WEBVTT - Fed’s Favored Price Gauge Rises at Mild Pace, Spending Holds Up

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, the bets preferred measure of underlining US inflation core PCE,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>rose at a modest pace in a June. Consumer spending

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>also remained healthy, encouraging signs for officials who are looking

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>to cool inflation without breaking the economy. As far as

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 2>the numbers look, core PCE, of course, it strips out

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 2>volatile food and energy rose two tenths of one percent

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 2>from May. From a year ago, it rose two point

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>six percent. That's according to Bureau of Economic Analysis data

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 2>that came out this morning. Wall Street certainly happy about

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the data. We see stocks hire, we see yields lower.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>For more, we turn to Bloomberg News International and Policy

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>correspondent Michael McKee, who joins us here in the studio. Mike,

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>is this exactly what Jay Powell wants to see?

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Basically I was going to say not quite, but I

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 3>think he'll settle for this.

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>He wanted to see it even lower.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, they wanted to get back to two percent. But

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>they did say that they were going to start cutting

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>interest rates before they got to two percent, and he

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 3>had said a little while ago that the range of

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 3>two and a half percent, as long as they got

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 3>into that range, they'd be gone.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 2>So any change for next week based on this data.

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 3>No, because they didn't set the markets up for that.

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>They don't like to surprise the markets. Now. I suppose

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 3>there could always be a leak to the Wall Street Journal.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 3>That's only happened once in the last fifteen years or so,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 3>but people do think of it as a realistic possibility occasionally.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But in this case, I think they will be satisfied

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>to wait, because what ends up happening is that bond

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 3>yields go down if they signal that they're going to

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>cut rates in September, and so they get the effect

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>of a rate cut even without doing it.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>So square the data that we got today with the

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 4>GDP data that we had earlier this week, are we

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>in a goldilocks scenario now with inflation moving in the

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 4>right direction and the economy still strong.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, i'll see your cliche and raise you one and

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 3>say soft landing. I think either one is probably a

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 3>good description, but only as to where we are right now,

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 3>because we don't know what's coming around the corner, and

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 3>there are certainly analysts who think that we could be

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 3>closer to an economic contraction than anything else. But right

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 3>now it looks pretty good. The GDP numbers were strong

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>and led mostly by consumption, business and consumer spending, which

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 3>is what you want to see. You want to see

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the demand remain It wasn't too bad. Personal spending rows

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 3>just three tenths in the month of June. May and

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>April had been revised higher, which help the GDP numbers.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>So overall it's exactly kind of what the Fed wants

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>to see. Sustainable growth two point eight percent is a

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 3>little high, but they anticipate it coming down. But sustainable

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>growth with continually falling inflation.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So separately, US consumer sentiment eased in July to

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 2>an eight month low, showed that consumers see prices remaining

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 2>high and that cooling inflation rate has not yet helped

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>improve their mood. Why do consumers remain so unhappy in

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>this environment?

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, there are a couple of reasons. One is you've

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 3>heard this before that it's the price level, not the

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 3>price change that bothers people. And another is the overhang

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 3>of bad news that we have had in so many

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>areas in the last six months or so. The wars

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>and the violence and that sort of thing, and the

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 3>attempted assassination of Donald Trump occurred when they were surveying. Now,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>what probably did not get picked up was the change

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 3>in the head at the head of the Democratic ticket

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 3>when you look under the hood. And the University of

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Michigan has been surveying this for a long time, but

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 3>they ask people, if you're a Democrat, Republican or an independent,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>are you more confident or less confident? And Democrats were

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>less confident, Republicans only slightly more confident, and independence less confident.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 3>And given the reaction that we have seen anecdotally and

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>in some polls already, you would expect Democrats to be

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>feeling a little bit better right now. So maybe we

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>get that next month.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe we'll have to wait and see. Mike, what

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 2>about the idea that generationally inflation hasn't been around in

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>many lifetimes of consumers, perhaps consumers who are completing these surveys.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Does that have to do with this too?

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>It probably does, because you get used to a certain

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 3>price level and you get used to inflation being so

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 3>Alan Greenspan's goal always was that people could make decisions

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 3>without factoring inflation into it, and that was the case

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>for so long, and now people had to cut back

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>on spending because prices were going up so much, so rapidly.

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 3>It's also true that it hits the lower income people

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>much worse than upper income people, because they spend most

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 3>of what they earn and inflation's been tough on them.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.559
<v Speaker 3>But I think the generational aspect is also true, because,

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>of course, there are those of us who remember the twelve, thirteen,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 3>fourteen percent mortgage rates that we once had in the

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 3>olden days.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Will I do not remember that. Thank you Emily

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>for bringing that up, But it is something we hear

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot when people do complain about seven percent mortgages.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>But there are a lot of differences between that environment

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 2>in the early nineteen eighties and the environment today. Here's

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>what the team at Bloomberg Economics said about some of

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the data that we got today, Mike, Those spending continued

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 2>to grow at a healthy, albeit slower clip. Income growth

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>slowed more rapidly, and with the labor market cooling, we

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>think consumption growth will ease further in the second half

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>of the year. Is there concern that it will slow

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 2>to the extent that we could start to see negative payrolls,

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>We could start to see a recession.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 3>That would be a kind of far left tail risk.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not what most people are anticipating. Slowing is what

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>we should be getting. With the FED interest rates where

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 3>they are, and even if they cut in September twenty

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 3>five basis points isn't going to spur a lot of

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>people six seven five mortgages just a bad almost as

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 3>a seven percent. But it's going to be the process

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 3>that starts sending it down that will make people feel better.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, before we let you go, we talked a little

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 2>bit about the FED meeting coming next week. The payrolls

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>report coming on Friday, one hundred and seventy five thousand.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 2>Is what I saw last look for jobs gained during

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the current month that we're in. What do we need

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>to be on the lookout for a week from today.

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, two things we'll be looking to see. The last

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 3>two or three months we have had forecasts in the

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 3>range of one seventy five one eight, and they've come

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 3>in significantly above that. So we'll have to see if

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>that trend continues, and if the trend of the previous

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 3>months being revised down continues. But the biggest thing is

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be the unemployment rate. This time, we're at

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>four point one percent. Now that's the forecast for another month.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>But if it goes to four point two, we're going

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to trigger the som rule and.

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Claudia's phone will be ringing.

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Claudia's phone will be ringing, and it will, as I said,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>scare the market, scare the horses, and we'll see what

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of reaction we get. There will be people in

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>that case who are saying it got cut right away,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>got cut right away, because it already means we're going

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>into recession. FED doesn't think so, because they think it's

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>not that people are getting laid off, but just more

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>people coming into the labor force that is pushing up unemployment,

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>and that in the long run is a good thing.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, labor force participation. You want to see that go

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>in the right direction. I thanks to Bloomberg News International

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Economics and Policy correspondent Michael McKee staying late for us

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>on this Friday because he was in really really early

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>this morning, so we appreciate that. Well. The opening ceremony

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 2>is continuing as normal in Paris for the Olympics after

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a quote massive attack on the country's super fast rail

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 2>network disrupted trains and cast a shadow over the event.

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>It's not just the trains that the organizers are concerned about, though,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>The Olympics cyber team is bracing for an onslaught from hackers,

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 2>so writes Jamie Terabey, Bloomberg News cybersecurity reporter. She joins

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>us from our Washington, DC bureau. Jamie, good to see

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you on this afternoon. I want to start with the

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>trains because lots of us in the US here waking

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>up to the news that French Transport Minister patrese Vergray said,

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>we're quote coordinated malicious acts that targeted several TGV lines

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and will seriously disrupt traffic until this weekend. What's the latest.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Do we know who's behind the attacks, do we know

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the motives behind the attacks? And do we know when

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 2>these trains will be up and running again.

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Look, right now, there has been no claim of responsibility,

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 5>but it could frankly, be any number of groups that

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 5>are seeking to destabilize these games. They are in the

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 5>heart of Paris. The entire world is watching, and whether

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 5>it's home grown, you know, disenfranchised actors. We've seen France

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 5>go through a very particularly tumultuous period recently, and of

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 5>course we have external forces as well. The physical security

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 5>aspect of the games has been something that has been

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 5>a really big concern amongst the French authorities. They've brought

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 5>on tens of thousands of shot soldiers and police force

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 5>and even private security guards to be part of that effort.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 5>They've had anti drone exercises happening within the city. Because

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 5>the games are happening in the heart of town along landmarks,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 5>there is an even greater exposure to possible weaknesses in

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 5>the system. And this wasn't this wasn't a coordinated arson attack.

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 5>And I understand that they're still in the process of

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 5>getting everything back on track, but you know, it's a

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 5>it's a big glaring target for a lot of different

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 5>people with a lot of different motives to destabilize and

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 5>ruin this for France and for the international sporting community.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy talk a little bit more about the extent of

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the damage that a cyber attack like this one has caused.

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 4>We know that rail traffic was disrupted and that there

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 4>were fires. Explain a little bit more what actually happens

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 4>when there is a cyber attack at this scale.

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 5>So we know that this was this was an arson attack,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 5>So this sounds like it was a deliberately set fire

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 5>at each of these signal stations. A cyber attack would

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 5>come in from the systems itself and cause a breakdown

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 5>or a shutdown of an electric grid, of a network

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 5>of computers. It could reboot, it could cause all kinds

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 5>of chaos. We could see hackers try to get malware

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 5>into a system to lock it up and paralyze it.

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 5>We've seen that happen in past Olympic Games. In the

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 5>Pyeongchang Winter Olympics, on opening day, on the opening ceremony,

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 5>in fact, there was a very disruptive cyber attack which

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 5>was later attributed to Russian actors. There are so many

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 5>different points along the critical infrastructure that make up the Games.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 5>The French cybersecurity agency ante has TARGET has named five

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred different entities that they say are critical to the

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 5>smooth operation of the games. They've been working with these

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 5>groups for months, if not years, to show them up,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 5>to audit their systems and look at how they can

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 5>be as strong and as muscular as possible when it

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 5>comes to anticipating and expecting these attacks and being able

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 5>to respond if and when they do see them.

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy, talk a little bit about the Russia element here,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 2>because as they have in Olympics past for other reasons,

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>they are not necessarily present as they have been in

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 2>the past at the Olympics this year, shut out in

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a sense, give us an understanding of where Russia is

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to potential cyber attacks and what the

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 2>French and its allies are prepared for.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 5>This is It's been explained to me in a lot

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 5>of different ways. Is that almost the perfect storm for

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Vladimir Prutin he has He and the Kremlin affiliated hackers

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 5>have been attacking France for a very long time through

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 5>the cyber landscape. They have had people, you know, particularly

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 5>with President Marquin and his attitude towards Ukraine and his

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 5>support for Ukraine and he's part in beefing up NATO,

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 5>has been a particular target for Russia. With the Olympics

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 5>happening it is a moment of international prestige. The opportunity

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 5>for the Russians to disrupt this moment for the French

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 5>and for the French leader in particular, is essentially just

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 5>an irresistible moment for him. In the As you've said,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 5>we've had Russian hackers erase data sets or really disrupt

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 5>past uh, you know, organize the roles of organizations like

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 5>the Anti Doping Agency because right there the athlete, Russian

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 5>athletes doping results were uh, somehow erased from the national

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 5>data set or from particular data sets. We've seen disruptions

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 5>from the the Olympic destroyer event during the peong Chang

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 5>Winter Games. Right now, we're seeing a lot of disinformation

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 5>campaigns that have been happening in the lead up to

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 5>and are currently happening at at at present that began

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 5>on Russian language social media platforms that are spilling over

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 5>into the media, into mainstream social media platforms, really disseminating

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 5>messaging like there's too much terrorism risks in Paris. Uh,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 5>there's the Frances on the verge of civil war. Paris

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 5>is not clean, Paris Is is not particularly friendly. It's

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 5>a terrible place to go as a tourist and all

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 5>sorts of disinformation opportunities that are being attributed to Kremlin

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 5>associated hackers. We're also seeing brute force attacks on websites.

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 5>So what that is is when there's so much traffic

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 5>directed at websites that it cripples their traffic and their

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 5>ability to operate. We've seen that recently on targets including

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 5>the French Film Festival and also the Grand Palais, which

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 5>is going to be one of the Olympic venues for

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 5>taekwondo and I believe fencing. So they're not going to stop.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 5>They're going to do everything they can from here going

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 5>forward to amplify, to disrupt, to create as much chaos

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 5>as they can, because the ultimate aim here is to

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 5>not give the French their moment in the international spotlight

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 5>without some kind of disruption.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Jamie, we only have about a minute left. But what

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 4>do we know about the US's involvement keeping the Olympics

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 4>safe and the participants safe as well.

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 5>We understand that representatives and employees from SISA, the US

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 5>government's cybersecurity agency, are on the ground in Paris, operating

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 5>out of a joint operation center. We understand that there

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 5>are also other American observers who are going to be

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 5>there throughout the entire event. You've also got to remember

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 5>that the next Summer Games will be in Los Angeles

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty eight. So there is a real opportunity

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 5>here for lessons learned from for the Americans to be

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 5>watching what's going on in Paris, how they anticipate and

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 5>deal and encounter all of these challenges, and how they

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 5>can apply them in four years time. So there's definitely

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 5>an international effort. The French are lot alone in this.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 5>Everyone is supporting them on the Allied Western side, and

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 5>they're certainly seeing that in the private sector as well

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 5>as in the public sector.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Jamie Terabe, Bloomberg News, a cybersecurity reporter, joining us from

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>our Washington, DC bureau.

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then Bright Auto with a

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business act or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 2>You guys are all familiar with Joe Logan. He's widely

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>believed to be the most popular podcaster on Earth. He's

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 2>got a huge Spotify contract. We're talking hundreds of millions

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>of dollars on message boards. People sometimes describe him as

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Oprah Winfrey for men.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 2>About four years ago, during the pandemic, he decamped from

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles and relocated he and his wife and three

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 2>daughters to Austin, Texas, and since then he's cultivated a

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>lifestyle tailor made for the new age of the comedy profession.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>It's ruled by podcasts instead of Hollywood movies and sitcoms.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>He's got a new podcast studio, He's got a sauna,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>bow hunting range, and most important, a new club, the

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Comedy Mothership for doing stand up, all of it engineered

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>to share with his friends. The past two years, a

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>growing group of comedians and podcasters have followed Joe Rogan

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to set up shop in Austin. Felix Jelied and Ashley

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Carmen write about Joe Rogan for Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Check out

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>their story. It's on the Bloomberg terminal and at Bloomberg

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>dot Com slash BusinessWeek. Felix is Bloomberg BusinessWeek Media Entertainment

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and Telecom editor. He's also the author of the book

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 2>It's Not TV. The Spectacular Rise, Revolution and Future of HBO.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 2>He joins us here in the studio, Felix, how much

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Joe Rogan did you listen to when writing this story?

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 6>A lot, a lot of.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 7>Joe Rogan, months of jo really months.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, because he wouldn't talk to us.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 7>He doesn't really do interviews, and he loves to talk

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 7>about the comedy stuff, the comedy club.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 6>On his show.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 7>So it's mixed in with you know, moon landing conspiracies

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 7>and a lot of mma, you know, minutia that I

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 7>don't really need to know, but it was interesting. You

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 7>get his whole perspective on the comedy world.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 2>So just not just recent podcast episodes, but episodes going

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>back a few years.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, for years he's been talking about this. I mean

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 7>he moved from la to Austin about four years ago

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 7>and yeah he got down there and he just like

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 7>everyone who moves to Austin, they just can't shut up

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 7>about it.

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. It's the greatest down ever.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 7>You know, we got the best barbecue, you know, like

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 7>it's incredible.

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 6>The customer.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it is hot in the summer. But the one

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 7>thing he didn't have is he missed having a place

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 7>to perform because he was a regular at the Comedy

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 7>Store in La Austin had a stand up comedy scene

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 7>over the years, but it was always pretty minor, especially

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 7>compared to the you know, live music scene there. And

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 7>so he was like, you know what, like, I'm just

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 7>gonna build a comedy club for myself and my friends,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 7>and I'm gonna spare no expense. He said on his

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 7>show that you know, it's not to make money. He

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 7>just doesn't want to lose money on it. But he

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 7>basically just puts all the money back into the comedians

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 7>and it's.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 6>A really nice club.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 7>And because Joe Rogan is Joe Rogan and he has,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 7>you know, this huge platform that anybody who goes on

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 7>Joe Rogan's show is going to get a bus, you know,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 7>bump for their their comedy show, their podcast, their book,

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 7>whatever it is.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 6>So his ability to recruit people is amazing.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 7>And every time he has someone on the show, he

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 7>gives them the sales pitch come to us that you know,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 7>come hang out with me, you can perform at the club,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 7>you can come on my show, you can have your show.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 7>You don't have to be you know, tethered to the

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 7>studios of LA.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 6>And New York anymore.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 7>Just move here and you know, some people resist, but

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 7>a lot of people have heard that pitch been like yeah, okay,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 7>And you know, Shane Gillis, Brian Simpson, Tony Hinchcliff, some

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 7>pretty big name comics have moved down there, and you know,

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 7>they all are headliners at the club and hang out

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 7>with Rogan outside the club. There's like this whole scene

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 7>around the bar at the Comedy Mothership. It's kind of

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.239
<v Speaker 7>fascinating when you're there because you have this feeling that

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 7>anyone that's kind of in that world, Elon Musk, Johnny Manzell,

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 7>anyone that's been on Rogan's podcast recently could pop in

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 7>at any time. That's kind of like their clubhouse. And

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 7>it's been this very and then that's the top end.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 7>And then there's been this whole trickle down effect in

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 7>Austin where since Rogan opened the Comedy Mothership, there's now

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 7>maybe a dozen other comedy clubs that have also opened

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 7>up in the Vicinity in downtown Austin. And now if

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 7>you talk to like young aspiring stand up comedians, which

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 7>we did for the article, you know, instead of moving

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 7>to New York or LA to try and make it,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 7>a lot of them are now like you know what,

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to Austin. So there's all these group houses

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 7>popping up in Austin, where you have you know, ten

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, up and coming stand up comedians all packed

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 7>into a house doing the open mic nights around town

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 7>and desperately trying to get a spot in the comedy Mothership.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 4>So Joe Rogan embraced Austin. But in your reporting and

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Ashley's reporting, did Austin embrace Joe Rogan?

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean I think they have to a certain degree.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, Austin has been such a boomtown. You know,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 7>it's been like the growing city, you know, every year

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 7>for like twelve years. I think they lost the title

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 7>this year. But there's been a ton of people moving there,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 7>including a lot of people from California. And you know,

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 7>there's this expression in Austin politics now, which is, you know,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 7>don't California my Texas, which initially people thought, oh, all

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 7>these you know, California immigrants are going to make our

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, the state bluer. And actually, in the end

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 7>what's happened is it hasn't been like the liberals who

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 7>have moved out of California. It's the more libertarians tech

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 7>folks that want low taxes that move to Austin, Elon Musk,

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 7>all these tech companies.

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 6>So actually Austin has gotten a.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 7>Little bit less liberal over time. And you know, I

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 7>was talking to Evan Smith, who's the co founder of

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 7>the Texas Tribune.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 6>He's a longtime Austin.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 7>Journalist, and he was saying, you know, there was a

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 7>time where if Joe Rogan had moved to Austin, there

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 7>would have been like an outcry, you know, but.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 6>Those days are basically over.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 7>Like there was a little resistance at the beginning, but

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 7>then they're like, well, he's put all this money into

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 7>downtown Austin, he's revamping this part of town that really

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 7>suffered during the COVID and yeah, the town has embraced him.

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little bit about how podcasting has

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 2>disrupted the traditional comedy route, because back in the day,

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the whole idea of becoming a successful comedian, you know,

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>you go and do some really good sets, you get

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>on one of the late shows, right, you do really

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 2>well on the late shows, and then you're given a

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 2>sitcom and that's that was like gold. Yeah, that was

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 2>the way to get to the top. Yeah, it's not

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>like that at all anymore.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 7>No, I mean, the whole profession has really shifted, and

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 7>it's fascinating to think.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, in the nineteen seventies, you.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 7>Know, the big upheaval and comedy was when Johnny Carson

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 7>moved The Tonight Show from New York to LA and

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 7>you know, that was the biggest thing, like getting in

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 7>to do your show, you know, your act on Tonight

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 7>Show and that could just catapult you. You get a sitcom,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 7>you get a you know, movie, whatever. And all the

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 7>producers on Tonight's Show would recruit and they used to

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 7>recruit at you know, the comedy clubs in New York.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 7>When the show moved to LA, that all moved to

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 7>the Comedy Store and so the Comedy Store was like

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 7>the place to be back in the day, and that was,

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, eventually, decades later, that's where Rogan hung out.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 7>A lot of his friends are like comedy store cup medians,

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 7>and I think they also saw that connection that existed

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 7>back in the day between the Tonight Show and the

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 7>Comedy Store.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, late night television no longer what it once was,

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 7>but it is fascinating that now, like the big thing

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 7>is Rogan's podcast, And similarly, the comedy club that he

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 7>runs is now kind of like a gateway, and that's

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 7>where talent is like, you know, pulled to with the

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 7>hopes of like, well maybe if I kill it, maybe

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 7>if I just absolutely make a name for myself at

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 7>Rogan's club, maybe then I get on his podcast. And

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 7>that scene is like, you know, the big place to be,

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 7>and even people that are out there, you know, promoting

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 7>and whatever it is they want to promote, especially to

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 7>the demographic that listens to Joe Rogan, which is like

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 7>young men presume, you know, primarily like you know, if

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 7>you if you're selling something to that demographic. Yeah, like

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 7>you want to get on his podcast, You want to

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 7>get on the podcasts of all of his friends who

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 7>were also in Austin this whole little universe, the Rogan

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 7>verse as we like to call it, you know, And

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 7>we talked to like Tucker Carlson who's trying to launch

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 7>his own streaming network, independent streaming network. Yeah, he goes

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 7>down there, has dinner with Joe Rogan, does the podcast,

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 7>goes to the club, does another podcast in the club,

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, and just goes hang out in the mid sies,

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 7>Like that's the new place to be and it is

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 7>a huge shift for the industry.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 4>So what's the comedy like at the club? Is it

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 4>all branded with the Joe Rogan, you know, carnivore diet.

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean you would.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Think like and when it first opened, people were like, oh,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 7>it's an anti woke club, you know, it's all going

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 7>to be Rogan style of humor. In truth, it's not

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 7>really like that. It's much more just like a anything

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 7>goes comedy club. I mean, it's like, whatever people are doing,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 7>that's funny. You can get up there. Some of the

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 7>humor is you know, political, but most of it's not.

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 6>So is it.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 2>How's the club different than other comedy clubs that people

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>would go to.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean, first of all, it's very hard to get

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 7>into these days. I mean that's part of why, you know,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 7>another dozen clubs have opened up in Austin because it's

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 7>just really hard to get.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 6>A ticket just to get in there. Additionally, you know.

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 7>It's kind of like Rogan's guys who are the headliners.

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 7>There's a smaller room and there's a whole system, a

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 7>hierarchy in the club. You know, if you get a

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 7>job as a door guy, then you work at the club.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 7>Then you can do the staff shows in the smaller room.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 7>If you really are successful there, maybe you'll.

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Get up to the top room.

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 7>But it's kind of like, you know, there are definitely,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 7>like plenty of big performers comedians around the country that

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 7>will never go to the Comedy Mothership. It really is

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 7>kind of like a place for Rogan, the people that

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 7>are already in his inner circle and the people that

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 7>are death to get into his in or so just.

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Very briefly, you're not allowed to bring a phone or

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 2>cameras or anything in, but they have cameras set up

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 2>for a very special reason.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, because they you know, you're gonna start seeing more

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 7>and more live shows on Netflix.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 6>Netflix.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 7>Just at their first live show, Brian Simpson did a

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 7>live from the Mothership. You'll see more of that. The

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 7>whole place is wired so that they can do specials.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 2>It's a great story by Felix, Jeled Nashley Carmen. They

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>write about Joe Rogan for Bloomberg Business Week. Do check

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>it out. You can read the story on the Bloomberg

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>terminal and at Bloomberg dot com Slash BusinessWeek. Felix also

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the author of It's not TV, the Spectacular, Rise, Revolution

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>and future of HBO. Joining us here in New York.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, you may have heard of the last month or

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 2>so quite a bit of DEI news, at least on

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the corporate side. So just last week, deer End company,

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it's the world's largest top farm machinery maker, said that

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 2>it was pulling back from diversity measures in the face

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of conservative criticism. It was the second agg related company

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in less than a month to bend to such pressure.

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 2>At the end of June, Tractor Supply, you might recall,

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.679
<v Speaker 2>said it was eliminating DEI roles and retiring DEI goals

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 2>quote while still ensuring a respectful environment. So some companies

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 2>are pulling back when it comes to DEI and others

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 2>are leaning into it, like the investment firm Illumin Capital.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Darren Dodson is managing partner at Allumin Capital. It's a

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 2>fund of funds that's working to achieve racial engender equity

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>across investing. Darren joins us from Oakland once again. Darren,

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>good to have you back on the program with us.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you. Illumin just received its annual report,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 2>or released its annual report. We're gonna get to that

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>in just a minute, but first I got to get

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you to weigh on what's happening on the corporate side,

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>because at least at some companies when it comes to DEI,

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>we've seen the environment shift quite a bit over the

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years. How are you watching this well?

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 9>Of course, our strategy at a luming capital is to

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 9>address biases as a methodology for unlocking economic value. So

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 9>those that are pulling away from DEI have to be

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 9>really careful that they're not pulling away from returns, because

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 9>that's exactly what our research and partnership with Stanford Spark

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 9>shows that as we address biases, we are able to

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 9>see underlying returns. Sometimes we miss if we don't address them,

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 9>particularly racial biases, which we've found that systematically black fund

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 9>managers that are outperforming or overlooked by asset allocators when

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 9>they're trying to achieve the highest return, they basically go

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 9>against their own training and selecting high performing managers when

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 9>race is present. So I think there's a lot of

0:28:56.320 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 9>work for those that are moving away from DEI at

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 9>that intersection of DEI and bias.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it's a mistake for companies And I'm

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 2>not talking about investment firms or firms that are making investments,

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 2>but companies like Deer and like Tractor supplies a mistake

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 2>for them to distance themselves from DEI after getting criticism

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>from customers.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 9>Well, what we've found is that our investors that represent

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 9>a number of the largest institutions and foundation endowments, pensions,

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 9>others in the country are really excited to do the

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 9>work to address these biases because they believe that there's

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.239
<v Speaker 9>tremendous economic value on the other side of that. And

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 9>that's also what our research in partnership with Stanford Sparks shows.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 9>So I think that leaders of corporations would do well

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 9>to also look at their biases and resource allocations. Of course,

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 9>Danielkahneman won the Nobel Prize in this area and looking

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 9>at systematic bias and resource allocation and firms and when

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 9>we look at the intersection of bias and way that

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 9>shows up with women and people of color as they outperform. Yes,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 9>there's some important work for leaders of companies to do

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 9>in that area as well.

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 4>So tell us more about why you founded illumin Capital

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 4>and what are you looking for if you're running a

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 4>fund of funds, when you're selecting different portfolio managers and

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 4>different funds to invest in.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, we're looking for fund managers that much of the

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 9>market is overlooking. So our research showed that as black

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 9>fund managers outperform, many missed that outperformance and basically fall

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 9>back on their own biases. So when we tested leaders

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 9>of university endowments that allocate large pools of capital, when

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 9>we talked to sovereign wealth funds managers and when we

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 9>tested them for bias, we found systematically they went against

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 9>their years and years of training and didn't select the

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 9>highest performing managers even money on the table. So, in short,

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 9>what we look for is high performing managers that others

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 9>in the market overlook, and that's part of the reason

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 9>why with our recent impact report that was referenced at

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 9>the top of the program, we've found that our managers

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 9>are about double the industry averages in terms of women partners,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 9>and also four times the industry average in terms of

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 9>underrepresented people of color. Where we believe that interrupting these

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 9>biases and finding these overlooked and underestimated managers will result

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 9>in continuing to create economic value for our investors.

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Darren, do you think that because you're investing in what

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 2>you call overlooked fund managers, you're able to invest at

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 2>some sort of discount because the market's not actually taking

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>into account what their performance is and what their performance

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>could be.

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 9>I think that it's very similar to the way that

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 9>Charlie Munger invests when there's latent value in the market

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 9>because others are overlooking it, and you partner with people

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 9>to deliver on that latent value. That's a partnership. So

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 9>we partner with our managers. We also have a unique program,

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 9>the Aluminiq Proprietary Training Program, where we help them to

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 9>identify companies and their underlying strategies that are also overlooked

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 9>and underestimated. So we do a tremendous amount of work

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 9>alongside of the funds that we select to ensure that

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 9>they are also beating their biases and choosing the best

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 9>companies in the marketplace as.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, What kind of evidence and research do you have

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 4>that kind of shows a real connection between meaningful returns

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 4>and portfolio outperformance and this DEI factor we could call it.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 9>I think the most substantial research there's probably about forty

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 9>years showing the outperformance of managers of color and women

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 9>led firms done by the National Association of Investment Companies.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 9>And was really unique about our research and collaboration with

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 9>Stanford Spark and a number of the leading professors in

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 9>the world in this particular area is that what we

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 9>found is that not only was there years and years

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 9>of outperformance, but there wasn't asset allocations to follow that

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 9>outperformance of women and people of color managers. So we

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 9>had to ask the question why, And what we found

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 9>in our research is that likely biases are interrupting people's

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 9>ability to see high performing black lead funds, as we

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 9>published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 9>in a pure reviewed paper, and that is really important

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 9>information for those that are looking to make money in

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 9>financial markets, is that if they're looking at their investment

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 9>strategies and they're finding that they don't have women and

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 9>people of within their portfolio construction. They have more work

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 9>to do to address their biases to ensure that they're

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 9>not interrupting their opportunities for more returns over time.

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Darren, just thirty seconds left. What's the fundraising environment

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 2>like right now?

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, this is one of the really interesting things, and

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 9>thank you for asking the question. The fundraising environment is

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 9>impacted by the increasing polarization, do the upcoming election, high

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 9>inflation as we know, and everyone's awaiting the feds new words.

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 9>But what we find is that at periods where there's

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot of market volatility and uncertainty like there is

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 9>right now, that people increase their biases substantially, and those

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 9>very things that led them to overlook and underestimate fund

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 9>managers and entrepreneurs get exacerbated during periods of stress like

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 9>the period that we're in right now. So I guess

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 9>what I would say is that it's even more important

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 9>now to do the work to interrupt biases for those

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 9>that are looking to meet their fiduciary duty and achieve

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 9>higher returns than ever before.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Darren, we love it when you join us. Darren Dodson,

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Managing partner at a Luman Capital. It's a fund of

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 2>funds that's working to achieve racial and gender equity across investing.

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Darren joins us from Oakland to California.

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, car Play and and brout Auto with a

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app, or watch US live on YouTube.

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Well Block and Michelle Obama endorsed Kamala Harris as bid

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to become the Democratic nominee this morning. The former president

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 2>and first Lady offered their support for Harris to follow

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 2>in Obama's footsteps as only the second black president in

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>US history. Here's a video which Barack Obama tweeted out

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 2>this morning at five am.

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Kamala, Hi, Hey there, ah, Hi, you're both together. Oh

0:35:58.920 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 6>it's good to hear you.

0:35:59.760 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Bout.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 10>I can't have this phone call without saying to my girl, Kamala,

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 10>I am proud of you.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be historic. We called to say,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Michelle and I couldn't be prouder to endorse you and

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to do everything we can to get you through this

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>election and into the Oval office.

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Oh my goodness, Michelle Bractice means so much to me.

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 2>That announcement from the Obamas follows a whirlwind two days

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 2>during which Harris secured enough pledged delegates to secure the nominees,

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 2>raised over one hundred and thirty million dollars, and met

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 2>with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Nett and Yahoo. Adrian Shropshire

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>is executive director of Black Pack. It's a democratic political

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 2>action committee that's focused on mobilizing and engaging with African

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 2>American voter. She joins US now from Los Angeles. Adrian,

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering, in your view, how big of a deal

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the Obama's endorsement is to Vice President Harris.

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 10>I imagine that it's a it's a pretty big deal,

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 10>I think, both to to the vice president just having

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 10>that support in in you know, addition to the support

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 10>from Democratic leaders you know, across the spectrum. But I

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 10>also think it's a really big deal for voters. You know,

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 10>obviously President Obama and Michelle Obama, you know, have really

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 10>high favorability, as we say, among among voters. They're very popular,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 10>and I think that we're Black voters in particular, you know,

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 10>who showed up for President Obama and historic numbers.

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 11>For his campaigns.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 10>It means a lot in terms of just having that

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 10>sort of final endorsement in place and people really feeling like, now,

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 10>you know, uh, they can get ready to go.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 4>So what did the next few months look like, Adrian,

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Because we really don't have a lot of time left

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 4>until the election, what kind of challenges do you anticipate

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 4>in terms of getting voters to now mobilize around a

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 4>candidate that just very recently came, you know, into this race.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that the good news, right, it is

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 10>that Vice President Harris is not unknown. I mean, I

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 10>think part of the challenge with what we were hearing,

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, from inside circles and the Democratic Party about

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 10>you know, the potential of going to an open primary

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 10>and to you know, sort of extending the internal debate

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 10>and frankly chaos, that would have been more challenging. Right,

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 10>The vice president is not unknown. She's been vetted not

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 10>only from her own presidential campaign, but through the twenty

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 10>twenty election, through the last four years of the administration.

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 10>So she's not unknown. And in fact, you know, we've

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 10>seen in our polling and even in the door knocking

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 10>that we've been doing over the last few days, we

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 10>made the sort of pivot. You know, folks are are

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 10>you know, very much aware of who she is, and

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing lots of excitement. I don't think that the challenges,

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 10>you know, are very different than the challenges that we

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.720
<v Speaker 10>were facing three weeks ago, which is, you know, voters,

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 10>a lot of voters, particularly black voters that we're talking to,

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 10>need to know because they don't have a real sense

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 10>of the accomplishments of the administration. They need to understand

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 10>the accomplishments that the Biden Harris administration had that the

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.240
<v Speaker 10>Vice president was directly involved with. We hear from folks

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 10>that they don't know a lot about what she's done

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 10>over the last four years. So she will need to

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 10>tell that story. The campaign will need to tell that story.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 10>We will need to tell that story. But I think

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 10>that that is, you know, not different right from what

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 10>we're facing before getting the information out there telling her story.

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 10>I think a lot of voters still don't know about

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 10>her her biography and want to know about her her backstory.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 10>So I think that they they need to tell that story.

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 10>They also just need to continue with the contrast that

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 10>they've been doing and making mistakes of the election very

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 10>clear about where where we have the potential to go

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 10>as as America as a democracy, that is, you know,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 10>toward that more perfect union or towards you know, an

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 10>America that you know is continues to sort of push

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 10>you know, divisiveness and uh and and rhetoric that is,

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 10>you know, not taking us to the future, but taking

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 10>us back.

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Adrian.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 2>One thing that we've seen in polls in recent months,

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 2>and this is before Kamala Harris was at the top

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 2>of the ticket, it became becoming the presumptive nominee, is

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 2>that although we can't really say that former President Trump

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 2>is popular with black voters, he has picked up black

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 2>voters since at least according to some polls, since leaving office,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 2>becoming more popular with them. I'm wondering what your polling

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>shows in terms of how that could shift now that

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris is in the race.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 10>So, I mean, I'd say a couple of things about

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 10>about those those polls. I mean, one is it really

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 10>is unfortunate that when we see national polls that that

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, really captured the head lines, particularly about black voters.

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 10>It's unfortunate that the sample size of those polls are

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 10>so small, and I think that that does a disservice

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 10>not only to people's understanding of the race, but the

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 10>electorate and how it is moving when in our research

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 10>and in our polling, which are much larger, much more

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 10>robust bus sample sizes, we do not see that kind

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 10>of shift and support among black voters, and that is

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:28.560
<v Speaker 10>across demographic When the Black electorate, I mean, you know,

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 10>regardless of gender, regardless of age, we see the same

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 10>level of support for Trump that we saw on the

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 10>election day in twenty twenty and on election day in

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 10>twenty sixteen, which is under ten percent. So we have

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 10>not seen those kinds of shifts. We haven't seen them

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.439
<v Speaker 10>in our polling, we haven't seen them in our focus groups,

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 10>and we definitely haven't seen them in the conversations that

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 10>we've had on the doors. I don't think that that

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.280
<v Speaker 10>means though, that, you know, this is sort of an easy,

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, sort of chewing in terms of mobilizing and

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 10>citing the black electorate for the vice president. I think

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 10>that there's a lot of work to be done, that

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of conversations that they need to have

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 10>with black voters, both to help black voters understand her

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 10>vision for the future house problems, that sort of intractable

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 10>problems that people are feeling very deeply. Whether it's the

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 10>cost of living or it's crime, those sorts of issues

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 10>that are really burdening people. They need to tell the

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 10>story about how they're going to address those issues. But

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 10>I don't see any I have not seen in any

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 10>of our research the kinds of dramatic shifts that I

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 10>know that we've seen in headlines and papers over the

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 10>last few months.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 4>What have you seen in terms of what the Harris

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 4>campaign can talk about. What has been a strong policy

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 4>that has resonated with the black voters that you interact with.

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot I would say that that, you know,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 10>black voters have a lot of issue ext There's a

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 10>lot of issues that people are concerned about, and I

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.120
<v Speaker 10>just named some of them, you know, whether it's crime

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 10>or the cost of living, healthcare, education, you know, rights

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:15.879
<v Speaker 10>and the erosion of rights. So there's there's a lot

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 10>of issues that folks are concerned about, and those issues

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 10>that those top issues are generally the same across the

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.240
<v Speaker 10>battleground states where we're operating. You know, the top issue

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 10>might be different in Philadelphia than it is in Wilmington,

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 10>North Carolina. But the top issues are generally the same.

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 10>When we ask people what issues are going to motivate

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 10>them to the polls, the issues that they say, I'm

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 10>going to go and vote because this issue matters so

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 10>much to me. Those are things that are really tied

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 10>to people feeling like our rights are being taken away,

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 10>that they're deeply concerned about the Supreme Court decisions, whether

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 10>it's you know, decisions on voting rights, whether it's reproductive rights,

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 10>whether it is affirmative action. Those are issues that people

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 10>are very concerned about. People are concerned about the rise

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 10>in white supremacy, They're concerned about hate crimes, people feeling

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 10>very uh, you know, personally like they have the you know,

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 10>might be a victim of a hate crime. So people

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 10>are worried about the divisiveness and the divisive rhetoric in

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 10>the country. And so I think it's those issues. There's

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.879
<v Speaker 10>a set of issues that people are are deeply concerned about.

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 10>People do not want to lose more rights, They're worried

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 10>about the direction of the country, and those are the

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 10>things that are going to motivate people to show up

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 10>to the polls.

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Adrian, thanks so much. For joining us. Do appreciate. Adrian

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Shropshire is executive director of Black Pack, a democratic political

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 2>action committee. It's focused on mobilizing and engaging with African

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 2>American voters. Joining us from Los Angeles this afternoon.

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Brom A Journal, you let me drive, Oh.

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no, no, please, I'll do these.

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to try.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question.

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:03.959
<v Speaker 1>This is good drive to the globe.

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Pong communing well by up to Jada.

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, look at that less than twenty two minutes to

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 2>go until the No, less than eighteen minutes to go? Yea,

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 2>we got to look at the clock more le's than

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 2>eighteen minutes to go to the end of trading on

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.440
<v Speaker 2>this Friday afternoon. We just heard the numbers from Charlie,

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 2>but they're worth repeating. We're seeing a rally underway with

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the Nasdaq. Can posit up close to one percent? Yes,

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 2>and people have hundred up just over one percent. Will

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the Dow is up one point six percent. Let's see

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 2>what Lance Cannon has to say about all this. He's

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 2>portfolio manager at Hood River Capital Management. Joining us from

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Palm Beach, guards Florida. Lance, you manage the Hood River

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 2>International Opportunity Fund, which this year is up close to

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 2>fourteen percent. It puts it in the ninety fourth percentile

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 2>of its piers. Good to have you with us. How

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 2>are you. I'm doing well.

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 8>Thanks God be back.

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you with us. Hey, we had a

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 2>pretty big sell off this week, and we're actually likely

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:58.399
<v Speaker 2>going to see, depending on how things close, another down

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 2>week for the Nasdaq one hundred and the S and

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 2>P five hundred. The rotation continues into small caps. How

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 2>are you looking at the environment right now?

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 8>So we're very constructive on small cap as you might

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 8>imagine being a small cap manager, but we actually see

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 8>a lot of data points that would give us reason

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 8>to be excited about the opportunities over the next twelve months,

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 8>particularly given the fact that look at your small cap

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 8>indexes relative to the large cap indexes or their equivalent peers.

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 8>They historically have traded at premiums relative to the larger indexes.

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 8>But right now that these small cap indexes, whether it's

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 8>international or domestic, or trading at equivalent or even below,

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 8>and we think that rotation you mentioned earlier is going

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 8>to continue to happen as we continue to see these

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:44.359
<v Speaker 8>opportunities and large reason why that's happening is because you've

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 8>got high quality companies are going to be delivering earnings,

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 8>Revisions are gonna be positive, and people are going to

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 8>see those opportunities and see that these are undervalued opportunities.

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 8>I want to rotate into those type of situations.

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:59.920
<v Speaker 4>So what exactly has to happen in the macro environment

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 4>to keep the small cap rally sustainable? That hasn't happened

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 4>already because I always think of, you know, small caps,

0:47:08.560 --> 0:47:11.479
<v Speaker 4>when economic growth is doing well, small caps will rally.

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 4>But the economy is doing pretty well, and it has

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:18.240
<v Speaker 4>been for the last several months. So like what happens

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 4>now that propels the rally further and keeps it.

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 8>It's a great question. I don't know if there's anything

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 8>necessarily that's going to happen that's very unique or specific,

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 8>as much as it's just the consistency that you will

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 8>continue to see out of small caps.

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 8>So again we're talking about we look for high quality

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 8>companies we want to be invested in over a period

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 8>of time. They're being run by phenomenal management teams. These

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 8>guys have been doing the same thing that you know,

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 8>you've been talking about during this economic period where they've

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 8>been delivering, but they've been overshadowed by these larger players.

0:47:49.239 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 8>As those shadows tend to fade, we think that they're

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 8>going to start to shine and be able to be

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 8>seen and think be more managers to rotate down that direction,

0:47:57.120 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 8>just kind of given the opportunity that they see where

0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 8>these are undervalues that situations relative to their larger piers.

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 8>I think Viking Holdings would be a great example of

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 8>something like that that were kind of already seen here

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 8>more recently. This is a cruise operator that has historically

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 8>been doing a lot of stuff in the rivers and

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 8>mostly in Europe, put has made a shift here to

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 8>the US.

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people are familiar with the

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 2>marketing Viking River Cruises, right.

0:48:18.600 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, if you haven't seen it yet, you probably will

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 8>now exactly. But they've been doing a lot. They've do

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 8>really great in the river side on the river kind

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 8>of cruises type thing. They're making a push now into

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.959
<v Speaker 8>ocean as well, and people are gravitating towards US because

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 8>they have the great experiences there. We think they're going

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 8>to grow at twice the three of what the industry

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:37.319
<v Speaker 8>are going to be growing, so you can imagine they're

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 8>either taking share or they're creating share in the marketplace,

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 8>but then they're also expanding their margins. We think they're

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 8>going to do this set a rate that's much higher

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 8>than what expectations are out there, and that will lead

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:49.439
<v Speaker 8>to a stock that will continue to appreciate going forward.

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Alenz, how long do you think we'll see small caps

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 2>outperform in your view, because it's been a lot of

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 2>years where they haven't.

0:48:58.120 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 8>I wish I had a crystal ball to tell you

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.320
<v Speaker 8>how long that will be, but I again, I'm pretty

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 8>positive on it. I think that the market is starting

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 8>to recognize that these things have been undervalued for quite

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:10.320
<v Speaker 8>a while now, that these are not just junk companies

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:11.839
<v Speaker 8>that are down here in small Collemba. They are high

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 8>quality businesses to be had opportunities to take advantage of.

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that one of the things that sets us

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:19.879
<v Speaker 8>apart to is just the ability to identify those high

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 8>quality businesses and so you don't get necessarily all the

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 8>riff raft down here when you're investing in a Hood

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 8>River type fund, just because you're looking at high quality

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 8>businesses being run by high quality individuals and that will

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 8>lead you to see hopefully longer term returns that are

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 8>better than what the indexes putting out there.

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 11>What about on a sector level, what is interesting to

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 11>you right now?

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 8>I think obviously there's a lot of stuff happening out

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 8>in the AI world. Small cap has a lot of

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 8>opportunities in which you can participate in the development of

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 8>our official intelligence and the things that are happening in

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 8>that space, whether it's in the data center side, you

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 8>can even do stuff on the semi conductor aspect of

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.360
<v Speaker 8>things as well. And then in another area that I

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 8>think it's pretty interesting too. It's just this idea of

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 8>moving things online. So one of the companies that we

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 8>would like an international fund is this company by the

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 8>name of red Care Pharmacy out of Germany. This is

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 8>an online pharmacy dealer ow an online pharmacy stores excuse me,

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 8>throughout Europe. But Germany just made it a case where

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 8>they're now allowing you to actually order your prescription drugs

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 8>online that it was not allowed before. You had to

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 8>go to a doctor and get it signed, It had

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 8>to be handwritten, had to be taken to the pharmacy

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 8>delivered by hand. So now you can actually go online.

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 8>You can order it and do it all electronically, right,

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 8>so you can have an e visite thing in theory

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 8>i've heard of. The doctor could then prescribe you. Yeah

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 8>you have, maybe you've done one.

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know, if you're interesting. They have the

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, the fast trains.

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:55.399
<v Speaker 11>But but they do you have to get medicine by hand.

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 11>In twenty twenty.

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 8>Four you did. Yeah. So as of May it all

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:02.600
<v Speaker 8>kind of shifted, right, and so we got our first

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 8>look into in the Q two results as to what

0:51:04.680 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 8>happened there, and they saw a thirty five percent subfluential

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:10.040
<v Speaker 8>growth rate in the e subscription business, and we think

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 8>that's going to continue and be the real driver of

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:14.359
<v Speaker 8>the growth. Meanwhile, all their other all the other stuff

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 8>in a pharmacy now you can buy online as well.

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 8>Over the that they're seeing that part of the business

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 8>continue to grow a twenty percent clip the streets, looking

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 8>for twenty percent total growth for next year. We think

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 8>this is going to continue to be a main driver

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 8>just kind of given the size of the prescription business

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 8>in Germany sixty five billion, and less than one percent

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 8>of that is penetrated today. Most countries in Europe that

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 8>have moved this way where they are allowing e prescriptions.

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 8>They're doing seeing a twenty five percent penetration rate, So

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 8>to go from one to twenty five percent, that's a

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 8>big chunk of cash that is to be had by

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:42.280
<v Speaker 8>these guys.

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 11>Lance, we have a FED meeting coming up.

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh we do yeah, next Tuesday Wednesday.

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 11>Next Tuesday Wednesday. So I'd love to get your thoughts.

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, it felt like this week we heard a lot

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 4>of people say that the FED needs to be cutting

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 4>sooner rather than.

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 2>You did have a couple of prominent voices come out

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and say that.

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 11>Bill Dudley saying let's do a cut right now in July.

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 11>What are your thoughts? What are you expecting Powell to

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 11>come out and talk about.

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a lot of people that would love

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 8>to see that happen. We are not necessarily planning on

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 8>that in nor do we position the portfolio to take

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 8>advantage meent type of macro type of environment. We're bottom

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 8>up fundamentalists. At the end of the day, We're looking

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 8>for long term opportunities that we believe the fundamentals are there,

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:23.879
<v Speaker 8>regardless of what's happening from a macro standpoint. So I'd

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 8>like to say we're macro aware, but we're not macro driven.

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 8>So in terms of like what happens next week with

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 8>the FED, you know, hopefully, you know, they're seeing some

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 8>of the same stuff that I think others are starting

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:35.959
<v Speaker 8>to see, and maybe that is voiced in a certain

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:38.280
<v Speaker 8>way that gives us some confidence. But it's not necessarily

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.719
<v Speaker 8>something that I'm spending a lot of time trying to,

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, position the portfolio around at this juncture.

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 11>I'm spending a lot of time thinking about it.

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:48.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm spending a lot of time thinking about that view

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:50.920
<v Speaker 2>that Lance has out of his backyard. Looks like he's

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:51.560
<v Speaker 2>red on the water.

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 8>I wish this was my backyard.

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:56.520
<v Speaker 2>This is yeah, oh okay, Well, wherever you are, that's

0:52:56.520 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 2>where we want to be. Lance Can, Portfolio Manager, River

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Capital Management, joining us from Palm Beach Gardens, Florida on

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 2>this Friday afternoon.

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:09.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch US live every weekday on YouTube

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal