WEBVTT - Target Will Benefit Most From Retailer Bankruptcies (Podcast)

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well, the death of US retail

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>was grossly exaggerated. Coal shares that climbing more than seven

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>percent almost eight percent now after reporting better than expected earnings.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Target also rallying. Joining us here to talk about that

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in your Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios is Burt Flickinger, Managing

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>director for Strategic Resource Group, So Bird. It seems like

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly Target and Coals and a number of others have

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>surprised to the upside. Is this a sign that US

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers are in good shape and that retail is coming

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>back in brick and mortar form? Or is this a

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>case of good management in a select number of cases? Lisa,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to your point, good management always always wins, particularly for

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the well capitalized companies that investing in technology, digital, retail

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>and really having what consumers want at the best possible prices.

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So iss you and Paul have reported off prices winning,

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>UH targets winning, Walmart's winning, while a lot of the

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of the retails losing. So looking through the Coals

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>earning statement, one of the things that was interesting is

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>they they called out there, I guess the partnership with

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Amazon as being you know, a contributor to growth. What

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what actually are they doing with Jim? What does that

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>joint venture or that partnership it's a joint venture. Interestingly,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul's something that Target dot Com tried with Amazon for

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>seven years and it didn't work out, but for because

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Amazon essentially got the Target Target quote unquote guest database,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and UH they migrated a lot of those shoppers over

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to Amazon. But with Coal's not have invested significantly sufficiently

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in digital. UH. The Amazon partnership in terms of cross

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>platform similar to what Richard Baker's doing with Huts and

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Hudson Bay, Sacks and the operating companies to UH. It

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>provides a customer base from combined companies and helps both

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>increase units customer counts, sell through whether it's digital as

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>well as fulfillment and so so if if I have

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a return from an Amazon, I can bring it to

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a coal store. You can bring it to a coal store.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>And his Bran Cornell pointed out with Bloomberg earlier this morning,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy five cent of all UM targets digital sales are

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled in store. So UH to your point, advantage Coals

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and advantage Target to how much is the rally that

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the positive forecasts for the year from

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Coals and Target? How much is that a result of

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the bankruptcies of a number of retailers that we've seen

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>from Jim Boree, etcetera. Lisa important point in in targets

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>home markets, everything from her Burger's and Carson's division of

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bontan Company, pay Less on Deck, UH and with

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Boys are us in a number of other key retailers

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of affecting UH shifting shoppers. The bankruptcies have have been

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>half of targets increase in our estimation, and that makes

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Cole's one percent same store comparison sales okay, but not

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not really that good. This is really fascinating to me. This,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to me is a really important story. We're finally slowly

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to see the denue mall of some of these

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>struggling retailers going out of business, and this is helping

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the healthier retailers survive and thrive. Where are we in

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the cycle of bankruptcies for retailers? Can we finally see

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the regrowth of this industry? Lisa, We're about three fifths

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of the way through. So Target will benefit the most

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>from the bankruptcies of a lot of food and drug

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>retailers were hoping for the best, fearing for the worst.

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>With right aid, obviously, Target is going to be the

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>big beneficiary there, and from the mid tier to moderate

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>department stores and sears Kmart which actually had fairly good

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>soft soft goods, uh, Targets still the big beneficiary. So

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Targets still a little bit further than halftime and benefiting,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But targets biggest benefit is really marketing, merchandizing value, branding,

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>own label, and with the political elections taking media costs

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to unprecedented proportions in nineteen and the year twenty twenty,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Target has some of the most effective ads, digital, connective, social, outdoor, radio, TV,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>as as does Walmart. And the effectiveness and the great

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>copy and the creative with Target as well as Walmart's

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>really helping both win. And it gets to what you

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>guys were saying, management leadership wins every time. Essentially, I

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like that the concept that three fists of the way

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>through kind of dealing with this consolidation of the industry.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Does that also relate to the number of stores the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>global the US footprint stores? Are we three fists the

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>way through rationalizing just the number of stores and in

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the footprint we're probably only two fists of the way through,

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>right from about overstored to about But Paul, what you

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and Tom Keane and Arthur Levitt we're talking about on

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>surveillance and you, Lisa and Carol masser Uh and Jason

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney we're talking about later for retail with medical marijuana.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Levitt was saying, the sales tax in Denver was

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty two million, so obviously the sales are a huge

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple of that. So medical marijuana may actually drive customer

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>counts into the pharmacies of the target CVS. Insular pharmacies

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>won't help coals help time. Paul, just can't help yourself

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>when they legalize marijuana. That's just gonna make right age

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>shares surge. Right might not say soon enough. Well, I

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>guess that, you know. I'm just wondering what's taking so long?

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>What will what will hurry the cycle up and allow

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>retail to kind of get its bearings and grow again.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The for them to really grow, they have to do

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what targets doing. Target, to the company's credit, has the

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>greatest gender UH social social diversity across its management groups,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>so arguably one of the best leadership teams in retail worldwide.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And in a declining birth rate, declining family formation, targets

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>getting more of the parents with young children and with

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a pet population with dogs and cat adoptions growing four

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>times faster than the birth rate for people. Targets getting babies, pets,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and lifetime loyalty from consumers of all languages and all

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>United Nations of consumer constituency. I gotta be honest with

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>that with you, Paul. I mean, when I was dealing

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with babies, Target was amazing because you could get the diapers,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you could get clothes that weren't going to cost you

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a crazy amount, all in the same place, and you

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>could get shampooon conditioner. That was actually a very very

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>positive development. I think Purchase gave us the stat of

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the day with the pets four times the growth rate

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of the human population. I didn't know that. Really. Yeah,

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the people actually are adopting more pets now than than

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>having children year. Well, there's gotta be an investment play there.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So you go to the stores that have the biggest

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>pet departments. I guess yeah, And it gets to your

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>your leadership point. Paul is pet Smart is on Moody's

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>list of seventeen retailers that could go bankrupt this year.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh less capable, undercapitalized, where Target Walmart. Even though they're

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>not category dominant and pet is a soul source destination,

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they're still winning with pets more than pet smart. Is

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to you have a pet uh son, Nick

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and wife actually have to rescue pets Reggie and Bow.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And look at Popper west Siders dot com for Dick's

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>pet blog on rescue pets. I didn't know this was

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn into a discussion of pets, but you never know.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>We're retails, retail retail increasingly. This is actually a sign

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of the times. Take this too heart. This has been

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the transformation. People would rather have a dog than a kid.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Three point four million pet adoptions every year. Oh that's

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, another Saturday, Bert flicking sure, thank you so much.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Bert is the managing director Strategic Resource Resource Group. He

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>joined us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. This

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe the year of Unicorn initial public offerings. We are

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>expecting Lift to start their road show and get their

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>initial public offering off, the off off off, and get

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this on track. A question here is how active will

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this year be and how much will these companies be

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>valued at? Joining us now to answer some of those

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>questions at Data, chief executive officer of equity Zen based

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Equity Zen is a fascinating company that

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>basicly enables from getting this right, enables individuals to transact

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in private shares ahead of these i p o s.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yeah, that's that's right. Look, we're not

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>inventing anything that didn't exist a hundred years ago. Effectively,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing is taking something that was only available

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for people that could write a ten million dollar check.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a private company. I know the company. I wanna

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you know everyone. I know us as this company. I'd

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like to invest before the I p o. Uh. If

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't have ten million bucks, it's really hard for

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you to get a seat at the table. Uh. Through

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Equisence platform, qualified investors can purchase the shares before the

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>company goes public. So is this basically a price discovery

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>mechanism whereby companies can figure out, huh, now might be

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the time to go public. That's definitely a very you know,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>big value offering that companies get. The other thing that

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies benefit from by using a platform

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like equities and is Hey, look, you know, we thought

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Q four was going to be a great time to

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>go public, but guess what, the markets turn volatile, So

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wait another or six twelve months to go public.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But I told all my employees that we're gonna go

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>public in twenty eighteen. So let me allow the secondary

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>platform to give them a little bit of liquidity and

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>basically fine tune exactly when I'm going to go public,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>keep the employees happy, get outside shareholder shareholders excited. Uh,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and me as a company, I didn't have to take

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>any delusion in order to conduct a secondary Trains is

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be presumably a huge year for tech I

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>p O S and for you know your company as well.

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got Lift, We've got Uber, we've got Airbnb. Presumably,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>let's focus on Lift. You know, we saw the prospectives

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>come out last week. I think they had trailing revs

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of about two point two billion. Yet they want to

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>raise twenty to twenty five billion dollars. Is that kind

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of evaluation? Ten times revenue or twelve times revenue? Is

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that reasonable in this market? Well, you know, if you

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>take a look at lifts only competitor, which is a

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>private company Uber, Uh, It's it's not even uh you know,

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a fair comparison. Uber is this goliath, you know, eleven

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in revenue, It's in over half the country

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is out there, It's it's got Uber Eats, It's got

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>five other business lines. Lift is a pure play ride

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>hill company focused on US and Canada. There's got a

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of growth that Lift is able to demonstrate a

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>year every year. Uh. It's got shrinking net lost margins,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>which is always nice to see for tech company to

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.119
<v Speaker 1>go public. I think it's got a pretty exciting valuation

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for a company that many of us, especially here in

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the US and Canada, um have on our phones, if

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not of at least seen friends use it teach. There

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>has been an argument made that fewer companies in the

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>US are filing for initial public offerings. They're waiting longer

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to do so. That's sort of the idea of US

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>public equities is being a way to access the dynamism

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the U S economy is sort of fading as

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a promise. And I'm just wondering if these if these

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>unicorns can access private capital and can even offer their

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>employees liquidity on a secondary market for their shares before

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an I p O. Why go public? Why public? That's

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Look, I think there's still the vast

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>majority of the world that cannot access these private markets.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have to be an accredited investor, the

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>secs some guidelines. These are risky investments at the end

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the day. So still the vast majority of the

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>world can access it. And LIFT and many other consumer companies.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Spotify is a great example last year where you know

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's got tens of millions of people using it, but

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>if the vast majority of its client base can't even

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>buy its own stock, well, then there's a little bit

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of a disconnect, right And a lot of these companies,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>LIFT included our mission driven companies, decent amount of its s.

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>One is talking about how the founder's letter and the

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>founders mission. Uh, they really want to be able to

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>maintain that brand image. Not only is it a rite

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>of passage to go public these days, but guess what

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you as a public company can qualify for a lot

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of these institutional long term investors, these pension funds and

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds, anchor investors that look at ten year horizons,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>not you know, Monday through Thursday. Well, the big issue

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that both right hailing companies might have love

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to get your opinion, is they're not even remotely close

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to profitable. List I mean, Lift lost almost I guess

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>nine million dollars on two point to million of revenues.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Uber is not profitable. And I think one of the

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>big issues that investors have not had to deal with before,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Facebook or Google, is the subsidies that they're

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>paying to these drivers for market share. Do you have

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a sense of when when these companies think they will

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be a profit, Well, they are driving closer and closer

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>towards profitability. I think in this day and age, a

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are almost accepting of high growth companies

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to lose capital in order to grow

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>market share um. What they're going to have to continue

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>showing these companies is a path to sustainable profitability. Like

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Lift had a two income margin two years ago, senetic

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>margin with the negative sixty last year, it's down to

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>forty and change forty three percent this year, uh uber

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>has gone down to thirty. So I think they are

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>moving towards profitability. But look, there's only one you know,

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lifts Perspectives said only one percent of

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>all miles driven in the US are actually using one

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of these ride hill services, So there's clearly a long

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>way to go, and I think there are no hurry

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and capture the share. Twenty seconds, what's your

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>estimate for I p o s this year? We think

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be uh five blockbuster I p o

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>s and they're all available on you know, equities and

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I p oh outlook, but we're not going to see

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the record number of I p o s. They're gonna

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be the names that everyone's been waiting for for the

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>last ten years and they're gonna be huge. They're gonna

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>be this It's gonna be a great year I think

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for I p O. Bankers on Wall Street, a Dove

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>dot chief executive officer of Equities and joining us in

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg eleven three O studios. Thank you so much

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us again. You know, I think it's uh

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this lift. The deal is going to be very important

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>um for the tech markets to start off the year

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>right and to get a good trade going. So we'll

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>have to see how it goes, and then of course

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Uber will follow it up, and then Airbnb and some

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>others well equity investors, what to do? We've had about

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a thirty seven percent round trip from that December decline

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>back up to the our performance we've had here in

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen with the SMP up about eleven year to date.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>The question is what to do. So to help us

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>answer some of those questions is Sean Matthews, chief executive

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>officer from Hondia's Capital Management. Sean is also the former

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald. Shawn, thanks for being in our

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>studios once again. He's in our Bloomberg eleven three O

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>studios here in New York with us. So is it

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>time to take money off the table? So, okay, okay,

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you have a shorter term view, so

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a twenty year view stocks make sense,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's perfectly fine. But if you have a year

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>or less view, certainly taking trips off the table make

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense. Here right now. We came into

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the year long risk ass us and thought it was

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity. But once you got to a deal

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or a quasideal that's coming out right now with China,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense just a de risk. Sean, can we

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about Hondia's capital management because I've known you for years,

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>um really as the CEO of Cancer to fitz Geralds,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and you've been at brokerages for years and then you

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>went off in last year to start your own hedge

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>fund has been going, it's going well. Look, the markets

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are interesting opportunities. So if you look at the opportunity

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>sets for the typical hedge fund with zero interest rates

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and correlated assets, they were very low. And going forward

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the next five years, you're going to see the coupling

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of assets. You're gonna see central banks changing their stances

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly going back and forth, which creates interesting opportunity. So

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going from two opportunities a year to kind of

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>six or seven or eight opportunities a year. But we

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>were listening to Bill Gross who was speaking on Bloomberg

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Television earlier. He was retiring, of course from Janice and

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the famed bond investor for Pimco. He was saying he

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thinks that the era of generating alpha, true alpha is

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming to an end, which I think that's

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a misnomer. So there's always gonna be alpha out there.

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The machines have taken some of that away, but you

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have to understand how to trade against the machines as well,

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so there will be interesting opportunities. So the last five

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>years there was no alpha. Certainly next five years, I

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be interesting opportunity in real alpha that's

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>out there. That's gonna be generated because pricing, and look

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we look at typical assets. Pricing has been very benigns

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>because volatility has been low. As volatility picks up, you're

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have large discrepancies in pricing. You don't have enough

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>capital sitting in the middle. So the typical Wall Street

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>firms had plenty of capital to be a true middleman

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and create orderly markets. That's gone. So there's gonna be

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>less capital there because the return of equity for those

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>firms has gone down substantially over the last five to

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years, So someone's gonna have to step in and

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>take advantage. So where do you think you're gonna be

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>playing in the next two or three years in terms

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of the fixing coming equity markets? Maybe pushing out on

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the risk curve to e M or something like that. Yeah,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to be opportunistic. And if we

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>look at the global macro picture, you're starting to see

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>some clear delineation of what's going on out there. So

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Europe's in a funk. I think the next thirty years

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's gonna be in a funk that's got real problems.

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But you start to look at Asia, especially after the

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tariff deal, is gonna be interesting opportunities there. You look

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at the US as well. I mean, I think if

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>as a trader you look at the marketplace right now,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably want to be short equities here at some

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>point in time for a short term trade, not a

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>long term trade, but short term. Okay, So if you

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>go short equities, are you going short individual names? Are

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>you're going short broad indexes? So you look at broad INDEXUS, right,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, getting down to that level of each

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>individual stock. That takes a lot of analysis and understanding.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You really understand what are liquidity going on thirty feet,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the marketplace from a high level,

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and then working your way down. All right, So Sean Matthews,

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for as the sort of the

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>trigger time to short stocks here? And then what are

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you looking for to say, okay, there we go again?

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is right now going to look

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>at earnings going forward and look at global growth. And

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>right now no one knows really what's going on. So earnings,

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if you talk to any particular person, you can range

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.239
<v Speaker 1>from zero to ten percent this year. Right, That's an

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing number if you think about it. How why the

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>distribution is of that? So I think you have to

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>get to a point of looking at where the market is,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>where global growth is going to be, and then make

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>that determination. Right now, we've run up twelve percent in

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the SMP so far this year. I mean you look

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>at European stocks, they're up huge. Why so going into

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>they're going to in a recession. Half of Europe is

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be in a recession, you know in two

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty. So what happened in December was that just

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad dream for the marketplaces or there's should we

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be pulling out some nuggets of real truth out of that?

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>December Swim, I think you have the algorithms actually, kid right.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So again, when we look at liquidity characteristics of the market,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they have changed because the market is not going to

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>be as orderly as it has been in the past.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And when there's zero interest rates and everyone is looking

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>at it saying, okay, we can stay long risk assets

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>for as long as possible, it makes a lot of

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>sense to continue to stay long. Once you get to

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a point where there's fear in the marketplace, you're going

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to see large price discrepancies. And Wall Street used to

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>be great as a as a middleman and really an

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>orderly market participant. And once that leaves, the whole marketplace

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>starts to look very different. And I think the next

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>five years will look very different than the last five.

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>How how has fundraising ben for you? We can't talk

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about that, no, no no, no, But in terms of when

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to clients, are they looking for alternatives? Are

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for you know, what are they looking for

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>from hedge funds? I think they're looking for people who

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>are going to drive alpha, right, So there's been so

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>little alpha out there that they're now looking at opportunities

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to not just be a market participant. And let's face it,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the hedge fund community, they've probably

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>steered more towards trying to keep their management fee in

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>place then actually drive alpha. So that that change, I

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to happen as well. The reason why

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I ask is because we're actually getting some indications that

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>flows have stabilized after years of outflows from hedge funds,

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and that you're actually starting to see some inflows again

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and certainly redemptions have stopped, and that was sort of

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering if that drives with your experience that

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the people who are still looking for alternatives, uh, you

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>know what what the ups and downs are absolutely Uh,

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone is right now trying to figure out we probably

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>live in a mid single digit equity world going forward

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the next five or ten years. That's drastically different than

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the last ten. So in a low return environment, everyone

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is looking for ways to drive higher returns. So I

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>know Bill Gross was mentioning that he thinks, you know,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds will have to really be creative in

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of maybe infrastructure infrastructure, investing hard commodities, buying timber,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>for example. Do you share the view that you're gonna

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>need more tools in a toolbox for the average hedge

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>fund manager, I think, depending on what your mission is,

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly more tools are better than less. Um. I think

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets have always looked for opportunities, and hedge funds

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>have always looked for opportunities. You know, they may come

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in different forms, but it's not just about buying queue

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>SIPs at some point in time. It's also about looking

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for other things. Sean twenty seconds, what's the next move

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>for a treasury yields? Up or down? Big move? I

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>think the long end of the curve actually goes up

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>um not not big. I mean it's probably fifty basis points.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh So you can see a three sixty seventy long

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>bond um, which in the grand scheme of things isn't

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a big move at all. And and I think the

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fixed income market, and certainly the guvy space, has been

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>really cautious about what's going on in the world and

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at global growth and saying this is a tough environment.

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think you'll start to see steeping the yolkurbs interesting.

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Sean Matthews, Thank you so much for being here. Sean Matthews,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>see Yo of Hondya's Capital Management, former chief executive officer

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of Cantor Fitzgerald joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Broker's studios. Well trying to remains aggressive in trying to

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>support its economy via fiscal stimulus, while at the same

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>time also lowering its outlook for growth to six six

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to six and a half percent range. The question is

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>can they do both? To answer that question, we bring

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in Brendan Ahearn, chief investment officer for Crane Shares based

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, joins us on the phone. Brendan,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. So China clearly is

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>remaining aggressive using the fiscal fiscal stimulus tool in its toolbox.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>How successful do you think they will be? Well point

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I did you believe that things are thus far as

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>showing we're seeing those green shoots. We're seeing the stimulus

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>solely trickled down into some of the economic releases. We've

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>probably not completely bottomed on from an economic or corporate

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>earnings perspective. At the same time, equity markets are forward

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>looking and I think the market is anticipating that the

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>positive effect is stimulus, both fiscal and monetary, will be

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for the economy over for the for

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy over the course of this year, and markets

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are rallying on that news. Brendon, does no one care

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>about leverage anymore? I think they still do care about leverage.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chinese, particularly you know, had pivoted to

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a domestic agenda in seventeen that was focused on deleveraging. However,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the trade war they've had to backburner that effort. Going forward,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see more targeted credit growth, trying to

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>get credit to small medium enterprises, private companies as opposed

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to the big est state owned enterprises. So how important,

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Brendan are success full trade negotiations with the US to

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>supporting what the Chinese government wants for its economy. I

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think for from an economic perspective, you know, China, there's

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>parts of China that are a going through a boom

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>time right now. Um, you know, like shen Zen. Um,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>no different than you know, I was just out in

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco last week. Uh, there's parts of China that

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are are doing poorly. Uh, No different than here in

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States. So so, I think export driven manufacturers

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>are facing a very very difficult, challenging environment. UM. So

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they need to do support that really addresses the big,

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>big geography, big economy that they have. Well, how about that,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you know one of the things when you I was

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the Ali Baba's recent results and boy,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, the Chinese consumer seems quite strong, and it's

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe stronger than one would expect. What is your sense

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese consumer and consumer buying power? I think

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the rumors on the death of the Chinese consumer have

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>been greatly exaggerated. Um. If one looks at the say

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>service p M I UM, we see it's an expansion.

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>We see this from the company themselves. Ce Trip reported

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>um after the market closes, having a very very large

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>rally today. Right this is uh Um online travel company

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>in China. So so, I think where where where we

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>want as investors be focused on this domestic consumption. That's

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of the stimulus and support for the

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>economy has taken place. They want to raise domestic consumption,

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>push on that gas pedal. At the same time, if

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at multinationals such as like a Caterpillar that's

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>geared to the element of China's economy that's slowing, and

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think investors want to avoid that aspect. How much

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>has the trade skirmish or trade disagreement, trade war, whatever

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you wanna call it, how much has that affected the

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy. So it's certainly affected an element of China's economy.

0:26:54.520 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Remember China's economy UHI is the service sector today about

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ten agriculture. So you do have a big element of

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>China that is geared to export driven manufacturing UM. Aggregate

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>exports the United States is less than twenty percent of

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>China's overall exports, but obviously that that's a very big

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage and that has been very much hampered. At the

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>same time, China is trying to support domestic consumption to

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 1>offset the weakness in one element of the economy, and

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>so it has had an effect on specific geographic areas

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>an element of China's economy UM, but not not the

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>whole economy. And that's what something investors missed. So I'm

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>just wondering from the p m I perspective and manufacturing data,

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the slowdown that we've seen there, which has been disproportionate uh,

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>for well, hasn't been disproportionate because of the trade issues.

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So so, certainly manufacturing p m I s are um

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Both the you know, the the official as well as

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the cash in a are are in negative terror territory

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there below fifty, which is the acceleration. At the same time,

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the non manufacturing or the service p m I s

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>are still in expansion territory. What's interesting, Lisa's using Google trends.

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>If you type China manufacturing p m I, you get

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole slew of results. You type China service p

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>m I no results. That literally it says there's no

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>data to input that. So I think in general investors

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>still view China's this export driven manufacturing engine. That's not

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily the reality today. Brenden Ahern, thank you

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Brennan is chief investment

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>officer at Crane Shares in New York talking to us

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>about China. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg pm L podcast.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney, I'm

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Bramwo. It's I'm

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Bramwoit's one before the podcast. You

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio