, you have full information, you're one of

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>eight on a deal team. Trump tweets something that portfolio

1:13:49.920 --> 1:13:55.759
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to go. Hey, you can be the darling

1:13:55.800 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of the industry one moment and be out of business

1:13:58.040 --> 1:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the next. And that is not that all so um,

1:14:01.680 --> 1:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, can be scary. So I don't know, UM,

1:14:04.840 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that is less appealing to women,

1:14:07.400 --> 1:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but maybe that factors into it as well. Huh. That

1:14:10.920 --> 1:14:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that's that's quite fascinating. So in terms of coming trying

1:14:16.640 --> 1:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring women into the industry earlier on last week,

1:14:20.600 --> 1:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and I am trying to you know, I'm doing what

1:14:22.479 --> 1:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I can. Last week, I actually um went out to

1:14:26.920 --> 1:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan to be the keynote speaker for

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the their Undergraduate Investment Conference, which is like the sound

1:14:34.439 --> 1:14:38.479
<v Speaker 1>conference for for exactly for undergrads, and uh really to

1:14:38.600 --> 1:14:41.519
<v Speaker 1>signal to them that this is an industry that wants

1:14:41.560 --> 1:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>women and try to encourage all these undergrads to come

1:14:44.400 --> 1:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if they're interested, Like this is a this is a

1:14:48.120 --> 1:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>um uh play, this is an industry that is salivating

1:14:52.520 --> 1:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for talent and UM, it is totally meritocratic and if

1:14:57.320 --> 1:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you're talented, nobody cares if you're a man, woman or otherwise.

1:15:01.040 --> 1:15:04.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just this is like, you know, it's that's a uh,

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what the focus is on. And one of the

1:15:07.640 --> 1:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>women towards the end when we had the Q and A,

1:15:10.400 --> 1:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>asked me the question of what can women do? How

1:15:14.960 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>do we become more, UM, fearless? How do we go

1:15:19.479 --> 1:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for it? How do we set ourselves up to be

1:15:22.000 --> 1:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more successful in life? And I, you know, I answered

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the question in terms of just UMU having you know,

1:15:29.439 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 1>you may not have the confidence early on, but that

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:35.559
<v Speaker 1>comes with success and UM building it over time and

1:15:35.600 --> 1:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just sort of not you know, going for it. That's

1:15:37.960 --> 1:15:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. But I but I UM. What bothered

1:15:41.560 --> 1:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>me about the question is I do think that there

1:15:44.080 --> 1:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is a UM sometimes a little bit of a orientation

1:15:50.080 --> 1:15:53.639
<v Speaker 1>of like, how do we how can we be UM,

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>how can we set ourselves up better for success? How

1:15:56.400 --> 1:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can we be more as you put it, fearless? Why

1:15:59.360 --> 1:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>are we at the world as though we have a handicap.

1:16:02.560 --> 1:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's scared when they're young, everybody's scared to make a

1:16:05.320 --> 1:16:08.479
<v Speaker 1>mistake every you know, but you just whether whether you're

1:16:08.520 --> 1:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a man or a woman, you have to sort of

1:16:11.240 --> 1:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>buck up and and as I said, go for it.

1:16:14.080 --> 1:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And this idea that, um, because we're female, we're somehow

1:16:19.160 --> 1:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage by our very nature pisces me off. And I

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of said that to her. I said, there's, like,

1:16:25.040 --> 1:16:27.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, this sort of cont impacted idea that you

1:16:27.600 --> 1:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>need special handling or there's something about you that we

1:16:31.320 --> 1:16:34.479
<v Speaker 1>need to treat differently. Why. I mean, you know, as

1:16:34.520 --> 1:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>long as we're all being good actors and behaving correctly,

1:16:39.360 --> 1:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>why should we Why do why do we need sort

1:16:41.400 --> 1:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of a different way of treating you? That as that

1:16:44.160 --> 1:16:47.559
<v Speaker 1>as long as is a loaded phrase because I recall

1:16:47.640 --> 1:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the early days in my career on a trading desk.

1:16:50.720 --> 1:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It was horrific. That can't go on anymore. And it doesn't.

1:16:53.920 --> 1:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You see ken foot happen with ken Fisher's contra, right,

1:16:56.920 --> 1:17:00.559
<v Speaker 1>So it's my good business, it's not good business. It's

1:17:00.600 --> 1:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lead to a successful outcome. And come back

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to at the end of the day, there's so few

1:17:05.880 --> 1:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>talented people. If that person happens to be a woman,

1:17:09.360 --> 1:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>There is no hedge fund manager in his right mind

1:17:12.080 --> 1:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that will do anything to make the environment inhospitable to her.

1:17:15.960 --> 1:17:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention, it's you can't get away with that

1:17:17.640 --> 1:17:20.479
<v Speaker 1>stuff anymore. So the world has changed completely. I don't

1:17:20.479 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>know if it's changed completely. I'm again, like you know,

1:17:24.000 --> 1:17:26.479
<v Speaker 1>we just saw with Fisher. There are still people who

1:17:26.800 --> 1:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>act out of turn. But in an industry that is

1:17:30.000 --> 1:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>measured minute to minute, and you're only as good as UM,

1:17:34.640 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>your last p m L, you cannot do things which

1:17:38.360 --> 1:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to scare away the very people that can

1:17:42.160 --> 1:17:45.599
<v Speaker 1>have a real impact on your business. It's just, it's

1:17:45.640 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so there's so much clarity in terms of who the

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers are. And to have half the population

1:17:51.960 --> 1:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>UM not be a source of talent is insanity. And

1:17:54.880 --> 1:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no hedge fund manager that would think that way

1:17:57.240 --> 1:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to be successful. But when we see

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the academic studies on male versus female mutual fund managers UM,

1:18:05.040 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the data shows that the women tend to do better

1:18:08.400 --> 1:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>than the men. The women don't have the same ego issues.

1:18:11.720 --> 1:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>They certainly don't suffer from the test what some people

1:18:14.439 --> 1:18:18.519
<v Speaker 1>have called testosterone poisoning. That they are more measured and

1:18:18.720 --> 1:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>less aggressive in a negative way than the male fund managers.

1:18:23.080 --> 1:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So the data even supports female fund managers can outperform

1:18:28.400 --> 1:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>male fund managers with without any change to who they

1:18:31.960 --> 1:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are with. You know, it's funny. I had drinks with

1:18:34.360 --> 1:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a woman that I'm not going to name her, but

1:18:36.320 --> 1:18:38.519
<v Speaker 1>I was so pleased when she did end up being

1:18:38.520 --> 1:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this successful candidate for search we did a year ago,

1:18:42.000 --> 1:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>very successful PM. One of the few who ran a

1:18:44.760 --> 1:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of capital where she was she ran two billion.

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Now she's running four billion as a real team underneath her.

1:18:50.360 --> 1:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And we were talking about somebody that she recently had

1:18:52.800 --> 1:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to let go, and it was just so I had

1:18:54.520 --> 1:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>such a smile playing on my face as she was

1:18:56.400 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>describing how emotional he was and he wasn't making rational decisions,

1:19:00.479 --> 1:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>and he was constantly complaining about, you know where where

1:19:03.560 --> 1:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>his p n L was at? And she's like, I

1:19:05.240 --> 1:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>know where you're p P and L is at. I'm

1:19:07.040 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 1>watching it, get with it and fix it, and so

1:19:09.840 --> 1:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's anyway, it's just a sort of sidebar

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on there is no difference these flighty emotional men. I mean,

1:19:17.840 --> 1:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>how can I exactly what I have to deal with?

1:19:21.479 --> 1:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>But but you know that is a genuine perception issue

1:19:25.280 --> 1:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and the reality is how So this was a question

1:19:29.720 --> 1:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get to, but I wanted to ask h

1:19:33.040 --> 1:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You have said the people best suited for this industry

1:19:36.479 --> 1:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>are the ones who remain cool under pressure. That that's

1:19:39.640 --> 1:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a quote of yours, which certainly is who's going to

1:19:42.760 --> 1:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>argue with that? How can you identify that in a

1:19:46.880 --> 1:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of casual conversation until you see them under pressure?

1:19:50.920 --> 1:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>How do you know how they're going to react. Well,

1:19:52.479 --> 1:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's less about the person, you know, the how they act,

1:19:58.400 --> 1:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, it's more about the comes. So decision

1:20:01.760 --> 1:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is not necessary. I'm looking at consistent pan l over time,

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and whether you do that by standing on your head

1:20:08.680 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or you know, crossing your fingers and toes and screaming,

1:20:11.240 --> 1:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the case may be. If you can generate,

1:20:14.080 --> 1:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the last four or five years, where has

1:20:16.479 --> 1:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>been so difficult and there's not been this tailwind to performance,

1:20:20.240 --> 1:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>if you can generate consistent pan l over time, that

1:20:24.760 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to me says you're somebody who possesses um a whole

1:20:29.160 --> 1:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other qualities which come with that. You're somebody

1:20:31.720 --> 1:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>who is flexible and humble. You are You're You're not

1:20:36.200 --> 1:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>so wetted to your positions that you can't um take

1:20:40.040 --> 1:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>new inputs and shift you know, on a dime where

1:20:42.680 --> 1:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you need to um you um uh and and and

1:20:48.320 --> 1:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so so. Looking at pan L over a period of

1:20:51.160 --> 1:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>time gives me insight as well as some of the

1:20:54.400 --> 1:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what makes some people vulnerable, which is the

1:20:57.479 --> 1:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>founder is often more vulneratible than they are in that. Again,

1:21:00.400 --> 1:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about behavior, although that comes with it sometimes,

1:21:03.240 --> 1:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean decision making. It's a guy who

1:21:06.240 --> 1:21:08.799
<v Speaker 1>comes into my office and says, you know, this happened

1:21:08.840 --> 1:21:11.759
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. Um he sat at a large hedge fund.

1:21:12.080 --> 1:21:14.559
<v Speaker 1>He was responsible for a big for a big chunk

1:21:14.560 --> 1:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, and um uh, even though he was doing well,

1:21:19.160 --> 1:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the fund was not, and he had he was the

1:21:21.880 --> 1:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>most robust uh short, had the most robust short book

1:21:25.880 --> 1:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>within the fund, which was not the founder strength or

1:21:29.000 --> 1:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>skill set. And the founder came in over the top,

1:21:31.479 --> 1:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>took off all his alpha generating shorts, put on index shorts,

1:21:34.479 --> 1:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and erased a lot of this guy's pan L. So

1:21:37.000 --> 1:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know enough of that kind of stuff happening is

1:21:42.280 --> 1:21:45.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the differentiation between the founder acting out

1:21:45.520 --> 1:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of sort of panic and emotion and not really understanding

1:21:48.400 --> 1:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, and this guy pointing to consistent pan

1:21:51.880 --> 1:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>l and where he's gotten tripped up is when he's

1:21:54.479 --> 1:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>been overridden by um, somebody who isn't taking a more

1:21:59.320 --> 1:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>measured approach. We assume that guy is no longer at

1:22:01.640 --> 1:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>that fund. We can. I have a million more questions

1:22:05.479 --> 1:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for you, but I know I don't have you all day,

1:22:08.080 --> 1:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So why don't I go to some of my uh

1:22:11.120 --> 1:22:13.599
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions. This hasn't been too painful, it's been a

1:22:13.600 --> 1:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun. Oh, I'm so glad you've said that.

1:22:15.439 --> 1:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's jump. And I don't know if you're gonna

1:22:17.840 --> 1:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>be able to answer this question because you were born

1:22:20.520 --> 1:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in Brooklyn and moved to Manhattan. Um, but let me

1:22:23.760 --> 1:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ask you the question, what was the first car you

1:22:26.080 --> 1:22:30.519
<v Speaker 1>ever owned? You're making model? Okay, Barry, you don't drive?

1:22:30.760 --> 1:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>You got it. You are the first person I've been

1:22:34.040 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>waiting for someone to say that to me. And I

1:22:37.080 --> 1:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>was expecting, like a millennial to say, oh I uber

1:22:39.800 --> 1:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>or Isaip drive. See I'm ahead of my time. You

1:22:42.680 --> 1:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>are so you never owned a car, never owned a car,

1:22:46.439 --> 1:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>never drove a car. I took a feely I took

1:22:48.920 --> 1:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a few lessons, uh like ten years ago and I

1:22:52.439 --> 1:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was just like, this is a waste of time. I'm

1:22:54.439 --> 1:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>never I'm never going to create the muscle memory to

1:22:57.560 --> 1:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>know how to do this. I'll probably kill someone or myself.

1:23:00.080 --> 1:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So if we get you on a track, it's a

1:23:02.240 --> 1:23:04.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun. Could be surprised. Can we do? Like

1:23:04.640 --> 1:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the what do you call them? The bumper cars? Though?

1:23:07.680 --> 1:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So now those bumper cars are all electric. There's a

1:23:10.840 --> 1:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>place called RPM. There's a bunch of them around this

1:23:13.760 --> 1:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one in Farmingdale and it's just the most amount of

1:23:17.080 --> 1:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I would love to have. It's a blas I should

1:23:18.840 --> 1:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>do that with my fifteen year old who tells me

1:23:20.920 --> 1:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in star contrast to myself he's going to have his

1:23:23.360 --> 1:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>learners permit when he's sixteen, which well I'm terrified of.

1:23:26.760 --> 1:23:29.759
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's such a different having that happen

1:23:30.360 --> 1:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>pre Internet, if you lived outside of a major city,

1:23:34.080 --> 1:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a car represented freedom. Now everybody's playing everything. It's just

1:23:39.240 --> 1:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>such a different So let's talk a little bit about, um, you,

1:23:43.120 --> 1:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the most important thing we don't know about? Allana Weinstein?

1:23:47.520 --> 1:23:49.519
<v Speaker 1>Although I think you may have just revealed it. I

1:23:49.560 --> 1:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think you I may have just revealed it. That I

1:23:51.920 --> 1:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>never have driven a car, never during a car. Yeah.

1:23:54.960 --> 1:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And and you know what everyone in this industry knows

1:23:58.040 --> 1:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>me is like a very um which is true to

1:24:01.080 --> 1:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the point, um, no nonsense, say it like it is

1:24:05.560 --> 1:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>businesswoman all true. But Barry, I do have a soft

1:24:08.920 --> 1:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and gooey center, right, I don't believe that it's true.

1:24:12.320 --> 1:24:15.519
<v Speaker 1>What is your soft and gooey center? Like? What what

1:24:16.200 --> 1:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's meaning? What? Um? So? What is what is yours?

1:24:19.320 --> 1:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this is the thing we don't know about you.

1:24:21.320 --> 1:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>What you work in a tough industry, male dominated, very sharp, elbowed,

1:24:26.880 --> 1:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>very competitive. What are you soft and gooey about? And

1:24:30.240 --> 1:24:32.559
<v Speaker 1>you brought this up? Not me? Yeah, I mean it's

1:24:32.600 --> 1:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just more you know, it's my it's my alter ego,

1:24:36.360 --> 1:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>non work persona. It's uh, you have to have a

1:24:39.160 --> 1:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>yang and yang, my yang or yang or whatever you

1:24:42.320 --> 1:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>want to whatever. The opposite one is that we're referring

1:24:44.439 --> 1:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to is you know, it's just you have to enjoy life.

