WEBVTT - China Considers Musk as TikTok Lifeline

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York. I'm Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm Mike Shepard and Washington in for Ed Ludlow. This

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Coming up.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Could elon Musk be TikTok Savior? China is analyzing the

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 4>option to save the social media company in the United

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>States and work with the next administration. Plus Nvidia CEO

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Johnson Wang goes to China this week as the company

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 4>is slapped with curbs on the sale of its AI

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 4>chips abroad and off to the space race with a

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 4>space infrastructure startup, Lost Orbital out with new funding news

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 4>to operate its satellites in Low Earth orbit. But first

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 4>we check in on these markets which have been moved

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 4>around from a volatile perspective. On the positive side, inflationary headwinds,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 4>cooling if you look at some of the wholesale prices,

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 4>does that bode well for CPI tomorrow?

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>But then we have the ongoing.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Narrative of how we impost harriffs on other countries, in

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 4>particular on China in the next administration. We're currently trading

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 4>flat as we have scoop after scoop coming from our

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Washington based colleagues. Bitcoin, though managed to fend off some

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 4>of that risk sentiment. We're currently trading two point two

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 4>percent higher, perhaps more looking towards where we could see

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Trump and the next administration.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 2>I in Crypto move on to have a look at.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 4>What's happening in terms of the individual movers, and I

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>go to a key story of the day, were of

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>course going to be analyzing if Elon Musk could indeed

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 4>take over the US operations. TikTok It is being eyed

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 4>by Chinese officials, but it has its impact on Meta,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 4>which also has been falling lower. I might add because

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 4>if there's some concerns surrounding the fact that well, they're

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 4>going to be offloading some of their lowest performers at

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 4>a faster rate. We'll get to that in a moment.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 4>Snap currently off by six percent. If indeed TikTok us

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 4>could be staying for longer here in the United States, if,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 4>of course, by January the nineteenth, it's deemed that it

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 4>has to be banned or divested. Could that divestment come

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 4>to one Elon Musk riding to the rescue.

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to all of this a Bloomberg Sarah Fryer.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>And Sarah, Where has this narrative come from? That Chinese

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 4>officials not bite Dance, but Chinese officials might think that

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk could be a good owner of this key

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 4>social media company.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, from what our starts tell us, they have been

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 5>evaluating the potential options for TikTok. Should the band go through,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 5>which it looks like, you know, based on the Supreme

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Court arguments and how that went, then it's very likely

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 5>that that well, we will see the law being acted.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk appealed to the Chinese government because he has

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 5>experience dealing with businesses in China through Tesla. He has

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 5>a you know, longstanding relationship with that country. The thing

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 5>I want to I want to give pause here on

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 5>is I mean, this is the Chinese government's idea. The

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 5>whole point of this entire exercise of you know, trying

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 5>to disentangle TikTok from its ownership was to reduce the

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 5>links to China. So it would they really go would

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 5>the US government really go with the solution that involves

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>somebody that is expected to be friendly with China. Well,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 5>maybe it won't matter because of Elon Musk's close ties

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 5>to Donald Trump, which is Chinese. Chinese government is also

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 5>seeing as a positive according to our sources. You know,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 5>he he has been at Trump's side day in and

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 5>day out. He gave more than two hundred and fifty

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 5>million in support of his campaign. So it's this really

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 5>complicated web of you know, we're trying to get the

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 5>US is trying to get this app out of connection

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 5>to the Chinese government, and the Chinese government has a

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 5>say and how that happens because of the TikTok algorithm.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 5>So it's getting very complicated, very fast.

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Sarah.

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Back to Elon Musk, but more from the perspective of

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>him as a social media platform owner already. How would

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>acquiring TikTok work for him? Is this something he has

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 3>floated before or thought about before?

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 6>And how would he come up with the financing too?

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 3>It would be a pretty expensive purchase, Well, it would be.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 5>It would be relatively insane to do this. I mean,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 5>he just bought TikTok. Sorry, excuse me, he just bought

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Twitter from forty four billion in twenty twenty two, and

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 5>he's still paying off those loans, so he's not very liquily.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 5>He's the richest man in the world, but his money

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 5>is not very accessible to him. If you were to

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 5>buy TikTok or propose such a thing, it would certainly

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 5>cost many billions. We don't We don't know exactly how much,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 5>but some estimates put it around forty to fifty billion

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 5>for TikTok Us. It could it could be a different

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 5>price depending on the diplomatic interest and not kind of

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 5>a deal. We don't know yet if TikTok if it

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 5>would be sold, which you know nobody's talking about just

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 5>yet in the company. If it would be sold, then

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't happen in a competitive process or would it be

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 5>more of a diplomatic arrangement between China and the US

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 5>and the company and whoever wants to buy it. So

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 5>some people are are already working on it. I know

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 5>Franklincort was on your show last week kept with Kevin O'Leary.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 5>They have a bid, so it is. It is something

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 5>that could be an Elon Musk financing situation, but it

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 5>could also not even get to that point.

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Briefly, Sarah, the are any of all of this? Some

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 4>other Chinese owned social media companies are doing really rather well.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 4>People are moving off from TikTok potentially to find new homes.

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 4>And you go to Apple's app store, what's trending?

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 5>The top apps are from China. And I think that

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 5>this is this is just indicating that the US consumer

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 5>is already embracing multiple Chinese apps. There's She, and there's Timu,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 5>There's there's a lot of you know, nascent social apps

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 5>that are that are booming right now. And so I

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 5>think that this is this is going to be a

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 5>whack a mole problem. One of the solutions to the

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 5>TikTok potential band could be that they just rename a.

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 6>New one Bloomberg. Sarah Frear, Thank you.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Now let's bring in Sarah Krepps into the conversation. She

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is the director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 3>University in Ithaca, New York. Sarah, this question of TikTok

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>is coming to a head now. Any buyer would have

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>to really demonstrate a complete separation from China.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 6>How would they go about doing that?

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 3>What would be the process once this sale were to

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 3>actually emerge if by Dance in China agreed.

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's such an interesting question, And it came

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 7>up in the Supreme Court hearing last week, and the

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 7>TikTok lawyer said he did not even think it was

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 7>possible to divest or separate TikTok from the owner Byte Dance.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 7>He said it could take years if it's even possible.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 7>So at the same time, the US Solicitor General and

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 7>those same hearings, said that she.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 8>Thought that maybe the Chinese government was playing this game.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 7>Of chicken and might at the last minute float some

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 7>sort of alternative. But you know, the TikTok lawyer, I

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 7>think sort of shot themselves a little bit in the

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 7>foot in the sense that he said, this is really complicated,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 7>and as your last guest was just saying, essentially, the

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 7>US TikTok is Byte Dance, and the Chinese government now

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 7>stepping in at this stage is confirming what the Congress

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 7>members of Congress thought a year ago and years ago,

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 7>which is that there is this Chinese government control over

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 7>a US social media company. It's hard to see how

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 7>you can do that, certainly not by the nineteenth And

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 7>as the TikTok lawyer said, if.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>At all, Sara, how would this fit into the broader

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>exchange and relationship between Washington and Beijing over matters including

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 3>trade and other technology related security issues. Is this something

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 3>that China could offer perhaps as a bargaining chip as

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump takes office.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's pretty savvy in two ways.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 7>One is that they're very mindful of the influence that

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk has as an advisor in the incoming administration,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 7>but also that the incoming administration really seems to want

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 7>to be making some like opening a door for better

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 7>relations with China.

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 8>Both of these countries.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 7>In the last several years, including in the first term

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 7>of the administrative Chump administration, technology really was at the

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 7>center of this rivalry, and so they've gone back and forth.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 8>And TikTok is emblematic of this rivalry.

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 7>But we see this in the chips space, in particular

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 7>in the chip space and AI.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 8>Just yesterday that the Administrator of the.

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 7>White House in the Biden administration, in its last days,

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.599
<v Speaker 7>issued a new policy and AI diffusion policy trying to

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 7>make it more difficult for.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 8>China to access US made chips.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I want to reiterate to our audience that, of course

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 4>no comments have been made by thus far the Chinese officials.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 4>We know that you know, Musk hasn't responded to this report,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 4>and indeed Bite Dots itself has called it fiction. But

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 4>I am interested, Sarah, to push us forward. What the

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 4>outcome seems to be of a potential TikTok ban has

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 4>been a movement onto other Chinese owned social media companies.

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 2>How big a national security issue is that?

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 8>Then well, it's interesting to me.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 7>Either they don't understand the law or they are banking

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 7>on the fact that it will be just too difficult

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 7>to enforce, because last week on TikTok they were trying

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 7>to push people to Lemonade, which is also Bite Dance owned.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 8>Now they're trying to push people to Red Note, also.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 7>Chinese owned, and so all of those social media platforms

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 7>would be covered under the law. There must just be

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 7>an assumption that enforcement of this will just be a

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 7>cat and mouse game, and maybe the incoming Trump administration,

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 7>who again seems warm to the idea of or has

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 7>looked and indicated that they don't support the ban, might

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 7>just turn a blind eye to these kind of complicated

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 7>ownership structures.

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 8>Or what's Red Note or what's Lemonade.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 7>Oh, that's Chinese owned and just kind of stain enough

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 7>behind it that something gets to perpetuate it.

