WEBVTT - It Sees You

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The woods grew thicker and more rampant as we went on,

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and the road, though paved with granite slabs, was more

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and more overgrown, for trees had rooted themselves in the interstices,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>often forcing the wide blocks apart. Though the sun had

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not yet near the horizon, the shades that were cast

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>upon us from gigantic bowls and branches became ever denser,

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and we moved in a dark green twilight, fraught with

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>oppressive odors of lush growth and of vegetable corruption. There

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>were no birds nor animals, such as one would think

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to find in any wholesome forest, but it rare intervals.

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>A stealthy viper with pale and heavy coils glided away

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>from our feet among the rank leaves of the roadside,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or some enormous moth with baroque and evil colored mottlings

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>flew before us and disappeared in the nous of the jungle. Abroad.

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Already in the half light, huge purpureal bats with eyes

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like tiny rubies, arose at our approach from the poisonous

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>looking fruits on which they feasted, and watched us with

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 1>malign attention as they hovered noiselessly in the air above,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and we felt somehow that we were being watched by

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>other and invisible presences, and a sort of awe fell

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>upon us, and a vague fear of the monstrous jungle,

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and we no longer spoke aloud, were frequently, but only

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 1>in rare whispers. Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>production of My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick. And Robert, you selected such a wonderful reading

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for us today. What is that for? Um? Well, you know,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was trying to think of a good

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a good reading that would tie into our topic today,

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>and I thought back to Clark Ashton Smith, one of

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>my really not only one, not one of my my

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite author of the Weird Horror period. You can keep

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>your your love crafts and your Howard's h because Clark

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Smith is all you need. This is from a

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>story titled The Tale of set Empra Zeros, and you

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>can find this in some of the key collections of

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Clark Ashton Smith's work, but it's also online in its

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>entirety at Eldric Dark dot com. That's where you can

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>find a lot of his his his writings and his

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>poetry and all. But I particularly picked this out though,

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because it it has this very familiar part of in

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it that I think should familiar to feel familiar to

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone who's ever watched a horror movie or even had

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of a creepy feeling themselves, particularly if you're out

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in the woods or in a strange part of town,

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this feeling that something is watching you, right, And so

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're gonna be talking about today, the feeling

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of being watched. And we're gonna look at this from

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different angles, from a real scientific investigation angles,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>some possible pseudo scientific interpretations, and of course, you know,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we we just got to try out the horror movies

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>because this is one of the most common moments in

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in a horror film. Uh. It's the moment when you

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell, whether the character says it out loud or not,

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that they feel eyes boring into the back of their

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>head or the back of their neck. I mean, this

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>brings to mind the Song of the Warrior by Scandal,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorites. You you you talk, talk, you

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to me. Your eyes touch me physically, so good.

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Which brings, you know, to mind of eyeballs actually touching

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>someone's body, but also this sort of idea that our

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>eyes like shoot out like like those of a cartoon

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>coyote and physically touch somehow that which they are viewing.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's another great song about touching eyeball, which

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is that Peter Gabriel song. You know, he says, he's like,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch your eyes. I always thought that

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was really funny. No, nobody else ever seems to think

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that's funny. But I imagine just salty kind of stinging

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>fingertips going right there on the sclera. No, no, it's

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>fair as fair. If we're gonna make fun of Scandal

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for for their lyrics, we're gonna make fun of the

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>great Peter Gabriel as well. Both of these great songs, though,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt. Another great song, though probably the greatest

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>song about the feeling of being watched though, comes to

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>us from Rockwell his synth funk single Somebody's Watching Me.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>This is from four this head backing vocals by Michael

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and Jermaine Jackson. You know the one, Joe, Oh yeah, yeah,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we we watched the music video. It's uh. I would say,

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>somewhat horror movie inspired. He there's like a shower scene.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>It's where he gets in the shower and he's singing

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the song at you while he's soaping up. Yeah, it's

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not quite thriller, and it definitely didn't have the budget

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>of thriller, but it's it's a fun, fun music video

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to look up and watch in this Halloween season. I

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>actually like the song. I think it's pretty good, uh

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of spooky, uh pop funk kind of thing. Yeah,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I know I would with that without hesitation put it

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on a fun Halloween mix. But of course it is

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a mainstay of horror movies, and strangely enough, I wonder

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what you think about this. I would say especially horror

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>movies that are set in the woods, where there's a

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>scene where you can tell something. Suddenly someone feels that

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they are being watched even though they can't see anything

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or anybody watching them. Absolutely Like when when you brought

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>this idea, I instantly thought of Friday thirteenth movies, and

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought about teens walking around and then being stalked

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>by something unseen. But then I also had to stop

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>myself and realize that I wasn't really specifically thinking back

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to Friday the thirteenth, I was thinking of that episode

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of The Simpsons where Ernest borg nine takes all the

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>campers and they wind up at what is supposed to

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>be Crystal Lake and Jason Vorhees is presumably stalking them. Yeah,

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it's often accomplished in the movies with with camera work actually,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like it sort of puts you suddenly in the point

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of view of the stalker, the monster, the killer, which

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>can be can feel kind of seedy and creepy, and

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>especially the seed here and creepier horror films, because there's

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this sense of, um, you're you're suddenly playing the voyeur,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and not only the the voyor, but the predatory voyer.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, as you're stalking some you know, new Bile

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>victim or something. It can feel a bit creepy. But

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess some of those films you're kind of supposed

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to feel creepy watching them. Yeah. Well, it's also I

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>guess part of the visual language of the horror movie

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that often it's not set out loud, you know. The

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Clark Ashton Smith story has a narrator who can actually

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>say we felt we were being watched, But in the movies.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>The idea is often conveyed without dialogue. It's just that,

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tina's wandering through the forest at night, and

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>then there's a certain sort of sequence of actions. She pauses,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>she looks over her shoulder cautiously, she listens, you know,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>she kind of turns her head to hear the sounds

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of the forest, as if Tina senses that she's being

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>observed without being able to see the observer. And the

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>weird thing is, we never really stopped to question that

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the narrative, do we. It's almost like you

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>just assume there is such a thing as a sixth

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sense for being observed. You just it just feels natural

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to say, like, oh, yeah, you can feel when somebody's

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>watching you. Yeah. Yeah. We we tend to to not

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's something supernatural when we're watching these, even supernatural films,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Like we don't think of that as the supernatural element um. However,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I was looking around, thinking around for some some key

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>cinematic examples of this where it's like really expressed deliberately,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and the two that came to mind. One of them

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is very much a supernatural event and the other one

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is sort of implied that it might be so the

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>first one predator from there's this character Billy Soul I

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think you probably remember him. He's one of the mercenaries.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>He's uh, I think he's supposed to be half sue

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Um and he feels the predator watching them like he's

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the I can't recall if he's like the first one

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to get this sense of the only one to get

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this sense, but he somehow knows that they are being

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hunted by this alien force. Another example this is one

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>from a from a book. I don't know that this

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is reflected in the various film adaptations or not, but

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I've found that in The Two Towers, there's a scene

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>where Sam since his Gallum quote, once looking suddenly back,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>as if some prickle of the skin told him that

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he was watched from behind. He thought he caught a

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>brief glimpse of a small dark shape slipping behind a

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>tree trunk. That's really interesting because it mentions a prickle,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna come up in some of the studies

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>we look at and and and again. Like you know,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of magic going on. Uh. In the

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Lord of the Rings, there's certainly some extrasensory perception but

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>generally we don't attribute that to Sam. Sam's about his

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>uh down to earth as you can ask for in

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this novel. And that's kind of the point, right, Sam

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>does not have the palatineer powers. He is a gardener. Yeah.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>I should also say that this apparently pops up in

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>a Twilight Zone episode one that I have not seen,

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>called stop Over in a Quiet Town. So if you've

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>seen it, let us know what you think. So I

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about this today. The feeling that you

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>can tell when you're being watched through means other than

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>your normal sensory apparatus. I mean, obviously you can tell

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>if like you can see the person watching you, but

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>by means other than that, by say, a tingling at

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the back of your neck or on your back. Uh.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And And it turns out this feeling is not just

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>something that we started to assume as natural when we

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>started watching slasher movies in the early eighties. This is

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>something that has been investigated scientifically at least as far

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>back as the eighteen nineties. And there is a very

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>important early study on this, probably the first study, definitely

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the earliest one I could find, and by the English

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>psychologist and Cornell University professor Edward Titchener, You ready to

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>jump into this study, Let's do it, okay. So the

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>study is called the Feeling of Being Stared At, and

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it was published in Science in the year eight and

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Tishner begins with a clear summary of the phenomena. He says,

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>every year I find a certain proportion of students in

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>my junior classes who are firmly persuaded that they can

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>feel that they are being stared at from behind, and

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a smaller proportion who believed that by persistent gazing at

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the back of the neck, they have the power to

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>make a person seated in front of them turn round

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and look at them in the face. And he learns

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>from conversations with with these students that this is usually

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>believed to happen in crowded settings. And I think this

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting contrast to UH. In the horror movies,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we often see it deployed in very lonely settings, say

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>when a character is is moving by themselves through a

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>forest at night or something. But Tishner says it's most

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>often mentioned in the context of being in church or

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in a classroom, or a public hallway or an assembly

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hall and so Tishner says, Okay, well, what does this

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like? What is it like when somebody is looking

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at you and you can and you can tell without

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>seeing them. Uh. Students describe the feeling as being uncanny,

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, of course it's a little bit creepy, but

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>also as a feeling of must by which I believe

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he means there's this irresistible, almost automatic impulse to turn

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>around and look behind you when you get this sensation,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but he says it's also sometimes described as having a

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>physical sensation in the body, like an unpleasant tension or

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>stiffness at the nape of the neck quote, sometimes accompanied

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>by tingling, which gathers in volume and intensity until a

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>movement which shall relieve it becomes inevitable. It is believed

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that this stiffness is, in some way or other, the

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>direct effect of the focusing of vision upon the back

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of the head and neck. So here's the phenomenon. Students

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>often described that they think they can either make other

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>people turn around by looking at their backs, or that

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they can feel when someone is staring at the back

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of their head. And sometimes this feeling has a physical

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>component it tingles back there. Yeah, and I certainly think

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we can all think back on examples of this from

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly from from school, you know, any kind

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of classroom environment you've been in where there is this

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh. The way I often encountered was this

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was this feeling that you should not stare at somebody,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>even the back of their head too much in class

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>because they will know that you are staring, and then

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they will turn around and you will be exposed as

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a creepy staring person in a very in a video

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>game context, have you ever played one of those games

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>where there's a stealth thing and there's kind of a

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>meter that fills up as a as a character is

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about to see you, and you have to not let

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the meter fill up. That sort of correlates to something

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in reality. It's like the longer you look at someone,

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the meter is filling up, and eventually if it fills up,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll whip around and look right at you. Am I wrong? No? No,

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's this is this is right? And I think

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the key thing is it's not that they will look

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>right at you when they turn around while you're staring

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at them. The key question is, is there's something about

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you staring at them that is making them turn around right, right,

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And we will get into a lot of this as

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we proceed here. Yes, And so Tishner argues that this

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>belief is not correct, that it is uh, that it

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is a false impression that you can feel the gaze

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of others, but that it is based on the foundation

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of a number of psychological realities. And in the rest

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the paper he presents an argument based on natural

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>phenomena to explain why people so often think they're having

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this experience. And so Tisner's explanation goes like this. First

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of all, he says, people are clearly nervous about their backs,

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and there are a number of observations you can make

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to confirm this. First of all, imagine a big audience

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>gathering in a lecture hall to listen to, you know,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>a defense of the existence of the luminiferous ether. Right,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you have maybe a dozen rows of students who are

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>seated in front of you. Just imagine sitting down and

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>watching the students in front of you. What do they

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do when they sit down, Well, very often you'll notice

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>them kind of checking and attending to their backs, so

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they're aware of people sitting behind them looking at them, so,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Tititioner writes, quote, you will notice that a great many

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>women are continually placing their hands to their heads, smoothing

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and patting their hair, and every now and again glancing

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>at their shoulders or over their shoulders to their backs,

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>while many of the men will frequently glance at or

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>over their shoulders and make padding or brushing movements with

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the hand upon lapel and coat collar. And obviously this

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to vary from person to person, but it

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>appears to be extremely common. When you know people are

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at your back, you start kind of fixing up

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>your back, right, Yeah, yeah, I mean, certainly posture comes

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to mind. You know. Um, I feel like if I

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>know that an back is being stared at, I'm gonna

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>be I'm gonna probably check in on my posture and

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure that I am seated correctly, you know, Yeah,

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>make it more self conscious, make sure you're not doing

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the plumber. But also, by the way, I've never seen

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>any convincing evidence that the butt hanging out of the

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pants is more common in plumbers than in other professions.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that may be unfair to plumbers. Yes, but

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Tishner also mentions a friend of his who quote learned

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to dance after he had arrived at Man's Estate. I

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>had to look that up. But Man's Estate, it just

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>means he only learned to dance once he was already

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a full grown adult. But he so he this guy

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was almost physically unable to bear the pain of turning

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>his back to his instructor while the instructor was watching him,

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and then concurrently he felt this extreme relief at the

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>inverse when the instructor would turn around and turn his

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>back to Tishner's friend, It's like he could come up

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for air. And Tishner also mentions the discomfort that many

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>lecturers feel when they have to turn their backs on

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the classroom or audience in order to write something on

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the chalkboard. And I remember this feeling from being in

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>front of a class. It's very uncomfortable whenever you turn

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your back on the audience or the classroom to write.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It's again, it's kind of like going under water. You

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>can sort of like come back up for air once

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you turn back around to face them again. But also

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean things that are common to everyday experience. Where

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do most people want to sit in a restaurant and

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know at a table with their back to the

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>door or in the middle of the room. Well, of

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>course not know. Most people want to sit like at

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a booth or a table with their back to the wall.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Where did nervous kids at a party want to hang

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>out there at the edge of the room with their

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the wall. Yeah, the wall is generally the

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>place to be. Um. Now that being said, I don't

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>want to be trapped at the back of the restaurant either.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be like the middle person in

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a booth, you know, the big circular booth like that.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>That in a way for me, is worse than being

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the room, but still not be

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>as bad as if you were seated very close to

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the door with your back to the door. That would,

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt be the worst. So yeah, it seems

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>totally clear that almost all of us, generally people are

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>nervous about their backs, and as Tisner points out, there

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>are extremely obvious phylogenetic reasons why people would be nervous

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>about their backs and uncomfortable with the idea of being

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>observed from behind. Our eyes face forward. Our anatomy is

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a raid with mostly forward facing defensive equipment. Our backs,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of course, are vulnerable to attack. Yeah, you look at

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>many many what we would refer to as prey species, uh,

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, are are going to have their eyes position

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>more towards the side of their skull, allowing for better

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>visual surveillance of the surroundings, while predatory species often have

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>more forward facing eyes. Though, of course, in all of

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>this we we still should not discount the importance of

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>other senses, and as always acknowledged that the sense worlds

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of other animals are not identical to the sense worlds

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of humans. For instance, the common house cat is both

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>predator and prey, and while it has those forward facing

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>eyes of a pure predator, it also has these high

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>howard ears that are essential to a cat since world,

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're always listening, so you know, sometimes serving as

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a kind of backward facing eye of the cat. So anyway,

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>this is not Tistioner's term, but I thought I should

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have a term for it, just so we can refer

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to it throughout the episode. I would call this general

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>type of nervousness dorsal anxiety. Right, it's the whatever the

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>back part of your you is, your back, the part

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>away from where your eyes face. There's there's nervousness about

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that area. So then on too. Tistioner's next point. One

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>of the ways that this dorsal anxiety manifests in a

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>crowded rumor hall is in the tendency to look around

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>behind you. However, we are also nervous about being caught

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>displaying this dorsal anxiety too conspicuously. Right, You've got to

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>be cool about it. You don't wanna, you know, you

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to look like you are overly concerned about

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>who's looking at you or about the appearance of your back,

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>so Tistioner writes. Quote. Hence, there's often avoluntary continuation of

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the original ideo motor movements, meaning looking behind you. Uh,

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>he continues, One looks around inquiringly, as if one we're

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.360
<v Speaker 1>seeking for a special person or event, taking one's direction

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>from some chance, noise or falling seats or rustle of dresses,

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>letting one's eyes come to rest upon some patch of

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>intense color, etcetera, etcetera. The deals differ in different cases.

