WEBVTT - Ken Rosenthal on Joe Espada’s job security, Marlins firing pro scouts, Crochet returning as reliever?

0:00:05.540 --> 0:00:08.420
<v Speaker 1>Look who's back. It's the Inside Scoop with FT Senior

0:00:08.460 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Insider Ken Rosenthal. Ken, it is good to see you.

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.860
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to dive into the Red Sox first.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.220
<v Speaker 1>We'll eventually get to the Astros and the Marlins and

0:00:16.260 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>some storylines there. Roman Anthony is going to come back

0:00:20.220 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. I don't know if we have the exact

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.140
<v Speaker 1>day down yet, but it's crazy. They've done this without him.

0:00:25.180 --> 0:00:27.010
<v Speaker 1>And I remember most of the season talking to you

0:00:27.070 --> 0:00:28.990
<v Speaker 1>and being like, hey, the Red Sox were hoping he

0:00:29.030 --> 0:00:30.630
<v Speaker 1>was going to be their main man. Well, can he

0:00:30.670 --> 0:00:32.190
<v Speaker 1>do that for the last month?

0:00:33.180 --> 0:00:34.860
<v Speaker 2>What will he be when he comes back?

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.500
<v Speaker 3>It's the question we always have with injured players. What

0:00:37.540 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 3>will Aaron Judge be when he comes back? They've got

0:00:40.500 --> 0:00:43.460
<v Speaker 3>Trevor Story and Isaiah Kainer-Falefa coming back as well. A

0:00:43.740 --> 0:00:48.070
<v Speaker 3>severe roster crunch awaits because some of the players who

0:00:48.090 --> 0:00:51.449
<v Speaker 3>have replaced the injured guys have done really well. And

0:00:51.470 --> 0:00:53.870
<v Speaker 3>now we're seeing it with Nick Sogard. We've seen it

0:00:53.950 --> 0:00:57.470
<v Speaker 3>with Monasterio and some of the others. So it's a

0:00:57.510 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>really interesting situation there. And obviously with Roman Anthony..

0:01:02.100 --> 0:01:02.660
<v Speaker 2>If he can.

0:01:02.580 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Produce at anywhere near the level that he expected, it

0:01:06.180 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 3>gives them a further boost.

0:01:09.540 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Ken, is there an expectation on crochet? Is he going

0:01:13.340 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 4>to come back and be in the bullpen? Isn't that

0:01:14.940 --> 0:01:16.550
<v Speaker 4>kind of what they're talking about with crochet?

0:01:17.500 --> 0:01:21.170
<v Speaker 3>There is, I wouldn't say an expectation, but a possibility

0:01:21.290 --> 0:01:24.270
<v Speaker 3>of that happening. And yeah, it would not be as

0:01:24.310 --> 0:01:26.350
<v Speaker 3>a starter. There's not enough time to build up as

0:01:26.390 --> 0:01:30.169
<v Speaker 3>a starter, but perhaps as a reliever and we'll see

0:01:30.209 --> 0:01:30.770
<v Speaker 3>where that goes.

0:01:33.310 --> 0:01:38.250
<v Speaker 4>Is it expected? Roman Anthony is supposed to be back when? Soon, right? Today?

0:01:38.590 --> 0:01:42.490
<v Speaker 4>Next week. Darn it, Ken. I was hoping he'd be

0:01:42.510 --> 0:01:44.429
<v Speaker 4>in the lineup on Saturday when you get to talk

0:01:44.470 --> 0:01:45.730
<v Speaker 4>about him on Fox.

0:01:46.780 --> 0:01:47.950
<v Speaker 2>I don't expect that to happen.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.940
<v Speaker 3>From what I'm reading, and this is coming from the

0:01:50.980 --> 0:01:55.660
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox beat reporters, that Story and Isaiah Kainafalefa are

0:01:55.740 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>expected back shortly, any day now. So those moves are

0:01:59.140 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>going to happen, and then they're going to have a

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>situation with Anthony where Their outfield's crowded already.

0:02:04.820 --> 0:02:06.460
<v Speaker 2>We know that. And they're going to have to make

0:02:06.500 --> 0:02:07.100
<v Speaker 2>some decisions.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Of those other two, Isaiah Conner for left and Trevor Story,

0:02:11.310 --> 0:02:14.810
<v Speaker 5>is there an expectation that maybe they don't slot into starting?

0:02:15.130 --> 0:02:18.130
<v Speaker 5>Not that it's going to delay their rehab, but there's,

0:02:18.430 --> 0:02:20.950
<v Speaker 5>like you said, guys that are having success since they've

0:02:20.990 --> 0:02:21.410
<v Speaker 5>been out.

0:02:22.810 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know how they're going to play it.

0:02:24.500 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 3>And Eric, it's going to be an interesting thing because

0:02:27.220 --> 0:02:31.210
<v Speaker 3>you've seen with this team, The players that we just discussed,

0:02:31.490 --> 0:02:36.090
<v Speaker 3>Sigler and Monasterio and Sogard, these are the guys who

0:02:36.110 --> 0:02:38.930
<v Speaker 3>have done a really good job in the absences of

0:02:38.970 --> 0:02:42.630
<v Speaker 3>these other players and kind of helped the Red Sox

0:02:42.710 --> 0:02:45.429
<v Speaker 3>get where they were. The roster became more functional with

0:02:45.470 --> 0:02:48.190
<v Speaker 3>these guys kind of doing their thing and they're very versatile.

0:02:48.970 --> 0:02:51.020
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know how this plays out.

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.500
<v Speaker 3>And there is a risk, I guess, some risk that

0:02:55.010 --> 0:02:57.540
<v Speaker 3>Things aren't as good with these guys coming back as

0:02:57.580 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 3>they were with the replacements. That's a challenge that manager

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.220
<v Speaker 3>Chad Tracy is going to face, and it's going to

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 3>be a difficult one for him, I imagine. I'm sure

0:03:08.210 --> 0:03:11.570
<v Speaker 3>we'll be discussing it on our broadcast Saturday because it's

0:03:11.590 --> 0:03:13.150
<v Speaker 3>going to be live at that point.

0:03:15.090 --> 0:03:17.709
<v Speaker 4>Ken, let's go to a different manager that's staying around,

0:03:17.750 --> 0:03:20.619
<v Speaker 4>and that's Joe Espada. Dana Brown was let go by

0:03:20.660 --> 0:03:23.660
<v Speaker 4>the Astros. Weird timing. I know Jim Crane isn't afraid

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>to do this in the middle of a season. Was

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Joe Espada really told that he's not being brought back

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.260
<v Speaker 4>and then he elected to stick around for the rest

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 4>of the year?

0:03:32.940 --> 0:03:37.030
<v Speaker 3>Not from what our reporter Chandler Rome understands. And the

0:03:37.170 --> 0:03:39.790
<v Speaker 3>Astros vehemently denied that. It was a report by Bob

0:03:39.850 --> 0:03:46.130
<v Speaker 3>Nightingale yesterday. And Joe Espada, if he was in that position,

0:03:46.590 --> 0:03:48.300
<v Speaker 3>he certainly has not acknowledged it.

0:03:48.510 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to.

0:03:50.940 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Dump on anybody's report, but this was roundly denied.

0:03:54.300 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, is Joe Espada in trouble?

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.740
<v Speaker 3>By definition, he is in trouble, one, because he's in

0:04:00.780 --> 0:04:03.220
<v Speaker 3>the last year of his contract, two, because the guy

0:04:03.260 --> 0:04:04.650
<v Speaker 3>who hired him just got fired.

0:04:05.190 --> 0:04:07.330
<v Speaker 2>So put those.

0:04:07.170 --> 0:04:09.970
<v Speaker 3>Two things together and the fact that this team, I

0:04:10.010 --> 0:04:12.350
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it's fair to say they've underachieved because

0:04:12.390 --> 0:04:15.090
<v Speaker 3>a lot of what Dana Brown did did not work out.

0:04:15.210 --> 0:04:18.589
<v Speaker 3>The pitchers he brought in, they never addressed the outfield adequately.

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 3>That's on the GM, not the manager, and perhaps that's

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.380
<v Speaker 3>why the GM was fired when he was. But Joe Espada,

0:04:26.610 --> 0:04:28.610
<v Speaker 3>at the very least, will have to deal with a

0:04:28.650 --> 0:04:32.130
<v Speaker 3>new GM above him, and that always is perilous for

0:04:32.170 --> 0:04:32.650
<v Speaker 3>a manager.

0:04:33.810 --> 0:04:36.290
<v Speaker 4>Jim Crane doesn't fire managers, he fires GMs.

0:04:36.970 --> 0:04:39.010
<v Speaker 5>Is it fair to say that this isn't a good

0:04:39.070 --> 0:04:43.580
<v Speaker 5>move with other organizations, but has been decently successful for

0:04:43.620 --> 0:04:47.020
<v Speaker 5>Jim Crane to fire GMs, even when he fired Click

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 5>after they won a World Series?

0:04:50.110 --> 0:04:52.110
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that the firing of Click can now

0:04:52.170 --> 0:04:56.110
<v Speaker 3>be remembered as positive because, frankly, they've had more trouble

0:04:56.210 --> 0:04:57.969
<v Speaker 3>under Dana Brown than they did under Click.

0:04:58.450 --> 0:05:00.510
<v Speaker 2>And what Dana.

0:05:00.250 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Brown was brought in to do, one of the things

0:05:02.980 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>was boost the farm system. He's a scouting background guy,

0:05:07.300 --> 0:05:10.660
<v Speaker 3>and that really hasn't happened. Their farm system is not

0:05:10.700 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 3>in great shape. Now, granted, they lost some picks back

0:05:14.500 --> 0:05:18.510
<v Speaker 3>in 20 and 21 because of the scandal, but it's still...

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.500
<v Speaker 3>a good amount of time has passed and it should

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 3>have been better by now. It's not better. So that

0:05:24.740 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>is on Dana Brown. And it's also on Dana Brown,

0:05:27.820 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 3>what I just said, the outfield, the pitching.

0:05:29.540 --> 0:05:32.310
<v Speaker 2>Staff, the fact that this team is not all there.

0:05:32.470 --> 0:05:33.870
<v Speaker 4>And he didn't.

0:05:33.710 --> 0:05:36.570
<v Speaker 3>Sign as many players to his extent to extensions as

0:05:37.070 --> 0:05:40.490
<v Speaker 3>he indicated he might. So I would not say that

0:05:40.550 --> 0:05:43.650
<v Speaker 3>this worked out well for them. Dana Brown is well-liked.

0:05:43.730 --> 0:05:44.470
<v Speaker 2>He's respected.

0:05:44.490 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>He's smart, but he's, Did he do the optimal job there?

0:05:48.420 --> 0:05:50.260
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that even Dana would say that.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:58.290
<v Speaker 4>Bella, Bella, Bella, where? I don't know where Bella is,

0:05:58.630 --> 0:06:00.610
<v Speaker 4>but I know how to take care of my pup.

0:06:01.230 --> 0:06:04.470
<v Speaker 1>Kratz, while you find Bella, today's episode is sponsored by

0:06:04.529 --> 0:06:08.830
<v Speaker 1>the ASPCA Pet Health Insurance Program. The ASPCA Pet Health

0:06:08.850 --> 0:06:12.110
<v Speaker 1>Insurance Program offers customizable accident and illness plans that can

0:06:12.150 --> 0:06:14.940
<v Speaker 1>fit your budget, your lifestyle, and even your pet's particular quirks.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.330
<v Speaker 1>Because let's be honest, vet bills can add up fast.

0:06:18.529 --> 0:06:20.670
<v Speaker 1>And when it's time to submit a claim, it's easy.

0:06:20.730 --> 0:06:23.570
<v Speaker 1>Just use their app and receive reimbursement for eligible vet

0:06:23.589 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>bills directly into your bank account so you can get

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>back to focusing on what really matters, your pet. To

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:38.219
<v Speaker 1>explore coverage, visit aspcapetinsurance.com. That's ASPCApetinsurance.com slash F-O-U-L. This is

0:06:38.260 --> 0:06:41.820
<v Speaker 1>a paid advertisement. Insurance is underwritten by either Independence American

0:06:41.860 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Insurance Company or United States Fire Insurance Company and produced

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.390
<v Speaker 1>by PTZ Insurance Agency Limited. The ASPCA is not an

0:06:49.450 --> 0:06:51.830
<v Speaker 1>insurer and is not engaged in the business of insurance.

0:06:52.890 --> 0:06:54.409
<v Speaker 4>All right. Can I have to ask a question then?

0:06:54.470 --> 0:06:57.430
<v Speaker 4>Is Jim Crane the reason why this is happening? Because

0:06:57.450 --> 0:07:00.230
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't love the extensions. He doesn't love long-term deals

0:07:00.270 --> 0:07:02.850
<v Speaker 4>for pitchers. He doesn't, you know, from what we've heard,

0:07:02.890 --> 0:07:06.270
<v Speaker 4>they were handcuffed by pick, pick, you know, the things

0:07:06.290 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 4>with the cheating thing, all that stuff. So then you

0:07:08.900 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 4>look at it and you say, okay, Dana Brown, did

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.620
<v Speaker 4>he want to trade for Carlos Correa? Apparently that was

0:07:13.660 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe a Jim crane thing, bringing Carlos Correa back, right?

0:07:17.420 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 4>The extensions are on the owner. If Jeremy Pena, if,

0:07:20.730 --> 0:07:22.810
<v Speaker 4>You know, whoever wants an extension, the owner has to

0:07:22.850 --> 0:07:24.690
<v Speaker 4>agree to it. The GM, I'm sure, goes to him

0:07:24.710 --> 0:07:27.370
<v Speaker 4>and says, hey, Jeremy, you want an extension? What do

0:07:27.390 --> 0:07:30.290
<v Speaker 4>you want? If he says five years, 100, Jim Crane goes, no,

0:07:30.690 --> 0:07:33.250
<v Speaker 4>too much. Well, then it ain't on Dana Brown. So

0:07:33.270 --> 0:07:36.070
<v Speaker 4>how much does Jim Crane have to have to take

0:07:36.090 --> 0:07:36.870
<v Speaker 4>for blame for this?

0:07:37.710 --> 0:07:38.869
<v Speaker 2>Certainly a good amount.

0:07:39.130 --> 0:07:42.510
<v Speaker 3>And they've made some bad decisions with contracts that were

0:07:42.550 --> 0:07:46.410
<v Speaker 3>Jim Crane driven over the years as well. So, AJ,

0:07:46.430 --> 0:07:48.010
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the whole thing, it's like with

0:07:48.090 --> 0:07:52.210
<v Speaker 3>any team. It's always hard to discern, not always, but

0:07:52.250 --> 0:07:55.540
<v Speaker 3>in many cases with clubs, it's hard to discern how

0:07:55.580 --> 0:07:58.020
<v Speaker 3>much is the GM's fault and how much is the

0:07:58.060 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>fault of the owner who might not be providing the

0:08:00.940 --> 0:08:03.780
<v Speaker 3>resources that the GM would want. I can give you

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:09.110
<v Speaker 3>any number of examples in the game where that distinction

0:08:09.170 --> 0:08:12.910
<v Speaker 3>is difficult to draw, where I don't know exactly if

0:08:12.990 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>it's a money thing, if it's the GM's balking at

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 3>certain things. There are all kinds of things that go on.

0:08:20.180 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 3>But certainly, Crane is the owner of the team. He

0:08:22.620 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>is the one who has said, we're not ever going

0:08:25.130 --> 0:08:29.950
<v Speaker 3>to rebuild. Well, there are indications or times where perhaps

0:08:29.990 --> 0:08:32.010
<v Speaker 3>you should rebuild. And you can make the case that

0:08:32.030 --> 0:08:34.330
<v Speaker 3>the Astros could have done some things along those lines,

0:08:34.710 --> 0:08:36.650
<v Speaker 3>but that's not the direction they chose.

0:08:37.230 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 2>So here they are, and it's going to be.

0:08:39.820 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Really interesting to see who they replace Dana Brown with.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.929
<v Speaker 3>Is it going to be Another first-time GM? That's what

0:08:45.970 --> 0:08:50.469
<v Speaker 3>they've done. Luno, Click, Dana Brown, all were first-time guys.

0:08:50.630 --> 0:08:52.170
<v Speaker 2>Or do they get someone more experienced?

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.540
<v Speaker 3>Or do they turn it to Jack Bagwell, who is

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 3>in the front office and clearly has influence?

0:08:57.780 --> 0:08:58.530
<v Speaker 4>Does he want it?

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Do they want him? All these questions.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.900
<v Speaker 3>And there's going to be some other teams, of course,

0:09:03.940 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 3>looking for GMs as well. Two in their own division

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:07.620
<v Speaker 3>right now are unsettled.

0:09:08.110 --> 0:09:11.030
<v Speaker 2>So it's going to be an interesting offseason.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.260
<v Speaker 4>Ken, you mentioned they don't want to rebuild. Last time

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 4>they rebuilt, they tore it down. They came back stronger

0:09:17.500 --> 0:09:20.900
<v Speaker 4>than ever. Correa, Bregman, all these guys, right? Altuve. And

0:09:20.940 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 4>they won two World Series, went to the postseason for

0:09:23.260 --> 0:09:27.450
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of years. Why is this organization so anti-rebuild

0:09:27.530 --> 0:09:30.030
<v Speaker 4>after they were kind of the model franchise for doing it?

0:09:30.890 --> 0:09:33.410
<v Speaker 3>Well, for one thing, AJ, you can't do it the

0:09:33.450 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 3>same way anymore. There's a draft lottery now, and it's

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:37.420
<v Speaker 3>just different.

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:38.090
<v Speaker 1>You cannot..

0:09:38.550 --> 0:09:40.110
<v Speaker 2>Tank the way you once did.

0:09:40.190 --> 0:09:43.590
<v Speaker 3>There are disincentives to doing that and properly so. We

0:09:43.630 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>needed that in the game. The other part of that is,

0:09:46.980 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 3>and I'll say this on behalf of Jim Crane, you

0:09:50.580 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 3>want an owner who is going to compete and you

0:09:53.020 --> 0:09:55.070
<v Speaker 3>want an owner who says we're going for it every

0:09:55.110 --> 0:09:58.150
<v Speaker 3>year in the way that they go for it. Obviously,

0:09:58.170 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 3>it's not all in financially.

0:10:00.090 --> 0:10:00.569
<v Speaker 2>We know that.

0:10:00.950 --> 0:10:05.030
<v Speaker 3>But that is his approach, and that is an approach, frankly,

0:10:05.050 --> 0:10:08.350
<v Speaker 3>we should applaud. Now, at the same time, there are

0:10:08.410 --> 0:10:11.609
<v Speaker 3>moments in a franchise's evolution where it is time to

0:10:11.650 --> 0:10:14.550
<v Speaker 3>take a step back, retool, and kind.

0:10:14.390 --> 0:10:16.870
<v Speaker 2>Of keep going forward. There are teams that do that

0:10:16.910 --> 0:10:19.270
<v Speaker 2>very well. Tampa Bay, Milwaukee, they.

0:10:19.190 --> 0:10:22.490
<v Speaker 3>Can constantly retool and yet stay competitive.

0:10:23.090 --> 0:10:25.510
<v Speaker 2>The Astros needed more of that, and they haven't done it.

0:10:26.570 --> 0:10:28.630
<v Speaker 5>A team in a constant rebuild is the Marlins. You

0:10:28.650 --> 0:10:31.489
<v Speaker 5>wrote a short little article about them getting rid of

0:10:31.510 --> 0:10:33.990
<v Speaker 5>the scouts. Do you have any more information since that

0:10:34.070 --> 0:10:36.860
<v Speaker 5>article came out about how many they got rid of,

0:10:38.110 --> 0:10:41.809
<v Speaker 5>what their next step is with doing mostly video scouting?

0:10:43.410 --> 0:10:45.270
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is something that has gone on with a

0:10:45.309 --> 0:10:48.290
<v Speaker 3>number of teams and we don't know the exact number

0:10:48.370 --> 0:10:52.910
<v Speaker 3>of people that were let go. My initial source told

0:10:52.929 --> 0:10:56.020
<v Speaker 3>me six to eight. That sounds like the proper range

0:10:56.460 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 3>or at least the accurate range for what this was.

0:10:59.580 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 3>What the Marlins are doing is saying we can do

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 3>this by video and they're going to have some in-person scouting.

0:11:05.540 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how much, but essentially they're going to

0:11:07.780 --> 0:11:10.339
<v Speaker 3>do this by video. A lot of teams have made

0:11:10.380 --> 0:11:14.069
<v Speaker 3>that choice in my opinion, It's not the right choice.

0:11:14.530 --> 0:11:18.110
<v Speaker 2>Video is fine. And video gets you a lot. Does

0:11:18.150 --> 0:11:18.929
<v Speaker 2>it get you everything?

0:11:19.170 --> 0:11:19.349
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:11:19.429 --> 0:11:22.540
<v Speaker 3>Now teams will say that having a scout in the

0:11:22.580 --> 0:11:26.620
<v Speaker 3>ballpark and what he might pick up either on players,

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, personal lives or different quirks in their

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.140
<v Speaker 3>work habits, whatever they might pick up is not worth

0:11:33.179 --> 0:11:35.950
<v Speaker 3>the investment of having them on the road. I don't

0:11:35.990 --> 0:11:39.290
<v Speaker 3>know about that being true. I don't necessarily buy that.

0:11:39.670 --> 0:11:42.740
<v Speaker 3>To me, having eyes in the ballpark, there is value

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:47.180
<v Speaker 3>in it. And can I economically quantify it to maximize

0:11:47.220 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the efficiency, which is what all the teams want?

0:11:49.700 --> 0:11:50.699
<v Speaker 2>No, I can't do that.

0:11:51.140 --> 0:11:52.940
<v Speaker 3>But if you're telling me there's no value in that,

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 3>that I would disagree with. At the same time, this

0:11:56.059 --> 0:11:59.819
<v Speaker 3>is an economic decision teams have made. And it's not

0:11:59.860 --> 0:12:01.260
<v Speaker 3>like the Marlins are the only one.

0:12:02.630 --> 0:12:06.420
<v Speaker 5>Asking a few people around since you wrote this. they

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.100
<v Speaker 5>don't necessarily think it's all economic. Have you heard anything

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:15.860
<v Speaker 5>about the fact that video can be evaluated by artificial intelligence, AI,

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.579
<v Speaker 5>and teams are leaning into that and the Marlins are

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.590
<v Speaker 5>the most thought of as the most progressive, but have

0:12:22.670 --> 0:12:27.610
<v Speaker 5>teams had success going to this model of video and

0:12:27.690 --> 0:12:28.410
<v Speaker 5>less scouting?

0:12:29.970 --> 0:12:31.829
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the exact answer to that, Eric.

0:12:32.710 --> 0:12:35.309
<v Speaker 3>Obviously they do it And they do it because they

0:12:35.350 --> 0:12:37.690
<v Speaker 3>believe it's going to lead to more success.

0:12:38.190 --> 0:12:40.970
<v Speaker 2>And they believe it's a more efficient way of scouting.

0:12:41.790 --> 0:12:45.250
<v Speaker 2>Is it making teams better or teams that were at

0:12:45.290 --> 0:12:47.790
<v Speaker 2>the forefront of this better off than teams that weren't?

0:12:48.250 --> 0:12:49.390
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the answer to that.

0:12:50.740 --> 0:12:52.340
<v Speaker 4>Ken, there was a team that tried this a few,

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, about 20 years. I don't know how

0:12:54.300 --> 0:12:56.780
<v Speaker 4>many years ago. It was the Oakland Athletics. And their

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.750
<v Speaker 4>drafts then went on to be some of the worst. Remember,

0:12:59.790 --> 0:13:02.670
<v Speaker 4>they fired all their scouts right after Moneyball. Billy Bean

0:13:02.710 --> 0:13:05.350
<v Speaker 4>had it all figured out. You know, him and Billy Bean,

0:13:05.390 --> 0:13:08.650
<v Speaker 4>Paul DePodesta, who's actually, you know, now in Colorado. But,

0:13:08.730 --> 0:13:09.770
<v Speaker 4>you know, they had it all figured out.

0:13:09.809 --> 0:13:10.010
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:13:10.030 --> 0:13:13.580
<v Speaker 4>Because just have guys that walk. And then they went

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 4>and did all video scouting. Remember, they just looked at

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 4>the numbers of guys in college and every draft was

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.380
<v Speaker 4>college hitters, college hitters. And they thought they all had

0:13:21.420 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 4>it figured out and it didn't really work. And now

0:13:23.660 --> 0:13:26.340
<v Speaker 4>they've gone back to having scouts. Is this a case

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 4>where the Marlins could do this and then have to

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:29.140
<v Speaker 4>bring back scouts later?

0:13:31.070 --> 0:13:33.980
<v Speaker 3>It is, but the trend in the game is not

0:13:34.010 --> 0:13:36.819
<v Speaker 3>that way. And again, it's not something I agree with.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:38.939
<v Speaker 3>And there are a lot of good people in baseball

0:13:39.540 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>who have either lost influence or lost their jobs in

0:13:42.540 --> 0:13:46.210
<v Speaker 3>recent years. And I know, as I said before, the

0:13:46.470 --> 0:13:48.969
<v Speaker 3>answer that clubs will give you is these guys weren't

0:13:49.010 --> 0:13:51.970
<v Speaker 3>all that and they weren't contributing as much as people

0:13:51.990 --> 0:13:54.710
<v Speaker 3>like me think they were. And that may be all

0:13:54.730 --> 0:13:58.030
<v Speaker 3>well and good. But what we don't hear about is

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.260
<v Speaker 3>what is missing with the video scouting and what teams

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 3>might be missing and the decisions that are made that

0:14:05.140 --> 0:14:07.750
<v Speaker 3>maybe aren't as shrewd as they should be. There are

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.709
<v Speaker 3>a lot of bad decisions made with all these clubs

0:14:10.890 --> 0:14:15.750
<v Speaker 3>operating under this maximum efficiency that they claim to be pursuing.

0:14:16.250 --> 0:14:18.390
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, they.

0:14:18.270 --> 0:14:20.770
<v Speaker 3>Can operate how they want to operate and I understand

0:14:20.810 --> 0:14:23.230
<v Speaker 3>it and I understand the economics of it and why

0:14:23.290 --> 0:14:25.650
<v Speaker 3>they're doing it and they believe it's a better way

0:14:25.690 --> 0:14:28.210
<v Speaker 3>to go about it. But You're telling me that it's

0:14:28.250 --> 0:14:30.989
<v Speaker 3>improved decision-making across the game? I don't know that that

0:14:31.050 --> 0:14:32.210
<v Speaker 3>is necessarily the case.

0:14:36.670 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>For the families out there looking for a new path

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.580
<v Speaker 1>to help your child succeed, take a look at K-12

0:14:41.660 --> 0:14:47.180
<v Speaker 1>Powered Schools. K-12 offers tuition-free accredited online public education for

0:14:47.230 --> 0:14:49.900
<v Speaker 1>students in kindergarten through 12th grade, It's all in a

0:14:49.940 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>setting that works for your family. And K-12 has been around.

0:14:53.380 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>They've been a leader in online education for over 25 years,

0:14:56.740 --> 0:15:01.310
<v Speaker 1>serving over 3 million families with flexible education options tailored

0:15:01.370 --> 0:15:04.550
<v Speaker 1>to each child's needs, interests, and goals for the future.

0:15:04.950 --> 0:15:08.430
<v Speaker 1>K-12's dedicated teachers are trained in virtual instruction, and they

0:15:08.450 --> 0:15:11.430
<v Speaker 1>provide real-time support. Hey, we've heard Todd Father on here

0:15:11.530 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about how his kids have gone through homeschooling, and

0:15:14.340 --> 0:15:16.900
<v Speaker 1>it's really helped them for a family that is very

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.890
<v Speaker 1>much on the move during his playing career. So you

0:15:19.930 --> 0:15:22.590
<v Speaker 1>can see how K-12 powered schools can help unlock your

0:15:22.630 --> 0:15:26.650
<v Speaker 1>child's full potential. Enroll online today at k12. com slash foul.

0:15:26.890 --> 0:15:33.730
<v Speaker 1>That's the letter K, the number 12.com slash F-O-U-L, k12. com

0:15:32.670 --> 0:15:38.630
<v Speaker 1>slash foul. One clarification here too, can pro scouting department.

0:15:39.140 --> 0:15:45.100
<v Speaker 1>So they're looking at minor league players via trades, waiver wire, scouting,

0:15:45.140 --> 0:15:48.660
<v Speaker 1>obviously for the team itself on, hey, picking up tendencies, right? Like,

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.950
<v Speaker 1>can you, explain anything on that front and how that

0:15:51.990 --> 0:15:54.730
<v Speaker 1>could affect the way that actually a team like the

0:15:54.770 --> 0:15:57.650
<v Speaker 1>Marlins finds a diamond in the rough. They just feel

0:15:57.690 --> 0:16:00.630
<v Speaker 1>like we can find the diamond in the rough via video.

0:16:00.690 --> 0:16:03.790
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to have guys out or girls on

0:16:03.830 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the scene, finding a waiver claim that ends up being

0:16:06.500 --> 0:16:07.620
<v Speaker 1>the next big thing for us.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.780
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're right, Scott, that people should understand there are

0:16:11.860 --> 0:16:15.750
<v Speaker 3>pro scouts who scout professional baseball and There are amateur

0:16:15.770 --> 0:16:18.990
<v Speaker 3>scouts who scout amateurs, guys that are going to be drafted,

0:16:19.030 --> 0:16:24.020
<v Speaker 3>and there are international scouts looking at the international players. Again,

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 3>with the pro scouting, it has definitely been diminished across

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the board in recent years. Now, the Marlins have taken

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.870
<v Speaker 3>what seems to be a pretty severe step. It basically

0:16:33.930 --> 0:16:37.790
<v Speaker 3>sounds like they've eliminated the entire department. They deny that,

0:16:37.910 --> 0:16:41.010
<v Speaker 3>but it's certainly the guts of the department have been removed.

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 2>There are other ways to scout.

0:16:43.620 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes. And that's what we're talking about here. Again, do

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.100
<v Speaker 3>you get everything you might get otherwise? These teams say no.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 3>And these teams say this is the way to go.

0:16:55.340 --> 0:16:57.980
<v Speaker 3>And I don't have an exact answer. What I was

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.300
<v Speaker 3>just saying before is that, and this is a complaint

0:17:01.340 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I hear from more.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.050
<v Speaker 2>Old school baseball people. Okay, they say.

0:17:06.650 --> 0:17:09.810
<v Speaker 3>We hear about our bad decisions and we make mistakes.

0:17:10.010 --> 0:17:12.790
<v Speaker 3>Everybody in baseball misses. That's the beauty of the game.

0:17:12.830 --> 0:17:15.170
<v Speaker 3>It's a game of failure, not just on the field,

0:17:15.230 --> 0:17:15.990
<v Speaker 3>but off the field.

0:17:16.850 --> 0:17:17.169
<v Speaker 4>Fine.

0:17:17.990 --> 0:17:21.610
<v Speaker 3>But what about the misses that occur under these new systems?

0:17:22.430 --> 0:17:23.950
<v Speaker 2>They're not talked about.

0:17:23.970 --> 0:17:28.330
<v Speaker 3>And that to me is a fair assessment that, yes,

0:17:28.650 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 3>we've changed the game or the game has changed in

0:17:31.100 --> 0:17:34.010
<v Speaker 3>many ways. And in some ways, definitely for the better,

0:17:34.030 --> 0:17:38.149
<v Speaker 3>the technology and all the things that are available now, data,

0:17:38.350 --> 0:17:43.170
<v Speaker 3>everything has given us a greater understanding as fans, media,

0:17:43.530 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>and of course, from.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.260
<v Speaker 2>A club perspective. But you still see mistakes.

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.900
<v Speaker 3>And that's the old school people's complaint.

0:17:51.140 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we made mistakes, sure.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.780
<v Speaker 3>But there are mistakes still being made.

0:17:57.010 --> 0:17:59.250
<v Speaker 4>Ken, it's so hard to replicate having a guy in

0:17:59.270 --> 0:18:01.429
<v Speaker 4>the stands. You know this when you do games. In

0:18:01.470 --> 0:18:03.810
<v Speaker 4>the stands, the atmosphere, watching a guy, the way they

0:18:03.830 --> 0:18:05.010
<v Speaker 4>react to situations.

0:18:05.109 --> 0:18:05.869
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:18:06.470 --> 0:18:08.649
<v Speaker 4>That's the thing that I think the video– fine, you

0:18:08.690 --> 0:18:11.189
<v Speaker 4>can measure bat speed. You can measure launch angle. You

0:18:11.210 --> 0:18:14.340
<v Speaker 4>can measure all those things, pitch spin, all those things.

0:18:14.630 --> 0:18:16.850
<v Speaker 4>But you can't measure a guy unless– I'm telling you,

0:18:16.859 --> 0:18:18.980
<v Speaker 4>unless you're sitting in a dugout, unless you're sitting in

0:18:19.020 --> 0:18:21.899
<v Speaker 4>the stands watching a guy, how they react to situations.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 4>And that's what I think we'll be missing. That's my comment.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.980
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think scouts are very valuable. I think

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 4>video is very valuable. I think there should be a

0:18:28.859 --> 0:18:31.100
<v Speaker 4>mix of the two. That's it. It's just really hard.

0:18:31.590 --> 0:18:36.230
<v Speaker 4>to evaluate a guy's heart makeup, all those things without

0:18:36.369 --> 0:18:37.910
<v Speaker 4>actually putting eyeballs on the guy.

0:18:38.890 --> 0:18:40.730
<v Speaker 2>I want to see everything.

0:18:41.090 --> 0:18:44.330
<v Speaker 3>I want to see what he's doing pregame in his

0:18:44.390 --> 0:18:47.310
<v Speaker 3>pregame work. I want to see AJ, just what you said,

0:18:47.810 --> 0:18:52.270
<v Speaker 3>how he's reacting to situations, body language, all of these things.

0:18:52.430 --> 0:18:54.340
<v Speaker 2>You're not picking all of that up on video.

0:18:54.390 --> 0:18:54.929
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry.

0:18:54.950 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You're not.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.580
<v Speaker 3>So AJ, yeah, there is something that is lost when

0:18:59.619 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 3>you eliminate the scout in the ballpark. And again, this

0:19:03.380 --> 0:19:05.500
<v Speaker 3>is an argument that's been going on in the sport

0:19:05.540 --> 0:19:07.929
<v Speaker 3>for years, and there are two sides of it.

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.859
<v Speaker 2>I just feel that the value.

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:16.419
<v Speaker 3>Of those in-person scouts has been diminished to the point

0:19:16.460 --> 0:19:18.060
<v Speaker 3>where it's not right.

0:19:19.140 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 2>These guys do have value.

0:19:20.180 --> 0:19:22.140
<v Speaker 4>All right, last one, Ken.

0:19:22.619 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 5>This weekend, you're the Yankees' the Vaunted, the unbelievable Yankees

0:19:26.460 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Red Sox series.

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.139
<v Speaker 4>What do you see or what are you intrigued.

0:19:29.660 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 5>About seeing in the coming week and this weekend with

0:19:32.540 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 5>the Yankees?

0:19:34.859 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 4>With the Yankees?

0:19:37.810 --> 0:19:42.270
<v Speaker 2>Well, obviously we're monitoring their injuries, right? Judge and Freed and.

0:19:42.290 --> 0:19:47.149
<v Speaker 3>Who's coming back when. But they're trying to stay in

0:19:47.170 --> 0:19:48.930
<v Speaker 3>the race in the AL East.

0:19:49.090 --> 0:19:49.970
<v Speaker 2>With Tampa Bay, right?

0:19:50.109 --> 0:19:54.050
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to possibly win the division title. So how

0:19:54.190 --> 0:19:58.110
<v Speaker 3>are they going to respond to that? That's what we've

0:19:58.130 --> 0:20:00.429
<v Speaker 3>been watching for a couple of months now with the

0:20:00.490 --> 0:20:04.699
<v Speaker 3>injury situation. And Ryan Weathers is the latest. John Carlos

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.410
<v Speaker 3>Stanton's not coming back, it seems. So they still remain

0:20:08.530 --> 0:20:11.910
<v Speaker 3>in this spot where they're not fully healthy, and they

0:20:12.430 --> 0:20:14.950
<v Speaker 3>are still trying to compete. Every team is in this position,

0:20:14.990 --> 0:20:19.100
<v Speaker 3>but they're missing some key pieces. So what we will

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>see on the field, okay, it's pretty good.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.419
<v Speaker 2>It's always pretty good. They're the Yankees. They're a quality team.

0:20:24.580 --> 0:20:27.460
<v Speaker 3>But this is a big series for them because the

0:20:27.510 --> 0:20:31.510
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox are chasing them, too, for that top wildcard spot.

0:20:32.190 --> 0:20:36.550
<v Speaker 3>And It's always interesting when these teams get together, guys.

0:20:36.830 --> 0:20:38.050
<v Speaker 1>Things seem to happen.

0:20:38.630 --> 0:20:41.369
<v Speaker 3>And that's the nature of a rivalry game in many ways.

0:20:41.530 --> 0:20:45.510
<v Speaker 3>But we never anticipated early in the season that this

0:20:45.550 --> 0:20:47.210
<v Speaker 3>particular series would be meaningful.

0:20:47.630 --> 0:20:48.510
<v Speaker 2>It's meaningful now.

0:20:49.510 --> 0:20:52.350
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah. I love it. Always good fun to have

0:20:52.390 --> 0:20:53.070
<v Speaker 1>the rivalry back.

0:20:53.090 --> 0:20:55.189
<v Speaker 4>But, Ken, you're going to be in Atlanta, right, on

0:20:55.230 --> 0:20:57.110
<v Speaker 4>Thursday for Dodgers Brewers?

0:20:58.270 --> 0:20:58.830
<v Speaker 2>I will not be.

0:20:58.850 --> 0:20:59.730
<v Speaker 4>Oh, sorry.

0:20:59.750 --> 0:21:01.910
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers are playing the Brewers in Atlanta? That's interesting.

0:21:01.930 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Dodgers are great.

0:21:03.300 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Sorry.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.900
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, Dodgers-Braves. Oh, the Braves used to be in Milwaukee, so,

0:21:07.940 --> 0:21:09.609
<v Speaker 4>you know, you can understand why. They did, AJ.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:21:10.940 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>You're going to be in Atlanta for that game.

0:21:12.220 --> 0:21:13.899
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I thought Ken might come for that game. You know,

0:21:13.940 --> 0:21:16.900
<v Speaker 4>it's two first-place teams, you know. Oh, but it's only

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.219
<v Speaker 4>on FS1. Should have known, Ken. Should have known. It's

0:21:20.290 --> 0:21:23.090
<v Speaker 4>on Fox 1, but it's not on Big Fox. So,

0:21:23.109 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Ken only does Big Fox.

0:21:25.910 --> 0:21:27.250
<v Speaker 2>That is not true, but okay.

0:21:28.950 --> 0:21:33.490
<v Speaker 1>Ken's like, Ken's very refreshed right now, just back from assignment. So, Ken,

0:21:33.550 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it's good to see you.

0:21:35.290 --> 0:21:35.790
<v Speaker 4>Thanks, guys.

0:21:35.810 --> 0:21:36.629
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you as well.

0:21:36.650 --> 0:21:39.570
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back. See you soon. Ken Rosenthal, FT

0:21:39.590 --> 0:21:41.820
<v Speaker 1>Senior Insider. You can catch him this weekend on Big

0:21:41.859 --> 0:21:44.340
<v Speaker 1>Fox or on the Fox One app. You can catch

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:49.300
<v Speaker 1>AJ on Dodgers Braves Thursday. It's Yamamoto against Sale.

0:21:49.420 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 4>I know, it's a great matchup.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:50.580
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:21:50.820 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 4>And Saturday with Ken, little Kenny.

0:21:53.140 --> 0:21:54.620
<v Speaker 1>Oh, wow, you're on the Saturday.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Red Sox Yankees.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:56.030
<v Speaker 1>The big boy.

0:21:56.050 --> 0:21:56.460
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:56.570 --> 0:21:58.570
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox Yankees. All right, so at home or on

0:21:58.590 --> 0:22:00.090
<v Speaker 1>the go, live or on demand, never miss a moment.

0:22:00.410 --> 0:22:02.530
<v Speaker 1>Stream now. Start your Fox One three-day free trial today

0:22:02.550 --> 0:22:13.660
<v Speaker 1>at foxone.com. Can we talk more about Kinley Rasmus, Little

0:22:13.700 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>League World Series coverage presented by New York Life, the

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>official financial guidance partner of Little League Baseball? You weren't

0:22:20.180 --> 0:22:25.270
<v Speaker 1>on with us the other day. No. Kinley can sling it. Who?

0:22:25.609 --> 0:22:29.250
<v Speaker 1>Kinley Rasmus, less than a week after tying Monet Davis,

0:22:29.270 --> 0:22:31.570
<v Speaker 1>you remember Monet Davis in her run, who actually made

0:22:31.590 --> 0:22:34.790
<v Speaker 1>a sick catch, went viral the other day in center field.

0:22:35.130 --> 0:22:35.770
<v Speaker 4>Monet Davis?

0:22:35.810 --> 0:22:38.390
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's playing as a college or pro.

0:22:39.940 --> 0:22:41.300
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a pro league.

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a pro league. Okay. So after tying her for

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout record by a girl pitching in the Boys

0:22:50.740 --> 0:22:54.290
<v Speaker 1>Little League World Series, right? She brought that total up

0:22:54.310 --> 0:22:57.930
<v Speaker 1>to 14 for the tournament now overall, which ties Davis.

0:22:58.390 --> 0:23:01.389
<v Speaker 1>And she helped lead Alabama to a 6-5 win in

0:23:01.430 --> 0:23:03.869
<v Speaker 1>an elimination game against Pennsylvania.

0:23:03.890 --> 0:23:05.470
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, of course she beat Pennsylvania.

0:23:07.850 --> 0:23:10.659
<v Speaker 1>Corey Rasmus, her dad. knows how to pitch, and he

0:23:10.700 --> 0:23:13.380
<v Speaker 1>taught her well if he was teaching her. Whoever taught

0:23:13.420 --> 0:23:14.020
<v Speaker 1>her taught her well.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.900
<v Speaker 4>Is she related to Colby Rasmus? It's got to be. Yeah.

0:23:19.060 --> 0:23:19.940
<v Speaker 4>That's her uncle.

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:21.050
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:23:21.510 --> 0:23:24.430
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I didn't know you didn't say Colby. You said Corey.

0:23:24.970 --> 0:23:25.889
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm giving you both now.

0:23:25.910 --> 0:23:26.550
<v Speaker 4>Jackass.

0:23:26.790 --> 0:23:29.890
<v Speaker 1>Last time I said Colby, and then Kratz, didn't you

0:23:29.970 --> 0:23:33.750
<v Speaker 1>say Corey? Because you know Corey, right? Did you play

0:23:33.790 --> 0:23:34.010
<v Speaker 1>with Corey?

0:23:34.030 --> 0:23:34.330
<v Speaker 7>No, no.

0:23:35.250 --> 0:23:35.970
<v Speaker 4>I know Colby.

0:23:36.670 --> 0:23:39.490
<v Speaker 5>And Corey is one of the four brothers in the

0:23:39.570 --> 0:23:40.910
<v Speaker 5>Razzle Dazzle house.

0:23:41.470 --> 0:23:44.900
<v Speaker 4>I homered off him. Corey Rasmus? Yeah.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:46.420
<v Speaker 1>Nice.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.380
<v Speaker 4>That's good. He's booked.

0:23:50.100 --> 0:23:51.980
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Good. We're learning a lot here.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:52.700
<v Speaker 4>I'm pretty sure.

0:23:53.580 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>No, you better be sure.

0:23:56.100 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I think it's so cool. I'll let you find that.

0:23:59.540 --> 0:24:04.390
<v Speaker 5>But Colby told me when we played together that his

0:24:04.450 --> 0:24:08.100
<v Speaker 5>dad was always like, you boys, you got to make

0:24:08.180 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 5>sure that your kids are athletic. I mean, these are

0:24:11.180 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 5>guys that grew up in like a one-room house. The

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.290
<v Speaker 5>four Rasmus boys all grew up in this tiny little

0:24:18.330 --> 0:24:21.630
<v Speaker 5>house together. And his dad was very much their hitting coach,

0:24:21.670 --> 0:24:24.150
<v Speaker 5>pitching coach, all that. And he was like, he would

0:24:24.230 --> 0:24:27.150
<v Speaker 5>instill it in their boys. Colby's like, yeah, my dad

0:24:27.190 --> 0:24:31.109
<v Speaker 5>always said, we got to make sure my grandkids are

0:24:31.150 --> 0:24:34.229
<v Speaker 5>athletic too. And like, that was like a thing. So

0:24:34.270 --> 0:24:38.389
<v Speaker 5>the fact that Kenley... is following in both her uncle

0:24:39.010 --> 0:24:40.470
<v Speaker 5>and father's footsteps.

0:24:41.090 --> 0:24:41.650
<v Speaker 4>She's good.

0:24:41.690 --> 0:24:45.010
<v Speaker 5>Like, yeah, she pitches really well, but that double play,

0:24:45.050 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 5>she made another play where she fielded it.

0:24:47.650 --> 0:24:48.830
<v Speaker 4>She can swing a little bit too.

0:24:49.330 --> 0:24:51.510
<v Speaker 5>It's so cool to see, like guys you played with

0:24:51.590 --> 0:24:53.190
<v Speaker 5>kids playing in the Little League World Series.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>It's time to remind everyone why baseball is glorious, especially

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.649
<v Speaker 1>nowadays where you could think your team is out of it,

0:25:01.700 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but they might be back in it again. Let me

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.450
<v Speaker 1>introduce you to the American League wildcard kp and let's

0:25:07.470 --> 0:25:09.609
<v Speaker 1>tell everyone why they might need to head back to

0:25:09.650 --> 0:25:12.950
<v Speaker 1>see geek grab some more tickets for what is a

0:25:13.020 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 1>playoff race before the playoffs actually begin.

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.140
<v Speaker 7>Well speaking about being out of it i'm an american

0:25:19.180 --> 0:25:21.940
<v Speaker 7>league east guy and i'm talking to you toronto fans

0:25:21.980 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 7>i'm talking to you baltimore fans a couple weeks ago

0:25:25.300 --> 0:25:26.899
<v Speaker 7>probably not a reason to come out to the games

0:25:27.020 --> 0:25:29.180
<v Speaker 7>look at the standings right now both of you teams

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:30.300
<v Speaker 7>are right back in this.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Wildcard race rangers fans we can go on and on

0:25:34.300 --> 0:25:36.379
<v Speaker 1>Mariners fans, you might be feeling a little queasy, but

0:25:36.420 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you're still in this thing too. So all of you

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>should head to SeatGeek and get yourself 10% off your

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.649
<v Speaker 1>next set of MLB tickets. 10% off MLB tickets with

0:25:46.690 --> 0:25:49.709
<v Speaker 1>the promo code TERRITORY10. Make sure you click the link

0:25:49.730 --> 0:25:51.510
<v Speaker 1>in the description to download the app and have the

0:25:51.530 --> 0:25:54.150
<v Speaker 1>code automatically added to your account so that you can

0:25:54.290 --> 0:25:54.869
<v Speaker 1>use it later.

0:25:55.790 --> 0:26:00.900
<v Speaker 4>Sorry about it. Booked. One for one. One homer. One RBI. Whoops. Oopsie.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 5>I guess that's... I always wonder. I always wonder that. Like,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.980
<v Speaker 5>I hit 31 big league homers. I wonder how many

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 5>AJ could get right.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 4>What do you have? Do you have over 200? No, 180-something, 88, 89,

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 4>something like that.

0:26:14.820 --> 0:26:16.460
<v Speaker 5>How many do you think you could get right? Maybe

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 5>this will be like extra content for everybody who subscribes.

0:26:19.140 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 5>We can do extra content. Hit the like and subscribe button.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 5>But how many do you think.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 4>You could get right? Could you get half? Could you

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:31.889
<v Speaker 4>get three-quarters? I wouldn't get all of them, but I

0:26:32.010 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 4>could give you a pretty good run. What would be easier?

0:26:36.260 --> 0:26:36.460
<v Speaker 1>Half?

0:26:38.180 --> 0:26:38.580
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean?

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.500
<v Speaker 1>Could you name half the pitchers, not right now, but

0:26:41.980 --> 0:26:44.100
<v Speaker 1>that you homered off of if we sat down with you?

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it'd take me a while. I mean, if

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 4>you threw me a name, I could give you a

0:26:47.580 --> 0:26:48.140
<v Speaker 4>yes or no.

0:26:48.810 --> 0:26:49.070
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.290
<v Speaker 4>That actually might be a fun game. I don't know

0:26:53.310 --> 0:26:55.340
<v Speaker 4>if I could get all of them, but I could get–

0:26:55.830 --> 0:26:58.190
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I could get most of them. I

0:26:58.290 --> 0:27:01.950
<v Speaker 4>always said everybody– If you threw CeCe at me, yes.

0:27:02.010 --> 0:27:05.770
<v Speaker 4>If you threw Verlander, yes. Scherzer, yes. Like those names.

0:27:06.070 --> 0:27:07.970
<v Speaker 1>I want the Corey Rasmus name.

0:27:07.990 --> 0:27:09.630
<v Speaker 4>I don't even know how that just popped in my head.

0:27:09.650 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 4>But then I saw him pitch and I was like,

0:27:11.630 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 4>I hit a homer off that dude. See, I love that.

0:27:15.220 --> 0:27:15.580
<v Speaker 4>I love that.

0:27:17.619 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Monet Davis is in the Women's Professional

0:27:20.700 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Baseball League. That's where the clip was. And one more

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>thing from the Little League World Series right now. Remember

0:27:28.340 --> 0:27:30.340
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers and the Braves were there over the weekend.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>We got a little bit more from the weekend. Bryce Terang.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.699
<v Speaker 1>and some of the Brew Crew players bought Little League

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>World Series hats, and then they traded pins with the

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.020
<v Speaker 1>players so that they could pin up the hats. It's

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:43.820
<v Speaker 1>a big thing out there.

0:27:43.900 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 4>But did they get to become pen pals?

0:27:46.090 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Pin pals.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:48.050
<v Speaker 4>Pin pals.

0:27:48.230 --> 0:27:49.090
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is.

0:27:49.090 --> 0:27:52.450
<v Speaker 4>That's what they were saying. Pin pals. That's right. Kratz

0:27:52.490 --> 0:27:55.110
<v Speaker 4>wasn't on for that yesterday. He doesn't get it. Kratz,

0:27:55.150 --> 0:27:59.149
<v Speaker 4>are you pen pals with anybody? No.

0:27:59.350 --> 0:27:59.810
<v Speaker 1>Pin pals?

0:27:59.830 --> 0:28:01.449
<v Speaker 4>When's the last time you wrote a letter to somebody,

0:28:01.490 --> 0:28:02.150
<v Speaker 4>handwritten letter?

0:28:03.710 --> 0:28:07.869
<v Speaker 5>Uh my last in 2020 i wrote it to i

0:28:07.910 --> 0:28:10.609
<v Speaker 5>tried to write it to clubbies when there was something

0:28:11.010 --> 0:28:12.750
<v Speaker 5>so i know 2020 was the last time i wrote

0:28:12.790 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 5>a letter besides my wife i write love letters to

0:28:15.130 --> 0:28:17.100
<v Speaker 5>my wife probably not as much as she would like

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.260
<v Speaker 5>but i need to do more yeah.

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a pen pal that's a pen pal

0:28:21.980 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>he's writing a letter.

0:28:25.300 --> 0:28:29.500
<v Speaker 4>To a pal yeah you're not mailing it Pen pals

0:28:29.580 --> 0:28:31.980
<v Speaker 4>used to be like you'd have a friend in China

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.580
<v Speaker 4>that you would send a letter to, right? And they

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 4>would send you a letter back. That was a pen pal.

0:28:37.540 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Or prison.

0:28:38.700 --> 0:28:41.780
<v Speaker 5>I think AJ wrote letters to people in prison.

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Nothing gets you more excited when someone used to– you

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.780
<v Speaker 4>used to get baseball cards from people in prison. And

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.020
<v Speaker 4>they would say, hey, I'm in prison collecting baseball cards.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.570
<v Speaker 4>You're like, I'm signing this one. This one's going back.

0:28:52.610 --> 0:28:54.210
<v Speaker 2>That was always what we'd always say.

0:28:54.250 --> 0:28:57.470
<v Speaker 4>You'd get one from somebody in prison. You're like– Like,

0:28:57.610 --> 0:28:59.130
<v Speaker 4>how long are you in there? How are you getting

0:28:59.170 --> 0:29:03.010
<v Speaker 4>baseball cards? And, yes, I'm definitely sending this back. Yes.

0:29:05.070 --> 0:29:05.730
<v Speaker 1>Stay out of trouble.

0:29:05.870 --> 0:29:09.270
<v Speaker 4>Anyways, Kratz, the reason this came up is yesterday Todd

0:29:09.290 --> 0:29:11.190
<v Speaker 4>did his thing from the Little League World Series. And

0:29:11.230 --> 0:29:12.700
<v Speaker 4>he's like, oh, you get to meet people that you

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 4>become pen pals with. And I was like, man, when's

0:29:14.940 --> 0:29:17.420
<v Speaker 4>the last time anybody was a– now, you might Snapchat them.

0:29:17.460 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 4>You might DM them. You know, you might send them

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.260
<v Speaker 4>a tweet back and forth. But ain't nobody writing letters

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.770
<v Speaker 4>back and forth. We might type them an email. But

0:29:24.810 --> 0:29:26.710
<v Speaker 4>ain't nobody handwriting letters anymore.

0:29:26.730 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Digital pen pal or pin pal. I gave him two

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:31.420
<v Speaker 1>options now instead of pen pal.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:31.940
<v Speaker 4>Pin pal.

0:29:32.260 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Pin pal. I like that. I think that's cool. Okay.

0:29:35.180 --> 0:29:37.170
<v Speaker 4>Anyways, Little League World Series is awesome. It's on as

0:29:37.210 --> 0:29:39.980
<v Speaker 4>we speak right now. Yes, Every big league clubhouse it's on.

0:29:40.430 --> 0:29:43.510
<v Speaker 4>Every guy's watching it. Every guy's hoping, every guy's hoping

0:29:43.550 --> 0:29:45.870
<v Speaker 4>that the team, some kid on the team says they're

0:29:45.950 --> 0:29:46.770
<v Speaker 4>their favorite player.

0:29:46.810 --> 0:29:47.050
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:29:47.470 --> 0:29:49.830
<v Speaker 4>Right. Every kid is going, please. Every guy in the

0:29:49.870 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 4>big leagues, like, please say you're my favorite. So please God,

0:29:52.140 --> 0:29:52.980
<v Speaker 4>let someone say that.

0:29:53.540 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>There was one kid just now. Cause we watch it

0:29:55.660 --> 0:29:57.820
<v Speaker 1>during the daytime right now, AJ and I, when the

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>show's going on, right. We're watching Japan and Mexico right now.

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And there was one that popped up and threw a

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.090
<v Speaker 1>basketball player out there instead of baseball said Curry's his favorite.

0:30:07.190 --> 0:30:09.690
<v Speaker 1>So I can only imagine in some big league clubhouse, some,

0:30:09.990 --> 0:30:12.630
<v Speaker 1>players sitting there like maybe it's me maybe it's me

0:30:12.670 --> 0:30:14.630
<v Speaker 1>coming up and it's a basketball.

0:30:14.620 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 6>Player right like there's no way like there's no like

0:30:18.780 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 6>there's no way I watched the entire I watched I

0:30:20.820 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 6>watched the intros just to see who their favorite players

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:27.460
<v Speaker 6>are I watched Australia not one Travis Bazana.

0:30:26.900 --> 0:30:29.630
<v Speaker 5>Kid said anything and I'm like so I was thinking

0:30:29.670 --> 0:30:32.970
<v Speaker 5>being in the Cleveland clubhouse being the Guardians clubhouse how

0:30:33.010 --> 0:30:35.590
<v Speaker 5>much how much trash they're talking to him like ah

0:30:35.650 --> 0:30:36.950
<v Speaker 5>mate nobody even knows.

0:30:36.770 --> 0:30:40.130
<v Speaker 1>Who you are Not enough dirt in his spikes yet.

0:30:40.900 --> 0:30:41.180
<v Speaker 4>True.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:42.700
<v Speaker 1>Got to make more of a name for himself.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:43.860
<v Speaker 4>I love it.

0:30:43.860 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>First year in the bigs.

0:30:44.980 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you would think those would be the kids,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.980
<v Speaker 4>the 12-year-olds that are, that's the guy.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.260
<v Speaker 1>Graham Balfour pitched too long ago for them. Liam Hendricks.

0:30:52.500 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Did we have a Liam Hendricks?

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:54.740
<v Speaker 4>I mean, did we have a Peter Moylan?

0:30:55.180 --> 0:30:57.540
<v Speaker 1>Peter Moylan? Who did we have? Did we get any

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Aussies or was it just straight like Ohtani and Judge?

0:31:01.060 --> 0:31:03.700
<v Speaker 4>It was like Mookie Betts, two Ohtanis.

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.660
<v Speaker 5>And I think the one kid said, Ellie De La Cruz.

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.729
<v Speaker 5>And I was like, What is going on? Like, Australia,

0:31:11.860 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 5>we need to get more foul territory in Australia. Hit

0:31:14.580 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 5>like and subscribe, and you in Australia can.

0:31:17.420 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Also watch our show.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure what time it is right now there,

0:31:19.820 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 5>but it might work out.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Does Todd have his own pin? I think he does.

0:31:26.300 --> 0:31:28.940
<v Speaker 4>I don't need a huge one. We just need like

0:31:28.980 --> 0:31:29.450
<v Speaker 4>a smaller one.

0:31:29.460 --> 0:31:31.890
<v Speaker 1>He's a big pin guy, Todd. He is.

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:32.950
<v Speaker 4>He's a pin pal.

0:31:33.330 --> 0:31:34.870
<v Speaker 1>He's a pin pal. He's talked about it. I've been

0:31:34.890 --> 0:31:36.090
<v Speaker 1>with him, so he does.

0:31:35.970 --> 0:31:37.590
<v Speaker 4>Have a pin. It's a huge. It's like a plate.

0:31:38.490 --> 0:31:39.690
<v Speaker 4>Because Todd's a collector.

0:31:40.270 --> 0:31:43.370
<v Speaker 1>So he likes that stuff when he's out there. He's,

0:31:43.930 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, finding someone like, hey, I got the.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.300
<v Speaker 4>Todd Father pin. You want my giant pin? And here,

0:31:50.340 --> 0:31:52.100
<v Speaker 4>you give me your little giant, you give me your

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:53.980
<v Speaker 4>pin here. I'll give you mine for yours.

0:31:54.060 --> 0:31:56.980
<v Speaker 1>Yep. There's a lot of wheeling and dealing with Todd Father.

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.270
<v Speaker 1>He likes a good deal. I'm serious. I've heard him

0:31:59.310 --> 0:32:01.470
<v Speaker 1>talk about the pins for years. Yep. All right.

0:32:01.750 --> 0:32:01.970
<v Speaker 7>Anyway.

0:32:02.540 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Life knows the importance of celebrating milestones, so

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.820
<v Speaker 1>they're giving you the opportunity to commemorate your first MLB

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>game with a special lineup card certificate, but also you

0:32:10.940 --> 0:32:12.780
<v Speaker 1>can enter to win a trip for two to a

0:32:12.780 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>2026 World Series game. Winners get access to the field

0:32:17.700 --> 0:32:20.580
<v Speaker 1>before the game to watch batting practice with round trip, flight,

0:32:20.740 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and hotel accommodations included. Please see official rules for complete details.

0:32:25.350 --> 0:32:32.230
<v Speaker 1>Those details sit at mlb.com slash myfirstgamesweeps for more information.