WEBVTT - Inside Operation Warp Speed

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. If you

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you can also listen to our radio

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sure to watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Global News. Well, Kayleie, we've got a lot of headlines

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>right when it comes to the virus. Today, the ECB

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>coming out and they kind of indicated Christine Lagarde that

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>there could be some more stimulus coming because of rising

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>infections and more lockdowns. We did have the U S

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>economy bounce back, but as we heard from Elena, you know,

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's kind of cautioning that, you know, we're still amid

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the virus and still kind of waiting on some more stimulus.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw out one number, the Institute for

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Health Metrics and Evaluation. It's a pretty influential modeling group.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They projected a higher US death toll about four hundred

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>five thousand COVID nineteen foot palities and that is by

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>February first, So uh yeah, we feel like we definitely

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like a second wave here. Dr Cyber Klein is

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Professor of molecular microbiology and Immunology at the Johns Hopkins

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg School of Public Health. Her research really focuses on

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>how males and females differ in their immune responses to

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>viral infection and vaccination. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Public Health, of course supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dr Klein on the phone

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore. Dr Klein, great to have you here with

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and myself. So you see these virus heads that

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>are coming out. Is it a second wave? Is it

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a third wave? What are your expectations for the coming

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>months around the globe and here specifically in the United States? Well,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Um, I think we are in the midst

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of seeing the second wave hit, and it's it's likely

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a tough time that we're going to

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>experience as we all move indoors. Um and and I

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>think the combination of moving indoors where air circulation is

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously not as good as when we can all be outdoors,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>combined with pandemic fatigue which has been setting in and

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>especially as we enter into the holidays and people want

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to be with families UM, and we're going to see

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>more movement of people, UM, which will contribute to increasing

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of exposures right well, and sober I just

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>look at Europe countries like Germany and France going back

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to these restrictive measures because cases are so high, and

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think back to the first wave of the virus

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in the spring, Europe was ahead of us here in

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the US, and then it hit us about six to

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks later. I mean, is that what we're heading for?

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what um, That's exactly what we're predicting. Yes,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that we should be looking to Europe and the experiences

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that they are having to give us an indication of

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>where we are headed. So is it increases in cases,

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>increases in hospitalizations, but the death the death count or

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the rise in deaths isn't as bad because we have

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>figured out treatments, UH, in terms of dealing with some

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of the most severe cases so that it doesn't lead

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>to a fatality. Absolutely, So I think your interpretation is

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely correct. We are seeing more cases, we're seeing more hospitalization.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I think people are more well educated, and they're seeking

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>um to be tested and or treated, probably earlier than

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what we were seeing in the first wave. I think

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>our our biggest concern is that as cases rise and

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as hospitalizations rise UM. While we do have a better

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>sense going into the second wave of how to treat

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>patients and the diversities of how we can treat patients,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's much better than it was when we

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>when we had to go through the shutdown in the spring.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think the big concern is if we exhaust

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hospitals and we exceed the limits of our health care system,

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>we will start to see the increases occur in satalities

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because we just may not have the beds and the

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>facilities to treat people. That's just infrastructure, right, That's infrastructure.

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly well. So you're a professor of immunology, so

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the vaccine. We heard Dr Anthony Fauci

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>say yesterday that we could have one by January at

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the earliest. Does that timeline scene realistic to you. I

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think that timeline is absolutely realistic. I think what is

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be UM challenging for the public to UM

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate is that while a vaccine maybe available as early

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>as January, the rollout is going to probably take a

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>longer duration of time, and so who has access to

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine as it initially has rolled out, It's obviously

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be limited. With a lot of recommendations from

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>many organizations who've been thinking long and hard about this,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that it would be health care workers, people UM at

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>our front lines from there moving to people who are

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>at greatest risk UM, and then slowly but surely making

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>its way out to the rest of us UM. So,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think it's going to be

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>challenging for our communities as we hear a vaccine has

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>been developed and as being rolled out, and when people

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>don't see that coming to their neighborhood drug store or

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to their primary care physician pediatrician right away, I think

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>there's just going to probably be a little frustration, but

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take some time. When we talk about

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions of doses, and if you know, these

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccines require UM special handle in conditions being kept at

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>older temperature. Things that are just going to require ensuring

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that again that infrastructure that you mentioned is in place. Sobber,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to the difference between women and men,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>but I want to ask you first more broadly about

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. Once we get one, what would you need

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>to hear, given you study this to be confident in

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>taking it. So I'm already confident enough in taking it

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that I was able to get my husband enrolled in

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the trials, which trial, which trials, the Fiser trial. Okay, okay,

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's how confident. And he was, you know, patient

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>eighties seven, so he was a part of that number.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Should tell you that when you're talking about tens of thousands,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>he was in a very early phase two trial doing great.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So what so give us some guidance though for those

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of us who are normal Joe's engines and you know,

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are just seeing a ton of vaccines being developed for

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>hearing the conflicting things we're seeing the polls, you know,

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what would be your guiding words to everyone? So my

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>guiding words, I think what's really tough is the public

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is having to watch science um at work and in

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>real time and sometimes you know, it's not all perfect,

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to have we do have setbacks, and

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that is a part of the scientific process at work. UM.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's a good thing. But I think

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it also for the public creates concern, wariness, UM questions

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>about things like safety as well as even how effective

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>UM these vaccines will be. Nothing is going to be

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>put out there until it is completely determined independent, but

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know by the FDA in the United States and

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>by other groups around the world to be safe as

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>well as effective. It's so true. Think about you take

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a medication. You don't think twice about it. Your doctor prescribed,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but you don't go and look at like, well, what

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of trials were done and what were they you

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know exactly, you didn't see that at play And at

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>times it probably wasn't pretty and at times they may

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have had to stop trials to manage an unusual occurrence.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>These are not unusual. What's unusual is we are having

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to do our work and have you and the rest

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of the public see us do our work in real time.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and and and so I want to

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>jump in, want we want to jump in because we

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are interested. We've been teasing that you have been studying

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the differences between men and women and their immune responses.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>What are we seeing maybe when it is when it

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to COVID. Yes, so when it comes to COVID,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just as as as you announced, Um, women are doing better,

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>and this is true across diverse adult ages. We're seeing this,

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>um in people who are getting sick as young as

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty and as old in their hundreds. Um. While for

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>both men and women, we do see an increase in

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>severity of COVID nineteen with age, So that is not

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that women are completely in the clear. There

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is an increase in the likelihood of hospitalization, intensive care

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>unit admission, as well as even death for both men

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and women, but in all adult ages it's consistently about

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>two times higher for men. Yeah, I mean, and it's

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world. I think that's another important point. So

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it cuts across maybe some of the diversity that we

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>might have and some of the social and cultural norms

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in just in our behaviors, in our lifestyles. Yeah, it's fascinating,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and that we just keep learning more and more about

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this virus and the differences and then maybe similarities. UM.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Dr Sabercline. She's Professor of Molecular

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>microbiology and Immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Public Health. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, Founder up, Bloomberg

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>GAUP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. On the phone in Baltimore. I

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>just love when we keep kind of just learning more

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and more, right, Yeah, exactly. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer from Bloomberg Radio. And we know we

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>heard from Dr Anthony Fauci yesterday he said vaccines at

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>least in the US won't be available until January the earliest.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>We just talked about that with our last guest. Well,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this week's cover story is all about the race for

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine here in the U s. It's of course,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>called Operation Warp Speed. It's the federal government's mission to

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>accelerate development of a COVID nineteen vaccine. This story written

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>by Bloomberg News Financial Investigation Senior writer Stephanie Baker and

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News is US healthcare reporter Cynthia Kuh and Stephanie

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from London. And Bloomberg Business

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Week editor Jel Webber is on the phone in Brooklyn. Joel,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>it's it's all about Operation Warp Speed. It's also around

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about a very specific company that's been involved in all

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of this. Yeah, that's so that, you know, we talked

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about vaccines a lot um in this program, and obviously

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of the things that everybody is,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching in addition to this, you know, election

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>next week. But the you know, obviously the big thing

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>here with the vaccine is, you know, how do we

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get to a viable vaccine and then how do you

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>distribute it? And one of the big unknowns sort of

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in our coverage has been what role Operation Warp Speed

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>actually plays in this And that was sort of the

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>mission that we put Um, Stephanie and Cynthia on with

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this story. And what we what we learned in the

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>process is Um is really told and they told the

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>story through a company called uh Emergent, which is in Baltimore.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a company I've never heard of, and yet they're

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the many players that are sort of in

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the Operation Warp Speed ecosystem. So so, Stephanie, what what

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is that company? Emergent tell us about Operation Warps feeds

