1
00:00:03,320 --> 00:00:06,120
Speaker 1: Welcome to a special Christmas Eve edition of the Bloomberg

2
00:00:06,200 --> 00:00:09,440
Speaker 1: day Break Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. Coming up, We'll

3
00:00:09,440 --> 00:00:11,800
Speaker 1: be taking a look at the year ahead for markets.

4
00:00:11,960 --> 00:00:14,520
Speaker 1: I'll be joined here in New York by Rebecca Walzer.

5
00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:17,639
Speaker 1: She is president at Wallser Wealth Management. But we begin

6
00:00:17,680 --> 00:00:20,160
Speaker 1: in Hong Kong, where we find e Katerina be Ghos.

7
00:00:20,360 --> 00:00:24,000
Speaker 1: She is the CIO for Asia ex Japan Core Investments

8
00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:27,320
Speaker 1: at AXA Investment Managers. E Katerina joins us from our

9
00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:29,880
Speaker 1: studios in Hong Kong. Thank you for making time to

10
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:31,840
Speaker 1: chat with us. I hope you're doing well. All the

11
00:00:31,880 --> 00:00:35,480
Speaker 1: best for the holiday season. I want to begin by

12
00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:37,920
Speaker 1: talking about what appears to be a little bit of

13
00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:41,680
Speaker 1: an excess capacity problem for the auto industry. We've been

14
00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:45,040
Speaker 1: talking a lot about this Honda Nissan deal. We know

15
00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:48,400
Speaker 1: the situation in China, particularly as it relates to evs.

16
00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:52,159
Speaker 1: China appears to have tremendous over capacity. Do you think

17
00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:53,880
Speaker 1: it's likely that we're going to see a lot more

18
00:00:53,880 --> 00:00:56,400
Speaker 1: in the way of consolidation in the year ahead.

19
00:00:56,960 --> 00:00:59,360
Speaker 2: I think it's fair to say that consolidation orto industry

20
00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:03,480
Speaker 2: will probably can but more driving consolidation, rationalization to understand

21
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:08,160
Speaker 2: where the competitive edge for the auto makers is and

22
00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:11,959
Speaker 2: for different ones will be slightly different. So have European

23
00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:15,560
Speaker 2: automakers in Germany that are being challenged. So certainly the

24
00:01:15,800 --> 00:01:19,200
Speaker 2: behind in terms of the broader innovation when you look

25
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:23,320
Speaker 2: at Japan, certainly is leading in terms of realization that

26
00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:26,760
Speaker 2: we need to have some degree of consolidation to achieve

27
00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:29,920
Speaker 2: that competitiveness. And of course China has become one of

28
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:34,399
Speaker 2: the key challenges to drive that need for consolidation, and

29
00:01:34,520 --> 00:01:38,880
Speaker 2: not just consolidation but becoming more competitive on relative basis

30
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:41,800
Speaker 2: because against China, as we know, leads in the av space,

31
00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:45,560
Speaker 2: and a lot of the demand already in China has

32
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:49,960
Speaker 2: shifted to home manufacturers and to evs a relative to

33
00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:55,160
Speaker 2: again exporters being competitive or being desired for a market

34
00:01:55,200 --> 00:01:58,160
Speaker 2: which is again been one of the largest for a

35
00:01:58,200 --> 00:01:59,120
Speaker 2: lot of those exporters.

36
00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:01,520
Speaker 1: At the same time, we're talking about the use of

37
00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,160
Speaker 1: tariffs as a way of protecting market share. Is this

38
00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:06,320
Speaker 1: something that it will lead in your view to a

39
00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:09,400
Speaker 1: lot more protectionism in twenty twenty five.

40
00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:12,280
Speaker 2: I think terriffs is an element of it. But if

41
00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:14,040
Speaker 2: you had to break it down by markets. I mean,

42
00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:18,520
Speaker 2: US already is ahead in terms of implementing tariffs on evs,

43
00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:24,720
Speaker 2: so largely for Chinese evs, US is inaccessible. I think

44
00:02:24,760 --> 00:02:27,560
Speaker 2: the big question is what happens to the tariffs, and

45
00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:31,760
Speaker 2: then what happens to china ability to export in US

46
00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:34,880
Speaker 2: and other markets being challenged, and if they look into

47
00:02:34,880 --> 00:02:37,480
Speaker 2: potentially offload some of that of a capacity in places

48
00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:41,480
Speaker 2: like Eurozone and creating a broader spillover of those trade tensions.

49
00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:45,760
Speaker 2: And I think this is our key secondary effect from

50
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:47,760
Speaker 2: the tariffs that we're watching very closely.

51
00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:50,480
Speaker 1: Is your view that the thread of tariffs really will

52
00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:53,520
Speaker 1: be nothing more than a negotiating ploy or will they

53
00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:55,080
Speaker 1: really take effect?

54
00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:58,520
Speaker 2: I think it's somewhere in between. We do. We have

55
00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:01,520
Speaker 2: the view that they'll probably not be as aggressive, or

56
00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,360
Speaker 2: the scale that has been projected is probably going to

57
00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:07,399
Speaker 2: be lesser, but we do think they will get implemented.

58
00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:09,800
Speaker 2: There will be selective. I don't think it's going to

59
00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:14,119
Speaker 2: be a blanket tariff implementation, So some of them will

60
00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:16,040
Speaker 2: be used for negotiation and some of them will be

61
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:18,440
Speaker 2: implemented to just be protectionists and bring some of the

62
00:03:18,440 --> 00:03:20,160
Speaker 2: industries back home to the US.

63
00:03:20,280 --> 00:03:22,680
Speaker 1: Let's talk a little bit about global macro right now,

64
00:03:22,720 --> 00:03:25,520
Speaker 1: particularly where central banks are concerned. We know that the

65
00:03:25,560 --> 00:03:28,680
Speaker 1: FED has adopted a strategy as a result of what

66
00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:31,560
Speaker 1: we heard from the last meeting that we can expect

67
00:03:31,560 --> 00:03:33,600
Speaker 1: fewer rate cuts in the new year. What do you

68
00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 1: think is changing the Fed's outlook right now? Is it

69
00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:40,680
Speaker 1: stubborn inflation or is it concerned that maybe we were

70
00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:43,600
Speaker 1: just talking about tariffs, that some of the policies from

71
00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:46,760
Speaker 1: the incoming Trump administration could prove inflationary.

72
00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:49,880
Speaker 2: I think it's a combination of the two, but I

73
00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:52,480
Speaker 2: would say the primary one is what is the state

74
00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:56,080
Speaker 2: of the economy at the moment, less of the projecting

75
00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:58,160
Speaker 2: what one may be the implications as much as it

76
00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:00,960
Speaker 2: is a consideration, but ultimately what the Fed or the

77
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:03,920
Speaker 2: decision was based on the data that they had at

78
00:04:03,960 --> 00:04:07,080
Speaker 2: hand the other day of the meeting, And suddenly it's

79
00:04:07,240 --> 00:04:09,840
Speaker 2: clear that the inflation is not yet a target with

80
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:12,720
Speaker 2: in a sickness of that inflation around three point three

81
00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:16,240
Speaker 2: percent for core, and more important, the growth is staying resilient.

82
00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,640
Speaker 2: We've seen the labor market adjusting as well, but it

83
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:22,840
Speaker 2: hasn't crashed again. The catalysts for the FED to continue

84
00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:27,440
Speaker 2: with that accommodation and aggressive mode, it's probably less backed

85
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:29,839
Speaker 2: by the data. So the data is indicating that needs

86
00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:32,040
Speaker 2: to be a lot more gradual, and the FED is

87
00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:35,560
Speaker 2: done the right decision to adjust the rate expectations that

88
00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:39,360
Speaker 2: the market has priced in past the September card, which

89
00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:42,200
Speaker 2: was quite aggressive starting with and I think the market

90
00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:46,200
Speaker 2: projected quite an aggressive path from that point onwards, and

91
00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:48,800
Speaker 2: I think some recalibration of that, I think it's fair.

92
00:04:48,920 --> 00:04:50,719
Speaker 1: So can we agree then that the path of the

93
00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:53,839
Speaker 1: dollar is going to be that it remains strong against

94
00:04:53,880 --> 00:04:56,839
Speaker 1: the major currencies, and that will in turn prove to

95
00:04:56,880 --> 00:05:00,520
Speaker 1: be a little bit of a headwind for Asia a assessment.

96
00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:03,719
Speaker 2: I think there's a combination of FED staying higher for longer,

97
00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:09,720
Speaker 2: and of course tariffs are deemed to be dollar strengthening.

98
00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:15,080
Speaker 2: And we do think for the Asian economy's biggest risk

99
00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:18,599
Speaker 2: or biggest consideration is the ability of their own central

100
00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:22,520
Speaker 2: banks to be able to support their growth and respective markets.

101
00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:24,880
Speaker 2: Accounting for the fact that the FED of course will

102
00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:27,000
Speaker 2: be a little bit higher, and then the currency is

103
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:29,440
Speaker 2: a consideration, and the tariffs, of course an implication of

104
00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:30,880
Speaker 2: that will be a consideration.

105
00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:33,919
Speaker 1: So which central bank has more difficulty. Is it the

106
00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:35,920
Speaker 1: Bank of Japan or the People's Bank of China.

107
00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:39,560
Speaker 2: I think it's hard to say, but I mean they

108
00:05:39,640 --> 00:05:43,920
Speaker 2: have slightly different challenges. When you look at a Bank

109
00:05:43,960 --> 00:05:47,320
Speaker 2: of China, of course, the intention is to be a

110
00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:50,080
Speaker 2: commoditive in twenty twenty five, whatever that's fiscal or monitor

111
00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:52,720
Speaker 2: and I think they projected that pretty well as we

112
00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:56,400
Speaker 2: go into the year end. The biggest risk for a

113
00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:59,320
Speaker 2: Bank of China is the monetary policy, the ability of

114
00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:01,400
Speaker 2: that policy to do what it needs to do. And

115
00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:04,440
Speaker 2: I say, because as I said, we have a FED

116
00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:06,599
Speaker 2: that's still be more paid in terms of normalization, but

117
00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:10,080
Speaker 2: tariffs again will have a weakening effect to the currency.

118
00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:13,920
Speaker 2: So we do have it. It has a too double wami,

119
00:06:13,960 --> 00:06:15,640
Speaker 2: if you might say, in terms of the ability to

120
00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:19,600
Speaker 2: maneuver that monetary policy, and I think some realization and

121
00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:22,479
Speaker 2: weakness in the one have to be accepted twenty twenty five.

122
00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:24,800
Speaker 2: When you look at Bank of Japan, of course, the

123
00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:28,920
Speaker 2: situation is slightly different in a sense that they are

124
00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:32,200
Speaker 2: looking and they intend to normalize the monetary policy or

125
00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:35,279
Speaker 2: bring the rates slightly higher, purely because they need to

126
00:06:35,279 --> 00:06:37,440
Speaker 2: get out of the cycle, but also to give them

127
00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:39,720
Speaker 2: additional room to maneuver in the future if they need

128
00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:43,560
Speaker 2: to accommodate again to support the economy. So certainly the

129
00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:45,880
Speaker 2: Bank of Japan has been fairly dorvish at the meeting,

130
00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:49,440
Speaker 2: but it's fair to say that the intention is to

131
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:54,000
Speaker 2: normalize policy. I think January is a potential move, but

132
00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:57,800
Speaker 2: it depends on where their wage negotiations go, and I

133
00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:01,560
Speaker 2: think this will be a key catalyst. And the second one,

134
00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,800
Speaker 2: of course, is what the Trump administration does and the

135
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,919
Speaker 2: policies that implements. And I think March and April is

136
00:07:07,920 --> 00:07:10,600
Speaker 2: probably going to be more a given because again more

137
00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:12,960
Speaker 2: data and transparency will be around those measures.

138
00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:16,640
Speaker 1: So how are you evaluating consumers in both of those jurisdictions,

139
00:07:16,760 --> 00:07:18,520
Speaker 1: first China and then Japan.

140
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:22,120
Speaker 2: In terms of consumption, you could say in Japan it's

141
00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:25,920
Speaker 2: upward trending or consumption is starting to recover. We've seen

142
00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:29,080
Speaker 2: the data, and I think the indications is that double

143
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:32,760
Speaker 2: continue in twenty twenty five. That is supported by improving

144
00:07:33,160 --> 00:07:37,360
Speaker 2: disposable income. And I think the trajectory for growth has

145
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:40,960
Speaker 2: been fairly constructive in twenty twenty four people because global

146
00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:45,600
Speaker 2: has stayed resilient and has provided support for the growth

147
00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:48,280
Speaker 2: in Japan when it looks when you look at China,

148
00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:51,400
Speaker 2: I think the consideration for consumption is related to a

149
00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:55,840
Speaker 2: broader wealth and income creation, which both have been weaker

150
00:07:55,880 --> 00:07:58,840
Speaker 2: and it's been negative. You might say, obviously we've had

151
00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:02,600
Speaker 2: a downturn and property market which has pressed the wealth creation.