1:24:48.479 --> 1:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And and that's a big part of who I am.

1:24:50.320 --> 1:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, Who are your mentors? Who has influenced your career?

1:24:54.600 --> 1:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Well it might be a cliche answer, but my parents

1:24:57.400 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are tremendous mentors. Um. Uh my mom in particular, even

1:25:04.000 --> 1:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>though she was a stay at home mom, she is

1:25:06.880 --> 1:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly bright woman who kind of managed the family.

1:25:10.479 --> 1:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd say in some ways similarly to a how a

1:25:13.640 --> 1:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO manages his you know, best employees, but with lots

1:25:16.880 --> 1:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of love, very but very no nonsense. Very kind of

1:25:20.400 --> 1:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>like the advice I gave this girl at you of

1:25:22.520 --> 1:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>them like, get up and go for it, stop whining,

1:25:26.040 --> 1:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just get it done. And um, and that gave me

1:25:30.280 --> 1:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and forcing my and that made me strong,

1:25:33.880 --> 1:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>um and creates winds and then it creates real confidence. Um.

1:25:37.960 --> 1:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Other mentors were just you know. I've cultivated great relationships, um,

1:25:43.240 --> 1:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>great relationships with my clients who have given me great

1:25:46.160 --> 1:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>advice along the way. UM. I mean everywhere I've worked,

1:25:52.000 --> 1:25:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I've just um, I've had the good fortune of finding

1:25:54.600 --> 1:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>great people who um I learned a lot from quite interesting. UM.

1:26:00.240 --> 1:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about your favorite books. What do you like

1:26:02.320 --> 1:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>to read when you're not out recruiting talent. I love

1:26:06.600 --> 1:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>books by and I think there's some commonality between them.

1:26:10.600 --> 1:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I love John krak Our, Tom Wolfe, Michael Lewis. They

1:26:14.680 --> 1:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, real stories um that are almost read like thrillers.

1:26:21.400 --> 1:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And Tom Wolfe is fiction, but he's really writing about

1:26:23.880 --> 1:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>moments in time that right, a bonfire, right, even I am.

1:26:29.560 --> 1:26:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte Simmons is based on you know, real LuFe. Do

1:26:32.560 --> 1:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that book? It's great, It's uh. I read

1:26:35.320 --> 1:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it a few years ago. It's a woman's um, a

1:26:38.720 --> 1:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>young woman's travails and experience at undergrad. I think it's

1:26:44.040 --> 1:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>it's meant to be a big Ten's type school and

1:26:46.680 --> 1:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>everything she goes through. It's a very thick book, but

1:26:50.040 --> 1:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was so on point in terms of

1:26:52.920 --> 1:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>what the undergraduate experience is like. I'm sure based on

1:26:56.040 --> 1:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>characters that he knew. Well, maybe Ben his own family.

1:26:59.439 --> 1:27:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Give us some more book titles. You mentioned a number

1:27:01.479 --> 1:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of authors. Um, I have to think the Big Short

1:27:04.320 --> 1:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is right in your love. In fact, it's funny you

1:27:07.200 --> 1:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>bring that up. I was on a long flight a

1:27:10.320 --> 1:27:12.559
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago and I didn't reread the book, but

1:27:12.640 --> 1:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I did see the movie again and I actually called

1:27:16.360 --> 1:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a number of my clients and said, you have to

1:27:18.720 --> 1:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>watch this again. And I made my son watch it again.

1:27:20.960 --> 1:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's so good, and I have so much respect for

1:27:24.120 --> 1:27:26.559
<v Speaker 1>how Michael Lewis did that. How he you know, he

1:27:26.600 --> 1:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>found it's just it's so many. It's a tough subject

1:27:29.640 --> 1:27:33.599
<v Speaker 1>to understand for a late person. He totally explained it well.

1:27:34.080 --> 1:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And he takes these stories and builds these not builds

1:27:37.920 --> 1:27:40.519
<v Speaker 1>they were, but brings to life these characters that were

1:27:41.200 --> 1:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting in esoteric and dynamic in their own ways and contrarians.

1:27:45.680 --> 1:27:47.759
<v Speaker 1>And then there's this That's why I call it a thriller,

1:27:47.800 --> 1:27:49.839
<v Speaker 1>like how is how is it all going to come together?

1:27:49.880 --> 1:27:51.479
<v Speaker 1>And how did they figure this out? And how did

1:27:51.479 --> 1:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>they all sort of end up interweaving um and tells

1:27:54.720 --> 1:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the story which is so multidimensional. I just brilliant. That

1:27:58.760 --> 1:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is the Michael Lewis form. Find an esoteric, quirky outsider,

1:28:04.320 --> 1:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and we've a narrative not from the center, but from

1:28:09.000 --> 1:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the people on the periphery who identify in a contrarian basis.

1:28:14.160 --> 1:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Wait what what does everybody seem to misunderstand? And then

1:28:17.400 --> 1:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the next level is how can we capitalize on it?

