WEBVTT - Hour 1 – Chiefs Eyeing 3-Peat, Dan Orlovsky

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.559
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 2>It is our one on Wednesday. It's the day before

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the day the NFL season opens up, and we have

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>something special for you, well, something special for us. We

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>hope it translates to something special for you. It's something

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>called hot Dogs and hot Takes. Who has it better

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>than we do?

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 3>No, Boddy?

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Wait wait wait wait wait, that didn't come on. Let's go, Todd.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even hear you. No, no, no, no, you

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>have to do it again. Hey, it's our one on

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>this Wednesday, the day before the day, and we have

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>something for you.

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.919
<v Speaker 4>No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no no no.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Hot dogs and hot takes. Yeah, who is it better

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>than we do? There you go, one single person?

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, nobody.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Hot Dogs and hot takes today coming up next hour,

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>piping hot hot takes. This is the fourth annual. I

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>don't even know if it is the fourth annual. We

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>want to make it sound like we've been doing this

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 2>a long time. This is where you can win the

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 2>game and lose credibility all at the same time with

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 2>a hot take, a couple of hot takes, you know,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 2>for instance, last year, one seat O'Connor said Lamar Jackson

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>would be the MVP hot take. No, it was a

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>real take and spot on. I do like that. When

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Seaton says Lamar Jackson MVP last year, Todd goes, I

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 2>would have gotten murdered if I said that is my

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>hot take.

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>You would not. Why would you get.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Crushed that a guy had already won a unanimous MVP

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.279
<v Speaker 2>could possibly win another MVP.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 5>I just I felt at that moment that I would

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 5>have been You guys just would have went all over

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 5>me for that.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>See, to be fair, Todd had just given possibly only

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>one of his hot time takes, and we spent like.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Five minutes making fun of it. Okay, what was it?

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>And then I don't remember what it was. It was

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 2>something about the Broncos. I think Broncos are finishing nine

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>to seven and one or something like that. I would

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>have road divisional playoff game, and the hell, all right,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll bring back some of our hot takes from a

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 2>year ago. And these guys wanted to have a food accompaniment,

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>so we have hot dogs and hot takes. Let's go

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 2>combing up today. Yeah, we got some mustard, butter and syrup,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>but hot takes.

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna happen. No, there's no hotcakes.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 5>We haveing hot dogs and hot cakes, hot take takes.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 5>I thought we're telling yesterday we were gonna be able

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.399
<v Speaker 5>to do like pancakes and hot dogs because of hot

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 5>takes hotcakes.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Unless I misunderstood you did, and it's called not listening.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>It was hot dogs, hot takes. This is where you

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>get murdered for stupid things. Yes, okay, this is where

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>we pile on.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 5>I searched the impression that we were hot dogs and

0:02:58.600 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 5>pancakes together.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, you make the pancakes.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 5>You guys wouldn't survive that with if you had me

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 5>put the batter and everything in there.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>That's true. But that's why I would like for you

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>to just go out there and do you know, take

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the first hour off some time, an hour two to

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>do it.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wow, wow.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Dan Orlovsky from the Mothership will join us in about

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>fifteen minutes. Nobody's joining us an hour two on the program. Hey,

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe Dan Lebotard will join us again for that disaster

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>that happened yesterday.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Is that all about it?

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea, no idea. You were the one

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>corresponding with Dan Levatard.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Guest, you're talking to him for like three minutes, and

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 5>then I'd even paying attention to what we're talking about.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Coming soon. The Jalapanio Lime Moonshine. Early reviews mine say

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>this flavor is outstanding. We'll let you know when you

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>can order that. And once again, first come, first serve

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>with Jlapanio Moonshine. It was one of those where I

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>was like, hmm, I don't know, and then all of

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>a sudden I had to taste and I went, oh,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Stat of the Day.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Brought to you by Patani America, the official trading cards

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>of this program. First down, we're brought to you by

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the great folks that Express Employment Professionals. They provide the

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 2>workforce you need. With Express, you can lower labor cost,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>reduce turnover. Go to expresspros dot com to find the

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>location nearest to you. That's expresspros dot Com. Yes, Paul.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 6>Now, to win the Hot Take game, it's not necessarily.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 6>You could win it in two different ways. You could

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 6>win it day of and you can win it six

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 6>months later. Like see O'Connor saying that Lamar Jackson win

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 6>the MVP might not have been the hottest take of

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 6>the game last year, but it sure worked out for

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 6>him six months later.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So like I.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Didn't win the Hot Take game initially, I don't think

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.239
<v Speaker 2>he did. In the long run, he did win, right.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 6>Because his predictions, most of them came true. Now to

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 6>win the hot Take game, like last year, if you

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 6>would have said something wild, like you know what, I

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 6>think the Cleveland Browns are going to make the playoffs

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 6>and Joe Flacco is going to be the court back,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 6>that would win you the hot taking but no one

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 6>would say that in the right mind.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Or if I said somebody's gonna die, come back to life,

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.359
<v Speaker 2>die and come back to life, but not win the

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Comeback Player of the Year, you would have said that's crazy,

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Dan Wild.

