WEBVTT - Yellen China Visit, APAC Markets

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Aisia podcast. I'm Doug Prisner.

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>You can join Brian Curtis and myself for the stories,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>making news and moving markets in the APAC region. You

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 2>can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your podcast

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now in our studios in Hong Kong is

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Stephanielum who is CIO at Stashaway. For a closer look

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 3>at markets, perhaps you can get to China in a moment.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a quick look at what we see coming

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>out of the United States. Very strong growth. The economy

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 3>seems to be really firing on all cylinders here and

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 3>it's causing a little bit of concern about those who

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 3>are watching inflation carefully. Stephanie, do you think inflation is

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 3>still coming down or should we worry about a reversal?

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think if you look at the latest kind

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 4>of growth data, particularly in the jobs market, the US

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 4>has been surprisingly strong to a lot of people. And

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 4>just think back about three four months ago at the

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 4>beginning of the year, the market is actually looking for

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the FED to start cutting interest rates in March by

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 4>about five six times by the end of this year. Now,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 4>of course, those expectations have been dial back, and right now,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean the market is looking at kind of the

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 4>second half of the year for the first rate cut,

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 4>and perhaps I mean some participants anticipate even later. The

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 4>FED itself has signaled that they will do three rate cuts.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Now the market is closer to what the FIL's expecting. However,

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 4>we do see some risks that inflation could be kind

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 4>of staying higher for longer. And this is something that

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 4>we've flagged out in I guess since the past twelve months,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>in the sense that if you look at the labor market,

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 4>the US labor market, there's reason why it's so strong.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 4>If you look at COVID, COVID actually took away a

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of jobs, a lot of people actually left their workforce.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean those people actually never came back. So if

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 4>you look at what the structural shortage of the US

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 4>labor market, the US is still short of one million

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 4>labor workers compared to pre COVID, and it takes time

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>for these jobs to be filled or for these people

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 4>to kind of move jobs, etc. So it's a structural

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 4>problem that we see and this playing app So.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Is this reacceleration of growth as you're describing it in

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the United States? Is that unique to the US. Are

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>we seeing growth reaccelerate in other parts.

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 5>Of the world.

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, the job's tightness is not just particular for the US.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing the same phenomenon in other developed markets, for

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 4>example the UK or other European countries. However, if you

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 4>look at the manufacturing cycle, the global manufacturing cycle has

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 4>actually been in a downturn for the last eighteen months.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Even that we're seeing signs of bottoming out. So when

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 4>you look at the manufacturing sector, which has been relatively

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 4>we compared to the service sector, the man of factoring

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 4>sector is rebounding, and we see it in the latest

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 4>PMI data, not just from the US, from a global perspective.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>And also, I think if you look at China data,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 4>China data seems to be bottoming as well. Right if

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 4>you look at CPI that has turned past it for

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 4>the first time in the last sort of like twelve

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 4>to eighteen months. If you look at the China PMI

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 4>that has also surpassed expectations. Now atbove fifty again, So.

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 3>This has very wide implications for risk assets. I would

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 3>think in the sense that you know, we have discounted

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot in the gains that we've seen in the

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 3>US market AI and perhaps you know the FED cutting

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>interest rates. I'm not sure we've really discounted you know,

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 3>concerted global growth reigniting here.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I mean this is not where funds are

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 4>position If you look at like where the crowded possessions are,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean those are off in technology AI kind of

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>acceectors that are not as leverage to the global cycle.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 4>And I think what you've seen in the past two

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>weeks or so in the price action of a lot

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 4>of commodities, a lot of cyclicals, is that there's been

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 4>a very very fast catch up to this kind of

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 4>imbalanced in terms of positioning. Now, of course, from a

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 4>market perspective, from a risk asset perspective, we think that

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 4>this kind of high for longer environment may not be

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>necessarily bad for equities per se, because companies actually do

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 4>pretty well in this kind of inflationary growth environment that

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 4>we identify. However, the leadership is going to be a

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 4>bit more spread out, not just focused on the AI

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 4>companies not just focus on Magnificent seven, but it's spreading

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 4>out to cyclicals. So we think there's still i mean

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 4>opportunity for its ketchup to go give it a low positioning.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>What about the Japanese equity market. We've got the nie

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>k today up about four hundred points. We broke about

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 2>forty grand last week. We're very close to that now

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 2>six hundred points shy of that level. Is there still

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>opportunity in Japan? Do you think? Yeah?

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 4>I think from a short term perspective, I mean, things

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 4>are a bit overbought, and there's kind of concern about

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 4>the yeah and potentially getting intervention from the boj However,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 4>if you look at a longer time frame, we're actually

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 4>structurally a lot more possile in Japan compared to other

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 4>Asia Pacific kind of economies, because there are signs that

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Japan is finally getting of deflation, and deflation has been

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of the worry about central bank, the worry of

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 4>Japan for the last thirty years.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 6>So if you look at Nikki.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Itself, for example, it has just surpassed the high that

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 4>it made in the early eighties. So this deflationary kind

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 4>of end of deflationary era is going to play out

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>over the next few years. So I think if there's

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 4>a correction in Japan, it would be a good time

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 4>for investors to accumulate, if they're not exposed already.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So there are a lot of aspects of the current

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 3>environment that look very positive, particularly for investing in risk assets.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 3>You have inflation arguably coming down in the US, and

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you have wages that are at four point one percent

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.239
<v Speaker 3>higher than inflation, protecting workers there to a certain degree.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>And yet the Fed funds rate is well above that

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 3>rate at five and a half percent or so. But

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that worries some people when things look too good, you know,

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>it makes you nervous. Should we be nervous?

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I am. I'm actually I think if we think

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 4>about where which as a classes we're worried about, we're

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 4>actually worry about government bonds duration. Given that the narrative

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 4>of high for longer may be here to stay with

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 4>us for the next few years. I think bonds actually

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 4>have less become less attractive in this environment.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 6>And you're seeing it in.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 4>Sort of the breakout of goal as well. So gold

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 4>actually had a breakout in March and a lot of

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 4>people wondering, I mean, why is goal breaking out. There's

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 4>no kind of snic the news, there's no actually large

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 4>buying actions. I think what the market is sniffing out

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 4>is that in March we had a very very strong

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 4>US data coming out, which surprised everybody. However, the FED

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 4>is still sticking to is a rate cut of three

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 4>times this year. So the fat is telling you that,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they're willing to sustain. They're willing to kind

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 4>of stomach higher inflation in the future compared to what

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 4>they've done in the past. And I think that's what

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 4>the goal market is telling us, is that in this

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 4>kind of high inflation environment, bond investors should be thinking

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 4>about I mean goal instead or other kind of commodities instead.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 4>So I think that is the reason.

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Last question. You know, we had a US based investor

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 2>visiting Hong Kong last week and when I asked her,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that was most surprising, she said

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.559
<v Speaker 2>that most people in Hong Kong feel as though Donald

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump would be elected president. I mean, if that's the case,

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>what does a Trump presidency do to your thesis on

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>putting money to work.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think we put out a piece looking at

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of like, what are the policy implications of buy

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 4>the versus Trump. I think, of course, right now is

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 4>still way too early. We've still got a few months ago. However,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the things that we're looking at

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 4>is sort of the historical precedence of this, and we

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 4>think that actually the correct situation still favors Biden.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 6>So we'll see, I mean a few months later.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, Stephanie, thank you very much for joining us.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure we'll have you in our studios a few

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>times between now and then. Stephanie lynge cio.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 6>At Stashaway.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now for some discussion of markets is Nancy Davis,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 3>founder and portfolio manager at Quadratic Capital Management. Well, we

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 3>had that strong jobs month of job creation during the

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>last month, Nancy, and I wonder whether or not, since

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 3>this may not sit so well with the Fed, whether

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>we'll see a lot more hawkish commentary coming from the Fed.

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know this payroll report, it was the fourth

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>consecutive upside surprise, and now most of the job gains

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>were in healthcare and government. But you know, definitely the

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>market expectations for the rate cuts have fallen dramatically in

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, We're now pricing about two and a

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>half rate cuts, as you can see on your Bloomberg terminal,

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot less than where we started the

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>year at about six cuts. But there is still room

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>if the job's data continues to be so hot. I

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>guess we'll see what the CPI print brings this week.

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 3>In the US, we.

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Were talking a moment ago about the oil price. I mean,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>we have a brent just under ninety one bucks at

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the moment. There's a lot of talk on the straight

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>about the possibility of a resurgence and commodity driven inflation.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Are you concerned about that at all and how that

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>may force the Fed to really do nothing in terms

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of changing policy.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's definitely a concern.

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>There's so many all so climate as well as other

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>things going on around the world, whether it's the droughts

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>or even the bridge that just broke down, that's really

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>going to probably be driving the price of oil specifically.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the commodities index, a lot

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the rally is actually cocoa like chocolate. So I

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>think the index overall for the commodities market is a

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>little kind of distorted because of that huge spike in cocoa.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But I definitely think the FED is keeping an eye

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on that because you know, it's tricky. The battle for

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation has kind of been declared a victory, and they're

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>easing now or saying they're going to be easing. I

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a question of whether easing is appropriate or

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>whether whether inflation is going to be more sticky.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Nancy, would you not say, though, that inflation still appears

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>to be on a downward trajectory, we may see higher

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>energy prices. This is one of the reasons the FED

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of separates that when it looks at core, but

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 3>then you also have shelter that is expected to be

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>coming down, and shelter is such a huge part of

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the CPI thirty odd percent or so. Isn't it likely

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 3>that we'll still see it. It's just that we won't

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 3>see it happen as fast as we had thought or hoped. Well.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you bring up a great point because CPI

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is just an index, right, the consumer price index. It's

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like any other index out there. It's probably not the

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>only way to measure inflation. It's even an index that

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the FED sort of discounts, right. They use survey data

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>more or the PCE, and CPI is also the year

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of a year change. So I think the tricky thing

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is CPI has been coming down and people expect Shelter

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to really drive sort of the downward trajectory. But I

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at average Americans and their real

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>life cost a living, it's not really come down, like

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>things are quite still expensive. Of lots of things are

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling quite inflationary in the day to day wives. So

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you have CPI saying one thing, and then it's also

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so sorted from the as you point out the rent component,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>which is about a third.

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>So earning season kicks off Friday, we get the big banks,

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan Wells City Group. I mean, how do you

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 2>think earning season is going to shape up this year

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 2>for the first quarter.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's tricky with the banks because the US yield

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>curve is still massively inverted. So what that means is

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>long dated yields in the US are lower than short

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>dated yields, and that's really tricky for a bank. Also,

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes haven't been tremendous. Everything is sort of going

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>up this year, right, twenty twenty four has been sort

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>of the everything is amazing. Everything is rallying. I think

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that is falling is inflation expectations, but

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>besides that, everything else is up, So it's it's definitely

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a tricky time for earnings. And I i'm you know,

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm I think the yield curve being so inverted in

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the US is also a pain point for the banks.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>I know that the appearance is that everything goes up

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>and the indexes have but individual stocks, I mean, plenty

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.199
<v Speaker 3>are getting really punished. I mean, you just look at

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 3>a company like Lululemon, came out with its earnings, wasn't

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 3>really all that bad, didn't give a strong forecast, and

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 3>was slammed. So I mean, I don't think that's a

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 3>good thing or a bad thing, but I do think

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 3>it makes for an interesting time for you know, stock.

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Picking, definitely. I mean, the market is quite complacent right now.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>If you think back to twenty twenty two, when everything

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was going down, the you know, sentiment was really terrible.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Right now, it's kind of opposite day where everybody is

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>very soft landing. Everything's fine, the Fed's going to cut

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Inflation's not a problem. Everyone is super complacent that things

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to be okay. And I think that's the

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>time that investors should really prick up and be worried.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Right when everyone gets very complacent, that's kind of when

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>surprises can happen.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Are you more exposed to the US right now than

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you are to markets offshore?

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So I manage two fixed income funds that are both

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>treasury funds, So for my my portfolio management is very

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>focused on the US. But that's by perspectus. So, but

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I do think there are a lot of great opportunities

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>out there in emerging markets, in fixing everyone in fixed

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>income and even equities, you know, going talking about complacency,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are certain markets that everyone hates, you know,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's I guess being a contrarian. I think it's

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>always interesting to look at the things that are out

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of favor or the things that people don't expect.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Where do you see some of the best value in

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 3>local currency em fixed in.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, everyone's really excited about Japan right now. They've just

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>changed their yield curve control ended that it's a new

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of regime, a new governor, and so I think

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are looking at Japan to say, hey,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are we going to have a new you know, kind

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of a new era to get out of this this

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>decade long deflation and have more interesting markets. But Japan

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has always been the widow maker with people trying to

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>play for higher yields. So it's also, you know, it's

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so you know, betting that bonds jgb's sell off has

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really been a really really tricky and bad thing to play.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>So to play to your strength. I mean, if you're

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 2>focused on US treasuries, let's talk about the shorter end

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 2>of the curve. Here is the two year of screaming

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>by at four seventy five.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so the you know, it's really I

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think two year yields probably will be going low. But

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're going to look at the front end,

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you pull up your Bloomberg terminal and

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you tape p X one, that's the code to look

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>at the t bill market, and you can see you

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>can buy a one year, one month te bill and

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>get paid five point three percent, right, So why you know,

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, if you're going to stay in the

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>short end, don't really make a bet about whether the

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed how many times they're going to cut, because that's

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Whereas I think.

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>The long end of the curve. You know you're not.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a negative term premium, so you're really not getting

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>paid to take that risk.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, Nancy, thanks very much for joining us. Nancy Davis,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 3>founder and portfolio manager at Quadratic Capital Management.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to our guests. Stephen Schoenfeld is with us.

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Stephen is the CEO at market Vector's Indexes. He joins

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 2>us from here in New York City. Good of you

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>to stop by. I want to begin by what appears

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to be, if you look at the jobs data, a

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 2>reacceleration of the American economy, and I think it's fair

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to say a real risk that interest rates may need

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to remain elevated for much longer than the market had

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 2>been predicting, or at least the FED had been guiding.

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 3>On.

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Last week, we heard from Neil Keshgard, the head of

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the Minneapolis FED, saying, maybe we don't get any rate

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>cuts this year. Are you prepared for that possibility?

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly the economy keeps on humming. It seems quite

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 5>impervious to a slowdown, and the FED speak toward the

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 5>end of last week, after Chairman Powell was a little

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 5>bit more hawkish, but there's no clear signs yet that

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 5>the voting, when it happens again, will will choose to postpone.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 5>But even if it does, we've now entered April, and

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 5>to me, if the US equity markets are going to

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 5>keep moving higher, it's a little bit less about interest rates.

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 5>It's more about earnings, and we're going to start to

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 5>see earnings this week, and so we're going to need earnings.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Growth expectations are around three to three and a half

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 5>percent for the S and P five hundred as a whole.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 5>If companies deliver, it could actually further insulate the market

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 5>from let's call it non loosening fears, right or a

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 5>longer pace before we see some interest rate cuts.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I think if you just use good old common sense,

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>with the economy this strong, and the fact that the

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 3>recent earnings were already pretty strong, you could get some

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 3>blowout stock gains in this next earning season because some

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 3>of these companies, particularly the in the AI related space,

0:18:55.600 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 3>are perhaps bound to have some very strong numbers'll just

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and that'll just you know, spike up the denominator and

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 3>bring the pees down, and you know, and investors will

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 3>be seduced by that. That's a kind of prediction from

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 3>a journalist. As journalists covering this stuff, we're all sort

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 3>of Monday morning strategists, as it were.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.959
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly in big tech, in financials, in the areas

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 5>that have been leading and are the biggest weights in

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 5>the main market cap indexes, you are going to need

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 5>some blowout earnings to to make these valuations reasonable. I

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 5>think where we might see the real surprises could be

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 5>in energy materials, the sectors that have not been in

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 5>favor and yet fundamentals are supporting them. It's hard to

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 5>do technical analysis on radio, but if you look at

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 5>the SMP energy sector, it actually made all time highs

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 5>last week and seems poised to go higher. So I

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 5>do think they'll be earning surprises. We've been generally surprised

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 5>on the upside on all the other economic statistics. The

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 5>question we still will see, and which will make April interesting,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 5>is where those positive earnings are going to be surprising

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 5>the market.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:15.479
<v Speaker 2>Well assume for the moment that some of that has

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>already been discounted. I mean, witness the advance that we

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>had in stocks Friday. I'm wondering whether or not it's

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the forecast part of the story that's even more important.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I mean, look, I think analysts have been adjusting

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 5>their estimates coming in. We've seen x post reduction of

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 5>estimates for you former high flyers like Tesla, and I

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 5>think you know, people are getting a little less excited

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 5>about another one of the Magnificent seven Apple, but there's

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 5>still plenty of room. I would be very surprised if

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 5>in Nvidia doesn't surprise again on the upside, which seems

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.239
<v Speaker 5>hard to believe given how consistently it's been doing it.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 5>But they're right there in the center of the AI story.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>And just for fun, let me take the opposite side

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>of a point you made a few moments ago about

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 3>about the rotation may may benefit even more. I would

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 3>say that there's a chance that rotation takes a pause

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>here because the earnings could be so strong for those

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>AI related companies and it's not just AI, but it's

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 3>it's also you know, the momentum place like Eli, Lilly

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 3>and Novo nor Disc and those those types of companies

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 3>just not just AI, but the money may flow back

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:38.479
<v Speaker 3>into them and put rotation on hold. Can you count that?

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, the whole notion of rotation and rotation

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 5>tends to happen in a healthy and bullish market, is

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 5>that the high paying sectors take a pause. They don't

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 5>always fall. Pharma definitely can still go further, but you

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 5>get new leadership. And it wouldn't be in Congress for

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 5>there to be positive earnings on the momentum on the

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 5>companies that led the market in the fourth quarter, but

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 5>still have the areas that have been out of favor,

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 5>like materials and energy continuing to go up. And I

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 5>certainly expect that it's hard to ignore what we saw

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 5>with energy prices and with the main oil and gas companies,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 5>as well as what we're beginning to see, in my opinion,

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 5>in precious metal minors.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no doubt about that, with gold and an all

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 2>time high. Stephen, thank you so much for making time

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 2>to chat with us. Stephen Schoenfeld as the CEO of

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Market Vector Indexes. This has been the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 2>bringing you the stories making news and moving markets in

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the Asia Pacific. Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to get more episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you listen and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and the Bloomberg Business appen