1:28:19.760 --> 1:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, you just describe what we do,

1:28:23.120 --> 1:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what you do, what I do as a hunter, What

1:28:25.400 --> 1:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I do as a headhunter. It's finding the people who

1:28:28.040 --> 1:28:31.519
<v Speaker 1>who see something, who can come at things differently, who

1:28:31.560 --> 1:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are um who are able to generate Alpha consistently over

1:28:36.080 --> 1:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>time in spite of everyone else, And what do they

1:28:39.320 --> 1:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean in terms of UM where

1:28:43.040 --> 1:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they can be most successful and where the industry is

1:28:45.280 --> 1:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going Give me one more book title, UM, because I'm

1:28:47.800 --> 1:28:49.479
<v Speaker 1>curious as to what else you read, And then I'm

1:28:49.479 --> 1:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>going to share two with you. I'm gonna bet you

1:28:51.680 --> 1:28:53.519
<v Speaker 1>probably well. One of them hasn't come out yet, but

1:28:53.560 --> 1:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one of them I wonder if you read. I'm in

1:28:56.280 --> 1:28:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the middle of one right now, which is not something

1:28:58.479 --> 1:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I normally read, but someone into to me and I'm

1:29:00.720 --> 1:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>actually really into it. It's called hacking Darwin. Have you

1:29:04.760 --> 1:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>read I'm familiar with it. I haven't ready. So it's

1:29:06.960 --> 1:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it's written by this UM technology futurist and it's all

1:29:14.120 --> 1:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>real stuff, which is amazing UM. And he's the premise

1:29:18.000 --> 1:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>being we can hack the genetic code the same way

1:29:20.280 --> 1:29:22.439
<v Speaker 1>you can have a computer, which we know we can,

1:29:22.520 --> 1:29:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, do things now with the genetic code UM

1:29:25.560 --> 1:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to make people healthier, to make them smarter. Uh. And

1:29:29.360 --> 1:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just I'm only midway through it. But it's both

1:29:32.320 --> 1:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the UM ethical challenges inherent in that as well as

1:29:37.080 --> 1:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the socioeconomic challenges. If we decide something's not ethical, but

1:29:41.680 --> 1:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>another country decides it is. Does that create sort of

1:29:44.640 --> 1:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a superior population to us? You know? There's there's so

1:29:47.479 --> 1:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>much in it that I think is interesting, and it's

1:29:49.280 --> 1:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>written in a way that a non um medical person

1:29:53.479 --> 1:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like myself can totally understand. Jamie Metzel, yes is the

1:29:57.120 --> 1:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>author courtesy of Google. So the two books I have

1:30:00.000 --> 1:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about because you kind of describe them both.

1:30:04.600 --> 1:30:07.519
<v Speaker 1>One is The Spider Network, but I think it's David

1:30:07.560 --> 1:30:12.519
<v Speaker 1>and Trust about the libor manipulation scandal, same sort of

1:30:12.560 --> 1:30:15.479
<v Speaker 1>thing where it's a financial book, but it reads like

1:30:15.520 --> 1:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a thriller and all the characters are odd and interesting.

1:30:18.200 --> 1:30:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally going to read that. Yeah, that's it. And

1:30:20.520 --> 1:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>then the new Greg Zuckerman book on renaissance technologies and

1:30:24.560 --> 1:30:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simon's The Man Who, um I'm trying to remember

1:30:29.520 --> 1:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with the title is the Man Who figure who solved

1:30:32.000 --> 1:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Markets? Another one that reads like a thriller, And

1:30:36.400 --> 1:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and how do we figure out um, we figure out

1:30:40.080 --> 1:30:42.679
<v Speaker 1>commodities and futures? How do we apply that and figure

1:30:42.720 --> 1:30:48.479
<v Speaker 1>out equities? Really a fascinating that's such a unknown entity

1:30:48.560 --> 1:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's so little public information on renaissance Um, the

1:30:52.439 --> 1:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Jim Simon's book is really quite fun. Thank you. I'm

1:30:54.840 --> 1:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>totally picking those two up. Can I tell you? I

1:30:57.080 --> 1:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>know that the Simon's book is just gonna go crazy

1:31:00.400 --> 1:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>only because it's, uh, it's a black box. No one

1:31:02.800 --> 1:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>knows what goes on and post election um everything that

1:31:06.920 --> 1:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>happened with them, Uh Simon's partner who who had such

1:31:11.360 --> 1:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>an impact on the Trump candidacy. That that's the I

1:31:17.080 --> 1:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>just see that book is blowing up. I could be

1:31:18.640 --> 1:31:21.639
<v Speaker 1>completely wrong and what I'm interested in very often other

1:31:21.640 --> 1:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people aren't. But I think you would, really, you especially

1:31:24.120 --> 1:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>would really appreciate both of those done. I'm totally reading them.

1:31:27.240 --> 1:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Next question, tell us about a time you failed and

1:31:30.120 --> 1:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what you learned from the experience. So I'm going to

1:31:35.360 --> 1:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>cite something that happened early on in my career, like

1:31:39.520 --> 1:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>inconsequential looking back, but I remember it because it was

1:31:43.800 --> 1:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so scary and crazy at the time. Uh. And this

1:31:49.439 --> 1:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was my first as my first job. I was a

1:31:51.840 --> 1:31:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Goldman UM and I had done this analysis and submitted

1:31:59.600 --> 1:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it and I got pulled into the partner's office who

1:32:04.280 --> 1:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ran my division, and he started reaming me out, like

1:32:08.680 --> 1:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>totally carrying on and screaming and yelling, and I'm sitting there,

1:32:12.200 --> 1:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>white knuckles, grabbing the chair, wondering what the heck did

1:32:15.000 --> 1:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I do? I worked so hard on this, like, well,

1:32:17.520 --> 1:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>how did I screw this up so badly? And I

1:32:20.280 --> 1:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>just I'm my head was exploding. I was listening as

1:32:22.840 --> 1:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, I don't I don't understand what what

1:32:24.880 --> 1:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because it had been submitted to some other partner that

1:32:27.240 --> 1:32:30.519
<v Speaker 1>was senior than him, so I can't make this up.

1:32:30.680 --> 1:32:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I had left off the middle initial of the partner

1:32:34.760 --> 1:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>who was the ultimate recipient of this analysis. I had

1:32:38.000 --> 1:32:39.439
<v Speaker 1>left off I think it was an A. I remember

1:32:39.479 --> 1:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to this point, to this day, I remember his name,

1:32:41.160 --> 1:32:43.719
<v Speaker 1>but I remember the middle initial was an A and

1:32:43.840 --> 1:32:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it was so insane. Wait, wait, that's what he was

1:32:46.520 --> 1:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>upset about. This guy had his higher up. It reamed

1:32:50.120 --> 1:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>him out because I attention to details, she left off

1:32:53.200 --> 1:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>my middle initial, so I can't see exactly. Um, but

1:33:00.040 --> 1:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on crazy I know, so UM. But you know what

1:33:06.680 --> 1:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I ended up doing was calling the guy who was

1:33:10.520 --> 1:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the middle initial A guy and asking to meet with him,

1:33:14.400 --> 1:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and we ended up having lunch and Um. As it

1:33:18.160 --> 1:33:20.439
<v Speaker 1>turns out, he wasn't nearly as upset as I think

1:33:20.479 --> 1:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy who called me into his office was just

1:33:22.120 --> 1:33:25.599
<v Speaker 1>having a bad day or you know, whatever the case was. Um,

1:33:25.600 --> 1:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>but it it taught me about dealing with things head

1:33:28.520 --> 1:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on and not letting someone else speak for me, um

1:33:32.080 --> 1:33:37.599
<v Speaker 1>and uh and diffusing the situation um again by just

1:33:37.680 --> 1:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>having a candid conversation, you know, sort of person to

1:33:41.080 --> 1:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>person and so UM it was. You know, it stuck

1:33:45.880 --> 1:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with me because I it was a ballsy move, but

1:33:49.880 --> 1:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it ended up okay as a result. Quite quite interesting.

1:33:52.520 --> 1:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you do for fun? What do you do

1:33:54.000 --> 1:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're not um up to your elbows in the

1:33:57.240 --> 1:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>hedge fun industry? So I've discovered inner athlete in the

1:34:01.439 --> 1:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>last few years. I you know, growing up in New York,

1:34:04.200 --> 1:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I uh, I don't know. I didn't like I went

1:34:07.080 --> 1:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to Stuybison. It wasn't like I was. I wasn't a

1:34:09.000 --> 1:34:11.320
<v Speaker 1>big sports person. I took ballet that was about as

1:34:11.320 --> 1:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>athletic as I as I was. UM. So I found

1:34:16.280 --> 1:34:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that I love cycling. Go on all these cycling trips

1:34:19.520 --> 1:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>now like all over the world. I have a buddy

1:34:22.800 --> 1:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>who does that. They have a Chase van and they

1:34:26.880 --> 1:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they went through Italy, they went through So I do

1:34:29.240 --> 1:34:31.439
<v Speaker 1>this in style. I'm not like you know, I mean,

1:34:31.640 --> 1:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so there is a van that follows us. We stay

1:34:33.840 --> 1:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in phenomenal places. We eat crazy copious amounts of food

1:34:38.439 --> 1:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>because we can. We're cycling fifty six. You see stuff

1:34:44.080 --> 1:34:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you would never see as a tourist, you know, you

1:34:46.280 --> 1:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really and we picked places that are just that are

1:34:49.880 --> 1:34:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they're beautiful to cycle. Where have you

1:34:52.280 --> 1:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>give us a few names? Provence, Croatia, uh, other parts

1:34:59.080 --> 1:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of France. Um which is off the coast of LaRochelle.

1:35:03.640 --> 1:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like the Hampton's of Paris, Umu, Costa Rica. Yeah,

1:35:13.800 --> 1:35:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that that sounds fascinating. Let me ask you UM this

1:35:17.360 --> 1:35:20.519
<v Speaker 1>question about the industry. What are you most optimistic and

1:35:20.560 --> 1:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>most pessimistic about the world of finance. So I think

1:35:26.920 --> 1:35:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that this this shakeout is going to be for the better,

1:35:30.040 --> 1:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>because I really think the industry has gotten tagged with

1:35:33.920 --> 1:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the poor performance of the majority of hedge funds and

1:35:37.360 --> 1:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>if they go away UM or, then I think what

1:35:41.520 --> 1:35:44.439
<v Speaker 1>we're left with are the guys that are actually really

1:35:44.479 --> 1:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>delivering on um a business model that works for LPs.

1:35:49.880 --> 1:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm I'm as much as this is a

1:35:51.840 --> 1:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>painful moment in time for a lot of funds. I

1:35:54.040 --> 1:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think the shakeout will happen the way it's supposed to.

1:35:57.400 --> 1:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the pessimistic I meant to to

1:36:00.600 --> 1:36:04.760
<v Speaker 1>quote you something from Jim Chanos who said thirty years

1:36:04.760 --> 1:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ago there were a hundred hedge funds. They all created alpha.

1:36:07.439 --> 1:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Now this eleven thousand hedge funds, and it's those same

1:36:10.040 --> 1:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds that are creating the alpha. Is that a fair

1:36:12.800 --> 1:36:15.519
<v Speaker 1>statement or you Now I don't I don't think that's true,

1:36:15.640 --> 1:36:18.519
<v Speaker 1>or you wouldn't see funds again like Eating Perry and

1:36:18.600 --> 1:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean sorry, Eating Park and Perry going out of business,

1:36:22.000 --> 1:36:24.479
<v Speaker 1>or High Fields closing its doors or Blue Ridge closing

1:36:24.479 --> 1:36:26.559
<v Speaker 1>its stores. Those two were by choice. The first two

1:36:27.040 --> 1:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, I'm not sure they were. UM and

1:36:30.760 --> 1:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and again all those funds that I mentioned that are

1:36:33.160 --> 1:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>now shells of their former selves. Right, we talked about

1:36:36.160 --> 1:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the A U M drops of funds like green Light

1:36:39.280 --> 1:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Corvax and Discovery and fir Tree. So those that's

1:36:42.000 --> 1:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not indicative of funds that have delivered great performance for

1:36:46.080 --> 1:36:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the past four or five years. Again this year exclusion.

1:36:49.160 --> 1:36:51.679
<v Speaker 1>So I don't agree with that. UM. I think now

1:36:52.040 --> 1:36:57.439
<v Speaker 1>what what UM is the differentiator? Are really funds that

1:36:57.560 --> 1:37:01.519
<v Speaker 1>have set up an infrastructure that bestows competitive advantage to

1:37:01.600 --> 1:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>their people. So what sort of advice would you give

1:37:04.439 --> 1:37:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to a recent college grad who was interested in going

1:37:07.600 --> 1:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>into finance. I think they need to They need to

1:37:11.800 --> 1:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>understand whether it's finance, whether it's investment banking, or it's

1:37:15.920 --> 1:37:18.240
<v Speaker 1>going directly to a hedge fund or really my advice

1:37:18.280 --> 1:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>would be no different to whether it's consulting anything. They

1:37:22.680 --> 1:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>need to be prepared to work harder than everybody else

1:37:25.800 --> 1:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted differentiate themselves. And I tell this to

1:37:28.160 --> 1:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>my son all the time. Everyone thinks they work hard.

1:37:31.080 --> 1:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>The truth is is you and I know Barry, most

1:37:33.360 --> 1:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>people don't actually work that hard. And I think, particularly

1:37:36.120 --> 1:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with millennial millennials, UM, they I don't think people these

1:37:40.880 --> 1:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>days we interview young kids from Goldman even to join

1:37:43.439 --> 1:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>our firm, to my firm, they're not working the way

1:37:45.960 --> 1:37:47.599
<v Speaker 1>I used to work when I was a Goldman, And

1:37:47.640 --> 1:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so I working hard that hard in being that overprepared

1:37:51.680 --> 1:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning is what will set you up for success,

1:37:54.840 --> 1:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>because you'll be ready for unexpected um questions. UM. It

1:38:00.120 --> 1:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>sets up a work ethic which UM, I think just

1:38:03.160 --> 1:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>serves you well in life. You know, and I that's

1:38:05.360 --> 1:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the ethos I live by still to this day.

1:38:08.120 --> 1:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the ethos of my firm. It's just it's being

1:38:11.920 --> 1:38:15.519
<v Speaker 1>paranoid that you're missing something and making sure that every

1:38:15.600 --> 1:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>last stone is uncovered. I've read certain coaches say that

1:38:19.479 --> 1:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>given a choice between hard work and talent, I'll take

1:38:22.280 --> 1:38:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the hard work. Quite interesting, and our final question, what

1:38:25.520 --> 1:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>do you know about the world of alternatives and talents

1:38:29.160 --> 1:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and recruitment today that you wish you knew twenty plus

1:38:32.520 --> 1:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago? So I think there's a special cocktail of

1:38:37.520 --> 1:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>art and science that goes into what makes the best people.

1:38:43.080 --> 1:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And when I look at the people I thought were

1:38:45.320 --> 1:38:48.240
<v Speaker 1>good fifteen twenty years ago, you know, when I when

1:38:48.240 --> 1:38:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I see them now, a lot of these people, I'm like,

1:38:50.520 --> 1:38:54.599
<v Speaker 1>what was I thinking? It's just what? So our judgment

1:38:54.680 --> 1:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>has certainly become a lot more refined as we've seen

1:38:58.000 --> 1:39:01.559
<v Speaker 1>people evolved through different markets. But there are certain things

1:39:01.760 --> 1:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that are common traits. Is what we've distilled from that

1:39:04.320 --> 1:39:06.439
<v Speaker 1>that I know now that I wish I knew then.

