WEBVTT - Yields, Web3, Credit Suisse, Retail, And Cruises (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, we got

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some p p I data tomorrow. That's the producer prices

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in next, and then cp I Thursday. Wow, this is

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>disturbing image. Matt Miller just walked in with a huge

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>thing of peanut butter. Yes, well, I'll tell you what.

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>We have these machines upstairs and they grind the peanuts.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They make it fresh for you, so it doesn't take

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>anything like peanut butter, the worst thing in the word.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you. It is so good and it's much

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>better for you than Jiff, which is my previous fat

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt loved eating Jeff peanut butter or skippy, but skinny

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Matt likes fresh ground peanuts. It's so much healthier. Alright, folks.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>For those of that don't know, Matt's been on a

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>diet for the last couple of months and has lost

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful amount thirty three pound the end of July.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Good for him. Ira save us

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>here Ira Jersey, chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I've got inflation data over the next couple of days.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>People like you tell me I need to pay attention.

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the FED looking for when I get some of

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>these data points over the next couple of days. Well,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they're really hoping for them to be lower. Um. You know,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, Bloomberg Economics actually has a relatively high print

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for or or things that it will be relatively high

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>print month on month. But if if the expectation is

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>met here on CPI, particularly core CPI being up only

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>zero point four uh instead of the zero point six

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it was up last month, I think the FED will

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of applaud that a little bit. And you know,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>don't look at the headline number being up or down

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, because there's you know, it's probably gonna

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>be up a little because gas prices are up a

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But it's really the core inflation number that

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the focus. I think that the

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>next month or two for for the FED and certainly

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for market participants. What about retail sales. I've heard a

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of people say that, you know, retail sales is

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big number to pay attention to

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this week. Yeah, so retail sales is always is always

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 1>a big number. In fact, I would say in this world,

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's really um the top three, you know, it kind

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of has been eclipsed a little bit by CPI recently

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of market reaction and market function. But retail sales,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>if it continues to slip, you know, X automobiles for example,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like it did last month, UM, then that certainly is

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a sign that these higher prices are leading to demand destruction.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's the real um, you know,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>real concern for UM for the economy in general and

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>things like corporate earnings. Will those keep up because if

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 1>obviously its top line revenues start to fall significantly, it's

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to be good for risk assets. UM. You know.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But but then again, like one of the reasons why

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>falling headline CPI is important and certainly headline UM core

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation is that that real wage is might wind up

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>being higher. Right, the wage numbers that we got last

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>week weren't that bad, you know, so so bad in

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>what sense bad for the FED or bad for the economy. Well,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I when I say weren't that bad, I mean that

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they were high enough that it looks like real growth

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>is still going to be positive. And that's where, um,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the the issue is right, nominal nominal growth

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>rates have just skyrocketed in part because of prices, but

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but demand has kept up right, So so that's why

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>those retail sales numbers that we're going to get on

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Friday are going to be, you know, pretty important facts.

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So I just saw pretty good walking by the Bloomberg

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio and I brought her in here, um

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>put her in front of a mike because Cretty, you're

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the one from whom I heard this. I think you

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>were talking yesterday with Carol masser Um on Bloomberg Business

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Week and saying that maybe the retail sales number is

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as important or more important than, um the CPI number. Yeah,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the logic there was that, uh, if the CPI number

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and the PPN number, basically it's becoming a question of

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the margin of of deceleration when it comes to the

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation figures. But the retail number is different because it's

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>speaking more to the demand side rather than the supply side,

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>whereas the CP and PPI is more supply side driven.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The retail numbers that we're going to say, are people

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>still spending and it's coming out of time when a

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are kind of expecting inventory levels that

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>are extremely high and therefore these massive sales and discounted

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>prices for the retail sector. So the question here is

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 1>if net net the GDP is going to kind of

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>um or I should say that the net sales are

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>going to drop in the fourth quarter going into holiday season.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>What you want to make up for the lower prices

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>or the lower sales is higher demand UM And that's

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>why the retail sales number could couldn't make or break

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that theory that people are still spending into the holiday

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>season rather than cutting back because of UM inflation or

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>higher prices or disposal when you do your Christmas shopping.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And Matt I don't completely disagree with that. So so

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the number within the retail sales number on Friday you

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>really want to be focused on is that retail sales

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>control group because it that is all the what inputs

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>into GDP that looks at at overall prices. Remember this

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>is a September number, so obviously going into like like

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's accurate to say, hey, are we

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>going to have a decent holiday sales numbers? Um, and

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>September is a little bit early for that. But but

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>still if we have a zero point three as the

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>consensus is expecting for that control group, that will be

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent number. And actually that would mean that

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>real control group sales was basically flat. And and you know,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>if demand continues to keep up with these price increases

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and things are good. And by the way, Matt, I

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just looked while we were talking, um, good things to

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>go to that that fresh peanut butter, because peanut butter

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the CPI report is up you know so far

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this year. So you are free in the Bloomberg pantry.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But is a poultry and like eggs like up or something.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Some some sectors in the food are are are quite

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>significantly um. But keep in mind like like things like

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like the the actual commodities that are in CPI, UM,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's for the consumer, so so a

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of that is still shipping costs. So things like

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices being much higher means that it's, you know,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>just cost more to get the good stores. All right,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Skippy superchunk is the way to go. And I would

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>die on that hill. Iro Jersey, chief US interest rate

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, Thank you so much. We didn't

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 1>even get to talk soccer. That's a wasted opportunity. Tomorrow,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll do it tomorrow. Let's bring our next

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>guest professional big time. Cole Speed, President portfolio manager of

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Smeet Capital Managements. Some really really good performance there. Well,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at this market. It's just been a blood

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 1>bath all year. I mean, I've got cash in my pocket.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Should I just leave it there? What should I be doing? Well?

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>To your point, what we're witnessing this year is what

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we call stock market failure, okay, and this is the

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>seeds of this were sowned by the spectator of euphoria

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>that we saw um in twenty one, whether it be

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Spacts or the Robin Hood Yolo traders, as Spencer Jacob

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.559
<v Speaker 1>from the Wall Street Journalist book lays out um. And

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so we're just we're bearing what we have to do

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with based on this, and by the way, we might

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>not be done with this bear market until Matt has

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>his next neat whiskey just okay. So so I just

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>say that because to your point, I think the topest

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thing for investors right now is some investors want to

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>go right back to what was just popular okay. In

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, there is a large population of the professional

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>stock pickers out there that are hiding out in big

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>cap tech because they think they'll pass through price pricing

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>better than anyone else. The question is will the valuation

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>protect them even if they can pass on pricing On

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the flip side, where you'd have to go, in our

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>opinion to make you know, wonderful money looking forward is

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you need to go into economically sensitive places that have

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>been bombed out based on the circumstances, based on the

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fear of macroeconomics, based on the FED I think to break, etcetera.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's where it looks like the best prospects are

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for making money in stocks. You know, I uh, there

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of hot stocks meme stocks during the

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pandemic that I've gotten crushed and most of them didn't

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>make any money. But I, in in my health pivot,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>have founded another way of taking the edge off. When

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I get home, it doesn't involve alcohol, and I'm wondering

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>if you have taken a look at weed stocks. I mean,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>talk about cheap valuations. Some of these stocks are trading

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at two times earnings and they're trading at three times sorry,

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>two times sales and three times earnings. I mean they're

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they're trading for very low valuations and they make money,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and the outlook has to be right, right. Uh yeah,

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how society is better off if

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we're all high to be. But you should be worried

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>about making money. You're not making value judgments, you're not

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>making ethical calls, right You you want to make money,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to maximize profitability, and you want to buy

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's cheap. I can take all the ethical questions

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and the ideological questions on by owning energy stocks and

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>get way wealth here. Okay, that's the difference in orders.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>There's an ideology going on out there about how bad

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that industry is. And by the way, it's effectively portfolio

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>managers being shamed so that they don't touch it. Okay.

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean when we can look across the value por

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>folios and find no energy holdings, Um, you know that

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the shaming has been tough because even the value people

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have given up on this, So we don't have to

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>make that judgment call. We don't have to wonder how

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>big they'll be, we don't have to wonder how profitable

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they could be. We can buy all those economics right

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>now in the energy business and use it. People ask

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>us often, you know, what does day to day trading

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>look like to you? I mean, Friday was a big

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>up day in the oil and the stocks rolled down.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's a down day and oil and the stocks are down.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So what goes on day to day in these stocks,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>whether you know, tied to the oil price, it really

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>hasn't correlated much. Any day over ninety is a drain.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.359
<v Speaker 1>We're just getting fat and happy and everyone else is frustrating.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 1>So well on that, What is your kind of your