152
00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:06,240
Speaker 2: We also had the income effect has been negative because

153
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:10,920
Speaker 2: of the weaker labor market, and the broader consumption is subdued.

154
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:13,360
Speaker 2: And I think a key focus for China twenty twenty

155
00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,360
Speaker 2: five will be to support that recovery in consumption.

156
00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:19,240
Speaker 1: So I think we can agree that Japan has finally

157
00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:23,800
Speaker 1: emerged from three decades of deflation. Is there a risk still,

158
00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:27,040
Speaker 1: in your view, that China gets miired in something that's

159
00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:28,560
Speaker 1: very similar look.

160
00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:32,400
Speaker 2: I think ultimately there are signs that Japan has exited

161
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:34,800
Speaker 2: of that deflation period. Again, we need to see a

162
00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:39,400
Speaker 2: lot a few more data points to crystallize that view indefinitely.

163
00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:42,959
Speaker 2: When it comes to China, I think their dynamics in

164
00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:45,240
Speaker 2: China is quite different, and I think it's fair to

165
00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:49,880
Speaker 2: say that policymakers have realized the complexity of the problem,

166
00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:52,679
Speaker 2: of the structural challenges and the micro challenges that they're facing,

167
00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:57,320
Speaker 2: and they're having an intention to use both fiscal as

168
00:08:57,440 --> 00:09:00,000
Speaker 2: and monitor in twenty twenty five to help that growth

169
00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:03,080
Speaker 2: and preshia and not enter into a similar spiral of deflation,

170
00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:05,240
Speaker 2: force sustain or a long prolonged period of time.

171
00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:07,800
Speaker 1: Katerine, it's always a pleasure. Thanks for making time to

172
00:09:07,880 --> 00:09:10,319
Speaker 1: chat with us from our studios in Hong Kong. E

173
00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:14,800
Speaker 1: Katerina Bigos from AXA Investment Managers, joining us here on

174
00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:25,720
Speaker 1: the Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back to a special Christmas

175
00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:29,680
Speaker 1: Eve edition of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner.

176
00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,360
Speaker 1: So with twenty twenty four pretty much in the rear

177
00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:34,920
Speaker 1: view mirror, we want to look ahead at the major

178
00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:38,280
Speaker 1: themes likely to drive market action in the year ahead.

179
00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:42,240
Speaker 1: I'm pleased to welcome Rebecca Waltzer. She is president of

180
00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:45,400
Speaker 1: Walser Wealth Management, joining us here in our studios in

181
00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:48,160
Speaker 1: New York City. Nice of you to drop by, love

182
00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:50,840
Speaker 1: with you looking forward. Thank you. I'm looking forward to

183
00:09:50,840 --> 00:09:53,280
Speaker 1: this conversation. What do you think the new year is

184
00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:55,880
Speaker 1: going to hold when mister Trump takes office and we

185
00:09:56,080 --> 00:09:59,079
Speaker 1: start to get greater clarity on some of these economic policies.

186
00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:02,960
Speaker 3: So we've seen a really big divergence with CEOs and

187
00:10:03,040 --> 00:10:08,080
Speaker 3: CFOs specifically really having a positive economic outlook globally under

188
00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:11,880
Speaker 3: the new administration in comparison to you know, the previous

189
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:14,640
Speaker 3: even you know, i'd say two decades, Like, there's really

190
00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:18,400
Speaker 3: big positive economic momentum that they feel with this Trump

191
00:10:18,400 --> 00:10:20,520
Speaker 3: administration is going to be possible. I don't know, Doug,

192
00:10:20,559 --> 00:10:22,560
Speaker 3: if it's related to his tariff policy, the fact that

193
00:10:22,559 --> 00:10:24,400
Speaker 3: he's been so open and blatant about it that he's

194
00:10:24,400 --> 00:10:27,320
Speaker 3: already having world leaders discussed that. We're already having Europe

195
00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:29,800
Speaker 3: say hey, we're going to buy crude from America instead

196
00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,560
Speaker 3: of Russia. We've got a lot of moving parts. So

197
00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:35,880
Speaker 3: there's a lot of positivity which is really great. Which

198
00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:38,199
Speaker 3: is why, too, Doug, that you saw the FED literally

199
00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:40,760
Speaker 3: in the last FOMC meeting come back and say, hey,

200
00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:44,520
Speaker 3: we're going to pare down the expectations from really more

201
00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:48,400
Speaker 3: than three or three or more to two or really two.

202
00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:50,760
Speaker 3: And when you consider that they started saying twenty twenty

203
00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:52,480
Speaker 3: four we're gonna have six and we're only going to

204
00:10:52,520 --> 00:10:54,800
Speaker 3: have three, then you can see that they've already kind

205
00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:56,360
Speaker 3: of backed themselves into a corner. And I think they

206
00:10:56,480 --> 00:10:57,320
Speaker 3: learned a hard lesson.

207
00:10:57,520 --> 00:10:59,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think you're right about that, because it's even

208
00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:02,040
Speaker 1: Powell say that there were members of the FOMC, the

209
00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:05,720
Speaker 1: FEDS committee that guides interest rate policy, they expressed some

210
00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,240
Speaker 1: uncertainty about where disinflation may be going from here, and

211
00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:12,079
Speaker 1: largely because of exactly what you're talking about the incoming

212
00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:15,440
Speaker 1: Trump administration. And it's not just tariff policy, is it.

213
00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:18,520
Speaker 1: I mean, it's a bit of spending and also the

214
00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,280
Speaker 1: possibility that investment, well, tax cuts.

215
00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:24,720
Speaker 3: To cuts two well, I mean, I'm not really happy

216
00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:27,560
Speaker 3: that the political cloud is not there to work on

217
00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:30,079
Speaker 3: the tax extension of his jobs and tax cut of

218
00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:32,559
Speaker 3: seventeen at the beginning of the term, because literally they're

219
00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:34,120
Speaker 3: talking about, we're going to do border stuff. We want

220
00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:35,480
Speaker 3: to do these things first, and then we'll look at

221
00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:37,440
Speaker 3: the tax policy. But we know that the tax jobs

222
00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:40,040
Speaker 3: since at the end of twenty twenty five, beginning of

223
00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:42,440
Speaker 3: twenty six, so we really need the political cloud to

224
00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:44,400
Speaker 3: go after that pretty quickly. So I'm a little concerned

225
00:11:44,400 --> 00:11:46,920
Speaker 3: that they're kind of pushing that more to the backburn

226
00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:48,520
Speaker 3: or later in the year instead of doing it right

227
00:11:48,559 --> 00:11:50,440
Speaker 3: up front when they have the mandate, because you know,

228
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:52,920
Speaker 3: how things politics get in the way and things change,

229
00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:54,720
Speaker 3: and then if we get some kind of bad economy

230
00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:57,040
Speaker 3: where we need more stimulus, and I do think that

231
00:11:57,040 --> 00:11:59,280
Speaker 3: that is a really big risk, you know, Doug, I've

232
00:11:59,280 --> 00:12:01,680
Speaker 3: been saying that there's a lot of hopism and there's

233
00:12:01,679 --> 00:12:04,720
Speaker 3: a lot of you know, irrational exuberance on the AI sector.

234
00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:06,720
Speaker 3: I believe AI has got a long runway and it

235
00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:09,440
Speaker 3: will deliver just like the Internet did in the two thousand,

236
00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:11,040
Speaker 3: but we still had to go through the dot com

237
00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:13,760
Speaker 3: crash before we realize how to monetize. So that's why

238
00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:17,280
Speaker 3: I'm saying AI's going to bring us real, true results

239
00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:20,199
Speaker 3: long term. But to expect that we're going to keep

240
00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:24,360
Speaker 3: this twenty plus growth rate before the monetization happens is

241
00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:26,640
Speaker 3: not right, And that's more comparable to dot com.

242
00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:28,720
Speaker 1: You know, it's interesting that you make that point because

243
00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:31,920
Speaker 1: when the FED made its decision, I saw how hard

244
00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:34,960
Speaker 1: hit small capstarts absolutely right, And so you think that's

245
00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:36,719
Speaker 1: going to be a big question mark over some of

246
00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:39,960
Speaker 1: the companies that are more exposed to the domestic economy

247
00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:43,479
Speaker 1: and not so much kind of exposed to what's happening internationally.

248
00:12:43,640 --> 00:12:46,920
Speaker 3: I think, yes, absolutely, But I also Am, As you know,

249
00:12:47,040 --> 00:12:51,200
Speaker 3: I've been very bearish on global economic situations, both in

250
00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:55,720
Speaker 3: Asia and Europe because these theaters have been really experiencing

251
00:12:56,040 --> 00:12:59,439
Speaker 3: economic malaise a lot longer than we have. And I

252
00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:01,560
Speaker 3: would say, you know, we had twenty twenty two that

253
00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:05,560
Speaker 3: was obviously a problem, right, but this last year, this year, hey,

254
00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:09,120
Speaker 3: we've run this AI wave. And yet that's not what

255
00:13:09,200 --> 00:13:11,680
Speaker 3: Germany's experiencing. That's not the US experiencing, and that's what

256
00:13:11,679 --> 00:13:15,439
Speaker 3: the UK's experience, that's what Chinese experiencing. We have big problems.

257
00:13:15,440 --> 00:13:18,240
Speaker 3: They just haven't arrived here yet. So while we have

258
00:13:18,320 --> 00:13:20,880
Speaker 3: Trump and we have all this positive economic outlook, and

259
00:13:20,920 --> 00:13:25,160
Speaker 3: I love that hopiism, I just see the reality. And

260
00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:27,160
Speaker 3: I also do see Doug that we had a lot

261
00:13:27,200 --> 00:13:30,160
Speaker 3: of influences trying to really sort of help look at

262
00:13:30,200 --> 00:13:32,120
Speaker 3: the numbers from a recession basis. You know, we had

263
00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:33,960
Speaker 3: a lot of things triggered that said, hey, we already

264
00:13:33,960 --> 00:13:37,880
Speaker 3: in recession. Yet all of the official administrative reports were no,

265
00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:40,200
Speaker 3: we're fine, we're fine. And now that we have this

266
00:13:40,240 --> 00:13:42,719
Speaker 3: Trump administration coming in, I'm wonderfu we'll see a sea

267
00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:45,280
Speaker 3: change in the data. And started saying Okay, yeah, there

268
00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:46,160
Speaker 3: is some issues here.

269
00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:48,760
Speaker 1: So you're looking out ahead, and I'm interested in knowing

270
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:52,080
Speaker 1: how your investment strategy is changing for twenty twenty five.

271
00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:53,120
Speaker 1: What are you doing differently?

272
00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:55,600
Speaker 3: We have to broaden out. We've been really a commodity's

273
00:13:55,640 --> 00:13:58,240
Speaker 3: focus because we really did feel that we were going

274
00:13:58,280 --> 00:14:00,120
Speaker 3: to have some kind of retrenchment and pull back, and

275
00:14:00,160 --> 00:14:02,240
Speaker 3: that it was too much optimism too fast on the

276
00:14:02,240 --> 00:14:05,920
Speaker 3: AI sector. I also have a little bit of a concern, honestly, Doug.

277
00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:09,800
Speaker 3: When I have US officials, President Trump included Senator Loomis

278
00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:12,880
Speaker 3: introducing a Bitcoin bill about a Reserve Act Bitcoin Reserve

279
00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,040
Speaker 3: Actor in July of twenty four. And what you're talking

280
00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:18,240
Speaker 3: about is now creating a federal reserve funded by the

281
00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:20,840
Speaker 3: Federal Reserve that is in bitcoin. We're talking about one

282
00:14:20,880 --> 00:14:23,120
Speaker 3: million bitcoins. Is the proposal for the Bitcoin Act of

283
00:14:23,160 --> 00:14:26,280
Speaker 3: twenty four that Loomis proposed. And when you're looking at that, Doug,

284
00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:29,880
Speaker 3: what are you really saying. You're saying, Hm, we are

285
00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:33,160
Speaker 3: the global reserve currency of the world since Bretonwood's that

286
00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:37,840
Speaker 3: has not changed yet. We are acknowledging, admitting, and then

287
00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:41,840
Speaker 3: actually taking action to maybe look at an alternative to

288
00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:44,880
Speaker 3: be a reserve currency, and that says a lot. And

289
00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:47,120
Speaker 3: I think that people are skipping over that, not even

290
00:14:47,160 --> 00:14:49,880
Speaker 3: realizing why can't we hold the reserves and dollars? And

291
00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:53,080
Speaker 3: there's that competition isn't happening, and that's a big problem.

292
00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:55,840
Speaker 1: What about changes in the regulatory regime that the Trump

293
00:14:55,880 --> 00:14:57,120
Speaker 1: administration may.

294
00:14:56,960 --> 00:15:00,480
Speaker 3: Initiate, I mean, very pro business, very pro We're very

295
00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:02,600
Speaker 3: pro crypto. I mean, look at Gary Gensler. Obviously a

296
00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:05,200
Speaker 3: lot of origination of litigation and so yeah, I think

297
00:15:05,240 --> 00:15:08,280
Speaker 3: that will be very much more pro growth on that.

298
00:15:08,520 --> 00:15:11,040
Speaker 1: We've seen how the financials have benefited. Right, maybe we

299
00:15:11,120 --> 00:15:14,640
Speaker 1: get fewer regulations where banks are concerned. But I'm wondering

300
00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:17,040
Speaker 1: about the M and A environment. Are you expecting a

301
00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:18,120
Speaker 1: lot more deal making in that?

302
00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,000
Speaker 3: I do, I am, But again, deal making from an

303
00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:24,920
Speaker 3: administrative policy perspective, yes, very you know, let's cut red tape,

304
00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:28,200
Speaker 3: let's make bureaucracy go down. But from an economic perspective,

305
00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:30,360
Speaker 3: and will we still have the momentum and the growth

306
00:15:30,400 --> 00:15:32,440
Speaker 3: momentum to kind of get us out of the quagmar

307
00:15:32,520 --> 00:15:36,080
Speaker 3: that we really are? It has really been siloed Ai

308
00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:37,920
Speaker 3: has done well, Crypto has done well, But if you

309
00:15:38,040 --> 00:15:40,280
Speaker 3: broaden out beyond those two things, that we don't have

310
00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:43,640
Speaker 3: a massive broad support strong economy like we need.

311
00:15:43,720 --> 00:15:45,640
Speaker 1: Well, so you mentioned some of the markets offshore. You

312
00:15:45,680 --> 00:15:49,840
Speaker 1: mentioned Europe, you mentioned Asia, particularly China. Valuations obviously in

313
00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:53,120
Speaker 1: those jurisdictions are much below what we're experiencing now in

314
00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:55,640
Speaker 1: the US. Sure, right, would you be inclined to put

315
00:15:55,720 --> 00:15:57,200
Speaker 1: some money to work in either.

316
00:15:57,120 --> 00:15:59,680
Speaker 3: Europe or or Asia if I had a long term

317
00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:02,920
Speaker 3: at excess capital play that I knew I wouldn't need

318
00:16:02,960 --> 00:16:06,400
Speaker 3: a return for sixty months if we had a major pullback. Absolutely,

319
00:16:06,520 --> 00:16:09,240
Speaker 3: if you're looking for a long term growth trajectory that

320
00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:11,360
Speaker 3: you don't need a return in the next sixty months, Yes,

321
00:16:11,520 --> 00:16:13,880
Speaker 3: But if you're looking at the next sixty months and

322
00:16:13,960 --> 00:16:15,880
Speaker 3: thinking that while I'm going to buy cheap and get

323
00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:17,800
Speaker 3: a turn around in two to three years, I think

324
00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:21,680
Speaker 3: that again, there is major global economic situations that are

325
00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,600
Speaker 3: under penning foundations that we've had for fifty years, and

326
00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:27,400
Speaker 3: so that is going to take its time.

327
00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:30,480
Speaker 1: So I'm curious as to whether your defensiveness is pushing

328
00:16:30,520 --> 00:16:32,400
Speaker 1: you more into the fixed income market.

329
00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:34,920
Speaker 3: Now, Well, that is such a great question. I'm so

330
00:16:34,920 --> 00:16:37,720
Speaker 3: glad you asked it because Honestly, the bond market is

331
00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:41,560
Speaker 3: really kind of forecasting and really a red flagging to

332
00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:44,800
Speaker 3: us that hey, we are seeing more risk than the

333
00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:48,040
Speaker 3: market is acknowledging. And the fact that PAW again, the

334
00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:50,360
Speaker 3: reason that the Fed came out at the last FOMC

335
00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:53,960
Speaker 3: meeting and really paired down expectations is because PO has

336
00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:57,120
Speaker 3: been almost preempted and his last two raises that basically

337
00:16:57,160 --> 00:16:59,880
Speaker 3: he excuse me, cuts, he caught, and the market took

338
00:16:59,880 --> 00:17:01,280
Speaker 3: a right back up to not only the.

339
00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:02,720
Speaker 1: Pre cut level, but higher.

340
00:17:02,880 --> 00:17:05,080
Speaker 3: And that's what happened again in the lastep ever, MCMDI

341
00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:07,040
Speaker 3: he cuts again twenty five BIPs and we're back to

342
00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:10,600
Speaker 3: four five for four four five. This is crazy. So

343
00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:13,600
Speaker 3: I think fixed income I want to say, it's going

344
00:17:13,640 --> 00:17:15,560
Speaker 3: to be another twenty twenty two year, but we are

345
00:17:15,600 --> 00:17:18,359
Speaker 3: going to see that what the Fed and central banks

346
00:17:18,359 --> 00:17:21,280
Speaker 3: are doing globally is not aligning with what the market

347
00:17:21,320 --> 00:17:22,800
Speaker 3: is pricing us from a risk perspective.

348
00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:24,840
Speaker 1: What are you hearing from clients these days? What's their

349
00:17:24,840 --> 00:17:25,560
Speaker 1: biggest concern?

350
00:17:25,720 --> 00:17:28,800
Speaker 3: I think that they are so double minded. And this

351
00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:30,680
Speaker 3: double mind in the sense that they hear the AI,

352
00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:33,120
Speaker 3: they hear the crypto, they hear all of these wonderful

353
00:17:33,160 --> 00:17:35,760
Speaker 3: new technologies that really are going to have decades and

354
00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:38,880
Speaker 3: decades of a long growth trajectory and runway. But yet

355
00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:42,520
Speaker 3: they do know that things just aren't exactly right. They

356
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:44,800
Speaker 3: do still know that prices are still sticky. Inflation is

357
00:17:44,920 --> 00:17:47,480
Speaker 3: two point seven CPI, now it's going up. We expect

358
00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,040
Speaker 3: the unemployment rate, according to policymakers in twenty twenty five,

359
00:17:51,040 --> 00:17:53,840
Speaker 3: to jump to four point three percent. So you're seeing

360
00:17:53,920 --> 00:17:58,040
Speaker 3: these indicators that there are fundamental underlying problems, but yet

361
00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:01,159
Speaker 3: everything seems so positive because they again it's like a

362
00:18:01,280 --> 00:18:04,359
Speaker 3: rational exuberance. Alan greenspan to mention like the dot com

363
00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:07,040
Speaker 3: air again only in the AI crypto space. So it

364
00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:09,760
Speaker 3: feels like a dichotomy of two different messages.

365
00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:12,080
Speaker 1: If you had to put a number on what you

366
00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:14,400
Speaker 1: expect the total return for the S and P five

367
00:18:14,480 --> 00:18:17,680
Speaker 1: hundred to be in twenty twenty five, what is that number?

368
00:18:17,920 --> 00:18:21,040
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, I think if we have another you're

369
00:18:21,040 --> 00:18:23,600
Speaker 3: like twenty twenty four, we could easily see, you know,

370
00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:25,760
Speaker 3: growth is slowing down globally. But I think if we're

371
00:18:25,800 --> 00:18:27,360
Speaker 3: if we're going to have a repeat of this year

372
00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:29,359
Speaker 3: and exactly what happened this year as far as you know,

373
00:18:29,400 --> 00:18:31,320
Speaker 3: how how the growth one, I think we could still

374
00:18:31,359 --> 00:18:33,800
Speaker 3: see you know, anywhere from a seven to twelve percent

375
00:18:33,840 --> 00:18:38,040
Speaker 3: growth rate literally not necessarily broad spectrum the entire market,

376
00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:40,240
Speaker 3: but the sectors. Right. But again though, Doug, if we

377
00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:42,639
Speaker 3: start to see the geopolitical and the economic weaknesses of

378
00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:45,400
Speaker 3: Asia and Europe come to our shores, then we could

379
00:18:45,440 --> 00:18:47,560
Speaker 3: have a loss year. And that's the issue that we're

380
00:18:47,600 --> 00:18:49,000
Speaker 3: not exactly sure which way it's going to go.

381
00:18:49,240 --> 00:18:50,879
Speaker 1: Rebecca, thank you so much for being with as.

382
00:18:50,880 --> 00:18:52,800
Speaker 3: Happy New Year, TA, thank you you as well.

383
00:18:52,840 --> 00:18:56,080
Speaker 1: Thank you. Rebecca Wallser is president at Wallser Wealth Management.

384
00:18:56,160 --> 00:19:01,679
Speaker 1: Joining us here on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Thanks for

385
00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:06,280
Speaker 1: listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast.

386
00:19:06,600 --> 00:19:09,680
Speaker 1: Each weekday, we look at the story shaping markets, finance,

387
00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:13,080
Speaker 1: and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You can find us

388
00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:17,240
Speaker 1: on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere

389
00:19:17,240 --> 00:19:20,280
Speaker 1: else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for insight on

390
00:19:20,320 --> 00:19:24,400
Speaker 1: the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia.

391
00:19:24,840 --> 00:19:27,240
Speaker 1: I'm Doug Chrisner, and this is Bloomberg