WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2019: FAAB Recap, Modica Monday | Fantasy BFFs, Ep. 437

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network list did did? Yeah?

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Now welcome Baby your host by Bay from man I

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Spun by Guy from Say Francis Frank. Stand ball, ladies

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and tell me your ps. Oh what is going on?

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Everybody to be an absolute lie here on a Monday.

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I am pump running. That is great. I am pump

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>one hell of a job by Christmas Bona right there?

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, how pro are you just hearing that? I

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it? I was, you know, I was giggling away

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>over here. Oh my god, Like get Greggy, let's go.

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely you have ever's live on video. If you were

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to us on the radio, Uh, we have miss

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>started today, Craig Miss Fantasy Sports Today going on live

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network from neon T two pm.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be on the video today at noon. And

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things are changing at things are in flux,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and Frankie talked about a little bit on Friday when

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I was out, so while I was changing, but we're

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>here today. That's why we say we hope at the

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, we're here today for now. For now,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep you updated. Of course, we're also airing live

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>all the radio overnight, will be podcasting like normal. After

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the show, it'll go right up, So if you're listening

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to it on a podcast, you probably have no idea

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>anything changing. But today it's gonna be a one hour

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>program on video. We're gonna bunch of fantasy stuff with Modica,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be a bunch of gambling stuff at the end. Well,

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of rotating how much gambling and how much

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy we're doing. Like I said, a lot of changing,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot in flux, a lot of stuff that we

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we're hoping for a frank and planning on a lot

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of good stuff potentially coming coming our fans way in

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>our listeners way. Uh So hopefully it's all work out

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and we hope. It's a really good time for your

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>fantasy b f for there you go, that's the start

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 1>of it for your bf us. It's a great time

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>right now. Lot going on. We're in the middle of

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>the baseball season. We're not gonna abandon fantasy baseball. Don't

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>worry about that. You know. Fantasy football rapidly approaching as well,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>probably towards the end of June the beginning of July,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>will start to work that in a little bit more.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>But for now, fantasy baseball, and we will also start

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to work in obviously our best bets forever for the

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>baseball season. Yeah, we'll get into the best bets forever.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we'll get into just so we're betting. Talking

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>in general, what we like or we didn't like, what

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>affected this spread, what didn't you know, just something that

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we're still going to be ourselves were handling. You go,

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you go, Maddimo. How's your weekend? A weekend was good.

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>The weather it actually kind of held up like a period.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It was gonna rain yesterday, but it didn't go late

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>last night. So do you come back? I came back

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>yesterday morning because you were in South Carolina. I was

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in South Carolina, Charleston was I said that on Friday,

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and then a bunch of people in my ear were like, no,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>he said Fort Lauderdale. I'm like, no, that's part that

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>someone else's bachelor party. Right now, that's totally much. It's

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>all good mentioned Fort lord Dale bachelor party. So it's

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>my bachlor party. Yes, I'm sorry, it's okay, Martina, I forgot,

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's all I was in Charleston, South Carolina. How was

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the weather there? Because here, I mean even dating back

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to like Thursday, it like rained every day. Greg, you

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't ask for a better weather in South Carolina. Oh

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>my god, you always stand well. That's like I do.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I that is the number one I think that I

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>do well. Thing that Greg does well. The show obviously,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that was good man, that was good. I

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>do sand well. I had a great time. It's a

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>great Batcher party. I did realize for the first time

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>how old I am. I think only been talking about

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it for three years now. It really and I say,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg's fifty years old, and it's like it really hit

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>because we were at a bar and it's a popular

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>location for bachelor and Matchelar parties. We went to the bar.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually back to back nights on Friday and Saturday. Was

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>an awesome bar, awesome rooftop, awesome drinks, pretty reasonably priced.

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And we see these girls. It was like the sashes, right, Like,

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>oh so I wanted to introduce our bacheld of their bachelor, right,

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you never know what could haven't wing the bachelor bachelorrette parties? Right?

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Except doesn't surprise me with Greg, except it was not

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a bachelorette party. It was a twenty first birthday party.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh my god, here we got forty

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 1>year old Greg approaching twenty one year old. Thirty one

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>year old Greg approaching twenty one year old old. She's like,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>just leave me, like the real ages in there for once, right,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one year old Greg approaching twenty one year old woman.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You have so much to leary, Greg. You could have

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>talked him so much about life. I could have. I didn't.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>How did that end? Uh? Mostly with us, you know,

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>my group just kind of just staring. Oh gosh, there

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.119
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of a lot of start, lots of staring.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>By the third we're all married and engaged, so it

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>was all the thirty year olds kind of just staring

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>at the new talent that was out there in charm talent. Yeah,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it was great at a great time. A lot of beach,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of beach for me this weekend, a lot

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of things. You played golf, you know, playing golfer. No,

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I ended up laying on the beach, laying on the

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>beach drinking. Yeah, I said at the time that we

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were on the show Friday, I said, Gregg's probably got

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a malbou babery somewhere to say. So I was drinking

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time. I was drinking the new very popular map.

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know about the White Claws Celtics say, I

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like Seltzer, same Spike Seltzers are pretty exactly my man.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>So we took it's a bunch of white colors to

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the beach with us on Friday and I drink a

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>few of those. Then on Saturday we took more myke collage,

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of those, like a lot on Friday night.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But Sunday night, Saturday night, made a little speech. You

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>know me, I like to like talk who would have thought?

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And I like to write. So I try to get

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>all my friends like a speech for their wedding. And

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I gave it to my buddy over the weekend. Well, yeah,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not had a great I had a great weekend.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>How was your weekend? It was pretty good. I mean,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing too crazy going on. I had to go to

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a birthday untild You went to Little Frankie's Italian restaurant.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Didn't make that name up either, By the way, Yes,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we went to a restaurant a Little Frankie's. There's another

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>restaurant by the same owners, just called frank frank All right.

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Well there you go. Popular name here in New York City.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I mean pretty pretty generic. Lots

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of lots of sports. Watch the Champions League on Saturday,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>watched a lot of baseball yesterday the NBA Finals. Uh,

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a great weekend for sports, Craig, it was

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a very fantastic weeknd for sports. But let's start with

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball here. Let's get into fantasy baseball with you, Matt,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and let's get right in to where the bids were

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this week. The first name I really wanted to ask

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you about. The first two names I wanted to ask

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you about are two pictures. Of course, I was always

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for pitching naturally and the young Pictures act Police

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Sac Devin Smeltzer were both up pramidded this weekend. In

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>most most leagues, it was Police Sack in the main

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>event that went for the most one. He went for

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight, Devin Smeltzer went for seven dollars. Which one

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>would you rather have? I'll take police Sack here. His

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>control seems to be elite uh t at earlier seven batteris.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.239
<v Speaker 1>He's walking on of course double hriple A and MLB

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, so he would be the gag. Smeltzer has

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>done well this season miners, and he has the one start.