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>approach in the vaccine development. Yes, well, you know, Operation

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Warp Speed turned to Emergent when they were looking for

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>surge capacity to make vaccines. Emergent had been a supplier

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to the US government for years, uh making vaccines against

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>anthrax and smallpox, and so they were in a prime

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>position to be able to sort of set that aside

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and start making COVID nineteen vaccines and had this sort

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of the manufacturing suites and the technology, and it turned

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>up that there now they had worked with three of

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the six vaccine developers that Operation Warp Speed had has

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>publicly backed um and you know, really turned themselves into

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>a sort of key node of production for COVID vaccines

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and are gearing up in the process of making what

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>will eventually be you know, hundreds of millions of doses

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of vaccines of various candidates. Now, obviously there are two

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>things here. There's one is which vaccines will get approved,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and then there's manufacturing them and making sure there's enough

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>supply when that approval does come. And I think that's

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what Operation Warps who's really focused on, is making sure

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that the supply chain is there, that the all the

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers have what they need and can use, for instance,

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the Defense Production Act to gain priority in in in

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain to make sure that those doses are

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 1>available if and when an approval does come right. Something

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that surprised me. I don't know whether it should have,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>considering they are intending to have this process happen at

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 1>warp speed, but they say their goal is to start

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>delivering a vaccine within twenty four hours of its approval.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a really quick turnaround. Have they succeeded in kind

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of doing having that infrastructure set up for when a

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is ultimately approved. Well, they are trying to prepare

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the groundwork by doing things like building an integrated computer

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>system to track where every dose goes. UM they've outsourced

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>distribution to a company UM that has historically worked with

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the Centers for Disease Control on vaccine distribution. But of

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>course this all depends on which vaccine gets approved and when,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's just so many uncertainties around that. And you know,

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the front runners fiser Um, which is developing

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine together with Germany's BioNTech UM. You know, it

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>has very challenging UH storage requirements. It needs to be

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>kept at minus seventy five degrees celsius, which is I

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think as a hundred and twelve degrees fahrenheit. And you

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>know that just creates huge challenges in terms of trying

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to farm those doses out across the country. And so

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you know they're they're working with individual states

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to try to come up with a plan. I think

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the states have pushed back saying, you know,

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys, you haven't provided enough detail on things like

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>storage or funding. I think there are a lot of

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>unanswered questions. So you get some bullish predictions from the

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>people working within Operation Warp Speed UM, and it's it's

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>unclear until the time comes come January you know whether

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or not they will be able to effectively farm this out. Um.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It is a massive challenge, Stephanie. One of the big

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers in the story is eight ten billion, which is

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>basically the figure that Operation work Speed has at its

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>disposal to invest in incentivize the private sector and the

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>farmer companies to help basically get a vaccino. UM. I'm

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>wondering when you think about how big that number is

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the logistical olenge that Operation Warp Speed is ultimately

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>facing here is there is there like almost an optimistic

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>take on this. I mean here we are like, regardless

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of when the vaccine comes, whether it's three months, six months,

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, like, we've never seen anything in

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the in this country operate at this velocity. What's your

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>take on that? Yeah, you know, when I started this story,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought there you know, there was a lot of

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>questions about lack of transparency in whether or not you know,

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>this was um wasted taxpayer money. But when you when

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, the scale of the economic fallout

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is so enormous. Trillions of dollars in a way, billion

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is very little um, and that they ought to be

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>throwing more money at it, and we'll probably have to

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>throw more money at it in reality when it gets

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>down to the distribution. Um, you know, the States are

0:16:55.320 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>demanding you know, more money. Um. You know Trump has

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>promised to provide the vaccine for free, so has Joe Biden. Um.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden has announced that he would spend billion on

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on distribution. Uh, you know, additional on on the vaccine effort,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>including distribution. UM. So you know, I actually think that

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it is a bargain in a way, if it

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>comes up with an effective vaccine, even if it's only one,

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>if they're able to produce three million doses, which is

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the target. He's definitely just really quick thirty seconds from

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>your reporting and what you found out about Operation Works.

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like it's sometimes I think we questioned

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the efficiencies in government or lack thereof. Do

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you feel like it's an efficient process? Just quickly yeah.

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we got from the companies that we spoke

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to they felt like they were getting the support um

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that they needed and that they it was surprisingly efficient. Um.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, it's obviously a mixed picture

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on you know, what company you're talking about, but

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of working out supply chain glitches, I think

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it actually has been quite effective. Pretty cool story, Um,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. It's the cover story in the magazine. Stephanie Baker,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Financial Investigation, senior writer at Bloomberg

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>News joining us from London. Jill Weber, thank you as well,

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg Business Week. You can find that story

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the magazine, hitting news stands, online and on the Bloomberg Carol.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It is five days to go into actually the official

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>voting club because then we're at election day if we're

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>playing that game, though the election has already started being

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. More than half of the people that voted

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in TWENTI have already voted early. So there you go.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty wild, right, It's like the numbers that we're seeing.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's over seventy five million, at least at

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 1>one check um that I looked at. I always look

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to talking with our next guest. Bloomberg News political

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>contributor I own a college professor of political science, Jeanie

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Zeno is back with us on the phone from New Rochelle,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>New York up in Westchester. Genny, great to have you

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>here with Kaylee and myself. I'm not quite sure where

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to start, Like, so you make up in the morning.

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you want to know when it

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>comes to the campaign trial. So good to talk to

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>both of you. It's time to believe, as you're just

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that, let's get crazy. But um, you know I

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I I do. As a poster, I have to confess

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that I do always look at the polls. We're just

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>having this discussion in class, trying to keep in mind

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that these are, you know, based on probabilities. And they're

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>fraught with you know, uncertainty at this point. But I

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>do look at the polls. I do look at my

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite forecasters. I have to admit everybody from five thirty

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>eight to Larry Sabato who comes on Bloomberg of course,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's wonderful, and you know, so many of the yes,

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>U v A. And Crystal Ball is great and of

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>course uh Cook political reports. So there's a lot of

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the forecasters I look at. But I get it right

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>last time. Um, you know, they did not necessarily get

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it right overall, but that but but the some of

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>them did, but the but you know, the the was

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more of I think a flaw of some of the

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>state polls. But again, you know, when you have states

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>like Michigan, Wisconsin, UM in Pennsylvania where the president one

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>by less than one percent, you know, those are really

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to call. So I look at that. But of course,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>like I always pay attention to what's going on in

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the news and of course the economy, like all of

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>these things that could sort of change something as well.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.719
<v Speaker 1>It's late for there to be sort of a big

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>changing news event, but I do think it can have

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>an impact. And one thing I'm curious about now is

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the prospect of the Democrats taking the

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Senate seems to increase, does that make people at least

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle unwilling to sort of give all of

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Washington to Democrats. I think that's a big question. Well, gee,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you brought up the Senate, so I want to ask you.

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at real clear politics right now. They

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>see forty five seats going to Democrats Republicans. Nine are

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>toss ups. That feels like it really could go either way,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it really does, you know. I think at this point

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>we are thinking that it looks, you know, that the

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats can take this, but we are not sure where

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>some of these states are going to come down. And so,

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think those are going to be some

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the most interesting races to watch are going to

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>be in the Senate this year. And so, you know,

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>some of them have been fascinating just listening to the president,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, quickly call up Martha McSally to you know,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to speak yesterday and just as quickly dismissed her. And

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen in the state in the race

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like Arizona, certainly, what's going to happen in the state

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like Colorado, in a state like Michigan. So there are

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>so many North Carolina. There's so many fascinating races going

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on around the country that could change this thing either

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>way at this point for sure, and with the Senate

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and with the presidential race, I want to ask you

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>how stimulus or the lack of getting a stimulus deal

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>factors into this. Who does it help, who does it hurt?

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Does it really make a difference. I think it does

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>make a difference. I think it is um, you know,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>something that I think it's something that we heard the

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>president you know, wanted to do um and they could

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>not get it done with the Democrats. Um, I think democrats.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it hurts the Republicans more because I think

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a tendency for the American public to blame the

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>people who control the White House or what doesn't does

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>not come out whether I don't think that's even quite fair,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think we all have a tendency to say

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the president could have made this happen if he or

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to. So I do think there's a tendency

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for this to hurt the Republicans because they do have

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and the White House. Um. But but you know,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of blame to go around too.

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, Democrats could have done more

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to come to an agreement. They did not do that.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>So I do think the stimulus plays a role. And

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think as people think about, you know, the stock

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>market and other things, the stimulus is you know, top

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on their mind in terms of how we go forward.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And we're hearing Sauci say yesterday that we could be

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of this pandemic not just through but

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty two before life returns to North and so we

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>are going to need a stimulus agreement out of Washington

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later. At a conversation with the CEO

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and they earlier today and saying that Cove is going

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to be with us for a few years. Like cases

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>will pop up and we just have to kind of

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>get used to it and figure out how to kind

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of live with it and stay safe generally. I do

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder on the early voting trends, um, is something happening

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a transformation of politics more than we

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of realize right now in the moment, this early

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>voting process, Is this going to be the norm going forward?

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>That is something I am so curious about. I do

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think that one of the quote unquote silver linings, if

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you will, of the pandemic is that it has pushed

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>many states to adjust. Um they're the way that they

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>allow their their their voters to vote. And I do

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>think it once you get people in the habit of

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>allowing them to vote by mail and vote early. Now,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously one election is not a habit, but once you

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>give people that option, I think it's tougher to pull

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that back. So I do think we are going to

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>see a movement in this direction. It's been coming for

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>some time. People out in the West know this. You know,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>states like Washington, Oregon, they've been great with voting by

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>mail and it's increased their turnout tremendously. And so I

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>think we start to see more of this as we

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>go forward, and you know, consideration of other things like

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>should we have weekend voting, um, you know, should we

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>make voting in other words easier and more accessible than

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we do. And the problem in the US is always

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because we are a federal system that's sort of a

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>state by state decision, So it takes some time to

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>wave if you will, across the nation, but I think

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is pushing it a bit. Jenny. What do

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you make of kind of the financial fortunes or lack thereof,

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>or diminishing fortunes of the Trump campaign versus the Biden campaign. Yeah,

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's been a fascinating story. Um. You know,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he has uh Biden has out raised and they can

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>now outspend the Trump campaign. Um. And that is obviously,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>always in our system, a huge benefit. I would just

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>caution it's not determinative, of course, because Hillary Clinton spend

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>more than Donald Trump did in twenty sixteen, and so

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what the Trump campaign, you know, more often

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>than not, money is going to translate into votes, um,

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but but it not always. And I think what the

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign is hoping is that with these rallies and

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of the statements by the President and his surrogates,

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>they are able to generate free media, if you will,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in these battleground states and get attention that way and

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>not have to spend I mean, this has been Donald

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump's bread and butter. As we know, he says, you know,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>semi controversial, outrageous things or things that get attention and

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he can then not spend as much as his opponents.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think this is there, this was necessarily

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a plan. I don't think they wanted to be out,

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, be out fundraised um, but this is the

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>position there in it is does vote very well for Biden,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's determinative. But with those rallies

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, Jennie, I have to wonder how much that

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>really helps him reach beyond his base, because isn't he

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just kind of preach into the choir. Yeah, I agree

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>with you. You know, they worked in sixteen, But I

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think the problem has been he's running this campaign as

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's sixteen and he's not. For one thing, we're

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of a pandemic, and so there's a

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>school of thought that those rallies actually work against him

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>when people turn on the TV, seniors for instance, who

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>he needs to vote for him. They turn on TV

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and see all these people close together, unmasked, as if

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic isn't happening right now. So, you know, I'm

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not certain it works for him to that extent. And then,

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of course, to your point, he is, you know, the

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>income and president as opposed to the challenger. This isn't

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, and he's got to reach independence and moderates,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not so sure those rallies are going to

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.959
<v Speaker 1>be able to do that, but they do show that

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he's got energy on the ground, and there is something

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to say for that, you know, But I do wonder too.

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a story Jennie a Ryan te Becker back

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>with reporting how President Trump isn't heating his aids. Advice

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the economy like this, You know, if

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>there's an election playbook, it's about the economy. And if

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you can point to are you doing better than you were?

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Or have you done well under my administration? You know,

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that will often get people to pull the lever for

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you when they go into the voting booth. Why is

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the president maybe not running on that? These to me

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>are this is the most confounding aspect of this campaign

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>is that he wins when it comes to the economy.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>People Most people think that they are better off than

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>they were before despite the pandemic, which is quite remarkable

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and to his credit, and he can point to the

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>economy before the pandemic and say he was the leader

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of a really strong economy. But he hasn't been able

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to sustain making that case. In any time this thing

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>refocuses on the pandemic, which is easy to do, it

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>turns against him. And so that to me is really

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>confounding that he hasn't focused on that. And also I

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think that he hasn't focused on the fact that when

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to economic issues like regulation, taxes, the deficit,

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the debt, trade, all these things that we care about jobs,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that a democratic, all democratic Washington is not what some

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Americans are going to want when they wake up in January.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And he you know, if he was to make that

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>case and say you may or not like me, but

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 1>I will hold the line as I have before, that

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>would be a winning case for many people. He hasn't,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, found the will or the ability or the

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>willingness to make it for some reason. Jennie, We're in

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the home stretch for five days or four days, Carol

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>out from the election. What can happen? Can anything happen

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in the next four days that is actually going to

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally change the trajectory of this race? Or have already

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>people already made up their minds already people have voted. Therefore,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know it's locked in at this point, you know,

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would normally say, yeah, this is pretty

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>much in the back. You know, so much seems to

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>happen despite what we say. But you know, the county,

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>after all, it's twenty twenty, right, it's crazy, but you know,

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the calendar is getting very narrow for a big shake

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>up at this point. They you know, some of this

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>was tried with the Hunter Biden release doesn't seem to

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have had much impact, so you know, it's becoming harder.

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, sure something could happen, it would have to

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be pretty major, you know, something to come out about

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the candidates that was just you know, turns

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>people who supported them against them. But even so, as

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you said, we've had so many people vote already they

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can't take back their votes. So those kinds of things

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>make it increasingly tough to turn this ship around, if

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you will. At this point, does that early voting, you know,

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it tends to lean towards Democrats, but I

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's true. We just got thirty seconds

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>left here. Can you make any assumptions or maybe not.

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to know because just because you're registered Democrat

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>mean you vote Democratic. So that's something to keep in mind.

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff as always, Genie, Genie, thank you

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so much. As we always say, I want to be

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in her policy class. I just do. I just do.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Genie's political contributor. I hear at Bloomberg News professor, a

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>political science at Iona College. Really a great go to

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to this campaign and the election. On

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New Rochelle, New York, I'm roc journal. Yeah,

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.959
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no home, honey, please,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the ding Drivelt me. I want to drive,

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just drive, baby, the question try this is the drive

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to the globe. Commun Thanks, We'll drying us down on

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. All right, Carol, we are just about eleven

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.959
<v Speaker 1>minutes to the closing alone. Of course, we've got a

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of big tech names, important results in just about

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ten twelve minutes time. Yeah, they we're gonna be crossing

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal fast and furiously. Let's get to the

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>drive to the close because with us, as Larry Pittkowski,

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he's managing partner and portfolio manager good Haven Capital Management.

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>He's back with us. He's based in Milbourne, New Jersey,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's where we find him on the phone. This Thursday, Larry,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with us, a very different

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>tone from what we got from yesterday. And we saw

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>UH stocks kind of picking up some momentum in the

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>last hour, so so we're kind of bouncing around our

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>highs of the day. I don't know what do you

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on right now in our world? There's so many

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>macro stories out there right now, the big ones, the election,

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the virus, the lack of stimulus, waiting for stimulus. UM,

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what's the most important to you, the most important to us, Carol,

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Or what do we think about our companies and what

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are the few journeyings going to be? And what do

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we think about the future values and what price are

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we paying for them? And that's the most critical thing,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, in investing UH, you have to decide if

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece of information is important and is it knowable.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>There's all kinds of things that are important, but they're

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really not knowable. And I think most of the macro

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff is not knowable. And I think it's the who's

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>an investor of any sort to just try and focus

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on the businesses that you own and what you think

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>about their future earnings capabilities are future drivers of value?

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And then try and pay an attractive price. And for

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>us at good Haven, we did a little buying yesterday

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't done any buying today. And I think

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that is consistent with the opportunistic way that I try

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and invest money. It's so funny because everything that was

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>true yesterday is true again today. The virus is still spreading,

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there's still no stimulus, there's still a lot of uncertainty

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that's hanging in the air when it comes to the election.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Um so do you expect this kind of volatility, the

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>daily ups and downs to continue. I think that one should.

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I I've written for some time that I think the

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>nature of markets, you know, the percentage of market activity

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that's electronic driven, either high frequency trading, quads, passive money

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is a very high percentage. And a lot of those

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>strategies to some extent or on autopilot, and a lot

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of it is sell weakness by strength, and so I

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think one should expect more volatility. The key as an

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>investor is how do you attempt to take advantage of that?

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, for yourself or for your clients of any sort.

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think you have to be prepared. I think

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it helps to not be leveraged, and I think you

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>need to have some liquidity, and then I think you

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>have to have your shopping list and have done your homeworker.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the volatility is going away. You know,

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>put twenty people in a room, investment guys, gals, you

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>name it, and you know, put out a Macro issue

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and you get ten to say one thing and ten

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to say the other. I mean, I feel that way

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>about Macro, like you can go kind of a lot

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of different directions. That it is about knowing your companies,

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>knowing your investments, knowing the fundamentals, and when to kind

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of pull the lever. So, Larry, let's drill down. You know,

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the names that are coming up

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on your radar? Where would you commit new money to

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well, you know, it's it's an interesting question.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You know. Back ind a younger Larry Pittkowski found himself

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>managing money during a period where there were excesses in

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>certain areas and there were other sectors that had been

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of left behind. And at that during that period,

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I happen to have found a bunch of opportunities in

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and around the property and casualty insurance area, which for

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the next eight years or so, uh, you know, proved

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a very good place to have investments, while

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>other sectors of the market went through a very difficult period.

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So ironically, here is we sit in. I think there

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are a bunch of the sector of things in and

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>around the property and casualty insurance area. I think is

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>an interesting place to look. And I mentioned that because

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to read you a a quote from I'm

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to tell you the company from an earnings

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>report from the other day. A company put out a

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>release and they said, by the way, the average price

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>increased for our you know, some of our main products,

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm paraphrasing, was fourteen and a half percent, and

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the top line grew eight percent in some areas. So

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not a cloud based company. That happens to be

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>w war Berkeley, which is a property and casualty insurance

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>company that we don't own. But it's a endemic of

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the positive tail winds happening in

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that industry. Now the sector will have some very material catastrophes.

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>For Q three, you've got hurricanes, you've got you've had

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>terrible fires, and you still have some COVID claims, but

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think a good haven. The question that I asked myself,

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know i'm assisted here in the portfolio by

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Artie Kak, is where are their sectors that the market

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>has potentially not recognized where there might still be bargains.

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Because there's all kinds of interesting sectors that the market

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.879
<v Speaker 1>has recognized them, and you know we own some of those,

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>which is fine, But where might there be opportunities? I

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think here are potential opportunities. Well, you say you're looking

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for a bargain. Can I assume that means you're staying

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>away from large cap tech? Well, we all we you know,

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we have a material exposure to Alphabet, which we've owned

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, and we've made an enormous amount

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of money on I and so. And I don't think

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>it's priced at a ridiculous level. I think it's you know,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>probably like a mid twenty uh mid twenties pe xtra

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>cash to earnings, which you know, for a company of

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that quality, where I think the growth will get back

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to some normal level and it so dominates its world.

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a ridiculous level. There are all

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>kinds of other sectors in and around tech where there

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be some material access is. I don't think,

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, Alphabet's one of them, and that's not a

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>prediction about what earnings are going to in you know,

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes. But there are plenty of obvious areas of

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>material access is. But the nice thing about investing, if

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you're managing a portfolio that you know somewhat concentrated and

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of flexibilities, you don't have to

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>go to where their excesses. You can go instead to

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>where you think there are opportunities. What do you say,

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And just got about forty seconds here. I think among

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>your top holdings is Berkshire and then you've got Alphabet,

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Like it's an interesting kind of very different companies. Yeah,

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and berke Shure. I feel like it's going through some adjustments, uh,

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of some of its holdings and investments,

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless two very different companies. What does that say

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>about kind of your thinking? And just got about forty

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.720
<v Speaker 1>seconds here. Very quickly, I think what it says about

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>my thinking, good haven thinking is we have an eclectic

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>approach to where we may find opportunities. I think it's

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a mistake to just pigeonhole one self and to say

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.439
<v Speaker 1>it has to have a certain metric of some sort.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>We think Berkshire's is now our biggest holding, is very attractive.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>It has material holdings in and aground property and casualty

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>insurance and reinsurance which look to have a tail wind.

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And I like the evolution of the uh Rod and

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Ted and the investment portfolio. I think it's a healthy

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>thing for the future of the business. All right, Larry,

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>take care good to get some thoughts from you. Larry Pitkowsky,

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Imaging Partner, Portfolio managing, good Haven Capital Management, on the

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>phone in Milinburgh, New Jersey. Thanks so much for listening

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>or at Bloomberg dot com, and be sure to check

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>out our daily radio show at two pm Eastern on

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. To be sure to watch us too on

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News.