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 3>But it did happen.

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Sedan, I was gonna give one of my hot

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>takes right now, but I shouldn't know. You gotta wait

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>till next hour. Next hour, we don't have any guests,

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>so we're gonna fill it up with let's just keep

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 2>bringing that hot dogs and hot takes, hotcakes. Yeah, I

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.679
<v Speaker 2>thought we were having hot hotcakes.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 5>I was all excited about hot dogs and pancakes. That's

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 5>so oddly wonderful.

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Eight seven seven three DP Show operator Tyler is sitting

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 2>by to take your phone calls. Got a name maple

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>syrup and butter for those hot cakes.

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 5>I know what you guys like, what are you talking about?

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Sitting but hot dog?

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Never once?

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 5>Why don't we do hot cakes?

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Which sometimes you hear what you want to hear, and

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 2>that's what happened.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 5>You have waffles. You're not gonna be pick XO waffles.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 5>You're not gonna let me have the hot dog at the.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Show's seven minutes in. Come on, we can do better

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>than this.

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can't be a good show.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 7>I know.

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Then all of a sudden, social media, why do you

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>guys always pick on Fritzy?

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because we have to, we need I do.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Tell them to write in on social media and flood

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 5>to Twitter about that.

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I know you're the one who did come up with

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>a suggestion box for this show. I did, and it

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>was an anonymous with handwriting. We all know you're creepy

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>handwriting and.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 5>My passive aggressive wording give it away as well.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll have a poll question seet and we'll

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 2>do the honors. Phone calls are always welcome. Email address

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 2>DPA Danpatrick dot com, Twitter handle at TP show it'll

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>be the Ravens and the Chiefs coming up tomorrow night.

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Ravens still getting three. This is where we overreact because

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>do you remember last year the Lions beat the Chiefs.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, here come the Lions. Uh, the Chiefs.

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>They're not going to repeat. Well, it's a long season.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>All you need to do is get into the postseason.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 2>We were correct about the Lions being real, and we

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>were correct about the Chiefs still being dangerous. They end

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>up winning. Now is it motivational? Is it pressure to

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>try to repeat? I think it might be motivation. I

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 2>don't find it pressure because nobody's done it before. And

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if people are still embracing the Chiefs

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and saying they are the team to beat because last

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 2>year we watched them get embarrassed by the Raiders late

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in the season and we thought, wow, they are not

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>going to repeat as champs. And then all of a sudden,

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>they did what they need to do.

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>It was Mahomesy and again to the rescue, Travis Kelce,

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah Pacheco and a great defense, and now we have

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>a team that could repeat.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 6>Here, yes, Pauli, I found some articles about the Chiefs

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 6>last year at the end of September, they opened with

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 6>the loss of the Lions, they just get by the

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 6>Jacksonville Jaguars, and then in Game four, with no Aaron Rodgers,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 6>they just squeak by the Jets. It was like the

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 6>sky was falling, you know. And mahomes numbers last year

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 6>were the worst of his His regular season numbers were

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 6>by far the worst of his career. But it's don't

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 6>you think they've entered the category of the Patriots ten

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 6>years ago that if they're in they're the favorites.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they'll find a way to win.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, but you know when you look at what

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes did now, I know he's on his own plateau,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>his own tier, but he didn't play great last year

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 2>until he really needed to play great. But this was

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, you had Rashid Rice, Isaiah Pacheco. It felt

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 2>like they had guys they were depending on that you

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't normally depend on. And Kelsey was wonderful when he

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>needed to be. But that was really a defensive effort

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>by Kansas City last year.

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>That was what was amazing.

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Like, we give Mahomes credit for winning back to back titles,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 2>but it's real It's almost like it was that defense

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and then Mahomes after that, not the other way around.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 2>And normally we lead with the quarterback. They said, yeah,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 2>he led them to a championship. He knows how to

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>close a game, and that, to me is invaluable. It's valuable.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>But trying to find that where you go that guy

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 2>knows how to close out a game. Brady knew how

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to close out a game. How many quarterbacks in history

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>know how to close out a game? And that's the difference.

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the difference between being great and an all time

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>great and the greatest of all time. Winning those games.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>You might not have great numbers, and Mahomes's numbers in

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl, you know, aren't mind boggling, but when

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 2>you need to have a play, it just feels like

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>game on the line. Every time Brady was playing in

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 2>a Super Bowl, got the ball and he had to

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 2>score a touchdown to win, I would just say he's

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>going to and I think the defense he but even

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>go back to when they face the Falcons, that was

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>a foregone conclusion. I mean it really was, where you

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>just going, He's gonna win the Super Bowl? Now you

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 2>know he got help White scored the touchdown, but still

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 2>you just said he's gonna win the game. Mahomes has

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 2>that feeling of he's gonna find a way. It's Marianna Rivera,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 2>It's it is Enter Sandman, and it's ballgame lights out.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, So we'll come up with the pole and

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>well seton what's pole question? We're looking at first hour

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>on the program, it's it's Hot Dogs and Hot Takes Wednesday.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 2>We can start semi negative number of coaches fired before

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the end of the season.