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The general mechanism is the same. Observe that this is

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>entirely independent of any gaze or stare coming from behind.

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're probably familiar with this too. Write

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like you you nervously glance over your own shoulder because

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you suddenly feel compelled to, but then you don't want

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to look like that's what you're doing, so you also

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just kind of look around so as you know, not

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to look nervous or like you're looking at anything in particular. Yeah,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a I mean, one of the big things that

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to keep coming back to it with

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>humans especially is just that we are very social animals.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We are we are communal, we we worked to together,

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but there there's a very it's it's a very complex arrangement.

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So it makes me think of say, a real backstagging

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stabbing villain in uh, you know, a picture of a

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>book or something like that. Backstabbing villain has a lot

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of dorsal anxiety because they know all about backstabbing, so

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>they they're perpetually afraid of being stabbed in the back.

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, they can't look like they're

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>afraid they're gonna be stabbing the back, because that's a

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>great way to get stabbed in the back. Yeah, you're

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>just inviting it at that point, So you gotta be cool,

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you gotta just kind of like, Oh, yeah, I wonder

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>what the walls are doing right now. Oh, that's an

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing up on the ceiling. Okay. Third part of

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Tishnar's argument, what are the consequences of these dorsal anxiety

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>checks well. Tishner points out that quote, movement in an

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>unmoved field, whether the field be that of sight or hearing,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>or touch or any other, is one of the strongest

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>known stimuli to the passive attention. We cannot help but

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>attend movement. So something moves, you naturally look at it.

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So imagine you've got a classroom. Jimmy is sitting in

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the front row and Gertrude is sitting in the back row.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>If Jimmy starts moving his head around or starts to

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>turn around and look behind him, Gertrude's attention is naturally

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be attracted to him by the movement. Then,

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as he continues looking all around the room in order

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to kind of be cool, he will tend to notice

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Gertrude and probably other people as well, are staring at

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>him because he moved. But Jimmy is likely to believe

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that the causality is reversed, not that people in the

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>room are looking at him because he's moving, but that

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he felt the urge to look behind him because he

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>could somehow sense that the people were already looking, and

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>when he turned to check, what do you know they

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>were looking. Yeah, this this sounds sounds pretty valid to me. Now,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what about that physical feeling that some people report at

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the base of the neck? Uh Tisner has an explanation

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>here too, and he believes that this is just a

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>result of the dorsal anxiety presenting psycho smatically. After all,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>when people suddenly pay conscious attention into sensations and pretty

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>much any part of the body, it's not uncommon for

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>them to notice parasthesias that they didn't notice moments before.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>So I want you to, at this moment now really

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>think about the instep of your right foot. What's touching

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that right now? What sensations do you feel there? Is

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it possible there's an insect or a spider crawling over

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>your foot right at this moment when we're prompted to

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>think like this, it's easy for many people to suddenly

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>feel an actual itching or tingling or numbness there. It

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>just kind of is a result of suddenly paying really

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>close attention to a part of your body. Yeah, or

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the moment in the slasher film you're watching this Halloween

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>where some sort of relatable physical damage occurs to somebody.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So not a beheading or or a limb being chopped off,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but some sort of like fingernail violence, uh, you know,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>or finger violence like that kind of thing. Like we

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>instantly we feel that, we watch it, we feel it,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about it. We we we feel it on

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>some level in our body, and we're instantly aware of

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>those fingers, which it would feel feels like a related concept. Absolutely, Yeah,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So the mind can generate sensations in the body. Tisna writes, quote,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>any part of the body will thus yield up its

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>quantum of unpleasant sensation, if only for some reason the

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>attention can be continuously held upon it to the exclusion

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. And so evolved instinct causes us to

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be frequently concerned about our backsides when they're exposed, and

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as the mind turns consciously to the subject of our backs,

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we sometimes feel physical sensations there. And then he goes

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on to say that there's so there's this feeling of

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>must remember, the sudden compulsion to turn and look as

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if it happens almost automatically, it's irresistible. And he says, well,

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this is just no different than the feeling of must

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that causes us to adjust our bodies in a chair

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>when the distribution of pressure is suddenly uncomfortable. It's just

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a physical impulse. Now. Weirdly, Tishnar relegates the reports of

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>his empirical experiments to the very last paragraph of his article.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But he did indeed carry out experiments to test people's

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed ability to detect being looked at, and he tested

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this both with quote persons who declared themselves peculiarly susceptible

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to the stair and with people who were peculiarly capable

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of making people turn around. So as for the ability itself,

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>all of his experiments invariably returned a negative result. People

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>were not able to detect when they were being looked at,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.239
<v Speaker 1>nor were they able to cause people to turn and

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>look by gazing from behind. Despite how strong the feeling was,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>there's just no evidence that it correlated with reality. However,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I will say Tishnar explicitly claims that these negative results

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>prove that quote his interpretation has been confirmed. I'd say

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that's very bad analysis, sir, like I think Tishnar's explanation

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>is a very decent one. It is very strong on

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>its face, but you can't prove it just by disproving

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the alternative. There could be other reasons people believe they

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>have this extrasensory power to detect the gaze of others.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, absolutely, But I mean I also agree

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he makes an interesting case. Uh, you know, there's nothing

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>glaringly wrong with it, but yeah, there are other modes

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that this could be taking place for you, so shame

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>shame titionary that you know, it doesn't work that way. However,

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 1>after that, he does go on to say something that

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel very sympathetic to, which is quote, if the

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>scientific reader object that this result might have been foreseen,

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and that the experiments were therefore a waste of time,

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>I can only reply that they seem to me to

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have their justification in the breaking down of a superstition

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>which has deep and widespread roots in the popular consciousness.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And this is in line with one of my pet

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>annoyances in in how people react to science news, which

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>is when people react to the conclusion of some study

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>by saying, well, duh, I could have told you that

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>why did this need to be study? This is a

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>waste of time. I would like to counter the cinnamon

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>as strongly as I can. It is not a waste

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of time to rigorously test ideas that might seem obvious

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to you. And there are a couple of major reasons

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>for this. First of all, you should be skeptical of

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>conventional wisdom and of things that seem obvious to you.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Conventional wisdom and the things that seem obvious when subjected

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to controlled testing often turn out to be wrong even

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>though they seemed obvious. And then the second part is

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what seems obvious to you is not necessarily obvious to others. Absolutely,

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, especially if we are looking to build more

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wisdom upon that conventional wisdom. You want you want the

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>foundation to be sound, you know, and uh and and uh. Yeah.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times there's a lot writing on top

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>of these conventional wisdoms culturally, socially, even at times like

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>scientifically like sometimes are what we think of as a

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>scientific understanding of of the world around us. If there's

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>some conventional wisdom kind of lodged in there, it can

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>make everything a little bit unsettled. Yeah, exactly, Tishner was

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>arguing that scientists should get in there, you know, not

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>just like hang back from questions that they deem kind

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of below them. He says that rigorous experiments disproving people's

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 1>claims of telepathy do more to keep psychological science firmly

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>grounded in reality than would quote any aloofness however authoritative. However,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Tishnar's negative results did not dissuade subsequent researchers from investigating

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the same phenomena. After all, one researchers report, of course,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is usually not enough to totally settle a question. So

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what did other researchers find? Well, I think maybe we

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>should take a break, and then when we come back,

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we can look at the work of one John Edgar Coover.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll be right back. Thank thank alright, we're back.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about j Edgar Hoover. No, no, no, no,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>John Edgar Coover is very different. Okay, alright, different different

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>episod entirely ce O O V E R. I wonder

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>if jed Or Hoover thought that he could feel people

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>staring at the back of his head. Statistically, the answer

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is yes, because more than half of people seem to

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think they have this power. But so this research that

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to talk about came fifteen years after Tishnar's

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>original study of of the feeling of being stared at.

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And I got to say, I was not at all

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>acquainted with the story of John Edgar Coover before preparing

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for this episode, but it led me down some very

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and weird, interesting rabbit trails. And uh, I would

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just say, Coover seems like a very interesting guy overall. Uh.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>He was born in eighteen seventy two. He grew up

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>as a farm boy in Indiana, beginning college at the

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>age of twenty two and paying his way through school

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>by working long hours as a stenographer, a typeist, a printer,

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and eventually a telegraph operator. So he's sending invisible messages

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and pulses to distant shores. And later in life, Couver

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.719
<v Speaker 1>wrote about the skills he acquired in these jobs. Quote,

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>one never knows when he may need skills or knowledge

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>once acquired. These traits seem to have pursued me during

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>my whole life. So I never had the time to

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>learn the social devices by which gentleman kill time. Dancing, cards, golf, lounging.

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It just great. I always appreciate a good dig at

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the gentleman um, but anyway, for his higher education, Coover

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>attended the State Normal School in Greeley, Colorado, and then

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>later he went to Stanford University, where Coover would end

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>up spending the rest of his career. He ended up

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>going into the burgeoning field of psychology. And I got

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of my information about Coover's life from an

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>obituary by Franklin Fearing published when when Coover died in

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight. So Coover had a passion for the subject

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of education and teaching in psychology, and Fearing rights that

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that Coover clearly understood that education had to consist of

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>awakening young minds, not just in the realms of knowledge,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but into quote clear under standing and good judgment. And

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the sense of clarity and judgment I think comes through

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the other parts of his career, because Couper was

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>regarded as a very careful, almost perfectionist, skeptical researcher who

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>was a very hard worker, but who published relatively little

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in his lifetime. And Fearing chalked some of this up

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to a lifelong inferiority complex that might have been rooted

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in in uh in his family life and where he

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>came from. But he was an early advocate of control

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>groups in psychological research, which of course is one of

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the most crucial elements of modern experimental method and absolute necessity.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>If you are a researcher and you don't want to

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>end up fooling yourself. Yeah, I mean, to a certain

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>extent faced with the alternative, a certain amount of an

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>inferiority complex is ideal in a scientific experiment. Uh. You

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>don't just blind optimism exactly right. So maybe some of

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>these personality attributes that kept him from being more ambitious

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in his field actually made him a really good experimental scientist.

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>But it was around nineteen twelve, after Coover became a

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>fellow in psychology at Stanford, that an interesting and perhaps

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>unlikely focus would start to dominate a large part of

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>his career, and that was psychical research. Uh. Spirit medium's

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>psychic powers, telekinesis, telepathy. This was an odd focus because

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>by all accounts, couver was quite skeptical, but Fearing's obituary

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>explains this by by another character who enters the story here,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and that character is Thomas Welton Stanford, the brother of

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the industrialist and Senator Leland Stanford, who was the founder

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of Stanford University. So we got a we got a

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>friend of the founder here, I guess not a friend,

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a a brother of the founder here, and Thomas Welton Stanford,

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the brother of the founder, was a devout believer in spiritualism.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Thomas was more than willing to give a generous endowment

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to the psychology department at Stanford to fund their re

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>search and by and subsequently Coover's research, as long as

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the department would investigate and Thomas surely hoped prove the

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>validity of psychical phenomena and the great powers of spirit mediums.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So here we have a classic case of the guy

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>who shows up with the money saying like, look, I've

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>got something I really want you to look into. And

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>so the president of Stanford, in the chair of the

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>psychology department, took the money and then appointed the skeptical J. E.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Couver to head up the psychical research program. And according

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to Fearing, Couver was not personally very interested in the

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>claims of psychics, but he considered his research a kind

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of professional necessity, like okay, in order to fund my

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>studies in other areas such as learning and cognition. I

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta I gotta do studies on psychics to make Thomas

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Welton happy. But he's the perfect person to do it, because,

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like we said, he's highly skeptical and he's he's something

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of a perfectionist exactly right. So it actually I think

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it turned out kind of to the best. Uh. And this,

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm about to talk about, is sort

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of a tangent. But there's one near runnin that Couver

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>had with the medium that I was reading about that

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is just too weird and funny not to mention. So

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what I'm about the site comes from

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>an April two thousand article in The Village Voice by

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a writer named Paul LeFarge, and Lafarge is talking about

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Welton Stanford and says that while he was living

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in Melbourne, he met an Australian medium named Charles Bailey.

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Now Charles Bailey was famous around the world for producing

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're known at the time as apports, that is,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>introducing physical objects to the seance table. And these objects

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>had supposedly been transported into the room by some spiritual conveyance,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so the spirits would provide him with flowers or statuettes

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or books, jewels, often even live animals like crabs or

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>small birds. Oh man, I wish I would see more

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>magic acts with live abs in them. We got tired

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of bunny rabbits. Live crabs is where it's at. I

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>know the crabs. The crabs are gonna get really interesting

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>with this next allegation. Okay, because I want to read

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>something written about Charles Bailey by the rationalist writer Joseph McCabe.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this accusation is true, but uh,

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but I hope so. So this comes from McCabe's book

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Is Spiritualism Based on Fraud from nineteen twenty, and he's

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>writing about Charles Bailey. He says, quote, he was taken

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>so seriously in the spiritualist world that Professor Ritchel, a

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>rich French inquirer brought him to France for investigation. Sure enough,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>although he was searched, the spirits brought into the room

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>two little birds quote from India. But his long hesitations

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and evasions had aroused suspicion, and on inquiry it was

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>proved that he had bought the birds, which were quite French,

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at a local shop in Grenoble. How he smuggled them

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>into the room. Remember, McCabe says that he was searched

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>before the seance, can hinuing. I give the answer as

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it is given by Count rochas his host, with reluctance.

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But it is absolutely necessary to know these things if

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to understand some of the more difficult mediumistic performances.

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>The birds were concealed in the unpleasant end of his

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>elementary canal the prison wallet. Oh man, I have to

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>pick up Mary Roach's Um Guts book to see if

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>because she has a whole chapter devoted up to to

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing. But I don't remember mention of

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>live animals per se live birds. This is really hard

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to believe in a way. I mean, it's not like

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe he actually produced them from the spirit world.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I I guess getting them in this way is more

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>likely than that, but I don't know. I'm not quite

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>sure how exactly this works with live birds. Well, but yeah,

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, and I'm being a little skeptical of this. Like,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>no doubt he smuggled them in, but I mean the

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>ways of a gifted sleight of hand, uh performer. I

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's unnecessary and and perhaps impractical to go

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to those links when they could easily be you know,

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>deposited up the sleeve or something, or or in some

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>manner that still defies easy detection but are far easier

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to produce. Yeah, so I'm gonna say I still got

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a question mark by that one. But but I think

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it is quite clear that, however he got these birds

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and other things in Charles Bailey was absolutely a con artist,

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas Welton Stanford loved Charles Bailey. He was enamored

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of Bailey's powers to read from LeFarge quote. For twelve

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>years he paid Bailey to give weekly seances in his

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>office in the company of wealthy Melbourne businessmen, despite the

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>fact that Bailey had been in trouble with the law

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>several times in Australia and abroad for obtaining money under

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.720
<v Speaker 1>false pretenses. So Bailey produced a ton of these things,

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>these apports for Thomas, many of which would end up

0:36:55.239 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on display in a museum on Stanford campus. LeFarge lists

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>off some of these objects that that Bailey supposedly got

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>from the Spirit World quote. One box contains thousands of

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>small red seeds, another holds fish lures, and another contains

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a cigarette case with a Japanese design, a lock of

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a woman's hair, and a handful of twenty two caliber

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>shell casings. And then later here's one quote an item

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>listed in the catalog as fur bat implement of death,

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>which appears unfortunately to have been lost, which, oh man,

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>what a what a tragedy. I've got to know. What

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is the fur bat? Well, it's an implement of death, clearly,

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what is it? I mean, it brings them My first,

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>my mind first went to like some sort of weird

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>furry bat that might be actually made out of the

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>fur of another animal. But then I also thought, well, maybe, yeah,

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it is like a whiffle bat that's covered in

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>fur um, you know, and it's for killing people. I

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know. Out there in listener world,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 1>if you know what the fur bat is, please contact us.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got to know. But then, so after this thing's

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>really came to a head because Stanford's president, David Starr

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's assigned j. E. Couver to travel to Australia and

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>put Bailey's powers to the test. It's like the founder's

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>brother really believes in this guy. Couver, Will you check

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>him out? And Uh. To pick up with what LeFarge

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>rights quote, Charles Bailey must have known what was in store.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>He happened to leave Australia before Couver showed up and

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the tests were called off. So the threat of being

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>put under the microscope by Couver appears to have literally

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>made Bailey flee the continent. But sorry, I know that

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.280
<v Speaker 1>was a long digression, but but I I couldn't stop

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>with that, So we got to come back to Coover's

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>actual research on the feeling of being stared at. This was,

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of course one of the many psychical phenomena that we're

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>being studied and promoted by spirit mediums of the time,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and so it was one of the things that Couver's

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>psychical research program investigated, and so he published a paper

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in the American Journal of Psychology called the Feeling of

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Being stared At in nineteen thirteen. Again, this was fifteen

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>years after Tishnar's original paper. Uh. This paper was written

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>up in the New York Times when it came out

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhat hilariously and with what appeared to me to be errors,

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, getting the dates wrong on things. But I

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>love the way they introduced the subject. They write quote

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>probably a majority of persons have experienced the sensation of

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>being stared at from behind and turning the head have

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>actually detected the gazer. Until recently, psychologists have talked learnedly

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about a vestigial third eye, which in the abyssom of

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>time belonged to the ancestors of man and might account

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for the instinctive feeling. What well, I mean that instantly

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>brings to mind, you know, research into the you know,

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the third eye, the penny old land and uh and

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so forth, and the and the prietal eye and so forth,

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But certainly none of that is positioned in the back

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of the head. Yeah, I'm I'm a little confused about

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>what the This is an unsigned article in the Times.