1:39:06.840 --> 1:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So those fall into two categories science and art. On

1:39:10.040 --> 1:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the science front, what we're looking for is a defined process.

1:39:15.600 --> 1:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for people who come at things through systematic research,

1:39:19.000 --> 1:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>through systematic um independent research, not through talking to their

1:39:23.720 --> 1:39:27.320
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund buddies. We're looking for velocity of ideas. I

1:39:27.400 --> 1:39:29.960
<v Speaker 1>want somebody who's constantly thinking out of the box and

1:39:30.040 --> 1:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>coming up with things, regardless of how tough it. Maybe.

1:39:33.479 --> 1:39:38.559
<v Speaker 1>I want somebody who can UM run a scale business.

1:39:38.680 --> 1:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, being able to deploy ten million dollars is

1:39:41.360 --> 1:39:43.519
<v Speaker 1>different than a hundred, is different than a billion. For

1:39:43.640 --> 1:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>our clients, I need the guy who can deploy a

1:39:46.120 --> 1:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars successfully and generate consistent alpha over time. And

1:39:49.360 --> 1:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that goes to my last point on science. I want

1:39:51.960 --> 1:39:54.479
<v Speaker 1>somebody who can be effective in different kinds of markets.

1:39:54.560 --> 1:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Isn't just a one trick pony. So that's on that's

1:39:56.920 --> 1:39:59.479
<v Speaker 1>a that's a toll order. That's on the science front.

1:39:59.479 --> 1:40:02.639
<v Speaker 1>But you can have of people who have great science

1:40:02.720 --> 1:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and no art and can't really generate P and L

1:40:06.080 --> 1:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and on the and art is you know, it's a

1:40:10.360 --> 1:40:12.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit. You know it when

1:40:12.560 --> 1:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you see it, certainly for us, And I'm not sure

1:40:16.000 --> 1:40:18.800
<v Speaker 1>how much of it UM can really be taught. I

1:40:18.840 --> 1:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think you learned this stuff that Wharton or it's

1:40:22.040 --> 1:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>hard to It's just it's there's a d N a

1:40:24.200 --> 1:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>composition to it, and it comes to passion. UM. I

1:40:27.840 --> 1:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>know it when I see it. I know somebody who's

1:40:29.920 --> 1:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>really into their subject matter. You can't fake that um

1:40:34.160 --> 1:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>intensity uh an intense desire to learn and grow. We

1:40:39.920 --> 1:40:44.519
<v Speaker 1>spoke about this earlier, humility, um arrogance as a killer

1:40:44.680 --> 1:40:47.439
<v Speaker 1>in this industry. It's what it's what kills performance. You

1:40:47.520 --> 1:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be willing to pivot and come at things

1:40:49.280 --> 1:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>differently and evolve. And I think, but I do think

1:40:53.360 --> 1:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the art can be made better if if you're somewhere

1:40:56.200 --> 1:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that can make the science better and gives you the

1:40:58.040 --> 1:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>tools to refine your process and comment research more effectively,

1:41:02.479 --> 1:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>then you can you can have more confidence in terms

1:41:06.760 --> 1:41:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of relying on things like your non intellectual judgment and

1:41:10.360 --> 1:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>your willingness to take risk and be wrong. So I

1:41:12.680 --> 1:41:15.479
<v Speaker 1>do think they're all those pieces fit together, and it's

1:41:15.479 --> 1:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about being somewhere which can really help you develop the

1:41:18.920 --> 1:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>right foundation. Quite quite fascinating. Thank you Alanna for being

1:41:23.080 --> 1:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so generous with your time. We have been speaking with

1:41:25.720 --> 1:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Alana Weinstein of I d W Group. If you enjoy

1:41:29.920 --> 1:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, we'll be sure to look up an inch

1:41:32.000 --> 1:41:34.599
<v Speaker 1>or down an inch on Apple iTunes and you could

1:41:34.600 --> 1:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>see any of the previous three hundred or so such

1:41:37.800 --> 1:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>conversations we've had over the past five years. We love

1:41:41.120 --> 1:41:44.760
<v Speaker 1>your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us at m

1:41:44.760 --> 1:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. If you're still here,

1:41:49.000 --> 1:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>uh this deep into the conversation, then you must have

1:41:51.720 --> 1:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it. Give us a lovely review on Apple iTunes.

1:41:55.240 --> 1:41:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com. Sign

1:41:58.520 --> 1:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>up from my daily reads at Ritholtz dot com. I

1:42:02.360 --> 1:42:04.519
<v Speaker 1>would be remiss if I did not thank the crack

1:42:04.600 --> 1:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>staff that helps put this conversation together each week. Michael

1:42:08.720 --> 1:42:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Boyle is my producer. Attica Valbrand is our project manager.

1:42:13.000 --> 1:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is my head of research. I'm Barry Ritolts.

1:42:17.040 --> 1:42:20.479
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.