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>central energy call here? Is it tied to the price

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of oil per se or is it something else? Macro? Well,

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean the lack of supply. It's massive. And when

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I say massive, you know, let's just say in the interim,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, parts of say Western Europe have slowed down

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because their energy crisis. That's that's probably likely, right, which

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 1>means there's just subtle demand that's taken off, but again,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>supply can't grow. UM supply is continued to disappear when

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the Saudis are out there making the case that we

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>cannot sustain at these levels. You know, there's real problems

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that The big myth to so we're all aware, is

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that out of nowhere OPEC can snap their finger, ten

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>million barrels can just show up. And that's false, right

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's western myth is what it is. And the

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>reality is if we're going to be we're gonna be

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>producing a lot more oil the United States and can it.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I've got to be a primary driver that. Just so

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>we're all aware, all right, good stuff, Cold, really love

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>getting your perspective there, coll Smeat President folio manager Smeat

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Capitol UH Management with a you know, a bullish call,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.839
<v Speaker 1>which it's really been surprising how well, well, I guess

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising, but it's just interesting to see how

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>well UH Energy has done over the last several years.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It was so out of favor for so long, Peak

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>oil and all that, but boys and how and how

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>well they've done Bill and it's I mean, they they

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have UM produced incredible performance at a time when other

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>funds just long stocks. Are getting crushed. Absolutely good stuff.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>G l c O the Global Commodity Price Dashboard on

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, that's where you find all the commodity stuff,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>energy metals, aggs, all that kind of good stuff. And

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that's typically where you're find you know, people like Mike mcglowan,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Senior Commodity Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence. But nope, he's not

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>on the farm checking out the corn, you know, or

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the cotton and soybeans or any of that kind of stuff.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He's in Vegas and he's at something called the web

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Crypto Conference. Mike, what are you doing in Vegas? And

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what is the Web three Crypto Conference? Hey boy, I

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was invited to attend by a group called the Wolf

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of All Streets and I've been presenting on the macro

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and um talking to you, um and but yeah, I

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was out in the cornbell a couple about of months ago,

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>bus the family and it was shocking how good the

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>corn crop was this year and the parts I went

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to Illinois. UM. But in terms of the rest of

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the space that you know, I look at, commodities is

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a futruty nail as the global macroeconomic

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>tide recedes and that's what you're seen in in crude

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>oil and things like that. It had its bounced, but

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just resuming and during bear market as

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we see stocks headlower. Two So what is where are

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities in the global commodity space? And and and folks,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcgloan has been covered doing this for four decades.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>He covers everything in the commodities, which is now included

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade U cryptocurrencies as as well, and

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he understands that as well, are better than anybody on

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. So, Mike, when you talk to your institutional

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>investor clients out there in the commodity space, where are

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they putting their money? Where they spending their time? Yeah,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the key thing. Everybody's looking for a place to hide.

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And I the sense I get here and keep I

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>keep saying. And when I'm getting since I'm getting for

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the money managers I speak to is

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>their selling equities on rallies and they're buying two you

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>notes on dips and are buying on dips. And I

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to continue. At some point They're gonna

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>make some good money. Even so from Jamie Timing yesterday.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Now cryptos and that space, I'm sensing a decent amount

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>of institutions are coming into the bigcoin space and looking

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to buying the bitcoin space. And that's really showed because

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it's been the same price since June. But again, it's

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it's also been the fastest horse in the race, and

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>it's going down. But that's my sense, and the key

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>question is where it stops. The key thing I like

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>to point out is there's been a lot of people

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>calling for very bullish calls and crude all this year,

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think they're missing the macroeconomics and being tied.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm afraid that this is just going to

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>excel rate, and particularly because we have the sledge hammer

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>from the FED out there, and sledge hammer is just

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>pounding harder and harder every day. When when do we

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>see bitcoin move out of this range? I mean, it

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really since June. Um. Okay, it's been up a

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>little to like twenty four thousand in August, and it's

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>been down a bit too, you know, eighteen, occasionally dipping

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>under that, but really it's been hovering around nineteen or

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand for months now. Why yeah, exactly, well and

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>more Sollars just like in obvious what my sensence, what's

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>happening with bitcoin. It's in that transition to becoming global

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>digital collateral and trading more like gold and long bonds,

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're both down to so far this year. But

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's showing that stabilization. The key thing I've been really

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>watching as you saw what happened in theerium. It bought