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who wrote this, but that's very funny.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>But okay, So what was Coover's actual method in the study. Well,

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>first of all, they did a survey to find out

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>how common was the belief that people could feel being

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 1>stared at from behind uh and and the belief that crucially,

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the belief that this feeling could be more or less

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>relied upon. And so for the the experimental portion, Couver

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>found ten students who all believed they had the ability

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to tell when they were being stared at from behind,

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and then he ran a hundred test rounds with each

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the ten subjects that went like this. The student

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>would sit with their back to the experiment or, who

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>was sometimes coover himself, sometimes other people, and the experimenter

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 1>would roll a die. If the die came up even

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the experimenter would stare at the back of the student's head,

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and if the role came up odd, they would look away.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Each time, the student had fifteen seconds to say whether

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they thought they were being stared at or not. In

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 1>each case, Couver reported that the experiment or quote stared hard,

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.919
<v Speaker 1>willing strongly that the three agent feel it. I guess

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it is making me think on a James Bond frequency.

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Made it made you feel it, did he. But in conclusion,

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Couver found the following. So, First of all, the belief

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>that people are able to somehow detect being stared at

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is indeed extremely common. I did a couple of surveys

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in different classes about this. In one, sixty eight percent

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of students agreed that they could tell when people were

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at them from behind. In the second survey, in

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>a different class, it was eight six percent who said yes. Uh.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>The second part is the experiments, again, like Tishner's, showed

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this sensation to be groundless. People did not do significantly

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>better than chance at guessing whether they were being stared

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at or not. The success rate was fifty point two percent.

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And third, Couver offers a passable alternative to the explanation

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that Tishner gave for the feeling, and that was basically

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>lying in the tendency for people to start to imagine

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that their mental imagery represents something in reality. So people

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>who described picturing in their mind that the experiment or

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was looking at them were more likely to think that

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 1>the experiment or was actually doing that, And so there

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was there's just a tendency for people to kind of

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>wonder what's going on behind them and then imagine a

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>scenario and then start to think that that imagination is

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>somehow vertical, it's telling them something about what's happening back there. Yeah,

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of it comes down to I think,

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the human imagination and it's it's basic role

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in simulating possible futures. And once you've simulated a future

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that is um certainly the one that is is possible,

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 1>um it it makes increasing sense to quickly update your

0:42:56.360 --> 0:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>current model of reality to assure yourself that it does

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>not aligne with this simulation. Yeah, and I guess what

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.439
<v Speaker 1>this all ultimately points to is just the basic fact

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's better safe than sorry psychology. You know,

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like assuming that you are being looked at from behind.

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Is even if you're getting a lot of false positives

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>by often assuming that, you're gonna probably be safer in

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the end if you assume that kind of thing a lot, right,

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if you're the guy in the crowded

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>room who's just going just like basically chasing his own

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>tail because he keeps looking over his back to make

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>sure nobody's stabbing him in the back, you know, still

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>people were probably not going to try and stab him

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in the back because he's clearly so animated about this

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.240
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Like he's he's going to be a hard target.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 1>But I will admit there are downsides. I mean, he's

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>also gonna have a harder time looking cool. Yeah, he's

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a hard time doing anything. So like if

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a James Bond scenario, like what does this guy do? Like,

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna be an effective assassin or an effective

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.760
<v Speaker 1>spy or an effective anything. If he's just only wound

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>up like so tightly in his own survive you know this.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This calls to mind another reason that I bet this

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>type of scene is really common in horror movies, where

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the character looks over their shoulder and in the lonely

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>woods at night and thinks maybe that there's something they're

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>watching them. And I think one of the reasons this

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>happened so often in movies is just because it's one

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>step in the heightening of dramatic tension or the raising

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of suspense. It's hard to build suspense when a character

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is completely unaware that anything could be threatening them. I

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that tends to lead to I don't know, a

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 1>different kind of way of viewing a threat in a

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:37.760
<v Speaker 1>movie all it's more kind of ironic if the character

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is completely unaware that there that something might be looking

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at them. Um. I don't know about you, but I'm

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 1>now vaguely remembering another trope. And again, these moments are

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 1>just so I feel like they're so common. I it's

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.399
<v Speaker 1>hard to actually think of specific examples, but I feel

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like I've seen this one before near the woods or

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in the woods, character has that feeling they're being watched.

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>They look back, they don't see a thing. Oh, if

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they feel okay and they keep moving, then we go

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the spot they were just looking at, and

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what's creeping up around the shrubbery but some sort of

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>vicious monster or a maniac killer. Yeah. Yeah, it's the

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>saw tooth escalation of of suspense. It's you know, you're

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the fake out, but then it's real, but then it's fake,

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>but then it's real even more placed the same kind

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of role as a cat scare. Yeah, yeah, but in

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a way it's kind of more subtle because it's like

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it's saying, oh, you think you're safe, but you're not safe.

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's actually you were right to check behind

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you because there is a monster there, even if you

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it. It's the one to where there's a

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 1>cat scare, and then you open the same closet door

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that the cat just jumped out of in the second

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>time the monsters there or the monsters behind the closet

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>door in the other direction. Yeah. But okay, So anyway,

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>coming back to the research on the feeling of being

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 1>stared at, as we've got a couple of these these

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>early studies into this sensation, first by tition Er, then

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>by Couver that found no vertical perceptive effect at all.

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But more recently, a number of researchers who advocate various

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>forms of psychic powers and extrasensory perception have continued research

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>into the psychic staring effect, which is what they often

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>call it, and they have sometimes claimed to have found

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>positive results, but of course mainstream researchers are skeptical. I'm

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to run through all of the later parapsychology

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>studies that reported positive results. I just want to pick

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>one example to talk about briefly, and that is that

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the researchers who claims to have contradicted these

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>early studies by Tishnarancouver on psychic staring detection is the

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>English parapsychologist author Rupert shell Drake. Shell Drake is very

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>well known in various paranormal circles. He's sort of a

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>titan of this domain. He advocates all kinds of psychic

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and paranormal phenomena, often under the shadow of a big

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis that he calls morphic resonance, which, uh, I'm probably

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>not fully doing justice too, but basically claims that some

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>types of men tool phenomena are not confined to brains

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and they can kind of spread around the world and

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>across time. One quote I found says, quote, it's the

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of mysterious telepathy type interconnections between organisms and of

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>collective memories within species. Okay, so so it's the force

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>basically kind of. Yeah, it's it's very similar to the force.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And so shell Drake, among many things, has been interested

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the idea that you can tell when you're being

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>looked at, even from behind. And so I was reading

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand five Scientific American article by Michael Schermer

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that examines shell Drake's claims about the psychic staring effect.

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, what what does shel Drake claim about it? Well,

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>he says, quote vision may involve a two way process,

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 1>an inward movement of light and an outward projection of

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>mental images. And shell Drake ended up crowdsourcing a lot

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of research back in the early days of the Internet,

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>very early for crowdsourcing. So he backed up his claims

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>about the psychic staring effect by saying that it was

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>confirmed by thousands of reports from people who downloaded an

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>experimental protocol from his web page, and he said that

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 1>these quote have given positive, repeatable and highly significant results,

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>implying that there is indeed a widespread sensitivity to being

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>stared at from behind. UH. It should go without saying

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>this immediately raises some questions about the quality of the

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:27.920
<v Speaker 1>reported results UH, and Shermer goes on to offer a

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>whole list of reasons why he thinks it's that we

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>should doubt shel Drake's results, including the following reason. So,

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there was a replication attempt by by

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>academic researchers in the year two thousand. A team including

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.720
<v Speaker 1>John Colewell of Middlesex University in England used shel Drake's

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>protocol and recorded the results UH quote. Twelve volunteers participated

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in twelve sequences of twenty stare or no stare trials

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>each and received accuracy feedback for the final nine session,

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and interestingly, they found there was a measurable effect, but

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:08.080
<v Speaker 1>only for the sessions where the subjects were getting feedback

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on their accuracy. So if they were told whether they

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>were getting it right or wrong as they went, suddenly

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.959
<v Speaker 1>they started doing a little better than they were doing

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>when they were not being told this better than chance.

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So what could explain this? Well, Cole Well had an

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>answer here quote when the subjects were getting active feedback,

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they were adapting to what was in fact a non

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:35.600
<v Speaker 1>random sequence of stair and no staircases. Uh. And so

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>this is another important reminder that people are just not

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 1>as good as we think we are at coming up

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:44.320
<v Speaker 1>with truly random sequences on the fly. You've got to

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 1>use some kind of objective generator, like a die or something,

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>or you will end up producing sequences that have unconscious patterns.

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>For example, when people try on purpose to come up

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:59.799
<v Speaker 1>with random sequences of of yes no binary options, they

0:50:00.120 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 1>up alternating too much. They don't generate enough streaks of

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the same value in their sequences, and these patterns are

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:11.919
<v Speaker 1>often detectable by others. Yeah, this instantly makes me think

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of Dungeons and Dragons. I don't know if you've had

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this experience, Joe. I know you've been playing recently, But

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're actually getting just random roles of the D twenty,

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll get those weird like awesome streaks of luck with

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Roman natural twenties, or just abysmal streaks of luck getting

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>natural ones, whereas if you were to try and fake it,

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were gonna sit there on the other side

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of your dungeons and dragon zoom call and just absolutely

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 1>fake all of your roles, like you wouldn't dare pull

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>three twenties in a row. Uh, but you might very

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>well get them just in the natural random order of things.

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what you're talking about. Yeah, I remember

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 1>having this thought recently when I had a sequence of

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>several very good roles in a row, and I was like,

0:50:57.640 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna think I'm lying because of course we're playing resume,

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, showing the die. I mean, obviously

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I could have moved it, so that doesn't really prove anything.

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But but I was like, no, this is real. But yeah,

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that's stuff like that happens when you're generating real random sequences.

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>When people try to generate random, supposedly random sequences from

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>their brains, they overcompensate against that kind of thing, and

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>they alternate too much, or they formed too tightly even

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:30.959
<v Speaker 1>of a distribution from from like moment to moment. Yeah,

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, well, I just take that twenty better

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>better fake a thought, No, I better fake a better

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:39.760
<v Speaker 1>fake an ate a better fake an aid, but anyway,

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>so after this one replication attempt, Shermer also reports there

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 1>was another one. A University of Hertfordshire researcher, a psychologist

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>named Richard Wiseman, attempted to replicate and also found that

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>people guessed no better than chance whether or not they

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 1>were being stared at. And then Shermer also points out

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to what appears to be, at least at a at

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a sort of like survey level of all the different results,

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be an experiment or bias problem. And

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that works like this, like when you count up all

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of the psychic steering effects studies and then evaluations of studies,

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and you organize them by sort of the affiliation of

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the author, like is this person affiliated with a pro

0:52:19.200 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>paranormal institution or with a mainstream research institution. The results

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in tone of the evaluations are pretty much what you

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>would expect. They sort of like line up with the

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the preconceptions you would expect. And to be fair,

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you could say it's possible that the bias runs the

0:52:36.280 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>opposite way. Maybe it's that mainstream and skeptical researchers are

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:44.440
<v Speaker 1>designing experiments with the bias that produces false negatives, but

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>personally I would strongly suspect it's the endverse. Now finally,

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, there is an ace in the whole. Uh.

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Shermer mentions that shell Drake responds to some of these

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>skeptical experiments and the ones that find no result by

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that quote that skeptics day hapen the morphic field

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the morphic residence field of right, Whereas we've heard this before,

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:08.320
<v Speaker 1>where you know, if you have a skeptic there, of

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>course I'm not gonna be able to work my magic. Yeah,

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:13.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a classic response. And Shermer contends, and I would

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>have to agree that this is a sort of death

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 1>blow to a hypothesis because it makes the hypothesis unfalsifiable.

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Negative results just further confirment, so there's no way to

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:27.399
<v Speaker 1>actually test it. It's a sign of a very bad hypothesis.

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of all this, while I would

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.400
<v Speaker 1>say I'm personally very skeptical of the idea of an

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>extrasensory perceptive ability to detect the gaze of others, I'm

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 1>totally sympathetic to the possibility that people are extremely sensitive,

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even on some subconscious levels. Two indications of being

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>watched that are acquired through normal sensory pathways. I mean,

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:53.719
<v Speaker 1>for social animals like us, what is more relevant than

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>being looked at other than like direct threats to your

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>immediate survival? The fact that you are the object to

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>someone else's attention is one of the most relevant and

0:54:03.239 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>important circumstances in all of life. It seems that, like,

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>there's every reason our bodies would be highly attuned to

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>detecting the attention of others by whatever means possible. So

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a quick break. When we come back,

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss this. Thank alright, we're back. So

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to, uh, something you mentioned earlier.

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Earlier Sheldrick's claim that that vision involves a two way process,

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>an inward movement of light and an outward projection of

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>mental images. Now, the first part of that is absolutely correct.

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That's how vision works. Light enters the eye um outward

0:54:40.080 --> 0:54:43.000
<v Speaker 1>projection of mental images. He means something else. But there

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>is something that is projected by the staring eye, and that,

0:54:46.920 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of course is just the intensity of our eyes. Like,

0:54:51.719 --> 0:54:54.520
<v Speaker 1>especially with humans, as we'll get into here, it is

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>very noticeable, especially to other humans, when you are staring

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>at them. There is a communication taking place there when

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>two eyes meet. Yes, yes, absolutely, I mean the eye

0:55:05.440 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is a two way radio. It not only takes in information,

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the eye itself conveys information to anyone who can see it. Yeah. So,

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:17.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, there's study that identified a specialized group of

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>neurons and the caaques and the cac brain that fire

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>specifically in reaction to another macaques gaze. So there's a

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of mental hardware and software tied up in responding

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to gazes, meeting gazes. We are sensitive to gazes as primates. Absolutely,

0:55:35.120 --> 0:55:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so much is tied up in a gaze.

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting that like the valance of the gaze

0:55:40.280 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of another of your species can be highly relevant in

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:45.840
<v Speaker 1>good and bad ways. It can be a threat, it

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:48.400
<v Speaker 1>can represent sexual interest, it can be it can be

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>very good or very bad. Yeah, I mean, you especially

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>see this in the mallion species. And this actually ties

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>into a study that I was very excited about this

0:55:57.640 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 1>week that came out. This was any study from the

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>University of Sussex about how to make proper eye contact

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with your pet cat and they were exploring the long

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>reported um um idea. The long reported importance of eye

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:19.160
<v Speaker 1>narrowing movements in maintaining a calm rapport with felines. You

0:56:19.239 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 1>may have heard this describe heard the described to too

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:23.440
<v Speaker 1>too as being this thing where you just kind of

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like squint your eyes a little bit and then like

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:28.319
<v Speaker 1>slowly open and closed them while staring at your cat.

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And they seem to sort of do the same thing.

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, the slow blank you have this kind of

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>moment with your cat um which which is funny because

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we tried to We tried to explain to our our

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>eight year old son that this is what we should

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>try and do, and of course they just can't do it,

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just all we can do is stare intently

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at the cat and creep it out. But but anyway,

0:56:49.800 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the the lead love is too pure, The cat love

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is too pure. It is the lead author on the study,

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>or the first author anyway, is a one Dr Tasman Humphrey,

0:57:03.120 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>PhD student in the School Psychology at the University of Sussex. Uh.

0:57:07.560 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And they end up there they do a whole experiment.

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:12.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna read just this quote from them because

0:57:12.680 --> 0:57:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I find that it it sums up some possibilities here.

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Quote in terms of why cats behave this way. It

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 1>could be argued that cats developed a slow blink of

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:25.200
<v Speaker 1>behaviors because humans perceived slow blinking is positive. Cats may

0:57:25.280 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>have learned that humans reward them for responding to slow blinking. Okay,

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one idea, but then they continue. It is

0:57:32.840 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>also possible that slow blinking and cats began as a

0:57:35.800 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 1>way to interrupt an unbroken stare, which is potentially threatening

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in social interaction. Oh interesting, and this kind of comes

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 1>back to what I said earlier about the about the

0:57:45.760 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>cat being the perpetual prey and predator. Um Attention is

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>never good if you're a cat, because you think about it,

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you're solitary creature. As a cat, you put up with

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>these humans certainly, uh worse yet, you may put up

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with a few select fellow fee lines, but for the

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>most part, you're alone hunter. Most creatures in the in

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the world around you are either potential prey or potential predator.

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Prey must either not see you until it's too late

0:58:12.200 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or just never see you at all. You know, you

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just get them completely behind the neck and snap their

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>little necks before they even glimpse your ferocious face. And yeah,

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and if the predators gaze. You want to avoid that

0:58:24.680 --> 0:58:28.160
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible, So attention is is not good

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're a cat. Now with humans, as we've mentioned,

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>were were obviously rather different than cats. We are not

0:58:34.920 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>solitary hunters. We are social creatures. And it's variable, but

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of us want to want at least

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to have the right sorts of attention. You might want

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the attention of desired romantic interest. An actor wants the

0:58:47.960 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the positive attention when they take the stage, etcetera, etcetera.

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are plenty of times when even the actors

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 1>among us, you know, want to remain unstared at, say

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>while while driving past a lurking State trooper car, or

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 1>while walking down an unfamiliar street while we're leaving oneself

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in the woods. Yes exactly, But anyway, that's that's all

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>consideration of the gaze of others when it is either

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 1>anticipated or feared, or or when it is identified. Um,

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of of of you know, getting back to

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea of about there being a potential sixth sense

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about about the perception of gays. Um. There's a wonderful

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 1>article article that came out in sixteen in the conversation

0:59:30.520 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>by Harriet Dempsey Jones titled a sixth Sense question Mark,

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and it points out a few interesting takes on all

0:59:37.000 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of this. Yeah, I just checked Dempsey Jones. I believe

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>she was a researcher at Oxford at the time this

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.320
<v Speaker 1>came out, and I think now she's at University College London.

0:59:45.720 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tremendous article. I recommend checking it out if

0:59:48.480 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you're at all interested in this topic, which I hope

0:59:50.720 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you are. You're already what about an hour into this thing.

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we've we've we've we've kept it going at an

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting click here. But anyway, um, dem see Jones points

1:00:00.800 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. Okay, first of all, you know, we're seemingly

1:00:02.960 --> 1:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>all wired for gay's reception. We see this in children

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>less than a week old, even just like day you know,

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a few days old. An infant is going to prefer

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the face that has direct gaze as opposed to in

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a verdant gaze. And we're not only drawn into the

1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>gaze of others, were also skilled at detecting attention and

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>revealing the direction of another individual's gaze. Okay, so how

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>does this work? Well, I mean this to come back

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to our idea of the crowded room. Uh, this is

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>something we've all experienced before. Our brains want to know

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>who is staring at us? And if they're not staring

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at us, what are they staring at? You know, it

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>makes sense there is vital social information at play here

1:00:45.880 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in this room. Is there something alarming about another individual

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the room that I should be alarmed about as well?

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there someone like really weird looking or really interesting

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>looking that I also should god at Is there vital

1:00:58.720 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>information about like and meals are coming out? You know,

1:01:01.280 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>there's just just where everybody in a room is looking

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot of information there, and our brains

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>got to know it. Yeah. One thing that's kind of

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting is if you ever just go into a meeting

1:01:12.480 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or people gather in a room, just kind of look

1:01:15.000 --> 1:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>around and see who everybody starts looking at at the

1:01:18.080 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the meeting, Like is it the boss who's

1:01:20.800 --> 1:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>leading the meeting, or is it somebody who you know

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they're wondering, oh god, what's he going to say today?

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Or or who is that person? What are they doing here?

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>What is their role? What's about to happen? I Mean,

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing is I don't actually have to tell

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you to look around and see who other people are

1:01:35.760 --> 1:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at, because this is automatically what we do. We're

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>constantly checking the line of sight of other people. Yeah,

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just it is there's important social information there and

1:01:44.880 --> 1:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and our and our brains really need to know what

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is going on, what is important in this current social dynamic. So,

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>referring to a two thousand one study, but kobyashi at all,

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Dimsey Jones points out the human eye structure is unique. Now,

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this gets into the this idea of projecting something, you know,

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not in a magical sense, but in just like look

1:02:04.640 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>at the eyes, right, The large white sclara of the

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>human eye makes it very easy to discern direction of

1:02:11.840 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>someone's gaze. If you compare that to the cat's eye,

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>for instance, it's harder to tell exactly what where a

1:02:19.200 --> 1:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>predator is looking. Uh, it's just darker than the eye

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is darker in that part. But but with a human

1:02:25.840 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very easy, especially for another human, to see

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>what they are looking at. Absolutely, and again you do

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it unconsciously. Yeah, So to come back to that crowded

1:02:34.840 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>room example, this enables humans to better pick up on

1:02:37.760 --> 1:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>those social signals. What is important? What should I be

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at? What should I not be looking at? I mean,

1:02:44.080 --> 1:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>just think of how much we can communicate just via

1:02:47.360 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the movements and the intensity of our eyes. Imagine what

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>life would be like if you could not tell what

1:02:54.240 --> 1:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>all the people around you were looking at. I mean,

1:02:56.640 --> 1:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just try to think of the contrary. Maybe if everybody

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>had a paque one way goggles over their eyes at

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>all the at all times. Wouldn't that be a a

1:03:06.240 --> 1:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>deeply weird world? I mean, I think about the ways that, Um,

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain there's a certain kind of psychological power

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that comes with wearing really dark sunglasses indoors, you know,

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>over like you're kind of saying like, I'm not going

1:03:21.640 --> 1:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to allow you to see who I'm looking at or

1:03:23.880 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>where I'm looking. And there's a there's a discomfort that

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>can come with that. I mean, sometimes people wear dark sunglasses,

1:03:29.920 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think in order to assert a kind of power

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>over others, cool hand Luke style. I mean, sometimes you

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just want to see the light that's right before your

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>eyes too, right, I get ask what does it mean

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>when he says, don't switch the blade on the guy

1:03:43.680 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in shades? Oh no, what does that? Does that refer

1:03:46.640 --> 1:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to something. I've never figured it out. Um, I tend

1:03:50.840 --> 1:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to assume that the whole meaning of this song is

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that if you wear your sunglasses at night, you were

1:03:56.200 --> 1:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>so cool that you can just say a bunch of

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just nonsense and it will sound cool. You know. It's

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like the Corey Heart effect or something that nobody's gonna

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>question me. I'm basically a blues brother. Yeah. Now, to

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>come back to Dempsey Jones and their piece here, it

1:04:09.560 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>should also come as no surprise that highly anxious people

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>focus more on the eyes and stairs of others, while

1:04:15.600 --> 1:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>people on the autistic spectrum focused less on the eyes.

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And direct gaze also factors into human conversation and one

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to one interaction. And this is something again that has

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>become painfully aware during our age of zoom meetings and

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what have you. But you know, we we tend to

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>look away from someone's eyes while speaking, uh, the author

1:04:34.120 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>points out, but we direct our Direct gaze plays into

1:04:37.800 --> 1:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the subtle ways we determine who is talking next, who's

1:04:40.560 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>getting the talking stick. Direct gaze also plays into the

1:04:44.680 --> 1:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>way we perceive trustworthiness and attractiveness and others, which of

1:04:48.520 --> 1:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>course is highly problematic in the zoom age, because you

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>really have to fake it, at least in my experience,

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to try and convey this sense of making eye contact

1:04:57.040 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with someone, because you know, I'm not even like, right now,

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do Joe through our zoom call, I'm

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not even looking at you. I'm looking at this green

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>dot above your head, above the little window that has

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>your image. But I'm I'm doing this so that I

1:05:10.240 --> 1:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can fake the sense that I am making eye contact

1:05:12.880 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'm trying it right now. Does it look

1:05:14.840 --> 1:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like I'm looking at you. I'm looking at it. At

1:05:17.320 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>my end, it creates an effective illusion, but we're both

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>having to do something other than the actual thing to

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>try and pull that off, and then of course that

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>takes you out of the actual interaction. I got to

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>apologize for a while. I was doing this thing that

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just did not work at all. Where I was putting.

1:05:32.200 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I was putting the meeting on my secondary screen and

1:05:35.040 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>had my notes on the screen right in front of me,

1:05:37.640 --> 1:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and so when I actually was looking right at you,

1:05:40.320 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I would probably appeared to you to be looking off

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to the side. And when I was looking when I

1:05:44.800 --> 1:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be looking at you, I was not looking

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>at you, So I'm sorry for any confusion there. I've

1:05:50.200 --> 1:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>stopped doing it that way. I assumed you were doing

1:05:52.760 --> 1:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>what I was doing, UH, and that was putting your

1:05:55.280 --> 1:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>your your miniature ized screen up close to the camera,

1:05:57.960 --> 1:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and I guess I just wasn't noticing when you were

1:05:59.720 --> 1:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>looking way. Well, I'm sorry for giving you so much

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>wide sclera these last few weeks. That's all right. So anyway,

1:06:06.800 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to gays detection, we we always have

1:06:09.560 --> 1:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to remember that we're highly wired to pick up on gazes. Anyway.

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>There's vital social and survival information in this for the

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>human brain. So again, when when the you know, the

1:06:20.640 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the girl at the front of the room feels like

1:06:22.320 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>she's being watched because this weird feeling, and she turns

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>around and someone is actually staring at them at that moment,

1:06:28.480 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>even if they weren't previously, even if they were only

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>staring at at them now because they just turned around. Whatever.

1:06:33.280 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>The reason there's like that is that they're going to

1:06:35.840 --> 1:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pick up on that gaze, Like the impression of being

1:06:38.920 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>stared at uh is going to be noteworthy to our

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>understanding of our environment. You know, this connects to another

1:06:46.720 --> 1:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>study that I was looking at for Today. That was

1:06:49.200 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>published in Current Biology and called humans have an expectation

1:06:54.520 --> 1:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that gays is directed toward them. This was by Isabel Marischal,

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Andrew jake Holder, and Colin W. G. Clifford. And in

1:07:03.480 --> 1:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this study, the authors they're they're trying to show that

1:07:06.520 --> 1:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>people just have a bias in favor of expecting that

1:07:09.920 --> 1:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>other people are looking at them when there's any kind

1:07:12.920 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of ambiguity about where other people are looking. Um, they say,

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>quote this expectation dominates perception where there is high uncertainty,

1:07:20.960 --> 1:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>such as at night or when the other person is

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>wearing sunglasses. We presented participants with synthetic faces viewed under

1:07:28.360 --> 1:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>high and low levels of uncertainty, and manipulated the faces

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>by adding noise to the eyes. Then we asked the

1:07:35.480 --> 1:07:39.439
<v Speaker 1>participants to judge relative gaze directions. We found that all

1:07:39.600 --> 1:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>participants systematically perceived the noisy gaze as being directed more

1:07:44.280 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>toward them. This suggests that the adult nervous system internally

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>represents a prior for gaze and highlights the importance of

1:07:52.080 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>experience in developing our interpretation of another's gaze. So, if

1:07:56.200 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you imagine somebody who for some reason you can't see

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>where their eyes are going almost all of our brains

1:08:01.280 --> 1:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>are just gunning to say they're looking at me, They're

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>looking right at me. And then that's that's especially funny

1:08:07.640 --> 1:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>given the situations where someone might be wearing sunglasses and

1:08:10.760 --> 1:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking I have free license to just stare at this

1:08:13.560 --> 1:08:17.439
<v Speaker 1>person because they can't tell I'm doing it right, They're

1:08:17.439 --> 1:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>assuming you are. Yeah uh um. Now. One thing I

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:24.479
<v Speaker 1>love about this too is that this ties indirectly with

1:08:24.800 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>our episode from earlier in the year on the spotlight effect. Yes, yeah,

1:08:29.040 --> 1:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the now, the spotlight effect was more about um, the

1:08:32.680 --> 1:08:36.879
<v Speaker 1>perception of attention than like just how what is directly

1:08:36.960 --> 1:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>being done with the eyes? But but it's very close,

1:08:40.760 --> 1:08:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and it definitely dovetails with this finding because the spotlight

1:08:43.920 --> 1:08:47.519
<v Speaker 1>effect is the tendency to overestimate the degree to which

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>other people notice and remember things about you. Um. You know.

1:08:51.720 --> 1:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I I seem to recall in David Eagleman's book Live Wired.

1:08:56.200 --> 1:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he gets into the idea of of additional

1:08:59.160 --> 1:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>sensory input. It's being um, you know, installed um in

1:09:03.439 --> 1:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the body into the brain. Uh And and I think

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he even mentioned briefly in passing with the idea of

1:09:08.840 --> 1:09:10.479
<v Speaker 1>like what have you added a third eye that looked

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>behind you. Um, like what that would do? And like,

1:09:13.280 --> 1:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>basically the answer is that your brain would adjust and

1:09:15.720 --> 1:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>this would become your your new vision of the world,

1:09:18.680 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>your new way of of of anticipating and um and

1:09:22.240 --> 1:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and viewing the world around you. Because he's he's

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>very much emphasizing the potential of neuroplasticity, right, He's saying, like,

1:09:28.880 --> 1:09:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the brain is highly adaptable to new types of you know,

1:09:32.840 --> 1:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>new ways of incorporating stimuli and stuff like that. Yeah,

1:09:36.240 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you give the brain new information. Uh, even if it

1:09:39.120 --> 1:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is a new type of information, he argues, it's going

1:09:42.280 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to use it if it is useful

1:09:44.600 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to the brain. It's hard to even imagine what that

1:09:47.040 --> 1:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>would be like now though, because you can't. I mean, yeah,

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I cannot imagine what it would be like to have

1:09:54.600 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a three hundred and sixty degree view in vision. That

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't it doesn't make sense. I mean, it comes

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to the different sense worlds of animals.

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Really to a large degree, you know, we can't truly

1:10:04.720 --> 1:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine what it's like to smell as a dog, or

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear as a cat, or to even see as

1:10:11.160 --> 1:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>something like, Um, you know, like the mantis, shrimp, etcetera.

1:10:15.160 --> 1:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, we're gonna go ahead and call it

1:10:17.040 --> 1:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there for the episode. We hope you all enjoyed this one.

1:10:20.439 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I feel like this is definitely one that

1:10:22.120 --> 1:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>everyone can relate to. We've all had some of the

1:10:24.560 --> 1:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>feelings here that we've discussed and we would love to

1:10:27.800 --> 1:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>hear your insight regarding it. In the meantime, if you

1:10:31.479 --> 1:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>would like to listen to other episodes of Stuff to

1:10:33.600 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind, you can find us wherever you find

1:10:36.360 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>our podcast, wherever that happens to be. We just ask

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that you rate, review, and subscribe. We have a lot

1:10:41.920 --> 1:10:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of great Halloween content this month. We hope you're checking

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it out, and if you haven't, if you're not familiar

1:10:46.360 --> 1:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of what we do, uh, do go

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in and check out our October offerings because we think

1:10:51.000 --> 1:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of fun. Uh. You can always find

1:10:53.160 --> 1:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>us at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com that

1:10:54.400 --> 1:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>will shoot you over to the I heart page for

1:10:56.479 --> 1:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>our show. There's a store link there if you want

1:10:58.760 --> 1:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy a shirt with a monster on it. We

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>got a few of them huge thanks as always to

1:11:02.960 --> 1:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

1:11:06.200 --> 1:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us with feedback on

1:11:08.040 --> 1:11:10.639
<v Speaker 1>this episode or any other, to suggest topic for the future,

1:11:10.720 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hello, you can email us at

1:11:13.080 --> 1:11:23.479
<v Speaker 1>contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff

1:11:23.479 --> 1:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for My heart Radio, visit the i

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to

1:11:31.080 --> 1:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.