WEBVTT - Andy Warhol Really Did Like Campbell's Soup

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Alec Baldwin and you're listening to Here's the thing,

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>My chance to talk with artists, policy makers, and performers,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear their stories, what inspires their creations, what decisions

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>change their careers, what relationships influenced their work. Andy Warhole's

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>images of campbell soup cans and billow boxes upset the

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>distinction between advertising and art. His Prince of Maryland and

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Eliza raised questions about the relationship between celebrity, culture, commerce

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and artistic expression. Warhole was an openly gay man before

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>stone Wall, and his New York studio was a place

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>where artists, drug addicts, and celebrities came to party, crash,

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and play a role. In one of Warhole's experimental, often

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>sexually explicit films, in nineteen sixty eight, Warhole was shot

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>by Valerie Salonis, who had appeared in two of his films.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>After the Shoe and until his death in nineteen eighty seven,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Warhole kept to a tight circle of friends and family

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and relied heavily on Vincent Fremont, his exclusive sales agent,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and Fred Hughes, his business manager. My guest today is

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric Scheiner, director of the Andy Warhol Museum, when Shiner

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>began his work at the museum twenty years ago, he

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>had a much different job interned at the Warhol Museum

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the year that we opened in nine, as an intern

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the curatorial department twenty years ago. That was you

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>had a contact with exactly connection with That's where I started,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and then I jumped off to Asia and always did

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Asian art through the lens of Warhol and pop art.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And then after working many years here in New York

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in that field specifically, I got a call out of

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the blue to go be the curator at the Warhol

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Museum back home in Pittsburgh. You would interned when the

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>museum first opened, And I want to go to that

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>point because I'm interested in Warhol died what year in seven,

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so we died seven years earlier. He had been shot

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in sixty eight, ten years RFK. That's right, what transpires

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>after Warhol's death? Was there a planned when Warhol was

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>alive to build this institution or did it all come

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to fruition after he was gone. There was no decided plan.

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It had been a conversation point and certainly people had

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>talked to Andy about the idea of one day having

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a museum, which he liked that idea, but there was

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing definitive about it whatsoever. Andy's will was incredibly basic,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and it said that he wanted his estate to support

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>art and artists, and that was all that had said.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And so who with a catalyst behind building the museum?

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And it must have Those things cost a lot of dough.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of urban legends that say that

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>several New York museums were approached a partner to have

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Andy Warhol Museum based here in New York City.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>But it's very important to remember that in the late

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, Warhol's reputation was about as low as it

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>could possibly because the result of as the result of

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>most of his exhibitions throughout the nineteen eighties receiving horrid

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>reviews in the art press. So a lot of institutions

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>here really questioned the sustainability of Andy Warhol as an

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>artist and really asked if he would even deserve his

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>own museum. Do you think that Warhole in that period

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was doing something different than Warhol had done or was

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he just being And he was an innovator in all things,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and what's constantly trying new ways of making art through

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>new mediums, through new subject matter, new color palettes. He

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was always trying to stay ahead of the curve, and

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that often affected him negatively, and that sometimes the work

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that he was doing was too fresh, it was too current.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It was two of the moment. For example, for example

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the dollar sign paintings and thinking about what that year

0:03:55.120 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>paintings in that two dollar bills was his very first exactly.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's in early nineteen sixties work nineteen sixty two.

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So he was being dismissed for that. He was and um,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people said that it was

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>too tacky to paint money. It was too ghosh. And

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>when we look at those paintings today, what's more indicative

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of the early nineteen eighties in New York than the

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>almighty dollar? He hit it square on the head. But

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Andy loved money. I mean that was one of his

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>driving forces, and he drew and painted money really throughout

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>his entire career. We have to say he loved money,

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>not just his art, but loved money in terms of

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>his own wealth. Oh absolutely, But he became that way.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>He did not monetize well in the sixties, and he

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>stopped painting. What year when did he stop painting well

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and he went into his filmmaking period in nineteen sixty

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>four is when he really shifts focus to the film making.

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Um he starts experimenting in nineteen sixty three, in sixty

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>four declares that he's going to be a filmmaker, and

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>yet never stops fully painting or fully making. He was

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>always making something, but he definitely put the onus of

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>his focus on film in nineteen sixty four, and then

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he comes back to painting, and not that he really

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>ever left, but he shifts back again, concentrating more on

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>painting when early nineteen seventies is when he really goes

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>back to it. The shooting has a lot to do

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>with that as well, when he starts to rethink his

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>life in that he does quite literally die as a

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>result of the shooting. He's miraculously brought back to life

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>after hours and hours of change after the shooting. Because

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>I think to myself, is that when he decided he

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to I don't say this in the vulgar sense.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Warhole really shifts the whole Warhole incorporated into fifth gear.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>After he's fully recovered from the shooting, he thought we

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>only lived so long right. It was a huge wake

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>up call, and he really did start to think about

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>business in a much more serious way, mortality and mortality.

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>He'd certainly been somewhat lackadaisical and business records and feelings

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>prior to the shooting, but after that he brings on

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Fred and Vincent to help run the business. Is they

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing, and they really pull a lot

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of order into his life. And I think it's also

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>important to think that post shooting, he becomes much more

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>insular and much more protected. So we all know about

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the parties at the factory that ends at that period,

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>it ends, and everybody we shed us, he sheds a skin.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>He does. He still gives him to shed a skin

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>social in ways, but he doesn't allow. Many people in

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in security and safety have a lot to do with that.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>When I think of Warhol, he seemed um not on

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the surface, but underneath, very jaded and very cynical, and

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>very playful and very boyish and very guileless. At the

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>same time. It was tremendous yin and Yang and him.

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that an accurate portray? Accurate? You hit it directly

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on the head. And when he trust, his trust was

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>probably very difficult to get wheel trust. He trusted his family,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stayed in regular contact with his brothers back in Pittsburgh

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>with weekly telephone calls. They were the rock Ums. Two brothers.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>What did they do? Paul and John. Paul was in

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the scrap metal recycling business, and Paul just died about

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half ago at the age of

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety one. Um the first to come in, the first

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to go worve. Now, how old would he be? Um?

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Andy would be, Let's see eighty seven this August. Wouldn't

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it be great to have an eighty seven year old

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Warhol around? It would be Could you imagine seven year

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>old Warhol? Oh? He loved so Um and the other

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>brother And the other brother was John, and John was

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a businessman and a salesman and was very much Andy's confident.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>In so many ways, was name itself changing? Because he's

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>photographing fame? Did fame have to become different? It's such

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing to think about because in so many

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>ways Warhol becomes famous because of his depiction of fame.

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So he is really linking himself to the very concept

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of fame and to the celebrities that drive the fame machine.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Certainly when you think about what fame meant across America

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineteen fifties early nineteen sixties, it's a

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>very different universe. It's a much more private world. Celebrities

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are certainly famous for their acting, for their persons. They're singing,

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but a talent, and that the world of press that

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>puts that out as a completely different media universe, the

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>media completely but changing them and certainly changing. But when

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, it relies so much on press

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and print, visual in visual images in the newspaper or

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>are huge, huge Life Magazine. Is the internet be all?

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>No Internet? And Warhol realizes that not only do people

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>like Maryland and Liz become famous through that media angle,

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.079
<v Speaker 1>but so do artists. And he's looking very carefully, and

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>where is the art in fame? Well, he asked himself,

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, because where is the art here? And he

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>knows that Jackson Pollock and a few other abstract expressionist

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>painters who have been um featured in Life Magazine and

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>other mainstream media sources our household names and famous, and

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what he wants more than anything, not only to

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>be respected as an artist, to be known as an artist,

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which is really one of the major driving forces in

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>his life. I think that, um, you know, television obviously

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is coming into its own in the early sixties, TV

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>engaging with someone's imagery. It's not just a void coming

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>out of the radio. And to me, Warhol represents someone

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>who starts that process in modern life of taking famous

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>people and saying they're here to be consumed by you

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like a product exactly. And that's why he does what

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>he does, because he realizes that celebrities are a consumer

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>product product just like buying the Campbell soup can just

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like buying brill like air and water that we need

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to survive in ways and yet um, we can certainly

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>live without them, but we need to have them in

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>our lives, and we buy them because you do buy

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>those gossip braggs, you buy into something. Well, well, obviously

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we've we've evolved to that. We take the television and

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pair it with what Warhol is doing. Certain people who

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>shall remain name less, they have a debt of gratitude

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they owe to Warhole, absolutely, And when you think about

0:10:55.760 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>his front and center depiction of fame and consumer products,

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>there's also another side of the coin that has to

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be factored in, which also plays directly into this. And

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it's about death and disaster. It's about his car crashes,

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about his suicides, it's about mortality. And Andy was

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>very keen and very aware of the fact that when

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 1>we buy gossip Braggs, when we watch television, the two

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>poles tend to be glamor, wealth and fame on one side,

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>death disaster on the other. And we can't where none

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of us can go and where all of us will go.

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right characterized from me in terms of his

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>friendships and how he behaved. UM. More specifically, if you can,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're willing to, how is life changed after the shooting?

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>He immediately the leaves. First off, the Valerie Salonis is

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>going to come back and finish the job. And why

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>was she only given three years in prison? Why it's incredible.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I just read a book about her biography and it's

0:11:55.840 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>really really insightful. Um. Valerie gave Andy's script and it

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was a play slash potential film that she had written

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>called Up Your Ass, and she gave it to Andy

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>hoping that he would produce it either as a stage

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>play or as a film. Now for people that don't

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>know that she they knew each other, They didn't know

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>each other. Um not she. Yes, she was one of

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the factory changing out chicks. She appeared in one of

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Andy's films in a very She was around background role, Yes,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>she was around, but a player b maybe player. And

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Valerie had a lot of really deep, dark, horrible things

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that had happened to in her life and it created

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of psychosis, and she was not stable, had

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 1>any sense, and yet she was incredibly smart. And it

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was a feminist who wanted to eradicate men from the world.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what the play was about. She started a one

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>woman um group called um Scum, the Society for Cutting

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Out Men, and wanted to eratic men from the earth.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that Andy, being a man, probably didn't like

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that idea so much, and when he read the script

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>he just thought it was not worth a conversation. Can

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you think of anything that Warhole exhibited towards women? What

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>did Warhole do do you think that might have provoked her?

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>If anything? Well, entirely very simply said Valerie, I'm not

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>doing this. I don't like it. It's not any good.

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And then he lost the script and didn't return it

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to her. She thought he was going to steal it

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>from her take the credit, and she went to get

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it that day and when he couldn't produce it, boom.

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Did she always go on her rounds collecting her scripts

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with a gun on her No, absolutely not. She purchased

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the gun just either the day or two told me,

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>in case somebody comes to pick up any scripts for

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>me at my apartment building, I want to be should

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>watch out a metal detector? Yeah, but no, she had

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>it out for him. And she really thought that Warhol

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was controlling her life. She was psychotic enough that she um. No.

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Valerie died um in the late nineteen eighties and she

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>only got three years. Did anybody, to anyone's satisfaction, find

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>out why? Um? It was, you know, a case of

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>her psychiatric status because she was deemed um insane and

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>went to a mental mental facility. She didn't go to prison,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>She went to a mental facility and somehow and the

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>standards are a little more lax, that much more lax.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And because he didn't die, um, she didn't have a

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>murder up and was there ever ever even the most

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>remote intersection of them. Again, well, she did reach out, Um,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>she would call the factory occasionally after she was instructed

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not to do exactly, and Fred and Bridgid and anyone

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>who would answer the phone would just have to say,

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>never call here again, Valerie, but periodically she would. She

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually made her way to San Francisco and died there,

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>penniless and addicted. So it's a very sad life that

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>she led. This is the I Shot Andy Warhole suite

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>written by John Klee. For the movie I Shot Andy Warhol,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Valerie Selonis was played by Lily Taylor. Take a listen

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Here's the Thing Archives, where I spoke with

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>artists Eric Fischel about his own dreams regarding art and commerce.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I used to have this fantasy that when my muse

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>left me, I would still be able to make product

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>right that I that that I wouldn't be making art anymore,

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'd be making things that look like art, and

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that that was okay. Take a listen and Here's the

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Thing dot Org. My guest today is Eric Shiner, director

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh. Warhol's work has

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>inspired countless artists and filmmakers. One of Warhol's own influences

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was Marcel du Champs, best known for his porcelain urinal

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>titled Fountain. Du Champ was by far and away his

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite artists, favorite Warhol. Oh, absolutely yeah, they met, they

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>became friends in the nineteen sixties. Du Schamp is in

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>several Warhol screen tests, for example, and they had a

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>very interesting back and forth about the ready made, about

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>taking something literally off the grocery store shelf and turning

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it into art. And most concepts of Warhol's find their

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>foundation in Adu Shampi, an aesthetic. People mentioned either that

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Warhol painted the soup cans and the different flavors was

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>one side of the corner of the other, either because

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>his mother made in the soup all the time and

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>he liked the soup, or his mother made him sup

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>all the time and he hated the soup, which was

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he loved the soupe absolutely and she really didn't serve

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it to him every day. And we have at the

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>museum in our collection what if one wanted it to be,

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>could be the Rosetta stone of Warhol. And that is

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a drawing that Julia, his mother made in ninety three

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>of two Campbell's soup cans and two cats, and in

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>her amazing cyrillic script. It says Campbell's soup very good gut.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So she beats him to the punch by nine years

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.959
<v Speaker 1>in this drawing and depicting Campbell's soup. And we know

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that Andy knew about this drawing because he kept it.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So Andy's paintings are not just of campbell soup, They're

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>paintings of his mother's rendering of He goes even more

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>than everything goes back to Andy's mother. She was an artist.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>They were incredibly close. She was an artist. She was

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>an artist drawings of cats and angels. We have many

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>up on display at the museum. She was incredibly talented.

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And she also, and this is really formative, Frandy makes

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sculptures um in the form of little pots of flowers,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and she makes them out of tin cans and they

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>just happen to be Campbell soup cans. So she literally

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>cuts the cans to make metal flowers and makes these arrangements,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and then she goes door to door and the rich

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>neighborhoods of Pittsburgh, Squirrel Hill, Shady Side, and sells these

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>things door to door with the boys hiding in the

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>bushes watching her, so that she can make a little

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of extra money to make ends meet, to help

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the family. So not only does Warhol have this artistic

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>um training from his mother, he also has a very

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>important economic training in that he sees that one can

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>make money from art. And certainly when he arrives here

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in New York and starts making cold calls immediately, it's

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he saw his mother doing when he was

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a kid. So incredibly important relationship. And Julia was so

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>convinced that her little baby boy could not take care

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of himself here in the big city. About eighteen months

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>after Andy moves here, Um he arrives nineteen nine. In

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen fifty one, Julia makes the move and moves

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>here to New York and moves in with Andy on

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>his apartment to his apartment on Lexington and lived there

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for how long until the end of her life, And

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it was early nineteen seventies, so she was ill. She

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>went back to shear through his shooting. She did. She

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>rushed to the hospital to be with him and take

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>care of him, and sadly, she fell ill when she

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was visiting relatives back in Pittsburgh and Um died about

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>six months after that. But they were incredibly close and collaborators.

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So throughout the entire nineteen fifties. If you see any

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>script on any Warhol drawing, any commercial work, whether it

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>be a title or um, some sort of um nomenclature

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>referring to the subject or Warhol signature, it's all Julia's hand.

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Warhol was the most prolific and produced the most of

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>his paintings and Prince and so forth at during what

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>period nineteen sixty to nineteen eight seven is the true

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>period of his painting, But he does experiment in the

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties, and of course it does have fits and

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>starts in between. Would you say that that after the

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>shooting he was even more prolific. Absolutely, So that's that's

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the most prolific periods period the mid seventies through the

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>end of his life. When you have a museum that

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is dedicated to one person's work, I'm assuming people are

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>giving you things to exhibit all the time. And and

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>how much of it do you own? How much of

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>war whole stuff do you guys have? We have the

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>biggest collection of Warhol in the world. First off, and

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>as everything for the most part came directly from Andy's studios,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he had been holding things back from every period, every series.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Why he was doing that, we have to question whether

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it was to hold it back so that one day

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be more valuable so that he could sell

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it for a lot more than when he made it

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.239
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties, for example, or if he was

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking about their one day being a museum. And there

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>are arguments on both sides of that equation, but UM

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say that we're in the percent range in

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of what we have. We're really only missing about

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ten prime examples of specific paintings from specific series and

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>those vactms that we have access to and can borrow

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>from UM the owners. But people are normally accommodating for

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the most part. Yes, support the mission absolutely, and those

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are the things that one day we hope those collectors

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>will think about donating one day to the museum so

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>that we have a full survey of his work. How

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>would Warhole describe to people his filmmaking career, which to

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>me is Warholes films. I still have a trouble getting

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>my hands around that in my head around that that

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not kitch and that and that and to use

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that word. Do you have an archive of his films

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously screens tis that we have all of them, We

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>actually own you all of the films are Oh, there

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>are literally a million feet of film, if not more.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And how many were actually cut into actually actually titled,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>probably about twelve dozen if you look at a film

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 1>in as much as there's some sort of an arc

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>or a storyline, but not always. And then the screen tests,

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of which they are well north of five hundred of

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>his filmmaking portraits of people that he knew, beautiful people,

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in complete strangers, and everything in between. So Warhol's film

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is a complete treasure trove that is very untapped. Uh.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean many people in the art world have, um,

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say reluctantly, but they've they've come

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 1>to an appreciation of warholes places in a contemporary art.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Are there people in the film world who have done

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the same thing? Absolutely? And Andy is viewed as one

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest and most important avant guard filmmakers here

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York, along with Jonas and with Jack Smith.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>So Jonas Mekas, Jack Smith, Andy Warhol always viewed as

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the top three. They're at the very beginning. What's the

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>film you think that is that represents his work as

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a filmmaker best. That's the one. What what do people

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>who come to the museum, what how do they respond?

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>What film do they respond to most? I think that

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Empire is the one that really gets people because it's

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a static shot of the Empire State Building for over

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>eight hours, and Andy sets about making the most boring

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>film ever made, and it was all about deconstructing the

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>notion of cinematic narrative, of taking a storyline out entirely

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and focusing on one object. The only thing that happens

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>is as it becomes dusk, the lights turn on. We

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>recently realized that the lights on the Empire State Building

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>were a very new thing in nineteen six four to

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the World's Fair, the year that it was filmed,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and people think of it as a durational um experience.

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>When it came out, people challenge themselves to try to

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>stay awake to watch the entire thing, and I don't

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>know if anyone has ever done that. Actually, Blake Blake Gopnick,

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the art critic who's working on a Warhol book right now,

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>has actually stayed awake for the entire thing, and he

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>should be alatted for that. But it was just this

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of completely redefining what film was and could be.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think because of that Um Empire or Sleep,

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>his two earliest films UM are important, But Chelsea Girls

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>is also a critical um film for Andy Warhol and

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that it's this idea of voyeurism. It's the idea of

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>being a fly on the wall at the Chelsea Hotel

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and seeing all of the strange denizens of that very um,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>odd and quirky environment and seeing the drama that unfolds

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 1>their room to room. And there's a script it's not

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>really adhered to very closely, and it in many ways

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>becomes the emblematic symbol of New York in that very

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>specific moment of time. And I also think is the

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>first iteration of what we know today is reality television,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of being that voyeur, that spy who has insight into

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>a world that you otherwise wouldn't. And I think we

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can safely blame Andy warholf for I never did you

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>never met him? From what you gather from people who

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>knew him, what was he like on the most elemental level,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>like when did he wake up in the morning and

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>what did he have for breakfast? And not his sexuality,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>meaning was he ever in love? Yeah? Absolutely? Who was?

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Describe him described typical guy who would tend to wake

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit late ten ten thirty, have breakfast

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the crack of ten. Oh yeah, absolutely. He would call

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Pat Hackett, his assistant, or he would call Bridget first

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thing to gossip about what happened the night before. He

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>would often call them the night before as well to

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>gossip about what had just happened, and then would remember

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the next morning. But then he would

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>go to work. And he was an incredibly hard worker.

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>He was working constantly and he would tell his staff,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>his family, and he mentees that he had you have

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to work hard to be successful. This is not something

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that comes just because of your talent or your skill.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You really have to work. And he was a workaholic.

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So I would assume that he was working eight to

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ten hours a day every day on Sundays. For example.

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Where he did his painting was where back then, well

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>it depends which his house was on sixty six Streets

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>between Park and Madison. The first house was at eighty

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>nine in Lexington and right across from Gristi's. He lived

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>there until the early nineteen seventies. UM. And then he

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>bought a mansion on sixty six Street between Park and Madison.

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a plaque on the house, so anyone walking on

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the north side of the street there. Um, I'm not

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at liberty to say, but it is someone that has

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>seven Warhoulian connections. Okay, yeah, and it's he's kept the

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>house exactly as anti Um had it, except for a

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>new kitchen and things like that, but otherwise it's just

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like walking into the house. It's amazing. But um Andy

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of course was a social being, so he would throw

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lunch parties at the factory, especially down at eight sixty

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Broadway on the northwest corner of Union Square. And when

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you say the factory, the factory was where the first

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>factory was on forty seven Street between Second and third Um.

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Sadly that building was torn down seventies right over by

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the un in Japan Society and it's now a parking garage. Um.

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And where did it move to? Then it moved to

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the west side of Union Square. Um. Well, the first

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>move happened in let's see late UM sixty nine. I'm

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking to the temporary space on the west side of

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Union Square. And then they moved to six a D Broadway, Um,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which um served its purpose just into it's the north

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>very northwest owner of Union Square. There's a petico on

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground floor Broadway. The switch the northwest corner of Broadway.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And what well it's Union Square, northwest corner of Union Square.

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So Broadway and what fifteenth or sixteen near coffee shop, Yeah, exactly,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And um there was the till when until he died, No, no, no,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>until UM three and into eighty four. Then and he

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>buys an old con ed building in the fifties and

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he moves everything there. It's a massive building and it

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>only served its purpose for what four years or so

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>until he dies. And that building has gone now as well,

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it was torn down. So the two middle factories still survive.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>The first and the last are gone. What was love

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>is in his life? Love for him was his family

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and also his partners, and he did have three long

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>term partners public and who were there John Jorneau, the American.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It was his first really true boyfriend and they dated

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Um, but they got along incredibly well.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And John was a huge positive influence on Andy and

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>appears in many of his early films and John is

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>still with us. He's today still doing his poetry and

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing, lovely human being. Um. Then later on

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen seventies, Andy has a long term relationship

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>with Jed Johnson, the interior designer. Jed and j Johnson

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>were twins who moved to New York and UM got

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs as messengers, and UM happened to make a delivery

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to the factory one day, and as soon as Andy

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>saw them, UM realized that he was dealing with talent

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>because they were incredibly good looking. Um. He took them

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>both under his wing and ended up starting to date

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Jed not too horribly long after that, and that relationship

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>lasted well into the late nineteen seventies. Um they broke up. Um,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they had their doc sins together, and there was a

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a scuffle over who was getting the dogs.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But they had a very loving long term relationship. You

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>made a literal scuffle a little m not that way,

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but yeah. And then his last long term boyfriend was

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>John Gould, who was a Hollywood executive at Paramount, and

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they had a long distance relationship between New York and

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>l A and would often meet in Aspen to spend

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>time together and that was Andy's last boyfriend and it

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>was in a time, uh well before there was any

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>discussion about gay marriage and so forth. But somebody tells

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>me that even if there were gay marriage, he wasn't

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the marrying kind. No, he was a solo act, wasn't he.

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>He really was in so many ways. And you know,

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy Toad the line right down the middle of those

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>two poles. He wasn't radical and out with an agenda,

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>nor was he closeted and hidden either, but he somehow

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was right in the middle of that. Interesting he just

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk about it and was incredibly queer in his

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>outward presentation to the world, and yet he didn't define

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>his life by his sexuality. That was a you know,

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly a major part of him, but it wasn't what

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he led with. If he were alive today, what would

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you ask him or would you want to say to him?

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.239
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to think about if you had access to

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>this person. And I will say that, Um, there are

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>occasional um seances and um people who try to talk

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to Andy in the afterlife and send messages to me

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>through an artist and it's a very creepy thing. And

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I never asked any questions because I don't really quite

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>buy into that. How your job it does, We'll trust me.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of weirdness that comes along with my

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>job in the Warhol world, which is fantastic, which is

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>why I love it. But I think at the end

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I wouldn't be much more interested in

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the psychology of Andy Warhol and how he everything had

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>played out. Was he happy with the way his life unfolded.

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I can pretty much guarantee you that he would say yes,

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.479
<v Speaker 1>but one never knows, so I would want to get

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>into his career in his mind and how he viewed

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>everything is had played out. Did he feel as though

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he mattered? We know today that he did in so

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>many ways, and that's what our daily work at the museum.

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And then of course i'd want to ask if he

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>was happy with the museum. If Andy Warhol were to

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>visit the museum that Eric Scheiner directs, he'd be one

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of over one hundred thousand people each year who tour

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the seven floors full of his work, which includes over

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred paintings, four thousand photographs, one hundred sculptures, and

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty feature films. I'm Alec Baldwin, and you're listening to

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Thing