WEBVTT - Charlie Hellman

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Welcome, Welcome back to Bob Lofstett's podcast. My guest

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>today is Charlie Eleman of Spotify. He's the VP Global

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Head of Music Product. What is that in English?

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 2>Charlick English? Yeah, nice to be here, Bob. Head of

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Music Product means I look after our end to end

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>music offering, mostly you know, in terms of our services

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to labels and publishers, artists and songwriters, So all the

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 2>tools that they use to get their music on Spotify,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>promote their music, manage their their profiles, and our overall

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>policies of running the music vertical for Spotify.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what involving music does not come under your purview?

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, so David Kafer and I run the music vertical together.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 2>He manages things like license and sing and artists relations.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I manage more of the product side, and together we

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 2>co lead the music vertical at Spotify.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, who would be overseeing the people who create playlists? Yeah?

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>The editorial team, the human editorial team is also part

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>of the music vertical. They report in to David Kaefer.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>But like I said, the two of us are joined

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 2>at the hip and working on all of that together

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>every day.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay. From thirty thousand feet. Yeah, he deals with licensing

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with the labels. Yeah, what do you deal with the labels?

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>So, for instance, like our Spotify for Artist product, which

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>is how the labels see how they're doing, manage their

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 2>presence on Spotify, promote their music, et cetera.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So in terms of ingesting music, yeah, that is

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not your thing. In terms of relationships with music and

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>promoting the music from labels, that is your thing.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:02.639
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Yeah. I've been at Spotify now for fourteen years,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>so obviously my role has evolved quite a bit over

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 2>the years. But recently my role expanded to being responsible

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>for the music vertical overall, which just means as we've

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 2>gone into podcasts and audiobooks, other leaders look after those

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 2>verticals and I try to look after our music proposition

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>end in.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you talk about the labels, How do you deal

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>with independent labels and independent artists?

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, great question, and that's been something that's evolved a

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 2>ton over the years. As you know. I mean, we

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>released our Loud and Clear Report today which you might

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>have seen, and in twenty twenty four, fifty percent of

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 2>all of our payouts went to indies, which is just

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a huge sea change from where it was, you know,

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>even a decade ago. And so for indies, that spanned

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>everything from a do it yourself artist that might be

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>coming through distro kid or tune core and they use

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Spotify for artists and manage their profile, you know, run

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>their promotions, et cetera, all the way to you know,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 2>a pretty big indie label that might have a direct

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 2>custom deal with Spotify and kind of everything in between.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>So the range of what is included in indies is

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty broad.

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's just stay there. Can you tell us more

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about the trends of consumption.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think the biggest one that stands

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>out to me is that year over year, in addition

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to just payouts growing and the overall size of the

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>pie growing, which is great, it's being cut up in

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot more ways. They're just a lot more types

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>of success stories happening now than we're happening five years

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 2>or ten years ago. So, you know, I think even

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>if you go back twenty years, maybe twenty percent of

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>plays and downloads we're coming from the top forty songs.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>That's now down to two percent something like that, And

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>so things have gotten cut up into a lot smaller

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>niches in music, so less top heavy and more kind

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of middle tier artists having sustainable fan bases but might

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 2>not be superstars. I think that's been the biggest shift

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 2>in consumption patterns over the last ten years or so.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's just assume I'm somebody through distro kid yeah

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>or CD baby, one of these independent aggregators. Yeah, can

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I touch you?

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean?

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I would assume if I'm universal, there's a direct pipeline

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>between them and you. They have the largest market share.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Whatever, I see what you mean.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that I'm an independent artist. Is there any

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>way to interact with someone at Spotify?

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we try to have avenues at all different levels

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 2>of scale. So I'll give you an example. Our human

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>editorial team. If you go back, you know, say, five

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 2>eight years, a lot of that was through human interaction.

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Like they were getting sent pre release music that was

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 2>going to come out, they were listening to stuff that

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>they were getting sent, and you know, they have limited

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 2>hours in the day, right, so they're trying to be

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>on top of everything, but they're only exposed to so much.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that we did was through

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Spotify for artists. We launched what we call New Music Submission,

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 2>this playlist pitching tool where everyone, even if you're a

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 2>do it yourself artist, you upload your music and then

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you can tag it with a bunch of stuff, tell

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 2>the story, what instruments are used, you know who's in

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the band, all this kind of stuff, tag it with genres,

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and then that all goes into one workflow for the editors.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 2>So it doesn't matter if you're from Republic or if

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 2>you're from District Kid. It all comes into one funnel

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.559
<v Speaker 2>and it goes into you know, if you're an indie

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>rock editor, you get all the stuff tagged for indie rock,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and then you you listen to the pre release music

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>and try to tag up you know, what's showing promise,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>what we're we're gonna believe in, what we're gonna give

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>some editorial love to. And so through things like that,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>we've tried to streamline it. So the levels of access

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>are pretty uniform, you know, regardless of the kind of

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>label set up the.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>F Let's say I'm an independent artist, I'm through one

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of those aggregators. Yeah, but I have money to spend,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>h Can I immediately get access? Say, well, you know,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I want certain stuff that you offer the big labels

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm willing to pay for it.

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's another area where we've really streamlined and made

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the same tools accessible for everyone. So there's two types

0:06:52.920 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>of promotional offerings that we offered a labels big and small.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>One is what we call native ads. So these are

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 2>things where if you come into Spotify you might see

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, sponsored recommendation or new release and it's featured

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and artists, you know, whether they're on the biggest label

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>or they're do it yourself. They can come into Spotify

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 2>for artists and they can book a campaign. They can

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>target dormant fans or existing fans or potential listeners, and

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>they can use a cash budget for that. You know,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>works very similarly the way a lot of digital advertising works.

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>And again because we've launched that in a self serve way,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>everybody has equal access to that. The other program that

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I would argue is even more accessible is Discovery Mode,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's more accessible because it actually requires zero upfront budget.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>So with Discovery Mode, you say, here are my promotional priorities,

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>these are the tracks I'm really trying to work. I

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>want you to try to find spotify any opportunity for

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>this to show up in more relevant place. And I

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>don't put in budget on the front end. I accept

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>a commission of my royalty rate on the back end

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>when you pay me next month. And because it doesn't

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>require upfront budget, it really levels the playing field so

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>that it doesn't advantage people that have the most you know,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.119
<v Speaker 2>cash on hand for marketing. But just you know, whatever

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>is the most relevant in the system, which you know,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>we're really proud of.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>That, Okay, you know, staying with the independent artists because

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of light on this particular sphere. Yeah,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I am an independent artist. Let's go with the latter.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>And I say, okay, I am checking in these discovery modes.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>If people listen, I will accept a reduce royalty. Yeah,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but what are the odds that people are gonna actually

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hear my stuff?

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 2>It performs pretty well. It's it's I think it's been,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, certainly our most successful promotional product today. So

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I can explain a little bit more and detail how

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>it works. But generally people say, you know, if you

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>look at how many streams you got before putting in

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 2>discovery mode and streams you got after putting in discovery mode,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 2>typically you're seeing you know, fifty one hundred hundred and

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent higher royalties because of the lift and streams,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you get.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>A little bit more granular. Yeah, how does it actually work? Sure?

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So discovery mode operates in algorithmic playlists. So these

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>are things like you know, radio stations or AutoPlay, right,

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and when a radio station is formed, there's two steps

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>to this. So first, you know you're making it a

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Dell radio station. There might be three four, five hundred

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>songs that are relevant for a Dell radio station. You know,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Slean Beyond to Beyonce. You could go a lot of

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 2>different ways. So you create a pool of all the

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>most hyper relevant stuff. But then you got to sequence

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>that playlist, right, like does this user typically like Selean

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>theon or do they like Beyonce? What are they famili

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you're with? Or what's going to be more of a

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 2>new discovery for them? You have to have some variations,

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>so it's not you know, all Adele in the beginning

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>and then all the other stuff, right, So a lot

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 2>of the goodness comes in the sequencing. So the only

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>thing that discovery mode does is after the track pool

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>has already been set up. It only affects the sequencing,

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So there's maybe fifty or one hundred things that go

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 2>into the sequencing, and discovery mode adds that one more ingredient.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>To say, factor in the fact that you know, this

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 2>is the promotional priority for this artist, and because of that,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 2>it's going to get sequenced often higher in the list

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 2>than it would have if it were not in discovery mode.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense?

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but let's just go even deeper. User creates a

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>radio station, Yeah, we'll use your example at Dell. Are

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we saying conventionally there's five hundred tracks or is that

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a number you just used.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's usually a track pool for radio stations, a

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 2>few hundred tracks. That's about right.

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there's five hundred tracks. The tracks in that pool

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are based on daddy you got from the listener, uh huh.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And the rotation because as you said, you don't want

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all adele first in all unknown at the end. How

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is the rotation established?

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So the sequencer it has all these different dimensions to it.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 2>But it's like we have to have a good mix

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of familiarity and discovery. So some tracks that you're going

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>to recognize in some that you don't. We want a

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 2>good diversity of mix of artists. We want to have,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, diversity of old versus new. So a lot

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of different factors go into it, and then discovery mode

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>becomes one of those factors that goes into the ordering

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 2>that we give the user.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's just use your number of five hundred. Yeah,

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>how do we decide if my discovery mode track goes

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Dell as a post to Deftones, and what

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if everybody wants to be with it? Don't.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, since discovery mode only affects the sequencer, it can

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>only move within a trackpool it's already in. You cannot

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 2>use discovery mode to inject a track into a radio

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>station that it wouldn't have already been in. The only

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>thing it influences is the rank within the track pool.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, once again, very deep. I upload my stuff, I

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>say I want discovery mode. Yeah, how do I know

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what acts and how many acts would I be in

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that pool of tracks?

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So we have these pre campaign analytics for you that

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>show you this is where you're at. These are some

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 2>suggestions of what might perform well, and then you can

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>take those suggestions or ignore those suggestions. You try something,

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and then you get a report that's like, this is

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 2>the amount of uplift each of these tracks got. These

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>ones are ROI positive because they're getting more royalties than

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 2>they did before. These ones. It's not resonating, like we

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 2>tried to give it more spins, but it's not performing

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>well and so it's staying flat and so you're accepting

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 2>a discount, but it's not really worth it for you.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 2>So you get all this reporting and then you make

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.319
<v Speaker 2>adjustments for next month about what you want to try.

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 2>That's different.

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, is it month by month?

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>It is month by month, Yeah, because that's the royalty

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 2>reporting cycle, and so it's a good, you know cycle.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So everybody's on the same month exactly counter month. Okay,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>let's say I'm a complete unknown quote Bob Dylan, do

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I get discovery options.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>For discovery mode? We need the system needs to know

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>a bit about you in the algorithm, right, because since

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you have to already be in the track pulls to

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 2>get you know, moving up and moving down, if the

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>algorithm has no idea where you're relevant, it can't process

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 2>the track for discovery mode. So you have to have

0:13:55.600 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>some minimum presence in radio stations or algorithm mixes. All right,

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>it still means that there's like hundreds of thousands of

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 2>uploaders who have access to the tool. But you can't

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 2>start from absolute zero.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's just doue them. I'm starting from nothing. Yeah,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in order to be eligible, is it as simple as

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>someone's got to listen to my track or people have

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to listen to my track a thousand times on Spotify?

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>How do we create the data that gives us the

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>ability to go to discovery mode?

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you need some thousands of streams and then you'll

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>see in Spotify for artists when the algorithm on the

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>radio and mix aside has picked it up enough where

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>you're now eligible for it.

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, this is all algorithmic radio playlist

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has got nothing to do with curated.

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Playlists, That's right.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>We have.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Two separate worlds, the man in the machine and for

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>editorial playlists like Today's Top Hits, rap CA stuff like that,

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 2>discovery mode has no impact on it whatsoever. It's only

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 2>for kind of the lean back sessions where people are

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>open to discovery and like a wide variety of tracks

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>where the discovery mode promotion system operates.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what percentage of Spotify listening is in lean back mode?

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's increase over the years, is the algorithms have

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>gotten better and better. I think it's grown from ten

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen towards twenty percent. Is you know, all the

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 2>personalized mixes, algorithmic mixes, auto play radio things like that.

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's say I create a radio station with Dell.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We understand that, Yeah, but also Spotify serves me a

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of algorithmic playlist to me. Yeah. If an act

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>signs up for discovery mode, will it potentially be placed there?

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 2>The types of mixes that it's in are kind of

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the lean back mixes. So these could be things like

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>daily mix We usually make a user five or six

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>daily mixes that are each of the users what we

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 2>call taste clusters or artists mix Like, here's a mix

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>of you know, adele like music for you, genre mixes,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, hip hop for you, those kind of mixes.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say I'm using Discovery Mode and I get traction. Yeah,

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.239
<v Speaker 1>let's just say, for the sake of discussion, my royalty

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>pool is increased. What are my options after I get traction?

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean usually what we see is obviously artists

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 2>are doing a bunch of different things across a bunch

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 2>of different platforms at the same time to try to

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 2>build buzz. So usually it's combining maybe native ads and

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>discovery mode on Spotify, but then also you know, organic

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>interest that they're trying to drum up on social media,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 2>maybe paid advertising on social media as well. It's even

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 2>as you get bigger and bigger sponsorship out of home,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. So it's usually part of a broader picture.

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 2>But typically, you know, like what we see is if

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.479
<v Speaker 2>you get traction and you see something's really resonating. One

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 2>of the things that's really cool about discovery mode is

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like a heat seeker where it will

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 2>route someone to say, oh, if that thing's resonating really well,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't thinking about that one being the next single

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that I'm really promoting. But maybe I'm gonna change the

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 2>plan a little bit, put a bit more emphasis on

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 2>that because it seems to be having, you know, some

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of grounds well.

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Wait, wait, a lot of stuff going on there. If

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm in discovery mode and I have enough traction such

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're doing it, yeah, do I pick a specific

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>track or do you take it from a pool of tracks?

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>How does that work?

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 2>So an artist could come in or their label, you know,

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're if you're doing it at that scale, and

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 2>they could put one track into discovery mode, or they

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 2>could put eight tracks. You know, it's up to them

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>how pointed they want to be with it and tactical

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>versus more broad and using the tool.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>So let's just assume that I'm gaining traction. What is

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the next level I'm eligible for?

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Its Spotify Well, I mean hopefully the way that we

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 2>see it working organically is signals kind of pick up

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>and ladder on each other. So if you're doing well

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in radio, then the algorithm's going to notice that and

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 2>start putting you more and more in other contexts. On

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the editor's dashboards, they're going to see, oh, you know,

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the save rate on this thing is super high. Everyone

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 2>that listens to it wants to save it, so they're

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 2>going to consider it more for things when we're thinking

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>about artists to partner with, you know, a radar artist

0:18:59.920 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 2>or some of the programs that we do to build

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 2>artist brands. It all kind of feeds into the better

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 2>a track is performing. All those opportunities start, you know,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 2>opening up for ours.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's be very clear, this is a business of hype

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and bullshit. Okay, let's assume I have some traction. They're

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be people who try to make contact with you,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>who are gonna spin a story. I'm gonna be on television,

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm selling tickets, et cetera, et cetera. How do you

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>separate the week from the chat?

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean we see it a lot. I think

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 2>there are things that spike, and then there are things

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 2>that have staying power, and I think we've gotten pretty

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>good at especially when things are in our programming or

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>editorial programming or algorithmic programming. You kind of see it

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 2>in the data, right, Like when someone listens to the song,

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>how often do they go back to it next week?

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>How often do they save it and make it one

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of the things in their playlist, how often they sharing

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>it with friends? You can't really fake that stuff in

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>terms of the response you're getting from real human beings.

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 2>And so you might get some noise in the data

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>from something having like a meme moment on TikTok or

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting featured somewhere, but it's pretty easy for

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>us to see what's gonna kind of stick with it

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 2>and have staying power.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm clicking boxes for discovery mode. Yeah, let's just

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>assume I continue to have more and more success. At

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>what point do I talk to a human being?

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean I don't. I don't say this to

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>say we don't want to talk to artists and levels

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 2>we talk to artisans.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I don't want to talk to people. I'd rather

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with email, whatever, So continue.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, It's just the point I'm trying to make is,

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, the music ecosystem is pretty small, right, like

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>this industry. It's a small industry and relationships matter. I

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>don't want to like deny that, but at the same time,

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's been good for the industry that more

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and more is done on the basis of, you know,

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.239
<v Speaker 2>how is something actually performing and how's it resonating with

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 2>fans more so than who you know and who you're

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 2>connected to. So we try to make it so the

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 2>top of the mountain isn't about getting to talk to

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 2>someone you know. It shouldn't require you having a friend

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 2>in the company, so that's not really all roads don't

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>lead to And then you have a meeting with Spotify

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 2>or hopefully our systems are working so that you can

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>get a lot done and it doesn't have to be

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>about a human relationship.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But after I'm in discovery mode and it's working, I

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>just have to have faith that editorial and it's going

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to work me. You know.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's about having faith, but it's also about

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 2>look For most artists that are really trying to do

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 2>this and they're trying to get out on tour and

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to have fans that maybe support them with

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>merch or become someone that's going to be a genuine supporter.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>It's about taking people from being light listeners maybe I

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 2>hear you in radio, to being high intent listeners like

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm searching for you and I'm playing you to a

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 2>real follower and supporter where I'm you know, buying things,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 2>and so we try to kind of flow those tools together.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 2>So let's say you have good success on discovery mode,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 2>then you can go in and buy a native ads

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 2>campaign that says, I want to target people that have

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 2>only ever heard me on programming but have never put

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>me in their library. Can you put me in front

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 2>of them? And then we want to say all right

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 2>now you've got some high intent listeners, Let's put your

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 2>show and your concert listing in front of them. And

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of the beautiful flow when it works really well,

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 2>is going from discovery mode low intent, native ads high intent,

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 2>and now you start having your concert listings or your

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 2>merch and you start, you know, not only getting very

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>material royalties, and I'm sure we'll talk about you know,

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 2>sizeable royalties that are getting paid out, but also other

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>revenue streams that you can drive by having those you know,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 2>high intent fans on Spotify.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, when you talk about AD, you're not talking about

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the free tier. You're talking about information that would be

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>served up to subscribers. You're right, yes, and that information

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>might be tour dates, might be merch anything else.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So it could be content like here's a new release

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>from an artist that you might have heard in a

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 2>radio station. It could be like you said, concerts merch.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And where would the user see that?

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, our main products are called Marquee, which is like

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>when you open the app, if there's a relevant new

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 2>release for you, you'll see a big screen when you

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>open the app announcing the new release, usually on release day,

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and then we have a second format called Showcase, which

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>is essentially a home shelf. You know how we have

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the shelves on home with different content recommendations. It's a

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>sponsored shelf where you can feature not only a new release,

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>but it could be a catalog, anniversary or kind of

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 2>anything that you want to promote.

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Previous Spotify reports have said the most active listeners

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>pick and choose their music as opposed to listening to playlists.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that accurate?

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, it's certainly true that almost every user

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 2>does both. So you know, users that are heavily engaged

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 2>often have their own playlists and they're curating stuff for themselves,

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 2>your favorite songs that you want to go back to

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>over and over. But the vast, vast majority of users

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 2>also have habits with our programming. Maybe they love hot

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 2>country or they love their daily mix too. The healthiest

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 2>users on Spotify have the most diverse habits. They listen

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 2>to us on their phone and the card, they listen

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to programming and you know, the DJ, and they do

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>a jam with their friends. Like, the more different parts

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 2>of Spotify you're using, the more you're going to retain,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the more you're gonna keep paying for your subscription.

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what is happening musically on Spotify? After all, we

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>hear all this top line stuff. It's a hip hop world.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Rock is dying.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 2>What is going on genre wise? You mean yes, well,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 2>you know earlier I said more nichefication. I think that's

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>definitely true. But I think probably like the biggest trend

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that I see is how global. Those trends have been

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>so regional Mexican music, K pop, afro pop, you know,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 2>music has gotten so global across the world, and now

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>we're at a place where artists get the majority of

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 2>their royalties from outside their home country. A third of

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 2>artists get more than.

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Who wha wha, wha wha A little bit slower. Yeah,

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>all artists around the world, both in small countries and

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in large markets US, Germany and UK, get most of

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>their royalties outside their home country.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 2>The average is that the majority of an artist's royalties

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 2>come from outside their home country.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I interrupted, you continue, Yeah.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 2>So just to say I think that I think we've

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 2>gone from a global music market that was a lot

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 2>more western centric and it's you know, these kind of

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 2>radio stations on Terrestra radio that fit into a certain

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 2>format to a lot more niche genres, and a lot

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 2>of those genres are driven outside the West, but are

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>becoming really popular globally.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we have the Spotify Top fifty, that's the most

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>dominant chart in the world. It does not seem to

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have niche ification if you look down the road. Are

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>these other niches going to grow or is that always

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be separate from the pool at large?

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I think so. I mean, when you look at the

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 2>top fifty on Spotify, you gotta remember that's a little

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>bit of a reflection of where our users are. But

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>as India has become a bigger and bigger area of

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 2>usage for Spotify, you see more and more music from

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 2>India charting, and I think we're just going to see

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 2>that as we've become more popular in Africa across Asia.

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 2>I certainly think you're going to see that on the

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 2>global chart.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's regional. Are we going to see an Americana

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>act in the Spotify Top fifteen?

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that because of the fact that

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the way music is breaking is so different now. I mean,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I said, in the nineties, you kind

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 2>of had to fit into a certain set of radio formats.

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 2>There are no rules now, Like, you can be whatever

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of music you want. You don't need to brand

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 2>yourself with a specific genre or whatever. And if you

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>have a fan base that's resonating with what you're doing

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 2>because of your personality or the way you relate to

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 2>them or whatever, you can grow. And so because of that,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it's possible for really any type of music

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to break through. Like I yeah, I don't think there

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 2>are really any rules boundaries anymore.

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Just going sideways for a second to what did we

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to tracks start on social media primarily TikTok and crossover,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or start on Spotify, or start on TikTok and not crossover.

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, I mean we certainly see all of the above.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I think typically, Well, let me divide into two types

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 2>of tracks, just to massively oversimplify, there's two types of tracks.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 2>There's tracks that follow like a typical historical pattern, which

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>is your biggest week is your opening week. You come

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 2>out hot out of the gate, all the attention, and

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>then slowly over time you kind of plateau and fade out.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 2>That's like one path that a track can have. A

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>second type of path that we see is what I

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>would think about as a momentum track, it gets released,

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of sitting there and then all of a

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 2>sudden it gets picked up by something. It's in a

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Netflix show, it's in a TikTok trend whatever, and now

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 2>it starts surging out of nowhere and it has this

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of big hill out of nowhere. So I think

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>in terms of tracks that really spike on Spotify, it

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 2>might be fifty to fifty ish in terms of the

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 2>first pattern versus the second pattern. Typically for the first

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>pattern tracks they really break first on Spotify, you see

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 2>them spike out of the gate. They're getting you know,

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 2>presence on playlists, and then they start getting picked up

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>elsewhere in the world. For the second time of track,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 2>usually streaming is a little bit behind, maybe you know,

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a couple of days or a week after it's trending

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 2>on social it starts, you know, we see the signals

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>in the search algorithm and stuff, and it starts getting

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>picked up by Spotify. But to your point about not sticking,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of the stuff that is a

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 2>trending sound to the background of a social media video

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 2>isn't the stuff that people want to have in their playlist,

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't actually you know, linger or really catch

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 2>on were genuine music streaming. It's just, you know, a

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>trend in a different sense.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay. As you said, today, Spotify released its annual economics report. Well,

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>those who haven't read it, can you give us some

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>highlights for sure?

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to me, I would boil it down to

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>two big things. First, the total pie continues to grow

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 2>and grow and grow, which is great. I started in

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the music industry two thousand and eight to twenty fourteen,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and every year it was how much are we going down?

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So I don't take it for granted that every year,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the industry grows. It's fantastic that total payouts

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in total revenues to the industry are going up and

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>up and up every year. It's clear that streaming has

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>gotten people to pay for music more and more and

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>more people are coming out to the idea that paying

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 2>for music every month is a great service, which is awesome.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 2>So ten billion with a B in total payouts from

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Spotify in twenty twenty four ten x growth from where

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 2>we were in twenty fourteen. We paid out one billion

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>in twenty fourteen. Ten billion in twenty twenty four the

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 2>most that any retailer has ever paid to the music industry,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 2>So that's awesome. The total pie is growing. Second big

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 2>thing that stands out is it's getting divided and shared

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 2>in by more and more types of artist success stories.

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So the number of artists that are getting ten thousand

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars in payouts per year, one hundred thousand dollars in

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>payouts per year, five million dollars in payouts per year,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 2>all those have tripled in the last seven years. So

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the number of artists seeing you know, meaningful amounts of

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 2>royalty payouts is growing faster than the total pie is growing,

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>which just means that we're finding more and more ways

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:03.479
<v Speaker 2>to program different types of artists to audiences and that's working.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Fifty percent of payouts going to indies. That was never possible,

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the previous way that the industry works.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 2>So those are the two big things that stand out

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to me, total pie growth and then how it's getting

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>shared by more and more types of artists.

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us, you know, this may be two minute,

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a couple of stories of people

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>were making a lot of money that I mean obviously

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Lady Gaga, Brude marsh and making a lot of money,

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but something domestic. We're speaking in English where people will

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>be surprised how much money these people are making.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a good question. I don't know, you know,

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 2>if I should owe any one artists specific payouts. But

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, actually I was just talking to there's a

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 2>guy on our team who's employed by Spotify, but he

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>does music with his band still as a side gig,

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and so we were looking at his stuff because I'm

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 2>allowed to talk about him because he works here. I

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 2>don't need to ask his permission. So they're bandy, you know,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 2>they all have jobs, but they put out music on

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 2>the side still. They have maybe around one hundred thousand

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 2>monthly listeners, a few million streams. They're generating about fifteen

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars a year in payouts from Spotify, and so

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you know that's probably they're yeah, probably some something like

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>the eighty thousand, you know, highest earning artists, and Spotify

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 2>by no means is this like you know, their day job.

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 2>But it just like gives you an example of the

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 2>types of that type of success story wasn't really even

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 2>a thing twenty years ago. So I thought that was cool,

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 2>just as an example of what's possible.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, since your tenure at Spotify, there's been a change

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>where you have to reach a certain threshold to get

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>royalties at all. Yeah, what percentage of tracks reach that threshold?

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 2>So ninety nine point five percent of tracks by stream

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 2>share monetize. But the reason that we established that threshold is,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I back up for a second, most

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>of what we try to do every day grow the

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 2>pie because it grows our revenues and it grows payouts

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to the industry. Right, very very infrequently, you can find

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.399
<v Speaker 2>a way to shift the payout that you're already doing

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 2>around to get people paid more. But that's what we

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>found with this. For tracks that were generating less than

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a thousand streams in the last year, on average, they

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>were generating three cents in payouts. So that means if

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 2>you went into your aggregator account and said I want

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 2>to withdraw my three cents, you couldn't even do it

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>because it's below the threshold of the fee to withdraw

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 2>your money. Right and so literally, if you add up

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 2>all those pennies of millions of uploaders generating a few pennies,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.479
<v Speaker 2>we were allowed fifty one hundred million dollars to sit

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 2>just between couch cushions getting wasted, and that seemed like

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 2>a real missed opportunity. We had gotten so big that

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 2>that amount of waste in the system seemed like a

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>miss So we established a threshold to say, you know,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 2>until a track has one thousand streams the last twelve months,

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't generate royalties. That allows all the tracks that

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 2>are generating royalties to get half a percent more payout,

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 2>so it increases all of their payouts. Spotify makes no

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 2>additional money by this policy. It just shifts the revenue

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:39.959
<v Speaker 2>to people that can actually withdraw their money. And because

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 2>of that, we eliminated waste in the system and we're

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>able to get everyone who's doing this a little bit

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 2>more seriously paid a little bit more money.

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Spotify is the largest player in streaming market, just

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like anybody who's the largest player, there's blowback. In addition,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>streaming is a different paradigm than it will in the

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 1>pre Internet era. Is this just something that the public

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't understand it needs to adjust to or what would

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>your response.

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Be, Yeah, I mean it depends on the type of

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 2>blowback you're talking about. I see it all, but you know,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the one type that I see is it was better

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 2>in the good old days. You know, everyone was making

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 2>more money in the good old days. And I don't

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 2>understand that. I haven't seen any data that at any

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 2>point in music history we're artists making more money than

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 2>they are now. I was looking at in loud and

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 2>clear this year, if you were the one hundred thousandth

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 2>most popular artists on Spotify last year, he generated six

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars from Spotify, And usually, you know, Spotify is

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>about a quarter of what you make from recorded revenue,

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 2>so maybe you're making twenty twenty five thousand in total

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>if you were one hundred thousandth most popular artists on

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Spotify in twenty twenty four. In two thousand and four,

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousandth most popular artist was making six hundred

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars from Spotify. So it's ten x and in two

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand four, if I go back ten years, additionally, there

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 2>was no Just.

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, because I think you missbooked, you're about

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen.

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, Yeah, So twenty twenty four it was generating six

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars. Twenty fourteen it was generating six hundred dollars.

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:30.399
<v Speaker 2>And if I go back to two thousand and four.

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Ten years earlier, there was no such thing as the

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred thousandth most popular commercial artists. The record stores

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 2>did not have one hundred thousand different artists in it,

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 2>so that didn't exist. They cut their demo, they didn't

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>get signed, no thank you, you're out of the game.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 2>They weren't even allowed to play. So we've gone from

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you can't be in the game to you can generate

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a couple hundred dollars to you know, twenty twenty five

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars a year from recorded revenue. Not that it's like, okay,

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 2>quit everything, this is your but that's the kind of

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>progress that makes it hard for me to understand how

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 2>you could look at this and say anything other than

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 2>the industry is so much healthier now than it's been

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 2>at any point in its history. Maybe, you know, if

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 2>you're a top ten, top twenty act and less of

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the streams, less of the attention goes to you, maybe

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 2>it's it's, you know, a weaker phase of music industry

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>at that tip of the iceberg. But in terms of

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the total revenue getting paid to artists, in terms of

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 2>the number of artists achieving meaningful amounts of royalties or

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>meaningful amounts of success. There's just no denying the fact

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 2>that there's more you know, success now than there's ever been.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 2>So to me, this is the good old days of

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the music industry. And that's probably the criticism that confuses

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>me the most of you know, streaming doesn't pay and

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 2>we are so much better off in the CD era.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I've just never seen a number or a fact to

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 2>support that way of looking at it.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how about all the people who say my track

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:11.439
<v Speaker 1>was streamed a million dollar a million times, but I'm

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 1>getting buck.

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 2>Gis, Yeah, totally, you know. One of the tough things

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that's it's hard to wrap your head around this. One

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 2>point four million tracks on Spotify have gotten a million

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 2>streams for more. It's just there's a lot of streams, right,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 2>So if if your track gets a million streams, it

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 2>means you're in the top one point four million tracks

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 2>last year. But just a million streams doesn't mean what

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>it used to in terms of total popularity. So I

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of times when people are frustrated about payouts,

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and it's from maybe an artist that you haven't heard

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 2>of before, or they haven't kind of built their brand.

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it is just the laws of popularity.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Like you and I could record a song today and

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>we could put it up on Spotify. There's twelve million

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 2>people who have uploaded. Are we gonna have a hit?

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 2>It's the odds are stacked against us. So it just

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>requires that much more popularity to break through today because

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 2>there's hundreds of millions of people streaming, and there's trillions

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>of streams every year, and so what might have seemed

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.479
<v Speaker 2>like a big number in a downloads era just really

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 2>isn't the same in the streaming era.

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>However, there are people, especially in the UK, keep saying, oh,

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you're putting out an artist out of business, they can't

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>make a living.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know if it's supported by facts, like

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I hear the anecdotes that you're talking about. But every

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 2>single piece of data that I see is that there's

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 2>more revenue being paid to artists that support more people

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 2>being able to afford living through music than there were

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago or twenty years ago. I mean ten

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 2>years ago the total industry had gotten to a bottom

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of thirteen fourteen billion, and now we're going to be

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 2>over in the thirties. In total revenues for recorded music,

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 2>So there's no doubt that more is being paid out.

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 2>We are one hundred percent transparent with how we pay

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 2>out and to who. No one's been more transparent than us,

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 2>And so there are occasions I'm sure where money is

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 2>getting lost in the pipes or it's not reaching the

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 2>right hands. I don't want to diminish any of that,

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 2>but overall, I think it to me, there's no denying

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 2>the data that the industry is more healthy and more

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:45.879
<v Speaker 2>people are making a living for music than there were

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:46.919
<v Speaker 2>at any previous era.

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, today, how many tracts are being uploaded a day

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>or a week or a month.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know it's in the tens of thousands, maybe

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 2>towards one hundred thousand a day.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I think now, Okay, you said something earlier that Spotify

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>represents twenty five percent, one quarter of overall recorded music revenues.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Where's the other three quarters?

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think in terms of let's see, I think

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 2>in terms of streaming revenue, that's about that's become about

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent of the business now and we're about thirty

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 2>five forty percent of that. And then outside of streaming,

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, you've got vinyl and CD and inside streaming

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 2>you have essentially Spotify's competitors.

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you know the big competitors domestically are Apple and Amazon.

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Are we considering streaming people who are listening for free

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube also which pays? But I just want to

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>know in the overall pie.

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when we look at total recorded revenues for the industry,

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 2>paid streaming is the biggest driver. Free streaming AD supported

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 2>streaming from Spotify and YouTube is the second biggest, and

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 2>then you know everything after that is pretty small, digital downloads,

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:15.479
<v Speaker 2>et cetera.

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>To what degree do you personally pay or the company

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 1>also pay attention to your competitors. Let me start on

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a gross level. Yeah, if you ever say, wait a second,

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.760
<v Speaker 1>something else has happened in there, we have to follow

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that trend.

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 2>I think for the most part, you know, we've been

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 2>more of a leader for the fact that this is

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 2>really all we focus on, you know, like this is

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>our whole business. If streaming music doesn't work for us,

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 2>we don't work, like we have to make this work.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 2>So we focus a lot on how can we make

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the most valuable service that we possibly can so that

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 2>more people pay for a music subscription so that we

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 2>grow revenues and we grow payouts. We have to be

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with that. We don't have any other We don't

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 2>have a cloud business or a you know, of books

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>business or a hardware business to subsidize this thing. It

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 2>has to work on its own. So I think because

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of that, we've been really focused. We've invested a ton

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 2>in innovation of the product and R and D, you know,

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to be in front and have what I'm biased, but

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 2>I think clearly the best consumer experience.

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a collegial small business. Do the other big companies

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have someone like you? Do you know them? To what

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 1>degree is their infrastructure akin to yours?

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is a small ecosystem, and I think that,

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 2>like you know, as much as we are competitors, I

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>genuinely mean this. There's what It's somewhere between five hundred

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and six hundred million people paying for music music subscription

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 2>around the world. Now there's seven eight billion people in

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the world. The big picture here is music is part

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 2>of every single human being's life. There is still a

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 2>ton of growth to get all of the world paying

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 2>for streaming music, and so if other companies are finding

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 2>ways to do that, I genuinely believe it's a good

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 2>thing because that brings them into this market, and I

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 2>think Spotify is the best product and so ultimately it's

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 2>going to win that market. But that's like the big

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 2>picture journey that we're on. I remember when I joined

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Spotify in twenty eleven, and you know, there's like industry

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 2>analysis reports and they were like, the total addressable market

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 2>for a paying music subscription, we think is between three

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 2>to five million or you know, and Spotify was at

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred thousand subscribers. The big picture why the pie

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 2>is growing, why there's more revenue in the industry, is

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 2>we got hundreds of millions of people to pay for music.

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.959
<v Speaker 2>So I'm cheerleading everybody that's trying to make that happen.

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:05.240
<v Speaker 2>And because of that, you know, I try to take inspiration.

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of Spotify alumni who've gone to YouTube,

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 2>We've gone to Apple, We've gone to Amazon and built

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 2>out similar things there, you know, Amazon Music for artists

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 2>or similar tools that what we're doing, and I think

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 2>that is a great thing.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you say to people who say Spotify pays

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>less per stream.

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:38.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a it's a totally bogus ridiculous concept. There

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 2>is no such thing as a There is no such

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 2>thing as a per play rate, and this is probably

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 2>the most misunderstood concept in the music industry. The thing

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that probably bothers me the most is when people in

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the music industry who fully know that it's bullshit and

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>still talk about it as if it's a real thing

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>because it serves their narraor. But there is no such

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 2>thing as a per play rate. The reason that there's

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 2>no such thing as a per play rate is because

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 2>no consumer pays per play that they do, you know,

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 2>they pay per month. So every music subscription pays the

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 2>same way. We all charge the same retail price, and

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we all take our music revenues and pay two thirds

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of it to labels and publishers. Every music streaming service

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 2>does that exactly the same way. So then if we're

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 2>all paying, if we're all doing the same retail price,

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.240
<v Speaker 2>and we're all paying out two thirds of that retail revenue,

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 2>why is the revenue per play higher in some streaming

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 2>services than others. The reason is that on other streaming services,

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 2>people play a lot fewer streams. So if you only

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 2>use your service to play one track in a month,

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 2>you got a per play rate of ten dollars. Congratulations,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 2>that looks amazing. If you use the service a lot

0:48:01.080 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and you're streaming thousands or tens of thousands of times

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 2>a month, the effective quote unquote per play rate goes down.

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 2>The only problem is if you look at what is

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the biggest predictor of churn of stopping paying for music,

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the biggest predictor of churn is low usage of the service.

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 2>So if you play five times a month or ten

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 2>times a month, it makes your per play rate look amazing,

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 2>and then next month you're probably canceling your description because

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you get no value from the thing. So all of

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the you know, anyone in the industry you're saying, we

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:38.399
<v Speaker 2>got to get the per play rates up. It's it's

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 2>literally backwards for what we need to be trying to

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 2>do as an industry. We need to be trying to

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 2>get people to engage more in their service so that

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 2>they're willing to pay more when we raise prices, that

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 2>they retain better. And so you know, if a service

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 2>has a lot of dormant accounts, you know, you sign

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 2>up with your phone carrier, but you never actually use

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 2>it, it makes your per play ray look amazing, but it's

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 2>it's totally a distraction, and it's opposite from what the

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>industry needs to be focused on. So it's so frustrating

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 2>misunderstood in the industry.

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what is the demo of subscriber of Spotify compared

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to Apple and Amazon.

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 2>It's younger, and it's more global.

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And it is also more active. Correct.

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I don't know if you could call

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that a demo, but way more active. I think, on average,

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 2>probably about twice as active.

0:49:34.280 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay. I was with a twenty something yesterday actually three

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 1>days ago, and she said she subscribed to Apple Music,

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:48.479
<v Speaker 1>which shocked me. Okay, they're out there not getting into

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 1>my own personal feelings about this. Let's just assume someone

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:56.919
<v Speaker 1>is listening and they don't have a subscription at all

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.399
<v Speaker 1>or there with a rival service, Why should would they

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be subscribing to Spotify instead.

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, in a live pitch them. Yeah, oh this

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 2>is exciting. Well, I think you know, typically the things

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that we see people calling out is the reason that

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 2>they come to Spotify or switch to Spotify is personalization.

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, all the mixes that we make for you,

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 2>the way that the service kind of wraps around your

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.840
<v Speaker 2>taste and get to know you. The second is ubiquity,

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Like we've put in fifteen years into making sure run

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 2>every speaker, every TV, every car, wherever you are you

0:50:30.719 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 2>can get Spotify to work. That's a big part of it.

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 2>And then recently, I think a lot of the investments

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 2>that we've been making into kind of product innovation, being

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 2>able to have a jam with your friends where you

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 2>can all cue songs together, the DJ feature where you

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 2>have someone giving you context about the music, and you know,

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 2>serving recommendations. I think all those things have felt like

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you're getting a little bit more value from this service

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 2>than maybe other places.

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there was a recent book that analyze Spotify and

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>said there were tracks created and that these tracks were

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>created mostly in lean back music. We're taking away royalties

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>from the overall pool. Can you tell us about that?

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Not true? Spotify creates zero tracks period. Every track that's

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 2>on Spotify comes from a third party, a licenser, which

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.840
<v Speaker 2>is a label or a distributor. They distribute us tracks.

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 2>We publish and program the tracks, so we do not

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 2>make our own music, and we do not like pad

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 2>our service with you know, Spotify's own tracks.

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>How about different royalty rates for different companies, like a

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:52.839
<v Speaker 1>music factory who's creating work for hire. Some guy comes in,

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:57.720
<v Speaker 1>creates an atmospheric track. They put these into a pile

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>of let's say twenty five thousand tracks. You say, okay,

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll program that, but we'll pay you a lesser royalty.

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So we never say we'll program that period. But we've

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 2>never said in a deal you give us this and

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 2>we'll program it that. That's not a quid pro quo

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 2>that we would ever do. If you're asking, would we

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 2>pay the same royalty rate for uh SPA background music

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 2>as Kendrick Lamar, of course, I think any sane person

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 2>would assume we're not paying the same rate for forests,

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, wind sounds as we are for you know,

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the top acts in the world. That's always been the

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 2>case in the history of the music industry. You have

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 2>your production music in the bargain bin, you've got the

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 2>hits that have a higher wholesale rate. There's I don't

0:52:48.520 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 2>think anyone would be surprised by that. But as far

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 2>as background music, it's really been an emergent behavior of

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the access model. Like what I mean by that is

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 2>there weren't a lot of people buying White Noise CDs

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 2>in the nineties, Are you really going to you know,

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 2>pay eight dollars to have that CD on hand for

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 2>when you want to listen to white Noise? Probably not,

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.239
<v Speaker 2>but in the access model and streaming where you've already

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 2>paid your monthly subscription, but you want to have you know,

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 2>your our meditation session, or you want to have the

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 2>background noise so you're you know, toddler can take a nap.

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 2>It's become you know, it's become an important use case

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to some people. It exists as an important playlisting category.

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 2>For us, it's been pretty consistent out of around one

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 2>to two percent of plays over the last decade. It

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 2>probably is about one to two percent of what we

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 2>think about day to day. It's Spotify, it's not a

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:50.919
<v Speaker 2>huge part. And so there's no you know, uh, there's

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 2>no scheme, there's no I don't really know where the

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 2>myths and the controversy come from, but it's sort of

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 2>a natural evolution of having access to anything you want

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that these kind of use cases become something that people do.

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:09.879
<v Speaker 1>How do you decide which tracks get a lower royalty rate?

0:54:10.640 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean everything is a negotiation. So if you're

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:17.839
<v Speaker 2>doing a deal with a production music company that specializes

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:19.920
<v Speaker 2>and by the way, some of them are very good

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:23.279
<v Speaker 2>at doing this really well. Like you have to make

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:27.759
<v Speaker 2>the music. I think boring is probably the right word, Like,

0:54:28.360 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 2>don't distract the user when they're trying to meditate with vocals.

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It's got to kind of just recede into the background

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and be as like unnoticeable as possible. So I don't

0:54:37.040 --> 0:54:39.320
<v Speaker 2>want to diminish the skill that it takes to create

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a great production library. It's it is certainly valuable. But

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're negotiating with that type of label, obviously the

0:54:45.680 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 2>mechanics of that are going to be different than if

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 2>you're negotiating with someone that drives a lot of their

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:52.560
<v Speaker 2>own demand that you know people are going to search

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 2>for that artist. It's not something that you know it's

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 2>just going to be a use case kind of music,

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:00.320
<v Speaker 2>but people actually care about that artists and going to

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 2>search it out.

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's mostly in the jazz soft jazz world. Artist

0:55:07.400 --> 0:55:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, I put in all my effort I create

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 1>this and and to save money. Spotify is programming stuff

0:55:15.480 --> 0:55:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that's more from one of these music factories instead.

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:23.279
<v Speaker 2>You know, from what we see. They just don't. They're

0:55:23.320 --> 0:55:26.399
<v Speaker 2>just not substitutional. Period. So, like, I'm a jazz fan,

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and there are times that I seek out jazz and

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I look for John Scholfield or Pamathany or I'm you know,

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for music because I care that I'm listening

0:55:35.840 --> 0:55:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to jazz. And then there's other times where I just

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 2>want background music. I don't think that you can get

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 2>someone who would be interested in jazz to be like,

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 2>don't you want to meditate right now? Or don't you

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 2>want to sleep right now? It's up to the user,

0:55:48.400 --> 0:55:50.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, what need they have. So it's just not

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a viable idea to say, oh, let's take someone that

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 2>would be looking for, you know, what's the latest in jazz,

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:01.359
<v Speaker 2>or let me go listen to Pamathany and instead give them,

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, background production music. It just doesn't work like that.

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, are there any companies that makes soft jazz that

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you have an overall deal with that you pay less to?

0:56:15.880 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if any of the production music, I

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know how much it goes into soft jazz or

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:22.800
<v Speaker 2>if it's more the white noise kind of baby sleep

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 2>nature sounds side of it. I'm sure there's some blurring

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of the edges, but what I can tell you is

0:56:31.080 --> 0:56:33.799
<v Speaker 2>that for any of these playlists, like if you look

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 2>at our noise meditation or our relaxation playlists or whatever,

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the people you know, just so you see what it

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 2>looks like on the inside. Within the company, the people

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 2>who are responsible for programming that playlist, they are accountable

0:56:53.239 --> 0:56:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to that playlist performing the best with consumers. So they

0:56:57.600 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 2>need to go in and say, every time I add

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:03.759
<v Speaker 2>some of the playlist, people skip less and they stream more,

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 2>and so they need to put the stuff in it

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that is the best. That is their incentive is to

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:12.080
<v Speaker 2>program it with the you know, the content that people

0:57:12.120 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 2>want for that use case or or for that playlist.

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 2>They're not asked to, you know, do it from here

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:19.360
<v Speaker 2>or do it from there. They're asked to put the

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 2>best stuff in there that's going to perform best for

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the user, because that's what gets people to retain in

0:57:23.480 --> 0:57:26.440
<v Speaker 2>their subscription and grows our revenue.

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're out there, you're somewhere, you're at dinner, you're

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 1>at a show, you're at a party, and it comes

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 1>out you work at Spotify. How do people react well?

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 2>For the most part, people who are not in the

0:57:48.920 --> 0:57:54.880
<v Speaker 2>music industry have lovely things to say about Spotify because

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:58.040
<v Speaker 2>from a consumer standpoint, it's been life changing. You know,

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:01.400
<v Speaker 2>like I feel like I get a amazing surplus of value.

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I get to listen to anything in the world. Your

0:58:02.960 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 2>playlists are amazing. When I talk to people who are

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in the music industry, they have lots more interesting things

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 2>to ask me about, you know, how do I get

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 2>on playlists? And how do your royalty rates work? And

0:58:15.320 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of stuff. But you know, if you're talking

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:19.640
<v Speaker 2>about just day to day interactions, I think people have been,

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, overjoyed about the way that Spotify plays in

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:27.919
<v Speaker 2>their life, how it's soundtracked different moments of their life,

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the role it plays with the time they spend with

0:58:30.480 --> 0:58:32.520
<v Speaker 2>their kids. I mean, that's really one of the things

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that has kept me at Spotify for now fourteen years,

0:58:36.320 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 2>is like there's just so few products that have one

0:58:40.440 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 2>a real role in people's lives, you know, that is

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 2>used by so many different people, but two in kind

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of a I would argue, like a purely positive way.

0:58:50.480 --> 0:58:53.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, you don't hear parents say I got to

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:55.400
<v Speaker 2>get my kid to spend less time with Spotify. I

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 2>think more time that people spend with Spotify, whether it's

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, podcasts or music, it's you know, it's enriching,

0:59:02.000 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 2>it's making your life. I don't know better in some ways,

0:59:06.560 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 2>you don't feel like, oh that hour that I just

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 2>spent has kind of robbed me of something or made

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 2>me feel worse or something. So you know, that's usually

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 2>what I hear about from most folks.

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we've covered Indie. Tell me about your relationship with

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the three major labels in large independence.

0:59:26.760 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that right now our relationship with the

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 2>industry is probably the healthiest it's been. I mean, look,

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:37.360
<v Speaker 2>in an industry like ours, you're always going to have

0:59:37.440 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 2>your debates d jure about what's going on in the

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 2>industry and things that you can argue about. But in

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a world where our incentives are so aligned, we all

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:51.440
<v Speaker 2>want to get more people in the world to pay

0:59:51.480 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 2>for music. We all want to figure out how to

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 2>raise prices in a way that's going to maximize revenue. Together,

0:59:56.480 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 2>we all want to figure out a way to add

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 2>more value to the subscription and so that we can

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 2>add more tiers or things like that. The conversations that

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we're in day to day, we're more aligned,

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, we want the same things. Of course, there's

1:00:11.080 --> 1:00:12.760
<v Speaker 2>always going to be things to figure out, but you know,

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>if you talk about the state of those relationships, I

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 2>think they're you know, they're as good as I've ever

1:00:17.440 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 2>seen them. Being at Spotify for the last fourteen years.

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>How often do you speak with people from the major labels?

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:29.439
<v Speaker 2>Definitely a few times a month.

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're saying you could talk to someone from Innerscope

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:38.520
<v Speaker 1>once a month, three times a month.

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, in my role, I typically am interfacing more with

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>people who are in the central corporate teams and the

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>major labels more so than the frontline labels. The frontline

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>labels have teams they can work with at Spotify on

1:00:53.760 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>this is the new release coming from this artist. We

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>want to give you heads up about it. We want

1:00:57.080 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to get prepared how we're going to partner around it.

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>That's you know, that's that's less of my day to.

1:01:01.760 --> 1:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Day just staying on that. Yeah, lessons daity, how does

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that actually work?

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Well? I mean, as you know, so much of a

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>new releases promotional cycle now has shifted to the pre

1:01:18.680 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>release phase, building hype, teasing it, getting people excited about it.

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And one of the ways that Spotify and markets its

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>service is in collaboration with artists. So we try to

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 2>do co marketing with artists that not only attract attention

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>to them, but might be the reason that someone joined

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Spotify for the first time. Like if you're sixteen and

1:01:45.520 --> 1:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>you see, oh, here's chaperone advertisement with Spotify, I want

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to make sure I get that new release on release day,

1:01:53.600 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and that could be the reason that you join Spotify.

1:01:56.320 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of times you try to coordinate, you know,

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:01.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of co marketing together around a new release.

1:02:02.680 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Well what about people who say that Spotify is run

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>presently streaming in general's run present like radio, where the

1:02:11.560 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>majors have a dominant relationship in market share and mind share.

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Every data point says the exact opposite thing. I mean,

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're if the assertion is that the majors dominate

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:31.240
<v Speaker 2>more than ever before, that's certainly not what we're seeing, right.

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing more share go to indies than ever before.

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:37.840
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing more DIY success than ever before. So I

1:02:37.920 --> 1:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>don't I haven't seen any data to support the idea

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>that the industry is getting more and more dominated by

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 2>major labels.

1:02:45.880 --> 1:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it is a relationship business. I personally know people

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>who have relationships with people at Spotify and work them

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on records. Yeah, somebody who's in Timbuctoo's got a record

1:02:57.280 --> 1:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have that relationship. Relationship must pay dividends.

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think so if we separate two things, we

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>talk about marketing, we talk about playlisting. Earlier I talked

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>about our playlist pitching system where we've tried to make

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>as level of a playing field as possible, and so

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 2>it's not about who can get in the building and

1:03:18.720 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>play their record on a stereo. It's it all comes

1:03:21.880 --> 1:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>through the same tool. People evaluate it with their headphones on.

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:26.760
<v Speaker 2>They decide, you know, our editors decide what they want

1:03:26.760 --> 1:03:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to get behind. So that's one piece of it. And

1:03:28.560 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>then on the co marketing side, we are our interest

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>is in partnering with artist brands where they're bringing something

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>to the table, an audience, an excitement, right, and so

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 2>when we see that, it can be from any angle.

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>It could be an independent artist, it could be an

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>indie major distributor urist, it could be a major as

1:03:49.240 --> 1:03:52.840
<v Speaker 2>signed artist. If it's if it's an artist that doing

1:03:52.880 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>a marketing tie up can be beneficial to both sides

1:03:55.880 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 2>because it allows us to have an interesting camp pain

1:04:00.360 --> 1:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and speak to a demo or a fan base that

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:07.840
<v Speaker 2>we'd like to reach. It doesn't really matter. Yeah, the

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:12.240
<v Speaker 2>exact kind of deal structure they have with their label.

1:04:19.960 --> 1:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I know people who have worked for Spotify no

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>longer worked there anymore for whatever reason.

1:04:26.640 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And they said traditionally drop date is Friday. And they said,

1:04:32.000 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>with some of these major racks, they can tell by

1:04:36.360 --> 1:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>early afternoon whether the albums is stiff for a success.

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you speak to that?

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that. Yeah, So typically stuff is coming out

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night midnight, and yeah, signals tend to emerge pretty

1:04:51.000 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>quickly in terms of again, how often are people sharing

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 2>the track, saving the track, repeap, playing the track. Those

1:04:56.520 --> 1:04:58.000
<v Speaker 2>signals start coming through pretty quick.

1:05:00.120 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>What would you tell someone who has, you know, a

1:05:04.840 --> 1:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>household name to a degree everything you say it's an

1:05:07.360 --> 1:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>interest today that the indicators are not good at first,

1:05:11.400 --> 1:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what would you tell them to try to prop up

1:05:14.000 --> 1:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the music?

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, so everything is context dependent. What I mean by

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:27.200
<v Speaker 2>that is, you know, if you take a song and

1:05:27.240 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>put it in hot country and it doesn't perform well,

1:05:30.000 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>it could be because it's just not a song that's

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>going to resonate with anyone. But it also could be

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that the people who are listening to that playlist, they're

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>not your people. You got to find some different people.

1:05:39.440 --> 1:05:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Our system tries to do that automatically. But sometimes it's

1:05:42.520 --> 1:05:45.800
<v Speaker 2>also about like, you know, who's this artist partnering with,

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:48.720
<v Speaker 2>where are they talking what? You know, like what culture

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:51.680
<v Speaker 2>are they trying to like appeal to. And sometimes it's

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:56.840
<v Speaker 2>about finding your zone a little bit. And you know,

1:05:56.920 --> 1:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I think that sometimes it can be a track that

1:05:59.400 --> 1:06:02.640
<v Speaker 2>will perform, just needs to be in a different type

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of context.

1:06:03.920 --> 1:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's just talk to someone who's truly a household names. Yeah,

1:06:07.240 --> 1:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they dropped their new album, numbers are not good. It

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:15.439
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be about classifying the niche. What might you tell

1:06:15.560 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>them to say, this is a way for you to

1:06:19.040 --> 1:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>make the album sustain.

1:06:21.640 --> 1:06:24.120
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to fight gravity. So I don't know that

1:06:24.160 --> 1:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I have any magic answers to that, but you know,

1:06:26.520 --> 1:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>at the very least, you're always gonna have, like, if

1:06:28.880 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about an established name, you're probably gonna have

1:06:31.720 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 2>some diehards that are gonna be with you no matter what.

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:36.080
<v Speaker 2>And so some records are gonna be the kind that

1:06:36.120 --> 1:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>are like I was even with you on that album,

1:06:38.880 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 2>even though it didn't kind of cross over to be

1:06:40.680 --> 1:06:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a pop hit. You always have that. But I don't

1:06:44.080 --> 1:06:45.920
<v Speaker 2>know that I have a magic answer outside of that.

1:06:46.800 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's assume I'm an act with some fan. Should

1:06:51.840 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I put out a single? Should I put out an EP?

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>How frequently should I put out my music? Yeah?

1:06:57.880 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I think there can be a lot of for success.

1:07:01.360 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>But I do think one of the big challenges with

1:07:03.680 --> 1:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>music is the long periods that can sometimes happen between releases,

1:07:11.920 --> 1:07:15.120
<v Speaker 2>where you kind of people start forgetting or fraying a

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit. So I do think that there's a pretty clear,

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, evidence that if you can keep a heartbeat

1:07:23.480 --> 1:07:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of engagement and keep you know, a touch point with

1:07:27.600 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the fans, it's a little bit easier when the next

1:07:29.960 --> 1:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>big project drops to have them ready and warmed up

1:07:32.840 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>and waiting. Dripping singles has been a pretty effective strategy

1:07:38.800 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 2>for that. So it tends to work a little better if,

1:07:41.400 --> 1:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you've got a big release coming in

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:46.960
<v Speaker 2>three months, if you can drip out one to five

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>singles along the way, every single one of those drops

1:07:50.760 --> 1:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>is an opportunity to drive word of mouth and attention

1:07:53.680 --> 1:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>and algorithmic you know, signal and relevancy. That just increases

1:07:57.440 --> 1:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the chances that when the full project drops, you know,

1:08:00.120 --> 1:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna do as well as I can possibly do.

1:08:03.280 --> 1:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And what about the number of tracks on an album.

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's been a trend of acts. I mean,

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to Morgan Wallen's a perfect example. The last couple

1:08:11.800 --> 1:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of albums have been double albums. One of the analysisses, well,

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna make more money.

1:08:19.360 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I you know, maybe I'm thinking too artistically puist, but

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 2>in my gut it is if you've got eighteen amazing

1:08:31.520 --> 1:08:33.839
<v Speaker 2>tracks that you really believe in, put out all eighteen.

1:08:34.240 --> 1:08:36.599
<v Speaker 2>If you've got nine and you try to force another nine,

1:08:36.680 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not gonna work. I mean, you can make an

1:08:38.360 --> 1:08:41.320
<v Speaker 2>eighteen album, but I don't think you can mathematically engineer

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>these things.

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Now.

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, if you've got a twenty track album and people

1:08:45.640 --> 1:08:48.439
<v Speaker 2>start listening to it from the beginning and they play

1:08:48.479 --> 1:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>through the end, that's gonna generate more royalty bearing streams.

1:08:52.320 --> 1:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>That's just math. But the songs have to be good

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:57.599
<v Speaker 2>enough where they don't skip and they don't tune out,

1:08:57.640 --> 1:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>So at the end of the day, it's really like

1:08:59.120 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 2>what you have that should dictate the release strategy.

1:09:03.120 --> 1:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to certainly the acts that are less popular,

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they say they have to make an album. That's the

1:09:11.880 --> 1:09:15.479
<v Speaker 1>only way they can get press. Otherwise, if they put

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:18.519
<v Speaker 1>out a single, they can't get press and they can

1:09:18.560 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>get no action on streaming. What do you say to that.

1:09:22.320 --> 1:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think there's one way. I mean the

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>traditional like I'm going to drop an album, I'm going

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to do a press tour around the album. That is

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a way you can do it that way. But I

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>think there's plenty of examples of a single EP or

1:09:35.200 --> 1:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a single track having its own moment, and that's cool too.

1:09:39.640 --> 1:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go back to the artist tools for Spotify.

1:09:45.600 --> 1:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's just make it an independent artist because they're more

1:09:49.960 --> 1:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wet behind the years. I am putting on a track

1:09:53.720 --> 1:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify and I want to have a career. This

1:09:56.320 --> 1:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is not something I did in my basement when I

1:09:58.200 --> 1:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>got home from being a CPA. Yeah, I used a distributor.

1:10:04.880 --> 1:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The track is populated on Spotify. What can I do

1:10:09.520 --> 1:10:11.919
<v Speaker 1>in terms of all the tools you were mentioning earlier.

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So to name a few I think we we

1:10:15.840 --> 1:10:19.799
<v Speaker 2>tend to think about this stuff in the release cycle.

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:24.679
<v Speaker 2>So pre release, we have a tool called the countdown page.

1:10:25.400 --> 1:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>UHHOA let's start at the raw level. I am an artist. Yeah,

1:10:31.439 --> 1:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a track that's going to come out on Spotify.

1:10:34.600 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there a general dashboard that I sign up for?

1:10:39.600 --> 1:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's the Spotify for Artists tool.

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I sign up for that. What's my next

1:10:46.800 --> 1:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>step or my next options?

1:10:49.320 --> 1:10:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, we try to take you through this journey, so

1:10:50.960 --> 1:10:52.920
<v Speaker 2>we have recommended steps for you that kind of guide

1:10:52.960 --> 1:10:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you through. So if I can just take it in

1:10:55.680 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 2>a timeline countdown page, first step, so you and that

1:11:00.439 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>a project is coming and people can see there's like

1:11:02.880 --> 1:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>a placeholder pre save it now, there's going to be

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>music here soon. That's an opportunity to gain attention. And

1:11:08.920 --> 1:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>in that countdown page you can drip out stuff, so

1:11:11.840 --> 1:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>you can do a clip of you in the studio,

1:11:14.160 --> 1:11:18.719
<v Speaker 2>you can tease you know, twenty seconds of an upcoming song.

1:11:19.600 --> 1:11:22.160
<v Speaker 2>You can tell a story with video tools, so that's

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>an important part of it. Then there's a bunch of

1:11:24.280 --> 1:11:30.439
<v Speaker 2>stuff to do to get ready to have your your

1:11:30.479 --> 1:11:34.200
<v Speaker 2>best audience on release day. So typically we see a

1:11:34.200 --> 1:11:37.519
<v Speaker 2>good pattern of using discovery Mode on catalog leading up

1:11:37.560 --> 1:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to release day, So warm up your catalog, get people

1:11:40.200 --> 1:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>hearing your catalog more so that there's more people who

1:11:43.320 --> 1:11:45.960
<v Speaker 2>have followed you or are fans of you on release

1:11:46.040 --> 1:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>day that it's going to get blasted to. Then on

1:11:49.120 --> 1:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>release day, you know, you drop your album. There are

1:11:52.840 --> 1:11:55.599
<v Speaker 2>a couple free to use tools that are pretty important.

1:11:56.240 --> 1:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>One is canvas, so having moving visuals with the track

1:12:01.040 --> 1:12:02.920
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to just stat at cover art. That's something

1:12:02.960 --> 1:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>you can upload in the tool that increases engagement. That's important,

1:12:06.479 --> 1:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>show your brand, let people see what you're about a

1:12:08.600 --> 1:12:11.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit more. And also the playlist pitching tool that

1:12:11.160 --> 1:12:13.599
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned before. Those are important things to do for sure.

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:16.759
<v Speaker 2>And then there's a paid tool on release day called Marquee,

1:12:17.080 --> 1:12:19.320
<v Speaker 2>which is to announce your new release to people who

1:12:19.400 --> 1:12:24.200
<v Speaker 2>are listeners or potential listeners. And then after release day

1:12:25.760 --> 1:12:29.439
<v Speaker 2>to sustain engagement, like discovery Mode on the actual record

1:12:29.439 --> 1:12:33.599
<v Speaker 2>that you put out, can be a good tool. Coming

1:12:33.640 --> 1:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>back and adding maybe more of a deluxe version by

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>adding clips behind each track, telling a story behind the track,

1:12:40.160 --> 1:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>what it means, how it was written, things like that.

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Those are things that can maybe take something that's starting

1:12:44.360 --> 1:12:46.439
<v Speaker 2>to die off and give it a reason to get

1:12:46.479 --> 1:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>reconsidered again and have a little bit of a second life,

1:12:49.800 --> 1:12:51.880
<v Speaker 2>if that makes sense. So we try to guide people

1:12:51.880 --> 1:12:56.799
<v Speaker 2>through that whole journey in the Spotify for Artists product, And.

1:12:56.720 --> 1:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all your Internet. It's not talking to anybody, it's

1:13:02.760 --> 1:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>clicking and uploading.

1:13:04.320 --> 1:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Everything that I just went through is self serve and

1:13:06.880 --> 1:13:10.160
<v Speaker 2>accessible to anyone, you know, with there are sometimes minimum

1:13:10.280 --> 1:13:12.519
<v Speaker 2>viable audience thresholds you need to have, like I was

1:13:12.560 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>mentioning earlier about discovery Mode, but other than that, it's

1:13:15.360 --> 1:13:17.960
<v Speaker 2>accessible to anyone in Spotify Artists.

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So staying on that point, if I'm a new artist,

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to be able to push out to

1:13:25.600 --> 1:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>my fans pre release information.

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Correct, That's right. So really the best system that we

1:13:35.240 --> 1:13:37.559
<v Speaker 2>have for brand new artists, like if you're coming out

1:13:37.600 --> 1:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>from from zero, is our Fresh Fines franchise. So we

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>have an algorithm that looks at all the listeners that

1:13:49.960 --> 1:13:52.719
<v Speaker 2>tend to listen to stuff before it really breaks out.

1:13:52.880 --> 1:13:55.040
<v Speaker 2>They tend to be like way on the beginning of

1:13:55.080 --> 1:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>the curve, what are they listening to right now? And

1:13:58.920 --> 1:14:01.840
<v Speaker 2>then we and then we feature those artists in these

1:14:01.880 --> 1:14:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Fresh Finds playlists, and we have them for every genre.

1:14:04.280 --> 1:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>And this is like the create Diggers. Like, if you

1:14:05.960 --> 1:14:07.680
<v Speaker 2>want to be a year ahead of who's going to

1:14:07.720 --> 1:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>be the cool new indie artist, that's the place to look,

1:14:10.120 --> 1:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>and we try to feature those people in Fresh Finds.

1:14:13.240 --> 1:14:15.720
<v Speaker 2>So if you're building a little bulls on social or like,

1:14:15.960 --> 1:14:17.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, people are talking about you on the Internet,

1:14:18.360 --> 1:14:20.519
<v Speaker 2>and then people start listening to you who are ahead

1:14:20.520 --> 1:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>of the curve, you get featured there and then a

1:14:22.720 --> 1:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of times that builds up enough of a listenership

1:14:25.479 --> 1:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>where some of these other tools are accessible to you.

1:14:30.920 --> 1:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm a brand new artist, theoretically I might be

1:14:35.120 --> 1:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>able to be on Fresh Finds. This is all without

1:14:41.320 --> 1:14:44.479
<v Speaker 1>people involved. You're collecting data from socials. How do you

1:14:44.560 --> 1:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>know that I have some traction outside Spotify?

1:14:47.240 --> 1:14:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, one of the biggest signals is on Spotify data,

1:14:51.080 --> 1:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>but listeners who are just ahead of the curve, so

1:14:54.920 --> 1:14:57.120
<v Speaker 2>we look at what they're listening to. Now, So what

1:14:57.160 --> 1:14:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I meant by that was if you're really buzzy on

1:14:59.479 --> 1:15:04.200
<v Speaker 2>social media, that might get people who are trendsetter listeners

1:15:04.200 --> 1:15:07.719
<v Speaker 2>to listen to you. And that's the biggest contributing factor

1:15:07.760 --> 1:15:10.880
<v Speaker 2>to whether you get on the Fresh Fines playlist.

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us an example of somebody who started

1:15:15.040 --> 1:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on Fresh Fines and then kind of blew up?

1:15:17.920 --> 1:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's a great question. I feel like almost every

1:15:22.479 --> 1:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>artist that has has broken over the last you know,

1:15:26.360 --> 1:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>ten years, has been that example. So yeah, I mean

1:15:31.360 --> 1:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I think literally almost every name that you could come

1:15:33.240 --> 1:15:33.439
<v Speaker 2>up with.

1:15:33.479 --> 1:15:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let me use a specific example. Zach Brian

1:15:36.720 --> 1:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>put out his albums independently, then went to Warner Brothers. Yep,

1:15:41.520 --> 1:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they get a hold of me, come to the will Turn.

1:15:44.840 --> 1:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I was there every now that I play stadium, So

1:15:48.320 --> 1:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this is at the beginning of the blow up. Everybody

1:15:51.680 --> 1:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there knows every song the album had an X I

1:15:55.600 --> 1:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>think fourteen or eighteen tracks. Were you aware of the

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>act that something was going on there? I don't.

1:16:05.160 --> 1:16:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the Zach Bryan like on platform history

1:16:08.960 --> 1:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>off the top of my head. We tend to be, yeah,

1:16:12.760 --> 1:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>especially our editorial team tends to be very on top

1:16:15.120 --> 1:16:16.799
<v Speaker 2>of that type of stuff, So I wouldn't be surprised,

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:18.599
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not sure what that specific example.

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, Chapel Road had been in the marketplace

1:16:20.880 --> 1:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while suddenly he's doing these live shows where

1:16:25.080 --> 1:16:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting email. Hey, you know, there's a big reaction.

1:16:27.680 --> 1:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's some videos cocomminentally, were you seeing this on Spotify? Yeah?

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:36.280
<v Speaker 2>And Chapel is a great example because I think a

1:16:36.280 --> 1:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of people know her story now because of her

1:16:38.680 --> 1:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Grammy win. But she had this up and down journey

1:16:41.400 --> 1:16:43.160
<v Speaker 2>right where she she put out a couple songs, she

1:16:43.200 --> 1:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>was dropped by the label, she went back home, she

1:16:45.040 --> 1:16:51.240
<v Speaker 2>researched even that first leg of the journey where she

1:16:51.280 --> 1:16:53.639
<v Speaker 2>put out a couple songs and then was subsequently dropped.

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:57.799
<v Speaker 2>She was getting Spotify editorial support even at that phase.

1:16:58.240 --> 1:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, she's been an editorials playlist on Spotify

1:17:02.040 --> 1:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I think continuously for the last seven years. So I

1:17:05.600 --> 1:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>think that's actually a great example of we tend to

1:17:08.920 --> 1:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>be yeah, ahead of the curve on those kind of things.

1:17:14.040 --> 1:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>How many people are an editorial.

1:17:17.360 --> 1:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Globally, I think it's around one hundred and fifty two

1:17:21.120 --> 1:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>hundred something like that.

1:17:22.720 --> 1:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's just talk domestically, it tens.

1:17:27.720 --> 1:17:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the number off my head.

1:17:30.120 --> 1:17:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I have a new album or I'm a

1:17:34.600 --> 1:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>new artist, I go through the release phase. Now, Spotify

1:17:40.280 --> 1:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for artists, What else will it give me? First of all,

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk very specifically in terms of data. Yeah, what

1:17:46.720 --> 1:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>data will I get?

1:17:49.479 --> 1:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>If anything, we get the feedback that it's too much.

1:17:53.320 --> 1:17:56.599
<v Speaker 2>But at a high level, you're looking at audience metrics.

1:17:56.680 --> 1:18:02.960
<v Speaker 2>So how many light listeners, heavy listeners, fans do you

1:18:03.040 --> 1:18:04.599
<v Speaker 2>have consuming your music?

1:18:05.320 --> 1:18:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, just stop right there. How do you break those

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>categories down?

1:18:08.960 --> 1:18:14.479
<v Speaker 2>So light listener is like, you know, maybe I listened

1:18:14.479 --> 1:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to today's top hits, right, and so Chapel Roone is

1:18:17.320 --> 1:18:20.600
<v Speaker 2>on that. I'm a listener, but I've never searched for

1:18:20.720 --> 1:18:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Chapel Roone. I've never put her in my playlist. So

1:18:23.400 --> 1:18:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I would be a light listener, but I would not

1:18:25.960 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 2>be a you know, high intent listener, if that makes sense.

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, take me up the next two levels.

1:18:32.720 --> 1:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, we have a couple levels of fandom and intent,

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>and part of what we try to do is show

1:18:36.880 --> 1:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you how the different things that you can do can

1:18:40.040 --> 1:18:43.120
<v Speaker 2>help to move audiences up. So maybe you want to

1:18:43.120 --> 1:18:46.360
<v Speaker 2>target the people that have only heard you on playlists

1:18:46.880 --> 1:18:49.559
<v Speaker 2>and have a goal of your campaign to be to

1:18:49.600 --> 1:18:51.559
<v Speaker 2>have them, you know, save you and listen to you

1:18:51.680 --> 1:18:54.000
<v Speaker 2>in their library instead. So that's like one level of

1:18:54.080 --> 1:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>data that we give you in Spotify for artists is

1:18:55.840 --> 1:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>the intent level of the audience, and you can see

1:19:00.120 --> 1:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>both total size of the audience, the intent level, the

1:19:02.760 --> 1:19:08.880
<v Speaker 2>geographic breakdown, the demographic breakdown, all that kind of stuff.

1:19:09.320 --> 1:19:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Then you also get data on each individual track, So

1:19:15.680 --> 1:19:17.920
<v Speaker 2>what playlist is it getting added to? You can see

1:19:17.920 --> 1:19:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Spotify playlists, you can see user playlists, what kind of

1:19:21.160 --> 1:19:23.400
<v Speaker 2>pickup is it getting, what kind of performance is that

1:19:23.439 --> 1:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>track getting, and you can compare that to like, how

1:19:26.080 --> 1:19:29.719
<v Speaker 2>is this signal single doing compared to my last one,

1:19:30.080 --> 1:19:32.080
<v Speaker 2>to get a sense for how it's coming out of

1:19:32.120 --> 1:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>the gate. Probably the most popular data feature is on

1:19:37.600 --> 1:19:41.479
<v Speaker 2>release day. We have a live listener account, so you

1:19:41.560 --> 1:19:43.759
<v Speaker 2>come in and its release day and you can see

1:19:44.080 --> 1:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>there's like a little heartbeat that's showing, you know, twenty

1:19:47.080 --> 1:19:49.960
<v Speaker 2>four nine and sixty four people are listening to this

1:19:50.760 --> 1:19:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you know artist right now. And you know, people have

1:19:54.120 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>fun on release day having their phone out and just

1:19:56.120 --> 1:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>seeing the number climb and climb and climb, and their

1:19:58.280 --> 1:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>baby is born and they get to see the world

1:20:00.160 --> 1:20:04.479
<v Speaker 2>kind of listening to it in real time. Yeah, So

1:20:04.880 --> 1:20:08.000
<v Speaker 2>those are you know, some of the bigger categories of data.

1:20:09.160 --> 1:20:11.599
<v Speaker 1>The heartbeat is how many people have listened in that day,

1:20:11.680 --> 1:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or how many listen simultaneous.

1:20:13.760 --> 1:20:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Second like this right now the audio is coming out

1:20:17.360 --> 1:20:19.479
<v Speaker 2>of their speaker. How many people listening right now to

1:20:19.520 --> 1:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>this track?

1:20:21.320 --> 1:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, if I'm an artist, can I do that any day? No?

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it was for like computational load or something.

1:20:29.120 --> 1:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>We had to limit it to the first release week.

1:20:31.320 --> 1:20:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it is, and then you know, so you

1:20:33.320 --> 1:20:37.840
<v Speaker 2>get that like concurrent right now metric for anything that's

1:20:37.880 --> 1:20:40.360
<v Speaker 2>released in the last seven days, but not every track

1:20:40.439 --> 1:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>in perpetuity.

1:20:49.560 --> 1:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so my track has some traction. People have listened

1:20:54.360 --> 1:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to it on playlists. What can I do as an

1:20:58.720 --> 1:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>artist to get higher consumption?

1:21:03.160 --> 1:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, to drive consumption on Spotify. A lot

1:21:09.000 --> 1:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Spotify for Artist tools are kind of purposely

1:21:12.960 --> 1:21:18.640
<v Speaker 2>designed for that. So, whether it's Discovery mode for more

1:21:18.760 --> 1:21:21.920
<v Speaker 2>lean back or the native ads for more high intent

1:21:22.280 --> 1:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>driving listening, those are great, you know, places to start.

1:21:27.439 --> 1:21:31.160
<v Speaker 2>If I think more broadly outside of you know, just

1:21:31.240 --> 1:21:33.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of our first party tools, a lot of what

1:21:33.160 --> 1:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>we see people having success with are collaborations, so that

1:21:39.080 --> 1:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>you can kind of share across people's different fan base

1:21:42.000 --> 1:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and that tends to work really well. We don't have

1:21:45.040 --> 1:21:46.920
<v Speaker 2>a tool for that. It's just a lot of times

1:21:46.920 --> 1:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>what people do when they're starting to get momentum is

1:21:49.040 --> 1:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, start that chain of collabse to sustain.

1:21:53.920 --> 1:21:56.759
<v Speaker 1>We covered it, but just go back. Yeah. Native ads

1:21:57.040 --> 1:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>would be paying to put information in front of the listener,

1:22:03.880 --> 1:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and it might be tour dates, merch whatever.

1:22:07.720 --> 1:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>It's it's for music primarily, So it's you can open

1:22:13.360 --> 1:22:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the app and on the homepage you might see, you know,

1:22:17.520 --> 1:22:20.960
<v Speaker 2>new release from this artist that you have some knowledge of,

1:22:21.400 --> 1:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's a placement that they've said, I want to

1:22:24.000 --> 1:22:27.680
<v Speaker 2>pay for a certain amount of clicks on that announcement,

1:22:27.960 --> 1:22:29.559
<v Speaker 2>and then we try to route it to the most

1:22:29.600 --> 1:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>relevant listeners of that you know, who'd be interested in

1:22:33.080 --> 1:22:33.479
<v Speaker 2>that promotion.

1:22:33.560 --> 1:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>How much might that cost?

1:22:37.400 --> 1:22:39.479
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's a cost per click model. It's similar

1:22:39.560 --> 1:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>to like buying native ads on Facebook or Google. It's

1:22:42.240 --> 1:22:43.120
<v Speaker 2>in the same ilk.

1:22:44.760 --> 1:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>As far as putting information tour dates in merch Do

1:22:49.880 --> 1:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I have to pay for that.

1:22:51.240 --> 1:22:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Free to do so? We aggregate as many concert listings

1:22:56.840 --> 1:22:59.479
<v Speaker 2>as possible through all of our partnerships. We partner with everybody.

1:22:59.479 --> 1:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>We want every possible toward a listed on Spotify, and

1:23:04.000 --> 1:23:07.160
<v Speaker 2>then we partner primarily with Shopify. On the merch side,

1:23:07.479 --> 1:23:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the industry has increasingly, you know, gotten onto Shopify as

1:23:11.360 --> 1:23:13.799
<v Speaker 2>the main place to do listings, and all that stuff

1:23:13.840 --> 1:23:18.640
<v Speaker 2>is listed on people's artist page for free. There's no

1:23:18.720 --> 1:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>additional fee for you know, having that on Spotify.

1:23:23.800 --> 1:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And is Spotify going to take a cut?

1:23:26.920 --> 1:23:31.160
<v Speaker 2>We have like a pretty standard on the concert side,

1:23:31.200 --> 1:23:35.679
<v Speaker 2>like the affiliate you know percentage if you click through

1:23:35.720 --> 1:23:38.799
<v Speaker 2>the link and you and you buy in that session,

1:23:39.439 --> 1:23:44.640
<v Speaker 2>we get an affiliate revenue for that. It's not a substantial,

1:23:44.960 --> 1:23:47.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, amount of money for for Spotify. We we

1:23:47.600 --> 1:23:51.160
<v Speaker 2>mostly do it because it's super important to artists, is

1:23:51.200 --> 1:23:53.439
<v Speaker 2>their most important revenue stream and something that you know,

1:23:53.560 --> 1:23:57.400
<v Speaker 2>fans find really interesting. But yeah, that affiliate model exists

1:23:57.439 --> 1:24:01.760
<v Speaker 2>in the background. And what about merch, I don't think

1:24:01.760 --> 1:24:05.000
<v Speaker 2>there's any I know, there had been some affiliate conversations

1:24:05.000 --> 1:24:06.479
<v Speaker 2>in the past. I don't think there's any cut that

1:24:06.520 --> 1:24:07.640
<v Speaker 2>goes back to Spotify and that.

1:24:08.280 --> 1:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>To what degree do these work?

1:24:13.640 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean concerts has become a huge use case,

1:24:19.280 --> 1:24:24.120
<v Speaker 2>so tens of millions of people buying concert tickets through Spotify,

1:24:24.880 --> 1:24:28.679
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of millions of dollars in concert sales driven through Spotify.

1:24:28.680 --> 1:24:30.679
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's become substantial for sure.

1:24:31.680 --> 1:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So going back to my dashboard, I can get

1:24:35.760 --> 1:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>simultaneous listeners with the heartbeat yep. I can get to

1:24:39.920 --> 1:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>what degree are people, you know, casual listeners more active listeners.

1:24:44.600 --> 1:24:48.519
<v Speaker 1>I can get regional data any other vertical that we

1:24:48.560 --> 1:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't covered.

1:24:49.600 --> 1:24:51.439
<v Speaker 2>When you say vertical, what do you mean by that,

1:24:51.479 --> 1:24:59.840
<v Speaker 2>any other area of information? Yeah, I think you co

1:25:00.040 --> 1:25:00.599
<v Speaker 2>for most of them.

1:25:01.680 --> 1:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, to what degree is the demographic and regional information

1:25:08.600 --> 1:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>broken down?

1:25:11.400 --> 1:25:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I think that it's been helpful because it

1:25:14.439 --> 1:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>gives you things like age and gender, so you can

1:25:18.000 --> 1:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>have an idea of kind of the segments that you're

1:25:21.080 --> 1:25:25.320
<v Speaker 2>appealing to. And then from a geo perspective, it's pretty

1:25:25.320 --> 1:25:29.280
<v Speaker 2>cool because sometimes things happen, you know, in regions that

1:25:29.280 --> 1:25:32.240
<v Speaker 2>people wouldn't expect for reasons they don't even fully understand.

1:25:32.240 --> 1:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>But knowing like oh maybe I could do a Latin

1:25:34.360 --> 1:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>American tour, I didn't realize, like, you know, is this

1:25:36.840 --> 1:25:39.400
<v Speaker 2>big and that part of the world. So I think

1:25:39.640 --> 1:25:43.799
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we have country level, city level listener

1:25:43.920 --> 1:25:48.800
<v Speaker 2>data stream data can be directly helpful for routing strategies.

1:25:49.760 --> 1:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And to what degree is a broken down demographically.

1:25:54.439 --> 1:25:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Age and gender is the main way And to.

1:25:58.400 --> 1:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>What degree in your tenure Spotify have you seen domestic

1:26:03.080 --> 1:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>us product spread around the world and what walls do

1:26:07.479 --> 1:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you hit?

1:26:11.160 --> 1:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean export in every direction is increasing. Things

1:26:14.320 --> 1:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>are just getting less confined to their domestic market. I

1:26:17.080 --> 1:26:20.680
<v Speaker 2>mean even country that people think of is maybe a

1:26:20.760 --> 1:26:25.720
<v Speaker 2>more I don't know, Waldoff Country is bigger in the

1:26:25.800 --> 1:26:31.479
<v Speaker 2>UK than it's ever been. But yeah, like I said before,

1:26:31.560 --> 1:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, the majority of artists seeing the majority of

1:26:33.240 --> 1:26:37.200
<v Speaker 2>their revenues from outside of their home country. And not

1:26:37.240 --> 1:26:42.719
<v Speaker 2>only that, but in terms of at an artist level,

1:26:43.760 --> 1:26:46.040
<v Speaker 2>artists that are making hundreds of thousands of dollars, so

1:26:46.160 --> 1:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>artists that are generating more than one hundred thousand dollars

1:26:49.080 --> 1:26:53.880
<v Speaker 2>in royalties from Spotify. Those artists last year recorded in

1:26:53.920 --> 1:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>over fifty languages. So the amount of diversity of artists

1:27:00.200 --> 1:27:02.120
<v Speaker 2>recording in all different languages around the world that are

1:27:02.120 --> 1:27:05.400
<v Speaker 2>actually having you know, very substantial audiences and payouts on

1:27:05.439 --> 1:27:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Spotify is way more diverse than it's ever been. I

1:27:08.479 --> 1:27:10.720
<v Speaker 2>think those numbers are up, you know, five ten x

1:27:10.760 --> 1:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>over the last ten years.

1:27:12.320 --> 1:27:17.559
<v Speaker 1>So how big is Latin in the US market? Massive?

1:27:18.560 --> 1:27:20.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a number for you, but it's it's huge.

1:27:21.120 --> 1:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, well, let's talk different genres. Yeah, there's Latin, there's country,

1:27:25.880 --> 1:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>there's jazz and classical, but they've historically been to minimus.

1:27:29.680 --> 1:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>There's rock, there's hip hop. These genres, what have you seen?

1:27:34.320 --> 1:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>What's going up? What's going down?

1:27:37.320 --> 1:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the interesting thing about rock is it's becoming

1:27:39.880 --> 1:27:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot less monolithic and a lot more cut up.

1:27:42.720 --> 1:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, indie, shoegaze, you know, all these different micro genres.

1:27:49.000 --> 1:27:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I think somewhat in the same story with rap drill music,

1:27:52.439 --> 1:27:58.679
<v Speaker 2>and I mean maybe this is really a cross genres trend,

1:27:58.800 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>not so much in country, but just the smaller scenes

1:28:02.240 --> 1:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that are having their own moments and their own communities

1:28:04.840 --> 1:28:06.679
<v Speaker 2>that do things a different way.

1:28:07.000 --> 1:28:12.599
<v Speaker 1>So, but can you give us an overall trend. I mean,

1:28:12.600 --> 1:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it used to be a rock world. Then there was

1:28:14.680 --> 1:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a hip hop world. You hear people, you know, prior

1:28:17.960 --> 1:28:20.599
<v Speaker 1>to this Kendrick Drake thing. You hear people saying, oh,

1:28:20.640 --> 1:28:23.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not as innovative. Then you have questlove the Kendrick

1:28:23.920 --> 1:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Drake saying oh it's the end of hip hop. Are

1:28:27.880 --> 1:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you seeing anything going up and down? I mean, there's

1:28:32.200 --> 1:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta be some movement up and down with all these genres. Yeah.

1:28:35.840 --> 1:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I think in terms of things that are ascendant, certainly

1:28:40.680 --> 1:28:44.519
<v Speaker 2>K pop, Latin, more recently afropop, these things have been

1:28:44.640 --> 1:28:49.559
<v Speaker 2>rising a lot, kind of at the expense of everything else.

1:28:50.960 --> 1:28:55.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's been one big loser to stand out,

1:28:55.720 --> 1:28:57.920
<v Speaker 2>but as those things grow, they kind of eat into

1:28:57.960 --> 1:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the averages of everything else.

1:29:00.320 --> 1:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And let's use K pop as an example that tends

1:29:04.200 --> 1:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a wall Yeah, people who were really into

1:29:07.040 --> 1:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it and then people couldn't give a shit. Do you

1:29:10.200 --> 1:29:13.599
<v Speaker 1>think that K pop and latin are going to start

1:29:13.640 --> 1:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>permeating people who traditionally would not be fans for this music.

1:29:18.200 --> 1:29:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I think so. I mean, you know, I think one

1:29:20.360 --> 1:29:22.960
<v Speaker 2>of the things that the editorial team that Spotify is

1:29:23.000 --> 1:29:27.719
<v Speaker 2>really proud of, justifiably is they started programming kate pop

1:29:28.200 --> 1:29:30.559
<v Speaker 2>when it was really walled off and people didn't know

1:29:30.640 --> 1:29:33.280
<v Speaker 2>exactly what to make of it. But I don't think

1:29:33.320 --> 1:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>it is wald off anymore. I think you see stuff

1:29:35.439 --> 1:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, seventeen and bts and that this stuff resonates

1:29:39.800 --> 1:29:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and can chart and do well in the US, like

1:29:42.680 --> 1:29:46.000
<v Speaker 2>other genres can because I think it takes some time

1:29:46.040 --> 1:29:48.760
<v Speaker 2>for people to get you know, comfort and familiarity. In

1:29:49.040 --> 1:29:51.519
<v Speaker 2>the US, maybe around something, but yeah, I think the

1:29:51.560 --> 1:29:53.840
<v Speaker 2>stuff crosses over and I think that you know, that's

1:29:54.160 --> 1:29:57.120
<v Speaker 2>that's absolutely true of Latin music. Latin music is massive

1:29:57.160 --> 1:29:59.759
<v Speaker 2>in every corner of the of the world for sure.

1:30:00.360 --> 1:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Going back to the days of MTV, which is not

1:30:02.800 --> 1:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a perfect analogy, yeah, they would literally have changes. They

1:30:08.120 --> 1:30:10.679
<v Speaker 1>would say, oh, we're not going to program any more

1:30:10.720 --> 1:30:15.599
<v Speaker 1>hard rock, We're going to program this. Do you guys say, well,

1:30:15.600 --> 1:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got to vibe on K pop. Let's

1:30:18.280 --> 1:30:22.559
<v Speaker 1>push it out to the listeners more. Yeah.

1:30:22.600 --> 1:30:25.599
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that the editorial team

1:30:25.760 --> 1:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>tries to focus on, or maybe the things that the

1:30:31.439 --> 1:30:34.720
<v Speaker 2>algorithm isn't automatically going to pick up, right, Like, the

1:30:34.760 --> 1:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>algorithm is good at picking up things that are trending

1:30:37.960 --> 1:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>in the numbers, but in terms of things that are

1:30:40.920 --> 1:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>picking up speed in the amount that you know, it

1:30:44.840 --> 1:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>has a cultural attention or zeitgeist or how much people care,

1:30:50.320 --> 1:30:53.519
<v Speaker 2>what's interesting, what's got people talking. I think the editorial team,

1:30:53.640 --> 1:30:57.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's where humans shine. The whole system that

1:30:57.040 --> 1:30:59.200
<v Speaker 2>we've made is tried to be the best combination of

1:30:59.720 --> 1:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>man and machine, kind of working in harmony. And that's

1:31:02.439 --> 1:31:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the piece that I think humans do really well.

1:31:05.360 --> 1:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to the dashboard. Yeah, we have the

1:31:08.800 --> 1:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>act that's brand new. We have the superstar. Let's assume

1:31:14.520 --> 1:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm more of a journey person. I'm putting out my

1:31:17.960 --> 1:31:22.599
<v Speaker 1>third or fourth album. Yeah, is it just identical. Well,

1:31:22.640 --> 1:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>we have the pregame, we have this or that, or

1:31:26.240 --> 1:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>once I'm in the game, are is there more information?

1:31:29.400 --> 1:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Are there more tools that you can help me to grow?

1:31:33.320 --> 1:31:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, I think that all the tools I don't know.

1:31:38.840 --> 1:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I I think that most of the tools that we

1:31:42.120 --> 1:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>have really shine in the in the kind of middle state.

1:31:47.800 --> 1:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>If you're a superstar and you're super saturated, certainly our

1:31:52.439 --> 1:31:55.720
<v Speaker 2>tools are valuable, but they're going to provide less lift overall,

1:31:56.760 --> 1:31:58.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, because you're already out there so many people

1:31:58.760 --> 1:32:00.720
<v Speaker 2>know you, maybe people have made up their mind about you.

1:32:00.920 --> 1:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And if you're brand new and we hardly know about you,

1:32:03.479 --> 1:32:05.559
<v Speaker 2>it's hard for the tools to do their job. Where

1:32:05.560 --> 1:32:08.240
<v Speaker 2>they really shine is in the middle where you're not

1:32:08.320 --> 1:32:11.600
<v Speaker 2>overexposed yet we know a little about where you're resonating

1:32:11.640 --> 1:32:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and can maybe try to help help you, you know,

1:32:14.439 --> 1:32:17.600
<v Speaker 2>do more. The tools tend to I mean, they're the

1:32:17.640 --> 1:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>same if it's your second album or your fourth album.

1:32:20.240 --> 1:32:24.479
<v Speaker 2>But what's hopefully changed is you know your audience that

1:32:24.520 --> 1:32:26.679
<v Speaker 2>you can tap it. The people who have been there

1:32:26.720 --> 1:32:28.720
<v Speaker 2>for you and your first album, your second album or

1:32:28.720 --> 1:32:30.519
<v Speaker 2>third album. Now those people are there for you to

1:32:30.560 --> 1:32:33.439
<v Speaker 2>target and try to resurrect and be on the next

1:32:33.479 --> 1:32:34.320
<v Speaker 2>part of the journey with you.

1:32:35.200 --> 1:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not your purview exactly, but the editorial

1:32:39.640 --> 1:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they're human beings and people would certainly believe someone with

1:32:45.000 --> 1:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing relationship with an editorial person is going to

1:32:49.120 --> 1:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>get their music in playlist.

1:32:52.000 --> 1:32:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Can you say more and what you mean by that?

1:32:55.280 --> 1:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Hey, this is traditional with distribution. I have a

1:33:00.840 --> 1:33:03.559
<v Speaker 1>steady stream of product. If you have a steady stream

1:33:03.600 --> 1:33:05.439
<v Speaker 1>of product, there's more of a reason to have an

1:33:05.520 --> 1:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>ongoing relationship with someone. I have a steady stream of product,

1:33:10.800 --> 1:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount has been successful. I find out who

1:33:15.040 --> 1:33:19.639
<v Speaker 1>is the programmer in my genre. Okay, I take him

1:33:19.640 --> 1:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to dinner, I send him some music, I send him

1:33:24.120 --> 1:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a birthday card, ask him about his wife, and then

1:33:27.920 --> 1:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I say I have a new release. Wouldn't you know

1:33:35.120 --> 1:33:38.759
<v Speaker 1>just on a human level, people would say that person

1:33:38.800 --> 1:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>would tend to play that record or play list that record.

1:33:43.000 --> 1:33:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I see what you're getting at. I think, first of all,

1:33:47.360 --> 1:33:50.479
<v Speaker 2>I want to be clear, there's a very rigorous code

1:33:50.520 --> 1:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>of conduct. You mentioned a birthday gift. I think at

1:33:53.000 --> 1:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>some point in that sequence gifts favors not allowed fireable

1:33:58.280 --> 1:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>offenses at Spotify. So we take it super seriously. Anything

1:34:02.040 --> 1:34:06.120
<v Speaker 2>that edges on you know, bribery, this stuff we take

1:34:06.160 --> 1:34:10.439
<v Speaker 2>super seriously. But the broader point you're making about like, Okay,

1:34:10.520 --> 1:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>this is an established manager. They've successfully recognized ten acts,

1:34:16.280 --> 1:34:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and they say this next one is just like their

1:34:18.400 --> 1:34:20.040
<v Speaker 2>first ten, and this next one is going to be

1:34:20.080 --> 1:34:23.799
<v Speaker 2>really good. That's a signal for sure. I don't actually

1:34:23.800 --> 1:34:25.760
<v Speaker 2>think it even matters whether you get the phone call

1:34:25.800 --> 1:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>from someone, if you just look up online. This is

1:34:28.680 --> 1:34:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the team they have around them. I think it's good

1:34:31.360 --> 1:34:34.000
<v Speaker 2>for the editorial team to notice that and take that

1:34:34.040 --> 1:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>into account. It's like, oh, okay, well that's part of

1:34:37.720 --> 1:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the full story that I'm seeing around this artist. These

1:34:40.720 --> 1:34:42.560
<v Speaker 2>people think they're going to be great, They're going to

1:34:42.640 --> 1:34:46.000
<v Speaker 2>have the you know, creative support of those people. I

1:34:46.080 --> 1:34:49.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's legitimate as a signal, you know, and you

1:34:49.080 --> 1:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>can never take out all bias from a system. I

1:34:52.240 --> 1:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>think we've done a really good job of trying to

1:34:55.000 --> 1:34:57.720
<v Speaker 2>mitigate it every possible place we can and have a

1:34:57.840 --> 1:35:02.040
<v Speaker 2>level playing field. But I take your point that it's

1:35:02.080 --> 1:35:05.720
<v Speaker 2>never a perfectly flat playing field. At the end of

1:35:05.800 --> 1:35:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the day, the thing that matters the most is the

1:35:09.400 --> 1:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>music comes out. And if you try it in new boots,

1:35:13.720 --> 1:35:16.559
<v Speaker 2>which is like the feeder playlist to hot country, and

1:35:16.600 --> 1:35:21.720
<v Speaker 2>it's not performing, if it's been there for four days

1:35:21.760 --> 1:35:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's not performing, all that other stuff that you

1:35:24.120 --> 1:35:27.080
<v Speaker 2>took into account, it doesn't really matter anymore. The fans

1:35:27.120 --> 1:35:30.479
<v Speaker 2>have decided now, right so you can't keep you know,

1:35:30.640 --> 1:35:37.280
<v Speaker 2>forcing it. And so I think that's the biggest difference

1:35:37.320 --> 1:35:40.040
<v Speaker 2>between the terrestrial radio era and this era that we're

1:35:40.040 --> 1:35:44.360
<v Speaker 2>in right now, is the fans give you signal very quickly,

1:35:44.439 --> 1:35:47.080
<v Speaker 2>and they walk with their feet and you know, they decide.

1:35:47.120 --> 1:35:50.080
<v Speaker 2>So that's the ultimate remover of bias.

1:35:50.880 --> 1:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell me more about the code of ethics.

1:35:54.200 --> 1:35:58.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you take the job, you agree to

1:35:59.840 --> 1:36:01.840
<v Speaker 2>not going to do any of these things, and if

1:36:01.840 --> 1:36:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I do them, I know that means I lose my job.

1:36:03.840 --> 1:36:05.439
<v Speaker 1>So they're all, oh, yeah, yeah, what are some of

1:36:05.439 --> 1:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>those things? If I take you to dinner, that's not

1:36:08.800 --> 1:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a code of ethics violation.

1:36:11.600 --> 1:36:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it is. I'll look up. I mean, I

1:36:13.880 --> 1:36:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I think we make sure we were splitting the bill

1:36:16.880 --> 1:36:17.800
<v Speaker 2>or we're taking people out.

1:36:18.040 --> 1:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's important.

1:36:19.320 --> 1:36:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we don't want to do that, so.

1:36:22.400 --> 1:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I give you a ticket to the show. Is that

1:36:24.479 --> 1:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a code of ethics violation?

1:36:27.760 --> 1:36:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, now you're gonna quiz me on all the things.

1:36:30.560 --> 1:36:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Let me let me you know, like go back.

1:36:32.680 --> 1:36:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Hey, if you can't remember, that's okay. But you know,

1:36:35.560 --> 1:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like if you look for work for a major newspaper,

1:36:38.840 --> 1:36:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they paid for their tickets. Is it that strict at Spotify?

1:36:43.720 --> 1:36:46.519
<v Speaker 2>I know it is very strict. I like, you know,

1:36:46.720 --> 1:36:50.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember the exact details of this concert ticket

1:36:50.600 --> 1:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>thing or whatever. I mean some of the you know,

1:36:52.760 --> 1:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>we we want our people to go to shows, right,

1:36:54.640 --> 1:36:56.800
<v Speaker 2>We want them to see the acts live, to contribute,

1:36:56.840 --> 1:36:58.960
<v Speaker 2>but like, yeah, we don't want it to be through

1:36:58.960 --> 1:37:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a favor. We want them to go, you know, on

1:37:01.680 --> 1:37:04.479
<v Speaker 2>Spotify's dime. These are things that are important, and like

1:37:04.479 --> 1:37:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I said, i'm the details, I'm I'll look into. But

1:37:08.479 --> 1:37:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I know that this has been a big point of

1:37:10.800 --> 1:37:16.800
<v Speaker 2>emphasis and something that isn't just theoretical. It's affected, you know, employment,

1:37:16.840 --> 1:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and we take super seriously.

1:37:18.960 --> 1:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, a complaint that I get, and you know, you

1:37:22.000 --> 1:37:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and me are in the same world. There are people

1:37:23.760 --> 1:37:27.679
<v Speaker 1>going to complain. People say, oh, I had my track

1:37:27.760 --> 1:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, I had my alm on Spotify. Yeah, and

1:37:30.800 --> 1:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they took it down because they thought it was spam.

1:37:33.960 --> 1:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And I put in this money for this and that

1:37:36.840 --> 1:37:39.439
<v Speaker 1>literally got that email yesterday. What would you say to

1:37:39.520 --> 1:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that person.

1:37:41.080 --> 1:37:44.599
<v Speaker 2>I feel so bad for artists who are in this situation.

1:37:44.920 --> 1:37:46.799
<v Speaker 2>And the reason I feel bad for them is because

1:37:46.840 --> 1:37:51.080
<v Speaker 2>if you look at these marketing sites, they are so predatory.

1:37:51.640 --> 1:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Like these marketing sites, they're like, you know, put in

1:37:56.160 --> 1:37:59.959
<v Speaker 2>one hundred dollars and we'll get you ten thousand totally

1:38:00.200 --> 1:38:06.400
<v Speaker 2>organic bot free streams, which is obviously total bs. There's

1:38:06.439 --> 1:38:08.479
<v Speaker 2>no such thing as that. But if you fall for

1:38:08.560 --> 1:38:11.120
<v Speaker 2>that scam and you pay one hundred dollars and you

1:38:11.200 --> 1:38:13.360
<v Speaker 2>genuinely think, oh, they said it's bop free. I'm doing

1:38:13.360 --> 1:38:15.480
<v Speaker 2>this all on the up and up, this is great,

1:38:15.840 --> 1:38:17.639
<v Speaker 2>you know. The truth is is that then they're getting

1:38:17.680 --> 1:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of bots to stream your song, and we

1:38:21.280 --> 1:38:26.599
<v Speaker 2>take that extremely seriously. We catch it very accurately. We

1:38:26.640 --> 1:38:30.439
<v Speaker 2>immediately remove all royalties paid out so we don't pay

1:38:30.439 --> 1:38:33.599
<v Speaker 2>for fraudulent streams. We remove the play counts, we remove

1:38:33.600 --> 1:38:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the monthly listener accounts, and we send notifications to the distributor,

1:38:38.400 --> 1:38:41.840
<v Speaker 2>so we say, hey, distributor, this thing is getting bodied.

1:38:42.560 --> 1:38:46.559
<v Speaker 2>And then if it's getting bodied really bad, we charge

1:38:46.600 --> 1:38:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the distributor a fee because we want to incentivize them

1:38:49.400 --> 1:38:51.960
<v Speaker 2>to say, don't keep letting this person do that. You

1:38:52.040 --> 1:38:54.559
<v Speaker 2>need to maybe charge them a fee, Maybe you need

1:38:54.600 --> 1:38:56.760
<v Speaker 2>to give them a strike. You need to ultimately, you know,

1:38:57.080 --> 1:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>remove it if they keep doing it over and over again.

1:39:00.880 --> 1:39:05.080
<v Speaker 2>So we take it super seriously. We try to make

1:39:05.120 --> 1:39:11.040
<v Speaker 2>sure that there are as few as possible, like wrongly accused.

1:39:12.400 --> 1:39:14.800
<v Speaker 2>No system is perfect. I think our system is very

1:39:14.920 --> 1:39:19.400
<v Speaker 2>very good. But this, this whole you know, streaming fraud

1:39:19.479 --> 1:39:22.080
<v Speaker 2>thing is a scourge on the industry and something we

1:39:22.120 --> 1:39:25.200
<v Speaker 2>try to combat as in every way that we can.

1:39:33.240 --> 1:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So where are you from?

1:39:35.400 --> 1:39:38.479
<v Speaker 2>Like where did I grow up? Yeah, grew up near

1:39:38.520 --> 1:39:39.480
<v Speaker 2>new Haven, Connecticut.

1:39:41.120 --> 1:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait wait, I'm from Connecticut where.

1:39:43.800 --> 1:39:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in Cheshire and then Madison.

1:39:46.920 --> 1:39:49.519
<v Speaker 1>And what did your parents do for a living?

1:39:50.320 --> 1:39:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Nothing to do with what I do. They were both

1:39:52.160 --> 1:39:54.559
<v Speaker 2>medical doctors, so I ran the other way.

1:39:55.400 --> 1:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so there are medical doctors. How many kids in

1:39:57.720 --> 1:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the family, Me and my older brother? And what your

1:40:00.920 --> 1:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>older brother do?

1:40:02.520 --> 1:40:05.120
<v Speaker 2>He's at Google. I've been a Spotify fourteen years. He's

1:40:05.160 --> 1:40:07.880
<v Speaker 2>been at Google like seventeen eighteen years. So we're both

1:40:07.920 --> 1:40:09.160
<v Speaker 2>crazy lifirst.

1:40:10.000 --> 1:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a close relationship.

1:40:12.240 --> 1:40:13.479
<v Speaker 2>I do, Yeah, love my brother.

1:40:13.760 --> 1:40:15.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that he's at a tech company,

1:40:16.400 --> 1:40:19.479
<v Speaker 1>You're in a music tech company. Is there anything in

1:40:19.479 --> 1:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the background that would predict that.

1:40:21.920 --> 1:40:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. He's more on the sales side. I'm

1:40:24.000 --> 1:40:29.320
<v Speaker 2>more on the product side. But you know, my we

1:40:29.360 --> 1:40:32.800
<v Speaker 2>came out it totally different ways. I've been obsessed with

1:40:32.880 --> 1:40:35.439
<v Speaker 2>music my whole life. I started playing guitar and piano

1:40:35.479 --> 1:40:38.120
<v Speaker 2>from a very young age. I had delusions of being

1:40:38.160 --> 1:40:41.280
<v Speaker 2>a performer myself, I you know, dismissed those thought. I

1:40:41.320 --> 1:40:45.880
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be a producer. Wrote my college thesis on

1:40:46.200 --> 1:40:48.760
<v Speaker 2>how the music industry should escape from napster. I mean,

1:40:48.800 --> 1:40:52.160
<v Speaker 2>I've been kind of like a single track mind about

1:40:52.360 --> 1:40:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, the music ecosystem and the music business and

1:40:56.360 --> 1:40:59.280
<v Speaker 2>how things could work better for artists and fans. My

1:40:59.320 --> 1:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>whole life been obsessed with it. That's my whole journey.

1:41:02.240 --> 1:41:05.599
<v Speaker 2>That's what I've been always most interested in, and that's

1:41:05.640 --> 1:41:07.840
<v Speaker 2>really the way I came to Spotify, not through tech

1:41:07.960 --> 1:41:09.479
<v Speaker 2>but more through music.

1:41:10.760 --> 1:41:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So how serious a musician were you?

1:41:13.400 --> 1:41:15.519
<v Speaker 2>I was like recording my own stuff in high school

1:41:15.560 --> 1:41:20.439
<v Speaker 2>and college and doing you know, a couple like small

1:41:20.600 --> 1:41:23.840
<v Speaker 2>gigs here and there, but nothing serious. I learned pretty

1:41:23.920 --> 1:41:25.479
<v Speaker 2>quickly that I was that was not going to be

1:41:25.520 --> 1:41:26.320
<v Speaker 2>my superpower.

1:41:26.920 --> 1:41:27.679
<v Speaker 1>How did you learn?

1:41:29.160 --> 1:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, like performing wasn't like fun for me. I

1:41:33.240 --> 1:41:35.320
<v Speaker 2>was just worried about it going bad. I wasn't enjoying

1:41:35.400 --> 1:41:40.160
<v Speaker 2>going well. And I just I, like, you know, I

1:41:40.240 --> 1:41:42.360
<v Speaker 2>wasn't great. I was good. I was just I wasn't great.

1:41:42.520 --> 1:41:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I could tell that there were other people that were

1:41:44.800 --> 1:41:46.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be offering way more in the world in

1:41:46.760 --> 1:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of recording and performing music than I was going to.

1:41:49.640 --> 1:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So you were like a solo actor? There were bands?

1:41:52.040 --> 1:41:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like a couple of people I were, you know,

1:41:54.240 --> 1:41:57.000
<v Speaker 2>just duos, trios that we were recording with in high

1:41:57.040 --> 1:41:57.719
<v Speaker 2>school and college.

1:41:58.280 --> 1:41:59.479
<v Speaker 1>And where'd you go to college?

1:42:00.080 --> 1:42:00.960
<v Speaker 2>At Penn in Philly?

1:42:02.040 --> 1:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you go to college at the height of the

1:42:04.000 --> 1:42:04.679
<v Speaker 1>dapster era.

1:42:05.240 --> 1:42:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty much.

1:42:06.640 --> 1:42:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So what was it like being in college during Napster? Yeah?

1:42:10.560 --> 1:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>It was wild.

1:42:11.240 --> 1:42:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean I remember getting to the dorm and having

1:42:14.080 --> 1:42:16.479
<v Speaker 2>one of the ras or you know, the older kids

1:42:16.479 --> 1:42:18.439
<v Speaker 2>that tell you what to do, being like, this is

1:42:18.479 --> 1:42:22.200
<v Speaker 2>the server you connect to to see everybody else's hard drives,

1:42:22.200 --> 1:42:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and this is how we all share our music together.

1:42:23.880 --> 1:42:25.840
<v Speaker 2>It was like part of like, you know, a new

1:42:25.920 --> 1:42:28.320
<v Speaker 2>student orientation is like this is how the piracy is

1:42:28.360 --> 1:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>going to work. So you just you know, it was

1:42:29.680 --> 1:42:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a totally different you know, era and world at that point.

1:42:35.880 --> 1:42:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And but you know, what I will say is the

1:42:40.280 --> 1:42:43.519
<v Speaker 2>social music discovery through that and being at college and

1:42:43.560 --> 1:42:45.640
<v Speaker 2>seeing like, you know, you're sitting in high school with

1:42:45.680 --> 1:42:47.120
<v Speaker 2>your own playlist and then you get to college and

1:42:47.120 --> 1:42:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you see everybody else's place. Oh you're into that and

1:42:49.280 --> 1:42:51.360
<v Speaker 2>you're into that. It was one of the most exciting

1:42:51.400 --> 1:42:53.519
<v Speaker 2>times for me as a music fan, just to see that,

1:42:53.600 --> 1:42:56.320
<v Speaker 2>even though like the business side of it was totally broken.

1:42:57.320 --> 1:42:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Definitely took some inspiration from that.

1:42:59.560 --> 1:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So what music were you're listening to? Oh?

1:43:02.040 --> 1:43:06.559
<v Speaker 2>Everything? But I grew up being mostly into jazz, into country,

1:43:06.560 --> 1:43:12.240
<v Speaker 2>indie rock, classic rock, Yeah, everything.

1:43:12.479 --> 1:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And you major in what in college.

1:43:15.880 --> 1:43:18.120
<v Speaker 2>In Anneburg they call it communication, but it's basically like

1:43:18.160 --> 1:43:20.759
<v Speaker 2>media industry stuff and music minor.

1:43:23.000 --> 1:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what did your thesis say?

1:43:27.520 --> 1:43:29.880
<v Speaker 2>It was actually more pessimistic than it turned out to be.

1:43:29.960 --> 1:43:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought people were gonna need to be like more

1:43:31.880 --> 1:43:35.639
<v Speaker 2>altruistic and be gifting artists and more like Patreon kind

1:43:35.640 --> 1:43:40.599
<v Speaker 2>of vibes. You know, the fact that products were made

1:43:40.640 --> 1:43:42.880
<v Speaker 2>that were actually better than piracy, that got people to

1:43:42.920 --> 1:43:45.400
<v Speaker 2>pay because they got something from it, not because of

1:43:45.720 --> 1:43:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the purity of their hearts. I think is a much

1:43:47.439 --> 1:43:49.599
<v Speaker 2>better evolution and a much bigger business for everyone to

1:43:49.600 --> 1:43:53.400
<v Speaker 2>be in. But I was, yeah, I was looking at

1:43:53.560 --> 1:43:57.800
<v Speaker 2>what are other ways that businesses have monetized freely available

1:43:57.840 --> 1:44:00.880
<v Speaker 2>goods like water to bottled water and you know these

1:44:00.960 --> 1:44:02.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of things, and how do you how do you

1:44:02.360 --> 1:44:02.680
<v Speaker 2>do that?

1:44:05.000 --> 1:44:06.719
<v Speaker 1>So why do you think you were wrong?

1:44:11.280 --> 1:44:16.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, so what I what I had conviction in was

1:44:16.800 --> 1:44:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you need to meet consumers where they are. Every young

1:44:20.400 --> 1:44:24.880
<v Speaker 2>person had the assumption music is free. So if you

1:44:24.880 --> 1:44:27.360
<v Speaker 2>put a paywall in front of people, you lost them already.

1:44:27.439 --> 1:44:31.679
<v Speaker 2>There has to be a free tier to get people

1:44:31.680 --> 1:44:36.439
<v Speaker 2>to pay. So my first, like real job was at

1:44:36.520 --> 1:44:40.360
<v Speaker 2>LimeWire where they were trying to build. My job was

1:44:40.400 --> 1:44:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to build a licensed MP three store, and we were

1:44:43.800 --> 1:44:48.599
<v Speaker 2>going to try to migrate people from file sharing into

1:44:48.640 --> 1:44:54.120
<v Speaker 2>a licensed subscription. And that was one idea of how

1:44:54.120 --> 1:44:56.439
<v Speaker 2>we could migrate people from like meet them where they are,

1:44:56.560 --> 1:45:00.320
<v Speaker 2>meet them with free, get them moved over. If I

1:45:00.360 --> 1:45:06.280
<v Speaker 2>did that so exceptionally well, the free to paid funnel

1:45:06.920 --> 1:45:09.120
<v Speaker 2>that's been built by getting people to come in and

1:45:09.160 --> 1:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>discover and invest in their library and then get so

1:45:13.200 --> 1:45:15.080
<v Speaker 2>invested that they want to remove the ads, and they

1:45:15.080 --> 1:45:16.759
<v Speaker 2>want to play on demand, and they want to convert

1:45:16.800 --> 1:45:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to premium. It just works so incredibly well to take

1:45:20.200 --> 1:45:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a population of the world that had no intention of

1:45:22.240 --> 1:45:25.640
<v Speaker 2>being a paid music subscriber now to a place where they,

1:45:25.840 --> 1:45:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of course I would never cancel that subscription. And it's

1:45:28.040 --> 1:45:31.960
<v Speaker 2>all been through crafting a really good, you know, product experience,

1:45:31.960 --> 1:45:32.320
<v Speaker 2>I think.

1:45:33.120 --> 1:45:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know what the churn rate is, Oh, it's

1:45:35.840 --> 1:45:36.240
<v Speaker 1>very low.

1:45:36.280 --> 1:45:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, especially on premium, you know, low, low single digits.

1:45:40.120 --> 1:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you graduate from college, your first job is with LimeWire.

1:45:44.520 --> 1:45:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see, I was in college, so when I

1:45:47.520 --> 1:45:51.360
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be a producer, I first worked at recording

1:45:51.400 --> 1:45:53.599
<v Speaker 2>studios and I thought I was going to like, you know,

1:45:53.800 --> 1:45:55.640
<v Speaker 2>get a turn on the pro tool set up, and

1:45:55.680 --> 1:46:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I was you know, rolling mike cable and taking out trash.

1:46:00.200 --> 1:46:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So it was like, Okay, that's not going to be

1:46:01.960 --> 1:46:05.439
<v Speaker 2>the route for me. And then the big turning point

1:46:05.479 --> 1:46:08.479
<v Speaker 2>for me was an internship I had at EMI. So

1:46:08.680 --> 1:46:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I got to be the intern for summer for Digital

1:46:12.640 --> 1:46:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Biz Dev for EMI when they were a major label,

1:46:15.320 --> 1:46:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and I met every single person in two thousand and

1:46:17.880 --> 1:46:23.080
<v Speaker 2>seven that wanted to license EMI, Spiral Frog and all

1:46:23.160 --> 1:46:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the ideas that people had. You know, Amazon was going

1:46:27.040 --> 1:46:30.320
<v Speaker 2>DRM free, MP three's, you know, everyone's trying to figure

1:46:30.320 --> 1:46:33.960
<v Speaker 2>it out. And one of the companies that I met

1:46:33.960 --> 1:46:36.680
<v Speaker 2>with that summer was LimeWire and they were like, we

1:46:36.720 --> 1:46:39.360
<v Speaker 2>have one hundred million monthly active users. We're trying to

1:46:39.360 --> 1:46:41.360
<v Speaker 2>get them onto a license thing. And I was like this,

1:46:41.360 --> 1:46:45.000
<v Speaker 2>this I can believe might work. So I was there

1:46:45.040 --> 1:46:48.839
<v Speaker 2>for three three or four years. That's where I learned

1:46:49.000 --> 1:46:52.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, product and software, and we made a run

1:46:52.320 --> 1:46:53.880
<v Speaker 2>at it. We built a product that would have been

1:46:53.880 --> 1:46:58.200
<v Speaker 2>competitive Spotify. There were some progressive people in the industry

1:46:58.240 --> 1:47:01.040
<v Speaker 2>that like the idea of migrating user from from Limeware

1:47:01.080 --> 1:47:03.120
<v Speaker 2>to that, but ultimately, you know, it got shut down

1:47:04.560 --> 1:47:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and then Spotify decided it wanted to start a US

1:47:09.920 --> 1:47:13.120
<v Speaker 2>office and had heard that you know, I and a

1:47:13.120 --> 1:47:15.400
<v Speaker 2>couple other folks were you know, trying to make this

1:47:15.439 --> 1:47:18.080
<v Speaker 2>thing happen in Limeware and reach out, and that's where

1:47:18.080 --> 1:47:20.640
<v Speaker 2>we started talking about starting the US team for Spotify.

1:47:21.320 --> 1:47:25.320
<v Speaker 1>They found you. Yeah, okay, so what year do you

1:47:25.320 --> 1:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>start working for Spotify?

1:47:27.560 --> 1:47:28.679
<v Speaker 2>February twenty eleven.

1:47:30.240 --> 1:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what was your job then?

1:47:35.479 --> 1:47:39.320
<v Speaker 2>In the beginning, it was building out a US product team.

1:47:39.760 --> 1:47:41.880
<v Speaker 2>So the whole company was, you know, one hundred and

1:47:41.920 --> 1:47:45.599
<v Speaker 2>fifty folks, mostly in Sweden at that time, but we

1:47:45.640 --> 1:47:48.479
<v Speaker 2>wanted to have a tech team in the US, and

1:47:48.800 --> 1:47:54.080
<v Speaker 2>initially we were building our you know, we decided to

1:47:54.080 --> 1:47:57.280
<v Speaker 2>get into recommendation. Spotify had never done recommendation prior to that.

1:47:57.880 --> 1:48:00.400
<v Speaker 2>We decided to build our own recommendation features up a

1:48:00.400 --> 1:48:04.880
<v Speaker 2>team to do that. We were also building the the

1:48:04.920 --> 1:48:07.479
<v Speaker 2>ad support of the free tier, how to run ads

1:48:07.479 --> 1:48:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and also how to kind of construct the freemium model,

1:48:10.280 --> 1:48:13.240
<v Speaker 2>what you get for free, what you need to you know,

1:48:13.360 --> 1:48:15.679
<v Speaker 2>get by converting. Those were some of the initial things

1:48:15.680 --> 1:48:18.519
<v Speaker 2>that I was accountable for when it was the US team.

1:48:19.640 --> 1:48:21.559
<v Speaker 1>And how did you move up the ladder to where

1:48:21.600 --> 1:48:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you are now.

1:48:24.320 --> 1:48:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, probably the biggest change that happened was Daniel. I

1:48:30.080 --> 1:48:35.759
<v Speaker 2>think it was probably twenty fifteen or something. Daniel, our CEO, said,

1:48:37.760 --> 1:48:43.479
<v Speaker 2>we really need to have a creator team. We really

1:48:43.479 --> 1:48:46.080
<v Speaker 2>thought of ourselves as we license music and then we

1:48:46.080 --> 1:48:49.160
<v Speaker 2>have a consumer product. You know, we didn't have we

1:48:49.160 --> 1:48:51.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't have the idea of a of a creator team

1:48:51.439 --> 1:48:55.439
<v Speaker 2>back then. But at that time, like if you think

1:48:55.479 --> 1:48:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the misconceptions in the industry today are bad, I mean

1:48:58.000 --> 1:49:00.800
<v Speaker 2>then it was like no artist knew whether they had

1:49:00.840 --> 1:49:03.280
<v Speaker 2>ten streams on Spotify or a million streams, Like it

1:49:03.320 --> 1:49:07.439
<v Speaker 2>was a total black box and we really needed to

1:49:07.479 --> 1:49:11.040
<v Speaker 2>build a bridge. And so he asked me, I had

1:49:11.120 --> 1:49:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like a team of I don't know, one hundred and

1:49:12.640 --> 1:49:15.360
<v Speaker 2>two hundred folks, and he was like, yeah, I want

1:49:15.360 --> 1:49:18.200
<v Speaker 2>you to give all that up and start this new thing.

1:49:18.560 --> 1:49:20.280
<v Speaker 2>It'll just be you in the beginning and build up

1:49:20.280 --> 1:49:21.800
<v Speaker 2>some you know, figure out what we should do on

1:49:21.840 --> 1:49:26.320
<v Speaker 2>the creator side. And that kind of felt daunting or

1:49:26.320 --> 1:49:27.920
<v Speaker 2>and exciting at the time, but that was kind of

1:49:27.960 --> 1:49:30.400
<v Speaker 2>a big turning point. Because everything that I've done since then,

1:49:30.520 --> 1:49:34.360
<v Speaker 2>building out Spotify for artists are business on the supply

1:49:34.439 --> 1:49:36.960
<v Speaker 2>facing side, and then now you know, leading the music

1:49:37.240 --> 1:49:40.639
<v Speaker 2>vertical more broadly is all kind of built on getting

1:49:40.680 --> 1:49:44.840
<v Speaker 2>really close to the artist's side, what they need, what

1:49:44.960 --> 1:49:47.639
<v Speaker 2>they want more out of Spotify. That's, you know, really

1:49:47.680 --> 1:49:49.320
<v Speaker 2>what I've been focused on for the last ten years.

1:49:50.479 --> 1:49:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you have stock?

1:49:53.320 --> 1:49:56.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, like all employees, you get you know, stock

1:49:56.200 --> 1:49:58.519
<v Speaker 2>as part of your package.

1:49:58.760 --> 1:50:02.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, when public, do you already have an interest? Yeah?

1:50:02.560 --> 1:50:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean even from the beginning when because I joined

1:50:05.439 --> 1:50:07.360
<v Speaker 2>what seven eight years before we went public?

1:50:07.400 --> 1:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So and have you sold any stock?

1:50:11.200 --> 1:50:15.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sharing my you know, personal uh, you know,

1:50:15.360 --> 1:50:19.200
<v Speaker 2>financial stuff, but I've sold some of hold some Yeah.

1:50:19.240 --> 1:50:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Well I mean it launched, yeah, went down ultimately, and

1:50:23.880 --> 1:50:24.840
<v Speaker 1>now it's through the roof.

1:50:25.360 --> 1:50:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Mm hm.

1:50:27.120 --> 1:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, is this like a traditional startup if you

1:50:30.080 --> 1:50:33.439
<v Speaker 1>wanted to quit your job, would you have to continue

1:50:33.479 --> 1:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to work?

1:50:35.840 --> 1:50:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, in the grand scheme of things, like

1:50:40.800 --> 1:50:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the success I've had is any much greater than anything

1:50:44.960 --> 1:50:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I was ever hoping for. Like I'm you know, I

1:50:48.800 --> 1:50:53.799
<v Speaker 2>consider myself very lucky in that way. I am obsessed

1:50:53.800 --> 1:50:55.720
<v Speaker 2>with what I do. I love what we're doing. I

1:50:55.720 --> 1:50:58.000
<v Speaker 2>feel really passionate about what I'm doing. That's the primary,

1:50:58.160 --> 1:51:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, reason that I do what I do for sure.

1:51:01.800 --> 1:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So what are the opportunities left for you in Spotify?

1:51:07.439 --> 1:51:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I go back to I think there's two

1:51:10.720 --> 1:51:14.360
<v Speaker 2>big things in terms of our overall mission to grow.

1:51:15.760 --> 1:51:20.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of the things I love about this Spotify,

1:51:20.479 --> 1:51:23.680
<v Speaker 2>but streaming in general, the incentives are so aligned. We

1:51:23.720 --> 1:51:25.960
<v Speaker 2>want to grow a revenue, and every time we grow revenue,

1:51:25.960 --> 1:51:28.880
<v Speaker 2>two thirds of that goes to rights holders. So a

1:51:28.920 --> 1:51:30.800
<v Speaker 2>lot can be made of disputes in the industry, but

1:51:30.840 --> 1:51:32.680
<v Speaker 2>by and large, what's good for us is good for

1:51:32.720 --> 1:51:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the industry. That is just true. And as we go

1:51:36.320 --> 1:51:39.320
<v Speaker 2>about trying to grow the pie together. The two big

1:51:39.320 --> 1:51:41.640
<v Speaker 2>things that stand out to me is one what I

1:51:41.680 --> 1:51:45.040
<v Speaker 2>said before, we have five hundred six five hundred and

1:51:45.040 --> 1:51:47.599
<v Speaker 2>six hundred million people paying for a music subscription around

1:51:47.640 --> 1:51:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the world. That's awesome. I don't think anyone thought we'd

1:51:50.400 --> 1:51:52.479
<v Speaker 2>get there. But there's billions of people in the world,

1:51:52.520 --> 1:51:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and we need to figure out how we're going to

1:51:55.000 --> 1:51:57.639
<v Speaker 2>adjust the offering and the freemium funnel and the different

1:51:57.640 --> 1:51:59.559
<v Speaker 2>skews to get everyone in the world paying for music.

1:51:59.600 --> 1:52:02.479
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's a really fun opportunity. And then

1:52:02.560 --> 1:52:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the second one is is kind of breaking out of

1:52:04.680 --> 1:52:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the one size fits all. I think for the vast,

1:52:08.160 --> 1:52:11.879
<v Speaker 2>vast majority of people paying one hundred and twenty dollars

1:52:12.200 --> 1:52:17.519
<v Speaker 2>a year ish I'm rounding in a music subscription raises

1:52:17.560 --> 1:52:19.800
<v Speaker 2>their total amount of spend because they wouldn't have spent

1:52:19.840 --> 1:52:22.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and twenty dollars, you know, in a previous era.

1:52:22.400 --> 1:52:26.600
<v Speaker 2>But for some the biggest super fans, that's under optimizing,

1:52:26.680 --> 1:52:28.920
<v Speaker 2>like they would be willing to spend more and they're

1:52:28.960 --> 1:52:32.120
<v Speaker 2>more passionate about music, and there's opportunities to make sure

1:52:32.160 --> 1:52:35.960
<v Speaker 2>that there's more points along the supply demand curve where

1:52:36.000 --> 1:52:40.400
<v Speaker 2>people can you know, get a more valuable service and

1:52:40.640 --> 1:52:42.960
<v Speaker 2>drive more revenue to the industry in return. So I

1:52:43.040 --> 1:52:45.520
<v Speaker 2>think both of those things are huge opportunities.

1:52:45.640 --> 1:52:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, just go because it has been such you know,

1:52:49.080 --> 1:52:54.799
<v Speaker 1>a talking point. Yeah, other than higher quality music which

1:52:55.000 --> 1:52:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and Apple bake in for the same price, what

1:52:59.360 --> 1:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>am I going to from my additional dollars?

1:53:02.240 --> 1:53:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, let's let's talk about high fidelity music.

1:53:13.200 --> 1:53:18.200
<v Speaker 2>So if you go back and in the recent history

1:53:18.200 --> 1:53:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of the last few years. I don't think there's any

1:53:22.400 --> 1:53:27.719
<v Speaker 2>evidence that hi fi is something that gets more people

1:53:27.920 --> 1:53:31.520
<v Speaker 2>in the boat. If you don't have a music subscription

1:53:31.600 --> 1:53:35.040
<v Speaker 2>at all. Is adding high fi going to be the

1:53:35.120 --> 1:53:36.800
<v Speaker 2>thing that gets you over the hump to say, oh,

1:53:36.840 --> 1:53:39.200
<v Speaker 2>now I want a music subscription. I don't think so.

1:53:39.360 --> 1:53:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen any evidence of that. So I think

1:53:42.200 --> 1:53:46.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a pretty big missed opportunity to just chuck it

1:53:46.680 --> 1:53:50.800
<v Speaker 2>in premium. I think that it under leverages what it

1:53:50.840 --> 1:53:53.719
<v Speaker 2>can do for the industry because really it's the most

1:53:53.840 --> 1:54:00.479
<v Speaker 2>leaned in, passionate people who care about that, and I

1:54:00.520 --> 1:54:02.200
<v Speaker 2>think you have to charge more. So I don't take

1:54:02.200 --> 1:54:04.960
<v Speaker 2>for granted that the status quo as it exists today

1:54:05.520 --> 1:54:09.280
<v Speaker 2>will exist or should exist in that way. But then,

1:54:09.680 --> 1:54:14.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, to answer your question beyond that, I think

1:54:14.800 --> 1:54:18.479
<v Speaker 2>that you know, if you think about what Spotify is

1:54:18.960 --> 1:54:21.720
<v Speaker 2>today compared to what it was ten years ago, we've

1:54:21.720 --> 1:54:26.559
<v Speaker 2>added tons of stuff that probably appeals more to you know,

1:54:26.880 --> 1:54:32.280
<v Speaker 2>big fans rather than casual listeners. And we've got a

1:54:32.320 --> 1:54:35.920
<v Speaker 2>road map of you know, twenty thirty forty things that

1:54:35.960 --> 1:54:39.480
<v Speaker 2>are going to be in that category rolling forward. So

1:54:39.800 --> 1:54:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I think there's going to be an opportunity to always

1:54:41.840 --> 1:54:45.560
<v Speaker 2>have a version that's you know, best in class and

1:54:45.600 --> 1:54:49.160
<v Speaker 2>appeals to the most ardent fans, while the vast majority

1:54:49.200 --> 1:54:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of people are totally satisfied with you know, the proposition

1:54:52.120 --> 1:54:52.919
<v Speaker 2>they get on premium.

1:54:53.480 --> 1:54:57.240
<v Speaker 1>What percentage of people would upgrade to this higher level

1:54:57.720 --> 1:55:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for you to be satisfied for the company to be honest.

1:55:00.400 --> 1:55:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Fine, I don't know. It's all upside, So I don't

1:55:02.960 --> 1:55:05.440
<v Speaker 2>think there needs to be a certain number to be satisfied.

1:55:06.280 --> 1:55:09.080
<v Speaker 2>It's it's it's pure incremental, both for us and for

1:55:09.280 --> 1:55:10.240
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the industry.

1:55:11.120 --> 1:55:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, if you want to go deeper, Spotify

1:55:13.920 --> 1:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stock is going way up. Analysis says, you know, there's

1:55:18.400 --> 1:55:22.840
<v Speaker 1>constant innovation. You look at the labels, their stock has

1:55:22.880 --> 1:55:26.280
<v Speaker 1>been somewhat morribn because they say, well, you know, there's

1:55:26.320 --> 1:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>no innovation, so they're banking on this additional tier. Lucy

1:55:32.800 --> 1:55:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Grange is going on and on, We're going to tap

1:55:34.880 --> 1:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>into the super fan. Okay, they're not. I mean, yes,

1:55:40.480 --> 1:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix you can pay extra for four K Okay,

1:55:45.440 --> 1:55:49.440
<v Speaker 1>but on most of these other streaming services you pay

1:55:49.520 --> 1:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe at you know, compared to music streaming, television is

1:55:53.200 --> 1:55:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so fuck up and antiquated My point is, I cannot

1:55:57.480 --> 1:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>think of a similar business. We're the main product is

1:56:03.240 --> 1:56:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not what you're upgrading. We're of a significant you know. Listen,

1:56:07.680 --> 1:56:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I just got to bug up my rear end about

1:56:09.800 --> 1:56:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this because they've been saying this to analysts. You know,

1:56:14.520 --> 1:56:18.400
<v Speaker 1>title never turned into anything. You know, originally it was

1:56:18.440 --> 1:56:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a Norwegian company that was something different whatever they were incompetent.

1:56:23.760 --> 1:56:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So I subscribe to my music service for the music

1:56:29.320 --> 1:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>unless you're gonna let me meet the act or you

1:56:32.520 --> 1:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>get me better concert tickets. You know, what is it

1:56:36.600 --> 1:56:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna give me.

1:56:39.240 --> 1:56:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you're gonna like it. We'll see you. We'll

1:56:41.280 --> 1:56:43.560
<v Speaker 2>talk in a year and we'll see if you like it.

1:56:43.720 --> 1:56:45.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think look, in a lot of ways, we've

1:56:45.600 --> 1:56:50.640
<v Speaker 2>already started on the journey. Like you know, to your point,

1:56:50.800 --> 1:56:54.920
<v Speaker 2>with family plans, you have more parental controls, you have

1:56:54.960 --> 1:56:59.520
<v Speaker 2>more accounts. We added audio books as an additional value proposition.

1:56:59.600 --> 1:57:02.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not like this is a brand new, you know idea.

1:57:02.880 --> 1:57:05.680
<v Speaker 2>We have reps under our belt for you know, how

1:57:05.720 --> 1:57:09.280
<v Speaker 2>to version the skews. I'm you know, I'm very optimistic

1:57:09.320 --> 1:57:11.960
<v Speaker 2>that there'll be opportunity to grow and change.

1:57:12.000 --> 1:57:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But let's just say you know, we're all very familiar

1:57:14.800 --> 1:57:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with the different things et SAT round audiobooks don't take

1:57:17.720 --> 1:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>from the royalty stream, and then the recent thing of

1:57:20.920 --> 1:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, lowering royalties overall through other things. Let's leave

1:57:24.160 --> 1:57:28.400
<v Speaker 1>all that aside. I'm a music fan. You want me

1:57:28.480 --> 1:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay an additional ten dollars other than a higher

1:57:33.200 --> 1:57:38.560
<v Speaker 1>quality sound blue skyet. I can't think of anything you

1:57:38.640 --> 1:57:40.640
<v Speaker 1>can give me the way. I'm going to say to

1:57:40.680 --> 1:57:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a significant number of people, that's better because it's about

1:57:44.320 --> 1:57:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the music. We've already established that the record companies don't

1:57:48.040 --> 1:57:52.280
<v Speaker 1>want exclusives, So yeah, you don't want to get into

1:57:52.320 --> 1:57:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a war of you can listen to it before everybody else.

1:57:55.680 --> 1:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>That'll be a disaster. As I say, your point of Spotify,

1:58:00.800 --> 1:58:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's total upside. I get it, okay, but the record

1:58:05.360 --> 1:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>industry is banking on this, okay, and so far they've

1:58:11.440 --> 1:58:14.600
<v Speaker 1>filled in the blanks not at all. They say, well,

1:58:14.600 --> 1:58:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't higher quality stream and then nothing, we're gonna

1:58:18.880 --> 1:58:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pay the superfans. I was that person. You know, I'm

1:58:23.000 --> 1:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>not paying to begin with. About one hundred and twenty

1:58:25.240 --> 1:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year is an incredible bargain relative to what

1:58:27.720 --> 1:58:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I used to spend on music. But I was buying music.

1:58:32.760 --> 1:58:35.080
<v Speaker 1>That was it. In addition, if I was a big

1:58:35.160 --> 1:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>music fan, I knew we could get the cheapest records. Yeah,

1:58:38.880 --> 1:58:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I might go for the contract tickets. I don't know

1:58:40.960 --> 1:58:44.840
<v Speaker 1>where else in the ecosystem there there's a spot for

1:58:44.880 --> 1:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>me to give it. You're gonna give me more services

1:58:47.840 --> 1:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't speak to the music. The US, the big

1:58:50.360 --> 1:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>super fan, they know what they want to listen to.

1:58:53.480 --> 1:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna give me audio bunk. You can give me

1:58:55.560 --> 1:58:58.879
<v Speaker 1>a blowjob whatever. It's got nothing to do with the music.

1:59:01.040 --> 1:59:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, look like I said, I mean, we're gonna do

1:59:03.720 --> 1:59:05.800
<v Speaker 2>it our own way. I'm sure that there's gonna be

1:59:05.800 --> 1:59:08.600
<v Speaker 2>twists and turns along the way. And then you'll be

1:59:08.640 --> 1:59:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the judge. I'll read your letter and we'll see what

1:59:10.760 --> 1:59:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you think.

1:59:12.240 --> 1:59:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, before I leave you, Oh, Bob.

1:59:14.840 --> 1:59:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Hold on one second. You earlier said something I have

1:59:17.880 --> 1:59:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to react to because I'm too easily triggered. You said

1:59:21.880 --> 1:59:25.120
<v Speaker 2>audio books recent thing, we lowered the royalty rate. I

1:59:25.200 --> 1:59:28.360
<v Speaker 2>just want to be clear. Our payouts have only gone

1:59:28.440 --> 1:59:31.040
<v Speaker 2>up every year they've gone up. There has not been

1:59:31.080 --> 1:59:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a lowering of our Wait.

1:59:32.240 --> 1:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait, wait, wait wait wait, audio books Spotify said would

1:59:38.520 --> 1:59:40.360
<v Speaker 1>not affect music royalties.

1:59:41.000 --> 1:59:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's taken out of a different different.

1:59:42.960 --> 1:59:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But this is all public information. Spotify is going to

1:59:49.720 --> 1:59:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a bundle model such that less of the subscription price

1:59:55.760 --> 1:59:57.720
<v Speaker 1>would go to music royalties.

1:59:58.920 --> 2:00:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so can I expand on that?

2:00:02.800 --> 2:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You got the platform, go for it?

2:00:04.520 --> 2:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so total royalties going up? You're right that with

2:00:09.680 --> 2:00:12.560
<v Speaker 2>bundles the royalty rate does go down. Of course it

2:00:12.600 --> 2:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>needs to because you need to accommodate at putting other

2:00:15.440 --> 2:00:17.920
<v Speaker 2>things in bundle. But let me explain how we got here. So,

2:00:19.240 --> 2:00:23.800
<v Speaker 2>as you well know, statutory rates in the US, these

2:00:23.840 --> 2:00:28.920
<v Speaker 2>are heavily negotiated things every four years or so. We

2:00:28.960 --> 2:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>had phono records for We settled in twenty twenty two

2:00:33.720 --> 2:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>after a long negotiation about how these new rates, these

2:00:39.640 --> 2:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>new statutory rates in the US should work. And if

2:00:42.360 --> 2:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>you go back to the press release that announced that

2:00:46.120 --> 2:00:49.480
<v Speaker 2>deal in twenty twenty two, it talked about two things.

2:00:49.880 --> 2:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Publishers were getting the headline rate increase that they were

2:00:52.560 --> 2:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>looking for, and the streaming services were getting the bundle

2:00:57.840 --> 2:01:00.520
<v Speaker 2>accommodations to be able to have lower to rate for

2:01:01.280 --> 2:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>services that were a bundle. The deal was celebrated by

2:01:05.440 --> 2:01:09.720
<v Speaker 2>both sides. Bundles are important. The reason bundles are important

2:01:09.760 --> 2:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>is because there's a lot of people like you and

2:01:12.440 --> 2:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>me that would gladly pay for a pure play music subscription,

2:01:16.640 --> 2:01:18.320
<v Speaker 2>but when we want to get the world to pay

2:01:18.320 --> 2:01:20.400
<v Speaker 2>for music, there's a lot of people who need maybe

2:01:20.400 --> 2:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>a couple other things to get interested. The vast majority

2:01:23.400 --> 2:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>of YouTube music subscribers are to YouTube Premium that includes

2:01:28.520 --> 2:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>music and ad for YouTube. The vast, vast majority of

2:01:31.280 --> 2:01:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Amazon subscribers are the kind that get music bundled with

2:01:36.400 --> 2:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Prime and all the other stuff that comes with Prime,

2:01:38.320 --> 2:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>not the pure play music subscription. Apple's got the Apple

2:01:41.320 --> 2:01:44.680
<v Speaker 2>one thing with music and you know eight other things.

2:01:45.240 --> 2:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>So this is important to grow the pie. Spotify last

2:01:50.320 --> 2:01:53.480
<v Speaker 2>year or recently we added audiobooks. That was a big move.

2:01:53.600 --> 2:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>It helped us grow revenue, it helped us convert better,

2:01:57.600 --> 2:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>It added more value to the subscription so we could

2:02:01.040 --> 2:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>get more people in the boat and grow the pie.

2:02:03.800 --> 2:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>And because of that, Spotify, just like YouTube with YouTube

2:02:08.720 --> 2:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Premium and Amazon with Prime, it became a bundle in

2:02:11.280 --> 2:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>the same way, and so we were on the bundle rate,

2:02:13.840 --> 2:02:16.680
<v Speaker 2>which is a lower royalty rate for on the publishing side,

2:02:17.440 --> 2:02:22.800
<v Speaker 2>than the headline rate that was challenged in court. The

2:02:23.000 --> 2:02:26.120
<v Speaker 2>judge looked at it, dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, and said,

2:02:26.360 --> 2:02:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Spotify is doing exactly what the deal was as negotiated.

2:02:30.880 --> 2:02:35.440
<v Speaker 2>They're paying exactly as you agreed to pay in this deal.

2:02:37.760 --> 2:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>So because of that, the facts are pretty clear about

2:02:42.800 --> 2:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>what happened beginning, middle, and end. That being said, we

2:02:45.480 --> 2:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be focused on arguing about the past

2:02:49.040 --> 2:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and a deal we did in twenty twenty two. We

2:02:51.280 --> 2:02:53.560
<v Speaker 2>want to figure out how to grow the pie moving forward.

2:02:54.080 --> 2:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>So the deals we did recently with Warner and Universal

2:02:58.000 --> 2:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>on the publishing side out us to say, yeah, let's

2:03:01.360 --> 2:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>have the rates go up on the publishing side, even

2:03:03.760 --> 2:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>four bundles. But in coordination with that, let's have Spotify

2:03:09.200 --> 2:03:12.960
<v Speaker 2>get rights that it needs to innovate and have new

2:03:13.000 --> 2:03:15.080
<v Speaker 2>propositions and things that are going to help us grow

2:03:15.080 --> 2:03:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the pie in other ways. And that's been great. So

2:03:17.400 --> 2:03:19.800
<v Speaker 2>now we can put this you know, accounting dispute behind

2:03:19.840 --> 2:03:22.760
<v Speaker 2>us with Universal and Warner, and now that that template

2:03:22.840 --> 2:03:26.360
<v Speaker 2>is there, I'm very optimistic that we can have that

2:03:26.400 --> 2:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>same you know thing roll out across the industry. But

2:03:29.560 --> 2:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to be clear that yes, the royalty

2:03:32.520 --> 2:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>rate is lower for the bundle products than it is

2:03:34.600 --> 2:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>for the pure play products, but in terms of total

2:03:36.920 --> 2:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>payouts to publishers, they went up more than ten percent

2:03:40.400 --> 2:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>last year. They didn't go down because of that royalty rate.

2:03:43.160 --> 2:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Our total payouts to publishers have gone up every year,

2:03:45.600 --> 2:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and last year was no exception. So I just wanted

2:03:47.360 --> 2:03:49.240
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that that wasn't, you know, lost in

2:03:49.280 --> 2:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the in the soup.

2:03:51.640 --> 2:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You get the last word, Charlie. I want to thank

2:03:54.480 --> 2:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you for taking this time with my audience, been very informative.

2:03:58.480 --> 2:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for having me as a present.

2:04:00.960 --> 2:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Till next time. This is Bob LOVESI