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 8>But at the same.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 7>Time, what I think the members of the National Security

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 7>risk here was that you had one hundred and seventy

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 7>million Americans in one space and actually to the extent

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 7>that they migrate elsewhere, that's actually.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 4>A win interesting new Shaoholmshoe or red note, as it's

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 4>new known, it seems to be oldganic movement actually going

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 4>over to that particular app it's not related to Bite Darts.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>But as you note, Lemonate certainly.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Is so push us forward as to you said, how

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 4>difficult it is to disentangle us TikTok from ultimately the

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 4>rest of the parent company. China has some sort of

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 4>authority here, even though of course there's not much direct

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 4>ownership of a Bite Darts, but because they can control

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 4>who gets to have access to algorithms sold by Chinese companies.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you think in any way the Chinese would ever

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 4>want its algorithm held by US company, whether it's Elon

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 4>muscowned or otherwise.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 7>No, I just don't see that scenario because it's too

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 7>lucrative that essentially TikTok is this very sophisticated and very

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 7>effective algorithm, and this is highly valuable to byte Dance,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 7>and there's no incentive for them other than to keep

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 7>operating in the US, but to share any of that.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 7>And so I don't again, Lawyer himself said last week,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 7>I don't see how you can actually disentangle these because

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 7>then TikTok without that ad or algorithm, just becomes any

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 7>other social media platform.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Creps, it's great to have your expertise, Director of

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 4>Cornell University Tech Policy Institute.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 4>Let's just relook at meta shares for a moment. As

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 4>I mentioned at the top, the company is planning to

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 4>cut about five percent of its lowest performers. This is

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 4>all according to an internal memo sent to employees now.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 4>The memo reads, I've decided to raise the bar on

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 4>performance management and move out low performers faster, and of

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 4>course coming from CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the memo also mentioned intentions.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 2>To backfill these roles.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 4>This year, all of course with an eye on where

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 4>the focus is around AI for the company in the future.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 3>The Biden administration is rolling out measures to boost car

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing and AI development in the US, even as it

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 3>looks to sharpened curbs on Chinese technology and free tea

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>up potential restrictions for Donald Trump to enact. Let's bring

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 3>in Bloomberg's Mackenzie Hawkins for more. Mackenzie, You've done so

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 3>much reporting over the past year on this wave of

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 3>restrictions on everything from semiconductors to AI technology.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 6>This is the final shot from the Biden team looking ahead.

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Do we see the incoming Trump administration holding on to

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 3>some of those curbs.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 9>So this week we've seen almost a new regulation or

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 9>two every day targeting China's tech industry and trying to

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 9>boost Americas and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said yesterday

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 9>that he does anticipate that Trump will maintain a lot

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 9>of the China contours that Biden is setting up in

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 9>his eleventh hour of his administration. But Trump is a

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 9>wildcard on China and many other things, So it remains

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 9>to be seen over the coming months what policies of

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 9>Biden's he will keep intact and which ones he'll do

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 9>away with.

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Just remind us how expansive these new rules are, what

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 4>indeed it includes, because it's not just AI chips.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 9>So the restrictions announced today are actually targeting Chinese automotive technology.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 9>We have restrictions on the import of cars that contain

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 9>certain software and hardware from China, and it's specifically Internet

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 9>connected cars, but that's pretty much every car.

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 2>You can almost think of.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 9>A car as the BIDE administration does, like a smartphone

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 9>on wheels, and the goal is to prevent China from

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 9>gaining access to Americans' personal data as they travel along

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 9>American roads. But this is also a preemptive measure because

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 9>there aren't actually that many Chinese cars in the US

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 9>thanks to tariffs of over one hundred percent on Chinese evs.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 6>Mackenzie.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Looking more broadly, some of these restrictions, including the ones

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>in particular unveiled yesterday on AI technology, have started to

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 3>hit a nerve. We heard video really objecting pretty loudly.

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Do we expect some of those objections to now really

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 3>take hold and have some influence.

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 9>So what we saw yesterday was the administration expanding what

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 9>has now been several years of curbs on the export

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 9>of AI chips to China and a bunch of other

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 9>nations to the entire world, with caps for specific countries

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 9>and caps for the maximumount that can go to any

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 9>one company. This set off a massive opposition in the

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 9>tech industry, led by Nvidia. His chips are going to

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 9>be the most affected, and absolutely they've been lobbying really hard.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 9>They're hoping that they can get a better ear than

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 9>they feel like they've gotten the Biden administration when Trump

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 9>takes office. We saw them put out a pretty heavily

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 9>worded statement to kind of nodding toward the Trump administration

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 9>having a less aggressive regulatory approach. And even in Vidia

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 9>CEO Jensen Wong said before the curves were officially announced

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 9>yesterday that he is sure that Trump will do the

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 9>right thing. So we'll see what happens.

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Putting Megs Mackenzie Holkins, thanks so much for tracking it,

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>and let's hone in a little bit more on Nvidia

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 4>and Jensen wom because while Washington is slapping on these

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 4>new curves at a time when Beijing is investigating the

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 4>company's own domestic presence, well, Jensen is embarking on a

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 4>trip to China and it's this week let's discussed being Megs.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Peter Elstrom to more on this, pieta interesting timing Jensen

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Wang visiting the key capitals.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 10>Very sensitive timing. We know that Jensen Wang is going

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 10>to be in Taiwan this week. He's going to tend

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 10>to party there on Friday of this week, but after

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 10>that we've heard, according to sources, that he's going to

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 10>go over to mainland China. As you mentioned, he's going

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 10>to stop into Shenzen for New Year's party we understand,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 10>to celebrate with some of the employees there, and then

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 10>his plans are to go to Shanghai and Beijing after that.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 10>He could still change these plans, as you pointed out

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 10>how this is very sensitive time. It also comes just

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 10>ahead of Trump's inauguration. There's some expectation that maybe he

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 10>would go to that too, But he is building a

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 10>more substantial business within China at this point.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 11>They've been adding.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 10>Employees there, especially around autonomous vehicle. So the company had

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 10>a bit of a setback, as McKenzie was laying out earlier,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 10>with these new regulations around AI exports that affects in

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 10>Vidia very very directly. They've been outspoken about wanting to

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 10>oppose those curbs, but Jensen Wang is still trying to

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 10>build a bridge between some of these different markets that

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 10>are so important for his company, Peter.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>One destination that doesn't seem to be on Jensen Wang's

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>list right now, is Washington or mar A Lago the

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 3>incoming president's base of operations. Do we expect him to

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>actually pay a visit, pay a call to Donald Trump?

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So many other big tech CEOs have done so already.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 10>So far, I would say, so far, we don't know

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 10>anything about his plans to attend either mar A Lago

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 10>or the inauguration. As you mentioned, I would, I would,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 10>I would stick a pin in that and see exactly

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 10>what happens. At this point, It'd be very surprising if

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 10>he does not try to build that bridge to the

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 10>Trump administration, as you say, So many of the tech

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 10>companies have done this. Of course Elon Musk has sort

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 10>of led the way, but many, many others, including Mark Zuckerberg,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 10>have also been trying to build a closer relationship with

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 10>the Trump administration as they come to power and they're

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.479
<v Speaker 10>going to begin and implementing these policies that are so

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 10>important to the companies. And there are very few companypanies

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 10>that have more at steak than in Nvidia and by extension,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 10>Jensen Wang. So I'd be surprised if they don't meet sometime.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Soon, And indeed he spoke with our own ed Ludlow

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 4>last week saying if he's invited, he'd love to go.

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 4>But Peter, how precedented or unprecedented is it for a

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 4>CEO such as Jensen to be going out to China when,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 4>of course he is upping his spending on AVS and

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 4>R and D do. Lots of other companies when facing

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 4>this sort of anti trust issue and indeed political overhang,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 4>tend to make visits.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 10>We see a lot of these companies. Remember it was

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 10>not that long ago that globalization was the standard of

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 10>business every place in the world. You saw many of

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 10>these business leaders going to China and other parts of

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 10>the world to build whatever kinds of global operations that

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 10>they possibly could. I would say Tim Cook at Apple

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 10>is another one who very regularly visits China. They have

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 10>a huge operation there. Of course, their partner Fox Kahn

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 10>builds most of the iPhones that we use around the

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 10>world in China. Right now they're trying to do more

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 10>of them in India too. But you see Tim Cook,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 10>Jensen Wang, many other business leaders are going to China

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 10>because it's important either for their manufacturing operations, their research

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 10>and development, or in some cases, the marketing of their businesses.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg's Peter Elstrom, thank you.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, data Bricks gets over five billion dollars in

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 3>financing from lenders. We'll have all the details next. This

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg software maker. Data Bricks has clinched more than

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollars of financing from lenders including Blackstone.

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 6>Apollo, and Blue Owl Capital.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 3>According to sources, this would be its largest debt RAYS

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>to date. Let's bring in Brody Ford for more. Brody,

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 3>what does all this money from this big rays mean

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 3>for the company and how does it help in this competition?

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 3>They are going toe to toe with Snowflake. We just

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 3>had the Snowflake CEO on yesterday. The two companies have

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>really locked horns in this space they're in.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely.

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 12>We've been seeing a lot of headlines with data bricks

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 12>and billion numbers, a lot of big numbers, big headlines.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 12>You might say, what's going on here? The answer is

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 12>that in a different reality, if we were in twenty

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 12>nineteen twenty twenty, data bricks would have been public already.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 12>But there's a trend right now where these big startups

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 12>data bricks canva figma. They're pushing the label a startup

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 12>a little bit by staying private quite long because they're

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 12>able to access these huge pools of funding from private institutions,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 12>and so Data Bricks often talks about the virtues of

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.239
<v Speaker 12>remaining private a little longer, right, they're able to do

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 12>things like make big acquisitions or higher aggressively.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>They say that a.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 12>Lot of these AI startups their monetization didn't work out,

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 12>and so they're going to try to either bring in

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 12>the right people or bring in their technology. This allows

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 12>Data Bricks to one offset some of the tax burden

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 12>from employees selling their shares, and two just continue to

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 12>invest in the business in a pretty aggressive way.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's what's so interesting.

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 4>That they're alleviating the tax burden for employees this liquidity

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 4>moment they can satiate with the secondary market.

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 2>They don't need IPO effectively.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 12>Their funder raise last month was IPO size. They raised

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 12>ten billion dollars, you know, right, And the fact that

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 12>they then have to raise five billion in debt to

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 12>help their employees offset tax burden shows you just kind

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 12>of the garganguin scale of data breaks at.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 2>This point extraordinary amounts.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 4>That's still a lot of new AI products and acquisitions

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 4>to be making all things data breaks and bready forward.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we're going to be speaking with d Wave

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 4>CEO Alan Barrats as quantum computing stocks face yet another

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 4>week of volatility.

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Are plenty more around.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 4>The company that has risen some four hundred percent since

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 4>October when everyone got very exuberant about one Willow chip

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 4>coming out of Google and the movement of quantum. This

0:21:53.280 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 4>is really met technology. Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology.

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 6>And I'm Mike Shepard in Washington.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 4>It's quick check on these markets, Mike, because look, we've

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 4>got macro at play in many ways and some cooling

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 4>of inflationary pressures.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting the Bitcoin remains on the higher siders.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Resentiments still a little jumpy at some of the tariff headlines.

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 4>We're at one point eight percent higher for bitcoin. Move

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 4>on and have a look at some stocks you've got

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>have been keeping an eye on throughout twenty twenty four

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 4>and now back in twenty twenty five.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>It has been a volatile path.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 4>For some of the most highly known but still relatively

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>small quantum stocks. Dewave Quantum Raghetti quantum Computing. We shine

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 4>a light on some of the moves today because we've

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 4>got b Riley analyst Craig Ellis really once again affirming

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 4>a positive view on the sector, the longtime potential, the

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 4>recent developments offering some encouraging technical advances. He says, of course,

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 4>this comes on the back of some rather cooling words

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 4>that came from in Nvidio's CEO last week. Remember Jensen

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Wang saying, maybe it's going to be twenty years until

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 4>you get very useful quantum computing. What's the take from

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 4>the C suite? Alan Barats is with us Twave CEO. Wow,

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 4>what a ride your stock has been on. But what

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 4>a company you've been slowly building here and I want to.

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Get your first take. Twenty years sound right?

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 11>No, right, not rate at all.

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 13>So there are many different approaches to building quantum computers,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 13>some of them will take many years to mature. But

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 13>at d Wave we selected an approach that is actually

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 13>commercial today. And this is a really important point. We

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 13>have customers that are using our systems today in support

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 13>of their business operations. So not twenty years but today.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Alan, can you talk a little bit more about those

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 3>products and how customers are already putting it to commercial use.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 13>Sure, So the approach that we've taken to quantum computing

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 13>is called annealing, and it's quite different from what everybody

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 13>else in the industry does. We've been working on this

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 13>for fifteen years. We're on our fifth generation system. So

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:01.479
<v Speaker 13>we have companies like NTT DoCoMo that is using our

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 13>quantum computers to optimize resources at cell towers, allowing them

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 13>to support up to fifteen percent more phones per tower.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 13>We've got other companies like Pattison Food Group. We've got

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 13>companies that are getting near commercialization, companies like Inner Public Group,

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 13>or companies like MasterCard.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 3>Alan to follow up on the development and this timeline

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 3>that is much in debate.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 3>There is another question hanging over quantum computing, and that

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 3>is the degree of government support that the industry might

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>need and might be seeing what more can Washington do

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 3>to help support development in this area.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 13>So government support is certainly important, although I will say

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 13>that at d Wave we've built our business primarily on

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 13>commercial customers. We have over seventy commercial customers.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 11>But government support.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 13>Is important, and we've actually got an issue right now.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 13>The National Initiative, which is the premier US government funding

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 13>mechanism for quantum, was passed during Trump's first administration. It

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 13>was due to be reauthorized almost a year and a

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 13>half ago, and under Biden it still has not been reauthorized.

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 11>So we're hopeful that with Trump.

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 13>Coming back in that will be reauthorized to provide incremental

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 13>funding to the quantum industry.

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>There have been incremental and significant breakthroughs of late.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 2>They're in quantum.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 4>The reason your shares have been up and to the

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 4>right significantly since October November December has been the announcements,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 4>for example on the Willow chip coming from Google. How

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 4>seismic was that, because as you articulately to the top,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 4>there's lots of different ways doing quantum here.

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So one of the main issues that must get

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 13>addressed for what's called gate model quantum computing, which is

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 13>the approach that pretty much everybody in the industry is taken.

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 11>Other than d wave.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 13>We do both a kneeling and gate but error correction

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 13>is critical to gate model systems.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 11>In fact, there's no evidence at all.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 13>That would out error you'll ever be able to do

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 13>anything useful with a quantum computer. Well, the Willow announcement

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 13>basically for the first time showed how error correction could

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 13>work on a quantum computer at an interesting scale.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 11>So this was a very important advancement.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Why then, and I'm just going to play hypotheticals with you,

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Why then do you think in video, which actually partners

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 4>with Google Quantum's team, is casting some sort of shade

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 4>on how quickly this could be useful?

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 13>Ye, because I think that when you're talking about gate

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 13>model quantum computers, we are many years away.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>How many from your perspective.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 13>It could be seven, ten, fifteen, We are many years away.

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 13>But what Jensen got wrong was that he didn't recognize

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 13>the fact that there's more than one approach to quantum

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 13>and so I'm guessing he has in his head only

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 13>gate model, which has some very significant challenges still to

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 13>be overcome, versus an kneeling which is quantum computing that's

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 13>in use today.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Alan, What are some of the limitations that are currently

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 3>posing a challenge or even an obstacle to further development

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 3>of the kind that you just talked about.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 13>So when it comes to a kneeling quantum computing, which

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 13>is the systems that we have in the market today,

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 13>we are already capable of supporting business applications at commercial scale,

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 13>but we are continuing to work on growing the size

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 13>of our quantum computers to solve even larger problems and

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 13>being able to solve them even faster. Although we can

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 13>solve things pretty fast to day. I mean we've been

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 13>able to solve problems in the air material simulation in

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 13>minutes that would take well over a million years to

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 13>solve on classical computers. So we're pretty good today. But

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 13>there's a need for increasing size and speed even in

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.479
<v Speaker 13>quantum computers, and we continue to work on that.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is you got swept up. Your share price

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 4>got swept up in exuberance when perhaps there were breakthrough

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 4>is being made in a.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Different type of quantum computing.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 4>We've got plenty of other players all seeing retail investors

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 4>jump in new exuberance around the next field of innovation.

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 2>How has your share holder base changed.

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 4>You're offering potentially up to one hundred and fifty million

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 4>dollars in new shares.

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 2>You're making the most of it.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So, first of all, I would say that the

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 13>Willow announcement is applicable to Gate model, and we are

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 13>building a Gate model system as well, in addition to

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 13>our annealing system, so that is.

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 11>Applicable to work that we are doing.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 13>It's just that with our annealing computers, that's not required

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 13>today and we are commercial today. As far as financing

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 13>the company, we recently announced that we now have over

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 13>one hundred and seventy million dollars in the bank, so

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 13>we've got the cash we need to execute.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 11>We will always be.

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 13>Looking for opportunities to increase that if we can do

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 13>it with limited delution.

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 11>We are very sensitive to delution in the stock.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 6>D Wave CEO, we thank you.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we'll be joined by loft Orbital Chief operating

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Officer Alex Greenberg to discuss the space infrastructure startup's latest

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 3>funding round.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg.

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Loft Orbital has announced one hundred and seventy million dollars

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 3>in new funding. The space infrastructure startup helps customers deploy

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 3>and operate satellites in low Earth orbit. For more on this,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>we're joined by the company COO Alex Greenberg. Alex, thank

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you so much for joining us. First, we want to

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 3>ask you, how do you plan to deploy this latest

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 3>injection of capital, Where's it going to go and how

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 3>will it help you.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So first off, thanks so much for having me.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 14>Really appreciate it and excited for the opportunity to chat

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 14>with you. So following this round, we're really going to

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 14>be focused on two key things. First and foremost, we

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 14>are focused on launching satellites that we have in our

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 14>backlog for our customers. So we've booked over thirty satellites

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 14>that we are set to launch over the next couple

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 14>of years. We've been investing in our production scale and

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 14>our automation, in our fleet management capabilities, so really focus

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 14>on deploying these satellites rapidly for our customers who have

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 14>entrusted us with their missions.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Get this to get to space.

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 14>And then the second thing we're focused on is actually

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 14>more before leaning nascent market, but that's the ability to

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 14>fly our customers AI applications in space. So we have

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 14>a lot of customers who are not content on just

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 14>collecting data. They actually want to make their satellites a

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 14>lot smarter so that things can be detected in real time.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 14>And so to do that, they are developing AI apps,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 14>and Loft is enabling them to deploy those apps to

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 14>our satellites as easily as you deploy software to the cloud.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 14>So we're not the application layer, but we're really the

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 14>infrastructure layer, the servers in space, if you will, that

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 14>allow those apps to function.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>AI knows no bounds, not even I'm interested, Alex, what

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 4>your customers ultimately want to achieve by going to space, NASA, Microsoft,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 4>US Space Force, the European Space Agency.

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>What are they using your low Earth orbit satellites to

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 2>really achieve?

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 14>There's really three fundamental things that we're enabling with our satellites,

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 14>so we're not focused on one specific application. We're an

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 14>infrastructure company that enables our customers to deploy any mission

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 14>in orbit. But it really comes down to three things.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 14>There is connectivity and data, there's national security and sovereignty,

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 14>and then there's understanding our climate. So we have customers

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 14>across all three of those areas. But that's fundamentally what

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 14>space is being used for today, and those are pretty

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 14>big problems that are impacting all of humanity.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 4>You've raised a lot of money, a lot of French

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 4>vcs involved, given the CEO himself as French. But I'm

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 4>interested as to the competitive nature of space right now

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 4>and the fact that someone very close to the next

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 4>administration is pretty prevalent when it comes to SpaceX.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 2>How are you finding your niche? How you seeing the

0:31:58.120 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 2>industry evolve?

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely so taking a step back, we started the company

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 14>eight years ago. My co founders and I had worked

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 14>in the industry for a while and what we saw

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 14>is that it just took too long to get satellites

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 14>in space.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>So it can take.

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 14>Up to five years from when you kick off a

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 14>satellite mission to when it actually launches. And for an

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 14>industry that needs to iterate quickly, that has to innovate,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 14>that has to provide real value to customers, five years

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 14>is just way too slow. And so we set out

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 14>to start Loft to get customers to space in months,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 14>not years, and be the fastest, most reliable, and just

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 14>simplest way for customers to get to space. So that's

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 14>really where we differentiate. And I think today what you're

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 14>seeing is commercial space is entering a golden age. I

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 14>think there's no better time to be a space company. Luckily,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 14>we've been building this company for eight years. We've raised

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 14>over three hundred million dollars of venture capital over that time.

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 14>We now have over five hundred million dollars of aggregate

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 14>contract value over the life of the company since inception

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 14>with some of the customers that you mentioned, and so

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 14>we're really ready to focus on scaling over the next

0:32:59.480 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 14>few years.

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Alex Caroline referred to Elon Musk and his proximity to

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 3>the president. Of course, his SpaceX is one of the

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>biggest presences in the entire field. Now, what sort of

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 3>opportunity do you see the incoming administration offering you in

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 3>terms of expanded business and also what sort of challenge.

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, well, so first off, SpaceX is really changed the

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 14>game in space by I want to say, making launch

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 14>a solve problem, but certainly by lowering the barrier for

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 14>companies like us to get to space. So we're really

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 14>thankful for SpaceX and their contribution to the industry. I

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 14>think this incoming administration has a history of being very

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 14>friendly towards commercial space, so budgets that we rely on

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 14>for our customers are certainly going to go up, and

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 14>that's very good for us. But I think space is

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 14>more than just a US issue. It's actually a global issue.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 14>Loft has an office in to Lose, France, and that

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 14>enables us to do business with customers in France, both

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 14>in government and the commercial side as well as in

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 14>the broader European Union. So that's in Europe, but we

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 14>all so see demand for space from countries that don't

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 14>really have their own native industrial base but want to

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 14>have more sovereignty over their space infrastructure. So a few

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 14>months ago we actually announced a joint venture in the

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 14>UAE where we've created the very first company in the

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 14>Middle East dedicated to high volume satellite production. That's a

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 14>joint venture with an excellent partner in the UAE, and

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 14>the first satellites will be built in the UAE starting

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 14>in twenty twenty.

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Six, Alex, do you foresee expanding more into the area

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 3>of national security and defense? That really does seem to

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 3>be a theme of some of the other Silicon Valley

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 3>investors who have aligned themselves with Trump, and they do

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 3>see some opportunity, do you as well with the Pentagon

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 3>intelligence agencies?

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 14>Absolutely, and we actually already have so I think we

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 14>have over one hundred million dollars of contract value in

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 14>the aggregate with US defense customers. A couple of years

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 14>ago set up a subsidiary, cup Loft Federal that has

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 14>the ability to do work with classified customers that's based

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 14>in Colorado. So we are very focused on the US government,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 14>both on the civil side and defense side, as a

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 14>key customer for US. We've set up the company to

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 14>be able to serve their customer and we're really excited

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 14>for the fact that they've embraced commercial space over the

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 14>last couple of years and we see that as a

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 14>trend that's going to continue and increase.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 3>Alex Greenberg, COO of loft Orbital, Thank you, Caroline, Mike.

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 4>It's time now for talking tech and first up, well,

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 4>the EU is considering it's spanning its investigation into Elon

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Musk's X for reaching content moderation rules and social media

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 4>platform is currently being probed under the EU's Digital Services

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Act for allegedly failing to tackle legal content and disinformation. Plus,

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Google is facing its first UK investigation.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Under tough digital antitrust rules.

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 4>The Competition Markets Authority is set to decide on whether

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the US tech john is distorting the market in its

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 4>search and on oine advertising services. The announcement comes as

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 4>Google fights and Order in the US sell it's Chrome

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 4>web browser. Of course, Microsoft has named Jay Perik executive

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 4>EP of the new AI Engineering Division and it is

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 4>set to oversee groups on AI platforms and supercomputers and agents.

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Prior to joining Microsoft, Paric worked at Facebook building are

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 4>tech infrastructure there and the data centers. AI's use cases

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 4>whether it's sending way beyond the office. Press Taste AI,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 4>for example, a company bringing a power of artificial intelligence

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 4>into the restaurant space, helping manage crews even predict demand.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 4>We're joined now by the CEO of that company in Gostalk,

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 4>as well as Union Square Hospitality Group founder Danny Maher,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 4>an investor in Press Taste. Danny, I start with you

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 4>because in Enlightened Hospitality Investments is where you've made this investment,

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 4>but you've actually got a plethora of AI investments. How

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 4>and at what point did you decide the artificial intelligence

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 4>was going to change.

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Up your game of restaurant.

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 15>Here we're facing, as we always have in our industry,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 15>really a business model where we have pretty thin margins.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 15>In the restaurant industry is notoriously competitive. But I think

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 15>what a lot of people may not realize is that

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 15>by the time you're done paying your rent and the

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 15>talent on the team, and the food costs and the

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 15>insurance and the florists and all the expenses, that only go.

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 16>Up over time.

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 15>You're not lived with much, and so we're constantly needing

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 15>to find ways that.

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 16>We can become more productive.

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 15>And machine learning, it turns out, is really really good

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 15>at a number of things. It helps us to not

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 15>only have much better data with which we can take

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 15>much better care of our guests, buy the proper amount

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 15>of food, because we never want to run out of food.

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 16>And on the other hand, we don't want too.

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 15>Much food, have the right amount of labor and talent

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 15>on the floor, never want to have too little, you

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 15>never want to have too much. We don't necessarily have

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 15>the ability to think about that and be very very

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 15>present to offer great hospitality for our guests.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 16>And so the more that we.

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 15>Can find outstanding applications for machine learning AI, what it

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 15>does is we get to be a lot smarter, but

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 15>we also need to be better at hospitality.

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 4>Which is precisely where you want to be getting better

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 4>and sticking to that kitchen knitting meanwhile, NGO, you have

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.919
<v Speaker 4>been applying AI in the real world for a long time,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 4>whether it be in academia, and we moved across to

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 4>really wanted to change up the back of kitchen.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 2>What drew you there? And how quickly have you managed

0:38:28.680 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>to scale?

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 16>Well, we have.

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 17>I have been in machine learning.

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 18>I did my have PHT in machine learning when I

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 18>still need to explain everyone what that is. But now

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 18>i'm you know, since a couple of months almost like

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 18>just two years, where CHET GPT or Google AI other

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 18>CHET agents came to market, it's now a big, big hype.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 18>Everyone you know has a capabilities now in the chetbot.

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 17>But the chetbot, you know, they have their limitations.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 18>You cannot have it drive your car, you cannot have

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 18>it prepare your meal.

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 17>You need specialized AI capabilities.

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 18>Such as you know, using computer vision to identify what

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 18>is going on, machine learning predictions to that breaks down. Okay,

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 18>what does this weather forecast and this POS forecast and this.

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:25.280
<v Speaker 17>Trade area information mean for my kitchen right now?

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 18>In those fifteen million inclements, so my crew can do

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 18>and deliver the best to optimize those razor thin margins

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 18>that exist in the restaurant AI.

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 19>For this specialized AI. That's what prec taste AI brings

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 19>to the table. And it's basically also the missing puzzle piece.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 19>Why software couldn't couldn't you know, come into the kitchens.

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 19>Kitchens are often still run like in the fifties, and

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 19>AI is the missing puzzle piece that can help to

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 19>bring true help to those kitchen operations.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 4>Danny, you've got some interesting puzzle piece from investments. You've

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 4>got seven shifts, seven rooms, prescy taste, AI converse. Now,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 4>you're a man who's often gone forward breaking boundaries when

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 4>it comes to tipping culture, when it comes to talking

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 4>to your own workplace, how have they reacted to artificial

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 4>intelligence with fear?

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 2>With excitement?

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:19.360
<v Speaker 16>Oh, with excitement.

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 15>Everybody who we hire is somebody who is a learn

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.280
<v Speaker 15>it all, not a know it all, and we're all

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 15>looking for ways we can learn to be better. If

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 15>you look at the different companies that you're showing right here,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 15>each one of these is providing the opportunity to make

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 15>us better at the thing we were doing anyway.

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 16>So there's nothing there that we were not doing before.

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 15>It's just much quicker, much smarter, much more productive.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 16>And everybody likes it because once you learn it.

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 15>By the way, when you get a new toy, it's

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 15>if I get a new update to my Apple phone,

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 15>my iPhone, it takes me a day to get used

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 15>to it, but once I get used to it, I

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 15>get exactly why they made those changes, So I don't

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 15>want to say that the first day we put something

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 15>into practice, everybody goes, oh, hallelujah. We have a new

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 15>reservation system, we have a new scheduling system, we have

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 15>a new way that we can talk to our guests,

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 15>a new way we can get to know our guests, and,

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 15>in the case of Presi Tastes, a new way that

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 15>we can actually deploy our talent to be as productive

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 15>as possible per task. That's the thing I want to

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 15>be clear about Presiye Tastes, which is really cool, is

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 15>that it knows all of our recipes. It knows exactly

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.760
<v Speaker 15>what we sold, what we're selling. It can actually see

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 15>how busy our restaurant is, and it can give the

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 15>kitchen in real time the predictions about how much food

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 15>you should be preparing to replace what just got sold,

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 15>how much food you should not.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 16>Be preparing, who should do it.

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 15>And it's the kind of thing that managers have done

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 15>an okay of the year after year. But now those

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 15>managers instead are taking their time to taste the food

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 15>and make sure it's perfect before a sauce goes out, Danny.

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 16>They're taking the time to be with our guests.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so appreciate having you both.

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 4>Pressie Taco Ingo Stare, Union Square Hospitality Group, Danny mar

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg,