WEBVTT - Underdog Chiefs, Lebron Drops 46 & This or That

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in Episode one twenty two. What's Right with Nick

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Wright the podcast? By the last week or earlier this week,

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>we asked you all to subscribe on YouTube so we

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 2>could maybe get to one hundred thousand subscribers by the

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl. I then send out a tweet about that.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>People evidently were very mean to Demanse in the comments. Man,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>you told me about it. What are you laughing about?

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Cause no, no, because as soon as you said something

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>about the one hundred thousand subscribers, it made me instantly

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:15.759
<v Speaker 3>think of the tweet.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 2>Man. Evidently you got roasted your mom told me you

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 2>got roasted. Yeah, she was like, did you see the

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 2>comments on there there and not being nice to Demanse.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 2>So first of all, don't be jerks. Hey, this is

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Demanse's side gig. However, maybe it's becoming his real gig.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 2>We'll show you why in a moment. But here's the

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 2>real news. We're now, We are like a dozen people

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>away from ninety seven thousand. We are right there. So

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 2>we need just over three thousand subscribers between right now

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and Super Bowl Sunday, and I think we can do it.

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>You get a plaque, you get a cash bonus. Were

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 2>people mean to you on that because I said you're poor?

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Is that what happened?

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>They were coming at me from different angles.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Man, I've got a tough exterior when it comes to

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>that type of thing. So don't worry guys. Okay, I'm

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>not asking to be flamed anymore.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, exactly. Yeah, be nice to the guy.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 4>But no, so uh it was.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>The yes, Like, there was one I saw one comment

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>that stood out. It was like he was like, you

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be moving to Los Angeles if you're poor or

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>if you and I was just like, ah, the other

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>guys are coming at me about like my somewhat speech

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 3>impediment when it comes to the show.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's a speech impediment. You just

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 2>stumble over your words sometimes. And by the way, La

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the people have been moving to Los Angeles without having stable,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, the most stable financial situation for as long

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>as Los Angeles has existed, the city of hopes and dreams.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get into what is not on today's show.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's what missed the cut. Katie out at least two

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 2>more weeks, the new NBA All Star game format and

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 2>not on the show. And Demanse do other podcasts? Now?

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Do we have photographic evidence of this? If you're watching

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube, you see Demanse on his buddy Daniel Salvador's podcast.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 2>You're being called a Fox reporter?

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Is that?

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 2>Did they ask you, like, how do you want to be? Yeah?

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 4>The problem?

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was gonna say, I don't know that you

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>have full authorization to be using the Fox brand as

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 2>a Fox reporter. By the way, I need to listen

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 2>to that podcast. I need to check that out. And

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>if you need if you're if you can't get enough Demanse.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 2>He also has the Twitch stream right upside down if

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>you want to follow him there. All right, let's get

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 2>to the show.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, all right, Vegas, you've insulted Nick, right, Yeah,

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs open as a favorite since he was a road

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 3>favorite until right before showtime. Yeah, just flipped yep, and

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 3>now it's Kansas City by one. Still disrespectful considering mahomes history. Honestly,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>is this the extra fire at Kansas City needs to

0:03:59.160 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>beat there boogey man?

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Or is this an ominous sign of what's to come?

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>On the gambling side of things, the difference between minus

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>one and plus one and all of that is minimal

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>except four when it comes to teasers, as we talked

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 2>about on Monday show, if when the Chiefs were getting

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>two and a half or getting one and a half,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 2>you teased them, you got immense value. By the way,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes Demanse has played ninety two career games, cause

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you could have teased the Chiefs to plus seven and

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a half. Right, how many of those ninety two games

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>do you think plus seven and a half would have

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>been a winning bet?

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Isn't it so?

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>The Chief Mahomes has started ninety two games. If you

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>were getting the Chiefs plus seven and a half. How

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>many of those ninety two do you think would you

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 2>have covered? I mean, I'll give you a little hint here.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 2>He's won sixty eight of the ninety two or sixty

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>nine of the ninety two, so you know there's at

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 2>least sixty nine of the go ahead.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I'd say about ninety eighty eight eighty eight.

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mahomes four times in his career is lost by

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>more than one score. So I say all that say

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 2>this teasing the Chiefs, Now, there is not value because

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>you're teasing through the zero as we talked about last week,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and you're only getting them up to plus five or

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>plus six. So if you were gonna include, if you

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>were gonna do the Chiefs Niners teaser, which felt like

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the best teas are available, it's no longer available. That

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>ship has sailed. I'm not teasing this game because I'm

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 2>just committed, committed on the Chiefs winning. Now, when it

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to bulletin board material, there's a lot of bullets

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and board material. The Bengals are given the Chiefs calling

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>arrowhead Burrowhead taught Joe Mixon saying we're the big dogs

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 2>of the conference. A whole lot of stuff that and

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I didn't used to believe in bulletin board materials, like

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>that's a media creation. This is it's the playoffs for

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the chance to go to the super Bowl. But the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>players year after year, time after time, talk about it

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>being meaningful. The Bengals were clearly motivated by the fact

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 2>that the logistics of Chiefs Bills being at a neutral

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>citement they had to start selling tickets early. The Bengals

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 2>kept referencing that and were motivated by that. Everyone thought

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 2>that this is in bulletin board material but it's of

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the same kind of a family of motivational materials that

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the Bills were motivated by having Damar Hamlin in the

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 2>building or the previous week after Damar's injury when they

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 2>started the game with the kick return. I do think

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals are playing with fire. I also think that

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals since Burrow has taken over this era of

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Bengal football, they have scored one playoff fourth quarter touchdown

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and was by a defensive end, Sam Hubbard, after the

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Huntley fumble return. So the defense really has been

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the story in these playoffs. Plus Burrow with some clutch

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>plays early but not doing all that much late.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, you know you said the bulletin board material stuff.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>So like, don't you think it's a little different because

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 3>is Burrow co signing on this type of stuff. I

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 3>feel like it's different, like if Burrow was the one

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 3>calling it burrowhead. You know.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing. He's the only one being smart,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>not doing it right. Burrow has come out and said,

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Chiefs are still the team to be Burrow,

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 2>but I I don't know that it matters where it

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>comes from. And Joe Mixon and Eli Apple and all

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>these guys and Eli Apples not good. That's the other thing.

0:07:55.600 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Like the best players aren't doing the trash talking. And

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I saw Mahomes jogging around at practice Wednesday, being a

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>full participant. And I think the Chiefs this is such

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant opportunity for the Chiefs right now because when

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>you look at the AFC, Okay, so the Bills took

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>their shot, and now Josh Allen's cap hit goes up

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 2>by twenty five million, Stefan Diggs cap hit doubles, Von

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Miller's cap hit triples, and the Bills are gonna have

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to pair away guys off that roster. The Chargers are

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>in a similar cap situation and they have to pay

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Justin Herbert. Right, the Raiders traded for Devonte Adams don't

0:08:54.800 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>even make the playoffs. Cincinnati is in a wonderful position.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 2>And however, this summer they pay Joe Burrow, they pay

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Jamar Chase, and then they make the decision, can we

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>also pay T Higgins? Probably can't. You probably can't have

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 2>two twenty five plus million dollar a year receivers. So

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 2>then they have to make the decision. Are we gonna

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 2>let t because they have one more year on Ta

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Tiiggans rookie contract. Are we gonna just play it out

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and then see him walk in free agency and we

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 2>get nothing, or are we going to trade him now

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>so we get something back? Allah what the Titans did

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 2>with aj Brown because they didn't want him to walk

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and they want to resign him. And now that was

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a mistake that set out aside. Point is, I think

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals are gonna be in it for years and years,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 2>but this might be. This is certainly the cheapest their

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>two best players will ever be because and Chase get

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the extensions. The Chiefs, on the other hand, traded away

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek Kill and played rookies more snaps this year than

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>any teams other than Chicago, Houston and Seattle. They have cheap,

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 2>young defensive players and a lot of cap flexibility and

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 2>extra draft picks. If that year when they were supposed

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 2>to be taking a slight step back, when so much

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>of the rest of the conference was positioned for right now,

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and with Mahomes less than one hundred percent, If even

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 2>under those circumstances, the Chiefs win the conference, that is

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>utterly and thoroughly devastating to everyone else in the conference.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Gets harder for Buffalo, It gets harder for Cincinnati, It

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 2>gets harder for the Chargers. The Ravens don't. It gets

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>harder for them if they're gonna pay Lamar or not.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 2>If this was not the year the Chiefs were supposed

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to be winning the conference. They're supposed to still be

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>good because they have Mahomes, but the offense takes step back.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>You're playing all these rookies, win ten to eleven games,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 2>win a playoff game, and then be rebooted for next season.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 2>If the reboot year they still win the conference, it's

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a bad sign for everybody, and not only do I

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna win. I don't think this is gonna

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 2>be who has the ball last Classic. I think the

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs are going to control this football game next.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, no matter what I try to tell

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you about the Chiefs, I know you're sticking with them,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>but they are serious concerns. When it comes to your

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one Super Bowl taken on the forty nine

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Ers side. To win, you need a rookie quarterback to

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>win in a hostile environment. You do realize that no

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>rookie has ever won in.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 4>The Super Bowl Super Bowl and you're still not hedging.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm still not hedging. And it's very simple. I

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 2>ain't they. I understand that the Niners have a massive

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>question at quarterback and.

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Crazy You've always been like a stat guy like I

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 3>feel like this this particular stat we'll stand out.

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 2>So here's the deal. Yeah, I yes, I do care

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 2>about the numbers. But this is a tiny sample of

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the rookie quarterbacks who've even been out in a position

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to get to a Super Bowl. And Sean King, Ben Roethlisberger,

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>uh gosh, I know who the other ones are, uh,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Mark Sanchez and Joe Flacco. And the distinction that I

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 2>would draw is number of things. One is, none of

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>those teams had dynamic offenses the Niners do. The Niners

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>have all pros all over the place.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 4>All of those.

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Teams had great defenses, as the Niners did that. I

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 2>picked the Niners to win the NFC with either essentially

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 2>a rookie quarterback Trey Lance. He's not a rookie, but

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>he's essentially a rookie, and the other Like we have

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 2>seen guys. We saw Russell Wilson in his rookie year

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 2>win a playoff game and almost win a second. We

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>saw Mahomes in his first year as a starter get

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to a conference championship game. We saw Joe Burrow in

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>his second year as a starter but first fully healthy year,

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>make a Super Bowl. Furthermore, I just don't think the

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Niners need great quarterback play. And I am not someone

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 2>that thinks, oh, brock Perty was this amazing steal. Brock

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Perty's this great player. I think he is a product

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 2>of Kyle Shanahan's system. Now am I nearly as confident

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Niners going into the Link as I am

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs at home against the Bengals. Of course not.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And while I am team never Hedge. Let me be

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 2>very honest here, if the Chiefs were the early game

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>and the Chiefs won, and then it would be fifty

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>thousand or zero on whether or not brock Party melts

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>down at the link, I might break my no head's

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 2>rule where if the Chiefs had it locked in and

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>now it's just the Niners, you know, either win or

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I lose my bet. Maybe I would, But I do

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>think Niners Eagles is a sixty to forty game in

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the Niners ed Niner side, even though the line would

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>say it's sixty forty on the Eagles side. And it's

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>not as if Jalen Hurts has exponentially more playoff experience

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>than brock Party. In fact, they have the same amount.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>They have both played two playoff game. Jalen Hurts played

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 2>one last year and one this year, and brock Perty's

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 2>played two this year. Jalen also has has not cooked

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 2>up a dominant He's been great this year, but he

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>has not cooked up a dominant defense. The Niners have

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>a dominant defense. I give respect to what Jalen's accomplished

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>this year. I know I've been an Eagle skeptic, and

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 2>thus far they've proven me wrong, but I like the

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Niners in this spot. By the way. Also, the speaking

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of hedging, I you know, I texted our group earlier

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.359
<v Speaker 2>this week. Hedging is for what did I say? Cowards

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and stock traders. I'm a goddamn gambler. We're making those

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>T shirts. They probably would already be made, but I

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>have not get They sent me the different designs and

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I haven't on a come to a decision on them.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>But we should have those by the super Bowl. Al right, next?

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, Oh, yes, they just.

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Showed the T shirt. We can show that T shirt again.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>This is not what they're going to look like. I

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 2>vetoed putting my face on the shirts. I think we'll

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 2>put the What's Right logo on the shirt. But we're

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna find a good way to do it. All right,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, all right.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Bill's GM Brandon Bean had a lot of excuses for

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the team that he put together lost.

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>He said since he had a better team because their

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 3>stars are on rookie contracts. He also said, I don't

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 3>want to suck bad enough to get Jamar Chase. You

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 3>have to feel bad. You have to feel for the

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Bills and Bean here right is a cheese fan. You

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 3>know firsthand how hard it is.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, stop that. So here's the problem with what Brandon

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Bean said, and it's multifold. First of all, it should

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 2>be noted and demand say, I don't think you know this.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>But the Bills got Stefan Diggs by trading for him

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>from the Vikings. The pick they traded for they traded

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 2>a first, a third, and a fourth for Diggs, so

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 2>three picks. The first round pick that they traded he

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 2>came justin Jefferson. So if they wanted a cheap rookie

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 2>contract receiver, they could have had justin Jefferson. They went

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>out and got Digs. And by the way, that was

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 2>actually fine because Diggs has been awesome for them. Help

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen take the leap, so be it. But you

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 2>made that choice. Additionally, when you say you don't want

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 2>to suck bad enough to get Jamar Chase, the year

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>after you drafted Josh Allen, you had a top ten pick,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>just like the Bengals did. Now, the Bengals the year

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.120
<v Speaker 2>after they drafted Borrow had the fifth pick. You had

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>the ninth pick. The difference is the Bengals took a

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 2>superstar wide receiver in Jamar Chase. You took a d

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>tackle in ed Oliver Houston, kid who's been a disappointment.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Three D linemen taken in the nine picks after Ed Oliver,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Simmons, Brian Burns, and Dexter Lawrence, all pro players.

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 2>You took the wrong guy. That's first of all. Second

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>of all, here's where Bean's comments really rung hollow. He's

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about how Burrow's on a rookie contract and Chase

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 2>on a rookie contract, but Josh and Stefan are expensive

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>and not true. Burrow and Chase this year made a

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>combined seventeen million bucks. Alan and Diggs this year made

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a combined twenty seven million bucks, So more expensive, but

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 2>ten million. That's that's one good player. Okay. Next year, however,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Burrow and Chase make a combined eighteen million, and Alan

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>and Diggs Demanse make a combined sixty million because Allen's

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 2>contract extension kicks in and Digs's cap hit doubles. So

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>if Brandon Bean was having trouble building out this roster

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 2>when Alan was making sixteen and Diggs was making eleven,

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna have a lot of trouble, and Allen's making

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 2>forty and Diggs is making twenty.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>All right, next sounds very salty. Yeah, all right.