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He's on a fantastic team, so that does boost his

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>value somewhat. But I would have went Police set. All right,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>What about you, Frankie, You actually agree with Matt. I

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think you saw the bidding closer than it should have been.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Because Smeltzer projectives have a double start this week as

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of now, at Cleveland and at Detroit, so that's why

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you see the bidding numbers a little bit

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>closer than they should be. I actually really like what

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen from Police Sac. I was watching that game yesterday.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Great game, by the way, Greg, it was Police Act

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>versus g Leto pictures duel there Um police Ac had

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven swinging strikes in nineties six pitches. Other than that,

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was watching his mid nineties fastball. Really

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>good command as well, works in some breaking pitches. Has

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to change up. But seven endings, four hits, one and

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>run one walks, seven strikeouts. Minor league numbers for Zach

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>police Act too. I mean, not really a highly regarded prospect,

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>but a two point nine nine right in his minor

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>league career, two undred thirty eight strikeouts over two hundred

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>and fifty three innings pitched. Those are some pretty good

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>minor league number. So I do have interest here. And

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Rodriguez got hurt for the Cleveland Indians last week,

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>so you know, even once Clevinger starts to come back,

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and if we ever see Klueberg, maybe there's a chance

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>police Sax sticks around a little bit here, Greg. So

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>I like what I've seen. The minor league numbers for

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for Devin Smeltzer were really good this season, uh, you know,

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at one point eight to e r A in triple A.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But all the other years I spoke about this last week,

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>UM A little bit more skeptical when it comes to uh,

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Devin Devin Smeltzer here. The minor league numbers haven't been

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>as great. Kind of a soft tossing, less lefty, you

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>can make it work. But I agree with Matt, I

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like I like Police Sack a little bit more. All right,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So well with you guys. I like Smeltzer, like police,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>police act your guy. He went for the most. As

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in the main event, he got picked up

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>for a spot start in my league yesterday. I didn't

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>pick him up on my home league because I had

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Gleado going in him and you know, the Yankees this week,

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna be interesting. It's gonna be interesting. I

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wish I actually fixed at Les sect. But nevertheless, in

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>between those two guys in the main event, one more

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>picture went for thirty three dollars. Not all that much

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>money was spent this week, and that was do Nelson Lamette,

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>who is rehabbing. I guess with the padres still rehabing

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>as he's on his way back. I'm not really interested

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Latte because I feel he's not really very good. Um

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>come on, man, are you interested in Nelson Lamette? I mean,

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's tough to kind of add him. There's

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>other guys, uh, you know, it's maybe obviously naturally only,

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm trying to think I've had a fifteen team

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>scenario where you pick him up right now. I know

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts are there in the home Bullpark, but I

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think there's other guys out there right now that warrant.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have picked up Mitch Keller, who was sent

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>down after the start pitched yesterday. He was effective. I

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>think he has the upside to ms Batch as well.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better going forward. I think I'll have

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity at some point soon. So yeah, I'm kind

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of with you on limit. I don't think he's somebody

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to totally ignore, but there's other guys I want right now.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>I can agree with that. And you know, if we're

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>just talking about stashing injured pictures, you know, I i'd

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>rather have Alex Reyes. I'd rather stash Nathan Vivaldi right now,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>who seems like he's working his way back. Someone that

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I really like coming into the season didn't work out.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>It seems like he's always dealing with injuries. But I

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like stashing Lament Greg probably not for thirty three dollars

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that he went for in the main event. If you

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can afford to. I mean, everyone's got injuries that they're

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. Uh so if you can't afford to in

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues, I do like the stash. This was a

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>guy that in the second half of the seventeen mosted

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at three point eight e r A with a caper

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>nine over ten ten point three. You know, a lot

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of people were excited about his uh you know, mid

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Nighties Fastball, his shrike out upside um. You know a

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were drafting him as a maybe you

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>know top if he is starting pitcher last year before

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we had to go for Tommy John. But he's made

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one rehab start so far, greg two point two winnings,

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pitched three hits, three earned runs, five strikeouts. Um, so

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>he's slowly working his way back. That was in high

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>A ball. I would think he probably needs at least

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>remore rehab starts, like he'll slowly wait work his way up.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I like stashing him, probably not for as much. There's

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a few other pictures as well that I have ranked

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him for stashing, but I don't dislike hate

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it stashing him right now, Okay, she's one of the guys.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>She's take a shot on a little bit later on

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we picked him up in the g d D fifteen team.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We didn't, and I didn't tell you. He did not

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>tell me that he is actually amazing, because Franks like, hey,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>did you gotta know? But I actually did tell you

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that we won Lament today. But I just think you

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't react to it because I heard Cooper that we

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted a second I sent you a screen shadow of

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 1>all of our bids last night. I did not, but

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>he was on that list, and I saw Cooper, I

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>know we got we got Colm, we got Colum, we

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>got Colin Moran as well. That's pretty cool. I'm excited

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>about that, he said Lament. I thought you said, like,

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>please sack No. I wish that would be great. I

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>did not know that he's Oh god, all right. Speaking

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of Yett Cooper, we both now own him at you

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>owed him in the mad at twenty three dollars. I

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like because we're all friendly with non No, like

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to like Garrett Cooper. I think that's the

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>only reason we both own him at this point. Now.

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll also give your new addition Greg Mitch a shout

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>out here. He's been pumping him up on Twitter. Too. Look,

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys been he has an opportunity on this team,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he's hitting the ball hard. He's hitting some

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>home runs. I mean unless he totally falls on his face.

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him leaving this lineup anytime soon. He

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>should hit in the heart of it. So you know,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>with Joey Gallo going down, I got him. I got

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>him in this league, I got him in in another

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>league where I needed to fill that core position. Uh well,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>his outfield now, but eventually I'm hoping to slat him there.

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you know you're gonna need to look to

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, re replace guys when they get injured, and

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy has a legitimate shut. Yes. Since returning from

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>injury for Garrett Cooper from May eleventh on, great to

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>eight six batting average, three sixty three O b P,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 1>four home runs, fourteen runs scored, thirteen r b I

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>s uh. And you know, I'll say this about the

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Marlins lineup. They picked it up recently with him coming

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>back and Harold Ramirez hitting well and jorgeil Farrow hitting well.

