WEBVTT - Rebecca Smith Pollard, aka Kate Harrington

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Missed in History Class, a production

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio. Hello, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Tracy V.

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and I'm Holly Frye. Sometime last year, some folks

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>here at work asked if we had anything planned for

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the show to go along with the two hundred and

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence that's being celebrated

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think it is safe to say that

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>there is not a year in which either of us

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>would really be interested in the kind of like over

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the top patriotism and national pride that is usually expected

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to go along with that kind of a milestone observance.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>We especially were not in the mood for that when

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we were asked twenty twenty five. I did, though, go

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>looking around to see if there was anything that was

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of more off the beaten path that might spark

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>my interests and also let us say to the folks

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that work, yes, there will be something related on the

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>calendar our recent episode on Kasimir Pulaski. Unrelated to that conversation.

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>That is just a coincidence somehow in my search for

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>something that would let us say, yes, we do have

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>something on the calendar. I found Rebecca Smith Pollard, who

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>also published under the name Kate Harrington, and her connection

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to the US Simmy Quincentennial is that she published a

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>book of poems to mark the US Centennial in eighteen

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>seventy six. That is not much of a connection, and

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode's also mostly not about that, because Rebecca Smith

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Pollard's major influence was not this book of poems that

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>she published. It was creating a method for teaching children

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to read that was really influential in her time and

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>still has relevance today. She also wrote a novel that

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was meant in part as a critical response to Harriet

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Beecher Stowe's anti slavery novel Uncle Tom's Cabin, so we're

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about that as well. Rebecca Harrington

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Smith was born in Allegheny City, Pennsylvania, on September twentieth,

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thirty one. Her mother, Marjorie, was born in Ireland

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and immigrated to the US with her family when she

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>was a child. Rebecca's father, Nathaniel Ruggles Smith, was born

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts, went to Harvard and then became a teacher,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly in private schools. He liked to teach the works

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare, and he wrote his own grammar and spelling books.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>A grammar textbook by Samuel Kirkham described Nathaniel Ruggles Smith

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>as a quote distinguished and acute grammarian. Nathaniel also established

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and edited a literary journal called the Hesperus, and Rebecca

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 1>was their youngest child. Yeah, that literary journal was apparently

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the first, if not the first literary journals

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>published west of the Mississippi. It's been a running theme

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on the show lately that we don't know much about

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>people's early lives. But we don't know much about Rebecca's

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>early life. There's even some uncertainty about her middle name.

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>A couple of sources I found gave it as Hutchinson

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>rather than Harrington. I'm not totally sure, but I think

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>this is because she had an older sister named Rebecca

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Hutchinson who only lived for a few months, and that

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was the year before this Rebecca was born. At some point,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the Smith family moved west. First they moved to Ohio

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and then to Kentucky. Apparently this move is because Marjorie

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was ill and they hope that the change of climate

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>would help her. It's hard to say what impact this

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>had but from what I was able to piece together.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Smith lived until eighteen seventy two, when she died

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>at the age of eighty four. She outlived Rebecca's father,

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>who died in eighteen fifty nine at the age of

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. While living in Kentuck, Ucky, Rebecca became a teacher,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and she also started publishing her writing. She published poems

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Louisville Journal under the name Kate Harrington, often

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with a notation of prairie cottage and the year the

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>poem was written at the end. In eighteen fifty four,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>she and another poet, miss M. E. Wilson, of Maysville, Kentucky,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>each wrote a poem called Moonlight Tryst that was inscribed

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to the other. These were published in the Journal, together

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>with a note from the editor saying that quote, two

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of our romantic young poetesses, living more than one thousand

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>miles apart, made a covenant to meet in spirit on

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a particular night and talk to each other in poetry.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>When Kate Harrington didn't submit anything to the paper for

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a while, in eighteen fifty five, her next poem appeared

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with this note from the editor, quote, we are heartily

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>glad to see you back. Dear Kate, you must never

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>play truant so long again. She also published essays in

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>other newspapers around Kentucky. Sometime in the mid eighteen fifties,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the family moved to Iowa, and in eighteen fifty six

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca published a novel titled Emma Bartlett or Prejudice and Fanaticism.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>The title page said that it was by an American lady,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but the copyright statement lists it as the work of R. H. Smith.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>In the words of her review and the Ohio Statesman quote,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the heroine, Emma Bartlett, is the offspring of a young

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and lively German woman who was driven with her relatives

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>by political and religious persecution from her own land to

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>seek a home in America. She illustrates, through a succession

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of thrilling scenes, the character of a gentle, noble, and

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>gifted woman suffering from the evils with which a corrupt

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>social system and an unwise and unjust prescription have surrounded her.

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>So as Tracy mentioned at the top of the show,

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this book was written at least in part as a

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>response to Harry at beecher Stowe's abolitionist novel Uncle Tom's Cabin,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>which was published in book form in eighteen fifty two

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and became a bestseller. Uncle Tom's Cabin, of course, has

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>its own very complicated legacy. Among other things, it was

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>straightforwardly anti slavery and as credited with sparking a surge

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in abolitionist sentiment in the US, but it also depicted

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.559
<v Speaker 1>black people in a very heavily stereotyped way, and Uncle

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom became an insult to describe Black people who were

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>perceived as subservient or complicit in their own oppression. At

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>least thirty novels were written in response to Uncle Tom's Cabin,

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>which are often grouped together under the umbrella of Anti

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Tom literature. At least a third of these novels were

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>by women, and they were mostly written by writers living

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in the South. A lot of Anti Tom novels were

0:06:55.800 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>explicitly pro slavery. I did not read this entire book,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but I did read selections from it, and Emma Bartlett

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>has kind of a broader focus than that. In the

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>words of a piece in the Weekly Courier of Atumwa, Iowa,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it was quote designed to illustrate the evils of abolitionism

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and no nothingism. The review from The Ohio Statesman that

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we read from earlier described the book as exposing quote,

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>political and religious prejudice and fanaticism as seen in Abolitionism,

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>No Nothingism, and Kindred heresies. Abolitionism was obviously the abolition

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of slavery. The No Nothing Party was an anti immigrant

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and anti Catholic political party that flourished in the eighteen fifties.

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Its name purportedly came from the idea that if members

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>were asked about any nativist organizations they belonged to, they

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>would say they knew nothing. Smith does not seem to

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have been Catholic herself. Her family were Presbyterians, but she

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>was sympathetic toward Catholics and opposed to the anti Catholic

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>prejudice that was widespread in the nineteenth century. Some of

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this prejudice was connected to the influx of Catholic immigrants

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>from Ireland who were fleeing the Great Famine that started

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen forties. So Smith wrote this novel, too,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>exposed No Nothingism as evil, and she apparently thought abolitionism

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was just as bad. The books, abolitionist characters are hypocrites

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and they have self serving motivations. There are rebuttals against

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>abolitionist arguments scattered throughout conversations that take place among the

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>various characters, like at one point, someone describes the idea

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of people as property as shocking, and the response is quote,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and yet who first brought them into a position to

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be sold as such? Was it not the inhabitants of

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that portion of the globe whose descendants are now continually

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>crying against the sin of slavery? Good gracious. Another conversation

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>frames accounts of brutality being carried out on southern plantations

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as overblown or even fabricated, basically the same kind of

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>nonsense that still is in Internet comment sections today. We're

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying that depicting something in a book is the

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>same as believing or endorsing it. Plenty of writers depict

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>evil or prejudice or violence in their books without it

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>being an expression of their own beliefs or tendencies. But

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this book was explicitly written for political reasons. It is

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to the quote true upholders of the Constitution and

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the firm supporters of our glorious Union. The preface

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to the first edition said that she quote endeavored to

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>present some facts in fiction just shaking my head. No, oh, Rebecca,

0:09:58.240 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know any of this when I picked her.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what makes it good. That's what makes it a

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>good thing to discuss. In the introduction to the second

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>edition of the novel, Smith described it as demonstrating quote

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>two or three notions which have of late grown to

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>the importance of political doctrines to be great political and

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>social evils. The two chief conclusions which she thought these

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>facts established were that a fellow creature's place of birth

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>should not be made the test of his capabilities or

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>intrinsic worth, and that there is neither reason, religion, nor

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>justice in crushing the white man in order to liberate

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>the blacks from a bondage in which they have been

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>placed by circumstances which no ordinary foresight of man and

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no ordinary exercise of humanity could have prevented. Once again,

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I say, oh, Rebecca. In this book and other writings,

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Smith was also so deeply opposed to the idea of

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dissolving the Union over the issue of slavery. That's one

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that she framed abolitionism as a fanatical evil.

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>She thought that the abolitionists were forcing the country toward

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.599
<v Speaker 1>a civil War. Near the end of Emma Bartlett, a

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>character even recites a five stanza poem that argues stridently

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>against dissevering the Union. Unfortunately, this book, which was written

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>when she was twenty five, is the biggest example we

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have of Rebecca Smith Pollard's thoughts on this. I looked

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>through newspapers for other stories or essays or poems that

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>she might have written later on to see if they

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>revealed anything in how or whether her opinions might have

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>evolved during and after the Civil War, and I really

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>did not find all that much. Her eighteen seventy six

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>books Centennial and Other Poems does include a dirge for

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune and one

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the founders of the Report publican party. He was

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 1>deeply opposed to compromising over the issue of slavery and

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the lead up to the Civil War. So this poem

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>describes Greeley, who was one of the people who worked

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to convince Abraham Lincoln to commit to ending slavery with

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War, as a spirit who quote so nobly

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>endeavored to save from disunion the land of the free.

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So does this poem mean that she came to see

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>slaveholders as the threat to the union rather than abolitionists.

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I really cannot say I have theories. See you Friday.

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We will get to her work as an educator after

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a sponsor break. On April sixth, eighteen fifty eight, Rebecca

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Harrington Smith married poet and newspaper editor Oliver I. Taylor.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>An announcement of their marriage and The Little Journal described

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca as having achieved considerable eminence in the literary world.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>On their wedding anniversary a year later, they welcomed a

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>daughter named Mary. Sadly, Oliver died of typhoid in eighteen sixty.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Two years later, Rebecca married James Pollard, who was elected

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Iowa State Senate that year. James had four

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>children from a previous marriage, and he and Rebecca had

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>three surviving children together, Adelaide, Eleanor, and Joseph Addison Smith Pollard.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Most written mentions of Joseph refer to him by his

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>initials JAS. In eighteen seventy, Pollard published a book of

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>poetry under the name Kate Harrington. It was called In

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Memoriam Maymy April sixth, eighteen sixty nine. It was in

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 1>memory of her daughter Mary, who died on that date,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>which was her tenth birthday and the anniversary of Rebecca's

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>wedding to Mary's late father. This was a series of

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>poems that were written for her daughter, but also to

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>any other mother who had loved and lost a child. Quote,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it matters little what her station proved, or of what nation, race,

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or tribe she'd be. I'll place her sympathy beyond all price.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll give her confidence and perfect trust. Such friendship true

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and strong as never dies, but lives. When lips that pledge,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it turned to dust. Pollard apparently had an ongoing correspondence

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>with Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, who wrote to her that this

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>collection brought tears to his eyes. I found references to

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this in writing about Pollard, but I did not find

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the actual letter. Pollard's books, Centennial and Other Poems, came

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>out in eighteen seventy six, also published under the name

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Kate Harrington. This collection starts with Iowa's Centennial Poem, which

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is a patriotic poem celebrating the American Revolution. Of course,

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Iowa was not really part of the Revolution at the time.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>What is now Iowa was claimed by Spain and not Britain.

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>This poem starts out describing Iowa as a barren wild

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years before, home only to indigenous people, who

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>she refers to as the Red Man. But it goes quote,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we share the nation's glory to by holding to the

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>world's broadview. Our men of mark are genius, rare, scattered

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like sunbeams everywhere. The United States Centennial took place just

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a decade after the official end of the Civil War,

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>so this was near the end of the reconstruction era,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and federal troops were still stationed in South Carolina, Florida,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and Louisiana, so for some people this was a strange

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and difficult time to be celebrating a national centennial. The

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>country still seemed very divided. A lot of ways it

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>was becoming more divided. This poem alludes to this, calling

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for quote prodigal suns to return and to be given

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a generous welcome, and to quote give them robes of

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a right royal hue. Let the rings that the restore

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>them be offered by victors who honor the blue. The

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>poem ends, quote, we ask you to pledge them, truehearted,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a covenant promise anew remembering mong Patriots Departed No Line Parts,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>The Gray from the Blue Centennial and other poems. Also

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>includes poems two and about members of Pollard's family, including

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>her late daughter, a memorial to William G. Bell Knap,

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>son of Grant's Secretary of War, William Wurst bell Nap,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a temperance poem, some nature poems, and some poems that

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>were written by her late father. In addition to writing poetry,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Pollard continued to work as a teacher, mainly at schools

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for girls, including in Keokuk, Iowa. That's a school that

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>she ran from eighteen seventy five to eighteen seventy seven.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like she and her husband, James were separated

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>by eighteen seven seventy seven, so especially after that, her

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>teaching and her writing would have been really necessary to

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>support herself and her children. James died in nineteen oh two.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Pollard was ahead of her time as

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a teacher. Nineteenth century schools often involved a lot of

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 1>learning by rote and strict discipline, but she taught hands

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on history lessons with her students dressing up and re

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>enacting battles. She cut up apples to help students learn

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>about fractions, and she had a classroom garden outside of

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the school. Part of the lesson involved pulling up some

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the plants at different stages of their development to

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>see how they grew. In eighteen eighty seven, Pollard was

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>awarded a patent under the name R. S. Pollard. This

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>was for an educational appliance, and here's how the patents

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>described this invention. Quote two or more plates connected together

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and shifting upon or within each other, and having upon

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>their faces a series of characters, which, upon a proper

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>shifting of the plate's form, and convey to the eye

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and mind different impressions, meanings and objects which singly or

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>improperly grouped. They do not indicate whereby the mind of

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a student is trained by the constructive and synthetic methods

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in the formation of objects, characters, and the language. In

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the accompanying illustrations, one of the plates is

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a ring with a series of letters written on it

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like S, RP, and M. The other plate is in

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the middle and it has the letters A through T.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So by turning that outer ring you can see how

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>these letters combine to form words sat, rat, pat, and MATT.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Another illustration shows this setup being used for arithmetic. These

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>devices would be made from blackboard or something else that

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>could be a RaSE, so that a teacher could prepare

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the board to go along with whatever the day's lessons were.

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Pollard had started teaching back when she was living with

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>her parents in Kentucky. At this point, she had at

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>least two decades of experience as a teacher. She also

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>had her father's example as a teacher, and she had

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>decided that teaching children phonics was critical to their learning

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to read. This was right in the middle of a

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>century's long debate in the United States about how best

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>to teach children to read. The idea of teaching children

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>through phonics very basically meaning the relationship between letters and

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the sounds that they make, goes back to at least

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the sixteenth century, when the first formal schools started to

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>be established in North America. Children were typically taught the

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>alphabet and the sounds made by each letter. Students put

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that into practice by reading the Bible or historic or

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>political texts. Since there were no text books made specifically

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>for children until the seventeenth century, I'll just say I

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>did not look into the history of reading education outside

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. At all for this episode, so

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we are not going to be talking about that. Some

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest reading and spelling textbooks in North America

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>were phonics based. Those included Noah Webster's The American Spelling Book,

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>also called The Blue Backed Speller, which came out in

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighty three. He also released A Grammar in seventeen

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>eighty four and A Reader in seventeen eighty five. We

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about Webster and his influence more in our two

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>parter on the Dictionary Wars, which came out in June

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty three. In the mid eighteen hundreds, school

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>started moving away from phonics in favor of a method

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that focused on learning whole words, or the look say method.

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>One advocate of this was Thomas Hopkins Gaaladet, founder of

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the first American School for the Deaf and namesake of

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Gallaudet University. In his book The Mother's Primer to Teach

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Her Child Its Letters, he wrote, quote in the common modes,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what can be more uninteresting than to commence with teaching

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a child to call certain arbitrary marks or letters which

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 1>in themselves have no meaning, by certain arbitrary sounds or

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>names of the letters, which also have no meaning. What

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>an unintelligible and irksome task it must be. So Galiadet's

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>method paired words with pictures, like a picture of a

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>cat along with the word cat, so that the student

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>could learn that whole word rather than its component letters.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>This method probably made a lot of sense to Galandet

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>because of his work with Death and Heart of hearing

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>students who either couldn't hear the sounds that were made

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>by different letters and letter combinations, or couldn't hear them

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>very well. But this method did not provide a way

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for students to decode written words that they didn't already know,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>other than to try to work it out from context

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>or maybe from illustrations that might be on the page.

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>The first books designed for this method also only went

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up to the third grade, and by necessity, they were

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on words for concrete objects and concepts that can

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be illustrated, so consequently their vocabulary was kind of limited.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>The Mother's Primer was written for the parents of hearing students,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>and starting in the eighteen forties, Galliaut's method was popularized

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>outside of schools for the deaf, in part by educational

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>reformer Horace Mann. Man advocated teaching children to read by

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>focusing on whole words and only after that to focus

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>on the alphabet and spelling. This whole word model was

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fiercely debated among educators, but in the later part of

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century it gradually became more widely used than

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>phonics based instruction in the United States. So that brings

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>us back to Rebecca Smith Pollard in the late eighteen eighties,

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so about forty years after Horace mann started popularizing the

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>look say method, she created a whole system for teaching reading,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>including a reader, a speller, and a teacher's manual, and

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it was based on phonics, which we will talk more

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about after a sponsor break. In eighteen eighty nine, Rebecca

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Smith Pollard published her first synthetic reader, synthetic Speller, and

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a complete manual Pollard Synthetic Method of Reading and Spelling,

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>which was a step by step guide for teachers on

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>how to use the other two books with their students.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>She wrote in the preface to the manual, quote, instead

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of teaching the word as a whole and afterwards subjecting

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it to phonic analysis, is it not infinitely better to

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>take the sounds of the letters for our starting point,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and with those sounds lay a foundation firm and broad,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>upon which we can build whole families of words for

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>instant recognition. Her method included what she referred to as

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>busy work, in which children practice sounding out letters or

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>drew latters that were used to illustrate the progression of

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>tones that different vowels could make, or drew wheels with

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a sound in the center and a spoke for each

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>word that can be made by adding a letter to

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that sound. She described these as families, so for example,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the ot the Aught family included words like pot tot

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>rot and cot uh. There was a lot of busy work.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are just examples, but Pollard also acknowledged the need

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to make things fun, incorporating drawing and sketching and singing

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate different concepts. In the preface, she wrote, quote,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>why should not something be used to awaken and hold

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the interest of children in the drudgery of the first

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>lessons in reading? Are not splints, balls, toothpicks, clay and

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sandwork used for this purpose In teaching the first principles

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of arithmetic and geography. Every intelligent teacher knows when the

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>developing mind of the child no longer needs these devices

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or helps in the last names branches, Why should there

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be any question as to when the devices of this

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>method have served their purpose. Pollard's method of teaching phonics

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>involved focusing on the twenty six letters of the alphabet

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and all the different sounds they can be used to represent. Students'

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>textbooks were illustrated to help students remember sounds associated with

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>different letters, like r R was shown next to a

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>growling dog, while H was next to a panting dog.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Stories incorporated the words and sounds that were the focus

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of a particular lesson, and these became more advanced over time,

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>so lesson one in pollard Synthetic first reader focused on

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>single syllable words that rhymed with hat, can, or bag,

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>while the first lesson and the second reader is focused

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on words ending in ing, as well as talk, walk,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>each piece, and square. These textbooks sorted the letters into

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>vowels and consonants, and then sorted the consonant sounds into

0:25:55.760 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>subvocals or voiced consonants, and aspirates or whispers. She also

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>described sounds as labial, lingual, dental, guttural, and pure aspirate

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>depending on where in the mouth each sound was formed.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>After learning the letters and these sounds, students could move

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on to learning combinations of sounds, like digraphs and trigraphs.

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Pollard's books also included tables of all the diacritical marks

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and the sounds they corresponded to. The busy work included

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>having students mark their textbooks with diacritical marks corresponding to

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the sounds made by each letter in each word. This

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>was controversial, both because people objected to the idea of

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>students writing in books and because people thought this busy

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>work was tedious. Pollard later suggested having students make their

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>marks on a piece of transparent material, so the book

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>itself remained unmarked. Pollard did not invent the idea of

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>teaching phonics, As we said, a lot of the earliest

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reading textbooks for children in the United States were phonics

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>based until the field of teaching had moved toward a

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>whole word approach. But she was one of the first

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to combine spelling and reading books with a teacher's manual

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so that everything went together. She also developed literature readers

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>that became gradually more advanced for children to move on

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to after they had mastered the basics. She developed all

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of this material over the course of about eight years

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>with the help of her daughter Adelaide, who had also

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>become a teacher and also wrote hymns. Pollard's phonics based

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>reading instruction became really influential in the late nineteenth and

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>early twentieth centuries. Her system was used all over the country,

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and multiple other textbook writers took inspiration from her. A

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>review of Pollard's Advanced Speller appeared in the journal Education

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen ninety seven. The reviewer wrote, quote, this book

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>teaches the pupil to spell, which is its great merit.

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>The need of such book is made painfully evident by

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers, the books, and the business letters that one

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>reads bad spelling is a fault of our busy her

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>read American life. The author of this volume has done

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>much to correct this fault. We believe in her system.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It teaches its students to think as well as to

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>write and speak correctly. It teaches him to note accurately

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the component parts of a word to form a scientific

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion as to its proper pronunciation. We would like to

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>have our own children taught by this system, and we

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>hope to secure the introduction of this book in the

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>schools attended by them. We commend it to all teachers.

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Proponents of Pollard's method included Edward Everett Hale, who was

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>an advocate of education for the Freed people and of

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chautauqua adult education movement. In the History and Pedagogy

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of reading with the Review of the History of Reading

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and Writing and of Methods and Texts and Hygiene in Reading,

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which came out in nineteen fifteen, Ian Edmund Burke Hughey

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote of Pollard's method quote, the main business of the

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>method is to make the child able to pronounce words

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for himself as he comes to them in reading new matter,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and it accomplishes this result pretty effectually. Hue also described

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the method as having been worked out with care and completeness,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and as successful at getting children to learn word structure

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and word calling, or recognizing and calling out the words,

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't praise Pollard's method across the board. He

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>also described it as quote intensely artificial and adult in

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>its conceptions, and destructive of right habits of reading and

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of using language generally. He was also of the opinion

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that working up from phonetic elements, to words, to ideas,

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to sentences as the opposite of how the mind naturally works.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>In her later years, Rebecca Smith Pollard wrote a number

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of religious hymns, and in eighteen ninety one she wrote

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a letter to George t Amas, founder and first president

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Massachusetts Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, noting, quote,

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the kindly mention you frequently make of our Catholic friends.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So Pollard, based on the way Angel had written about Catholics,

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that he might appreciate an experience she'd had while

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>traveling to train teachers to use her reading methods. That

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>included visiting a lot of convents to train the nuns

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>who taught in Catholic schools. She said she had been

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an eye inflammation for some time during one

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of these visits, and one of the Catholic mothers told

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>her not to go to the doctor yet, but that

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they would have all eleven hundred children in their schools

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pray for her quote what wonder that the shadows lifted,

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the clouds dispersed, and that ere the week had ended,

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>there was not to dim my vision save the grateful

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>tears which I could not banish when I remembered how

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>quickly the Loving Savior responded to the children's calls. Pollard's

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>last published poem was called Althea or the Morning Glory,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it came out in nineteen twelve, when she was eighty.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Unlike most of her earlier poetry work, she published it

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>under her own name, Rebecca S. Pollard. It's a long poem,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It's more than thirty pages, and it's a meditation on

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>faith and mortality with a lot of flower imagery. Rebecca

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith Pollard lost most of her eyesight toward the end

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of her life. She spent the last years of her

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>life living with her son in Fort Madison, Iowa. She

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>died there on May twenty ninth, nineteen seventeen, at the

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>age of eighty five. A poem she had written several

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>years earlier but had never published, titled Heaven, was read

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at her funeral. She was buried at Farmington Cemetery with

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a marker that says Rebecca Smith Pollard and then under

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that in quotation marks Kate Harrington. Around the time of

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Pollard's death, phonics started to fall out of favor again

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, with reading instruction once again moving

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>back to focus on whole words. In nineteen fifty five,

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph Flesh's book Why Johnny Can't Read criticized the abandonment

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of phonics, which led to another resurgence in phonics based instruction.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Then that shifted once again with a move toward whole

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>language instruction in the nineteen eighties, and then the evolution

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of balanced literacy in the nineteen nineties. This back and

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>forth is sometimes characterized as the reading wars. Uh yeah,

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say both the back and forth and the

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>discussion around the back and forth has been characterized as

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the reading wars. Balanced literacy has been described as kind

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of a happy medium between phonics and whole word instruction,

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>taking the best parts of each of them, but there

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>has also been a lot of variation in exactly what's

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>involved in different methods that have been under this umbrella

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of balanced literacy. Some of its critics described balance literacy

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>as mainly a variation on whole word instruction without enough fun.

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Most recently, the idea of three quing that is part

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of some balanced literacy systems has come up under really

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>heavy criticism. Three queuing involves trying to figure out the

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>meanings of unfamiliar words based on context clues or pictures,

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>or making a guess based on the sound made by

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the first letter, rather than teaching children how to sound

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>out or decode unfamiliar words. A lot of public interest

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and criticism of this followed reporting by Emily Hanford at

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>American Public Media, and then a podcast that came out

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of that reporting called SOULD a story in twenty twenty two. Today,

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US, there's been a growing movement towards the

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>science of reading, which bases reading instruction on techniques that

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can be backed by scientific evidence of their efficacy. Broadly speaking,

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>phonics and phonemic awareness are two components of the science

0:33:56.080 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of reading, which also includes multiple other elements like vocabulary

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and reading comprehension. Because being able to sound out the

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>word based on its letters or phonemes is only one

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>step in the process of understanding what something means. The

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Science of Reading isn't a program for reading instruction, though,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a body of research into reading and

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>literacy and the use of that research to guide programs

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>that teach reading. And there is still, of course, a

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of controversy around exactly how best to implement all

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of this research. Yeah, I have seen a number of

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>discussions among teachers and other people who work in education

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>who feel like some uh, some systems that are framed

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>as science of reading, feel like that that's just the

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>phonics part and not all of this other part that

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is also necessary to really being able to read, and

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this part being able to figure out what individual words

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are if you're not familiar with them, or even if

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you are. That is just one component of what is

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 1>being described as a literacy crisis in the US. After

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I finished this whole outline, like first thing this morning,

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I saw an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that talked about other factors contributing to this literacy crisis,

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>including smartphones, which the author of this article was like,

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of a naysayer and thinking smartphones were

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a problem, but there is a growing body of evidence

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that smartphones really are playing a role. Other factors were

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>early reliance on AI chatbots to try to get information,

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and a shift in the way not just like the

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>reading of words is taught, but once you get into

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>reading pieces of work, a shift away from reading complete

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>works to instead trying to get core pieces of information

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>from very short excerpts so instead of reading the entirety

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of a novel, reading a small amount of it and

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>testing comprehension that small amount, which sort of has left

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>people getting into high school and college without sort of

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the reading stamina to read whole long works and analyze

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and follow them. We obviously are not teachers. We do

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>not have hands on experience with all of this, but

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it is clear that there has been a lot of

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 1>debate about all of this in recent decades. It's things

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that are having a clear impact and how students are

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>taught and how society functions as people are or are

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>not able to read and make sense out of information.

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's Rebecca Smith Pollard ahead of her time in

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>some ways but not others. Do you want to read

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and make sense out of some listener mail? Yes? This

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is kind of funny that we're talking about reading comprehension

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>because I had to ask Collie earlier if she remembered

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 1>me reading this email already. We don't think I read

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this email ready, but apologies if I have read it twice.

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>This is from Ellen. Ellen wrote another vote for a

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>loft codiohearn and wrote, Dear Holly and Tracy, I started

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 1>listening to your podcast when I had a very long

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>commute to a job was giving me insomnia and panic attacks.

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I was working for a very critical supervisor. I'm just

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>going to skip ahead and say having a really rough time.

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And I remember when I read this email the first time.

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I got very choked up at the next part, in

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>which Ellen said, I especially appreciated your Friday blessing when

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you tell us all that you hope we have a

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>RESTful weekend and do something that makes us happy. I

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>want you to know how meaningful that little kindness was

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to me during that time. Now, thankfully I have a

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>much better job, but still do a lot of driving,

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so I often have thoughts Velveteen Rabbit, Philip Glass embroidery.

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>They have not yet made it into an email, but

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when I was listening to the Elizabeth Bisland episode and

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>heard the name left coddioharn, I thought that name sounds familiar.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:01.760
<v Speaker 1>As he went on, I remembered I have a book

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>by him. Back in the early nineteen nineties. My mother

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>gave me his book Some Chinese Ghosts after I returned

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>from living in Taiwan for a couple of years. She

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>knew I was enjoying reading the sort of weird old

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>books you find in used book sales. This book was

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>published in eighteen eighty seven, and my copy is a

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>reprint by the Modern Library from nineteen twenty seven. The

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>intro to this volume is a short bio of hern

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>written in such an entertaining and old fashioned style, I

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>decided to scan it and attach it for you. While

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>his whole life story is extremely interesting, the book itself

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty rough read. It's full of Chinese transliterations,

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Victorian orientalism, and lofty prose. Sounds about right. According to

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>his bio, this book was typical of his strange genius,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and he considered it quote an attempt in the direction

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope to make triumph someday poetical prose poorlof Codio.

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>He was not a very good judge of what people

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in the future would like to read. Maybe he would

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>be a good candidate for a Halloween eppisode because, apparently

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 1>quote he gives the reader a ghostly shutter by building

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>up an intimacy with the unseen. I will pause to

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>say I have him like as a potential October topic

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for that reason. To return to the email. Since Embroidery

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 1>was also a recent topic. I'm sending you a photo

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of my first needle point project, which I inherited unfinished

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>from my husband's grandmother. She had started it as a

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>wedding present for me and had finished about a third

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of it when she passed away. I had never done

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>needle point before, but it was such a beautiful pattern

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>based on an artwork by Mukha that I decided to

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>try it. After all, needle point is just one stitch,

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>how hard can it be? Well? It ended up taking

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>four years to finish it, as it is quite large,

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but since then I've completed several much smaller projects and

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>even learned to do more than one stitch. As pet tax,

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>here is a photo of our grand tortoise. He is

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a Russian tortoise named Ivan the Turtble. He loves to

0:39:57.640 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>go outside and dig in the garden and is fond

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of you, snowdrops, dianthus and Petunia's when he can reach them.

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for your podcast, and especially for

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>being your lovely, smart, kind, unique selves. You make me

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>feel better about the world. Best wishes, Ellen. I want

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the email to show me the blocked content. Oh my goodness,

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a little tortoise out in the yard looking

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.880
<v Speaker 1>at what appears to be a small ceramic statue of

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a bunny. Adorable, incredibly cute. And this needle point is

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really lovely. I don't even know how to describe it,

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's beautiful, and it's lovely that you finished all

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah, I love that conceptually very much. Yeah,

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I am sorry for the loss of your husband's grandmother

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who had passed away while working on this. Anyway, beautiful,

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what a great email. So thank you again, Ellen for

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>this email and for the PDF from some Chinese ghosts

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and these beautiful pictures'autiful story. If you would like to

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>send us a note or a history podcast atiheartradio dot com.

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to see our show notes with

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>all of the sources for the episode, including all of

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Smith Pollard's work that we talked about, that is

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at our website, which is missinhistory dot com. And you

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe to the show on the iHeartRadio app and

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else you'd like to get your podcasts. Stuff you

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Missed in History Class is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,