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Yah, let me wait on that.

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 2>One two or fewer three or more two or fewer

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:49.439
<v Speaker 2>two or fewer, fewer two or fewer Yeah, I mean,

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at coaches who have left a job prior

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 2>to the end of a season. Since twenty fourteen. There's

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of coaches, man, a lot of coaches I

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>don't even get to finish the job that you try

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>to start.

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 3>So we'll have that for you coming up as well.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>What else do we have?

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 2>It feels like most seasons there's two or three coaches

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>fired before the end of the season.

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, two or three, all right.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if the over under is one and a

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 2>half or would it be.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Two and a half.

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going two and a half.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Two and a half.

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Maybe DraftKings has that. I mean, I hate to skew

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 2>negative so early on the hot dogs and hot takes?

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, which is better? Hot dog job? Okay? All right,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 3>here we go. Would you rather have hot cakes today

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 3>or hot dogs today?

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I should have asked this. I did a preemptive strike.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I got a hold of Tyler last night. I said

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>we need hot dogs, and he goes, okay, And then

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I came in and then I realized someone thought we

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>were having hotcakes. Todd wants hotcakes. Seaton hot dogs are

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 2>hotcakes with hot takes. I'm turning into more of a

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 2>hot cake guy as I get older.

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 3>But at hot dogs, okay, Marvin, hot dogs.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 6>I think Paulie both rhyme like hotcakes and hot takes

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 6>would have also worked.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going to be grateful for the hot dogs. Okay,

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 3>thank you, Yes.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 5>And hotcakes over hot dogs that they were having them together.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 3>He wants both, which is great. No, that's that was

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 3>a misunderstanding.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>You had a misunderstanding because you thought I said hot cakes,

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 2>not hotcakes and hot dogs.

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 5>And I'm happy with the hot dogs over hotcakes. You're

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 5>just gonnain.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I don't believe you, but you know that's what

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 2>we're having hot dogs.

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yes, to give you example of a great hot

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 6>take last year, imagine last year in the hot take game,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 6>we would have said someone has said Patrick Mahomes will

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 6>not finish top five for at League MVP. That had

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 6>been a scalding hot take coming off the season he

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 6>had the year before. Yeah, he finished seventh for m

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 6>VP last year. Okay, that's that would have been the scalding

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 6>one last year.

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Overrated.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't let Nick write here that he'll be calling up

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 2>to defend his boy. My Super Bowl pick is tomorrow,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I know, and man, it could get out of hand.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>It could get squirrely Chargers again. No, no it I

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I think I can be talked out of it.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 6>Historically, you think of a pick, yeah, then think of

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 6>eight other picks and go back to your first pick.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, I wish I would have done that on

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the SAT. I would have done better, but it didn't

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 2>work out.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 3>No, it did not.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Damn did I outsmart myself. I got numbers in the

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 2>teens on my ACT and I I know, and then

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 2>my mom goes, you need to apply yourself. And I said,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>all right, the next time, I'm not going to sleep,

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll stay out all night and go in and just

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>take the test. And then I did better, and I said,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I applied myself. Mom the night before, just stayed out,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 2>had some beverages, went in and took it at eight

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 2>in the morning.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we'll come up with the poll question here. Wait,

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 3>did you come up with one seaton?

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm gonna go with that. Coaches one? Oh wait,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 2>we're skewing negative? Yeah, okay, how many? Way too much

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>positivity flying around right now.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so we'll pick the coach or coach it. No, oh,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 3>we have to. No, it's ugly, but you have to.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I got already got one written down. First coach I

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 2>think is getting fired.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 3>No offense? But is this you follfense?

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, that was no offense. No whoa?

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, okay, let's go.

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's rally. I don't know did well? All right, man,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if that was good. I have a

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>coach too, let's go.

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that first segment was good. But

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you know what, Dan is gonna join us. I'm gonna

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>make Orlovsky give us a couple of hot takes that

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit fun, you know what, Fritzy, maybe

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>frame it that way because I don't want ky go.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't want people to go, oh my gosh, you

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>picked the Falcons to win the Super Bowl.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 3>We want some fun takes out of if you.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 5>Were already communicator and he set that to me by text, Yes, sir,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 5>he's ready with fun takes.

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Alrighty, let's take a break here, just getting started. Morale

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>is high ish and uh. We'll talk to Dan Rolofsky

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>from the mothership right after this.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Catch all of our shows at Foxsports Radio

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com and within the iHeartRadio app. Search FSR to

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>listen live. He's Mike Karmen. I'm Dan Bayern.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 7>We have a fantasy football podcast called I Want Your Flex.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right Dan.

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 8>Every week we're gonna scour the waiver wire to find

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 8>the pickups to turbo boost your fantasy lineup, sit starts,

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 8>fantasy football players rankings to get you ready to dominate

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 8>the competition.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 7>Listen to I Want Your Flex with Mike Carmon and

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 7>me Dan Byer on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts and

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 7>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>We bring in Dan Rolofsky ESPN football Analysts part of

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 2>NFL Live and they're extending it to two hours on

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Mondays this football season. Dano with Mark Spears, Ryan Clark,

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Meta Kaimes, Laura Ruttledge will be there for the Jets

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and Niners on Monday in Santa Clara three Eastern on ESPN.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Great to have you back on. Are the Chiefs on

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 3>scholarship this year?

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 7>Meaning are we giving them a pass type of thing.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Even if they have a slow start. They lost to

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 2>the Lions last year opening night. You know, they could

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 2>have lost to the Jets. I mean they struggled a

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit there. Mahomes didn't play great during the regular season.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, so go back to last year. I don't

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 7>think the Lions winning down there was that surprising, you know,

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 7>just because the style of play. I do think the

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 7>people being out in that game, Chris and Travis had

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 7>their part. And then obviously the story of the season,

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 7>which was one that everyone teetered back and forth on

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 7>was it going to matter or not, was the drops

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 7>in the penalties, And that was really why Patrick didn't

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 7>play to Patrick's level and all that. So, you know,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 7>it's silly or it's odd to think that the team

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 7>that won the Super Bowl is a better football team

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 7>this year than they were last year. But I don't

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 7>think it's even close that they're a better football team

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 7>this year as long as Hollywood and Xavier Worthy or

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 7>healthy players, because just the addition of speed now they got.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 7>I was saying this yesterday. I mean, Patrick is by

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 7>far the best player in the NFL, right, most important

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 7>player in the NFL. He's got a rookie starting at

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 7>left tackle. I mean, you can make the case we

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 7>often have the conversation who's under the most pressure in

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 7>the NFL? That left tackle rookie from BYU Bob. You know,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 7>he's he's got a lot of pressure on him. So

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 7>you know, we got to see what that looks like.

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 7>But I do think if they play to you know,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 7>the way that the talent kind of aligns it, they'll

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 7>be a better football team. So the expectation, you know,

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 7>they're the team to be.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 2>But I wonder if it's pressure or motivation to try

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to repeat if I said pick one or the other

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>for the Chiefs, is there pressure to threepeat or is

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it motivation to three p I think it's.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 7>An obsession to three p You know, I don't you

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 7>know they are. Patrick has long been different when it

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 7>comes to the way he viewed his career. I think

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 7>that's why he took that long contract. The same with Travis,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 7>the same with Andy Reid. I think there's this obsession

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 7>to go do it because no one's done it. I

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 7>think for Patrick it he realizes that places me firmly

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 7>into the conversation with Tom Brady, like because I've done

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 7>something that he's never done. Obviously, Tom has the longevity

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 7>in the seven. So I think there's an obsession within

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 7>that group, within that organization to go get it done.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 7>I don't sense a ton of pressure. I think it's

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 7>more them wanting to go do something that's never done before.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>When do you make your Super Bowl pick?

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 7>I've made him already. I actually shared them to ESPN yesterday.

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, who wants to guess Orlovsky's Super Bowl picks?

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 5>Todd dani Alaski has the forty nine Ers beating the

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.360
<v Speaker 5>Chiefs and keeping them from the three people see.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 3>No Connor.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Eagles Chiefs Eagles Chiefs.

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Marvin Chiefs forty nine ers. Okay, guys are boring, Paulie.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 6>I think he's got Ravens Niners.

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Ravens Niners. I think he's got the Lions in there.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 7>Lions who Lions, Chiefs who went second?

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>It's Seaton.

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 7>I got Chiefs Detroit, I think, yeah, Chiefs Chiefs Detroit. No,

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 7>was that you, Dan, Chiefs Detroit? Yeah? I got Chiefs

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 7>Detroit in the Super Bowl. I think I got the

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 7>Chiefs winning, though. I took. My AFC championship game was

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 7>Kansas City Houston, and then my NFC championship was Detroit Philly,

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 7>I think, and I had Kansas City beating Detroit in

0:19:58.880 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 7>the Super Bowl.

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Give me this surprising team who doesn't make the playoffs.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Start with the NFCIX.

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 7>Surprising team he does not make the playoffs. I feel

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 7>like I've been adamant about this. The Dallas Cowboys, I

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 7>think is a injustifiably just because of all the different

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 7>pieces excuse me, that are part of their football team.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 7>You know, there is obviously the narrative, the pressure of

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, the contract situation with certainly Dak and Mike McCarthy,

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 7>but you know their offense is going to start two

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 7>rookies and all counts seem to be like they're gonna

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 7>be good players, but it's a different animal be and

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 7>those guys on a consistent week to week basis. Their

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 7>running back room is a lot left to be desired.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 7>Defensive tackles still a question. Inside linebackers still a question.

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 7>The Deron Bland injury is still a big deal because

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 7>he's gonna miss the first what four or five six games,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 7>So I think a lot of the defensive pieces are missing,

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 7>specifically Dan Quinn as well. I think Washington can finish

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 7>second in that division, so I would say the Dallas

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 7>Cowboys are on. I think the NFC nor is gonna

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 7>be the best division in football. So I don't think

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 7>Dallas and green or Detroit and Green Bay miss it.

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 7>But I think you could have a really good Minnesota

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 7>Vikings team. Not get in type of thing.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 3>What about AFC?

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the AFC, I think Kids City's in.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 3>You like Buffalo Dolphins, I.

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 7>Don't like the Dolphins to get in. No, as much

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 7>as I love their football team, the Dolphins are in

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 7>a tough spot because it's gonna take them a little

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 7>bit to start this season to get truly healthy We'll

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 7>see where Jalob's Phillips, Jalen Phillips is. Jub's got to

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 7>come back from the injury. Think a couple of pieces

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 7>on their offensive line. But then in the assumption game

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 7>where everyone or when everyone gets healthy. Their final eight

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 7>games are absolutely treacherous like they're and you could you

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 7>could be a good team and not win one. It's

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 7>it's that daunt think of a schedule. So it doesn't

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 7>set up well for them. So I could see Miami

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 7>missing out. I think Buffalo makes it just because how

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 7>Josh would be so great. But I've concerned with the

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 7>Milano injury. Baltimore. I think Baltimore is fantastic, obviously, but

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 7>Baltimore's got a lot of question marks. You know, you're

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 7>replacing fifty percent of the best inside linebacker duo and ball,

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 7>You're replacing three offensive lineman, you're replacing a defensive coordinator.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 7>They have my attention for sure.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Danilovsky, ESPN Football Analyst, NFL Live expanding to two hours

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, starting at three Eastern as they will be

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 2>on the road in Santa Clara.

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Jets and the forty nine.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Ers, you have, the Jets are always going to be

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting with Rogers being there. They have a lot of talent.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>They did win seven games and they had zero quarterback play.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, hard to.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It feels like you're trying to troll people if you

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>pick the Jets to be great this year, Like do

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you get that feeling? And it's a good roster And

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it really depends on I'm not comfortable with the coaching,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>but Rogers being healthy.

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 7>I would say this, Dan, I don't think it's trulling

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 7>because I would ask you, how are the Jets not

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 7>good this year? If you just took the roster, the

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 7>talent that they have, and we're honest about the talent,

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 7>because that league is about talent, how do they not

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 7>How are they not a good football team this year?

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 7>You would say, Number one, some of the key d

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 7>or pivotal pieces get hurt, you know, if Tyron Smith

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 7>doesn't hold up. But then I would say, well, fashion

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 7>who can maybe play there? Garrett Wilson gets hurt, God forbid?

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 7>Or you know, Aaron Rodgers gets hurt again, God forbid.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 7>So you sit there and go, well, it's health. But

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 7>then I could say that for everybody, and then well

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 7>the coaching, offensive coaching, we can make we could have

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 7>that conversation, but then you go, well, Aaron Rodgers, and

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 7>he's got to give you some confidence that that won't

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 7>be maybe as bad on the surface. So it's hard

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 7>for me outside of health to see how the Jets

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 7>aren't a good football team.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 2>And and also you go back to Buffalo, it feels

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I think Josh Allen's got second best MVP odds, and

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 2>it feels like he might get more credit the better

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 2>they are, because they may not be as loaded as now,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 2>they could be better. But I think with Dig's not there,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we might look at Buffalo as an underdog

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 2>instead of a favorite like we have in recent years.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, because you know, the favorite of recent years I

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 7>think was coming off of that AFC Championship game with

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 7>Patrick and whatnot. It's hard for me to see joshuin

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 7>MVP just because Josh, if you're not Patrick, you're everyone

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 7>thinks you so type of thing. So you know, people

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 7>are gonna find ways because Josh's style of play as well,

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 7>I do think that they will be a more consistent offense.

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 7>I do think that Josh is capable of becoming that

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 7>second version of Patrick where he plays a little bit

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 7>of that point guard mold. That's what's going to be necessary.

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 7>It really comes down to their defense, and I don't

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 7>want to minimize poy'er in Hyde were as good at

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 7>duo as the NFL, and Milano's is spectacular. So you're

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 7>talking about losing twenty five percent of your defense to

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 7>really high end players. So I think they're still the

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 7>favorite in that division. They are, but I want to

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 7>see how the defense looks more so than the offense.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 3>Could Josh Allen change his style?

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 7>No, and he doesn't have to. He doesn't have to,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 7>though he doesn't have to. And I have said this

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 7>since I think we had this conversation maybe about you

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 7>know what Cam Newton and Carson Wentz a little bit

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 7>just onto the football field. Josh has a certain skill,

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 7>a certain physical talent that if you don't play to

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 7>that way, you're making him a lesser player. Over the

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 7>course of time, you might have a game or two

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 7>stretch where you adjust it because that's what's necessary. But

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 7>over the course of time, you can't change that style

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 7>of play, nor do you want to. Because the highs

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 7>are as high as anybody, and there might be some

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 7>lows along the road that you sit there and go

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 7>God bless if this didn't happen. But you're not paying

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 7>him for that, you didn't draft him for that, and

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 7>you don't have a chance to win the Super Bowl

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 7>because of it.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 3>What's your policy on starting rookie quarterbacks?

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 7>The number one thing is are we capable of supporting

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 7>them so they can survive? Are we capable? I think

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 7>the rookies in the quarterback needs three things. They need

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 7>a really good scheme and play caller together. They need

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 7>a plus offensive line and plus skill group. I will

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 7>always go back to if we looked at the rookie

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 7>quarterbacks that have come in and played at a high level,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 7>I'll go to CJ. Stroud last year. Okay, did he

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 7>have a plus scheme? Yes, the Kyle Shannan scheme, Bobby Slowank.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 7>We didn't know if he was a good play caller.

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 7>Turns out he is. Did they have a plus offensive line? Yes,

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 7>Now that scheme helps that offensive line because of the

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 7>play action. And do they have plus skill group? Absolutely?

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 7>That's why part of the reason why CJ. If you

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 7>go to Dak Prescott in twenty sixteen had one of

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 7>the greatest offensive lines in the history of football. He

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 7>had Jason Whitten Hall of Famer, you had Dez Bryant.

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 7>Maybe in the conversation for Hall of Fame, he had

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 7>Ezekiel Elliott. So just remarkable support group, Ben Roethlisberger, Russe Wilson.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 7>So they all have those similar traits. So that's like

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 7>the surrounding parts. Those three things got to be in place. Second,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 7>he has to have something about his game that allows

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 7>him to survive early on and then thrive. It's either

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 7>unbelievable processing, it's remarkable athleticism, it's lights out ball placement. Like,

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 7>he's got to have something in his game. And I

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 7>think the third thing is he better be You better

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 7>be darn sure that he can handle the suck of it,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 7>the failure of it, because in college you're not often

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 7>going to walk into that building on a morning being

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 7>the reason you lost in the NFL. You will, and

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 7>you better be able to handle that mentally.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>All Right, it's time for hot dogs and hot takes.

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 2>You don't get the hot dogs, but it's time for

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>you to provide us with a couple of wild predictions

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this year. Okay, Now, now you don't have to believe

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 2>in it totally, but just okay, just something that.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 7>We can be convinced into it, all right, A little fun,

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 7>a little fun, all.

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 3>Right, So let's start in the NFC. Give me a

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 3>hot take.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 7>Washington wins the NFC East. Okay, I think Jaden Daniels

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 7>wins Rookie of the Year. Washington wins the NFC East.

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.479
<v Speaker 7>Philadelphia stumbles out of the gates and there's chaos in Philly,

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 7>so I will start with that one. The second one

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 7>is the NFC North gets three playoff teams in and

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 7>it's not Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, and Minnesota all make

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 7>the NFC playoffs, and Sam Donald becomes, oh my gosh,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 7>Sam Donald doesn't stay get football conversation narrative?

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Pretty fun.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 7>The Los Angeles Rams win the NFC West. That's not

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 7>that crazy, you know. San Francisco obviously the favorite. But

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 7>the Rams win the NFC West. So I think those

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 7>are probably but my my NFC ones.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, give me AFC down.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 7>Jacksonville wins the AFC South. You know, the whole conversation

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 7>this off seasons Houston, Houston, Houston, Houston, Houston, and Tennessee

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 7>gets Brian Callahan and Jacksonville hasn't been talked about a

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 7>lot and Trevior Lawrence is in the MVP conversation, so

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 7>finally takes that big giant leap. I have a fun

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 7>one for the AFC West, but it's a little bit

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 7>attached to college football as well AFC North. I'll sit

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 7>there and say, well, I.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Think that's it for the AFC that I have fun Wise, well,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>what's the AFC webs all Right?

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 7>This is just like a hypothetically fun one.

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I could see it sounds like a harball, Yeah.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 7>I could so. I think I was big proponent of

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 7>Antonio Pierce getting that job in Las Vegas, right, But

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 7>I don't. I don't think they're gonna be a great

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 7>football team, good defense, great football team. Hypothetically, they get

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 7>into the back end of September October ish, they're not playing. Well,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 7>there's the future, doesn't look promising. Trade Davante to the

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 7>New York Jets for a number one next year. They

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 7>become the number one pick in next year's NFL draft.

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 7>They pull a Houston Texans and they take at number

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 7>one Shador and then at number find a way to

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 7>use that second first round pick to get to number

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 7>two and take Travis Hunter, and both of them go

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 7>to Las Vegas.

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I'mbout a round of applause for dan Or last year

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 3>that time.

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, man, I want that one to hit. I want

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 7>that one to hit.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Damn.

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I like that one and it's on the record. Now,

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 2>it's not one of those. Hey you had a fun pick.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh you actually believe the Raiders and this guy and

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 2>this and this and this the dominoes that have to fall.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 7>Oh yeah, that's I'm sure I'm gonna get a couple

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 7>of social media ones off that. Now.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Once again, this is just a hot take. This is

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 2>having fun. Yeah, yes, don't want you to lose credibility, Dan,

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't want that. But if it hits it, yeah,

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>absolutely absolutely you can take a victory lap us Save Travels.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us as always, and we'll talk to

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you soon.

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 7>You guys are the best. Thanks Bud.

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 2>That's Dan Orlovski NFL Live. Two hours coming up on

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Monday this football season, Marcus Spears, Ryan Clark, Mena Kimes,

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Laura Rutledge. They will be in Santa Clara Jets and

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the Niners. That'll be Monday. They'll start at three Eastern

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>on the mother Ship. Take a break play the day.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after this.

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to catch the live edition of The Dan

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show weekdays at nine am Eastern six am Pacific

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.959
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 6>Wap Oh My God.

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 3>To Play of the.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Day, ter LIFs, I got it play.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 2>This is the play of the day.

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Check this out.

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Here's the pitch from Contreras.

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Lookie Swans, HiT's a dry d plot, Paul, This ball's back.

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>This's both gone home on Hooky Bets. Put a Mookie

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 4>on Anna him a three run the shot here. The

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Dodgers have opened it up in the tent.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 2>The Angels intentionally walked show hey Otani to get to

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Mookie Bets. First time the batter ahead of Bets was

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>intentionally walked since twenty sixteen. That's courtesy of AM five

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 2>seventy LA Sports Dodgers Radio Network. Mooki goes two for five,

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 2>drove in four of the Dodgers six runs. That's your

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>play of the day. Play of the Day brought to

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you by tire rack dot Com, the official tire expert

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 2>of the program. Go to tire rack dot com slash

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Dan try the tire decision Gun. See the full lineup

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of Hankook tires and special offers free road azard protection,

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 2>mobile tire installation, tire rac dot com, the way tire

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 2>buying should be. What show Heyo Tani forty four homers,

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 2>forty six stolen bases, gonna get to fifty stolen bases?

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 2>He stole third last night? Question is are they going

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>to pitch to him? Can he get to fifty home runs?

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I think Ronald Acunya Junior the third didn't he have

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 2>like seventy stolen bases and twenty home runs? Does that

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>sound about right with the most homers, most stolen bases, yes, Paulin.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 6>Ronald Lecunya in twenty twenty three had forty one homers.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Seventy three Oh god, he had that many home runs?

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, break down Wow, stell of the day, stant of

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 6>a day, stant of a day, stantata day.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.959
<v Speaker 3>This is the style of the day. Stat of the day.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Ron to you buy Panini America the official trading cards

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of the program. The Broncos cornerback Patrick Sirtan signed a

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>war year ninety six million dollar contract extension. That's getting paid.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 2>He's a really good player too. Dan Orloonski had some

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 2>picks here, he had some hot takes there. The Commanders

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 2>winning the East. I like the Commanders probably. Okay, there's

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of teams I might like more than I should.

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 2>Falcons Commanders in the NFC, I like them. I like

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville to win their division. There's there's just a couple

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of these teams where you go, I'm just not quite sure.

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 3>You have to prove it to me.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 2>The Raiders trade with Davante Adams to the Jets, and

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Shudor Sanders and Travis Hunter Colorado and what that is wild?

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 2>That's not one of those where you go, oh, let

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>me see, here's a hot take. It's here's something I've

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>been thinking of for quite some time that would be

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 2>wild and Davante to the Jets. So my Super Bowl

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.840
<v Speaker 2>pick tomorrow. Next hour, it's hot dogs and hot takes.

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll go around the room. We'll bring back some of

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 2>our hot takes from last year, including Seaton saying that

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson would be the MVP. I don't know if

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that's like crazy hot takes since he'd already won an MVP,

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 2>but it did work out. And I don't know if

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 2>you can be a unanimous pick as MVP and be

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>surprised that you're going to be an MVP again. But

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.879
<v Speaker 2>I didn't hear anybody else make that prediction last year

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 2>except for Seaton, so he gets to take the victory.

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Lamp. I think I hit.

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 2>I hit three out of four.

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't know if we're keeping score. Supposed to

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 3>be just fun, yeah, not for me, just fun.

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 7>Not for me.

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to provide entertainment. You're trying to win something.

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Correct, I'm trying to win the room.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm trying to win the audience with content.

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>At Desmond Ruder getting venched, called it.

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 6>Esman murder helped you out so much.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 3>He's out of the league.

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeh, benched and out of the league. Lions Texans

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 2>winning ten games, No big deal.

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty good.

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Called it now that one that's impressive. Called it that's

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that's impressive. I had the Broncos winning the AFC West.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 2>That's impressive. Yeah, nobody else had that one, including the Broncos.

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 2>Todd didn't even Todd had them.

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 3>What nine? I love the one and a road playoff loss.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 9>I love that.

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 3>I love that? All right, Andy and Florida, Andy, what's

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 3>on your mind today?

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 7>Hey?

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 9>DP five eleven one seventy five?

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 9>Anyway, So I got a way for you to do

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 9>hot dogs and hot cakes on the same day, because

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 9>so it sounds like a bad combination. But on the

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 9>first night of Konica, my mom always made us hot

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 9>dogs and potato pancakes. Okay, does that count as hot

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 9>dogs and hot takes?

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah, I guess, but that's not part of the

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 2>game that we're playing. But thank you Andy.

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Little Apple saw some sala cream on the side with

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 5>the potato pancakes.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Nicetas Yeah, yeah, okay said you're like one percent years

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>here you go. When I did my twenty three and me,

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I was from an area and that I guess would

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 2>be a Jewish area.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 3>It's a little blip on the swab on the stand,

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 3>so they gave me a one percent.

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 10>Uh.

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>There was also like one percent or two percent West Africa.

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how to explain that. But then the

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 2>other ones where you're just kind of looking through everything

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, oh, you're like a four percent Dutch

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 2>or something like crazy.

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Paul, we did h I know a few people

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 6>did twenty three and me and that my in laws actually,

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 6>who are all Polish and really embraced the Polish heritage

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 6>and lifestyle. One of the brothers did at twenty three

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 6>and me and found out they were nine percent Polish

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 6>and like eighty percent Lithuanian. That was a total curveball

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 6>in their lifestyle.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, you have that credit card commercial whether their father

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 2>and son are going to a country and they find

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 2>out that they're not from that country.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 3>I think overseas something like.

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 6>Switch mid stride. If you lived your whole life embracing

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 6>a certain culture and then you found out, hey, guess

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 6>what we're actually from blank.

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that I would probably just stay.

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 2>You know what, I what I've been telling everybody, as

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 2>opposed to, hey I got a secret here.

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well that you know.

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 2>The flip side of that was my twenty three A

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 2>meter where they basically confirmed I was like ninety eight

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 2>point nine percent Irish. They're like, that's it. That's pretty

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 2>much all you got. There wasn't anything else even remotely

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 2>interesting other than you're just pretty much straight up Irish.

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 2>That's not as far back as you go. It'd be

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 2>great if it came back you're one hundred and four

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 2>percent Irish. Think you can not be anymore from this

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>area of the world. That's where you come from.

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Bryant in Virginia, Hi Bryant, what's on your mind?

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 10>KDP. Nice to be back on. Just a quick question

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:08.720
<v Speaker 10>talking about Mahomes. Obviously, he's been pretty dominant out.

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 7>Of the gate.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 9>If he won this year, do you feel like he

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 9>would be in that.

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 10>Tiger Wood's dominance stays basically where maybe he's not the

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 10>greatest of all times, but has the most dominant run.

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, yes.

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Now you can look at the window where the Steelers

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 2>won with Terry Bradshaw, the Niners won with Joe Montana,

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 2>where you're winning four super bowls. Mahomes doing this before

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 2>he's what twenty eight, that would probably be the greatest

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 2>run that we've seen in modern football history for a quarterback.

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes in four super bowls in quarters one through three.

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Is okay, two touchdowns, three interceptions, seventy four point two

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 2>passer rating, but four order and overtime complete almost sixty

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>seven percent of his passes five touchdowns, two interceptions, passer

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 2>rating is a little over one hundred. He's a closer

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 2>and I think sometimes you think, boy, he had an

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 2>unbelievable super Bowl, but he has it. He's had unbelievable

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 2>or really clutch fourth quarters in overtime performances, and that's

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 2>why he's won three Super Bowls. All right, Seaton, We're

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 2>going to answer the pole question next hour because we

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 2>have to ask the question and then answer it ourselves.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Of quarter which coaches get fired during the season?

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 5>I think?

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 7>So?

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yes? Is that how we're phrasing this?

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, right now we have a number of coaches fired

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 2>before the end of the season. But we'll start naming names,

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 2>oh my goodness, and then it's time to play hot

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 2>dogs and hot takes that'll be coming up.