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>him at a thousand, it had the merge and went

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand. Now it's back towards and I think

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that those are two things where we see what's looked

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>five ten years for that's the rapidly advancing technology. It's

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>much likely to more likely to appreciate, and I think

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>people get that. And then you see the old like

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you like proof of steak, Well, I like it, Matt,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>But it has the income. Now you can get involved.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Institutions are getting involved, and they can measure discounted cash

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>flows and that's what's a really unique space for its

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing though that didn't exist before. So it's getting the attention.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But right now we are in a macroeconomic beer market.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Cryptos are part of it. And this is the fact

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin has been able to stabilize as we see

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a new low in the NASA today is showing that

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's moving forward, looking to a better future. It's just

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's October. We all know the Feds tightening

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and markets haven't gone down enough yet. Unfortunately, by the way,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in crypto circles, Paul, this month is typically referred to

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as October October yeah, because average average returns to two

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one for bitcoin has been I'm sorry, two

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen has been about usually it's a game. Usually

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a game, all right. My important question where you're

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>staying in Vegas at the win this is a resource. Yeah,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's rough, Diggs here, Yeah, you've got to play

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to go. Is the wind the place to get the place?

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm a Blagio guy, but the wind is the

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>setting the bar like like he always does. I mean

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys, I mean Mr Wynn is just the just

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the visionary in which is crazy term use since he's

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>partially blind. But I thought that was secret or you're

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to admit or tell him that he's blinds

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, it's no big Oh. I thought

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a thing that he didn't like I've I've

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 1>always I've always talked him about it. But anyway, Uh so, Mike,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you're at this crypto conference in in the midst of

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a bare global bear market. What is the conversation from

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>crypto folks in Vegas this week? They're One key person

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to yesterday was a minor and adventure capital

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>investor and he've got much more capitalist to the point,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and his quote was, I really prefer bearer markets because

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you get rid of the silly speculation. And he's just

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at to play more capital. Um so there's a

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of positive there from people like him. Partney says, Hey,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I've got good investor returns and I've got a lot

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of good discounts here. But that's the main sense. It

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was the first day in a semi Holley associate. What

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really kicks it today? But it's an investor conference. It's

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly be enthusiasm from a few months ago was gone,

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>which most people here for the institutions think, thank you.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It's good to get rid of that. Oh I haven't

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>been there in years. You gotta go. I mean, so, Mike,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>how is Vegas? Is it? Is it hopping? Is it

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the old days. What's going on? Give

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>us a read? It's my first time here, is really what?

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It's your first time ever in Las Vegas. I have

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to admit that, yes, my wife and I walked on

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the strip yesterday and we found a nice place to eat.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not much of a gamble. I can lose

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot enough, a lot of much money in markets,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>even with an edge. So but it's it seems to

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>be hopping. It's happening. But the key thing is there's

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>so much construction and building and so much going on here.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just quite an amazing place. So it's cool, cool

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to be here for the first time from and the

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>key thing there for you know, people who invest in,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, these gaming companies, is the conference business. That

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of Yeah, I thought that that's what

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, and I've I haven't been there in years,

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.199
<v Speaker 1>but it's great to go for that purpose. You know,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't gamble much either because I just end up

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>losing money, but I do like to go to conferences

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>or um, you know, I've been down there to a

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>few track schools. Lamborghini has tracks schools down there, super fun,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 1>good stuff all right, Mike, Well, we'll let you get

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>back to it. Let you get back to the tables.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike McLoone senior commodity strategist for Bloomberg Intelligent out of

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Vegas at Crypto conference. But again, you think about they

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>have so much conference space out there. I mean, the

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Electronics Show in January, it's just a monster. You know,

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple hundred thousand people descend on the city. Win

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like the biggest. I mean I'm looking at the

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>RV function, which shows you relative value of one company

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to others. So I put up Win Resorts um it's

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest by market cap six and six point six

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 1>billion of any of the American ones. Of course, they

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have Win Macau, which is another three point three billion.