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Lebron's out forty six the other night and I lost,

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 3>but it got people talking. Anthony Davis came back Wednesday

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and they beat the tanking Spurs. Plus they finally traded

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 3>for a superstar. Let me check my notes.

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 2>It's his name, Ruey Hashimura.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Ruey hasher more. Oh yeah, I saw some Yeah, well,

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Anthony days.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 3>With Anthony Davis coming back, the Lakers could go on

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 3>a run if they turn it around.

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Are you gonna start seeing Lebron should win the MVP? No?

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I listen, Lebron's been unbelievable since he turned thirty eight.

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>He's averaging thirty five points per game. We've never seen

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>anything like it. And I, you know, I don't even

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 2>really want to talk about the Lakers lack of moves

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 2>other than Ruey Hachamura, and I don't want to talk

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>about the MVP thing. Here's what I want to say

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 2>about the Lebron thing. Okay, he's one hundred and fifty

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>points away from passing Kareem and it seems like the

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>media collectively is decided we are not treating this like

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a big deal. Kareem has held the scoring title, demonse

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>since before Lebron or I were born. Do you know

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>in the last let me do the math here fifty

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 2>five years, who has held the NBA scoring title. I'll

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 2>give you the full list, Wilt Chamberlain and Kareem Abdul Jabbar.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 2>That's the list for fifty five plus years. Two people

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 2>have held this for the last forty years. Every single

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 2>day the NBA's all time scoring leader has been Kareem.

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>It was thought of as a truly unbreakable record. Up

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to and including five, six, seven years ago, there were

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 2>articles written that it can't be broken, that it's an impossibility,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 2>and Lebron it. It's not only that it is now

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 2>a fate accompany one hundred percent chance he's breaking it.

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>He's also, by the way, it's so annoying. The Lakers

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>play in their next three games, two of them. I'm

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 2>going to they play the next Monday and the Knicks Tuesday,

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and Lebron's probably gonna break it the game or game

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 2>or two after that. I'm gonna miss seeing him do

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it by a game or two. I mean, he would

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 2>need to average fifty a night over the next three,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>so he's not it's gonna get He's really gonna be

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 2>just a few, which is also to shame for him

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 2>too in this regard MSG on national TV. He's gonna

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 2>go into the game, I think probably needing like like seventy,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 2>so he's not gonna be able to do it. So

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>he'll break it at home, but it won't be on

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 2>national TV. But here's my frustration there. This is one

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>of the many things that folks said would never happen,

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>and now that it is happening, folks are going to

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 2>act as if this is not the only NBA record

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 2>that has ever mattered. Like there are team accomplishments and

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>championships and rings and all of that stuff, But all

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 2>time scoring title, like the all time assist title is

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>held by Stockton, nobody cares the all time steel title,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 2>by the way, also held by Stockton, Nobody cares like

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 2>one hundred points in a game Kareem's scoring record. These

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 2>are the things that have resonated. And the fact that

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Lebron what I was trying to say, I interrupted myself,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 2>is not only going to break it, but he's going

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 2>to break it wild dominated, well, he's not breaking it

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>while being a fifteen minute game guy, and then he.

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Might truly make the record unbreakable.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent. So Lebron has been He's the youngest

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>guy to every thousand point mark in league history. He

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 2>just became the youngest guy to thirty eight thousand. But

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>only two people have gotten there, him and Kareem. He's

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 2>gonna put up forty two forty four thousand points and

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 2>four context there. And by the way, this is ultimately

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 2>does become when we talk goat stuff. The longer the

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>timeline goes, the more people are going to think that

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Michael Jordan being the greatest ever is ludicrous because history

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 2>is going to look at it and say, okay, so

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 2>why is Jordan the best? People will be like, well,

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 2>six championships, It's like, oh, that's the most. It's like, no, uh,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Kareem also has six. Oh, it's tied for the most. No,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 2>there's this guy named Bill Russell. He has eleven. Oh, okay,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the guy is eleven. How long did he eat third?

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's not the chips thing. He was just clear

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 2>far and away the best players. Five mv He is

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the most MVPs No, that's actually also Kareem. He has

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 2>five MVPs and we'll see or six MVPs. Pardon me. Oh,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 2>so he must have been the greatest scorer ever. Well

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of. He averages the most points. But by the way,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's gonna stay because scoring is

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 2>going up so much.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Where is he on the all time points list? He's fifth?

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh is it close? Well, no, he scored thirty two

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 2>thousand points. Oh who has the most? Lebron how many

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>did he score? Forty four thousand points? The gap so

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 2>right now, right now, this moment, just for context, here,

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the gap in career points, which is what Jordan was

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 2>best at, between Jordan and Lebron, is six thousand. The

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 2>gap between Jordan and Lebron is bigger than the gap

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 2>between Jordan and Dominique Wilkins, bigger than the gap between

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Jordan and Paul Pierce. Okay, So I'm just telling you guys,

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>it is and what it's going to turn into is

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 2>you just had to be there. You just had to

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>trust us that Jordan was And it's like, oh, oh,

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 2>I get it. He had to go through, but winning

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 2>those rings, he had to go through like that was

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>when the league was at its best. It's like, well, no,

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 2>his big rival in the East were the Knicks. How

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 2>many great players did they have? One? And then there

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>was the Pacers. They were kind of a rival briefly.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>How many great players did they have? Half Reggie Miller? Okay,

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 2>that's in the East. But in the finals he had

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 2>to go through super teams, right like Lebron did all

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 2>those things. It's like, well, no, not really. He beat

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers for first championship. Oh they had Kareems. No,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Kareem had been gone, and and Magic was kind of

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>on his you know, on the downslope a bit. Magic

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 2>was so great. But we're okay, what about the next one?

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>The Blazers they had one great player? But oh oh,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 2>the Suns they had one Hall of Fame player. What

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 2>are the next? The Sonics they had one and a

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 2>half great players? And so I'm just telling you guys,

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 2>so more, more of the story.

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 3>Didn't have a shot at winning MVP this year, but

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 3>he is the greatest basketball player to ever play the game.

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Never missed the opportunity to tell us that Lebron is.

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.960
<v Speaker 2>The well, I mean, yere's the thing. I guess I'll

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>just take the charge to do it because he's about

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to break the most important record in the history of

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the sport, and nobody gives a damn, nobody seems to care.

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 2>And he's doing it while averaging thirty points per game,

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>while when you look at everyone else on this list,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 2>how what they were averaging when they scored their final points.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 2>It's thirteen, it's fifteen, it's twelve.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead.

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 3>It would be really weird for him to break this

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 3>record had him not averaging thirty points per game, like

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, like if he happened to break this record

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>while scoring like ten to fifteen points.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.719
<v Speaker 4>But that's it could be like a really weird thing.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 2>But that's kind of how these records almost are always broken.

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 3>Right, So like Kareem in and so many points that

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 3>you've got to be in there for a.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Long time exactly, So Kareem, even Kareem, when Kareem broke

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 2>Wilt's record, I'm gonna check real quick. Kareem beat wilt

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 2>record by seven thousand points. So Kareem. The year he

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 2>broke Wilt's record, he was still awesome, but he was

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 2>not League MVP Kareem anymore. He was averaging twenty one

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a game. Yeah, and then he played another five years

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 2>when Jordan scored his final points, he's averaging twenty a

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>game playing for the Wizards. The I mean top another

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 2>top six all time scorer. You look at what Kobe's

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>last year he averaged, like seventeen, Dirk's last year he

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 2>averaged I think eleven. Lebron, the Lebron's gonna be averaging

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>thirty when he crosses forty thousand points. Nobody else in

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 2>league history averaged twenty five when they crossed thirty thousand points.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a little context there, all right.

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Next, so could we got a little poll?

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Could I mean not a little pole? Yeah, we do

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 4>have a little pole.

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Could Lebron have a shot at MVP? Thirty eight percent?

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Say he has sixty percent?

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 2>He's not gonna win MVP. The team's not gonna be

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>good enough. Uh, this is gonna be Luka Jokic with

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Tatum having an outside shot and with Giannis having an

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>outside shot. Those your MVP candidates. All right, we're inna

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a fast b block because I got to get to TV.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll come right back. Be back. What's right live on YouTube?

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back? In episode one What's Right with

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Nick Wright got TV today at three o'clock. Should be

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 2>a great show. We also got a little bit of

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>breaking news involving the Jets coaching staff that we're gonna

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>get to later in this segment, but demonte let's get

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 2>right to it, my friend.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, a lot of speculation surrounding Sean Payton this last season.

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Seems like he's down to two options between Denver or

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 3>staying retired. Yeah, Denvergis traded everything for Russell Wilson. Obviously,

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 3>now they're trading another high pick for a coach. Yep,

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>if you're the Broncos, do you think this is the

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>right move to the right move to make the catch

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 3>up to Kansas City?

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so listen, the Broncos do have another first round

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 2>pick to trade because they got a first round pick

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>when they traded Bradley Chubb, which it came from the Dolphins,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's actually the Niners pick. So have the Niners

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 2>first round pick this year. I think hiring Sean Payton

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 2>objectively would be a great move by them. I do

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 2>not think that team is good enough for it to

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 2>make a significant difference, and I do not think that

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be able to fix Russell Wilson in

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 2>a way that's going to make them a contender. I

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 2>don't think that roster's great. I think everyone overvalued their receivers.

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I like Javonte Williams, but he got hurt, and running

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 2>backs after they get hurt, you're always worried about him.

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 2>So there's that. It is a brutal division, and I

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 2>think Sean Payton's best option, honestly is staying retired and

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 2>waiting to see if the Chargers or the Cowboys job

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>comes open, or see if the Cowboys job comes open

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>this year. And I know it looks like they're not

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>firing McCarthy, and I get it, he's won twelve games

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 2>and back to back seasons. I understand all of that.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>But if the Cowboys are being honest with themselves, they

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>are not going to break through with the McCarthy Dak

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>combo and they're not doing anything with Dak. So see

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>if you could reinvent Dak under Sean Payton, that's what

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I would recommend. I don't think they're gonna do that.

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 2>If I were Sean Payton, You're gonna have just as

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>much leverage next season. You got a great job with Fox,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 2>make good money, good life, all that stuff. I wouldn't

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 2>rush to go to Denver. Now. If they're gonna pay

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>him though five years, one hundred and twenty five million

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to be a head coach, maybe he does it, but

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that makes them catch up. Obviously it's

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 2>a massive improvement over Nathaniel Hackett, but I don't think

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it would be enough, especially because that Russ contract is

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 2>a disaster and all those picks they traded. Is hard

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 2>to build out a roster. All right, what's our game?

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 4>All right? Today's game? We're playing this or that.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 3>No time for the tennis court today, but we will

0:31:56.200 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 3>be live after the men's final today final Monday. Yet

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 3>it until then, let's get a prediction from the Australian Open.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Winner will be Novak Djokovic or the field.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 2>First of all, great pronunciation of Djokovic means you've been

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>paying attention to the tennis corner. I would take Novak,

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 2>but I will admit this is the one major on

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the tennis calendar that I don't pay that much attention

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to because it's during the NFL playoffs and because it's

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 2>happening in the middle of the night, Because it's over

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. I am not locked into this the way.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I will be the French Open, Wimbledon, and of course

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>the US Open. So I would take Novak Djokovic, admitting

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 2>that I haven't been watching much of the Australian Open next.

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, the coach of the phone felt the coach.

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 3>The Coach of the Year finalists were announced earlier this week.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Many of the names we expected made the final cut,

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 3>with two notable exceptions. The bigger Coach of the year

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 3>stuff was Dan Campbell or Andy Reid's.

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid, No, well, listen, coach of the year. I

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 2>think Belichick's only won it once or twice. A Coach

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 2>of the Year has become what it means is like overachieved,

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 2>yes exactly, And I ain't Coach of the year this year.

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Actually is Kyle Shanahan. So I was third quarterback. They

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>got the two Seedy. I think he deserves it. So

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm good with Kyle Shanahan. But everyone pretending like they

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 2>expected the Chiefs to be dominant this year. They're lying

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 2>that is not what Vegas thought, that is not what

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the audience thought. And then Andy Reid, It's like, oh okay,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 2>no big deal. They had the highest scoring offense and

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the most efficient offense despite losing the guy that some

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>people think is the league's best offensive weapon, and by nobody.

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs number one receiver Mcole Hardman has been out

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>for two months and nobody and their number one running

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>back's been out for two months and they haven't missed

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a beat. But I understand Mahomes gets the credit, but

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>he should Andy should have at least been nomine by

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Ain Kyle Shannon's Coach of the Year.

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 3>By the way, the finalists were McDermott, Sirianni Shanahan and

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Dable and.

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 2>And Doug Peterson. I don't understand how Sean McDermott gets

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 2>nominated and he read doesn't. I just don't. And maybe

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it's because they think he handled the DeMar Hamblin situation beautifully,

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>so like, maybe that's it. But if that's it, that's fine,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>But I don't understand otherwise, all right, next.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 3>During the Bills game, Stefan Diggs was visibly upset at

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen, and after the game he reportedly attempted to

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 3>leave the stadium before the coaches even made it to

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 3>the tunnel. Yeah, Stefan Diggs is a competitor or a

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 3>cry baby.

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna actually go with both. Listen, this is an

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 2>emotionally immature team, and Josh Allen actually plays kind of

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.439
<v Speaker 2>an immature style, just going for kill shot after kill shot,

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 2>deep ball after deep ball. We saw their offensive coordinator,

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>remember the timber tantrum he threw in the booth, throwing

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 2>the papers and everything, just a couple of months ago.

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 2>So if that's okay from Ken Dorsey, a grown man

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 2>in khakis, you know what I mean, up in the booth,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 2>then Stefan Diggs can get upset on the sideline. What's

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 2>not good from Diggs is he seemed to be blaming

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 2>Alan directly, and I don't think that's great for their team.

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>But I think he's a competitor and I think he's

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 2>whining a bit.

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Next, all right, Bill.

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 3>O'Brien is returning to the Patriots. I didn't know that

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots hired competent assistance. Next season, bill O'Brien will

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 3>turn back around or burn mack down.

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 2>I think Mac will be a little bit better, so

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'll say turn back around. But here's the problem.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Belichick refuses to hire anyone other than his kids and

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>people he taught football to. Everyone on his staff is

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 2>either related to him or someone who previously was on

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 2>his staff. He needs to bring in new blood, someone

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 2>that will challenge him and try to bring some cutting

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 2>edge ideas. There's a Boston Herald article that came out

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 2>this morning. I haven't read the whole thing about how

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 2>dysfunctional that entire team was this year, and Belichick seems

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 2>destined to just keep making the same mistake again and again.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Next All right, Aaron Rodgers is reportedly open to a

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 3>networking or being sorry, reworking his deal, reworking his deal,

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 3>either for the Packers or another team if he's traded.

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Wait the fifty million dollars quarterback held back his team.

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 4>Aaron Rodgers is sincere or trade bait.

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 2>It's trade bait. I think Rodgers getting traded. I think

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Packers want to trade him. I think Rogers is finely

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 2>being traded. I wouldn't give up a first round pick

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 2>for Aaron Rodgers, but maybe somebody will. I think it'll

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 2>be a mistake. But that actually brings us to our

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>next question. Go ahead.

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of Aaron Rodgers breaking news, his buddy Nett Hackett

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 3>was just named Jets offensive coordinator Nett Hackett.

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 4>Great hire or the best of the best hire.

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean if this is the Broncos evidently hired Hacket

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 2>hoping to get Rogers. Now the Jets are doing the

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 2>same thing. What a great setup for this guy, Nad Hackett,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 2>who like, if you remember, Collinsworth told us during one

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 2>of the broadcasts, the reason Rogers liked him so much

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>was because he made him laugh and they played darts

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 2>together or whatever, not because of his brilliant offensive system.

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 2>But this does to me set up for the Jets

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 2>trading for Aaron Rodgers. I think that's pretty clear. That's

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 2>why they're bringing in mad Hackett. And I listen, I

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 2>think Rogers is clearly on the downslope. I think we

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 2>saw the Cliff come and get him this year, and

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 2>he's wildly expensive. But the Jets they think they're right

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 2>there with competent quarterback play. So you'll see if they

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 2>get it from Rogers. I don't believe in it, but

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 2>we'll see what happens, all right. Last one, Oh this

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 2>for me Demonse officially and invited guests or other shows.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Now Demonse stands are real I'm feeling like a proud

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 2>father or a monster maker. Look, Demonse, look at the screen.

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Look it's that.

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 2>That's Demonse just taking over me on First Things First.

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:11.879
<v Speaker 2>That's Demonse with Joe Rogan. This is why you should

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 2>watch on YouTube. That's Demonse with Joe Rogan watching First

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Things First in the background, and you're wearing the same

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 2>outfit for both of them. Uh No, I'm proud. I

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 2>love it. I love that. Uh, Demonse, do you want

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to mention Daniel's podcast?

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 3>No, no, Dani, I'm sorry. If you see this, oh

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 3>we got it, we gotta go over it and stuff.

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to.

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I did it, I got you. Don't worry about it.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 2>That's fine. No, I love that answer that. I am

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 2>prouder now than before. Demonsey's like, no, I don't want

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.399
<v Speaker 2>to mention that. I'm not sure what's going out there.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Not sure. We're just not doing it okay. And by

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the way, the Dangels I can see this, you know,

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and watch my podcast, so it's no problem. But no,

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm even prouder now. That's great. Follow him on

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Twitch right upside down. Oh, ask your questions now in

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the comments. But take quick break, come back, answer the

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 2>listener questions. Next where we wrap up episode one twenty two.

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 2>What's right? Our episode one twenty two. We're now answering

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 2>your listener questions live on YouTube. Demons, go right ahead.

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Our first off, we got Jonathan Appraisa or Piza Sorry

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 3>it said Nick. Do you think the trade between Westbrook

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 3>and Lavine will become true? Apparently Chicago is interested in

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 3>this trade if Laker's had two first rounders.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that Rob Polink is making any significant

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>moves of the deadline. I think that. I mean his

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 2>quotes this week that were like, I would only make

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a move if I thought it put us in championship contention,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 2>which is him saying we're not the team I built,

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 2>can't win, right, which would make sense if so, if

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 2>going into the year, if you're Polenka, it's like, what's

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 2>the best case scenario for how Lebron's gonna play? Well,

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 2>he's exceeded that.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 4>If you feel, all.

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, what's the best case scenario for how Anthony Davis

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>is gonna play? He's exceeded that. Now he got hurt,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 2>but he's back now all right? What about uh, how

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the west is gonna shake out. Is anyone going to

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>be running its dominant teams? Nope? Wide open right now,

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 2>there are two games separating the five seed from the

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 2>twelve seed. So everything fell exactly the way you had hoped,

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 2>and yet you still don't think you're a championship contender.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Why because the roster is not good enough. You built

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the goddamn thing.

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 4>It's so frustrated, unfortunate that is in this situation. Even

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 4>though he doesn't seem like.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Really, oh he's mad, No, I think he cares onlinka guy.

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 4>It sounds like a coward.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable. It is unbelievable.

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 4>That's what this guy's legacy.

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>And the Lakers and Polinka got the job. He was

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Kobe's agent and then they hired him be the GM.

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 2>They were an unmitigated disaster until Lebron saved them because

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to live in La then got Anthony Davis

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to go there. And now it's like they're punishing it

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Lebron because he pushed them to trade.

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 3>For Westbrook, aabotaging sabotaging Lebron, so he doesn't surpass Kobe

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 3>too much.

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 2>So what you just said there sounds ridiculous, except for

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the fact that that is like on like the deep

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 2>web of like the biggest Lebron stands there are. They

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 2>truly believe that that the Lakers are actually not wanting

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to win because they don't want Lebron. That I don't

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 2>believe that. I just believe they're bad at their job.

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, All right, Ryan Fitzgerald, he wants me

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 3>to do something.

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, Nick ran his.

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Best to worst case scenario on the Super Bowl winning

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 3>teams Bengals winning at all, worst case or Philly that

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 3>he's doubted.

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 2>My best case scenario is obviously the Chiefs, my worst case.

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 2>My second best case scenario would be the Niners because

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 2>it would prove me so correct that Jimmy g was

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 2>just a product of the system and that anybody could

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 2>come in and do what he did or do it better.

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 2>My next best case scenario would be the Bengals, because

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I give them credit like I don't. If the Bengals

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.400
<v Speaker 2>beat the Chiefs for a fourth straight dime and then

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 2>win the Super Bowl, salute, we got a real they

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 2>have a real claim they're the team to beat, and

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs got to go chase them.

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Salute.

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 2>Good for them, they will have earned it. And then

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the worst one would be the Eagles because I've doubted

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 2>them all year. Those fans already hated me, and those

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 2>are some and I go to Philly a lot to

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 2>play cards. That's that would be the worst. Yeah, there

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 2>would be no question that would be the worst.

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 4>All right, Next, conrac Queeny, says Demonse.

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 3>If you get it that one thousand dollars bonus, how

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 3>much of it will you bet on an insane super

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Bowl parlay?

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Twenty five percent?

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 3>What I'm kidding, that's not a good idea.

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm joking.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Works one hundred bucks on a super Bowl parlay? Yeah, man,

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Demonsey's the gambling hasn't been going great for Demonse lately.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like, I don't, I really don't even I don't

0:42:58.280 --> 0:42:59.720
<v Speaker 3>like that there's only like two guys.

0:42:59.719 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 2>That's what I knew. That's what you were about to say, Yeah,

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.320
<v Speaker 2>you can't put in an exotic seventeen parlay?

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I only I was just telling him at earlier.

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:13.240
<v Speaker 3>I want to just do teasers all the time now.

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 2>Like teasers are teasers are dangerous because they always look

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 2>like Danny And yes, Danny and I have a long

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 2>standing joke of we text each other a couple teasers

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.919
<v Speaker 2>a week and then just text in all caps. How

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 2>does it lose? Yeah, Like it feels like they can't lose, No.

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 3>And ever since I switched up my freaking my the

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 3>bills plus two and a half to sense you back

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 3>to plus thirteen or thirteen or whatever, I just feel

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 3>like a wizard with it.

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Like I feel like.

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 3>With everything that you've given me about you know, teasing

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 3>across his zero and all that. Yeah, I feel like

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 3>when I make those teasers, I really am that. And

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the losing the first five hundred to the Dak Prescott

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 3>freaking yeah, pick to the jacks.

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 2>But I still can't believe you did that. You woke

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 2>up at two in the morning and made a ten

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 2>X bet the old ten you or I guess you're

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>you were betting like twenty to thirty dollars a game,

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So I guess that's like a twenty unit bet you made.

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, initially I was doing like fifty seventy five,

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 3>but I was doing it like just on.

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 2>The line, right, you were ok at yeah, right, And

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>then you were betting smaller amounts on super long shots. Yeah,

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and then how many legs? Was that teaser four?

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Five or it was all? It was all four of

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 4>the games? Last? Are you talking about the one that yeah,

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 4>the Dak Prescott. Yeah it might have been five.

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was a lot of way. That's the thing,

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 2>just and I just so you know, it's not free money.

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Once you need five separate outcomes fors tough, but doable.

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I would stick to two or three team teasers, but

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 2>it's fine.

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>One last question.

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 4>Justin Dusty, say, can demonte started streaming on Twitch for

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 4>longer than forty minutes?

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, Dusty, what why are you annoyed with him?

0:44:58.400 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not annoyed. That just didn't happen. So I did.

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 4>It was two separate streams that I did.

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 3>There was one where you know, I was I think

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I was just playing mad, and then I had switched

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 3>over to Fortnite. I think the stream had told it

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 3>out to like an hour and forty five minutes. It's

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 3>not my fault, you cameley.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well we'll take that. See we are really super serving.

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>One audience member right now was Demonse is explaining to

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Dusty how he what happened on that thing? I think

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 2>that means it's probably a good time to end the show.

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.319
<v Speaker 2>You can follow Demonse on Twitch at Right upside Down.

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 2>You can follow Dusty on Twitch. I think it called

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:36.360
<v Speaker 2>me d Black Goda. He's our one of our producers.

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 2>First things first. Also a loyal listener to the What's

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the Right Show? Subscribe here on YouTube. Let's get to

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousand. We've got a couple weeks left to

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 2>do it. See you guys. Want to see you tomorrow

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 2>for our gambling show, What's Right

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:01.959
<v Speaker 4>Show