Speaker 1: Told of you for being with us. Happy Monday, if
Speaker 1: there ever was such a thing. Glad you could be
Speaker 1: on board another day another I mean, the craziness in
Speaker 1: this country is so out of control. I mean, I'll
Speaker 1: just give you a sampling of the news that I
Speaker 1: read every day that we often don't even have time
Speaker 1: to get to. You know, Mayor Brandon Johnson restaurants have
Speaker 1: ties with slavery, so we need reparations. Who's going to
Speaker 1: want to open a restaurant in Chicago? You have one
Speaker 1: sitting US Senator. I don't know if you saw this one.
Speaker 1: You know those overseas trashing America, bad mouthing our president
Speaker 1: as a tyrant. Donald Donald Trump is trying to end
Speaker 1: our democracy. He's trying to seize control, most significant threat
Speaker 1: since the Civil War. Where do these people come from?
Speaker 1: How do these people?
Speaker 2: You know? What makes them think?
Speaker 3: This is?
Speaker 2: How crazy? This is?
Speaker 1: Uh? By the way, that's Chris Murphy of Connecticut making
Speaker 1: that stupid remark. We got former Vice President Harris, not
Speaker 1: exactly the smartest woman in the world, saying about the
Speaker 1: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Nett.
Speaker 2: Yahoo.
Speaker 1: Now remember Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Bill and Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: Barack was Saint Obama all said that Iran can't have
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapon. We all learned that they had, you know,
Speaker 1: four hundred and sixty kilograms of sixty percent enriched uranium
Speaker 1: twelve days later. That can be weapons grade uranium. He
Speaker 1: entered a war pulled into it by Bibi.
Speaker 2: No, he didn't.
Speaker 1: He's just lying and she's not very smart. Let us
Speaker 1: be clear about that. Entered a war that the American
Speaker 1: people do not. What would she be doing?
Speaker 2: Nothing?
Speaker 1: The Iranians would have a nuclear weapon if she was president.
Speaker 1: Be a disaster. Linda, did you see the Chinese humanoid
Speaker 1: robot shattered the world record for a half marathon fifteen
Speaker 1: minutes twenty six seconds.
Speaker 3: Smary?
Speaker 1: No, it's not scared. Why is that scary? That is
Speaker 1: called the future, and the future is now. It's not
Speaker 1: some distant it's not somewhere in the distant future. Why
Speaker 1: does that scare you.
Speaker 3: I want robots to have their own category. I don't
Speaker 3: want them racing against humans.
Speaker 2: No, I like it. I like that a lot.
Speaker 1: I don't know why I thought it was funny as
Speaker 1: how the robot wins. Now, I will tell you this,
Speaker 1: but the average American. For all of you listening to
Speaker 1: my voice today, I'm telling you you're going to have
Speaker 1: an option to have a robot in your home that
Speaker 1: will mow your lawn, clean your dishes, vacuum your house,
Speaker 1: take care of mundane chores and you won't ever have
Speaker 1: to do it again. And it'll probably come with updates
Speaker 1: that every year the technology will get that much better.
Speaker 1: Latitia James won't release her tax returns. You want to
Speaker 1: know why they will make that determination? Her staff, you
Speaker 1: won't make that determination. It was a big controversy. Nike
Speaker 1: had to take down an that reads runners welcome, Walkers
Speaker 1: are tolerated on a Newberry Street put up ahead of
Speaker 1: the post marathon. I mean, Nike, you why did they
Speaker 1: have to remove? What's so offensive about that?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: You're you're offending walkers in marathons. Walkers and marathons are
Speaker 1: called a waste of time. What you can walk twenty
Speaker 1: six miles? I wouldn't want to walk twenty six miles.
Speaker 1: I know many of my friends have run marathons. I
Speaker 1: have no interest in training to ever run a marathon.
Speaker 2: Ever.
Speaker 1: Did you see in your former Beautiful State at New
Speaker 1: York City intersection about one hundred cars involved in this
Speaker 1: video unfolding a queen's neighborhood as mobs light fires on
Speaker 1: the streets and the cars spinning around. It looks straight
Speaker 1: out of the Middle East. Unbelievable. I've seen that. I've
Speaker 1: seen many many times before. Women living under Hamas ruling
Speaker 1: Gaza described to the Daily Mail how they have been
Speaker 1: sexually abused by the terror groups fighters and four staff
Speaker 1: sex and return for.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: Do you believe it or not? Marxist Kami, Mom, Donnie?
Speaker 1: Do you believe in democratic socialism more than I did
Speaker 1: the day before? This is pretty bad. I wonder why
Speaker 1: people leaving New York and troves. Eric Holder explains that
Speaker 1: GOP redistricting is stealing seats. Now you've got this redistricting
Speaker 1: ballot measure in the Commonwealth of Virginia tomorrow. I hope
Speaker 1: you people in Virginia are smart. If you're a conservative Republican,
Speaker 1: understand that even though Trump got forty six percent of
Speaker 1: the vote and you had a really good governor that
Speaker 1: could only serve one term, Glenn Youngkin who's now gone,
Speaker 1: and you have Abigail Spanberger who's concocted this idea that
Speaker 1: she wants to take away pretty much all representation of
Speaker 1: any Republican in the Commonwealth of Virginia. And she will
Speaker 1: design and redistrict seats so that Democrats will get ten seats,
Speaker 1: Republicans will get one. Wow, talk about one party rule.
Speaker 1: And then Chucky Schumer made the statement, we played it
Speaker 1: last week, we'll play again and later. You know his idiot,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, James Carvel made it. Democrats win and win
Speaker 1: the House, both Houses of Congress, and the presidency, Puerto Rico,
Speaker 1: DC statehood and packed the Supreme Court. He's saying the
Speaker 1: quiet part out loud, that is that is the future
Speaker 1: of your radicalized Democratic Party. That that is just a
Speaker 1: primer of stuff that we don't even have time to
Speaker 1: get to every day. Let me get to where we
Speaker 1: are with Iran and where the president is, and there's
Speaker 1: going to be I guess one more round of negotiations
Speaker 1: in Islamabad tomorrow, he says, quote. And the media doesn't
Speaker 1: want to listen to him. And if they would listen
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump, they know a lot more than they
Speaker 1: than they currently do. It's it's pathetic that they have
Speaker 1: such little curiosity in terms of knowing Donald Trump. But
Speaker 1: the deal we are making with Iran will be far
Speaker 1: better than JCPOA, commonly referred to as the Iran Nuclear
Speaker 1: Deal penned by Barack Hussein Obama and Sleepy Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: one of the worst deals ever made having to do
Speaker 1: with the security of our country. It was a guaranteed
Speaker 1: road to a nuclear weapon, which will not cannot happen
Speaker 1: with the deal that we're working on. They actually gave
Speaker 1: one point seven billion dollars in cash, by the way,
Speaker 1: and other currency loaded into these cargo planes and flown
Speaker 1: to Iran for Ranian leadership to spend any way they
Speaker 1: saw fit. They emptied out the cash from banks in
Speaker 1: d C, Virginia, Maryland. Those bankers said they'd never seen
Speaker 1: anything like it before. In addition, hundreds of billions of
Speaker 1: dollars was paid to Iran. If I did not terminate
Speaker 1: that deal, nuclear weapons would have been used on Israel
Speaker 1: and all over the Middle East, including our cherished US
Speaker 1: military bases. The fake news the lightweight Washington Post journalist
Speaker 1: David Ignatius loves to talk about JCPOA, knowing that it
Speaker 1: was dangerous, in a complete embarrassment to our country. That
Speaker 1: was the lowest of the low I really was, please.
Speaker 2: Be nice to us.
Speaker 1: We'll drop cash and other currencies and give you billions
Speaker 1: of dollars if you just give us your word you
Speaker 1: won't build a nuclear weapon for ten years, but it
Speaker 1: won't include anywhere, any place, anytime American inspectors anyway. So
Speaker 1: the President goes on. If a deal happens under Trump,
Speaker 1: it will guarantee peace, security and safety not only for
Speaker 1: Israel the Middle East, but for Europe, America and everywhere else.
Speaker 1: It will be a safer world. Yeah, of course, I'm
Speaker 1: not surprised that there is. You know that you have
Speaker 1: emerged an emerging internal battle for power to fill the
Speaker 1: vacuum now that the supreme leader's dead. That the President
Speaker 1: goes on, it will be something that the entire world
Speaker 1: will be proud of instead of the years of embarrassment
Speaker 1: humiliation that we have been forced to suffer due to incompetent,
Speaker 1: cowardly leadership. And that's the message from Trump, He said.
Speaker 1: The Democrats are doing everything possible to hurt the very
Speaker 1: strong position we are in with respect to Iran, despite
Speaker 1: World War One lasting four years, three months, fourteen days,
Speaker 1: World War II lasting six years and one day, the
Speaker 1: Korean War lasting three years, one month, two days, Vietnam
Speaker 1: lasting nineteen years, five months, twenty nine days, Iraq lasting
Speaker 1: eight years, eight months, twenty eight days. He could have
Speaker 1: added Afghanistan here. They like to say that I promised
Speaker 1: six weeks to defeat Iran, and actually from a military standpoint,
Speaker 1: it was far faster than that. But I'm not going
Speaker 1: to let them rush the United States into making a
Speaker 1: deal that is not as good as it could have been.
Speaker 1: I read the fake news saying that I am under
Speaker 1: pressure to make a deal. This is not true. I
Speaker 1: am under no pressure whatsoever or low. It will all
Speaker 1: happen relatively quickly. Time is not my adversary. The only
Speaker 1: thing that matters is that we finally, after forty seven years,
Speaker 1: straighten out the mess that other presidents let happen because
Speaker 1: they didn't have the courage or foresight to do what
Speaker 1: had to be done with spec to Iran. We're in
Speaker 1: it and it will be done right, and we won't
Speaker 1: let weak empathetic democrats, traders all who for years have
Speaker 1: been talking about the dangers of Iran and that and
Speaker 1: that's something has to be done. But now, and since
Speaker 1: I'm the one doing it, you know they're belittling the
Speaker 1: accomplishments of our military and the Trump administration. This is
Speaker 1: being perfectly executed on the scale of Venezuela, just a bigger,
Speaker 1: more complex operation. The result will be the same. In
Speaker 1: my first term, I built the greatest military our country
Speaker 1: has ever seen, including adding space force. In my second term,
Speaker 1: I am properly and judiciously using our military to solve
Speaker 1: problems left to us by others of far less understanding
Speaker 1: and competence. Now this is you know, none of this
Speaker 1: is easy. I don't know why people think that. You know, Oh,
Speaker 1: we just look at these rockets, you know, destroying military targets.
Speaker 1: Oh this is easy. No, it's easy. None of it's easy.
Speaker 1: It's all hard, it's all complicated, and it's all with
Speaker 1: the right mindset. I have zero patients to try to
Speaker 1: convince stupid people that Iran was not on the verge
Speaker 1: of nuclear weapons. And then he dealt with the elephant
Speaker 1: in the room. Iran decided to fire bullets yesterday in
Speaker 1: the Strait of Hormuz, a total violation of our ceasefire agreement.
Speaker 1: Many were aimed at a French ship and a freighter
Speaker 1: from the UK. That wasn't nice.
Speaker 2: Was it.
Speaker 1: Our representatives are going to Islamabad in Pakistan. They will
Speaker 1: be there tomorrow evening for negotiations. Iran recently announced that
Speaker 1: they were closing the strait, which is strange because our
Speaker 1: blockade had already closed it. They're helping us without knowing
Speaker 1: that they're the ones that lose with the closed passage.
Speaker 1: They're losing five hundred million dollars a day, the US
Speaker 1: loses nothing. In fact, many ships are headed right now
Speaker 1: to the US Texas, Louisiana, Alaska to load up complements
Speaker 1: of the Ranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. Always wanting to be
Speaker 1: the tough guy or offering a very fair, reasonable deal,
Speaker 1: and I hope they take it, because if they don't,
Speaker 1: the US is going to knock out every single power plant,
Speaker 1: every single bridge in Iran.
Speaker 2: No more missed the nice guy.
Speaker 1: They'll come down fast, they'll come down easy if they
Speaker 1: don't make the deal. And it will be my honor
Speaker 1: to do what has to be done, which should have
Speaker 1: been done to Iran by other presidents for the last
Speaker 1: forty seven years. It's time for the Iran killing machine
Speaker 1: to end now. We either you agree with that or
Speaker 1: you don't. It's not an issue that you can actually
Speaker 1: dispute or debate debate with somebody. People make up their mind.
Speaker 1: There's no point now. One other issue the president dealt with,
Speaker 1: and this has been one of the big lies told
Speaker 1: by the legacy media mob and told by liberals in general,
Speaker 1: radical leftists, and told by these isolationist groups. I think
Speaker 1: they many of which, by the way, it's so interesting,
Speaker 1: many actually got an audience with the President and tried
Speaker 1: to appeal to the President both before Midnight Hammer before
Speaker 1: Epic Fury. I think many of them are just angry
Speaker 1: that the President didn't agree with him, so they make
Speaker 1: these proclamations that he's listening to Israel, he's listening to
Speaker 1: Fox News, he's listening to bb NENTA and Yahoo, Mark Levin,
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity. No, the President, if you knew him, he
Speaker 1: makes up his own mind. And I didn't go to
Speaker 1: the White House and sit down in front of him
Speaker 1: and could try to convince him of anything. Israel has
Speaker 1: never talked me into a war with Iran. The results
Speaker 1: of October seventh added to my lifelong opinion that Iran
Speaker 1: can never have a nuclear weapon. And he said, I
Speaker 1: watch and read the fake news pundits and polls in
Speaker 1: total disbelief. Ninety percent say they are lies and made
Speaker 1: up stories. The polls are rigged. Once is the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty presidential election was rigged, just like the results in Venezuela,
Speaker 1: which the media doesn't like talking about. The results in
Speaker 1: Iran will be amazing, and of Iran's new leaders, regime
Speaker 1: change or smart Iran can have a great prosperous future.
Speaker 1: You know, I keep saying, and I have been saying
Speaker 1: for how many days, Linda, that they're going to either
Speaker 1: do it the hard way or the easy way. And
Speaker 1: there's one other thing that this president pointed out, especially
Speaker 1: in light of NATO nations, Western European nations that have
Speaker 1: neglected homeland security, national security, their own national security, national defense.
Speaker 1: We pay two thirds the cost of NATO. They have
Speaker 1: destroyed their economies with radical alarmist of climate alarmism and socialism.
Speaker 1: They have an unfettered illegal immigration without assimilation, resulting in
Speaker 1: no go zone sharia courts throughout Europe. It's insane. And
Speaker 1: the President made this operation. Whether people like Israel or not,
Speaker 1: they have proven to be a great ally of the
Speaker 1: United States of America. They are courageous, they are bold,
Speaker 1: they are loyal, they are smart. Unlike others, they have
Speaker 1: shown their true colors in a moment of conflict and stress.
Speaker 1: Israel fights hard and they.
Speaker 2: Know how to win.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the President's right, Europe is pathetic
Speaker 1: and weak and in decline, and I don't even know
Speaker 1: if they can recover At this point, I'd say the
Speaker 1: odds are actually low, which is pretty interesting. So that's
Speaker 1: basically where we are. This is not going to be
Speaker 1: a forever war. Might be a little more challenging, difficult,
Speaker 1: There's going to be a conclusion and at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, whether it's the guys with guns or
Speaker 1: the guys in suits that ultimately have the decision making
Speaker 1: capability in Iran, this is going to come to an
Speaker 1: end and America will win and we'll get what we
Speaker 1: want and Iran will never have a chance to have
Speaker 1: a nuclear weapon for our kids and grandkids. And if
Speaker 1: that is not something worthwhile to you, I can never
Speaker 1: convince you. And I'm not going to waste my breath.
Speaker 1: Let's play the Iranian ship that was see Saturday by
Speaker 1: US marines. Apparently prior to this, the onset of this
Speaker 1: conflict had been making regular oil deliveries to China. Now
Speaker 1: China's losing about half the oil the they would normally import.
Speaker 1: They're getting hurt here. And that's what was so interesting
Speaker 1: is last week when the President turned around that Chinese
Speaker 1: ship and said now that tanker and said no, you're
Speaker 1: going back to port, and they did, and that the
Speaker 1: President got on the phone with President She. Now he's
Speaker 1: supposed to meet with him in May. I don't know
Speaker 1: if this conflict is ongoing, if that'll be postponed again,
Speaker 1: but anyway, the Iranian cargo ship seized by US forces
Speaker 1: in the Gulf of Omam this weekend as part of
Speaker 1: a fleet that often sails straight to China, one of
Speaker 1: Tehran's most important backers. And every time the President got
Speaker 1: on the phone also with President She last week and said, no,
Speaker 1: re arming the Iranians is a really bad idea, and
Speaker 1: we'll really put us straight in our relationship, and President
Speaker 1: She back down. We have a tape the US destroyer
Speaker 1: that took out Iranian ships and the Iranian ships engine
Speaker 1: room on Saturday before it was boarded by US marines.
Speaker 1: Here is the message that they were given just moments
Speaker 1: before we took out their engine room.
Speaker 4: Motor motor vessel. Vacate your engine room. Vacate your engine room.
Speaker 4: We're prepared to subject you to disabling fire.
Speaker 1: All right, vacate you're the engine room, Linda, What would
Speaker 1: you do? I don't think that was a lot of
Speaker 1: time after they said vacate the engine room to actually
Speaker 1: vacate the engine room, do you Yeah.
Speaker 3: It was pretty fast, not a lot of leewing.
Speaker 1: Vacate the engine room, boom, which is pretty amazing. And
Speaker 1: the you know, we blew a hole in this Iranian
Speaker 1: ship that tried to run the blockade. Iran is losing
Speaker 1: anywhere between four hundred and thirty five and five hundred
Speaker 1: milli million dollars a day, as experts warn their economy
Speaker 1: is on life support. Look, ultimately, you know, I want
Speaker 1: to have I want to be realistic. I don't know
Speaker 1: how you're able to reason with people that have bought
Speaker 1: into and have been indoctrinated into radical Islamic extremism, because
Speaker 1: that's what the last forty seven years in Iran has been. Now,
Speaker 1: do I think it is the natural state of man,
Speaker 1: regardless of where you live. If you believe that all men,
Speaker 1: women and children were created by God, and then of
Speaker 1: course there's life's choices and a propensity for good and
Speaker 1: evil and one's life. Do I believe that it is
Speaker 1: the natural state of mankind to desire to be free?
Speaker 1: I do?
Speaker 2: Do.
Speaker 1: I think those Iranians, to some forty plus thousand that
Speaker 1: were mowed down, were out there fighting for their liberty
Speaker 1: and their freedom, knowing the great price they may pay
Speaker 1: by doing so. Do it showed enormous courage. That's not
Speaker 1: the president's stated goal. Regime change has never been a
Speaker 1: stated goal. But now that I mean, what has emerged
Speaker 1: here is it seems in the vacuum of leadership created
Speaker 1: by the first three tiers of Iranian leaders now gone.
Speaker 3: Is you.
Speaker 1: Have those forces with guns, as Lindsey Graham accurately described him,
Speaker 1: and then you have the guys in suits. The guys
Speaker 1: in suits wanted to make a deal with the president.
Speaker 1: The guys with the guns are the ones that disrupted
Speaker 1: the ceasefire, and that would be the Uranium Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Speaker 1: So they reversed force on reopening the strait, and we're
Speaker 1: blowing their ships out of the water. And how this
Speaker 1: ultimately turns out, I don't know. But the President I
Speaker 1: just read his truth posts. The president doesn't really care
Speaker 1: and as much as he's gonna win one way or
Speaker 1: the other. And this is why I keep saying, and
Speaker 1: I have been saying for a number of days now,
Speaker 1: and I'm not going to be proven wrong on this,
Speaker 1: that they're gonna either do it the easy way or
Speaker 1: they're going to do it the hard way. And it
Speaker 1: seems like you have you have, you know, competing leadership
Speaker 1: emerging to fill the vacuum in Iran, and one understands
Speaker 1: the handwriting is on the wall, and the other, you know,
Speaker 1: wants to fight to the death and get their seventy
Speaker 1: two virgins in paradise. That's what it seems like to me,
Speaker 1: if I had to read the tea leaves, certainly seems
Speaker 1: that seems that way. And that's why Iran announced its
Speaker 1: own blockade, and their blockade is not working. The only
Speaker 1: one that's being blockaded are Iranians and their ability to
Speaker 1: sell their oil on moral markets. And the net result
Speaker 1: of that is actually a net plus for the US.
Speaker 1: Doesn't help the world. I mean, we want the free
Speaker 1: flow of oil at market prices. That's in everybody's best interest.
Speaker 1: It's in America's frankly unique interest if the strait was
Speaker 1: closed and they'd have to come to America for all
Speaker 1: of their energy needs needs as we are a net exporter.
Speaker 1: But that's not in everyone's best interest. I don't think
Speaker 1: that's what the President wants either. He's not stated as much.
Speaker 1: So you've got this little Hormuz whiplash that has gone
Speaker 1: back and forth. However, it is going to come to
Speaker 1: an end. The President does not have endless patients, and
Speaker 1: he will make the decision, probably very quickly. I would
Speaker 1: imagine that this meeting and what happens immediately thereafter and
Speaker 1: how the Iranians react is going to be the determining factor.
Speaker 1: And I would say this that if the Iranians underestimate
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, they do so at their own peril.
Speaker 2: They would be pretty stupid.
Speaker 1: But they've done that three times before, although it was
Speaker 1: a different set of leaders. Three times. The President has
Speaker 1: given them headlines. Fifty days before Israel started wiping out
Speaker 1: their ballistic missiles, their air defense systems, and every other
Speaker 1: system in between. Then led up to paving the way
Speaker 1: for Operation Midnight Hammer, of which they were given a
Speaker 1: warning again to make a nuclear deal, and again they
Speaker 1: steadfastly refused anyway, fourteen bunker buster bombs later, and twelve
Speaker 1: days later they wanted peace because they had been defeated. Okay,
Speaker 1: now we've got residual. If the president's stated goal of
Speaker 1: preventing them from becoming a nuclear power, if that remains
Speaker 1: the President's goal, then really we have two things to accomplish.
Speaker 1: Secure the remaining sixty percent enriched uranium again what he
Speaker 1: affectionately calls dust. And that could be done a couple
Speaker 1: of different ways. One we get it, two they hand
Speaker 1: it over, or three we entomb it and keep eyes
Speaker 1: on it at all times so that nobody could ever
Speaker 1: get their hands on it. But that could open the
Speaker 1: door for a return to the region at some point,
Speaker 1: as you know, they begin to rebuild, and they'd have
Speaker 1: the ability now to sell oil, so that would give
Speaker 1: them money, et cetera, et cetera. But the president is
Speaker 1: if they doubt, for us second, that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: is not serious, if they don't believe he's serious about
Speaker 1: blowing up Iranian infrastructure, if a deal is not made,
Speaker 1: they don't know Donald Trump. And I'm telling you right
Speaker 1: now there's no ambiguity here. The President will take out
Speaker 1: their infrastructure. It may happen this week, it is not.
Speaker 1: This is is not a forever timeline. This is not
Speaker 1: a timeline is going to constantly be extended. The President
Speaker 1: is even telegraphing as much as saying it no more
Speaker 1: missed a nice guy. Well, they should interpret that. If
Speaker 1: you remember, before Epic Fury began, there were reports that
Speaker 1: the Supreme Leader and his pop aides had planes are
Speaker 1: ready to go on tarmacs at airports all around where
Speaker 1: wherever it is that they were around Tehran, and that
Speaker 1: they were preparing to leave the country and seek asylum
Speaker 1: in Russia. I'm sure with them, and I suggested at
Speaker 1: the time, on those planes they'd be pillaging the country
Speaker 1: and they'd be taking out millions and billions of dollars
Speaker 1: with them. And my advice to them many times on
Speaker 1: radio and TV was I humbly suggest you leave now
Speaker 1: while you can, because this window is going to close
Speaker 1: very quickly. And it turns out the opening salvo of
Speaker 1: Operation Epic Fury, all of those people were killed, they
Speaker 1: were all wiped out. So I will send another message.
Speaker 1: And it's interesting how Iran does follow my TV show
Speaker 1: and this radio show, and we know this for a fact,
Speaker 1: and it's been confirmed to us, you know, because we
Speaker 1: have guests on like General Keene and Mark Levinn and
Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham and people that they know have been very
Speaker 1: hawkish about just defeating them winning this thing outright, and
Speaker 1: I think the President. The only reason that the President,
Speaker 1: and I'm surmising here has not done so is to
Speaker 1: give them time to wake up to what the reality
Speaker 1: of their current situation is. In other words, the President
Speaker 1: does care deep down about the ninety million plus Iranians
Speaker 1: that will be impacted by the absolute obliteration of all
Speaker 1: their infrastructure and their immediate future of having an economy.
Speaker 1: You're already they are facing one hundred percent inflation rates,
Speaker 1: the value of their currency is zero, reports that half
Speaker 1: their working population is not getting a paycheck, and they
Speaker 1: don't have jobs to go to. So what the President
Speaker 1: is trying to do is thread this needle. Probably the safer,
Speaker 1: the more sure path to a lasting piece would be
Speaker 1: to wipe them out.
Speaker 2: That would be the.
Speaker 1: More sure path, But the President is trying to factor
Speaker 1: in the human toll to that decision, and it would
Speaker 1: be a much much easier operation if the President would
Speaker 1: just wipe out carg island, wipe out their ability, their infrastructure,
Speaker 1: their bridges, their power plants, darkened the whole country and
Speaker 1: good luck ever, you know, reconstituting any military, so to speak,
Speaker 1: that we would think of as a working military, it's
Speaker 1: not going to happen. On the other hand, the President says,
Speaker 1: Iran is not going to allow He's not going to
Speaker 1: allow them to blackmail US and the world. In terms
Speaker 1: of what's going to happen in this situation, they don't
Speaker 1: have the cards to do so. Can they have little
Speaker 1: little symbolic victories like, oh, we broke the peace agreement
Speaker 1: and now we're going back to the table. Oh we
Speaker 1: got the president to move back to the table. I
Speaker 1: would not take his his his desire ultimately for a
Speaker 1: peaceful outcome to be Barack Hussein, Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: Hillary and Bill Clinton kind of weakness, because it's not.
Speaker 1: They will there will be a deadline. That deadline could
Speaker 1: be as early as this Wednesday. Of these talks don't
Speaker 1: go well, but the strategy is working. You know, we've
Speaker 1: been bleeding the Iranians dry. There's no other way to
Speaker 1: put it. We are on the verge of a great
Speaker 1: military success. And when I hear the arguments in favor
Speaker 1: of just outright winning this thing militarily, it is safer
Speaker 1: for our own military, safer for the region, but more
Speaker 1: catastrophic to a lot of innocent people that will be
Speaker 1: impacted by it. And the president's first choice is not
Speaker 1: to do that for the sake of the people in Iran.
Speaker 2: And is he ever going to get credit for that? No,
Speaker 2: he will not.
Speaker 1: Linda, you disagree with anything that I'm saying, it would
Speaker 1: the easier answer would be to just obliterate them.
Speaker 2: That wouldn't be hard to do. I can see you're
Speaker 2: very conversion on this.
Speaker 3: No, I just you know, I think your points are
Speaker 3: so well made. But I also think the issue is,
Speaker 3: and I've been saying this to a lot of my friends,
Speaker 3: people won't actually understand what's going on there. It's not
Speaker 3: like we're going in everybody's like, Oh, it's for the oil,
Speaker 3: it's for the money. There's a back end game. And listen,
Speaker 3: I'm not the obi wan Kenobi of what's happening in Iran,
Speaker 3: but there's a lot of people that are suffering under
Speaker 3: this disgusting rule for forty seven years. There's a lot
Speaker 3: of people that are afraid of a nuclear weapon. There's
Speaker 3: a lot of people that are afraid of Uranian enrichment,
Speaker 3: and what's happening with ballistic missiles. There are a lot
Speaker 3: of things that are going on beyond just we want
Speaker 3: dominance and world power. If not us, then who is
Speaker 3: going to save these people?
Speaker 1: Well, the problem is if the easier solution and the
Speaker 1: safer solution and the longer term solution, if you want
Speaker 1: them to stop momenting terror in the region, funding their
Speaker 1: proxies and and moving forward with their crazy radicalism, the
Speaker 1: easier choice would be to obliterate them, meaning their infrastructure,
Speaker 1: not the people. By the way, why do we have
Speaker 1: a forty four year old Iranian woman in Los Angeles
Speaker 1: that had to be arrested by the FBI for being
Speaker 1: an arms dealer for Iran's theocratic regime? Just like why
Speaker 1: is Solomony's niece and great niece living in America and
Speaker 1: dressing in a way that would get them stone to
Speaker 1: death in.
Speaker 2: Iran. It's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: And we got more Hesbola humans shield strategies that we'll
Speaker 1: share with you as well. By the way, fake news
Speaker 1: reports that our military is not being fed. Well, no
Speaker 1: they released images, and I've made contact with people. No,
Speaker 1: by the way, I want to give credit to the
Speaker 1: Pope people were angry with last week, even though I
Speaker 1: said a lot of good things about how Catholicism impacted
Speaker 1: my life. I just don't agree that God does not
Speaker 1: believe in it never supports conflict. Well, that to me
Speaker 1: contradicts the Bible, and I believe the God of the
Speaker 1: Old Testament New Testament is the same God. But he
Speaker 1: did say remarks about world the world being ravaged by
Speaker 1: a handful of tyrants, were not aimed at Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I'd rather not have this fight. I'd rather bring people
Speaker 1: to Jesus. We discussed it last week. As far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned, it's over eight hundred and nine. Do I
Speaker 1: get to declare it over? I hope.
Speaker 2: So it ain't over for me.
Speaker 1: Oh good grief. I gotta cut you off. I gotta
Speaker 1: cut that mic off.