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know that Miami is going to

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>be moving forward. This team that we were streaming against

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>every single start that we were in the past. If

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you look over the past seven days, the Miami Marlins

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>seven s ops as a team that puts them right

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the pack in baseball. There sixteen

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>during that stretch in team OPS. So you know, Garrett

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Cooper coming around hitting well at the top of that order,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, batting second most of the time, solid batting

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>average o b P. There's well, hits the ball really hard,

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate during the span from May eleven on,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but does hit a lot of groundball, So I would

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like from the lift the ball a little bit more,

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but hitting for good batting average and to offer some

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>pop as well. So you know, I think I believe

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in YAHOO he has corner infield eligibility and outfield so

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>might have even a little bit more value there. But yeah,

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in deeper leagues, Garret Cooper should be own. Gregg Para, North,

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Carrick Cooper playing well right now, both Craig miss Nan,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>No Matt and frank all over this guy. I think

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Vantage community has found some love runs again for

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Cooper. But the man that everybody's talking about right now,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Frankie is Miles Straw. For his speed. You want him

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the Native Man for twelve bucks. You were ecstatic last

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>night to win Miles Straw. For those who don't know

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about him, I want you to tell us about it. Yeah.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So I spoke about him at length on Friday with

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>with Craig Mitch who he was actually really really excited

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about Miles Straw. He kind of talked me into him,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, we got a glimpse of it

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and I tweeted this, he makes fast people look

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not so fast. I mean three stolen bases yesterday. You

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>see him running the bases and I mean he's just electric.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>So um, it's electric. There you go, Greg, Uh, I

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>lost the Gordon, so I've been I've been looking to

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>replace some speed for now. I wasn't expecting to win

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>him for twelve dollars. It's a little bit bitter sweet

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>because I was happy to get him, but unfortunately Mett

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Moodico was the backup bid for ten dollars. I beat

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>him out by two bucks. So I felt a little

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>bit bad for you there, Matt. But this guy's speed

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely legit and the hit tool is there as well. Uh,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's you know three batting average all levels in the

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>minors seventy stolen bases last year. I worry about the

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>long term, but what do we say on Friday, Matt

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>You want to win week till week at this point

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the season, and that's what I'm trying to do.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So we had the long term term concerns for Miles Straw,

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but for the time being, it looks like he's going

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to at least provide batting average and stolen bases. How

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about Miles Straw? Yeah, I got him

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in two other leagues for ten dollars each. This ten

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar bit obviously failed. And you know when you show

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>me he did yesterday in league, you had to put

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a bid. I'm not saying crazy. He

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>went into my you know, satellite high shooting nobody people

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that are very successful in all right, we'll take a

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>break here when we come back. More on the Waiver

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Wire with Maddie mo Deco. Also take a look and

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for the two star pitchers for this week, and you

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on baseball. Stay around more next Daily

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>roado dot Com Optimizer in minutes build an optimized line

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys learned from the game's

0:17:55.200 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players joined Daily roado dot com. The following

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette?

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know, Maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one. That's

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>eight six six eight four ninety six one. Do you

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>want to risk free wagers up to one thousand dollars?

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>If so, go to points bet dot com forward slash grid,

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>open yourself up a points pet sports wagering account, enter

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the promo code grid, and you'll get to risk free

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bets of up to one thousand dollars. In addition to

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional fetting, points bets also offers its own betting concept,

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>where customers they're rewarded by how much they win their

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pett that's points pet dot com Forward slash Grid. Enter

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the promo code grid and get your two risk free

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>bets of up to one thousand dollars. Today, they we're

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>back your fantasy dfs and it's witch he used, not

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>saying the fantasy df part, just the FS. I get

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>used that, So correct me if I'm wrong, Frank, Please,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I will try. It's like I L and D O

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>it is, you know, it's kind of the interchangeable. Yeah. Uh,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we got breaking news, Greg Rancisco. You don't like this?

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, this is relevant, Gregg? Is it just? Yes?

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It is. Rancisco is being recalled by the Baltimore Orioles.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm hoping that this is a sign of things

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to come because I've been talking to Ryan mount Castle

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>for a while and he hit three home runs yesterday

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>in the minors, and I actually picked him up in

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>one of my home leagues to stasch him. So I'm

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>hoping as the season goes along, we start to get

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>more of these youngsters up for the Baltimore Orioles specifically.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Now we got Cisco, and I'm hoping that we can

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>get Ryan mount Castle and Austin Hayes uh sooner rather

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>than later. But Francisco in the minors this year was

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>hitting two eight nine with ten home runs and ops.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth mentioning because we do have some

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>catcher injuries. Buster Posey is hurt, godd Ear Molina is

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>hurt as well, so, you know, to catcher leagues, we're

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to find these guys. I think Rancisco has a

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of pop obviously, hits in a good ballpark

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Matt, any interest in Francisco, Yeah, and two

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>catcher leagues, Yeah, I think he's somebody, do you, Matt.

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Everyone will have an eye on due to the you know,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate situation that is the catcher position, and Cisco is

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like the ultimate spring training minor league guy where he

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>goes off there, hopefully this time at the majors. He

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>gets the opportunity and uh, you know produces him. Chance

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Cisco back in our hearts. Now you are in the

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>major leagues. Thank you, thank you, Chance, thank you. All right,

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>other players that you guys added this week, and I

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>want to be quickly. We have a lot to get

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to you, not a lot of time to do it.

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Um Matt Weaders the other second catcher, eighteen bucks. He

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>went four in the main event, and our guy Eric

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Dames in the main event here, Frank, Yeah, with Matt Weaders,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he's actually hit well since Scottia Molina has gone down

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with this injury. Uh he started, you know, four of

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the last five games for the St. Louis Cardinals, obviously

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a really good lineup as well, he said, two home

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>runs during that span. He has two multi hit games.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So again we're talking about to catcher leagues, deeper leagues

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>where people might have lost out here Molina, Matt Weeders

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>flashing some of that offensive upside we used to think

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that he had, but maybe this is what he needed.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So there for the for the St. Louis Cardlinos and

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>then Eric Thames. I mean, look, Hagar is just an

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>absolute mess. I mean you can drop Agilar anywhere. And

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Eric Thames had a big game over the

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend as well, you know, cheap exposures to the Milwaukee

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Brewer's lineup. But uh yeah, it's been a it's been

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a messy season for Hazer Taglar and you know, maybe

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we get more consistent playing time from Eric Thames moving forward. Maddie,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you have anything on those guys For Thames, I'll say this,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity might be there. I still kind of think

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that it might be Travis Shure, who's you know, getting

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the left handed at bats at first base. I can't

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>see Milwaukee. I know they mentioned maybe promoting Kissing Hi

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>can't the guy's name, but I don't see that happening.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they need that kid right now, so I

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>can sure as so, I don't know how that's gonna

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>play out. Yeah, why would the demote Kesting here? Because

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy is just getting hot now, so

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>why would you Why would you mess with that? I

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.640
<v Speaker 1>mean a two eighty one batting average for hera five homers,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>nine ribbies, one stolen base. So yeah, something to pay

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>attention to Travis Shaw is was he performing as badly

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as he was early in the season, because he was

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the risk injury. I mean that that might

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>have been part of it. Um, you know he was

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he was back to back seasons with thirty home runs

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and we thought that he was actually pretty safe for

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the power. But clearly something was not right from So

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>give him time to rest up. If he comes back,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe he gets some time at first base worked into

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that mix with Eric Thames and hass Aglar Greggy. Eric

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Thames over the past two weeks betting three hundred with

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>two homers, eight runs scored six RBIs himself again in

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues. If you felt for the trap that was

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Hayes's agil and you need a first baseman fifteen team

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>roto and only if a guy like Eric Thames was

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>out there, I get trying to take a shot on him. Yeah,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no, no question about that. Um, you should be out.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you see, the playing time ultimately is there

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and uh and we'll see what happens. I wonder one

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>of the two star pitchers managed anybody else guys you

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about there picked up this week that

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was worth mentioning. Uh, well, I was gonna reference Chase Anderson,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get to him for the for the two

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>star pitchers and uh Addison Russell. Obviously we've been we've

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>been talking a lot about him. He went for thirty

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars in my Great Fantasy base momentation and pretty

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>much saw him added in a bunch of deep leagues

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>this week for people who lost Carlos Correa or need

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a middle infielder for some pop. I think that makes

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense a name that I've been seeing

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get picked up multiple locations. Actually matt was Tim la

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Castro of the Arizona Diamondbacks and good, good batting average

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>source in the minor leagues. Gets the bat on the ball,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't strike out all that much, has sneaky speed as well.

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>He's been playing, you know recently for the Arizona Diamonbacks.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He has five stone based on the season with a

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>two eighty nine batting average. Um, what do you know

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about Tim Lacastro? Did you have any bids on him?

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>And te like he's really just batting average and maybe

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>some modest speed as well. I got him for like

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a buck or show in multiple leagues, Uh, places where

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get um straw. I thought, you know, he

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was somebody that can provide you with the speed. It's

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just tough in Arizona right now. Parolta is coming back,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>they're saying without a rehabsitant. They do have a d

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>H this weekend. But I think Lacastro, if he plays,

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you can get you stolen bases as well. So I

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>got him for pretty much nothing, you know, with guys

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that I could afford to say goodbye to, and we'll

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. Yeah, it's a pretty crowded I'll feel there.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You referenced David Paul's gonna get back at some point

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for them. Uh so do we see Lacastro maybe in

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>center spending time with Draw Dyson or spending time with

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Adam Jones. So it is something to pay attention to

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for now. Great, but that was someone that I saw,

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting added in deeper leagues this week because

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone's trying to find speed as usual. Yep. Absolutely always

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for speed, always looking for an oportunity to find

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>a steel. That's why I picked at Malex Smith in

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the league. Frankie, Oh, Greg, you're coming around, let's go.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I picked him up for you know what, because it's

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>only four games today, So I picked him up last night,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking at the extra game to that, of course he's

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna stay on your team forever. What You're gonna stay

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on your team forever? I heard, Yeah, you don't Alex

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Smith now coming around, I don't know that I'll be

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>on my team like like sixtlen Bases last week. Well,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>let's let's hope for a couple of tomorrow. I'm just

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that point sometime this season when you say

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that you were wrong about Malex Sman, Well, we'll see, Frankie,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>my guy. I don't know how I became. I didn't

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>even sign up to be the Malex Smith supporter, but

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it just happened organically. You are man, You absolutely are

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>all right. You mentioned to start pitchers this week, we

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>look pat Devin Smeltzer a little while ago. Let's get

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>into Chase Anderson O the Milwaukee Brewers coming off okay

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>out in here against Pittsburgh. To start pitcher this week

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is Chase Anderson and he's facing Miami and Pittsburgh. Matt

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>those are two very very tasty matchups. Yeah, I'm gonna

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>go with Anderson here for the to start matchup. Based

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and all that, one thing I would recommend you look

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at if you're in a quality start league, I don't

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>know if he's gonna get you at six innings. Uh

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>So i'd be a little careful there. But in a

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>wins league or you know, just regular, I'm gonna, I'm gonna,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna play him for this double bit. Yeah, I

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>think in deeper leagues, I'm all right with it. In

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamers, that's mostly where I was seeing him being

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>added this past uh this past weekend. But look at

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>his last five starts. He hasn't a lot more than

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>three runs and any of those. He also hasn't got

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>more than five innings in any of those, So he's

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>he's pitching better as of late. Two pretty solid matchups

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>here against the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Miami Marlins. I

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's why most people are looking at him. Greg

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is solely for the matchups here. Understandable. The matchics are

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really get really much better, And I think this

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is how they maximize Chase Anderson's potential is you don't

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>let him go that deep into games. You don't let

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>him go third time through the order, So you see

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 1>him a lot of times five innings, four innings, four

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds around there, So just keep that in mind.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>MAT's right about you know, if if you play in

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a quality start league or you get a bonus for

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>quality starts, you're more than likely not gonna get that

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>out of Chase Anderson. Are you starting Pablo Limpez year

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this week? Matt in fifteen teamers, If I don't have

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a better option, I will. I love the kid long term.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrified of the Miller Park start. I think that

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can really go wrong for him. He has the start

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>home versus road splits. Uh, it's not just the luck

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on the babbit and the left on base percentage. It's

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>also he's got a much better strike ap percentage at

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>home than on the road, and even better control. So

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not like at Lanta is a cupcake coal

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at home, even though at home he did pitch like

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>six or seven and he's one run ball verse. I'm

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>already this year still a tough matchup, So it's basically

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamer if I have no better option having on

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the up right now, Greggy g s t Yeah, we

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have him in. Our other options are Joe Muscro at

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>home against Atlanta and Spencer Turnbull at home against Tampa Bay,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Maddie Mo, would you start either of those guys of

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>our Papulo Lopez? I figured I do. I'm starting him.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I have him on my bench in a fifteen team league,

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think my partner he brought the question

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>up before we came on air. Um, I have have

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt and Stroman there. I like those matchups, better matches,

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>gotta really good. He's a much better picture at home.

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Put it that. We just get the splits, you know,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the e r A is night and day, the strike

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>ap percentage and stuff. So look, I'm just really worried

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Lopez road start at Miller Park. Stuff. I

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>can avoid that. And like I said, it's not a

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>cupcake matchup. First the Braves, all right, So now we

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta figure out Greggy Joe Musko over Spencer Turnbull. I

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was leaning Turnbull. Is that crazy? Yeah? I mean, just

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>going up against Tampa Bay, like the Razors scrappy lineup.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>They've been pretty good against right handed pitching so far

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this year. Turn Will just been inconsistent, right, so you

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>know the starts that you want them for the two

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>start week against the Marlins and the Mats. He like

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>struggles through both of those starts, and then last week

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I bench him against Atlanta and he ends up throwing

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a quality start. So it's just been it's been a

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag for Turnbull. It's been really hard to figure

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>out when to use him and when not to. So

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>just something we'll have to discuss further. But I don't

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>really love the match up against Tampa Bay. It seems

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like they can go off at any time. Randomly, they

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>could have, but they lost like six in a row,

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>right Bay, Yeah, I tell you, I know they can

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>go off at any time, but they've been really cold

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>as three in a row, three rows they got. They

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>got swell by the twins. Yeah, they got swept twins.

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>They had lost a bunch in a Roman or really

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten to have from six and four

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in their last time. Okay, so before that they were

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very good. I prefer the match with a raise the Raves.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know so Tampa Bay over the last week

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as a team, offensively, they have eight oh seven o

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>p s, which is tenth in Baseball, whereas the Atlanta

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Braves are baseball with a six seventy nine. So you

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can kind of go with like who's hot, Who's not

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean, things are obviously gonna change by

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the time they get to those matchups. But the Tampa

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Bay Rays line up, at least over the past week,

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>has been hotter than the Atlanta Braves. So but I

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>guess you can argue that Spencer Turnbull has been more

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>consistent than Joe must Grove, which breaks my heart to say,

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Raft must grove, g sit too, must grove. Yes, yes, yes,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, Um, what do you start pictures on this list? Rank?

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm almost positively is a two star pitcher because we

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>said this is the end for us, and that's John Lester.

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Matt John Leicster has struggled mightily significantly since coming off

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the I L and the matches have gotten worse for him.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But we said this is kind of the end for

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Lester if he didn't produce, And this week I believe

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Lester is a two star picture and he faces awful.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me get it up. John Lester faces off against

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the Angels today and then St. Louis the Angels and

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals. He's starting John Lester, I'm sorry, yes, yes,

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>for me, I've I don't really want to. I think

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>these peripherals pretty much speak to the picture he is

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he got by in a twelve team league. No, it's

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a it's I'm gonna have better options here in a

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamer. Once again, it comes into play. If I

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>need to catch up in wins, I'll take the gamble

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that they can take down the Angels today. So maybe

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I go that route. But even if I am starting him,

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not confidently. So I think you got the best

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of John Lester, you know over these first two months

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna see. Yeah, he's allowed at least four

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>earned runs in each of his past three stars and

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>he's faced the Astros, the Phillies, and the Nationals. So

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 1>not the easiest starts here, Matt. Earlier on in the year,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to John Lester for uh for talking him

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>down throughout draft season, and then last week I came

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on and said that he needs to call into the

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>show and apologize to me. Maybe you jump the gun

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on the air because you know the swinging strike rate.

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, just is very talented with him and stuff.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>He's on a very good team. You know that the

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Cubs are very good. They've got that slow start that

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>first week or so, but you know they've been one

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of the better teams in MLB since that point. So

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>look for wind chasing. I can kind of see it.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>He can give you five innings or so, get you

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>into the six and pick up a win. But you know,

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it will come out. Of course, do you

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>race here? Okay? So not feeling great about John Lesson

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this week? I feel better. This is it, man, this

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is it for me. I told you I'm starting just

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>left the guy. I told you I was starting him

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this week. If it's if it's over, it's over. By

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the way that it was talking about the dropping people,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and I saw you tweet about it last week. Have

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you dropped forest with everywhere? Yeah? I had to. It's

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>most unfortunate. I picked him up on one league not

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>two months ago. I wasn't fad, but I thought he

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>would kind of start around. But once they shut him

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>down for this for a shoulder issue, you just you

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>just can't hold on anymore. Where it's already June. I

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>thought the plan was to bring him up in mid June,

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's obviously not the case. He hasn't earned it. Ultimately,

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>he's clearly dealing with something right now. He's got an

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>e r A over twelve and triple A. Understand that.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And you know in PCL and in the minors it's

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've seen this huge jumping home runs like

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we have seen in the majors. But I mean, to

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>have a twelve e r A, there's got to be

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>something going on there, Greg, So it doesn't surprise me. Yeah,

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're playing a league where you don't actually have

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>minor league spots, I don't really see how you can

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>hold on someome for now. So I held him all

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>year in the pit league. Do you have him but

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't have minor league spots? I know? Wow? Yeah,

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think especially in a daily Transactionally, Greg, I'm surprised

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that you held him this long. They did, but not anymore.

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to drop him off. I mean that you

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>gained another streaming spot. Well, let me ask you this, Matt.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Another two start pictures for this week. Corbin Martin, the

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.760
<v Speaker 1>astro starter, faces Seattle and faces the Orioles. He's available

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>in my league? Do I pick him up? Like he's

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>been very disappointing. I think he's allowed twenty peace runners

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>over sixteen and a thirty innings so far this season.

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And I wrote in my article. I have nothing outside

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of the astros are good to substantiate any reasoning for

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>starting him. But I'm actually in a deeper league in

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a team I would start him. I think that the

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>possibility for wins. I think he's better picture than what

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he's shown to date. Gonna get to that five innings,

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, So I gamble on this it in deeper leagues. Well,

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>team or Greg, what are you doing picking its four team? Right? Yeah,

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>but the roster spots aren't that deep you're picking them up.

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I was toying with the idea of streaming him today

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, So when you brought him up, I ran

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>over here and I'm like looking at him, like should

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I pick up? So I was about to do it,

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately one person on this list I'm really rooting against.

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Who's that? That's uh, Jennis Cabrera. I'm hoping that he

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gets lit up tomorrow Alex rays on something. Yeah, because

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they've already talked about potentially promoting Alex Reyes next weekend, Gregy,

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so that would basically be in line for Genesis. Cabrera's

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>second start, so he faces Seattle in his first start

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at Cincinnati in his next one, so We'll see what

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>happens there. Genesis Cabrera actually someone that Craig Miss was

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>talking up saying that you know he's He's actually watched

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>him before and has some strike out upside, but hasn't

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily come to fruition yet. So we'll see what happens

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>with Cabrera. He gets rocked. Maybe we see Olex race

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. Now we appreciate the time, man, Let's

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>do it again next week. Got gentlemen. Matt Modigo from

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The Athletic follow him at CCN Baseball these articles as

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>his podcast as well. Take a break the Fantasy Best

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Best for Ever coming up? Well, well you know what

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>happened this weekend. We'll get into Warriors and a Raptors

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>as well. The Fantasy Sports Network is ready to take

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you out to the ball game. Our experts and analysts

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are following the Boys of Summer through all one, d

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and six and two games of the two thousand nineteen

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>MLB season with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and your TA Best tournaments.

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Will always want you back listening and watching the Fantasy

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network on the fn T s Y Radio app

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and the f n T s Y YouTube channel, The

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network, where we're root route routing for your

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball team. Maurice Sale two thousand and fifteen, two

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen,

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>World number one. You personally, I keep my game face

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>on me all the time, especially coming out with the bucker,

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>leaving the range or even leaving the boys. What's your story?

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Go to game based grooming dot Com from all your

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs. Rains, make it rain.

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>What we didn't expect is you lost Clay Thompson, Steph

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Hurry to be sick. We didn't expect eight really productive

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>minutes from Boogie Damn Cousins. But what we ended up

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>getting was a champion. We got the Golden State Warriors

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>showing you why they are going for number three. You're

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a champion until somebody beats you. What the golden opportunity

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>slipped through Toronto's fingertips Weekdays six and nine am Eastern

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular pod gas

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Providers I can't get enough fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>launched their NFL three Fantasy Football package, which includes the

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>best math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Davis Madig and the Ruto Experts are providing dynasty,

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>season long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft content every

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>day of the year to give you an edge regardless

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of what type of fantasy football you play. Say Tember

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>cent at Rugo Experts dot com with the promo code

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>V and t s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Football package only at Rhoto Experts dot com. We are

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>back with you here on the Best Friends Forever. We're

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna get into you yourself. There, I saw you. What

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>how are you talking about? Yeah? The BFS Greig, Yeah,

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>let's be about We are back. We are back for now,

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>for now. Put your money where your mouth there to

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>take a shot and opening over sports wager account with Fandal,

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey's largest sports book dot com slash grid. You're

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>receiving free bed of its five hundred bucks. It's free

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>bed of up to five dollars. We open a sports

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>wagering account at fan Duel dot com slash grid poie prids,

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>game totals, props, parlays, and in game wagering on sports

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.239
<v Speaker 1>in pro sports, and you're in control vandal dot com

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>slash grid, open your new account, claim your free wager

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>up to five hundred bucks today. Okay, So I tell

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody this weekend Rose in Charleston, bud that my best

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>bets forever they're on, Like I am, I'm feeling good

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>about this. In Fuego, so it was Friday, and my

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>buddies like, who you like? Like, this is crazy? But

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>if I if I have to pick three teams, I

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>texted you this while you're on the air, I'm like

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lock of the Night, whereas my buddies put the

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Whale of the night. It's the Twins. I loved the twin.

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>What does whale mean? Greg? Like, think about a kind

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of betting term that I don't know. It's like a

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>huge fish, a huge wind. It's like a guarantee. You're

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like you're shoeing your big pick. Yeah. Sure. So the

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>well was Jose Burrios as an underdog on Friday Night.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I get he's facing Tampa. I understand that on the road,

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road, you seem to get good you seem

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to get good value even when you have good pictures

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Correct exactly. I love Burrios as an underdog.

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He pitched well enough twins score in the eighth went

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on a wind that was my well and I loved it.

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Other picks I liked not as much. For I light

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and did a Frank theory. Oh I took Andrew Kashner

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Oh's they won, all right, I know he

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>got blown up. What he won is there in San

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Bays and Drew palmerans who was worse. Oh yeah,

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so as you cash the one that was two and out.

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And my third pick, which I lost, it was in

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Miami Marlins. I love the Caleb Smith every time. So

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the next night the only one I liked, so I

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't really take too much time to look at it.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:12.800
<v Speaker 1>On Saturday night, I really like jose Urania of the

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Marlins and went back to the Marlin as well. It

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>worked at many Marlins are hot, so I feel good.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm on a roll with my picks,

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I wanted to get into the Fantasy

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>best Bets Forever Wolves take a look. Obviously, at Game three,

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the lines when it comes to the NBA

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:32.959
<v Speaker 1>as well. So take you a look at the sports

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>book today. We'll use the FanDuel sports book just for fun.

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you could play I don't know when the sports

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 1>poott dot com. Look at today's lines, Frankie, you got

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Angels and the Cubs. Angels using opener is Felix painting.

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If evena I believe so, I would, I would imagine

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that when whenever there's an open Felix, I don't have

0:42:55.200 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>more people. Uh so may yeah, so today's day. Yeah,

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>today's day. So it's Felix pain mostly against John Lester. Correct,

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>now this is your thing? This according to Yah, who's

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>not supposed special Tuesday. First. Second, No, he's not suspicial Tuesday.

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know these piction today throws in his opening.

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>We know that for sure. Yes, let me feed the

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:23.560
<v Speaker 1>book all right. Let me see here CBS Sports as

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Camp Droser will serve as the opener, and Trevor k

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Hill going for the Angels. They're using the opener for

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Kile. You're using an opener to for Trevor Kallee tonight.

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're the heavy underdog against Kale's fourteen one of

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>his former teams, these Chicago Cubs. Now John Lester has

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 1>been awful. The overunder year is nine. Cubs are a

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty heavy favorite. What do you think of this? I

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really love this game overall. I think it's kind

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of hard to get a lean here, Greg, because again

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned it. Lester has an been great, but can

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>he buckle down against the Angels here? Trevor Khill hasn't

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>been great either, so maybe we're looking at the total here,

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's a little bit elevated at nine, So ultimately

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't feel confident either way. This is probably

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a game that I wouldn't touch this overall, but there's

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>really only value if you go with the Angels like

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs money line at minus one sixty eight, Like

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I probably just wouldn't be What are that total of nine?

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Would you go over? That got into my head? Probably,

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>but you don't love it. I don't love this game. Okay,

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all right? We got the Dodgers and d Backs and

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>then't even riding the Robbie Rags train is late, Ray

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the d Backs hit it on the Dodgers and Walker

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Bueller the Dodgers already favorite, not a heavy favorite. On

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the road minus one forty eight over under sits at

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. Frank Bueller's pitched well, raised been Ray.

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you see this one? Yeah? So Walker Bueller

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>actually turned to season round in the month of maybe

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>point nine zero e r A across thirty one endings

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pitched And you know what I was just saying about,

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you can get aces on the road and you can

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 1>get pretty good value. You. That's exactly what happing about

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>for the next two games that we're gonna discuss here.

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the Dodgers in the Diamondbacks and the Philly is

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Podres. So I do like the

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers at minus one eight money line. The total is

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>tricky because they could see Robbie Ray getting blown up

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>by the Dodgers here, so wouldn't surprise me if it

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>went over here. But then the number that I really

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>do like is the Dodgers money line at minus You

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta lay some juice obviously here, but I feel pretty

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:28.799
<v Speaker 1>confident that the Dodgers can win tonight against Robbie Ray

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>with the The only thing I wonder is maybe we

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>take the run line at one and a half, right

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>if they win by two against Robbie Right. I should

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers put up some runs in Arizona. I kind of

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like the run line here, like you should never touch

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the spread in baseball. Where's the thing I want and half?

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting Walker Bueller in h way love that plus

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>one twelve. I'm getting a plus money now. Yeah, so

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think it's worth it. I see the

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>logic behind it. Yeah, but when the Dodgers win like

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>five for tonight, you're gonna be so pissede trying to

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get greedy. This is definitely me getting greedy. I like

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the run line here with Walker Bugleer plus one twelve

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.239
<v Speaker 1>and might is one and a half. All right, we'll

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>see what the props are here. How about Walker Bueller

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>over five and a half strikeouts, greggy, Let's see what

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he's been doing. Well, I mentioned what he did in

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the in the month of May. I want the nine

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>zero year. No, I know that. I want the game

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 1>lot though, so over five strike as at over five

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half. He hasn't had less than five and

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a half since April in a game. The Diamondbacks are

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the pack against right handed pitching

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to strikeout right there. Twenty three percent

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate, so five and a half it's a good number. Well,

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you get it at minus team like that. So if

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:44.839
<v Speaker 1>you think Bueller is gonna have a good game, why

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>don't you just you can parlay the over for Walker

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Bueller strikes tonight five and a half with the with

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the money line in the game. You get that together

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>at Oh you can't do that, Well you do it,

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>won't you do it? Well you do it separately. Then hey,

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do the if you want to

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do the run spread at minus one and a half

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Dodgers and then walking Peeler over five and

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a half, you just think the Dodgers dominate tonight over

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>five and a half strikeouts. I like that. I like

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that too. You do this all over the Vandal Sports book. Yeah,

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's you click on If you click on more, you

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can see like all these different kind of props. I

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of crazy stuff here. Actually, Greg, where's

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the more? Frank? Is it all? You mean? Maybe? Okay?

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you can actually like to someone to hit

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a home run tonight. You can definitely do that. Yes, yes,

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hit a home run, to hit a home run and

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>win the game. So like Cody Bellinger to hit a

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 1>home run and the Dodgers are you better? Awesome? Yeah? Right?

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And I like that you predicting someone to hit a

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>home run. What about I'm not gonna get rich doing

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting. Robbie Ray, his strike ats over under

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is actually more than Buelers at six and a half.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Well that makes sense though, we just were over strike

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a picture. But Dodgers strike out as much as the

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Backs too. That's a good question. Let's pull it up.

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>So against the left handed pitching this year, the Dodgers

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>have a one percent strikeout rate, which is twenty second,

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>so they actually don't strike out all that much against

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>left handed pitch. Like the under man was crazy early, right,

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>so he will You're knock gonna have before he gets there.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not a bad idea. Well, what do you get

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the under it? So the under six and a half strikeouts,

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the under six and a half strikeouts Robbie Ray plus

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:25.439
<v Speaker 1>one fourteen. Now, Robbie Ray, what's the game log telling?

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>How about this? In three of his last four starts,

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray has been under six and a half strikeouts.

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I think you found it, Craig. I think I found

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it Frank plus one four team Roberluser, and that's what

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we're doing. Sports like that, and I like I like

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers money line as well. Run line, Frank, just

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>run line, run line tonight, get them get the plus

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>money alright, Phillies and Padres. Later on Eric Loer on

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the mound facing Aaron Nola Phillies or minus one forty

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego, who have been struggling here as of

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>late over under there seven and a half fronds, which

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>also seems low to me. Yeah, it is really low.

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And Arnola hasn't been himself so far this year, and

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>unlike Walker Bueller, he's kind of turned around, but not

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 1>to the same extent in the month of May two

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>point seven three e r A. But it feels like

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he's just been shaky still. He hasn't necessarily been himself.

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Forty two strikeouts in thirty three innings pitched, and I

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:26.359
<v Speaker 1>I get why the total is what it is, Greg

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because when I looked into Lower I was actually surprised

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to see that he's really only been blown up once

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, and that was in Colorado, So he's actually

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:37.399
<v Speaker 1>pitched pretty well. Is going up against a different Beast

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>tonight in the in the Philadelphia Philly. So I think

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:44.760
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to sucker me in there, I will say overthinking.

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But I do like the Phillies money line at at

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>minus one four. I will say this, Despite the struggles,

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Nola has not given up more than three earned

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>runs in a game where three runs total in a

0:49:56.320 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>game since a Yeah, it's pretty good. Now, some of

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>them are short he starts, but he's not giving you

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like these crazy dominance sting. No, he's not. He's although

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the mother man you read the stats was actually very good.

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>He allowed one run or less. Actually, now that's not true.

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>One run exactly in four of his six starts, one

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 1>run exactly four of his six starts, an other man.

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at lower right, his past three starts,

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>one and run exactly in each of those starts. The

0:50:27.239 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 1>last time he got blown up was May Tent. That

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was at Colorado. But you kind of give him a

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.040
<v Speaker 1>pass for that, Greg, So do we go under the

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 1>name hasn't He hasn't allowed more than three runs and

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the start he's only done it once in three or five, six, seven,

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>eight and seven of his last eight starts he's allowed

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>three or runs or less. That's eric lower. So do

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we go and I think, no, I think this is

0:50:49.640 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 1>your don't don't be a sucker bit. I think that

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what they want us to think, want us to

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>go there, sucking, sucking us in here. I don't think.

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they're trying to get an over, but maybe

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 1>just talk. You're just not touching it that No, no, no, no,

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't touch the total. But I like the Phillies

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to win the game. Hey, yeah, I don't like this

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>game at all. The Yeah, I mean that's how I

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>felt about the Cubs and the Angels. Yeah, I'm not,

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, I'm not. You like the you like the Diamondback,

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that Diamonds Dodgers games. Where we're going, We're going that

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 1>under six. I'm on under six and a half of

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Reray over uh five and a half of Walker below.

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Dodgers with the run line. And with that,

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna sign off YouTube for now. There is one

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 1>more game to go later on today. I believe that's

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners and the Astros right there the ten pm

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>uh t BM start for them to be the first pitch.

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break down that game next exclusively on the

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>radio side and on the podcast. So if you're watching

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>on a video, make sure that the podcast as soon

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as it goes up so you can get our breakdown

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:47.439
<v Speaker 1>here of Houston and Seattle. Ten pm, First pitch on ESPN.

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Come up next at one pm on the video. Sean

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Grostamakia at the Window makes their debut here on the network.

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>He'll be breaking down on the NBA, breaking down all

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this baseball stuff, a lot of gambling to talk to

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you with Seawan. Shan makes his UH at the Window debut,

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 1>coming up next. All right, Frank, let's break this down here.

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the Houston Astros taking on the Seattle Mariners. And

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it's on the board at the sports book.

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Don't see it? Yeah, that seems like

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. I don't really know why it wouldn't be

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>on the board. I mean there might be a reason

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>for it. Is there something in question? For now? It's

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Corbyn Martin against Wade le Blanc. Although interesting, it's

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:30.600
<v Speaker 1>been pulled from a lot of locations. Maybe they're waiting

0:52:30.640 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on a news but whose all today? And so these

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>actual players maybe there's somebody coming up for the Astros.

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. The matter is gonna be making the trade.

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So it opened at Maris did make the trade, So

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Corbyn Martin against Wade le Blanc. Seattle opened at

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>plus one, twenty, Houston at minus one thirty. On the

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>road the total was at nine and a half. It's

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 1>been pulled at the West Gate, the MGM William Hill

0:52:56.840 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>will win, It's been pulled everywhere. But those does sound

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like pretty good odds for the Astros though, what was

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it minus one? It opened minus one the thirties now

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:07.839
<v Speaker 1>minus one forty for the for the Astros to win.

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it. I know hasn't been great, but

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the Marriors lineup has also slowed down tremendously over the

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>past week. Twenty three in ops for the Seattle manners

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:22.439
<v Speaker 1>seven oh six ops and they trade away j Bruce.

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So no, that's not going to help their lineup either. Greg.

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the Astros to win the game. I mean

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna They're gonna blow up Wade LeBlanc. There's no

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:32.840
<v Speaker 1>doubt in my mind. Well why can't why can't the

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Marriagers keep up? I guess what would the total do

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you do? You have a total there? Nine and a half,

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:42.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's no. But I mean I like that over.

0:53:44.600 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the one you you live up for. There, like

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that because Cortan Martin hasn't been great either, so he

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>can give up some runs and I would expect I

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>mean whatever, like the Astros run total for their team

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.359
<v Speaker 1>alone is I would probably be interested in that because

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Wade LeBlanc has not been good. Greg see, even with

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the injuries, who uh to all the the Astros players.

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Their lineup hasn't been terrible either, So I got nothing.

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:17.839
<v Speaker 1>We got nothing here, to be honest with you. Unfortunately.

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:20.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well we like the over, and I think

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Astros win the game too, okay, So we'll stick

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>with that when it comes to Houston. We'll stick with

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes to Houston. Last night, game number

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:34.240
<v Speaker 1>two in the NBA Finals between the Raptors and the Warriors, Warriors.

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Warriors pull off the win in Toronto, despite losing Clay Thompson,

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:44.440
<v Speaker 1>despite losing Um, despite losing Kevon Looney, no Kevin Durant

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 1>last night. Do you think he returns in games free?

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I mean, all indications have been

0:54:49.960 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's still dealing with uh this injury. He's been

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>limping around. He hasn't practiced yet, and I know that

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend they said that he doesn't necessarily need

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to practice, or maybe he only needs one practice to

0:55:01.280 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>get that under his belt before he's back in the finals.

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, I don't think that he's going to play

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And now we have Clay Thompson in

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>question as well, who hurt his hamstring yesterday. I know,

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they asked him after the game, are you

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be available? And maybe it was just adrenaline going,

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's, you know, he's telling everyone, I'm not gonna

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 1>miss this game. I'm gonna be ready to go for

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Game three. So obviously a lot of storylines playing out here. Greg,

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was I thought it was a really

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:29.399
<v Speaker 1>bad loss for the Toronto Raptors overall, because you hold

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the you hold Steph Curry to twenty three points on

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>six of seventeen shooting, but you let other guys get

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 1>going here. DeMarcus Cousins gets going a little bit. You

0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>get Andrew Bogan randomly chipping in six points, Quinn Cook

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>randomly chipping in nine points, Toronto Raptors had every opportunity

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to pull this one out, Greig, if you were watching

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that fourth quarter, they got stopped after stop after stop,

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but they just couldn't put the ball in the basket.

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And for everyone who's freaking out about the refs, they

0:55:57.640 --> 0:55:59.800
<v Speaker 1>were bad on both sides, Greg, let let's not just,

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's not paint this picture like it's like

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's some kind of one one sided thing here, because

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:06.879
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the free throws in this one

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:11.879
<v Speaker 1>for the Raptors twenty three for the Warriors, I thought

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it was really bad on both sides. So I'm not just,

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, blaming this loss for the Raptors on the referees.

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought they had opportunities. You know, they shot thirty

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:24.440
<v Speaker 1>seven percent from the field. Credit to the Warriors defense.

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They played well again. Boogie really came on in that

0:56:27.040 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>second half. I thought Andre Egodala, I don't know what

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he did. Did he take Mike's magic water at halftime, Greg,

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:34.319
<v Speaker 1>because you know, he healed up and he actually looked

0:56:34.320 --> 0:56:36.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. He was the savior last night. He hit

0:56:36.160 --> 0:56:38.799
<v Speaker 1>the dagger three, but played some good defense as well.

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But I thought it was a really, really bad loss

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to the Raptors not great. So now they go to

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Golden State. They are five and a half point dogs

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. And you know this, it's really interesting because

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:50.279
<v Speaker 1>this number can change so much up in the air.

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>If it's a rant Clay, what the deal is with that?

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's a very big deal. If you like Golden State,

0:56:57.080 --> 0:56:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you do it now. No, I I don't think that

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>number goes out. I only think it goes up with

0:57:01.600 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Clay News and Katie Dowers. I was actually leaning the

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>other way. I don't think Katie's gonna play. And I

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>do have my doubts about playtops and is effective. And

0:57:08.600 --> 0:57:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying I don't I like it. I say,

0:57:10.200 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>if you like the Warriors, do it now. I can

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>see the number going Youngberg, that's gonna do it for us,

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for Frank Staffle, I'm Greg Susman. We'll do it all gonnamorrow. YopE,