WEBVTT - Week 7 Preview, Start or Sit Fantasy BFFs

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoomo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening. Yeah, well,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>good bye, ex spun bro st Francis. Ladies and gentlemen,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>your damn with that. We want to be inside of

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. Here's Frank Stamford.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Susman. Week seven upon us and all

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>day to day we'll break it down for you. What's happening, Frankie, Greggy,

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Happy Friday too. Yeah, lots to talk about today, obviously,

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>big game last night between the Kansas City Chiefs and

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the Verbroncos. If you listen to me earlier in the week,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I told you the Chiefs were a good defensive stream.

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Hell of call about you. You know, I get one

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>right every now and then, every now and then, every

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>now and then, you know, But I think there's probably

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>bigger news to discuss from last night's game. Greg agreed.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>The Rangers lost four to two last night at the

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Credential Center. It was it was a fun game. Yeah,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our Yankees, let's say they're about to bow out of

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the competition. It's not looking good man, It's a badass

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sports for me. Great night hanging out and buddy Y though,

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>went to the Rangers game with cold buddies of mine.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 1>He was like, dude, I was like, obviously I wanted

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>fraid to be it is what he said, because obviously

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't fraid to be here like hanging out with Frank.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But it was cool that you brought people that are

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like actually hockey fans. Obviously, like you don't care, and

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank doesn't care. I probably would have just been watching

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>baseball while I was there. I said a bar like

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>watching baseball for like, you know, half the second period. Um,

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But it was also like we had a really really

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>fun time. Um. It was cool seeing like Ey in

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>public transportation. He was like because like we were like

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>squashing down on they had a train to go to Newark, right,

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was just like so congested. We sat down.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>He calls his wife's like, you're not gonna believe what

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we just did we just like, I don't know how

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>these guys do it. I'm like, dude, like you're a

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>fresh and wrestler. Man. It was awesome and I'll know

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>with him all night. Came back to the city, went

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to a bar to watch the Yankee game and after

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the eighth and he's like, I am exhausted, like I

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go. I was like, you, you're tapping it

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>before me. True, it was awesome, really fun time. Yeah,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>so happy that happened for you, Greggy. Good times. They're

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with a good buddy e Y in the neighborhood.

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the Chiefs handled their business last night. Is

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not an indulgement right now. I don't know what do

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you what else do you want me to say? Let's

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>go range Rangers lost, but no seriousness. We were sitting

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>there watching this game and as a guy is like,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Patrick Mahomes just got hurt. And next thing,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, where every we're trying to get up on Twitter.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Not good service, Potential center just like bizarre. They don't

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have like free WiFi, which is crazy, and we all

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually get service. We're on Twitter and we find out

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that Patrick Mahomes dislocates his kneecalf his Matela and we're

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>like this, this is bad, not good. The okay news

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>today that comes out is like, hey, the ligament damage,

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>everything's all right. It kind of basically needs the heel.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>No surgery required. He should be back in a matter

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, which is like, wow, sigh of relief. I

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>saw Andy read gott a ton of crap for calling

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that play, which to me was I don't understand why

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>any ready deserved that crap. Like Patrick Mahomes running for

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>his life against von Miller. He could fall forward for

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a yard right like that made no sense

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, um that any of you got killed for that. Thankfully,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL, Mahomes should be back in a month

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>or so, which is great news. Um. And as you said,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chief's able to dominate Denver, dominate Joe Flacco and

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>get a big victory last night. Yea, the words of

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schefter, this turned out to be the best case

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>scenario for Patrick Mahomes and they're expecting him to miss

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>about three weeks. If you are a Patrick Mahomes owner

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>in a single quarterback league, like Grig Susman and myself

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>are you're already looking forward to next week if you

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>could still make pickups. We just added Jared Golf He's

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Bengals next week. Matt Stafford going

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>up against the Giants. Those are two quarterbacks that are

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>available now if you want to kind of look ahead

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to week eight. If you are a Patrick Mahomes owner

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>in a one quarterback league, if you're playing the Super

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Flux and Patrick Mahomes, you're screwed. I'm sorry, unless you

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>unless you have, unless you have a good backup quarterback,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, she'll be picking up Matt Moore. But yeah,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's obviously it was devastating news last night for

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. I'm happy it was the best case scenario. Obviously,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we never wanted him to get hurt in the first place,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>but with that offensive line, I mean, he's not healthy

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.559
<v Speaker 1>already coming into this game. The Chiefs handled their business

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>regardless Tyreek Hill long touchdown dime of a throw from

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt more So, that was good to see that. You know,

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>even if Matt Moore has to step in for two

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or three games, that he can make the throws necessary.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Obviously he's not gonna make the same throws that Patrick

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes does. But just get the ball in the hands

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of your playmakers. Keep targeting Tyreek Hill, keep targeting Travis Kelsey,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and that'll be fine for fantasy football. Obviously. From a

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>running back perspective, on the Kansas City Chiefs, Lashaw McCoy

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was once again the best running back on the team.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He had twelve carries. Damie Williams had nine for seven carries.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a zero point eight yards per carry

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams? Last night? I have no idea why people

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>were ranking Damian Williams over the Shawn McCoy. I have

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>no idea what I was gonna say. Everybody was doing it,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, what am I missing? You and Florida

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth like what, I don't get it.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Why were people hide on Damian Williams? What did they see?

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't. I don't get it, And last night

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>you were proven correct. Yeah. The only thing that I

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>was thinking was maybe I missed a quote brought the

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, brought the week saying that they were

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna give Damian Williams more work. But la Shaw McCoy

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was the one that was used more last week and

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I figured that would carry over and that's exactly what happened.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>He averaged over five yards were carried here. The Denver

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Broncos just completely crap the bed here. Courtland Sutton continues

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to get it done. So that's awesome. And if you

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>started Royce Freeman, at least he scored a touchdown. He

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>had four receptions as well. But Courtland Sutton awesome. I

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>tweeted this out earlier. He's on pace for over yards.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been extremely consistent. The targets are still there. I

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do have concern starts. When did they go to Drew

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Lock because I think it's going to happen as soon

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as he was back and healthy and cruise that he

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>could play. That's when they go to take a break.

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>We're done with Thursday night up to Sunday next. I

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily Rodal dot com optimizer and the most

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts, breaking news,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more good slay

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>games for you. This Sunday, Week seven and they starts

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>doing the Atlanta Falcons Los Angeles Rams. Two teams are

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>really right now. Rams can't buy a win North Cara

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>can Atlanta Dan Quinn his s cannot get any hotter

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. The Rams definitely need a big offensive

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>performance and that's what you go to Atlanta four. Do

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you get a big offensive performance? Atlanta's defense can't stop

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>seemingly anything right now. Do you need to pick me

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up game from Jared Goff, Well, you have it, Atlanta. Well,

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>their defense has been so pitiful that that rise at

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it your really good fantasy season and that's made Austin

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Hooper have a fantastic fantasy season as well. Frank. With

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rams and Falcons playing the Sunday, how do you

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>see this one checking out? Start everybody? Greg No, It's

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>seriously fifty four and a half point total in this

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>game right now is the highest on the Week seven slate.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this should be a get right Spy four.

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Jared Golf in the Los Angeles Rams offense. If it doesn't,

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>then maybe we're not streaming Jared Golf next week against

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals, because if you can't get it done

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>against this Atlanta Falcons defense right now, then you're just

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to get it done at all. It's inside

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of the dome as well, so we should see a

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of offense on both sides here. Jared Golf only

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>through for seventy eight yards last week. The Rams offense

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>total had a hundred and fifty seven yards last week

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>against the San Francisco forty niners. But again, this should

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be a get right spot. The Atlanta Falcons thirty one

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and past defense div a way so far this season.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So I have Cooper Cup ranked inside of my top

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>three wide receivers this week. Greg love him for DFS

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, like Jared gofferd DFS. You know other people

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>who might have been scared off of him. I'm going

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>right back to that. Well. I have Robert Woods and

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cook's all ranked inside of my top twenty. There

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>should be points. Theoretically, Todd Gurley looks like he's going

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to be good to go. I'd imagine if you own

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, you don't really have an option better than him.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a solid RB two. I think he's

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in that realm of a top fifteen, top eighteen running

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>back this week. On the other side, it's gonna be

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see if j Jalen Ramsey actually suits up

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for this one. I think he's gonna be good to go.

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>He's been practicing full of this back injury all of

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a sudden gone. Yeah, he never was dealing with a

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>back injury. He didn't want to play for the Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna make life difficult for Julio Jones. But Julio Jones,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>if you own him again, you're still starting him greg.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>This is why I like Calvin Ridley a lot. This week.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>He has had at least six targets in every game

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but one. He scored a touchdown in back to back weeks.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I have Calvin Ridley as the top twenty wide receiver

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>because if Jalen Ramsey makes life difficult for Julio Jones

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and we see points getting traded back and forth, the

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are going to have to throw the ball to somebody.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that somebody will be Calvin Ridley. I think

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that somebody will be Austin Hooper and if you're really desperate,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Mohammed's new is in the mix as well.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>DeVonta Freeman. Based on the way he's being used in

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the past game, Greg has to be trusted as a

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>low nd RB two. They can't run the ball efficiently.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Their offensive line is extremely banged up. But I think

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>based on the way he's being targeted, you have to

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>start DeVonta Freeman as as a low n RB two

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>right now, you start Girl or Freeman now that you

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>probably have that choice, but I just wan don't know

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>who you have ranked Tire. I have girly ranked tire

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Docot Brown is questionable this week? Is that sure? Malcolm

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Brown is questionable. I didn't gonna know that he's been

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>able to practice. But regardless, you know, Darryl Henderson probably

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>gets a few touches this game, you know, six to eight,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe up to ten even, but I think you know,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>when they get down near the go line, we're still

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a lot of Todd Girley. All Right, Todd

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>gurl gonna get all the the run that he can handle,

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>especially around the goal line. This week Rams and a

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>good bounce back spot here against the Atlanta Falcons. We're

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>waiting news Frank on Alban Camaro, who has not practiced

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>all week. We'll see if he gets a practice in. Today.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans is facing Chicago, and last week, I know

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we sat here and debated as Malcolm Brown, I think

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a good matchup against San Francisco, but we

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately chose Malcolm Brown over Javonte Freeman because well, we're dumb.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We're dumb, exactly. Let's call it for what it is.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So this week, Latavius Murray not a great matchup against

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears. But if he starts and Albu Camaro doesn't play,

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the sole guy. People are going

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to have to make the choice between Otavias Murray and

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>some other options like we are, for instance, right Ladavis

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Murray over a guy like Frank Gore or James White.

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a decision we are going to have. How do

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you what would you do in a matchup that's not ideal?

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's gonna be right in that mix.

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the running backs you mentioned are a good

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>area for Latavius Murray to vault up to If Alvin

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Kamaro was not to play in this game, I think

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he would be a high high end flex option. We

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>just saw before the bye the Chicago Bears got shredded

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>by Josh Jacobs. He ran for a season high, you know,

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty six yards in that game. And Greg,

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget they lost a Chem Hicks, who was

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one of their best you know, arguably their best defensive lineman,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>their best defensive tackle. He is a big piece of

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>them stopping the run. So if Alvin Kamara were ruled

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>out in this game, I think Latavius Murray is a

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>high end RB three, high end flex option, low end

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>RB two because again, while the Bears are still gonna

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 1>be very good against the run, you know, losing a

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Chem Hicks is obviously a big loss for them. The

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>total in this game is thirty eight and a half.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>If you have Michael Thomas, obviously you're using him. I

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to use Teddy Bridgewater anywhere outside of super

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>flex leagues, to be honest, I don't love this game

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>much from a fantasy perspective. David Montgomery, it's gonna be

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>really hard for him to run against the Saints defense.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>They've been really good against stopping running backs going back

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to last year. That's carried over so far this season.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>And they can't run block right now. They're thirty second

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>in the league run blocking according to Football Outsiders. Their

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive line just hasn't done enough. I know they lost

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Long. He's on I R as well Gray, So

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I really don't love this game. I think David Montgomery

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is a middling RB three flex option. I would use

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore over him. I would use the Chargers running

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>backs over him as well. I just don't think this

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is a good spot. And if Drabinsky is the quarterback,

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't really love the wide receivers either. I mean,

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen Robinson had a two touchdown game before the bye,

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna see Marshawn Lattimore, who has stepped up

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>once again and is looking like one of the best

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks in the league. So Alan Robinson, while you know

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he's seen a large majority of the targets for the

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears, I have question marks about Trabinsky, and I

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have question marks about him going up against Lattimore. He's

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>more of a RB three for me. Greg Wide receiver

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>three for me, and not even high end wide receiver

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>three for that fair enough, and I go back to

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this Latavia's Murray things. That's what stands out to me

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>here in this game. You're right with the Bears. I

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have to start on the running game

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with Kyda Long and this Chicago Bears team beat up

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Long being out. Obviously, Alan Robinson has been good. Um

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lattimore though, as you said, he's been one of

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterbacks in the NFL. One on one of

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the season. I'm waiting word. I hope we get it

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>during our program. In regards to Alvin Camaris status, yeah,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we shall see you again. Latavius Murray would be a

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>volume play here, probably fifteen to twenty touches. They've been

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>signing a bunch of running backs as well. To me,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't bode well for Alvin Kamara. Probably not Zack

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Center of course, the one that they signed earlier this week.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Moving on to our next game, Houston Texans are in

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis here this week. Shawn Watson get an m v

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>P push at this moment as yeah, I know you're

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>checking the head. Yes, yes, I have a twenty five

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar wager on Deshaun Watson to win the MVP on

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so I pay out over six hundred bucks. Fanstastic. Let's go,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's go Texans, Let's go. Let's go there in Indianapolis,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>basing Jacobe Brissette and the Indianapolis Colts. Colts coming off

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there by, I believe Houston coming off a huge win

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas c ch the Texans gay rolling on

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cults, refreshed after the bye week. I think this

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a close game. The spread says so

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. Right now, the Colts are down to a

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>one point favorite at forty seven point total in this game,

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and I really like the running backs on both sides here.

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I have hard Carlos Hide ranked as a top twenty

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>four running back this week. I think he's an RB

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>two coming off a game where he just had twenty

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>six carries a hundred and sixteen rushing yards, and going

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>up against the Indianapolis Colts went and run defense DV

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a way so far this season, so Carlos hides in

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a good spot. Obviously, DeAndre Hopkins has not given you

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what you've expected this year, but you still have to

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to start him. Will Fuller, I am dropping down

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>tremendously right now. To me, he's in that similar conversation

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as an Alan Robinson. I think he's a solid wide

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver three. He's not the top twenty four wide receiver

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he has been each of the past two weeks. Because

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills is going to play in this game, and

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that in games when Kenny Stills plays, Will

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Fuller does not see the same target share. He does

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not see as many targets down the field. So I

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>do have some concern over will Fuller. He is not

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the must art that he has been the past couple

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. On the also, Darren felt when it comes

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to Darren Fells, if you are really desperate at the

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>tight end position, I like him as a low end

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>tight end one. The Colts are giving up the third

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing tight end so far this season.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I mentioned I like the running

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>backs in this game. I think Marlon Max should be

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>able to have some success. I think he's a high

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>end RB two. Again, I think it's a close game,

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and we saw the Colts know what their recipe is

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to win games. In that game, against the

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs before the by Marlon Mack twenty nine

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>carries has a monster game. I think that they're going

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to feed him a lot in this game. But if

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they end up getting into a shootout, Greg, we have

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>said this for a long time now. T Y Hilton

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>owns the Houston Texans and he should be able to

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>own them here. Their past defense has not been great

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>so far this season, they have older corners. I don't

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>know that they'll be able to keep up with t

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton. I think he's in a really good spot.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a high end wide receiver to for me this week.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Outside of him, I think you can stream Brissette. I

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think he's a cheap DFS play. But any other weapons here,

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't feel good about the Zach Pascals, any

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the other wide receivers, you know, the Dion Kanes.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We've wanted these wide receivers to step up. It hasn't

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>happened again. I think they really want to run the football,

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and even with the tight ends you know, Greg, with

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton back, it's really hard to choose between

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>an Eric Ebron versus Jack Doyle. I have a few

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>other tight ends I'd rather stream. We'll get to that

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on. Darren Fells is one of

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>those Darren Fells. So we're doing seven. A lot of

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>praying with the tight End'll tell you all I'm praying

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for next. I want to be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire.

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily road dot com backslash dunk to learn more

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>what all out of the lamp on draft Kames and

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel's NFL. There's n h L DFS season and joined

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot com and love him the best. Dailey

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy sports players get updated fantasy hockey projections for nh

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>L DFS, line combinations and build stacks for tournaments in

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Rodo NHL DFS. I'm optimized her if you

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>were playing daily Fantasy hockey without using Daily rodo you're

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong into the promo code action for a

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>tempercent discounts. Promo code action right ten percent discount Daily

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com for millionaires are made right, Yes, you

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have played the DFS using Daily Order dot Com last

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>night when I was came, Yeah, why not right stack

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of Rangers and Devils. Was it a high

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>scoring game? Yeah, that's a decent amount of goals win

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>on the number. Pretty entertaining. Yeah, it was, you know

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>what it was? Had? It was really tense, right, Rangers

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>versus Devil's. It was awesome. Man. It's about his fa

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>as my hockey knowledge ghost knowing the names of the

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>team so well. The Devil's in the first overall pick

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this past year. They have the Jack Hughes be Jackie.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Everyone loves Jack and the the Rangers drag the second

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>overall pick in the draft and they drive the Capo CaCO.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So these guys will be forever linked linked to each other.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Both are like prodigies. Do they play? Are the first

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>team players? Are? Right? All right? Yeah, so that's where

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I was last night. All right. It talks about um

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>praying for your China end situation this week, and there's

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>like only seven tight ends in the NFL that are

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>actually good at fantasy football this week. I'm hoping one

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of those guys is Dawson Knocks come over to the

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>dark side. Greggy. Frank's been talking about Dawson Knox and

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Duke Williams for weeks now. I've been telling him, you

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 1>could love them all you want, but Bills don't love them,

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they're not very good. And yeah, I found

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>myself losing will Disley and being in a tough spot

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>where I have to start also Knox this week against

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins, Bills are all in play. As long as

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>John Brown plays, Gorge Josh Allen coming off of bye,

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>should be in a good spot Bills in Miami. Ryan Fitzpatrick,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a start for Miami, revenge game for Ryan fits Magic.

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>It is Buffalo Bills week. Nobody circles the wagons like

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills. I'm sure Gamemorency will be happy to

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>hear that all Buffalo Bills are in play this week. Legitimately,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gora have as a top twenty four running back

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>low n RB two for me. He's averaging four point

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry a couple of weeks ago, we

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>saw him run for over a hundred yards against New

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots. The Buffalo Bills are the number one run

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>blocking team in the NFL right now according to Football Outsiders.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>I think Devin Singletary is in play as a flex

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>option as well. John Brown inside my top twenty four.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand he's dealing with I believe it's a groin injury,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>but he has been practicing on a limited basis and

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's gonna be good to go as well.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Top twenty four wide receiver for me, Cope Beasley inside

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>my top thirty six. He's a wide receiver three. I

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think we see the safety out of Beasley again. If

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you need a bye week replacement, I think he's a

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty safe bet for five, for fifty, five for sixty.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he even gets in the end zone against the

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins as well. You mentioned Dawson Knox greg coming

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>off a season high five targets before the bye week,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins are allowing the eleventh most fantasy points

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to opposing tight ends. And of course we love the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills defense, but they are extremely expensive in dfs

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this week, so I don't really know how you're gonna

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>work them in, unless, of course, you pick them up

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in a season long league. Uh. That is it's good

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for you, obviously you're getting him in there. But outside

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of that, on the Miami Dolphins side of things, Greg, anything,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know we were not we I was

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>riding the Dolphins wide receivers last week. Vonte Parker scored

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, never in doubt, but honestly, it wasn't a

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>great game for either one of those guys. I don't

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to the well. The Buffalo Bills

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>secondary is you know, one of, if not the best,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>in the league. So I don't want to use the

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins wide receivers. Maybe Kenyan Drake is a low

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>end flex option, but only if I'm really desperate. I

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want any Buffalo Bills in there. Greg, Miami Dolphins are.

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not starting any Miami Dolphins this week. You know

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how I feel up Preston Williams, you know how I

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>feel about DeVante Parker. I'm not doing it at all

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>here this week. For me. As I said, Rana Dawson

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>knocks in the league right now, my wide receivers inside

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>my top twelve you's a tight end stream this week.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go hopefully that guys the thing going vote, Frank,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I hope so, at least for one week and then

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the next time they play the Dolphins in five

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks from now. Greg, we'll take it. New York and

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Arizona tip off or kickoff from MetLife Stadium around one

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Sunday. Two defenses that are bad.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is getting better though, because Patrick Peterson officially back

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. Startling Shepherd is not for the Giants, however,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>see Kwon Barkley and Evan Ingram are not even listed

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on the final injury report. These guys are good to

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>go on Sunday should be a high scoring affair between

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals and the Giants. Looking forward to this one. Yeah,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the highest point totals of the week, fifty

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>point five right now. But between the Giants and the

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals. Let's start with the Giants. Obviously, you're using

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>se Kwon ark the long awaited return. He has had

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe ample enough time to rest here. We heard

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that he was trying to return for that there's a

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>night football game against the Patriots. Ultimately, We're happy that

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He gets more time to rest up. They

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>were never gonna win that game, whether sake Kawon Barkley

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>was playing or not. Anyway, it's a good matchup here,

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Arizona Cardinals. Phenomenal matchup for Evan

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Ingram as well. I mean it's well documented the Cardinals

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most Fantasy points to opposing tight ends. They

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get shredded every single week. We just saw Austin Hooper

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>go for eight receptions over a hundred yards and a

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week against the Cardinals as well. Evan Ingram

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>should be on your radar for DFS. Really good tight

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>end week as well. For DFS, a lot of those

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>top tier tight ends have really good matchups. Evan Ingram.

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You gotta pay up for him, but I think it's

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be worth it. You mentioned Patrick Peterson's going

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 1>to be back, Greg, How does that affect the New

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>York Giants weapons here? Well, Darius Slayton, I don't think

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you were starting him anyway, but he is likely the

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>one that's gonna be matched up with Patrick Peterson. Peterson

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>does not travel into the slot. That's where Golden Tape plays.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I like Golden Tape this week. I think he's a

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>low win wide receiver too. He's gonna be matched up

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>against Fremaine Brock. We saw him have a big game

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>last time out against the New England Patriots. If we're

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>expecting points to be scored on both sides, I think

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate gets involved as well on the other side.

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg Arizona Cardinals David Johnson returned to practice yesterday. He's

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been dealing with a bunch of different injuries. Last week

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>he was dealing with some stuff. This week he had

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the ankle, but he did return to practice. Looks like

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be good to go as well. Obviously,

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we like David Johnson has a top five running back

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>this week based on the way that he's being used

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in the pass game. He's not really running well, he's

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>not running efficiently, but he's being targeted in the red zone.

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Has a nice little rapport with Kyler Murray. Larry Fitzgerald.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think a he's let us down man, you know,

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I want to rank Larry Figerald lower. But it's

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>such a good matchup going up against the New York Giants,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Cardinals want to air it out

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit against the secondary. I don't expect Christian

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Kirk to be back for this game, and they're gonna

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>have to throw the ball to somebody. I think that

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>somebody's going to be Larry Fitzgerald, So I still have

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>him as a high end wide receiver to Kyler Murray.

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I have him as the top five quarterback this week, Greig,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think Daniel Jones is right on that border

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of a low n QB one, you know, top twelve,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>top fourteen quarterback. I think I think Daniel Jones very

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>much in the mix this week Kyler Murray as well.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>How about a DFS stack little Daniel Jones and Evan Ingram.

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's say this whole game, man, Yeah, I'll put that

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one out there. Why not. Absolutely. I'm trying to figure

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>out because you know, in one of my leagues, I

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>just had the worst starting wide receivers you've ever heard.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Trying to figure out who I could potentially put in

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>instead of these shrucks that I have in right now,

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of led me to Green May in Oakland,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>where there is a lot of players missing in this game.

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>For Green Bay, Davante Adams has already been ruled out

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Marquess Vallance Scantling was asked today, hey, is he your

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ankle and your need is bothering me? He goes. Both

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>genuinely got me through last week. I don't know if

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I can go this week. Dono Allison is battling everything.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>The rams to a concussion question yet right, so they

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>might be with out the top three options on offense

0:25:58.080 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>screen day, which means we talked a lot about the

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>lizard here this week. Jake Kuberro's gonna get an opportunity

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to start up four Green Bay and then for Oakland.

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Isn't Tyro Williams still out too? I don't think that

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go in this game. So we're talking about

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the top four wide receivers in this game, combined with

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Davantae Adams, Ronimo Allison, Marcus Valdiscantling, and Tyra Williams all

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially out in this game, and it looks like a

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>trending that way. Greg so Um desperate for a wide receiver, Frank,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>how would you rank the guy's left over in this game?

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's gonna catch bass. I think the only one that

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I really think is viable is Alan Lazard. We heard

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in the post game last week that Aaron Rodgers says

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that he's been you know, working his tail off and practice,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Aaron Rodgers has noticed him and he's

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>been lobbying for Alan Lazard to get some playing time here. Uh.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's six ft three, he's a bigger wide receiver.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>We saw that touchdown that he called last week where

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the defender was basically right on top of him, still

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>came down and earned some trust there from Aaron Rodgers.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think Alan Lazard is in play as a

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three and he's super cheap in DFS. Saw

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>him on Fandel earlier today Ford, so I think he

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>will be in play there. The way that you want

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to attract attack the Oakland Raiders is through the air.

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg they are they are twenty six and past defense

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>DV away, so the way to attack them is is

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>through the air. Um and Jimmy Graham is even banged

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>up as well, so I think we see some targets

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>here for Anlazar. I know a lot of people have

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>been talking about Kumarro for a while now, but it

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>was Lazard who was the one who actually showed up

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>last week. On the Oakland Raiders side of things, it's

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hunter renfro Za. Jones had a week to get himself

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>caught up to speed, was traded there throughout the bye week.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to get involved with any of

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. I don't want to get involved with any

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of the Oakland Raiders options. I think Ryan Grant is

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>now on the Packers on the Raiders earlier this year,

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>so hashtag revenge game for Ryan Grant. I don't really

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>want to fool around with that. I saw that Darren

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Waller popped up limited practice the past couple of days.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Should be good to go, and I expect a lot

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of targets here for Darren Waller again because who else

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna throw the ball too? For Oakland. I

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>love Josh Jacobs in this game. I saw a tweet

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier on today. The Raiders are averaging a league best

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry versus eight plus men in the box.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>The Packers are allowing a league worst five point nine

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>two yards per carry with eight men eight plus men

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the box, and I think John Gruden and the

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Raiders realized before the bye that they can ride Josh

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs two victories. He is that good. Saw a season

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>high and carries in that game twenty six carries season

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.719
<v Speaker 1>high and rushing yards under and twenty yards, had two touchdowns.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>He had a season high and targets four targets three receptions.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we are in for a big Josh Jacobs game.

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Greg, I still think that Aaron

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones is a solid RV two. I think it's if

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I had to put a split on it, I think

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's six. Aaron Jones, Jamal Williams, Jama Williams, a low

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>end flex option. But Greig, the Oakland Raiders have actually

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>been good against the run this year, which you know,

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not used to saying, but they are six in

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and run defense DV away so far to

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the season. So if they can take away the run,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a tough game for Aaron Rodgers because

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really have a lot of guys to throw to.

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Aaron Rodgers is kind of in that same

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>territory as Daniel Jones. Actually, this week I would start

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones over Aaron Rogers. Probab absolutely better matchup. I mean,

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't It's a good matchup against Oakland, but he

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>has no one to throw the ball. Agree, you can't

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>rely on Aaron Rodgers, but I like Daniel Jones over

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers this week, Can you start Jamal Williams and

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones? You can, I wouldn't recommend it again. I

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think Jamal Williams more of a low end flex option

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at low and RB three. I think Aaron Jones is

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>still gonna see six percent of the work puts him

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>on pace as a r B two. Latest news comes out.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Al Camaro Jared Cooke both do not practice today. The

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans not looking good for Kamara. Not looking good

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for either of these players. We'll continue on and do

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of the Sunday games. I want to

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your end

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on fandel and draft Kings this season. Compete with the

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. Visit Daily

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot com backslash dunc to learn more Wager talk

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>with Teddy covers at Ralph mic Cols six point four

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>yards per played. That's number one hundred and fifteen of

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the thirty FPS teams. For me, is the differential between

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what they allow on defense, which is what they gain

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on offense. When you find teams that better plus one

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>plus one, don't I have plus two yards per play?

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Most tends to be some pretty good football teams, and

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously La fayet it with some impressive debts that is

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>most assuredly driving this number. What's live week days three

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>or four pm Eastern on Sports Grade and TV Channel

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>seven nights. Franks has brings up a fantastic points going

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>back sauce conversion. He goes, Bro, you know everyone's trying

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to say it is not easy, Bro, everyone knows I'm

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to sound even with me talking them up as

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the hottest commodity in fantasy football commodity. Frank, when did

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you turn it to Mike Francisca? You know what? Uh?

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what I've been saw? What did you saw? Greg?

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw? I see Stefon Diggs this week against Detroit? Oh,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and you like them? No? Why is that. I don't know, man.

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a tough spot. I really like Detroit

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in this game, to be honest, and they're like their

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>home dogs. It's a it's a close friend. They should

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have beaten Gold, they should have beaten Green Bay on

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the road last week Monday night. And know it's a

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>short week. Minnesota is not as good as we've seen

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks. I think it's a good

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>spot for the trip it so I'll give you a

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>little sneak peak. Gregg recorded some videos last night with

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>CBS and I had give them my best bets. The

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings were one of my best bets, Gregg, I

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>am bucking the trend. I understand that under Mike Zimmer,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they are better at home, Kirk Cousins is better against

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>non division opponents. I understand all of that. I don't

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>see how the Detroit Lions are gonna be able to

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>stop the run here with Dalvin Cook and Alexander Madison

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>um just all year. I mean, the Lions just allowed

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty one rushing yards to the combination

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of Jamal Williams and Aaron Jones. And Dalvin Cook ranked

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as my RB one on the week. Love him for

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>DFS as well, And I think if you're really desperate,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Madison sneaks in as a low end flex

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>as well, in that same range as a Jamal Williams.

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Greg Stefon Diggs is likely going to see Darius Slay here.

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that since Adam Feeland has called out

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, he's been phenomenally. He's throwing for over six

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards, he's storing for six touchdowns in each of

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the past two games combined. But this is a tougher

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>matchup here for Stefon Digg. So are of a low

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver too high end wide receiver three than

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>where we were at last week with him because he

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>was going up against the Eagles. But ultimately, I think

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we see a lot of running in this game on

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>both sides. I think they're gonna try and run with

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins. Is a little bit harder against the Minnesota Vikings,

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>who have the fourth best defense according to the Run

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Defense DEVA numbers from Football Outsiders UM And I think, look,

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want Kenny Golladay, you're still throwing him out there.

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Either of the quarterbacks in this game. I don't love Stafford,

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Kirk Cousins. Again, I think it's a big,

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>big game for both of these running backs. But based

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on the way Kenny Golladay has played this year, he

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is still a high end, solid wide receiver too, regardless

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of matchup. Is very interesting because as you're talking like

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Keny Golladay and this literally just came in, Uh, a

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>guy in my league who's, hey, would you trade Tyreek Hill? Like,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, sure, let's let's hear what all this is

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>going to bed Kenny Golladay and another piece? Like, what's

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the other piece? What's the other piece? I don't know

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the other pieces? He didn't, he didn't really say that.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I think you've you've got a foundation

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of a trade right there, if you are desperate for

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>other pieces, Greg, I mean if I don't know if

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a team where you have terrible wide receivers or not. No,

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's team that he is pretty good. So yeah, I mean,

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>only only if the offer is right, Greg, Kenny Golladay

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and like Christian Kirk can do it. It's fair if

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you need wide receiver help. I like buying on Christian

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Kirk right now, even if he doesn't play this week,

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladen and Bob Anderson do it also fair. I

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>think Robby Anderson and Christian Kirk are in a similar range.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna be high end wide receiver threes

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>after this week, once we get past the Patriots and

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>once Christian Kirk returns healthy. We'll find out in a

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>few moments. Okay, um, let's just give you ont you

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>mentioned during the rate to me Cordy Glenn and the

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals decimated Jacksonville heads there without Jalen Ramsey, who's

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>over his back injury thankfully but now plays for the Rams.

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 1>So Jacksonville and Cincinnati game. I was checking out, Frank, Yeah,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna get a little bit of the

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>hewing theory here as well. You know, don't have to

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>worry about the di traction of Jalen rams anymore. I

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>think it might be addition by subtraction here for this

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars defense, a defense that gets a ton of pressure.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>They are fifth in the NFL, and sacks they're Ethan pressures.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>If you've ever seen a game with Andy Dalton where

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>he's under pressure, then you've seen all of them. You

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 1>know that he doesn't really perform well under pressure here.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that the Bengals, I'll read this out

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>for you, Greg there without their top two cornerbacks. They're

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>out there without two of their starting offensive lineman. Cordy

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Glenn was supposed to return. He will not play in

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>this game there without two of their top pass rushers.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh A J. Green will not play in this

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>game either. So I love the Jacksonville Jaguars this week.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I love betting on them FINUS three and a half.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I understand that they're on the road, but and this

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Bengals team has somehow remained competitive, but I don't really

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>see how it's gonna happen here. I'm going back to

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the Minshew mustache as well. I think d J H.

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Tark is in play for a good game. The fact

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that Drake Kirkpatrick is going to miss this game g

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>D Westbrook a little bit more banged up. Not really

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in a D D Westbrook this week as much as

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I was last week. I do like d J. Tark

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>as a wide receiver to the and I think this

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>is a good game for both running backs. Yes, I

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>said it. I think it could be a solid game

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Mixon as well. Both the Jaguars and the

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are allowing over five yards per carry right now

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. We know that the Bengals get

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>shredded by running backs. Leonard four Nette is going to

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>be very chalky in DFS this week. He's a good

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>cash game play as well. On the other side, though,

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:22.959
<v Speaker 1>if the Bengals can keep this game somewhat close, Gregg,

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and they can get Joe Mixon fifteen plus carries, I

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>think that he can take advantage of this. Yes, the

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is decimated, but the Jaguars are allowing the

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>most yards per carry to opposing running backs so far

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this season. So if Joe Mixon was ever going to

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>get it done, I think it would be in this matchup.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me move on, Frank. San Francisco and Washington talk

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this yesterday about Kyle Shanahan Wanning

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.919
<v Speaker 1>stick it to the Washington football team, and it's really

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tough because Bill Callahan wants to establish the run. San

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Francisco says, Hey, yeah, establishing against us. Please try your back,

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>try your darnedest, Gregg, because you know, one of the

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>best defenses in the league against the run as well.

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>The forty nine is allowing just three point nine eight

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. Their secondary has been also their number

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one in past defense dv away so far this season.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So good luck, Washington. I don't know what you're going

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do in this game. I understand

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 1>that you're home and you're getting nine, nine and a half,

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>ten points, whatever it is. I would still be laying

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the points with San Francisco in the spot. I do

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>think that they're that dominant. I think that Kyle Shanahan

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to stick it to Dance Nider and Washington a

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit here in the spot. I like both Washington.

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I like both San Francisco running backs as well. Tevin

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Coleman a high end RB two for me this week.

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 1>He is the guy right now. I understand he dropped

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a receiving touchdown in the red zone last week, but

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 1>he's been used in the red zone a lot since

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>he's returned. The workload has been there. Matt Brita probably

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>still gonna see his you know, ten to twelve, maybe

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>thirteen fourteen touches here, and it's a good matchup. So

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I like Brita. Moore as a low nd RB two

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>high inflex I like Tevin Coleman as a high end

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>wide running back to George Kittle. Obviously, if you own him,

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you're using him. And I think Dante Pettis, Greg, if

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you're really sneaky, I know you were talking if you're

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>really desperate. I know that you were talking about a

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>team where you're you need wide receiver help badly. You

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>know some people are gonna turn to Alan Lazard. I

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think Dante Pettis isn't play. I think he's a sneaky

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>play You can laugh at me. I understand him, the

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Dante Pettis guy, but he played the most snaps last week.

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He played a season high and snaps last week, and

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Josh Norman has not practiced all week. I don't know

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>if that honestly hurts or or helps Washington right now,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that he's been playing. But their secondary is

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>not good. I think if they want to take some

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>shots here, Dante Pettis isn't play if you are desperate

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for a wide receiver. Not saying he's you know, a

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>must start Greg, but if you are desperate, it is

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a good matchup for dance people talking to Mark, he's

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Goodwin as a sneaky play for the same reason. And

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that they rotate their wide receiver. Dante

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Pettis is playing the most of them right now, and

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in Goodwin and Deebo Samuel are kind of shuffling in

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and now, and they're playing the same amount of snaps

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and the targets are inconsistent. If I choose a wide

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>receiver from this game, it's gonna be Pettis for me. Surprise, surprise, surprise,

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>going after you meagined wide receivers you can pick to

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially fill in. That brings me to Tennessee and the

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Chargers. Tennessee making a quarterback change. You saw

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill come. They didn't relieve of Marcus Mariota last week.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>He gets to start again to the Los Angeles Chargers

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at home in Nashville on Sunday. I don't know how

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna utilize their wide receivers this week. Obviously we

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>know about Ryan Tannehill's connection with Jarvis Landry all those

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 1>years in Miami. Maybe Adam Humphreys comes into play, Corey Davis,

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Taj Sharp, A J. Brown, They're all in the mix

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. He see this one breaking down and we'll

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>just start any of these guys, all right, So I'll

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>start off with the Tennessee Titans side of things, and

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, their past catching options. I think it

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>can't hurt Marcus Mariota could not get the ball in

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the hands of his playmakers. The Tennessee Titans have to

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>stop playing Taj sharpy just have to throw a j

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Brown out there as their wide receiver to put him

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.880
<v Speaker 1>out there in two wide receiver sets, play him more

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>than Taj Sharp. When they go to three wide receivers,

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Adam Humphries comes in and plays in the slot. Actually

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like Humphreys the most all three wide receivers this week, Greg,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good matchup going up against the

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>slot here against the Chargers and Ryan Tannehill. The one

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that we know about him was when he was

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in Miami, he threw the ball at on to Jarvis Landry.

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Now that might have been in Adam Gays philosophy thing,

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's used to throwing to the slot, and I

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>think Adam Humphries gets a boost here. Uh, it can't

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>hurt Delaney Walker. If you're desperate at tight end, you

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>know he's seen his snaps come down, you know, the

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>past month or so, which is weird because they need

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>all the help, uh for their offensive playmakers as they

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>could possibly get. I don't want to do the Corey

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Davison greg He's gonna be going up against Casey Hayward.

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It can't hurt the Tannehills the quarterback. But I'd rather

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>take a wait and see with Corey Davis if I can,

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're desperate. I think Adam Humphreys didn't play in

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that similar range as a Dante Pettis. I like Derrick

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Henry this week. We know that they want to run

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the football. They want to play smash Mount football. The

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Chargers are allowing four point five seven yards per carry

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs to season. I think it's a

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>good spot for Derrick Henry. On the other side of things,

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>what do we do with Melvin Gordon and Austin Ekeler.

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>They're outside of my top twenty four. Both of them

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>are outside of my top twenty four. It's hard to

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>trust either one right now. Russell Okung is expected to

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>return for this game. He's a good run bocker, helps

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line, But honestly, I want to see them

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>do it for a game before I get them back

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>in my lineup. And honestly, if Melvin Gordon has a

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>good game on my bench or Austin Ekeler, I'm not

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be kicking myself. How can you trust these guys

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:21.839
<v Speaker 1>right now? I want to see them have a good

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 1>game again before I go back to the Chargers running back.

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So for me, there's nothing more than high end flex options.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not must start running max for me. Keenan Allen,

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>where have you been? You're on the back of a

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>milk carton right now. The targets have been down. I

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think if your own Keenan Allen, you gotta still go

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>go with him because that is a guy where if

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I bench Keenan Allen and he goes off, I will

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>kick myself because this is a guy that you spent

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a second round pick on, a third round pick on,

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and we know what his upside can be. We saw

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that earlier on in the season. In fact, I think

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams doesn't play here. Greg. I know the Tennessee

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 1>Titans are a good defense, but Mike Williams has seen

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>double digit targets in back to back games and he

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>has not scored a touchdown yet this year. He scored

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>ten touchdowns last season. Some touchdown regression is going to

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>be coming for Mike Williams. I think he's in play

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I love love Hunter Henry This week, especially in DFS.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>His price has not caught up to what he did

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, and the Tennessee Titans are allowing the eighth

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.280
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to opposing tight ends so far this season.

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So I really like Hunter Henry. I think Mike Williams

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is sneaky as well, high end wide receiver three for me,

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>now that you care about this, right game. But yeah,

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but our next game was Baltimore in Seattle, and I

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>was really excited about this one. I think be awesome, fireworks, right,

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson versus Lamar Jackson should be the best game

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of the week, to be honest, I'm totally with you, man.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of just a few games on at

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>four o'clock, right, so we have, let's see one to

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>have three games at four o'clock, and this is not

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the national game. I was like, Waltimore Seattle awesome. And

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's like Dick Stocktons now saying like, oh god, so

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the national game is New Orleans and Tenny Bridgewater. I

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>was hoping you're not Strawinsky and Chicago, Like, how do

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they not give us Baltimore in Seattle? Well, they make

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>this before the season, right, they can switch what they

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>can switch that? I maybe before the season with the

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Nation is yeah, I mean, well they might have had

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the broadcasters already set up. It is terrible, I agree,

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in prime time and if you have a way to

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>watch all the games, I mean, you're gonna want to

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>watch this Seahawks and Ravens, it's gonna be a really

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>fun one of forty nine total. As of right now,

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown did not practice today. I don't think he plays.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we got another week a big production for

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews here. I think he's gonna see a ton

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of targets. And frankly, I don't think that you can

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>really trust anybody else on the Baltimore Ravens passing attack here,

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I have a league, a deeper league

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>where I lost Hollywood Brown last week and I picked

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>up Billie Sneed and started him in his place. He

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>had three catches for fifteen yards. How can you trust

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone else in this Baltimore passing attack right now. They

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like to spread the ball around to their other tight ends.

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>They'll throw a few times to Miles boykn a few

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>times to Willie Sneed, But it's really Mark Andrews. He's

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy who you know is going to see consistent

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>targets share. So I love Mark Andrews. Love Lamar Jackson obviously.

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a lot out of back and

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>forth here between him and Russell Wilson. Chris Carson top

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:05.640
<v Speaker 1>eight running back for me this week, Greg, I mean

0:44:05.680 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>he's been seeing twenty plus carries weekend and week out.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Tyler Lockett as well. You know, losing will

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>dis Lee, I think that solidifies the target share for

0:44:14.000 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>both Tyler Lockett and DK Metcalf. Metcalf to me solid

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three Marcus Peters comes over to the Baltimore Ravens.

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>He can make plays at times, but he also gives

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 1>up big plays. I think Metcalf is in play here.

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf very much and play with thirty seconds ago Someday

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>night football Eagles and Cowboys. Mark Cooper did practice today.

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Are you waiting for him? I think so. I think

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play. He's gonna try and play through the pain.

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to start your wide receivers against this eagle

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.240
<v Speaker 1>secondary right now. It's a tough situation. I like Alshon

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey as a solid wide receiver three as well. I

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think he's very very sneaky. God are two god or

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>two as a tight end stream this week why not? Yeah,

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 1>he's Frank Oh Greag will be back here on Monday.

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 1>We hope. I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus lineup alerts,

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more.

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So what did appen? What did? Here's what you missed

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on the BF maps. Latavius Murray would be a volume

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>play here, probably fifteen to twenty touches. They've been signing

0:45:41.040 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of running backs as well. To me, that

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bode well for Alvin Kamara, probably not Zack Center,

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, the one that they signed earlier this week.

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Moving on to our next game, the Houston Texans are

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in Indianapolis here this week. Shawn Watson men m v

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>P push at this moment as yeah, I know you're

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>checking the head. Yes, yes, I have a twenty five

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar wager on DeShawn Watson to win the m v P,

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:06.400
<v Speaker 1>so would pay out over six hundred bucks. Sounds Let's go,

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's go Texans, let's go. Let's go there in Indianapolis,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>basing Jacobe Brissette and the Indianapolis Colts, Colts coming off

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 1>there by. I believe Houston coming off a huge win

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Kansas City Chiefs, the Texans key rolling on

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cults when refresh after the bye week, I think

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be a close game. The spread says

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>so as well. Right now, the Colts are down to

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a one point favorite at forty seven point total in

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this game, and I really like the running backs on

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>both sides here. I have hard Carlos Hide ranked as

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty four running back this week. I think

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's an RB two coming off a game where he

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just had twenty six carries a hundred and sixteen rushing

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>yards and going up against the Indianapolis Colts were eight

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and run defense div away so far this season, So

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Carlos hides in a good spot. Obviously, DeAndre Hopkins has

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not given you what you've expected this year, but you

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>still have to continue to start him. Will Fuller, I

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>am dropping down tremendously right now. To me, he's in

0:46:56.760 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>that similar conversation as an Alan Robinson. I think he's

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a solid wide receiver three. He's not the top twenty

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:03.959
<v Speaker 1>four wide receiver he has been each of the past

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Because Kenny Stills is going to play in

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this game, and we've seen that in games when Kenny

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Stills plays, Will Fuller does not see the same target share.

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>He does not see as many targets down the field.

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 1>So I do have some concern over will Fuller. He

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>is not the must start that he has been the

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks. On the also, Darren Fells. When

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Darren Fells, if you are really desperate

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at the tight end position, I like him as a

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>low end tight end one. The Colts are giving up

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the third most fantasy points to opposing tight ends so

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>far this season. On the other side, I mentioned I

0:47:30.760 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>like the running backs in this game. I think Marlon

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Max should be able to have some success. I think

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.359
<v Speaker 1>he's a high end RB two. Again, I think it's

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a close game, and we saw the Colts know what

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>their recipe is in order to win games in that

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>game against the Kansas City Chiefs before the by Marlon

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Mack twenty nine carries has a monster game. I think

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to feed him a lot in this game.

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But if they end up getting into a shootout, Greg

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>we have said this for a long time now. T

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Y Hilton owns the Houston Texans and he should be

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>able to own them here. Their past defense has not

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>been great so far this season, they have older corners.

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they'll be able to keep up

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>with t Y Hilton. I think he's in a really

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>good spot. He's a high end wide receiver to for

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>me this week. Outside of him, I think you can

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 1>stream Brissette. I think he's a cheap DFS play. But

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>any other weapons here, like I don't feel good about

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the Zach Pascals, any of the other wide receivers. You know,

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dion Kines, we've wanted these wide receivers to step up.

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't happened again. I think they really want to

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.319
<v Speaker 1>run the football and even with the tight ends you know, Greg,

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>with t Y Hilton back, it's really hard to choose

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>between and Eric Ebron versus Jack Doyle