WEBVTT - Can Red Flag Laws Help Prevent Mass Shootings?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of iHeart Radio, Hey brain

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Lauren boglebam Here in California, the manager of a

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>car dealership contacted police and described a scary situation. An

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>employee allegedly had confided to a coworker that if he

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was fired from his job, he would shoot his supervisor

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and other employees, though he would warn the coworker in

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>advance so the coworker could escape. Thanks to the red

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>flag law the California enacted in the police could take

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>action in this case right away without having to charge

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the employee with a crime. The cops obtained a court

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>order and the next day seized five firearms. The court

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>subsequently issued another order allowing authorities to hold on to

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the weapons for a year. That case, described in an

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>article by University of California Davis researchers that was published

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>in August of nineteen in the Journal and Alls of

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Internal Medicine, is an example of what many advocate as

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a way to prevent the mass shootings that have increasingly

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>plagued the United States. Red flag laws are designed to

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>give authorities a way to intervene and take guns away

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from a person who's perceived as a possible threat. They

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>can do that even if the person doesn't have a

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>criminal record, or a history of being institutionalized for mental illness,

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>or other factors that might show up in the federal

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>instant background check system and prevent the person from buying

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>again from a dealer in the first place. The problem

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is that loopholes and emissions in state records submitted to

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the background check system have often enabled people who went

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on to become mass shooters to obtain guns even when

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they should have been disqualified. We spoke with Jeffrey Swanson,

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Duke University

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>School of Medicine. He said, we focus all his attention

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on the point of sale upon people who have felony,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>criminal record or mental health record. Those rules are too

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>narrow and too broad. They identify lots of people because

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they had an involuntary commitment twenty five years ago and

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't hurt anybody, and they also failed to identify people

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>who do pose a risk. We also spoke with Daniel J. Flannery,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>director of the Begun Center for Violence Prevention, Research and

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Education at Case Western Reserve University. He said, this is

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>about putting protocols in place so that when an individual

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is identified as potentially being a threat to themselves or

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>other people, police and courts would have the authority to

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>remove firearms. According to Flannery, red flag laws try to

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>strike a middle ground between protecting public safety and individual rights.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>A person who's flagged isn't arrested or charged with a crime,

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and authorities have to be able to convince a judge

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that them having guns poses a risk, and the person

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>has an opportunity to get the weapons back at some point.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Flannery said there's a due process to that so that

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not automatic and not permanent. So far, red flag

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>laws have been enacted by seventeen states, plus the District

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of Columbia. In Florida, where a red flag law was

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>enacted in twenty eighteen in the wake of the Marjorie

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, authorities have utilized it to

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>take guns away from more than two thousand pep bowl.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Red flag laws have attracted some strong public support. A

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post and ABC News poll conducted an early of

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>September twenty nineteen, for example, found that eighty six percent

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of Americans supported allowing the police to take guns away

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>from people whom a judge finds dangerous. That included of Democrats, Republicans,

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and eighty two percent of independence polled this August. Even

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>President Donald Trump, who otherwise mostly has been an opponent

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of gun control, indicated his support for red flag laws.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, the National Rifle Association's website criticizes

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>existing red flag laws as violating gun owners Second Amendment rights.

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Civil rights and Second Amendment advocates that are against red

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>flag laws say the seizures of these individuals weapons is

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a violation of the u S constitutions guarantee to do process,

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>which means the people should have the right to argue

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>their case in court before their guns are taken, not after.

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And whether or not red flag laws do much prevent

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>mass shootings is a difficult question to answer. The study

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned at the top of this episode, conducted by

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the u C. Davis researchers, cited twenty one cases in

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>California in which a court issued in order to seize

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>guns quote after the subject of the order had made

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a clear declaration of intent to commit a bass shooting

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>or had exhibited behavior suggesting such an intent, but it's

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>not really possible to prove conclusively that any of the

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>individuals actually would have committed such an act. Swanson wrote

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in a Washington Post opinion piece that red flag laws

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily going to prevent killings by mass shooters, except

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in instances in which an alert citizen notices that an

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>angry young man is amassing and arsenal. Nevertheless, Swanson supports

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>such laws because he and other researchers have found strong

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>evidence that they reduce another sort of gun violence that

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>cumulatively inflicts a much higher death toll, suicide by firearm

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in he and colleagues calculated that for every twenty guns

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>seized through red flag law, one suicide is prevented. Preventing

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>people with the potential to develop suicidal ideation from getting

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>guns does save lives because research shows that people who

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.559
<v Speaker 1>attempt suicide by other methods end up surviving of the time,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but with a gun, they're effective at killing themselves almost

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the time. Swanson said, from the picture of

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>public health, that's a good enough reason for red flag laws.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode was written by Patrick Jake Tiger and produced

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>by Tyler Clang. Brain Stuff is a production of I

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio's has Stuff Works. For more on this and

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of other topics, visit our home planet how Stuff

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com and for more podcast my heart Radio,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>visit that I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.