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And now that I hear, it's the place to say

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>they're setting the bar. I want to go down there

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and get a get a suite, go out there. Yes,

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.479
<v Speaker 1>go out there, out to Vegas. But when you talk

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>about the gaming companies, it's all about Asia Macau. I mean,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that's McCaw's such. It dwarfs the strip on Vegas. So

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you think about what moves the needle for these gaming companies,

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>it's for the majority of them, Las Vegas Sands wins

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>those big ones. It's been Macau because that is a

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>huge gaming market for these companies and they put monstrous

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>investments in there. So it's kind of fun to get

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>some feedback from Mike mcgloan in Vegas. We have to

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>get to Allison Williams. We've got Allison coming up and

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to We always talked. We talked to pretty

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot on linked to talk to her, but we'll

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>get more coming up. But I need to talk to

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Alice Williams because starting Friday, we'll get the big banks

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting numbers. And that's big for a lot of reasons.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>A for the for the banks themselves and for their sheralders,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but also for their their read on the overall economy.

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Alison Williams joints the senior Global Banks and Asset Manager

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So Alison, I wanted to start

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>first with Credit Swiss that I guess the latest twist

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.239
<v Speaker 1>in this story is if they want to survive, if

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>they want to implement their restructuring, they may need more capital.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of the read? That is the read?

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually you know that is been the concern

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>with the stock. I think every other day we get

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a we get another number that's being thrown out there. Um,

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there was numbers to the multi billions.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>But but but the bottom line is that the amount

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of capital they need depends on you know, a what business,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what businesses in their portfolio are they going to keep

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>um and seek to fund um If they're selling businesses,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously that they can get capital without raising stock. They

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>can get it from from other investors um. But then

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are the steps ahead and you know

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what money do they need to pay for those taps

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>steps in terms of restructuring. And so that's why when

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>you see sort of various numbers out there, any of

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>these numbers could be correct. It really just depends on

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to hear from them on the So, Alison,

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is are the so over? Like when I was a

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Credit Swiss we felt we could pitch any deal anywhere

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>around the world and be really competitive. Are those days

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of over for this new Credit Swiss? So? I think,

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's not really where the challenge lies. I think

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in general, um, you know, across the firm they have

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:24.479
<v Speaker 1>to be feeling Um, you know some pressure as you know,

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>clients as well as investors are looking at them with

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>some uncertainty, but they really do you know, they have

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>a good m and a franchise. UM, equity underwriting and

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>leverage lending. These are all areas that the bank is

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong on. But as we know that there's not that

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>none of those deals are being done right now, aren't

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>being done. Leverage lending is a book where we're is

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a business where we're seeing write downs. Um, just given

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the markets this year, so there's structural issues with credit

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Swiss and then the cyclical pressures I think are just

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, really um bringing those issues to bear. So

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hear from the big banks JP Morgan

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>on the fourteenth. What day is today? Today is the

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>eleventh Friday? Okay, so we're gonna hear from JP Morgan

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, Wells Fargo as well, City Group as well,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the following week Bank America, UM State some

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>other states treat as some mother's truest you always think

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is not a great name. Um, what do we expect

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear? Yeah? And so yeah, so Friday, as you said,

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll get JP Morgan, City Wells and Morgan Stanley. UM,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big thing that we're watching is what

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>happens with UM credit provisions. We think that credit is

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>good right now, but the question is how are banks

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>looking out into the future and factoring that into UM

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>their lost provision. So it's more a view towards what

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the risks are head We saw UM headlines yesterday UM

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>from JP Morgan's comments talking about our recession next year.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>When the banks set these reserves, they look over the

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>loan life so if they see increasing odds of a recession,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if they see a recession looking tougher, we'll see it

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in those reserves, and so we're watching that number more

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for three risk UM. From a revenue perspective, the negative

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>is investment banking fees, as we talked about wealth inesset

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>management fees, mortgage fees, lots of fees going down. Fixed

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>income trading will be the highlight in the investment bank.

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But the revenue story is really not interest income that's

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>going to come in very strong for the banks UM.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>There's potential upside relating to rates UM, but the question

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for the outlook what is how our loans growing. Again,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that comes back to the economic risks and then what's

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>happening with their cost of deposits? And on the cost side, Allison,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>when we talk costs, we usually talk people, Uh, you

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>know better than anybody. Are we going to get some

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>big announcements from some of these banks. Is this an

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for them to really pair back their head count?

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think what we're going to see

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the quarter is more on the compensation side of things. So, UM,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>when we look across banks, are our expectation is that

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>they'll bring down comp um at a similar amount to

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the related revenue. So keep in mind that many of

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>these banks are diversified UM. Morgan Stanley and Golbin Sachs

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are are sort of more focused on the capital market.

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see it. UM. They're the most revenue down

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.199
<v Speaker 1>CALMP down UM. The issue is that some of the

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>non compense station costs are going up. We have inflation broadly, UM.

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>We have wages and businesses that are not related to

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>capital markets that are impacted by inflation. UM. So net

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>net investors are not going to like, uh some of

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the negative operating leverage that we're going to see at

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the banks. UM. So we think that there will be

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>pressing questions in terms of what's coming in the final quarter.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Will compensation appruals be depressed further to help UM offset

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the lower revenues that we've just discussed, And

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>how are they looking at investments and discretionaries spending? Will

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there be some pullback there as well? So, I mean

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>in the in the deals, in the fees space, I

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>can't remember the last time we had a juicy m

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>N a trade other than Elon and Twitter. I can't

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>remember the last time we had a really big juicy

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>at all, the opposite of juicy, ye, So I mean, no,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely gone from feast to famine. Keeping keep in

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>mind that, you know, to your point, you can't remember

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>when we've seen some interesting transactions, you know, I p

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>O s are are very scarce. Last year was a

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal year, record m and a record equity fees, and

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>we came into the year UM. You know, sort of

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about compensation when we came into this year.

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.239
<v Speaker 1>UM the pressure was extreme because not just it's not

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 1>just investment banks right like hedge funds, other people are

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>looking to hire UM the staff, so and the competition

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>from technology also raising UM sort of the cost to compete.

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we've had the markets are sort of uh pulled back,

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to pull back some of the pay pressure.

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Also on the tech side of things, UM, as their

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>cost of capital goes up with these tupper markets, they

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>have less access to capital. That also UM has a

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a relief aspect to their cost base.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff, Allison, thank you so much as

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>always for joining us. We know you're gonna have a busy,

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>busy Friday coming up, Alison Williams. She covers all the

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>banks on a global basis for Bloomberg Intelligence. Alright. One

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of the many many tickers Met Miller has taught me

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>over the years is one is m O V movers.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It gives you the big movers. You type in SMP

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>next and it gives you, you know, what are the

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>big gainers? What are the big losers of today? The

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>losers today number one, number two casino stocks win Las

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Vegas stands. What's going on? And we just talked to

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike mc loan. He's at Vegas. He said this strip

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>was hopping. Conferences are back, So we said, let's get

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Brian egger On here. He does all this kind of

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>stuff ran Nigger, senior gaming and lodging analyst. Also the

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>cruise lines and all the fun stuff. Guy hasn't worked

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a day in his life. Let me tell you he's

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg intelligence Brian, what's going on with the casino sucks?

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought like China's letting people go gamble away their livelihoods.

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Vegas has hopping. What's going on? Yeah, you're right, Paul,

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean China really is the issue now. On the

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one hand, to your point, we do have some good

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>news on the travel from We've gotten resumption of China

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tour groups coming up, as well as the issuance of

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>online or e visas, which had helped travel volumes going

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to next year. But at least a totally the feedback

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is the Golden Week holiday was weaker than expected from

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a gaming volume perspective, So we've still got a MACCAU

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>market with a lot of pressures after v I P

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Junk of credit was basically banned West December. I think

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>those travel openings which I mentioned are good news going forward,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I sim it's going to take time

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>for those to pan out. The market is still quite

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>weak compared to pre pandemic levels. Who do you want

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to own? I mean I was looking at when before

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>just because um, we were talking about how great it

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>would be to stay at one of their suites, and

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>then I ran the RV function relative value to see

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>who's bigger. Um, I look at competition like Las Vegas,

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Sands like Boyd, like Pen like Caesar's, which is the

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>most desirable of the group. So the way I think

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>about this is if you if you want to avoid

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>fundamental exposure to Macao because you know that market likely

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to be down at least this year versus pre pandemic levels,

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>then you know, really of the companies in North America, UM,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Sands and Win arguably the most exposed. You know,

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>falled by MGM. Um. You know right now it is

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>true that domestic but doesn't Win have their Macau business

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>broken out to Win Macau. It's still part of the

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>consolidated company, right, So you know when as a when

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>resorts as a company still has through its Macau subsidiaries,

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>substantial exposure to Macau, and now it's Sands out of Vegas,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really all the cow in Singapore. So if you

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>want it to be more domestically exposed among the bigger destinations.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, companies like MGM and Caesar's don't have that

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>McCaw exposure. And then of course all the regional companies

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>right now in North American gaming at least compared to

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>pre prodemic levels is by most standards back, which is

