WEBVTT - Bloomberg Law: A Discussion on Mueller Investigation (Audio)

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>In an interview this week with The New York Times,

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>President Trump made some remarkably pointed remarks, including this one

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>about Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the Russia investigation. I

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's very unfair to the president. How do you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>take a job and then refuse yourself. If he would

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>have refused himself before the job, I would have said, thanks, Jeff,

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.159
<v Speaker 1>But I can't. You know, I'm not gonna thank you.

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>It's extremely unfair, and that's a mild word to the president.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So he recuses himself. I then end up with a

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>second man, who's a deputy President. Trump also claimed that

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who's conducting the investigation, has conflicts

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of interest and should not investigate President Trump's personal finances,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>although Bloomberg News reported yesterday that Mueller's office has already

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>expanded its investigation into Trump business transactions, and The Washington

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Post reported last night the Trump lawyers and staffers are

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>investigating the investigators working in Mueller's office and that the

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>president may be examining his power to pardon those under investigation. Well,

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that's an awful lot going on, but here to talk

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>with us about what this is likely to mean for

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the investigation into Russian colusion. Are two attorneys with exceptional

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>records of public service uh AND who have looked at

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>elected officials over the years. Peter Zeidenberg, a partner at

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Fox who in many years at the Justice Department

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>UH included time at in the public Integrity section. And

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Richard ben venist Day, a partner at brayermnt LP who

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of the lead prosecutors on the Watergate Special

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Prosecution Task Force. Richard, the president is said a lot

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in this interview about UM different officials who the FBI

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that the thinks the FBI Report Director reports directly to

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the president, talked about his ability to get rid of

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the investigation entirely made the comments I mentioned earlier and

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the one we played. What he's got this investigation going on?

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>What can you discern in terms of what the president

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and strategy is here? I don't see that the president

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>has any strategy. He's created chaos throughout at least the

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department UH and has repeatedly made contradictory statements UH

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and statements that go on the will beyond the pale

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of being the subject of an investigation which

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by this time, no doubt President Trump is. And so

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you start with the notion that h he

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>has been stealing like a tea kettle and may reach

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the boil at any moment, provoking a constitutional crisis. Uh,

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he cannot abide the situation he finds himself in with

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Sessions quite properly recusing and Trump seething at sessions decision

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that put in Starring in the position as acting Attorney General,

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a man wide widely praised on both sides of the aisle,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and confirmed I think by a vote of two um.

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So he's Trump's pick. And then he promptly appoints Bob

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Mueller as UH special counsel. Now, Bob Muller has bipartisans support,

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and rightly so, because he is an extraordinary pick to

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>leave the investigation. He is a man of unmatched integrity,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>great experience as a former federal prosecutor and the former

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>FBI director, and there's no one who could suggest that

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he lacks the integrity to conduct the investigation. Peter, let's

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about President Trump being very upset

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about his personal finances being looked into. Mueller is empowered

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at any matters arising from his investigation. Everyone

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>who knows these kinds of investigations, No, you follow the money?

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Is he is following the money within his purview? Yeah? Absolutely, Um,

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're, you're, any investigation is going to be

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at these financial relationships, um, with Russians and with

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Russia and trying to understand um for one thing, motive um,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>which could explain the relationships and the behavior, you know,

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the frankly bizarre behavior um of the president in regards

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to Russia and why he may have colluded, which is

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the investigation. So if there is indebtedness that

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>he has with Russia or Russians that these old arks

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>with business with loans, um, then it's absolutely fair game.

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, he would be derelict if look at

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it this way. Let's let's say he looked at it narrowly.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm only gonna look at the last sixteen months. President

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump's apparent unhappiness with the investigation into possible collusion with

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Russia manifested itself this week in a number of statements

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the President made, including assertions that the special investigator has

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>conflicts of interest and that it would cross a red

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>line if the investigation looks at his finances. We're talking

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about the investigation with two former government officials, Peter Zeidenberg

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of Aaron Fox and Richard Benveniste of Mayor Brown. Peter,

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the President does appear to be doing trying to do

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>something to affect at least perception of this investigation by

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>making all these comments. Is it likely to have any

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>impact on Special Counsel Robert Mueller? Not directly on Mueller

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>or his team. This is pure background noise to them,

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're not gonna it's not gonna make one bit

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of difference to them at all. They're not going to

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>be intimidated by it. They're not going to be particularly

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bothered by it. But it's more of a political question, um,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because he's trying to stir up his base and to

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 1>get put out talking points for Fox News and for

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, avid supporters of of the president to uh.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's really just a political gamp, but not

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a legal one. And um, Richard, he's also been talking,

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>according to what Washington Post last night, he's been the

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>President has been asking about his partnering power and even

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>about partnering himself. Can a president pardon himself? It's not

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>been determined by the courts whether that's possible. Um. I

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>think the stronger argument is that it's not. If you

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the history of the pardon power, and he

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>may be sending a message to those who have information

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>damaging to the president, um, that he has his power

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and is prepared to use it. So they ought to

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>stay in line. Now he can pardon anyone other than himself. Uh,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>there there will be tremendous political consequences for him doing so,

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because that would truncate the investigation certainly at this early point. Peter,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you when you look at these comments

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the president has made, and the fact is thinking about pardons,

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're investigating, the investigators who are investigating them, that

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>he is uh that you know, he said all these

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>things about who reports to who, and whether Sessions should

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be attorney general. One wonders about, in the context of

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the obstruction of justice investigation, what does the president seem

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about? You know, what do these comments tell

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>us about the way the president thinks about his relationship

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to other officials in the government. Well, I'll make the

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>same observations that others have made in the last day

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>or so, which is this is all of a piece

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that shows that, you know, the president seems to think

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that he treats the government like he's the CEO of

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>an organization and everyone reports to him and he's the

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>boss of everyone. UM. That's not the way d o J,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for instance, works. UM. The FBI director doesn't report directly

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>to the president, like he said, he reports to the

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>attorney general, actually the deputy attorney general. So there are

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>structures in place and UM and norms in place, and

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the president has no understanding how any of that works.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's to put it charitably. UM. Just on the

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 1>point that Richard made about UM the pardon power of

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>parting one self, whether he could pardon himself, I think

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that that is UM an issue that's really an away

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>academic because I don't think it's likely or or even

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in the realm of possibility, that he would be indicted anyway.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the light more much greater likelihood is that

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he would be impeached, in which case partying himself would

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>only make it more likely he'd be impeached, not less likely. Richard,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you were Watergate prosecutor, and there has been some noise

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump might try to fire the special counsel

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as he fired Jim Comey. Would that parallel the seventy

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>three Saturday Night massacre? I think it would be even

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>worse on the circumstances where he's already used his executive

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>power to fire Jim Comey, who was investigating him and

0:09:53.520 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>other aspects. Um, He's also fired Tree Baha, the U

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>S Attorney for the Southern District of New York. So

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you see a pattern of firing people who have the

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>power to do him harm, and they do him harm

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>only in connection with their legal authority to investigate longdoing

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>each of these steps makes Trump look more and more

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>guilty of something. And if, in fact, Uh he fires

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Mueller or attempts to do so through the chain of

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>command that the Justice Department by firing people who refuse

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to do so until he gets to one who will,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:48.599
<v Speaker 1>then he's created a constitutional crisis in this country. He

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>looks guilty as hell as Nixon did. By the way,

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>when he fired Archibald cox Um, people who are on

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines are under side did said to themselves, what

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>is he hiding to incur this kind of chaos upon

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the country, Uh, Peter, In just about twenty seconds, do

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that what the President said makes the case

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>easier for Muller to make, uh, you know, because of

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>an obstruction you know, he has made so many comments,

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>um like this to show state of mind in terms

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of a possible obstruction case. You know, at this point,

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just guilding the lily. He's made it very

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>clear why he fired uh Comey and his interest in

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>firing Mueller. So he's just digging the hole deeper. Well,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to leave it there. Are thanks to

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Peter Zeidenberg of Aaron Fox and Richard Bandernisti of Mayor

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Brown for being here. On Bloomberg Law. Coming up, we're

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about whether the Federal Trade Commission is

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>acting as aggressively under President Trump as it did under

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>President Obama. That's right ahead on Bloomberg Law. You're listening

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg m