WEBVTT - Where do the World's Best Band Names Come From?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, Mango, what's that? Will? So I know we're

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>both pretty good at celebrating each other's accomplishments. But I

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>do have to admit there's one thing you have on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>your resume that I've honestly always been a little jealous of.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You have a band named after you, Mango. I mean,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit of a stretch. I don't think it's

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a stretch at all, all right, So, so our listeners

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>will know, when we were in college, Mango was playing

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the keyboards in a band that a few of our

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>closest friends had started. Well, this also happened to be

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>around the time we were trying to start Mental Floss,

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and Mango realized there just weren't enough hours in the day. So,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>fortunately for all future fans of Mental Floss and even

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>part time genius, Mango decided to keep working on our

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>new venture, and he dropped out of the band. Now,

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this was also around the time that the band was

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just starting to get a few more gigs. And I

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>mean some of their shows we're getting I don't know,

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>what would you say, Mango, like tens of people on

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the audience. It was at least ten. It was impressive,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but they needed to settle on a name, so they

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>decided to simultaneously honor and throw a little bit of

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a friendly jab at Mango by calling the group Minus Mango. Well,

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not your honors the right term for that. Well,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>either way, the band ran with it, and they had

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a short but fun run. And I've even heard the

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>band inspired some songs like I think it was meat

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>loafs I would do anything for love and shares believe

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken. Yeah, I mean, there's only one

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>problem with that theory, Will and and actually there's several

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>problems with that, the main one being that it's not true,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but the other being that both those songs came out

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>well before the band formed. Well, I just think that's

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>what makes it so impressive. I mean, that is really remarkable.

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we're not here to talk about Minus Mango today.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 1>We're here to talk about the origins of some other

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 1>band names and maybe even create a little hall of

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>fame of great and terrible band names. So let's get started.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Ya Hey there, podcast listeners, Welcome to Part Time Genius.

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm Will Pearson, and as always I'm joined by my

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>good friend Manu shot Ticketer and on the other side

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of that soundproof glass rocking a T shirt for his

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite mash up cover band, Mago. I don't know if

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd heard of this one before. I had not. It's

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>called Beatallica anyway, that's our friend and producer Tristan McNeil

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, Beatles songs covered in the style

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of Metallica. It's not something you'd expect to work, but

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Tristan played me a few tracks earlier and I've honestly

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>got to say I really kind of dug it. Yeah,

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the way they blended Blackbird with Fade to

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>Black is pretty masterful. That My favorite probably still all

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you Need is Blood. I mean, it really says it all,

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>don't you say. Anyway, as funny or clever as cover

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>band names and song titles can be, the stories behind

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>them are usually not all that interesting. I mean, by definition,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>they're pulled from or at least made in reference to

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>existing works by other artists, and all the origin stories

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for the names of original bands tend to be a

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more interesting. Even that's not a sure thing. I mean,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>take the Beatles, for example. They've definitely earned their place

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in the rock and roll hall of Fame. But in

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the band name hall of Fame, I really don't think

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they belonged there. I mean, they took the name of

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>an insect and kind of turned it into this obvious

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pun on musical beats, and so it doesn't tell you

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>anything about the group or the kind of music they play,

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, worst of all, there's no hidden meaning or

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting story behind it at all. That's right. So for

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>today's show, we're gonna set aside the artists and their

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>work and really focus instead on what they chose to

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>call themselves. Even bad band names are on the table,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just as long as the stories behind them are strange,

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you're interesting. Yeah, And I thought we could do this

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like we did a while back in that episode where

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we tried to assemble our own version of Mount Rushmore,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And of course it was so much fun to hear

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>from all the listeners with ideas of what other presidents

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we should include on Mount Rushmore and why. So we're

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of doing the same thing here. We'll each pitch

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the best band name origins that we had,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, come across while researching and kind of gradually

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>fill out our Hall of Fame, and you know, The

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing we noticed while preparing for this episode is

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>how many band names fall into similar categories, whether that's

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>band's name for literary works or band's name for TV shows.

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So we'll try to limit our picks to one per

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.119
<v Speaker 1>category so that we end up with a pretty good

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>mix of origins. So alright, Mano, I'm gonna leave it

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>up to you. Where do you think we should start?

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So I was thinking about this, and I think we

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>should start with band names inspired by history, because those were,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the most interesting to me and

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>also some of the hardest to choose from. So a

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>few are pretty well known at this point. I mean,

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you think about like Franz Ferdinand, which takes its name

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>from the archduke who's assassination led to World War One,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Or there were lots of other ones I knew that

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are taking from history, Like do you know that you

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>two was actually named after a spy plane of currently

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you Two's were used to monitor the Soviets in the

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties. You know, I've heard of this term before,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but I actually didn't. I didn't realize that, but I

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>guess it makes sense though A lot of You two

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>songs contain references the political and historical events, and actually

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking about one the other day. Is

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't Sunday Bloody Sunday about the guerrilla warfare in Northern Ireland?

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>It is? Actually have you watched that Alan Partridge episode

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>where Steve Coogan's like a total buffoon and he's talking

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>about this inspiration for the song and he's like, it's

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>just so relatable, like when you're in line at Tesco's

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and you just think Sunday Bloody Sunday. Maybe that actually

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is the origin. I'm not sure. That's pretty good, but well,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what's funny to be though, is that the band really

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't choose YouTube to make any sort of political statement,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Like they went with it because it sounded ambiguous and

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>also I guess inclusive, like you know the phrase YouTube.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And also it was just more interesting than their earlier names,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like they started out as Feedback in nineteen of me

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>six before switching to the Hype and then you two

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>within the spand of two years. It's funny because I

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>found another band that couldn't seem to settle on a

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>name until they stumbled upon an historical one. So you

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>remember jeth Row Toll right. Well, they had a hit

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>with that song Aqua Lung in the early seventies, and

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>apparently Jethro Toll was a real person, just not a

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>member of the band. He was actually this English agricultural

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>pioneer who played this pretty pivotal role in bringing about

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the British agricultural revolution in the early eighteenth century. And

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so his biggest claim to fame was the invention of

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a horse drawn seed drill too easily, so seeds in

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>orderly Rose, which really laid the groundwork for modern agriculture.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's just so rock and roll. I know, you said,

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the bend just happened upon that name. Yeah. So, in

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the band's early days, they had this habit of making

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>up a new name for every single gig because their

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>performances were so spotty and most places didn't book them

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a second time. So after about seriously, like four do

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you something name changes, the group finally hit on this

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>unexpected winner with their homage to an eighteenth century agronomist.

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know that's the way it goes. That's pretty incredible. Well,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>but agricultural roots aside, My favorite band name with an

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>historical origin probably has to be Food Fighters. So this

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is strange, right, because I consider myself something of a

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>history buff. I actually won Mr. Zippi's History Award in

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Depth grade. But I have no idea what part of

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>history that could possibly come from, like we're the Food Fighters,

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Genghis Kans Elite Bodyguards or something not even close. It

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>actually comes from the tail end of World War Two,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is when the Allied pilots began reporting some

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>sightings of these mysterious German aircraft and they really couldn't

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be identified, and so the pilots took to calling these

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>UFOs food Fighters. And when frontman Dave Grohl came across

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the nickname he was reading a book about UFOs, he

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>actually just decided it was perfect for his new band.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So did he ever elaborate on what made it sound

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>so perfect to him? Well, Girl actually courted the entire

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>first Food Fighters album all by himself, but he kind

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of wanted everybody to think it was the work of

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a proper group, and for whatever reason, he thought a

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>World War two term for UFOs would lead people to

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>assume there was more than just one man behind this music.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty funny reasoning. So you know, I read this

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>history article of Nirvana, where the guys would always apparently

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>remind Dave Grohld that he wasn't in the first iteration

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of the band. So, I mean, it's kind of like

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>telling Ringo he wasn't an original Beatle, just over and

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>over and write. Feel awful for him, but you know why,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>food fighters like he could have chosen any word that

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>was a plural noun. Well, you know, girl apparently came

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to a similar conclusion because later he said in an interview,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he said, um, had I actually considered this to be

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a career, I probably would have called it something else

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's the stupidest effing band name in the world.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So I almost kind of want to add it to

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>our list just for that reason. But really, if we're

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna narrow it down to a single band per category,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to give this to the Decembers. Okay,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So I know their songs tend to be very literary

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes recount or maybe pull from historical events. And

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I do remember a little bit about the Decembers from

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a Russian history class I took years and years ago.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think I need a little bit of a refresher, right,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So the historical Decembers, whose spelling actually is different from

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the month in the band because it doesn't actually have

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a third e in it. They were this group of

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Russian revolutionaries who lent almost a failed uprising in the

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>December of eight and so the group was composed mostly

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of these young Russian officers and also members of the

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>upper classes who they wanted to reform the autocratic government

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>into more of a liberal system. And they actually took

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the chaos surrounding the death of one's are

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and the ascension of another to stage rebellion. But because

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it had been so poorly organized, their revolution was quickly

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>put to an end, and their hope of overturning an

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>oppressive system has really only lived on with martyrd December

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is now serving almost as a source of inspiration for

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>new generations of Russian rebels. So is that actually where

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the band name comes from. Yeah, so that's the thing

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it does, and it doesn't. So, according to the band's frontman,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Colin Malloy, the names partly derived from the Russian freedom

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>fighters and partly from the month of December itself. I mean,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it feels like you might be cheating a little on

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this one man, It's it's only a half reference to history.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So so why do you feel like it deserves a

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>spot on our list Because this is the only historical

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>band name we've mentioned where the reference wasn't chosen at random.

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So with the December Is there's actually this real thematic

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>connection between the band's name and its music. And as

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Colin Milloy puts it, quote, I like to think that

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the drama behind the month of December, there's a group

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of people who that is their month, and they're sort

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of stuck in this month. And I think that sort

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of speaks to the songs and the characters and the

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>songs sort of marginalized, sort of on the outskirts, all

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>living in the coldest month. That is pretty interesting. But actually,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't you say the real Decembers were from the mobility.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It kind of doesn't sound like they were marginalized people

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>living on the outskirts as he was describing. Yeah, so

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they were definitely a minority in terms of openly opposing

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the system that ruled them, and once their rebellion was

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of stifled, the Decembrist became well and truly marginalized.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Most of the surviving members were sent off to remote

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>work camps in Siberia, where their descendants still eke out

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a living even though they brought education and culture with

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>them to that land. Well all right, well, it's not

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the cheeriest historical connection, but but you're right, it certainly

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>seems like one of the deepest. And because of that,

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and I'll give it to you. The Decembrist

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>deserve the first spot in our band name Hall of Fame,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Ding Ding Ding, So so they probably don't know it,

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but that's a huge honor. And since it took us

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a while to decide on that first entry, I actually

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have a category that we can probably knock out pretty fast,

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's best band name acronym that isn't actually an acronym.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And remember r M is disqualified from this one because

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it really is an acronym and it stands for rabid

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>eye movement. Apparently Michael Stipe just cribbed it from the

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>dictionary after pointing to the word at random. Yeah, probably

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the laziest way to come up with a band name,

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but you do hear that happening a lot. Well, I

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>guess my pick for this one would be kiss. I

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>would think, you know, everybody's heard the rumors that the

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>name secretly stands for something sinister. I remember hearing as

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a kid that it stood for things like kids in

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Satan's service. But you know, according to Gene Simmons, the

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>name doesn't stand for anything and was simply just this,

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like this idle suggestion from one band member to another.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was it was Paul Stanley that came up

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>with this, and he's actually gone on record that he

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>chose the name Kiss because of quote just sounded dangerous

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and sexy at the same time. I mean, I guess

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't argue with the results, or I I guess

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you can actually, but I'm sure some people found them

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>sexy and others dangerous. I think my sister would be

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>included in that category. I know I've told you this before,

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but my sister is a few years older than I am,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So when I was little, I would sneak into her

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>room and us into her music. But i'd also, of

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>course go through all of her stuff. And one of

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the things I remember finding was this shoe box, and

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it was full of these Kiss trading cards because we're

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>hilarious to look at it. I really wish she still

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>had these and that's pretty amazing. But you know, for

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>my money, the best bot acronym band name is still wasp. Oh.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I remember them. So they were a heavy metal band

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and back in there was this seven I guess this

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was the eighties, right, And I can't believe that's not

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>actually an acronym. And they even put a period between

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>each of the letters. I know, I mean, I guess

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's from the era where you'd put gratuitous like oom

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>lots and nonsense and names like wingdings and whatever. But

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>supposedly it was just because not many other bands had

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>done it at that time, and they hoped it would

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>make them stand out and get people curious about the band.

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>But just like kiss, rumors world that the acronym stood

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for all sorts of naughty stuff, like we are sexual perverts,

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we are Satan's preachers, we all smoked pot. But my, my,

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>my favorite red herring of that lot is an answer

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the band members gave when he was doing

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>an interview and he said, you know, they asked what

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>does WASP stand for? He said, we ain't sure. Pal oh,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I like that. That's a pretty good ones there, all right,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So the periods were just a marketing technique. But what

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>about the name itself? I mean, does it stand for anything?

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Or like why wasp? I I guess one of the

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>band members saw a wasp one night and thought it

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>might make for a cool band name. All right, Well,

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess you kind of stacked the deck with this category,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm still going to give you this one as

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>well for wasps, so we will add them to the

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>list here, which is awesome because I'm two for two

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I don't think you have any points on

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the board, right, No, but don't don't get too cocky.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>We still got a bunch of origins to get to

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and I really doubt you're gonna be able to top

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>this next one. But before I hit you with it,

0:14:46.240 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. You're listening to Part Time

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Genius and we're talking about the weird stories behind famous

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>band names. Alright, Mango. So now our Hall of Fame

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be the best story for a band name

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>taken from a TV show or a movie. It can

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>be either one, and I actually think I've got the

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect contender. Now, if first I thought about fallout Boy,

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I'm always thinking about Fallout Boy, or

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe but you know, they've been this nameless band until

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>they pulled the audience at their second show and someone

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the crowd shouted out the name of Radioactive Man,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>superhero sidekick from the Simpsons, and it actually just sort

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuck. That's amazing, that's where it comes from. Yeah,

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty good story. So but but actually then

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought I'd go with something a little more obscure,

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's what led me to the Bloodhound Gang. Do

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you remember the blood Hud Gang? Yeah? I mean I

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>wish I didn't, because they had that annoying song bad Touch,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and the video of it was just them in monkey

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>costumes running around town and I guess doing weird, dirty

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>things to everyone in sight. I don't know, it was

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just art mango. I don't know why you don't want

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to remember that. Well, there is something interesting I found

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>out about that when you talk about them running around

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>doing weird and dirty things to everything in the video,

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, that's that the Bloodhound Gang was actually a

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more wholesome than you might think, or or at

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>least their name was. And that's because the band took

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it from this recurring sketch that was on the old

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>three to one Contact show from PBS and the eighties.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I know you were a big fan as a kid.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>The sketch was all about this group of dorky kids

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>called the Bloodhound Gang, and so they'd get together and

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>try to solve these crimes using math puzzles, and that's

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>where they got the name. That's pretty funny that, you know,

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>such a raunchy band would take their name from kids program.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, even though three to one Contact

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>magazine was actually a huge influence on me and mental

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>plus A. Seriously, I'm I'm still not sure I want

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>those guys in our Hall of Fame. Wow. I guess

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that the video did a number on you. But all right,

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I do agree with you. No Bloodhound Gang allowed, so

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we gotta come up with another one. So what sort

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of slemed on entry do you have for TV and movies? Well,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be a little band I like to call

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>exclamation Point, exclamation Point, exclamation point, or or as fans

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have wisely decided to call them, chick Chick Chick of course.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're this post punk funk group out of Sacramento,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and they actually took their unusual name from the nineteen

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>eighties South African comedy The Gods Must Be Crazy. You

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>remember this movie, right, Yeah, that's crazy. So for listeners

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>who haven't seen it, it's about this remote African tribe

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that lives in peace until they find a coke bottle

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that falls out of an airplane and they all start

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>fighting over it. And you know, it's a funny movie.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But I have to make I don't know what it

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>has to do with those three exclamation points. Well, in

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the movie, The Bushman's Shocean Language was subtitled as a

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>series of exclamation points, and the band liked this idea

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of using that to refer to a different kind of sound,

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, one that's hard to categorize, And I guess

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that's how they viewed their own music now, because the

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>bush language sometimes sounds a lot like clicking sounds. I

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>guess you know, the most common pronunciation is chick, chick, chick.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But according to the band, the intention was for people

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to use any three repetitive sounds and they could just

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>choose them, so you could call the band bam bam bam,

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>or pal pal pal, and you know, you technically still

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>be talking about the same band. I can give you

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>other examples that's right. All right, Well, I I think

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you've sold me on Chick Chick Chicken. That's gonna get

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>my vote. But I have a feeling this next category

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a bit more hotly contested, and

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the best band name for somebody who isn't in

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the band. Oh yeah, there's a bunch of good examples

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>for this, but actually, for instance, you you you know

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Alice Cooper right, Well, the band was originally called the Earwigs,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but after playing around with a Quiji board, it put

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>him in touch with a ghost name Alice Cooper, so

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they decided to switch to that instead. So I love

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that wegi board story. But you know what's weird is

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that I I didn't even know Alice Cooper was a band,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I thought it was just the one guy. Well

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not at first. There was the guy that ended up

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>taking the name, and it was the front man. His

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>real name was Vincent Fernier. But after he split off

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>from band, he went solo and he actually ended up

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just taking the name Alice with him. Well, I mean

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>that is pretty cool, but you know, I prefer bands

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>named after real people, thank you very much. And that's

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>why my pick for this category is Pink Floyd. No way,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is that them a real person? Yeah, it's actually the

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>name of two real people. So you know, one of

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the band's founding members, the legendary Sid Barrett, came up

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>with idea for combining the names of two of his

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite blues musicians, and that's Pink Anderson and Floyd Counsel.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, I had no idea about that, all right,

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>but that does mean if I'm not mistaken that Anderson

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Counsel would still be on the table then right, definitely.

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So for any nameless bands out there, here's the answer

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you've been looking for, all right. Well, I have to

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>give it to you. Pink Floyd is a two for

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>with that double homage and and that is tough to beat.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But I have one I've been saving, and I think

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to give the edge to, you know, to

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>my Alabama brothers, Leonard SKINNERD. I mean, aren't they from Florida?

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Details details name also mean in terms of fake sounding

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>names like Leonard SKINNERD like no real name has that

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>many wise, and know many how many times I've written it,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many times I've actually written it,

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but I never can seem to get it right. But

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you might have a point because you know, while the

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>band did take their name and honor of their real

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>life gym teacher and basketball coach, they also tweaked it

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a little to sound a little bit more interesting. So

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the real guy's name was Leonard Skinner, and after the

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>band made him their namesake, Skinner reconnected with his old

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>pupils and actually even m seed one of their shows.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But really, though, the band might have been better off

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>just sticking with Leonard Skinner, because you know, their name

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was just so hard to remember how to spell, and

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the misspelled version they went on was just so phonetically

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.719
<v Speaker 1>confusing that even their self titled debut album, it had

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this little pronunciation. Guy. I don't know if you've seen

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>this before, but on the cover of the album to

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>help people know how to pronounce it, you know, just

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to be safe. That's ridiculous. Okay, so I I guess

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you're two for two. I'm gonna give that one to you.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But this next category I think is all mind because

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I found the all time best band name inspired by

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>another artist, and it belongs to none other than the

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>man who taught the world to do the twist. Mr

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Chubby Checker. Oh wow, So who inspired Chubby Checker's name.

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>So apparently it's a riff on the name of fellow

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>musician and near contemporary Fats Domino. Uh yeah, But the

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>first person to ever call Ernest Evans by the name

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Chubby Checker was actually Dick Clark's wife, and they met

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>when Chubby appeared on Dick Clark's American Bands in nineteen

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty and during the recording, Chubby launched into this impression

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of Fats Domino, And afterwards he told Mrs Clark that

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.959
<v Speaker 1>his friends actually called him Chubby, and she smiled and

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>said as in Checker, and he just kind of liked

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it so much that he used as a stage name

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>from then on. You know, this is one of those that,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight you think that Fats Domino and Chubby Checker,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems obvious, but actually had never made that connection before.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, so I will concede this one. Chubby Checker

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>should have a spot in the band Name Hall of Fame. Well,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I am glad you're on board, because I really like

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that one, and it just kind of lines up perfectly

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with an article I read about the science of choosing

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the perfect band name. Oh, I definitely want to hear

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>more about this, but first let's take a quick break,

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, Mango, So it's time to spill it. What

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is the secret to coming up with a truly top

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>shelf band name? Well, if we've shown anything today, it's

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that memorable band names come from all different places, you know,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>summer homages to real life events and people. Others are

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>nonsense words or appealing phrases crib from media or other musicians.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And some names come in sudden flashes of inspiration. I mean,

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>others just seem to be whatever drummer happened to be

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at at the time. And there's really no one

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>fixed approach that works. But there actually do seem to

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>be some linguistic patterns that crop up among the best

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>band names. Alright, So what do you mean by patterns? So,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>just on a basic level, most compelling band names have

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>something unusual about them. So you know, you think about

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like the grateful Dead or the Flaming Lips, and those

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>are just these unexpected word combinations that you find together

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and when you hear them, they kind of grab your attention.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But there's also this other factor that's more cultural than

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>linguistic and what's that. So this might sound a little strange,

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but it comes down to the way people connect words

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and names that belong to a certain category. So for example,

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like think about something the naming patterns for cars, right,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>two big ones that might come up are fast moving animals.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got things like the Jaguar, the Mustang, even the viper,

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and also astronomical figures, so like tourists or mercury, Nova, Saturn, Subaru. Like,

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point, we're kind of so used to these

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>recurring patterns and car names that any words that fit

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>into that genre like that brings true to us, is

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a good name for a car? That's yeah, that's true definitely,

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But so are you're saying that the same kind of

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thing happens with band names. Totally, But this is something

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I recognized on my own. It's actually the theory of

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 1>this linguist named chi Lu. And one important thing she

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>points out in her research is that these cultural associations

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>that we create for categories of names are always changing

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>over time. So here's actually a quote from her article

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>in j Store where she lays out some of these

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>generational patterns of music. She writes, quote, short names beginning

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>with the and a common noun is an obvious pattern

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from the mid twentieth century, got the Beatles, the monkeys,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the animals, the Kanks, and that's seen a revival in

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>recent times. The heavy metal genre is one of the

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>classes with more obvious linguistic patterns, usually involving death, so

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Megadeth's Layer of course, and other perils such as dangerous animals,

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>white snake weapons, guns and roses, iron maiden, or sometimes

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>drugs and unhealthy substances poison. All Right, so I guess

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it does make sense. Like when you were talking about

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Chubby Checker before, it lines up pretty well with this

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of these these naming patterns. Obviously, in this case,

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it was picking a name that wasn't too far off

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>from somebody else's, you know, Fats Domino in this case.

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>And so you kind of found that ultimate shortcut to

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>making a recognizable band name, right, And I mean that

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be like the cardinal rule of rock and roll,

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>where the music is always derivative, right, Like it's always

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>pulling from the blues. So why shouldn't the naming conventions

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be derivative as well? Just copy the other guys? Yeah,

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a good point and it does seem to work

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>all right. Well, I wanted to come back to some

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of these other names, but I'm not sure if you

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>experienced this, but in doing the research, there were definitely

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a ton of fun band name origins that they kind

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of don't fit into a particular category. I feel like

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>we should take a little bit of time to just

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>throw out a few wild card entries for our band

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>name Hall of Fame. Yeah, I love that, it's perfect.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So I've actually been dying to talk about Dexis Midnight Runners,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's any other way I could

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>work them in. Yeah, it sounds like kind of a

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>tough sell, so I have to admit, who are they exactly?

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So you might remember them as the British band that

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>gave us the eighties hit song come On Eileen, No,

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I definitely don't remember them as that. I mean, of

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>course I remember the song, but I couldn't have told

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>you sung it well either way. Their naming situation is

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>basically the exact opposite of what happened with the Bloodhound Gangs.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>So instead of being like a raunchy band with an

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>innocent name, the Dexis Midnight Runners were I guess, like

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a squeaky clean band with a highly suspect name. That

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds pretty funny, but I think you're gonna have to

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>walk me through because I honestly have no clue what

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a Dexi's Midnight Runners. Okay, So the band openly admitted

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that the dexis part of their name comes from a

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a stimulant called dexadrine and this was popular

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>among soul music fans in Northern England during the seventies,

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Midnight Runners part that refers to the users

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>who used the drug as a way to dance all

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>night long. Wow. So so, but you said these guys

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>were like a squeaky clean band totally. So they were

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>completely sober and they didn't even have alcohol at any

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of their shows. Oh wow, that's pretty bizarre, But that's great.

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, I think my wild card pick is

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>an oldie but a goody, and that would be the

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>one and only led Zeppelin. You can kind of think

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of this as the Yankee Doodle Award for our Hall

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>of Fame name because you know, just like in that song,

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the name led Zeppelin has its origins and something that

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.719
<v Speaker 1>was originally intended as an insult. So the story goes

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that The Who's Keith Moon was actually invited to drum

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>for this new London band, but ended up being so

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>unimpressed with the other members and he mockingly predicted that

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they would quote go down like a lead balloon. So

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>then John entwhistle basis for The Who went even further

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>than that, and he remarked that the new band would

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be such a colossal failure that it would be more

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>like a led Zeppelin, which is pretty harsh but also

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of clever. Yeah, it was, but maybe as clever

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>as that. When the insult made its way back to

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Page and his manager, they actually thought it was

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>so funny that they decided to make it the official

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>band name, though only after dropping the A from lead,

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and the whole reason was to, you know, to keep

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Americans from mispronouncing it as Lead Zeppelin. So I don't

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>know what I should be impressed by how much they

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>cared about preserving like that lead balloon joke at all costs,

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or I guess insulted by how little they thought of

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>American intelligence. I don't know. I sort of think it

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>was a smart call. I mean you remember the pronunciation

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>guide I mentioned about Leonard Skinner, Right, Yeah, of course,

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I understand that desire to make sure

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>your name comes across as intended, because the name of

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>band goes with can have this major impact on a

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>musician's career. Didn't bring everything from their radio exposure to

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>merchandise design to you know, what kind of people will

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>actually listen to the songs? And even after the music

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>stops and the spotlight shifts to someone else, a good

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>name can still keep a band afloat in the cultural site, guys,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>so long as there's an interesting story about where it

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>came from. Oh yeah, I mean, I think you're absolutely right.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I was actually this close to talk about Hoodie and

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the Blowfish today and Mango, it's two thousand eighteen. Well,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you haven't missed your opportunity yet. It's time for the

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>fact off, and there's still a few empty spots left

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about band names. All right, we'll dust off

0:28:54.120 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>your Blowfish. Hootie, you're coming in, so I'm gonna start

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>his off. And I love it when bands named themselves

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>after songs from other bands as somewhat of a tribute,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's actually how radio Head got their name. When

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they first formed in the mid eighties, they were known

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>as on a Friday, which was the day that they

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>got together to practice. But then five or six years later,

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>when they signed with E. M. I, they actually changed

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>their name to Radiohead as a tribute to the Talking

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Heads and the song Radiohead. You know, something similar actually

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>happened with the Rolling Stones. So Jagger and Richards first

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>formed the band back in the early sixties, and at

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that point they were called the Blue Boys. The story

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>goes that during an interview with this jazz focused newspaper,

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 1>guitarist Brian Jones spotted this Muddy Waters record. It was

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just sitting there on the floor where he was doing

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the interview, and it made him think about that song

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Rolling Stone from the same album, and that's where they

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>got the name. That's really cool. So, you know, having

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>played an a band in high school or several bands

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in high school, I love stories of groups that you know,

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>met his kids and kept performing together. And another one

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of those was a group that came together in the

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>nineties out of Cleveland. They were just in junior high

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>school when they started rapping together and one day Anthony

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Crazy Bone Henderson had this minor crash on his moped,

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and in somewhat of an act of solidarity, the group

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>all supported bandages and they started calling themselves the band

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Aid Boys, And while that name didn't stick, we now

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>know them as Bone Thugs and Harmony. You know, I

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>also think it's fun when bands don't seem to actually

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>remember their origin, or at least they're competing stories for origins.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And one of these where I saw so many different

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>stories on this was Pearl Jam, and so I won't

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>share all of them. But there have been some claims

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that the band name was inspired by Eddie Vetter's great

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>grandmother Pearl, who apparently made this famous peyote jam. I

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is true enough. And I thought

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty funny, and then it ranges to the

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>much less interesting. You know, one of them that they

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>just liked the word pearl and then they added jam

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to it because that's what a group of musicians do.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think I'm gonna stick with the great grandmother story.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It just seems so much more fun to believe. Yeah,

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I like that a lot. Well, I know we're not

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>really focusing on cover bands, but there's one that's kind

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of a cover band but also kind of a weirdly

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>inspired band called Austrian Death Machine, and apparently they sing

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>entirely in the style of Arnold Schwarzenegger, and all their

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>songs are from some of his famous one liners. So

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it's not a tumor. You can actually

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>find on the band's first album, Total Brutal, which is right,

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that's actually the first album. Oh, just the first album. Wow,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this band is something else. I would imagine that's one

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of those shows that you're like, this is gonna be

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so hilarious, and for the first five minutes it's so hilarious,

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it's just torture from that point on. Alright, MANO,

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to disappoint anybody, because we promised to

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>include Hootie and the Blowfish, and I'm here to deliver.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that we actually did promise, but we

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>said Hoodie and the Blowfish. We did. We promised Hootie.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think most people assume that the frontman,

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Darius Rucker, was Hoodie and that his supporting band members

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>were The Blowfish, but it actually turns out the he's

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of both or at least both names came from

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>people that Darius went to school with. So one was

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>this kid they called Hoodie because I guess he kind

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of looked like an owl. And there was a separate

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>classmate that had these puffed up cheeks and was nicknamed Blowfish.

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure why they decided to combine these two,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of want to see pictures of these

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>guys because it's just would make for an interesting story.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But it seemed to work. And I've actually got an

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>equally important fact because just recently a friend reminded me

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that in our high school yearbook there was a photo

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of me playing basketball in a game, and for some reason,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was dribbling, I would do this thing where

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I blow out my cheeks like a blowfish, you know,

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Jordan's tongue, but much less cool and

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>much less effective, of course, But when you weren't dunking,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>when I wasn't dunking, that's what I was doing. And anyway,

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I was doing that in this photo, and the capture

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>under it said Willie and the Blowfish. So how about that, Mango?

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good? Well, I feel like you deserved today's trophy

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just based on that story alone. Thank you very much,

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and thank you guys for listening. I know we must

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have left out so many great origin stories of band names,

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so please let us hear those from. You can always

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 1>email us part Time Genius at how stuff Works dot com.

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You can also call us on our seven fact hotline

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>one eight four four pt Genius, or hit us up

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook or Twitter. But thanks so much for listening.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again for listening. Part Time Genius is a production

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of How Stuff Works and wouldn't be possible without several

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>brilliant people who do the important things we couldn't even

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>begin to understand. Christa McNeil does the editing thing. Noel

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Brown made the theme song and does the mixy mixy

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>sound thing. Jerry Rowland does the exact producer thing. Gabe

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Bluesier is our lead researcher, with support from the research

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>army including Austin Thompson, Nolan Brown and Lucas Adams and

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Eve Jeff Cook gets the show to your ears. Good job, Eves.

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>If you like what you heard, we hope you'll subscribe,

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And if you really really like what you've heard, maybe

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you could leave a good review for us. Do we do?

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>We forget Jason. Jason who