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>good news. But MACAU has the lingering effects of not

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>only the pandemic, but you know, clamp down on junk

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>at credit and other pressures. Yeah. If I look at

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I always look at the comp screen, as you know, right,

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and um total return over the last five years for

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas sands down thirty for when down fifty five.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at you know, BOYD is up

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven, Caesar's up thirty five, Pen up four mg

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of five, so everybody else is killing it. Ye. Hey, Brian,

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the only time I've I've been to Vegas

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I love Vegas, but basically every time I

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>go to Vegas it's because of a conference, you know,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the c E S conference, the n a B, the

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>National Association Broadcasters, or any other conference I can glom

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>onto for for that matter, what is the concert business

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas? Now? It was such a driver is such

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a driver is it back the pre pandemic. It's un

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>back to where it was, which would be total room

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>nights for a company like MGM, but it's it's coming back,

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and the bookings have been there. Of course, the question

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is if you have meeting planners and trade associations and

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>businesses begin to experience some waiting confidence because of a

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>shaker economy, that could certainly effect the tone of bookings.

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But based on the lag to seat back we have

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're due for an update discerning season, the bookings

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>are winding up fairly well. I mean, ce yes, they're

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a couple hundred thousand people there in January,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know. But all right, let's switch over

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to cruises because I think Matt's thinking about his next

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>vacation and I think he should do a cruise. Take

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole family, go down to you know, the Caribbean,

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, see see that part of the world.

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>How's the cruise business, Brian? So the Chris business from

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of bookings, I mean, the good news is

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the fleets are back in operation, um after that long

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic pause, and uh, you know right now they're not

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>only the fleets back, but after a lot of the

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic protocols are lifted, bookings have improved. The question of

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>course is whether or not profitability returns at a fast

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>enough pace. So the company is to continue to manage

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and to manage their debt obligations, which which they have.

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we were just at an investor media

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago for Norwegian cruise Lines and

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they expect to see record revenue yields and ibadad next year.

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, so there's some good news in the out there.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, the recent feedback from Carnival was a little

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more mixed, I thought in terms of the booking space,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there's you know, there's obviously concern what

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>happens in a slowing on To me, I think the

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>good news at least is that the chips are back

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in operation and is pandemic protocols get lifted, bookings have revived,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>so discretion or income, which is kind of how your

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>companies make their bread and butter bride, whether it's a

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>casino or a cruise line or a hotel. In a recession,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>how sticky is that spending or is that one of

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the first things that go I pull back on my vacations.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>My cruise is my vagus, you know kind of trip. So,

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, historically, the cruise industry across the multiple decades

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>has performed well in economic downturns. This one is more

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>complex because you've got potentially rising inflation, You've got the

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>lingering effects of how consumers behave after the pandemic. But

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it depends, I think really on the severity

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 1>in the hell effects overall consumer discretionary income, I mean gaming.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it really depends on the part of gaming

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. Those regional markets have to date

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>held up really well despite higher gas prices and inflation,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it's some of the businesses are more

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>cyclical than others, the hotels, but I think a lot

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of it depends on whether or not the consumer holds

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>up as well as it has so far. And you're

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>also just on the cruise ships. They stopped by the

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>gas tank there. It's a lot to fill up a

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>cruise ship, isn't it getting less and less? Right? Yeah,

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess he would have beens been to help, and

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously any any back off in bunker fuel prices would

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be bunker helpful as much as they help the bunker

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>fuel so as much as they do hedge. You know,

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's another cost pressure that has certainly you know,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>weight on the companies. Can't put bunker fuel on my truck, No,

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so it's got to be at least

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>octane doesn't Okay, which is the best. It's running about

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>four dollars and fifty cents. That's the credit price near me.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Just wait, but you gotta go electric. Maybe we'll get

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>electric cruise ships at some point. Brian Edgar, Senior Gaming

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and Lodging ANALYSTEE covers the you know the cruises. I

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>mean again, the guy has not worked a day in

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>his life. You should see the trips he goes on.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Supposedly for research intelligence reasons, but it's a scam. But

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>he does that. He's been doing it for decades on

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. One of the time I know he's he's

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>gamed it. He's not a dumb guy. He went to

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Wharton undergrad. You never Chicago for an NBA, so he

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>knows what he's up. And he's been doing this on

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street four decades at DLJ Credit, Swiss, all great

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>shops before from him to Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Pet On Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio