WEBVTT - Project 2025 Is Real. And It’s Happening Now.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>During the campaign, there was polling that showed twenty twenty

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>five was deeply on popular, but people just didn't believe

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that Trump would do these things. They said, if Trump did,

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, band abortion entirely, for example, I wouldn't like that.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's no chance he's going to do this. And

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole list of those things. So I think

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>when people understand what it actually means, there will be

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>more pushback. But if they see it simply as a

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of fuzzy pro family agenda, they may underestimate just

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>how sweeping and radical it is.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everyone, and welcome back to this episode of Next

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Question You Know. Project twenty twenty five is a nearly

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>one thousand page document that is designed to serve as

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a blueprint for transforming American society. Most people, of course,

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>heard of it prior to the election, but many people

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>hadn't and still haven't read it, and those who did

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>read it thought there was no way in hell that

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump would actually implement it. Well guess what he has.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>So here are the questions, what does Project twenty twenty

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>five actually say, what does it mean? And is there

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 2>any way to stop what seems to be this runaway train.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>David Graham, who's a writer for the Atlantic, has written

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>a new book called The Project. How Project twenty twenty

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 2>five is reshaping America, and he's here to answer those

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 2>questions and more. I think you're one of the few people, David,

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 2>who has read Project twenty twenty five's Mandate for Leadership

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>cover to cover. It's almost one thousand pages, nine hundred

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>and twenty two. So, in broad strokes, what was your

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>takeaway after reading the whole damn thing?

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Right? You know, I'd read bits and pieces during the campaign,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but I hadn't read the whole thing, And when I

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>actually sat down to read it, I was pretty astonished.

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a richer document that I had realized. It

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>was more radical, it was more interesting. There are these

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>conflicts in it, and it seemed like such a roadmap

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to what we would expect from a Trump administration. And

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly how it's played out.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>You were initially somewhat skeptical of the hype around Project

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, but as you said, it was much

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 2>more radical than you thought. Can you tell us more

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 2>about that and what you ascertained that made you think

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Jesus this is pretty serious stuff.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, we get these kind of policy blueprints every

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>four years, and often there are just kind of lists

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of policies people want, and that's what I thought this

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was too. But this is really a whole scheme for

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>remaking the federal government and then remaking American society. I

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>think it's ambitions are just much broader, and it has methods.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they thought about how to make these things

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>happen in a way that the typical policy wishless just

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Like what I mean, tell us how they hope to

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 2>implement it to get widespread acceptance, and we'll talk about

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>its popularity or left up later, but it's much more

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>give us a little more meat to understand the methodology

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 2>they hope to incorporate.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the centerpiece is taking charge of the

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>federal government and taking charge of the executive branch in

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>a way that no president has before. So they lay

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out how to take over the Justice Department, how to

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>use the Office of Management and Budget, which is you know,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dusty agency as the command center for

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>taking charge of the federal government, how to use the

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Office of Presidential Personnel, and then to sort of accrue

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>presidential power by taking over independent regulatory agencies, so things

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the FCC or the FTC. Traditionally, you know,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they work relatively independently. They're appointed by the president and

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>their leaders, but then they do their own thing. They

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's unconstitutional. They want Trump to be directing those things.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And once you have control of all of them, and

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you start to push civil servants out as well, you

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>can make the federal government do what you want to do,

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and that includes creating this very conservative vision of society.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump during the campaign obviously distanced himself from Project

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, but it seems like he is in it

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 2>hole hog, isn't it. Talk about the difference between how

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>he talked about this document and how it's been implemented

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>already during the course of his still young administration second administration.

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's something like seventy contributors to Project twenty

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. A quarter of them were in his first administration.

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of them were cabinet members. Russell Vote, wh's kind

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of the intellectual architect, was the head of OMB in

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the first administration. He is again. He led Trump's policy

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>committee during the twenty twenty four campaign. So the idea

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that there was really any distance I think was always

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>very flimsy. But now that he's in office, he's put

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>these people in top positions and he's followed their prescriptions

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>really closely. So, you know, if you look at the

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>executive orders we saw in the first week of the presidency,

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven of forty seven I believe, according to Bloomberg,

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>were directly from Project twenty twenty five. He's following the

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>blueprint right as it's laid out.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Tell me more about this Russell Vogue guy, because if

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>he is sort of the intellectual archaet of it, tell

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 2>me about his background, his philosophy, and how he has

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 2>imbued this document or this blueprint with his own ideas.

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So votes an interesting guy because he comes from this

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of traditional conservative, socially conservative, fiscally conservative wing of

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, and he worked for Phil Graham and

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. He came up through these these traditional channels.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't seem like naturally a Trump guy because he is

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>so socially conservative. But he got into the first Trump

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>administration and he found himself really frustrated by what he saw.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>He saw civil servants, he felt who were obstructing Trump.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But he also saw political appointees who he thought were lazy,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>or who were rhinos, or who were you know, trying

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to obstruct Trump for whatever their ends were. And he

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't want that to happen again. And so he designs

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Projects twenty twenty five as a way to have staff

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>who would be on board, who'd be trained and ready

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to go, and as a set of methods to sort

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of drive through that opposition and to bring about the

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Christian nation that he says we should be.

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And we're founded as you who shocked.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.679
<v Speaker 2>I know you've read bits and pieces before you wrote

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>this book, but when you read it in its totality,

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>what was your reaction in general as just an American

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>citizen in terms of what they were trying to do.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I was amazed how radical it was. I mean, this

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is just a program for all of society, and they

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>want to change so many basically, you know, want to

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>change the way your children are taught and what you

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>get in classrooms. They want to change the way you

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>interact with your healthcare providers. They want to affect really everything,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>every part of life. And I think I hadn't realized

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that I mean, I remember reading through it and I

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>kept like, you know, walking out of my office to

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>my wife, like you won't believe what I'm reading here?

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe that they're saying this? And you know,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it is. You know, it's important to understand

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>just how systematic it is. And that's what I didn't

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>grasp until I read the whole thing, and what I

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>hope I can convey in the book.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I'm curious if you saw it also

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>as a blueprint for autocracy, because you know, it sounds

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>both like it wants to go back in time right

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and remove what most people see as progress or some

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 2>people see as progress in terms of equal rights, the

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>role of women, and marginalized communities, opportunities, you know, being

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 2>more full throated participants in American life, and autocracy. So

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>where do you see it philosophically? Landing it's a melding

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of those two things, you know. So some of the

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>ideas here are things that we've heard from the Republican

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Party or from social concertis for a long time. And

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I think what sets this apart is the willingness to

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>use the federal government as a kind of coercive force

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>This is not a sort of, you know, Ronald Reagan

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>limited government idea. This is about accruing a lot of

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>presidential power and using it to, you know, to build

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>the society people want in a way that the Republican

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Party has traditionally stood against. We'll talk about the Christian

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>nationalism part in a moment, because I don't want to

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>make listeners viewers think that I just was like glossing

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>that over. But first I want to talk about some

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of the goals of Project twenty twenty five. They're four

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>of them, and let's talk about them. One is restore

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the family is the centerpiece of American life and protect

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>our children. What does that mean exactly? From their vantage point.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It means a whole range of things. So it means,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, abolishing the Department of Education and giving parents

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and giving religious organizations much more ConTroll over education, moving

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>things away from the public school system and towards private

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>schools and religious schools. It means banning abortion nationwide. It

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>means defining gender or defining sex as male and female

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with nothing between, sort of pushing trans people into the shadows.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It means using things like welfare to encourage nuclear families

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to encourage marriage and fatherhood. They lay out basically how

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to use every department of the government as a way

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to achieve these things.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 2>How much of the document feels like, either blatantly or implicitly,

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>a backlash against progressive sort of liberal thinking in general.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Does it go without saying or is it specified within

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Project twenty twenty five.

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>It is specified at places. And they talk a lot

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>about wokeness. They don't tell us what they mean by that,

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but they're clearly reacting against something. And in statements, you know,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in interviews elsewhere, Russell Vote and Paul Danz, who is

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of his partner in building this, have talked about

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>their reaction to how society has changed, and they're feeling that,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Christianity is being sidelined, and then the America

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that they know and love is being taken away from

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>them and they want to reclaim it.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>What do they think of separation of church and state.

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't believe in it.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>They don't.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's simply not a factor. I mean, they say that

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the government shouldn't establish a church, but they say this

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is a Christian nation, it was founded as a Christian nation,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and it should be Vote speaking to Charlie Kirk a

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago said, you know, the left uses

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>all these pejoratives for us. They call me a Christian nationalist,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But unlike a lot of the pejoratives, I think that's true.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Christian, I'm a nationalist. I think we should

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have a Christian nation.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Another goal is to dismantle the administrative state and return

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>self governance to the American people. What does that mean exactly?

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So, the administrative state is basically the executive branch as

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>we know it. We have hundreds of thousands of civil

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>servants who, you know, we interact with them when we're

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>dealing with social security. They are forecasting our weather, they

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>are sending grants to our schools, all of these things,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and they operate in a sort of semi autonomous way.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>They're non political, they stay in the government no matter

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>what happens. They're also these independent agencies that act sort

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>of outside of the president's purview. They want to demolish

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that. They think the president should have full

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>control of anyone who works at the executive branch, and

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>those people should be basically working towards his political goals,

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>whatever those might be. And so they want to lay

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>off civil servants. We've obviously seen a lot of that already,

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and I will see more of it. They want to

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>convert other civil servants to being political appointees, and they

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>want to with you know, get rid of these guard

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>reels we've traditionally seen, like Justice Department independence example.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Scary, right, I mean, you're talking about it so matter

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 2>of factly, but you know, most civil servants aren't necessarily

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 2>there to push an ideological agenda. They're really there to

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>keep the government going right, the wheels of government operating right.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.839
<v Speaker 2>So it's almost a sense of paranoia that there are

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>dark forces lurking. I guess that's why they call it

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the deep state, but dark forces lurking everywhere that have

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 2>a very concrete political agenda that they're trying to push.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>But it really that's not really the case of government workers,

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it exactly right?

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not. I mean, you know, there are surveys that

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>show that government workers lean left in their politics, but

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the things they do simply are not political.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know a lot of Americans gripe

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>about bureaucrats, but when I read the prescriptions here, I

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think is making these people, you know, appointed on the

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>basis of their politics, on their loyalty to the present.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to make services better or is it

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>going to make things worse? It seems to me it's

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>likely to make things worse.

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>The third thing is defend our nation's sovereignty, borders and

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.359
<v Speaker 2>bounty against global threats. Help me understand that.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a little opaque.

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that means a couple Also, what is bounty.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's a lofty term they want to use to

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>make this seem maybe a little bit.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>More patriotic or old school or something.

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that means first of all, borders, so it

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>means closing the border. It means reducing immigration, both legal

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and I legal. There's a sense that there are too

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>many people coming into the country through whatever means. So

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that means fewer visas, making it harder to immigrate. Those

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are things that they value. And it also means a

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of existential conflict with China. So throughout you see

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the sense that China is a threat that Americans don't grasp.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't see how big a threat China is, and

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it has to be confronted economically, culturally, and if necessary,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>militarily as well.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>And finally, secure are God given individual rights to live

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 2>freely what our Constitution calls the blessings of liberty. So

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>how do they view liberty because a lot of people

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>think that liberties are being taken away, not granted to

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:14.119
<v Speaker 2>American citizens.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. There's this chilling quote where Kevin Roberts, who's

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the head of the Heritage Foundation which convened this, says you,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>liberty is doing not just what we want, but what

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we ought. So it's libert or willing. And I mean,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not liberty. And I think the way most

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>people understand it, it's using the federal government to tell

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you how to live.

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Where do you see the germ of this coming from.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we talked about a backlash against I guess pluralism, globalization,

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>equal rights right, and I think gender roles, DEI, affirmative action,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera, trying to level the playing field

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in our society. But what else is really fomented this?

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>In your view having read.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It, yeah, I think it has a very long history.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And so you know DEI is a boogeyman often in

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the document, but you go further back and their concerns

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>about you know, Title nine, for example, and they want

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to use Title nine to enforce certain priorities. But also

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they're very skeptical of it. They're skeptical of the Equal

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Employment Opportunity Commission, they're skeptical of the New Deal itself. So,

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a sense that over the last century

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>things have happened to change the way America works that

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have taken us away from the Christian founding. They see

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and they want to reclaim things in that way.

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>What if we told you it was possible to prevent, manage,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.359
<v Speaker 2>your cure all disease by the end of the century.

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 2>The Chans Zuckerberg Initiative is advancing biomedical research and leveraging

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 2>AI to change medicine for decades to come by bringing

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 2>together science, tech researchers, and engineers a better future for everyone.

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Learn more at CZI dot com that's CZI dot com,

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 2>or follow them on social media. You talk about Russell

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Vote casually mentioned he's a self described Christian nationalist, So

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>can you talk about what Christian nationalists believe and how

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>his principles bled into this document.

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they believe that this is a Christian nation.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>They believe that.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, can you explain why they believe that?

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, they look at the founders and they say,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>many of the founders were Christians. They see language about God,

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and they simply believe that since, you know, since European

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>settlers arrived in the in what is now the United States,

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they would bring Christian ideas and that is the foundation

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of the country. And they think that that has always

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>been in the DNA. But we've started to drift away

0:15:59.440 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>from that.

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so, how does this fit in with sort

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of Donald Trump's seeming obsession with anti Semitism and sort

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>of Jewish American citizens.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, they often use this language about a Judeo

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian society, and they talk about, for example, a biblically

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>grounded vision of the family. And so it's a little

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>bit broader, but very much it's focused around Christianity. So,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, they think that there should be

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>all people should have a sabbath. You know, they should

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>not have to work for at least a day a week,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and if they do, they should have to get time

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half. This is an idea that maybe could

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have appeal across the spectrum, but it's phrasing these very

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>religious ways, and they say, we assume this would be Sunday,

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but it could, for example, be Friday evening to Saturday

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>evening if for somebody of a different faith. So there's

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of accommodation. But the norm is very

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>much Christianity, and so much of the policy stems from Christianity.

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk about the dark side of Christian nationalism

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>for people who are perhaps unaware of the sort of

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>nefarious ramifications of this kind of ideology.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's very much about telling people how to live,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and so it means shutting down abortion rights. It means

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>pushing women towards motherhood and out of the workplace. Not

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the workplace, but away from the workplace. It

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>means knocking down, you know that many of the changes

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we have seen in the last few decades of giving

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>women more leeway and more rights. It means discouraging things

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like divorce. It means schools that are tutoring children in

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>biblical principles and that are not necessarily teaching things like evolution.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a you know, there are a

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of ideas that are not popular, and it's a

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>very totalizing way to approach.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Life, but it is popular in some quarters. Can you

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about where Project twenty twenty five resonated and the

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>segment of the population who might embrace this, if not wholeheartedly,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 2>then half heartedly.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I think that this vision of society,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and this the kind of backlash we're talking about, is

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>really core to Donald Trump's appeal. It is people who

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 1>feel like they are losing status in society. They feel like,

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a white man in particular, don't have the

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>same kind of status they once did. The Christians are persecuted,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that white people are persecuted. And for those people, Donald

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump is very popular. They want to see this kind

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of vision and they're willing to follow a plan that

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>offers some of these things. Now, I do think that

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit. I think it's a bit of

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a shallow appeal. I think people have this really emotional

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>connection to it, but when they get to some of

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the details of Project twenty twenty five, I don't think

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be as fond of some of them.

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean emotional appeal on principle for some

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>of these ideas.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that just the concept that that something's been

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>taken from you. We're going to put things back the

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>way they were at some point, and this is often

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>left quite, you know, a little bit vague. At some

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>point things started to change in this country and they're

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not the way they once were, and this is often done.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of vague way, it's kind of a new window.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>And what do you think they're talking about.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think they have to be studiously they because

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to say things were better before the

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Act, when on occasion we've seen politicians say

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that it has gone very poorly for them, so they

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of cloak it in this vagueness. This

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is why when we say make America great again, Trump

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>never tells us exactly when it was that America was

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>great that he wants to go back to.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about sort of you talked about the

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>inherent sexism. What about the inherent racism of this document?

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Clearly it is anti immigrant, right unless they're white immigrants,

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 2>white Christian immigrants, right, So can you talk about how

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 2>you interpreted the inherent racism that these people incorporated in

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Project twenty twenty five.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think was a real paternalistic attitude and a lot

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of the document. You know, they say that we need

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to restore the family, and they say in you know,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, in poor black communities, they're not allowed enough

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>fathers living in the home. We need to encourage that.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>You have in the chap on the Department of Housing

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and Urban Development a sense that, you know, things like

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>housing vouchers or public housing are creating a culture of

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dependency and people are not willing to help themselves. So

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, these are things we've heard from the right.

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to say, and I think there's some people,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>even who are moderate who can say I could get

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>on board with the need to have more involved fathers

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 2>in all communities.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Back Obama was a big proponent of right.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 2>So at its face, it's not that offensive. But is

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:33.719
<v Speaker 2>it imbued with more sort of racist dog whistles or

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 2>innuendo that would be interpreted by the average person.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of that is not necessarily there.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>They do keep us a very sort of color blind

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>approach at a lot of places. But what you see is

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a disparate impact on people. If you start directing aid

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on these ways, if you start putting it through religious groups,

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if you take away things like the EEOC, you're going

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to have disparate impact, and they say disparate impact is

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a false concept that ought to be

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>thrown out.

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, let's talk about that, because is there much

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 2>discussion on the impact of all these proposals and policies

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and is there any kind of appreciation or acceptance of

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 2>how these things could go or wry.

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>No, I would say there's a little bit of a gap.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They talk about as sort of the shining future they imagine,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and they talk about the policies that they are, but

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a gap in between about how exactly these things work.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think often they fail to really grapple with

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the impacts of the things they suggest. So, you know,

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>they complain about politicization in the executive branch, and then

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>they offer a plan to politicize it that seems to

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>cut against what you want. They complain that Congress has

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>abdicated too much power and is you know, no longer

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of as it should bete and they

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>want to give more power to the executive branch.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>So they say Congress has abdicated it, but they don't

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>say the executive branch has seized it.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>No, they one of the executive branch to seize much more.

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Donald Trump is in lockstep with a

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of these policies or do you think he simply

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 2>sees it as a means to an end, as a

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 2>means to a massive power grab by him and the

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>people around him who agree with him.

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's symbiosis. So for Trump, he gets trained employees,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, trained staffers who are loyal to his project,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>who are ready to go on day one. He has

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole policy agenda and he has ways, for example,

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to clear out the deep state that he hates, and

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to reak retribution by using the Justice Department, newly in

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>his control, as a tool of retribution. And for them,

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a vessel. I mean they understand that these

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>things are hard to do, that they've been conservative priorities

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and they haven't happened, and they

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>see Trump as someone who's willing to sort of force

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>it through. So each side gets something they want, but

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>they're looking way beyond Trump. I mean, this is a

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>plan for decades to come, and Trump is just the

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>first stage of that.

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, tell us more about that. What is the

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 2>long view for the architects of Project twenty twenty five.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>They understand that the firste hundred days are very important,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen, they understand the first two years before

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the midterms are very important. They want to get as

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>far as they can toward that. But the changes they're

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>making are not going to be reversed no matter, you know,

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how Democrats do in the midterms or who the next

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>president is, because you can't rehire thousands of federal employees.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be so much brain drain. There's going

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to be programs that are shut down. You know, there's

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>an end to basically all climate change research is kind

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of plated here. Those are things that are hard to

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>put back. You can't rehire all the generals they've fired,

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>which is another Project twenty twenty five priority. So the

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>next president will inherit a government that is much smaller

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and is reoriented a lot, and they will have to

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>grapple with that rather than what Trump received on January twentieth.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Could you get on board with anything that was in

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Project twenty twenty five in terms of you know, so

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 2>called waste, fraud and abuse. I think it's so interesting

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>they're you know, getting rid of fraud by getting rid

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>of the people who are basically responsible for recognizing, recognizing

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and doing something about it. Right.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean people talk about waste, fraud, and abuse,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and obviously nobody is in favor of those things. But

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot harder to find that than it seems

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>as Elon Musk has discovered. It's not just sitting there

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>waiting to be discovered. You know, I think there are

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>some really interesting ideas in here, and I think, for example,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they're concerned about driving at birth rates, this pro natalist view,

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's places that you can see, you know, crossover

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with the left. They think duelas should be available to

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all mothers. For example, they think that childcare should be

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>more easily avaiable. They advocate for childcare in the workplace, saying,

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, parents shouldn't have to be so far away

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>from their children.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>They want to give money to women or families where

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 2>they're six or more children.

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>M There's all these ways to encouraging and you know,

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>these are ideas that I think the left would like.

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Often that they have diagnoses that I think are reasonable,

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's whether the prescription works, and that's often where the

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>problem is.

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Give me an example of that.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I think talking about Congress is a

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>great one. Congress is very broken. If you talk political

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>scientists or former members of Congress from either party, they'll

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you that it's just that giving the president unfettered

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 1>power everything else isn't going to fix that problem. It's

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to solve the problems in our politics.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I know that you right that the architects of Project

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five sought the year twenty twenty four as

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 2>a critical moment in time comparable to seventeen seventy six

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 2>or eighteen sixty. Can you describe that? And I guess

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>they look at it as a huge and dramatic inflection

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>point for American society.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.719
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I mean, I think that they phrase it

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>this way tells us how important it is to them

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and how sweeping their plan is. They're trying to meet

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a moment like that. Kevin Roberts, the head of Heritage,

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>said last summer that we're in the midst of a

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>second American revolution and bloodless if the Left allows it

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. I think that's pretty chilling, and it also explains,

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I think why it's so important to pay attention to

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this and understand what they want to do and understand

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the methods they've layed out.

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I would probably normally save this towards the end of

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>our interview, but you know, as I hear this, it

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 2>feels like a runaway train, right, And I think so

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 2>many people are wondering how can we stop this train?

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>And there don't seem to be the tools at our

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 2>disposal to say, hey, we don't want this society. And

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>in fact, I think only thirteen percent and who knows

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 2>how deep the understanding is of this plan approve of

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Project twenty twenty five in America. But it is happening

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>at full speed. So how do you stop this or

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 2>how do you reverse course? If, in fact, so much

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>damage is going to be done in the first two

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 2>years of this administration.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really tough question. I mean, I

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>think the first thing is understanding it, and I think

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that is something we've missed. I think Democrats don't seem

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be looking ahead. I think a lot of the

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>population has been shocked by things that have happened. And

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things I wanted to do

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in the book was explain to people where things are

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>going so that they can look ahead, and so they're

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less surprised and they can start figuring

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>out how they want to respond. And I think that's

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>valuable for people who agree with Projects twenty twenty five too.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to understand this. It's an important

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>part of being an American citizen to see where our

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>country is headed.

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 2>That's a pretty unsatisfying answer. I having to be honest

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 2>with you. I'm talk to me, so I agree. Understanding

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>it is the first step. But what can be done

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>at all? Or is that something you actually didn't focus

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>on in this book.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not something I focused on it.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you need to do a second book, right.

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Being the sequel? Right? I mean, I think there was

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>so much in the document that I felt like I

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>had to get. I had to explain all of those

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and break it down and figure out how to respond

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to it as a such a vast topic too, you know,

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think people need to understand that what is going

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.199
<v Speaker 1>to come later is not going to be returned to

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>where things were. We're not going to go back to

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pre Project twenty twenty five. We have to rethink what

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>American government should be like. I think I've thought a

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>lot about the post Watergate reforms and whether we might

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>see something like those sorts of reforms to the government,

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, after Trump leave's office.

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the Elon Musk of it all and

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>how he fits into Project twenty twenty five. How does

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 2>he You.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Know, he's not contemplated and the speed with which he's

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>acted is something that has come to as a surprise

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. The things he's done have not. It's really

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>been the space.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Is he operating with this playbook?

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>He is very much If you look at what he's doing,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>he's following what they're doing it. He's doing it a

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>lot faster they you know, they these are people who

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have served in government and thought really hard about how

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they could work using the laws, using what's in place

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to achieve what they wanted, and Musk kind of just

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>buldoze through it. He's made those things happen a lot faster.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's working closely with Russell Vote, and I think

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for people like Russell Vote and other Project twenty twenty

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>five architects, Musk is just a vessel. In the same

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>way that Trump is a means to an end, Musk

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is a means to an end as well.

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>They approve of what he's doing though right.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They do, absolutely. I think they're they're driving it. They're

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>encouraging him, they're pointing him where to go.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Is saying, now though, that DOGE will produce only fifteen

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of the savings that promised, and the New York

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Times is saying that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So how can they be pleased with the results if

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 2>they're not really, I guess, dismantling the deep state as

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>significantly as they had hoped.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think the efficiency is something he talks

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about a lot. It's not their concern. Their concern is

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of the employees. And we see these people

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>leaving every day. We see them. Russell Vote said he

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to put the federal bureaucracy in trauma, and I

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think we see that happening all the time. Federal workers

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are in fact in trauma. They're contemplating the exits, they're

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>being forced out. Just today, I see that the federal

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>watchdog in charge of employees is no longer going to

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>be fighting these dismissals. And so this progress is happening.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Even if they don't save money, they know that they're

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>putting things under the President's control, and they're moving things

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>toward this Christian society. Anything else is just kind of

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>collateral damage.

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>So who will replace all these people? There will have

0:29:59.880 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>to be a litmus test for your religious beliefs and

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>your loyalty to Donald Trump.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Right. They want people chosen on whether they're true to

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the president, whether they are longtime MAGA believers. And you know,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw for example, people being question for their jobs

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in the administration. Do you believe the twenty twenty election

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was stolen? If you say no, you don't get a job.

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>These are the kind of tests that we're going to get.

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, dumb question, But isn't that against the law.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of things that are ostensibly against the law,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and if you just do them and try to get

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>away with them, you can do that. And one thing

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that the architects of Project twenty twenty five want to

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do is push things to Supreme Court. So, for example,

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's illegal for the president to take control of or

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to fire you know, members of the National Labor Relations

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Board or the Federal Elections.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Commission aren't the chairman of the FED.

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>For example, but they want to they they believe that

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's unconstitutional if they can push that the Supreme Court.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>They think they now have a conservative majority that will

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 1>rule with them and overturn ninety five years of president

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>About this, well.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about how they view the judiciary branch of

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the American government. What is discussed in Project twenty twenty

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 2>five about that.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>They almost don't pay attention to any of the lower branches.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen the President Jdvan tell these people

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>attacking federal judges directly. The architects of Project twenty twenty

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>five mostly see the Supreme Court as allies, and they

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think if they can push these cases to them, they're

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get favorable rulings and be able to work

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>towards society they want.

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 2>And what do you think do you think the Supreme

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Court will rubber stamp a lot of the stuff that's

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>being done, or do you think that they will say, hey,

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, this has gone too far and uphold

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the decisions the lower courts may be making when they

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 2>are against what Donald Trump wants to do.

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard to know. We've seen sometimes the Supreme

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Court go along with what seemed like very far fetched

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>arguments from Trump. I mean, you know, give immunity the

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>immunity exactly, and then we saw them more recently shooting

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>down as alien Enemies Act use. So it's a little

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>bit hard to tell. I think the question is, you know,

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we know there are two to three votes who will

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>agree with almost anything he says. They know there are

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>three votes that will vote against almost anything he says.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And the question is where these people in the middle.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>You know where John robertson, where Cunny Barrett come out?

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Really, because she offended people with a recent decision, tell

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 2>us about that.

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, she is somebody who the right has worked

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so hard to get judges in place who will work

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>along with them, and I think you know those efforts

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>go right along with Projects twenty twenty five. They were

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very upset about somebody like a David Suiter proving more

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>liberal than they expected. And so when they see a

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>judge who doesn't simply rubber stamp what Trump says, they

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>see this as disloyalty. So there's an implicit idea that

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the judiciary should be listening to the president, that it

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be an independent check, even if that's not something

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that is directly stated.

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 2>This is so friggin' terrifying. If you want to get

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 2>smarter Every morning with a breakdown of the news and

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 2>fascinating takes on health and wellness and pop culture. Sign

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 2>up for our daily newsletter, Wake Up Call by going

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>to Katiecuric dot com. SO Project twenty twenty five calls

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>for drastic tax cuts, the elimination of federal regulations, massive

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 2>reduction in the federal workforce, but also is proposing a

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 2>slew of initiatives that would need to be paid for

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and administered by you, guessed at the federal government. So

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 2>how do they reconcile just replacing perhaps one bureaucracy with

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 2>one that is closer to them ideologically.

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they do. I think it's a real flaw.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And although, for example, they say a recurring theme because

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's organized by department, there's a chapter on each department,

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is that the writers say that we need to get

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of many federal employees, we need to hire some

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.479
<v Speaker 1>more in this agency, we need to expand the Defense Department,

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to expand the Department of Homeland Security. So

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a real flaw there, and they don't

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>explain how they're going to administer a lot of the things.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>If they have cleared out the experts and they're bringing

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>people who don't have any training in these things.

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about climate change. Since it is Earth Day today,

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 2>what is the document stance on global warming?

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't say that global warming is a hoax. They

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to deal with it. So any climate

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>related research would be shut down, Climate warnings would be

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>thrown out, environmental regulation would be trashed across the board.

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's air pollution, water pollution, but that's also you know,

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gas issues. They think that the Interior Department should

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 1>basically be in charge of getting more oil and gas extracted.

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Everything is arranged around fossil fuels.

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 2>But is protecting the earth and clean air, clean water?

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Is that not a Christian value?

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, you would think so. And the story they

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>tell I think is very strange. They say, back in

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the seventies, the air was dirty, the water was dirty.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 1>We cleaned things up. We should celebrate that. Why are

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>environmental that is always telling us how bad things are.

0:34:58.600 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>We need to look at all the things that are

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>really goot and we need to focus on things that

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 1>we can measure. And they say, you know, we can't

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>measure climate change well enough and so we just shouldn't

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>worry about it, and I think that's it's very hard

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to grasp.

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 2>One of the more radical proposals you highlight is the

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 2>privatization of NOAH, which is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>which provides essential weather data. What do they have against

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that agency?

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a couple of things there. One is that

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>NOAH oversees a lot of climate research, and they you know,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they believe that that that's pernicious, that it's part of

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the sort of leftist ideology that's pushing things. So they

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>want to put some of these things in the private sector,

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's been a conservative party for a while. There

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 1>was an attempt to privatize it in the first Trump

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>administration that didn't get very far. So you know, there's

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>an element of the private sector can do things better,

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>and also an element of we've got to get these

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>climate things out of the way and not be telling

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>people about this because it will make them believe the

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>climate change is a problem.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 2>But doesn't know what does so much in terms of

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you're saying they want to privatize sort of the National

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Weather Service and telling people when storms are going to

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>be happening, and they want to erase sort of the

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 2>impact climate change may have on these weather events.

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, if you're worried about hurricanes, you know, if you

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 1>live in a hurricane zone, you want the National Hurricane

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Center to be doing its best work, and you wanted

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking about climate change because climate change affects hurricanes.

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>If we shut these things down, it's going to you know,

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to directly affect people's lives. It's going to

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it threatens their very safety.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 2>And also just about development, you know, if you want

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 2>to think about flooding or see exact levels and all

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 2>kinds of things that not only impact sort of quality

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 2>of life, but really life and death decisions, right for both,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, on the personal level and on the societal level, right.

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Right, you know, they say, well, technology will fix these things,

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's whistling past the graveyard.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 2>How will technology fix these things?

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't tell us that.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to dig into the family first toenda a

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, because it's super fascinating and kind of

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the trad wife's dream. Right. One of the mandates is

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 2>restore the family is the centerpiece of American life. But

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 2>they have a very specific image of what a family

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 2>should be at a time where families have become increasingly diverse, right, right,

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So talk about that, and you know, they have this

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 2>very Ossie and Harriet, yes, throwback vision of American families

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and American life. And you say they want to push

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 2>women away from the workforce, but not completely get them

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the workforce. Can you explain sort of how

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 2>they view what is sort of ideally this American family.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, for them, the highest calling for a woman's

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>motherhood and everything should be rerented around that. They want

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>women to be having more children. They want them to

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>be spending as much time as they can with the children,

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so that ideally means being at home for the children.

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Failing that, they should, you know, and they should have

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 1>childcare on site where they're working. The father should be working.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The father should be the bread winner. They should be

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the focus of the family. The children should be gender conforming,

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so their boys or their girls, they you know, wear

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>blue or pink. Trans people are sort of pushed into

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the shadows. They're skeptical of same sex marriage. They don't

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about overturning the precedents, but they say, and this

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is not true, but they claim that same sex marriage

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>has higher divorce rates. I spend a long time trying

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to track down how they justify this. There's no data

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to back it up. You know, it's a whole program,

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very old school I'd.

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Say, yeah, and so anti women and I don't know,

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 2>just really bizarre.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>You know they I think there are women involved who

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>would say that this is in fact, this is pro women,

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a.

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>House so I mean, I think pro women is being

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 2>able to make the choice right.

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, this is very much this tad wife aesthetic.

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 1>As you say, you know, they think that women will

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>be happier in the circumstance.

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, or what was that woman's name, something Morgan, Marabelle Morgan.

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember her?

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 2>No, I think she used to say you should greet

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 2>your husband when he comes home from work wrapped in

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 2>saranne wrap. I just remember, anybody remember Marabelle Morgan here? Anyway,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 2>maybe google her and see if I'm right? Am I

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 2>we interrupt this podcast to get a little more context here.

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Marabelle says you should greet your husband at the door

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 2>wearing nothing but saranne rap. I was right.

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow, good recall, Yeah.

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll take famous anti feminists for two thousand, please, Alex right.

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean it is just so such a throwback and

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 2>honestly so insulting to women.

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, they talk about it, And what did your.

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Wife say about this when you came and said, wow,

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 2>you won't believe what it says here?

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>She was not a fan. You know, you talk about

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>gender ideology, they say all these things left to pushing

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>gender ideology and anything that is sort of contra their vision.

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think they fail to understand how much what

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>their offering is an ideology too. They don't recognize that.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you say gender ideology, I mean what does

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that mean exactly?

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So that means, for example, the idea that you could

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be non gender conforming, it means LGBTQ people in general,

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 1>all of these things they see not as you know,

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not as real people who exist in the world, but

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>simply as a figment of leftist ideology.

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 2>There are currently forty Republican women serving in Congress at

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the moment, eight women in cabinet level positions in the

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 2>current Trump administration. So how do they reconcile that would

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 2>they like to see those women just go home and

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 2>take care of their children or grandchildren.

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't reconcile it. It's another one of these flaws,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think there are a lot of prominent

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>women in the White House and in the conservative movement

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. The contributors to Project twenty twenty five, though,

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>are much more male than a lot of that, and

0:40:57.840 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the sort of leading architects are very much male. I

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>think if somebody like Roger Severino, who wrote the chapter

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>on Health and Human Services and writes about a lot

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of this, his wife, Carrie Severino, is a very prominent

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lawyer in the conservative movement. She's been involved in confirming

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>judges for Trump. And so even as they're pushing these ideas,

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>there are people in the orbit who don't really conform

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>to the vision.

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 2>They say, so what you know, you said that you

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't really know what the solution was. In terms of

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:29.360
<v Speaker 2>pushing back. Is part of it providing an alternate vision

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>for America by say Democrats are people who are more

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 2>progressive in their thinking. You know.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason I think it's unsatisfying is that

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there are ideas that are more popular. A lot of

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the things that the Democrats have been pushing are things

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that pull much better, And I think people haven't understood

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the details of Project twenty twenty five or they don't

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>believe it. So during the campaign there was polling that

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.479
<v Speaker 1>showed Project twenty twenty five was deeply unpopular, but people

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.919
<v Speaker 1>just didn't believe that Trump would do these things. They said,

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, yes, I don't if Trump did, you know,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>banned abortion entirely, for example, I wouldn't like that. But

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no chance he's going to do this. And there's

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole list of those things. So I think when

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>people understand what it actually means, there will be more pushback.

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But if they see it simply as a kind of

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>fuzzy pro family agenda, they may underestimate just how sweeping

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and radical it is.

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.359
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think of this notion of an

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 2>alternative vision for America that perhaps maybe isn't as progressive

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 2>as some of these policies and actions were during previous administrations,

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:41.280
<v Speaker 2>but that represents something that is certainly far less radical

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 2>than this few of America.

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think there is a broad consensus

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>around a lot of things. I think most people understand

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>that trans people exist, and they may have hesitations about

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>specific policies, but they certainly don't want to write them

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 1>out of the language of the government. There are people

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>who you know, oppose abortion on moral grounds, but understand

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's a danger in banning it nationwide need access

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to healthcare. They're people who you know, something like medicaid

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is an example here. Medicaid is wildly popular and people

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on the right have been trying to cut it for decades.

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 1>It's something that people like. So some of the things

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that are already there, and I think there's a consensus

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>that is just looking sort of to be marshaled and

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>organized around an alternative.

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this got enough attention during the campaign?

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I know many of my followers were saying, why aren't

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 2>you talking more about Project twenty twenty five. At that point,

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 2>I felt like everybody was talking about it. But you

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.279
<v Speaker 2>say people were talking about it but not taking it seriously.

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and I would count myself in this.

0:43:37.800 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I had looked at it, and I looked at bits

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and pieces. You know, you read some of the individual

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 1>policy points. You're writing about an issue, or you're covering

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>issue and you get a little bit of it, or

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>there's something you're passionate about it has to be read

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>as a whole, and that's very hard to do. You know,

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>this is nearly a thousand pages. It's an often very

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>technical language. You know. One thing I hope to do

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in the book is to make these things more legible

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and pull out what is important and make put in

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>terms that people can understand.

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 2>So this is kind of the cliff Notes version of

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:04.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty five.

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I want people to understand what's important and how

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it all works without having to weigh through a lot

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of technical language.

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, David Graham, you've ruined my day. I'm very sorry,

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 2>but thank you, and I think this is a really

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 2>important book for people to read if they want to

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 2>understand what's going on, because you really can't come up

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 2>with solutions or an antidote until you figure out what

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the game plan is, so you can not only decide

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 2>what your defense is going to be, but what your

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 2>offense is going to be as well. Definitely, thank you

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 2>so much, Thank you, Thanks for listening everyone. If you

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 2>have a question for me, a subject you want us

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.280
<v Speaker 2>to cover, or you want to share your thoughts about

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 2>how you navigate this crazy world, reach out send me

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 2>a DM on Instagram. I would love to hear from

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 2>you next Us is a production of iHeartMedia and Katie

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Couric Media. The executive producers are Me, Katie Kuric, and

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Courtney Ltz. Our supervising producer is Ryan Martz, and our

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 2>producers are Adriana Fazio and Meredith Barnes. Julian Weller composed

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 2>our theme music. For more information about today's episode, or

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 2>to sign up for my newsletter wake Up Call, go

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 2>to the description in the podcast app, or visit us

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 2>at Katiecuric dot com. You can also find me on

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Instagram and all my social media channels. For more podcasts

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 2>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:44.479
<v Speaker 2>you listen to your favorite shows. What if we told

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you it was possible to prevent, manage, your cure all

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 2>disease by the end of the century. The chan Zuckerberg

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Initiative is advancing biomedical research and leveraging AI to change

0:45:56.160 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 2>medicine for decades to come. By bringing together science, tech researchers,

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and engineers, they're building a better future for everyone. Learn

0:46:05.640 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 2>more at CZI dot com, dot CZI dot com, or

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 2>follow them on social media.